operation management chp 1

Upload: nursyahirah93

Post on 15-Oct-2015

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

chapter 1

TRANSCRIPT

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    1/52

    1 - 1 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    1Operations and

    Productivity

    PowerPoint presentation to accompanyHeizer and RenderOperations Management, 10ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e

    PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    2/52

    1 - 2 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Hard Rock Cafe

    First opened in 1971

    Now129 restaurants in over 40 countries

    Rock music memorabilia

    Creates value in the form of good foodand entertainment

    3,500+custom meals per day in Orlando

    How does an item get on the menu?

    Role of the Operations Manager

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    3/52

    1 - 3

    Learn ing Object ives

    Definition of Operations Management (OM)Organizational Functions

    Why Study OM?

    A brief history of operations management

    The future of the discipline

    Goods Versus Services

    Measuring productivity

    Career opportunities in operations management

    2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    4/52

    1 - 4 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    What Is Operat ions

    Management?

    Productionis the creation of

    goods and servicesOperations management (OM)isthe set of activities that createvalue in the form of goods and

    services by transforming inputsinto outputs

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    5/52

    1 - 5 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Organ izing to Produce

    Goods and Serv ices Essential functions:1. Marketinggenerates demand

    2. Production/operationscreatesthe product

    3. Finance/accountingtracks howwell the organization is doing,pays bills, collects the money

    4. Human Resourcesprovideslabor, wage and salaryadministration and job evaluation

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    6/52

    1 - 6 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Commercial Bank

    Operations

    Teller Scheduling

    Check Clearing

    Collection

    Transaction processing

    Facilities design/layout

    Vault operations

    Maintenance

    Security

    Finance

    Investments

    Security

    Real estate

    Accounting

    Auditing

    Marketing

    Loans

    Commercial

    Industrial

    Financial

    Personal

    Mortgage

    Trust Department

    Human Resources

    Recruitment

    Job evaluation

    Performance evaluation

    Wage and Salary Adm.

    Personnel records

    Organ izat ional Charts

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    7/521 - 7 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Manufacturing

    Operations

    FacilitiesConstruction; maintenance

    Production and inventory controlScheduling; materials control

    Quality assurance and controlSupply-chain managementManufacturing

    Tooling; fabrication; assembly

    DesignProduct development and designDetailed product specifications

    Industrial engineeringEfficient use of machines, space,

    and personnelProcess analysis

    Development and installation ofproduction tools and equipment

    Finance/ accountingDisbursements/

    creditsReceivablesPayablesGeneral ledger

    Funds ManagementMoney marketInternational

    exchangeCapital requirements

    Stock issueBond issue

    and recall

    MarketingSales

    promotion

    AdvertisingSalesMarket research

    Human Resources

    Recruitment

    Job evaluation

    Performance evaluation

    Wage and Salary Adm.

    Personnel records

    Organ izat ional Charts

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    8/521 - 8 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Why Study OM?

    1. OM is one of four major functions ofany organization, we want to studyhow people organize themselves forproductive enterprise

    2. We want (and need) to know howgoods and services are produced

    3. We want to understand whatoperations managers do

    4. OM is such a costly part of anorganization

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    9/521 - 9 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Options for IncreasingContr ibut ion

    Table 1.1

    Sales $100,000 $150,000 $100,000 $100,000

    Cost of Goods 80,000 120,000 80,000 64,000

    Gross Margin 20,000 30,000 20,000 36,000

    Finance Costs 6,000 6,000 3,000 6,000Subtotal 14,000 24,000 17,000 30,000

    Taxes at 25% 3,500 6,000 4,250 7,500

    Contribution $ 10,500 $ 18,000 $ 12,750 $ 22,500

    Finance/Marketing Accounting OM

    Option Option Option

    Increase Reduce Reduce

    Sales Finance ProductionCurrent Revenue 50% Costs 50% Costs 20%

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    10/521 - 10 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    What Operat ions

    Managers Do

    Planning Organizing

    Staffing

    Leading

    Controlling

    Basic Management Functions

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    11/521 - 11 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Ten Crit ical Dec isionsTen Decision Areas Chapter(s)

    1. Design of goods and services 52. Managing quality 6, Supplement 6

    3. Process and capacity 7, Supplement 7design

    4. Location strategy 85. Layout strategy 96. Human resources and 10

    job design

    7. Supply-chain 11, Supplement 11management

    8. Inventory, MRP, JIT 12, 14, 16

    9. Scheduling 13, 15

    10. Maintenance 17 Table 1.2

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    12/52

    1 - 12 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Cri t ical Dec isions

    1. Design of goods and services

    What good or service should weoffer?

