osteogenic studies of drug eluting nanotubular laser...
TRANSCRIPT
Osteogenic Studies of Drug Eluting Nanotubular
Laser Additive Manufactured Commercially Pure
Titanium.
Thesis submitted by
LEKHA R.
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
DEGREE OF
MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY
SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES
AND TECHNOLOGY
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695011
(An institute of national importance under Govt. of India with the status of
University by an Act of Parliament in 1980)
Declaration
I, Lekha R., hereby declare that the thesis work entitled “Osteogenic Studies of
Drug Eluting Nanotubular Laser Additive Manufactured Commercially Pure
Titanium” was done by me under the direct guidance of Dr. Sabareeswaran
A., Scientist E, Histopathology Lab, Biomedical technology wing, Sree Chitra
Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala, India. External help sought are acknowledged.
LEKHA R.
2015/M.Phil/05
SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND
TECHNOLOGY
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695011, INDIA
(An institute of national importance under Govt. of India with the status of
University by an Act of Parliament in 1980)
Certificate
This is to certify that the thesis work entitiled ‘“Osteogenic Studies of Drug
Eluting Nanotubular Laser Additive Manufactured Commercially Pure
Titanium” submitted by Lekha R (2015/MPhil/05) in partial fulfillment for the
Degree of Mater of Philosophy in Biomedical Technology was done under my
supervision and guidance at Histopathology lab, Biomedical technology wing,
Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology,
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Place: Thiruvananthapuram Dr. Sabareeswaran A.
Date: Scientist E
Histopathology lab
Biomedical Technology Wing
The thesis entitiled
Osteogenic Studies of Drug Eluting Nanotubular Laser
Additive Manufactured Commercially Pure Titanium.
Submitted by
LEKHA R.
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
DEGREE OF
MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY
Of
SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND
TECHNOLOGY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – 695011, INDIA
Evaluated and approved by
Signature Signature
Name of supervisor Examiner’s name and designation
Acknowledgement This study was carried out under the supervision and valuable guidance of my guide Dr.
Sabareeshwarn A., Scientist E, Histopathology Lab, Biomedical Technology Wing, SCTIMST,
Trivandrum. I gratefully acknowledge the excellent and incessant help given by her, and, for her
valuable guidance and encouragement throughout this study and for the correction of the thesis.
I am greatly obliged to Dr. Anilkumar T.V., Scientist “G”, Scientist in Charge, Experimental
Pathology lab, BMT Wing, for her generosity and sincere help rendered for the completion of the
project as well as the Course.
I am greatly obliged to Dr. Kumari, Scientist “G”, Scientist in Charge, Division of Tissue
culture, Head of the Department (TRI), BMT Wing, for her generosity and sincere help rendered for
the completion of the project as well as the Course.
My deep gratitude goes to Dr. Harikrishna Varma P. R., Engineer “F” Scientist-in-Charge
G, Scientist in Charge, Division of Bioceramics, BMT Wing, for his generosity and sincere help
rendered for the completion of the project as well as the Course.
I would like to express my gratitude to The Director (SCTIMST), Head (BMT Wing), Dean,
Deputy Registrar and M.Phil. coordinators for their co-operation, encouragement and providing all
the facilities during the work.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to Mrs. Deepa.K.Raj (TIC) for her valuable advice
and help provided during the entire tenure of work.
It is my great pleasure to express my gratitude to Mr. Balu V Gopal, PhD Student for his
timely advice, support, patience and the pain he took for helping in the completion of work.
I am thankful to Mr. Nishad K.V. (SEM lab) for the technical help and support he provided in
doing the project.I am greatful to Dr.Rajesh (Former P.hD. student,),Mrs.Nimmi (P.hD. student)of
Bioceramics division for his valuable help and support he provided in doing the project.
I am greatly obliged to Dr. Joy Mitra (Assistant Professor) and Dr. Dr Mayanglambam
Suheshkumar Singh (Assistant Professor) of School of Physics IISER, Trivandrum for helping me to
undertake FESEM analysis.
Expressing special thanks to Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology and
Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India for their service and funding of this project.
I express my sincere thanks and gratitude to Mrs. Sulekha Baby (Senior Scientific Officer),
Mr. Thulaseedharan N.K. (Junior Scientific Officer), Mr. Joseph Sebastian (Technical assistant)
and all others in my lab for their help, technical advice and patience.
Special thanks are due to Dr. Manjula V James and Dr. Soumya Vijayakumar Scientist –
Temporary, for their care and support.
I am at a loss of words to express my heartfelt thankfulness to all my friends for their valuable
friendship, affection and care. I am gratefully remembering the care, love and support of my beloved
father, mother, sister and all my relatives which enabled me endeavoring all the achievements in my
life. Above all I would like to thank God Almighty, for showering his blessings to complete my work
successfully
Abbreviations
% Percentage
µg Microgram
µl Microlitre
µm Micrometer
2D Two dimensional
3D Three dimensional
ALP Alkaline Phosphatase
AM Additive manufactured
BM Bone marrow
BMD Bone mineral density
BM-MSC Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell
BMP 2 Bone morphogenetic protein 2
BSA Bovine serum albumin
C Carbon
CCD Cleidocranial dysplasia
CD 105 Cluster of differentiation 105
CD 90 Cluster of differentiation 90
COL-1 Collagen 1
Cp Ti Commercially pure Titanium
DAPI 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
ECM Extra cellular matrix
ELI Extra low interstitial
ESEM Environmental scanning electron microscope
FBS Fetal bovine serum
FDA Fluorescene di acetate
FESEM Field 6mission scanning electron microscope
FTIR Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
G1 phase Growth phase 1
GADPH Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
hMSC Human Mesenchymal stem cell
I pass lower passive current density
KCl Potassium Chloride
KH2Po4 Monopotassium phosphate
L Litre
LAM Laser additive manufactured
LAM-CP-Ti Laser additive manufactured porous
commercially pure Titanium
mg Milligram
ml Millilitre
MPA Monocyte platelet aggregates
mRNA Messenger Ribo nucleic acid
MSC Mesenchymal stem cell
N Nitrogen
Na2HPo4 Disodium hydrogen phosphate
NaCl Sodium chloride
NaHCo3 Sodium bicarbonate
NaOH Sodium hydroxide
NT Nanotubes
NT-LAM-Cp-Ti Nanotubular Laser additive manufactured
porous commercially pure Titanium
NT-Ti Nanotubular Titanium
OCN Osteocalcin
OPN Osteopontin
OSE2 Osteoblast specific cis-acting element
PBS Phosphate buffered saline
PI Propedium iodide
RUNX2 Runt-related transcription factor 2
SD Standard deviation
SV Simvastatin
Ti Titanium
TiO2 Titanium oxide
TNT Titanium nanotubes
tris HCl Tris Hydrochloride
UV Ultra violet
V Volt
α MEM Minimum Essential Medium Eagle - Alpha
Modification
Β-actin Human gene and protein symbol
ACTB/ACTB
Table of contents
Section No. Title Page No.
Synopsis 1-4
1 Chapter 1 Introduction 5
1.1 Bone 6-8
1.2 Titanium 9
1.3 Simvastatin 9
1.4 Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells 9-10
1.5 Hypothesis and Objectives 10
1.6 Review of Literature 11
1.6.1 Titanium and Biomedical applications 11-12
1.6.2 Commercially pure Titanium 12-13
1.6.3 Titanium and its structural modifications 13-14
1.6.4 Laser Additive Manufacturing of Titanium 14
1.6.5 Nanotubular structural modification of Titanium 14-17
1.6.6
Nanotubes and osteogenic induction potential 17-18
1.6.7 Drug delivery using nanotubes 18
1.6.7.1 Simvastatin 18-19
1.6.8 Defects of Titanium and its modification 19-20
1.6.9 Cells for studying osteogenic potential 20-21
1.6.9.1 Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells 21-24
1.6.9.2 Gene expression studies 24-26
2 Chapter 2 Materials and methods 27
2 Materials 27
2.1 Chemicals 27-29
2.1.1 Primers 29
2.2 Methods 30
2.2.1 Laser Additive Manufactured Commercially Pure Titanium (LAM-
Cp-Ti)
30
2.2.2 Anodization 30
2.2.3 Surface characterization 30-31
2.2.4 Dilution of Simvastatin solution 31
2.2.5 Loading of Simvastatin Drug and elution study 31
2.2.6 FTIR Analysis 31-32
2.2.7 Isolation and culture of rat bone marrow MSC 32
2.2.8 MTT assay of cells using LAM-Cp-Ti 32-33
2.2.9 Live-Dead staining of BM-MSC on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti 34
2.2.10 Characterization of rat bone marrow MSC 34
1.2.11 Multilineage differentiation of rat bone marrow MSC 34-35
2.2.12 Cell adhesion assay 35
2.2.13 Osteogenic study 35-36
2.2.13.1 Alkaline phosphatase Assay (ALP assay) 36
2.2.13.2 Special staining
A. Von Kossa staining
B. Alizarin Red S staining
C. Masson’s Trichome staining
36-37
2.2.13.3 Osteogenic gene expression study 37-38
2.2.14 Statistical analysis 38
3 Chapter 3 Results and Discussion 39
3.1 Material Characterisation 39
3.1.1 Structure analysis of LAM-Cp-Ti 39
3.2 Nanotubular structural modification 40
3.2.1 Effect of electrolyte, Voltage and time in formation of nanotubes 40
3.3 Simvastatin drug loading 44
3.3.1 Incorporation of simvastatin into Nanotubes of LAM-Cp-Ti 44
3.3.2 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) 44
3.3.3 The morphology of the simvastain loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti 45-46
3.4 In-vitro Simvastatin drug release study 48
3.4.1 UV-Spectroscopy analysis of drug elution 48-49
3.5 Rat Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem cells (BM-MSC) 49
3.5.1 Culture of rat BM-MSC 49
3.5.2 Characterization of Rat BM-MSC 51
3.5.2.1 Direct Immunofluorescence staining 51
3.5.2.2 Cytoskeleton staining 51
3.6 Cytocompatability of LAM-Cp-Ti 55
3.6.1 Cell Adhesion studies 56
3.6.1.1 Rat BM-MSC culture with porous LAM-Cp-Ti 56
3.6.2 Differentiation potential of Rat BM-MSC 58
3.6.2.1 Osteogenic and Adipogenic potential of Rat BM-MSC 58
3.6.3 Rat BM-MSC cultured on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti 60
3.6.3.1 Cytoskeleton staining 60
3.6.3.2 Live-Dead assay 60
3.6.3.3 Morphology and adherence 60
3.7 Osteogenic study of LAM-Cp-Ti 61
3.7.1 Special staining 63
3.7.2 Alkaline phosphatase assay 73
3.7.3 Osteogenic Gene expression study 74-76
3.8 Discussion 77
3.8.1 Material Characterisation 77
3.8.1.1 Structure analysis of LAM-Cp-Ti 77
3.8.2 Nanotubular structural modification 78-79
3.8.2.1 Effect of electrolyte,Voltage and time in formation of nanotubes 79-80
3.8.3 Simvastatin drug loading and elution studies 80-81
3.8.3.1 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Analysis 81
3.8.3.2 The morphology of the Simvastain loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
82
3.8.3.3 UV-Spectroscopy analysis of drug elution 82
3.8.4 In vitro cell culture studies 82
3.8.4.1 Culture of rat bone marrow MSC 82-83
3.8.4.2 Characterisation of Rat Bone Marrow Mesenchymal stem cells 83
3.8.4.3 Cytocompatability analysis 84-88
3.8.4.4 Osteogenic studies 88-89
3.8.4.5 Osteogenic gene expression studies 89-91
4 Chapter 4 Summary and Conclusion 93
4.1 Summary 93
4.2 Conclusion 94
4.3 Future aspects 94
4.5 References 95-101
List of figures
Figure
Title
Page no
1 Showing the collection of Femur from the Rat for Isolation of Rat BM-MSC
33
2 ESEM image of the porous LAM-CpTi showing its topographic
microstructure
39
3 ESEM image of the CpTi showing its topographic microstructure
40
4 FESEM images showing the difference of nanotubular structures on the Cp Ti
(A) and porous LAM-Cp-Ti (B)
41
5 ESEM images Showing the length (A) and diameter (B) of nanotubular
structures on the porous LAM-Cp-Ti
42
6 FESEM images showing the nanotubular structures formed on the porous
LAM-Cp-Ti in 20 v and 10 v.
43
7 FTIR spectra of Simvastatin dissolved in ethanol in 1mg/ml concentration
44
8 FTIR spectra of 200µg of simvastati ethanol mixture sample
45
9 FTIR spectra of eluted mixture sample containing simvastatin from
nanotubes on LAM-Cp-Ti.
45
10 ESEM image showing the drug coated (A)and ethanol(B) loaded NT-LAM-
CP-Ti disc
46
11 ESEM image A and Bshowing the drug coated disc after elution
47
12 The release profile of Simvastatin (SV) from drug-loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
48
13 The cumulative release profiles of Simvastatin (SV) from drug-loaded NT-
LAM-Cp-Ti
49
14 Inverted phase contrast images (A& B) showing the cultured Rat BM-MSC
50
15 Fluorescence microscope images showing Immunostaining of mesenchymal
stem cells using CD90.
52
16 Fluorescence microscope images showing Immunostaining of mesenchymal
stem cells using CD105.
53
17 Nuclei are stained blue with DAPI, and βactin filaments are labelled with β
Actin. The merged images showing the cell with nucleus is depicted above
54
18 Inverted phase contrast micrographs showing the monolayer of MSC on the
bottom of the well
55
19 Inverted phase contrast micrographs showing the adherence and growth of
MSC on the marginal area of the LAM-Cp-Ti discs.
56
20 ESEM images showing the adherence and growth of MSC on the surface (A)
and macropore(B) of the LAM-Cp-Ti discs
57
21 ESEM images showing the extending filopodia connecting macropore margins
(A)and growth of MSC inside macropore of the LAM-Cp-Ti discs(B)
57
22 Von Kossa stainingof BM-MSC showing Mineralisation
59
23 Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC showing calcification
59
24 Oil red O staining of BM-MSC showing oil droplets
59
25 Nuclei are stained blue with DAPI,, and actin filaments are labelled with β
Actin. The merged images showing the cell with nucleus is depicted above.
Cytoskeletal staining of BM-MSC grown on NT-LAM-Cp-TI
61
26 Live dead assay of the BM-MSC grown on the surface of NT-LAM-Cp-TI
62
27 ESEM images showing the difference in population of BM- MSC on porous
LAM-Cp-Ti(A) and nanotubular surface of LAM-Cp-Ti discs(B)
62
28 ESEM images showing the aggregation of MSC on nanotubular surface of
NT-LAM-Cp-Ti discs
63
29 ESEM images Showing the filopodia of BM-MSC extending into the
nanotubes formed on the NT-LAM-Cp-Ti .
63
30 Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 7th
day.
64
31 Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 14th
day.
65
32 Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 21st day
66
33 Trichome staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing collagen
during 7th
day.
67
34 Trichome staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing collagen
during 14th
day.
68
35 Trichome staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing collagen
during 21st day.
69
36 Von kossa staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification durinm 7th day
70
37 Von kossa staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 14th
day.
71
38 Von kossa staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 21st day.
72
39 Graph showing the ALP activity of the cell culture with LAM-Cp-Ti 7,14 and
21 days respectively.
73
40 Graph showing the relative gene expression on the 7th
and 14th
day analysis
74
41 Graph showing the fold change of COL1 and OPN gene expressed on the 7th
day by Simvastatin loaded disc
75
42 Graph showing the fold change of COL1 and OPN gene expressed
on the 14th
day by nanotube modified disc
76
1 | P a g e
Synopsis
The biological response of an implanted biomaterial is related to its cell- material
interaction. This work focuses on the evaluation of drug eluting nanotubular surface
modified Laser additive manufactured commercially pure Titanium (LAM- Cp-Ti) for its
cytocompatibility and osteogenic properties in relation to its porous structure and topography.
Nanotubular surface modification was done using anodisation method and incorporation of
Simvastatin drug is made possible followed by biological evaluation of the LAM- Cp-Ti in
relation to its osteogenic induction potential using rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
in vitro (BM-MSC).
Chapter One Introduces the back ground of the study; reviews literature on the previous
studies conducted and hypothesis of the present study. The selection of an ideal biomaterial,
its modification and optimization is the most important factor. Although performance of the
biomaterial according to the need remains a challenge in many implant scenarios. This is due
to complex relationships between intrinsic material properties and the cell -tissue response.
As the aging population increases various bone defects due to trauma and disease conditions
are raising day by day and the need for ideal orthopedic biomaterial is in great need. Bone is
a complex tissue which acts as a supporting framework of the body, characterized by its
rigidity, hardness, and power of regeneration and repair. Ossification (or osteogenesis) is the
process of formation of new bone by cells called osteoblasts. These cells and the bone matrix
are the two most crucial elements involved in the formation of bone. Titanium and Titanium
based alloys as biomaterials are a suitable for biomedical applications in orthopedics. Of
these, medical grade commercially pure titanium (CpTi) plays an effective role as an
orthopedic biomaterial. By modifying the structural topographies like laser additive
manufacturing and formation of nanotubes can upgrade the biocompatible nature of Titanium
2 | P a g e
and can act as a drug loaded vehicle. Statins including Simvastatin are category of potentially
promising drugs for treatment of osteoporosis. In addition to its lipid-lowering effects,
Simvastatin can also elicit some pleiotropic effects, leading to the modulation of the process
of bone regeneration at the molecular and cellular levels. It has long been recognized that
adult bone marrow stem cells (BMSC) form multiple mesenchymal tissues in vivo including
bone and have utility for engineering skeletal tissues. This seems to be beneficial for in vitro
studies to evaluate the osteogenic potential of LAM-Cp-Ti.
Chapter Two describes the methods and the materials used in conducting the experimental
study. The material and drug samples included in the study are LAM-Cp-Ti and Simvastatin.
Rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells has been used for biological evaluation studies.
Isolation and culture of rat bone marrow MSC is done as per the published protocol.
