p rog ressive e ngineering i nc. · 2020-04-30 · aisi ts-7-02 - cantilever test method for...

40
58640 State Road 15 Phone: 574-533-0337 www.p-e-i.com Goshen, IN 46528 - Fax: 574-533-9736 - P rogressive E ngineering I nc. 12' x 12' Floor using 1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking Fastened at 6" & 12" to Lumber Trusses Spaced 24" o.c. This test report contains forty (40) pages, including the cover sheet. Any additions to, alterations of, or unauthorized use of excerpts form this report are expressly forbidden. RSP INDUSTRIES, INC. 6/5/2018 2018-6149 AISI TS-7 Cantilever Floor Diaphragm Test on a

Upload: others

Post on 26-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 58640 State Road 15 Phone: 574-533-0337

    www.p-e-i.com

    Goshen, IN 46528 -Fax: 574-533-9736 -

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    12' x 12' Floor using 1-1/2" SAPboard Floor DeckingFastened at 6" & 12" to Lumber Trusses Spaced 24" o.c.

    This test report contains forty (40) pages, including the cover sheet. Any additions to, alterations of, or unauthorized use of excerpts form this report are expressly forbidden.

    RSP INDUSTRIES, INC.

    6/5/2018

    2018-6149

    AISI TS-7 Cantilever Floor Diaphragm Test on a

  • 1. TITLE

    2. OBJECTIVE

    3. TESTED FOR

    4. TESTING ORGANIZATION

    www.p-e-i.com

    5. TESTING PERSONNEL

    Director of Testing - Jason R. HoldemanTechnician - Chris Stutzman

    6. REFERENCE STANDARDS

    7. TEST EQUIPMENT

    A.B.C.D.E.

    AISI TS-7-02 - Cantilever Test Method for Cold-Formed Steel Diaphragms

    Load Cell (PEI No. 602)

    58640 State Road 15Goshen, IN 46528

    See IAS Evaluation Report TL-178 for ISO 17025 Accreditation.

    The tests were not witnessed by the client.

    Two (2) Lynair Hydraulic Cylinders, Model No. LH-D401, Bore 3-1/4" and 12" strokeFour (4) Linear Transducers (PEI Nos. 1079, 1085, 1130, and 1131)

    This test report pertains only to the specimens tested. It remains the sole responsibility of themanufacturer to provide a product consistent to that which was tested.

    ASTM E455-16 - Standard Test Method for Static Load Testing of Framed Floor or Roof DiaphragmConstructions for Buildings

    2182 East Aurora Road

    Progressive Engineering Inc .

    AISI TS-7 Cantilever Floor Diaphragm Test on a 12' x 12' Floor using 1-1/2" SAPboard FloorDecking Fastened at 6" & 12" to Lumber Trusses Spaced 24" o.c.

    One (1) Omega Pressure Transducer (PEI No. 633)

    Data Acquisition System (PEI No. 566)

    Twinsburg, OH 44087

    RSP Industries, Inc.

    The objective of this test was to determine the horizontal diaphragm strength of a floor diaphragmconstructed per the enclosed details using 1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking.

    2 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • 8. TEST SPECIMEN MATERIALS

    A. Floor Sheathing

    B. Floor Framing

    1.

    2.

    3.

    C. Fasteners

    1.

    2.

    9. TEST SPECIMEN CONDITIONING

    10. TEST SPECIMEN CONSTRUCTION

    A.

    B.

    C.

    D.

    All materials were stored in lab ambient conditions for a minimum of 7 days prior to construction ortesting.

    Sheathing to Frame - #8 x 3" long Strong-Drive® WSTNL Subfloor Screw manufacturedby Simpson Strong-Tie®. See Appendix for more information.

    Joists to Rim Board and Bracing to Truss - .131" x 3-1/2" long nails, Senco Part No.K529APBXN

    Bracing - 2x6 SPF No. 2 Grade lumber.

    The frame was squared and then the SAPboards were fastened to it with the long edgeperpendicular to the trusses. The groove was cut off of the starting row and the cut edge washeld flush to the rim boards. The tongue was removed on the opposite side of the sample, sothat the panel was flush with the rim board.

    Joists - 18" deep by 138" long trusses manufactured by Allegheny Structural Componentsas OPENJOIST. The trusses were manufactured with varying sizes of SPF lumber finger-jointed and adhered to the top and bottom chords. The truss chords were 2x4 SPF No. 2Grade lumber laid flat, such that the supporting surface was 3-1/2" wide. The averagemeasured moisture content of the top chord was 12.8%.

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking - 48" x 96" panels, with an effective width of 47-1/4",consisting of two (2) layers of 23/32" OSB manufactured by Huber with a sound insulationmaterial adhered between the OSB layers. A tongue and groove edge was present along thelong edges of the panels. The OSB board code information from Huber was "102717 TECOTested PS 2-10, Exposure 1, FLOOR SPAN, 23/32" Perf. Cat 24 oc" and "Mill 229, CrystalHills, VA". The average measured thickness was 1.533". See attached photographs,drawings, and Appendix section for more details.

    Six (6) test samples were constructed to an overall dimension of 11'-9" x 12' by PEI personnel.Three (3) were tested with the load applied parallel to the trusses and three (3) were tested with theload applied perpendicular to the trusses.

    The trusses were laid out at 24" o.c. A 144" long rim board was attached flush with the top ofeach truss using three (3) nails in each truss. A second rim board was attached flush with thebottom of each truss using three (3) nails in each truss.

    Bracing was fastened near the center of the trusses along one of the vertical web posts usingtwo (2) nails in each truss.

    The panels were fastened at 6" o.c. around the perimeter, inset 1" from the corners, and 12" o.c. in the field with #8 screws. Fasteners were inset 1/2" from all panel edges and ends. Care was taken to insure that the fasteners were kept flush or slightly below the surface of the panels. See attached drawings for details.

    Rim Boards - 2x8 SPF No. 2 Grade lumber.

    3 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • 11. TEST SETUP

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    12. TEST PROCEDURE

    A.

    B.

    C.

    A Simpson S/HDS Hold Down Anchor was fastened near the top of the tension side truss or joistusing #8 washerhead wood screws. A 2x6 was was attached to the truss webs for the perpendiculartests to provide a frame connection for the hold down. A 5/8" diameter threaded rod was placed thruthe hold down and connected to the rigid steel fixture. A torque of 75 ft-lbs. was applied to the nut onthe threaded rod. The rim board and truss heels on the load side were positioned on a steel tubewhich was set on rollers spaced approximately 24" apart to provide unrestricted horizontalmovement. Two (2) vertical hold downs were placed over the floor on each end of the load side toprevent uplift. Two (2) 1" diameter rollers were placed between the hold down tube and a steel plateon the floor sheathing, with a minimum gap of 1/16" set at the beginning of the test.

    Four (4) displacement transducers were placed on the floor diaphragm assembly in the followinglocations:

    In-line with the tension joist (Uplift)

    In-line with the fixed rim board (Slip)

    The data acquisition system was initiated and all of the displacement gauges, pressuretransducer, and the load cell were checked to insure the signal was active. The preload file wasopened and the program was initiated. A preload of approximately 10% of the expectedultimate load.

    In-line with the loaded rim board (Total Movement)

    In-line with the compression joist (Compression)

    The load cell, displacement transducers and pressure transducer were connected to a dataacquisition system.

