Nov 7 , 2008

To whom it may concern,

In regards to Ms. Brenda Souder request for a permit to keep 10 dogs at her home. The original agreement between Ms. Souder and The Board of Supervisor was she was allowed to keep 10 dogs (max at the time) and any and all pippies up to the age of four months (as that was also her original request for puppie mill).

She also told at the time, she is not allowed to replace any of the mature dogs as they died off. It appears she has given up the puppie mill business as she has removed all signs from her car as she once had.

I do not know the number of dogs she presently has, but I feel the Board has a responsibility to address these questions before a decision can be made.

In conclusion, I have never apporved of the situation but I was forced to accept it by.The Board,s original decision.

Respectfully,

Page 1 o f 1

1 A

June Lawlor - Re: Brenda Souder's garage

From: June Lawlor To: Cowboy, Arizona Subject: Re: Brenda Souder's garage CC: Montgomery, John

Mr. Jarvis,

Thank you for the information. The P & Z Commission will be meeting today on this item. I am forwarding it to John Montgomery.

>>> "Arizona Cowboy" cazcowboyl@frontiernet.net> 11/11/2008 1:26 PM >>> Hi June,

I am emailing you about Brenda Souder at 899 S. Liana PI., Golden Valley. I was just talking to her other neighbors Kim and Mike who live on the other side on Lgurta Rd. They said that a truck came and unloaded a lot of stuff into her garage in August. With her house up for sale she should not be bring more stuff in. She had said to me once that she was going to let someone use her garage. We don 4 know if she is gettlng money for it or not but with her histow of renting that garage out we can 4 see her not getting money for it Sorry it is so late ktting you know about it.

Robert & Bonny Jarvis 828 5. Ligurta Rd. Golden Valley, A2 86413 (928) 279-0691

.--I..~. ~ F.:.,., ~; , ~ . !-.; .:.. ~~ -. , I , . . . 1;: t.: : > .

. I

,j. ru';>- 2 >[:> I : , ~ ~ .-

: I .' I

~- . i ' I ...,...

. . ,,;L? .

HOU-10-2008(MOM) 03:02 EL RIO 5RLES OFFICE

H THE HOOVER~CO~%~~A$I,~~

November 6.2008

Kevin Davidson Planner TI Mohavc County Planning and Zoning P.O. Box 7000 3675 E. Hwy 66. Stc A Kingman, hZ 86402-7000

Rc: P&Z Nuvcmbcr 12,2008 mtg - removal or items 5A and 5B -Monte Carlo RV Resort

We respccrCully rcqucst tha~ tbc followiog itcms as they appear on the agendzl for the November 12.2008 Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission Hcaring bc removed kom the agenda md hill the requcstr bc officially tcrminatrd as the Hoover Cornpanics no longcr dcsirc to pursuc the actions addressed in the request:

Tkms lo be removed l e Mohave Valley Area Plan and ltcm 5R - R m n c

If you should have any question regarding our requcct to rcmovc thc above mentioned items please contact our projcct mmapr Chuck Chisholm at (928) 727-5901.

Sincerely,

cc: Christine Ballan3 Sylvia Shaffer

PASEDENA

From: "Kat Brodskf <k-brodsky@hotmail.com> To: ~rosevelt.areilano@co.mohave.az.us~ Date: 11/11/2008 10:12:20 AM Subject: Parcel 153; Minor Amendment to General Plan

Dear Planning 8 Zoning:

I am a properly owner within one-half mile of Parcel 153, which is coming up for REZONE hearing tomorrow.

I had planned to attend tomorrow's P&Z meeting, but have been called out of town and am not able to attend. Please include my comments below in the P8Z Commission's notes.

MY COMMENTS RE: PARCEL 153 RE-ZONE TO UDA, GC 8 L-I8 C-2 8 C-MO:

I have been a resident and properly owner in Golden Valley for 25 years. I also own property with one-half mile of Parcel 153.

A commerciallretail center and services on Aztec Rd. in Golden Valley (Parcel 153) would be a GREAT BENEFIT to ALL residents of Golden Valley. The majority of residents in Golden Valley have for many years longed for more "responsible" services to benefit h e greater majority of citizens.

More commerciallretail businesses would benefit the overall economy in the area with jobs and the services they bring. With the proximity to the Pmvada Development, this commercial center is NEEDED and will be of great benefit to the entire area.

Another benefit would also be realized in savings on fuel consumption by have more services nearby. This too would improve our air quality.

All in all, the Golden Valley area NEEDS more responsible retail and commercial services and those can not come without the proper zoning. There is a scarcity of commercially zoned property and we need more.

Please approve this Re-Zoning.

Thank you for your time.

Kathryn Brodsky

A Z T E C C O M M E R C I A L C E N T E R C O N C E P T P L A N MOHAVE COUNTY TRACT #3318

N.T.S.

PROPERTY INFORMATION A P N 306-30-013

RECORD OF SURVEY (BK 1 OF IAN0 SURVEYS PGS 28.37 d: 41) T21N R l8W SEC 2 3 (ROADWAY & UTlUTl EASEMENT) PARCEL 153

ACR-GE: 37.30 GOLDEN VALLEY. MOHAVE COUNTY ARIZONA

OWNER/DEVELOPER: WESTAR DEVELOPMENT U C 9 0 17918 Plon..r Blrd. Sull. Z W Arf.alo. CA 80701 Ofllce: (562) 924-2337 Fox: (562) 924-2037

DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATNE: DON M. RODRIGUEZ EMPIRE U N D t DEVELOPMENT. LLC 11 1 5 YO~~POI~ Way Beulder Clly. NV 88005 (702) 540-1867

U N BERNARDINO CO. (702) 442-1080 fox CAUFORNIA

< REGIONAL MAP GENERAL NOTES:

f

P E

ABR100 DR

1 E

<

PHASE 7: LOT 11 PHASE 0: LOTS B k 1 0

I

6 8

B + I z 3

HIGHWAY

I

E m BOLSA DR

SHINARUMP DR . VICINITY MAP 7 EMPIRE LAND

& DEVELOPMENT (702) 54-1867 (702) 442-(MD tor

SERVICE WATER. TEMP. PHASE I: PRIVATE COMMERCIAL WELL PROVIDERS: PERM. ALL PHASES: VALLEY PIONLERS WATER CO.

