order in the matter of shri sanjay jethilal soni

Upload: shyam-sunder

Post on 03-Jun-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Order in the matter of Shri Sanjay Jethilal Soni

    1/4

  • 8/11/2019 Order in the matter of Shri Sanjay Jethilal Soni

    2/4

    2

    (for short the company HKGS) for a period between October 1, 2004 to

    January 12, 2005 and noted that the price of the scrip went up from ` 0.93

    on October 1, 2004 to` 5.48 on January 12, 2005. It was noticed that one

    Eaugu Udyog Ltd. (EUL), one of the major promoters of the company

    HKGS, off-loaded its shares in the market when the company HKGS was

    making good profit. EUL sold 69,56,727 (Sixty Nine Lacs Fifty Six

    Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Seven) shares in the secondary market

    and 25,45,000 (Twenty Five Lacs Forty Five Thousand) shares in off-

    market transactions.

    3. While EUL was off-loading shares in the market, it was found that

    the major counter party clients were a group of connected entities, namely,

    Sanjay J. Soni, Jaiprakash Jain, Haresh Soni, Jayesh C Shah, Dinesh Vijla

    and Abhijit Todi. It was also noted by SEBI that these entities executed

    synchronized trades and also indulged in order book manipulation while

    trading through their brokers. The appellant was also found to have traded

    alongwith the group of these connected persons who acted as counter

    parties to the sell-off by EUL. This created artificial volume in the scrip

    and ultimately facilitated EUL for off-loading the shares of the company

    HKGS.

    4. Accordingly, a show cause notice dated July 16, 2010 was issued to

    the appellant and a detailed enquiry was conducted as per the procedure

    established under Rule 4 read with Section 15I of SEBI Act, 1992. Learned

    adjudicating officer after affording an opportunity of personal hearing and

    seeking reply from the appellant imposed a penalty of` 10 lac for violation

    of Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1) and 4(2)(a) of the FUTP Regulations,

    2003.Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

  • 8/11/2019 Order in the matter of Shri Sanjay Jethilal Soni

    3/4

    3

    5. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and

    perused the pleadings. On the basis of the off-market details received from

    National Securities Depository Ltd. (NSDL) it has been brought on record

    that the appellant received 25,000 shares from EUL on November 17, 2004,

    3,75,000 shares from Dinesh Vijla on November 18, 2004, 6,73,125 shares

    from Piramal Hotels on November 23, 2004 and November 24, 2004 and

    25,000 shares from Haresh Soni on November 25, 2004. The appellant

    subsequently, transferred 5,50,000 shares to Haresh Soni on November 18,

    2004 and November 23, 2004, 4,12,000 shares to Jayesh Shah on

    November 24, 2004 and November 27, 2004 and 25,000 shares to Charu

    Sanghvi on November 25, 2004 in the off-market trades during the

    investigation period.

    6. It has also been established during the enquiry that the appellant

    alongwith the group of entities as mentioned above in para 2 indulged in

    synchronized trades and also made payments to the brokers on behalf of

    one Mr. Haresh Soni to the tune of` 95,50,000/- for atleast 20 settlements.

    Therefore, we have no hesitation in upholding the impugned order dated

    October 21, 2011 passed by the learned adjudicating officer.

    7. However, it is brought to our notice that similarly situated certain

    persons, who had also indulged in the manipulative synchronized trades in

    question, have been imposed lesser punishment though they had traded

    enormously in the same scrip. In such similar cases involved in the

    transaction of the same scrip during the same investigation period, an

    average penalty of ` 6.30 lac has been imposed by the respondent.

    Therefore, keeping in view the limited role of the appellant in the matter

    and in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the monetary

    penalty of` 10 lac is modified to` 7 lac to be paid by the appellant within

    Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

  • 8/11/2019 Order in the matter of Shri Sanjay Jethilal Soni

    4/4

    4

    a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order failing which

    original penaltyof` 10lac would revive.

    8. With the above modification of penalty, the impugned order dated

    October 21, 2011 is upheld and the appeal is, accordingly, partly allowed.

    No costs.

    Sd/-Justice J. P. Devadhar

    Presiding Officer

    Sd/-

    Jog Singh

    Member

    Sd/-

    A. S. LambaMember

    20.08.2014Prepared and compared by:

    PTM

    Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz