next generation energy storage - ny-best · · 2016-10-26natural gas turbine. jcesr: beyond...
TRANSCRIPT
JOINT CENTER FORENERGY STORAGE RESEARCH
Next Generation Energy Storage
George CrabtreeDirector, JCESR
Argonne National LaboratoryUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
OutlineThe Energy Storage Challenge: Transportation and the Electricity Grid
Beyond Lithium-ion ConceptsFour Proof of Principal Prototypes
NY-BEST Energy Storage ConferenceSyracuse, NY
October 20, 2016
Automated Mobility Services Require Cheaper, Higher Performing Batteries Personal Electronics
Lithium-ion batteries enabledthe personal electronics revolution
Forever changed the way we interact with people and information
Transportation: $20K electric cars Diversity transportation fuelsLower carbon emissionsReduce energy useLower operating costs
Grid-scale electricity storageWidespread deployment of wind and solar
Enhance reliability, flexibility, resilienceUncouple instantaneous generation
from instantaneous demand
~ 2% of US energyPersonal electronics
28% of US energyTransportation
39% of US energyElectricity grid
TRA
NS
PO
RTA
TIO
NG
RID
$100/kWh
400 Wh/kg 400 Wh/L
800 W/kg 800 W/L
1000 cycles
80% DoD C/5
15 yr calendar life
EUCAR
$100/kWh
95% round-trip efficiency at C/5 rate
7000 cycles C/5
20 yr calendar life
Safety equivalent to a natural gas turbine
JCESR: Beyond Lithium-ion Batteries for Cars and the Grid Vision
Transform transportation and the electricity grid with high performance, low cost energy storage
MissionDeliver electrical energy storage with five times the energy
density and one-fifth the cost of today’s commercial batteries within five years
Legacies• A library of the fundamental science of the materials and
phenomena of energy storage at atomic and molecular levels
• Two prototypes, one for transportation and one for the electricity grid, that, when scaled up to manufacturing, have the potential to meet JCESR’s transformative goals
• A new paradigm for battery R&D that integrates discovery science, battery design, research prototyping and manufacturing collaboration in a single highly interactive organization
JCESR’s Beyond Lithium-ion Concepts
Multivalent Intercalation
Chemical Transformation
Replace monovalent Li+ with di- or tri-valent ions: Mg++, Ca++, Al+++, . . .
Double or triple capacity
Replace solid electrodes with liquid organic solutions or suspensions:
lower cost, higher capacity, greater flexibility
Macromolecular Organic Redox Flow
Lithium-ion “Rocking Chair”Li+ cycles between anode and cathode,
storing and releasing energy
Replace intercalation with high energy chemical reaction: Li-S, Li-O, Na-S, . . .
e
Li+Li metal anode
Sulfurcathode
Li+
e
Metal oxide
cathode
Graphite anode Liquid
organic electrolyte
Mg++
e
Metal oxide
cathode
Mg metalanode Liquid
organic electrolyte
Liquid organic
electrolyte
Redox Active Colloid
Redox Active Polymer
Redox Active Oligomer
Redox Active Molecule
Proof-of-concept
Prototypes Transportation
Grid
Organic Redox Flow
TE modeling
Genome
Synthesis
EDL
MaterialsComponentsIntegration
Li-Sulfur StationaryLi-O
Li-S Flow
Four Prototype Targets
Air-Breathing Aqueous
Sulfur
Science-Driven Outcomes
MultivalentMg++, . . .
Science-Driven Outcomes
Final Prototype Targets Selected Jan 2016
JCESR Spins Out Two Startups
Nitash Balsara, Alex Teran and Joe DeSimone (UNC)Inorganic-polymer hybrids for Li anode batteriesVillaluenga et al, PNAS 113, 52, (2015)
Robin Johnston, Michel Fouré, Brett Helms and Peter Frischmann
Lightweight energy storage for the electrification of flight
Li et al, Nano Lett. 15, 5724 (2015)Best All-around Team
Bay Area I-Corps competition
Blue Current
Sepion
Engaging the private sectorTraining next generation entrepreneurs
Building JCESR relationships
Further ReadingJonathan Walker and Charlie Johnson, Peak Car Ownership: The Market Opportunity of Electric Automated Mobility Services, Rocky Mountain Institute, 2016, http://www.rmi.org/peak_car_ownership.
