oklahoma police pension & retirement system 2q 2017.pdfoklahoma police pension & retirement...

108
Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30, 2017 231 South Bemiston Avenue 14th Floor Saint Louis, Missouri 63105 www.acgnet.com 314.862.4848

Upload: others

Post on 23-Sep-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Investment Performance Review

June 30, 2017

231 South Bemiston Avenue ♦ 14th Floor ♦ Saint Louis, Missouri 63105 ♦ www.acgnet.com ♦ 314.862.4848

Page 2: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,
Page 3: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Information Disclaimer:

The following report was prepared by Asset Consulting Group, LLC (ACG) using information from sources that may include the following: client’s custodian(s); client’s investment

manager(s); ACG Investment Manager Database and Client Reporting Tool; third party data vendors; and other outside sources as may be directed by the client. Index Characteristics

utilized in this report are obtained from third party data providers and may be different than index characteristics reported by investment managers/funds due to varied calculation

methodologies and data sources. Although the information presented herein has been obtained from and is based upon sources ACG believes to be reliable, no representation or

warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy or completeness of that information. Accordingly, ACG does not itself endorse or guarantee, and assumes no liability

whatsoever for, the accuracy or reliability of any third party data or the financial information contained herein.

Reasonable care has been taken to assure the accuracy of the data in the ACG database and the ACG Client Reporting Tool.

This report is provided as a management tool for the client’s internal use only. Information contained in this report does not constitute a recommendation by ACG.

This report may contain confidential or proprietary information and may not be copied or redistributed to any party not legally entitled to receive it.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

Page 4: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,
Page 5: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Table of Contents

Tab 1 Market Overview

Tab 2 Total Portfolio Summary

Tab 3 Equity

Tab 4 Fixed Income

Tab 5 Real Assets

Appendix Definitions of Statistical Measures

Quality Rating Scale

Historical Benchmark Composition

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

Page 6: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,
Page 7: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Market Overview

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

7

Page 8: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Global Long-Only EquityThe second quarter of 2017 was truly a “Tale of Two Markets” as Growth indicesoutperformed their Value counterparts.

The Information Technology and Health Care sectors led the markets in the quarter,providing an outsized boost to Growth given the heavy presence of the two sectors withinthese indices. Meanwhile, Financials have lost steam following the robust run in 2016 whichaccount for the largest sector representation on the Value side. As such, Value hasstruggled to keep up with Growth this year.

International markets continue to outpace domestic stocks due to lower valuations relativeto US markets as well as stronger earnings revisions on the belief of stronger globaleconomic growth. Currency was also a tailwind for developed international holdings in thequarter, as the US dollar weakened against the euro and pound, in particular.

US markets have posted positive gains this year. Overall earnings expectations for the yearpoint to an acceleration in growth which has helped support rising valuations this year.However, political uncertainty looms with concerns over the administration’s ability todeliver on promised pro-growth agendas. With stock valuations at peak levels, expectedpolitical advancements such as tax reform, infrastructure spending, and regulatory easingwill likely be necessary for maintaining strength and valuations in the domestic equitymarkets.

Global Long/Short Equity

Sources: S&P Research, S&P Dow Jones Indices

Sources: ACG Research, Bloomberg

4.7% 4.8%

8.2% 8.4%

1.1% 1.1%

5.7%

2.2%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

9%

Russell 1000 Russell 2000 MSCI EAFE MSCI EMGrowth Value

Q2 Performance for Indicies - Growth Versus Value

Volatility continues to be at historical lows. As measured by VIX, volatility dropped to itslowest level since 1990, even hitting single digits during May and June. This is not expectedto continue, and the anticipation of increased volatility has prompted managers tomaintain their net exposure at slightly below historical averages. Gross exposure,however, has increased towards the high end of historical averages, based on continuedoptimism that fundamentals will matter and increased performance dispersion betweensectors (the combination of an increase in volatility as well as dispersion in the marketprovides managers the opportunity to potentially make money on both longs and shorts).

The eventual shrinking of the Fed’s balance sheet decreases/eliminates the “rising tides”effect and increases the likelihood that fundamentals will drive stock pricing. Risinginterest rates will be a mild tail wind for managers on the short side (something they havenot had for the past few years).

Lower valuations in Europe at the end of 2016 prompted equity long/short managers toincrease their European investments. Managers have now reached their highest level ofEuropean exposure since 2010. Eurozone consumer confidence remains high and weanticipate this to remain an area of opportunity for the foreseeable future.

The ongoing delays of the President’s health care and tax reform initiatives hasdecreased the market’s expectations for successful outcomes. M&A activity hascontinued, but the optimism about a looser regulatory environment has somewhatabated, slightly decreasing the opportunity set for event driven managers.

Q2 Performance for Indices – Growth vs. Value

Volatility Remains Muted

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Jun-

97

Jun-

98

Jun-

99

Jun-

00

Jun-

01

Jun-

02

Jun-

03

Jun-

04

Jun-

05

Jun-

06

Jun-

07

Jun-

08

Jun-

09

Jun-

10

Jun-

11

Jun-

12

Jun-

13

Jun-

14

Jun-

15

Jun-

16

Jun-

17

VIX Index 20-Year Average

20-Yr Average: 20.74 20-Yr Low: 9.75 (on 6/2/17)

©2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved8

Page 9: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

Feb

-01

Feb

-02

Feb

-03

Feb

-04

Feb

-05

Feb

-06

Feb

-07

Feb

-08

Feb

-09

Feb

-10

Feb

-11

Feb

-12

Feb

-13

Feb

-14

Feb

-15

Feb

-16

Feb

-17

Global Private Equity

Global Real Assets

Sources: ACG Research, Bloomberg, Real Capital Analytics

Much like public markets, valuations remain high for new deals in private markets. Themedian acquisition price for a private equity-backed company purchased in 1Q 2017was 9.7x EBITDA. Pricing is down from 10.3x EBITDA in 2015, however, it is on par withthe transaction multiples of 2007, the end of the last buyout boom. Althoughpurchase price multiples are at the same level as 2007, the composition of the price ismuch different today. The average buyout in 2007 used 11% more debt than abuyout completed in 1Q 2017. Factoring in the much lower debt servicing costs, thebuyouts of 2017 should be in better position to weather a downturn than the buyoutsof 2007. Still, higher purchase prices today are likely to translate into lower returnsgoing forward.

After two lackluster years the IPO market has been relatively strong in the first half of2017, with 77 companies making their public debuts, compared to 126 for the entiretyof 2016. Just halfway through the year, the 2017 IPO market raised more capital thanall of 2016 and appears poised to continue its healthy pace for the remainder of theyear. IPO investors continue to favor technology and health care as these sectorsmade up half of the 52 IPO’s completed in 2Q 2017. Private equity managerscontinue to take advantage of the accommodative IPO market. The 15 PE-backedcompanies to IPO in 2Q raised $5.1 billion, a two-year high for deal count and a three-year high for proceeds. The combination of high valuations and a strong IPO marketis likely to lead to strong distribution activity over the coming quarters as IPO lock-upperiods expire and managers look to fully realize gains.

Real estate assets continue their impressive streak of gains even as many investorsquestion whether the momentum is sustainable in the face of a rising rate environment.After a post-election rise to 2.45% at year-end, 10-year Treasuries were yielding 2.32% at theend of 2Q 2017 even as the Fed raised rates twice during this period. The majority ofinvestors view real estate as a longer-term asset class, making comparisons to 10-year ratesmore meaningful than comparisons to short-term rates. The more recent rise in risk-freerates has done little to affect US real estate cap rates and the spread between 10-year USTreasury rates and cap rates actually increased marginally from year-end 2016.Fundamental indicators remain strong as occupancy, lease rates and NOI continue tosupport real estate returns. The current spread of 403 bps is 260 bps higher than the pre-recession low suggesting that US real estate still has room to run.

A mixed outlook for the commodity sector led to mixed results across sub-sectors. OPEC’sdecision to maintain production cuts, as opposed to increasing cuts, was a major reasonthat oil sold off in 2Q, declining more than 9% to $46 per barrel. Until the next unexpectedevent that causes some production to go offline, oil prices will be driven by the battlebetween OPEC’s desire to raise prices and US shale producers ability to fill any productiondecreases agreed by the cartel. Prices any lower than $40 per barrel could bring highercost production offline and be supportive of prices going forward. Gold, although roughlyflat during the quarter, could be a beneficiary if and when volatility returns to globalmarkets.

US LBO Purchase Price Multiples

US Real Estate Cap Rate Spread to Treasuries

6.2x

5.1x

3.9x4.7x 5.1x 5.2x 5.4x 5.8x 5.8x 5.5x 5.5x

9.7x9.1x

7.7x8.5x 8.8x 8.7x 8.8x

9.8x10.3x 10.0x 9.7x

0.0x

2.0x

4.0x

6.0x

8.0x

10.0x

12.0x

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1Q17

Mul

tiple

Leverage Purchase Price

Sources: ACG Research, S&P Capital IQ

Spread - Cap Rate to 10-Year Treasury Rate Average Cap Rate 10-Year Treasury Rate

©2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved9

Page 10: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

(%)

January 1,2015 through June 30, 2017

Fed Funds (Lower Limit) Fed Funds (Upper Limit)2-Year UST 10-Year UST

Global Traditional Fixed IncomeCurrent Rate Hiking Cycle

Global Nontraditional Fixed Income

Percentile Rankings of Observations for Past 15-Years

Sources: ACG Research, Bloomberg

Sources: ACG Research, Bloomberg

Liquid Absolute Return strategies generally fell short of traditional bond benchmarks in 2Q-17,but the median manager outperformed cash by about 80 bps and the diversification of riskfactors remains valuable within portfolios. Trailing 12-month returns have been comfortablywithin the commonly referenced LIBOR +3% to +6% objective.

The lack of clarity in a broad range of global policy matters has sustained the feeling ofuncertainty in the market. Anticipated volatility in rates, spreads, and currency should provideopportunities for tactical managers with a wide range of implementation options. Balancingidiosyncratic exposures against liquidity and risk constraints will be key.

As the credit cycle matures, Alternative Fixed Income investors are carefully weighing issuerfundamentals with market valuations. Opportunities in corporate and securitized assets havecontinued to drive returns among credit-oriented strategies. Event-driven managers haveoriented portfolios toward opportunities outside of distressed situations as supportive marketconditions continue to sustain marginal businesses. Eventually, we expect relative valuetrading and alpha-focused strategies to become more prominent in attribution.

Private Credit strategies offer the opportunity to earn both a credit spread and an illiquiditypremium (typically 5-10 year terms) versus publicly traded fixed income strategies. Fundraisingand capital deployment in the sector remains strong with direct lending strategies enjoying themajority of activity at this point in the cycle. Distressed opportunities appear in a small numberof sectors or geographies as the overall default environment remains well below crisis levels.

The Federal Reserve utilized its mid-June meeting to further its rate hiking campaign, whichnow includes four 25 basis points (bps) adjustments over the last 18-months. Investors werealso provided guidance regarding the eventual unwinding of its enlarged $4.5 trillionbalance sheet, with limited roll-offs likely to begin before year-end. The response over thepast quarter has been a notable flattening of the US Treasury yield curve, as two-year ratesprogressed modestly higher while longer-term rates actually declined with more mutedgrowth/inflation assumptions. Unanticipated eagerness on the part of the FOMC, or otherprominent central bankers, is a tail risk that could prompt an adjustment in asset prices.

The BloomBar Aggregate was solidly positive during the quarter. The decline in longer-termrates was a tailwind for all categories, but IG corporates dominated from an excess returnstandpoint as investor demand drove credit spreads to their tightest level since mid-2014.

High Yield continued its impressive performance trend. Spreads are now 230 bps tighterover the past year, but its worth noting that index-level yields don’t typically spend muchtime below 6%. As such, careful security selection is becoming increasingly important.

Municipal Bonds were very solid, with tax-exempt issues benefitting from steady demandand low issuance fueled by a collapse in re-financing deals. The yield ratio versus USTreasury bonds has become fairly rich across the curve, especially for shorter-dated issues.

Unhedged Global government bonds outperformed domestic counterparts as the USdollar’s decline aided returns. Outcomes in Emerging Markets remained particularly strong.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

10-YearUS Treasury

Yield

US Treasury10's - 2's

Curve Slope

IG CreditSpread

High YieldCredit Spread

EquityVolatility

(VIX)

Rolling 12-MonthTrade-Weighted

CurrencyVolatility

Trailing 12-Month Minimum Trailing 12-Month Maximum June 30, 2017

Rates low,but rising

Curve now flattening

Both IG and HY spreads continue to narrow

Equity volatility still very low

Currency volatility near

average

©2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved10

Page 11: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Market Environment

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

YTD (%) 1 Year (%) 3 Years (%) 5 Years (%) 10 Years (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

1.87 -2.32 2.01 1.28 4.06BloomBar US Treasury

2.27 -0.31 2.48 2.21 4.48BloomBar US Aggregate

2.63 0.91 2.76 2.73 4.73BloomBar Universal

9.34 17.90 9.61 14.63 7.18S&P 500

4.99 24.60 7.36 13.70 6.92Russell 2000

14.23 20.83 1.61 9.18 1.50MSCI EAFE

11.82 19.42 5.39 11.14 4.27MSCI ACWI

18.60 24.17 1.44 4.33 2.25MSCI Emerging Markets

-5.26 -6.50 -14.81 -9.25 -6.49Bloomberg Commodity

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

11

Page 12: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Equity Index Returns

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

YTD (%) 1 Year (%) 3 Years (%) 5 Years (%) 10 Years (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

9.34 17.90 9.61 14.63 7.18S&P 500

8.93 18.51 9.10 14.59 7.26Russell 3000

4.66 15.53 7.36 13.94 5.57Russell 1000 Value

14.00 20.42 11.11 15.30 8.91Russell 1000 Growth

5.99 18.57 8.53 14.92 8.56S&P Mid Cap 400

4.99 24.60 7.36 13.70 6.92Russell 2000

0.54 24.86 7.02 13.39 5.92Russell 2000 Value

9.97 24.40 7.64 13.98 7.82Russell 2000 Growth

14.23 20.83 1.61 9.18 1.50MSCI EAFE

14.45 21.00 1.27 7.70 1.59MSCI ACWI ex US

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

12

Page 13: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

US Markets - Performance Breakdown

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

S&P 500 - Sector Returns (%)

Consumer Discretionary

(12.27)

Consumer Staples

(9.05)

Energy

(6.01)

Financials

(14.55)

Health Care

(14.51)

Industrials

(10.28)

Information Technology

(22.26)

Materials

(2.85)

Real Estate

(2.93)

Telecommunication Services

(2.14)

Utilit ies

(3.16)

1.98

0.90

-7.03

3.80

6.66

4.17

3.76

2.64

1.85

-8.14

1.35

10.23

6.59

-13.81

5.97

15.07

8.34

16.38

8.09

4.62

-12.79

6.86

Russell 2000 - Sector Returns (%)

Consumer Discretionary

(12.39)

Consumer Staples

(2.69)

Energy

(2.85)

Financials

(17.92)

Health Care

(14.98)

Industrials

(14.47)

Information Technology

(16.86)

Materials

(4.33)

Real Estate

(7.48)

Telecommunication Services

(0.86)

Utilit ies

(3.65)

2.66

-4.22

-19.72

0.90

9.02

2.31

3.84

0.09

3.00

15.54

2.85

3.81

-5.56

-28.27

-0.77

22.86

3.35

10.17

6.16

2.90

9.18

7.68

3 Months YTD

Numbers in parenthesis represent sector weightings of the index. Sector weights may not add to 100% due to rounding or securities that are not assigned to a Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sector.

Source: ACG Research, Bloomberg

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

13

Page 14: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Non-US Equity Index Returns

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-4.00

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

YTD (%) 1 Year (%) 3 Years (%) 5 Years (%) 10 Years (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

14.23 20.83 1.61 9.18 1.50MSCI EAFE

7.94 22.68 7.52 13.05 2.50MSCI EAFE Local Currency

11.60 25.71 -0.05 8.70 0.50MSCI EAFE Value

17.03 16.13 3.20 9.58 2.43MSCI EAFE Growth

18.60 24.17 1.44 4.33 2.25MSCI Emerging Markets

10.11 19.58 5.87 9.86 1.42MSCI Japan

14.45 21.00 1.27 7.70 1.59MSCI ACWI ex US

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

14

Page 15: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Non-US Equity - Performance Breakdown

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

MSCI EAFE - Sector Returns (%)

Consumer Discretionary

(11.95)

Consumer Staples

(11.52)

Energy

(4.73)

Financials

(21.60)

Health Care

(10.83)

Industrials

(14.54)

Information Technology

(6.05)

Materials

(7.50)

Real Estate

(3.63)

Telecommunication Services

(4.25)

Utilit ies

(3.40)

4.88

7.91

-0.47

7.47

7.40

7.25

9.67

3.55

4.74

4.96

7.47

10.56

17.74

-2.14

15.50

16.72

17.20

22.55

11.48

11.17

10.43

15.86

MSCI EAFE - Country Returns (%)

Australia (7.06)

Austria (0.24)

Belgium (1.14)

Denmark (1.80)

Finland (1.02)

France (10.52)

Germany (9.51)

Hong Kong (3.49)

Ireland (0.45)

Israel (0.69)

Italy (2.30)

Japan (23.45)

Netherlands (3.53)

New Zealand (0.17)

Norway (0.61)

Portugal (0.15)

Singapore (1.31)

Spain (3.46)

Sweden (2.92)

Switzerland (8.51)

United Kingdom (17.67)

-1.82

22.06

5.52

15.39

14.35

9.86

6.92

7.18

3.85

6.67

9.60

5.23

8.06

8.07

4.78

4.07

5.27

8.08

9.05

9.42

4.74

9.00

33.15

10.96

22.97

23.16

17.93

16.04

21.55

7.89

12.69

16.45

10.11

20.32

10.59

6.35

12.66

19.46

24.16

19.93

19.08

10.05

YTD3 Months

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

Source: ACG Research, Bloomberg

Numbers in parenthesis represent sector or country weights of the index. Sector or country weights may not add to 100% due to rounding.

15

Page 16: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Emerging Markets - Performance Breakdown

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

MSCI Emerging Markets - Sector Returns (%)

Consumer Discretionary

(10.46)

Consumer Staples

(6.79)

Energy

(6.55)

Financials

(23.59)

Health Care

(2.39)

Industrials

(5.73)

Information Technology

(26.73)

Materials

(7.09)

Real Estate

(2.66)

Telecommunication Services

(5.39)

Utilit ies

(2.61)

8.50

5.22

-4.78

4.07

4.41

3.91

15.60

-0.30

11.47

2.11

-1.53

22.51

13.24

-0.52

14.58

10.16

18.08

35.27

11.81

23.22

9.93

8.33

MSCI Emerging Markets - Country Returns (%)

Brazil (6.62)

Chile (1.14)

China (27.90)

Colombia (0.45)

Czech Republic (0.18)

Egypt (0.13)

Greece (0.39)

Hungary (0.33)

India (8.81)

Indonesia (2.46)

Malaysia (2.38)

Mexico (3.69)

Pakistan (0.13)

Peru (0.37)

Philippines (1.18)

Poland (1.30)

Qatar (0.67)

Russia (3.16)

South Africa (6.56)

South Korea (15.61)

Taiwan (12.48)

Thailand (2.17)

Turkey (1.18)

United Arab Emirates (0.74)

-6.62

-1.50

10.66

2.48

10.89

3.26

34.00

19.37

2.91

8.75

5.14

7.30

-2.07

7.21

7.19

13.80

-10.88

-9.81

3.64

10.26

8.99

2.53

19.79

1.33

3.13

14.38

24.98

8.32

17.16

5.16

29.37

19.30

20.54

16.45

13.86

24.54

-4.03

13.12

13.99

34.01

-9.23

-13.96

8.37

28.90

21.84

11.42

32.79

3.68

YTD3 Months

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

Numbers in parenthesis represent sector or country weights of the index. Sector or country weights may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Source: ACG Research, Bloomberg16

Page 17: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Interest Rate Term Structure

Government Issues - 3 Months to 30 Years Maturity

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Yie

ld t

o M

atu

rity

(%

)

Years to Maturity

Jun 2017 Mar 2017 Jun 2016

90 Days 1.01 0.75 0.26

180 Days 1.13 0.90 0.35

1 Year 1.23 1.02 0.44

2 Years 1.38 1.26 0.58

3 Years 1.55 1.49 0.69

4 Years 1.72 1.78 0.89

5 Years 1.89 1.92 1.00

7 Years 2.14 2.21 1.28

10 Years 2.30 2.39 1.47

20 Years 2.57 2.74 1.81

30 Years 2.84 3.01 2.29

Source: Bloomberg

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

17

Page 18: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Fixed Income Index Returns

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-4.00

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

YTD (%) 1 Year (%) 3 Years (%) 5 Years (%) 10 Years (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

0.31 0.49 0.23 0.17 0.58US T-Bills 90 Day

0.44 -0.11 0.69 0.63 1.95BofA ML 1-3 Yr Treasury

3.17 0.44 2.02 2.06 4.00BloomBar 5 Yr Municipal

2.27 -0.31 2.48 2.21 4.48BloomBar US Aggregate

4.93 12.70 4.48 6.89 7.67BloomBar US Corp High Yield

4.41 -2.18 -0.35 0.78 3.69BloomBar Global Aggregate

6.19 6.04 5.38 5.72 7.44JPM EMBI Global Diversified

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

18

Page 19: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

US Fixed Income Market Environment

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Nominal Returns By Sector (%)

3 Months YTD 1 Year 3 Years

US Aggregate 1.44 2.28 -0.31 2.49

US Treasury 1.18 1.86 -2.32 2.01

US Agg: Gov't-Related 1.29 2.69 -0.19 2.23

US Corporate IG 2.55 3.81 2.30 3.61

MBS 0.87 1.35 -0.04 2.18

CMBS 1.31 2.18 -0.34 2.57

ABS 0.60 1.14 0.63 1.65

US Corp High Yield 2.17 4.94 12.72 4.49

Nominal Returns by Quality (%)

3 Months YTD 1 Year 3 Years

AAA 1.06 1.68 -1.25 2.09

AA 1.65 2.62 -0.15 2.93

A 2.43 3.47 1.11 3.63

BAA 2.68 4.44 3.55 3.47

BA 2.67 4.79 9.83 5.20

B 1.72 4.29 12.45 3.61

CAA 1.85 6.60 20.78 4.82

Nominal Returns by Maturity (%)

3 Months YTD 1 Year 3 Years

0.311-3 Yr. 0.72 0.39 0.98

0.813-5 Yr. 1.55 0.17 1.97

1.055-7 Yr. 1.82 -0.37 2.15

1.387-10 Yr. 2.19 -1.79 2.72

4.3210+ Yr. 5.82 -1.27 5.23

Excess Returns by Sector

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Aggregate Gov't-Related Corporate MBS CMBS ABS High Yield

(Corporate)

3 Months YTD 1 Year 3 Years

Exc

ess

Re

turn

(b

ps)

Excess Returns by Quality

-400

0

400

800

1200

1600

2000

2400

AAA AA A BAA BA B CAA

3 Months YTD 1 Year 3 Years

Exc

ess

Re

turn

(b

ps)

Source: Bloomberg

Excess returns are relative to the duration-neutral Treasury.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

19

Page 20: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Monthly Index Returns

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

3 Months (%) YTD (%) 1 Year (%) 3 Years (%) 5 Years (%) 7 Years (%) 10 Years (%)Index Name

Equity

S&P 500 3.09 9.34 17.90 9.61 14.63 15.41 7.18

Russell 1000 3.06 9.27 18.03 9.26 14.67 15.43 7.29

Russell 1000 Growth 4.67 13.99 20.42 11.11 15.30 16.48 8.91

Russell 1000 Value 1.34 4.66 15.53 7.36 13.94 14.31 5.57

Russell 2500 2.13 5.97 19.84 6.93 14.04 14.78 7.42

Russell 2000 2.46 4.99 24.60 7.36 13.70 14.35 6.92

Russell 2000 Growth 4.39 9.97 24.40 7.64 13.98 15.16 7.82

Russell 2000 Value 0.67 0.54 24.86 7.02 13.39 13.50 5.92

Wilshire 5000 Cap Wtd 2.95 8.73 18.54 9.34 14.61 15.33 7.29

MSCI ACWI 4.45 11.82 19.42 5.39 11.14 11.07 4.27

MSCI ACWI ex US 5.99 14.45 21.00 1.27 7.70 7.14 1.59

MSCI EAFE 6.37 14.23 20.83 1.61 9.18 8.40 1.50

MSCI EAFE Local Currency 2.95 7.94 22.68 7.52 13.05 9.86 2.50

MSCI EAFE Growth 7.72 17.03 16.13 3.20 9.58 8.98 2.43

MSCI EAFE Value 5.07 11.60 25.71 -0.05 8.70 7.75 0.50

MSCI Emerging Markets 6.38 18.60 24.17 1.44 4.33 4.22 2.25

Fixed Income

BofA ML 1-3 Yr Treasury 0.17 0.44 -0.11 0.69 0.63 0.76 1.95

BloomBar 5 Yr Municipal 1.25 3.17 0.44 2.02 2.06 2.84 4.00

BloomBar US Aggregate 1.45 2.27 -0.31 2.48 2.21 3.19 4.48

BloomBar Gov't Bond 1.17 1.86 -2.18 1.99 1.30 2.41 3.93

BloomBar US Credit 2.35 3.68 1.84 3.40 3.68 4.85 5.61

BloomBar 10 Yr Municipal 2.35 4.18 -0.41 3.56 3.40 4.52 5.13

BloomBar US Corp High Yield 2.17 4.93 12.70 4.48 6.89 8.15 7.67

Citigroup World Govt Bond 2.89 4.49 -4.14 -1.00 -0.20 1.68 3.49

BloomBar Global Aggregate 2.60 4.41 -2.18 -0.35 0.78 2.39 3.69

BloomBar Multiverse 2.64 4.58 -1.38 -0.16 1.05 2.64 3.85

JPM EMBI Global Diversified 2.24 6.19 6.04 5.38 5.72 7.09 7.44

Real Assets

NCREIF Property 1.75 3.33 6.98 10.17 10.49 11.58 6.42

NFI ODCE Net 1.49 3.05 6.91 10.33 10.76 12.03 4.29

FTSE NAREIT US Real Estate 1.52 2.70 -1.70 8.36 9.52 13.17 6.00

Bloomberg Commodity -3.00 -5.26 -6.50 -14.81 -9.25 -5.68 -6.49

Cash and Equivalents

US T-Bills 90 Day 0.20 0.31 0.49 0.23 0.17 0.15 0.58

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

20

Page 21: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Monthly Index Returns

For the Periods Ending July 31, 2017

1 Month (%) YTD (%) 1 Year (%) 3 Years (%) 5 Years (%) 7 Years (%) 10 Years (%)Index Name

Equity

S&P 500 2.06 11.59 16.04 10.87 14.78 14.63 7.74

Russell 1000 1.98 11.44 15.95 10.58 14.85 14.65 7.84

Russell 1000 Growth 2.66 17.02 18.05 12.66 15.60 15.78 9.36

Russell 1000 Value 1.33 6.05 13.76 8.45 14.00 13.46 6.21

Russell 2500 1.04 7.07 15.08 9.12 14.43 13.84 8.16

Russell 2000 0.74 5.77 18.45 9.89 14.19 13.39 7.76

Russell 2000 Growth 0.85 10.91 17.76 10.22 14.58 14.25 8.49

Russell 2000 Value 0.63 1.18 19.21 9.50 13.76 12.49 6.94

Wilshire 5000 Cap Wtd 1.88 10.77 16.21 10.71 14.80 14.53 7.86

MSCI ACWI 2.83 14.98 17.69 6.80 11.45 10.27 4.72

MSCI ACWI ex US 3.71 18.70 19.55 2.84 8.18 6.38 1.99

MSCI EAFE 2.89 17.53 18.32 3.26 9.55 7.44 1.94

MSCI EAFE Local Currency 0.68 8.67 17.90 7.83 12.87 9.25 2.91

MSCI EAFE Growth 2.43 19.87 13.40 4.83 9.73 8.11 2.76

MSCI EAFE Value 3.35 15.34 23.42 1.61 9.29 6.70 1.05

MSCI Emerging Markets 6.04 25.77 25.30 2.76 5.14 3.90 2.32

Fixed Income

BofA ML 1-3 Yr Treasury 0.21 0.65 0.17 0.79 0.63 0.75 1.88

BloomBar Municipal 0.81 4.40 0.26 3.55 3.10 4.15 4.60

BloomBar US Aggregate 0.43 2.71 -0.51 2.71 2.02 3.10 4.44

BloomBar Gov't Bond 0.17 2.03 -2.40 2.10 1.14 2.33 3.80

BloomBar US Credit 0.73 4.44 1.26 3.67 3.27 4.68 5.65

BloomBar 10 Yr Municipal 0.93 5.15 0.45 3.78 3.28 4.41 5.14

BloomBar US Corp High Yield 1.11 6.09 10.95 5.34 6.72 7.78 8.17

Citigroup World Govt Bond 1.86 6.43 -2.87 -0.08 -0.02 1.43 3.37

BloomBar Global Aggregate 1.68 6.16 -1.28 0.51 0.88 2.15 3.66

BloomBar Multiverse 1.71 6.37 -0.53 0.72 1.16 2.39 3.84

Real Assets

Bloomberg Commodity 2.26 -3.11 0.77 -12.69 -9.98 -6.26 -6.48

Cash and Equivalents

US T-Bills 90 Day 0.09 0.39 0.54 0.26 0.19 0.16 0.55

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

21

Page 22: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

This page intentionally left blank.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

22

Page 23: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Total Portfolio Summary

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

23

Page 24: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Total Portfolio

Dollar Reconciliation ($000s)

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

3 Months YTD FYTD 5 Years

Beginning Market Value 2,346,027 2,264,618 2,195,220 1,751,829

Net Additions -18,124 -21,082 -56,350 -216,912

Return on Investment 61,659 146,027 250,693 854,646

Ending Market Value 2,389,563 2,389,563 2,389,563 2,389,563

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

Fiscal year ending June. 24

Page 25: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Total Portfolio

For the Period Ending June 30, 2017

0.004.00

8.0012.00

16.0020.00

US La

rge C

ap Equ

ity

US Sm

all/M

id C

ap Equ

ity

Long/S

hor

t Eq

uity

Int'l

Develo

ped Marke

ts E

quity

Emerg

ing M

arkets

Equ

ity

Private

Equ

ity

Core

Bon

ds

Multi-

Sector F

ixed In

come

Abso

lute

Retu

rn

Private

Cre

dit

Core

Real E

sta

te

Opportu

nist

ic R

eal Estate

Com

moditi

es

Cash

and E

quivale

nts

17

.24

8.1

7

14

.05

10

.19

4.7

1 7.4

4

7.1

2

9.0

2

7.8

2

0.7

9

6.4

4

2.5

6

3.2

2

1.2

4

15

.00

5.0

0

15

.00

10

.00

5.0

0 10

.00

10

.00

7.5

0

7.5

0

0.0

0 5.0

0

5.0

0

5.0

0

0.0

0

Actual Allocat ion Target Allocat ion

Market

Value ($000s)

Actual

Allocation (%)

Target

Allocation (%)

Over/Under

Target (%)

Range

Min-Max (%)

