national tertiary sector analysis€¦ · fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector ee/res...

91
1 NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS Factsheets on best practice in the tertiary sector EE/RES

Upload: others

Post on 25-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

1

NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS Factsheets on best practice in the tertiary sector EE/RES

Page 2: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

2

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

DOCUMENT TITLE

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES applications

DOCUMENT TYPE

Deliverable D2.1 (WP2 – T2.1)

VERSION

Version 3.0

DATE

30/06/2018

AUTHORS

Chiara Wolter, Ambiente Italia

Guillaume de Laboulaye, ENERGIES 2050

Marko Bisčan, Marko Karan, Energy Institut Hrvoje Požar

Maria Frangou, Stavroula Tournaki; Technical University of Crete

Neuza Rosa, Jesus Ferreira Consultores

Pedro Luis Espejo, Paolo Michele Sonvilla, CREARA

EDITORS

Pedro Luis Espejo, CREARA Consultores

Paolo Michele Sonvilla, CREARA Consultores

PROJECT SUMMARY

Achieving the European Union’s 2020 energy efficiency targets and at the same time reducing its

dependency on energy imports is a huge task that requires innovative approaches and tools – such

as the ones Trust EPC South wants to provide.

The Trust EPC South project aims to unleash the tertiary sector market potential for energy

efficiency investments in Southern Europe by developing a new investment assessment instrument

backed by an established building rating methodology (Green Rating™). Such instrument shall support

energy service companies (EPC providers and facilitators), financing institutions and tertiary market

actors thanks to the application of a standardised methodology to the investment assessment and

decision processes, ultimately allowing to reduce barriers to energy efficiency investments.

Trust EPC South, a project financed by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme, will pursue

its ambitious objectives in Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Croatia and Greece. The project

consortium, led by the Spanish firm CREARA, is composed by interdisciplinary experts representing the

participating countries and by the international non-profit organisation Green Rating Alliance. The

partners are united by the common intent to stimulate investments in the target markets, which are

offering great opportunities for energy efficiency as well as energy performance contracting.

Page 3: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

3

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROJECT SUMMARY 2

INTRODUCTION 4

ACCRONYMS 5

OVERVIEW OF BEST PRACTICES 6

OVERVIEW OF PILOT PROJECTS 8

BEST PRACTICES FACTSHEETS 11

PILOT PROJECTS FACTSHEETS 44

Page 4: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

4

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

INTRODUCTION

Within the scope of Trust EPC South, the project consortium initially conducted a thorough market

analysis in the six southern European participating countries. This analysis includes an advanced state

of the art of sustainable energy solutions for the tertiary sector and the characterisation of the

corresponding tertiary sector segments, the assessment of market barriers as well as the presentation

of available financing solutions. It also includes the evaluation of the most promising sustainable energy

projects or “best practices”, which are presented in this report.

These best practices have been used to generate standardised sustainable energy project technical

functional models that have been used to develop the GREPCon tool. Thirty three (33) factsheets are

presented in this report to show which are the most common solutions used and outline how they are

being implemented, how they are financed and what are the other conditions for success.

Additionally, at the end of the project, this document has been complemented with 46 factsheets

describing the pilot projects identified and supported by Trust EPC South’s in the six participating

countries.

The factsheets cover the main tertiary sector segments: Retail, Health, Hospitality, Offices, Sports

Centres or Education. Since the purpose is mainly to highlight the most promising sustainable energy

solutions, and due to the challenging EPC market conditions in the participating countries, not all of the

projects chosen involve EPC contracts, but also other more traditional arrangements such as energy

supply contracts or turnkey projects.

They also cover a wide range of measures, from boilers’ replacement to optimisation of energy

management systems, energy monitoring tools, and the installation of renewable energy sources. The

interventions on the building envelope are less represented due to their long investment recovery times.

For each factsheet, a set of over 20 indicators is provided, divided into four areas:

• Introductory information including segment of activity and stakeholders involved;

• The project’s context, where the facility and initial situation/energy use are described;

• Specifications of the contract: including duration, planned savings, contractual details, financing

arrangements and results;

• Additional comments have also been added when relevant to further detail the project and its

specificities (elements for success, advantages for the clients, etc.).

The choice of the indicators has been made to create synergies with existing initiatives such as

TRANSPARENSE and EESI2020, but also to give a comprehensive overview and thus reinforce our

analysis on potential EE and RES applications in tertiary sectors. One important criteria used in the

selection of the best practice cases is their replicability, as one aim of our work is to stimulate the

development of further implementations.

Page 5: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

5

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

ACCRONYMS

CCHP: Combined Cooling, Heating and Power:

DH: District Heating

DH&C: District Heating and Cooling

DHW: Domestic Hot Water

EE: Energy efficiency

ESCO: Energy Service Company

EPC: Energy Performance Contract

FEDENE: Fédération des Services Énergie Environnement

H&C: Heating and Cooling

HVAC: Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning

IPMVP: International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol

IRR: Internal Rate of Return

LED: Light Emitting Diode

PV: Photovoltaic

RES: Renewable Energy Source

ROI: Return on Investment

ST: Solar Thermal Systems

TPF: Third Party Financing

Page 6: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

6

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

OVERVIEW OF BEST PRACTICES

Code Tertiary Segment Client Summary - main fields of action

ES1 Retail CC parque sur de Madrid Efficient Lighting and HVAC systems

ES2 Health Hospital La Paz Various EE measures

ES3 Hospitality Confidential More efficient thermal power

ES4 Education Confidential Efficient lighting and HVAC systems

ES5 Retail Berriak Monitoring, efficient lighting and others

ES6 Health Hospital Virgen de la Poveda

Efficient lighting, monitoring, heat pumps, building insulation

ES7 Offices Stratenergy Optimal energy use, efficient lighting, insulation, heat pumps

FR1 Hospitality Groupe Accor Boiler replacement, hot water exchanger, Building Management System, buffer for iced water

FR2 Retail Carrefour Refrigeration systems, closer management, remote monitoring, training and awareness raising

FR3 Retail Logidis Comptoirs Modernes Evaporators' fans, Refrigerating systems

FR4 Education Sup'Elec and CESAL Heating system management, efficient lighting, rescheduling

FR5 Retail Ubinail Rodamco Regulation of heat pumps, Management of roof top, Ventilation and lighting

FR6 Health Clinic of Saint Priest - Private hospital of Lyon East

Building Management System, boiler, awareness raising

FR7 Health CHU Toulouse - Energy pole PURPAN

Raising awareness, Set point temperatures regulation, ventilation, management of pumps' speed, biomass heaters and heat recovery

GR1 Offices KG Law Firm Efficient lighting, monitoring and energy management, boilers, insulation, heat exchanger for hot water

GR2 Hospitality Mistral Hotel Automatic controls, monitoring and management

GR3 Hospitality Hotel Solar protection, efficient lighting, automatic controls, monitoring and management, PVs, ST, heat pumps

GR4 Health Mpodosakeio Hospital Efficient Lighting

GR5 Offices Administration of Western Macedonia

Efficient Lighting

HR1 Hospitality Adriainvest Inženjering Solar collectors, Heat recovery, PV systems, building management system

Page 7: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

7

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

Code Tertiary Segment Client Summary - main fields of action

HR2 Offices Crosco Low temperature hot water boilers feed with natural gas

IT1 Retail Conad del Tirreno Efficient refrigeration, lighting, air conditioning, management; structural revamping, internal layout.

IT2 Sport Center Palasport Treviglio Review of lighting system

IT3 Hospitality Confidential Building insulation, solar protection and PV plant

IT4 Sport Center Confidential Centralised heat generation, heat recovery, metering devices, lighting

IT5 Offices/Hospitality Confidential Thermal insulation, windows replacement, lighting, PV plant

PT1 Hospitality Confidential Various EE measures

PT2 Hospitality Confidential PV generation plant

PT3 Health Long-term Care Facilities PV generation plant

PT4 Health Retirement Home and Day Care Center

PV plant, solar thermal panels, biomass boilers, heat pumps, pipe insulation, efficient lighting, monitoring

PT5 Sport Center Indoor swimming pool Pipe insulation, lighting, isothermal pool cover, solar thermal, monitoring

PT6 Retail Hypermarket Lighting

PT7 Health Confidential Biomass boiler and lighting

Page 8: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

8

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

OVERVIEW OF PILOT PROJECTS

Code Segment Type of building Main measures Level of

Investment (k€) Projected

Savings (MWh/y)

PP01 Education University Lighting, boiler burners,

thermostatic valves, occupancy sensors…

238 112

PP02 Education University

Sun shading devices, Lighting, Occupancy

sensors, Variable frequency drives for pumps, PV plant

237 237

PP03 Hospitality Apart Hotel Lighting, water saving

aerators, BMS, PV and solar thermal plants

89 166

PP04 Office Modern offices Efficient lighting, presence

sensors, energy star procedure in computers

130 362

PP05 Tertiary services

Offices and other tertiary

Efficient lighting, presence sensors, Inverted chiller

200 137

PP06 Tertiary services

Ederly residence and offices

Efficient lighting, presence sensors, variable frequency drives for pumps and solar

thermal plant

162 327

PP07 Commerce Shopping mall Efficient lighting, presence sensors, BMS, PV plant

946 1031

PP08 Commerce Shopping mall Efficient lighting, BMS, PV

plant 240 356

PP09 Hospitality Hotel Efficient lighting, variable

frequency drives for pumps 73 285

PP10 Hospitality Hotel Efficient lighting, variable

frequency drives for pumps 125 409

PP11 Hospitality Hotel

Efficient lighting, presence sensors, Biomass boiler,

Solar thermal and PV plant, pipework insulation

411 321

PP12 Education School, offices and dormitories

Windows replacement, HVAC schedule definition, Efficient lighting, BMS, PV

plant

47 112

PP13 Education School, offices and dormitories

HVAC schedule definition, Efficient lighting,

Thermostatic valves, PV plant

50 126

PP14 Hospitality Hotel Efficient lighting, HVAC

schedule definition, Solar thermal plant

40 77

PP15 Hospitality Hotel

Efficient lighting, windows replacement, building

insulation, thermostatic valves

51 40

Page 9: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

9

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

Code Segment Type of building Main measures Level of

Investment (k€) Projected

Savings (MWh/y)

