overview of emissions on worldoverview of emissions on ... · urea injection for urea injection for...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview of Emissions on World-Overview of Emissions on WorldHarmonised and Non-road Cycles from
th AECC E VI Pthe AECC Euro VI ProgrammeM G Ri k tMr. G. Rickert
AECC Technical Steering Committee
AECC Technical Seminar on Heavy-duty Engine Emissions
Brussels, 25 October 2007
Contents
• Introduction
• WHTC
• NRTC
• Steady-state cycles (WHSC and NRSC)
• Summary
2
AECC heavy-duty Euro VI test engine• 6 cylinder 7.5 litre engine designed for US2007
- Common railT b h d- Turbocharged
- EGR - No modification to base engine calibrationg- No change to calibration or regeneration strategy.
• AECC emissions control system + Bosch advanced airless urea dosing systemurea dosing system- Basic urea dosing system calibration for the ESC, ETC and WHTC- No specific calibration for other cycles.
(optional)NOx sensor
NOx sensor
• No thermal management.
Mixer SCR + ASCDOC1m mixing length between injector and SCR face.
3
No thermal management.
PM vs NOx (ESC test)
0.160
0.1802002 2006 2007 (Euro V & EEV data)
0 120
0.140
0.160
Euro III limits (<0.75dm3 & >3000min-1 rated power speed)
0 080
0.100
0.120
M g
/kW
h Euro III limits
( p p )
0.060
0.080PM
AECC Euro V tailpipe result
0.020
0.040
Euro IV limitsEuro V limits
0.0000.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
NOx g/kWh
S KBA d t J 2002 J 2006 M h 2007AECC Euro VI tailpipe result
4
Source: KBA data, June 2002, January 2006, March 2007
ETC and WHTC cycle comparison
800 ETC
WHTC operates at lower speeds and loads than ETC.
600
ETCWHTCPowermap
400
m)
200
Torq
ue (N
m
200
0500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
-400
-200
5
Speed (rpm)
ETC and WHTC tests: CO & HC emissions for engine o t and tailpipefor engine-out and tailpipe
ETC, tailpipeETC, engine-0ut WHTC, tailpipeWHTC, engine-0ut
Engine Out12.0
14.0
Engine Out
1.0
Engine Out10.0
h]
Engine Out
0 6
0.8
Wh]
Euro V NMHC limit
6.0
8.0
CO
[g/k
Wh
90% conversion 79%
conversion Tailpipe0.4
0.6
otal
HC
[g/k
W Euro V NMHC limit
63% conversion
69% conversion
Tailpipe
Tailpipe
2 0
4.0Euro V limit
conversion
Tailpipe0.2
To
conversion
Tailpipe
0.0
2.0
ETC WHTC (5 min hot soak,0.0
ETC WHTC (5 min hot soak,
6
10% cold weighting)(
10% cold weighting)
ETC and WHTC tests:PM emissions for engine o t and tailpipe
0 80
ETC, tailpipeETC, engine-0ut WHTC, tailpipeWHTC, engine-0ut
PM emissions for engine-out and tailpipe
E i O t
Engine Out
0.70
0.80
10.0mg/kWh
Engine Out
0.50
0.60
s [g
/kW
h] 8.0
Wh]
0.30
0.40
Par
ticul
ate
Mas
99.8% 99.7% i Tailpipe
4.0
6.0
ate
Mas
s [m
g/kW
TailpipeTailpipe0.10
0.20conversion conversion
Tailpipe
Tailpipe
2.0
Par
ticul
a0.00
ETC WHTC (5 min hot soak,10% cold weighting)
0.0ETC WHTC (5 min soak,
10% cold weighting)
7
ETC and WHTC tests:NO emissions for engine o t and tailpipe
2 5ETC, tailpipeETC, engine-0ut WHTC, tailpipeWHTC, engine-0ut
NOx emissions for engine-out and tailpipe
2.0
2.5
Euro V limit
Engine OutEngine Out1.5
/kW
h]
g
1.0NO
x [g
/
86% conversion
76% conversion
Tailpipe
Tailpipe0.5
0.0ETC WHTC (5 min hot soak, 10% cold weighting)
8
Tailpipe cold and hot start WHTC results showing effect of hot soak period
3.0Cold Start 5 min Soak 10 min Soak 20 min Soak
showing effect of hot soak period
No EGR or SCR at
cold start
2.0
[g/k
Wh]
cold start
1 0mis
sion
s [
1.0Em
0.0NOx THC CO PM*100
9
NOx THC CO PM 100
SCR temperatures for ETC and cold start WHTCand cold start WHTC
600WHTC ColdStart Test Temperature at SCR inlet
500
Start TestETC Test
ETC is a
400
re [°
C]
hot start test
300
Tem
pera
rtur
100
200
Urea injection for SCR t t d ti ft
0
100
EGR valve starts operating after ~570s
on cold start tests
started operating after ~800s on cold start
tests
