p. toulemonde institut néel , cnrs and uga, f-38042...
TRANSCRIPT
P. ToulemondeInstitut Néel , CNRS and UGA, F-38042 Grenoble, France.
neel.cnrs.fr
2
� Institut Néel, CNRS and UGA, Grenoble, France:S. Karlsson, P. Strobel, M. Raba, P. Rodière, A. Sulpice, F. Gay, L. Doussoulin
� SPSMS, CEA-INAC and UGA, Grenoble, France: C. Marcenat
� ESRF, Grenoble, France:V. Svitlyk, V. Dmitriev, D. Chernyshov, F. Cova, G. Garbarino, M. Mezouar
� ILL, Grenoble, France:Th. Hansen
Collaborations
� KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany
Haghighirad A.A.
� IMPMC, CNRS, UniversitéP&M. Curie, Paris, France:B. Lebert, S. Klotz
� LPS, Orsay, France:V. Balédent
� SOLEIL, Orsay, France:J. P. Rueff
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 3000.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
FeSe crystal grown by CVTR(280K)/R(10K)=18.5
R(O
hm)
Temperature(K)
Ts=90K
Tc=8.7K
neel.cnrs.fr
3
� Our study on FeSe crystals grown
by chemical vapor transport:
1) X-ray diffraction / HP-lowT
2) Neutron diffraction / HP-lowT
3) X-ray Emission (XES) & X-ray Absorption
spectroscopies (XAS) / HP-lowT
� Conclusion & Perspectives
Outline
� Introduction/motivations
FeSe
neel.cnrs.fr
4
G. Garbarino, P. Toulemonde, M. Nunez-Regueiro et al. EPL 86 (2009)
Medvedev et al. Nat. Mat. (2009).
Huge increase of Tc under pressure: + 1.7-3.5K/GPa !
Introduction/motivations
neel.cnrs.fr
5
→ A priori: Superconductivity NOT issued from a
(long-range AFM ordered) magnetic phase
→ Non continuous Tc change
Samples: single crystals grown in a NaCl/KCl flux.
SrFe2As2
« Ortho-I » (Cmma)
neel.cnrs.fr
6
FeSe: P,T phase diagram: more complex than expected!!!
→ Non continuous Tc change→ Pressure induced magnetic phase!
Sun et al. Nat.Comm.7 (2016).
Resistivity/HP
Bendele et al. PRL 104 (2010); PRB 85 (2012).
Muons
spectroscopy
neel.cnrs.fr
7
Shanghai, China
Wang, Xue et al. Chin. Phy. Lett. 29 (2012)
Beijing, China
Interface-Induced High-Temperature Superconductivity in Single Unit-Cell FeSe Films on SrTiO 3
STM :Tc ∼∼∼∼ 65-77K
Transport:
ARPES:
neel.cnrs.fr
8
� Our study on FeSe crystals grown by chemical vapor transport:
1) X-ray diffraction / HP-lowT
2) Neutron diffraction / HP-lowT
3) X-ray Emission (XES) & X-ray Absorption spectroscopies (XAS) /
HP-lowT
� Conclusion & Perspectives
Outline
� Introduction/motivations
neel.cnrs.fr
9
HP(-lowT) X-ray diffraction study (ESRF)
ESRF, id27 high pressure beamline
Diamond anvil cellPTM= helium
Sample: single crystal grown by CVT.
Svitlyk et al. Phys. Rev. B 96, 014520 (2017).
neel.cnrs.fr
10
• at HP & 300K
Rapid degradation of the crystalline
quality of the HP ortho-II (Pbnm)
FeSe phase.
Some reciprocal layers of FeSe
LowP tetrag. (P4/nmm) FeSe
phase; yellow grids = pseudo-tetragonal
lattice .
HP ortho-II (Pbnm) FeSe phase; reciprocal lattice vectors indicated
by red arrows; bluearrow marks a second d-segregated domain.
Svitlyk et al. PRB 96, 014520 (2017).
hk0
→ transition between 6.6 GPaand 8.1 GPa @ 300K
neel.cnrs.fr
11
coexistence of the HP ortho-II FeSe phase (reciprocal lattice vectors indicated by red arrows) and the LP (Cmma) FeSe
phase
Strong decrease in the concentration of the LP
superconducting phase above 6.9GPa.