Total Portfolio 2,389,563 100.00 100.00

Equity 1,476,945 61.81 60.00 1.81 50.00 - 70.00

US Large Cap Equity 412,054 17.24 15.00 2.24 10.00 - 20.00

US Small/Mid Cap Equity 195,337 8.17 5.00 3.17 0.00 - 15.00

Long/Short Equity 335,626 14.05 15.00 -0.95 10.00 - 20.00

Int'l Developed Markets Equity 243,561 10.19 10.00 0.19 5.00 - 15.00

Emerging Markets Equity 112,645 4.71 5.00 -0.29 0.00 - 10.00

Private Equity 177,721 7.44 10.00 -2.56 5.00 - 15.00

Fixed Income 591,171 24.74 25.00 -0.26 15.00 - 35.00

Core Bonds 170,040 7.12 10.00 -2.88 7.50 - 20.00

Multi-Sector Fixed Income 215,452 9.02 7.50 1.52 5.00 - 10.00

Absolute Return 186,745 7.82 7.50 0.32 5.00 - 10.00

Private Credit 18,934 0.79 0.00 0.79

Real Assets 291,846 12.21 15.00 -2.79 0.00 - 20.00

Core Real Estate 153,859 6.44 5.00 1.44 0.00 - 10.00

Opportunistic Real Estate 61,126 2.56 5.00 -2.44 0.00 - 10.00

Commodities 76,861 3.22 5.00 -1.78 0.00 - 10.00

Cash and Equivalents 29,601 1.24 0.00 1.24

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

25

Page 26: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017Return

(%)

Rank Std Dev

(%)

Sharpe

Ratio

3 Months

Total Portfolio 822.64 -- --

Total Fund Policy 3.04 -- --

IF TF Between 55 - 70% Equity 3.11 -- --

Calendar Year Returns

-40.00

-30.00

-20.00

-10.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

10.2

6

-23.1

2

17.3

8

11.7

0

0.0

2

12.2

0

16.1

8

5.2

0

1.0

5 7.4

7

6.3

1

-26.1

6

19.5

7

13.5

2

2.5

5

14.5

1

15.0

3

4.3

6

-1.4

5

7.6

5

8.1

7

-25.7

3

21.8

9

13.1

9

-0.3

6

12.9

0

17.3

6

5.8

9

-0.5

2

7.5

5

Re

turn

(%

)

5 Year Risk / Return

2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.006.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

Total Portfolio Total Fund Policy

IF TF Betw een 55 - 70%

Equity

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

5 Year Relative Statistics

Total

Fund Policy

Beta 0.76

Up Capture (%) 86.29

Down Capture (%) 64.16YTD

Total Portfolio 906.46 -- --

Total Fund Policy 7.69 -- --

IF TF Between 55 - 70% Equity 7.91 -- --

FYTD

Total Portfolio 7711.56 3.00 3.71

Total Fund Policy 11.95 3.54 3.26

IF TF Between 55 - 70% Equity 12.86 3.63 3.38

3 Years

Total Portfolio 604.95 5.47 0.87

Total Fund Policy 4.07 6.83 0.57

IF TF Between 55 - 70% Equity 5.21 6.80 0.74

5 Years

Total Portfolio 658.52 5.20 1.61

Total Fund Policy 8.04 6.50 1.22

IF TF Between 55 - 70% Equity 8.93 6.40 1.37

The rankings represent the portfolio's gross of fee returns versus a gross of fee peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

26

Page 27: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Total Portfolio

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.002.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

Total Port folio Total Fund Policy

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Total

Portfolio

Total

Fund Policy

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 5.03 5.00

Standard Deviation (%) 8.06 10.58

Sharpe Ratio 0.57 0.43

Beta 0.73

Up Capture (%) 76.78

Down Capture (%) 72.97

10 Year Growth of a Dollar 10 Year Return Analysis

Total

Portfolio

Total

Fund Policy

Number of Months 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 5.31 7.47

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -9.92 -12.85

Number of Positive Months 78 72

Number of Negative Months 42 48

% of Positive Months 65.00 60.00$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

Jun-07 Feb-09 Oct-10 Jun-12 Feb-14 Oct-15 Jun-17

Total Port folio Total Fund Policy

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

27

Page 28: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Total Portfolio

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Aug 1985

2.5

4

6.2

7

11.1

4

4.5

2

8.0

8

2.6

4

6.4

6

11.5

6

4.9

5

8.5

2

8.3

3

3.0

4

7.6

9

11.9

5

4.0

7

8.0

4

3.1

1

7.9

1

12.8

6

5.2

1

8.9

3

Net of Fees * Gross of Fees Total Fund Policy IF TF Betw een 55 - 70% Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 82 90 77 60 65

5th Percentile 4.44 10.13 15.94 6.78 10.59

25th Percentile 3.56 8.80 14.14 5.90 9.66

50th Percentile 3.11 7.91 12.86 5.21 8.93

75th Percentile 2.75 7.15 11.67 4.35 8.14

95th Percentile 2.22 5.91 9.86 2.99 6.78

Observations 551 546 530 483 431

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

* Performance is calculated using net of fee returns.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

28

Page 29: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Total Portfolio

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-4.00

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

11.1

4

-0.6

3

3.3

8

14.9

9

12.3

3

11.5

6

-0.2

0

3.8

1

15.5

0

12.7

2

11.9

5

-0.1

5

0.8

3

17.3

0

11.3

412.8

6

-0.3

2

3.1

4

16.9

1

12.7

3

Net of Fees * Gross Of Fees Total Fund Policy IF TF Betw een 55 - 70% Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 77 48 35 76 51

5th Percentile 15.94 3.42 5.88 19.67 16.08

25th Percentile 14.14 1.12 4.25 18.09 14.04

50th Percentile 12.86 -0.32 3.14 16.91 12.73

75th Percentile 11.67 -2.05 1.71 15.53 10.98

95th Percentile 9.86 -4.08 -1.08 13.38 8.89

Observations 530 509 488 459 432

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

* Performance is calculated using net of fee returns.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

29

Page 30: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Rates of Return Summary & Universe Rankings

Market

Value ($000s)

Actual

Allocation (%)

3 Months

(%)

Rank YTD Rank

(%)

FYTD

(%)

3 Years 5 YearsRank

(%) (%)

Rank Rank 10 Years

(%)

2,389,563 100.00 2.54 6.27 11.14 4.52 8.08 4.70Total Portfolio * (06/05) ¹

2.64 82 6.46 90 11.56 77 4.95 60 8.52 65 5.03Total Portfolio (08/85)

3.04 7.69 11.95 4.07 8.04 5.00Total Fund Policy ²

IF TF Between 55 - 70% Equity 3.11 7.91 12.86 5.21 8.93 5.39

1,476,945 61.81 3.40 8.90 16.38 6.59 10.87 5.18Equity (01/98)

4.45 11.82 19.42 5.39 11.14 4.27MSCI ACWI

412,054 17.24 US Large Cap Equity

412,054 17.24 493.05 9.26 46 18.02 9.27 14.6546 41 41 7.31Northern Trust Russell 1000 Index (08/98) ³

3.06 9.27 18.03 9.26 14.67 7.29Russell 1000

eA US Large Cap Core Equity 3.01 9.06 17.35 8.91 14.32 7.49

195,337 8.17 US Small/Mid Cap Equity

110,411 4.62 25 / 242.18 4.34 71 / 21 25.81 7.96 15.3112 / 26 46 / 43 52 / 41 8.38Boston Partners (01/98)

0.32 1.95 18.36 6.21 13.69 6.52Russell 2500 Value

eA US Mid Cap Value Equity 1.46 5.44 17.75 7.79 15.54 7.90

eA US Small Cap Value Equity 0.93 1.99 23.19 7.65 14.82 7.91

84,927 3.55 395.59 10.83 57 32.67 7.77 --11 58 --Cortina (02/14)

4.39 9.97 24.40 7.64 13.98 7.82Russell 2000 Growth

eA US Small Cap Growth Equity 5.05 11.54 24.34 8.30 14.54 8.26

335,626 14.05 Long/Short Equity

335,626 14.05 2.15 6.12 11.45 4.57 7.59 3.33Grosvenor Long/Short Equity (11/03)

4.45 11.82 19.42 5.39 11.14 4.27MSCI ACWI

1.65 5.51 9.38 1.83 4.55 0.88HFRI FOF: Strategic

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

* Net of fee return data.

FYTD: Fiscal year ending June.

30

Page 31: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Rates of Return Summary & Universe Rankings

Market

Value ($000s)

Actual

Allocation (%)

3 Months

(%)

Rank YTD Rank

(%)

FYTD

(%)

3 Years 5 YearsRank

(%) (%)

Rank Rank 10 Years

(%)

243,561 10.19 International Developed Market

131,552 5.51 874.26 12.07 73 16.37 0.63 8.5894 80 81 1.72Mondrian International (05/04)

6.37 14.23 20.83 1.61 9.18 1.50MSCI EAFE

eA EAFE All Cap Value Equity 6.04 13.58 22.96 2.95 10.35 2.79

112,010 4.69 297.51 16.71 19 21.54 5.42 8.1642 14 95 --Baring Focused International (03/12)

6.37 14.23 20.83 1.61 9.18 1.50MSCI EAFE

eA EAFE All Cap Equity 6.71 14.77 20.47 3.30 10.14 2.40

112,645 4.71 Emerging Markets Equity

33,773 1.41 109.12 20.37 36 13.72 1.93 --95 59 --Wasatch Emerging Markets (09/12)

2.69 16.10 17.34 1.10 5.46 2.46MSCI EM SC

eA Emerging Mkts Equity 6.27 19.24 23.75 2.47 5.77 3.25

78,872 3.30 625.70 19.68 45 -- -- -- --AB EM Strategic Core Equity Fund (11/16)

6.38 18.60 24.17 1.44 4.33 2.25MSCI Emerging Markets

eA Emerging Mkts Equity 6.27 19.24 23.75 2.47 5.77 3.25

177,721 7.44 1.23 2.77 5.47 8.74 10.00 8.46Private Equity (07/03)

591,171 24.74 1.72 3.40 3.82 1.45 3.90 4.72Fixed Income (01/98)

1.52 2.63 0.91 2.76 2.73 4.73BloomBar Universal

170,040 7.12 Core Bonds

170,040 7.12 331.65 2.54 48 0.44 2.86 2.8044 47 46 4.88Agincourt Core Fixed Income (10/99)

1.45 2.27 -0.31 2.48 2.21 4.48BloomBar US Aggregate

eA US Core Fixed Income 1.56 2.52 0.34 2.79 2.73 5.04

215,452 9.02 Multi Sector Fixed Income

120,555 5.05 2.19 4.44 11.88 4.26 6.90 6.88Oaktree Capital Management (02/98)

1.45 2.27 -0.31 2.48 2.21 4.48BloomBar US Aggregate

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

31

Page 32: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Rates of Return Summary & Universe Rankings

Market

Value ($000s)

Actual

Allocation (%)

3 Months

(%)

Rank YTD Rank

(%)

FYTD

(%)

3 Years 5 YearsRank

(%) (%)

Rank Rank 10 Years

(%)

94,897 3.97 343.31 6.05 35 -0.71 -0.14 1.1587 64 75 --Loomis Sayles (06/08)

2.89 4.49 -4.14 -1.00 -0.20 3.49Citigroup World Govt Bond

eA All Global Fixed Income 2.52 5.14 4.25 1.22 3.28 4.67

186,745 7.82 Absolute Return

126,868 5.31 0.81 3.03 6.62 0.10 5.03 2.96PAAMCO (10/02)

1.45 2.27 -0.31 2.48 2.21 4.48BloomBar US Aggregate

0.37 1.58 5.14 1.44 3.61 0.79HFRI FOF: Conservative

59,877 2.51 960.25 0.11 99 -- -- -- --Wellington Global Total Return (12/16)

0.28 0.53 0.93 0.55 0.44 0.92LIBOR 3 Month

eA Global Unconstrained Fixed Income 1.87 4.41 5.82 2.54 3.60 4.74

18,934 0.79 Private Credit

291,846 12.21 1.02 1.86 5.52 4.45 7.35 3.94Real Assets (01/98)

-0.01 0.26 2.35 -1.65 3.38 0.75Real Assets Blended Index ⁴

153,859 6.44 Core Real Estate

115,904 4.85 1.57 3.52 7.94 10.78 12.15 --JP Morgan Strategic Property (12/07)

1.49 3.05 6.91 10.33 10.76 4.29NFI ODCE Net

1.75 3.33 6.98 10.17 10.49 6.42NCREIF Property

37,955 1.59 2.67 5.10 11.79 -- -- --Blackstone Property Partners (01/15)

1.49 3.05 6.91 10.33 10.76 4.29NFI ODCE Net

1.75 3.33 6.98 10.17 10.49 6.42NCREIF Property

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

32

Page 33: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Rates of Return Summary & Universe Rankings

Market

Value ($000s)

Actual

Allocation (%)

3 Months

(%)

Rank YTD Rank

(%)

FYTD

(%)

3 Years 5 YearsRank

(%) (%)

Rank Rank 10 Years

(%)

61,126 2.56 Opportunistic Real Estate

56,368 2.36 3.34 6.23 9.04 12.17 10.60 --Private Real Estate (08/11)

Private Real Estate Direct

4,758 0.20 4.83 7.03 9.12 10.67 9.48 11.72Columbus Square (01/98)

1.75 3.33 6.98 10.17 10.49 6.42NCREIF Property

1.49 3.05 6.91 10.33 10.76 4.29NFI ODCE Net

76,861 3.22 Commodities

29,564 1.24 -1.10 -4.88 0.81 7.08 7.21 4.34Mount Lucas Peak Partners (01/98)

-1.77 -1.54 3.58 1.43 2.79 5.09CS Hedge - Global Macro

47,297 1.98 -3.17 -5.18 -5.33 -- -- --Gresham Tap Fund (08/14)

-3.00 -5.26 -6.50 -14.81 -9.25 -6.49Bloomberg Commodity

29,601 1.24 Cash and Equivalents

Notes:

1 Total Fund Policy Index history available in appendix.

2 Total Fund Policy: Effective April 2016, the index consists of 60.0% MSCI ACWI, 25.0% BloomBar Universal, 10.0% NFI ODCE Net, 5.0% Bloomberg Commodity.

3 Performance data prior to October 31, 2014 is reflective of the Mellon Capital Passive Index fund. Due to contributions and withdrawals in this account, the returns may differ from the performance of the fund.

4 Real Assets Blended Index: Effective January 2016, the index consists of 67.0% NFI ODCE Net, 33.0% Bloomberg Commodity.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

33

Page 34: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

This page intentionally left blank.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

34

Page 35: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Equity Manager Performance

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

35

Page 36: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Northern Trust Russell 1000 Index

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy US Large Cap Core

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark Russell 1000

Performance Inception Date August 1998

Fees 1 bps

Performance Goals

Mirror the risk/return profile of the Russell 1000.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA US Large

Cap Core Equity universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 399,847 386,004

Net Additions 0 -40,019

Return on Investment 12,207 66,068

Ending Market Value 412,054 412,054

Characteristics

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

140.00

160.00

180.00

W td Avg M kt Cap

($Bil)

Div idend Yield P/E (1 Yr Trailing) EPS Growth (5 Yr

Proj)

P/B

15

2.8

6

1.9

6

21

.94

11

.99

3.0

6

13

8.9

7

2.1

1

21

.20

12

.24

2.7

3

Northern Trus t Russell 1000

Sector Allocation

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

Cons

Disc

Cons

Staples

Energy Financials Health

Care

Indust rials Info Tech M aterials Real

Es tate

Telecom U t ilit ies

12

.64

8.4

4

5.7

6

14

.65

13

.93

10

.46

21

.81

3.2

8

3.8

0

2.0

5

3.1

3

12

.63

8.4

4

5.7

7

14

.64

13

.90

10

.44

21

.73

3.2

7

3.8

1

2.0

5

3.1

2

Northern Trus t Russell 1000

Characteristic and allocation charts represents data of the EB Daily Valued Large Cap Stock Index Fund (Non-Mutual Commingled).