PP16 Education School, offices and dormitories

HVAC schedule definition, Efficient lighting,

Thermostatic valves 65 107

PP17 Hospitality Hotel Windows replacement, sun shading devices, efficient

lighting 65 43

PP18 Offices Modern offices HVAC schedule, Efficient

lighting, PV plant 45 172

PP19 Commerce Retails Efficient Lighting 184 694

PP20 Logistics Storage and

offices Efficient lighting, BMS,

building insulation 183 956

PP21 Offices Offices Windows replacement,

efficient lighting, automatic doors and presence sensors

38 43

PP22 Offices Offices

Efficient lighting, Variable Frequency drives, Window films, solar thermal and PV

plants

110 229

PP23 Hospitality Hotel and restaurant

PV plant, efficient lighting and appliances, presence

sensors 104 195

PP24 Hospitality Hotel and

restaurant, spa

Inverter chiller, Heat recovery systems, Building insulation, Substitution of windows, Solar thermal

plant, Swimming pool heat cover, Efficient lighting

539 1002

PP25 Leisure Leisure/Sports

centre

Inverter chiller, boiler replacement, air curtains, window films, PV Plant

178 410

PP26 Health Hospital Boiler replacement, heat

recovery, window films, PV plant

600 1602

PP27 Hospitality Hotel Efficient lighting, solar

thermal plant 10 130

PP28 Hospitality Hotel Efficient lighting, PV plant 32 12

PP29 Offices Offices Efficient lighting and

inverted chillers 686 1601

PP30 Leisure Public pools Condensing boilers, Solar

thermal plant, HVAC reconstruction

426 1328

PP31 Health Thalasso Heat pump, solar thermal,

efficient lighting 500 1110

Page 10: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

10

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

Code Segment Type of building Main measures Level of

Investment (k€) Projected

Savings (MWh/y)

PP32 Hospitality Hotel

Inverter chiller, Building insulation, Substitution of windows, Efficient lighting,

HVAC schedule, condensation boiler

441 543

PP33 Hospitality Hostel Building insulation, Efficient

lighting and presence sensors, condensation boiler

133 192

PP34 Commerce Shopping mall Efficient lighting, Variable Frequency drives, HVAC

schedule, PV plant 529 754

PP35 Tertiary services

Bank office Windows replacement and

building insulation 490 285

PP36 Education Primary school Efficient lighting, biomass boiler, building insulation,

PC Plant 268 172

PP37 Leisure Sport centre

Building insulation, Substitution of windows,

presence sensors, condensing boiler

140 266

PP38 Leisure Sport centre

Inverter chiller, Thermostatic valves, Building insulation, ,

Efficient lighting, condensation boiler

91 253

PP39 Office Offices Efficient lighting,

condensation boiler, PV Plant

143 120

PP40 Education School Building insulation, , Efficient lighting, condensation boiler

189 205

PP41 Leisure Sport centre Efficient lighting,

condensation boiler, roof insulation

94 105

PP42 Hospitality Buildings complex

Efficient lighting, PV and solar thermal plants

166 140

PP43 Education School Efficient lighting, PV and

solar thermal plants, BMS 89 78

PP44 Tertiary services

Offices and shopping mall

Efficient lighting, BMS 48 67

PP45 Offices Offices Efficient lighting,

condensation boiler 19 109

PP46 Offices Offices Efficient lighting,

condensation boiler 19 109

Page 11: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

11

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BEST PRACTICES FACTSHEETS

BP1 CC PARQUE SUR DE MADRID ES1

1. Introduction

Name of client CC Parquesur de Madrid (Shopping Center)

Segment of activity Retail

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC project

Service provider / facilitator Efirenova

Location and climatic region Madrid (Mediterranean / Continental climate)

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Shopping Center

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building: 151,200 m2

Age of buildings Opened in 1989

Description of the initial situation Large building with old and inefficient equipment for H&C

Main energy use Heating & Cooling

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner EE measures for individual areas and DH for the whole centre

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented - Implementation of efficiency measures for HVAC, Design and implementation of high efficiency HVAC with CCHP and DH&C, Implementation of energy efficiency measures for individual stores

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 20 %

Corresponding financial savings Confidential

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 196 t

Cost of investment 7.5 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty and maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol

Financed provided by (100 % ESCO, mix?) 100 % provided by a third party (Bank)

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients DH&C implementation (CCHP system)

Best Practice criteria assessment Representative contract in the private sector with duration of 15 years. Financed by a third party

General comments Energy savings obtained reached 44 %

Page 12: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

12

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP2 HOPITAL LA PAZ ES2

1. Introduction

Name of client Hospital ''La Paz''

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EE project (turnkey and energy supply contract)

Service provider / facilitator Dalkia

Location and climatic region Madrid (Mediterranean / Continental climate)

Other operators involved Gas Natural Servicios (energy provider for the duration of contract)

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hospital

Number of buildings and surface in m² 17 buildings and 4 large hospitals; approximately 180,000 m2

Age of buildings Built in 1964

Description of the initial situation Thermal installation providing hot water and heating for all the facilities working for more than 40 years

Main energy use H&C

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Energy efficiency and savings

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 2015

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

New H&C installation: - Natural gas thermal power station - Natural gas supply - Improvement of facilities (insulation, lighting and others)

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 30 %

Corresponding financial savings Total of 9 M€ savings

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Confidential

Cost of investment 36.2 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty and maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol

Financed provided by (100 % ESCO, mix?) Dalkia and Gas Natural Servicios

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients New installation and immediate savings without financing the project

Best Practice criteria assessment Large EE project for a very important hospital of Spain that offers EE measures and energy supply with maintenance and warranty of equipment

General comments This project could lead to several more in health sector

Page 13: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

13

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP3 HOTEL ES3

1. Introduction

Name of client Hotel (the client’s name is confidential)

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator EE Project

Location and climatic region Confidential

Other operators involved N.A.

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building

Age of buildings Confidential

Description of the initial situation Thermal installation using diesel oil as energy source

Main energy use Diesel

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Replace the installation and reduce energy costs

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 10 Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacement of equipment: -High efficiency heat pumps -Implementation of pilot monitoring & control system

Energy savings guaranteed by contract Financial savings were guaranteed but not the energy savings

Corresponding financial savings 40 %

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Confidential

Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) 7 years

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty and maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) EPC provider

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Specialized software establishing set points according to the meteorological conditions in the area helping save more energy

Best Practice criteria assessment Pilot project of high efficiency equipment with new type of monitoring and control system

General comments

Page 14: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

14

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP4 SCHOOL ES4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity School

Type of contract (EPC/other) EE project (turnkey solution)

Service provider / facilitator Gese Servicios Energéticos

Location and climatic region Confidential

Other operators involved N.A.

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building School

Number of buildings and surface in m² Mid-size school with primary education and high school

Age of buildings Confidential

Description of the initial situation Old H&C and DHW systems, optimization needed for lighting

Main energy use Electricity

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 700.46 kWh/day (not per m2)

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Energy efficiency and savings

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year Confidential Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Main implemented measures: - Optimization of lighting system - Management of heating and cooling and DHW

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 27 % (economically)

Corresponding financial savings ~10 k€ /year Daily consumption before: 96.86 €/day and after: 44.06 €/day 57 % savings on energy consumption

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) NA

Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty and maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) EPC provider

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients New installation and immediate savings without having to fund the project

Best Practice criteria assessment Small EPC project that promotes EE in the education sector and increases customer’s trust. Strong savings above contractual engagements

General comments

Page 15: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

15

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP5 BERRIAK ES5

1. Introduction

Name of client Berriak

Segment of activity Retail

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC project

Service provider / facilitator Gese Servicios Energéticos

Location and climatic region Basque Country (Oceanic climate)

Other operators involved Dexma energy management (management solution)

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Supermarket

Number of buildings and surface in m² 4 supermarkets in different locations

Age of buildings Confidential

Description of the initial situation Berriak supermarkets wanted to promote energy efficiency to reduce their energy consumption and in the meantime their environmental impact, without disrupting their customers comfort and well being

Main energy use Electricity

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available)

335 k€/year (each supermarket)

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner

Energy efficiency and savings

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year Confidential Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

- Monitoring for refrigeration equipment - Lighting system optimization - Energy management system implementation

Energy savings guaranteed by contract Confidential

Corresponding financial savings Confidential

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 34 t/year

Cost of investment 10 k€/supermarket

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 months

Particular safeguards conditions Confidential

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 20.3 k€ in savings obtained the first year

Details on monitoring and assessment Dexma energy management monitoring solution

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) EPC provider

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Monitoring for their food conservation equipment

Best Practice criteria assessment Replicability and scalability of the solution; project developed in 4 different facilities with a single contract

General comments

Page 16: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

16

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP6 HOSPITAL VIRGEN DE LA POVEDA ES6

1. Introduction

Name of client Hospital ‘Virgen de la Poveda’

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC project

Service provider / facilitator Creara

Location and climatic region Madrid (Mediterranean / Continental climate)

Other operators involved N.A.