• at HP & 20 K → transition ortho-I → ortho-II between 6.2 GPa and 6.9 GPa
@ 20K
neel.cnrs.fr
12
Böhmer et al. arxiv/condmat: 1803.09449
� Confirmation of the ortho-I → HP ortho-II phasetransition occurring at 7.7GPa (at 60K) & 8 GPa (300K) in FeSe single crystals:
neel.cnrs.fr
13
Two sets of antiparallel displacements of both Fe (red spheres) and
Se (blue spheres)sublattices at 90°
(displacive ��� phonon
field).
HP (MnP-type, Pnma or Pbnm)
ortho-II structure of FeSe
composed of chains of face shared FeSe6
octahedra alongthe a axis.
• Transformation mechanism from LP Cmma (ortho-I) → HP Pbnm(ortho-II) phase
Result of combined structure distortions by the ��
� phonon field and additional ���� (~0.3)
strain. Red lines: hexagonal NiAs-type
lattice (�~ 3; dashed lines: (MnP-type) ortho-II
structure cell.
neel.cnrs.fr
14
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 85.08
5.10
5.12
5.14
5.16
5.18
5.20
5.22
5.24
5.26
5.28
5.30
5.32
5.34
AF
M p
hase
Tet
rago
nal p
hase
a &
b-a
xis
(Å)
P (GPa)
T=50K b-axis (Å) our data a-axis (Å) our data b-axis Kothapalli et al. a-axis Kothapalli et al. b-axis Millican et al. a-axis Millican et al.
Ort
horh
ombi
c ph
ase
15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 16.4 16.6 16.8 17.0 17.2 17.4 17.6 17.8
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
2 theta (deg.)
inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
(401
)(0
41)
(400
)
inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
7.03GPa
6.66GPa
5.85GPa
5.04GPa
4.58GPa
4.08GPa3.62GPa
3.10GPa
2.49GPa2.04GPa1.80GPa1.55GPa1.27GPa1.07GPa0.92GPa0.65GPa0.40GPa
0.25GPa
6.90GPa
6.23GPa
5.04GPa4.35GPa
4.09GPa
3.65GPa
3.11GPa
2.69GPa
2.21GPa
1.67GPa1.27GPa
0.95GPa0.81GPa0.49GPa
0.18GPa
(040
)
→ Analysis using Crysalis software or using directly specific (400), (040) and (331) Bragg peaks of the orthorhombic lattice.
• at HP & 50 K: Analysis of structural parameters in the low P region (P<8GPa)
ort
ho-I
Tetr
a.AFM
-phas
e (o
rtho-I
*)
50 K 20 K
ort
ho-I
AFM
-phas
eO
rtho-I
*
neel.cnrs.fr
15
Terashima et al.JPSJ 84, 063701 (2015).
Knöner et al. PRB 91, 174510 (2015): PTM = He.
50K
50K
transport/HP
transport/HP
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 85.08
5.10
5.12
5.14
5.16
5.18
5.20
5.22
5.24
5.26
5.28
5.30
5.32
5.34
AF
M p
hase
Tet
rago
nal p
hase
a &
b-a
xis
(Å)
P (GPa)
T=50K b-axis (Å) our data a-axis (Å) our data b-axis Kothapalli et al. a-axis Kothapalli et al. b-axis Millican et al. a-axis Millican et al.
Ort
horh
ombi
c ph
ase
• at 50K: ortho-I (Cmma)→ tetra. at 0.9-1 GPain agreement with transport measurements
neel.cnrs.fr
16
Bendele et al. PRL 104 (2010); PRB 85 (2012).
1st evidence of an induced AFM
phase emerging at 1GPa.
50K
2GPa
� Muons spectroscopy
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 85.08
5.10
5.12
5.14
5.16
5.18
5.20
5.22
5.24
5.26
5.28
5.30
5.32
5.34
AF
M p
hase
Tet
rago
nal p
hase
a &
b-a
xis
(Å)
P (GPa)
T=50K b-axis (Å) our data a-axis (Å) our data b-axis Kothapalli et al. a-axis Kothapalli et al. b-axis Millican et al. a-axis Millican et al.