Sector weights may not add to 100% due to securities that are not assigned to a Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sector.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

36

Page 37: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Northern Trust Russell 1000 Index

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.004.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

Northern Trust Russell 1000

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Northern

Trust Russell 1000

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 7.31 7.29

Standard Deviation (%) 15.49 15.49

Sharpe Ratio 0.44 0.44

Beta 1.00

R Squared (%) 100.00

Alpha (%) 0.02

Tracking Error (%) 0.05

Batting Average (%) 65.00

Up Capture (%) 100.00

Down Capture (%) 99.92

10 Year Growth of a Dollar 10 Year Return Analysis

Northern

Trust Russell 1000

Number of Months 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 11.20 11.21

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -17.49 -17.46

Number of Positive Months 78 78

Number of Negative Months 42 42

% of Positive Months 65.00 65.00$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

$2.00

$2.20

Jun-07 Feb-09 Oct-10 Jun-12 Feb-14 Oct-15 Jun-17

Northern Trust Russell 1000

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

37

Page 38: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Northern Trust Russell 1000 Index

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Aug 1998

3.0

5

9.2

6

18.0

2

9.2

7

14.6

5

6.5

1

3.0

6

9.2

7

18.0

3

9.2

6

14.6

7

6.4

4

3.0

1

9.0

6

17.3

5

8.9

1

14.3

2

Northern Trust Russell 1000 eA US Large Cap Core Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 49 46 46 41 41

5th Percentile 5.54 13.34 24.21 11.65 16.70

25th Percentile 3.88 10.51 20.18 9.86 15.19

50th Percentile 3.01 9.06 17.35 8.91 14.32

75th Percentile 2.33 7.80 14.83 7.52 13.39

95th Percentile 0.93 5.25 10.15 5.06 11.14

Observations 353 353 352 340 308

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

38

Page 39: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Northern Trust Russell 1000 Index

For the One Year Periods Ending June

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

32.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

18.0

2

2.9

6

7.3

7

25.3

7

21.1

2

18.0

3

2.9

3

7.3

7

25.3

5

21.2

4

17.3

5

1.2

0

7.7

7

25.3

4

20.8

6

Northern Trust Russell 1000 eA US Large Cap Core Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 46 34 57 50 48

5th Percentile 24.21 10.08 12.92 32.39 27.03

25th Percentile 20.18 4.41 9.92 27.29 23.16

50th Percentile 17.35 1.20 7.77 25.34 20.86

75th Percentile 14.83 -2.13 5.54 22.85 18.57

95th Percentile 10.15 -5.49 1.63 18.02 13.40

Observations 352 365 399 413 428

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

39

Page 40: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Boston Partners

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy US Small/Mid Cap Value

Vehicle Separately Managed Account

Benchmarks Russell 2500 Value and Russell 2000 Value

Performance Inception Date January 1998

Fees 60 bps base fee with annual performance fee

Performance Goals

Outperform the Russell 2500 Value and Russell 2000 Value.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA US Mid Cap

Value Equity universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 108,226 88,277

Net Additions -167 -604

Return on Investment 2,351 22,737

Income 634 1,982

Gain/Loss 1,717 20,755

Ending Market Value 110,411 110,411

Characteristics

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

32.00

W td Avg M kt

Cap ($Bil)

M ed M kt Cap

($Bil)

Div idend Yield P/E (1 Yr Trailing) EPS Growth (5 Yr

Proj)

P/B

4.5

3

3.4

6

1.7

0

17

.50

9.8

0

1.8

04.2

2

0.9

6 2.3

4

23

.95

9.0

7

1.5

5

1.8

3

0.6

6 2.3

0

25

.38

8.5

7

1.4

3

Bos ton Partners Russell 2500 Value Russell 2000 Value

Sector Allocation

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

Cons Disc

Cons Staples

Energy

Financials

Health Care

Indust rials

Info Tech

M aterials

Real Es tate

Telecom

U t ilit ies

Cash

12

.00

1.0

0

9.8

0

29

.80

5.3

0

12

.90

17

.00

7.6

0

2.1

0

0.0

0

0.8

0

1.7

0

10

.53

3.3

9 6.0

8

24

.31

5.7

9

12

.67

8.4

0

5.0

7

15

.19

0.4

2

6.5

1

0.0

0

10

.53

2.7

8 4.7

4

30

.31

5.5

9

11

.55

9.4

3

4.0

1

11

.55

0.6

9

6.6

4

0.0

0

Bos ton Partners Russell 2500 Value Russell 2000 Value

Sector weights may not add to 100% due to securities that are not assigned to a Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sector.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

40

Page 41: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Boston Partners

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 20.00 21.00 22.004.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

Boston Partners Russell 2500 Value

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Boston

Partners

Russell

2500 Value

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 8.38 6.52

Standard Deviation (%) 19.63 18.88

Sharpe Ratio 0.40 0.32

Beta 1.02

R Squared (%) 96.04

Alpha (%) 1.74

Tracking Error (%) 3.92

Batting Average (%) 53.33

Up Capture (%) 103.55

Down Capture (%) 96.82

10 Year Growth of a Dollar 10 Year Return Analysis

Boston

Partners

Russell

2500 Value

Number of Months 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 19.35 15.95

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -22.79 -20.65

Number of Positive Months 74 74

Number of Negative Months 46 46

% of Positive Months 61.67 61.67$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

$2.00

$2.20

$2.40

Jun-07 Feb-09 Oct-10 Jun-12 Feb-14 Oct-15 Jun-17

Boston Partners Russell 2500 Value

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

41

Page 42: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Boston Partners

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

32.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Jan 1998

2.1

8 4.3

4

25.8

1

7.9

6

15.3

1

9.8

6

0.3

2 1.9

5

18.3

6

6.2

1

13.6

9

9.0

5

0.6

7

0.5

4

24.8

6

7.0

2

13.3

9

8.4

6

1.4

6

5.4

4

17.7

5

7.7

9

15.5

4

0.9

3

1.9

9

23.1

9

7.6

5

14.8

2

Boston Partners Russell 2500 Value Russell 2000 Value eA US M id Cap Value Equity eA US Small Cap Value Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 25 / 24 71 / 21 12 / 26 46 / 43 52 / 41

5th Percentile 4.60 / 4.16 10.16 / 7.90 29.80 / 30.55 10.73 / 11.11 17.80 / 17.68

25th Percentile 2.17 / 2.13 7.06 / 3.76 21.42 / 26.00 9.09 / 8.81 16.35 / 15.86

50th Percentile 1.46 / 0.93 5.44 / 1.99 17.75 / 23.19 7.79 / 7.65 15.54 / 14.82

75th Percentile 0.32 / -0.15 4.00 / -0.34 15.91 / 20.37 6.33 / 5.57 13.98 / 13.49

95th Percentile -0.67 / -1.83 1.78 / -2.72 13.12 / 14.33 1.77 / -0.59 11.54 / 10.06

Observations 102 / 233 102 / 233 102 / 233 102 / 222 97 / 213

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

42

Page 43: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Boston Partners

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

25.8

1

-4.2

7

4.4

9

26.9

1

27.6

4

18.3

6

0.2

2

0.9

9

24.9

4

26.8

8

24.8

6

-2.5

8

0.7

8

22.5

4

24.7

6

17.7

5

-0.2

3

5.2

4

27.3

8

27.6

2

23.1

9

-2.7

7

3.9

6

25.5

2

27.0

9

Boston Partners Russell 2500 Value Russell 2000 Value eA US M id Cap Value Equity eA US Small Cap Value Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 12 / 26 80 / 66 60 / 43 55 / 37 50 / 45

5th Percentile 29.80 / 30.55 8.51 / 4.47 10.69 / 10.32 34.19 / 33.59 33.69 / 37.16

25th Percentile 21.42 / 26.00 3.15 / -0.13 7.32 / 6.48 29.67 / 28.36 29.82 / 30.92

50th Percentile 17.75 / 23.19 -0.23 / -2.77 5.24 / 3.96 27.38 / 25.52 27.62 / 27.09

75th Percentile 15.91 / 20.37 -3.89 / -5.41 2.35 / 0.59 24.64 / 23.17 23.83 / 24.14

95th Percentile 13.12 / 14.33 -10.43 / -14.03 -3.10 / -8.24 18.92 / 18.97 20.16 / 17.21

Observations 102 / 233 109 / 241 113 / 253 118 / 255 123 / 254

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

43

Page 44: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Cortina

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy US Small/Mid Cap Growth

Vehicle Separately Managed Account

Benchmark Russell 2000 Growth

Performance Inception Date February 2014

Fees First $25M at 100 bps, next $25M at 90 bps, balance at 80 bps

Performance Goals

Outperform the Russell 2000 Growth.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above median in the eA US Small Cap

Growth Equity universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 80,616 64,590

Net Additions -188 -672

Return on Investment 4,499 21,009

Income 16 93

Gain/Loss 4,483 20,916

Ending Market Value 84,927 84,927

Characteristics

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

W td Avg M kt

Cap ($Bil)

M ed M kt Cap

($Bil)

Div idend Yield P/E (1 Yr Trailing) EPS Growth (5 Yr

Proj)

P/B

1.3

6

1.0

0

0.2

0

27

.20

18

.60

3.2

0

2.2

0

0.8

9

0.7

5

48

.19

14

.27

3.9

8

Cort ina Russell 2000 Growth

Sector Allocation

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

Cons Disc

Cons Staples

Energy

Financials

Health Care

Indust rials

Info Tech

M aterials

Real Es tate

Telecom

U t ilit ies

Cash

8.9

5

1.9

3 3.9

3

5.2

2

25

.40

12

.97

32

.12

3.0

9

0.0

0 2.2

6

0.0

0

4.0

9

14

.20

2.6

1

1.0

0

5.7

9

24

.17

17

.32

24

.13

4.6

3

3.5

0

1.0

3

0.7

2

0.0

0

Cort ina Russell 2000 Growth

Sector weights may not add to 100% due to securities that are not assigned to a Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) sector.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

44

Page 45: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Cortina

3 Year Risk / Return 3 Year Portfolio Statistics

12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 20.004.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

Cort ina Russell 2000 Grow th

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Cortina

Russell

2000 Growth

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 7.77 7.64

Standard Deviation (%) 15.62 16.07

Sharpe Ratio 0.49 0.46

Beta 0.91

R Squared (%) 87.37

Alpha (%) 0.83

Tracking Error (%) 5.74

Batting Average (%) 61.11

Up Capture (%) 92.46

Down Capture (%) 92.81

3 Year Growth of a Dollar 3 Year Return Analysis

Cortina

Russell

2000 Growth

Number of Months 36 36

Highest Monthly Return (%) 11.26 8.95

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -9.33 -10.83

Number of Positive Months 23 24

Number of Negative Months 13 12

% of Positive Months 63.89 66.67$0.80

$0.85

$0.90

$0.95

$1.00

$1.05

$1.10

$1.15

$1.20

$1.25

$1.30

Jun-14 Dec-14 Jun-15 Dec-15 Jun-16 Dec-16 Jun-17

Cort ina Russell 2000 Grow th

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

45

Page 46: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Cortina

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 2 Years 3 Years Since Feb 2014

5.5

9

10.8

3

32.6

7

11.5

4

7.7

7

5.5

4

4.3

9

9.9

7

24.4

0

5.3

7 7.6

4

7.9

2

5.0

5

11.5

4

24.3

4

6.6

2 8.3

0

Cort ina Russell 2000 Grow th eA US Small Cap Grow th Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 39 57 11 15 58

5th Percentile 9.34 19.03 35.21 14.10 12.79

25th Percentile 6.65 14.78 28.26 9.08 10.51

50th Percentile 5.05 11.54 24.34 6.62 8.30

75th Percentile 3.58 8.83 20.91 3.82 5.62

95th Percentile 1.13 3.94 15.55 -0.49 2.14

Observations 179 179 179 176 172

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

46

Page 47: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Cortina

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-20.00

-10.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

32.6

7

-6.2

3

0.6

0

24.4

0

-10.7

5

12.3

4

24.7

3

23.6

7

24.3

4

-8.7

0

11.2

5

24.2

4

25.1

2

Cort ina Russell 2000 Grow th eA US Small Cap Grow th Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 11 36 97

5th Percentile 35.21 2.13 19.96 34.48 34.32

25th Percentile 28.26 -5.32 14.50 27.77 28.70

50th Percentile 24.34 -8.70 11.25 24.24 25.12

75th Percentile 20.91 -13.57 8.44 20.42 21.50

95th Percentile 15.55 -18.51 1.59 15.81 16.32

Observations 179 188 199 208 210

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

47

Page 48: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

■ Equity Long/Short Hedge Fund of Funds■ Performance Inception Date: November 2003

■ Net Exposure: 59.86%■ Gross Exposure: 185.65%

■Historical Average:

Gross Exposure: 143.61%Net Exposure: 42.66% ■

Characteristics provided by manager are the weighted average of GLSEF and GLSEF-B data.

The Beta of the portfolio relative to the MSCI All Country World Indexshould be < 0.7.

Market Value: $335,626,204

Grosvenor Long/Short EquityFor the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Historical Net & Gross Exposure

Exposure

Performance GoalsMeet or exceed the return of the MSCI All Country World,over extended time periods (5 to 10 years).

The volatility (standard deviation) of the portfolio should be less thantwo-thirds the volatility of the MSCI All Country World.

Strategy Allocation Strategy

0%

40%

80%

120%

160%

200%

240%

Net Exposure Gross Exposure

Gross Longs Gross Shorts

Equities, 94.52%

Quantitative, 2.36%

Macro, 2.41%

Other, 0.22%

Cash , 0.48%

48

Page 49: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Grosvenor Long/Short Equity

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00-2.00

-1.00

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

Grosvenor MSCI ACWI HFRI FOF: St rategic

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Grosvenor MSCI ACWI

HFRI FOF:

Strategic

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 3.33 4.27 0.88

Standard Deviation (%) 7.38 16.96 6.69

Sharpe Ratio 0.39 0.23 0.07

Beta 0.34 1.01

R Squared (%) 61.67 83.06

Alpha (%) 1.64 2.47

Tracking Error (%) 12.06 3.04

Batting Average (%) 50.00 64.17

Up Capture (%) 37.61 119.80

Down Capture (%) 40.43 91.41

10 Year Growth of a Dollar 10 Year Return Analysis

Grosvenor MSCI ACWI

HFRI FOF:

Strategic

Number of Months 120 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 4.12 11.90 4.25

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -10.06 -19.79 -7.66

Number of Positive Months 77 69 70

Number of Negative Months 43 51 50

% of Positive Months 64.17 57.50 58.33$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

Jun-07 Feb-09 Oct-10 Jun-12 Feb-14 Oct-15 Jun-17

Grosvenor MSCI ACWI HFRI FOF: St rategic

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

49

Page 50: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Grosvenor Long/Short Equity

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Nov 2003

2.1

5

6.1

2

11.4

5

4.5

7

7.5

9

5.0

6

4.4

5

11.8

2

19.4

2

5.3

9

11.1

4

7.9

2

1.6

5

5.5

1

9.3

8

1.8

3

4.5

5

3.6

7

Grosvenor MSCI ACWI HFRI FOF: Strategic

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

50

Page 51: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Grosvenor Long/Short Equity

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

11.4

5

-5.7

3

8.8

1

11.7

7

12.8

3

19.4

2

-3.1

7

1.2

3

23.5

8

17.2

1

9.3

8

-7.7

1

4.6

2

9.0

8

8.4

5

Grosvenor MSCI ACWI HFRI FOF: Strategic

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

51

Page 52: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Mondrian International

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Int'l Developed Markets Equity

Vehicle Limited Partnership

Benchmarks MSCI EAFE and MSCI EAFE Value

Performance Inception Date May 2004

Fees 70 bps on the first $20 million, 50 bps on the next $30 million, 40 bps on the

next $50 million, 30 bps thereafter

Performance Goals

Outperform the MSCI EAFE and MSCI EAFE Value.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA EAFE All Cap

Value Equity universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 126,182 113,048

Net Additions 0 0

Return on Investment 5,369 18,503

Ending Market Value 131,552 131,552

Characteristics

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

Wtd Avg Mkt Cap ($Bil) P/E (1 Yr Trailing) P/B Dividend Yield

63

.20

18

.00

1.6

0

3.8

0

55

.83

19

.11

1.6

7

3.0

7

61

.97

16

.43

1.2

2

4.0

2

Mondrian MSCI EAFE MSCI EAFE Value

Sector Allocation

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

Cons Disc

Cons Staples

Energy

Financials

Health Care

Industrials

Info Tech

Materials

Real Estate

Telecom

Utilities

Cash

11

.60

10

.60

9.3

0

15

.60

12

.80

12

.00

8.2

0

0.0

0

1.2

0

10

.40

7.2

0

1.1

0

11

.95

11

.52

4.7

3

21

.60

10

.83

14

.54

6.0

5

7.5

0

3.6

3

4.2

5

3.4

0

0.0

0

9.1

6

3.0

5

8.5

4

35

.44

8.6

8

10

.75

3.0

2 5.5

2

4.6

8

5.7

0

5.4

7

0.0

0

Mondrian MSCI EAFE MSCI EAFE Value

Country Allocation

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

Japan

United Kingdom

France

Germany

Switzerland

Australia

Netherlands

Hong Kong

Spain

Sweden

Emerging Markets

Other

17

.50

22

.90

7.2

0 10

.20

9.8

0

1.3

0

2.4

0

0.3

0

5.6

0

4.4

0

4.2

0

14

.20

23

.45

17

.67

10

.52

9.5

1

8.5

1

7.0

6

3.5

3

3.4

9

3.4

6

2.9

2

0.0

0

9.8

8

23

.11

19

.57

10

.72

9.0

1

7.7

9

6.9

3

1.7

8 3.3

7 5.1

1

2.8

3

0.0

0

9.7

8

Mondrian MSCI EAFE MSCI EAFE Value

Characteristic and allocation charts represents data of the Mondrian International Equity Fund, LP (Limited Partnership).