SANITARY SEWER: SACRAMENTO UTILITIES PDWER: UNISOURCE ENERGY SERVICES TELEPHONf: FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS NATURAL GAS: UNISOURCE ENERGY SERVICES SOUD WASTE DISPOSAL: TBO FIRE PROErnION: GOLDEN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT

PHASING: THE DEVELWMENT IS PROPOSED m a PHASES. MASS GRADING IS PROPOSED TO BE CONDUCTED UPON APPROVAL OF THE MASTER (CONCEPTUAL) DRAINAGE STUOY. INFRASTRUCTURE IS PROPOSED TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNER THAT SERVICES EACH PHASE AS IT IS DEVELOPED.

PARCELS: THERE ARE (13) PROPOSED LOTS WITHIN THE COMUERCIAL & LOTS SUBDIVISION. 'LOTS 1 THRU IS'. THERE ARE (4) PARCELS,

'A. THRU "0". PHASE 1: LOTS 1 a 3 PHASE 2: LOTS 2, 6 & 13 PHASE 3: LOT 4 P W E 4: LOT 5 PHASE 5: LOTS 7 & 8 PHASE 6: LOT 12

I

k

AZTEC COMMERCIAL C E N T E R Z O N E CHANGE & PLAN AMENDMENT MOHAVE C O U N T Y TRACT #3318

PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS LOT 1: 1.45 AC

PROPOSEO ZONE: C-2. GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSEO USE: GENERAL/EIGHBORHOOO COMMERCIAL

LOT 2: 1.27 AC PROPOSED ZONE: C-2. GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSEO USE: GENERAL/NEIGHBORH000 COMMERCIAL

LOT 3: 1.41 AC PROPOSED ZONE; C-2. GENERAL COMMERCIAL p u o v o s r o USE: GENERAYNEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL

1 LOT I 3.32 AC I PROPOSED ZONE: C-2. GENERAL CMIMERCIAL

PROPOSED USE: GENERAL/NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL I LOT 5: I

1.42 AC PROPOSEO ZONE: C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED USE: GENERAL/NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL 3 . u 4c PROPOSED ZONE: C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED USE: GENER4L COMMERCIAL

I LOT 7: 3.26 AC PROPOSED ZONE: C-MO. COMMERCIAYMAUNFACTURINC

WITH OPEN LOT STORAGE PROPOSED USE: LIGHT INOUSTRIAL 3.17 4C PRopos ro ZONE: C-MO. COMYERCIAL/MAUNFACTURING

WlTH OPEN LOT STORAGE PROPOSEO USE: UGH1 INDUSTRIAL 3.11 AC PROPOSED ZONE: C-UO. COMUERCIAL/MAUNFACTURlNG

I WlTH OPEN LOT STORAGE

PROPOSED USE: LIGHT INDUSIRIAL 1 LOT10 : 2.68 AC

I PR~POSEO ZONE: C-UO. COMMERCIAL/UAUNFACNRING WlTH OPEN LOT STORAGE

I PROPOSED USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 1 LOT 11: 3.04 AC

1 PROPOSED ZONE: C-MO, COMUERCIAYMAUNFACTURINO WlTH OPEN LOT STORAGE

PROPOSED USE: UGH1 INDUSTRIAL I LOT 12: 4.74 AC

1 PROPOSEO ZONE: C-MO. COMMERCIAL/WUNFACTURING WlTH OPEN LOT STORAGE

PROPOSED USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL I LOT 13: 0.54 AC PUBLIC FACILITY - PROPOSED WASTEWATER TREATMENT P

I PARCEL *: 0.76 AC 1 PUBLIC FACILITY - POTABLE WATER PUMP AND STORAGE SYSTEM

PARCEL 8: 0.64 AC PUBLIC FACILITY - DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN

PARCEL C: 0.13 4c

I B O U A DR PUBUC FACILITY - DCTENTION/RETENTION BASIN

PARCEL 0: 0.20 AC PUBLIC FACILITY - DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN LEGEND

BOUNDARY/PROPOSED -

PROPOSED USE: GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPOSED USE: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPOSEO ZONING: C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOT k P A R C E L L I N E S ACREAGE:

PROPOSLO ZONING: C-MO COMMERCIAL APPROXIMATELY 13.50 MAUFACTURING & OPEN LOT STORAGE

CENTERLINE ACREAGE: APPROXIMATELY 23.80

r

AZTEC COMMERCIAL CENTER CONCEPT LOTTING & PHASING MOHAVE COUNTY TRACT #3318

N T L PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS

PROPOSED USE: GENER4UEIGHBORHDW) COMMERCIAL 1 4 1 AC

PROWSED ZONE; C-2, GENERAL COYMERCIAL P ~ P O S E D USE. OUIER&/NEIOHBORHWD MUUERCIAL

PROPOJED ZONE C-MO. CMIUERWAL/LUUIFACTURWG WrrH OPEN LOT STORAGE

P LL

E PROPOSE0 USE: UDHT INOUSTRUL

4

PROPOSED zom; c-uo. CM~RCUL/YIUNFACNRING WITH OPEN LOl STORWE

PROQOSKC ZMIE: C-UO. COYYERCIA YIUNFACWRIf f i WITH OPEN LOT ST%AGE

PROPOSED USE: UWl I N W S R l L d

PUBLIC FACILITY - DETENTION/RETENTION BASIN PARCEL C! 0.13 d C

PUBLIC FACIUN - DETWTION/RETENTION BASIN PARGEL 0: 0.20 AC

PUBUC N I C I U ~ - DDENTION/REIENTIW BASIN

-.-- BOUNDARV/PROPOSED - -- CENTERUNE ..mm..m PHASE LINE LOT & PARCEL LINES 7 EMPIRE LAND

&DEVELOPMENT ALL PI~XSU &NO LOTS A ~ E CO*CEPTU~L ANO NBIECT 10 S U W I ~ A L C O Y Y C ~ U L IYIOIYPID* WIW .*D YO HAY^ C W H ~ n w rrrmv~r. (702) 540-1867 (702) 112-1MO fox

AZTEC COMMERCIAL CENTER CONCEPT BUILDING PLAN PROPERTY APN: 306-30-013 ACREAGE: 37.30 GOLDEN VALLEY, MOHAVE COUNTY, ARIZONA

BUILDING A: FUEUNG STATION/CONVENIENCE 5,000 SF BUILDING B: RETAIL & OFFICE COMMERCIAL 16,000 SF

15,225 SF

(OIVISIBLE 8K TO tZK SF) BUILDING L: UOHT INDUSTRIAL (1 BLDGS) 14.050 SF

(DIVISIBLE 4U TO 8K SF) BUILDING M: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (4 BLDGS) 30,900 SF

N N : N N (8.320 SF EA.) BUILDING N: UGHT INDUSTRIAL (16 BLDGS) 72,000 SF

(6.000 SF EA.) BUlWlNG 0: UGWT INDUSTRIAL (4 BLDGS) 24.000 SF

(8.000 SF EA.)