Jeffery B. Greenblatt and Samveg Saxena, Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles, Nature Climate Change 5, 860 (2015).
George Crabtree, Elizabeth Kocs and Lynn Trahey, The Storage Frontier: Lithium-ion Batteries and Beyond, MRS Bulletin 40, 1067 (2015).
Why Energy Storage May Be the Most Important Technology in the World Right NowForbes Apr 1, 2016
Frontiers of EnergyNature Energy Jan 11, 2016Ten experts, including JCESR’s George Crabtree, share their vision of coming energy challenges
Perspective: The Energy Storage RevolutionNature Oct 28, 2015How next-generation storage can change the car and the grid
Lithium Batteries: To the Limits of LithiumNature Oct 28, 2015
Why We Need A Revolution in Energy StoragePBS Jan 5, 2016
Li-ion
Li-ion
Development of Lithium Batteries
1970-2015
Gravim
etric Energy Density (W.h/kg)
Cost
(US$
/kW
. h)
3000
2000
1000
0
300
200
100
0
Year
20151970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Ni-MHNi-Cd
1971Conceptualization
1991Commercialization
Crabtree, Kocs, Trahey, MRS Bulletin 40, 1067 (2015)
Lessons from Lithium-ion Batteries
Long incubation period
Lithium-ion battery of 1991looked nothing like
the 1970s vision
Many (most) good ideas fail
Multiple paths forward are critical
20 year
incubation
JCESR Creates a New Paradigm for Battery R&D
Multivalent Intercalation
Chemical Transformation
Non-Aqueous Redox Flow
CR
OS
SC
UTT
ING
S
CIE
NC
E
SystemsAnalysis and Translation
Cell Designand
Prototyping
Commercial Deployment
Battery Design
Research Prototyping
Manufacturing Collaboration
MATERIALSPROJECT
Sprints
Discovery Science++
TECHNO-ECONOMIC MODELING“Building battery systems on the computer”
ELECTROCHEMICAL DISCOVERY LAB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEzsKJwYjDQ
Focus exclusively on beyond lithium ion
A single highly interactive organization
Multivalent Intercalation
One working example: Mg++ in Chevrel phase Mo6S8, Aurbach et al (2000), Levi et al (2006)
ConceptReplace Li+ with Mg++, Ca++, Zn++Advantage: double the energy per ion transfer
++
e
MV metalanode
Intercalation cathode
Organic electrolyte
Mg++
Ca++
Zn++
Why is progress so slow?Too many candidates, too few winners
Inadequate fundamental understanding for rational design
ChallengesMany cathodes operate at low voltage low energy densityDivalent ions move slowly in cathode slow charge, dischargeElectrolytes decompose at desirable cathode voltagesAnode surface degradation on plating and stripping
Promising Mg Cathodes
Mo6S8 Cr2S4
Ti2S4
Cr2O4
Ni2O4
Co2O4
Mn2O4
ps-Mn2O4
ps-Co2O4
BL-V2O5
Where we are going
Where we are Diameter ~ mobility
Dotted lines: cathode-only energy density
Trends
Voltage: Oxides higher than sulfides
Capacity: Oxides higher than sulfides
Mobility: Sulfides higher than oxides
Synthesis: Sulfides easier than oxides
Lithium-Sulfur Challenges e
Li+Li metal anode
Sulfurcathode
S8 (s) + 16 Li ↔ 8 Li2S (s)
U = 2.2 V vs Li
S Li2SLi2Sx
Li2S8
Li2S6 Li2S4
Li2S?Sx
2-
Polysulfides: Li2Sx
• soluble in electrolyte• migrate to anode • react with Li precipitate • depletes Li and S • limits cycle life
Li-electrolyte side reactionDepletes Li and electrolyteLimits cyclesConventional fix: large excess of Li and electrolyte
Li dendrite growth• cycling roughens Li surface• dendrites form and grow • break off to deplete Li• grow across electrolyte to