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

52

Page 53: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Mondrian International

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 20.00 21.00 22.00-2.00

-1.00

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

Mondrian MSCI EAFE MSCI EAFE Value

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Mondrian MSCI EAFE

MSCI

EAFE Value

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 1.72 1.50 0.50

Standard Deviation (%) 16.69 18.65 19.82

Sharpe Ratio 0.08 0.06 0.00

Beta 0.87 0.82

R Squared (%) 95.36 94.26

Alpha (%) 0.27 1.09

Tracking Error (%) 4.30 5.39

Batting Average (%) 50.00 53.33

Up Capture (%) 89.11 81.27

Down Capture (%) 91.87 83.87

10 Year Growth of a Dollar 10 Year Return Analysis

Mondrian MSCI EAFE

MSCI

EAFE Value

Number of Months 120 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 11.12 12.96 17.46

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -15.52 -20.17 -20.56

Number of Positive Months 62 61 61

Number of Negative Months 58 59 59

% of Positive Months 51.67 50.83 50.83$0.40

$0.50

$0.60

$0.70

$0.80

$0.90

$1.00

$1.10

$1.20

$1.30

Jun-07 Feb-09 Oct-10 Jun-12 Feb-14 Oct-15 Jun-17

Mondrian MSCI EAFE MSCI EAFE Value

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

53

Page 54: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Mondrian International

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since May 2004

4.2

6

12.0

7

16.3

7

0.6

3

8.5

8

6.7

8

6.3

7

14.2

3

20.8

3

1.6

1

9.1

8

6.1

9

5.0

7

11.6

0

25.7

1

-0.0

5

8.7

0

5.8

2

6.0

4

13.5

8

22.9

6

2.9

5

10.3

5

M ondrian M SCI EAFE M SCI EAFE Value eA EAFE All Cap Value Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 87 73 94 80 81

5th Percentile 9.61 19.59 29.95 6.02 13.80

25th Percentile 6.71 14.38 25.14 5.01 13.04

50th Percentile 6.04 13.58 22.96 2.95 10.35

75th Percentile 5.40 11.77 19.09 1.10 8.65

95th Percentile 2.84 9.25 16.24 -0.07 7.38

Observations 34 34 33 31 30

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

54

Page 55: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Mondrian International

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-30.00

-20.00

-10.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

16.3

7

-7.3

9

-5.4

4

27.7

7

15.9

420.8

3

-9.7

2 -3.8

2

24.0

9

19.1

425.7

1

-14.9

1

-6.6

4

27.4

9

19.2

1

22.9

6

-8.7

6 -2.4

9

26.1

6

21.5

8

M ondrian M SCI EAFE M SCI EAFE Value eA EAFE All Cap Value Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 94 43 78 28 80

5th Percentile 29.95 5.96 1.24 31.06 30.42

25th Percentile 25.14 -4.17 -0.83 27.91 24.16

50th Percentile 22.96 -8.76 -2.49 26.16 21.58

75th Percentile 19.09 -11.49 -5.43 23.76 17.67

95th Percentile 16.24 -15.39 -7.73 19.59 13.09

Observations 33 36 33 33 33

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

55

Page 56: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Baring Focused International

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Int'l Developed Markets Equity

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmarks MSCI EAFE and MSCI ACWI ex US

Performance Inception Date March 2012

Fees 40 bps base feel plus performance based fee

Performance Goals

Outperform the MSCI EAFE and MSCI ACWI ex US.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA EAFE All Cap

Equity universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 104,276 93,032

Net Additions -100 -951

Return on Investment 7,834 19,929

Ending Market Value 112,010 112,010

Characteristics

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Wtd Avg Mkt Cap ($Bil) P/B P/E (1 Yr Trailing) Dividend Yield

39

.10

2.4

8

20

.86

2.3

4

55

.83

1.6

7

19

.11

3.0

7

57

.68

1.6

8

18

.00

2.9

1

Baring MSCI EAFE MSCI ACWI ex US

Sector Allocation

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

Cons Disc

Cons Staples

Energy

Financials

Health Care

Industrials

Info Tech

Materials

Real Estate

Telecom

Utilities

Cash

15

.97

10

.05

3.6

7

18

.67

9.1

2

10

.15

14

.72

7.9

3

1.5

6

5.0

2

0.0

0 3.1

4

11

.95

11

.52

4.7

3

21

.60

10

.83 1

4.5

4

6.0

5

7.5

0

3.6

3

4.2

5

3.4

0

0.0

0

11

.15

9.9

2

6.2

9

23

.33

8.1

4

12

.01

10

.76

7.5

6

3.2

0

4.4

0

3.1

3

0.0

0

Baring MSCI EAFE MSCI ACWI ex US

Country Allocation

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

32.00

Japan

United Kingdom

France

Germany

Switzerland

Australia

Netherlands

Hong Kong

Spain

Sweden

Emerging Markets

Other

24

.84

26

.73

6.3

2 9.5

0

2.6

7 5.4

5

6.0

1

3.7

9

2.2

9

2.1

9

0.0

0

10

.21

23

.45

17

.67

10

.52

9.5

1

8.5

1

7.0

6

3.5

3

3.4

9

3.4

6

2.9

2

0.0

0

9.8

8

16

.32

12

.30

7.3

2

6.6

2

5.9

2

4.9

1

2.4

6

2.4

3

2.4

1

2.0

4

23

.80

13

.47

Baring MSCI EAFE MSCI ACWI ex US

Characteristic and allocation charts represents data of the Baring Focused International Equity Fund (Non-Mutual Commingled).

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

56

Page 57: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Baring Focused International

5 Year Risk / Return 5 Year Portfolio Statistics

8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.004.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

Baring MSCI EAFE MSCI ACWI ex US

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Baring MSCI EAFE

MSCI

ACWI ex US

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 8.16 9.18 7.70

Standard Deviation (%) 11.04 11.75 11.57

Sharpe Ratio 0.73 0.77 0.65

Beta 0.88 0.87

R Squared (%) 87.47 82.68

Alpha (%) 0.13 1.45

Tracking Error (%) 4.16 4.84

Batting Average (%) 50.00 48.33

Up Capture (%) 89.28 87.88

Down Capture (%) 93.01 82.24

5 Year Growth of a Dollar 5 Year Return Analysis

Baring MSCI EAFE

MSCI

ACWI ex US

Number of Months 60 60 60

Highest Monthly Return (%) 8.27 7.82 8.21

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -7.13 -7.35 -7.63

Number of Positive Months 35 35 36

Number of Negative Months 25 25 24

% of Positive Months 58.33 58.33 60.00$1.00

$1.10

$1.20

$1.30

$1.40

$1.50

$1.60

Jun-12 Apr-13 Feb-14 Dec-14 Oct-15 Aug-16 Jun-17

Baring MSCI EAFE MSCI ACWI ex US

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

57

Page 58: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Baring Focused International

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Mar 2012

7.5

1

16.7

1

21.5

4

5.4

2

8.1

6

5.7

9

6.3

7

14.2

3

20.8

3

1.6

1

9.1

8

7.0

6

5.9

9

14.4

5

21.0

0

1.2

7

7.7

0

5.4

16.7

1

14.7

7

20.4

7

3.3

0

10.1

4

Baring M SCI EAFE M SCI ACWI ex US eA EAFE All Cap Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 29 19 42 14 95

5th Percentile 9.56 20.08 29.78 6.06 13.84

25th Percentile 7.79 15.98 23.32 4.54 11.40

50th Percentile 6.71 14.77 20.47 3.30 10.14

75th Percentile 6.04 13.82 17.37 1.80 9.00

95th Percentile 3.90 11.02 12.57 0.17 8.15

Observations 117 117 116 108 97

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

58

Page 59: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Baring Focused International

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

21.5

4

-5.0

6

1.5

2

13.9

1

10.9

2

20.8

3

-9.7

2

-3.8

2

24.0

9

19.1

4

21.0

0

-9.8

0

-4.8

5

22.2

7

14.1

4

20.4

7

-8.0

8

-1.3

7

24.6

0

19.6

4

Baring M SCI EAFE M SCI ACWI ex US eA EAFE All Cap Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 42 28 15 99 99

5th Percentile 29.78 1.12 3.75 30.60 28.44

25th Percentile 23.32 -4.74 0.43 27.57 22.51

50th Percentile 20.47 -8.08 -1.37 24.60 19.64

75th Percentile 17.37 -11.13 -4.27 21.98 16.77

95th Percentile 12.57 -13.57 -7.95 17.18 12.72

Observations 116 119 117 115 114

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

59

Page 60: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Wasatch Emerging Markets

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Emerging Markets Equity

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark MSCI EM SC

Performance Inception Date September 2012

Fees 150 bps

Performance Goals

Outperform the MSCI EM SC over a market cycle.

Rank above median in the eA Emerging Mkts Equity universe over a market

cycle.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 31,068 30,116

Net Additions -125 -433

Return on Investment 2,829 4,090

Ending Market Value 33,773 33,773

Characteristics

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

P/E (1 Yr Trailing) P/B Dividend Yield EPS Growth (5 Yr Proj)

30

.35

6.3

7

1.5

4

23

.51

20

.66

1.4

6

2.1

7

14

.83

Wasatch MSCI EM SC

Sector Allocation

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

Cons Disc Cons

Staples

Energy Financials Health

Care

Industrials Info Tech Materials Real

Estate

Telecom Utilities

20

.44

12

.32

1.0

3

16

.25

9.5

6

15

.26 17

.89

5.3

4

1.9

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

16

.77

6.6

7

2.0

8

9.2

0

8.0

6

14

.96

17

.09

11

.17

8.9

5

0.9

4

3.9

2

Wasatch MSCI EM SC

Country Allocation

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

China Taiwan South

Korea

India South

Africa

Brazil Thailand Malaysia Mexico Indonesia Other

12

.30

17

.97

13

.42

14

.84

4.4

1 6.8

1

4.5

0

0.5

2

5.8

9

1.0

5

18

.29

20

.42

17

.91

16

.38

13

.96

5.1

5

4.4

6

3.6

7

3.3

2

3.0

6

2.4

5

9.2

2

Wasatch MSCI EM SC

Characteristic and allocation charts represents data of the Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap CIT (Non-Mutual Commingled).

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

60

Page 61: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Wasatch Emerging Markets

4 Year Risk / Return 4 Year Portfolio Statistics

10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.000.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

Wasatch MSCI EM SC

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Wasatch MSCI EM SC

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 2.38 4.30

Standard Deviation (%) 13.00 13.70

Sharpe Ratio 0.17 0.30

Beta 0.83

R Squared (%) 76.59

Alpha (%) -1.07

Tracking Error (%) 6.71

Batting Average (%) 41.67

Up Capture (%) 87.36

Down Capture (%) 98.28

4 Year Growth of a Dollar 4 Year Return Analysis

Wasatch MSCI EM SC

Number of Months 48 48

Highest Monthly Return (%) 8.10 10.01

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -9.57 -9.60

Number of Positive Months 27 29

Number of Negative Months 21 19

% of Positive Months 56.25 60.42$0.85

$0.90

$0.95

$1.00

$1.05

$1.10

$1.15

$1.20

$1.25

Jun-13 Feb-14 Oct-14 Jun-15 Feb-16 Oct-16 Jun-17

Wasatch MSCI EM SC

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

61

Page 62: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Wasatch Emerging Markets

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Sep 2012

9.1

2

20.3

7

13.7

2

1.9

3 3.9

7

2.6

9

16.1

0

17.3

4

1.1

0

5.4

6

5.1

76.2

7

19.2

4

23.7

5

2.4

7

5.7

7

Wasatch M SCI EM SC eA Emerging M kts Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 10 36 95 59

5th Percentile 9.67 24.49 31.88 6.55 10.42

25th Percentile 7.45 21.14 26.74 4.01 7.29

50th Percentile 6.27 19.24 23.75 2.47 5.77

75th Percentile 4.77 17.15 19.86 1.09 4.45

95th Percentile 2.70 13.51 13.11 -1.48 2.84

Observations 441 440 440 397 322

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

62

Page 63: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Wasatch Emerging Markets

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-20.00

-10.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

13.7

2

-9.7

3

3.1

6

3.7

6

17.3

4

-12.5

0

0.6

4

14.5

3

10.2

2

23.7

5

-9.2

2

-4.2

0

15.1

6

6.3

5

Wasatch M SCI EM SC eA Emerging M kts Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 95 55 7 99

5th Percentile 31.88 -1.80 4.03 25.14 19.38

25th Percentile 26.74 -6.19 -1.27 18.20 10.10

50th Percentile 23.75 -9.22 -4.20 15.16 6.35

75th Percentile 19.86 -11.90 -7.29 12.85 3.21

95th Percentile 13.11 -14.64 -11.68 8.57 -0.78

Observations 440 457 449 444 408

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

63

Page 64: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

AB EM Strategic Core Equity Fund

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Emerging Markets Equity

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark MSCI Emerging Markets

Performance Inception Date November 2016

Fees 65 bps (preferred fee)

Performance Goals

Outperform the MSCI Emerging Markets.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA Emerging

Mkts Equity universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 74,618 0

Net Additions 0 69,666

Return on Investment 4,254 9,206

Ending Market Value 78,872 78,872

Characteristics

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

Wtd Avg Mkt Cap ($Bil) P/E (1 Yr Trailing) Dividend Yield

63

.00

13

.44

2.8

0

67

.80

14

.89

2.4

3

AB EM Strategic Core Equity Fund MSCI Emerging Markets

Sector Allocation

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

Cons Disc

Cons Staples

Energy

Financials

Health Care

Industrials

Info Tech

Materials

Real Estate

Telecom

Utilities

Cash

10

.02

6.6

1

5.4

9

31

.37

3.6

6 6.2

2

22

.67

4.6

9

1.1

6 4.8

3

0.7

8

2.5

0

10

.46

6.7

9

6.5

5

23

.59

2.3

9 5.7

3

26

.73

7.0

9

2.6

6 5.3

9

2.6

1

0.0

0

AB EM Strategic Core Equity Fund MSCI Emerging Markets

Country Allocation

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

China South

Korea

Taiwan India Brazil South

Africa

Mexico Russia Indonesia Malaysia Other

22

.72

17

.02

16

.66

2.4

8

3.5

6

1.1

7

36

.39

27

.90

15

.61

12

.48

8.8

1

6.6

2

6.5

6

3.6

9

3.1

6

2.4

6

2.3

8

10

.33

AB EM Strategic Core Equity Fund MSCI Emerging Markets

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

64

Page 65: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

AB EM Strategic Core Equity Fund

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

3 Months 6 Months FYTD Since Nov 2016

5.7

0

19.6

8

13.1

0

6.3

8

18.6

0

24.1

7

13.4

8

6.2

7

19.2

4

23.7

5

AB EM Strategic Core Equity Fund M SCI Emerging M arkets eA Emerging M kts Equity