TOTAL BWG FWTPRINT AREA: 386.262 SF

BUILDINGS / PADS @ WATER RESERVOIRS

' a DRAINAGE RETENTION

-,-.- PROP. PROPERTY UNE WTR WATER WELLS & PUMPS

- 0 . CENTERLINE

EMPIRE LAND

N T 5

HUALAPAI DR ;OLDEN - /ALLEY

CHEMEHUEVI OR

LEGEND

AZTEC/SACRAMENTO II.I ARTERIAL ALIGNMENT

(55 MPH DESIGN SPEED)

PROPOSED AZTEC COMMERCIAL CENTER

PRAVADA MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY

A Z T E C ~ A C R A M E N T O ARTERIAL ALIGNMENT

EMPIRE LAND &DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL MAP

-

00

B ;f 80L

MO

OD

i3nv

BV

4

P A

a

AZ

TE

C4

0

GO

LD

EN

VA

LL

EY

, A

Z

u

Pn

Lw

-L

WO

liE

10

0

u.

~l

CU

OI

nl

IO

E

XIS

TiN

GO

NS

TE

BA

SIN

S

-IS

FA

X -a

VALLEYPIONELLUS WATER COMPANYLNC. 5998 wed Chino && War (m) 5654663 Fax (928) 565-2971

Gdclen Valley, AZ 86413 m ~ s ~ a a r 0 g r ~ m f m d ~ r d o f ~ 7 1 1

A - f i e e-msil -mS

RE: ~ ~ ~ A P N 3 0 6 - 3 0 - 0 1 3 -

Dear Mr.

I f V ~ P i ~ p ~ e v s i l , i n ~ t h i s e x o e o s i o n t o t b e ~ c t ~ W W C a r i l l s a v e possbkwatatothepopnty~above,prcwided:(I)yooadninodnllfmds~eeessaryto ~ m s i n 1 $ & s t o ~ w s u % t o t h e ~ , ( 2 ) y o m s e n r i O e ~ ~ a l l o t b a ~ f a s s c r v i o e a s t ~ i n a p p l i ~ ~ a r . " " ~ ~ t I a i f f & a n d policy direives issual by ACC.

-. . - cooditioos. AccoPdiagly, VPWC amwages you to review VPWC's tsriff and tbe applicable Arizroaa AdminiSrative Cods Ruks 14-2403 lhrou& 14-2410 tbe cstabtisbmq continaaoce,andterminatiwofpolsble*-. AoopyofthelmiffandthasGndeJam zwtwle for FRliew at VPWC's &.

S i y .

BOwe L. wood -Msnsger

ORIGINAL

DATE:

DOCKET NO: WM033A-060262

ARaONA CORPORATION COMMISSION

& I d plcase find the d o The tion has been filed in thc ~ozm-of an Opinion and 0rd& on:

VALLEY PION'ERS WATER COMPANY, INC. ( C W EXTENSION)

Plursurmt to A.A.C. R14-3-110(B), you may i5k cxceptian~ to the rooommahtkm of the Admhbtdve Law Judge by filing an original and Wtcm (13) copies of the exceptio~~ withtheCanmiseion'sDockct~latthe~listalbelowby~pm-onorbefae:

NOVEMBER 5,2008

TheenclosedisN~snordaoft&Commvm . . . . 'on, but a -011 of the Admmtdve Law Judge to the comnm5011~111. Clmddedon ofthis matter har p&g&& been scbhled fa the Commkion's W o w Session end Open Meeting to be held on:

NOVEMBER 12,2008 N NOVEMBER 13,2008

For more idommti~n, ~ O U may oontad Doclrct Control at (602) 542-3477 a the H & q Division at (602) 542-4250. For infinmation about the Opm Meeting, con- the Executive Director's O~XCC at (602) 542-3931.

- - -- ~. . ~ . I .- -. - - - - - - - -- -. -. - -. - ~- -- -. . . .-

1 BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION

WILLIAM A. -ELL JEFF HATCH-MILLER

5 KRISTIN K. MAYES I GARY PIERCE 6

DATE OF HEARWCk

PLACE OF HEARING:

10

I ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:

15 APPEARANCES: I

IN THE MA- OF THE APPLICATION OF VALLEY PIONEERS WATER COMPANY, INC. FOR AN EXTENSION OF ITS EXISTING CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO PROVIDE WATER UTILITY SERVICES IN MOHAVE COUNTY.

1 BY TEE COMMISSION:

=NO. W-MO33A-06M62

DECISION NO.

.-

Mr. Stcve Wenc, M O W SELLERS & SIMS, on behnlfof Valley Pioneers Water Company, Inc.; and

Mr. Kevin Tomy, S W Attorney, Le(pll Division on behalf of Utilities Division of the Arimna h p o d o n . commkion.

On April 20,2006. valley Pionem Watu Compeny, Inc. ("valley Pioneas," "Appliwr' or

"ampmy") Iild with tbe Ariuwa Chp~ration (lmmision ("Commission") qplicaiion for

extension of its mist& Curti6catt of Comnniaroc rmd N d t y (''Cd&xden w "CC&P) to

provide utility &as ("Application"). The Application statca W Valley Pioneas is seeking

~ v a l t o p r o v i d e w a t e r s a v i c e t o a n e r r a w h a e p o t a b k ~ i s a l m o s t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e d ~

resideats, in Mohave County. 1 in this docket stating that Valley Pioneers' Application bad not meet the sufiiciency mpimmnb as

outlined in the A&ma Ad live Code ("A.A.C.").

. - - - DOCKFX NO. W-02033A-069262

- - - - - _ -__ - . --

On July 18,2006, Applicant filed its RespoaPe to S W s Iusuf6ciency L.tter.

On August 16,2006, Staff61ed a second Imdciency Letter in this docket.

~cccmba 14,2007, Staff filed a reminds letta to the Appliamt that it had not mponded

0 statrs second JndEciimoy Lctta.

