ogp final self-assessment report. -
TRANSCRIPT
OpenGovernmentPartnership
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIPGovernment Self-Assessment Report
“Open Government for accelerated development”
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP
GOVERNMENT SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT
April 2013
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
Ϯ
�
Contents I. Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
II. Introduction and Background ........................................................................................................................................................ 5
III. The South African Country Action Plan and Commitments ......................................................................................................... 5
IV. Process Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7
(a) Internal OGP Consultation ............................................................................................................................................. 7
(b) External OGP Consultation ........................................................................................................................................... 8
(c) Action Plan Implementation Approach .......................................................................................................................... 9
(d) Process Challenges in developing the Action Plan ..................................................................................................... 11
(e) OGP Awareness Campaigns ....................................................................................................................................... 13
V. Implementation of the Country Action Plan ................................................................................................................................ 15
VI. Conclusion, Lessons Learnt and Next Steps ............................................................................................................................. 17
Annexure A: Implementation Matrix - Country Action Plan ............................................................................................................. 19�
�
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
Ϯ
�
Contents I. Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
II. Introduction and Background ........................................................................................................................................................ 5
III. The South African Country Action Plan and Commitments ......................................................................................................... 5
IV. Process Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7
(a) Internal OGP Consultation ............................................................................................................................................. 7
(b) External OGP Consultation ........................................................................................................................................... 8
(c) Action Plan Implementation Approach .......................................................................................................................... 9
(d) Process Challenges in developing the Action Plan ..................................................................................................... 11
(e) OGP Awareness Campaigns ....................................................................................................................................... 13
V. Implementation of the Country Action Plan ................................................................................................................................ 15
VI. Conclusion, Lessons Learnt and Next Steps ............................................................................................................................. 17
Annexure A: Implementation Matrix - Country Action Plan ............................................................................................................. 19�
�
�
� �
ϯ
�
I. Foreword
In September 2011, the South African government endorsed the Open Government
Partnership (OGP) Declaration of Principles, thereby committing itself to work with civil
society towards enhancing transparency, public participation, accountability, and the
fight against corruption in both the public and private spheres. This global partnership
initiative on open government is in line with the African Union’s African Peer Review
Mechanism (APRM) which encourages African governments to improve public
governance - including participation, openness and service delivery to their
populations.
Open government in the South African context, is premised on our progressive and
transformative Constitution which enshrines a Bill of Rights and the principles of open
governance. Chapter 9 of our Constitution specifically provides for the establishment of
independent institutions to safeguard and enforce openness, transparency,
accountability, responsiveness, and ethical governance in the public and private spheres. These institutions are an important
armoury in promoting and protecting the rights of our citizens.
Also, based on the election manifesto of the ruling party and the Medium Term Expenditure Framework of government, a set of
12 outcomes were developed through extensive consultation at both Ministerial and administrative levels. These outcomes
reflect the desired governance and development impacts we seek to achieve, given government`s policy priorities. Of these key
outcomes, the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) is responsible for Outcome 12 which is focused on the
development of an efficient, effective and development-orientated Public Service and an empowered, fair and inclusive citizenry.
This important outcome is a further indication of government`s continued commitment to deliver services to its citizenry in a
participatory and transparent manner. At an operational level, we promote citizen engagement and participation through, among
others, direct contact with citizens in the form of our 3100 Community Development Workers (CDWs) who are based in local
communities throughout the country. Furthermore, we provide formal avenues for public participation through structures such as
Ward Committees, Community Policing Forums, School Governing Bodies, Community Health Committees, Service Delivery
Improvement Forums, and municipal Integrated Development Planning Forums, to name a few. We hold regular izimbizo
(government-community gatherings) where citizens, in their localities, have a formal platform to share their compliments or voice
their concerns with regard to government performance in governance and service delivery matters.
Also important in promoting open and accountable government is the fight against corruption. In his 14 February 2013 State of
the Nation Address, President Jacob Zuma re-stated our government’s commitment to fight corruption by highlighting that,
among other interventions, government has increased the capacity of the Special Investigations Unit (SIU) from an initial staff
0V�$\DQGD�'ORGOR��03
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϰ
�
compliment of 70 to more than 600 at present. This significant increase in the human resources capacity of this independent
statutory body that is tasked to fight corruption is indicative of the seriousness with which government discharges its
constitutional obligation to root out corruption and promote open government.
The creation and maintenance of genuine avenues for participatory democracy and development; and independent institutions to
uphold and enforce the broad principles of good governance is indicative of the South African government`s unambiguous
commitment to the values and principles of an open society as espoused in, among other documents, the Declaration of
Principles of the OGP.
As government, we consulted with civil society in drafting an OGP country action plan and in developing this Government Self-
Assessment Report – the core of which is an account of the progress we have made in implementing our country action plan
commitments. These consultation processes will continue as we regard the OGP country action plan as a living document
responding to the ever-changing governance environment. As we commit to continue our support to the global OGP initiative, we
will also continue to support and participate in continental initiatives that assess our performance in open governance, such as
the APRM as stated earlier. In partnership with the governments of Kenya and Tanzania, we are also driving an outreach
programme to popularise the OGP on the African continent. The objective of this outreach is to encourage more African
countries to strive to meet the eligibility criteria and to join the OGP. As we do this, we are mindful of the need to ensure
alignment between the OGP and the APRM as these two initiatives are mutually affirming in strengthening good governance
practices in Africa.
Working with our people, we will deliver on our undertakings to create a society where all South Africans have a voice and
participate in processes to determine and improve how they are governed.
I want to thank all South Africans who have participated in drafting our first OGP country action plan. I also want to thank those
active citizens and organisations in the business and civil society sectors that made inputs to this important document - our first
OGP Government Self-Assessment Report.
Truly we have shown that by working together, we can do more to improve our country and the world.
Ms. Ayanda Dlodlo, MP
Deputy Minister for Public Service and Administration
Government focal point on OGP
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϰ
�
compliment of 70 to more than 600 at present. This significant increase in the human resources capacity of this independent
statutory body that is tasked to fight corruption is indicative of the seriousness with which government discharges its
constitutional obligation to root out corruption and promote open government.
The creation and maintenance of genuine avenues for participatory democracy and development; and independent institutions to
uphold and enforce the broad principles of good governance is indicative of the South African government`s unambiguous
commitment to the values and principles of an open society as espoused in, among other documents, the Declaration of
Principles of the OGP.
As government, we consulted with civil society in drafting an OGP country action plan and in developing this Government Self-
Assessment Report – the core of which is an account of the progress we have made in implementing our country action plan
commitments. These consultation processes will continue as we regard the OGP country action plan as a living document
responding to the ever-changing governance environment. As we commit to continue our support to the global OGP initiative, we
will also continue to support and participate in continental initiatives that assess our performance in open governance, such as
the APRM as stated earlier. In partnership with the governments of Kenya and Tanzania, we are also driving an outreach
programme to popularise the OGP on the African continent. The objective of this outreach is to encourage more African
countries to strive to meet the eligibility criteria and to join the OGP. As we do this, we are mindful of the need to ensure
alignment between the OGP and the APRM as these two initiatives are mutually affirming in strengthening good governance
practices in Africa.
Working with our people, we will deliver on our undertakings to create a society where all South Africans have a voice and
participate in processes to determine and improve how they are governed.
I want to thank all South Africans who have participated in drafting our first OGP country action plan. I also want to thank those
active citizens and organisations in the business and civil society sectors that made inputs to this important document - our first
OGP Government Self-Assessment Report.
Truly we have shown that by working together, we can do more to improve our country and the world.
Ms. Ayanda Dlodlo, MP
Deputy Minister for Public Service and Administration
Government focal point on OGP
�
� �
ϱ
�
II. Introduction and Background
Democracy in South Africa is premised on a progressive and transformative Constitution enshrining a Bill of Rights and the
principles of open governance. Chapter 9 of the South African Constitution (Act 108 of 1996) specifically provides for the
establishment of institutions to safeguard and enforce the constitutional principles of openness, transparency, accountability,
responsiveness, and ethical governance in the public and private spheres commensurate with good governance and
international human rights practices1. For this reason, the advancement of human rights and the promotion of democratic
governance are key pillars on which South Africa's foreign policy rests.
Over the past decade, the global bilateral and multi-lateral system has been increasingly taking centre stage in addressing the
governance and development challenges facing humanity. In this regard South Africa is often called upon to cooperate with other
nations in pushing back the frontiers of under-development and human rights deprivation. This call for cooperation is made in the
context of South Africa's own democratisation experience which has been hailed as a good model for other emerging
democracies to emulate. Within the latitude provided by this strategic recognition, and the democratic governance imperatives of
the constitution of the Republic, South Africa endorsed the Open Government Partnership (OGP) - a multilateral initiative
launched in September 2011 with the aim of securing concrete commitments from governments to promote transparency and
accountability, empower citizens through participation, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance.
South Africa is an active participant in the OGP and, as one of the founding governments, serves on the OGP governance
structure – the OGP Steering Committee. At the September 2011 launch of the OGP, President Jacob Zuma joined the Heads of
State of the OGP founding countries including the United States of America, Brazil, Mexico, Norway, Philippines, Indonesia and
the United Kingdom to declare the South African government`s support for the OGP, and in particular, to announce South
Africa`s country action plan.
III. The South African Country Action Plan and Commitments
The South African OGP country action plan, which was developed in consultation with civil society organisations from across the
country; including citizen and business sector inputs through the National Planning Commission`s Diagnostic Overview
consultation processes, identifies Service Delivery Improvement as the country`s grand challenge.
The South African action plan further identifies seven commitments as concrete steps towards addressing the grand challenge of
Service Delivery Improvement. These seven commitments are:
1. Developing citizen participation guidelines for government departments.
2. Establishing Service Delivery Improvements Forums.
3. Implementing a “Know Your Service Rights and Responsibilities” campaign.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϲ
�
4. Capacity development of anti-corruption officials.
5. Developing guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases.
6. Involving civil society in the budget process in order to enhance the progressive realisation of socio-economic rights
and enable citizens to track public expenditure.
7. Developing a portal for environmental management information.
The implementation of these seven OGP commitments over the past twelve months have not only contributed towards ensuring
Service Delivery Improvement in South Africa in a meaningful way; it has also contributed to the promotion of greater
transparency, citizen participation, accountability, and innovation in keeping with the core open government principles as
enshrined in the South African Constitution and articulated in the OGP Declaration of Principles.
The practical integration of Service Delivery Improvement and the core open government principles (transparency, citizen
participation, accountability, and innovation through technology) is reflected in the South African country action plan
commitments as follows:
x The development of citizen participation guidelines for government departments gives direction to government
departments on how to operationalise citizen engagement and participation in service delivery planning,
implementation and monitoring through, among others, the use of direct forms of engagement such as government-
community meetings and online and mobile technological platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
x Citizen participation and accountability to the public regarding service delivery performance is enhanced through the
establishment and functioning of Service Delivery Improvements Forums (SDIFs).
x Citizen awareness and knowledge of legal frameworks for accountability, transparency and citizen participation in
public service delivery matters are enhanced through implementing the “Know Your Service Rights and
Responsibilities” campaign.
x Capacitating anti-corruption officials ensures that officials have the necessary competence (i.e. skills, aptitude and
attitude) to discharge their functions thereby enhancing accountability, intensifying the fight against corruption and
strengthening public trust.
x Developing guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases reflects government`s commitment to root out
corruption and transparency is enhanced if public officials and citizens are aware of the scope of sanctions for
corruption-related cases in the Public Service.
x Civil society involvement in the budgetary process enables citizens to inform the strategic priorities of public budgets,
thereby ensuring transparency, accountability and participation every stage of the process.
x Transparency and accountability are enhanced if citizens have access to secure technological innovations that provide
reliable and accessible data on environmental matters.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϲ
�
4. Capacity development of anti-corruption officials.
5. Developing guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases.
6. Involving civil society in the budget process in order to enhance the progressive realisation of socio-economic rights
and enable citizens to track public expenditure.
7. Developing a portal for environmental management information.
The implementation of these seven OGP commitments over the past twelve months have not only contributed towards ensuring
Service Delivery Improvement in South Africa in a meaningful way; it has also contributed to the promotion of greater
transparency, citizen participation, accountability, and innovation in keeping with the core open government principles as
enshrined in the South African Constitution and articulated in the OGP Declaration of Principles.
The practical integration of Service Delivery Improvement and the core open government principles (transparency, citizen
participation, accountability, and innovation through technology) is reflected in the South African country action plan
commitments as follows:
x The development of citizen participation guidelines for government departments gives direction to government
departments on how to operationalise citizen engagement and participation in service delivery planning,
implementation and monitoring through, among others, the use of direct forms of engagement such as government-
community meetings and online and mobile technological platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
x Citizen participation and accountability to the public regarding service delivery performance is enhanced through the
establishment and functioning of Service Delivery Improvements Forums (SDIFs).
x Citizen awareness and knowledge of legal frameworks for accountability, transparency and citizen participation in
public service delivery matters are enhanced through implementing the “Know Your Service Rights and
Responsibilities” campaign.
x Capacitating anti-corruption officials ensures that officials have the necessary competence (i.e. skills, aptitude and
attitude) to discharge their functions thereby enhancing accountability, intensifying the fight against corruption and
strengthening public trust.
x Developing guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases reflects government`s commitment to root out
corruption and transparency is enhanced if public officials and citizens are aware of the scope of sanctions for
corruption-related cases in the Public Service.
x Civil society involvement in the budgetary process enables citizens to inform the strategic priorities of public budgets,
thereby ensuring transparency, accountability and participation every stage of the process.
x Transparency and accountability are enhanced if citizens have access to secure technological innovations that provide
reliable and accessible data on environmental matters.
�
� �
ϳ
�
IV. Process Summary
At the July 2011 meeting of the OGP Steering Committee in Washington DC, it was decided that OGP founding countries should
develop country action plans with commitments in consultation with civil society organisations. It was further decided that these
action plans should be presented by Heads of State of the founding governments at the official launch of the OGP on 20
September 2011 in New York in the margins of the United Nations General Assembly meeting.
Immediately after the OGP Steering Committee meeting in July 2011, an internal and external OGP consultation process was
embarked upon to ensure adequate public consultation in drafting the South African OGP country action plan.
(a) Internal OGP Consultation
Within government, consultations were held with the National Planning Commission (NPC) in the Presidency who in June 2011
produced a Diagnostic Overview Document for public inputs as part of their mandate to develop a National Development Plan2
for the country. Over a three month period (June-August), the NPC facilitated consultations with stakeholders from within the
public and private sectors and civil society3 to discuss the Diagnostic Overview Document and to secure broad agreement about
the challenges facing the country and possible strategies to address these.
An important outcome of the NPC public consultation process was that education and employment were identified as the most
pressing challenges facing South Africa4. Significantly, improving the performance of the Public Service and public service
delivery improvement were identified as related challenges that impacts on South Africa`s ability to bolster the quality of
education and create more jobs. Based on the extensive research and consultations of the NPC, “Increasing public integrity by
improving public services” was identified as the South African OGP grand challenge.
Consultations were also held with the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, the Department of Finance
(including Treasury, the Public Investment Corporation, the Accounting Standards Board, the Land Bank, and the South African
Special Risk Insurance Agency), the Departments of Water and Environmental Affairs, the Director-General in the Presidency,
within the Department of Public Service and Administration (including the Centre for Public Service Innovation, and the Public
Administration Leadership and Management Academy), as well as the provincial offices of the country`s nine Premiers. All these
stakeholders supported the country action plan and commitments by submitting inputs on progress to the Government Self-
Assessment Report.
The process of engaging Cabinet on the OGP process started immediately after the July 2011 OGP Steering Committee
meeting. A Cabinet Memorandum on the OGP was drafted by 10 August 2011 and presented to the Governance and
Administration (G&A) Working Group and Cluster Meeting on 15 November 2011. In January 2012, the Cabinet Memorandum
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϴ
�
was presented to the G&A Cabinet Committee who recommended its submission to Cabinet by the Minister for Public Service
and Administration (who also serves as the APRM focal point). On 5 December 2012, Cabinet approved the OGP Cabinet
Memorandum thereby signaling its endorsement of South Africa`s full participation in the OGP.
(b) External OGP Consultation
The OGP obligates participating governments to commit to developing their country action plans through a multi-stakeholder
process, with the active engagement of citizens and civil society organisations5. South Africa has a vibrant civil society
organisation culture with more than 98 920 civil society organisations, of which 53 % are less formalised community-based
organisations6.
The South African National NGO Coalition (SANGOCO) is the largest single umbrella body of civil society organisations (CSOs)
in the country with offices in all nine provinces and members in every corner of the country, working on cross-cutting issues
related to democratic governance and human development. Within its membership, SANGOCO represents more than 3500
different types of organisations and groupings: from community-based organizations (CBOs) to non-governmental organizations
(NGOs); faith-based organizations (FBOs); social networks, forums, associations and movements.
In August 2011, consultative meetings were held with the national executive of SANGOCO about the OGP and a draft OGP
action plan was proposed. This was followed by an extensive two-day consultative workshop7 with the SANGOCO national office
and its nine provincial affiliate structures. The outcome of the OGP consultative workshop was a draft country action plan with
seven commitments aimed at Service Delivery Improvement; with the promotion of transparency, citizen participation,
accountability, and innovation through technology as cross-cutting concerns.
Subsequent to the development of this draft action plan, a call to participate in the OGP process was made to CSOs not affiliated
to SANGOCO and the following organisations responded with formal inputs to the draft OGP action plan: the Open Democracy
Advice Centre (ODAC), the South African National Civics Organisation (SANCO), the Centre for Economic Governance and Aids
in Africa (CEEGA).
Inputs received through the OGP internal and external consultative processes were consolidated into the 2011/12 OGP country
action plan with commitments for South Africa. This plan was submitted to the OGP Secretariat in Washington DC on 14
September 2011 and presented at the official launch of the OGP on 20 September 2011 in New York.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϴ
�
was presented to the G&A Cabinet Committee who recommended its submission to Cabinet by the Minister for Public Service
and Administration (who also serves as the APRM focal point). On 5 December 2012, Cabinet approved the OGP Cabinet
Memorandum thereby signaling its endorsement of South Africa`s full participation in the OGP.
(b) External OGP Consultation
The OGP obligates participating governments to commit to developing their country action plans through a multi-stakeholder
process, with the active engagement of citizens and civil society organisations5. South Africa has a vibrant civil society
organisation culture with more than 98 920 civil society organisations, of which 53 % are less formalised community-based
organisations6.
The South African National NGO Coalition (SANGOCO) is the largest single umbrella body of civil society organisations (CSOs)
in the country with offices in all nine provinces and members in every corner of the country, working on cross-cutting issues
related to democratic governance and human development. Within its membership, SANGOCO represents more than 3500
different types of organisations and groupings: from community-based organizations (CBOs) to non-governmental organizations
(NGOs); faith-based organizations (FBOs); social networks, forums, associations and movements.
In August 2011, consultative meetings were held with the national executive of SANGOCO about the OGP and a draft OGP
action plan was proposed. This was followed by an extensive two-day consultative workshop7 with the SANGOCO national office
and its nine provincial affiliate structures. The outcome of the OGP consultative workshop was a draft country action plan with
seven commitments aimed at Service Delivery Improvement; with the promotion of transparency, citizen participation,
accountability, and innovation through technology as cross-cutting concerns.
Subsequent to the development of this draft action plan, a call to participate in the OGP process was made to CSOs not affiliated
to SANGOCO and the following organisations responded with formal inputs to the draft OGP action plan: the Open Democracy
Advice Centre (ODAC), the South African National Civics Organisation (SANCO), the Centre for Economic Governance and Aids
in Africa (CEEGA).
Inputs received through the OGP internal and external consultative processes were consolidated into the 2011/12 OGP country
action plan with commitments for South Africa. This plan was submitted to the OGP Secretariat in Washington DC on 14
September 2011 and presented at the official launch of the OGP on 20 September 2011 in New York.
�
� �
ϵ
�
(c) Action Plan Implementation Approach
Five of the seven country action plan commitments were implemented by the Department of Public Service and Administration
(DPSA) and two commitments – involving civil society in the budgetary process and the development of a portal on
environmental management information – was implemented by the Departments of Finance and Water Affairs respectively. The
DPSA coordinated the action plan implementation process and was responsible for facilitating consultations with CSOs and
citizens on implementation progress through both in-person engagements and online electronic consultations of which the details
were communicated to stakeholders in advance. In-person consultations were conducted across the country by Community
Development Workers (CDWs), who are Public Servants working in the communities where they live. In-person consultations
also happened through OGP Roundtable Dialogue sessions that were held in the Kwazulu-Natal and Western Cape provinces
with representatives from business, academia, traditional leadership, and civil society organisations – including NGOs, FBOs,
and CBOs. Online e-consultations on action plan implementation progress were facilitated with CSOs over a two-day period, 17-
18 September 2012.
The first engagement with CSOs on the action plan implementation progress was through an in-person workshop on 12 April
20128.�The DPSA covered the transport and accommodation costs of all CSO participants. The following business and civil
society organisations participated:
A second engagement with CSOs on action plan implementation progress was a two-day online e-consultation with the afore-
mentioned organisations. These organisations, including the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) which
represents the largest trade union federation in the country, expressed satisfaction with the action plan implementation progress.
One of the CSO stakeholders, ODAC, made a written submission on the action plan implementation progress report indicating
that it would: “…like to note from the outset that the OGP call is for a “stretch [of] government practice beyond its current
baseline” in relation to the Commitments made. Such a stretch we do not believe has been reflected in a consideration of the
current Progress Report”9. ODAC is thus of the view that in implementing the OGP commitments, government has not
demonstrated an ability to implement the OGP commitments beyond its current work focus.
Business Unity South Africa (BUSA) Congress of Traditional Leaders of South Africa (CONTROLESA) Charities Aid Foundation InuthukoSithabisile Child and Youth South African History Archives – Access to Information Centre Institute for Democracy in Southern Africa (IDASA) South African National NGO Coalition (SANGOCO) Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC) South African National Civic Organisation (SANCO)
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϭ
�
CDWs, they were capacitated to understand the pro-forma template that was designed to record/collect citizen inputs on the
OGP. CDWs were also equipped with a simplified OGP pamphlet printed in the 11 official languages of the country. The aim of
the CDW door-to-door campaign was three-fold: to enhance citizen understanding of the APRM and OGP; to bring citizens on
board in terms of progress with the OGP and to collect citizen inputs to the action plan implementation progress report. The
outcome of this CDW door-to-door community engagement process will be a consolidated CDW/OGP report with citizen inputs
on OGP. This information will assist government in improving progress on its commitments and in developing a revised country
action plan for South Africa.
Worth noting is that the majority of CSOs participating in the South African OGP processes are also key stakeholders in the
APRM processes. Government mooted the idea of an OGP Government – Civil Society Multi-stakeholder Forum. But because
there is a synergy between the APRM and OGP, the existing APRM National Governing Council (NGC)11 will serve the
mechanism for government-civil society engagement on both the APRM and OGP. This approach will reduce participation
fatigue on the part of civil society and reduce the time and monetary costs associated with ongoing public participation
processes.
