LEA/ Charter School Name: NDr\h \-\QX-r,<;,t.Y"\ Sc.>nco\ Corpcro:ho11

Corporation Number:

3\~0

Missing one or more signatures

Fiscal agent, if Consortium:

Description of program Description of program goals and objectives is goals and objectives is incomplete or vague; provided; goals and program goals and objectives partially align to objectives do not align to data sources and data and prioritized needs. prioritized needs.

Specific data sources Specific data sources missing; little to no provided; quantitative quantitative or qualitative and/or qualitative data data utilized; om oo~ utilized; more than one data source included; data source included; data does not align to data may not clearly align program goals or prioritized to program goals and

All signatures are complete

Description of progra'm goals and objectives is clear; proposed activities clearly align to needs assessment; direcrlink provided from identified needs to proposed

Specific data sources provided; analysis of quantitative and qualitative data utilized; more than one data source included; data aligns to program goals

~ _,/

\

\

- ?to~\~ 0-X\cl o D_) lv-h vti; ()Xt,..

Y~vt-

- '(\ l) ()\ en V\. :\\ t~ \'Y\ t Y\ \\CY\ tit

_- DY\\~ 0-DJtt 5DUflQ... YY\iX\1\D\1t..d \ S tr[· SlX\ 00 \ 0. t L YLO\ \ rClt\ D V)

sorv~~ .. l \ St\" I scufu)

- ---· ···-·-·-·· · ··--··•·•··•·•··•··-·· · ·

Description of prioritized needs is missing; identified needs are not aligned to · data sources or program goals and objectives; no description of how high­need schools will be prioritized.

Little to no evidence of consultation; only staff or internal groups were consulted. No description of consultation activities included.

Description of prioritized needs is provided; identified needs are partially aligned to data sources or program goals and objectives; partial description of how high­need schools will be prioritized.

Evidence of consultation; staff or internal groups and external or community groups were consulted; description of consultation activities inducfoa:------

Clear description of prioritized needs is provided; identified needs are clearly aligned to data sources and program goals and objectives; clear description of how high­need schools will be prioritized.

Evidence of extensive consultation; multiple staff or jnternql groups and external or community groups were consulted; clear description of consultation activities included.

Descriptions of activities All description sections are All description sections are are missing or do not completed; some may completed and clearly clearly or adequately lack clarity in describing anc;:j adequately describe describe the scope of work the scope of work of the scope of work of of proposed programming. proposed programming. proposed programming.

Rationale linking needs assessment and proposed activities is missing or unclear; outcomes of proposed activities do not tie back to identified needs.

Rationale linking needs assessment and proposed activities is somewhat clear; link between outcomes of proposed activities and identified needs.

Rationale linking needs assessment and proposed activities is clear and comprehensive; clear link between outcomes qf proposed activities and identified needs.

7__

1.

. ' 1-

\

- digx, ~\\on o t Y"\D\A) -~

C,Of\S~ \-\-~hen_ ftlD\L J?\C~CQ. \S \C\L\(\~ \Q~ ,,~b

-- .\-\DW \µ\ \ \ tru.. itG'n C:,Ompcnt:~

i' S t1n.-\'"I S tnu') D \Jr S l) (X(,\.,\ C~ ~XY\t) h om, ,~\J XJ r., or\- s ·~1 ~ ·km

1

' ?

\ht,\ r Y'lmOJ<¼S j \js\-ro..s \11 k . ih.L\, S \-C\, \<.tho i cu.rs \;vOXQ.., \nvo\vQ0\1 bur \1 uors11J ,S ~ ¥\OW -\t\R}- ·\'\ t~ \J°'-L-~

·\-6 t\'\L "u..Gts -

Program objectives not provided or not clear ; outcomes are not easily tracked for progress or needed improvement.

Program objectives provided; outcomes may not be easily tracked for progress or needed improvement.

Evaluation plan is missing or Evaluation plan is vague; unclear; no clear timeline ti~lines or frequency or or frequency of evaluation evaluation provided may provided; no individuals lack clarity; single identified as part of the individual identified as part evaluation process. of the evaluation process.

