noble gas sampling and detection methods for on-site ... · noble gas sampling and detection...
TRANSCRIPT
Noble Gas Sampling and Detection Methods for On-Site Inspections in Support of CTBT
J.S. Elisabeth Wieslander, Kirill KhrustalevEquipment Officers, CTBTO
On-Site Inspection DivisionPreparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-BanA Treaty OrganizationProvisional Technical SecretariatVienna International CentreP.O. Box 1200A-1400 Vienna
Presentation at IAEA Symposium, Wien, 20-24 Oct 2014
The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the CTBTO Preparatory Commission
On-Site Inspections (OSI): Last step of the verification
OSI the final verification measure specified by the Treaty
guided by the OSI Operational Manual
Each State Party has the right to request an OSI
only AFTER the Treaty has entered into force
The Treaty, Article IV, Paragraph 35
The sole purpose of an on-site inspection shall be to clarify whether a nuclear weapon test explosion or any other nuclear explosion has been carried out in violation of Article I and, to the extent possible, to gather any facts which might assist in identifying any possible violator.
Context for radionuclide monitoring
Atmospheric, surface, near surface and some underwater explosions
can be identified via particulate monitoring
detections in the IMS will most likely suffice for verification of the Nuclear Event
Underground & underwater explosions:
low amount of aerosols escape
NG likely to be released via cracks and diffusion
NG are inert gases : stay in the atmosphere, seep times & concentrations vary
this is where an On-Site Inspection becomes of interest....
Detection of radionuclides from nuclear weapon testing
Detection of ACTIVATION & FISSION products
Both radioactive GAS and PARTICLES
Measurements supported by Atmospheric Transport Modelling (ATM)
RN detections in an OSI are supported by other verification methods:
VISUAL observations
GEOPHYSICS methods, active and passive SEISMIC monitoring
Multi spectral/infrared analysis (MSIR)
Verification methods
KEY RADIONUCLIDES the traces that indicate nuclear test
Table 1. Most abundant radionuclides after a 1 kt explosion. Table 2. Radionuclides relevant as nuclear test indicators. Courtesy of CTBTO/IDC
OSI permitted RN : DRAFT LIST
Not included below but in the DRAFT LIST: Tc-99m, I-132, Pr-144 Cal. sources: Co-60, Ba-133
Background: K-40, Natural Decay Chains from U-238 & Th-232, activation products from detectors & shielding material
Primary NG : - Xe-133, -133m, 131m, -135 and Ar-37
No Kr-85 : - too long half-life (10y) - production by civilian nuclear industry substantial global background : 1-1.5 Bq/m3
OSI NG Field Sampling- current status
Sub-soil GasXe & Ar-37Number of samples/day depends on Number of Sampling Stations and resourcesSampling Station = combination of sampling points, which provides volume & cover larger areaVariable sample volume according to soil typeRequirement = 0.4 – 4 m3/sample
Manual = Labour intensive
Bulk AirXe (currently no Ar-37 capability)Continuous monitoring 2 samples/dayVariable air volume up to ~10 m3/sample
Automatic, ~unattended = ~no Labour after installation
Xe & Ar-37Selected atm. bulk air samples taken in the field as background comparison to subsoil gas samples0.4-2 m3/sample
Manual = some daily Labour
SSSS
2233
4455
11S = points
Getting enough gas per sample in the Field
Newtonian search = faster screening in the Lab
S1S1 S2S2
S3S3 S4S4
S5S5 S6S6
S7S7 S8S8
Sscrening = (S1-S8)fractions
OSI NG Field Sampling
• Continuous low sampling flow overnight / several days• Compressed into high-pressure transportation bottles
• Tampering control• Chain of Custody
OSI NG Field Laboratory
can be assemblied by 2 persons
Laboratory equipment housed in two 20-feet shipping containers with climate control, UPS and back-up generator.
OSI NG Field Laboratory- premiere in 2014
OSI NG Field Laboratory- premiere in 2014
SAUNA-OSI 2014MARDS and SAUNA-OSI 2014
WITHOUT cryogenics & large amounts of consumables, can be mounted by 2 pers.