    Prior to testing the diaphragm samples a bare frame was evaluated for shear stiffness in the paralleland perpendicular to truss orientation. This was performed to insure that the frame stiffness was lesthan 2% of the diaphragm stiffness or if above 2% then apply the appropriate adjustment.

    The preload was applied at approximately the same rate as is required to attain the anticipatedmaximum load in not less than ten (10) minutes. The preload was held for approximately 5seconds and then was released. The data file was saved and then closed. The load wasremoved for a minimum of one (1) minute.

    The test sample was positioned in the test fixture with one of the rim boards or trusses set flush tothe top of a 10"- 30 lb./ft. C-channel. The rim board or truss was then attached to the C-channelusing 1/2" bolts with a maximum spacing of 12" o.c. One (1) 4" x 144" long I-beam was thenattached to the other rim track, flush to the top, using #8 x 2" long washerhead wood screws, set 6"o.c. on the top flange and 6" o.c. on the bottom flange of the I-beam. Two (2) hydraulic cylinderswere positioned on a reaction beam in-line with the I-beam. Note: A 2x6 was attached to thetrusses at the bearing side and load side to aid in clamping or connecting to the test fixturing, but inno way added to the diaphragm capacity or stiffness.

    The "test file" was then opened and then the program was initiated with all measurementdevices set to zero. The load was applied using the hydraulic cylinders and manually regulatedusing flow control valves to maintain a load rate of not less than ten (10) minutes to themaximum load. Observations were recorded throughout the test.

    4 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • D.

    E.

    13. TEST RESULTS

    14. CONCLUSION

    A.

    B.

    C.

    Note: The frame stiffness accounted for less than 2% of the diaphragm stiffness and was thereforenot used in the determination of the shear load.

    The data acquisitionsystem was set to record continuouslythroughout the test. The data pagesfound in this report display only ten (10) readings between zero and the maximum load.However, the chart reflects the data as recorded by the acquisition system.

    Based on the testing described in this report, when tested per AISI TS-7 Cantilever Test Method, anaverage ultimate shear strength (Sn) of: (1) 773 plf when applied parallel to the trusses and (2) 675plf when applied perpendicular to the trusses, can be attained when using the following:

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking fastened in accordance with Section 10 and drawing B1 in thisreport.

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking fastened using #8 x 3" long Strong-Drive® Subfloor screwsmanufactured by Simpson Strong-Tie®.

    Wood trusses manufactured with Spruce-Pine-Fir (SPF) lumber with 2x8 nominal lumber rimboards attached in accordance with Section 10 and the drawings in this report.

    See the attached data pages and charts for test results.

    The load was released at the point where no further gain could be attained or the netdisplacement had exceeded 2.5". The file was saved and then the maximum load anddisplacement at the maximum load was recorded by the technician, along with a detaileddescription of the failure.

    5 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 5/17/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 71

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 53

    Preload (lbf): 0

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 141

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 144Test No. 18-6149-PARA - Frame Only Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 04:16

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" .000" .000" .000"

    .1*Pn 7 .001" .000" .018" .000" .017"

    .2*Pn 15 .000" .000" .423" .002" .421"

    .3*Pn 22 .002" .000" .722" .003" .717"

    .4*Pn 30 .004" .000" .846" .003" .839"

    .5*Pn 37 .015" .000" 1.703" .010" 1.679"

    .6*Pn 45 .015" .000" 1.749" .011" 1.723"

    .7*Pn 52 .016" .001" 1.792" .011" 1.765"

    .8*Pn 59 .054" .002" 3.902" .037" 3.810"

    .9*Pn 67 .055" .002" 3.998" .038" 3.904"Pn 74 .058" .002" 4.083" .039" 3.985"

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 74 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 6 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 30 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = 497 plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    A 1-1/8" thick OSB Rim Board, 18" tall, was attached to the ends of the trusses, but was later changedto 2x8 SPF for the diaphragm test. OSB Rim Board would offer more stiffness than the 2x8 framingand therefore is worst-case.

    Deflection (in)

    The Truss Frame System only, no sheathing with load applied parallel to thetrusses.

    6 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 5/23/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 69

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 62

    Preload (lbf): 1,650

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 144

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 141Test No. 18-6149-PARA-#8SIMP-1 Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 23:38

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" .000" .000" .000"

    .1*Pn 972 .003" .010" .040" .000" .027"

    .2*Pn 1,944 .008" .029" .127" .003" .087"

    .3*Pn 2,915 .020" .049" .270" .011" .190"

    .4*Pn 3,887 .036" .069" .471" .021" .344"

    .5*Pn 4,859 .054" .096" .755" .037" .565"

    .6*Pn 5,831 .076" .120" 1.107" .053" .856"

    .7*Pn 6,802 .101" .143" 1.512" .070" 1.195"

    .8*Pn 7,774 .131" .170" 1.983" .089" 1.588"

    .9*Pn 8,746 .176" .219" 2.774" .201" 2.170"Pn 9,718 .237" .134" 4.187" .231" 3.574"

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 9,718 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 827 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 3,887 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = 138,741 plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    Load was applied parallel to the trusses. A 2x8 SPF Rim Board was attached to the ends of thetrusses.

    The panels shifted along the T&G joints and panel butt-joints separated resulting in screw shearfailures and truss top chord split at the fasteners. See attached failure drawing for details.

    Deflection (in)

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking (T&G) fastened to 2x4 SPF lumber trusses,set 24" o.c., with #8 x 3" lg. Simpson subfloor screws spaced 6" o.c. aroundthe perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field. See drawing no. B1 for details.

    7 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • RO

    W #

    3

    RO

    W #

    2

    RO

    W #

    1

    TON

    GU

    E SI

    DE

    OF

    PAN

    EL

    JOIS

    T #7

    JOIS

    T #1

    PARALLELLOAD DIRECTION

    BEARING SIDE (PARALLEL)

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    e

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    IE n

    gin

    ee

    rin

    g

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:Th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    all i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    cont

    aine

    d he

    rein

    is th

    e pr

    oper

    ty o

    f PR

    OG

    RES

    SIVE

    EN

    GIN

    EER

    ING

    , IN

    C. a

    nd is

    not

    to b

    e re

    prod

    uced

    w

    ithou

    t the

    writ

    ten

    perm

    issi

    on

    of

    assu

    mes

    no

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y fo

    r una

    utho

    rized

    use

    of

    this

    dra

    win

    g.