Characterization of rat BM-MSC was done by phalloidin-FITC, CD90 and CD105
immunofluresence staining. Multilineage differentiation of BM-BMSC was evaluated by
differentiating cells in induction media followed by staining. Anodization is the process by
which the nanotiubular structures has been created on the material surface.. The surface
characterization studies are done by using the field emission scanning electron microscopy
(FE-SEM) and Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Simvastatin drug
solution was prepared using absolute ethanol. The Simvastatin loading was carried out by dip
coating and vacuum drying process. FTIR analysis was done to confirm the drug
incorporation into the nanotubular structures.. MTT assay was performed in rat bone marrow
MSC to evaluate cytotoxicity of LAM-Cp-Ti .. Viability of cells were evaluated by live-dead
staining of rat BM-MSC on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti. Cell adhesion assay was analyzed using ESEM.
Osteogenic potential was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase assay and using specific staining
like Alizarin Red, Von Kossa and Trichome. Osteogenic gene expression study was
3 | P a g e
conducted and osteocalcin, osteopontin, collagen type I and RUNX2 genes expression by
BM-MSCs was quantitatively measured.
Chapter Three details the results of each analysis and briefly discuss the same with
reference to already published scientific literature. Anodization process resulted in the
formation of Titanium nanotubes on the surfaces of LAM-Cp-Ti. The Surface
characterization studies revealed the topography, structure, and characteristic features of the
nanotubes formed. The Simvastatin loading carried out by dip coating method and vacuum
drying process was successful resulted in the incorporation of the drug into the nanotubes.
FTIR analysis revealed Simvastatin on the LAM-Cp-Ti surface and denaturing of the drug
was not found. Elution studies revealed stable release of Simvastatin continuously over a
period of 15 days. Isolation and culture of rat Bone marrow MSC is done and sub cultured
effectively throughout the studies. Characterization of rat BM-MSC revealed CD90 and
CD105 immunofluresence staining positive results. MTT assay of bone marrow MSC using
LAM-Cp-Ti and Simvastatin was done which revealed the noncytotoxic nature of LAM-Cp-
Ti and Simvastatin. High viability was shown by the cells in live-dead staining of BM-MSC
on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti. Multilineage differentiation was shown by rat BM-MSC special staining.
ESEM analysis provided evidence for the cell adhesion. Osteogenic study revealed alkaline
phosphatase synthsisi by cells. and osteogenic special staining by Alizarin Red, Von Kossa
and Trichome evidenced the osteogenic induction potential of LAM-Cp-Ti. Gene expression
studies using quantitative real time PCR to study the osteogenic gene expression namely
osteocalcin, osteopontin, collagen and Runx2 revealed upregulaation osteocalcin,
osteopontin, collagen and down regulation of Runx2.
4 | P a g e
Chapter Four Summarizes and concludes the present study briefly and gives an outline on
future prospects. Nanotubular surface modified and Laser additive manufactured
Commercially pure Titanium (CpTi) is non cytotoxic and is having osteogenic induction
potential on rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
5 | P a g e
Introduction
The diverse interactions between the cells with the biomaterials will directly influence
the success and the failure of biomaterial. The specific nature and extent of biological response
will be influenced by the nature of biomaterial surface and the cell or tissue with which it
interacts. The selection of an ideal biomaterial, its modification and optimization is the most
important factor. Although performance of the biomaterial according to the need remains a
challenge in many implant scenarios. This is due to complex relationships between intrinsic
material properties and the cell response. Orthopedic biomaterials and implants impart
therapeutic benefit through adhesion to the tissue or cell, thus exhibiting a direct functional
dependence on cell or tissue-material reactivity.
According to the current scenario as the aging population increases various bone
defects due to trauma and disease conditions are raising day by day and the need for ideal
orthopedic biomaterial for numerous clinical applications is in turmoil. In order to develop an
ideal bone construct, it is far more important to understand the mechanisms of native bone
mechanics, osteogenesis, and development and fracture healing, as these processes should
ideally guide the selection of optimal conditions for tissue culture and implantation of
suitable biomaterial in relation to bone mechanics, development and healing properties.
It is essential that the biomaterial for bone construct should have the capacity for
osteogenesis, osteoconduction, osteoinduction and osteointegration - functional connection
between the host bone and the biomaterial. The promise of tissue engineering is to combine
the advances in the fields of biomaterials and cell biology towards making a suitable implant,
graft or scaffold that matches most or all of these characteristics.
6 | P a g e
1.1 Bone
Bone is a highly specialized supporting framework of the body, characterized by its
rigidity, hardness, and power of regeneration and repair. It protects the vital organs, provides
an environment for marrow and acts as a mineral reservoir for calcium homeostasis and a
reservoir of growth factors and cytokines. Bone constantly undergoes modification during life
to help it adapt to changing biomechanical forces, as well as remodification to remove old,
micro damaged bone and replace it with new, mechanically stronger bone to help preserve
bone strength. The bones have two components – the cortical bone which is dense, solid, and
surrounds the marrow space and the trabecular bone which is composed of a honeycomb-like
network of trabecular plates and rods interspersed in the bone marrow compartment.
The structure of bone is constituted by: (a) Inorganic (69 %) component, consisting of
hydroxyapatite (99 %) (b) Organic (22 %), constituted by collagen (90 %) and noncollagen
structural proteins which include proteoglycans, sialoproteins and glycoproteins. The
functional component of the bone includes growth factors and cytokines. The hardness and
rigidity of bone is due to the presence of mineral salt in the osteoid matrix, which is a
crystalline complex of calcium and phosphate (hydroxyapatite). Calcified bone contains
about 25 % organic matrix, 5 % water, and 70 % inorganic mineral (hydroxyapatite). Bone
provides mechanical support for anchoring muscles and facilitating movement, while
protecting vital organs. The primary functions of bone are based on its structural
characteristics. The mechanical properties of bone generally depend on its structure and
orientation.
As we know that the bone is composed of supporting cells like osteoblasts and
osteocytes and remodeling cells called osteoclasts along with non-mineral matrix of collagen
and noncollagenous proteins called osteoid. During life, the bones undergo processes of
longitudinal and radial growth, modeling (reshaping), and remodeling. Longitudinal growth
7 | P a g e
occurs at the growth plates, where cartilage proliferates in the epiphyseal and metaphyseal
areas of long bones, before subsequently undergoing mineralization to form primary new
bone. Ossification (or osteogenesis) is the process of formation of new bone by cells called
osteoblasts. These cells and the bone matrix are the two most crucial elements involved in the
formation of bone. This process of formation of normal healthy bone is carried out by two
important processes, namely the intramembranous ossification characterized by laying down
of bone into the primitive connective tissue (mesenchyme) resulting in the formation of bones
(skull, clavicle, mandible) and Endochondral ossification where a cartilage model acts as a
precursor (e.g., femur, tibia, humerus, radius). This is the most important process occurring
during fracture healing when treated by cast immobilization. If the process of formation of
bone tissue occurs at an extra skeletal location, it is termed as heterotrophic ossification
Osteoblasts originate from mesenchymal stem cells (osteoprogenitor cells) of the bone
marrow stroma. They are responsible for bone matrix synthesis and its subsequent
mineralization. Commitment of mesenchymal stem cells to the osteoblast lineage requires the
canonical Wnt/ j3-catenin pathway and associated proteins. Osteoblasts are mononucleotide,
and their shape varies from flat to plump, reflecting their level of cellular activity, and, in
later stages of maturity, lines up along bone-forming surfaces. Osteoblasts are responsible for
regulation of osteoclasts and deposition of bone matrix. As they differentiate, they acquire the
ability to secrete bone matrix. Osteocytes are the most abundant cells in bone; these cells
communicate with each other and with the surrounding medium through extensions of their
plasma membrane. The osteoblasts, rich in alkaline phosphatase, an organic phosphate-
splitting enzyme, possess receptors for parathyroid hormone and estrogen.
Intramembranous ossification is one of the two essential processes during fetal
development of the mammalian skeletal system resulting in the formation of bone tissue.
Intramembranous ossification mainly occurs during formation of the flat bones of the skull
8 | P a g e
but also the mandible, maxilla, and clavicles; it is also an essential process during the natural
healing of bone fractures and the rudimentary formation of bones of the head. The bone is
formed from connective tissue such as mesenchyme tissue rather than from cartilage.
The important cell in the creation of bone tissue by membrane ossification is a
mesenchymal stem cell. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) within human mesenchyme or the
medullary cavity of a bone fracture initiate the process of intramembranous ossification. An
MSC is an unspecialized cell whose morphology undergoes characteristic changes as it
develops into an osteoblast. The process of membranous ossification, which is essentially the
direct mineralization of a highly vascular connective tissue, commences at certain constant
points known as centers of ossification. The remodeling process is required for the maintenance of
normal healthy bone. Initial bone formation results in an irregular distribution of disorganized fiber
bundles known as woven bone. This is subsequently remodeled via the coordinated interaction of
osteocytes, osteoclasts and osteoblasts into lamellar (layered) structures. Osteoclasts are of
hematopoietic origin and are the main cells responsible for bone resorption. They are critical for
remodeling processes that occur in response to mechanical stimulation during bone development as
well as fracture healing. Upon activation, osteoclasts resorb bone at the endosteal surface. This is
followed by bone formation by osteoblasts. The process between resorption and formation is tightly
coordinated and balanced in healthy bone.
Bone, when damaged, is unique in its ability to heal without the formation of scar
tissue. Fracture healing of long bones occurs via several stages and involves coordinated
responses of the bone marrow, bone cortex, periosteum and the surrounding soft tissues,
including regulation of cellular proliferation, migration and differentiation. The process
combines elements of endochondral and intramembranous ossification recapitulating many of
the developmental steps.
9 | P a g e
1.2. Titanium
Titanium and its alloys posses good mechanical property, biocompatibility and have
enhanced wear and corrosion resistance in biological environment. In the current scenario,
Titanium and Titanium based alloys as biomaterials is suitable for biomedical applications in
orthopedics. Titanium and its alloys are noted primarily for outstanding strength-to-strength
ratios elevated temperature properties and corrosion resistance. They also possess high
rigidity-to-weight ratios, good fatigue strength and toughness and, in some cases, excellent
cryogenic properties. Because of these characteristics along with improved fabrication
techniques titanium and its alloys as a biomaterial is ideal for orthopedic biomedical
applications.
1.3. Simvastatin
Simvastatin is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs for the treatment of
hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular diseases. Major characteristics of Simvastatin is that
it regulates the synthesis of cholesterol .In addition to its lipid-lowering effects, Simvastatin
can also elicit some pleiotropic effects, leading to the modulation of the process of bone
regeneration at the molecular and cellular levels. Simvastatin seems to play an important role
in bone regeneration by participating directly in osteoblast activation by increasing bone
morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) expressions and by inhibiting osteoclast. Simvastatin can
promote the differentiation of osteoblasts to regulate bone anabolic metabolism.
1.4. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal stem cells
Large numbers of cells capable of producing bone extracellular matrix are needed for
the production of clinically-sized engineered tissues. Mesenchymal stem cells, which
differentiate and form bone during normal development, have long been the primary cell
source for engineering bone grafts. It has long been recognized that adult bone marrow stem
10 | P a g e
cells (BMSC) form multiple mesenchymal tissues in vivo including bone and have utility for
engineering skeletal tissues. For engineering and regeneration of bone, the properties of
choice include high biosynthetic activity expression of osteogenic markers and phenotypic
stability.
In this present work procured Laser additive manufactured commercially pure
Titanium disc is evaluated for biocompatibility, adhesion and proliferation properties in
relation to its porous structure and topography. Nanotubular surface modification was done
using anodisation method and incorporation of Simvastatin is made possible followed by
biological evaluation of the surface modified disc whas been done to evaluate its osteogenic
induction potential using rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-in vitro.
1.5. Hypothesis and Objectives
The Hypothesis of this research work is that surface modified and Laser additive
manufactured Commercially pure Titanium(CpTi) with drug eluting property have
osteogenic induction potential on rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and can
be used in bone tissue engineering applications in the near future.
The Major objectives of the study include,
1. Nanotubular surface modification of LAM-CpTi.
2. Isolation and characterization of Rat BM-MSC and its differentiation.
3. To study drug loading and elution capacity of Nanotubes.
4. To find out the biocompatibility of LAM CpTi.
5. To study the osteogenic induction potential of LAM-CpTi.
6. To know the influence of surface modified and drug eluting LAM-CpTi on rat BM-
MSC differentiation.
11 | P a g e
Review of Literature
2.1. Titanium and biomedical applications
Over the past few decades, titanium (Ti) and it alloys have been used as implant
materials for biomedical applications (Park et al., 2010). The highly biocompatible nature
(Vega et al., 2008), the excellent mechanical properties and chemical stability (Lee et al.,
2009) of Ti makes it a perfect candidate to be used in biomedical implant applications.
Because of favorable nature of the mechanical and biocompatible properties of Titanium and
its alloys compared in relation with the biological characteristics and mechanical features of
bone, they showed as an excellent competition among the biomaterials for orthopedic and
orthodontic implants. However, most of the implant materials for clinical applications tend to
fail because of their poor surfaces characteristic that enable to support new bone growth and
this will lead insufficient bonding to juxtaposed bone (Ma et al., 2008), thus slow
osteoconductivity (Thian et al., 2006) and healing process. Numerous studies have shown
that the early events of bone healing around implants are related to their long-term clinical
success (Davies, 2003; Marco et al., 2005.
In recent years, great progress has been made in designing implants using metals,
ceramics and polymers. Comparing these three types of materials, the excellent mechanical
properties of metals make them the first choice as orthopedic implants to restore the load
bearing functions of the bone tissue. On the other hand, ceramics or polymers are frequently
used as parts in an integrated orthopedic implant system, such as bearing balls in artificial
joints, or coatings on the surface of metallic implants (Bauer et al., 2013, Hench, 1991).
Among the metallic implants, the routinely used implant materials are Ti and its alloys (Chen
and Thouas, 2015).
12 | P a g e
To achieve and promote the osteogenic induction osseointegration and
osteoconduction of implants materials for orthopedics various surface treatments have been
proposed and lately considerable attention has been focused on Ti surface modification
(Chang et al., 2009) such as plasma coating (Hauser et al., 2009 and Wei et al., 2008), etching
(Das et al., 2007) and anodization (Yu et al., 2009) to improve surface characteristic for
implant material. The objective of these surface treatments is to improve protein adsorption,
cell adhesion and differentiation and consequently, the tissue integration of titanium implants.
2.2. Commercially pure titanium
Commercially pure titanium (Ti CP) and extra low interstitial Ti-6Al-4V (ELI) are the
two most common titanium base implant biomaterials. These materials are classified as
biologically inert biomaterials. As such, they remain essentially unchanged when implanted
into human bodies. The human body is able to recognize these materials as foreign and tries
to isolate them by encasing it in fibrous tissues. However, they do not promote any adverse
reactions and are tolerated well by the human tissues. These metals do not induce allergic
reactions such as has been observed with some stainless steels, which have induced nickel
hypersensitivity in surrounding tissues.
Titanium is very light with a density of 4.5 g/cm3. The Ti CP is 98.9 - 99.6 % Ti,
being the oxygen content (and other interstitial elements such as C and N) the main element
influencing significantly its yield, tensile and fatigue strengths (Table 1). Interstitial elements
strengthen the metal through interstitial solid solution strengthening mechanism, with
nitrogen having approximately twice the hardening effect (per atom) of either carbon or
oxygen. Phase (HCP) below 882 ºC andPure Ti is an allotropic metal having hexagonal
phase (BCC) over that temperature. As its typical microstructuretransforming to a cubic is
a single alpha phase, cold work is also an applied strengthening mechanism.
13 | P a g e
It is very good biocompatibility is due the formation of an oxide film (TiO2) over its
surface. This oxide is a strong and stable layer that grows spontaneously in contact with air
and prevents the diffusion of the oxygen from the environment providing corrosion
resistance. It is a biomaterial with a high superficial energy and after implantation it provides
a favorable body reaction that leads to direct apposition of minerals on the bone-titanium
interface and titanium osseointegration.
2.3. Titanium and its structural modifications
The surface properties of Ti determine the initial protein adsorption, and subsequent
cell adhesion, cell-surface interactions and cell functions. A straightforward approach to
modify the surface chemistry of Ti is to introduce non-therapeutic or therapeutic molecules
on it (Alghamdi and Jansen, 2013). The non-therapeutic molecules are usually inorganic. One
example is the use of calcium phosphate on Ti, due to its compositional similarity to the
mineral phase of the bone (Goodman et al., 2013).
Surface modification of Ti with therapeutic molecules can enhance osseointegration
by providing biomimetic surfaces and acting like localized biochemical stimuli (Goodman et
al., 2013). These molecules are expected to alter the surface property of Ti to recreate the cell
microenvironment at the implant site (Morra, 2006, Tejero et al., 2014). For instance, ECM
components such as collagen and growth factors regulate osteoblast functions during bone
formation. They are good candidates for surface modification of Ti to induce specific
intrinsic osteogenesis directly at the bone-implant interface (de Jonge et al., 2008).
Out of the structural modification the quiet recent one is the production of porous
structures by additive manufacturing techniques as explained in detail work of Davies and
Zhen (1983) who outlined several methods of production for foamed metals. The porous Ti
structures have been manufactured for use in many applications using a powder metallurgy
route which presents a number of advantages, primarily the ability to shape complex
structures with tailored mechanical properties at low temperature as in the research work
14 | P a g e
conducted by Brenne et al. (2013) who studied the microstructure of additive manufactured
(AM) porous Ti and its impact on the mechanical properties.
2.4. Laser additive manufacturing of Titanium
Among the many additive manufactured techniques Dunand (2004) reviewed the
production methods of Ti foams by powder sintering and bubble expansion, Wadley
(2002) reviewed the development of periodic metallic porous structures and Singh et al.