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hospital

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building: 20,000 m2

Age of buildings Built in 1978

Description of the initial situation Low efficiency equipment and diesel heating system

Main energy use Heating (41 %)

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 3,643 TWh (total)

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Renovation of facilities

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 4+2 (contract fixed for 4 years and could be extended for 2 additional years)

2014

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

Main measures implemented: - Led lighting - Monitoring & control - High efficiency heat pumps - Building insulation improvement

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 25 %

Corresponding financial savings 30 %, 102 k€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 270 k€ + VAT

Payback period (estimated or real) 2.4 years

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty, no maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) EPC Provider (which obtained financing through a leasing from a Bank)

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Renovation of equipment and facilities

Best Practice criteria assessment Innovative and replicable pilot. The successful development of this project will lead to several more

General comments

Page 17: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

17

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP7 STRATENERGY ES7

1. Introduction

Name of client Stratenergy

Segment of activity Offices

Type of contract (EPC/other) EE project

Service provider / facilitator Creara

Location and climatic region Basque Country (Oceanic climate)

Other operators involved N.A

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Office

Number of buildings and surface in m² 5 buildings: 1 for offices, 1 laboratory and 3 for industrial process

Age of buildings Confidential

Description of the initial situation High consumption facilities

Main energy use Electricity

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 7.4 TWh/year (3.8 TWh excluding industry)

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Optimization of energy consumption

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 7 years 2015

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

Some of the measures implemented: - Optimization and control system - LED Lighting - Insulation improvement - Heat pumps installation

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 20 %

Corresponding financial savings Confidential

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Confidential

Cost of investment 500 k€

Payback period (estimated or real) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Full warranty, no maintenance

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP protocol

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Customer

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Guaranteed savings; EE measures for whole facilities

Best Practice criteria assessment Important project for office, laboratory and industrial facilities in one single contract

General comments

Page 18: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

18

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP8 ACCOR FR1

1. Introduction

Name of client Groupe Accor

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Siemens Building Technologies

Location and climatic region Paris (Temperate)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² Hotel Sofitel Paris Arc de triomphe

Age of buildings Over 30 y

Description of the initial situation Hotel 125 rooms with boiler 1.5 MW and a refrigeration group of 441 kW

Main energy use Heating

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Pilot project to reduce energy consumption especially linked to heating

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 4 2006

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Boiler replacement, Installation of a hot water exchanger, Building Management System, Installation of a tarpaulin buffer for iced water to reduce groups' uses in peak hours

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 21 %

Corresponding financial savings 40,000 €/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 175,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4.5

Particular safeguards conditions -

Details on monitoring and assessment Control and analysis of consumption; Regular energy reports; Partnership with ESCO; Training and support

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % Siemens (ESCO)

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Could carried out work without the need for investments

Best Practice criteria assessment

Good practice but not followed up because: - Accor Group is more interested in investing itself in EE - lack of visibility over energy use after the end of the contract - issues with monitoring, unable to see if savings were clearly coming from the measures implemented

General comments http://www.urbanisme-puca.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/emergence-contrats-performance-energetique-marche-francais.pdf

Page 19: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

19

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP9 CARREFOUR FR2

1. Introduction

Name of client Carrefour

Segment of activity Commerce

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Schneider electric

Location and climatic region France (Temperate, Mediterranean and oceanic)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Commercial centres

Number of buildings and surface in m² 16 buildings for a total of minimum 162,827 m²

Age of buildings Various

Description of the initial situation Carrefour aimed at improving the energy efficiency of its commercial centres, the mechanisms for monitoring energy consumption were especially deficient

Main energy use Mainly gas (Heating)

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Carrefour aimed at improving the way energy is managed. They wanted a ROI of 3y maximum and asked Schneider Elec. To launch a process of audits and recommendations for each building

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 3 2005

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Optimization and reconfiguration of systems for refrigeration, Energy Management, Installation of a remote monitoring system, Training and involvement of Carrefour's staff

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 12 %

Corresponding financial savings 800,000 €/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment Based on energy saving and PB period: probably between 1.5 and 2 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) 2.5

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 14 % achieved

Particular safeguards conditions Bonus or malus (penalties) are subject to a global balance each year

Details on monitoring and assessment Remote monitoring system, follow-up with Carrefour's staff

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % Carrefour

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Schneider carried on everything and the ROI was quite short

Best Practice criteria assessment Savings above guarantees

General comments Source: Ortega (2011), Carrefour et Schneider

Page 20: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

20

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP10 LOGIDIS COMPTOIRS MODERNES FR3

1. Introduction

Name of client Logidis Comptoirs Modernes

Segment of activity Commerce

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Schneider electric

Location and climatic region Le Mans (Temperate)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Logistic platform, Offices, Storages

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 dry storage 51,000 m², 1 cold storage 14,000 m², Offices 2,500 m²

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation LCM is part of Carrefour, which has developed projects with Schneider Electric. LCM wanted to sign an EPC to develop energy efficiency of its platform in Le Mans.

Main energy use Energy use at 50 % for Refrigeration. Total energy use 9 GWh

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner The client wanted a solution to reduce its energy bills, while keeping its installations working, producing a refrigeration of quality and easing maintenance

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 3 N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Optimized management of evaporators' fans, Optimization of management and regulation of the 2 main refrigerating systems + installation of speed regulator, Installation of High Floating Pressure

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 18% including 36% on refrigeration systems

Corresponding financial savings N.A.

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) Inferior to 2 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Not communicated

Particular safeguards conditions Bonus malus depending on performances

Details on monitoring and assessment Classic monitoring approach – IPMVP, trimestral analysis of results

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) N.A.

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Could carried on its own activities, rapid ROI (2y)

Best Practice criteria assessment Good practice with an integrated approach to EE in logistic platforms and Offices

General comments Private contract, Source Schneider, Ortega (2011)

Page 21: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

21

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP11 SUP’ELEC/CESAL FR4

1. Introduction

Name of client Sup'Elec and CESAL

Segment of activity Education

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Schneider electric, EDF

Location and climatic region Gyf sur Yvette (Temperate)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building School premises and students' housing

Number of buildings and surface in m² 60,000 m². The campus is made of 3 sites including one which is older than 30 y.

Age of buildings Over 30 years

Description of the initial situation

Sup'Elec school and CESAL manage the students’ campus. They aimed to modernize buildings and offer greater comfort to users, reduce costs, and minimize environmental impacts. Buildings were becoming old and a comprehensive new strategy regarding energy management was necessary. They could not invest without guarantees on savings.

Main energy use Heating and lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Improve the users' comfort, upgrade the installations to current standards, promote exemplarity and sustainable management

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 10 1998

Sustainable Energy measures implemented New heating system management, Replacement of luminaires, Optimization of external lighting, Integration of practical constraints and specific schedule of the school in the design of solutions

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 15 % per year

Corresponding financial savings 100,000 € HT per year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 100 t/year

Cost of investment 1 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) 7 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Performances guaranteed by Schneider and EDF

Particular safeguards conditions Guaranteed performances

Details on monitoring and assessment Global monitoring and awareness raising provided by Schneider / EDF, Monitoring and reporting of performances, Training of staffs

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Confidential

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Could carried on its own activities, ROI 7 y

Best Practice criteria assessment Performance are guaranteed and despite high investment, the payback period was short

General comments Private contract. Source EDF, Schneider, FEDENE, Ortega (2011)

Page 22: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

22

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP12 UBINAIL RODAMCO FR5

1. Introduction

Name of client Ubinai Rodamco

Segment of activity Real estate - Commercial centers

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Dalkia

Location and climatic region Near Melun (Temperate)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Commercial centers

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 commercial centre, more than 50.000 m²

Age of buildings Built in 1997

Description of the initial situation Commercial centre with need for improvement in energy efficiency

Main energy use Cooling, heating, lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Reduced energy use

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 3 2009

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Regulation of heat pumps' differential pressure; Better management of roof top; Hourly programming for fresh air Automatic lighting system in technical corridors

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 5 % for electricity and 10 % for gas

Corresponding financial savings After a year: 60,000 € in electricity (17 %) and 12,000 € in gas (25 %)

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 40,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) Less than 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 17 % in electricity, 25 % for gas

Particular safeguards conditions Performances guaranteed by contract

Details on monitoring and assessment Dalkia is in charge of the site exploitation

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % Dalkia

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Short Payback period, no investment needed

Best Practice criteria assessment Savings above guarantees, funding from ESCO, possibilities to extend

General comments Private contract, source: Ortega (2011), Ubinail Rodamco sust. Dev. Report 2008

Page 23: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

23

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP13 CLINIC ST PRIEST FR6

1. Introduction

Name of client Clinic of Saint Priest - Private hospital of Lyon East

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Dalkia

Location and climatic region France (Temperate)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Clinic

Number of buildings and surface in m² 12,000 m², 189 beds and places for patients

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation Need for energy efficiency improvement in the clinic

Main energy use Gas heating

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Gas consumption: 4,055 MWh pcs/y Electricity consumption: 2,641 MWh/year

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Reduce energy use

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 5 2011

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

Optimized energy use: Building Management System was reprogrammed, 3 way-valve installed upstream the boiler Raise awareness of staff towards sustainable behaviours Realization of a guide presenting environmental good practices

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 14 %

Corresponding financial savings N.A.

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 28,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) N.A.

Achieved savings (if already implemented) On-going project

Particular safeguards conditions N.A.

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP protocol

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) N.A.

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use and increased comfort for patients

Best Practice criteria assessment Example of good practice in a clinic

General comments Private contract, source: FEDENE

Page 24: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

24

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP14 CHU TOULOUSE FR7

1. Introduction

Name of client CHU Toulouse - Energy pole PURPAN

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Dalkia

Location and climatic region France (Mediterranean and oceanic)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hospital

Number of buildings and surface in m² 4 Health related buildings – 73,000 m² 1 building for logistic (technical rooms, offices and kitchen) – 5,300 m² Housing building – 1,500 m²

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation Goal of the EPC was to reduce energy use in all premises

Main energy use Heating

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 17,190 MWh/y for heating 6,410 MWh/y for cooling and refrigeration

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Reduce global energy use

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 25 2012

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

Raising awareness of users Adjustment of heating and cooling set point temperature Hourly programming of offices and common blocs' ventilation, Electronic variation of pumps' speed, Biomass heaters, Heat recovery, Etc.

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 15 %

Corresponding financial savings Confidential.

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 80 % (5,300 t/y)

Cost of investment N.A.

Payback period (estimated or real) N.A.