    Pei. P

    ei

    RSP

    IND

    UST

    RIE

    S

    CO

    NFI

    GU

    RAT

    ION

    PA

    RA-

    1 FA

    ILU

    RE

    J. H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    = SU

    RFA

    CE

    SPAL

    LIN

    G=

    FAST

    ENER

    RO

    TATI

    ON

    = SH

    EATH

    ING

    PU

    LL-O

    VER

    = SE

    PAR

    ATIO

    N O

    R S

    HIF

    TIN

    G (<

    1/4"

    )=

    SEPA

    RAT

    ION

    OR

    SH

    IFTI

    NG

    (>1/

    2")

    = FA

    STEN

    ER S

    HEA

    R

    = BO

    ARD

    BR

    EAKA

    GE

    B4

    8 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 5/30/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 75

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 57

    Preload (lbf): 1,648

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 144

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 141Test No. 18-6149-PARA-#8SIMP-2 Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 23:00

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" -- .000" --

    .1*Pn 790 .004" .001" -- .005" --

    .2*Pn 1,580 .008" .001" -- .015" --

    .3*Pn 2,370 .017" .008" -- .035" --

    .4*Pn 3,160 .028" .024" -- .064" --

    .5*Pn 3,950 .041" .048" -- .103" --

    .6*Pn 4,740 .057" .076" -- .151" --

    .7*Pn 5,530 .075" .114" -- .212" --

    .8*Pn 6,320 .095" .151" -- .280" --

    .9*Pn 7,110 .115" .188" -- .380" --Pn 7,900 .148" .246" -- .553" --

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 7,900 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 672 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 3,160 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = N/A plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    Load was applied parallel to the trusses. A 2x8 SPF Rim Board was attached to the ends of thetrusses. The panels used on this sample were taken from a previously tested sample due to ashortage of material. Gauge #3 was not reading properly during this test and therefore no NetDeflection was attained.

    The panels shifted along the T&G joints and panel butt-joints separated resulting in screw shearfailures and truss top chord split at the fasteners. See attached failure drawing for details.

    Deflection (in)

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking (T&G) fastened to 2x4 SPF lumber trusses,set 24" o.c., with #8 x 3" lg. Simpson subfloor screws spaced 6" o.c. aroundthe perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field. See drawing no. B1 for details.

    PEI Report # 2006-660 (D)

    9 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • RO

    W #

    3

    RO

    W #

    2

    RO

    W #

    1

    TON

    GU

    E SI

    DE

    OF

    PAN

    EL

    JOIS

    T #7

    JOIS

    T #1

    PARALLELLOAD DIRECTION

    BEARING SIDE (PARALLEL)

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    e

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    IE n

    gin

    ee

    rin

    g

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:Th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    all i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    cont

    aine

    d he

    rein

    is th

    e pr

    oper

    ty o

    f PR

    OG

    RES

    SIVE

    EN

    GIN

    EER

    ING

    , IN

    C. a

    nd is

    not

    to b

    e re

    prod

    uced

    w

    ithou

    t the

    writ

    ten

    perm

    issi

    on

    of

    assu

    mes

    no

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y fo

    r una

    utho

    rized

    use

    of

    this

    dra

    win

    g.

    Pei. P

    ei

    RSP

    IND

    UST

    RIE

    S

    CO

    NFI

    GU

    RAT

    ION

    PA

    RA-

    2 FA

    ILU

    RE

    J. H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    = SU

    RFA

    CE

    SPAL

    LIN

    G=

    FAST

    ENER

    RO

    TATI

    ON

    = SH

    EATH

    ING

    PU

    LL-O

    VER

    = SE

    PAR

    ATIO

    N O

    R S

    HIF

    TIN

    G (<

    1/4"

    )=

    SEPA

    RAT

    ION

    OR

    SH

    IFTI

    NG

    (>1/

    2")

    = FA

    STEN

    ER S

    HEA

    R

    = BO

    ARD

    BR

    EAKA

    GE

    B5

    10 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 6/4/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 68

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 48

    Preload (lbf): 1,570

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 144

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 141Test No. 18-6149-PARA-#8SIMP-3 Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 27:52

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" .000" .000" .000"

    .1*Pn 964 .004" .001" .051" .014" .031"

    .2*Pn 1,929 .009" .002" .145" .026" .108"

    .3*Pn 2,893 .019" .013" .327" .043" .250"

    .4*Pn 3,858 .032" .028" .561" .060" .438"

    .5*Pn 4,822 .049" .061" .907" .081" .713"

    .6*Pn 5,786 .071" .110" 1.390" .117" 1.087"

    .7*Pn 6,751 .094" -- 1.901" .152" 1.649"

    .8*Pn 7,715 .115" -- 2.369" .170" 2.079"

    .9*Pn 8,679 .136" -- 2.999" .191" 2.665"Pn 9,644 .174" -- 4.838" .221" 4.435"

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 9,644 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 821 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 3,858 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = 107,913 plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    Load was applied parallel to the trusses. A 2x8 SPF Rim Board was attached to the ends of thetrusses. The panels used on this sample were taken from a previously tested sample due to ashortage of material. The slip gauge was not reading properly at the end of the test, therefore the NetDeflection shown is higher than the actual.

    The panels shifted along the T&G joints and panel butt-joints separated resulting in screw shearfailures and truss top chord split at the fasteners. See attached failure drawing for details.

    Deflection (in)

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking (T&G) fastened to 2x4 SPF lumber trusses,set 24" o.c., with #8 x 3" lg. Simpson subfloor screws spaced 6" o.c. aroundthe perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field. See drawing no. B1 for details.

    PEI Report # 2006-660 (D)

    11 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • RO

    W #

    3

    RO

    W #

    2

    RO

    W #

    1

    TON

    GU

    E SI

    DE

    OF

    PAN

    EL

    JOIS

    T #7

    JOIS

    T #1

    PARALLELLOAD DIRECTION

    BEARING SIDE (PARALLEL)

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    e

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    IE n

    gin

    ee

    rin

    g

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:Th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    all i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    cont

    aine

    d he

    rein

    is th

    e pr

    oper

    ty o

    f PR

    OG

    RES

    SIVE

    EN

    GIN

    EER

    ING

    , IN

    C. a

    nd is

    not

    to b

    e re

    prod

    uced

    w

    ithou

    t the

    writ

    ten

    perm

    issi

    on

    of

    assu

    mes

    no

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y fo

    r una

    utho

    rized

    use

    of

    this

    dra

    win

    g.

    Pei. P

    ei

    RSP

    IND

    UST

    RIE

    S

    CO

    NFI

    GU

    RAT

    ION

    PA

    RA-

    3 FA

    ILU

    RE

    J. H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    = SU

    RFA

    CE

    SPAL

    LIN

    G=

    FAST

    ENER

    RO

    TATI

    ON

    = SH

    EATH

    ING

    PU

    LL-O

    VER

    = SE

    PAR

    ATIO

    N O

    R S

    HIF

    TIN

    G (<

    1/4"

    )=

    SEPA

    RAT

    ION

    OR

    SH

    IFTI

    NG

    (>1/

    2")

    = FA

    STEN

    ER S

    HEA

    R

    = BO

    ARD

    BR

    EAKA

    GE

    B6

    12 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Progressive Engineering Inc.

    0

    2,000

    4,000

    6,000

    8,000

    10,000

    12,000

    0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 4.25 4.5 4.75 5

    Load

    (lbf

    )

    Net Deflection (in)

    RSP Industries, Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Floor Diaphragm Test

    using 1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Deckingwith a 6"-12" Fastening Schedule

    on 24" o.c. Lumber Trusses (Parallel to Load)

    PARA-1 PARA-1 (P) PARA-3 PARA-3 (P)

    PARA‐2 not shown due to displacement gauge malfunction

    13 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 5/17/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 71

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 53

    Preload (lbf): 0

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 141

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 144Test No. 18-6149-PERP - Frame Only Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 02:17

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" .000" .000" .000"

    .1*Pn 7 .001" .000" .097" .002" .094"

    .2*Pn 14 .000" .000" .327" .004" .323"

    .3*Pn 22 .003" .002" .430" .006" .419"

    .4*Pn 29 .018" .008" .901" .013" .863"

    .5*Pn 36 .020" .009" .971" .014" .929"

    .6*Pn 43 .029" .014" 1.321" .020" 1.259"

    .7*Pn 50 .032" .015" 1.379" .021" 1.312"

    .8*Pn 57 .033" .015" 1.437" .021" 1.368"

    .9*Pn 65 .049" .023" 1.951" .030" 1.850"Pn 72 .069" .034" 2.633" .040" 2.493"

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 72 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 6 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 29 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = 393 plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    A 1-1/8" thick OSB Rim Board, 18" tall, was attached to the ends of the trusses, but was later changedto 2x8 SPF for the diaphragm test. OSB Rim Board would offer more stiffness than the 2x8 framingand therefore is worst-case.

