niacin - aaps_poster_niacin
TRANSCRIPT
8/7/2019 Niacin - AAPS_Poster_Niacin
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/niacin-aapsposterniacin 1/1
# T3248
Table 1.
Formulations for tablets used in study.
Formulation:
A
B
C
D
Niacin (mg) 250 500 750 1000Polymer (mg) 300* 100 112.5 100Electrolyte (mg) 100 25 56.25 50Lubricant (mg) 10 13 18.75 23.5* Denotes different polymer selection
Table 3.
Variations on components of Formulation A & B (table 1)
F
ormulation Niacin Polymer Electrolyte Lubrican t
A +/- 10% Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged
A Unchanged +/- 10% Unchanged Unchanged
A Unchanged Unchanged +/- 10% Unchanged
A Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged +/- 10%
B +/- 10% Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged
B Unchanged +/- 10% Unchanged Unchanged
B Unchanged Unchanged +/- 10% Unchanged
B Unchanged Unchanged Unchanged +/- 10%
Table 4.Tablet characteristics. Example of Formulation A (table 1)
Formula A
Hardness (kP)
Friability (% )
Hardness (kP)
Friability (% )
Time Point Accelerated Accelerated Ambient Ambient
0 (months)* - - 14.49 0.114
4 (months) 12.48 0.110 14.14 0.070
5 (months) 11.66 0.063 13.79 0.004*Note: Exam performed at 1 month after date of manufacture.
Niacin release studies The physical form of niacin used did not significantly affect the in vitro dissolution profile. We
were able to produce equivalent dissolution profiles with b oth the fine powder, granular and agglomeratedniacin (graph 1) when compared to the reference listed drug.
Dissolution trials utilized various physiologically significant dissolution media in order tosimulate the conditions the formulation may come into contact with during transit through the gut. The invitro release of the niacin was not significantly affected by the pH of the dissolution media (graph 2) andmaintained equivalent performance when compared to the reference-listed drug. These results indicatethat the delivery within this novel formulation will be capable of high levels of precision and p erformanceequal to other environmentally independent systems like osmotic pumps.
Dissolution trials were also run at various paddle speeds in order to vary the hydrodynamiceffects and challenge the ruggedness of the formulation. Results indicate that there is no significantdifference in the in vitro dissolution profiles regardless of the paddle rpm (graph 3), which supports theenhanced performance of the delivery system. The increase in hydrodynamics typically increases theerosional impact on the dissolution of the active ingredient. Th e dissolution profiles at the higher rpm’sare not significantly different from each other, with exception to the slowest rpm (graph 3). T hisformulation offers improved release performance in a highly robust and rugged system that is capable of release independent from the environment or other physical effects that occur with the GI.
In order to test the flexibility and forgiveness of the formulation, the individual components werealtered (table 3) to simulate potential problems in processing that may lead to poor content uniformity.The in vitro dissolution profiles were monitored and compared to the unaltered formulation. The rate of release did not significantly change with alterations of the formula (graph 4 & 5) however, the amplitudewas affected in the cases where the active ingredient was increased or reduced when compared to the
original formulation. T he formulation is capable of handling changes, as high as 20%, which supports itsflexibility and forgiveness on the manufacturing scale. The formulation demonstrates that it has thecapability to handle slight variations that may occur during processing and allows for simple processtroubleshooting.
The in vitro release studies demonstrrated the robustness and ruggedness of this formulation. Thisformulation will enable the efficient manufacture, on an industrial scale, of controlled release niacintablets capable of mimicking the in vitro release characteristics of the reference listed drug and othercurrent niacin preparations. Independence of the environment provides evidence to the improved releasewhen compared to simple matrix style diffusion limited formulations. The a bility to self-correct and beindependent of erosional forces alludes to the precision of this formulation. The flexibility andforgiveness demonstrates the ease of manufacture and further enhances the robustness and ruggedness of the formulation.
Development of a High Dru g Load Monolithic Contr olled Release Oral DelS. Turner, M. Hite, C . Federici Nutr aceutix, Inc. Redmond, WA. 98052 and R . Fassihi Ph .D. School of Pha
Purpose. To design a monolithic, solid oral dosage form ca pable of 12-hour near zero-order releasedelivery of high load niacin preparations. Methods. Three formulations using polyethylene oxide andsodium bicarbonate salts were developed to represent clinically relevant dosage strengths of niacin at500mg, 750mg, and 1000mg for direct compression tableting and s cale up operation. Dissolution studieswere conducted using USP 24 apparatus II, at 50 rpm in 0.1N HCl over 12 hours. Tablet hardness,friability, weight and dry blend characterization were conducted to ensure smooth manufacturability.Results. The physical characteristics of tablets, including friability, content uniformity and hardness werewithin the USP 24 limits. Near zero-order release over 12-hours was achieved and featured completeelease of the drug at different loading doses using a proportional formula. Conclusions. Results
suggest this monolithic formulation is capable of delivering high drug load with minimum burst for 12ours, utilizing a mechanism of polymer-electrolyte hydration in this robust and directly compressible
Objectives:
1.Develop a formulation capable of controlled release of a highly soluble drug.
2.Develop a formulation capable of high drug load with minimal controlling excipient.
500mg, 750mg, and 1000mg Niacin CR
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0. 00 2 .0 0 4 .0 0 6. 00 8 .0 0 10 .0 0 12 .0 0 14. 00 16 .0 0
Time (hr)
Corrected release
1000mg
500mg
750mg
Graph 3.Combined in vitro dissolution profiles of finished tablets. Formulation A, compresII, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 rp m’s, 900mL aqueous media at 37 degrees C).
250mg OTC Niacin F22
0.0000
0.2000
0.4000
0.6000
0.8000
1.0000
0 .0 0 2 .0 0 4 .0 0 6 .0 0 8 .0 0 1 0. 00 1 2. 00 1 4
Time (hr)
Fractional release
Graph 2.Combined in vitro dissolution profiles of finished tablets. Formulation A, compresII, 50 rpm, 900mL aqueous media 0.1 N HCl, pH’s 3.0, 5.4, 6.8, 7.8 at 37 degrees
250mg OTC Niacin, F22
0.0000
0.1000
0.2000
0.3000
0.4000
0.5000
0.6000
0.7000
0.8000
0.9000
1.0000
0 .0 0 2 .0 0 4 .0 0 6 .0 0 8 .0 0 1 0. 00 1 2. 00 1 4. 00
Time (hr)
Fractional release
Graph 1.
Combined in vitro dissolution profiles. Formulation A, using fine powder and aggltons (USP 24 apparatus II, 50 rpm, 900mL aqueous media pH 7.0 at 37 degrees C.)
500 mg Niacin CDT, F20 & F20a Comparison; 01-22-0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 .0 0 2 .0 0 4 .0 0 6 .0 0 8 .0 0 1 0. 00 1
Time (hr)
Corrected Release