(d) Process Challenges in developing the Action Plan
The following challenges emerged during the development of the country action plan:
x Timeframes for developing the plan: Developing a country action plan with concrete commitments in partnership
with CSOs in a two-month period was challenging for two reasons. Firstly, South Africa is a vast country and civil
society formations are fragmented in that there is no single umbrella body that represents the interests of all CSOs in
the country. Hence, a decision was taken to partner with the largest umbrella body representing civil society
organisations in the country, namely SANGOCO. Secondly, participation is costly in terms of financial and human
resources; both of which were not assigned to the South African OGP initiative through the formal bureaucratic
process. Hence, a decision was taken to draw on research and consultative process already underway while formal
approval was obtained for the allocation of resources to the South African OGP initiative. In this regard, research and
consultations on the APRM and NDP processes proved valuable in feeding into the action plan development process.
x Cabinet engagement on the plan: Although the South African President indicated his support to the OGP by
endorsing the South African government`s participation in OGP, Cabinet had to be engaged on this important global
initiative aimed at promoting open government. The process of engaging Cabinet generally starts with obtaining
approval for such engagement from the administrative and political head of a government department, followed by
approval by a government cluster working committee and a Cabinet sub-committee. Only then can Cabinet be
engaged. In the case of the OGP, the approval process faced unique challenges in that there was a Cabinet reshuffle
in October 2011 which delayed the approval process. After the deployment of a new Minister to the DPSA, he was
�
� �
ϭϬ
�
A third engagement with CSOs on action plan implementation progress was an in-person workshop10 with the following
organisations:
Black Sash – National Anti-corruption Forum South African Council of Churches (SACC) RAO – Youth Development South African National Civics Organisation (SANCO) Business Unity South Africa (BUSA) South African NGO Coalition (SANGOCO) - National Office, Gauteng SANGOCO, Northern Cape SANGOCO, Kwazulu-Natal SANGOCO, Eastern Cape SANGOCO, Western Cape SANGOCO, Limpopo SANGOCO, Free State
During all three engagements with CSOs and the private sector, valuable inputs were made to the action plan implementation
process and these have been considered in the implementation of OGP commitments. For example, CSOs and the private
sector argued in support of the increased use of information communication technology (ICT) in the implementation of
commitments. The South African government is however aware that the majority of its citizens in the country do not have access
the internet and social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. But in acknowledging the input from CSOs and the private
sector, a decision was made that community-based Community Development Workers (CDWs) will be issued with ICT
equipment to ensure that information on service delivery performance at community-level are communicated to relevant
government departments for immediate action.
To popularise the OGP among private citizens, and to obtain their inputs on implementation progress of OGP commitments,
government adopted an approach of utilising its 3100 Community Development Workers (CDWs) employed across the country.
The process started with a workshop of all provincial coordinators of the CDW Programme, where they were capacitated on the
OGP programme to understand its key tenets and objectives.
This workshop was followed by a national CDW Conference in March 2013, where 600 CDWs were empowered to understand
their communications function regarding the dissemination of information on government programmes including the APRM and
OGP. The plan was to replicate the national CDW Conference in all nine provinces. Only three provinces – KwaZulu-Natal,
Mpumalanga, Northern Cape – could however be reached through CDW workshops. CDWs in the remaining provinces of the
Eastern Cape, Free State, North West, Limpopo and Gauteng have indicated that they will conduct OGP door-to-door visits for a
two-week period and submit reports to the DPSA by the end of April 2013. Prior to the OGP door-to-door engagements by
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϭ
�
CDWs, they were capacitated to understand the pro-forma template that was designed to record/collect citizen inputs on the
OGP. CDWs were also equipped with a simplified OGP pamphlet printed in the 11 official languages of the country. The aim of
the CDW door-to-door campaign was three-fold: to enhance citizen understanding of the APRM and OGP; to bring citizens on
board in terms of progress with the OGP and to collect citizen inputs to the action plan implementation progress report. The
outcome of this CDW door-to-door community engagement process will be a consolidated CDW/OGP report with citizen inputs
on OGP. This information will assist government in improving progress on its commitments and in developing a revised country
action plan for South Africa.
Worth noting is that the majority of CSOs participating in the South African OGP processes are also key stakeholders in the
APRM processes. Government mooted the idea of an OGP Government – Civil Society Multi-stakeholder Forum. But because
there is a synergy between the APRM and OGP, the existing APRM National Governing Council (NGC)11 will serve the
mechanism for government-civil society engagement on both the APRM and OGP. This approach will reduce participation
fatigue on the part of civil society and reduce the time and monetary costs associated with ongoing public participation
processes.
(d) Process Challenges in developing the Action Plan
The following challenges emerged during the development of the country action plan:
x Timeframes for developing the plan: Developing a country action plan with concrete commitments in partnership
with CSOs in a two-month period was challenging for two reasons. Firstly, South Africa is a vast country and civil
society formations are fragmented in that there is no single umbrella body that represents the interests of all CSOs in
the country. Hence, a decision was taken to partner with the largest umbrella body representing civil society
organisations in the country, namely SANGOCO. Secondly, participation is costly in terms of financial and human
resources; both of which were not assigned to the South African OGP initiative through the formal bureaucratic
process. Hence, a decision was taken to draw on research and consultative process already underway while formal
approval was obtained for the allocation of resources to the South African OGP initiative. In this regard, research and
consultations on the APRM and NDP processes proved valuable in feeding into the action plan development process.
x Cabinet engagement on the plan: Although the South African President indicated his support to the OGP by
endorsing the South African government`s participation in OGP, Cabinet had to be engaged on this important global
initiative aimed at promoting open government. The process of engaging Cabinet generally starts with obtaining
approval for such engagement from the administrative and political head of a government department, followed by
approval by a government cluster working committee and a Cabinet sub-committee. Only then can Cabinet be
engaged. In the case of the OGP, the approval process faced unique challenges in that there was a Cabinet reshuffle
in October 2011 which delayed the approval process. After the deployment of a new Minister to the DPSA, he was
�
� �
ϭϬ
�
A third engagement with CSOs on action plan implementation progress was an in-person workshop10 with the following
organisations:
Black Sash – National Anti-corruption Forum South African Council of Churches (SACC) RAO – Youth Development South African National Civics Organisation (SANCO) Business Unity South Africa (BUSA) South African NGO Coalition (SANGOCO) - National Office, Gauteng SANGOCO, Northern Cape SANGOCO, Kwazulu-Natal SANGOCO, Eastern Cape SANGOCO, Western Cape SANGOCO, Limpopo SANGOCO, Free State
During all three engagements with CSOs and the private sector, valuable inputs were made to the action plan implementation
process and these have been considered in the implementation of OGP commitments. For example, CSOs and the private
sector argued in support of the increased use of information communication technology (ICT) in the implementation of
commitments. The South African government is however aware that the majority of its citizens in the country do not have access
the internet and social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. But in acknowledging the input from CSOs and the private
sector, a decision was made that community-based Community Development Workers (CDWs) will be issued with ICT
equipment to ensure that information on service delivery performance at community-level are communicated to relevant
government departments for immediate action.
To popularise the OGP among private citizens, and to obtain their inputs on implementation progress of OGP commitments,
government adopted an approach of utilising its 3100 Community Development Workers (CDWs) employed across the country.
The process started with a workshop of all provincial coordinators of the CDW Programme, where they were capacitated on the
OGP programme to understand its key tenets and objectives.
This workshop was followed by a national CDW Conference in March 2013, where 600 CDWs were empowered to understand
their communications function regarding the dissemination of information on government programmes including the APRM and
OGP. The plan was to replicate the national CDW Conference in all nine provinces. Only three provinces – KwaZulu-Natal,
Mpumalanga, Northern Cape – could however be reached through CDW workshops. CDWs in the remaining provinces of the
Eastern Cape, Free State, North West, Limpopo and Gauteng have indicated that they will conduct OGP door-to-door visits for a
two-week period and submit reports to the DPSA by the end of April 2013. Prior to the OGP door-to-door engagements by
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϮ
�
briefed on the OGP. Sadly, the Minister passed away in May 2012 which caused a further delay in the process. A new
Minister was deployed in June 2012 and once she was briefed on the OGP the process to engage Cabinet was back
on track. The OGP Cabinet Memorandum was finally presented to Cabinet on 5 December 2012 where it received
overwhelming support and approval.
x Securing inter-departmental cooperation on the plan: Obtaining Cabinet support for the OGP was critical given that
the OGP is a government-wide initiative involving cooperation and support of all government departments.
Furthermore, inter-departmental cooperation was necessitated by the fact that five of the seven action plan
commitments are within the legal mandate of the DPSA, and two within the mandate of the Departments of Finance
and Water Affairs respectively. The inadvertent delay in engaging Cabinet caused delays in securing cooperation with
these two key departments, although they had already put plans in place to address the commitments within their
respective legal mandates.
As mentioned, the action plan development and implementation approach included engagements with CSOs through online e-
consultations. In addition to the direct engagement with 100 CDWs in Mpumalanga province by government officials, the OGP
political focal point in South Africa also engaged them on OGP through the use of Skype. Both approaches to participation
represent the innovative use of technology in government planning, implementation and consultation given that participatory
approaches in South Africa traditionally involves in-person engagements.
The OGP Networking Mechanism was established by the OGP Support Unit to connect OGP governments with providers of
open government expertise to help them develop and implement ambitious open government commitments. The Networking
Mechanism’s mission is to introduce OGP governments to peer governments, NGOs, and private companies with specific
expertise, skills, and technological capacities across a range of open government issues. Through introductions with its
extensive network of suppliers, the Networking Mechanism can assist governments with conceptualising and implementing the
ambitious open government commitments and reforms contained in their respective OGP national action plans. The South
African government did not have a need to use the expertise of the OGP Networking Mechanism because it has the internal
knowledge and expertise to implement its OGP commitments. Government officials responsible for the implementation of country
commitments did however benefit from the information and knowledge shared at Networking Mechanism exhibitions and
presentations at OGP events.
Furthermore, the Learning and Peer Support (LPS) sub-committee of the OGP was established to foster active exchange and
learning among OGP countries and other interested parties. South Africa benefitted little from hands-on LPS sub-committee
support in planning for the May 2013 OGP Africa Regional Outreach event. This is mainly because the four OGP sub-
committees got off on a slow start due to inadequate support from the OGP Support Unit.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϮ
�
briefed on the OGP. Sadly, the Minister passed away in May 2012 which caused a further delay in the process. A new
Minister was deployed in June 2012 and once she was briefed on the OGP the process to engage Cabinet was back
on track. The OGP Cabinet Memorandum was finally presented to Cabinet on 5 December 2012 where it received
overwhelming support and approval.
x Securing inter-departmental cooperation on the plan: Obtaining Cabinet support for the OGP was critical given that
the OGP is a government-wide initiative involving cooperation and support of all government departments.
Furthermore, inter-departmental cooperation was necessitated by the fact that five of the seven action plan
commitments are within the legal mandate of the DPSA, and two within the mandate of the Departments of Finance
and Water Affairs respectively. The inadvertent delay in engaging Cabinet caused delays in securing cooperation with
these two key departments, although they had already put plans in place to address the commitments within their
respective legal mandates.
As mentioned, the action plan development and implementation approach included engagements with CSOs through online e-
consultations. In addition to the direct engagement with 100 CDWs in Mpumalanga province by government officials, the OGP
political focal point in South Africa also engaged them on OGP through the use of Skype. Both approaches to participation
represent the innovative use of technology in government planning, implementation and consultation given that participatory
approaches in South Africa traditionally involves in-person engagements.
The OGP Networking Mechanism was established by the OGP Support Unit to connect OGP governments with providers of
open government expertise to help them develop and implement ambitious open government commitments. The Networking
Mechanism’s mission is to introduce OGP governments to peer governments, NGOs, and private companies with specific
expertise, skills, and technological capacities across a range of open government issues. Through introductions with its
extensive network of suppliers, the Networking Mechanism can assist governments with conceptualising and implementing the
ambitious open government commitments and reforms contained in their respective OGP national action plans. The South
African government did not have a need to use the expertise of the OGP Networking Mechanism because it has the internal
knowledge and expertise to implement its OGP commitments. Government officials responsible for the implementation of country
commitments did however benefit from the information and knowledge shared at Networking Mechanism exhibitions and
presentations at OGP events.