    Deflection (in)

    The Truss Frame System only, no sheathing with load applied perpendicular to the trusses.

    14 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 6/5/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 69

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 66

    Preload (lbf): 1,011

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 141

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 144Test No. 18-6149-PERP-#8SIMP-1 Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 28:24

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" .000" .000" .000"

    .1*Pn 835 .004" .001" .035" .011" .019"

    .2*Pn 1,670 .007" .001" .132" .034" .091"

    .3*Pn 2,504 .012" .009" .294" .063" .211"

    .4*Pn 3,339 .020" .018" .520" .096" .389"

    .5*Pn 4,174 .030" .029" .802" .125" .622"

    .6*Pn 5,009 .040" .040" 1.158" .151" .931"

    .7*Pn 5,844 .050" .055" 1.593" .174" 1.318"

    .8*Pn 6,678 .065" .073" 2.097" .192" 1.773"

    .9*Pn 7,513 .083" .097" 3.076" .212" 2.690"Pn 8,348 .102" .119" 4.602" .227" 4.161"

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 8,348 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 696 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 3,339 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = 100,943 plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    Load was applied perpendicular to the trusses. A 2x8 SPF Rim Board was attached to the ends of thetrusses.

    The panels shifted along the T&G joints and panel butt-joints separated resulting in screw shearfailures and truss top chord split at the fasteners. See attached failure drawing for details.

    Deflection (in)

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking (T&G) fastened to 2x4 SPF lumber trusses,set 24" o.c., with #8 x 3" lg. Simpson subfloor screws spaced 6" o.c. aroundthe perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field. See drawing no. B1 for details.

    PEI Report # 2006-660 (D)

    15 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • RO

    W #

    3

    RO

    W #

    2

    RO

    W #

    1

    TON

    GU

    E SI

    DE

    OF

    PAN

    EL

    JOIS

    T #7

    JOIS

    T #1

    BEAR

    ING

    SID

    E (P

    ERPE

    ND

    ICU

    LAR

    )

    PER

    PEN

    DIC

    ULA

    RLO

    AD D

    IREC

    TIO

    N

    TRU

    SS S

    PLIT

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    e

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    IE n

    gin

    ee

    rin

    g

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:Th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    all i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    cont

    aine

    d he

    rein

    is th

    e pr

    oper

    ty o

    f PR

    OG

    RES

    SIVE

    EN

    GIN

    EER

    ING

    , IN

    C. a

    nd is

    not

    to b

    e re

    prod

    uced

    w

    ithou

    t the

    writ

    ten

    perm

    issi

    on

    of

    assu

    mes

    no

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y fo

    r una

    utho

    rized

    use

    of

    this

    dra

    win

    g.

    Pei. P

    ei

    RSP

    IND

    UST

    RIE

    S

    CO

    NFI

    GU

    RAT

    ION

    PE

    RP-

    1 FA

    ILU

    RE

    J. H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    = SU

    RFA

    CE

    SPAL

    LIN

    G=

    FAST

    ENER

    RO

    TATI

    ON

    = SH

    EATH

    ING

    PU

    LL-O

    VER

    = SE

    PAR

    ATIO

    N O

    R S

    HIF

    TIN

    G (<

    1/4"

    )=

    SEPA

    RAT

    ION

    OR

    SH

    IFTI

    NG

    (>1/

    2")

    = FA

    STEN

    ER S

    HEA

    R

    = BO

    ARD

    BR

    EAKA

    GE

    B7

    16 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 6/5/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 69

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 66

    Preload (lbf): 1,103

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 141

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 144Test No. 18-6149-PERP-#8SIMP-2 Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 28:25

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" .000" .000" .000"

    .1*Pn 834 .003" .001" .058" .023" .032"

    .2*Pn 1,669 .017" .011" .195" .070" .098"

    .3*Pn 2,503 .066" .025" .397" .104" .206"

    .4*Pn 3,337 .083" .038" .612" .122" .373"

    .5*Pn 4,171 .101" .050" .886" .137" .603"

    .6*Pn 5,006 .122" .068" 1.255" .151" .920"

    .7*Pn 5,840 .151" .100" 1.772" .167" 1.360"

    .8*Pn 6,674 .177" .128" 2.281" .181" 1.803"

    .9*Pn 7,509 .205" .167" 2.890" .194" 2.332"Pn 8,343 .233" .214" 3.608" .207" 2.963"

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 8,343 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 695 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 3,337 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = 105,253 plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    Load was applied perpendicular to the trusses. A 2x8 SPF Rim Board was attached to the ends of thetrusses.

    The panels shifted along the T&G joints and panel butt-joints separated resulting in screw shearfailures and truss top chord split at the fasteners. See attached failure drawing for details.

    Deflection (in)

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking (T&G) fastened to 2x4 SPF lumber trusses,set 24" o.c., with #8 x 3" lg. Simpson subfloor screws spaced 6" o.c. aroundthe perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field. See drawing no. B1 for details.

    PEI Report # 2006-660 (D)

    17 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • RO

    W #

    3

    RO

    W #

    2

    RO

    W #

    1

    TON

    GU

    E SI

    DE

    OF

    PAN

    EL

    JOIS

    T #7

    JOIS

    T #1

    BEAR

    ING

    SID

    E (P

    ERPE

    ND

    ICU

    LAR

    )

    PER

    PEN

    DIC

    ULA

    RLO

    AD D

    IREC

    TIO

    N

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    e

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    IE n

    gin

    ee

    rin

    g

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:Th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    all i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    cont

    aine

    d he

    rein

    is th

    e pr

    oper

    ty o

    f PR

    OG

    RES

    SIVE

    EN

    GIN

    EER

    ING

    , IN

    C. a

    nd is

    not

    to b

    e re

    prod

    uced

    w

    ithou

    t the

    writ

    ten

    perm

    issi

    on

    of

    assu

    mes

    no

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y fo

    r una

    utho

    rized

    use

    of

    this

    dra

    win

    g.

