optical networks - bu
TRANSCRIPT
Optical Networks
Poompat Saengudomlert
Session 1
Introduction & Outline
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 1 / 16
Basic Course Information
Lecture hours: Mon 13.00−14.30 & Wed 9.00−10.30
Instructor: Poompat Saengudomlert ([email protected])
Class website: http://bucroccs.bu.ac.th/courses/
Grading policy:Assignments and quizzes (20%)Class project (10%)Mid-semester exam (30%)Final exam (40%)
Exam policy: Closed-book exams with sheets of notes allowed
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 2 / 16
Distribution of Topics
Aspects of optical networks
Basic optical components (≈10%)
Optical transmissions (≈20%)
Optical networking (≈70%)
Largest emphasis on optical networking
Wavelength-routed optical networks (for WANs) (≈50%)
Traffic grooming (for MANs) (≈25%)
Optical access networks (for LANs) (≈25%)
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 3 / 16
Well Known Reference Textbooks
In the alphabetical order based on first authors’ last names:
G. Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications. McGraw-Hill, 2010.
G. Kramer, Ethernet Passive Optical Networks. McGraw-Hill, 2005.
B. Mukherjee, Optical WDM Networks. Springer, 2006.
R. Ramaswamy, K. Sivarajan, and G. Sasaki,Optical Networks: APractical Perspective, Fourth Edition. Morgan Kaufmann, 2010.
J.M. Simmons, Optical Network Design and Planning. Springer, 2008.
T.E. Stern, G. Ellinas, and K. Bala, Multiwavelength OpticalNetworks: Architectures, Design and Control, Second Edition.Cambridge, 2008.
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 4 / 16
1.1 Background and Motivation
Optical transmission is common, especially in core networks.
For transmission rates up to 40 Gbps, a fiber can be used as a singletransmission channel.
Commonly used standards
Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH)
With more traffic, wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) is morecost effective for transmissions than using multiple fibers.
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 5 / 16
Electronic Switching Node
In current networks, traffic switching is mostly done in electronics.
electronicswitch
end user equipments
fiber
DMUX MUX
switching node
wavelengthchannels
The above architecture is called electronic switching nodearchitecture.
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 6 / 16
Electronic Bottleneck
Potential problem with electronic switching: switching speed cannotkeep up with transmission speed
⇒ referred to as electronic bottleneck
Example:
Electronic witching speed = 1 Tbps, 32 wavelengths per fiber, 10 Gbpsper wavelength
⇒ 320 Gbps per fiber
⇒ maximum input fibers at switching node = 3 (not enough!)
Currently, we don’t have “much” traffic, but future Gbps applicationsmay cause the electronic bottleneck.
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 7 / 16
Opaque Optical Switching Node
In the opaque optical switching node architecture, optical switches are used
to overcome the electronic bottleneck.
opticalswitch
fiber
DMUX MUX
switching node
wavelengthchannels
electronicswitch
end user equipments
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 8 / 16
Optical Bypass
With optical switching, some traffic can pass through without goingthrough electronic switching.
⇒ referred to as optical bypass
With O-E-O conversion at optical switch ports, any input can beconnected to any output.
NOTE: Signals are converted to the same wavelength and thenswitched optically.
Opaque optical switching vs. electronic switching
Lower switching cost thanks to optical bypassHigher transmission cost due to less multiplexing
⇒ trade-off between switching cost and transmission cost
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 9 / 16
Example (Trade-off between switching cost and transmissioncost):
The electronic switching architecture uses 1wavelength channel on each link. Theelectronic switch at node B processes thetraffic amount of 15 Gbps.
A B C
D
With optical bypass at node B, the opaqueoptical switching architecture uses 2 additionalwavelength channels. The electronic switch at node B processes the traffic amount of 5 Gbps.
A B C
D
traffic Gbps, 10 Gbps per wavelength channel
Electronically switched traffic down by 10 Gbps
Two additional wavelength channels used
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 10 / 16
Transparent Optical Switching Node
Can reduce switching cost further (O-E-O conversion still costly) by using
the transparent optical switching node architecture.
fiber
DMUX MUX
switching node
wavelengthchannels
electronicswitch
end user equipments
opticalswitch
opticalswitch
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 11 / 16
Transparent vs. Opaque Optical Switching
Lower switching cost due to no O-E-O conversionLess flexible due to the wavelength continuity constraint
Example:
Traffic of 1 wavelength from 1 to 4, from 3 to 6, and from 5 to 2
6
4
2
35
1
6
4
2
35
1
opaque optical switching transparent optical switching
wavelength
Opaque optical switching needs 2 wavelengths.
Transparent optical switching needs 3 wavelengths.
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 12 / 16
Properties of Transparent Networks
With wavelength continuity constraint,
routing ⇒ routing and wavelength assignment (RWA)
An “all-optical” connection is called a lightpath.
Maximum distance limit of a lightpath is called the optical reach.
Decreases with transmission bit rateBypass-enabled network instead of all-optical network
One key advantage of a lightpath is transparency.
A lightpath can support traffic at any rate and in any format.Equipment upgrades needed only at network edgesFuture-proof fiber infrastructure
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 13 / 16
First/Last-Mile Bottleneck
Current traffic in several core networks is not large enough to justifyoptical switching.
Optical industry moves towards end users to overcome thefirst/last-mile bottleneck.
cable modems and DSLs:typically in order of 1 Mbps
Standard bit ratesof 2.5-10 Gbps perwavelength channel
MAN or WAN
Typically 1-GHz clock rate 32-bit bus = potentialinternal transfer rate of
32 Gbps of which 1-3 Gbpsis achievable with hard drives
Internals of personal computer
Bottleneck between two Gbps worlds [Gre04]
⇒ optical access networks, e.g. fiber-to-the-home (FTTH)
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 14 / 16
Passive Optical Networks
Passive optical networks (PONs) are well accepted to serve as opticalaccess networks.
A PON contains passive devices internally.Low deployment cost per user (important for user adoption)
Typically tree topology
Internet
centraloffice
fiber
splitter/combiner
endusers
fiber
Key aspects of PONs
Single fiber for both upstream and downstream transmissionsDownstream traffic is broadcast (one-to-many).Upstream traffic (many-to-one) requires multiple access control (MAC).
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 15 / 16
1.2 Course Structure
Core networks (WANs)
RWA for static and dynamic traffic
Recovery from node/link failure
Dynamic lightpath setup/release
Distribution networks (MANs)
Efficient traffic multiplexing called traffic grooming
Allocation of electronic multiplexers at nodes
Optical access networks (LANs)
MAC protocol for downstream and upstream traffic
Dynamic transmission resource allocation
NOTE: Energy efficiency is a recent concern in all networks.
P. Saengudomlert (2017) Optical Networks Session 1 16 / 16