Furthermore, the Learning and Peer Support (LPS) sub-committee of the OGP was established to foster active exchange and
learning among OGP countries and other interested parties. South Africa benefitted little from hands-on LPS sub-committee
support in planning for the May 2013 OGP Africa Regional Outreach event. This is mainly because the four OGP sub-
committees got off on a slow start due to inadequate support from the OGP Support Unit.
�
� �
ϭϯ
�
(e) OGP Awareness Campaigns
Given the delay in engaging Cabinet on the OGP and the fact that human and financial resources were not immediately available
for OGP activities after its official launch in September 2011, the South African government had difficulty launching a national
OGP awareness and participation campaign. As a start, existing initiatives such as the APRM processes were used as platforms
to raise awareness of OGP among CSOs and the general public. However, in February 2013, government implemented the
following OGP public awareness and participation initiatives to promote public understanding of the OGP and to ensure
meaningful public input to the country action plan implementation report:
Community Radio Programmes on OGP: In South Africa, Community Radio refers to a non-profit, service-oriented radio that
is solely owned and operated by the community (separate from commercial and public broadcasting). Community Radio stations
serve geographic communities and communities of interest by broadcasting content that is relevant to a local, specific audience.
It encourages dialogue and empowers local communities through information sharing and critical debate. Through the use of 66
community radio from across the country, more than 10 million citizens were informed about the OGP and how to make inputs to
the country action plan implementation progress report.
Public/Commercial Radio on OGP: The focal point for the OGP in the country, Deputy Minister Ayanda Dlodlo, also
participated in public/commercial radio programmes during which she raised awareness about OGP, responded to citizen
questions on OGP, and invited more than 2 million listeners to participate in planned OGP processes through their local CDWs.
Public Television Broadcasting Campaigns on OGP: The OGP focal point in South Africa also participated in television news
magazine programmes on the national television broadcaster to popularise the OGP and to invite citizens to become active
participants in OGP processes. In one of these television programmes, the South African OGP focal point was joined by the
United Kingdom co-chair of the OGP Steering Committee, Minister Francis Maude, to reinforce the need for public participation
in OGP processes. An estimated total of 2.2 million citizens were reached through these television programmes.
Print and Internet Media Campaigns on OGP: The OGP print media campaign consisted of developing and printing a standard
advertorial on the OGP and, in particular, progress on the implementation of action plan commitments. In total, eight daily and
weekly newspapers with an estimated readership total of more than 1 million were used to carry the OGP advertorial in English,
Afrikaans and isiZulu – the three most widely spoken languages in the country. With regards to internet-based news media, the
IOL Breaking News platforms was used; reaching an additional 574 000 daily readers.
The OGP house-to-house Campaign by CDWs: On 14-15 March 2013, the DPSA hosted a national CDW conference where
President Zuma addressed 600 CDWs on, amongst others, the need to mobilise communities to participate in OGP processes.
CDWs are public servants working at the community-level. Their job function includes the facilitation of meaningful interaction
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϰ
�
and partnerships between government and communities through, among other interventions, house-to-house engagements on
key government programmes and services. It is within the context of their specific information dissemination role that President
Zuma urged CDWs to intensify public awareness and participation in OGP processes.
Following this call, Deputy Minister Dlodlo hosted a CDW workshop in KwaZulu-Natal province on 28 March where 160 CDWs
were capacitated on OGP and provided with tailor-made “OGP orientation packs” and brochures. Following this empowerment
workshop, CDWs conducted an OGP house-to-house campaign during which they engaged 10 000 households on the OGP
country action plan commitments and progress against these commitments. This approach was replicated on 05 April in
Mpumalanga province and 12 April in the Northern Cape province where CDWs committed to reach a further 45 000 households
on OGP. It is envisaged that by the end of May 2013, more than 1 million households (representing approximately 4.5 million
citizens) would have been engaged on the OGP through this OGP door-to-door campaign by CDWs.
OGP Roundtable Dialogues: On 20 March 2013, Deputy Minister Dlodlo hosted an OGP Roundtable Dialogue in the city of
Durban with 160 stakeholders who included representatives from the Durban Chamber of Commerce, the Durban Press Club,
academic institutions, civil society organisations, and traditional leadership authorities. A similar OGP Roundtable Dialogue was
held in Cape Town on 16 April 2013 with 40 stakeholders who included representatives from CSOs, academic institutions, the
media, business, municipalities, faith-based organisations, and social movements. These stakeholders expressed support for the
country action plan implementation progress report and shared concerns and ideas on how to strengthen accountability,
transparency, public participation, and intensify the fight against corruption in the country.
President`s Coordinating Council (PCC) engagement on OGP: The PCC is a council consisting of the President and Deputy
President of South Africa, Cabinet Ministers and the Premiers of the nine provincial governments. At a PCC meeting on 11 April
2013, the South African OGP political focal point presented the OGP Government Self-Assessment Report for inputs, comments
and endorsement. The report was welcomed and received overwhelming support.
In total, it is estimated that more than 21 million citizens have been conscientised about the OGP and its participatory process.
The total impact of the OGP Public Awareness Campaign is as follows:
Mode of Engagement Number of Engagements Estimated Reach Community Radio 66 10 million Public/Commercial Radio 2 2.5 million Television 2 2.2 million Print and Internet Media 8 1 million Door-to-door Campaign 3100 CDWs 4.5 million Roundtable Dialogues 2 150 representative organisations
(potential reach 30 000)Number of citizens engaged on OGP progress (Estimated)
21 300 000 citizens
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϰ
�
and partnerships between government and communities through, among other interventions, house-to-house engagements on
key government programmes and services. It is within the context of their specific information dissemination role that President
Zuma urged CDWs to intensify public awareness and participation in OGP processes.
Following this call, Deputy Minister Dlodlo hosted a CDW workshop in KwaZulu-Natal province on 28 March where 160 CDWs
were capacitated on OGP and provided with tailor-made “OGP orientation packs” and brochures. Following this empowerment
workshop, CDWs conducted an OGP house-to-house campaign during which they engaged 10 000 households on the OGP
country action plan commitments and progress against these commitments. This approach was replicated on 05 April in
Mpumalanga province and 12 April in the Northern Cape province where CDWs committed to reach a further 45 000 households
on OGP. It is envisaged that by the end of May 2013, more than 1 million households (representing approximately 4.5 million
citizens) would have been engaged on the OGP through this OGP door-to-door campaign by CDWs.
OGP Roundtable Dialogues: On 20 March 2013, Deputy Minister Dlodlo hosted an OGP Roundtable Dialogue in the city of
Durban with 160 stakeholders who included representatives from the Durban Chamber of Commerce, the Durban Press Club,
academic institutions, civil society organisations, and traditional leadership authorities. A similar OGP Roundtable Dialogue was
held in Cape Town on 16 April 2013 with 40 stakeholders who included representatives from CSOs, academic institutions, the
media, business, municipalities, faith-based organisations, and social movements. These stakeholders expressed support for the
country action plan implementation progress report and shared concerns and ideas on how to strengthen accountability,
transparency, public participation, and intensify the fight against corruption in the country.
President`s Coordinating Council (PCC) engagement on OGP: The PCC is a council consisting of the President and Deputy
President of South Africa, Cabinet Ministers and the Premiers of the nine provincial governments. At a PCC meeting on 11 April
2013, the South African OGP political focal point presented the OGP Government Self-Assessment Report for inputs, comments
and endorsement. The report was welcomed and received overwhelming support.
In total, it is estimated that more than 21 million citizens have been conscientised about the OGP and its participatory process.
The total impact of the OGP Public Awareness Campaign is as follows:
Mode of Engagement Number of Engagements Estimated Reach Community Radio 66 10 million Public/Commercial Radio 2 2.5 million Television 2 2.2 million Print and Internet Media 8 1 million Door-to-door Campaign 3100 CDWs 4.5 million Roundtable Dialogues 2 150 representative organisations
(potential reach 30 000)Number of citizens engaged on OGP progress (Estimated)
21 300 000 citizens
�
� �
ϭϱ
�
V. Implementation of the Country Action Plan
In the assessment period September 2011 to 31 March 2013, South Africa included seven commitments in its country action
plan of which four have been fully implemented; and three partially implemented. Overall, implementation progress of the country
action plan commitments are as follows (see also Annexure A):
1. Developing citizen participation guidelines for government departments: This commitment was fully implemented in
the assessment period. A citizen participation guideline was developed and is awaiting formal approval. The DPSA will work
with nine government departments (three per quarter) in the period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2013 with the aim of
institutionalizing public participation in these departments. In collaboration with the Public Administration Leadership and
Management Academy (PALAMA), the DPSA will provide training for officials in all departments to build internal capacity to
successfully implement and sustain Public Participation activities in their respective departments.
2. Establishing Service Delivery Improvements Forums (SDIFs): This commitment was partially implemented. A concept
document on the institutionalisation of SDIFs has been developed focusing on the approach; institutional and governance
arrangements; and terms of reference for SDIFs. Consultations on the establishment of SDIFs were held with all the nine
provinces. The plan is to establish functional SDIFs in the period new financial year based on the concept document and
consultations with provinces. This process will be completed by October/November 2013.
3. Implementing a “Know Your Service Rights and Responsibilities” (KYSR&R) campaign: This commitment was
partially implemented. A KYSR&R guideline was developed to ensure the implementation of the KYSR&R campaign by
provincial departments. The DPSA furthermore implemented the KYSR&R campaign in schools in the Limpopo and Eastern
Cape provinces where 36 700 “Know Your Service Rights and Responsibilities” booklets were dispatched to Community
Development Worker (CDW) coordinators for distribution to learners. The media campaign on KYSR&R will be intensified in
the new financial year with the view to have the commitment fully achieve by March 2014.
4. Capacity development of anti-corruption officials: This commitment was fully implemented. A total number of 2018 anti-
corruption officials were capacitated. Additionally, in the February 2013 State of the Nation Address, President Zuma
recommitted South Africa to the fight against corruption, indicating that additional resources will be made available to
strengthen the capacity of the Anti-Corruption Task Team as part of government`s resolve to fight corruption. The Minister
for Public Service and Administration has also announced government’s plans to establish an Anti-Corruption Bureau to add
to and re-enforce the existing anti-corruption measures.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϲ
�
5. Developing guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases: This commitment was partially achieved.
Government has existing regulations in place governing the conduct of public officials. These regulations are being
reviewed to include sanctions for corruption relation cases.
6. Civil society involvement in the budgetary process: This commitment was fully implemented. The extent and quality of
civil society participation in budgetary processes has resulted in South Africa being ranked second out of 100 countries in
terms of budget participation, transparency and oversight12. In South Africa, the tabling of the Division of Revenue Bill
(national budget) gives citizens and civil society groups a space to input on the national budget through their respective
provinces and municipalities. Also, government departments, before any given budget cycle, conduct intensive
engagements with civil society and the public in general through budget road shows also known as ‘izimbizo’. In addition to
this, the Minister of Finance solicits inputs from the public via social media (“tips for Pravin” on the National Treasury
website). Some of these inputs are responded to and articulated at various points during the budget speech, where specific
action to be taken is mentioned. At the local government sphere, municipalities engage the public and civil society
stakeholders through Integrated Development Plans (IDPs), which links municipal budgets to projects identified by local
communities. There are a series of bilateral engagements with various stakeholders/civil society during the Medium Term
Expenditure Framework process through Function Committees. Some NGOs are involved in function group discussions as
part of the Medium Term Expenditure Committee (MTEC) process, which focuses on budget preparation, including
deliberations on past budget execution of government priorities. Also, public hearings are conducted by the legislature
where civil society organisations and civil society in general are encouraged to participate. The Minister of Finance has a
more formal arrangement for discussing policies in the Public Finance and Monetary Chamber of the National Economic
and Development Labour Council (NEDLAC), which includes representatives from business, labour and community
constituencies. Furthermore, members of Parliament have constituency visits on a regular basis to discuss the budget with
citizens.
