optical models jian huang, cs 594, spring 2002 this set of slides are modified from slides used by...

Optical Models

Jian Huang, CS 594, Spring 2002

This set of slides are modified from slides used by Prof. Torsten Moeller, at Simon Fraser University, BC, Canada.

Optical Models

• Nelson Max, “Optical Models”, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1995.

• Jim Blinn’s 1982 SIGGRAPH paper on scattering.

• The mathematical framework for light transport in volume rendering.

Transport of Light• Determination of Intensity• Local - Diffuse and Specular• Global - Radiosity, Ray Tracing, Ultimate

Physcial• Mechanisms in Ultimate Model

– Emittance (+)

– Absorption (-)

– Scattering (+) (single vs. multiple)

Light

Observer

Transport of Light• Typically based on - S. Chandrasekhar “Radiative

Transfer”, Oxford Universtiy Press 1950• Mathematically challenging • Approximate models required -

Blinn et al to the rescue• Over Operator -

only emission and absorption

Light

Observer

Max - 1995

• Several cases:– Completely opaque or transparent voxels

– Variable opacity correction

– Self-emitting glow

– Self-emitting glow with opacity along viewing ray

– Single scattering of external illumination

– Multiple scattering

Blinn - Assumptions

• Assumptions:– N - surface normal

– E - eye vector

– L - light vector

– T - surface thickness

– e - angle btw. E and N

– a - angle btw. E and Laka phase angle

– I - angle btw. N and L

a

LE

N

ei

Particles

T

Blinn - Assumptions

• Assumptions (contd.):– particles are little spheres with

radius p

– n - number density (number of particles per unit volume)

– - cosine of angle e, i.e. N.E

– D - proportional volume of the cloud occupied by particles

a

LE

N

ei

Particles

T

3

3

4pnD

Blinn – transparency (1)

• Expected particles in a volume will be nV

• Probability that there are no particles in the way can be modeled as a Poisson process:

• Hence the probability that the light is making it through those tubes is:

E L

t

Cylindersmust be empty

nVeVP ,0

E

L

Cylindersof Integration

t

Bottom Lit

Top Lit

TpnTpn

eeVP

2

0

2

,0

Blinn – transparency (2)

• Transparency through the cloud:

• is called the optical depth

eTrE

-E

Tpn 2

T

Max - absorption only

• I(s) = intensity at distance s along a ray• (s) = extinction coefficient

• T(s) = transparency between 0 and s

sIsds

dI

sTI

dttIsIs

0

0

exp0


• Linear variation of

2

0exp

exp0

DD

dttsTD

t

D

D)

0)


• On the opacity

• assuming to be constant in the interval

...2/

exp1

exp11

2

0

DD

D

dttsTD

Max - cloud model

• Using fractal structure (Perlin)

Max - self-emitting glow

• Without extinction:

sgds

dI

s

dttgIsI0

0


• Without extinction:


• With extinction:

sIssgds

dI

dsdttsgdttIDID D

s

D

00

0 expexp

dssTsgDTIDID

0

0

• The continuous form:

• In general case, can not compute analytically

dsdttsgdttIDID D

s

D

00

0 expexp

Volume Ray Integral (1)

Volume Ray Integration (2)• Practical Computation Method:

» note: x can be xi (different everywhere)

– which leads to the familiar BTF or FTB compositing …

dsdttsgdttIDID D

s

D

00

0 expexp

xxixxiti 1exp

011211

1 110

Itggtgtg

gttIDI

nnnnn

n

ii

n

ijj

n

ii

g(s)

• g(s) could be:– Self-emitting particle glow– Reflected color, obtained via illumination

• The color is usually the sum of emitted color E and reflected color R


• Identical glowing spherical particles:• projected area a = r2

• surface glow color = C• number per unit volume = N•

• extinction coefficient = a N• added glow intensity per unit length

g = C a N = C

A

aNAdl

area total

area occluded

dl

A


• Special Case g=C: (and C constant)

• This is compositing color C on top of background I0

DTCDTIDI 10

D

D D

s

D D

s

dttC

dsdttsCdsdttsg

0

00

exp1

expexp


• For I0=0 and : varying according to f:

Volume Ray Integration Equation

• Self-emitting glow, none constant color

dsdttssCdsdttsgD D

s

D D

s

00

exp)(exp

Max - reflection

• i(x) = illumination reaching point x• = unit reflection direction vector• ’ = unit illumination direction vector• r(x,,’): BRDF

– for conventional surface shading effects

xixrxg ,,

xf

O

X

Max - reflection

• For particle densities:

– w(x) = albedo• Blinn: assuming that the primary effect is from interaction of light

with one single particle

• albedo - proportion of light reflected from a particle: in the range of 0..1

– p(,’) = phase function

• still unrealistic external reflection of outside illumination

,,, pxxwxr

O

X

Blinn - Phase Function

• “how” we see theparticles

• depends on the angle ofeye E and light vector L

• smooth drop off …

L E

L

E

L

E

a = 0

a = 90

a = 180

Top View EyeView

a0 180

a


• Many different models possible• Constant function

– size of particles much less then wavelength of the light

• Anisotropic– more light forward then backward - essentially our

diffuse shading

• Lambert surfaces– spheres reflect according to Lamberts law– physically based

1 a

axa cos1

aaaa cossin38


• Rayleigh Scattering– diffraction effects dominate

• Henyey-Greenstein– general model with good fit to empirical data

• Empirical Measurments– tabulated phase function

• sums of functions– weighted sum of functions - model different effects in

parallel

aa 2cos143

23

22 cos211 aggga

Max - shadows

• Should account for transparency of volume between light source and point x:

• those are the “shadow feelers”• e.g. Kajiya’s two pass algorithm

0

exp, dttxLxi

O

X

Max - shadows

Max - multiple scattering

• I(x,): intensity at position x in direction • g(x,): source term (glow at x in direction )

dxIxrxg ,,,,4

dssTdxIsxr

DTDxIxID

0 4

0

,,,

,,

KIII 0


• use radiosity ideas for the solution• simplified model - scattering is isotropic• i.e. g(x,) does not depend on :• then we can compute the total contribution of all

voxels to the iso-tropic scattering:

• where Fij are the “form factors” and ai are the albedo coefficients

• do a first pass like Kayija and collect external illumination in E(xi)

jj

ijii xgFxaxS


• Results in big equation system

• we still need to solve the form factors• use an iterative solution method as in progressive

radiosity

jj

ijiii xgFxaxExg

03

02

00

0000

00

0

IKIKKII

KIIIKIKI

KIIKI

KIII


• Different approach: Monte Carlo Method

• Trace a large representative selection of rays from light sources and absorb them, with probability proportional to , or scatter them, with probability proportional to r. Build up the distribution of light flux flowing through each voxel (in each direction).


• In a view dependent rendering pass, do a final single scatter of this light distribution towards the eye:

dssTdxIsxr

DTDxIID

0 4

0

,,,

,,viewpoint


• albedo = 0.99• 15 iterations were needed• cloud on a 24x24x18 volume• each iteration took

15 minutes• final 512x384

rendering took5 minutes

Volumetric Ray Integration

color

opacity

object (color, opacity)

1.0

Ray-casting - revisited

color c = c s s(1 - ) + c

opacity = s (1 - ) +

1.0

object (color, opacity)

volumetric compositingInterpolationkernel

Volume Rendering Pipeline (Levoy’88)

Acquired values

Data Preparation

Prepared values

classificationshading

Voxel colors

Ray-tracing / resampling Ray-tracing / resampling

Sample colors

compositing

Voxel opacities

Sample opacities

Image Pixels

)1(

)1(

inout

inout CCC

)1(

)1(

inout

ininout CCC

Which one?

Volume Rendering Pipeline (Wittenbrink et. al. 98)

• FTB color:

• BTF color:

• Opacity:

• The colors that are composited must be pre-weighted with opacity, i.e. associate color: – C’ = C

optical models jian huang, cs 594, spring 2002 this set of slides are modified from slides used by...

Documents