short cathode
Li dendrite
Plating
JCESRmembrane in contact with Li anode surfaceMaintain coherent interface as Li strips and plates through membrane
JCESR • “lean” electrolyte• sparing solvation• solvates Li and anion, but
not polysulfides
JCESR Protective membrane
• blocks electrolyte• allows Li conduction
anode cathodeelectrolyte
Functionalized grapheneoxide membrane
JCESR Prototypes Constructed and Tested Push State-of-the-Art
JCESR today: 1 Ah Li/S cell (6 layers)• 270% excess Li• 1.7 mLElectrolyte/gSulfur lean electrolyte• > 4.5 mAh/cm2 areal charge density in cathode
JCESR targets • < 100% excess Li • 1 mLElectrolyte/gSulfur• > 8 mAh/cm2
1 M LiTFSI, 0.2 M LiNO3DOL:DME (v/v)
Chen et al., in prep (2016)
Rese
arch
Indu
stry
SO
A
JCES
R to
day
JCES
R ta
rget
JCES
R to
day
JCES
R ta
rget
Eroglu et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 162(6) A982 (2015)
ActiveMaterial
US$/kg Ah/kg US$/kAh
LiCoO2 40.0 136.92 138.7
Graphite 10.0 371.90 26.9
Li 66.4 3861.26 17.20
Na 2.0 1165.78 1.72
S 0.20 1671.67 0.12
Air-Breathing Aqueous Sulfur Flow BatteryTeam: MIT (Chiang, Brushett), LBNL (Helms), Waterloo (Nazar)
16 TWh of Li/S batteries
~ 4M cubic meters of sulfur from oil sands Fort McMurray, Alberta
• Ultralow $/Ah cost of sulfur • High solubility in water 4X the energy density
of V-redox solutions
Wind farms baseload powerSeasonal energy storage, summer winter
Can inexpensive, large scale electrochemical storage compete
with pumped hydro and compressed air?
T-E model includes everything including profit marginPHS = pumped hydroelectric storage
CAES = compressed air energy storage
Where Aqueous Sulfur fits in the world of grid storage
100-300h storage to turn a windfarm into baseload power
Testing Air-Breathing Aqueous S Flow BatteryFull cell reaction
2Na2S + O2↑+ 2H2SO4⇄ 2S + 2Na2SO4 + 2H2O
H2OSn
2-
Na+
OH-
(+) Positive (-) Negative
A-io
n co
nduc
ting
solid
ele
ctro
lyte
O2
Na+
e-
O2H+
Na+
SO42-
O2 + 4H+ + 4e-
2H2OS2- S + 2e-
(discharge)
Pump
Cell
Reservoirs
In 2014, JCESR Introduced the Concept of Macromolecular-based Redox Electrolytes . . .
Elec
trod
e Pa
rtic
le S
ize
RAC105-109
redox unitsColloid
RAP10 -1000
redox unitPolymer
RAO2 -10
redox unitsOligomer
RAM1 redox unitMolecule
AdvantagesInexpensiveRecyclableDesign for• Solubility• Stability• Activity• Size selectivity
. . . and the field gains momentum as others follow our lead . . . Synthesis and characterization of TEMPO- and viologen-polymers for water-based redox-flow batteries, Polym. Chem., 6, 7801-7811 (2015)
Poly(TEMPO)/Zinc Hybrid-Flow Battery: A Novel, Green, High Voltage, and Safe Energy Storage System, Adv. Mater. 28, 2238–2243 (2016)
Poly(boron-dipyrromethene)—A Redox-Active Polymer Class for Polymer Redox-Flow Batteries, Chem. Mater., Article ASAP Publication Date (Web): May 6, 2016
CelgardInexpensiveoff the shelf
Polymer Intrinsic Microporous (PIM) membranes developed in JCESR for Li-S
polysulfide selectivityTunable pore size ~ 1 nm
Li et al., Nano Letters, 15, 5724 (2015)
JCESR’s Macromolecular Organic Flow Cell Directions
0 2 4 6 80.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Volta
ge (V
)
Time (Hour)
Full cells of all four types routinely cycled
Target for next 18 monthsPrimary: RAO-PIM for cost target
Secondary: RAP-Celgard for cost -performance comparison
based on TE modeling