(2010) looked at the additive manufactured methods to produce Ti scaffolds for biomedical
application. Thus making laser additive manufacturing (LAM) has been found to be a very
promising method in developing porous titanium for biomedical applications. This LAM
approach uses a computer aided design to direct a laser point that melts a powder bed of
titanium to directly build Ti structures with controlled porosity. LAM provides a continuous
connected pore network that is difficult to achieve using typical foaming methods such as
bubble foaming or space-holder foaming, which can form closed pores. LAM allows greater
control over the final structure of very complex interconnected strut designs to tailor pore and
strut sizes and therefore allows customization of the mechanical properties of a porous
structure.
2.5. Nanotubular structural modification of Titanium
Along with the macro porous structural modifications, the nanostructural modification
of is also an interesting area of research for biomaterial especially in the case of metals for
orthopedic implants. Nanometer-sized features control the adhesion and osteogenic
differentiation of cells (Dalby et al., 2007b; Le Guéhennec et al., 2007) but these results have
not been confirmed on titanium. It is therefore of great interest to study TiO2 nanotubular
surfaces in view of their biomedical effects. The Ti surface was modified to form self-ordered
layer of vertically oriented titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotubes (NT) with diameters ranging
from 25 and 100 nm by anodization process (Lan et al., 2014). The results revealed that
15 | P a g e
proliferation and cytocompatibility of cells on vertically aligned TiO2 nanotube surfaces are
nanotubes diameter dependent.
It has been well acknowledged that the surface topography of Titanium nanometer
level can affect its integration with the host tissue (Gittens et al., 2013, Mendonca et al.,
2008, Shalabi et al., 2006, Wennerberg and Albrektsson, 2009). A review of surface
modification of Ti with micrometer and nanometer-scaled structure is given below. To
introduce microtopographon Ti, irregular micro features such as micro phases, micro pits and
microspores can be created using blasting, acid etching and anodization. On the other hand,
ordered micro features such as microgrooves can be created using photolithography (Nikkhah
et al., 2012). The microstructures on Ti enhance osteoblast functions in terms of adhesion,
alignment, proliferation, differentiation and/or mineralization in vitro (Cei et al., 2011, Lu
and Leng, 2003, Park et al., 2010, Park et al., 2013). In vivo, the microstructures direct the
development of proper interlocking of Ti with bone tissue, leading to improved bone-implant
contact (Cochran, 1999, Shalabi et al., 2006). Experiment driven results from in vitro and in
vivo investigations have concluded that micro topographies in the range of 1-10 μm is
optimal for orthopedic implants to maximize the physical interlocking to the host bone tissue
(Bauer et al., 2013). One limitation of the microstructures is that they are usually irregular
features, and the dimension of the features cannot be easily tuned or optimized by changing
reagents, or changing reaction or microfabrication conditions.
Titanium with nanostructures alters the chemical reactivity of Ti, and hence affects
the ionic or biomolecular interactions at the interface (Zhang et al., 2013, Zhao et al., 2010).
Since cell-surface interactions are based on integrins which also have nanostructures (8-12
nm), it can be predicted that cell-surface interactions will be affected by the nanostructures of
Ti (Cavalcanti-Adam et al., 2006, Minagar et al., 2012). Recently, different nanostructures
such as nanopits, nanopores, nanophases, NTs, nanopillars and nanodots have been created
16 | P a g e
on Ti to enhance osteoblast and MSC functions (Hong et al., 2014, Lavenus et al., 2011, Oh
et al., 2009, Sjostrom et al., 2009, Variola et al., 2008, Yu et al., 2010).
Nanotubular modification are one of the most established and characterized
nanostructures. Highly self-ordered tubular features can be formed on Ti surface with
dimensions which can be tuned by reagents and reaction conditions (Regonini et al., 2013).
Titanium nanotubes (TiNTs) can be prepared by anodization, where Ti is used as anode and
an inert metal (usually gold or platinum) is used as cathode in an electrolyte under constant
voltage. Different morphologies of NTs on Ti can be achieved by controlling the
experimental factors. These factors include type of electrolyte, concentration of electrolyte,
pH, reaction temperature, voltage applied, interelectrode spacing, duration of anodization,
and post reaction annealing (Minagar et al., 2012, Roy et al., 2011).
Numerous studies have reported NTs with diameter below 100 nm on Ti significantly
improve osteoblast and MSC functions, although there is no conclusive result on the optimal
dimension of the NTs on cell functions (Oh et al., 2009, Park et al., 2009, Yu et al., 2010).
For instance, Jin’s group reported that NTs with diameters of 70-100 nm on Ti enhanced the
differentiation of mouse osteoblasts significantly more than those with smaller diameters (20-
50 nm) in vitro (Brammer et al., 2009). The group also reported that NTs with diameter of 80
nm on Ti improved the bone bonding tensile strength compared with grit-blasted Ti in vivo in
a rabbit tibia model (Bjursten et al., 2010). For human MSCs (hMSCs), smaller diameter NTs
(~30 nm) on Ti were reported to promote adhesion but not differentiation, while larger
diameter NTs (~70-100 nm) on Ti induced osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs (Oh et al.,
2009).
On the other hand, Schumki’s group demonstrated that adhesion, proliferation and
differentiation of rat MSCs and human osteoblasts were maximally induced on NTs with
diameter of 15 nm on Ti. However, larger diameter (~100 nm) NTs impaired cell functions
on the TiNT substrate (Park et al., 2009, Park et al., 2007). The TiNT can be further modified
17 | P a g e
with non-therapeutic or therapeutic molecules to achieve a combined surface modification.
For instance, BMP-2 has been immobilized on the PDA-coated TiNT, and these results in
further enhanced osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs compared to those on TiNT in vitro.
(Lai et al., 2011).
2.6. Nanotubes and osteogenic induction potential
A nanotube with diameter of 25 nm seems to have high biocompatibility of epithelial
cells in comparison to 50 and 100 nm. Such results indicate that the surface nanostructure of
an implant is an important factor for surface cell adhesion and growth. In line with this result,
Zhao and co-workers (2013) observed 30 nm-diameter TiO2 nanotubes promotes the spread
of mesencymal stem cells (MSC) into polygonal osteoblastic shape. The TiO2 nanotubes
samples promote osteogenesis in absence of an extra osteogenic agent. A 30 nm-diameter
TiO2 nanotubes also generates big nodular alkaline phosphatase (ALP) product and induce
extracellular matrix (ECM) mineralization. However, two years ago, Zhao et al., (Zhao et al.,
2012) reported 80 nm-diameters of TiO2 nanotubes give best ability to simultaneously
promote MSC proliferation and osteogenic differentiation simultaneously.
In 2011, Choe has demonstrated that 50 nm-inner diameter of TiO2 nanotubes
provided good osseointegration such as cell proliferation, migration and differentiation (Choe
et al., 2011). Yang et al. suggested that surface treatment with nanotubular TiO2 surface
enhanced the early osteoblast response, such as cell spreading and cytokine release, which is
an important factor for subsequent cell functions and bone healing in vivo (Yang et al.,
2008a).
Previous studies by Brammer et al., demonstrate that nanotopography provided
nanoscale cue that facilitate cellular probing, cell sensing if more actin cytoskeletal filaments
formed lamellipodia and locomotive morphologies (Brammer et al., 2011b). Park’s group
also showed that adhesion, spreading, growth and differentiation of MSC are critically
dependent on the tube inner diameter (Park et al., 2007). Spacing between 15 – 30 nm
18 | P a g e
provided an effective length scale for accelerated integrin clustering/focal contact formation
and strongly enhanced cellular activities compared to smooth TiO2 surfaces. Cell adhesion
and spreading were severely impaired on nanotube layers with tube diameter larger than 50
nm resulting reduced cellular activity and experienced programmed cell death. So, Park’s
group suggested TiO2 nanotubes with 30 – 50 nm inner diameter represents critical
borderline for cell to survive (Park et al., 2007). The cell function altered if the inner diameter
of TiO2 nanotubes were less than 30 nm and more than 50 nm. The above-mentioned
findings are valid generally for the cell response to different topographical nanorough surface
and have an important impact on the design and composition of implant surfaces (Gongadze
et al., 2011).
2.7. Drug delivery using nanotubes
As the research conducted and reported by Popat et al., the surface of nanotube array
can help local delivery of antibiotics at the site of implantation, with demonstrated prevention
of bacterial adhesion while maintaining the osseointegrative properties of the nanostructured
surface. By controlling the nanotube length and diameter, drugs elution rates and amounts at
the implant site could be varied.
2.7.1. Simvastatin
Statins family including simvastatin are a category of potentially promising drugs for
treatment of osteoporosis. (Mundy et al.1999)found that statins promote new bone formation
in the calvarial bone of neonatal mice, and several studies have confirmed the discovery.
(Sugiyama et al.,2000)reported that both compactin and simvastatin increase the expression
of BMP-2 (bone morphogenetic protein-2) mRNA and protein in HOS (human osteosarcoma)
cells. Osteogenic effects of statins have also been found in other cell lines. Meanwhile,
animal tests have confirmed the osteogenic effects of statins. Recently, (Chuengsamarn et
al.2010)reported that statins promote bone formation and increase BMD (bone mineral
density) in patients with hyperlipidaemia. Other diseases, such as bone non-union or femoral
19 | P a g e
head necrosis may benefit from statins. In addition, statins decrease bone resorption by
inhibiting osteoclast differentiation and osteoblast apoptosis. Therefore statins may play an
important role in orthopedics owing to their regulatory effects on bone anabolism
2.8. Defects of titanium and its modification
Ti has been introduced for biomaterials applications because it owns some of the good
biocompatibility and high corrosion resistance. Yu et al. (2011) observed that 30 nm-diameter
TiO2 nanotubes had higher resistance of the barrier layer and lower passive current density (I
pass) compared to the smooth Ti. However, the relation within electrochemical corrosion
behavior of TiO2 nanotubes with cell-metal interaction was not reported. Indeed,
comprehensive corrosion behavior study and cell-metal analysis would able to determine the
best biomaterials implant.
The recent studies conducted reported that the increased hydrophilicity and protein
adsorption is important as it has been reported that cells are constantly in contact with
biomaterial surfaces that have previously adsorbed water and proteins from fluids rather than
with the bare surface. The cellular adhesion process begins with an attachment phase
dominated by van der Waals forces and is followed by an adhesion phase by anchoring to the
implant surface via fibronectin and vitronectin proteins to form focal adhesions at cell
membrane integrins. The spreading if fingerlike projections (filopodia) for increased
anchorage ensue. The effects of TiO2 nanotube diameter have also been investigated and it
has been reported that the optimal nanotube diameter for bone cell formation and activity is
on the order of 70 nm. In addition to in vitro studies of cellular responses to TiO2 nanotubes,
in vivo studies have also reported positive outcomes. Wang et al. investigated the effect of
anatase TiO2 nanotube diameter of implants on osseointegration in minipigs. The expression
of osteogenesis-related genes, such as alkaline phosphatase (ALP), was significantly
20 | P a g e
increased in comparison to a machined control. The highest levels of gene expression
occurred with the 70 nm nanotube implants.
Recently, surface topography such as TiO2 nanotubes have been shown to alter cell
behaviors such as adhesion, orientation, differentiation and migration significantly (Koo et
al., 2013). It is due to nanotubes topography that can provide more abundant topographical
cues similar to dimensional scale of bone collagen fibrils and elasticity resembling bones
(Wang et al., 2013). However, the dimensionality (diameter and length) of TiO2 nanotubes
on cell interaction is not well understood. In addition, there have been some inconsistencies
in the literature regarding the optimal size of TiO2 nanotubes for eliciting maximal adhesion,
proliferation and cell functionality (Moon et al., 2011; Rajyalakshmi et al., 2011; Lan et al.,
2013 and 2014). Therefore, in this research work the effect of diameter and length of TiO2
nanotubes on cell interaction were systematically studied.
Another factor attribute to the drawback of Ti as implant materials is TiO2 phases.
Among three different crystalline phases of TiO2, anatase phase is more favorable for cell
adhesion and proliferation due to lower surface contact angle (hydrophilic) and wet ability
(Koo et al., 2013). In contrast, high surface contact angle (the water contact angle is larger
than 90 °) lead to hydrophobic surface, which mimic biological surface such as lotus leaf
(Rosario et al., 2004). However, An and group reported that mixture anatase-rutile phase was
more favorable for cell interaction (An et al., 2011). Such contradicting outcomes among
research groups cause difficulty for researchers to select the best phase for implant materials.
Thus, in order to understand effect of crystal structure on cell interaction, considerable efforts
have been devoted to produce stable TiO2 nanotubes phase that suits cells interaction
requirement.
2.9. Cells for studying osteogenic potential
Besides, the selection of cells has also drawn an essential role in determining the cell-
metal interaction. Many cells cannot adapt and poorly survive in vitro or implanted in the
21 | P a g e
foreign body. This is because foreign material cannot interact properly with cells as they are
lack of ECM (Llopis-Hernández et al., 2011). Some efforts have been devoted in the
literature to correlate the surface properties to protein adsorption and cell adhesion (Wang et
al., 2012). There is still lack of understanding of the cell-metal interaction from an integrated
point of view that includes cell adhesion, cell viability and biocompatibility, adsorbed
proteins on the nanomaterials surface such as TiO2 nanotube arrays regarding their
dimensionality. The different cells been used in the literature (Ducy.et.al.,1997) also make the
analysis on the cell-metal interaction became more complicated. Therefore, detail study on
cell-metal interaction specifically on porous titanium surfaces and porous titanium with TiO2
nanotube arrays need to be done by using stem cell (bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells)
will be primary concern of this study. Bone marrow cells are well known for a good and main
available source of stem cell at the present time (Yang et al., 2004 a). It is also well ascribed
that MSC are best candidates for tissue engineering and cellular therapy of orthopedic
musculoskeletal tissues.
2.9.1. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
MSCs are multipotent cells which can differentiate into mesenchymal lineages
(Pittenger. et al., 1999). It has been shown that recruitment of MSCs plays a crucial role in
bone repair (Milner et al., 2011), where local mobilization of MSCs occurs from both bone
marrow and periosteum. This local recruitment could be boosted by injection of culture-
expanded MSCs (Milner et al., 2011). MSCs have been found in a range of tissues, including
adipose tissue, bone marrow, periosteum, peripheral blood, placenta, skin, synovium, and
umbilical cord blood (De Bari et al., 2001;De Bari et al., 2006;Kassis et al., 2006;Pittenger et
al., 1999;Shih et al., 2005;Yen et al., 2005;Zuk et al., 2001). The minimal criteria to
characterize human MSCs are tri-lineage potential (adipogenic, chondrogenic and
osteogenic), adherence to plastic in culture, and surface expression of a set of defined
markers (Dominici et al., 2006). Although these minimal criteria apply to all MSCs
22 | P a g e
regardless of their different tissue origin, MSCs from various tissues appear to possess
different potential for osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation (Im.et al., 2005).
By analysis its potential bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have
been suggested as a suitable option for cell-based tissue engineering therapies. This is due to
their capacity for self-renewal and their ability to differentiate into numerous different tissue
types, such as bone, cartilage and fat. BMSC can be easily isolated from the marrow aspirate
based on their ability to adhere and grow on tissue culture plastics, and can reach up to 50
population doublings in culture. The quantity of stem cells initially isolated varies between
different patients and aspirate preparations, and reportedly declines with the patient age. It is
most likely that the mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow aspirates, which drive the
normal bone remodeling and regeneration, are an excellent source of cells for bone repair.
Studies have shown that the cell culture substrate and the growth factors
supplemented to cell culture medium help maintain the differentiation potential of these cells
during expansion. The need to utilize the right cell phenotype for engineering of human
tissues is widely recognized, but the exact phenotypic characteristics are not always well
defined.
MSCs have been exploited primarily for their multipotential ability and the prospect
of differentiating them to bone and cartilage in vitro and in vivo poses them as a valuable tool
in skeletal tissue regeneration. Remodeling of bone is continuous throughout life in order to
maintain skeletal integrity and mechanical strength. Bone homeostasis is dependent on the
fine balance between bone producing cells (osteoblasts, derived from MSC) and bone
resorting cells (osteoclasts, derived from HSC) (Biel by et al., 2007). MSCs play a key role in
this process as they directly influence the rate at which osteoblasts are formed and mature
into osteocytes. However, under certain conditions, such as fractures and diseases including
osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and cancer, this balance is lost leading to poor bone healing and
reduced bone strength (Masi and Brandi, 2001). Furthermore, the associated connective
23 | P a g e
tissues including cartilage, tendon and ligament exhibit a limited regeneration capacity in
response to damage caused by trauma or disease. To address these issues, a variety of MSC
preparations have been assayed as novel cell-based therapies for the repair of damaged
skeletal tissues, including cranial bones and articular cartilage (Chang et al., 2004, Chang et
al., 2008). These MSC preparations are based on optimal numbers of MSC which are either
directly injected into the targeted site or cultured as explants in 2D and 3D cultures.
As reviewed by Boeuf. et. al., differences in chondrogenic potential could be caused
by the origin of the cells from different tissues, the isolation methods used to segregate cells,
or medium composition used to culture the cells. Likewise, osteogenic potential must be
influenced by these factors. Most studies have examined the osteogenic potential of implant
surfaces in vitro by using immature osteoblast or osteoblast cell lines (Dalby et al., 2006a;
Dalby et al., 2006b; Le Guéhennec et al., 2008a; Le Guéhennec et al., 2008b). However, the
first cells to colonise the surface after implantation, are mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).
Peripheral MSCs are attracted into the peri-implant region by chemo-attractant molecules and
are able to migrate through the blood clot to colonise the implant surface (Caplan et al., 2006;
Caplan, 2009). MSCs are multipotent cells present in blood, bone marrow and other tissues at
low levels. Under the control of specific cues (e.g., cytokines, growth factors, or micro-
environment), MSCs have the capacity to differentiate into osteoblasts (Marinucci et al.,
2010), chondroblasts (Zannettino et al., 2008), myoblasts (Engler et al., 2006) and adipocytes
(Morganstein et al., 2010). The nature of the tissue around implants may well depend on the
differentiation of MSCs induced by their surface properties (Engler et al., 2006; Kassem,
2006; Protivínský et al., 2007; Lavenus et al., 2010). The first event after implantation is the
adsorption of blood proteins on the surface of the implant. The nature and conformation of
proteins on the implant are regulated by surface properties, in particular chemical
composition, wet ability and micro- and nano- topography (Cai et al., 2006; Protivínský et al.,
2007).