    How should we design theseproducts and services?

    2. Managing quality

    How do we define quality?

    Who is responsible for quality?

    Table 1.2 (cont.)

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    13/52

    1 - 13 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Cri t ical Dec isions

    3. Process and capacity design

    What process and what capacity willthese products require?

    What equipment and technology isnecessary for these processes?

    4. Location strategy

    Where should we put the facility?

    On what criteria should we base thelocation decision?

    Table 1.2 (cont.)

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    14/52

    1 - 14 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Cri t ical Dec isions

    5. Layout strategy How should we arrange the facility?

    How large must the facility be to meet

    our plan?6. Human resources and job design

    How do we provide a reasonablework environment?

    How much can we expect ouremployees to produce?

    Table 1.2 (cont.)

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    15/52

    1 - 15 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Cri t ical Dec isions

    7. Supply-chain management Should we make or buy this

    component?

    Who should be our suppliers and howcan we integrate them into our strategy?

    8. Inventory, material requirementsplanning, and JIT

    How much inventory of each itemshould we have?

    When do we re-order?

    Table 1.2 (cont.)

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    16/52

    1 - 16 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Cri t ical Dec isions

    9. Intermediate and shorttermscheduling

    Are we better off keeping people on

    the payroll during slowdowns? Which jobs do we perform next?

    10.Maintenance

    How do we build reliability into ourprocesses?

    Who is responsible for maintenance?

    Table 1.2 (cont.)

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    17/52

    1 - 17 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Opportuni t ies

    Figure 1.2

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    18/52

    1 - 18 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Sign i f icant Even ts in OM

    Figure 1.3

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    19/52

    1 - 19 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Heritage of OM

    Division of labor (Adam Smith 1776;Charles Babbage 1852)

    Standardized parts (Whitney 1800)

    Scientific Management (Taylor 1881)

    Assembly line (Ford/ Sorenson 1913)

    Gantt charts (Gantt 1916)

    Motion study (Frank and Lillian Gilbreth

    1922) Quality control (Shewhart 1924; Deming

    1950)

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    20/52

    1 - 20 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Heritage of OM

    First Digital Computer (Atanasoff 1938)

    CPM/PERT (DuPont 1957, Navy 1958)

    Material requirements planning (Orlicky 1960)

    Computer aided design (CAD 1970) Flexible manufacturing system (FMS 1975)

    Baldrige Quality Awards (1980)

    Computer integrated manufacturing (1990)

    Globalization (1992)

    Internet (1995)

    Mass Customization (2000s)

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    21/52

    1 - 21 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    New Challenges in OM

    Global focus

    Just-in-time

    Supply-chainpartnering

    Rapid productdevelopment,alliances

    Masscustomization

    Empoweredemployees, teams

    ToFrom Local or national focus

    Batch shipments

    Low bid purchasing

    Lengthy productdevelopment

    Standard products

    Job specialization

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    22/52

    1 - 22 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Character is t ics o f Goods

    Tangible product

    Consistent productdefinition

    Production usuallyseparate fromconsumption

    Can be inventoried

    Low customerinteraction

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    23/52

    1 - 23 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Charac ter ist ics o f Serv ice

    Intangible product

    Produced andconsumed at same time

    Often unique High customer

    interaction

    Inconsistent productdefinition

    Often knowledge-based

    Frequently dispersed

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    24/52

    1 - 24 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Industry and Services as

