optimization of cpps of sublimation phase (1° drying) of “lyophilization process” using face...

5
FOR DEVELOPMENT OF FREEZE DRIED RECONSTITUTED DOSAGE FORM AS PER QbD OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF SUBLIMATION PHASE (1° DRYING) OF LYOPHILILIZATION PROCESS RISKS PRODUCT TEMPERATURE DURING PRIMARY DRYING TOTAL DURATION OF PRIMARY DRYING QUALITY COMPROMISED EXCEEDS CRITICAL TEMPERATURE (Tcol FOR AMORPHOUS/ Teut FOR CRYSTALLINE) EXCEEDS MAXIMUM TIME TO ACCOMMODATE THE PLANT’S DEMANDS FOR PRODUCT SUPPLY PATIENT ACCEPTANCE COMPROMISED CAKE APPEARANE COMPROMISED (COLLAPSE/MELT) MFG COST OF THE D PRODUCT INCREASED FACTORIAL MIXTURE BOX BEHNKEN RESPONSE SURFACE FACE CENTERED CENTRAL COMPOSITE CHAMBER PRESSURE SHELF TEMPERATURE A B DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES DESIGNING OF EXPERIMMENTS CASE STUDY 14 © Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary SHIVANG CHAUDHARY Created & Copyrighted by: Quality Risk Manager & Intellectual Property Sentinel- CIIE, IIM Ahmedabad, INDIA MS Pharm (Pharmaceutics)-NIPER, PGD (Patents Law)-NALSAR [email protected]

Upload: shivang-chaudhary

Post on 12-Aug-2015

36 views

Category:

Healthcare


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Optimization of CPPs of Sublimation Phase (1° Drying) Of “Lyophilization Process” using Face Centered Central Composite RSM for 2 Factors for Development of Reconstituted Dosage

FOR DEVELOPMENT OF FREEZE DRIED RECONSTITUTED DOSAGE FORM AS PER QbD

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF SUBLIMATION PHASE (1° DRYING) OF LYOPHILILIZATION PROCESS

RISKS

PRODUCT TEMPERATURE DURING PRIMARY DRYING TOTAL DURATION OF PRIMARY DRYING

QUALITY COMPROMISED

EXCEEDS CRITICAL TEMPERATURE (Tcol FOR AMORPHOUS/ Teut FOR CRYSTALLINE)

EXCEEDS MAXIMUM TIME TO ACCOMMODATE THE PLANT’S DEMANDS FOR PRODUCT SUPPLY

PATIENT ACCEPTANCE COMPROMISED

CAKE APPEARANE COMPROMISED (COLLAPSE/MELT) MFG COST OF THE D PRODUCT INCREASED

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

FACE CENTERED CENTRAL COMPOSITE

CHAMBER PRESSURE

SHELF TEMPERATURE A

B

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

DESIGNING OF EXPERIMMENTS

CA

SE

STU

DY

14

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

SHIVANG CHAUDHARY Created & Copyrighted by:

Quality Risk Manager & Intellectual Property Sentinel- CIIE, IIM Ahmedabad, INDIA MS Pharm (Pharmaceutics)-NIPER, PGD (Patents Law)-NALSAR

[email protected]

Page 2: Optimization of CPPs of Sublimation Phase (1° Drying) Of “Lyophilization Process” using Face Centered Central Composite RSM for 2 Factors for Development of Reconstituted Dosage

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

Factors (Variables) Levels of Factors studied -1 0 +1

A Shelf Temperature ( ͦC) -10C +5C +20 ͦC B Chamber Pressure (Pa) 10 Pa (o.1mbar) 15 Pa 20 Pa (0.2mbar)

NO. OF FACTORS

NO. OF LEVELS

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SELECTED

ADD. CENTER POINTS

TOTAL NO OF EXPERIMENTAL RUNS (NO OF TRIALS)

2

3

FACE CENTERED CENTRAL COMPOSITE RSM for 2 factors

4

4FP +4SP+5CP =13

To Optimize CPPs of Sublimation Phase (Primary Drying Step) of Freeze Drying Process for Reconstituted Powders

OBJECTIVE

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

DESIGNING OF EXPERIMMENTS

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FREEZE DRYING PROCESS FOR RECONSTITUTED POWDERS

A SHELF TEMPERATURE

B

CH

AM

BE

R P

RE

SSU

RE

FACE CENTERED CENTRAL COMPOSITE C

ASE

ST

UD

Y 1

4

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Page 3: Optimization of CPPs of Sublimation Phase (1° Drying) Of “Lyophilization Process” using Face Centered Central Composite RSM for 2 Factors for Development of Reconstituted Dosage

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

PREDICTION EFFECT EQUATION OF EACH FACTOR, THEIR INTERACTIONS & CURVATURES ON INDIVIDUAL RESPONSE BY QUADRATIC MODEL

Product Temperature=-16.21+7.00A+1.50B+0.000AB-0.28A2+0.22B2

Total Drying Time =+39.86-27.33A-7.83B+4.00AB+0.48A2+1.98B2

CQAs CPPs

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

design of experimments

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FREEZE DRYING PROCESS FOR RECONSTITUTED POWDERS

FACE CENTERED CENTRAL COMPOSITE C

ASE

ST

UD

Y 1

4

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Page 4: Optimization of CPPs of Sublimation Phase (1° Drying) Of “Lyophilization Process” using Face Centered Central Composite RSM for 2 Factors for Development of Reconstituted Dosage

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

design of experimments

Factors (Variables) Knowledge Space Design Space Control Space A Shelf Temperature ( ͦC) -10°C - +20°C -2.5 - +17.5°C 0°C- +15°C B Chamber Pressure (Pa) 10-20 10-20 10-20Pa (0.1-0.2mbar)

Responses (Effects) Goals for Individual Responses Y1 Product

Temperature should be maintained below critical product temperature i.e. -12°C to prevent collapse of the structure to get the desired cake appearance

Y2 Primary Drying Time

should be less than 48 hours (2day) to control processing cost &

ultimately to control product price for high patient acceptance

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FREEZE DRYING PROCESS FOR RECONSTITUTED POWDERS

FACE CENTERED CENTRAL COMPOSITE C

ASE

ST

UD

Y 1

4

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Page 5: Optimization of CPPs of Sublimation Phase (1° Drying) Of “Lyophilization Process” using Face Centered Central Composite RSM for 2 Factors for Development of Reconstituted Dosage

THANK YOU SO MUCH FROM

DESIGN IS A JOURNEY OF DISCOVERY…

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

SHIVANG CHAUDHARY

© Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Quality Risk Manager & Intellectual Property Sentinel- CIIE, IIM Ahmedabad MS (Pharmaceutics)- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research (NIPER), INDIA

PGD (Patents Law)- National academy of Legal Studies & Research (NALSAR), INDIA

+91 -9904474045, +91-7567297579 [email protected]

https://in.linkedin.com/in/shivangchaudhary

facebook.com/QbD.PAT.Pharmaceutical.Development