outsourcing 3 pl 4 pl challenges final
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Presentation on
Outsourcing - 3PL / 4PL ChallengesIndustry 2.0 Conference
Presentation on
Outsourcing - 3PL / 4PL ChallengesIndustry 2.0 Conference
February 8, 2005
Arif A. SiddiquiArif A. SiddiquiGeneral Manager
confidential 23/23/2005
Content
• Understanding the Outsourcing Landscape
• Establishing the Outsourcing Strategy
• Case Study 1 - Consumer Durable
• Case Study 2 - Hi-tech
• Challenges
confidential 33/23/2005
• Understanding the Outsourcing Landscape
• Establishing the Outsourcing Strategy
• Case Study 1 - Consumer Durable
• Case Study 2 - Hi-tech
• Challenges
Content
confidential 43/23/2005
Globalization
ContractTransportation/
Distribution
1995 - 2000
LogisticsOutsourcing
IntegratedSupply ChainManagement
1985 - 1995 2000 +
Single function Integrated multi-functions
Transactional Strategic partnerships
Local, regional Global, door-to-doorcoverage
Asset heavy, processexecution
Information/knowledge focus,integrated IT solutions
Landscape
80% of Fortune 500 Manufacturers use 3PL services accounting to 40% of the logisticoutlay. This is likely to reach 50% by 2006
confidential 53/23/2005
Source: Logistics The way it is today - Sajal Kabiraj
Distribution Model
Replenishment
Customer Service Time
Customer
Orders
Demand
Shipment Type
Destinations
Warehouse Type
Order Cycle Time
Predictable
Monthly or Fortnightly
Channel
Reactive, Rigid
Supply Driven, Push
Scheduled
Stable, Consistent
Bulk
Major Towns - Concentrated
Go-downs
Variable, Small Lots
Weekly or Daily
End Customer
Responsive, Flexible
Demand Driven, Pull
Real Time
More Cyclical
Smaller Lots
Geographically Dispersed
Custom Built
Logistics Then Logistics Today
Logistics Today
confidential 63/23/2005
Asia-Pacific Logistics OverviewM
arke
ts
l Hong Kongl Singaporel Japanl Australial New Zealandl Koreal Taiwan
Mature
l China
Unique
l Malaysial Thailandl Indonesial Philippinesl India
Mid-Level
l Sub-Continentl Vietnaml Cambodial Laosl Myanmarl Etc
Developing
l DevelopedLogistics
l High Competitionl High Service
levelsl Lead time
pressurel Lower Growth
l RapidDevelopment
l Undevelopeddomestic mkt..
l Increasingservice levels
l High Growth
l Developingsophistication
l Increasingcompetition
l Increasingservice levels
l Varied Growth
l Poorerinfrastructure
l Lowercompetition
l Regulatoryhurdles
l OwnershipIssues
l High Growth
Cha
ract
eris
tics
confidential 73/23/2005
Outsourcing in India
• Emerging Trends
– Current India Logistics Market approximately Rs. 40,200 crore (Euro 6.7 bn) *
– In-sourced Logistics accounts for 45%
– Out-Sourced Logistics forecasted to increase
• Driving factors
– Supply Chain Management - Not a core competency
– Changes in Regulatory Framework (e.g. Free Trade Zones, Exemptions,Customs EDI, VAT, etc.)
– Supply Chain integration intra-entities
– Emergence of Global Logistics Service Providers
– Improvement in infrastructure
Source: *ATKearney Estimate
confidential 83/23/2005
Extent of Outsourcing in India
Importance Rating and Extent of Outsourcing of Logistics Activities (2001)
Source : Third Party Logistics Practices: An India Perspective, B. S. Sahay and Ramneesh Mohan
confidential 93/23/2005
• Understanding the Outsourcing Landscape
• Establishing the Outsourcing Strategy
• Case Study 1 - Consumer Durable
• Case Study 2 - Hi-tech
• Challenges
Content
confidential 103/23/2005
Outsourcing Strategy
Develop a business case Select a service providers
confidential 113/23/2005
Business case
Whyoutsource?
What tooutsource?
How tooutsource?
Strategic Factors
l Focus on core competenciesl Improve customer servicel Enhance flexibility
Operational Factors
l Improved process executionl Improved technology
Financial
Factors
lReduce costs
lReduce capital requirements
Why to outsource?