    Pei. P

    ei

    RSP

    IND

    UST

    RIE

    S

    CO

    NFI

    GU

    RAT

    ION

    PE

    RP-

    2 FA

    ILU

    RE

    J. H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    = SU

    RFA

    CE

    SPAL

    LIN

    G=

    FAST

    ENER

    RO

    TATI

    ON

    = SH

    EATH

    ING

    PU

    LL-O

    VER

    = SE

    PAR

    ATIO

    N O

    R S

    HIF

    TIN

    G (<

    1/4"

    )=

    SEPA

    RAT

    ION

    OR

    SH

    IFTI

    NG

    (>1/

    2")

    = FA

    STEN

    ER S

    HEA

    R

    = BO

    ARD

    BR

    EAKA

    GE

    B8

    18 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date: 6/5/2018

    Client: RSP Industries Temperature: (°F): 65

    Specimen: Relative Humidity (%): 50

    Preload (lbf): 1,044

    Diaphragm Width a (in): 141

    Diaphragm Length b (in): 144Test No. 18-6149-PERP-#8SIMP-3 Load Duration to Pn(min:sec): 22:59

    Load (lbf) Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Δ*0 0 .000" .000" .000" .000" .000"

    .1*Pn 761 .004" .001" .035" .010" .020"

    .2*Pn 1,521 .006" .008" .127" .021" .092"

    .3*Pn 2,282 .014" .017" .272" .035" .208"

    .4*Pn 3,043 .024" .032" .480" .048" .377"

    .5*Pn 3,803 .038" .049" .742" .060" .598"

    .6*Pn 4,564 .053" .076" 1.100" .075" .899"

    .7*Pn 5,325 .070" .113" 1.568" .090" 1.299"

    .8*Pn 6,085 .086" .148" 2.115" .103" 1.782"

    .9*Pn 6,846 .103" .189" 2.795" .117" 2.390"Pn 7,607 .120" .224" 3.652" .130" 3.183"

    Ultimate Load (Pn) = 7,607 lbf Shear Strength (Sn) = 634 plf

    P =.4*Pn = 3,043 lbf Shear Stiffness(G') = 94,866 plf

    Failure:

    Notes:

    * Δ is derived by the equation Δ = Δ3 - [Δ2 + (width / length)(Δ1 + Δ4)]

    Test Conditions

    Progressive Engineering Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Diaphragm Test

    Load was applied perpendicular to the trusses. A 2x8 SPF Rim Board was attached to the ends of thetrusses. The panels used in this test were taken from a previously tested sample due to a shortage inmaterial.

    The panels shifted along the T&G joints and panel butt-joints separated resulting in screw shearfailures and truss top chord split at the fasteners. See attached failure drawing for details.

    Deflection (in)

    1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Decking (T&G) fastened to 2x4 SPF lumber trusses,set 24" o.c., with #8 x 3" lg. Simpson subfloor screws spaced 6" o.c. aroundthe perimeter and 12" o.c. in the field. See drawing no. B1 for details.

    PEI Report # 2006-660 (D)

    19 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • TON

    GU

    E SI

    DE

    OF

    PAN

    EL

    JOIS

    T #7

    JOIS

    T #1

    BEAR

    ING

    SID

    E (P

    ERPE

    ND

    ICU

    LAR

    )

    PER

    PEN

    DIC

    ULA

    RLO

    AD D

    IREC

    TIO

    N

    RO

    W #

    3

    RO

    W #

    2

    RO

    W #

    1

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    e

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    IE n

    gin

    ee

    rin

    g

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:Th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    all i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    cont

    aine

    d he

    rein

    is th

    e pr

    oper

    ty o

    f PR

    OG

    RES

    SIVE

    EN

    GIN

    EER

    ING

    , IN

    C. a

    nd is

    not

    to b

    e re

    prod

    uced

    w

    ithou

    t the

    writ

    ten

    perm

    issi

    on

    of

    assu

    mes

    no

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y fo

    r una

    utho

    rized

    use

    of

    this

    dra

    win

    g.

    Pei. P

    ei

    RSP

    IND

    UST

    RIE

    S

    CO

    NFI

    GU

    RAT

    ION

    PE

    RP-

    3 FA

    ILU

    RE

    J. H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    = SU

    RFA

    CE

    SPAL

    LIN

    G=

    FAST

    ENER

    RO

    TATI

    ON

    = SH

    EATH

    ING

    PU

    LL-O

    VER

    = SE

    PAR

    ATIO

    N O

    R S

    HIF

    TIN

    G (<

    1/4"

    )=

    SEPA

    RAT

    ION

    OR

    SH

    IFTI

    NG

    (>1/

    2")

    = FA

    STEN

    ER S

    HEA

    R

    = BO

    ARD

    BR

    EAKA

    GE

    B9

    20 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Progressive Engineering Inc.

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    8,000

    9,000

    0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 4.25 4.5

    Load

    (lbf

    )

    Net Deflection (in)

    RSP Industries, Inc.AISI TS-7 Cantilever Floor Diaphragm Test

    using 1-1/2" SAPboard Floor Deckingwith a 6"-12" Fastening Schedule

    on 24" o.c. Lumber Trusses (Perpendicular to Load)

    PERP-1 PERP-1 (P) PERP-2PERP-2 (P) PERP-3 PERP-3 (P)

    21 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • RO

    W #

    3

    RO

    W #

    2

    RO

    W #

    1

    TON

    GU

    E SI

    DE

    OF

    PAN

    EL

    GR

    OO

    VE R

    EMO

    VED

    JOIS

    T #7

    JOIS

    T #1

    BEAR

    ING

    SID

    E (P

    ERPE

    ND

    ICU

    LAR

    )

    144"

    1411 4

    "

    48" x

    471 4

    "96

    " x 4

    71 4"

    96" x

    471 4

    "

    96" x

    463 4

    "

    48" x

    471 4

    "

    48" x

    463 4

    "

    NO

    TE:

    1) #

    8 x

    3" L

    G. S

    TRO

    NG

    -DR

    IVE

    SUBF

    LOO

    RSC

    REW

    S AT

    TAC

    HED

    TO

    FR

    AMIN

    G 6

    " O.C

    .AR

    OU

    ND

    PER

    IMET

    ER A

    ND

    12"

    O.C

    . IN

    TH

    E FI

    ELD

    .

    1"

    1/2"

    1"

    12"

    6"

    1/2"

    463 4"

    1"6"

    471 4"

    471 4"

    PER

    PEN

    DIC

    ULA

    RLO

    AD D

    IREC

    TIO

    N PARALLELLOAD DIRECTION

    BEARING SIDE (PARALLEL)

    JOB

    NO

    .

    B12018-

    6149

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    J.H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    O.

    This

    dra

    win

    g an

    d al

    l inf

    orm

    atio

    n co

    ntai

    ned

    here

    in is

    the

    prop

    erty

    of

    PRO

    GR

    ESSI

    VE E

    NG

    INEE

    RIN

    G,

    INC

    . and

    is n

    ot to

    be

    repr

    oduc

    ed

    with

    out t

    he w

    ritte

    n pe

    rmis

    sion

    of

    as

    sum

    es n

    o re

    spon

    sibi

    lity

    for u

    naut

    horiz

    ed u

    se

    of th

    is d

    raw

    ing.

    1-1/

    2" S

    APbo

    ard

    FAS

    TEN

    ING

    6"-

    12"

    24" O

    .C. F

    RAM

    E

    RSP

    IN

    DU

    STR

    IES

    Pei. P

    ei

    2018

    -614

    9

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7G

    osh

    en

    , IN

    46

    52

    85

    86

    40

    Sta

    te R

    oa

    d 1

    5

    ng

    ine

    eri

    ng

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    eE

    Inc

    .

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    22 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • 23/3

    2" O

    .S.B

    .