On Jammy 14, 2008, Applicant filed a letler m this dock* stating that Valley Pioneers'

oe- had changed and tbat the Applicant dcpsted filing a Response to Staffs second

nst&iciencyLetterwithin30day*

On February 14.2008. Appliuiut filed its Reqponsc to S W s scroond I t r d k h q LeUa.

OnMsrob 13,2008, Staffiiledathird Insufficimcy Letter.

On April 4,2008, Valley Pioneers file its Respoape to Ststrs third b d i c i y Ldter.

On June 10,2008, Staff fild a Su6iciieacy Letter m this docket idcat@ Valley Pioncas'

@plicationhadmctthesufiicimcyrsqahanaatsasoldlinsdintheAA.C.

On Jlme 21,2008, by P r o d u d (kda, a hearing was set to c o m m ~ a on August 18,2008,

Idothcrpa!dmldesdlineswaeestab~

On July 21,2008, Valley Piomas filed an A£tIdavit of Publicadion and Cat&ath of

~statingthetwticeofthebesringdafehed~pubWonJ~11,2008in~gingmm,

kily~,a~offgenaslcirculation,dthstnoticeof~~cadio11~bcmaentto

d ~ f ~ p l l o p e c t y ~ i a t h e ~ c x t c a s i o n a n a o n J d y 14,2008,viaFirstClass

J.S. Mail.

On Au@ 18, 2008, a full public br ing ws9 mad before a duly coltborized

LE - '.' " Law Judge of the Commission at its ofticed in Phoenix, Arimaa 'he Apphnt and

ltafappeaFedthrwghcounselandpresartedevidmaand testimony. Two membes of the public

ppearedat thehesr ing tog ivepuMiccommenD1.At theconc lus ionof the~the~~

iirecadto~latafiledexhibits~tothetestbnonyendevihpraPentedat~~

On August 19, 2008, Seatf filed a Iale-W exhibit which inchnied Decision No. 51496,

howing the portions of lend tbat wem included in Valky Pionwrs' C W N .

On Septcmbsr 22,2008, a Rocedmal (kla was issued d k d q W a n d thc Applicant to

DECISION NO.

~. ~ . - .. . -. I DOCKET NO. W-02033A-06M62 - . - .-

1 &ajoint&lingwithamMkgal~ondmapfo~therequestedarteaslon I amw, as well

2 legal description and msp for the artas Staff w ~ 9 recommending the -011 W to

3 ValleyPioneers.

4 I On October 14.2008, Staff d the Applicant j o i i fled a late-filed &bit, which included

12 ( 1. Valley pi- is a a ~ n - p f i t ~ d a ~ l r coqmmtia cmpged in the b".?b~~ of

5

6

7

8

15 @~emk26.1%7).

16 I 3. Valley Pionem is in good standiDg with h chpormi- Di&+n of the

a ~ s e d l e g a l ~ o n s n d m a p s .

~ r c c e i p t o f t h e ~ f i l d e x h i ~ t h c m s t t c r ~ ~ t s l r m ~ l a d e r ~ d v i a m e n t ~

of a hcommedcd Opinion and Onia to the thmnkiop

8 ' a * *

23

24 pposcd extension area is locsfad in Golden

25 Valley, an area located between Kingman and B d b d C i ArizDne, in Mobnn County a d is

26 I I dley P ionm' Application slated that h current ( cated mat Valley Pionem' service area encompa!

service arsa includes 22 i square miles

IJ ;ION NO. - I

mon fully M b e d in Exhiiit A, attachad herdo and inoorporated hstein by refcame.

7. VallcyPi~~thatthepurposeoftbeAppli~is%providewMr&~~

to rm area whae residents cunmtly depead almost exclusively on hauling wster tbr potable water

sllpplies, and to improve resotnce mauagemmt "3

8. Awnding to Valley Pioneers' A p p h i h , the Cnmpmy-

-tbaJ

10. Staffreccrmmendsthabtheiilsuaaocof1

ubject to m m p b with the f0110Whg Unldili01~1-

2) That Valley Pi- file with Dackct Chtml, as a comphm item in this dockst. I ~ a copy of ~ r i m n a ~cpllrtment of Em' I Wty C.ADEQ7 -cate of I

3) Tbnt Valley Pioneera file with Dockst Colrfrd, as a m m p ~ item in this dock*

a mpy of thc DepirGwnt of Water Resources -. - -

ls water supply or Physicl ' ailability T

pr~perties demonstrating that there is adequate warc

-=-?tive date of the order granting the Order F're1ir'---

hat Valley Pionegs file with W e t Co& --

DECISION NO. I !

DOCKET NO. W-02033A-060262 -- - --- - -

atfertne e iveaare or me - I 5) That Valley noneas reduce its watar loss to less than 1G -L rvithin three years

of the efktive date of the order grenting the Order Preliminery.

6) lhat aRsr VsUey Pioneers canplies with Req ' * Nos. z 3 . 4 , a d 5, Valley

Piomem shall make a i ihg stating so. Wahin 30 days of such filing, Staff shell file a . . response. The Comrmsslon should scbduk tfiis item for a vote to gmt the C W as I

soon as posiile after s t a r s 6ling that confinas valley Pioneas' o o m p ~ with

Requhnmts Nos. 2,3,4, and 5.1 I

bet Valley Pioneas 6le with Dockd Contrd, as a complimct itan m this Wet,

a copy of the A r k Departmmt of Wstsr Resources ("ADWR") Let& of Adequate

Wsta Supply (Wsta AdGquacy Report) for ewry mbdivkion m eech of the eight

~ e ~ . w h e n ~ V e d b y t h e C a m p a n y , ~ ~ , l a t c a t h a n 3 O d a y s afteritsreceipt

15 - f o r m 16 1 I. On May 19, 2006. Seaff issd a Data Request which directed Valley Pi- to

l7 povide the mpwb for swhx kxu all the propaty ownas in thc proposed extedon area In its l8

dated J ~ Y 18,2006, valley Pi- stated tbed "beccl~se the om pan^ is noqmfit.. . it '9 clmmt pard signiiicant smwo*r of money to pawide sw with engineering p w w r y

20 a p p r o v a l s a n d s w h x ~ ~ a l l h d o ~ i n t h e ~ o n A r a ~ " Thsresponsefmther I 21 1- that "documentiag savia reqwsts h m evay ~ ~ W I I W Within the Ektmsion Area is

" impossiblqn however, "th Company would supplancat its Application with r#lutsts fw -a by 23 laudowners within the Extension Area a9 the process moves forward." 24 12. Again, on August 16,2006, Staff submitted a Data Request directing Valley Pioo#R 25 t o p r o v i & ~ f o r ~ ~ ~ ~ t h e l ~ n e r s i n t h e p ~ ~ o n -

26 13. On Dewauk 14,2007, Staff filed a letter mmhdbg Valley Piomas tbat it had not

27 filed a response to Statrs August 16,2006, Data Re- and that if the Company was still inbnsted

28

DECISION NO.