7. Developing a portal for environmental management information: This commitment is fully addressed. Citizens are able
to access credible data on drinking water quality and identified risks within their respective municipalities. This information is
accessible from the Department of Water Affairs website: www.dwa.gov.za/bluedrop or on the mobi site: my-water.mobi.
Also, citizens are able to access credible data on wastewater management and identified risks within their respective
municipalities. This information is accessible from the Department of Water Affairs website: www.dwa.gov.za/greendrop.
The progress negates the need to conduct a feasibility study on the establishment of a portal for environmental
management information. Additionally, the Gauteng Province has a publicly accessible portal on environmental
management information. In 2010, this project won a Centre for Public Service Innovation (CPSI) Award, and in 2011 it won
the United Nations Innovation Award. Also, in October 2012, South Africa hosted a global conference on best practices
regarding publicly accessible portals on government data through the United Nations under the theme: Next Stage in Open
Government Data: Using Data for Transparency, Accountability and Collaboration.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϲ
�
5. Developing guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases: This commitment was partially achieved.
Government has existing regulations in place governing the conduct of public officials. These regulations are being
reviewed to include sanctions for corruption relation cases.
6. Civil society involvement in the budgetary process: This commitment was fully implemented. The extent and quality of
civil society participation in budgetary processes has resulted in South Africa being ranked second out of 100 countries in
terms of budget participation, transparency and oversight12. In South Africa, the tabling of the Division of Revenue Bill
(national budget) gives citizens and civil society groups a space to input on the national budget through their respective
provinces and municipalities. Also, government departments, before any given budget cycle, conduct intensive
engagements with civil society and the public in general through budget road shows also known as ‘izimbizo’. In addition to
this, the Minister of Finance solicits inputs from the public via social media (“tips for Pravin” on the National Treasury
website). Some of these inputs are responded to and articulated at various points during the budget speech, where specific
action to be taken is mentioned. At the local government sphere, municipalities engage the public and civil society
stakeholders through Integrated Development Plans (IDPs), which links municipal budgets to projects identified by local
communities. There are a series of bilateral engagements with various stakeholders/civil society during the Medium Term
Expenditure Framework process through Function Committees. Some NGOs are involved in function group discussions as
part of the Medium Term Expenditure Committee (MTEC) process, which focuses on budget preparation, including
deliberations on past budget execution of government priorities. Also, public hearings are conducted by the legislature
where civil society organisations and civil society in general are encouraged to participate. The Minister of Finance has a
more formal arrangement for discussing policies in the Public Finance and Monetary Chamber of the National Economic
and Development Labour Council (NEDLAC), which includes representatives from business, labour and community
constituencies. Furthermore, members of Parliament have constituency visits on a regular basis to discuss the budget with
citizens.
7. Developing a portal for environmental management information: This commitment is fully addressed. Citizens are able
to access credible data on drinking water quality and identified risks within their respective municipalities. This information is
accessible from the Department of Water Affairs website: www.dwa.gov.za/bluedrop or on the mobi site: my-water.mobi.
Also, citizens are able to access credible data on wastewater management and identified risks within their respective
municipalities. This information is accessible from the Department of Water Affairs website: www.dwa.gov.za/greendrop.
The progress negates the need to conduct a feasibility study on the establishment of a portal for environmental
management information. Additionally, the Gauteng Province has a publicly accessible portal on environmental
management information. In 2010, this project won a Centre for Public Service Innovation (CPSI) Award, and in 2011 it won
the United Nations Innovation Award. Also, in October 2012, South Africa hosted a global conference on best practices
regarding publicly accessible portals on government data through the United Nations under the theme: Next Stage in Open
Government Data: Using Data for Transparency, Accountability and Collaboration.
�
� �
ϭϳ
�
VI. Conclusion, Lessons Learnt and Next Steps
Overall, valuable lessons were learned during the development of the country action plan, the implementation of the plan, and
the consultation processes aimed at soliciting public inputs on action plan implementation progress. In terms of the afore-
mentioned processes, we learned more about the value of time. OGP founding countries that had to submit their country action
plans by 14 September 2011 were under pressure to consult as widely as possible on the country grand challenge and country
commitments within less than eight weeks. The lesson for South Africa is that one should not err on the side of time allocated to
an activity as important as public participation. As government, we (again) learned that participation has major financial and
human resource cost implications and that committed budgets are needed to do justice to consultative processes.
Further lessons learned by government include the following:
x We need to have a more structured annual calendar for citizen engagement on OGP.
x We have not fully exploited traditional leadership structures as a mechanism to engage citizens.
x This information gathered through the consultative processes of developing this Government Self-Assessment Report
can enhance our revised country action plan and commitments.
x We should not only rely on engaging CSOs as we did in the initial stages of the country action plan development
process. We need to engage citizens directly in order to obtain better inputs.
x We need to engage Ratepayers `Associations to cover a wider spectrum of CSO representation.
x The APRM and OGP reporting processes were running parallel with signifivcant cost and human resources
implications. The lesson is to develop a consultative process that speaks to both the APRM and OGP, especially since
both have the same political focal point.
Also, we learned that civil society in general suffer from participation fatigue in the sense that they are invited to participate in
local planning, implementation and monitoring process such as municipal integrated development planning processes (IDPs);
they are also invited to participate in provincial process such as the development, implementation and monitoring of Provincial
Growth and Development Strategies (PGDS); at a national level they are invited to participate in processes related to the
National Development Plan (NDP) and many other process that are of importance to citizens; at a continental level citizens are
invited to participate in (APRM processes; and the call to participate in the global OGP process in terms of developing a country
action plan and making inputs on implementation progress do overwhelm and thereby fatigue citizens and civil society
organisations. To address this concern, government has adopted an approach of synergising some of these participatory
processes because the same CSOs who are participating in the APRM are also participating in the OGP. This approach of
synergising the stakeholder engagement framework for the APRM/OGP is aimed minimizing the problem of participation fatigue
and reducing the costs related to meaningful public participation.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϴ
�
With regards to the three partially fulfilled commitments, South Africa undertakes to fully implement these commitments by the
end of March 2014. In submitting our first Government Self-Assessment Report to the OGP, we reiterate our request for clarity
regarding the concepts of “civil society” and “public participation”. These concepts are important variables in the governance
discourse and they have particular meanings in the South African context which, we have noted, differs from other OGP
participating country contexts. Clarity on what constitutes “civil society” and “public participation” in the OGP context would clarify
and render a common understanding of these terms thereby greatly assisting in the implementation of the OGP Declaration of
Principles and the commitments reflected in the country action plan.
In terms of the OGP generally, South Africa remains committed to the Declaration of Principles it endorsed in September 2011
and will continue to be an active OGP participant. We resolve to establish an OGP/APRM Government-Civil Society Multi-
Stakeholder Forum; update our country action plan through a consultative process with civil society; fully integrate and rationalise
the OGP/APRM stakeholder engagement framework and engage in and support OGP outreach initiatives on the African
continent and beyond.
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
�
� �
ϭϴ
�
With regards to the three partially fulfilled commitments, South Africa undertakes to fully implement these commitments by the
end of March 2014. In submitting our first Government Self-Assessment Report to the OGP, we reiterate our request for clarity
regarding the concepts of “civil society” and “public participation”. These concepts are important variables in the governance
discourse and they have particular meanings in the South African context which, we have noted, differs from other OGP
participating country contexts. Clarity on what constitutes “civil society” and “public participation” in the OGP context would clarify
and render a common understanding of these terms thereby greatly assisting in the implementation of the OGP Declaration of
Principles and the commitments reflected in the country action plan.
In terms of the OGP generally, South Africa remains committed to the Declaration of Principles it endorsed in September 2011
and will continue to be an active OGP participant. We resolve to establish an OGP/APRM Government-Civil Society Multi-
Stakeholder Forum; update our country action plan through a consultative process with civil society; fully integrate and rationalise
the OGP/APRM stakeholder engagement framework and engage in and support OGP outreach initiatives on the African
continent and beyond.
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
�
� �
ϮϬ
�
3. Enhance national integrity through institutional capacity-building of National Anti-Corruption Forum (NACF) and Anti-Corruption Hotline.
This will include the capacitydevelopment of anti-corruption officials and strengthening the Hotline`s advocacy and investigation functions.
The NACF is capacitated
Number of anti-corruptionofficials capacitated.
The DPSA implemented the Public Sector Anti-corruption Capacity Building
Programme focusing on capacitating three categories of public service officials: (1) anti-corruption practitioners - 487 officials capacitated); (2) law enforcement officials including investigators, prosecutors and presiding officers; (3) general public servants - 1531 officials in categories 2 and 3 capacitated.
Capacitating anti-corruption officials is an ongoing activity of government.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
4. Approve guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases
Guidelinedeveloped
A generic guideline on discipline in the Public Service has been developed. This guideline will be review to enhanceeffectiveness by March 2014.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
5. Develop a Citizen Participation guideline for Public Sector departments that would ensure that every public sector department across all spheres have a functional, resourced and capacitated citizen engagement unit which regularly and proactively engage with civil society.
Guidelinedeveloped
In October 2011, the DPSA hosted a roundtable discussion to engage national and provincial government departments, including academia, on drafting a generic Public Participation guideline and to solicit stakeholder inputs before the actual drafting of the guideline.
In November 2011, a first draft of the Public Participation guideline was presented for inputs to the Community Development Worker Programme (CDWP) National Task Team, representing the Public Participation Units of the Department of Cooperative Governance in all nine provinces.
The generic guideline on Public Participation has been completed and was submitted for final approval.
The DPSA will work with nine national departments (three per quarter) with the aim of institutionalizing Public Participation in these departments.
Ms Colette Clark Tel: 012 336 1056
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
In
the
new
fina
ncia
l ye
ar e
ndin
g in
M
arch
201
4 th
e KY
SR&R
Cam
paig
n w
ill be
inte
nsifi
ed.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
�
��
ϭϴ
�
With
reg
ards
to th
e th
ree
parti
ally
fulfi
lled
com
mitm
ents
, Sou
th A
frica
und
erta
kes
to fu
lly im
plem
ent t
hese
com
mitm
ents
by
the
end
of M
arch
201
4. In
sub
mitt
ing
our f
irst G
overn
ment
Self-A
sse
ssm
ent
Report
to th
e O
GP,
we
reite
rate
our
requ
est f
or c
larit
y
rega
rdin
g th
e co
ncep
ts o
f “c
ivil
soci
ety”
and
“pu
blic
par
ticip
atio
n”.
Thes
e co
ncep
ts a
re im
porta
nt v
aria
bles
in t
he g
over
nanc
e
disc
ours
e an
d th
ey h
ave
parti
cula
r m
eani
ngs
in t
he S
outh
Afri
can
cont
ext
whi
ch,
we
have
not
ed,
diffe
rs f
rom
oth
er O
GP
parti
cipa
ting
coun
try c
onte
xts.
Cla
rity
on w
hat c
onst
itute
s “c
ivil
soci
ety”
and
“pub
lic p
artic
ipat
ion”
in th
e O
GP
cont
ext w
ould
cla
rify
and
rend
er a
com
mon
und
erst
andi
ng o
f the
se te
rms
ther
eby
grea
tly a
ssis
ting
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of th
e O
GP
Dec
lara
tion
of
Prin
cipl
es a
nd th
e co
mm
itmen
ts re
flect
ed in
the
coun
try a
ctio
n pl
an.