Ort
horh
ombi
c ph
ase
• at 50K: tetra. → ortho-I* at 1.9 GPa
in agreement with µSR results* maybe monoclinic supplementary distortion in the AFM phase, because
(-331)ortho and (331)ortho become non equivalent at P>1.9GPa.
neel.cnrs.fr
17
• in agreement with Millican et al., SSC 149 (2009), for P<0.9GPa (neutron powder diffraction; PTM= helium) and with Kothapalli et al.Nat. Comm. 7 (2016) for P<3.1GPa.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
5.14
5.16
5.18
5.20
5.22
5.24
5.26
5.28
5.30
5.32
5.34
Ort
horh
ombi
c ph
ase
a &
b-a
xis
(Å)
P (GPa)
T=20K b-axis our data a-axis our data b-axis Kothapalli et al. at 19K a-axis Kothapalli et al. at 19K
AF
M p
hase
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
5.15
5.20
5.25
5.30
5.35
5.40
5.45
Ort
horh
ombi
c ph
ase
(Cm
ma)
T=20K c-axis lattice volume
P (GPa)
c-ax
is (
Å)
68
70
72
74
76
78
Latti
ce v
olum
e (Å
3 ) in
the
tetr
agon
al c
ell
AF
M p
hase
• at HP & 20 K: lattice parameters (P<8GPa)
• at 20K both analyses detect only the ortho-I (Cmma ) → ortho-I (monoclinic?) AFM phase at 2GPa (anomaly in c-axis & volume variation).
neel.cnrs.fr
18
� Previous study: powder XRD/HP study @ 16K
• Sample: 31% of hexag. (NiAs) impurity
• Anomalies at 2GPa (Se height/Fe-Se
bond length) and 8 GPa (c-axis)
• At 16K transition at P > 7.5 GPa → hexag.
(NiAs) HP phase (P63/mmc)
• Hexag. (NiAs) → ortho (Pbnm) transition
detected at 9-12GPaMargadonna et al. PRB 80, 064506 (2009).
neel.cnrs.fr
19
� Raman spectroscopy
• Collapse of critical nematic fluctuations
between 1.6 and 3 GPa
• Anomalous softening of phonons below
2 GPa
P. Massat, Y. Gallais, P. Toulemonde et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 077001.
neel.cnrs.fr
20
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
Tet
ra. p
hase
AF
M p
hase
Ort
horh
ombi
c ph
ase
δ=(b
-a)/
(a+
b)
P (GPa)
orthorhombicity at 50K orthorhombicity at 20K• Orthorhombicity (defined as
δ = (b - a)/(b + a) parameters ratio)
o of the ortho-I phase at superconducting, i.e. for P > 1.7-2GPa, (20 K, blue)
o and non-superconducting, i.e. in particular in the AFM phase for P> 2GPa, (50 K, red) temperatures.
• at HP & lowT: orthorhombicity (P<8GPa)
→ Competition between superconductivityand magnetism: superconductivity tends to reduce the lattice distortion while magnetism increases it.
21
In agreement with Böhmer et al. arxiv/condmat: 1803.09449Orthorhombicity tends to decrease when Tc increases from 3 to 6.4GPa (when SC coexists with magnetism).
• at HP & lowT: orthorhombicity (P<8GPa)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025
0.0030
0.0035
0.0040
Tet
ra. p
hase
AF
M p
hase
Ort
horh
ombi
c ph
ase
δ=(b
-a)/
(a+
b)
P (GPa)
orthorhombicity at 50K orthorhombicity at 20K
Pressure-dependence of the zero-T limit of the ortho. distortion
→ competition between superconductivityand magnetism:
neel.cnrs.fr
22
Large filled circles at the 20, 50 and 300 K isotherms = our workblack – tetragonal phase, grey – “ortho-I” phase, green – AFM phase, red – “ortho-II” phase, blue – a mixture of “ortho-I” and “ortho-II” phases, cyan – possible onset of the formation of the “ortho-II” phase; * - our unpublished data based on transport measurements below 1.3 GPa.
• Updated P,T phase diagram
Svitlyk et al. PRB 96, 014520 (2017).
Sun et al. Nat.Comm.7 (2016).
50K
50K
XRD & Mössbauer/HP
transport/HP
• Comparison with 2016 literature
Kothapalli et al., Nat.Comm. 7
(2016).
ILL, D20 instrument, Grenoble, France
Paris-Edinburgh large volume cellPTM= 4:1 deuterated methanol : ethanol mixture;
TiZr gasketSample: grinded single crystal grown by CVT.