Achieved savings (if already implemented) The contract is still recent

Particular safeguards conditions Partnership contract

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP Protocol opt C

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) -

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Regular savings on the long term

Best Practice criteria assessment Long term contract, systemic approach to energy, high reduction in GHGs thanks to RE

General comments Private contract, source: FEDENE, CHU Toulouse

Page 25: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

25

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP15 KG LAW FIRM GR1

1. Introduction

Name of client KG Law Firm

Segment of activity Office

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator COFELY GDF SUEZ

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Office

Number of buildings and surface in m² 3 buildings 850 m2

Age of buildings 9 Years

Description of the initial situation High-energy consumption basically associated with the HVAC systems. There was a need to implement energy efficiency improvements, but no funds were available.

Main energy use Main energy use was electricity associated with air conditioning

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 590 kWh/(m²y)

N.A3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction, Awareness about environmental issues

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 5 years 2014

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Efficient lighting, Monitoring and energy management systems, Boilers, Compensation systems, Insulation of boilers and hot water piping, Heat exchanger for hot water

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 18.44 kWh/m²/year

Corresponding financial savings 16 % - 10,000 €

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 9.000 Kg

Cost of investment 15,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 2.5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Particular safeguards conditions Maintenance contract for 5 years.

Details on monitoring and assessment

The building’s baseline consumption was created through a five-year collection of bills, and by software the energy consumption has been allocated on each of the energy demands (heating, cooling etc.). Counters were placed in order to record the daily, monthly and annual consumption; comparing those levels to the baseline they could calculate the energy savings achieved.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use and increased comfort

Best Practice criteria assessment The financing savings per year (16 %) and the low payback period (2.5 years) make this EPC a good practice.

General comments Private contract

Page 26: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

26

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP16 MISTRAL HOTEL GR2

1. Introduction

Name of client Mistral Hotel

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Α&Β Energy

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² 8,800

Age of buildings 25

Description of the initial situation

Settings associated with the cooling, heating and hot water production systems, leading to high-energy consumption. There was a need to implement efficiency improvements, but no funds were available and experts should operate and monitor the facilities.

Main energy use Electricity for cooling and lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 112.5 kWh/m²/year

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction, Environmental policy of the company Awareness about environmental issues

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 1 2012

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Automatic controls, Monitoring and energy management systems

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 54.000 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 8.5 % 7,400 €

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 15,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 2 years

Particular safeguards conditions Proof with statistical analysis for the energy saving amount

Details on monitoring and assessment

A network, of automatic control systems and energy meters was placed on the boiler room and the hot water production system allowing the ESCO to perform tele-monitoring on the facility and prevent matters associated with maintenance and energy wasting. The energy savings were calculated with the IPMVP.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Mix

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use

Best Practice criteria assessment The financing savings per year (8.5 %) and the low payback period (2 years) make this case a good practice.

General comments Private contract

Page 27: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

27

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP17 HOTEL GR3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hotel

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator ETVA VIPE

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² 600

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation The main problem had to do with the set-points, associated with the cooling, heating and hot water production systems, leading to high-energy consumption

Main energy use Electricity

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 240 kWh/m²/year

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 10 years 2014

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Shading, Efficient lighting, Automatic controls, monitoring and energy management systems, Boilers, Compensation systems, PVs for electricity, Solar collectors for Hot Water, Heat pumps

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 48 kWh/m²/year

Corresponding financial savings 21 %, 12.000 €

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 80,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6.1 years

Particular safeguards conditions Letter of guarantee, pledging of equipment, Payment upon completion of the billing period, Equipment warranty, 24 hours troubleshooting warranty

Details on monitoring and assessment Control and regular analysis of consumption

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use and increased comfort for clients

Best Practice criteria assessment The level of financing savings per year (21 %) and the low payback period (6.1 years) make this case a good practice

General comments Private contract

Page 28: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

28

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP18 MPODOSAKEIO HOSPITAL GR4

1. Introduction

Name of client Mpodosakeio Hospital

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES Co. (Energeiakes Technologies)

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

Other operators involved Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hospital

Number of buildings and surface in m² 20,000 m²

Age of buildings 14 years

Description of the initial situation High level of electricity consumed for lighting. Old technology fluorescent lamps operating 24/7 had to be replaced.

Main energy use Electricity for cooling and lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 369.1 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner

EPC contract with Third-Party Financing during the implementation of Pilot Action 2.1: "Mechanisms of Third Party Financing - TPF" of the MARIE project with the participation of Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 5 years 2014

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacing 60 old technology fluorescent lamps Τ8 58W with 60 LED lamps 31W (Master LED tube, PERF 1500mm 31W/865 T8)

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 16,293.60 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 2,085.60 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 4,200 kg

Cost of investment 2,900 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 2 years

Particular safeguards conditions

Client is responsible for the good operational conditions of lighting bulbs and the facility. ESCO is responsible for the replacement and repairing of any problematic bulb or malfunction. In case of not achieving the goals for energy consumption while there is good operation of the lights the ESCO has to bear the cost.

Details on monitoring and assessment Benchmarking was used to calculate and measure the energy savings achieved. Luminance and electrical power were measured before and after the EE applications

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) TPF

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use

Best Practice criteria assessment This contract is one of the 2 first contracts signed in Greece, created to be an example of best practices

General comments Private contract. The contract had reached the final stage but no signatures had been signed.

Page 29: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

29

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP19 ADMINISTRATION OF WESTERN MACEDONIA GR5

1. Introduction

Name of client Administration of Western Macedonia

Segment of activity Public Offices

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES Co. (Energeiakes Technologies)

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

Other operators involved Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Office

Number of buildings and surface in m² 11,200 m²

Age of buildings Built in 2003

Description of the initial situation High energy consumption related to 14 high-pressure lamps with Na bulbs that were used for outdoor lighting. Significant energy saving could be achieved by replacing them with Power LED lighting type.

Main energy use Electricity for lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 164.2 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner

EPC contract with Third-Party Financing during the implementation of Pilot Action 2.1: "Mechanisms of Third Party Financing - TPF" of the MARIE project with the participation of Regional Development Agency of Western Macedonia (ANKO) SA

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 10 years 2014

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacing lighting the perimeter of the building 14 High Pressure lamps with Na bulbs 250W replaced with Power LED type “700mA, 4000Κ Power 110W –13720lm, Disano / 3282 Rolle T3”

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 8,623.81 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 1,136.20 €

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 3,550 kg CO2

Cost of investment 6,200 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 years

Particular safeguards conditions

The client is responsible for the good operational conditions of the lighting bulbs and the facility. ESCO is responsible for the replacement and repairing of any problematic bulb or malfunction. In case of not achieving the goals for energy consumption while there is good operation of the lights, the ESCO has to bear the cost.

Details on monitoring and assessment Benchmarking was used to calculate and measure the energy savings achieved. Luminance and electrical power were measured before and after the EE applications

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) TPF

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Reduced energy use

Best Practice criteria assessment This contract is one of the 2 first contracts signed in Greece, created to be an example of best practices

General comments Private contract. The contract had reached the final stage but no signatures had been signed.

Page 30: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

30

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP20 ADRIAINVEST INŽENJERING HR1

1. Introduction

Name of client Adriainvest Inženjering

Segment of activity Hotel - Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator HEP ESCO

Location and climatic region Biograd na moru (Mediterranean)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² N.A.

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation Adria Hotel has 208 modern equipped rooms. All rooms are air-conditioned and have a balcony, shower, toilet, mini-bar, telephone, and satellite TV. Fuel oil is used for DHW and heating.

Main energy use Cooling and DHW

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Project to reduce energy consumption especially linked to DHW

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 8 2011

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

Solar collectors for domestic hot water preparation Hot water tanks (2 x 6,500 l) Heat recovery from existing chiller for DHW Installation of photovoltaic system 30 kW Building Management System

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 75 % of Fuel oil consumption (30,000 l) 36,000 kWh of electricity produced

Corresponding financial savings 44,760 EUR/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 78.6 t

Cost of investment 276,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6

Particular safeguards conditions Client is responsible for the good operational conditions of the installed equipment.

Details on monitoring and assessment IPMVP is used

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback period, no initial investment

Best Practice criteria assessment Integrated approach to EE including installation of RES

General comments One of the few ESCO projects in tertiary sector in Croatia

Page 31: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

31

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP21 CROSCO HR2

1. Introduction

Name of client Crosco

Segment of activity Offices

Type of contract (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator HEP ESCO

Location and climatic region Zagreb (Continental)

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Office

Number of buildings and surface in m² N.A.

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation Fuel oil is used for DHW and heating.

Main energy use Heating

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Project to reduce energy consumption especially linked to heating

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 6 2008

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Low temperature hot water boilers (2 x 575 kW) on natural gas

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 140,000 kWh

Corresponding financial savings 56,500 €/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) N.A.

Cost of investment 247,000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4

Particular safeguards conditions Client is responsible for the good operational conditions of the installed equipment.

Details on monitoring and assessment Modified IPMVP is used

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback period, no investment

Best Practice criteria assessment High financial and energy savings

General comments One of the few ESCO projects in tertiary sector in Croatia

Page 32: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

32

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP22 CONAD DEL TIRRENO IT1

1. Introduction

Name of client CONAD del Tirreno

Segment of activity Retail - Supermarket stores

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator 3EPC

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

Other operators involved Unicredit (financing institution)

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Supermarkets - retail stores for large scale distribution: measures on several buildings with different location

Number of buildings and surface in m² 18 buildings, with an average of 1,000 m2 for about 20,000 m2

Age of buildings 15 years on average

Description of the initial situation The buildings needed a deep renovation, involving the refurbishment of the building and the requalification of the plants, in particular the refrigeration equipment.

Main energy use Heating, cooling and lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Between 600 and 1,200 kWh/m2

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Energy cost reduction, awareness toward environmental issues

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 8 years 2015

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

Revamping of freezing equipment; Installation of low dispersion refrigerated bars; LED illumination; Revamping of air conditioning systems; Advanced Energy Management Service for Energy Efficiency Certifications; Structural revamping; Renewed internal layout.