10
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Time [s]
SCR temperatures for WHTC options
600WHTC Cold Start TestWHTC Hot Start After 5 min Soak
Note: SCR inlet temperature plotted. The urea injection is triggered by an the average of the inlet & outlet temperatures over the SCR
500
WHTC Hot Start After 10 min SoakWHTC Hot Start After 20 min Soak
Urea injection forUrea injection forUrea injection for
inlet & outlet temperatures over the SCR catalyst. Hence on the cold start test, the SCR temperature may be in excess of the 200°C threshold before urea injection is observed
400
re [°
C]
Urea injection for SCR started operating after ~675s on hot test after 20 min. soak
Urea injection for SCR re-started operating after ~490s on hot test after 10 min. soak
Urea injection for SCR started operating after ~80s on hot test after 5 min. test soak
200
300
Tem
pera
tur
short period of urea injection around ~90s on hot test after 10 min. soak
100
200
EGR valve started Urea injection for
00 300 600 900 1200 1 00 1800
EGR valve started operating after ~570s on cold start tests
Urea injection for SCR started operating after ~800s on cold start t t
Note: EGR valve operated from the start on the hot tests
11
0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Time [s]
Summary of WHTC composite results
Engine Tail Conv Engine Tail Conv Engine Tail Conv Engine Tail Conv
Emissions [g/kWh]Test ProcedureTHC NOx CO PM
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
WHTC cold 0.662 0.159 76% 2.338 1.689 28% 6.314 1.570 75% 0.594 0.002 99.6%
WHTC hot ( 5 min) 0.624 0.202 68% 1.131 0.147 87% 9.403 1.962 79% 0.735 0.002 99.7%
10% cold weighted 0.628 0.198 69% 1.252 0.301 76% 9.094 1.922 79% 0.721 0.002 99.7%
WHTC cold 0.662 0.159 76% 2.338 1.689 28% 6.314 1.570 75% 0.594 0.002 99.6%
(EU-composite WHTC)
WHTC hot (10 min) 0.570 0.204 64% 1.232 0.191 84% 8.039 1.794 78% 0.735 0.002 99.8%
10% cold weighted 0.579 0.199 66% 1.343 0.341 75% 7.866 1.772 77% 0.721 0.002 99.8%
WHTC cold 0.662 0.159 76% 2.338 1.689 28% 6.314 1.570 75% 0.594 0.002 99.6%
WHTC hot (20 min) 0.574 0.161 72% 1.193 0.178 85% 8.321 1.993 76% 0.735 0.002 99.8%
10% cold weighted 0.583 0.161 72% 1.308 0.329 75% 8.121 1.951 76% 0.721 0.002 99.8%
14% ld i ht d 0 586 0 160 73% 1 357 0 394 71% 8 034 1 933 76% 0 715 0 002 99 8%14% cold weighted 0.586 0.160 73% 1.357 0.394 71% 8.034 1.933 76% 0.715 0.002 99.8%
Hot NOx conversion efficiencies ~85%.PM d ti ffi i i 99 5%
(US-composite WHTC)
12
PM reduction efficiencies >99.5%.
Continuous trace for NO2 on the WHTC
World Harmonised Transient Cycle (WHTC)
250 Engine Out: NO2Nitrogen Dioxide
y ( )
150200250
nt [p
pm]
Post DPF: NO2Tailpipe: NO2
g
50100
onst
itue
00 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Time [s]
C
13
Profile of nitrogen species through the emissions control systemthe emissions control system
World Harmonised Transient Cycle (WHTC)
70pm]
Engine Out
y ( )
50
60
ntra
tion
[p Post DPFTailpipe
20
30
40
s C
once
n
0
10
20
erag
e G
a
Nitric Oxide Nitrogen Dioxide Nitrous Oxide AmmoniaAve
14
WHTC and NRTC cycle comparison
WHTC vs NRTC Cycle Comparison800 WHTC
600
NRTCPowermap
400
m)
200
Torq
ue (N
m
200
0500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
-400
-200
15
Speed (rpm)
Non-Road Transient CycleC ld t t i hti f t EU i 10% US i 5%Cold start weighting factors: EU is 10%; US is 5%.Soak time between the cold and hot tests is 20 minutes.Cold start: EGR and low SCR inlet temperature for first 300s. Hot tests: SCR inlet temperature reaches 200°C after 60s.600
WHTC Test(Hot tests)
500NRTC Test
(Hot tests)
300
400
pera
ture
[°C
]
200
Tem
p
0
100
16
00 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800
Time [s]
HC and CO for non-road transient cycle
0.20
0.25
0.10
0.15
Tota
l HC
[g/k
Wh]
0.00
0.05