~ .. - --. ~ WCKeT NO. W-02033A46-0262 . - . - . .- . _ _ _... - - --

m pursuing the Application to file a responsa by January 15, 2008 m Staff may r#lucst thet the I &d be sr' ' ' ' h e l y closed

I 14. On January 14, 2008, Vdey Piomas docketed a letta statjug tbat it war Still

1 intaested in puRldng the Application, but that the *mam@~~wnt of the Compeny had cbaaged d the

~ p ) w o d d 6 1 ~ i ~ - - t o S ~ s A ~ 1 6 , 2 0 0 . D P ~ ~ 3 P ~ o f t h e

I-. 1

I 15. On February 14,2008, Valley Pionom filed its nspcmse to S W s August 16,2006,

p a Requests and provided sevenxqwsts fur savicc from propaty owna who own eight I I propertien within the p m p d extension sra.

16. Atthehesring.twommbemofthepublicprsaeatedpublicconnnmbr Mr.Ray

Segennan prsGnted public comments in suppcnt of the Application. MOT to the herniple Mr.

~ e g e a m s n ~ a a l ~ w r i t t e n ~ f u r & a t o ~ ~ ~ i a m a s . ~ e ~ t h e t h c i s a d e v e l o ~

andownsapproximately 160acres,dintmdsto&vdop440residentiallotsnndaomc~

~ i n t h e p m p o s d a d a r s i o a a r e a ( T r . a t 6 ) Herr ta tcdthathehas f i l ed~onswi th

M o h a v e C o u n t y t o b o g i a t h e ~ ~ p m c c s q h c h a s ~ v c d t h c r c d l i n e s r n ~ t h e

CoMtyon~pplopogeddcsigndtfudthegeaoSingoftheC~~anwillb?lphimsstisfy~

~ r e q ~ t b s t h c o b 5 a i n a w a t a p r o v i d a f o r t h e d e n l ~ f l r . a t 7 ) Mr.Sguman

18 a l s o s t a t e d t h s t h e w i l l b c ~ w i t h t h e ~ t o m e e t ~ c o a s a v s t i o n r e q n I 19 fw the ddivisioa (Tr. at 7)# :german *lied that four and a half acres have h

20 aside in ~mposed subdiv I cate a package wastewater treatment facility. (Tr. at

21 17. Mr. Segaman M c d that hc believed it would take appmxhabIy two yeers to

22 collPpledeallofthecOlmtysndStrltenquiransnts I for Or pposed development. flr. at 55)

23 18. Mr.GrtgLowthcp.alsopresmtsdplblic~atthe~.Mr.h~stated

26 men valey Pioneers' service area

DECISION NO.

19. Mr. Lo* stated that he auticipntcs bceinning development mund May of 2009.1

pmass, or hsd any kind of a r c h i m or engineerins type plans drawn up for the development

(TI. at 12)

20. Post hearing, Mr. Lowther Qcketed a letttr requedq saria firom Valley Pioaeas

and plovided a legal description for hi9 inopslty.

21. ~ t h e h e a i u g , U a B o b b i W o o d , G e n a a l ~ f o r V a l l e y P i ~ t e s t i f i e d

thstthe~ygetsweelrlyralu*as~popertyownastohavewatersaria8ndmatthcnan

about 25 water haulers that are elderly, who could be eligible fix eammunity Hock grants to bring

water to their propatic8 d the Company wants to help them get water scavice. (Tr. at 22)

22. Ua Wood~ed~shsuscdtheMohaveColmtywebei~tDtindthenamesand

addms.9 of the property owners loaded in the proposed extension area and sent out 330 lettux to the

propaty ownas dtsuibing the Compgay's pendiag application before the Commwslon. . . She f lu th~

testi6ed she d v c d several phone calls related to hex mailing. but mat shc did not nq~ad that thc

pqmrty owms submit a writlea statement or request for service. (Tr. at 34)

23. Ms. Wood kd ied that out of the seven requests for service appmbakly half of

3t req

agrcunents with p r o m o w n c ~ or belopen and that without an cx temh of Valley PMllecrs' I

hm Valley Pianeers was a better optiom (TI. at 35) I

DECISION NO. I

staff t d e d that . . . tbe standard, if there is my, for an d o n of a CCQN would be the oonveni-aod n a ; e a p i t y ~ i f ~ i s a l l e e d f o s ~ o o . Staff also t d 6 a d that theConnnisson doesn't have a policy as to m b t the n q u s s t f o r s a v i c e ~ h a s t o s a y a w b o t h c doammt has to be hS

Whetha incluaion of the area could masonably be expcdtd to contribute to o p c r a t i o n a l e ~ c s . WhethercxclusionoftheereadrtlrponabIybeexpectedtoresultin owrational inefficiencies.

TNbetbatheCompsnyatissueisfinenciallyaound. W h e t h a t h e C o m p e n y a t i s P u e i s m c o m p ~ w i t h ~ ~ ~ ADEQ aud ADWR 0- &owing by the Comjmny at iasuc that it is h the public iahrest to appovethe-

- 6

DECISION NO. I

- . - ~ - . ---- ~ ~- M>cKET NO. W-02033A46-0262 ~. 1

28. In a prior Commission Decision, the Commksim found that where the Applicant has

demonshbi that there is a need for A c e in a proposed e d o n area by providing requests for

service from 100 percent of the property OWI~~IS, the Applicant's request to extend its CC&N into

those areas should be granted.'