24 | P a g e
It has been shown that nanotopography does not only control protein adsorption, but
also cell morphology and adhesion (Yang et al., 2002; Zhao et al., 2007). In vitro experiments
have shown that cells can respond to their micro-environment (Curtis and Varde, 1964;
Engler et al., 2006). Other studies have demonstrated that nanotopography influenced cell
behavior (Curtis et al., 2001; Stevens and George, 2005; Dalby et al., 2007a; Dalby et al.,
2007b). Surface topography induced mechanical stress in the cytoskeleton that controls gene
expression and thus differentiation (Watson, 1991; Kilian et al., 2010; Olivares-Navarrete et
al., 2010). While the nature of cell adhesion and the degree of cytoskeletal tension are widely
accepted as affecting stem cell behavior, the precise role of nanotopography on the adhesion,
morphology and differentiation of cells has not yet been established.
2.10. Gene expression studies
RUNX2, one of the Runt-related transcription factors, has been characterized as the
principal osteogenic master gene. RUNX2 controls osteoblast differentiation and bone
formation by binding to the osteoblast specific cis-acting element (OSE2), which is located at
the promoter of osteoblast marker genes, such as collagen type I, OPN, bone sialoprotein and
OCN (Ducy et al., 1997). The osteogenic regulatory function of RUNX2 has been
demonstrated in vivo and in vitro in many studies in the last two decades (Harada and Rodan,
2003). RUNX2-deficiency in mice (RUNX2 ) results in a lethal phenotype due to the
complete lack of osteoblast activity and bone formation (Komori et al., 1997). The phenotype
in mice lacking only one allele of RUNX2 is identical to human ossification disease
cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) and genetic analysis of CCD patients revealed that
heterozygous mutations of RUNX2 is the cause of the disease (Otto et al., 1997). Enforced
expression of RUNX2 in MSCs induce osteoblast specific gene expression, and increases
matrix mineralization in vitro.
Transplantation of the MSCs with overexpressed RUNX2 into skull defect mice
model results in an average of 85% osseous closure at four weeks, while controls with
25 | P a g e
scaffold only and with nontransduced MSC-scaffold constructs showed no defect healing
effect (Zheng et al., 2004). These data suggest RUNX2 expression is sufficient to promote
osteogenic differentiation and osteogenesis. However, transgenic mice with overexpression
of RUNX2 in osteoblasts showed osteopenia with multiple fractures which were enriched
with OPN and invaded by osteoclasts, although there was an absence of enhanced
osteoclastogenesis. Further examination of the transgenic mice revealed that mature
osteoblasts were diminished greatly, despite pre-mature osteoblasts expressing OPN
increasing in adult bone (Liu et al., 2001). These results indicate that the effect of RUNX2 on
osteogenic differentiation and bone formation is developmental stage-dependent, RUNX2
accelerates osteogenic differentiation at early stage and inhibits terminal differentiation at late
stage. Recent studies suggest RUNX2 not only guides MSCs osteogenic differentiation but
also plays regulatory roles in cell growth control. RUNX2 null cells exhibit a higher rate of
proliferation than wild type, and RUNX2 expression is regulated by the cell cycle with
maximum expression in G1 phase. Forced elevation of RUNX2 in preosteoblasts inhibits
their proliferation suggesting RUNX2 promotes cells to exit from cell cycle (Galindo et al.,
2005; Pratap et al., 2005). Further evidence was observed that RUNX2 targets at cyclin
dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p21 and p27; overexpression of RUNX2 resulting in
down-regulation of CDK, thus supressing progression into S-phase and promoting cell cycle
exit.
In summary, quiet few studies were conducted along these years and even the
conducted studies does not provide sufficient data regarding the osteogenic induction
potential of as laser additive manufactured commercially pure Titanium porous structures on
bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell and prove it as a biocompatible biomaterial for bone
tissue engineering or as an ideal orthopedic implant material. Even though many efforts have
been made by researchers to improve biocompatibility of titanium as an implant material by
developing TiO2 nanotubes, the effect of nanaotubular structural modification on laser
26 | P a g e
additive manufactured commercially pure porous titanium, there nanotubes dimensions,
structural topography changes, crystal structures and simvastatin drug incorporation studies
in relation to its biocompatibility and osteogenic potential in-vitro in bone marrow
mesenchymal stem cells are less reported. Therefore, in the present research those parameters
were studied.
27 | P a g e
Materials and Methods
3. Materials
3.1Chemicals
1 Alizarin red Sigma
2 Alpha minimal essential medium (α MEM) Gibco
3 Ammonium Fluoride (NH4F) Merck
4 Bovine serum albumin (BSA) Sigma
5 Cell culture flask (t25,t75) Thermo Fisher
6 Cell culture plate (12,24,48,96 wells) Thermo Fisher
7 Centrifuge tubes (1.5ml,2ml,5ml) Eppendorf
8 Cetyl pyridium chloride Sigma
9 Chloroform Merck
10 Cluster of differentiation 105(CD105) Abcam
11 Cluster of differentiation 90 (CD90) Abcam
12 Commercially pure Titanium (CpTi) Medical grade Four
13 Disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPo4) Merck
14 Ethanol Merck
15 Falcon tubes (50ml,15ml) Eppendorf
16 Fluorescene di acetate (FDA) Sigma
17 Fetal bovine serum (FBS) Invitrogen
18 Glutaraldehyde Merck
19 Glycerol S.d.Fine-Chem
28 | P a g e
20 Isoamyl acetate Merck
21 Laser additive manufacture commercially pure Titanium (LAM-Cp-Ti)
22 Methanol Merck
23 Monopotassium phosphate (KH2Po4) Merck
24 Osteogenenic differentiation medium Gibco
25 Para formaldehyde Merck
26 PCR tubes Eppendorf
27 Penicillin-streptomycin Sigma
28 Phosphate Buffered Saline Invitrogen
29 Pnpp substrate Sigma
30 Potassium Chloride (KCl) Merck
31 Primers Integrated DNA Technologies
32 Propidium iodide (PI) Sigma
33 RNA’s away Invitrogen
34 RT PCR kit Eurogentec
35 Silver nitrate Sigma
36 Simvastatin Sigma
37 Sodium bicarbonate (nahco3) Merck
38 Sodium chloride (Nacl) Merck
39 Sodium hydroxide (Merck, India) Merck
40 Syber green Kappa Biosystems
41 Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Blue (MTT) Sigma
42 Trichome stain kit Sigma
43 Tris hydrochloride ( tris-hcl) Sigma
44 Triton X-100 Sigma
29 | P a g e
45 Trizol Merck
46 Trypsin EDTA (Sigma) Sigma
47 Ultra pure water Invitrogen
48 β-Actin Sigma
2.1.1. Primers
No Oligo Name 5'<-----Sequence----->3' Length
1 OCN forward CAGTAAGGTGGTGAATAGACTCCG 24
OCN reverse GGTGCCATAGATGCGCTTG 19
2 COL-1 forward GGTCCCAAAGGTGCTGATGG 20
COL-1 reverse GACCAGGCTCACCACGGTCT 20
3 GAPDH forward GGCAAGTTCAACGGCACAGT 20
GAPDH reverse GCCAGTAGACTCCACGACAT 20
4 RUNX2 forward GCTTCTCCAACCCACGAATG 20
RUNX2 reverse GAACTGATAGGACGCTGACGA 21
5 OPN forward GACGGCCGAGGTGATAGCTT 20
OPN reverse CATGGCTGGTCTTCCCGTTGC 21
30 | P a g e
3.2. Methods
3.2.1. Laser Additive Manufactured Commercially Pure Titanium (LAM-
Cp-Ti)
Discs of Laser additive manufactured commercially pure Titanium (LAM-Cp-Ti) was
obtained from bar stock modified by Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology
(RRCAT) with a diameter of 3 mm. Subsequently, discs were subjected to ultra sonic
cleaning and were autoclaved at 121°C for 10 minutes.
3.3 Anodization
Nanotubes of TiO2 were grown on polished LAM-Cp-Ti substrates by
electrochemical anodization. The cleaned samples were chemically etched in 1:1 V/V HNO3
and HF. The electrolyte for anodization was based on glycerol and deionised water in a 1:1
weight ratio. 0.5 Weight % NH4F was added to the glycerol–water system kept at 25 °C and
magnetically stirred at 700 rpm for 2 h prior to anodization to ensure the complete and
homogeneous mixing. A polished and cleaned sample of titanium was used as the cathode,
while the chemically etched Ti substrate was placed as anode at 4 cm apart from cathode.
Anodization was performed at a constant voltage of 20 V with continuous magnetic stirring
for 30 min and then rinsed with deionised water. The anodized samples were then heat treated
at 450 °C for 2 h in ambient atmosphere as it is known to help crystallization of TiO2.
3.4 Surface characterization
Each Test material sample was analyzed using field emission scanning electron
microscopy (FE-SEM) (JSM-7001F) in Indian Institute of Science Education and Research
31 | P a g e
(IISER). Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) Quanta FEI, Hillsboro, USA.
The topography, Naotubular length, diameter, pore size of the scaffolds were analyzed from
ESEM micrographs using image analysis software (Image J, National Institutes of Health,
USA).
3.5 Preparation of Simvastatin solution
1mg of Simvastatin is dissolved in 1 ml absolute ethanol and transferred to a brown
bottle. 1 ml eppendorf tubes and stored in -20°C.
3.6 Loading of Simvastatin Drug and elution study
The Simvastatin loading was carried out by dipping coating and vacuum drying
process.NT- LAM-Cp-Ti discs were soaked under vacuum for 15 min in Simvastatin (200µg)
and then dried under vacuum after taking out from the Simvastatin solution. Kinetic release
measurements were performed on drug coated NT-LAM-Cp-Ti discs. Each disc was soaked
in a solution of 3 ml phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and maintained at 37 °C. 3 ml of the aliquots
was sampled periodically up to 14days for UV Spectrophotometer analysis. 3 ml of freshly
prepared phosphate buffer was added after each sampling for further elution. The cumulative
amount of Simvastatin released was determined with ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer
(Cary 50, Varian, and Australia) at 238 nm. Discs were weighed before and after drug
loading.
3.7 Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy analysis
Simvastain stock solution (1mg/ml concentration in 99.99% Ethanol),200µg of drug
aliquot and elution sample drug from drug loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti were subjected to Fourier
Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis using Thermo Nicolet 5700 FT-IR with
32 | P a g e
Diamond ATR Accessory. The spectra were taken in the frequency range of 4000-400cm-1
and the resultant peaks obtained were analyzed.
3.8 Isolation and culture of rat BM-MSC
Mesenchymal Stem Cells was isolated from bone marrow stroma of 3 month old male
Sprague Dawley rats (140 –160 g). Animals were used with prior approval of Institute
Animal Ethics Committee. Rats were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and femurs were
collected in PBS containing antibiotics. The femur was cut at epiphysis level using a bone
cutter (Figure: 1) and the marrow was flushed out with minimal essential medium (αMEM)
containing antibiotic using a syringe connected with 20G needle. The flushed out marrow
was pipetted few times and was centrifuged at 600g for 10 min. The pellet was collected and
resuspended in fresh αMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics. The cell
suspension was transferred to T25 culture flask and the culture was left undisturbed inside a
CO2 incubator set at 37C/5% CO2 for three days. The first medium change was done on
third day on every third day. The culture was maintained in αMEM supplemented with
10% FBS and antibiotics and sub cultured using Trypsin-EDTA up to two passages. The
cells at second or third passage were used for experiments.
3.9 MTT assay
The cytotoxicity was evaluated by the colorimetric MTT assay. LAM-Cp-Ti samples
were loaded with rat BM-MSC onto 96 well plates at a density of 104
cells/ml. The plate was
incubated for 24 h at 37ºC with 5% CO2. On day 2, the medium was replaced with scaffold
extract and incubated for 24 h at 37ºC with 5% CO2. On day 3 the material extract was
removed and the cells were incubated with 5 mg/ml MTT solution for 3 h and the viability of
33 | P a g e
cells were determined by measuring the Optical Density (OD) with the use of a micro plate
reader (ASYS UVM 340) at 540 nm. Phenol was used as the negative control. Percentage cell
viability was calculated using the formula:
Percentage cell toxicity = (Sample absorbance – cell free sample blank)/Mean media
control absorbance.
Figure: 1: Showing the collection of Femur from the Rat for Isolation of Rat BM-MSC
34 | P a g e
3.10. Live-dead staining of rat BM-MSC on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
The viability of cells cultured on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti was qualitatively assessed using
live-dead staining. The scaffold along with the cells was incubated with Fluorescene di
acetate (FDA) (in FBS free media) for 5 minutes in dark. Then 100µl of propidium iodide
(PI) was added and incubated with 10 minutes. It was then washed in PBS and observed
under Nikon fluorescent microscope. FDA stains live cells green and PI stains dead cells red.
3.11 Characterization of rat BM-MSC
The cells (3rd
passage) were cultured on cover slips for 24 hrs; fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde (w/v) in PBS (pH 7.4) for 10 min at room temperature; permeabilised with
0.1% Triton X 100 for 1 min at room temperature (permeabilisation step was avoided for the
staining of membrane markers) and blocked with 1% BSA. The slides were incubated with
primary antibodies, phalloidin-FITC, CD90 and mouse CD105 to stain the cytoskeletal
proteins such as actin and cell membrane markers CD90 and CD90 respectively at 4ºC
overnight. The nucleus was then stained with Hoechst 33258 (10µg/ml) and mounted on a
glass slide. The images were captured under Inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus
IX71).
3.12 Multilineage differentiation of rat BM-BMSC
In order to investigate the potential of rat BM-MSC to differentiation into adipocytes,
and osteocytes, the cells were seeded at 104
cell/ml density onto a 4-well culture plate and
incubated with αMEM containing 10% FBS until the cells became confluent. The medium
was then replaced with adipogenic differentiation medium for 7 days. The medium was
changed every 2 days. On day 7 of differentiation, adipogenesis were detected by Oil Red O
positive staining of lipid droplets in the cells. The osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSC was
35 | P a g e
performed by culturing in osteogenic induction medium for 21 days. The medium was
changed every 2 days. On 21 day of differentiation cells were detected by Alizarin Red S for
calcification and Von Kossa positive staining of mineralisation in cells.
3.13 Cell adhesion assay
Rat BM-MSC attachment to the LAM-Cp-Ti, nanotubular modified and drug coated
discs was initially evaluated ESEM. After seven days of culture when the cells are attached to
the Titanium substrates cells are fixed. Nonadherent cells were removed by gentle rinsing
with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Adherent cells were fixed with 1% (w/v)
gluteraldehyde for 30 minutes followed by dehydration using 30%, 50%,70%,90%and 100%
ethanol for 15 minutes each with 2 changes. Later critical point drying is done after dipping
the discs in isoamyacetate for 5-10 minutes followed by gold coating.
3.14. Osteogenic study
The osteogenic property of LAM-CP-Ti was evaluated by checking the differentiation
of Rat BM-MSC to osteogenic lineage.
The rat BM-MSC monolayer at passages 1 or 2 was sub cultured to 12 well plate at a
density of 3 × 104 cells per well. The cells were allowed to form monolayer. The test
materials were placed carefully over the cells and maintained the culture for 21 days. MSC
cultured in commercially available osteogenesis differentiation medium was considered as
positive control. Negative control received αMEM. The triplicate test and control cells were
maintained at 37C in a CO2 incubator set at 95% relative humidity and 5% CO2) with media
change on every 3 days. The morphology and cell growth was monitored under inverted
phase contrast microscope (Leica DMI 6000M).
At 7, 14 and 21 days test and control cells were evaluated for the following
Alkaline Phosphatase Assay
36 | P a g e
Calcium deposition (Alizarin Red S and von Kossa staining)
Collagen staining (Masson’s Trichrome staining)
3.14.1 Alkaline Phosphatase Assay (ALP)
At 7, 14 and 21 days, cells from duplicates of test, negative control and positive
control were rinsed with PBS and lysed for ALP assay. Cells were scrapped off and collected
in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris and 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 (pH 7.4). The cell suspension
pipetted vigorously and stored at -80C until used for ALP estimation.
ALP activity was measured according to protocol. Standards reagents were prepared
from known concentrations of p-nitrophenylphosphate ranging from 50 to 800 mM. The
following reagents were freshly prepared and mixed sequentially within pre labeled wells of
96 well plates.
Reagent Standard Test
Cell lysate - 80 l
Working Buffer (5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 M 2-amino-2-methyl-1-
1-propanol)
100 l 20 µl
Substrate solution (5 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate) 100 l 100 l
The plate was incubated for 1 h at 37C and the reaction was stopped by adding
100µL of 0.3 M NaOH to all wells. The absorbance was measured at 405 nm using a micro
plate reader (Biotek, USA).
3.14.2. Special Staining
Confirmation of osteogenenic property of LAM-Cp-Ti was done by Von Kossa and
Alizarin Red S staining. At 7, 14 and 21 days, test material was removed and the test,
negative control and positive control cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde.
37 | P a g e
A. Von Kossa staining
Von Kossa method indirectly identifies the presence of calcium deposits or salts by
transforming calcium salts into metal salts in the presence of silver nitrate solution. The fixed
cells were exposed to 5% silver nitrate solution under ultra violet light for 30minutes. The
secretion of calcified ECM was observed as black nodules with von Kossa staining.
B. Alizarin Red S staining
The fixative was removed and cells were rinsed with PBS. 1 ml of 2% (pH 4.1)
Alizarin Red S was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The
stain was removed and cells were washed thrice with deionised water.