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 62 45

5th Percentile 9.67 24.49 31.88

25th Percentile 7.45 21.14 26.74

50th Percentile 6.27 19.24 23.75

75th Percentile 4.77 17.15 19.86

95th Percentile 2.70 13.51 13.11

Observations 441 440 440

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

65

Page 66: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Private Equity

For the Period Ending June 30, 2017

Summary of Cash Flows for 6 Months

Cash Outflows Cash Inflows Net Cash Flows

-14,408,724 22,459,813 8,051,089

Summary of Portfolio Inception to Date

Inception

Date Committed

Drawn

to Date

Remaining

Commitment

Distributions

to Date

Adjusted

Ending Value Total Value

Total Value

to Paid-in

Total 613,000,000 499,469,334 135,441,679 555,381,200 177,721,353 1.47x733,102,553

Buyout 205,500,000 174,931,453 44,655,734 217,056,849 50,620,280 1.53x267,677,129

Marathon IV Apr-99 7,000,000 7,462,426 - 10,188,872 - 1.37x10,188,872

Hicks, Muse Oct-01 15,000,000 16,211,210 - 28,272,306 - 1.74x28,272,306

Calera Capital (Fremont III) Jan-02 10,000,000 10,998,419 271,104 10,210,986 39,740 0.93x10,250,726

Arsenal Capital Partners Jan-03 15,000,000 16,154,576 - 28,622,510 - 1.77x28,622,510

Levine Leichtman Jan-03 10,000,000 10,612,096 439,719 15,175,710 1,387,508 1.56x16,563,218

Marathon Fund Limited Partnership V Dec-04 10,000,000 10,557,584 9,301 19,621,324 -10,517 1.86x19,610,807

Arsenal Capital Partners II Sep-06 15,000,000 14,898,996 -24,371 24,805,969 6,254,708 2.08x31,060,677

Thompson Street C.P. II Dec-06 10,000,000 10,579,171 970,164 18,484,018 2,414,614 1.98x20,898,632

Sun Capital Partners V Apr-07 12,500,000 12,588,330 2,182,365 8,296,866 8,569,706 1.34x16,866,572

HM Capital Sector Performance Fund May-07 15,000,000 15,604,226 647,720 14,690,140 - 0.94x14,690,140

Calera Capital Fund IV Jan-08 10,000,000 8,750,484 1,249,516 12,521,567 1,355,307 1.59x13,876,874

Levine Leichtman IV Aug-08 10,000,000 8,627,273 1,679,127 13,417,144 2,694,113 1.87x16,111,257

Thompson Street Capital III Aug-11 7,500,000 7,363,701 136,299 7,060,973 4,064,565 1.51x11,125,538

Arsenal Capital Partners III Apr-12 7,500,000 7,914,948 1,809,271 4,481,287 7,791,781 1.55x12,273,068

Apollo Investment Fund VIII Oct-13 7,500,000 5,367,722 3,003,886 1,185,253 5,025,616 1.16x6,210,869

Francisco Partners Fund IV Nov-14 8,000,000 4,900,000 3,100,000 - 5,511,868 1.12x5,511,868

CenterOak Equity Fund I Aug-15 7,500,000 2,315,408 5,184,592 - 1,520,347 0.66x1,520,347

Thompson Street Capital Partners IV Jan-16 7,500,000 3,235,558 4,264,442 - 3,233,523 1.00x3,233,523

Leonard Green Equity Investors VII Feb-16 7,500,000 789,325 6,732,599 21,924 767,401 1.00x789,325

Apollo Investment Fund IX May-17 13,000,000 - 13,000,000 - - --

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

66

Page 67: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Private Equity

For the Period Ending June 30, 2017

Summary of Portfolio Inception to Date

Inception

Date Committed

Drawn

to Date

Remaining

Commitment

Distributions

to Date

Adjusted

Ending Value Total Value

Total Value

to Paid-in

Distressed 143,500,000 115,894,534 28,064,456 153,025,563 19,165,906 1.49x172,191,469

Oaktree Opportunities Fund II Feb-98 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 4,525,923 - 1.51x4,525,923

Oaktree Opportunities Fund III Sep-99 5,000,000 5,000,000 - 7,534,416 -1,369 1.51x7,533,047

Oaktree Opportunities Fund IV Dec-01 10,000,000 10,000,000 - 16,802,931 1,897 1.68x16,804,828

Siguler Guff Dist Opp I Jan-03 20,000,000 19,568,416 - 30,991,330 - 1.58x30,991,330

Oaktree Opportunities Fund V Jun-04 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 6,458,089 93,427 1.64x6,551,516

Oaktree Opportunities Fund VI Aug-05 4,000,000 4,000,000 - 6,317,103 3,808 1.58x6,320,911

Siguler Guff Dist Opp II Sep-05 20,000,000 20,006,044 - 27,504,768 837,942 1.42x28,342,710

Oaktree Opportunities VII A Mar-07 7,500,000 7,554,219 - 9,687,042 694,593 1.37x10,381,635

Oaktree Opportunities VII B May-08 7,500,000 6,750,000 750,000 11,101,022 542,208 1.72x11,643,230

Siguler Guff Dist Opp III Aug-08 15,000,000 14,480,311 600,000 18,881,598 3,788,016 1.57x22,669,614

Oaktree Opportunities VIII Nov-09 7,500,000 6,750,000 750,000 7,879,319 1,834,410 1.44x9,713,729

Oaktree Opportunities IX Jun-12 7,500,000 7,500,000 - 1,046,121 6,659,753 1.03x7,705,874

Oaktree European Dislocation Fund Oct-13 7,500,000 4,285,544 3,214,456 3,545,901 1,130,231 1.09x4,676,132

Oaktree Opportunities Fund X Mar-15 7,500,000 3,000,000 5,250,000 750,000 3,580,990 1.44x4,330,990

Oaktree Opportunities Fund Xb Jun-15 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 - - --

Apollo EPF III Dec-16 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 - - --

Emerging Markets Focused 7,500,000 5,895,216 2,121,067 980,182 5,063,833 1.03x6,044,015

Actis EM IV Jan-12 7,500,000 5,895,216 2,121,067 980,182 5,063,833 1.03x6,044,015

Mezzanine 49,500,000 49,629,213 5,519,655 65,682,458 5,228,122 1.43x70,910,580

TCW Crescent II Mar-99 7,000,000 6,726,192 - 9,793,612 - 1.46x9,793,612

TCW Crescent Mezzanine Partner III Jul-01 10,000,000 10,188,852 200,324 20,545,737 325,013 2.05x20,870,750

TCW Crescent IV Jun-06 10,000,000 9,873,180 1,921,076 11,036,326 105,822 1.13x11,142,148

Newstone Capital Partners Oct-06 5,000,000 5,697,863 116,709 6,584,299 436,536 1.23x7,020,835

TCW Mezzanine Fund V Jan-08 10,000,000 7,336,349 2,663,651 9,228,323 1,223,811 1.42x10,452,134

Newstone Capital Partners II Jan-10 7,500,000 9,806,777 617,895 8,494,161 3,136,940 1.19x11,631,101

Other 31,500,000 15,310,440 17,429,619 5,371,602 12,497,158 1.17x17,868,760

EnCap Energy Fund IX Jan-13 6,500,000 6,355,402 818,509 3,332,950 4,861,453 1.29x8,194,403

EnCap Energy Fund X Mar-15 7,500,000 4,018,943 4,047,205 1,125,082 3,319,444 1.11x4,444,526

ArcLight Energy Partners VI Mar-15 7,500,000 4,936,095 2,563,905 913,570 4,316,261 1.06x5,229,831

EnCap Energy Fund XI Dec-16 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 - - --

Secondary Fund of Funds 20,000,000 21,439,062 326,939 24,582,447 4,155,624 1.34x28,738,071

Lexington VI Dec-05 20,000,000 21,439,062 326,939 24,582,447 4,155,624 1.34x28,738,071

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

67

Page 68: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Private Equity

For the Period Ending June 30, 2017

Summary of Portfolio Inception to Date

Inception

Date Committed

Drawn

to Date

Remaining

Commitment

Distributions

to Date

Adjusted

Ending Value Total Value

Total Value

to Paid-in

Venture Capital 155,500,000 116,369,416 37,324,209 88,682,099 80,990,430 1.46x169,672,529

Weiss, Peck & Greer V, LLC Jul-99 7,000,000 6,932,406 67,594 4,507,097 - 0.65x4,507,097

Firstmark Venture Partners II (Pequot) Feb-00 1,000,000 955,000 - 322,553 - 0.34x322,553

Lightspeed Venture Partners VI (WPG) Oct-00 12,000,000 11,010,270 989,730 10,111,364 503,783 0.96x10,615,147

Midtown Fund III (Firstmark III,Pequot) Oct-00 15,000,000 14,738,625 - 12,141,249 - 0.82x12,141,249

Venture Lending & Leasing Fund May-01 6,000,000 4,500,000 - 5,496,840 105,930 1.25x5,602,770

Accel Europe Jun-01 10,000,000 10,000,000 - 10,893,985 2,453,096 1.33x13,347,081

Knightsbridge Fund VI Dec-04 12,000,000 11,232,000 768,000 7,532,368 7,705,534 1.36x15,237,902

Firstmark I (Pequot, Firstmark IV) Nov-05 5,000,000 4,950,000 50,000 12,823,983 20,577,942 6.75x33,401,925

Weathergage Venture Capital Mar-07 7,500,000 6,862,500 637,500 6,429,343 6,540,043 1.89x12,969,386

Warburg Pincus Sep-07 15,000,000 15,000,000 - 14,334,293 7,727,191 1.47x22,061,484

Weathergage Venture Cap II Mar-11 7,500,000 6,900,000 600,000 1,475,348 9,863,103 1.64x11,338,451

Firstmark II (Firstmark V) Jul-11 5,000,000 4,822,365 177,635 400,700 6,585,896 1.45x6,986,596

Warburg Pincus XI Oct-12 7,500,000 7,061,250 438,750 1,744,478 7,654,763 1.33x9,399,241

Firstmark Capital Fund III Oct-13 5,000,000 3,800,000 1,200,000 - 4,144,330 1.09x4,144,330

Firstmark Capital Opportunity Fund I May-14 5,000,000 3,225,000 1,775,000 441,498 3,032,872 1.08x3,474,370

Warburg Pincus XII Dec-15 10,000,000 3,180,000 6,820,000 27,000 3,048,685 0.97x3,075,685

FirstMark Capital Fund IV May-16 7,500,000 300,000 7,200,000 - 300,000 1.00x300,000

FirstMark Capital Opportunity Fund II May-16 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 - - --

Weathergage Venture Capital IV Dec-16 10,000,000 900,000 9,100,000 - 747,262 0.83x747,262

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

68

Page 69: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Fixed Income Manager Performance

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

69

Page 70: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Agincourt Core Fixed Income

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Core Bonds

Vehicle Separately Managed Account

Benchmark BloomBar US Aggregate

Performance Inception Date October 1999

Fees 25 bps on the first $25 million, 20 bps on the next $75 million, 15 bps on the

next $50 million, and 10 bps on the next $50 million

Performance Goals

Outperform the BloomBar US Aggregate.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA US Core

Fixed Income universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 167,350 169,582

Net Additions -76 -292

Return on Investment 2,766 749

Income 1,494 6,576

Gain/Loss 1,272 -5,826

Ending Market Value 170,040 170,040

Characteristics

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

Avg Maturity (yrs) Eff Duration (yrs) Avg Quality YTM (%)

7.9

4

5.7

7

20

.00

2.7

3

8.2

7

6.0

1

22

.00

2.5

6

Agincourt BloomBar US Aggregate

Sector Allocation

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Treasury Inv Grade

Credit

MBS Agency CMBS High Yield Bank

Loans

Non-US

Dev

Emerging

Markets

Other Cash

9.5

5

56

.90

29

.27

0.0

0

3.2

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

1.0

8

37

.01

25

.34

28

.16

3.5

1

1.7

7

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0 4.2

1

0.0

0

Agincourt BloomBar US Aggregate

Quality Allocation

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC CC C Below

C/NR

43

.57

4.6

4

18

.61 3

3.1

8

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

71

.50

4.2

9 10

.67

13

.54

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

Agincourt BloomBar US Aggregate

The Other sector consists of ABS, CMO, Convertibles, Municipals, Private Placements/144As and TIPS.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

70

Page 71: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Agincourt Core Fixed Income

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.002.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

AgincourtBloomBar US

Aggregate

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Agincourt

BloomBar US

Aggregate

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 4.88 4.48

Standard Deviation (%) 3.58 3.27

Sharpe Ratio 1.24 1.24

Beta 0.99

R Squared (%) 81.55

Alpha (%) 0.45

Tracking Error (%) 1.54

Batting Average (%) 60.00

Up Capture (%) 106.46

Down Capture (%) 101.41

10 Year Growth of a Dollar 10 Year Return Analysis

Agincourt

BloomBar US

Aggregate

Number of Months 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 3.80 3.73

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -3.54 -2.37

Number of Positive Months 81 81

Number of Negative Months 39 39

% of Positive Months 67.50 67.50$0.90

$1.00

$1.10

$1.20

$1.30

$1.40

$1.50

$1.60

$1.70

Jun-07 Feb-09 Oct-10 Jun-12 Feb-14 Oct-15 Jun-17

AgincourtBloomBar US

Aggregate

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

71

Page 72: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Agincourt Core Fixed Income

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-2.00

-1.00

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Oct 1999

1.6

5

2.5

4

0.4

4

2.8

6

2.8

0

5.5

1

1.4

5

2.2

7

-0.3

1

2.4

8

2.2

1

5.1

1

1.5

6

2.5

2

0.3

4

2.7

9

2.7

3

Agincourt BloomBar US Aggregate eA US Core Fixed Income

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 33 48 44 47 46

5th Percentile 1.93 3.22 2.35 3.72 3.91

25th Percentile 1.69 2.77 0.94 3.08 3.16

50th Percentile 1.56 2.52 0.34 2.79 2.73

75th Percentile 1.43 2.32 -0.10 2.60 2.43

95th Percentile 1.17 2.00 -0.70 2.21 2.03

Observations 229 229 229 225 222

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

72

Page 73: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Agincourt Core Fixed Income

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

0.4

4

6.2

4

1.9

8

5.1

1

0.3

4

-0.3

1

6.0

0

1.8

6

4.3

7

-0.6

9

0.3

4

6.1

3

2.0

7

5.0

0

0.2

8

Agincourt BloomBar US Aggregate eA US Core Fixed Income

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 44 40 59 45 48

5th Percentile 2.35 7.27 2.96 6.84 2.85

25th Percentile 0.94 6.56 2.38 5.56 1.07

50th Percentile 0.34 6.13 2.07 5.00 0.28

75th Percentile -0.10 5.67 1.75 4.36 -0.27

95th Percentile -0.70 4.38 1.21 3.31 -1.09

Observations 229 253 263 276 296

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

73

Page 74: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Oaktree Capital Management

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Multi-Sector Fixed Income

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark BloomBar US Aggregate

Performance Inception Date February 1998

Fees 50 bps

Performance Goals

Outperform the BloomBar US Aggregate.

Each underlying strategy should outperform its relevant benchmark.