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 35 ~ 50 % in energy consumption per year Performance guarantee specifically tailored for each single store

Corresponding financial savings 35 ~ 50 % in energy bill per year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Average of 50 ~ 150 t CO2 per year

Cost of investment 33 M€

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 ~ 7 years estimated on technological/structural interventions

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Just implemented

Particular safeguards conditions Special privilege, accounts pledge, transfer of VAT credit

Details on monitoring and assessment Implementation of the system Mætrics® Advanced to enhance energy management: consumption monitoring, system controls, alert and ticketing for maintenance, waste quantification;

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Project finance (Unicredit)

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients The realization of the intervention in project financing has enabled the possibility of a deeper renovation, involving energy efficiency and space refurbishment

Best Practice criteria assessment Best practice innovation: combination of a guaranteed savings and a Project Finance structure. Replicability.

General comments Private contract

Page 33: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

33

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP23 PALASPORT TREVIGLIO IT2

1. Introduction

Name of client Palasport Treviglio

Segment of activity Sport Centres

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Nesco srl

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Sport hall

Number of buildings and surface in m² Around 2,000 m2

Age of buildings 15 years

Description of the initial situation - High and frequent voltage fluctuations - Continuous generation of harmonics with big impact on all electronic devices - Unbalanced star point - Rephasing needed

Main energy use Lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) 113 MWh/y (for lighting purposes)

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Increase the efficiency of the plant

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 5 years N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Review and optimisation of the lighting system, based on harmonics filtering, rephasing and balancing of the system

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 22 %

Corresponding financial savings 5,400 €/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 24 %

Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) 3.5 years estimated

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Particular safeguards conditions Client is responsible for the operational conditions, which have to be

maintained above a contractual limit

Details on monitoring and assessment The performance of the plant is continuously controlled by remote

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients No initial investment needed, a part of shared savings from the beginning of the contract

Best Practice criteria assessment Short duration of the contract by a guaranteed saving of 22 % on the baseline

General comments Source: www.nescosrl.it

Page 34: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

34

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP24 HOTEL IT3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator Confidential

Location and climatic region Mediterranean – Central Italy

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 building, 9.000 m2

Age of buildings ~ 30 years

Description of the initial situation The hotel presented a very high H&C energy consumption. The low quality of the outer envelope and the large glazed surface determined a large consumption in both winter and in summer.

Main energy use H&C, lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Costs reduction, energy efficiency improvement

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year N.A. N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented

- Thermal insulation of the building envelope (external walls, roof) and of the heat distribution net - Reduction of the solar gains in summer through shadowing - PV plant 67.54 kWp (covering about 10 % of the yearly electricity consumption)

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 607 MWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 100,000 €/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 180 t/y

Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) 5.3 years estimated

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Particular safeguards conditions White certificates go directly to the ESCO

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Partly self-funded, partly public money (incentives)

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Higher investment possible, due to the mix of financing. Very short payback for efficiency measures on the building structure

Best Practice criteria assessment Mix funding and short payback period. Use of performance bond

General comments Project is still in a study phase: it is very important to have a good risk analysis, a clear baseline and the complete MV program before signing the contract.

Page 35: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

35

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP25 SPORT CENTRE IT4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Sport facilities

Type of contract (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator Confidential

Location and climatic region Mediterranean - Tuscany

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Sport Hall

Number of buildings and surface in m² 3 buildings ~ 5,000m2

Age of buildings Built in 1968; 1976; 2002

Description of the initial situation Several little units for heating purposes

Main energy use H&C, lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Costs reduction, energy efficiency improvement

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year N.A. N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Centralized heat generation, heat recovery, metering devices, substitution of existing lamps with LED

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 120 MWh/y (electricity) + 115,000 m3 (natural gas)

Corresponding financial savings 132,500 €/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 300 t/y

Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) IRR of the project 7.76 % IRR for the investor 12.36 %

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 9.8 years estimated for the project, 8.5 for the investor

Particular safeguards conditions White certificates go directly to the ESCO

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Partly self-financing, partly public money (incentives)

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Strong costs reduction

Best Practice criteria assessment Mix funding and short payback period. Use of performance bond

General comments Project is still in a study phase: it is very important to have a good risk analysis, a clear baseline and the complete MV program before signing the contract.

Page 36: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

36

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP26 OFFICES AND HOSTEL IT5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of contract (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator Confidential

Location and climatic region Mediterranean – Northern Italy

Other operators involved A bank as financer; an additional ESCO for the PV plant

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices and hostel

Number of buildings and surface in m² 1 Building, ~ 1,700m2

Age of buildings 45 y

Description of the initial situation The building needed refurbishment and the management aimed to reach an high efficiency standard, in order to offer more comfort in a low-cost hospitality premise

Main energy use H&C, lighting

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) Confidential

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Costs reduction, energy efficiency improvement

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year N.A. N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented - Thermal insulation external walls and roof, - windows replacement - LED, PV plant

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 170 MWh/y (electricity) + 25,000 m3/y (natural gas)

Corresponding financial savings 48,000 €/y

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) 120 t/y

Cost of investment Confidential

Payback period (estimated or real) IRR of the project 5.45 %

Achieved savings (if already implemented) 4.3 years estimated for the extra costs

Particular safeguards conditions White certificates go directly to the ESCO

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Partly self-financing, partly financed by a bank

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients The finance contract and the EPC contract will be aligned in time, in order to ease their realization.

Best Practice criteria assessment Very good negotiation of the financing. Performance bond

General comments Project is still in a study phase: it is very important to have a good risk analysis, a clear baseline and the complete MV program before signing the contract.

Page 37: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

37

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP27 5 STAR HOTEL PT1

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Tourism

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator VIVAPOWER Showrooms

Location and climatic region Madeira - Oceanic

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building 5-star Hotel

Number of buildings and surface in m² N.A.

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation Hotel with casino, fitness centre, pool, spa, restaurants, 379 rooms, common areas, etc. Total electric baseline 2,887 MWh/year; Lighting baseline 407 MWh/year; Pumps baseline 320 MWh/year

Main energy use Electricity and thermal

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Reducing the cost of energy, improving the energy efficiency of the hotel and, at the same time, maintaining the high quality of the hotel

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 6 years Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented 250 kWn PV Plant + circulation pumps + efficiency lighting

Energy savings guaranteed by contract PV Plant 382 MWh/year + circulation pumps 82 MWh/year + lighting 113 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings PV Plant 44,321 €/year + circulation pumps 8,712 €/year + efficiency lighting 12,429 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 208 t CO2

Cost of investment Circulation pumps + efficiency lighting = 56,500 €; PV Plant = 343,661 €; Total investment cost = 400,161 €

Payback period (estimated or real) Circulation pumps + efficiency lighting = 2.7 years; PV Plant = 7.8 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the equipment (PV modules, circulation pumps and efficiency lighting) during the contract period; No energy production guarantee

Details on monitoring and assessment Monitoring the energy production of the PV Plant + Monitoring the circulation pumps and efficiency lighting working hours and consumption

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Mixed financing: 60 % ESCO+ 40 % public

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Part of the financing provided by public funds, which was an added value for the client

Best Practice criteria assessment The combination of implemented RES and EE measures will provide a considerable reduction in the electricity costs.

General comments N.A.

Page 38: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

38

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP28 RURAL TOURISM PT2

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Tourism

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator VIVAPOWER Nova

Location and climatic region Portalegre - Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Rural tourism

Number of buildings and surface in m² N.A.

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation Rural tourism composed by 5 properties

Main energy use N.A.

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Implementing RES through PV plant

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 20 years 2014

Sustainable Energy measures implemented 456 kWn PV plant

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 903 MWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 99,760 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 325 t

Cost of investment 533,500 €

Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 5years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the PV equipment

Details on monitoring and assessment Monitoring of the PV plant through a dedicated monitoring system

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback, no investment

Best Practice criteria assessment Performance of renewable energy is guaranteed and monitored, funding 100 % ESCO and short payback period

General comments N.A.

Page 39: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

39

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP29 LONG-TERM CARE FACILITY PT3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator VIVAPOWER Nova

Location and climatic region Portimão - Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Long-term Care Facilities

Number of buildings and surface in m² N.A.

Age of buildings Built in 2011 - 4 years

Description of the initial situation Long-term Care Facilities with capacity for 60 patients

Main energy use N.A.

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Reduce energy cost

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 years Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented 30 kWn PV Plant

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 65,805 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 7,752 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 24 t

Cost of investment 39,311 €

Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the PV equipment

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Short payback, no investment

Best Practice criteria assessment Performance of renewable energy is guaranteed and monitored, funding 100 % ESCO and short payback period

General comments N.A.

Page 40: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

40

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP30 RETIREMENT HOME PT4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator Energia Própria

Location and climatic region Borba - Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Retirement Home and Day Care Center

Number of buildings and surface in m² 2,458.37 m²

Age of buildings 1988 - 27 years

Description of the initial situation

Retirement Home and Day Care Center with a community centre; laundry facilities; social, administrative and services areas; bedrooms; toilets; kitchens; etc. Retirement Home occupation is 61 people and Day Care Centre about 24 people. Average consumption: 171 MWh/y (electricity), 472 MWh/y (propane gas)

Main energy use Electricity (HVAC, lighting, equipment); Propane gas (equipment, DWH)

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner The objective was to implement EE and RES that promote and reduce energy consumption of the building,

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year 15 years (only in the case of PV) Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented 65 kWn PV Plant + Solar thermal panels + biomass boilers + pumps + pipe insulation + efficient lighting + monitoring system

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 116,320 kWh/year (for the PV plant with EPC); Total savings for EE measures: 26.9 kWh/year (electricity) + 200.7 kWh/year (propane gas)

Corresponding financial savings

12,319 €/year (for the PV Plant with EPC); EE measures: 1,136 €/year (Solar thermal) + 5,795 €/year (biomass boiler) + 155 €/year (pumps) + 2,073 €/year (pipe insulation) + 2,690 €/year (lighting) + 3,195 €/year (monitoring system); Total financing savings for EE: 15,423 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 42 t (for the PV Plant with EPC) + 30 t (EE measures)

Cost of investment

73,005 € (for the PV plant with EPC) + EE measures: 11,300 € (solar thermal) + 41,815 € (biomass boiler) + 2,260 € (pumps) + 4,840 € (pipe insulation) + 22,990 € (lighting) + 21,900 € (monitoring system). Total investment for EE measures: 104,900 €

Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 6 years (for the PV plant) + 6,8 years (for EE measures)

Particular safeguards conditions Performance guarantee of the PV equipment during the EPC contract.

