openggcm simulation vs themis observations in an dayside event

13
OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California, Berkeley THEMIS 2008 UCLA

Upload: lajos

Post on 15-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Wenhui Li and Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire Marit Øieroset University of California, Berkeley THEMIS 2008 UCLA. OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event. THEMIS Observations on 06/03/2007 ( Øieroset et. al. 2008). Northward IMF with strong By - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observationsin an Dayside Event

Wenhui Li and Joachim RaederUniversity of New Hampshire

Marit ØierosetUniversity of California, Berkeley

THEMIS 2008 UCLA

Page 2: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

THEMIS Observations on 06/03/2007(Øieroset et. al. 2008)

● Northward IMF with strong By

during ~15:25 -- ~17:00 UT

● THEMIS-B in the magnetosheath

● THEMIS-A, C, D and E detect a layer of nearly-stagnant magnetosheath plasma (T ~ 1 keV, N ~ 3-6 cm-3) attached to the magnetopause on closed field lines

● From TH-D to TH-A, magnetospheric ion and electron flux increases

● Thickness of the layer ~ 0.9 RE

● No evidence for Kelvin-Helmholtz waves nor diffusion at the local magnetopause

● Particle distributions suggest double-high latitude reconnection involving the same field lines

Page 3: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

THEMIS Observations on 06/03/2007(Øieroset et. al. 2008)

Page 4: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-A Observations

NIMF CDPS MP

Page 5: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-E Observations

NIMF CDPS M.P.

Page 6: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-C Observations

NIMF CDPS M.P.

Page 7: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-D Observations

NIMF CDPS M.P.

Page 8: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS-B Observations

M.P. NIMF

Page 9: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations

-- Thickness of the cold dense plasma layer

values on the line passing THA at 16:30 UT

~1.3

THEMIS: ~ 1.1 RE along THEMIS trackSimulation: ~ 1.3 RE

CDPL

Open layer

IMF

Page 10: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

How the cold dense plasma layer forms?

1. Double high-latitude reconnection captures magnetosheath plasma

Solar Wind

Page 11: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

How the cold dense plasma layer forms?

2. New closed flux tubes slowly convect around magnetopause toward nightside -- results in a balance of inflow and outflow at dayside magnetopause and form a cold dense plasma layer

Solar wind

An entry flow pathFrozen-in field lines

Magnetic nulls

(Li et. al. 2005)

Page 12: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

Summary

● THEMIS observed cold dense plasma layer in dayside closed field attached to magnetopause

● The multi spacecrafts estimated the thickness of the cold dense plasma layer to be ~0.9 RE

● An OpenGGCM simulation reproduces the THEMIS observations

● Observations and simulation analysis indicate that double high-latitude reconnection causes the formation of this cold dense plasma layer

Page 13: OpenGGCM Simulation vs THEMIS Observations in an Dayside Event

Additional Information

A comprehensive study of magnetosphere under northward IMF conditions using OpenGGCM simulations can been found in:

Solar wind plasma entry into the magnetosphere under northward IMF conditions

Li et. al. 2008, JGR, newly published