    SOU

    ND

    INSU

    LATI

    ON

    1 1/

    2"

    0.40

    "

    0.67

    "

    0.09

    "

    0.48

    "

    0.56

    "

    0.43

    "

    ww

    w.p

    -e-i

    .co

    m

    P ro

    gre

    ssiv

    e

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    IE n

    gin

    ee

    rin

    g

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:Th

    is d

    raw

    ing

    and

    all i

    nfor

    mat

    ion

    cont

    aine

    d he

    rein

    is th

    e pr

    oper

    ty o

    f PR

    OG

    RES

    SIVE

    EN

    GIN

    EER

    ING

    , IN

    C. a

    nd is

    not

    to b

    e re

    prod

    uced

    w

    ithou

    t the

    writ

    ten

    perm

    issi

    on

    of

    assu

    mes

    no

    resp

    onsi

    bilit

    y fo

    r una

    utho

    rized

    use

    of

    this

    dra

    win

    g.

    Pei. P

    ei

    J.H

    OLD

    EMAN

    11/8

    /18

    RSP

    IN

    DU

    STR

    IES

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    SAPb

    oard

    T&

    G D

    etai

    lB2

    2018

    -614

    9

    23 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • 2x8

    SPF

    RIM

    BO

    ARD

    (2 P

    LAC

    ES)

    1.5"

    SAP

    boar

    d FL

    OO

    R D

    ECKI

    NG

    TRU

    SS T

    OP

    CH

    OR

    D

    RIM

    BO

    ARD

    FAS

    TEN

    ED T

    O

    TRU

    SS U

    SIN

    G T

    HR

    EE (3

    ).1

    31" x

    3-1

    /2" L

    ON

    G N

    AILS

    PER

    TR

    USS

    .TR

    USS

    HEE

    L

    Fa

    x (5

    74

    ) 5

    33

    -97

    36

    nc

    .

    58

    64

    0 S

    tate

    Ro

    ad

    15

    Go

    she

    n, I

    N 4

    65

    28

    Ph

    on

    e (

    57

    4)

    53

    3-0

    33

    7

    In

    gin

    ee

    rin

    gP r

    og

    ress

    ive

    This

    dra

    win

    g an

    d al

    l inf

    orm

    atio

    n co

    ntai

    ned

    here

    in is

    the

    prop

    erty

    of

    PRO

    GR

    ESSI

    VE E

    NG

    INEE

    RIN

    G,

    INC

    . and

    is n

    ot to

    be

    repr

    oduc

    ed

    with

    out t

    he w

    ritte

    n pe

    rmis

    sion

    of

    as

    sum

    es n

    o re

    spon

    sibi

    lity

    for u

    naut

    horiz

    ed u

    se

    of th

    is d

    raw

    ing.

    Pei. P

    ei

    THIS

    DR

    AWIN

    G IS

    A P

    ART

    OF

    TEST

    REP

    OR

    T N

    o. 2

    018-

    6149

    RSP

    IN

    DU

    STR

    IES

    RIM

    BO

    ARD

    / TR

    USS

    DET

    AIL

    JOB

    NO

    .

    DW

    G. N

    O.

    SCAL

    E:

    DAT

    E:

    DW

    N. B

    Y:

    TITL

    E:

    REV

    ISED

    ON

    :C

    LIEN

    T:J.

    HO

    LDEM

    AN

    8/31

    /201

    5

    B3

    24 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • 25 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

    jholdemanLine

    jholdemanCalloutEnds cut off to overall length of 138"

    jholdemanCallout2x4 No. 2 Grade SPF lumber

    jholdemanText BoxDimensions marked in RED were verified by PEI personnel

    jholdemanRectangle

    jholdemanRectangle

    jholdemanRectangle

    jholdemanCalloutCut off for testing

  • INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Test Setup Parallel to Trusses (Frame Only) Test Setup Parallel to Trusses

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Test Setup Parallel to Trusses Test Setup Perpendicular to Trusses (Frame Only)

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Test Setup Perpendicular to Trusses Test Setup Perpendicular to Trusses

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    26 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Sample No. 18-6149-PARA-#8SIMP-1

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Load Side Failure Panel Shift / Rotation

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Typical Screw Shear

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    27 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Sample No. 18-6149-PARA-#8SIMP-2

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shifting during test Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    28 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Sample No. 18-6149-PARA-#8SIMP-3

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    29 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Sample No. 18-6149-PERP-#8SIMP-1

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift / Rotation

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Top Chord split at T&G Joint

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Separation

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    30 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Sample No. 18-6149-PERP-#8SIMP-2

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    31 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Sample No. 18-6149-PERP-#8SIMP-3

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Top Chord split at T&G Joint

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    Panel Shift and Screw Shear Panel Shift and Screw Shear

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    32 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Progressive Engineering Inc.

    APPENDIX

    RSP INDUSTRIES, INC.2018-6149

    33 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    SAPboard Stamp SAPboard Stamp

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.) INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    Panel Tongue Detail Panel Groove Detail

    INSERT PICTURE HERE (2.72" H. X 3.63" W.)

    #8 Subfloor Screws

    Progressive Engineering Inc.

    34 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • Date:Client:

    Specimen:

    FastenerHead

    DiameterOuter

    Thread Dia. Length1 0.335" 0.182" 2.981"

    2 0.331" 0.182" 2.984"

    3 0.333" 0.182" 2.983"

    4 0.334" 0.182" 2.999"

    5 0.334" 0.182" 2.985"

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    Average: 0.333" 0.182" 2.986"

    Comments / Observations:Five (5) fasteners were randomly selected by Chris Stutzman of PEI and measured as indicated above using a digital caliper. These fasteners were used to fasten the SAPboard to the trusses.

    Progressive Engineering Inc.Fastener Measurements

    6/12/2018

    #8 x 3" Long Strong-Drive Subfloor Screws, Part No. WSNTL3R300

    RSP Industries

    35 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • C-F

    -201

    7 ©

    2017

    SIM

    PS

    ON

    STR

    ON

    G-T

    IE C

    OM

    PAN

    Y IN

    C.

    Simpson Strong-Tie® Fastening Systems

    366

    Load Tables, Technical Data and Installation Instructions

    WSNTL – Allowable Shear – Wood Structural Panel Diaphragms with Framing of Douglas Fir-Larch or Southern Pine for Wind or Seismic Loading (2", 2 1⁄2" and 3" Lengths) (in Pounds per Foot)1-8

    Panel Grade

    Minimum Nominal

    Panel Thickness

    (in.)

    Minimum Nominal Width

    of Framing Members at

    Adjoining Panel Edges and Boundaries

    (in.)4,5

    Blocked Diaphragms Unblocked Diaphragms

    Screw spacing (inches) at diaphragm boundaries (all cases), at continuous panel edges parallel to load (Cases 3 and 4),

    and at all edges (Cases 5 and 6)6Screws Spaced 6", Maximum,

    at Support Edges6

    6 4 2 1/2 7 27 Case 1 (no unblocked edges

    or continuous joints parallel to

    load)

    All other configurations (Cases 2,3,4,5

    and 6)

    Screw Spacing (in.) at Other Panel Edges

    6 6 4 3

    Structural 1

    3⁄82 270 360 530 600 240 180

    3 300 400 600 675 265 200

    15⁄322 320 425 640 730 285 215

    3 360 480 720 820 320 240

    Sheathing and

    single floor

    3⁄82 240 320 480 545 215 160

    3 270 360 540 610 240 180

    7⁄162 255 340 505 575 230 170

    3 285 380 570 645 255 190

    15⁄322 290 385 575 655 255 190

    3 325 430 650 735 290 215

    19⁄322 320 421 640 730 285 215

    3 360 480 720 820 320 240

    1 . Minimum fastener penetration of 1 1⁄4" into the framing member is required .2 . For wind design, shear capacities may be increased 40% per section 2306 .3 .2 of

    the 2006 IBC, 2306 .2 .1 of the 2009 IBC, and 2306 .2 of the 2012 /2015 IBC .3 . Allowable loads are shown at the wood load duration of CD=1 .6 . No further

    increases shall be permitted . For shear loads of normal or permanent load duration as defined by the NDS-2012, the values in the table above must be multiplied by 0 .63 or 0 .56, respectively .