Details on monitoring and assessment Monitoring of the PV Plant and EE measures

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) 100 % ESCO (for PV Plant) + 100 % national funds for EE measures

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Mixed investment which will benefit the client in terms of energy savings and cost reduction

Best Practice criteria assessment Mixed of investment, EPC and services dealing with RES and EE

General comments PV plant with EPC contract and EE measures implementation without

Page 41: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

41

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP33 HOSPITAL PT7

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Health

Type of contract (EPC/other) Implementation of EE measures

Service provider / facilitator Energia Própria

Location and climatic region Lousada - Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hospital

Number of buildings and surface in m² 3,420 m²

Age of buildings 2001 - 14 years

Description of the initial situation Hospital with rooms, technical areas, bathrooms, living rooms, office rooms, observation rooms and consultation, medical operation rooms, bar, changing rooms, common areas, isolation rooms, pharmacy, etc.

Main energy use Electricity and Propane Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention (if available)

N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Costs savings maintaining the operation of the building

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year Confidential Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Biomass boiler + lighting

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 106,628 kWh/year (lighting) + 450,635 kWh/year (biomass boiler)

Corresponding financial savings 8,060 €/year (lighting) + 21,982 €/year (biomass boiler)

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 41 t

Cost of investment 11,956 € (lighting) + 128,571 € (biomass boiler)

Payback period (estimated or real) 1.5 years (lighting) + 6 years (biomass boiler)

Achieved savings (if already implemented) Confidential

Particular safeguards conditions N.A.

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) National Fund

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Financing by a National Fund, ensuring the energy and costs savings for the client

Best Practice criteria assessment Combination with National Fund and simple EE measures with short payback

General comments Project is still in a study phase

Page 42: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

42

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP31 SWIMMING POOL PT5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Sport Facility

Type of contract (EPC/other) Implementation of EE measures

Service provider / facilitator Self Energy Engineering & Innovation

Location and climatic region Fiães - Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Indoor swimming pool

Number of buildings and surface in m² 2,898 m²

Age of buildings N.A.

Description of the initial situation Sports Complex with indoor swimming pool, with common areas, bathrooms, sports halls, classrooms, technical areas, etc.

Main energy use Electricity and Natural gas

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Implementation of RES and EE measures

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year Confidential Confidential

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Pipe insulation + lighting + variable speed drivers + isothermal pool cover + solar thermal system + monitoring system

Energy savings guaranteed by contract

169,741 kWh/year (Isothermal pool cover) + 19,949 kWh/year (solar thermal system) + 4,892 kWh/year (lighting) + 2,355 kWh/year (variable speed drivers) + 32,251 kWh/year (pipe insulation) + 75,939 kWh/year (monitoring system)

Corresponding financial savings

6,000 €/year (isothermal pool cover) + 600 €/year (solar thermal system) + 405 €/year (lighting) + 195 €/year (variable speed drivers) + 970 €/year (pipe insulation) + 3,000 €/year (monitoring system). Total financial savings: 11,170 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total ~ 67 t

Cost of investment

43,500 € (Isothermal pool cover) + 10,000 € (solar thermal system) + 2,000 € (lighting) + 1,260 € (variable speed drivers) + 3,200 € (pipe insulation) + 23,000 € (monitoring system) Total cost of investment: 82,960 €

Payback period (estimated or real)

7 years (Isothermal pool cover) + 16 years (solar thermal system) + 5 years (lighting) + 6 years (variable speed drivers) + 3 years (pipe insulation) + 4 years (monitoring system). Total payback period: ~ 7 years

Particular safeguards conditions N.A.

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Financed by a National Fund

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients No investment by the Client and the Sport Complex will be the main beneficiary of the implementation of the measures

Best Practice criteria assessment Project implementation combining the installation of RES and EE measures dedicated to sport facilities

General comments No EPC in this project. Only implementation of RES and EE measures in order to reduce the consumption of the sport facility

Page 43: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

43

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

BP32 HYPERMARKET PT6

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hypermarket

Type of contract (EPC/other) Implementation of EE measures

Service provider / facilitator Energia Própria

Location and climatic region Santa Maria da Feira - Mediterranean

Other operators involved None

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hypermarket

Number of buildings and surface in m² 10,532 m²

Age of buildings Built in 1998 - 17 years

Description of the initial situation Hypermarket with shopping gallery, toilets, technical areas, offices, kitchens, parking car, sales area, etc. Baseline 2.910.187 kWh/year (electrical consumption)

Main energy use Electricity, Natural gas and diesel

Energy use per m² before EPC (if available) N.A.

3. Project Specifications

Describe the objective of the building owner Rationalizing the building's energy consumption by implementing energy efficiency measures and, consequently, the reduction of bills

Project Duration (in years) / Starting year N.A. N.A.

Sustainable Energy measures implemented Replacement of the existing lighting

Energy savings guaranteed by contract 231,877 kWh/year

Corresponding financial savings 19,939 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) ~ 83 t

Cost of investment 47,526 €

Payback period (estimated or real) ~ 2 years

Particular safeguards conditions N.A.

Details on monitoring and assessment N.A.

Financed provided by (100% ESCO, mix?) Potentially will be financed by a local/national fund

4. Additional comments

Innovations and advantages for the clients Combination of local/national fund, with EE measure dedicated to the lighting system with sort payback, maintaining and ensuring the quality of system

Best Practice criteria assessment Short payback period

General comments Project is still in a study phase

Page 44: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

44

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PILOT PROJECTS FACTSHEETS

PP01 EDUCATION ES’1

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Education

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far CREARA

Location and climatic region Madrid – warm temperate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building University

Surface in m² 36 100 m²

Annual energy use ~ 2 500 MWh

Main energy use Heating and lighting

Main energy source Electricity and fuel

Energy use per m² before intervention 70,6 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Enhancing energy efficiency

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 12

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Substitution of boiler burners and

fuel type, Thermostatic valves for radiators, Occupancy and presence

sensors, Variable frequency drives for pumps

Potential Energy savings 112331 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 45.481 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 100 t

Cost of investment 238100€

Payback period (estimated or real) 5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Following the assessment, it has been proposed as a client-financed scenario of 80% debt and 20% equity with a 7 year loan, considering a 12 year time horizon and corresponding to an A GREPCon rating

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility could save 23 % of its total energy costs Rapid ROI

Status of project Started

General Comments The EPC Contract model was proposed but at the end it was decided to implement the project through a turnkey contract

Page 45: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

45

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP02 EDUCATION ES’2

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Education

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far CREARA

Location and climatic region Valence – hot-Summer Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building University

Surface in m² 16315 m²

Annual energy use ~ 1 500 MWh

Main energy use Cooling and lighting

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 91.3 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Enhancing energy efficiency and reducing cooling energy use through EPC or turnkey project

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 12y

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Installation of sun shading devices, Substitution of conventional lamps,

Occupancy and presence sensors, Variable frequency drives for

pumps, Photovoltaic plant (production)

Potential Energy savings 236.801 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 23 367 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 100 t

Cost of investment 237 173€

Payback period (estimated or real) 10 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Following the assessment, a client-financing scenario of 80% debt and 20% equity was discussed with a loan duration of 12 years

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing D : Medium-Low Profitability, medium-high likelihood of bad performance, medium-long payback time, with a medium-low level of security in the financing

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility could save 20 % of its total energy costs

Status of project Started

General Comments Although the investment has only a D GREPCon rating, the owner of the installation was interested in implementing the measures in two different phases as turnkey contract projects.

Page 46: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

46

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP03 HOSPITALITY ES’3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far CREARA

Location and climatic region Madrid – warm temperate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Apart Hotel

Surface in m² 9193 m²

Annual energy use ~ 580 MWh

Main energy use Domestic hot water

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 63.1 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Although the hotel presents an efficient lighting system there is still potential to achieve considerable energy savings

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, water saving aerators, solar thermal

plant, PV plant (production), Building Management System

Potential Energy savings 166330 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 13544 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 63 t

Cost of investment 89 374€

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 10 years EPC contract scenario, with 80% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing B : Medium-High Profitability, medium-low likelihood of bad performance, medium-short payback time, with a medium-high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility could save 30 % of its total energy costs with low ROI

Status of project Assessment phase

General Comments Preliminary assessment

Page 47: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

47

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP04 OFFICE ES’4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Office

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far CREARA

Location and climatic region Barcelona – Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Modern offices

Surface in m² 14646 m²

Annual energy use ~ 2 700 MWh

Main energy use Lighting and ITs

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 184,3 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective

The tenant of part of the building has no control of heating and cooling systems. The lighting system has already been analysed and it was found that there is a huge potential in the substitution of the lighting system by a more efficient one

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 9

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, occupancy and presence sensors,

implementation of energy star procedure in computers

Potential Energy savings 361785 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 30878 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 107 t

Cost of investment 130 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 9 years EPC contract scenario, with 80% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The client could save 14 % of its total energy costs with low ROI

Status of project Assessment phase

General Comments Preliminary assessment, waiting for Information from the client in order to complete the study.