In te
rms
of th
e O
GP
gene
rally
, Sou
th A
frica
rem
ains
com
mitt
ed to
the
Dec
lara
tion
of P
rinci
ples
it e
ndor
sed
in S
epte
mbe
r 201
1
and
will
cont
inue
to
be a
n ac
tive
OG
P pa
rtici
pant
. W
e re
solv
e to
est
ablis
h an
OG
P/AP
RM
Gov
ernm
ent-C
ivil
Soci
ety
Mul
ti-
Stak
ehol
der F
orum
; upd
ate
our c
ount
ry a
ctio
n pl
an th
roug
h a
cons
ulta
tive
proc
ess
with
civ
il so
ciet
y; fu
lly in
tegr
ate
and
ratio
nalis
e
the
OG
P/AP
RM
sta
keho
lder
eng
agem
ent
fram
ewor
k an
d en
gage
in
and
supp
ort
OG
P ou
treac
h in
itiat
ives
on
the
Afric
an
cont
inen
t and
bey
ond.
19
REP
UB
LIC
OF
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
�
� �
ϮϬ
�
3. Enhance national integrity through institutional capacity-building of National Anti-Corruption Forum (NACF) and Anti-Corruption Hotline.
This will include the capacitydevelopment of anti-corruption officials and strengthening the Hotline`s advocacy and investigation functions.
The NACF is capacitated
Number of anti-corruptionofficials capacitated.
The DPSA implemented the Public Sector Anti-corruption Capacity Building
Programme focusing on capacitating three categories of public service officials: (1) anti-corruption practitioners - 487 officials capacitated); (2) law enforcement officials including investigators, prosecutors and presiding officers; (3) general public servants - 1531 officials in categories 2 and 3 capacitated.
Capacitating anti-corruption officials is an ongoing activity of government.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
4. Approve guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases
Guidelinedeveloped
A generic guideline on discipline in the Public Service has been developed. This guideline will be review to enhanceeffectiveness by March 2014.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
5. Develop a Citizen Participation guideline for Public Sector departments that would ensure that every public sector department across all spheres have a functional, resourced and capacitated citizen engagement unit which regularly and proactively engage with civil society.
Guidelinedeveloped
In October 2011, the DPSA hosted a roundtable discussion to engage national and provincial government departments, including academia, on drafting a generic Public Participation guideline and to solicit stakeholder inputs before the actual drafting of the guideline.
In November 2011, a first draft of the Public Participation guideline was presented for inputs to the Community Development Worker Programme (CDWP) National Task Team, representing the Public Participation Units of the Department of Cooperative Governance in all nine provinces.
The generic guideline on Public Participation has been completed and was submitted for final approval.
The DPSA will work with nine national departments (three per quarter) with the aim of institutionalizing Public Participation in these departments.
Ms Colette Clark Tel: 012 336 1056
�
��
ϮϬ
�
3.En
hanc
e na
tiona
l int
egrit
y th
roug
h in
stitu
tiona
l cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g of
N
atio
nal A
nti-C
orru
ptio
n Fo
rum
(N
ACF)
and
Ant
i-Cor
rupt
ion
Hot
line.
This
will
incl
ude
the
capa
city
deve
lopm
ent o
f ant
i-cor
rupt
ion
offic
ials
and
stre
ngth
enin
g th
e H
otlin
e`s
advo
cacy
and
in
vest
igat
ion
func
tions
.
The
NAC
F is
ca
paci
tate
d
Num
ber o
f ant
i-co
rrupt
ion
offic
ials
ca
paci
tate
d.
The
DPS
A im
plem
ente
d th
e P
ublic
Se
cto
r A
nti-c
orr
uption C
apacity B
uild
ing
Pro
gra
mm
e
focu
sing
on
ca
paci
tatin
g th
ree
cate
gorie
s of
pu
blic
se
rvic
e of
ficia
ls:
(1)
anti-
corru
ptio
n pr
actit
ione
rs -
487
offi
cial
s ca
paci
tate
d);
(2)
law
en
forc
emen
t of
ficia
ls
incl
udin
g in
vest
igat
ors,
pr
osec
utor
s an
d pr
esid
ing
offic
ers;
(3)
gen
eral
pub
lic s
erva
nts
- 15
31 o
ffici
als
in c
ateg
orie
s 2
and
3 ca
paci
tate
d.
Cap
acita
ting
anti-
corru
ptio
n of
ficia
ls
is a
n on
goin
g ac
tivity
of
gove
rnm
ent.
Dr.
Ale
x M
ahap
a Te
l: 01
2 33
6 14
87
4.Ap
prov
egu
idel
ines
on
sanc
tions
fo
r cor
rupt
ion
rela
ted
case
s G
uide
line
deve
lope
d A
gene
ric g
uide
line
on d
isci
plin
e in
the
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce h
as b
een
deve
lope
d.
This
gui
delin
e w
ill be
revi
ew to
en
hanc
eef
fect
iven
ess
by
Mar
ch 2
014.
Dr.
Ale
x M
ahap
a Te
l: 01
2 33
6 14
87
5.D
evel
op a
Citi
zen
Part
icip
atio
n gu
idel
ine
for P
ublic
Sec
tor
depa
rtm
ents
that
wou
ld e
nsur
e th
at e
very
pub
lic s
ecto
r dep
artm
ent
acro
ss a
ll sp
here
s ha
ve a
fu
nctio
nal,
reso
urce
d an
d ca
paci
tate
d ci
tizen
eng
agem
ent
unit
whi
ch re
gula
rly a
nd p
roac
tivel
y en
gage
with
civ
il so
ciet
y.
Gui
delin
ede
velo
ped
In O
ctob
er 2
011,
the
DPS
A ho
sted
a ro
undt
able
dis
cuss
ion
to e
ngag
e na
tiona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts,
incl
udin
g ac
adem
ia,
on d
rafti
ng a
ge
neric
Pub
lic P
artic
ipat
ion
guid
elin
e an
d to
sol
icit
stak
ehol
der
inpu
ts b
efor
e th
e ac
tual
dra
fting
of t
he g
uide
line.
In N
ovem
ber
2011
, a
first
dra
ft of
the
Pub
lic P
artic
ipat
ion
guid
elin
e w
as
pres
ente
d fo
r in
puts
to
the
Com
mun
ity D
evel
opm
ent
Wor
ker
Prog
ram
me
(CD
WP)
Nat
iona
l Tas
k Te
am,
repr
esen
ting
the
Publ
ic P
artic
ipat
ion
Uni
ts o
f th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
oope
rativ
e G
over
nanc
e in
all
nine
pro
vinc
es.
The
gene
ric g
uide
line
on P
ublic
Par
ticip
atio
n ha
s be
en c
ompl
eted
and
was
su
bmitt
ed fo
r fin
al a
ppro
val.
The
DPS
A w
ill w
ork
with
ni
ne
natio
nal
depa
rtmen
ts
(thre
e pe
r qua
rter)
with
the
aim
of
in
stitu
tiona
lizin
g Pu
blic
Pa
rtici
patio
n in
th
ese
depa
rtmen
ts.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
3.En
hanc
e na
tiona
l int
egrit
y th
roug
h in
stitu
tiona
l cap
acity
-bui
ldin
g of
N
atio
nal A
nti-C
orru
ptio
n Fo
rum
(N
ACF)
and
Ant
i-Cor
rupt
ion
Hot
line.
This
will
incl
ude
the
capa
city
deve
lopm
ent o
f ant
i-cor
rupt
ion
offic
ials
and
stre
ngth
enin
g th
e H
otlin
e`s
advo
cacy
and
in
vest
igat
ion
func
tions
.
The
NAC
F is
ca
paci
tate
d
Num
ber o
f ant
i-co
rrupt
ion
offic
ials
ca
paci
tate
d.
The
DPS
A im
plem
ente
d th
e P
ublic
Se
cto
r A
nti-c
orr
uption C
apacity B
uild
ing
Pro
gra
mm
e
focu
sing
on
ca
paci
tatin
g th
ree
cate
gorie
s of
pu
blic
se
rvic
e of
ficia
ls:
(1)
anti-
corru
ptio
n pr
actit
ione
rs -
487
offi
cial
s ca
paci
tate
d);
(2)
law
en
forc
emen
t of
ficia
ls
incl
udin
g in
vest
igat
ors,
pr
osec
utor
s an
d pr
esid
ing
offic
ers;
(3)
gen
eral
pub
lic s
erva
nts
- 15
31 o
ffici
als
in c
ateg
orie
s 2
and
3 ca
paci
tate
d.
Cap
acita
ting
anti-
corru
ptio
n of
ficia
ls
is a
n on
goin
g ac
tivity
of
gove
rnm
ent.
Dr.
Ale
x M
ahap
a Te
l: 01
2 33
6 14
87
4.Ap
prov
egu
idel
ines
on
sanc
tions
fo
r cor
rupt
ion
rela
ted
case
s G
uide
line
deve
lope
d A
gene
ric g
uide
line
on d
isci
plin
e in
the
Publ
ic S
ervi
ce h
as b
een
deve
lope
d.
This
gui
delin
e w
ill be
revi
ew to
en
hanc
eef
fect
iven
ess
by
Mar
ch 2
014.
Dr.
Ale
x M
ahap
a Te
l: 01
2 33
6 14
87
5.D
evel
op a
Citi
zen
Part
icip
atio
n gu
idel
ine
for P
ublic
Sec
tor
depa
rtm
ents
that
wou
ld e
nsur
e th
at e
very
pub
lic s
ecto
r dep
artm
ent
acro
ss a
ll sp
here
s ha
ve a
fu
nctio
nal,
reso
urce
d an
d ca
paci
tate
d ci
tizen
eng
agem
ent
unit
whi
ch re
gula
rly a
nd p
roac
tivel
y en
gage
with
civ
il so
ciet
y.
Gui
delin
ede
velo
ped
In O
ctob
er 2
011,
the
DPS
A ho
sted
a ro
undt
able
dis
cuss
ion
to e
ngag
e na
tiona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts,
incl
udin
g ac
adem
ia,
on d
rafti
ng a
ge
neric
Pub
lic P
artic
ipat
ion
guid
elin
e an
d to
sol
icit
stak
ehol
der
inpu
ts b
efor
e th
e ac
tual
dra
fting
of t
he g
uide
line.
In N
ovem
ber
2011
, a
first
dra
ft of
the
Pub
lic P
artic
ipat
ion
guid
elin
e w
as
pres
ente
d fo
r in
puts
to
the
Com
mun
ity D
evel
opm
ent
Wor
ker
Prog
ram
me
(CD
WP)
Nat
iona
l Tas
k Te
am,
repr
esen
ting
the
Publ
ic P
artic
ipat
ion
Uni
ts o
f th
e D
epar
tmen
t of C
oope
rativ
e G
over
nanc
e in
all
nine
pro
vinc
es.
The
gene
ric g
uide
line
on P
ublic
Par
ticip
atio
n ha
s be
en c
ompl
eted
and
was
su
bmitt
ed fo
r fin
al a
ppro
val.
The
DPS
A w
ill w
ork
with
ni
ne
natio
nal
depa
rtmen
ts
(thre
e pe
r qua
rter)
with
the
aim
of
in
stitu
tiona
lizin
g Pu
blic
Pa
rtici
patio
n in
th
ese
depa
rtmen
ts.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
REP
UB
LIC
OF
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
�
� �
Ϯϭ
�
6. Allow for the involvement of civil society in the budget process in order to enhance the progressive realisation of socio-economic rights, and enable citizens to track public expenditure.
Civil society participation in budgetaryprocesses.
The tabling of the Division of Revenue Bill (national budget) gives citizens and civil society groups a space to input on the national budget through their respective provinces and municipalities.