    4 . The minimum nominal width of framing members not located at boundaries or adjoining panel edges must be 2" .

    5 . Framing at adjoining panel edges must be 3" nominal or wider, and screws must be staggered where both of the following conditions are met: (1) screws having penetration into framing of more than 1 1⁄2" and (2) screws are spaced 3" o .c . or less .

    6 . Space screws maximum 12" o .c . along intermediate framing members (6" o .c . where supports are spaced 48" o .c .) .

    7 . Framing at adjoining panel edges must be 3" nominal or wider, and screws must be staggered where screws are spaced 2" or 2 1⁄2" on center .

    8 . See ICC-ES ESR-1472 for allowable shear loads for high load diaphragms .

    Load

    Framing

    Framing

    CASE 1 CASE 2

    CASE 6 CASE 5

    CASE 3 CASE 4

    Diaphragm boundary Continuous panel joints

    Continuous panel joints Continuous panel joints

    Blocking if used

    Blocking if used

    Strong-Drive ® WSNTL SUBFLOOR ScrewFor Subfloor and Sheathing to wood, Multi-Ply Wood Members

    Codes/Standards: ICC-ES ESR-1472; City of L .A . RR25661 (Note: 1 3/4" length not code listed)

    For More Product Information, see p . 96

    1 3/4" – 3"

    Tech

    nica

    l Inf

    orm

    atio

    n

    36 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • C-F

    -201

    7 ©

    2017

    SIM

    PS

    ON

    STR

    ON

    G-T

    IE C

    OM

    PAN

    Y IN

    C.

    Simpson Strong-Tie® Fastening Systems

    367

    Load Tables, Technical Data and Installation Instructions

    WSNTL – Allowable Withdrawal and Pull-Through Loads for Wind or Seismic Loading1-6

    Model No.6Nominal Screw Length

    (in.)

    Thread Length

    (in.)

    Allowable Pull-Through1 (lb.) Reference Allowable Withdrawal Load per Thread Penetration (lb./in.)Minimum Nominal Panel Thickness (in.)

    OSB/Plywood Rated Sheathing, Exposure 1 Framing Member3

    7⁄16 15⁄32 19⁄32 23⁄32 2x SPF/HF 2x DFL 2x SP

    WSNTL2LS 1.94 1.47

    70 71 116 116 93 133 175WSNTL212S 2.50 1.97

    WSNTL3S 3.00 2.17

    1 . Use the lower of the pull-through or withdrawal values to determine axial design value .2 . Screws must be installed straight into the side grain of the wood main member

    with the screw axis at a 90° angle to the wood fibers .3 . The main framing member must be wood having a minimum specific gravity of 0 .50 for

    DFL and SP main members, and 0 .42 for SPF and HF main members . DFL is Douglas Fir-Larch . SP is Southern Pine . SPF is Spruce-Pine-Fir . HF is Hem-Fir .

    4 . Table based on testing conducted in accordance with AC233 . Design values presented are based on average ultimate values and divided by 5 .

    5 . Allowable loads are shown at the wood load duration factor of CD = 1 .0 . Loads may be increased for load duration up to CD = 1 .6 .

    6 . The model number may end in the designation L or R, indicating that the screws are packaged as collated or for hand drive, respectively .

    Strong-Drive ® WSNTL SUBFLOOR Screw (cont .)

    IBC Equivalent Prescriptive Fastening Schedule1

    Connection Fastening Location

    2015 IBC Table 2304.10.1

    19. 1" brace to each stud and plate 2 screws Face

    21. 1" x 8" and wider sheathing to each bearing 3 screws Face

    24. 1" x 6" subfloor or less to each joist 2 screws Face

    2012, 2009 and 2006 IBC Table 2304.9.1

    3. 1" x 6" subfloor or less to each joist 2 screws Face

    4. Wider than 1" x 6" subfloor to each joist 3 screws Face

    20. 1" diagonal brace to each stud and plate 2 screws Face

    21. 1" x 8" sheathing to each bearing 3 screws Face

    22. Wider than 1" x 8" sheathing to each bearing 3 screws Face

    1 . Fastener penetration into the supporting member must be a minimum of 13⁄16" .

    Visit our Screw Substitution Calculator at strongtie.com/webapps/screwsubstitutioncalculator/.

    Tech

    nica

    l Inf

    orm

    atio

    n

    37 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

    http://strongtie.com/webapps/screwsubstitutioncalculator

  • C-F

    -201

    7 ©

    2017

    SIM

    PS

    ON

    STR

    ON

    G-T

    IE C

    OM

    PAN

    Y IN

    C.

    Simpson Strong-Tie® Fastening Systems

    368

    Load Tables, Technical Data and Installation Instructions

    Simpson Strong-Tie® Strong Drive® WSNTL series #8 flathead, countersunk wood screws are a fast and reliable method for attaching 2-ply and 3-ply girder trusses .

    WSNTL – Allowable Loads Comparison of Common Fasteners Used to Attach Truss Plies Together1-6

    Fastener7 Length (in.)Diameter

    (in.)

    Shear (lb.) Withdrawal (lb.)

    DFL SP SPF DFL SP SPF

    WSNTL212S 2 1⁄2 0.132 85 95 70 133 175 93

    WSNTL3S 3 0.132 100 110 85 200 263 140

    0.120" collated nail5 3 0.120 81 89 69 44 56 28

    0.131" collated nail5 3 0.131 97 106 82 48 61 31

    1 . Table values are based on attachment of a 1 1⁄2" side member to a 1 1⁄2" main member of the same species and grade .

    2 . Table values are based on the 2012 NDS, CD=1 .0 . Values shall be multiplied by all applicable factors, such as duration of load, etc . except where noted .

    3 . Specific Gravities (G) assumed: DFL G = 0 .50, SP G = 0 .55, SPF G = 0 .42 .

    4 . The spacing of applied uniform loads to the multi-ply member shall not exceed 24 inches on center .

    5 . Assumes collated nail Fyb = 100 ksi .6 . WSNTL212S and WSNTL3S withdrawal values

    based on testing per AC233 .7 . The model name may end in the designation L or R, indicating that

    the screws are packaged as collated or for hand drive, respectively .

    Ply-To-Ply Connection Comparison for a 30' Long 3-Ply Girder – Bottom Chord Loading

    Examples based on 3-ply girder spanning 30', 2x6 Southern Pine bottom chords, 825 plf BC load and 1 .15 load duration . Nail and screw spacing is repeated for each layer .

    4"o.c.

    5"o.c.

    Sample Bottom Chord Nailing Requirement for 3-ply Girder using 0.120 x 3" Collated Nails

    Bottom chord: 2 rows at 4" o .c . = 360 nails

    4"o.c.