C. Collagen staining
The differentiation of MSC to osteoblastic lineage was analyzed by collagen
deposition by using Masson’s trichrome staining. The cells were fixed overnight in Bouins
fixative and rinsed with deionised water until yellow color is removed. The cells were
stained with Harry’s Iron Hematoxylin Solution for 5 min followed by Biebrich Scarlet-Acid
Fucshin for 5min. The cells were then treated with Phosphotungstic-Phosphomolybdic Acid
Solution followed by Aniline Blue Solution for 5 min each. The cells were exposed to 1%,
acetic acid for 2 min and then viewed under light microscope for collagen deposition.
3.14.3 Osteogenic gene expression study.
The gene expression pattern of differentiated MSC to osteoblastic lineage in the
presence of test samples was analyzed and compared with negative and positive control.
Total RNA was extracted from test, negative control and positive control at 7, 14 and
21 days using trizol reagent. The cell lysate in trizol was mixed thoroughly and kept at -80
C until used. RNA was isolated at 4C by phenol-chloroform and isopropanol method. The
RNA precipitate was dissolved in RNase free water and quantified spectrophotometrically
(Biophotometer, Eppendorff). The cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase kit
38 | P a g e
according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The cDNA was amplified by Polymerase Chain
Reaction kit (Eurogentic RT-PCR-Kit) based on the product instructions. The specific
primers were used for the gene expression studies include Osteopontin (OPN), osteocalcin
(OCN), Runt related transcription factor2 (RUNX2) and collagen type I(COL1).
3.15. Statistical analysis
The quantitative results are represented as mean ± standard deviation and were
statistically assessed using two - way analysis of variance using graph pad prism software.
39 | P a g e
Results and Discussion
3. Results
3.1 Material Characterisation
3.1.1. Structure analysis of LAM-Cp-Ti
The topography and microstructure of laser additive manufactured Titanium porous
structures (LAM-Cp-Ti) had a uniform pattern (Figure: 2), the surface seemed to be rough
and consisted of pores. The macro pores are visible throughout the disc with varying size
ranging from 50 µm to 200 µm in diameter. Commercially pure Titanium (Cp Ti) surface
remained uniform and smooth (Figure: 3).
Figure: 2: ESEM image of the porous LAM-CpTi showing its topographic microstructure
The LAM-Cp-Ti discs exhibits a three-dimensional spatial structure. When observed
Under 50X magnification, pores are visible on the material surface and are evenly distributed
and interconnected. The trabecula between the pores is rough, presenting a micro pore
40 | P a g e
structure. A clear grading in the porosity from front to back in the test LAM-Cp-Ti has been
observed.
Figure: 3: ESEM image of the CpTi showing its topographic microstructure
3.2. Nanotubular structural modification
3.2.1 Effect of electrolyte, Voltage and time in formation of nanotubes
The Titanium oxide nanotubes formed on porous LAM-Cp-Ti are round edged
cylindrical structures. While hexagonal edged cylindrical tubes are formed on Cp-Ti. The
Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images of the nanotubular structures
formed on the porous LAM-Cp-Ti and Cp Titanium clearly shows the structural topography
difference (Figure:4). The lengths of nanotubes obtained are in the range of 100 nm to 400
nm and diameter ranges from 50 nm to 130 nm. The ESEM images clearly shows the
cylindrical Titanium oxide nanotubes formed with different lengths and diameter (Figure: 5).
Nanotubular structures in the LAM-Cp-Ti formed with 10V and 20V had a distinct porous
structures (Figure: 6)
41 | P a g e
Figure: 4: FESEM images showing the difference of nanotubular structures on the Cp Ti
(A) and porous LAM-Cp-Ti (B)
A
B
42 | P a g e
Figure: 5: ESEM images Showing the length (A) and diameter (B) of nanotubular
structures on the porous LAM-Cp-Ti
A
B
43 | P a g e
Figure: 6: FESEM images showing the nanotubular structures formed on the porous
LAM-Cp-Ti in 20V and 10V.
B
A
44 | P a g e
3.3. Simvastatin drug loading
3.3.1. Incorporation of Simvastatin into Nanotubes of LAM-Cp-Ti
The average of the weight before drug loading is 0.1182 ± 0.00121g and the average weight after
drug loading is 0.0189± 0.001212g.
3.3.2. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis of
Drug elution
There was no significant difference in the FTIR spectra of pure drug and the elution
samples of NT-LAM-Cp-Ti discs carrying Simvastatin. The physical mixture eluted from the
nanotubular structures showed the same spectral range like that of the pure drug. All major
peaks of Simvastatin is observed at wave numbers 3185.83 (Free O – H stretching vibrations)
and 2968.87 and 884.02 (Alkene C – H stretching vibrations), with combination of 1380.78
(C- H bending), 1274.72 (C- O- C asymmetric stretching) are retained in the eluted sample
mixtures from the nanotubes (Figure: 7-9)
Figure: 7: FTIR spectra of Simvastatin dissolved in ethanol in 1mg/ml concentration
45 | P a g e
Figure: 8: FTIR spectra of 200µg of Simvastatin ethanol mixture sample
Figure: 9: FTIR spectra of eluted mixture sample containing Simvastatin from nanotubes
on LAM-Cp-Ti.
3.3.3 The morphology of the Simvastatin loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
The drug loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti ESEM image showed the presence of drug in the
surface covering the entire nanotubular surface (Figure: 10A). The ESEM images of the
control disc treated with ethanol alone showed nanotubular structures (Figure: 10B). The disc
loaded with ethanol clearly showed the nanotubular structures while the drug loaded disc
surface is entirely covered with drug and nanotubular structure could not be seen.
46 | P a g e
Nanotubular structure is seen in the disc after elution which is evident in the ESEM analysis
(Figure: 11).
Figure: 10: ESEM image showing the drug loaded (A )and ethanol (B)alone NT-LAM-CP-Ti disc
A
B
48 | P a g e
3.4. In-vitro Simvastatin drug release study
3.4.1. UV-Spectroscopy analysis of drug elution
When in-vitro Simvastatin release study from drug loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti was
performed in PBS of 7.3 pH at 37°C. The release profiles of Simvastatin from drug-loaded
NT-LAM-Cp-Ti show a specific release pattern (Figure 12). A typical two-phase release
profile was observed, which indicates that there was a relatively rapid initial release of the
drug followed by a sustained and slow release of the drug over a prolonged period of time of
15 days (Figure:13)
In NT-LAM-Cp-Ti loaded with 200µg of Simvastatin solution, an increased release of
around 30µg was detected initially in day one followed by a steady release of the
incorporated drug was noted in the next three days, respectively. During the fourth, fifth and
sixth days the release of drug were similar to each other but greater than the previous three
days. After sixth day the release became less till eight and increased during the ninth and
moreover remained similar till fifteenth day. A total cumulative release of 40µg was detected
in total of 15 days except the burst release during the first day.
Figure: 12: The release profile of Simvastatin (SV) from drug-loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336 360
Am
ou
nt
of
dru
g re
leas
ed
(µ
g/m
l)
Time (h)
49 | P a g e
Figure: 13: The cumulative release profiles of Simvastatin (SV) from drug-loaded NT-
LAM-Cp-Ti
3.5. Rat Bone marrow mesenchymal Stem cells (BM-MSC)
3.5.1. Culture of rat BM-MSC
Most of the cells were still mononuclear during first day of the culture. On the second
day, some spindle-shaped cells appeared among the mononuclear cells followed by the
increase in the spindle-shaped cells on the third day. On fourth day, the spindle-shaped cells
reached about 70% confluence and the cell growth was slower in the flasks. After the cells
reached 100% confluence, they were splited and passaged. On Passage three, the cells had
uniform fibroblast-like morphology. Approximately a count of about 4 × 107–1 × 108 BM-
MSCs from one rat bone marrow was detected in passage three. During the period of cell
culture the cells seemed healthy and proliferating. The BM-MSC showed steady growth
during the period of subculture (Figure: 14)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 264 288 312 336 360
cum
ula
tive
re
leas
e µ
g/m
l
time (h)
51 | P a g e
3.5.2. Characterisation of Rat Bone Marrow Mesenchymal stem cells
3.5.2.1. Direct Immunofluorescence staining
MSC showed CD90, CD105 with positive staining throughout the cell surface, but the
strongest staining was detected near the nucleus. Spindle cells from extended BM-MSC
cultures appeared elongated, elastic morphology and fibroblast-like appearance with oval
vesicular nuclei. The positive staining obtained by CD 90 (Figure: 15) and CD 105 (Figure:
16) were alike. But CD 90 was expressed by all cells while CD 105 was restricted to some
cells and in the case of CD 90 there was also a clear difference in levels of expression
between cells, with some cells much brighter than others.
3.5.2.2. Cytoskeleton staining
The fixed rat BM-MSC showed prominent cytoskeletal structures of βactin filaments.
Immunofluorescence staining showed actin cytoskeleton organization with highly dynamic
network composed of actin polymers .DAPI stain showed the predominant nucleus on cells.
Both temporally and spatially arranged actin filaments are identified with orientational
distribution of actin filaments within a cell and no disruptional formations of cytoskeletal
actin filaments were identified (Figure: 17).
52 | P a g e
Figure: 15: Fluorescence microscope images showing Immunostaining of mesenchymal
stem cells using CD90.
DAPI
CD90
Merged
DAPI
CD90
Merged
53 | P a g e
Figure: 16: Fluorescence microscope images showing Immunostaining of mesenchymal
stem cells using CD105.
DAPI
CD105
Merged
54 | P a g e
Figure: 17: Nuclei are stained blue with DAPI, and βactin filaments are labelled with β
Actin. The merged images showing the cell with nucleus is depicted above
DAPI DAPI
βactin βactin
merged merged
55 | P a g e
3.6. Cytocompatability of LAM-Cp-Ti
3.6.1. Direct contact test
3.6.1.1. Rat BM-MSC culture with porous LAM-Cp-Ti
During first day, the Rat BM-MSC’s where first attached to the plastic base of the
culture plate. After one day by BM- MSC cultured with porous LAM-Cp-Ti began to adhere
to the edges of the disc. In addition, cells of different sizes were dispersed on the bottom of
the culture plates, with cell processes exhibiting elongated spindle shapes. The number of
cells adhering to the edge increased and the cells proliferated rapidly between the next few
days, aggregating and fusing into flakes. Monolayer of cells was formed in the bottom of the
wells after seven days (Figure: 18). Proliferation rate was comparatively high. No
morphology change or apoptosis was identified. BM-MSC seemed fully growing and
adhering into the margins of the disc without any restrictions. (Figure: 19).
Figure: 18: Inverted phase contrast micrographs showing the monolayer of MSC on the
bottom of the well
56 | P a g e
Figure: 19: Inverted phase contrast micrographs showing the adherence and growth of MSC
on the marginal area of the LAM-Cp-Ti discs.
3.6.2. Cell Adhesion studies
3.6.2.1. Rat BM-MSC culture on porous LAM-Cp-Ti
ESEM micrographs have revealed that the porous LAM-Cp-Ti had numerous
micropores. Further evaluating the disc for the study of the cellular adhesion and proliferation
of mesenchymal stem cells in the macro pore regions of the LAM-Cp-Ti disc. Disc cultured
in mesenchymal stem cells for 7 days was fixed and studied using ESEM. A small number of
mesenchymal stem cells with varying morphologies were sparsely arranged on the surface of
the LAM-Cp-Ti disc samples (Figure:20).The result also showed the filopodial extension
connecting cells between macro pore structures and movement of BM-MSC interlocking
each other from the macro pore margins (Figure:21)
57 | P a g e
Figure :20: ESEM images showing the adherence and growth of MSC on the surface (A)
and macro pore (B) of the LAM-Cp-Ti discs
Figure :21: ESEM images showing the extending filopodia connecting macro pore margins
(A)and growth of MSC inside macro pore of the LAM-Cp-Ti discs(B)
A B
A B
58 | P a g e
3.6.3. Differentiation potential of rat BM-MSC
3.6.3.1. Osteogenic and Adipogenic potential of rat BM-MSC
When subjected to osteogenic and adipogenic media, the cultured rat BM-MSCs
developed calcification and lipid droplets. Von Kossa (Figure: 22). and alizarin red staining
(Figure:23) showed a good amount of calcification of cultured rat BM-MSC and oil droplets
were found concentrating on the rat BM-MSC cultured in adipogenic media. High
calcification is visible in Alizarin red staining. Small concentrated lipid droplets are seemed
scattered in the cell surface when oil red staining (Figure: 24) was done. Oil droplets are
evenly distributed throughout while the calcification seemed to be concentrated to a specified
area. A continuous mineralisation was detected by von Kossa staining.
59 | P a g e
Figure: 22: Von Kossa staining of BM-MSC showing Mineralisation
Figure: 23: Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC showing calcification
Figure: 24: Oil red O staining of BM-MSC showing oil droplets
60 | P a g e
3.6.4. Rat BM-MSC cultured on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
3.6.4.1 Cytoskeleton staining
The rat BM-MSC grown on the NT-LAM-Cp-TI showed prominent cytoskeletal
structures of actin filaments in βactin- DAPI staining. Immunofluorescence staining showed
actin cytoskeleton organization with highly dynamic network composed of actin polymers.
DAPI stain showed the predominant nucleus on cells. Both temporally and spatially arranged
actin filaments are identified with orientational distribution of actin filaments within a cell
and no disruptional formations of cytoskeletal actin filaments was identified. Cells are seen in
large numbers and small in size throughout the disc surface. (Figure: 25).
3.6.4.2. Live-Dead assay
High rate of cell viability is found on the NT-LAM-Cp-TI and cells seemed to be
proliferating. Some co-aggregation of cells can be spotted in specific areas over the disc and
the proliferation, adhesion and viability. An effective experiment was done using BM-MSC
on nanotubular surface. Fluorescence microscope showed the high rate of cell spreading
across the disc increasing the cell density and cells seemed to retain their shape (Figure: 26).
.
4.6.4.3. Morphology and adherence
Rat BM-MSCs cultured on the NT-LAM-Cp-TI showed that the cells are spreaded,
proliferated and attached to the nanotubular surface. The number of cells on nanotubular
surface was significantly higher in comparison to the cells adhered to Cp Ti (Figure: 27).
Importantly, the cells incubated on Titanium nanotubes (TNT) attached to the surface and
started to form filopodia and formed aggregates (Figure: 28) partially and fully coating the
61 | P a g e
nanotubular surface. The cells also presented abundant filopodia and intercellular connections
(Figure: 29)
Figure: 25: Nuclei are stained blue with DAPI,, and actin filaments are labelled with β
Actin. The merged images showing the cell with nucleus is depicted above. Cytoskeletal
staining of BM-MSC grown on NT-LAM-Cp-TI
DAP
I
βactin
merged
DAP
I
βactin
merged
62 | P a g e
Figure: 26: live dead assay of the BM-MSC grown on the surface of NT-LAM-Cp-TI
Figure: 27: ESEM images showing the difference in population of BM- MSC on porous
LAM-Cp-Ti (A) and nanotubular surface of LAM-Cp-Ti discs (B)
A B
63 | P a g e
Figure: 28: ESEM images showing the aggregation of MSC on nanotubular surface of
NT-LAM-Cp-Ti discs
Figure: 29: ESEM images showing the filopodia of BM-MSC extending into the
nanotubes formed on the NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
3.7. Osteogenic study of LAM-Cp-Ti
3.7.1. Special Staining
When cells cultured for 7, 14, 21 days with LAM-Cp-Ti are subjected to
mineralization staining Von Kossa and Alizarin Red S method indirectly identified the
presence of calcium deposits starting from the day 7 itself even though the rate of calcium
64 | P a g e
deposits were very less compared to the positive control, gradual change and increase in the
calcium deposition was found from 7 towards the 21st day. Collagen deposition was detected
in an average basis by using Masson’s Trichrome staining during the 7th, 14th and 21st day
respectively (Figure 30-38)
Figure: 30: Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 7th day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured
with cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
A
B
C
65 | P a g e
Figure: 31: Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 14th day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured
with cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
C
B
A
66 | P a g e
Figure: 32: Alizarin Red staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 21st day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured
with cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
C
B
A
67 | P a g e
Figure: 33: Trichome staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing collagen
during 7th day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured with cultured
with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
C
B
A
68 | P a g e
Figure: 34: Trichome staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing collagen
during 14th day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured with
cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
A
B
C
69 | P a g e
Figure: 35: Trichome staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing collagen
during 21st day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured with
cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
A
B
C
70 | P a g e
Figure: 36: Von Kossa staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 7th day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured
with cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
A
B
C
71 | P a g e
Figure: 37: Von Kossa staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 14th day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC cultured
with cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
A
B
C
72 | P a g e
Figure: 38: Von Kossa staining of BM-MSC cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti showing
calcification during 21st day. Negative control (A), Positive control (B), BM-MSC
cultured with cultured with LAM-Cp-Ti(C)
A
B
C
73 | P a g e
3.7.2. Alkaline phosphatase assay
In the presence of induction medium, cells seeded with the unmodified LAM-Cp-Ti
underwent osteogenic differentiation. When the result where analysed all cells acquired the
mesenchymal morphology and up regulated alkaline phosphatase activity. Alkaline
phosphatase assay was done in MSC in duration of 7, 14 and 21 days in osteogenic medium
and continued to increase in intensity over 21 days. The MSC rapidly produced alkaline
phosphatise. (Figure: 39).
Figure: 39: Graph showing the ALP activity of the cell culture with LAM-Cp-Ti 7, 14
and 21 days respectively. Negative control (NC), Positive control (PC)
0
50
100
150
200
250
7 14 21
ALP
act
ivit
y in
µM
/30
00
0ce
lls
ALP of LAM-Cp-Ti
Ti
NC
PC
Days
74 | P a g e
3.7.3. Osteogenic Gene expression study
Osteogenic gene expression by LAM-Cp-Ti, and the modified nanotubular surface
and the Simvastatin loaded disc showed up and down regulation of differentiation genes on
the Rat BM-MSC. The up regulation of the major differentiation genes such as OPN, OCN,
and COL1 was observed throughout during 7th day as well as 14th day along with the down
regulation of the RUNX2 respectively. This up and down regulation showed that the
maturation protein genes including the OPN and OCN are expressed by the BM-MSC
showing differentiation into osteogenic lineage. The down regulation of RUNX2 confirmed
that the BM-MSC are losing their stemness and differentiating. (Figure: 40)
Figure: 40: Graph showing the relative gene expression on the 7th and 14th day analysis
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
7th DAY 14th Day
Re
lati
ve e
xpre
ssio
n o
f G
en
es
COL
OPN
RUNX2
OCN
75 | P a g e
Rat BM-MSC cultured on nanotubular modified disc and Simvastatin eluting discs
showed variation on the intensity of gene expressed when collected in 7th and 14th day. There
was an high increase in the OPN and COL1 gene expression on the 14th day on the nanotube
modified disc when compared with the gene expression viewed in the positive control
(Induction medium) (Figure: 42). In the case of Simvastatin loaded nanotube modified disc
the gene expression was high in the case of OPN as well as COL1 (Figure:41).