29. , tst, tt ~mmission has found that where po reglie@ for service

specific area, Lpplicant'r I extend its CCBcN i-0% areas should not be granted

30. In the instanr case, Valley Pioneers' Application states it wants to improve water

rwouroe management in the proposed exbsion area. Valley Pioneers did not conduct a preliminary

9 -plan to detemm I how best to serve the proposed extension area (Tr. at 45) In Valley

10 Pionears' respollse to Staff's Jhta Request (dated July 18, 2006). the response stated &at the

11 "Company does not intend to make to a substantial inwslment on speculative engbahg plans to

12 serw the Extensi.on Area at this time, especially when the Comrmsno I ' n hBg not apaovui the

13 application." Further, Valley Piooeers application states that d o n of the main a 'onlints

14 would be extended at a cost of $26 per linear foot

15 31. ting 1,814

Js. Valley Pioneers' had more than two years, during the I I

18 Valley Pioneers Rlfficient n 1 mos he proposed extensio

19 and~mnodctaminationcilnbemad.~lstowbetherthertisanecdfor~ceinartaswhere

20 there are no requtstr, for suvicc.

32. Valley Pion- choose not to wnd# a pdhhmy engimaiae plan, Mch would

22 have provided a master plan that wukl be used to improve resource management and help to 21 1 23 lwniribute to o@onal e5ciencies in the proposed extension area Under Valley Pionca' I 24 Ipmposed p h to have landowners pay f a h e extensions,9 in conjunction with the expansive area

25 (being requested and the location of its existing water hhshucture, it can reamnebty be expected that

27 'Swckunmkh Lkcisioi1No.70381 hsle 13,2008). 'Sk . . Dseidon No. 69163 (Lkcmba 5.2006). z8 D a t e Z W July 18,2006. pg. 4.

DECISION NO. I

1 1 , . - lines, m m e mstancq would have to be extsndcd ova s s v d miles to pvide I

DOCKET NO. W42033A-064262 -. .. .. . . .- . , , . .. . . . . , . ~. . ~ .... .-

I 3: -- m-

I CC&N area A

d o n w i e d within the p r o m

.-

9 I area (Tr. at 76-78) Although there is not - -~mpeting application in this matte~, it is not .-

blic interest to grant such an expansive area to Valley Pioneers at this time because then a ~

11 'ce in those areas and it aav be mon

12

13

1 6 ~ f i w h i c h ~ d ~ ~ i ~ h forsavice, subject to wmpbma with the itcmsl

If a public savice c m p m t b desires to exad& a right a privilege lmdea a huchisc a peamit which it c o m t a y h @ securing. but which h not yet been gramted to it, the axpomtk may apply to the commission for an wdar peliminmy to the issue of the d c a t s . The coadssh may makc en order dcchhg that it will thereafter, upon Uponcation, under rula it p m c r i i igJue the desired d c a % upon tams and caditiom it designates, a h the corporatioa has ohincd the colltemplatd f h d h or permit a may melee m orda issuing a mtif~cabe on the condition that the contemplated franchin or pennit is obtaiaed d on otha tssms and conditions it desigoafes. If the conrmission makes an order prdmhry to the i s s u a a c e o f t b e ~ c a t c , u p o n p m s e n W o n t o t h e ~ o n o f e v i ~ that the h n & k or pennit has been semved by the corporation, the wmmissionJballissueme~cate.(emplaasisaddbd)

DECISION NO. I

I-. . -~ -. -. . . -. ~ ~ ~ - - . - ..

1 36. Staffs w i t a w g ~ t b t

2 l ' d m b q i s b e c a r m e k ~

3 -

DOCKFX NO. W42033A-069262 - . . ~ ~ .. . .~ .

7 ( 38. Valley Pioneas filed obje;ctioas to W s reco tionforcmOnkrReliminery. 1

.

--. - J 7-'

I each time thc31

~ f o l ~ ~ i m p o s s i ' M e , i t c o u l d h a v c , atandnhnuns, o~requoarforsavioehmthe

o l l s to lacrs i tp larmedtosa~ht t tc f ias t f iveyt srs in tho~ua . T h e O r d a h h h r y

g m c s t h e ~ t y , ~ l l l d l o r ~ c m ~ t h a t a ~ C C & N w i l l b c l p o t e d i f t b o

d t i m m & w i t h i n t h e & ~ w h i l e m e L L a g i t c k t h a t i f t h e ~ f i i b t o

a c t d i l i g d y m ~ i t s r i g h t s S p i t s ~ t h e t h c ~ w i l l w i l l b a x r m e r m d

void. We find st.Bps % t b t h r t c m O r d o t P r e f i m i n r r y b e ~ p c i o r t o k f i n a l ~ i n

thismet$rrsasonable.

40. We furtha fiad Staffs -on thst VPUey Pioaesrs' <)rda pI.e-

DOCKET - - NO. . W42033A-064262 _ .

1 find that Mr. bwtha's request to nccive service from Valley Pioneers and to have his pmpc@

2 in the Order Rehinary masonable and the property should be included I m-- wa*sw-

41. Valley Pioneers' ammt water system consists of four drinking wettr wells, with a

proddon rate of 2,140 gallom pa minute (WPM"); and six storage tauks, with a wmbined

capacity of 2,188.000 gallolrr

42. Staffs Report stated that Valley Pioneas has e x p e r i d an annual averngc growth

rateof63 mmcctionsoverthepasteightyesrs.

43. Valley Pioneers ha3 a daily averngc mmuqtion of 299 gallons p a day ("WD'),

based onitswatausagedatafortheyear2007.

44. M s Report hdkated that Valley Pioneas non-acmmt wata loss was 13 paceat

for the year 2007, and exceeds StafFs rmmmedd non-aemunt water loss of no more than

16 not adsqustely rncasuring water flow and the Compsmy has implemented a p.ogram to test meters on

17 anmdombsis.(Tr.at42) I 46. Valley PioneeR pnpxa to wctad its cxishg &inch maim along section lines to

swvetherrqutstedsr~a StaEwnclulcdthatthepmlroscdsystemwil lba~~~csp.oi tyt0

24 linear foot Staff concludad that the Compariy's cost cstimete I tosavethecxtulsionanais

25 reasonable. However, Staff made no "used and d'' . . astothcpropcdplrmtandw

20

21

22

23

26 ~ u s i o l l s should be infed for titwe rate making or rate bbse purposes.

27 I 48. ADEQ has detamined that Valley Pioneas is delivering wata that mssts water

sene customas in the proposed extension area and Valley Piomma can be reamdly expected to

develop tbe additional capecity to meet btwc growth as awded

47. AoooFding to Valley Pioneas' Application, the CMnpany estimatts that the d t cost

to~the&inohlllaiaoneedadtosavethepoposad~lnaawiUbeeppFoxitn;lt.ly$26prr

DECISION NO.