WHTC ( 5 min) WHTC (10 min) WHTC (20 min) Europe ETC (hot) USA Japan JE05 (hot) NRTC (20 min)( ) ( ) ( ) p ( )FTP (20 min)
p ( ) ( )
2.00
2.50
1.00
1.50
CO [g
/kW
h]
0.00
0.50
WHTC ( 5 min) WHTC (10 min) WHTC (20 min) Europe USA Japan JE05 (hot) NRTC (20 min)
17
WHTC ( 5 min) WHTC (10 min) WHTC (20 min) EuropeETC (hot)
USAFTP (20 min)
Japan JE05 (hot) NRTC (20 min)
NOx and PM for non-road transient cycle1 00
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
NOx [g/kW
h]
0.00
0.10
0.20
WHTC (5 min) WHTC (10 min) WHTC (20 min) EuropeETC (hot)
USAFTP (20 min)
JapanJE05 (hot)
NRTC (20 min)0.0030( ) ( ) ( )
0.0020
0.0025
ass [g/kW
h]
Partial flow (MDLT) measurement system
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
Par
ticulate Ma
Note: PM limit for Stages IIIB & IV is 25mg/kWh Average test result is <1mg/kWh
0.0000WHTC ( 5 min) WHTC (10 min) WHTC (20 min) Europe
ETC (hot)USA
FTP (20 min)Japan
JE05 (hot)NRTC (20 min)
18
Note: PM limit for Stages IIIB & IV is 25mg/kWh. Average test result is <1mg/kWh
Particle numbers measurements o er non road transient c cleover non-road transient cycle
1.0E+13
3 orders of magnitude reduction
1 0E+12
gfrom engine-out emissions
(4.66E+14/kWh cold NRTC; 4.71E14/kWh hot NRTC)
1.0E+12
icle
/kW
h
1.0E+11
part
1 0E+101.0E+10
19
NRTC composite results
Test Procedure Emissions [g/kW.h]THC NOx CO PM
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
Engine Out
Tail pipe
Conv. Effy.
NRTC cold cold 0.584 0.070 88% 2.217 1.220 45% 4.380 0.719 84% 0.541 0.001 99.8%
NRTC hot hot (20 min) 0.775 0.122 84% 1.486 0.388 74% 6.820 1.007 85% 0.505 0.001 99.8%
NRTC (EU) 10% cold wtd. 0.756 0.116 85% 1.559 0.471 70% 6.576 0.978 85% 0.509 0.001 99.8%
NRTC cold cold 0.584 0.070 88% 2.217 1.220 45% 4.380 0.719 84% 0.541 0.001 99.8%
0 775 0 122 84% 1 486 0 388 74% 6 820 1 007 85% 0 505 0 001 99 8%
N ti i ti d t k
NRTC hot hot (20 min) 0.775 0.122 84% 1.486 0.388 74% 6.820 1.007 85% 0.505 0.001 99.8%
NRTC (US) 10% cold wtd. 0.766 0.119 84% 1.523 0.429 72% 6.698 0.992 85% 0.507 0.001 99.8%5%
• No optimisation was undertaken.- No change to engine calibration from US2007 HD basis.- ‘One-shot’ system sizing: would be optimised for production.
U d i t ti i d f d l- Urea dosing was not optimised for non-road cycles.- No thermal management strategy to improve cold NOx emissions.
20
HC and CO for steady-state tests
0.25
0.30h]
0.10
0.15
0.20
THC
[g/k
W.h
0.00
0.05
ETC wtd-WHTC[20] ESC WHSC NRSC
2.00
2.50
.h]
0 50
1.00
1.50
CO
[g/k
W
0.00
0.50
ETC wtd-WHTC[20] ESC WHSC NRSC
21
NOx and PM for steady-state tests
0.80
1.00
.h] NRMM
0.40
0.60
NO
x [g
/kW Stage IV
NOx limit
0.00
0.20
ETC wtd-WHTC[20] ESC WHSC NRSC
8.0
10.0
kW.h
]
4.0
6.0
M, M
DLT
[mg/
k
0.0
2.0
ETC wtd-WHTC[20] ESC WHSC NRSC
PM
22
Summary• Over the EU-composite World Harmonised Transient Cycle,
NOx emissions were 0.3g/kWh and PM emissions were 2mg/kWhPM emissions were 2mg/kWh.
• NOx conversion efficiency over the hot-start WHTC was similar to that for the ETC (85%). Cold start efficiency was ( ) ylower as the EGR did not operate until 570s and the system did not reach minimum urea injection until 800s on cold tests.Th t t f ll ti i d th th l• The system was not fully optimised; there was no thermal management to assist cold start NOx emissions.
• The Non-Road Transient Cycle has higher speeds and loadsThe Non Road Transient Cycle has higher speeds and loads than the WHTC, resulting in faster achievement of operating temperatures.
• Over the EU-composite Non-Road Transient Cycle,NOx emissions were 0.471g/kWh andPM emissions were 1mg/kWh
23
PM emissions were 1mg/kWh.
Acknowledgements
the OE engine manufacturerBosch, urea dosing system supplier
Yara International, urea supplierRi d UK d th AECC M bRicardo UK and the AECC Members
Thank you for your attention
24