• A set of equipment from several manufacturers• Partly Unattended Systems
Name Manufacturer Nucl. Gas Separation & Processing
Detection Systems
Analysis Software
SAUNA-OSI FOI, Sweden Xe Y Y Y
XESPM NINT, China Xe Y N N
Si-Pin Detector LARES, Russia Xe N/A Y Y
MARDS INPC, China Ar-37 Y Y Y
Pre-Processing FOI, Sweden Xe Y N/A N/A
Support equipment & consumables• Gas detectors (CO2, H2O, Methane etc)• Carrier gases He, N2, CO2• H&S equipment (Oxygen alarm, comms, fire alarm)
OSI NG Field Laboratory- premiere in 2014
integrated into one OSI NG Lab
OSI NG Lab Process
SAMPLE INPUT high pressure bottle to low pressure Lab syst.
Quantification 1
ANALYSISvarious software
EVALUATIONratios, historical data, local bkg, atm, data
fusion with other OSI techniques…
Quantification 2
Ar-37 Processingseveral steps
Xe Processingseveral steps
Decay Measurementvarious equipment
Exhaust incl. Argon,
N2, O2 CO2, H2O etc
• State of Health• Data quality, integrity, security• Chain of custody, managed access
Xe Processing Example
Processing
Quantification 1
- coincidence measurements
Quantification 2
OSI NG detection capability vs background
(*1) Limiting factors: one detector & manual sample change
(*2) Limiting factors: manual sample change
(*3) Heavy items are mainly leadshield modules
(*4) Data from CEP, University of Bern (Dr. R. Purtschert)
Ar-37 Xe-133
Bkg subsoil gas < 100 mBq/m3air (*4) TBD (*5)
Bkg atm air 1-5 mBq/m3 (*4) 0.087 ppm
IMS MDC (mBq/m3) N/A ~ 0.2 (12h)
OSI MDC (mBq/m3) ~25 (10h) ~ 0.2-1 (24h)
Sample volume 0.4 m3 2-4 m3
System throughput 4-6 / 24 h (*1)6 / 24 h (SAUNA)4 / 24 h (XESPM)
LAB total throughput for 10 h workday
2-4depends on counting time
6-8depends on sample change
System foot print (WxL) ~ 2.1 x 3 m ~0.85 x 1.6 m (SAUNA)~ 1 x 3 m (XESPM)
System module weight 20-60 kg (*3) 20-80 kg (*3)
(*2)
(*5) No data set yet available, indications of initial measurements show in the range of <10 of mBq/m3. Work in progress.
OSI NG Detectors : Xe
Typical detectors for Xe detection
kBq NaI det. syst.
Bq HPGe det. syst.
mBq - coincidence det. syst.
Si-Pin- coincidence systems with Digital Pulse Processing
Detectors optimized for • low count rates• high sensitivity (~4 geometry), • focus on metastable isotopes isotopic ratios for source discrimination• modularized lead shields
Si-Pin: High-resolution - NaI coupled with SiPin diodes
SAUNA-OSI: Low-resolution - NaI coupled with plastic scintillator
- Al oxide coated to reduce memory effect
- Clover design – 4 detectors in one shield with
individual compartments incl. lead separator
Calibration process is complicated• QC sources (Cs-137) : Energy and Resolution• Gas spikes : Efficiency
SAUNA
OSI NG Detectors : Ar-37
Proportional counter with veto system
• Copper tube inside a NaI well-type crystal (muon veto)• Analog NIM electronics• Volume 500 ml at ~2 bar• Filling gas : 90% Ar, 5% CO2 and 5% He• HV ~2500 V• 100 kg lead shield in modules
Single Ar-37 X-ray 2.38 keV
Calibration• straight-forward using external Am-241 source• BUT: very sensitive to the impurities from the
gas processing
NG coincidence spectrum-Spike test
Xenon Isotopes: Xe-131m, -133m, -133 and -135
Thank you!