DOCKET NO. W-02033A45-0262 ~ ~. ~

> - -- -. -. . - . -

pality shdada reqrrired by the A A C and that Valley Pioneers is in o o m p ~ with ADEQ

W ("AMA") and therekc is not subject to AMA reporting and mmwatioo dds.

SO. ~ a l l e y P i o n w a s i s c l r r r m t l y h o o m p ~ w i t h A D W R r e c l u i r e m m t s ~ ~ ~

~onstr there is adequate water for the nine propertie

D provide f the ADWR Analy -

: t e w

52. Valley Pioneas has nooutptandiag ACC w m p b issaeg

53. Valley Pioneashas acOmmki0118ppved ' " t tad&

54. Valley Piomas has an approved barlcfow pmrmtion tariff on file with

he Coolrmssloa . .

55. Valley Pioneas has a Mohevc C o w Fkadke A @ @ t that thrrt- the

n o w c w a r e a

56. Valley P i o m ' wimesrr testitied that thae are no pmposed golf anuses or

d lsLm plrmned for the pmp0-3 cxtmsion ama (Tr. at 43)

57. Because an allowance for propaty tax exper& is in Valley Pioneas' rst*l

m d w M h m i t s c u s ! o m e r s , t h e ~ . . scdm ss~uranws from Valley Pionam that any

~ ~ U 4 f m m r e t e p . y e n b a v c b G o n r c m i t t a l t o t h c a p p r o p r i a t e ~ ~ t p . Ithrscomcto

~ ~ ( ~ ' s ~ t h a t a n u m b a o f w a t a d ~ c o m p n i ~ ~ h s v e b e e n u n ~

xunableto fulfill t h e i r o b l i ~ t o p c l y t h e t a x a t h a t a n n c o l l e c t e d ~ ratspayers, soma foras

m y az twenty years. It is &1e, therehe, that ar, a pmnntive masum Valley Pioneas shall

umually file, as part of its annual rsporS an affidavit with the Utilities DIvisim attesti* tbat the

lnnpanyiscurreatinpayiogitspmpatytaxdshAriuMa

58. The Chmnidon has become increapingly concaned with the n&d to comeme

DECISION NO.

roundwater in Arizona Therefore, we believe Valley Pioneers should be r e q u i d to con~em

roundwater and that Valley Pioneers should be prohibited from selling groundwater for the purpose

f irrigating any hbm golf courses or any ornamental lakes or water features located in the common

reas of the pmpcwed new developments, within the ppmed expaosion area

coNCLUsIONS OF LAW

1. VaIley P i o m is a non-profit Corporation, and a puMic -ce coqmdion

vithin the meaning of Article XV of the Akxma ConstiMion and A R S . 8$40-281 and 40-282.

2. The Commission has jurisdiction over Valley Pioneers and the subject math of the

~pplicati~n.

3. Notice of the Application was provided in accordance with the law.

4. lhere isap~bl icneedandnecess i tyfor~~tysQvice intbcpFoposedd~n

tee for the nine pmpeaies for which Valley Piomers d v e d requesCF for service.

5. Valley Piomem is in c o m p k with the Arizona Dqmbmt of Environmental

Wty mphments aud is nmently delivering water that meets the standards required

iy t h e k k c .

6. Staffs rscommendations, ss d e d herein, are reasonable end should be ado@.

7. Valley Pioneers is a fit and propa entity to d v e an Order hllminary to the

mance of the final CC&N for the nine properties described herein.

ORDER IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to A.R.S. 8 40-282 (D), this Orda F i i m r y

3 the issumce of the final Certificate of Convenieace and Necessity is hereby gnmted to Valley

'iomem Water Company, Inc., for the nine @es discussed hcrein.

FURTHER ORDERED denying Valley Pioneers Water Company, Inc's., reqi

xtend its Certi6cate of Convenience and Necessity to the areas located outside the boundaries

he properties granted in this Order Reliminary.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Valley Pioneers Water Company, kc., sball He with

h k e t Coatrol as a compliance item in this docket, a copy of the Arizona Department of

DECISION NO.

2 1 of & nine properties, within ytan of the e&aiva date of tbis Ordm Reliminary.

6 the]

7 Orc eliminary.

8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Valley Pimeus Watt -

CQI as a wml x item in this dockc

I U ry.

11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Valley Pi- Weta Compmy. k, sball nduce itn m m

12 ~ c c o l m t ~ l m t o l ~ t h a n 1 0 ~ w i t h h ~ y e a ~ o f t h e ~ ~ o f t b i s O r d a

13 hhimy.

14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Valley Pioaeeni Water Company, In=, fails to comply

IS with any one of the above staid mditbm within the t; ' -- 16

1

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED tht lftrr Valley r - . h , k c a @ i a l

with the above s t a d mditbm it sball docket a filing slating its wmpliauce and rcqueshg the

Commissim issue the final Catificatc of Cowmienoe and Ncmssity for the nine propertitJ

hi hcrsin. W m 30 d.ys of suoh filing. Staff shall file a respume cmfirmine Valley Pioneas

Wata Company's wmpliallcc a d r#lucsting the (lmmmml . . s h d d e the time for a vote to grant

the6naICortificaXeofConvsaiau;caadN~.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Valley Pi- Water Compmy, Inc., shall c@ its

sldhorizedratcsandcbargesintheextcasionarea

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Valley Piomem Water Com;peny, Inc.. shall me with

Docket h t r o l as a mmphtm itan in this docket, a copy of tb Arizons Departwnt of Wets

R*wwrces JAkr of Adequate Water Supply (Watar Adcquecy Report) for every subdivision in eaoh

DECISION NO.

- ~. ~ ~- WCKET NO. W42033A-06-(KL62 . ..~ - - . , .

aying its properly taxc

IT IS FURTHER ORDERB) tbat in light of the nead to amsave gro~ndwatcr in Arbna,

'alley Pioneers Wata Company, Inc., is prohibited from sew & r o w for the purpose of

rigating any future golf courses or my ornamental lakes or water feehnes located m the common

reas of the. propod new developments within ttie nine popde8 described in this Order

te-.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that tbh DGcision shall become efhtive immediately.

BY ORDER OF THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION.