    Percen tage of GDPServices Manufacturing

    Australia

    Canada

    China

    CzechRep

    France

    Germany

    HongKong

    Japan

    Mexico

    RussianFed

    SouthAfrica

    Spain

    UK

    US

    Turkey

    90

    80

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    25/52

    1 - 25

    Allocation of GDP by Sector,Turkey, 2010

    Agriculture 8.8%

    Industry 25.7%

    Services 65.5%

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    26/52

    1 - 26 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Goods and Services

    AutomobileComputer

    Installed carpeting

    Fast-food meal

    Restaurant meal/auto repair

    Hospital care

    Advertising agency/investment management

    Consulting service/teaching

    Counseling

    Percent of Product that is a Good Percent of Product that is a Service

    100% 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100%| | | | | | | | |

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    27/52

    1 - 27 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Changing Chal lenges

    TraditionalApproach Reasons forChange CurrentChallenge

    Ethics andregulationsnot at theforefront

    Public concern overpollution, corruption,child labor, etc.

    High ethical andsocialresponsibility;increased legal

    and professionalstandards

    Local ornationalfocus

    Growth of reliable, lowcost communicationand transportation

    Global focus,internationalcollaboration

    Lengthyproductdevelopment

    Shorter life cycles;growth of globalcommunication; CAD,Internet

    Rapid productdevelopment;designcollaboration

    Figure 1.5

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    28/52

    1 - 28 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Changing Chal lenges

    TraditionalApproach Reasons forChange CurrentChallenge

    Low costproduction,with littleconcern for

    environment;freeresources(air, water)ignored

    Public sensitivity toenvironment; ISO 14000standard; increasingdisposal costs

    Environmentallysensitiveproduction; greenmanufacturing;

    sustainability

    Low-cost

    standardizedproducts

    Rise of consumerism;

    increased affluence;individualism

    Mass

    customization

    Figure 1.5

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    29/52

    1 - 29 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Changing Chal lenges

    TraditionalApproach Reasons forChange CurrentChallenge

    Emphasis onspecialized,often manualtasks

    Recognition of theemployee's totalcontribution; knowledgesociety

    Empoweredemployees;enriched jobs

    In-houseproduction;low-bidpurchasing

    Rapid technologicalchange; increasingcompetitive forces

    Supply-chainpartnering; jointventures,alliances

    Large lot

    production

    Shorter product life

    cycles; increasing needto reduce inventory

    Just-In-Time

    performance;lean; continuousimprovement

    Figure 1.5

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    30/52

    1 - 30 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    New Trends in OM

    Ethics Global focus

    Environmentally sensitive production

    Rapid product development Mass customization

    Empowered employees

    Supply-chain partnering Just-in-time performance

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    31/52

    1 - 31 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Product iv i ty Challenge

    Productivity is the ratio of outputs (goodsand services) divided by the inputs

    (resources such as labor and capital)

    The objective is to improve productivity!

    Impo rtant Note!Produc t ion is a measure of outp ut

    on ly and not a measure of eff ic iency

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    32/52

    1 - 32

    Eff ic iency VersusEffect iveness

    The difference between efficient and effective is thatefficiency refers to how well you do something, whereaseffectiveness refers to how useful it is.

    Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness isdoing the right things.

    Doing the Right Things is MoreImportant than Doing Things Right

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    33/52

    1 - 33

    Eff ic iency VersusEffect ivenes

    For example, if a company is not doingwell and they decide to train their

    workforce on a new technology. Thetraining goes really well - they train alltheir employees in avery short time andtests show they have absorbed the

    training well. But overall productivitydoesn't improve. In this case thecompany's strategy was efficient but noteffective.