λ=2.41 or 1.30 Å2 experiments:
(1) FeSe powder pressurized by c-BN anvils(2) FeSe presurized by sintered diamond anvils
neel.cnrs.fr
23
HP-low T neutron diffraction study
neel.cnrs.fr
24
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1100
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
(211
)
(200
)(1
12)
(111
)
(001
)
(101
)(1
11)
Pb
(P m
arke
r)
inte
nsity
(a.
u)
2 theta (deg.)
0 GPa 0.1 GPa 1.22 GPa 2.24 GPa 3.14 GPa 4.21 GPa 6.23 GPa 7.48 GPa 7.91 GPa 8.47 GPa 8.49 GPa 9.13 GPa 10.36 GPa 10.90 GPa 11.8 GPa
(111
) C
-dia
mon
d an
vil
D20, ILL (l=2.41Å)
→ decrease of the sample signal with P→ Lattice contraction in agreement with the one obtained from XRD andPTM=He (at least up to 7GPa)→ Only a few % of ortho-II (at 10-12GPa) detected before signal lost!
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1262
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
Latti
ce v
olum
e (Å
)
P(GPa)
volume at RT (from NPD, PTM=alcohol) volume at 300K (XRD, PTM=He)
NPD: from exp. number 2(loading with sintered diamond anvils)
• Compression at room temperature
neel.cnrs.fr
25
55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105200
300
400
500
600
(211
)(1
03)
Pb
Pb
(201
)
(200
)
(111
)
1.8GPa 300K 1.6GPa 6K
2 theta (deg.)
inte
nsity
(a.
u)
(112
)
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
• Cooling at 1.8-1.6 GPa
→ non discernable ortho –I (Cmma) distortion at low T in our configuration (high flux)
P (GPa)
neel.cnrs.fr
26
• Cooling at 4-5GPa: to probe the pressure induced AFM phase
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1100
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2 theta (deg.)
Yobs Ycal Yobs-Ycal posr
P=4.8GPa, T=6K
FeSe (nuc)FeSe (mag)Pb
→ non discernable ortho (monoclinic) distortion at low T at both λ→ Rietveld fit: magnetic peaks (if any) hidden in the noise/background
→ Simulation with the single-stripe (colinear) AFM structure
with K = (0 1 ½) and m=0.75µB → m(Fe) probably < 0.5µB at 4-5GPa
K = (0 1 ½)
P (GPa)
neel.cnrs.fr
27
K = (0 1 ½)
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
inte
nsity
(a.
u.)
2 theta (deg.)
Yobs Ycal Yobs-Ycal posr
P=4.8GPa, T=6K
FeSe (nuc)
FeSe (mag)
→ Rietveld fit: magnetic peaks (if any) hidden in the noise/background
→ Simulation with the single-stripe (collinear) AFM structure
with K = (0 1 ½) and m=0.75µB → m(Fe) probably < 0.5µB at 4-5GPa
• Cooling at 4-5GPa: to probe the pressure induced AFM phase
“collinear1”
neel.cnrs.fr
28
or
a
b
+ FM (I) or AFM (II) coupling along c-axis
� Long range AFM orders compatible with µ-SR study (R. Khasanov et al. Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017)):
• Cooling at 4-5GPa: to probe the pressure induced AFM phase
our data
CI or CII BI or BII
→ our suggested upper limit for m(Fe): 0.3µB for CI/II and 0.2µB for BI/II.
- Extrapolations from µ-SR (Pmax=1.9GPa)
predict a moment of 0.35µB at 4.5GPa, should be visible for the BI/II configuration in our data!→ CI/II structure with m(Fe)=0.3µB
= the most probable!
neel.cnrs.fr
29
- Update of the previous result obtained by NPD on FeSepowder/HP:
→ low m(Fe) in the AFM phase (1.5-6GPa) < 0.3µB
Bendele et al. PRB 85 (2012): from muons spectroscopy: m(Fe)
= 0.2µB at 2.4GPa and from NPD (PSI-SINQ) <0.5µB at
4.4GPa
• pressure induced AFM phase studied by NPD: Conclusion
Perspectives:
- neutron scattering on FeSe single crystal /HP-low T necessary to measure magnetic reflections
- NPD experiment at P>8-10 GPawith a larger sample signal required to reach the (ortho-II) Pbnm phase and probe its possible long range magnetic order
30
HP-low T XES & XAS studies
SOLEIL, Galaxies beamline, Saclay, France
B.W. Lebert et al. Phys. Rev. B 97, 180503(R) (2018)
10K
Diamond anvil cellPTM= silicon oil; CuBe gasket
T= 300K & 10K.Sample: few single crystals grown
by CVT.