Growth of a Dollar

$0.80

$1.20

$1.60

$2.00

$2.40

$2.80

$3.20

$3.60

$4.00

Dec-97 Mar-01 Jun-04 Sep-07 Dec-10 Mar-14 Jun-17

OaktreeBloomBar US

Aggregate

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 118,130 108,346

Net Additions -165 -643

Return on Investment 2,590 12,852

Ending Market Value 120,555 120,555

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

74

Page 75: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Oaktree Capital Management

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.002.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

OaktreeBloomBar US

Aggregate

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Oaktree

BloomBar US

Aggregate

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 6.88 4.48

Standard Deviation (%) 8.90 3.27

Sharpe Ratio 0.73 1.24

Beta 0.65

R Squared (%) 5.69

Alpha (%) 4.28

Tracking Error (%) 8.72

Batting Average (%) 57.50

Up Capture (%) 120.06

Down Capture (%) 59.62

10 Year Return Histogram 10 Year Return Analysis

Oaktree

BloomBar US

Aggregate

Number of Months 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 7.58 3.73

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -14.86 -2.37

Number of Positive Months 83 81

Number of Negative Months 37 39

% of Positive Months 69.17 67.50

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Less

than

-4%

-4% to

-3%

-3% to

-2%

-2% to

-1%

-1% to

0%

0% to

1%

1% to

2%

2% to

3%

3% to

4%

Greater

than 4%

3 3

9 913

33

25

12

6 7

0 0 26

31

52

26

1 2 0

OaktreeBloomBar US

Aggregate

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

75

Page 76: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Oaktree Capital Management

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Feb 1998

2.1

9

4.4

4

11.8

8

4.2

6

6.9

0

7.2

5

1.4

5 2.2

7

-0.3

1

2.4

8

2.2

1

5.0

0

Oaktree BloomBar US Aggregate

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

76

Page 77: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Oaktree Capital Management

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

11.8

8

0.7

5

0.5

3

11.9

8

10.0

2

-0.3

1

6.0

0

1.8

6

4.3

7

-0.6

9

Oaktree BloomBar US Aggregate

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

77

Page 78: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Loomis Sayles

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Multi-Sector Fixed Income

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark Citigroup World Govt Bond

Performance Inception Date June 2008

Fees 35 bps

Performance Goals

Outperform the Citigroup World Govt Bond.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA All Global

Fixed Income universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 91,927 95,889

Net Additions -74 -308

Return on Investment 3,045 -684

Ending Market Value 94,897 94,897

Characteristics

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

Avg Quality YTM (%) Eff Duration (yrs) Avg Cpn (%)

18.00

3.25

7.16

3.30

21.00

1.17

7.69

2.35

Loomis SaylesCitigroup World Govt

Bond

Sector Allocation

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

80.00

Treasury Inv Grade

Credit

MBS Agency CMBS High Yield Bank

Loans

Non-US

Dev

Emerging

Markets

Other Cash

0.8

0 11

.62

2.4

1

0.0

0

1.5

8

5.9

8

4.6

9

64

.45

0.9

4

5.7

0

1.8

3

34

.61

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

63

.40

1.9

9

0.0

0

0.0

0

Loomis SaylesCitigroup World Govt

Bond

Regional Allocation

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

US/Canada United

Kingdom

Europe

ex-UK

Japan Asia Pacific

ex-Japan

Emerging

Markets

Other Cash

24

.20

8.5

2

27

.74

17

.17

4.6

4

16

.20

1.5

3

0.0

0

36

.27

5.7

0

33

.41

20

.54

2.0

4

2.0

4

0.0

0

0.0

0

Loomis Sayles Citigroup World Govt Bond

Characteristic and allocation charts represents data of the Loomis World Bond NH Trust (Non-Mutual Commingled).

The Other sector consists of ABS, CMO, Convertibles, Municipals, Private Placements/144As and TIPS.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

78

Page 79: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Loomis Sayles

9 Year Risk / Return 9 Year Portfolio Statistics

4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.000.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

Loomis SaylesCit igroup World

Govt Bond

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

Loomis

Sayles

Citigroup

World

Govt Bond

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 3.56 2.08

Standard Deviation (%) 7.69 6.65

Sharpe Ratio 0.44 0.29

Beta 1.03

R Squared (%) 78.65

Alpha (%) 1.46

Tracking Error (%) 3.56

Batting Average (%) 65.74

Up Capture (%) 120.67

Down Capture (%) 104.44

9 Year Growth of a Dollar 9 Year Return Analysis

Loomis

Sayles

Citigroup

World

Govt Bond

Number of Months 108 108

Highest Monthly Return (%) 7.16 7.11

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -6.59 -5.03

Number of Positive Months 67 61

Number of Negative Months 41 47

% of Positive Months 62.04 56.48$0.80

$0.90

$1.00

$1.10

$1.20

$1.30

$1.40

$1.50

Jun-08 Dec-09 Jun-11 Dec-12 Jun-14 Dec-15 Jun-17

Loomis SaylesCit igroup World

Govt Bond

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

79

Page 80: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Loomis Sayles

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-6.00

-4.00

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Jun 2008

3.3

1

6.0

5

-0.7

1

-0.1

4

1.1

5

3.5

0

2.8

9

4.4

9

-4.1

4

-1.0

0 -0.2

0

2.1

2

2.5

2

5.1

4

4.2

5

1.2

2

3.2

8

Loomis Sayles Cit igroup World Govt Bond eA All Global Fixed Income

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 34 35 87 64 75

5th Percentile 7.92 11.20 13.50 5.14 7.77

25th Percentile 3.91 7.50 8.37 3.56 4.96

50th Percentile 2.52 5.14 4.25 1.22 3.28

75th Percentile 1.60 3.60 1.08 -1.17 1.11

95th Percentile 0.32 1.21 -2.71 -4.61 -0.85

Observations 612 612 611 569 477

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

80

Page 81: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Loomis Sayles

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-16.00

-12.00

-8.00

-4.00

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

-0.7

1

10.1

3

-8.9

4

7.8

9

-1.4

3

-4.1

4

11.2

6

-9.0

2

6.8

5

-4.5

0

4.2

5

3.1

9

-4.0

0

9.1

6

3.3

1

Loomis Sayles Cit igroup World Govt Bond eA All Global Fixed Income

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 87 6 76 62 79

5th Percentile 13.50 10.63 3.66 19.51 14.57

25th Percentile 8.37 6.43 1.12 12.27 7.54

50th Percentile 4.25 3.19 -4.00 9.16 3.31

75th Percentile 1.08 0.46 -8.71 6.70 -0.79

95th Percentile -2.71 -6.81 -16.84 2.80 -6.04

Observations 611 667 673 662 628

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

81

Page 82: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

■ Low Volatility Hedge Fund of Funds■ Performance Inception Date: October 2002■ Redemption: Quarterly with 60 days written notice

■ Target annualized return: 10-12%■

■ Maximum number of managers: 55■ Allocation to any manager: not to exceed 5% at cost or 7% at market value■ Allocation to Convertible Bond Hedging: 20-40%■ Allocation to Sovereign Debt & Mortgage Hedging: 0-10%■ Allocation to Credit Hedging & Distressed Debt Hedging: 0-25%■ Allocation to Merger Arbitrage: 0-20%■ Allocation to Equity Market Neutral & Long/Short Equity: 20-45%■ Allocation to Short Biased: 0-5%■ Allocation to Cash: 0-5%

■ Net Exposure: 37.50%Historical Average ■ Gross Exposure: 534.70% Gross Exposure 294.03% Net Exposure 43.27%

Characteristic data provided by manager.

PAAMCO

Objectives and Constraints

StrategyMarket Value: $126,868,066

Historical Net & Gross Exposure

Target annualized standard deviation: approximate the standard deviation of the Barclays Capital Aggregate

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Sector Allocation

Exposure

0%50%

100%150%200%250%300%350%400%450%500%550%600%650%700%

Net Exposure

Gross Exposure

Gross Longs

Gross Shorts

Convertible Bond Hedging3.60%

Fixed Income Relative Value

16.80%

Distressed Debt Hedging9.90%

Long/Short Equity18.50%

Equity Market Neutral4.80%

Event-Driven Equity7.30%

Long/Short Credit21.70%

Opportunistic Credit11.10%

Cash6.30%

82

Page 83: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

PAAMCO

10 Year Risk / Return 10 Year Portfolio Statistics

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00-2.00

-1.00

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

PAAMCOBloomBar US

Aggregate

HFRI FOF:

Conservat ive

Standard Deviat ion (%)

Re

turn

(%

)

PAAMCO

BloomBar US

Aggregate

HFRI FOF:

Conservative

Benchmark Relative Statistics

Return (%) 2.96 4.48 0.79

Standard Deviation (%) 6.03 3.27 4.25

Sharpe Ratio 0.42 1.24 0.09

Beta -0.02 1.33

R Squared (%) 0.01 87.32

Alpha (%) 3.25 1.96

Tracking Error (%) 6.90 2.56

Batting Average (%) 58.33 64.17

Up Capture (%) 40.15 151.14

Down Capture (%) -4.86 110.17

10 Year Growth of a Dollar 10 Year Return Analysis

PAAMCO

BloomBar US

Aggregate

HFRI FOF:

Conservative

Number of Months 120 120 120

Highest Monthly Return (%) 4.90 3.73 2.42

Lowest Monthly Return (%) -9.06 -2.37 -5.91

Number of Positive Months 82 81 80

Number of Negative Months 38 39 40

% of Positive Months 68.33 67.50 66.67$0.80

$0.90

$1.00

$1.10

$1.20

$1.30

$1.40

$1.50

$1.60

Jun-07 Feb-09 Oct-10 Jun-12 Feb-14 Oct-15 Jun-17

PAAMCOBloomBar US

Aggregate

HFRI FOF:

Conservat ive

Statistics are calculated using monthly return data.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

83

Page 84: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

PAAMCO

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Oct 2002

0.8

1

3.0

3

6.6

2

0.1

0

5.0

3

5.1

6

1.4

5

2.2

7

-0.3

1

2.4

8

2.2

1

4.2

4

0.3

7

1.5

8

5.1

4

1.4

4

3.6

1

3.0

6

PAAMCO BloomBar US Aggregate HFRI FOF: Conservative

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

84

Page 85: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

PAAMCO

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-12.00

-8.00

-4.00

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

6.6

2

-6.7

4

0.8

7

12.6

4

13.1

5

-0.3

1

6.0

0

1.8

6

4.3

7

-0.6

9

5.1

4

-3.3

4

2.7

0

6.6

7

7.2

2

PAAMCO BloomBar US Aggregate HFRI FOF: Conservative

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

85

Page 86: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Wellington Global Total Return

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Absolute Return

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark BloomBar US Aggregate

Performance Inception Date December 2016

Fees 25 bps, plus 20% of excess return beyond cash + 1%

Performance Goals

Outperform the LIBOR 3 Month.

Over rolling three year periods, rank above the median in the eA Global

Unconstrained Fixed Income universe.

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 59,778 0

Net Additions -50 59,950

Return on Investment 150 -73

Ending Market Value 59,877 59,877

Characteristics

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

Avg Cpn (%) Avg Quality Eff Duration (yrs) YTM (%) Yield to Worst

1.0

0

20

.00

-3.4

3

0.2

6

0.7

83.0

6

22

.00

6.0

1

2.5

6

2.5

5

Wellington Global Total

ReturnBloomBar US Aggregate

Sector Allocation

-20.00

-10.00

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

60.00

70.00

Treasury Inv Grade

Credit

MBS Agency CMBS High Yield Bank

Loans

Non-US

Dev

Emerging

Markets

Other Cash

56

.81

17

.23

0.0

0

12

.77

0.0

0

3.0

2

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

-1.4

7

11

.64

37

.01

25

.34

28

.16

3.5

1

1.7

7

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

4.2

1

0.0

0

Wellington Global Total

ReturnBloomBar US Aggregate

Quality Allocation

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

AAA AA A BBB BB B Below B Below C/NR Cash

12

.12

18

.31 28

.65

21

.73

3.1

4

0.8

2

0.0

2

3.4

9 11

.72

71

.50

4.2

9 10

.67

13

.54

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

Wellington Global Total

ReturnBloomBar US Aggregate

The Other sector consists of ABS, CMO, Convertibles, Municipals, Private Placements/144As and TIPS.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

86

Page 87: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Wellington Global Total Return

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-2.00

-1.00

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

3 Months YTD FYTD Since Dec 2016

0.2

5

0.1

1

-0.1

2

0.2

8

0.5

3 0.9

3

0.6

1

1.8

7

4.4

1

5.8

2

Wellington Global Total Return LIBOR 3 M onth eA Global Unconstrained Fixed Income

Re

turn

(%

)

Ranking 96 99

5th Percentile 7.08 10.24 12.77

25th Percentile 3.18 6.87 8.08

50th Percentile 1.87 4.41 5.82

75th Percentile 1.30 2.92 3.70

95th Percentile 0.28 1.18 0.18

Observations 162 162 162

The rankings represent the portfolio's returns versus a peer universe. The rankings are on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 being the best.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

1

87

Page 88: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Private Credit

For the Period Ending June 30, 2017

Summary of Cash Flows for 6 Months

Cash Outflows Cash Inflows Net Cash Flows

-12,726,113 501,617 -12,224,496

Summary of Portfolio Inception to Date

Inception

Date Committed

Drawn

to Date

Remaining

Commitment

Distributions

to Date

Adjusted

Ending Value Total Value

Total Value

to Paid-in

Total 60,000,000 18,684,603 41,315,397 480,862 18,933,695 1.04x19,414,557

Mezzanine 20,000,000 8,684,603 11,315,397 314,337 8,832,593 1.05x9,146,930

Newstone Capital Partners III Jan-17 20,000,000 8,684,603 11,315,397 314,337 8,832,593 1.05x9,146,930

Other 40,000,000 10,000,000 30,000,000 166,525 10,101,102 1.03x10,267,627

LBC Credit Partners Fund IV Sep-16 40,000,000 10,000,000 30,000,000 166,525 10,101,102 1.03x10,267,627

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

88

Page 89: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Real Assets Manager Performance

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

89

Page 90: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

JP Morgan Strategic Property

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Information

Ending Market Value $115,903,709

Fund Information

Gross Market Value $42,066,525,484

Net Market Value $31,362,435,511

Cash Balance of Fund $2,107,469,786

# of Properties 162

# of Participants 428

Allocations

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

10.6

8

42.7

7

20.2

5

26.3

0

Industrial Office Residential Retail

Property Type

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

30.9

8

4.7

7

22.7

1

41.5

4

East M idw est South West

Geographic Region

Returns by Property Type (%)

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

18.00

3 M onths 1 Year

2.1

6

14.2

9

2.1

2

7.7

9

0.9

1

7.0

4

1.3

3

8.1

3

Industrial Office Residential Retail

Account Description

Strategy Core Real Estate

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmarks NFI ODCE Net and NCREIF Property

Performance Inception Date December 2007

Fees First $100M at 92 bps, next $150M at 85 bps, next $250M at 80 bps,

balance at 75 bps

Performance Goals

Outperform the NFI ODCE Net.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

Characteristic and allocation charts represents data of the Strategic Property Fund (Non-Mutual Commingled). 90

Page 91: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

JP Morgan Strategic Property

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Dec 2007

1.5

7

3.5

2

7.9

4

10.7

8

12.1

5

5.6

5

1.4

9

3.0

5

6.9

1

10.3

3

10.7

6

4.0

8

1.7

5

3.3

3

6.9

8

10.1

7

10.4

9

6.3

2

JP Morgan NFI ODCE Net NCREIF Property

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

91

Page 92: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

JP Morgan Strategic Property

For the One Year Periods Ending June

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

7.9

4

11.1

0

13.3

7 14.1

0

14.3

6

6.9

1

10.8

0

13.3

7

11.7

5

11.0

7

6.9

8

10.6

4

12.9

8

11.2

1

10.7

3

JP Morgan NFI ODCE Net NCREIF Property

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

92

Page 93: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Blackstone Property Partners

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Current Quarter Returns (%)

0.00

0.40

0.80

1.20

1.60

2.00

2.40

2.80

Appreciat ion Income Total-Gross Total-Net

0.90

1.30

2.20

1.80

0.64

1.07

1.71

1.49

Blackstone NFI ODCE

Account Information

Ending Market Value $37,955,306

Fund Information

Net Market Value $5,600,000,000

# of Properties 17

Allocations

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

12.0

0

29.0

0

32.0

0

27.0

0

Industrial M ult i-Family Office Retail

Property Type

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

47.0

0

7.0

0

2.0

0

8.0

0

36.0

0

East M idw est North South West

Geographic Region

Account Description

Strategy Core Real Estate

Vehicle Limited Partnership

Benchmarks NFI ODCE Net and NCREIF Property

Performance Inception Date January 2015

Performance Goals

Outperform the NFI ODCE Net and NCREIF Property.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