Figure: 41: Graph showing the fold change of COL1 and OPN gene expressed
on the 7th day by Simvastatin loaded disc
0
5
10
15
20
25
COL OPN
fold
ch
ange
Day 7 relative gene expression
Induced SS DiscSimvastatin coated DiscInduction medium
76 | P a g e
Figure: 42: Graph showing the fold change of COL1 and OPN gene expressed
on the 14th day by nanotube modified disc
Both these results clearly show the osteogenic induction potential of LAM-Cp-Ti and
the nanotubular modification of the surface and the eluting Simvastatin drug. The intensity of
OPN expression induced by Simvastatin seemed higher compared to the nanotubes while the
OCN and COL 1 expressed by the nanotubular surface of the disc seemed quit higher with
that of Simvastatin eluting and majorly with the positive control with induction media .A
drastic change can be viewed in the induction of osteogenic differentiation gene by
Nanotubular LAM-Cp-Ti when compared with the induced samples of BM-MSC using
osteogenic induction media alone itself.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
COL OPN
fold
ch
ange
Day 14 relative gene expression
Induced T i DiscInduction medium
77 | P a g e
3.8. Discussion
3.8.1 Material Characterisation
3.8.1.1. Structure analysis of LAM-Cp-Ti
Earlier works done on the influence of surface topography of Titanium on the
osteogenic differentiation like Buser.et.al (1991 and 1998), Wennerberg.et.al.(1996) had
proved that rough topographic Ti surfaces were clinically proven to induce more rapid
osseointegration than smooth surfaces. In this current study also the topography of LAM-
CpTi was rough compared to the CpTi and showed irregular surface topography (Figure:
2 &3).
Porosity can be defined as the percentage of void spaces in a solid. Some of the
early works by Takemoto et.al (2005 ) reported that the percentage of pores suitable for
Ti samples is between 25 and 66%. Work done by Thelen .et al., (2004) suggested that
porous Ti with 40% porosity could be an alternative for clinical use and Oliveira et.al.,
(2004) and Takemoto et.al., (2005) confirmed that the porous Titanium with 5 and 80%
porosity have shown bone formation and this increased porosity, permits the growth of
cell into the pores and subsequently followed by the mineralization. Later studies
conducted in the porous nature of Titanium confirmed that the porosity of Titanium
increases the contact area between the biomaterials and bone tissue by Bottino.et.al
(2009), this porosity results in improved implant stability over time, as well as
accelerating the process of osseointegration as per the studies done by Faria.et.al (2010)..
The LAM-Cp-Ti used in this study possess a graded porosity from 0 - 60% which clearly
defines that the porous LAM-CpTi that used in this study benefits the BM-MSC
proliferation, adhesion, etc leading to high cytocompatability and also plays an important
role in BM-MSC differentiation to osteogenic and adipogenic lineage.
78 | P a g e
3.8.2. Nanotubular structural modification
In case of nanotubular surface modification made in the LAM-Cp-Ti, early works by
Assoian et al.(1997),shown that nano-sized features control cell adhesion and osteogenic
differentiation. Theoretically, an ideal titanium implant would encourage stem cells to
differentiate into mature osteoblasts for direct bone apposition, rather than fibroblastic cells
resulting in fibrous tissue encapsulation. It has been established that integrins are the links
between cells and ECM and serve as signal transducers for regulating cell growth,
differentiation and motility as per the studies conducted by , Lafrenie and Yamade(1996),
Kumar(1998) and Wang et al., (2006). Recent works in which similar Ti surface was
modified to form self-ordered layer of vertically oriented titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotubes
with diameters ranging from 25 and 100 nm by anodization process Lan et al.(2014). The
results revealed that proliferation and cytocompatibility of cells on vertically aligned TiO2
nanotube surfaces are nanotubes diameter dependent. A nanotube with diameter of 25 nm
seems to have high biocompatibility of epithelial cells in comparison to 50 and 100 nm. Such
results indicate that the surface nanostructure of an implant is an important factor for surface
cell adhesion and growth. In line with this result, Zhao and co-workers(2013) observed 30
nm-diameter TiO2 nanotubes promotes the spread of BM-MSC into polygonal osteoblastic
shape. The TiO2 nanotubes samples promote osteogenesis in absence of an extra osteogenic
agent. A 30 nm-diameter TiO2 nanotubes also generates big nodular alkaline phosphatase
(ALP) product and induce extracellular matrix (ECM) mineralization. However, Zhao et al.,
(2012) reported 80 nm-diameters of TiO2 nanotubes give best ability to simultaneously
promote MSC proliferation and osteogenic differentiation simultaneously. In 2011, Choe has
demonstrated that 50 nm-inner diameter of TiO2 nanotubes provided good osseointegration
such as cell proliferation, migration and differentiation (Choe et al., 2011). It has been
suggested that surface treatment with nanotubular TiO2 surface enhanced the early osteoblast
79 | P a g e
response, such as cell spreading and cytokine release, which is an important factor for
subsequent cell functions and bone healing in vivo (Yang et al., 2008a). It has also been
demonstrated that nanotopography provided nanoscale cue that facilitate cellular probing, cell
sensing if more actin cytoskeletal filaments formed lamellipodia and locomotive
morphologies (Brammer et al., 2011b). Park’s group also showed that adhesion, spreading,
growth and differentiation of MSC are critically dependent on the tube inner diameter (Park
et al., 2007). Spacing between 15 – 30 nm provided an effective length scale for accelerated
integrin clustering/focal contact formation and strongly enhanced cellular activities compared
to smooth TiO2 surfaces. Cell adhesion and spreading were severely impaired on nanotube
layers with tube diameter larger than 50 nm resulting reduced cellular activity and
experienced programmed cell death. The cell function altered if the inner diameter of TiO2
nanotubes were less than 30 nm and more than 50 nm. The above-mentioned findings are
valid generally for the cell response to different topographical nano rough surface and have
an important impact on the design and composition of implant surfaces (Gongadze et al.,
2011). Since the result obtained is moreover similar (Figure: 4&5) to the above works rat
BM-MSC had proliferated and differentiated in the nanotubular modified LAM-Cp-Ti.
.
3.8.2.1. Effect of electrolyte, Voltage and time in formation of nanotubes
According to past studies the mechanism of nanostructured titanium oxides in terms
of different anodizing conditions have a competitive reaction between the combination of
electrolyte used and the ratios in which it is optimised, which provides different levels of
incorporation of anions in the formed oxide (Ercan et al., 2011; Kalbacova et al., 2008) .This
is thought to be due to the relatively aggressive nature of the water based electrolyte and the
high dissolution rates. The main observation (Figure :6) that was found in this study is that
the topography of the nanotubes such as tube lengths (L), Diameter and type of structure
80 | P a g e
produced for a certain time and at a specific voltage showed variations in the same LAM-Cp-
Ti samples. In general, it is found that the porosity and the pore size increased with increasing
voltage. The nonporous titanium layers were detectable at voltage values of 10 V and 20 V
even though there is a variation on length and diameter formed. The surface morphology in
the LAM-Cp-Ti formed with 20V had a distinct porous structure in comparison to other
processed at lower voltage of 10 V.
By analysing the FESEM and ESEM images of the nanotubular modified LAM-Cp-
Ti discs, it is evident that nano tubes are formed on the surface of the discs during
anodisation process. The present study also shows similar data, maximum length nanotubes
have obtained is limited to100 nm to 400 nm and diameter ranges from 50 nm to 130 nm.The
ESEM images clearly shows the cylindrical Titanium oxide nanotubes formed with different
lengths and diameter. It has been found in the study that the morphology of titanium oxide
nanotubes formed upon the selected electrochemical conditions have long round edged
cylindrical nature in LAM-Cp-Ti, when compared with CpTi that shows hexagonal edged
cylindrical nanotubes
3.8.3. Simvastatin drug loading and elution studies
In this study, we demonstrated that Simvastatin can be loaded and eluted from nanotubes
successfully with a particular pattern of drug release mechanism. Simvastatin -loaded porous
LAM-CpTi surface potently increased level of gene expression of osteopontin and type I
collagen in rat BM-MSC cells.
When Simvastatin of amount 200µg used in each well carrying single nanotube modified LAM-Cp-Ti
discs along with negative control of nanotubes modified LAM-Cp-Ti discs in 200µg of ethanol was .The
entrapment was found to be about 50% but not more than that. First of all, the study clearly shows the
nanotubes can effectively entrap the Simvastatin drug molecules. Further, nanotubes have
81 | P a g e
large inner volumes that can allow for loading about 100µg of drug ensuring the increase in
the surface area. Moreover, nanotubes have open ends which can increase drug loading
efficiency. The result also shows that the ethanol was fully evaporated during the drug
incorporation process using the vacuum pump while the Simvastatin was remained in the
nanotubes. The average amount of discs showed the weight variation of 0.0001g.which
proves the maximum intake capacity of the discs. Last, but not the least, nanotubes have
separated inner and outer surfaces, which can be differentially functionalized to load desired
molecules inside, but impart chemical features to the outer surface allowing for site-specific
drug delivery. The above observations that obtained are similar to the work done by
Gulatietal.,(2012).
3.8.3.1.Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) Analysis
FTIR Spectroscopy was used to study the presence and concentration of Simvastatin
in stock solution, in the loading volume and in the eluted samples. Stock solution prepared by
dissolving 1 mg of Simvastatin 1ml of ethanol and elution sample of Simvastatin loaded
nanotubular modified LAM-Cp-Ti Discs in ethanol. The possibility of any interaction
between nanotubes and Simvastatin causing any denaturation of the drug. The FTIR result
shows that there is no denaturation or any chemical changes occurring in the drug when
Simvastatin was incorporated within the nanotubes. By the FTIR analysis it is evident that the
drug has been eluted outside. Titanium nanotubes are hydrophilic in nature while
Simvastatin is hydrophobic, this characteristic can make the intake of drug into the Titanium
nanotube arrays difficult. But by analysing the so far received results the presence of
Simvastatin and elution of the Simvastatin by the NT-LAM-Cp-Ti is accurately seen in this
experimental study. Earlier literatures also show that Simvastatin molecules will move from
the high concentration area to low concentration area. Therefore, we will achieve the goals to
82 | P a g e
filling the Simvastatin into the TiO2 nanotubes . The result (Figure: 7, 8 &9) that we obtained
was more over similar to the works done by Cochran et.al.,(2002) and Ayukawa et.al.,(2004).
3.8.3.2. The morphology of the Simvastatin loaded NT-LAM-Cp-Ti
The ESEM analysis (Figure:10&11) showed that the disc morphology will not change
when the drug is loaded and eluted. The nanotubular structures formed on the surface remain
at the same state without any further degradation or other damages. By analysing the data
obtained with the similar results shown in the studies conducted by Cochran et.al. (2002) and
Ayukawa et.al,(2004) it is evident that the nanotubes formed on LAM-Cp-Ti remains solid
and strong during the drug intake and eluting periods making it an ideal drug delivery
vehicle.
3.8.3.3. UV-Spectroscopy analysis of drug elution
In NT-LAM-Cp-Ti loaded with 200µg of Simvastatin solution, A release of
around 30µg was detected in 24 hours, followed by a steady release of the incorporated drug
was released in the first 3 days, respectively. During the fourth, fifth and sixth days the
release of drug were similar to each other but greater than the past three days. After sixth day
the release became less till eight and increased during the ninth and moreover remained
similar till fifteenth day (Figure: 12). A total cumulative release (Figure: 13) of 40µg was
detected in total of 15 days except the increased release found during the first hour after drug
loading was done. By analysing the elution data the burst release is very high but the drug
have a steady pattern of release during the whole 15 days.
3.8.4. In-vitro cell culture studies
3.8.4.1. Culture of rat BM-MSC
Visual assessment of cultures showed that the BM-MSC’s are bigger in size and more
heterogeneous shape-wise which proves that the cultured cells were healthy. The gradual
83 | P a g e
change of cell morphology and proliferation was observed during each passage attaining
100% confluency during the passage 3 showing the rate of proliferation of rat BM-MSC
which seemed similar studies conducted by Park.et.al.(2012).Consistent with previous
research conducted with human bone-marrow-derived cells by Colter.et.al. (2001) and
Sekiya.et.al.(2002) this study (Figure:14) also shows that the morphologies of rat MSCs
from mesenchymal tissues are heterogeneous, with large colonies consisting of small
spindle-shaped cells, and small colonies comprising large polygonal cells.
Previous work by Lavenus et al.(2010) showed that the differentiation may cause
changes in cell shape, several studies have noted that cell morphology can also alter the
differentiation of mesenchymal lineage and the round cells promote adipogenesis while cells
with high spreading prefer an osteoblast fate. These studies demonstrated that mechanical
cues embodied in cell shape, cytoskeletal tension and RhoA signalling are integral to the
commitment of stem cell fate as by Lavenus et al.( 2010). In our work, also rat BM-MSCs
spread considerably with a wide spread spindle shaped morphology on LAM-CpTi as well as
in the nanotubes modified CpTi and also showed increase in the contractility of the
cytoskeleton which can lead to the preferential osteoblastic differentiation. Similarly, in
previous works, it has been shown that the round shape induces low contractibility resulting
in adipocyte differentiation of MSCs as by Kilian et al. (2010) which was not fing in the
culture. The spindle morphology was retained by the rat BM-MSC . In our study, the LAM-
CpTi and nanostructure modified surface showed spindle shaped morphology of BM-MSC
that may promote osteogenic differentiation.
3.8.4.2. Characterisation of Rat Bone Marrow Mesenchymal stem cells
The general strategy for identifying in vitro cultivated rat BM-MSCs is to analyze the
expressions of cell-surface markers such as CD90 and CD105 which was explained in detail
in the studies conducted by Donzelli et al.(2007), Yu et al. (2007) and De Macedo Braga et
84 | P a g e
al. (2008). In order to determine the stemness of the isolated r rat BM-MSC in our study,
cultures were analyzed for panel of cell surface markers by immunofluresence staining.
Immunocytochemistry results showed that the BM-MSC were positive for stem cell
markers and showed typical in vitro MSC properties. Mesenchymal stem cells showed a
positive expression for both CD90 (Figure:15), CD105 (Figure:16). BM-MSC showed
CD105 positive staining throughout the cell surface, but the strongest staining was detected
near the nucleus. These results are in agreement with the expected phenotypic characteristics
presented by mesenchymal stem cells in the above mentioned studies conducted prior and
confirm that the plastic-adherent, self-renewing cells in the cultures we used are stem-like
cells.
The cytoskeleton plays important roles in cell morphology, adhesion, growth, and
signalling. Changes in the cytoskeleton of the cell allow the cell to migrate, divide, and
maintain its shape as described in the work of Stossel (1993) and Hayakawa.et.al (2001)
explained that the cytoskeleton responds to external mechanical stimuli. Wakatsuki.et.al
(2001) Defined that the cytoskeleton actin filaments can be bundled and cross linked by
several actin-binding proteins in a network and are anchored to stable structures, or anchor
sites, in the cell (such as the plasma membrane). In this study also the fixed rat BM-MSC
showed prominent cytoskeletal structures of βactin filaments. Immunofluorescence staining
showed (Figure: 17) actin cytoskeleton organization with highly dynamic network composed
of actin polymers .DAPI stain showed the predominant nucleus on cells. Both temporally and
spatially arranged actin filaments are identified with orientational distribution of actin
filaments within a cell and no disruptional formations of cytoskeltal actin filaments were
identified.
85 | P a g e
3.8.4.3. Cytocompatability analysis
It has previously been found that the cytoskeleton may affect the differentiation of
cells. Mallein.et.al (1991)and Spiegelman.et.al(1983) the rat BM-MSC grown on the NT-
LAM-Cp-TI showed prominent cytoskeletal structures of actin filaments in βactin- DAPI
staining. Immunofluorescence staining showed (Figure:25) actin cytoskeleton organization
with highly dynamic network composed of actin polymers. DAPI stain showed the
predominant nucleus on cells. Both temporally and spatially arranged actin filaments are
identified with orientational distribution of actin filaments within a cell and no disruptional
formations of cytoskeleton actin filaments was identified. Cells are seen in large numbers and
small in size throughout the disc surface which shows connection with the results from Oh
et al.(2009) that NTs induce larger cell numbers in the surface.
Micro- and nanotopography has been documented to increase cellular signalling,
adhesion, viability and proliferation of most cell types as studied by Martinez.et.al(2009),
Bettinger.et.al(2009), and Miller.et.al (2009). Porous three-dimensional structure were
studied intensively to understand whether it favours cytocompatability including cell
adhesion, proliferation and viability in previous literatures including Weinad.et.al(2006),
Marcacci.et.al (2007), Gan.et.al (2008), . Materials tested in the current work have
demonstrated an excellent cytocompatibility. BM-MSC can be isolated from several sources
and display multilineage differentiation ability that includes osteoblastic differentiation.