neel.cnrs.fr
31
• X-ray Emission Spectra at K-edge of Fe: Kβ1,3 (~7070eV) andKβ’ (~7060eV, sensitive to local magnetic moment)
→ XES reveals completely unexpected LS → HS transition under HP
--- FeS2 zero-spin reference
Kβ’ Kβ1,3
• PFY-XAS = Partial-fluorescence yield x-ray absorption spectroscopy→ Measure Kβ1,3 emission while scanning Fe K-edge
• Pre-peak follows ortho-I → ortho-II structural transition• Decreased hybridization
• Tetrahedral (Td) → octahedral (Oh) coordination• Increased Fe-Se bond lengths (5%)
• ortho-I → ortho-II structural transition associated with LS → HS
XES
sate
llit
e i
nte
nsit
y (
% o
f K
β)
XA
S «
peak A
» a
rea (
arb
. u
nit
s)
• XAS spectra simulations (FDMNES) - Includes spin-orbit coupling
- Fermi level found self-consistently
→ they confirm ortho-I phase is LSortho-II phase is HS
• Intensity of the ortho-II pre-edge peak not well reproduced (atomic positions slightly wrong?)
• ortho-II pre-edge shape most important, related to orbitals’ energy splitting & spin state, matches with the HS state
• XAS C-D feature tracks Tc increase?
• Proximity of ortho-II phase induces enhanced spin fluctuations in the LS ortho-I phase?
XES
sate
llit
e i
nte
nsit
y (
% o
f K
β)
Peak A
C-D
XA
S a
rea (
arb
. u
nit
s)
• Between 2 – 6.5GPa: a Tc (XAS C-D) plateau followed by a strong increase
• XAS C-D feature tracks Tc increase?• Proximity of ortho-II phase induces
enhanced spin fluctuations in the LS ortho-I phase?
• Between 2 – 6.5GPa: a plateau followed by a strong increase
Sun et al. PRL 118, 147004 (2017)
→ Strong increase of Hall coefficient at ~6.5GPa
evidencing strongly enhanced interband spin fluctuations in the high-Tc
phase
XES
sate
llit
e i
nte
nsit
y (
% o
f K
β)
Peak A
C-D
XA
S a
rea (
arb
. u
nit
s)
neel.cnrs.fr
36
Conclusions
� Use of high quality FeSe single crystals grown by CVT method in the 3 experiments
1) XRD / HP:- Superconductivity enhanced when orthorhombic distortion is reduced- Transformation mechanism from LP Cmma (ortho-I) → Pbnm HP (ortho-II) phase- Ortho-II phase already present at 7GPa & lowT, i.e. near the P(Tc=max)
2) NPD / HP:- Only a few % of ortho-II (at 10-12GPa) detected before signal lost!- Refinement of the previous result obtained by NPD on FeSe powder/HP: low m(Fe) in
the AFM phase (1.5-6GPa) < 0.3µB
3) XES & XAS / HP:- XES: gradual decrease of the Fe local magnetic moment, until 6-7 GPa, similar to
Kumar et al. (APL 2011) & Chen et al. (PRB 2011), then a sudden rise from 7 GPa to 10 GPa associated with the ortho-II phase, suggesting a LS → HS transition
- XAS: clear spectral change and decrease of the pre-edge region intensity at P>6GPa- XAS simulations confirm the octahedral site of Fe in the ortho-II phase above
6-7GPa and the HS state
neel.cnrs.fr
37
Perspectives� Neutron scattering experiment on FeSe single crystal/HP-lowT
[1st attempt: IN22/ILL Oct.2018]
� Study of S-substituted Fe(Se1-xSx) crystals where orthorhombic (nematic) phase is weaken [XRD experiments done for x=0.12 and 0.18: id15B/ESRF, June 2018]
- to systematically study the lattice distortion versus x(S)- to find a possible link with the AFM state or the SC state
Matsuura et al. Nat. Comm. 8 (2017)
neel.cnrs.fr
38
Thank you for your attention!