Government departments, before any given budget cycle, conduct intensive engagements with civil society and the public in general through budget road shows also known as ‘imbizos’. In addition to this, the Minister of Finance solicits inputs from the public via social media (“tips for Pravin” on the National Treasury website). Some of these inputs are responded to and articulated at various points during the budget speech, where specific action to be taken is mentioned.
At the local government sphere, municipalities engage the public and civil society stakeholders through Integrated Development Plans (IDPs), which links municipal budgets to projects identified by local communities.
There are a series of bilateral engagements with various stakeholders/civil society during the Medium Term Expenditure Framework process through Function Committees. Some NGOs are involved in function group discussions as part of the Medium Term Expenditure Committee (MTEC) process, which focuses on budget preparation, including deliberations on past budget execution of government priorities.
Public hearings are conducted by the legislature where civil society organisations and civil society in general are encouraged to participate.
The Minister of Finance has a more formal arrangement for discussing policies in the Public Finance and Monetary Chamber of the National Economic and Development Labour Council (NEDLAC), which includes representatives from business, labour and community constituencies.
Members of Parliament have constituency visits on a regular basis to discuss the budget.
Government will explore further opportunities for enhancedengagement with civil society for participation in the budget process.
Nokwazi Makanya Tel: 012 395 6773
�
��
Ϯϭ
�
6.Al
low
for t
he in
volv
emen
t of c
ivil
soci
ety
in th
e bu
dget
pro
cess
in
orde
r to
enha
nce
the
prog
ress
ive
real
isat
ion
of s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic
right
s, a
nd e
nabl
e ci
tizen
s to
trac
k pu
blic
exp
endi
ture
.
Civ
il so
ciet
y pa
rtici
patio
n in
bu
dget
ary
proc
esse
s.
The
tabl
ing
of th
e D
ivis
ion
of R
even
ue B
ill (n
atio
nal b
udge
t) gi
ves
citiz
ens
and
civi
l so
ciet
y gr
oups
a s
pace
to
inpu
t on
the
nat
iona
l bu
dget
thr
ough
the
ir re
spec
tive
prov
ince
s an
d m
unic
ipal
ities
.
Gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts,
befo
re a
ny g
iven
bud
get
cycl
e, c
ondu
ct in
tens
ive
enga
gem
ents
with
civ
il so
ciet
y an
d th
e pu
blic
in g
ener
al th
roug
h bu
dget
road
sh
ows
also
kno
wn
as ‘
imbi
zos’
. In
add
ition
to
this
, th
e M
inis
ter
of F
inan
ce
solic
its in
puts
from
the
publ
ic v
ia s
ocia
l med
ia (“
tips
for P
ravi
n” o
n th
e N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
web
site
). So
me
of th
ese
inpu
ts a
re r
espo
nded
to a
nd a
rticu
late
d at
va
rious
poi
nts
durin
g th
e bu
dget
spe
ech,
whe
re s
peci
fic a
ctio
n to
be
take
n is
m
entio
ned.
At t
he l
ocal
gov
ernm
ent
sphe
re,
mun
icip
aliti
es e
ngag
e th
e pu
blic
and
civ
il so
ciet
y st
akeh
olde
rs t
hrou
gh I
nteg
rate
d D
evel
opm
ent
Plan
s (ID
Ps),
whi
ch
links
mun
icip
al b
udge
ts to
pro
ject
s id
entif
ied
by lo
cal c
omm
uniti
es.
Ther
e ar
e a
serie
s of
bila
tera
l en
gage
men
ts w
ith v
ario
us s
take
hold
ers/
civi
l so
ciet
y du
ring
the
Med
ium
Ter
m E
xpen
ditu
re F
ram
ewor
k pr
oces
s th
roug
h Fu
nctio
n C
omm
ittee
s. S
ome
NG
Os
are
invo
lved
in fu
nctio
n gr
oup
disc
ussi
ons
as p
art o
f the
Med
ium
Ter
m E
xpen
ditu
re C
omm
ittee
(M
TEC
) pr
oces
s, w
hich
fo
cuse
s on
bu
dget
pr
epar
atio
n,
incl
udin
g de
liber
atio
ns
on
past
bu
dget
ex
ecut
ion
of g
over
nmen
t prio
ritie
s.
Publ
ic
hear
ings
ar
e co
nduc
ted
by
the
legi
slat
ure
whe
re
civi
l so
ciet
y or
gani
satio
ns a
nd c
ivil
soci
ety
in g
ener
al a
re e
ncou
rage
d to
par
ticip
ate.
The
Min
iste
r of F
inan
ce h
as a
mor
e fo
rmal
arra
ngem
ent f
or d
iscu
ssin
g po
licie
s in
the
Publ
ic F
inan
ce a
nd M
onet
ary
Cha
mbe
r of
the
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd
Dev
elop
men
t Lab
our C
ounc
il (N
EDLA
C),
whi
ch in
clud
es re
pres
enta
tives
from
bu
sine
ss, l
abou
r and
com
mun
ity c
onst
ituen
cies
.
Mem
bers
of P
arlia
men
t hav
e co
nstit
uenc
y vi
sits
on
a re
gula
r bas
is to
dis
cuss
th
e bu
dget
.
Gov
ernm
ent
will
expl
ore
furth
er
oppo
rtuni
ties
for
enha
nced
enga
gem
ent
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
for
parti
cipa
tion
in
the
budg
et p
roce
ss.
Nok
waz
i Mak
anya
Te
l: 01
2 39
5 67
736.
Allo
w fo
r the
invo
lvem
ent o
f civ
il so
ciet
y in
the
budg
et p
roce
ss in
or
der t
o en
hanc
e th
e pr
ogre
ssiv
e re
alis
atio
n of
soc
io-e
cono
mic
rig
hts,
and
ena
ble
citiz
ens
to tr
ack
publ
ic e
xpen
ditu
re.
Civ
il so
ciet
y pa
rtici
patio
n in
bu
dget
ary
proc
esse
s.
The
tabl
ing
of th
e D
ivis
ion
of R
even
ue B
ill (n
atio
nal b
udge
t) gi
ves
citiz
ens
and
civi
l so
ciet
y gr
oups
a s
pace
to
inpu
t on
the
nat
iona
l bu
dget
thr
ough
the
ir re
spec
tive
prov
ince
s an
d m
unic
ipal
ities
.
Gov
ernm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts,
befo
re a
ny g
iven
bud
get
cycl
e, c
ondu
ct in
tens
ive
enga
gem
ents
with
civ
il so
ciet
y an
d th
e pu
blic
in g
ener
al th
roug
h bu
dget
road
sh
ows
also
kno
wn
as ‘
imbi
zos’
. In
add
ition
to
this
, th
e M
inis
ter
of F
inan
ce
solic
its in
puts
from
the
publ
ic v
ia s
ocia
l med
ia (“
tips
for P
ravi
n” o
n th
e N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
web
site
). So
me
of th
ese
inpu
ts a
re r
espo
nded
to a
nd a
rticu
late
d at
va
rious
poi
nts
durin
g th
e bu
dget
spe
ech,
whe
re s
peci
fic a
ctio
n to
be
take
n is
m
entio
ned.
At t
he l
ocal
gov
ernm
ent
sphe
re,
mun
icip
aliti
es e
ngag
e th
e pu
blic
and
civ
il so
ciet
y st
akeh
olde
rs t
hrou
gh I
nteg
rate
d D
evel
opm
ent
Plan
s (ID
Ps),
whi
ch
links
mun
icip
al b
udge
ts to
pro
ject
s id
entif
ied
by lo
cal c
omm
uniti
es.
Ther
e ar
e a
serie
s of
bila
tera
l en
gage
men
ts w
ith v
ario
us s
take
hold
ers/
civi
l so
ciet
y du
ring
the
Med
ium
Ter
m E
xpen
ditu
re F
ram
ewor
k pr
oces
s th
roug
h Fu
nctio
n C
omm
ittee
s. S
ome
NG
Os
are
invo
lved
in fu
nctio
n gr
oup
disc
ussi
ons
as p
art o
f the
Med
ium
Ter
m E
xpen
ditu
re C
omm
ittee
(M
TEC
) pr
oces
s, w
hich
fo
cuse
s on
bu
dget
pr
epar
atio
n,
incl
udin
g de
liber
atio
ns
on
past
bu
dget
ex
ecut
ion
of g
over
nmen
t prio
ritie
s.
Publ
ic
hear
ings
ar
e co
nduc
ted
by
the
legi
slat
ure
whe
re
civi
l so
ciet
y or
gani
satio
ns a
nd c
ivil
soci
ety
in g
ener
al a
re e
ncou
rage
d to
par
ticip
ate.
The
Min
iste
r of F
inan
ce h
as a
mor
e fo
rmal
arra
ngem
ent f
or d
iscu
ssin
g po
licie
s in
the
Publ
ic F
inan
ce a
nd M
onet
ary
Cha
mbe
r of
the
Nat
iona
l Eco
nom
ic a
nd
Dev
elop
men
t Lab
our C
ounc
il (N
EDLA
C),
whi
ch in
clud
es re
pres
enta
tives
from
bu
sine
ss, l
abou
r and
com
mun
ity c
onst
ituen
cies
.
Mem
bers
of P
arlia
men
t hav
e co
nstit
uenc
y vi
sits
on
a re
gula
r bas
is to
dis
cuss
th
e bu
dget
.
Gov
ernm
ent
will
expl
ore
furth
er
oppo
rtuni
ties
for
enha
nced
enga
gem
ent
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
for
parti
cipa
tion
in
the
budg
et p
roce
ss.
Nok
waz
i Mak
anya
Te
l: 01
2 39
5 67
73
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
REP
UB
LIC
OF
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
�
��
ϮϮ
�
7.D
evel
op a
com
preh
ensi
ve a
nd
publ
icly
acc
essi
ble
port
al o
n en
viro
nmen
tal m
anag
emen
t in
form
atio
n.
Feas
ibilit
y st
udy
com
plet
ed
Ther
e w
as n
o ne
ed t
o co
nduc
t a
feas
ibilit
y st
udy
sinc
e th
e D
epar
tmen
t of
W
ater
Affa
irs h
as d
evel
oped
a p
orta
l th
roug
h w
hich
citi
zens
can
acc
ess
relia
ble
info
rmat
ion
on
drin
king
w
ater
qu
ality
th
roug
h th
eir
web
site
: w
ww
.dw
a.go
v.za
/blu
edro
p or
on
the
mob
i site
: m
y-w
ate
r.m
obi. A
lso,
citi
zens
ar
e ab
le t
o ac
cess
cre
dibl
e da
ta o
n w
aste
wat
er m
anag
emen
t an
d id
entif
ied
risks
with
in th
eir
resp
ectiv
e m
unic
ipal
ities
. Thi
s in
form
atio
n is
acc
essi
ble
from
th
e D
epar
tmen
t of W
ater
Affa
irs w
ebsi
te: w
ww
.dw
a.go
v.za
/gre
endr
op.
In t
he G
aute
ng P
rovi
nce,
the
Gau
teng
Dep
artm
ent
of A
gric
ultu
re a
nd R
ural
D
evel
opm
ent
(GAR
D)
deve
lope
d a
publ
icly
ac
cess
ible
po
rtal
of
envi
ronm
enta
l man
agem
ent i
nfor
mat
ion.
In 2
010,
thi
s pr
ojec
t w
on a
Cen
tre f
or P
ublic
Ser
vice
Inn
ovat
ion
(CPS
I) In
nova
tion
Awar
d, a
nd in
201
1 it
won
the
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Inno
vatio
n Aw
ard.
This
bes
t pr
actic
e w
ill be
rep
licat
ed n
atio
nally
und
er t
he l
eade
rshi
p of
the
C
PSI.
The
porta
l w
ill be
ex
pand
ed to
incl
ude
info
rmat
ion
on
broa
der
envi
ronm
enta
lis
sues
with
sup
port
from
the
CPS
I.