Apart from this property, they display an established immunophenotype and are in vitro
expanded based on their property of adherence to plastic surfaces pattern is explained in the
works of Dominici.et.al(2006), Barry (2004). Most studies published to date in this setting
are focussed on bone repair by combination of progenitor cells with several biomaterials,
especially calcium phosphate compounds based on their similarities with the mineral bone
86 | P a g e
phase and their resorbability. The few works that explore interactions of titanium with MSC
are mainly centred on assessing the effects on the structural architecture, especially the
surface as previously recorded by Sjostrom.et.al.(2009), Stiehler.et.al.(2008),
Zhou.et.al(2008).The results (Figure: 19&20) showed that the interaction between cells and
implants is an important focus of research into the biocompatibility of that biomaterial. The
interaction and adhesion of mesenchymal stem cells to the marginal surface of LAM-Cp-Ti
showed the positive biocompatibility nature of the test material and proving its potency in
cell adhesion and proliferation properties. The Cells must interact with the surface of the
biomaterial, including adhering, extending, migrating, differentiating and proliferating.
Adhesion to a material, including metal, can affect the proliferation and differentiation of
cells. The interaction between mesenchymal stem cells and the metallic material depends
largely on the surface properties of the material, which include the geometric structure,
porosity and chemistry. Thus the LAM-Cp-Ti has a three-dimensional structure and
interconnected pores of sufficient size, which is beneficial for bone cell adhesion and
migration, and thus, appropriate for osteogenesis.
A few protrusions (Figure: 21) grew adherently on the surface of the discs joining the
two marginal regions of the macro pores and within the macro pores. The cell stretched,
lengthened and extended pseudopodia gradually was identified revealing the adherence
nature of BM-MSC on the LAM-Cp-Ti discs. The process of adjacent cells connected with
each other across the pores was clearly visible. The BM-MSC also showed flakes like
processes extending into the adjacent surroundings. In some of the specific areas cells on the
surface and in the pores had grown into multiple layers, secreting matrix and covering the
surface completely.
Previous studies reveal that Rat bone marrow-derived MSC isolated in various
laboratories around the world share at least two characteristics; (1) BM-MSCs can grow over
87 | P a g e
a long period of time (a process known as long-term self renewal). (2) In response to
appropriate stimuli, BM-MSCs can differentiate into mesodermal lineage cells including
osteoblasts (Lorenzi et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2008), chondrocytes (Ahmed et al. 2006; Peng
et al. 2008), muscle cells (Wakitani et al. 1995), adipocytes (Lorenzi et al. 2008; Peng et al.
2008), and tenocytes (Hoffmann and Gross 2007).In this work also the differentiation
potential of rat BM-MSC showed similar result (Figure:22,23&24) when osteogenic and
adipogenic staining was done.
Requirements for ideal biomaterials for orthopaedic implants include excellent
mechanical properties, a porous structure and the capacity to support in growth of the host
cell or tissue. Compared with other metallic materials, porous LAM-Cp-Ti is stable and has a
higher porosity, larger pore size and a low elastic modulus. By the ESEM analysis of the
adhesion property of the mesenchymal stem cell in the porous region and surface of LAM-
Cp-Ti indicated that the MSC were able to adhere, grow and proliferate in the pores of the
material and the surface and the pores of the porous LAM-Cp-Ti discs were fully covered
with rat BM-MSC. Porous LAM-Cp-Ti has a high porosity (0%–60%) and is able to induce
the development of BM-MSC and its growth inside its pores. These results also further
confirm that porous LAM-Cp-Ti promotes the adhesion, proliferation of mesenchymal stem
cells and may be able to induce stem cells for differentiation into osteoblasts
To determine the effectiveness on the surface modified nanotubes on LAM-Cp-Ti in
the proliferation, Adhesion and viability (Figure: 26) of BM-MSC cultured on them. An
effective experiment was done using BM-MSC on nanotubular surface. Experiments to
ascertain BM-MSC interaction with the disc samples were completed on days 7th day after
initial seeding of the cells. MSC nuclear, cytoplasmic and skeletal structures were stained by
cytoskeletal staining. Cellular viability was determined through the live dead assay. MSC
adhesion and morphology was observed through the employment of ESEM (Figure :27). The
88 | P a g e
Rat BM-MSC grown on the NT-LAM-Cp-TI showed prominent cytoskeletal structures of
actin filaments in β –actin- DAPI staining. Immunofluorescence staining showed actin
cytoskeleton organization with highly dynamic network composed of actin polymers .DAPI
stain showed the predominant nucleus on cells. Both temporally and spatially arranged actin
filaments are identified with Orientational distribution of actin filaments within a BM-MSC
and no disruptional formations of cytoskeleton actin filaments was identified. BM-MSC are
seen in large numbers and small in size throughout the disc surface and live dead assay
showed high rate of cell viability on the NT-LAM-Cp-TI.and seemed to be proliferating.
Some concentrations of cells can be spotted in specific areas of the disc the proliferation,
Adhesion and viability of BM-MSC cultured on them. Oh et al. And Popat. et al. Reported
that the filopodia of cell extensions were protruding into the nanotubular architecture using
different cell types. According to these research findings, it is possible to consider that the
TNT may constitute the attractant for the filopodia facilitating BM-MSC attachment. Which
is also found in this study (Figure: 29)Moreover, the ESEM data showed that the nanotubular
structure facilitates adhesion and proliferation of BM-MSC. The result more over combines
the biocompatibility of the modified NT-LAM-Cp-Ti.
3.8.4.4. Osteogenic studies
ALP is commonly used as a biochemical marker to assess osteoblast activity, using p-
nitro phenyl phosphatase (pNPP) as substrate. The hydrolysis of phosphate esters is catalyzed
by ALP under alkaline pH conditions. A coloured yellow end product, p-nitro phenol, is
optically measured at 405 nm wavelength as explained in studies conducted by Bessey,
Lowry et al. (1946), Sabokbar, Millett et al. (1994), and Akcakaya, Aroymak et al. (2007). In
contrast, the mineralization process is considered “a functional in vitro endpoint reflecting
advanced cell differentiation” as explained by Hoemann, El-Gabalawy et al. (2009). Alizarin
red staining is used to detect calcium deposition and Von Kossa staining indicates phosphate
89 | P a g e
deposition within the mineralized matrix has been provided in detailed in the results of
previous works by Henrichsen (1956), and Puchtler, Meloan et al. (1969). As expected
when the special staining was done using, Alizarin red (Figure : 30-32) , Masson’s Trichome
(Figure : 33-35) and Von Kossa (Figure:36-38).Von Kossa and Alizarin Red identified the
presence of calcium deposits starting from the day 7 itself even though the rate of calcium
deposits were far less compared to the positive control, gradual change and increase in the
calcium deposition was found from 7 towards the 21st day. Collagen deposition was detected
in an average basis by using Masson’s Trichrome staining during the 7th, 14th and 21st day
respectively.ALP activity increases (Figure: 39) over time in confluent monolayer Mac cell
cultures along with the LAM-Cp-Titanium. when compared with the negative and positive
control the alkaline phosphatise produced during the 7th, 14th and 21st day is comparatively
higher showing a positive result.MSC develop increasing ALP activity in the presence of
LAM-Cp-Titanium shows the stimulatory effect of the discs in the medium without
producing any inhibition for the ALP activity. The progression of ALP activity can be seen
from 7th to 21st day during the 14th day a slight decrease is detected with an increase in the
following 21st day. It clearly shows the events in a three-week osteogenesis assay can be
promoted or inhibited by a variety of biomaterials, hormones, cytokines, or pharmacological
agents at key developmental stages and here the LAM-Cp-Ti promoted ALP activity during
the period of osteogenesis. The progression of events in a three-week osteogenesis assay can
be promoted or inhibited by a variety of biomaterials, hormones, cytokines, or
pharmacological agents at key developmental stages. The Alp activity assay and the
osteogenic staining show that the LAM-Cp-Ti can induce osteogenic potential in BM-MSC.
3.8.4.5. Gene expression studies
Osteogenic differentiation of MSCs use transcriptional analyses of specific
osteoblastic genes including Cbfa1/Runx2, Col I, OSN, OC, OPN and ALP was specified in
90 | P a g e
previous literature like Jaiswal, Haynesworth et al. (1997) and Carpenter, Goodrich et al.
(2010).Early works done on this specific gene studies provided results that, Osteocalcin, the
bone-specific glycoprotein that binds calcium and may promote calcification of the bone
matrix has been used as a late marker for osteogenic differentiation (Ho et al. 2006; Donzelli
et al. 2007; Tseng et al. 2007). Osteopontin, synthesized by bone forming cells is also a
phosphoprotein that possesses several calcium-binding domains and is associated with cell
attachment, proliferation, and mineralization of extracellular matrix into bone (Donzelli et al.
2007). Osteonectin, one of the important non-collagen proteins is related to mineralization at
the early stage of tooth and bone formation. All together, these proteins are considered as
lineage-specific markers of osteoblastic differentiation. It has been shown by quantitative RT-
PCR analysis that osteocalcin (Eslaminejad et al. 2007; Hayashi et al. 2008) and osteopontin
(Eslaminejad et al. 2007) were produced in culture of the rat BM-MSCs in the absence of
osteogenic supplements. These data strengthens our immunohistochemical observations with
rat BM-MSCs which were positive for osteocalcin and osteopontin. However, contradictory
to our findings and the findings of supporting data, rat BM-MSCs were reported to be
osteocalcin non-expressers (Yang et al. 2007). In conclusion, it may be true to speculate that
rat BM-MSCs have diverse immunophenotypic characteristics that can explain why these
cells can easily differentiate into cells of the bone tissue. Zhang et al. (2008) examined the
level of collagen type I mRNA in rat BM-MSCs and reported an increase in the expression of
collagen type I mRNA after 12-h stretching in comparison to the control group (Zhang et al.
2008). This result agrees with observation of expression of type I collagen in rat BM-MSCs
and explains the reasoning behind the differentiation of rat BM-MSCs into tendon cells or
ligament fibroblasts (Hoffmann and Gross 2007).
91 | P a g e
In the result obtained, rat BM-MSC cultured on nanotubes modified disc and
Simvastatin eluting discs showed variation on the intensity of gene expressed when collected
in 7th and 14th day (Figure :40) . There was a high increase in the OPN and COL1 gene
expression on the 14th day (Figure: 42)on the nanotube modified disc when compared with
the gene expression viewed in the positive control (Induction medium). In the case of
Simvastatin loaded nanotube modified disc the gene expression was high in the case of OPN
as well as COL1. Regardless of the specific reason(s) for the osteogenic potential of
Simvastatin loaded and nanotububular structure modified LAM-CpTi on rat BM-MSCs, the
molecular basis for this finding is clearly evident from the results of these experiments.
Runx2 down -regulation and transcriptional activity are required for osteogenesis, as has
been compellingly demonstrated in murine gene deletion models by Komori, Yagi et al.
(1997), Nakashima, Zhou et al. (2002) and Zhou, Zhang et al. (2010). Their works showed
that Runx2 will be significantly down -regulated in BM- MSC cultures maintained in
osteogenic medium. The intimate action mechanism of statins in inducing bone formation is
not fully understood. The osteoblast-differentiating effect may be explained by a BMP2
mediated action as described by Mundy et al. (1999). Alternatively, in osteoblast-like
MC3T3-E1 cells some studies have shown that Simvastatin induces phosphorylation of
mitogen-activated-protein (MAP) kinase through the heat shock protein 27 (HSP-27) by
Wang et al., (2003)
Our findings were similar to some earlier reports on the osteogenic effects of simvatatins
(Figure: 41). Mundy et al.(1999) first reported the bone anabolic effect of Simvastatin both in
vivo and in vitro. Subsequent in vitro studies described by Li.et.al (2003), Song.et.al.(2003)
and Ruiz.et.al(2007) showed the stimulation of osteogenic differentiation and concurrent
inhibition of adipogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal cells by Simvastatin.
92 | P a g e
Furthermore, studies done by Maeda.et.al.(2004) confirmed that Simvastatin could potently
induce mRNAs encoding osteoblast differentiation markers such as, type I collagen, bone
sialoprotein, and osteopontin. Ayukawa et al. (2004) found that the administration of
Simvastatin increased the value of both bone contact ratio to the implant and bone density
and suggested that this drug might have the potential to improve the nature of
osseointegration. The intimate action mechanisms of the stimulatory effect of Simvastatin on
bone formation have not been fully defined in the work of Horiuchi.et.al. (2006) .Maeda et
al.(2001) demonstrated that Simvastatin induced synthesis of differentiation markers that are
the characteristic of late osteoblast stages. Which clearly defines the result of the COL1 and
OPN gene expression shown by Simvastatin loaded LAM-CpTi discs during the work.
93 | P a g e
Summary and conclusion
4.1. Summary
Anodization process done resulted in the formation of Titanium nanotubes on the
surfaces of LAM-Cp-Ti. The Surface characterization studies revealed the topography,
structure, and characteristic features of the nanotubes formed. The Simvastatin loading
carried out by dip coating method and vacuum drying process was successful resulted in the
incorporation of the drug into the nanotubes. FTIR analysis revealed Simvastatin on the
LAM-Cp-Ti surface and denaturing of the drug was not found. Elution studies revealed stable
release of Simvastatin continuously over a period of 15 days. Isolation and culture of rat
Bone marrow MSC is done and sub cultured effectively throughout the studies. MTT assay of
Bone marrow MSC using LAM-Cp-Ti and Simvastatin was done which revealed the
noncytotoxic nature of both the materials. High viability was shown by the cells in Live-
dead staining of BM-MSC on NT-LAM-Cp-Ti Characterization of Rat BM-MSC is done by
phalloidin-FITC, CD90 and CD105 immunofluresence staining revealed positive results.
Multilineage differentiation was shown by BM-MSC in staining. ESEM analysis provided
evidence for the Cell adhesion. Osteogenic study was evaluated by alkaline phosphatise
assay and osteogenic staining by Alizarin Red ,Vonkossa and Trichome gave much evidence
on the osteogenic induction potential of LAM-Cp-Ti followed by major osteogenic gene
expression viz., osteocalcin, osteopontin, collagen and Runx2.
Osteogenic Gene expression study shows the positive results in the induction of genes
by LAM-Cp-Ti. For osteogenesis to occur a sequence of genes needs to be activated in the
correct order to permit proliferation and differentiation. Three principal development periods
(proliferation, ECM maturation and mineralization) have been defined by the sequential
expression of the genes associated with each phase. In this progression cell cycle and growth
94 | P a g e
genes (i.e., c-fos and/or c-myc) are down regulated to end proliferation and this is followed
by the process of differentiation, with expression of genes encoding ECM proteins that
prepare the matrix for mineralization. Hence, to study growth, osteogenic gene expression by
LAM-Cp-Ti , and the modified nanotubular surface and the drug effect on the Rat BM-MSC
.Rat BM-MSC cultured on nanotopography modified disc was collected in 7 and 21 days
respectively ,the transcription factors RUNX2 , the extracellular maturation proteins ,
osteopontin (OPN) and osteocalcin (OCN) and the main ostegenic indicator COL-1 and
housekeeping gene GAPDH were examined at the transcript level over a 7 AND 21 day time
course .In the study there is an up regulation of COL1 ,OPN,OCN in the nanotubular
modified LAM-Cp-Ti, A down regulation of RUNX2 gene extensively and An up regulation
of OPN by Simvastatin drug in the nanotubes of LAM-Cp-Ti. This clearly shows the
osteogenic induction potential of LAM-Cp-Ti and the nanotubular modification of the surface
and the eluting Simvastatin drug.
4.2. Conclusion
The surface modified and Simvastatin drug eluting Laser additive manufactured
Commercially pure Titanium(CpTi) shown osteogenic induction potential on rat bone
marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and can be used in bone tissue engineering
applications in the near future.
4.3. Future aspects
Drug elution studies should be studied in detail to understand the Kinetics and
mechanics of Simvastatin drug delivery from nanotubes.
Polymer –LAM-CpTi composite biomaterial modification for controlled delivery of
Drug
Specific gene expression studies including MMP9, MMP2 to understand in detail about
the cell-material interaction.
95 | P a g e
Reference
1. Ayukawa Y, Okamura A, Koyano K. Simvastatin promotes osteogenesis around titanium
implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:346-50.
2. Boeuf S & Richter W (2010). Chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells: role of tissue source
and inducing factors. Stem Cell Res Ther 1, 31.
3. Bottino MC, Coelho PG, Henriques VA, Higa OZ, Bressiani AH, Bressiani JC (2009)
Processing, characterization, and in vitro/in vivo evaluations of powder metallurgy processed
Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloys. J. biomed. mater. res. A. 88: 689-696.
4. Bottino MC, Coelho PG, Yoshimoto M, König Jr B, Henriques VAR, Bressiani AHA, et al.
(2008) Histomorphologic evaluation of Ti-13Nb-13Zr alloys processed via powder metallurgy.
A study in rabbits. Mat. sci. engin. C. 28: 223-227.
5. Branemark PI. (1983) Osseointegration and its experimental background. J. Prosth. Dent. 50:
399-410.
6. Brentel AS, Vasconcellos LM, Oliveira MV, Graça ML, Vasconcellos LG, Cairo CA,
Carvalho, YC. (2006) Histomorphometric analysis of pure titanium implants with porous
surface versus rough surface. J. appl. oral sci. 14: 213-218.
7. Bretscher A et al. (1994). J Cell Biol 126:821-825.
8. Bruder SP, Kurth AA, Shea M, Hayes WC, Jaiswal N, & Kadiyala S (1998). Bone regeneration
by implantation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 16,
155-162.
9. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium
implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(5):611–9.
10. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface
characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature
pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25(7):889–902.
11. Butler DL, Gooch C, Kinneberg KRC, Boivin GP, Galloway MT, Nirmalanandhan VS, Shearn
JT, Dyment NA, Juncosa-Melvin N (2010) The use of mesenchymal stem cells in collagen-
based scaffolds for tissue-engineered repair of tendons. Nat Protoc 5: 849-863
12. C.M. Kolf, E. Cho, R.S. Tuan (2007) Mesenchymal stromal cells. Biology of adult
mesenchymal stem cells: regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation, Arthritis Res
Ther, 9 , p. 204
13. Chen D, Zhao M, Mundy GR (2004) Bone morphogenetic proteins. Growth Factors 22: 233-
241.
