network neutrality rules for a digital economy · network neutrality rules for a digital economy...
TRANSCRIPT
Network Neutrality Rules
for a Digital Economy
Barbara van Schewick
Professor of Law and (by Courtesy) Electrical Engineering,
Stanford University
@vanschewick
11th International CRC Workshop on Regulation
August 29, 2016
I. Background
II. Criteria for Evaluating Net Neutrality Rules
III. Rules
IV. Zero-rating
2
I. Background
3
What is network neutrality?
4
Original Internet
5
Network is application-blind
6
Network can’t control
7
Users decide
8
Today network can control
9
Network neutrality rules
limit network providers‘ ability to interfere
10
I. Background
11
II. Criteria for Evaluating Net Neutrality Rules
12
13
Factors
14
Story 1
15
17
Architecture
18
19
The End-to-End Arguments
(Broad Version)
Network to provide only general services
of broad utility across applications
Network not optimized in favor of specific applications
All application-specific functionality at end hosts
Two versions
20
21
The End-to-End Arguments
(Broad Version)
Network to provide only general services
of broad utility across applications
Network not optimized in favor of specific applications
All application-specific functionality at end hosts
Network is general
22
Innovators decide independently
23
Network is general
24
Users decide independently
25
Low cost of innovation
26
Many different people can innovate
27
Innovation without permission
28
Innovation without permission
User Choice
29
Innovation without permission
User Choice
Low costs of innovation,
very large and diverse group of innovators
30
Story 2
31
32
33
Architecture
34
35
The End-to-End Arguments
Broad Version
Network only general services of broad utility across
applications
Network not optimized in favor of specific applications
All application-specific functionality at end hosts
Consequence: Network is application-blind
Network is application-blind
36
Network can’t control
37
Today network can control
38
Increase profits
39
Unwanted content
40
Manage bandwidth
41
Network can control.
Innovators don’t innovate.
Investors don’t invest.
42
Users decide
vs.
Network providers decide
43
The Impact of Changes
44
45
Market?
€$
€ $€$
Potential Innovator
Benefits > Costs?
Yes:
InnovateNo:
Do not Innovate
Economic Theory
CostsBenefits
46
Market?
€$
€ $€$
Potential Innovator
Benefits > Costs?
Yes:
InnovateNo:
Do not Innovate
Economic Theory
CostsBenefits
Many different innovators decide.
User decide.
47
More and more diverse
vs.
Fewer and less diverse
48
Under uncertainty or user heterogeneity
More and better innovation
that better meets user needs
49
More and more diverse innovators
50
More and more diverse ideas
51
More ideas realized
52
Less and less diverse innovators
53
Less ideas realized
54
Widespread experimentation
Large, diverse group of innovators
55
Users decide
vs.
Network providers decide
56
Innovation without permission
57
Innovation without permission
User choice
58
Innovation without permission
User choice
Network can’t control
59
Innovation without permission
User choice
Application-blindness
Low costs of innovation,
very large and diverse group of innovators
60
III. Rules
61
62
Blocking
Discrimination
Limits on Charging Application Providers
63
Blocking
Discrimination
Limits on Charging Application Providers
64
Blocking
Discrimination
Limits on Charging Application Providers
No discrimination
Between applications and classes of applications
65
Netflix & YouTube vs. XFinityTV.com
66
Internet telephony vs. Online video
67
No discrimination
Between applications and classes of applications
Allow application-agnostic discrimination
68
Exception:
69
Reasonable network management
70
Targeted, tailored
As application-agnostic as possible
71
72
Blocking
Discrimination
Limits on Charging Application Providers
Limits on Charging
* for access to users
* for preferential treatment
73
No discrimination based on provider payments
74
75
76
77
78
Innovation and economic growth
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
All sectors of the economy
87
Democracy and culture
88
89
90
91
92
Collateral damage
93
The devil is in the details
94
Network Neutrality and Quality of Service
95
IV. Zero-rating
96
Zero-rating
Exempting applications from data caps
97
How to think about zero-rating?
98
99
makes zero-rated apps more attractive
100
makes zero-rated apps more attractive
powerful tool to favor some apps over others
101
makes zero-rated apps more attractive
powerful tool to favor some apps over others
same problems as technical discrimination
data
102
powerful impact on user behavior
103
users strongly prefer zero-rated content
104
zero-rating directly limits user choice
105
106
unlimited video
vs.
9 min per day
107
108
109
four forms of zero-rating
110
111
zero-rating for a fee
112
zero-rating for a fee
zero-rating some apps, but not similar apps
113
zero-rating for a fee
zero-rating some apps, but not similar apps
zero-rating all apps in a class
114
zero-rating for a fee
zero-rating some apps, but not similar apps
zero-rating all apps in a class
application-agnostic zero-rating
zero-rating for a fee
115
zero-rating for a fee
same problems as fast lanes
116
zero-rating some apps, but not similar apps
117
zero-rating some apps, but not similar apps
(no fee)
118
zero-rating some apps, but not similar apps
(no fee)
same problems as speeding up some apps
119
120
zero-rating all apps in a class
121
zero-rating all apps in a class
(no fee)
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
slippery slope
131
environment for innovation
132
who gets to chose
133
harm to consumers
134
application-agnostic zero-rating
135
application-agnostic zero-rating
(no fee)
136
137
138
139
140
141
More:
@vanschewick
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/people/barbara-van-schewick
142
143
144
Interconnection with last-mile networks
145
146
147
Is this a network neutrality problem?
148
149
150
151
152
153
154