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    34/52

    1 - 34 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Feedback loop

    Outputs

    Goodsand

    services

    Transformation

    Economic systemtransforms inputs to outputs/CONVERSITION PROCESS

    The Econom ic System

    Inputs

    Labor,capital,

    management

    Figure 1.6

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    35/52

    1 - 35 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Measure of process improvement

    Represents output relative to input

    Only through productivity increasescan our standard of living improve

    Product iv i ty

    Productivity =Units produced

    Input used

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    36/52

    1 - 36 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Produc t iv i ty Calculat ions

    Productivity =Units produced

    Labor-hours used

    = = 4units/labor-hour1,000

    250

    Labor Productivity

    One resourc e input sing le-facto r product iv i ty

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    37/52

    1 - 37 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Mult i -Facto r Product iv i ty

    Output

    Labor + Material + Energy+ Capital + Miscellaneous

    Productivity =

    Also known as total factor productivity

    Output and inputs are often expressedin dollars

    Mult ip le resou rce inpu ts mul t i -factor product iv i ty

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    38/52

    1 - 38 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    =Old labor

    productivity

    8 titles/day

    32 labor-hrs

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    39/52

    1 - 39 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    8 titles/day

    32 labor-hrs=

    Old laborproductivity = .25 titles/labor-hr

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    40/52

    1 - 40 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

    New System:

    8 titles/day

    32 labor-hrs=

    Old laborproductivity

    =New labor

    productivity

    = .25 titles/labor-hr

    14 titles/day

    32 labor-hrs

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    41/52

    1 - 41 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

    New System:

    8 titles/day

    32 labor-hrs=

    Old laborproductivity = .25 titles/labor-hr

    14 titles/day

    32 labor-hrs=

    New laborproductivity

    = .4375 titles/labor-hr

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    42/52

    1 - 42 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

    New System:

    =Old multifactor

    productivity

    8 titles/day

    $640 + 400

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    43/52

    1 - 43 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

    New System:

    8 titles/day

    $640 + 400=

    Old multifactorproductivity

    = .0077 titles/dollar

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    44/52

    1 - 44 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

    New System:

    8 titles/day

    $640 + 400=

    Old multifactorproductivity

    =New multifactor

    productivity

    = .0077 titles/dollar

    14 titles/day

    $640 + 800

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    45/52

    1 - 45 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Col l ins Ti t le Product iv i ty

    Staff of 4 works 8 hrs/day 8 titles/dayPayroll cost = $640/day Overhead = $400/day

    Old System:

    14 titles/day Overhead = $800/day

    New System:

    8 titles/day

    $640 + 400

    14 titles/day

    $640 + 800

    =Old multifactor

    productivity

    =New multifactor

    productivity

    = .0077 titles/dollar

    = .0097 titles/dollar

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    46/52

    1 - 46 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Measu rement Prob lems

    1. Qualitymay change while the quantityof inputs and outputs remains constant(HDTV, iphones)

    2. External elementsmay cause anincrease or decrease in productivity(using more reliable electric powersystem)

    3. Precise unitsof measure may belacking

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    47/52

    1 - 47 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Product iv i ty Variables

    1. Labor- contributesabout 10% of theannual increase

    2. Capital- contributesabout 38% of theannual increase

    3. Management-contributes about 52%of the annual increase

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    48/52

    1 - 48 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Key Variab les for ImprovedLabor Produc t iv i ty

    1. Basic education appropriate for the laborforce

    2. Diet of the labor force

    3. Social overhead that makes laboravailable such as transportation andsanitation

    Challenge is in maintaining andenhancing skills in the midst of rapidlychanging technology and knowledge

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    49/52

    1 - 49 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Investment and Product iv i ty

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0Percentincreaseinpro

    ductivity

    Percentage investment

    10 15 20 25 30 35

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    50/52

    1 - 50 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Service Product iv i ty

    1. Typically labor intensive (teaching,counseling)

    2. Frequently focused on unique individual

    desires (customer representatives in banks)3. Often an intellectual task performed by

    professionals

    4. Often difficult to mechanize

    5. Often difficult to evaluate for quality

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    51/52

    1 - 51 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Ethics and

    Social Responsib i li tyChallenges facingoperations managers:

    Developing and producing safe,quality products

    Maintaining a clean environment

    Providing a safe workplace Honoring stakeholder commitments

  • 5/25/2018 operation management chp 1

    52/52

    Entry-Level Jobs in OMPurchasing planner/buyer

    Production (or operations) supervisor

    Production (or operations)scheduler/controller

    Production (or operations) analyst

    Inventory analyst

    Quality specialist

    Others