Ms.
Deb
orah
Moc
hotli
Tel:
012
336
7255
�
� �
ϮϬ
�
3. Enhance national integrity through institutional capacity-building of National Anti-Corruption Forum (NACF) and Anti-Corruption Hotline.
This will include the capacitydevelopment of anti-corruption officials and strengthening the Hotline`s advocacy and investigation functions.
The NACF is capacitated
Number of anti-corruptionofficials capacitated.
The DPSA implemented the Public Sector Anti-corruption Capacity Building
Programme focusing on capacitating three categories of public service officials: (1) anti-corruption practitioners - 487 officials capacitated); (2) law enforcement officials including investigators, prosecutors and presiding officers; (3) general public servants - 1531 officials in categories 2 and 3 capacitated.
Capacitating anti-corruption officials is an ongoing activity of government.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
4. Approve guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases
Guidelinedeveloped
A generic guideline on discipline in the Public Service has been developed. This guideline will be review to enhanceeffectiveness by March 2014.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
5. Develop a Citizen Participation guideline for Public Sector departments that would ensure that every public sector department across all spheres have a functional, resourced and capacitated citizen engagement unit which regularly and proactively engage with civil society.
Guidelinedeveloped
In October 2011, the DPSA hosted a roundtable discussion to engage national and provincial government departments, including academia, on drafting a generic Public Participation guideline and to solicit stakeholder inputs before the actual drafting of the guideline.
In November 2011, a first draft of the Public Participation guideline was presented for inputs to the Community Development Worker Programme (CDWP) National Task Team, representing the Public Participation Units of the Department of Cooperative Governance in all nine provinces.
The generic guideline on Public Participation has been completed and was submitted for final approval.
The DPSA will work with nine national departments (three per quarter) with the aim of institutionalizing Public Participation in these departments.
Ms Colette Clark Tel: 012 336 1056
Ms.
Deb
orah
Moc
hotli
Tel:
012
336
7255
The
porta
l w
ill be
ex
pand
ed to
incl
ude
info
rmat
ion
on
broa
der
envi
ronm
enta
lis
sues
with
sup
port
from
the
CPS
I.
Ther
e w
as n
o ne
ed t
o co
nduc
t a
feas
ibilit
y st
udy
sinc
e th
e D
epar
tmen
t of
W
ater
Affa
irs h
as d
evel
oped
a p
orta
l th
roug
h w
hich
citi
zens
can
acc
ess
relia
ble
info
rmat
ion
on
drin
king
w
ater
qu
ality
th
roug
h th
eir
web
site
: w
ww
.dw
a.go
v.za
/blu
edro
p or
on
the
mob
i site
: m
y-w
ate
r.m
obi. A
lso,
citi
zens
ar
e ab
le t
o ac
cess
cre
dibl
e da
ta o
n w
aste
wat
er m
anag
emen
t an
d id
entif
ied
risks
with
in th
eir
resp
ectiv
e m
unic
ipal
ities
. Thi
s in
form
atio
n is
acc
essi
ble
from
th
e D
epar
tmen
t of W
ater
Affa
irs w
ebsi
te: w
ww
.dw
a.go
v.za
/gre
endr
op.
In t
he G
aute
ng P
rovi
nce,
the
Gau
teng
Dep
artm
ent
of A
gric
ultu
re a
nd R
ural
D
evel
opm
ent
(GAR
D)
deve
lope
d a
publ
icly
ac
cess
ible
po
rtal
of
envi
ronm
enta
l man
agem
ent i
nfor
mat
ion.
In 2
010,
thi
s pr
ojec
t w
on a
Cen
tre f
or P
ublic
Ser
vice
Inn
ovat
ion
(CPS
I) In
nova
tion
Awar
d, a
nd in
201
1 it
won
the
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Inno
vatio
n Aw
ard.
This
bes
t pr
actic
e w
ill be
rep
licat
ed n
atio
nally
und
er t
he l
eade
rshi
p of
the
C
PSI.
Feas
ibilit
y st
udy
com
plet
ed
7.D
evel
op a
com
preh
ensi
ve a
nd
publ
icly
acc
essi
ble
port
al o
n en
viro
nmen
tal m
anag
emen
t in
form
atio
n.
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
REP
UB
LIC
OF
SOU
TH A
FRIC
A
�
Ann
exur
e A
: Im
plem
enta
tion
Mat
rix -
Cou
ntry
Act
ion
Plan
C
omm
itmen
t In
dica
tor
Prog
ress
Sum
mar
y W
ay F
orw
ard
Coo
rdin
atin
g O
ffici
al
1.Fo
rmal
ise
partn
ersh
ips
with
ci
vil
soci
ety
orga
nisa
tions
in
al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s to
es
tabl
ish
Serv
ice
Del
iver
y Im
prov
emen
t Fo
rum
s (S
DIF
s) a
t lo
cal
leve
l to
pro
vide
tim
ely
citiz
en
repo
rt ca
rds
on
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l, es
peci
ally
in
re
latio
n to
pr
imar
y he
alth
ca
re,
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n,
envi
ronm
enta
l m
anag
emen
t and
hou
sing
.
Num
ber o
f SD
IFs
esta
blis
hed
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
Dev
elop
ed a
con
cept
doc
umen
t on
the
inst
itutio
nalis
atio
n of
the
SDIF
s w
hich
un
pack
s th
e ap
proa
ch;
inst
itutio
nal a
nd g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts;
term
s of
re
fere
nce,
am
ong
othe
rs.
The
DPS
A en
gage
d al
l ni
ne
prov
ince
s an
d so
me
natio
nal
gove
rnm
ent
depa
rtmen
ts o
n th
e SD
IF c
once
pt a
nd t
here
is
a ge
nera
l co
mm
itmen
t to
es
tabl
ish
SDIF
s as
mec
hani
sms
to e
nhan
ce p
ublic
ser
vice
acc
ess
and
citiz
en
parti
cipa
tion
in p
ublic
ser
vice
del
iver
y.
SDIF
s w
ill be
es
tabl
ishe
d by
M
arch
201
4.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
2.En
hanc
e th
e ca
paci
ty
and
capa
bilit
ies
of
com
mun
ities
to
ac
cess
an
d cl
aim
th
eir
soci
o-ec
onom
ic r
ight
s th
roug
h th
e ro
ll-ou
t of
nat
iona
l pu
blic
edu
catio
n ca
mpa
igns
, sp
ecifi
cally
a
publ
ic
outre
ach
cam
paig
n on
Kno
w Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Res
pons
ibilit
ies
(KYS
R&R
) to
info
rm c
itize
ns a
bout
th
eir
serv
ice
right
s, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s,
and
lega
l mec
hani
sms
avai
labl
e to
ho
ld g
over
nmen
t acc
ount
able
.
Num
ber o
f KY
SR&R
wor
ksho
psco
nduc
ted
in a
ll ni
ne p
rovi
nces
.
Num
ber o
f br
oadc
asts
on
KYSR
&R th
roug
h co
mm
unity
radi
o st
atio
ns in
all
offic
ial l
angu
ages
.
The
DPS
A ha
s de
velo
ped
a gu
idel
ine
that
will
be u
sed
to m
obiliz
e go
vern
men
t de
partm
ents
to p
artic
ipat
e m
ore
activ
ely
in th
e KY
SRR
cam
paig
n.
DPS
A ha
s ro
lled
out
the
KYSS
R c
ampa
ign
in s
choo
ls i
n th
e Li
mpo
po a
nd
East
ern
Cap
e pr
ovin
ces
whe
re 3
6 70
0 “K
now
Y
our
Serv
ice
Rig
hts
and
Responsib
ilitie
s”
book
lets
w
ere
disp
atch
ed
to
Com
mun
ity
Dev
elop
men
t W
orke
r (C
DW
) coo
rdin
ator
s fo
r dis
tribu
tion
to s
choo
ls.
In th
e ne
w fi
nanc
ial
year
end
ing
in
Mar
ch 2
014
the
KYSR
&R C
ampa
ign
will
be in
tens
ified
.
Ms
Col
ette
Cla
rk
Tel:
012
336
1056
Endnotes
�����������������������������������������������������������1 Chapter nine institutions refer to a group of organisations established in terms of Chapter 9 of the South African Constitution to
guard democracy. The institutions are: the Public Protector; the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC); the
Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities (CRL Rights
Commission); the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE); the Auditor-General; the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC); an
Independent Authority to Regulate Broadcasting.
�2 The National Development Plan (NDP) consists of a vision statement for 2030 and a plan setting out how this vision can be
achieved in partnership with all sectors of society, including citizens and business.
3 In the South African context, civil society consists of citizens, community-based organisations, non-governmental organisations,
faith-based organisations, and labour unions (Davids I., F. Theron and K. Maphunye, 2009. Participatory Development in South
Africa: A Development Management Perspective. Van Schaik, Pretoria).
4 Diagnostic Overview Report, June 2011:5 & National Development Plan-Vision for 2030, 11 November 2011: 3. National
Planning Commission, Pretoria.
5 OGP Articles of Governance, 2011.
6 Swilling, M. and B. Russel (2002: viii). The size and scope of the non-profit sector in South Africa. Graduate School of Public
and Development Management, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
7 1-2 September 2011, Premier Hotel, Pretoria.
8 The venue for the workshop was the Public Administration Leadership and Management Academy, PALAMA, Pretoria.
9 ODAC, OGP E-Consultation: Inputs on SA Country Plan Progress Report, 19 September 2012. Submitted by Gabriella
Razzano of the Open Democracy Advice Centre͘�
�10 28 November 2012, Birchwood, Johannesburg.
11 This is the body that provides strategic policy direction to the implementation of the APRM. This body consists of both state
and non-state actors including representatives of key line ministries, civil society, Parliament, media, private sector, youth,
women groups, disabled, marginalised groups, rural populations etc.
�12 Open Budget Survey 2012. International Budget Partnership. Washington, DC.
�
� �
ϮϬ
�
3. Enhance national integrity through institutional capacity-building of National Anti-Corruption Forum (NACF) and Anti-Corruption Hotline.
This will include the capacitydevelopment of anti-corruption officials and strengthening the Hotline`s advocacy and investigation functions.
The NACF is capacitated
Number of anti-corruptionofficials capacitated.
The DPSA implemented the Public Sector Anti-corruption Capacity Building
Programme focusing on capacitating three categories of public service officials: (1) anti-corruption practitioners - 487 officials capacitated); (2) law enforcement officials including investigators, prosecutors and presiding officers; (3) general public servants - 1531 officials in categories 2 and 3 capacitated.
Capacitating anti-corruption officials is an ongoing activity of government.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
4. Approve guidelines on sanctions for corruption related cases
Guidelinedeveloped
A generic guideline on discipline in the Public Service has been developed. This guideline will be review to enhanceeffectiveness by March 2014.
Dr. Alex Mahapa Tel: 012 336 1487
5. Develop a Citizen Participation guideline for Public Sector departments that would ensure that every public sector department across all spheres have a functional, resourced and capacitated citizen engagement unit which regularly and proactively engage with civil society.
Guidelinedeveloped
In October 2011, the DPSA hosted a roundtable discussion to engage national and provincial government departments, including academia, on drafting a generic Public Participation guideline and to solicit stakeholder inputs before the actual drafting of the guideline.
In November 2011, a first draft of the Public Participation guideline was presented for inputs to the Community Development Worker Programme (CDWP) National Task Team, representing the Public Participation Units of the Department of Cooperative Governance in all nine provinces.
The generic guideline on Public Participation has been completed and was submitted for final approval.
The DPSA will work with nine national departments (three per quarter) with the aim of institutionalizing Public Participation in these departments.
Ms Colette Clark Tel: 012 336 1056
21
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIPGovernment Self-Assessment Report
OpenGovernmentPartnership
OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIPGovernment Self-Assessment Report