Developing a business case helps logistics managers to determine if the decisionhas strategic, financial and operational justification
confidential 133/23/2005
Dimension Transportation Distribution Import/Export
l Network design
l Carrier contracting
l ShipmentoptimizationP
lan
nin
gE
xecu
tion
l Carrier selection/tendering
l Shipment tracking
l Freight payment
l Facility design
l Project management
l Core warehouseactivities
l Value addedservices
l Coordination ofglobal freightmovements
l Customs clearance
l Freight forwarding
What to outsource?
confidential 143/23/2005
How to outsource?
PerformStrategic
Assessment
Decision to form
relationship
EvaluateAlternative
Options
PotentialPartner
Capabilities
CompanyNeeds &Priorities
StructureOperating
Model
Implementation &
ContinuousImprovement
Select Partner
confidential 153/23/2005
Vendor Selection
Jack ofAll Trades
One-StopShop
National Operator
LocalExpert
Integrated
Niche
Local National
FunctionalGrowth
ValueManagement(3PL/ 4PL)
GeographicGrowth
Multi-vendor Management(Transporter/ Landlord)
Service ProvidersScope of Service
Service ProvidersGeographic Breadth
Managem
ent Style
confidential 163/23/2005
• Understanding the Outsourcing Landscape
• Establishing the Outsourcing Strategy
• Case Study 1 - Consumer Durable
• Case Study 2 - Hi-tech
• Challenges
Content
confidential 173/23/2005
Scope
• Warehousing - 20 locations
– Finished Goods
– Project Material
• Primary Transportation
• Secondary Transportation - Inter-city/ inter-region
• Secondary Transportation - Intra-city
confidential 183/23/2005
Factory/Plant
Warehouse2
ImportLocations
Warehouses 1
Dealer/Distributor/Customers
LST billing
EXPRESS
CST Billing
EXPRESS
IBSTFTL
ImportsFTL
TRANSACTION
DISTRIBUTION MODE
TRANSACTION
DISTRIBUTION MODE
Imports DomesticMULTIPLE
VENDOR ANDWAREHOUSES IN
THE SAME REGION
Dealer/Distributor/Customers
LST Billing
EXPRESS
One region of Customer
Existing - SCM Model
IBSTFTL
ImportsFTL
Limitations
• Push Model resulting in huge inventoryacross the system and sub-optimalutilization of warehousing space
• Low inventory information visibility due todecentralized system
• High logistics cost due to movement toand from multiple warehouses to samemarket
• Factory feeding the market directlyleading to longer lead-time
• Port of clearance not completely inalignment with cost and consumptionmarket
• Lack of standardization resulting inlonger lead-time for policy roll-outs, MISgeneration, etc.
confidential 193/23/2005
Expectations and Challenges
Expectations
• Uniform processes across country
• Visibility of inventory through the entiresupply chain
• Shorter order to delivery TAT
• Reduction in inventory holding
• Facilitating right stock at right place basedon pull system
• Reduction in working capital throughincreased inventory turns
• Optimization of warehousing space acrossthe country
• Shift from Static to Dynamic model
• Over all reduction in logistics cost
• Manage smooth transition
Logistics Challenges
• Initiating change management andimplementation of new process across theorganization
• Vendor re-evaluation on proper SLAs andcost optimization - 4PL
• Integrating systems, standardizing process
& MIS across multiple locations
• Framing stringent KPIs/ SLAs andimplementing the same as part of theoperations
• Flexibility in offering dynamic servicesrequired due to seasonality of demand
• Facilitating movement based on pull as
against push system
• Reduction in total logistics cost to turnover
confidential 203/23/2005
Recommended - SCM Model
RegionalWarehouse
2
State/ SatelliteFlow-throughWarehouses
Dealer/Distributor/Customers
