net neutrality: in support of the 2015 open internet order
TRANSCRIPT
The Open Internet Order is Clear
Clarity is necessary
The Open Internet Order provides clear, bright-line rules
The Open Internet Order is Clear
1) No blocking2) No throttling3) No paid prioritization4) No unreasonable
interference/disadvantages5) Enhanced transparency
The Open Internet Order is Clear
Applies to mass-market internet service providers
Allows for reasonable network management
Exempts “specialized services”
The Open Internet Order is Reasonable
Purpose – maintain and promote an open internet as a “virtuous cycle of
innovation”
Rules are narrowly tailored
Innovation in specialized services promoted
The Open Internet Order is Reasonable
Forbearance of many Title II regulations
Wireless given greater leeway
Waivers available for essentially everything
The Open Internet Order is Necessary
ISPs are in a position to be a direct threat to “virtuous cycle of
innovation”
They have the incentive
The Open Internet Order is Necessary
ISPs are in a position to be a direct threat to “virtuous cycle of
innovation”
They have the ability
The Open Internet Order is Necessary
ISPs are in a position to be a direct threat to “virtuous cycle of
innovation”
They have a terrible track record
The Open Internet Order is Necessary
ISPs have:• Banned wi-fi networks, VPNs, and
home networking• Threatened criminal action against
anyone using for commercial purpose• Blocked competing VoIP (wire line
and wireless)• Interfered with peer-to-peer
networking (and lied about it)
The Open Internet Order is Necessary
ISPs have:• Exempted their own services from caps
applicable to competing services• Throttled unlimited data plans (and lied
about it)• Blocked smartphone tethering• Blocked Apple’s FaceTime app• Blocked Google Wallet (then released
their own version
The Open Internet Order is Necessary
Increased horizontal integration has reduced user choice
Increased vertical integration has increased opportunity to unjustly
benefit