14. Cheng B, Zhao S, Luo J, Sprague E, Bonewald LF, Jiang JX (2001) Expression of functional
gap junctions and regulation by fl uid fl ow in osteocyte-like MLO-Y4 cells. J Bone Miner Res
16: 249-259.
15. Chu CR, Szczodry M, & Bruno S (2010). Animal models for cartilage regeneration and repair.
96 | P a g e
Tissue Eng Part B Rev 16, 105-115.
16. Cochran D , Schenk R, Lussi A, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and
loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the
canine mandible. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1998; 40: 1-11.
17. Colter DC, Class R, DiGirolamo CM, Prockop DJ (2000) Rapid expansion of recycling stem
cells in cultures of plastic-adherent cells from human bone marrow. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97:3213–3218
18. Colter DC, Sekiya I, Prockop DJ (2001) Identification of a subpopulation of rapidly self-
renewing and multipotential adult stem cells in colonies of human marrow stromal cells. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7841–7845
19. Curtis ASG, Casey B, Gallagher JO, Pasqui D, Wood MA, Wilkinson CDW (2001) Substratum
nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of
nanotopography important? Biophys Chem 94: 275-283
20. D. Dunand (2004)Processing of titanium foams Adv. Eng. Mater., 6, pp. 369–376
21. D.L. Cochran, D. Buser, C.M. ten Bruggenkate, D. Weingart, T.M. Taylor and J.P. Bernard
(2002),JP: Clin. Oral Implants Res. 13p. 144.
22. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Herzyk P, Sutherland D, Agheli H, Wilkinson CD, Curtis AS (2007b)
Nanomechanotransduction and Interphase Nuclear Organization infl uence on genomic control.
J Cell Biochem 102: 1234-1244.
23. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC (2006a) Osteoprogenitor
response to defi ned topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 27: 1306-1315
24. De Bari C, Dell'Accio F, Tylzanowski P, & Luyten FP (2001). Multipotent mesenchymal stem
cells from adult human synovial membrane. Arthritis Rheum 44, 1928-1942.
25. De Bari C, Dell'Accio F, Vanlauwe J, Eyckmans J, Khan IM, Archer CW, Jones EA,
McGonagle D, Mitsiadis TA, Pitzalis C, & Luyten FP (2006). Mesenchymal multipotency of
adult human periosteal cells demonstrated by single-cell lineage analysis. Arthritis Rheum 54,
1209-1221.
26. Devas MB (1967). Shin splints, or stress fractures of the metacarpal bone in horses, and shin
soreness, or stress fractures of the tibia, in man. J Bone Joint Surg Br 49, 310-313.
27. Dominici M, Le BK, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A,
Prockop D, & Horwitz E (2006). Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal
stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8,
315-317.
28. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R,
Keating A, Prockop D, Horwitz E (2006) Minimal criteria for defi ning multipotent
mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement.
Cytotherapy 8: 315- 317.
29. Donahue H. (2000) Gap junctions and biophysical regulation of bone cell differentiation. Bone
26: 417-422. Doty SB (1981) Morphological evidence of gap junctions between bone cells.
Calcif Tissue Int 33: 509- 512.
97 | P a g e
30. Donzelli E, Salvade` A, Mimo P, Vigano` M, Morrone M, Papagna R, Carini F, Zaopo A,
Miloso M, Baldoni M, Tredici G (2007) Mesenchymal stem cells cultured on a collagen
scaffold: in vitro osteogenic differentiation. Arch Oral Biol 52:64–73
31. Dubreuil RR. (1991). BioEssays 13:219-226.
32. Ducy P, Zhang R, Geoffroy V, Ridall AL, Karsenty G (1997) Osf2/Cbfa1: a transcriptional
activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell 89: 747-754
33. Ducy, P., Zhang, R., Geoffroy, V., Ridall, A.L., and Karsenty, G. (1997). Osf2/Cbfa1: a
transcriptional activator of osteoblast differentiation. Cell 89,747P754
34. Eslaminejad MB, Mirzadeh H, Mohamadi Y, Nickmahzar A (2007) Bone differentiation of
marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells using beta-tricalcium phosphate–alginate–gelatin
hybrid scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1:417–424
35. F. Yang, S.F. Zhao and F. Zhang: (2011), Med. Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111p.551.
36. Faria PEP, Carvalho AL, Felipucci DNB, Wen C, Sennerby L, Salata LA. (2010) Bone
formation following implantation of titanium sponge rods into humeral osteotomies in dogs: a
histological and histometrical study. Clin. implant dent. rel. res. 12: 72-79.
37. Frosch KH, Barvencik F, Lohmann CH, Viereck V, Siggelkow H, Breme J, Dresing K, Stürmer
KM. (2002) Migration, matrix production and lamellar bone formation of human osteoblast-like
cells in porous titanium implants. Cell tis. org. 170: 214-227.
38. G. Mundy, R. Garrett, S. Harris, J. Chan, D. Chen, G. Rossini, B. Boyce, M. Zhao and G.
Gutierrez: (1999), Science 286p. 1946.
39. Gotfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjorting-Hansen E. Anchorage of
TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed
Mater Res 1995;29(10):1223–31.
40. Grossner-Schreiber B, Herzog M, Hedderich J, Duck A, Hannig M, Griepentrog M. Focal
adhesion contact formation by fibroblasts cultured on surface-modified dental implants: an in
vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(6):736–45.
41. Guvendiren M, Burdick JA. The control of stem cell morphology and differentiation by
hydrogel surface wrinkles. Biomaterials 2010;31:6511e8.
42. H.N.G. Wadley(2002) Cellular metals manufacturing Adv. Eng. Mater., 4 , pp. 726–733
43. Hamidouche Z, Fromigue O, Ringe J, Haupl T, Vaudin P, Pages JC, Srouji S, Livne E, Marie PJ
(2009) Priming integrin α5 promotes human mesenchymal stromal cell osteoblast differentiation
and osteogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 18587-18591
44. Hayashi O, Katsube Y, Hirose M, Ohgushi H, Ito H (2008) Comparison of osteogenic ability of
rat mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow periosteum and adipose tissue. Calcif Tissue Int
822:38–47
45. Ho M, Yu D, Davidsion MC, Silva GA (2006) Comparison of standard surface chemistries for
culturing mesenchymal stem cells prior to neural differentiation. Biomaterials 27:4333–4339
46. Hoffmann A, Gross G (2007) Tendon and ligament engineering in the adult organism:
mesenchymal stem cells and gene-therapeutic approaches. Int Orthop 31:791–797
98 | P a g e
47. Horwitz EM, Prockop DJ, Fitzpatrick LA, Koo WW, Gordon PL, Neel M, Sussman M, Orchard
P, Marx JC, Pyeritz RE, & Brenner MK (1999). Transplantability and therapeutic effects of
bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med 5,
309-313.
48. Hwang R, Lee EJ, Kim MH, Li SZ, Jin YJ, Rhee Y, et al. Calcyclin, a Ca2_ ion– binding
protein, contributes to the anabolic effects of simvastatin on bone. J Biol Chem
2004;279:21239-47.
49. Im GI, Shin YW, & Lee KB (2005). Do adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have the
same osteogenic and chondrogenic potential as bone marrow-derived cells? Osteoarthritis
Cartilage 13, 845-853.
50. Jorge R. Vega et al. (2008) Arthroscopic Fixation of Displaced Tibial Eminence Fractures: A
New Growth Plate–Sparing Method. j.arthro.2008.07.007
51. K. Gulati, S. Ramakrishnan, M. S. Aw, G. J. Atkins, D. M. Findlay, and D. Losic, (2012)
Biocompatible polymer coating of titania nanotube arrays for improved drug elution and
osteoblast adhesion. Acta Biomater. 8, 449
52. Kalbacova, M.; Macak, J. M.; S.-Stein, F.; Mierke, C. T.; Schmuki, (2008), P. TiO2 Nanotubes:
Photocatalyst for Cancer Cell Killing, Phys. Stat. Sol. 4, 194–196.
53. Kassis I, Zangi L, Rivkin R, Levdansky L, Samuel S, Marx G, & Gorodetsky R (2006).
Isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from G-CSF-mobilized human peripheral blood using
fibrin microbeads. Bone Marrow Transplant 37, 967-976
54. Komori, T., Yagi, H., Nomura, S., Yamaguchi, A., Sasaki, K., Deguchi, K., Shimizu,
Y.,Bronson,R.T.,Gao,Y.H.,Inada,M.,etal.(1997).Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a
complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 89,
755P764.
55. Kujala S, Ryhänen J, Danilov A, Tuukkanen J. (2003) Effect of porosity on theosteointegration
and bone ingrowth of a weight-bearing nickel-titanium bone graft substitute. Biomaterials. 24:
4691-4697.
56. Laufs U, Fata VL, Liao JK. Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase
blocks hypoxia-mediated downregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Biol Chem
1997;272:31725-9.
57. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y (2007) Surface treatments of titanium
dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 23: 844-854
58. Li X, Cui Q, Kao C, Wang GJ, Balian G. Lovastatin inhibits adipogenic and stimulates
osteogenic differentiation by suppressing PPARgamma2 and increasing Cbfa1/Runx2
expression in bone marrow mesenchymal cell cultures. Bone 2003;33:652-9.
59. Liu YL, Schoenaers J, Groot K, Wijn JR, Schepers E. (2000) Bone healing in porous implants:
a histological and histometrical comparative study on sheep. J mat. sci mat. med. 11: 711-717.
60. Liu,W.,Toyosawa,S.,Furuichi,T.,Kanatani,N.,Yoshida,C.,Liu,Y.,Himeno,M.,Narai,S.,
Yamaguchi, A., and Komori, T. (2001). Overexpression of Cbfa1 in osteoblasts inhibits
osteoblast maturation and causes osteopenia with multiple fractures. J Cell Biol 155, 157P 166.
61. Lorenzi B, Pessina F, Lorenzoni P, Urbani S, Vernillo R, Sgaragli G, Gerli R, Mazzanti B, Bosi
99 | P a g e
A, Saccardi R, Lorenzi M (2008) Treatment of experimental injury of anal sphincters with
primary surgical repair and injection of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Dis
Colon Rectum 51:411–420
62. M. Sugiyama, T. Kodama, K. Konishi, K. Abe, S. Asami and S. Oikawa: (2000), Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Comm.271p.688.
63. Maeda T, Matsunuma A, Kawane T, Horiuchi N. Simvastatin promotes osteoblast
differentiation and mineralization in MC3T3-E1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001;
280:874-7.
64. Maeda T, Matsunuma A, Kurahashi I, Yanagawa T, Yoshida H Horiuchi N. Induction of
osteoblast differentiation indices by statins in MC3T3-E1 cells. J Cell Biochem 2004;92:458-71.
65. Marinucci L, Balloni S, Becchetti E, Bistoni G, Calvi EM, Lumare E, Ederli F, Locci P (2010)
Effects of Hydroxyapatite and Biostite on Osteogenic Induction of hMSC. Ann Biomed Eng 38:
640-648
66. Matsudaira P. (1991). Trends Biochem Sci 16:87-92.
67. Matsudaira P. (1994). Semin Cell Biol 5:165-174.
68. Milner PI, Clegg PD, & Stewart MC (2011). Stem cell-based therapies for bone repair. Vet Clin
North Am Equine Pract 27, 299-314.
69. Mustafa K, Silva Lopez B, Hultenby K, Wennerberg A, Arvidson K. Attachment and
proliferation of human oral fibroblasts to titanium surfaces blasted with TiO2 particles. A
scanning electron microscopic and histomorphometric analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res
1998;9(3):195–207
70. Nishikawa S (2000) Localization of transcription factor AP-1 family proteins in ameloblast
nuclei of the rat incisor. J Histochem Cytochem 48:1511–1520
71. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, Teng D, Engler AJ, Chien S, et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by
altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:2130e5.
72. Oliveira PT, Nanci A. (2004) Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression
of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by curtured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials. 25: 403-413.
73. Otto,F., Thornell, A.P., Crompton, T., Denzel, A., Gilmour, K.C., Rosewell, I.R.,
Stamp,G.W.,Beddington,R.S.,Mundlos,S.,Olsen,B.R.,et.al.(1997).Cbfa1,a candidate gene for
cleidocranial dysplasia syndrome, is essential for osteoblast differentiation and bone
development.Cell 89,765P771.
74. Park CY, et al. (2010) Simultaneous genome-wide inference of physical, genetic, regulatory,
and functional pathway components. PLoS Comput Biol 6(11):e1001009
75. Park, J.T.; Patel, R.; Jeon, H.; Kim, D.J.; Shin, J.-S.; Kim, J.H.(2012) Facile fabrication of
vertically aligned TiO2 nanorods with high density and rutile/anatase phases on transparent
conducting glasses: High efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 6131–6138.
76. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA,
Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human
mesenchymal stem cells.Science. Apr 2; 284(5411):143-7.
100 | P a g e
77. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA,
Simonetti DW, Craig S, & Marshak DR (1999). Multilineage potential of adult human
mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143- 147.
78. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage
potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999; 284:143e7.
79. Pratap, J., Javed, A., Languino, L.R., van Wijnen, A.J., Stein, J.L.,Stein, G.S., and Lian
J.B.(2005).TheRunx2osteogenic transcription factor regulates matrix metalloproteinase 9 in
bone metastatic cancer cells and controls cellinvasion.MolCellBiol 25,8581P8591.
80. R. Singh, P.D. Lee, R. Dashwood, T. Lindley(2010) Titanium foams for biomedical
applications: a review Mater. Technol., 25 , pp. 127–136
81. Rao JY et al. (1990). Cancer Res 50:2215-2220.
82. Ruiz-Gaspa S, Nogues X, Enjuanes A, Monllau JC, Blanch J, Carreras R, et al. Simvastatin and
atorvastatin enhance gene expression of collagen type 1 and osteocalcin in primary human
osteoblasts and MG-63 cultures. J Cell Biochem 2007; 101:1430-8.
83. Sakou T. Bone morphogenetic proteins: from basic studies to clinical approaches. Bone
1998;22:591-603.
84. Sekiya I, Larson BL, Smith JR, Pochampally R, Cui JG, Prockop DJ (2002) Expansion of
human adult stem cells from bone marrow stroma: conditions that maximize the yields of early
progenitors and evaluate their quality. Stem Cells 20:530–541
85. Song C, Guo Z, Ma Q, Chen Z, Liu Z, Jia H, et al. Simvastatin induces osteoblastic
differentiation and inhibits adipocytic differentiation in mouse bone marrow stromal cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;308:458-62.
86. Sudo K, Kanno M, Miharada K, et al.(2007) Mesenchymal progenitors able to differentiate into
osteogenic, chondrogenic, and/or adipogenic cells in vitro are present in most primary
fibroblast-like cell populations.Stem Cells,25:1610–1617.
87. Takemoto M, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Suzuki J, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. (2005) Mechanical
properties and osteoconductivity of porous bioactive titanium. Biomaterials. 26: 6014-6023.
88. Thelen S, Barthelat F, Brinson LC. (2004) Mechanics considerations for microporous titanium
as an orthopedic implant material. J. biomed. mat. res. A. 69: 601-610.
89. Tseng PY, Chen CJ, Sheu CC, Yu CW, Huang YS (2007) Spontaneous differentiation of adult
rat marrow stromal cells in a long-term culture. J Vet Med Sci 69:95–102
90. Vasconcellos LM, Oliveira MV, Graça ML, Vasconcellos LG, Cairo CAA, Carvalho YR.
(2008(a)) Design of dental implants, influence on the osteogenesis and fixation. J. mat. sci.: mat.
med. 19: 2851-2857.
91. Vasconcellos LM, Oliveira MV, Graça MLA, Vasconcellos LGO, Cairo CAA, Carvalho YR.
(2008(b)) Porous titanium scaffolds produced by powder metallurgy for biomedical
applications. Mat. res. 11: 275-280.
92. Wazen RM, Lefevre L-P, Baril E, Nanci A (2010) Initial evaluation of bone ingrowth into a
novel porous titanium coating. J. biomed. mat. res. B: applied biomat. 94: 64-71.
93. Wen CE, Yamada Y, Shimojima K, Chino Y, Asahina T, Mabuchi M. (2002) Processing and
101 | P a g e
mechanical properties of autogenous titanium implant materials. J. mat. sci. mat. med. 13: 397-
401.
94. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and
grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and
surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17(1):15–22
95. Y. Ayukawa, A. Okamura and K. Koyano: Clin. Oral Impl. 15(2004), p. 346.
96. Yang Y, Kusano K, Frei H, Rossi F, Brunette DM, Putnins EE. Microtopographical regulation
of adult bone marrow progenitor cells chondrogenic and osteogenic gene and protein
expressions. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;95: 294e304.
97. Yang Y, Rossi FM, Putnins EE (2007) Ex vivo expansion of rat bone marrow mesenchymal
stromal cells on microcarrier beads in spin culture. Biomaterials 28:3110–3120
98. Yen BL, Huang HI, Chien CC, Jui HY, Ko BS, Yao M, Shun CT, Yen ML, Lee MC, & Chen
YC (2005). Isolation of multipotent cells from human term placenta. Stem Cells 23, 3-9.
99. Z. Du, J. Chen, F.Yan and Y. Xiao: Clin. (2009), Oral Implants Res. 20p.145.
100. Zhang L, Kahn CJ, Chen HQ, Tran N, Wang X (2008) Effect of uniaxial stretching on rat
bone mesenchymal stem cell: orientation and expressions of collagen types I and III and
tenascin-C. Cell Biol Int 32:344–352
101. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD (2007) Requirement for both
micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate
surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 28: 2821-2829.
102. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, et al. High surface
energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A
2005;74(1):49–58.
103. Zheng, H., Guo, Z., Ma, Q., Jia, H., and Dang, G. (2004). Cbfa1/osf2" transduced" bone"
marrow" stromal" cells" facilitate" bone" formation" in" vitro" and" in" vivo." Calcif" Tissue"Int
74," 194P203.
104. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, Benhaim P, Lorenz HP, &
Hedrick MH (2001). Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based
therapies. Tissue Eng 7, 211-228.