Program objectives are clear and comprehensive; outcomes are able to be tracked for progress or needed improvement.

Evaluation plan ls clear and effective; timelines and frequency of v evaluation proviqed are clear and sufficient; multiple individuals / identified as part of the evaluation process.

\ .

1·

4 or more errors in budget totals; total budget and proposed activity totals do not match.

l -3 errors in budget totals; Correct sums provided for total budget and proposed budgeted totals for all 3 activity totals match. focus areas; total budget

and proposed activity totals match.

References to specific future funding sources are vague or missing; no clear plan to continue activities provided; little or no eviqence of effective capacity building.

Possible future funding sources provided but may lack specificity; plan to continue activities provided; some capacity building is evident or built into the plan.

There is no plan in place to The plan to track track effectiveness of measurable outcomes is action steps or the unclear. s~gested plan does not have a clAqr meosuFeble outcome.

···•Ex¢ell·~~f •·f '•3····pdi11.ts•···

Future funding sources are specific and may include assurances or evidence of 3 future funding having been secured; clear plan to continue activities in absence of Title IV funds provided; clear focus on local capacity building is evident. There is an effective plan in place to track measurable outcomes. \

·' V,,J\-\Dv\- (\;YL ~ O{CL\00"-'-rlOVl (:X\ .. \t)(lCl 1_

- G1ood '9 \cu11 on V\ol0 to &JV)? \.lXYl m-\- \ c1v\-t_y-

- \ O\Dn '-r 0-LL C\

C,, \ ~ 0 \}T tD 'rf\l

S\-W~ DJ/)~ \;UY\lrL

+-- rn- • ----• - ••• • -- • ---·-• ---••·--• ···•·• ··· • ·• ·• ······ •

Non-public equitable share components missing; not all non-public schools in geographic location included; no evidence of consultation provided.

Either budget request table or detailed budget page provided; missing components within tables.

Few or no expenditures are Some expenditures are reasonable, allowable, or reasonable, allowable, necessary. and necessary.

Few, if any, expenditures are aligned with the activities and goals of the grant.

Expenditures are considered supplanting

Some expenditures are aligned with the activities and goals of the grant.

All components present; all non-public schools in geographic location (if applicable) are included; \ evidence of consultation provided. (Note: public charter schools do not need to complete this section).

Both budget table AND detailed budget provided and all sections are completed.

All expenditures are reasonable, allowable, and necessary.

All expenditures are aligned with the activities and goals of the grant.

Expenditures are not considered supplanting

3

3

3

'

3

Narrative boxes are not Narrative boxes are mostly Narrative boxes are .., W'10v\- S~ Sv f \7h~s? How complete OR gives little complete OR some detail complete and give great

~ :::-----.. \;Ji\\ 'rtlu-2 ~ \) SWt7_ ·. ) de~nding will to how funding will be detail to how funding will be utmzed:- utilized. be utmzed. -w Y\C>v-f \S \( ',\l'(Dfl'\.t. \)OO'l_ 'Sv 'f\?\YNJ'"ltoJ-'w

----Staffing section is not Staffing section is Staffing section is complete - \ s tn \ s °' C'.,, \ QS,'S / ~ OJ \eX-::Lhwj complete OR gives little somewhat complete OR and gives great detail on

\ (lcr\v,1 'N\\CI.\- if> 'l-\'1\5 de ta ii ~ers on gives some detail on staffing person

resp~ staffing person responsibilities. Sh~{, ·. fDr~ responsibilities.

Budget tables contain 5 or Budget tables contain 1-4 Budget tables contain no

\ - 6uc~~ ,\t'l 'o\.e.. ~DJ 000 ) C\ CD

more errors; budget totals errors; most budget totals errors; budget totals align. '(\D{ \','\0-,\-C,Y'\ b\l~ OVL'<Y''W

do not align. align. l $ 25,0CD)

Total Points: 0 (~ 1 points possible)