Characteristic and allocation charts represents data of the Blackstone Property Partners (Limited Partnership). 93

Page 94: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Blackstone Property Partners

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

3 Months YTD 1 Year 2 Years Since Jan 2015

2.6

7

5.1

0

11.7

9

17.3

3

15.0

8

1.4

9

3.0

5

6.9

1

8.8

4 9.8

8

1.7

5

3.3

3

6.9

8

8.7

9 9.8

4

Blackstone NFI ODCE Net NCREIF Property

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

94

Page 95: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Blackstone Property Partners

For the One Year Periods Ending June

0.00

4.00

8.00

12.00

16.00

20.00

24.00

28.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

11.7

9

23.1

6

6.9

1

10.8

0

13.3

7

11.7

5

11.0

7

6.9

8

10.6

4

12.9

8

11.2

1

10.7

3

Blackstone NFI ODCE Net NCREIF Property

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

95

Page 96: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Columbus Square

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Jan 1998

4.8

3

7.0

3

9.1

2

10.6

7

9.4

8

13.9

1

1.7

5

3.3

3

6.9

8

10.1

7

10.4

9

9.5

0

1.4

9

3.0

5

6.9

1

10.3

3

10.7

6

7.9

5

Columbus Square NCREIF Property NFI ODCE Net

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

96

Page 97: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Columbus Square

For the One Year Periods Ending June

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

16.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

9.1

2

13.7

5

9.2

1

3.7

6

11.8

2

6.9

8

10.6

4

12.9

8

11.2

1

10.7

3

6.9

1

10.8

0

13.3

7

11.7

5

11.0

7

Columbus Square NCREIF Property NFI ODCE Net

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

97

Page 98: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Private Real Estate

For the Period Ending June 30, 2017

Summary of Cash Flows for 6 Months

Cash Outflows Cash Inflows Net Cash Flows

-4,908,075 6,936,204 2,028,129

Summary of Portfolio Inception to Date

Inception

Date Committed

Drawn

to Date

Remaining

Commitment

Distributions

to Date

Adjusted

Ending Value Total Value

Total Value

to Paid-in

Total 92,500,000 70,795,028 30,778,266 36,342,397 56,368,000 1.31x92,710,397

Real Estate 92,500,000 70,795,028 30,778,266 36,342,397 56,368,000 1.31x92,710,397

Siguler Guff Dist. Real Estate Opp. Jul-11 10,000,000 8,608,587 1,650,773 6,965,931 6,220,846 1.53x13,186,777

TA Associates Realty X Nov-12 20,000,000 20,000,000 - 10,854,182 16,762,490 1.38x27,616,672

Cerberus Real Estate Fund III May-13 20,000,000 25,185,319 3,552,375 16,806,989 16,671,011 1.33x33,478,000

Hall Capital Fund III Feb-14 7,500,000 6,959,483 540,517 217,364 8,524,155 1.26x8,741,519

Siguler Guff Dist. Real Estate Opp. II Nov-14 10,000,000 7,507,577 2,492,423 756,118 7,273,331 1.07x8,029,449

Cerberus Institutional Real Estate Partners 4 Jun-16 15,000,000 2,534,062 12,542,178 741,813 916,167 0.65x1,657,980

Siguler Guff Dist. Real Estate Opp. II B May-17 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 - - --

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

98

Page 99: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Mount Lucas Peak Partners

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Commodities

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark CS Hedge - Global Macro

Performance Inception Date January 1998

Fees 100 bps and an annual incentive fee

Performance Goals

Outperform the CS Hedge - Global Macro.

Growth of a Dollar

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

$4.50

Dec-97 Mar-01 Jun-04 Sep-07 Dec-10 Mar-14 Jun-17

Mount Lucas PeakCS Hedge - Global

Macro

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 29,969 29,665

Net Additions -76 -336

Return on Investment -329 235

Ending Market Value 29,564 29,564

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

99

Page 100: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Mount Lucas Peak Partners

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-8.00

-6.00

-4.00

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 3 Years 5 Years Since Jan 1998

-1.1

0

-4.8

8

0.8

1

7.0

8

7.2

1

5.9

9

-1.7

7

-1.5

4

3.5

8

1.4

3

2.7

9

7.8

3

Mount Lucas Peak CS Hedge - Global Macro

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

100

Page 101: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Mount Lucas Peak Partners

For the One Year Periods Ending June

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

Jun 2017 Jun 2016 Jun 2015 Jun 2014 Jun 2013

0.8

1

-2.3

4

24.7

1

1.6

2

13.5

1

3.5

8

-3.8

6

4.7

8

3.9

3 5.8

3

Mount Lucas Peak CS Hedge - Global Macro

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

101

Page 102: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Gresham Tap Fund

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Account Description

Strategy Commodities

Vehicle Non-Mutual Commingled

Benchmark Bloomberg Commodity

Performance Inception Date August 2014

Fees 75 bps

Performance Goals

Outperform the Bloomberg Commodity over a complete market cycle.

Growth of a Dollar

$0.55

$0.60

$0.65

$0.70

$0.75

$0.80

$0.85

$0.90

$0.95

$1.00

Jun-14 Dec-14 Jun-15 Dec-15 Jun-16 Dec-16 Jun-17

GreshamBloomberg

Commodity

Dollar Growth Summary ($000s)

FYTD3 Months

Beginning Market Value 48,845 49,962

Net Additions 0 0

Return on Investment -1,548 -2,665

Ending Market Value 47,297 47,297

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

102

Page 103: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

TAP Bloomberg TAP Bloomberg Abs Est. Wgtd TAP Bloomberg Abs Est. WgtdTotal Gross Return 100.00 100.00 -3.14 -3.22 -- 0.08 -5.05 -5.61 -- 0.56AGRICULTURE 15.56 25.06 3.13 3.28 -0.15 -0.49 -0.53 0.44 -0.97 -0.46

Corn 4.05 8.03 0.61 0.53 0.08 -0.14 2.11 1.96 0.15 -0.28Soybean 4.51 5.70 -0.61 -0.91 0.30 0.04 -7.27 -7.59 0.33 0.00Wheat (CBOT) 2.87 4.20 15.42 15.95 -0.53 -0.26 17.25 17.84 -0.59 -0.21Wheat (KC) 0.77 1.47 17.78 17.82 -0.04 -0.12 15.11 15.15 -0.04 -0.09Wheat (MGE) 0.29 40.49 40.49 0.08 41.28 41.28 0.09Soybean Meal 2.43 2.95 -1.78 -1.89 0.11 0.00 -5.33 -5.62 0.29 0.00Soybean Oil 0.66 2.72 2.70 2.58 0.12 -0.09 -6.32 -6.71 0.39 0.02

ENERGY 27.20 27.29 -9.36 -9.88 0.52 -0.06 -19.12 -20.29 1.17 -0.36Crude Oil 7.42 6.16 -10.64 -10.68 0.04 -0.15 -18.84 -18.82 -0.02 -0.46Brent Crude 6.45 6.80 -9.77 -10.41 0.64 0.03 -17.00 -17.44 0.44 -0.04Heating Oil 1.95 3.38 -7.32 -7.46 0.14 0.04 -16.79 -17.08 0.29 0.16Gas Oil 2.32 -8.49 -8.45 -0.04 -0.17 -16.08 -16.12 0.03 -0.29Natural Gas 6.25 7.48 -8.80 -9.59 0.79 0.11 -24.97 -25.10 0.13 0.18Unleaded Gas (RBOB) 2.81 3.47 -9.10 -10.51 1.41 0.09 -19.03 -21.53 2.50 0.10

INDUSTRIAL METALS 22.39 18.70 -1.05 -1.42 0.37 0.08 7.58 5.93 1.64 0.27Aluminum 7.13 5.21 -2.62 -2.93 0.31 0.02 12.45 11.84 0.61 0.14Copper (LME) 8.00 1.36 1.16 0.20 0.29 6.83 6.35 0.49 0.78Copper (NY) 2.09 8.23 1.22 1.17 0.05 -0.26 6.72 6.55 0.17 -0.76Nickel 1.41 2.37 -6.95 -6.90 -0.05 0.03 -7.37 -7.37 -0.01 0.01Zinc 2.47 2.89 -0.85 -1.05 0.20 -0.01 6.59 6.15 0.44 -0.09Lead 1.29 -2.38 -2.57 0.19 0.01 13.13 13.12 0.01 0.20

LIVESTOCK 11.80 6.89 10.28 10.95 -0.67 0.28 14.43 10.94 3.49 0.96Live Cattle 6.96 4.10 8.69 8.59 0.10 0.17 15.08 14.03 1.04 0.55Lean Hogs 2.61 2.79 12.95 14.44 -1.49 -0.12 8.29 6.34 1.95 0.03Feeder Cattle 2.23 10.74 9.96 0.78 0.22 18.06 16.90 1.16 0.38

PRECIOUS METALS 17.46 16.26 -2.83 -3.40 0.57 0.08 6.49 5.87 0.62 -0.11Gold 12.23 12.04 -0.93 -0.99 0.06 -0.03 7.09 6.99 0.10 -0.19Silver 3.60 4.22 -9.70 -9.69 -0.01 0.06 2.75 2.72 0.02 -0.10Platinum 0.94 -3.11 -3.11 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.05Palladium 0.69 5.23 5.23 0.05 22.70 22.70 0.13

FOODS & FIBERS 5.59 5.80 -13.13 -14.45 1.32 0.13 -15.80 -18.71 2.92 0.21Cotton 1.41 1.37 -7.87 -9.44 1.57 0.03 -0.02 -2.46 2.44 0.03Sugar 1.62 2.30 -19.24 -18.76 -0.48 0.08 -28.62 -30.13 1.51 0.22White Sugar 0.23 -14.74 -14.74 -0.03 -23.34 -23.34 -0.05Coffee 1.36 2.13 -12.75 -12.79 0.04 0.09 -12.70 -12.81 0.11 0.04Coffee (Robusta) 0.30 -1.87 -1.87 0.00 -1.72 -1.72 0.01Cocoa 0.67 -8.79 -9.38 0.59 -0.05 -10.17 -11.70 1.54 -0.04

Data provided by manager.

-MTD ROI % and YTD ROI% columns show TAP and Bloomberg individual commodity returns.

-A composite weighted return is shown for Wheat, Crude Oil, Heating Oil and Copper. Wheat (KC), Brent Crude, Gas Oil, Copper (NY) and Cocoa were added to TAP's portfolio in the middle of January 2008. Wheat (MGE) was added to TAP's portfolio in the middle of January 2010.

-'Abs' is the absolute difference in ROI between TAP and Bloomberg for each commodity. 'Est. Wgtd' is the portfolio effect (TAP's return x TAP's period avg. wgt. - Bloomberg's return x Bloomberg's period avg. wgt.). 'Average Weights' is calculated using month-end weights. -All returns are estimates. Total Gross Return is gross of fees and includes cash returns. All indicated TAP returns are net of commissions and gross of management fees.

Gresham TAP Fund

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

Portfolio Weights (%) QTD ROI (%) ROI DIFF YTD ROI (%) ROI DIFF

Attribution Analysis and Bloomberg Commodity Comparison

103

Page 104: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Gresham Tap Fund

For the Periods Ending June 30, 2017

-18.00

-16.00

-14.00

-12.00

-10.00

-8.00

-6.00

-4.00

-2.00

0.00

2.00

3 Months YTD FYTD 2 Years Since Aug 2014

-3.1

7

-5.1

8

-5.3

3

-10.6

8

-14.6

2

-3.0

0

-5.2

6

-6.5

0

-9.9

7

-13.7

0

Gresham Bloomberg Commodity

Re

turn

(%

)

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

104

Page 105: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Appendix

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

105

Page 106: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Definitions of Statistical Measures

Alpha - the annualized difference between the manager's actual return and the managers's expected return given its relative risk vs.

the benchmark (which is represented by beta, a measure that tracks volatility to an index).

Batting Average - a measure used to quantify a manager's ability to meet or beat a benchmark. A manager who outperforms the

benchmark 20 out of a possible 40 times has a batting average of 50.

Beta - measures the portfolio's sensitivity of returns to market movements represented by the primary benchmark.

Down Capture - demonstrates the ratio of the portfolio's average returns relative to the benchmark in periods in which the benchmark

had a negative return. For instance, a down-capture of 96% indicates that, on average, the portfolio is down 96% when the benchmark

is down 100%. Lower portfolio down-capture is preferred.

R Squared - the amount of the manager's return that can be explained by the benchmark. A R Squared of 100 indicates a perfect

correlation, while a R Squared of 0 indicates no correlation at all.

Sharpe Ratio - a measure of return per unit of risk. Higher sharpe ratios are preferred while negative ratios are generally meaningless and

cannot be used for comparison purposes.

Standard Deviation - a measure of the portfolio's volatility. A large standard deviation relative to the benchmark represents volatile

portfolio returns.

Tracking Error - a measure that reports the difference between the return of a manager that is received and that of a benchmark that

the manager is attempting to track.

Up Capture - demonstrates the ratio of the portfolio's average returns relative to the benchmark in periods in which the benchmark had

a positive return. For instance, an up-capture of 96% indicates that, on average, the portfolio is up 96% when the benchmark is up 100%.

Higher portfolio up-capture is preferred.

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

106

Page 107: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Quality Rating Scale

Moody's

Rating

S&P

Rating

Prior to

1Q09

Beginning

1Q09

Beginning

3Q11

Moody's

Rating

S&P

Rating

Prior to

1Q09

Beginning

1Q09

Beginning

3Q11

TSY

AGY

Aaa

Aa1

Aa2

Aa

MIG1

Aa3

A1

A-1

A2

A

MIG2

A3

Baa1

Baa2

Baa

MIG3

Baa3

Ba1

TSY

AGY

AAA

AA+

AA

AA

AA-

A+

A

A

A-

BBB+

BBB

BBB

BBB-

BB+

10

10

10

9.3

9

9

8.7

8.3

8

8

7.7

7.3

7

7

6.7

26

25

24

23

22

22

22

21

20

20

19

19

19

18

17

16

16

16

15

14

24

24

24

23

22

22

22

21

20

20

19

19

19

18

17

16

16

16

15

14

Ba2

Ba

MIG4

Ba3

B1

B2

B

B3

Caa1

Caa2

Caa

Caa3

Ca

C

NR

NA

N/A

BB

BB

BB-

B+

B

B

B-

CCC+

CCC

CCC

CCC-

CC

C

DDD

DD

D

NR

NA

N/A

6

6

5.7

5.3

5

4.7

4.3

4

3.7

3

2

1

N/A

N/A

13

13

13

12

11

10

10

9

8

7

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

-1

13

13

13

12

11

10

10

9

8

7

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

-1

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

107

Page 108: Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System 2Q 2017.pdfOklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System Investment Performance Review June 30,

Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System

Historical Benchmark Composition

Total Fund Policy

The index consists of 55.0% Russell 3000, 35.0% BloomBar US Aggregate, 10.0% MSCI EAFE.10/31/1990

The index consists of 55.0% Russell 3000, 35.0% BloomBar Universal, 10.0% MSCI EAFE.06/30/2007

The index consists of 55.0% Russell 3000, 10.0% MSCI EAFE, 30.0% BloomBar Universal, 5.0% NFI ODCE Net.11/30/2007

The index consists of 65.0% MSCI ACWI, 30.0% BloomBar Universal, 5.0% NFI ODCE Net.08/31/2012

The index consists of 60.0% MSCI ACWI, 30.0% BloomBar Universal, 5.0% NFI ODCE Net, 5.0% Bloomberg Commodity.08/31/2014

The index consists of 60.0% MSCI ACWI, 25.0% BloomBar Universal, 10.0% NFI ODCE Net, 5.0% Bloomberg Commodity.04/30/2016

© 2017 Asset Consulting Group All Rights Reserved

108