Page 48: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

48

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP05 TERTIARY SERVICES ES’5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Tertiary services

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Bureau Veritas Iberia

Location and climatic region Terrassa – Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices and other tertiary buildings

Surface in m² 4131 m²

Annual energy use ~ 572 MWh

Main energy use Air conditioning

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 138,5 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective

The current air conditioning systems are very inefficient and many of equipment are obsolete. The energy consumption by air conditioning represents 60%, and it can be lowered considerably with a more efficient technology

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 20

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Occupancy and presence sensors,

Substitution of a low efficiency chiller with inverter chiller

Potential Energy savings 137 000 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 17819 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 50 t

Cost of investment 200 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 11 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 20 years EPC contract scenario, with 50% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment There is a high saving potential in the substitution of a low efficiency chiller with inverter chiller and the substitution of lamps. The facility can save 35% of its total energy costs

Status of project Under implementation

General Comments NA

Page 49: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

49

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP06 TERTIARY SERVICES ES’6

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Tertiary services

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Bureau Veritas Iberia

Location and climatic region Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Elderly residence and offices

Surface in m² 11 902 m²

Annual energy use ~ 1 843 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 154.8 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective

Private institution wanting to make an inventory of existing equipment of their installations, acquire in-depth understanding of the energy management of their installations and know which EE measures could be implemented in order to reduce their energy and economic costs

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 20

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Replacement of lamps ballast,

Occupancy and presence sensors, Variable frequency drives for pumps,

Solar thermal plant

Potential Energy savings 326 253 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 26187 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 51 t

Cost of investment 162 367 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 8 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 20 years client contract scenario, with 80% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment There is a high saving potential in the substitution of conventional lamps and in the installation of a solar thermal plant. The facility can save 19% of its total energy costs

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments Under a 20 years EPC contract scenario, with 80% financing, the investment could reach a C GREPCon rating

Page 50: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

50

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP07 COMMERCIAL ES’7

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Commercial

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Bureau Veritas Iberia

Location and climatic region Madrid, warm temperate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Shopping mall

Surface in m² 220 000 m²

Annual energy use ~ 8 426 MWh

Main energy use Air conditioning

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 38.3 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Key issue is to ensure energy savings as foreseen

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 20

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Occupancy and presence sensors,

Installation of a photovoltaic plant, Building Energy Management System

Potential Energy savings 1 031 000 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 165 403 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 307 t

Cost of investment 946 371 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 20 years EPC Contract scenario, with 60% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment High saving potential in the substitution of conventional lamps, installation of a photovoltaic plant and building management system The facility could save 13% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments None

Page 51: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

51

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP08 COMMERCIAL ES’8

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Commercial

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Bureau Veritas Iberia

Location and climatic region Madrid, warm temperate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Shopping mall

Surface in m² 67 091 m²

Annual energy use ~ 3 900 MWh

Main energy use Lighting and air conditioning

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 58.1 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Key issue is to ensure energy savings as foreseen

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Photovoltaic plant ,Building Energy

Management System

Potential Energy savings 356 416 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 46 685 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 307 t

Cost of investment 239 650 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 9 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 10 years EPC Contract scenario, with 60% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment High saving potential in the substitution of conventional lamps and installation of a Building Energy Management System The facility could save 9,2% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments Could start in 2018

Page 52: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

52

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP09 HOSPITALITY ES’9

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Bureau Veritas Iberia

Location and climatic region San Sebastian, Oceanic

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Surface in m² 13 130 m²

Annual energy use ~ 3 024 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 230.3 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective This hotel is a historical building close to the beach, and needs a better energy management system.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 5

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Replacement of lamps ballast,

Photocell to dim luminous flux based on natural light, Variable frequency

drives for pumps

Potential Energy savings 285 445 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 35 392 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 12.3 t

Cost of investment 73 270 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 5 years EPC contract scenario, with 60% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment There is a high saving potential in the substitution of conventional lamps and Variable frequency drives for pumps The facility can save 9% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments Possible project start date: 2018

Page 53: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

53

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP10 HOSPITALITY ES’10

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Bureau Veritas Iberia

Location and climatic region Palma de Mallorca, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Surface in m² 20 907 m²

Annual energy use ~ 4 982 MWh

Main energy use Heating and air conditioning

Main energy source Gas (heating) and electricity (AC)

Energy use per m² before intervention 238.3 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective This hotel is a historical building with conventional installations and equipment that wants to reach higher energy efficiency.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 5

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Replacement of lamps ballast,

Photocell to dim luminous flux based on natural light, Variable frequency

drives for pumps

Potential Energy savings 408 786 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 56 043 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 15 t

Cost of investment 124 616 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 5 years EPC contract scenario, with 60% financing

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment High saving potential in the substitution of conventional lamps and in the installation of a solar thermal plant The facility can save 10% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments Possible project start date: 2018

Page 54: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

54

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP11 HOSPITALITY ES’11

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far CREARA

Location and climatic region Madrid, warm temperate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Surface in m² 20 356 m²

Annual energy use ~ 1 621 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 79.6 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective The owner of the building is interested in exploiting the huge potential existing in the substitution of the heating, lighting and hydraulic distribution systems

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Occupancy and presence sensors,

Installation of biomass boiler for heating, Pipework and boiler insulation,

Solar thermal plant, Photovoltaic plant (generation)

Potential Energy savings 371 227 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 57 544 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 325 t

Cost of investment 410 884 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 10 years Client Financing contract scenario

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment High saving potential in the HVAC and building management system of the building The facility could save 33,0% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments none

Page 55: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

55

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP12 EDUCATION FR’1

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Education

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Avignon, Humid Subtropical climate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Classrooms, offices and dormitories

Surface in m² 1838 m²

Annual energy use ~ 306 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 166.5 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective This private education organisation is involved in sustainability initiatives and energy efficiency. They want to exploit opportunities in this field but lack means to invest.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 7

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of windows (the single glazed windows in the old building),

HVAC Schedule definition to avoid waste, Substitution of conventional

lamps, Building Management System, PV Panels (5kw)

Potential Energy savings 112 331 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 11 176 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 20.2 t

Cost of investment 47 050 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 7 years EPC project under a financial scenario of 10% grant, 80% debt, 20% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC Contract financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Lack of resources for investing but high EE potential – EPC could be a strong solution. The facility can save 22% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments Medium scale project but opportunities to bundle with other similar educational organisations are discussed

Page 56: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

56

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP13 EDUCATION FR’2

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Education

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Montélimar, Humid Subtropical climate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Classrooms, offices and dormitories

Surface in m² 1643 m²

Annual energy use ~ 323 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 196.6 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective

Managers of this education building shown interest in implementing energy saving measures, mainly as they are engaged in sustainability policies. They lack resources for investing and need support of subventions or a loan with preferential conditions, or through innovative mechanisms.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 6

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, HVAC schedule definition (including

upgrade of the heat distribution system), Thermostatic valves for

radiators, PV Plant

Potential Energy savings 125 911 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 10 690 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 23 t

Cost of investment 50 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financed project under a financial scenario of 10% grant, 70% debt and 30% equity.

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Lack of resources for investing but high EE potential The facility can save 30% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning phase

General Comments Medium scale project but opportunities to bundle with other similar educational organisations are discussed

Page 57: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

57

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP14 HOSPITALITY FR’3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region South Corsica, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Surface in m² 2700 m²

Annual energy use ~ 515 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 190.7 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective The hotel is engaged in a strategy for high energy performances and is willing to invest in this field.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 6

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, HVAC schedule definition solar

thermal plant

Potential Energy savings 76 607 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 7756 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~9 t

Cost of investment 40 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financed project under a financial scenario of 60% debt and 40% equity.

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Large potential for replicability The facility can save 15% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Started

General Comments Higher investments are possible (up to 70000€) but the profitability is lower and ROI longer

Page 58: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

58

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP15 HOSPITALITY FR’4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Mercantour, Mountainous

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Surface in m² 900 m²

Annual energy use ~ 120 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 133.3 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Owners want to invest in energy efficiency to ensure comfort during winter time. Building in poor shape and energy efficiency investments could be added to the necessary refurbishments.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Substitution of windows, Building

insulation, Thermostatic valves

Potential Energy savings 40 337 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 3346 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~7.3 t

Cost of investment 51 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 14 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financed project under a financial scenario of 50% debt and 50% equity.

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing C : Medium Profitability, medium likelihood of bad performance, medium payback time, with a medium level of security in the financing

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Old mountainous hotel which already went through some refurbishment but which globally shows very poor energy performances. The facility can save 35% of its total energy costs

Status of project Started

General Comments Hotel willing to open in winter – will require refurbishments in any cases

Page 59: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

59

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP16 EDUCATION FR’5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Education

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Avignon, Humid Subtropical climate

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Classrooms, offices and dormitories

Surface in m² 1672 m²

Annual energy use ~ 217 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity and gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 130 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective

Managers of this education building shown interest in implementing energy saving measures, mainly as they are engaged in sustainability policies. They lack resources for investing and need support of subventions or a loan with preferential conditions, or through innovative mechanisms.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

BMS, Thermostatic valves for radiators, Substitution of conventional

lamps, HVAC Schedule definition

Potential Energy savings 106 882 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 7 331 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 23 t

Cost of investment 65 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 10 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financed project under a financial scenario of 80% debt and 20% equity.

