no disclosures€¦ · nonunion –16% • arthroplasty • ... femoral neck fractures •results-...
TRANSCRIPT
11/18/2015
1
Femoral Neck Fractures :
My Thoughts
Dean G. Lorich, MD
New York, NY
No disclosures
Inverted Triangle?
This is what frequent does
happens…
11/18/2015
2
Valgus impacted = stable
•21 % reop
•49% reop - tilt
>20
•10% - <10 deg
Goal:
•Minimize complication of interupted vascularity of femoral head
•Heal femoral neck
•Maintain hip anatomy x
A malunion is not the endpoint of
success
11/18/2015
3
Intracapular femoral neck
fracture :
•Reoperation :• IF - 20-36%
•AVN - 30%
•Nonunion – 16%
• Arthroplasty
•THA – 5-7%
•Bipolar – 6-7%
Tidermark etal JOT 02
X
FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES:
• WHY CAN’T WE RELIABLY
HEAL THE FRACTURES
AND
IN AN ACCEPTABLE POSITION?
How do neck fractures heal
•Beneath the synovial membrane,
periosteum covers proximal femur•Periosteum lacks a cambium layer on
the femoral neck, accounting for the
lack of callus formation of fracture
11/18/2015
4
Femoral head vascularity:
Gautier, Ganz 00
Gad-MRI : comparison
11/18/2015
5
Gad MRI: Quantitate
contribution of the
inferior vincular artery
Femoral neck fracture:
vascularity
•Observation•Vascularity is not as tenuous as we were
lead to believe
•2 main terminal branches of MFCA
•Posterosuperior – usually injury
•Posteroinferior – always intact
Is sliding necessary for healing?
Is AVN an inevitability of poor
reductions and unstable
fixation?
11/18/2015
6
“ Most treatments work because of the
relative indestructibility of the human
musculoskeletal system.”
Henry Mankin, MD
•Minimize complication of interupted vascularity of femoral head
•Heal femoral neck
•Maintain hip anatomy
Can we????
REDUCTION is critical
11/18/2015
7
Without it … failure is
predictable
Strict adherence to reduction of
ALL fractures (including valgus
“impacted”)
11/18/2015
8
Younger =
OPEN Reduction
Open reduction
1 year
11/18/2015
9
Results:• Average Age was 78 years
• Classification• 2 nondisplaced
• 15 Garden I - reduced
• 16 Garden III,
• 21 Garden IV patients.
• 54/57 (95%) patients healed successfully.• of the 54
• No complications
• No revision surgery needed).
• Of the 3 failures
• AVN - 1.
• 2 non-union requiring arthroplasty.
J Trauma 2010
Radiographic analysis:
•Average head migration
was 1.98 mm
J Trauma 2010
Gait analysis results: Contd.• Average return of SLS (single
limb stance) of involved limb
when compared to normal
side was:• 79% at 6 weeks
• 86% at 3 months
• 93% at 6 and 12 months.
• No improvement between 6
and 12 months.
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
6 weeks
3 Month
s
6 month
s
12 month
s
S L S
C olumn1C olumn2
AOTS 2011
11/18/2015
10
Intracapular femoral neck
fracture :
•Function status : able to walk w/ or
w/o cane• Internal fixation – 63 (44-97)
•Bipolar – 85 (64-93)
•THA - 87 (76- 90)
Tidermark etal JOT 02
Build a better mouse trap?
Results : locking femoral neck
plate
•21 consecutive femoral neck
fractures• 18 w f/u >16mos
• 17/18 w anatomic reduction
JOT 2012
11/18/2015
11
16 weeks12 weeks
6 weeks
Results : locking femoral neck
plate•11/18 – achieved union comparable
radiographic results in our original study
•7/18 – catastrophic failure• Screw breakage• Intraarticular screw penetration• Plate pull off from shaft
•5 - THA
JOT 2012
Why : do we need some
dynamization in hip fractures?implant-bone relationship weakens over time
– loosening / instability over time
11/18/2015
12
57 yo – 48 hrs p injury
Ideally : implant /bone interface
strengthens over time
6 mos
Allograft
incorporation
11/18/2015
13
Endosteal Biologic Augmentation for Surgical Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
JOT 2015
• Patients and Methods: 27 patients with isolated
displaced FNF surgically treated by a single
surgeon.
• Intervention: Open reduction of the femoral neck,
fixed with a length- and angle stable-construct of
two fully threated cannulated screws augmented
with an endosteal fibular allograft serving as a
biologic dowel.
Endosteal Biologic Augmentation for Surgical Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
JOT 2015
• Main Outcome Measurements:
–Clinical and radiographic outcomes
of the fixation construct
–Viability of both the femoral head and
the fibular allograft
Endosteal Biologic Augmentation for Surgical Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
JOT 2015
- MRI 12 months postop
- partial or complete osseous
incorporation of the fibular allograft
in 86% of the patients
11/18/2015
14
Endosteal Biologic Augmentation for Surgical Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
JOT 2015
- HHS - excellent outcomes (91 ±13.2).
- SF-36
- Mental - 52.9 ±11.8
- Physical 50.5 ±8.3.
- All patients demonstrated
- normal gait without need for assistive devices
- Gait analysis
- 98% of single-limb stance time
- 100% of cadence,
- 96% of cycle duration
- 98% in stride length compared with uninjured side.
Natural History of Post-Traumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Stable Anatomic Fixation of Displaced
Femoral Neck Fractures
• Results- Pre-op DCE MRI
• injured side VS the contralateral side.
• decreased perfusion (73.8%) - arterial
• increased washout delay (199%) - venous
• some perfusion to the femoral head was always
noted in the injured side.
Natural History of Post-Traumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Stable Anatomic Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
• Results- Post op MAVRIC MRI
– MRI revealed AVN segments in 87% (20/23)
of patients.
– All AVN segments developed in the anterior
aspect of superomedial quadrants
– area of higher decrease perfusion on
pre-op DCE MRI)
11/18/2015
15
Natural History of Post-Traumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Stable Anatomic Fixation of Displaced
Femoral Neck Fractures
• Results- Post op MAVRIC MRI
– The ON segment involves a small percentage of
the femoral head
– 14% at 3months
– 13% at 12 months
– 1yr MRI - 17% (4/23) had minimal subchondral
collapse (<2mm)
–2YR xray - 0/23 – demonstrated any
segmental collapse
Natural History of Post-Traumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Stable Anatomic Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures
• Extend of the ON segment
– Proportion of the cross-sectional area of the head-
Collapse rate (Nam et al JBJS 2008)
– 5% in small lesions (<30%)
– 46% in medium lesions (30%-50%)
– 83% in large lesions (>50%)
– All except one of the ON segments in our cohort were
small lesions (range 3.0-24.6%; one with medium
lesion -31.8%)
– > 2/3 of the weight-bearing area of the Femoral
head present a significant higher rate of collapse (Nishii CORR 2002)
- All our patients with ON occupy < 2/3 of the weight
bearing area
If anatomy cannot be restored
and maintained - THA
•My learning curve•No respect for the amount of
displacement or timing of injury
•Reduction on the OR table is critical
•Critical evaluation is:
• “Can a stable construct of the calcar be accomplished?”
• “is it worth trying to saving the hip in this particular patient?”
11/18/2015
16
Calcar reduction possible?
•Compression at the time of surgery
•Construct should allow post op compression without excess sliding capability
•Fixed angle to maintain alignment
Convinced
•Can heal displaced femoral fractures•Reliably
•Near anatomically
•Without significant clinical risk related to AVN