IBST
EXPRESS
LST Billing
EXPRESS
TRANSACTION
DISTRIBUTION MODE
RegionalWarehouse
1
RegionalWarehouse
3
ImportLocations
RegionalWarehouse
4
State/ SatelliteFlow-throughWarehouses
Dealer/Distributor/Customers
IBST
EXPRESS
LST Billing
EXPRESS
State/ SatelliteFlow-throughWarehouses
Dealer/Distributor/Customers
IBST
EXPRESS
LST Billing
EXPRESS
State/ SatelliteFlow-throughWarehouses
Dealer/Distributor/Customers
IBST
EXPRESS
LST Billing
EXPRESS
CST Billing
EXPRESS
IBSTFTL
IBSTFTL
IBSTFTL
IBSTFTL
ImportsFTL
ImportsFTL
ImportsFTL
IBSTFTL
TRANSACTION
DISTRIBUTION MODE
Imports DomesticSINGLE 3PL
VENDOR
Factory/Plant
confidential 213/23/2005
• Integrated operation and standardized logistics policies across the country facilitating better MIS
and inventory visibility through the supply chain
• Two step distribution model - RWH for stocking and state warehouse for LST billing with state
warehouses essentially holding low inventory only of fast moving SKUs
• Movement from factory to RWH to be on FTL mode, onward movements on express mode
facilitating economies of scale
• Slow moving manufactured items to be stocked primarily at RWH
• Non-saleable/ damaged stock cleansing on regular intervals
• Single point accountability across services across country
• Considerable reduction in lead time envisaged in servicing orders of finished goods across India
• Movements based on pull as against push will result in lower inventory at regional/ state
warehouse, thus reducing inventory holding cost
Highlights of theImplemented SCM Model
confidential 223/23/2005
• Understanding the Outsourcing Landscape
• Establishing the Outsourcing Strategy
• Case Study 1 - Consumer Durable
• Case Study 2 - Hi-tech
• Challenges
Content
confidential 233/23/2005
Scope
• Warehousing - 4 mother warehouses, 17 state-warehouses, 24 tertiary
warehouses
– Finished Goods
– Infrastructure Material - open space
– Defective Returns Management
• Intra-country distribution
• Rapid Fulfillment
confidential 243/23/2005
Factory/Plant
Port ofEntry
Warehouses1
Dealer/Distributor/Customers
LST billing
EXPRESS
CST Billing
EXPRESS
TRANSACTION
DISTRIBUTION MODE
TRANSACTION
DISTRIBUTION MODE
Imports Domestic
MULTIPLE C&F VENDOR
Few Geographical Markets
Existing - SCM Model
IBSTFTL
ImportsFTL
Drivers
• Strategy of expanding PAN India onshort notices, with focus on B Classcities apart from metros
• Rapid Fulfillment - last mile deliveries
• Increase in volume of transactions
• Barcode integration to capture serial nos.of goods
• Shorter product life cycle and increasedimportance of logistics during newproduct/ service launches
• Postponement logistics - productactivation at warehouses
• Cost optimization through refurbishingand reuse of returned material
confidential 253/23/2005
Expectations and Challenges
Expectations
• Large mother/ regional warehouses andsmall satellite warehouses across India
• Process standardization at national level
• Integration of systems like Oracle, SAP,etc.
• Logistics support during new product/service launches
• Equipment Serial Nos. capture forintegrated billing and AMC
• Rapid fulfillment
• Value added services
• Reverse Logistics
• Dynamic Cost model (pay-by-use)
Logistics Challenges
• Managing transition, systems integration &process standardization across threeentities within client organization
• Implement SCM across 45 locations inIndia including roll-out of closed and openwarehouses
• Formulating and implementing investmentplan to scale up
• Managing logistics during new product/service launches
• Ability to provide value added services likeproduct activation, kitting, etc.