:HAIRMAN COMMISSIONER

:OMMISSIONER C O M M I S S I O ~ COMMISSIONER

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, BRIAN C. McNEIL. Executive Dimetor of the. Arizona Corporation commidon, haw heiemto set my hand and caused the official seal of the Commissiontoba&edatthe~ItoI,in~CityofPhoenix, this- Waf- 2008.

BRIAN C. McNEIL EXECUTIVEDLRECTOR

DECISION NO.

1 SERVICE LIST FOR: I VALLEY PIONEERS WATER COMPANY, INC.

I WCm NO.:

- I J- Alward. Chief Counsel 6

' (191Divisiod ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION

stwmL..wene MOYES SELLEFS dt SIMMS V i i C o m Cmter 1850 N o h Central Avenue, Suite 1 100 Phoenix, Ariunra 85004.4541 Attomcy for Valley Pioneus Wata Company

1200 west wwhhgton Strect

9 "1 Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Utilities Division ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION

DEcmlON NO.

VALLEY PIONEERS WATER COMPANY, INCORPORATED STAFF RECOMMENDATION

TOWNSHIP 21 N. RANGE 18 W

m

I TOWNSHIP 21 N, RANGE 17 W i

Mojave County Planning and Zoning Departmeat P.O. Box 7000 Kingman, AZ 86402

D.B. and Phyllis Haley 1853 Bogey Way Headerson, W 89074

Re: Randy Lyles Parcel 3 I-B Tract 383 1 APN 123-19-002

Gentlemen,

This letter is written in support of the proposed change of zoning for the above referenced property from Heavy Industrial to Ruml Residential.

As owners of Parcel 3 1A, APN 123-19-004, 309.65 acres immediately north of subject Parcel 3 1 -B, we take no exception to the proposd change.

D.B. Haley 6

Windows Live Hotmail - - Page 1 of 1

~ l n d o w s Live" ~ o m e Il(ofmanl sparer 3necare NSN 1 - i c o m . .. . .. - 5,s' "..1

lnbor New Reply Reply all br.rard Delete lunk Move to .. opr~ons @ lunk (1)

You've just added mi5 render to your safe senderr list. Add contact Dra* (11

sent annex 15') imm rucca hre (yucrafireQhotma81 m m l

BOaoer Bent Mon 9,2Uoa 9 20 A"

Ads Pmmo TO mCetraCtrandy@hOtrna#l corn @ Racetran doc (18.9 ns)

ComPPlat iecunw x a n uvon download @ma

CompPlat2

CompRldge

Computer See how Wlndows Moblle bnngs your llfe together-at home, work, or an the go See Now

e6av

ebalt7.k

Eg~lpment

EResponle

GarmCDmm

Lombard0

Orders

Rrronal

Pugs

RaterrAuctlan

sen6aved

TratLa*

manage Wdwr

Today

Ma,,

contactr

Calendar

nave a hrt ronnectnon and want more featurer7~ry me full veralon to see rnerrape prevtewr in your mbox (111 I r e , too )

o 2008 n~oosom I ~ r v a r y I ~wai ~ e ~ p central I rvovnr I ~eedbact

racetrackrandy@hotmail.com Randy Lyles

Thank you for you recent inquiries about possible annexation into the Fire District.

Researching your location shows your property to be located three sections south of the present border of the district.

Annexation requires, properties to be continuous, 50% of the property owners signatures on a petition, as well as an impact statement. There are 18 sections in your township which were not in the original annex.

It would only require those sections which are in direct line and adjacent to your property signatures which would narrow it down a little.

The Fire District is always willing to assist in annexation however the more the property is broken up the more difficult it is in locating and getting signatures.

Desert Hills Fire District is also south and east of your location about 3 miles, however there is no road access from that area.

We are aware of other areas which have expressed an interest in annexation , so we will be contacting them to check there progress.

Again thank you for the inquiry and we will work on it from this end also.

Yucca Fire District

Jimmylee Todd Chief Yucca Volunteer Fire Department

"The Last Lap Race Place LLC" A PRIVATE VEHICLE TESTING COMPLEX !

N e a r L a k e H a v a s u C i t y AZ. USA racetrackrandy@hotrnail . corn --

....................................-mm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B B B B B B B B B ~ ~ B B B ~ B B ~ ~ ~ ~

November 10, 2008

Hello Sylvia, This letter is to inform you as to the current situation regarding the process to annex my project "The Last Lap Race Place LLC" Tract 3831 subdivision into the Yucca Fire Dept. District.

- After discussions regarding my Plat in late August, I was in favor of the annexation. It seemed like a good addition to the subdivision even though it was not required, my property has water, and the State Fire Marshall supplied a letter as per the request from P&Z. As you know my initial contact with the Fire Chief Jimmy Lee Todd at the beginning of September was favorable. In the first conversation I was told that it was not a difficult process but somewhat time consuming on his part. At that time, the letter that arrived after a 2 week waiting period seemed somewhat clouded. After reviewing the letter several times, the result was that the letter did not exactly address what was needed. I decided to pursue and request another letter as an update. So now to date, after 2 requests by email and 2 requests by phone, I still have not received the requested update and my opinion has now changed that this is not a feasible addition to my subdivision. The major reason now is that within those conversations and emails, I have been told, that it could

,, possibly take 1 to 2 years to complete the annexation! This would create a major delay for the recordation of the projects Final Plat, which would mean, without a doubt, failure to my project! So, based on these new facts and actions, I respectfully request that the condition of annexation to the Yucca Fire District for a recorded Plat be removed from my submission. Thank you and Sincerely, Randy Lyles

1711 Stockton Hill Rd. #339, Kingman, AZ 86401

From: "JeffCarltonV <jeffcarlton@npgcable.com> To: "Sylvia Shaffe? <Sylvia.Shaffer@co.mohave.az.us> CC: "Tim Holley" <timinkingman@yahoo.com>, "Werner Fleischmann" <w.fleischma ... Date: 1111012008 11:49 AM Subject: Greenwood V~llage

Mrs. Shaffer,

Please find this to be a formal request to continue ltems 14A. and 148. as are shown on the November IZth, 2008 Agenda of the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission meeting until the December meeting. These ltems concern the rezone and approval of the Preliminary Plat of GREENWOOD VILLAGE UNIT II, TRACT 3818. 1 respectfully ask that a return E-Mail be sent to me confirming receipt of this request and confirmation of the requested continuance of ltems 14A. and 148. to the December meeting.

Respectfully;

Jeffery S. Carlton, RLS