    5"o.c.

    Alternate Fastening using WSNTL3S Screw

    Bottom chord: 2 rows at 5" o .c . = 288 screws

    Installation:• Screw spacing shall be in accordance with the

    fastener schedule provided on the Truss Design Drawing or as otherwise approved by the Truss Designer . Screw spacing shall not exceed 12" on center and shall not be less than 3" on center .

    • WSNTL series screws may be installed with the screw heads in either the loaded or unloaded ply . Do not overdrive screws .

    • For 3-ply girder assemblies, the WSNTL screws may be installed from the same side as each ply is applied (no flipping of the truss is required) in accordance with BCSI (2006 edition) . Girders that are fastened together at the jobsite must have the fastener heads visible for inspection .

    • Stagger the screws in the third ply a minimum of 1" from the screws installed into the first two plies .

    • Individual screw locations may be adjusted up to 1⁄2 of the required screw spacing to avoid conflicts with other hardware or to avoid lumber defects . (3" minimum spacing still required .)

    • Use minimum of 3" long fasteners to attach hangers to the girder truss .

    • A 2,500-rpm motor is recommended .

    1" recommended (typ.)

    3" min.-12" max.3" min.-12" max.

    1¾" min.

    ¾" min.

    ¾" min.

    Typical Spacing for WSNTL Screw

    2-Ply Assembly 3-Ply Assemblies

    Truss Plant Installation

    Jobsite Installation

    Strong-Drive ® WSNTL SUBFLOOR Screw (cont .)

    Tech

    nica

    l Inf

    orm

    atio

    n

    38 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • C-F

    -201

    7 ©

    2017

    SIM

    PS

    ON

    STR

    ON

    G-T

    IE C

    OM

    PAN

    Y IN

    C.

    Simpson Strong-Tie® Fastening Systems

    369

    Load Tables, Technical Data and Installation Instructions

    2"–3" WSNTL Fasteners Meet Code RequirementsAs listed in ICC-ES ESR-1472, WSNTL screws meet code requirements for the 2015 and 2012 International Building Code (IBC) and International Residential Code (IRC) . Evaluation report recognized uses of WSNTL screws include the following applications:

    • Substitute for 8d and 10d nails in horizontal diaphragms per AWC SDPWS-2008 and IBC (2012 and 2015) Tables 4 .2A, 4 .2B, and 4 .2C

    • Code-prescribed wood connections per IBC Tables 2306 .3 .1, 2304 .9 .1 and 2304 .10 .1

    • Single, diagonally-sheathed lumber diaphragms per AWC SDPWS Table 4 .2C (IBC 2012 and 2015)

    • Prescriptive sheathing applications in IRC Table R602 .3(1) and in structures regulated by the IRC where an engineered design is submitted in accordance with IRC R301 .1 .3

    Guidelines for Fastening Diaphragms without GlueThe design of wood floor systems constructed with wood structural panel (WSP) sheathing fastened to framing considers the diaphragm performance of the system as presented in the codes (as affected by framing, sheathing thickness, sheathing layout and fastening) and may also consider the composite action of the sheathing with the framing system (composite action is the combined stiffness of the joist with the sheathing) . The framing systems can be grouped into two classes: (1) sawn lumber and parallel-chord wood trusses, and (2) wood I-joists . WSNTL screws may be used as alternate fasteners to common nails in each floor class subject to certain constraints .

    For Diaphragms with a Framing System that is Sawn Lumber or Parallel-Chord Wood TrussesSimpson Strong-Tie WSNTL screws may be used as one-for-one substitutes for 10d common and smaller nails that are specified for horizontal diaphragm design in accordance with the 2015 and 2012 IBC and IRC .

    For Diaphragms with Wood I-Joist Framing SystemsI-joist manufacturers use the extra stiffness resulting from composite action when developing allowable floor joist span tables . Therefore, I-joist floor span tables generally assume glued-nailed construction .

    1 . For floor systems designed or intended to be glued-nailed:• WSNTL screws may be substituted one-for-one for common nails, without glue,

    provided the maximum allowable I-joist span is reduced by 12" compared to the I-Joist manufacturer's glued-nailed spans . The screws shall have at least 1 1⁄4" penetration into the I-joist flange (or full penetration for flanges less than 1 1⁄4" thick) .

    • Where glue is used with the screws, no reduction in span is required .

    • Check with the I-joist manufacturer for any additional diaphragm requirements .

    2 . For floor systems designed or intended to be nailed-only:• WSNTL screws may be substituted one-for-one for common nails, with no

    reduction in span, provided at least 1 1⁄4" penetration into the I-joist flange is achieved (or full penetration for flanges less than 1 1⁄4" thick) .

    • Check with the I-joist manufacturer for any additional diaphragm requirements .

    The Original “No Glue” Solution for Subfloor

    Strong-Drive ® WSNTL SUBFLOOR Screw (cont .)

    Tech

    nica

    l Inf

    orm

    atio

    n

    39 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

  • NOTE: SEE SECTION 1 FOR ADDITIONALFASTENERS AT SHEARWALL LOCATIONS

    4'-0

    "

    PROVIDE #8 x 3" WOOD SCREWSAT 6" O/C AT PANEL EDGES

    SANDWICH PANEL GLUED TO FLOORTRUSSES WITH SUBFLOOR ADHESIVE

    PROVIDE #8 x 3" WOOD SCREWS AT12" O/C AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

    SOUND ABSORPTION PANEL (SAP) BOARD - MIN.REQUIRED FLOOR DIAPHRAGM FASTENERS

    UNIT FLOOR FRAMING AT 2'-0" ON CENTER

    SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

    SECTION 1

    DOUBLE TOP PLATE

    2x SHEARWALL FRAMING

    2x SHEARWALL FRAMING

    FLOOR FRAMING AT24" O/C, MAXIMUM

    (2) #10 x 4-1/2" LONG WOODSCREWS AT 6" O/C THRU BOTTOMPLATE, SHEATHING LAYERS AND1-1/2" MINIMUM EMBEDMENT INTOFLOOR TRUSS BELOW.

    SHEAR ATTACHMENT BYSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER

    TOP OR BOTTOM LAYER OF 3/4" STRUCTURALSHEATHING PROVIDES THE STRUCTURALFLOOR DIAPHRAGMS. SEE DETAIL A FORADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    SCALE: NO SCALE

    DETAIL A

    8'-0"

    NOTE: SCREW FASTENERSMUST MEET OR EXCEED THECAPACITIES LISTED IN ICC-ESESR-1472

    NOTE: SCREW FASTENERSMUST MEET OR EXCEED THECAPACITIES LISTED IN ICC-ESESR-1472

    1-1/

    2"

    NOTE: SECTION FOR REFERENCEONLY. ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALLDESIGN INDIVIDUAL PROJECT FORREQUIRED LOADING CONDITIONS.

    SAP BOARD PANELEDGE (TYPICAL)

    40 of 40 PEI Report No. 2018-6149

    2018-6149 Report Bodypara frame onlypara-1B4para-2B5para-3B6Para Chartperp frame onlyperp-1b7perp-2b8perp-3b9Perp ChartEND DETAIL18in x 12ftB1B2Setup Picsparallel picsperp picsapp coverDetail PicsFastener MeasurementsC-F-2017-p366-3692018-06-26 SAP Board Attachment Detail