• Reverse Logistics Management includingrefurbishing activities
• Managing rapid fulfillment and tatkaaldeliveries
confidential 263/23/2005
Recommended - SCM Model
Motherwarehouse
Circlewarehouse
Clusterwarehouse
In-Bound Out - Bound
Overseas Supplier
LocalSupplier
AgentCustomer
Material Receipt
Quantity Check
Put Away
Receive Order-STN/Invoice
Pick List Generation
Material Retrieval
Dispatch
System Update
Generate System Report
System Update
Serial Nos. Capturing
Equipment Activation
Systems Updation
Reverse Logistics
Conduct inspection and segregation
Equipment refurbishing
confidential 273/23/2005
• Surrogate customer account management (single window - Program Mgmt)
• Standardized logistics policies across the country
• Customized SCM reports for effective inventory management through bar-
coding technology
• Warehouses scaled across 45 locations in India within 6 months
• Rapid fulfillment mechanism from warehouses to meet immediate demands
• Standard Operating Procedure to manage distribution during new service and
product launches
• Value added activities conducted at warehouse
• Reverse logistics management within warehouse
• Implementation/ Roll-out of customer’s ERP within warehouses
Highlights of theImplemented SCM Model
confidential 283/23/2005
• Understanding the Outsourcing Landscape
• Establishing the Outsourcing Strategy
• Case Study 1 - Consumer Durable
• Case Study 2 - Hi-tech
• Challenges
Content
confidential 293/23/2005
• Strategic
– Management buy-in
– Cultural fit
– Scope of outsourcing
• Organizational
– Restructuring organization
– Re-deploying existing resources
– Anticipating quantum and timing of change
– Managing change
• Operational
– Reengineering existing processes in view of outsourcing strategy
– Framing KPIs/ SLAs both for internal resources and for external agencies
– Implementing processes across the organization and initiating MIS generation
– Measuring performance and benefits of outsourcing
Outsourcing Challenge -Internal to the Organization
confidential 303/23/2005
• Selection Challenges
– Ability to understand and assess customer’s requirement
– Project management and roll-out capabilities
– Framing appropriate performance measurement system
– Information technology integration and interface
– IT and communication infrastructure upgradation
– Managing relationship with customers/ vendors/ authorities/ employees
– Developing short-term and long-term infrastructure
– Developing strong intra-country dependable distribution service
– Ability to scale-up/ down depending on customer’s requirement
– Developing and enhancing Intellectual Capital
– Continuously enhancing and expanding service offerings
– Developing and implementing industry-specific SCM solutions with tangiblemeasurable results
Outsourcing Challenge -Vendor Selection
confidential 313/23/2005
• External Challenges
– Optimizing within infrastructure constraints
• Poor road conditions
• Lack of dependable communication infrastructure
• Real estate hurdles
– Managing multiple government authorities
• Sales tax authority
• Octroi Authorities/ Entry Tax Authorities
• Local bodies (Gram Panchayats, etc.)
– Understanding and adopting laws of land
• Sales Tax
• Entry Tax
• Excise Laws
• Octroi rules
• Other documentation like permits, etc.
Outsourcing Challenge -External Business Environment
confidential 323/23/2005
Logistics
ProductionControl &ProductionManagement
TransportationManagement
DistributionManagement
NetworkManagement/Optimization
Customer Service and
OrderManagement
Procurement& InventoryManagement
Strategy& Planning
InformationTechnology
• Forth Party Logistics - managing multiple3PLs and technology partner
• Transportation Excellence
• National Footprint
• Advanced IT Application - WMS,Track andTrace, RFID, etc.
• Optimizing Decision Support Tools
• Transition and relationship managementcapabilities
• 24/ 7 Service Capability
• Managing ‘Mission Critical’ installationsduring high cost machine down timescenarios
• Value added services and Postponementlogistics
Future Expectations from 3PL
Getting the right combination
confidential 333/23/2005
Key Success Factors
• Management Buy-in
• Project Management Capabilities (Service Provider & Customers end)
• Flexibility in scaling and adapting to changes
• Standardized service and processes across the country
• Strict adherence to performance management - KPIs/ SLAs
• Cost reduction and resource optimization initiatives
• IT integration and upgradation capabilities
• Change management capabilities
• Adequate trained and skilled manpower
confidential 343/23/2005
“MANUFACTURING QUALITY IS NO LONGER THE KEY COMPETITIVEDIFFERENTIATOR, SUCCESS NOW DEPENDS ON THE ABILITY TO MEETCUSTOMER DEMANDS FOR DELIVERY, QUANTITIES AND OPTIONS AS ARESULT, COMPANIES ARE SCRAMBLING TO IMPROVE SUPPLY CHAIN
PERFORMANCE SIMPLE TO REMAIN COMPETITIVE.”
- JIM SHEPHERD - V. P. RESEARCH, ADVANCE MANUFACTURING REASEARCH
• When quality is given and customer order fulfillment becomes a keydifferentiator between products/ organizations, SCM design and efficientoutsourcing becomes the buzzword.
• 80% of Global Fortune 500 manufacturers use 3PL services ascompared to 55% of Indian manufacturers
• With booming Indian economy where infrastructure and tax reforms arebeing implemented, SCM will be the prime focus for organizations
confidential 353/23/2005
Speed
Openness Collaboration
Time Trust Skills
Collaboration(CPFR),
Communities ofInterest (Service
Providers & Industry)
Speed
Future competitive weapon
Economy of Skill
Commandand Control
Costs
Economy of Scale
Competitive Weaponsof the 2000’s
Competitive Weaponsof the 1990’s
confidential 363/23/2005
Thank youThank you