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing B : Medium-High Profitability, medium-low likelihood of bad performance, medium-short payback time, with a medium-high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Lack of resources for investing but high EE potential The facility can save 28% of its total energy costs

Status of project Started

General Comments Medium scale project but opportunities to bundle with other similar educational organisations are discussed

Page 60: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

60

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP17 HOSPITALITY FR’6

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Verdon, Mountainous

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Surface in m² 1200 m²

Annual energy use ~ 282 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 235 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Owners shown interest in implementing energy efficiency and improving constantly their performances in this field. They have several labels including the Eco Label but need to unlock funds for investments.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 20

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of windows (single glazed in the old building), Installation of

sun shading devices, Substitution of conventional lamps

Potential Energy savings 43448 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 6360 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 1,5 t

Cost of investment 65 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 10 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing The investment has been currently proposed as a 20 years loan directly made to the client under a financial scenario of 70% debt, 30% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing C : Medium Profitability, medium likelihood of bad performance, medium payback time, with a medium level of security in the financing

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Lack of resources for investing but high EE potential. The facility can save 15% of its total energy costs

Status of project Started

General Comments None

Page 61: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

61

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP18 OFFICES FR’7

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Offices

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Paris, oceanic

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices

Surface in m² 2600 m²

Annual energy use ~ 340 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 130.8kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Owners shown interest in investing in energy efficiency as part of their global actions for sustainability.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 5

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

HVAC schedule definition, Automatic shut off for HVAC, Substitution of

conventional lamps, Rooftop PV plant (3kW)

Potential Energy savings 172229 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 22970 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 7.4 t

Cost of investment 45 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 5 years EPC project under a financial scenario of 50% debt, 50% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 50% of its total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments None

Page 62: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

62

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP19 COMMERCE FR’8

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Commercial

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Across France

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Shopping centres

Surface in m² 40 000 m²

Annual energy use ~ 2 400 MWh

Main energy use Lighting

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 60kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Reduce lighting energy consumption across 90+ retails – limited opportunities in the other fields.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 5

Sustainable Energy measures recommended Substitution of conventional lamps

Potential Energy savings 694000 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 90 000 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 20 t

Cost of investment 184 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 5 years EPC project under a financial scenario of 25% debt, 70% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Large investment, rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments

Retails are of special interest, not individually as clients often rent the space located in large commercial centers, but at a larger scale. Focus is here primarily on lighting as it is the main consumption source and it is directly under control of client

Page 63: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

63

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP20 TERTIARY SERVICES FR’9

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Logistics

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far ENERGIES 2050

Location and climatic region Paris, Oceanic

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Storages/logistics

Surface in m² 30 000 m²

Annual energy use ~ 6 400 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 213.3kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Reduce lighting energy consumption across 90+ retails – limited opportunities in the other fields.

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Building management system,

Building insulation

Potential Energy savings 935587 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 19280 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 183 t

Cost of investment 183 000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 9 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 10 years equity financing project

GREPCon Project Rating

Equity financing C : Medium Profitability, medium likelihood of bad performance, medium payback time, with a medium level of security in the financing

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Large investment, owners are planning to invest in structural refurbishment of buildings and to implement at the same time EE measures

Status of project Planning

General Comments Recent extension of the previous buildings needs structural refurbishment in any cases

Page 64: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

64

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP21 OFFICES GR’1

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Offices

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Confidential

Location and climatic region Chania, Crete, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices

Surface in m² 1545 m²

Annual energy use ~ 97 MWh

Main energy use Cooling and heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 62.9 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Reduce energy losses especially from the openings

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 8

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of single-glazing windows with double-glazing ones with

thermal-break, Installation of automatic door at entrance, Substitution of

conventional lamps with LED, Occupancy and presence sensors in the

corridors and toilets

Potential Energy savings 42569 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 7628 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 42 t

Cost of investment 37575 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing EPC financing in combination with grants

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment

The energy saving scenarios and corresponding interventions emerged after interviews and collaboration with the building managers to investigate their investments priorities. The facility can save 44 % of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Under implementation

General Comments Old building from 1968, 4-floors, located in the town center. Building occupants will benefit from improved indoor environmental conditions, due to the improvements in the building envelope.

Page 65: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

65

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP22 OFFICES GR’2

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Offices

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Confidential

Location and climatic region Athens, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices

Surface in m² 6575 m²

Annual energy use ~ 943 MWh

Main energy use Server rooms

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 143.4 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Reduce electricity use, increase use of RES, become nearly zero energy building

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 8

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps with LED, Variable Frequency Drives

with CO2 sensors for Air Handling Units, Window films to improve their

solar factor, Solar thermal plant for DHW, Photovoltaic plant

Potential Energy savings 229151 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 26251 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 207 t

Cost of investment 109,900 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 8 years EPC project under a financial scenario of 60% debt, 40% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A: High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 24% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI, despite already considered an energy efficient building,

Status of project Planning

General Comments Built in 2008 following bioclimatic architecture, has applied EN ISO 50001:2011. Potential start date 2018 (Q3)

Page 66: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

66

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP23 HOSPITALITY GR’3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Confidential

Location and climatic region Rethymno, Crete, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel and restaurant

Surface in m² 4450 m²

Annual energy use ~ 517 MWh

Main energy use Restaurant/kitchen

Main energy source Electricity and gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 116.2 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Improve energy efficiency of the facilities and invest in RES, become nearly zero energy building

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 8

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Photovoltaic plant, Installation of ceiling fans, Substitution of electric

appliances with gas appliances in the kitchen, Substitution of appliances

in laundry with more efficient ones, Occupancy and presence sensors in

corridors, Substitution of conventional lamps with LED

Potential Energy savings 194651 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 21218 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 170t

Cost of investment 103605 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 8 years EPC project under a financial scenario of 60% debt, 40% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing B : Medium-High Profitability, medium-low likelihood of bad performance, medium-short payback time, with a medium-high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 34% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Under implementation

General Comments Key issues to overcome: regulatory issues with the PV installation due to the grid limitations in islands.

Page 67: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

67

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP24 HOSPITALITY GR’4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Confidential

Location and climatic region Lasithi, Crete, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building 15 buildings complex, that includes guests’ rooms and suites, restaurants, bars, swimming pools, spa centre, kids club

Surface in m² 18000 m²

Annual energy use ~ 2082 MWh

Main energy use Cooling

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 115.7 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Improve energy efficiency of the facilities and comfort, increase use of RES, become nearly zero energy building

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of low efficiency chiller with inverter chiller, Heat recovery

systems, Thermal insulation of building envelope, Substitution of

windows, Solar thermal plant, Swimming pool heat cover, Substitution of

conventional lamps with LED

Potential Energy savings 1001573 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 103900 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 521t

Cost of investment 539000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 10 years client financing under a financial scenario of 60% debt, 40% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 32% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Under implementation

General Comments

The financial indicators arising from the insulation measure may not be as good as for the rest of measures, however it needs to be considered that insulation significantly improves indoor environmental conditions, an aspect which is particularly important for hotels (guest comfort)

Page 68: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

68

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP25 LEISURE GR’5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Leisure

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Confidential

Location and climatic region Chania, Crete, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Leisure/Sport centre

Surface in m² 4172m²

Annual energy use ~ 862 MWh

Main energy use Cooling and heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 206.6 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Exploit large potential for energy efficiency

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 8

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of low efficiency chiller with inverter chiller, Substitution of

boiler, Air curtains installation in main entrance, Improve solar factor,

Photovoltaic plant installation

Potential Energy savings 410241 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 73515 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 406t

Cost of investment 178500€

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 8 years EPC project under a financial scenario of 60% debt, 40% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 48% of total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments

The facility has a significant energy efficiency potential, mainly due to the poor energy management applied so far. The interventions in the windows and door, as well as the cooling/heating system, will significantly improve comfort of occupants

Page 69: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

69

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP26 HEALTH GR’6

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Healthcare

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Confidential

Location and climatic region Athens, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hospital

Surface in m² 45,000 m²

Annual energy use ~ 19411 MWh

Main energy use Cooling and Heating

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 431.4 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Improve energy efficiency and management in the facility and increase use of RES

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional boiler with condensing boiler, Heat recovery

systems, Window films to improve solar factor, PV plant in the outdoor

parking (solar parking shadings)

Potential Energy savings 1602240 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 91250 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 549t

Cost of investment 600000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 7 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 10 years client financing under a financial scenario of 60% debt, 40% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment

The facility can save almost 100,000 €/year of its total yearly energy costs and improve its energy efficiency despite already being a highly efficient building. In addition the facility will acquire a shaded parking lot (PV plant).

Status of project Planning

General Comments

Due to the numerous already implemented energy saving interventions, the savings percentage that can be achieved is relatively small (8%); nevertheless, this corresponds to a significant amount of energy savings (1.6 GWh/year).

Page 70: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

70

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP27 HOSPITALITY HR’1

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far EIHP

Location and climatic region Brac, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building 4 stars family hotel

Surface in m² 978 m²

Annual energy use ~ 40 MWh

Main energy use Lighting and Domestic Hot Water

Main energy source Electricity and gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 40.8 kwh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Improve energy efficiency of the facilities in this hotel built in 1970 and partially reconstructed in 2002

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of all lamps with LED lamps, Installation of a solar thermal

plant, Reactive power compensation

Potential Energy savings 130 214 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 2814€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 7t

Cost of investment 10000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 10 years client financing under a financial scenario of 70% debt, 30% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 41% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments None

Page 71: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

71

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP28 HOSPITALITY HR’2

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far EIHP

Location and climatic region Split, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel and Spa

Surface in m² NA

Annual energy use ~ 223 MWh

Main energy use Heating and cooling

Main energy source Electricity and fuel

Energy use per m² before intervention NA

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Project deals with upgrade of highly energy efficient hotel to the status of nearly zero energy building

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 15

Sustainable Energy measures recommended Substitution of halogen lamps with LED lamps, Photovoltaic plant

Potential Energy savings 11532 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 2200€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 2.5t

Cost of investment 32000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 15 years client financing project with a grant of 73%, 19% debt and 8% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 9% of its total yearly energy costs

Status of project Planning

General Comments None

Page 72: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

72

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP29 OFFICES HR’3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Offices

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far EIHP

Location and climatic region Zagreb, Oceanic

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices

Surface in m² NA

Annual energy use ~ 25 983 MWh

Main energy use Heating and cooling

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention NA

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Improve EE in this complex of office buildings constructed in 1970

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 9

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of low-efficient lamps, Substitution of low efficiency chillers

with inverter chillers

Potential Energy savings 1605726 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 127000€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 23t

Cost of investment 686000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 9 years client financing project with a grant of 27%, 51% debt and 22% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 6% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments None

Page 73: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

73

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP30 LEISURE HR’4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Leisure

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far EIHP

Location and climatic region Osijek, Oceanic

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Public pool and sport centre

Surface in m² NA

Annual energy use ~ 2 770 MWh

Main energy use Swimming pools

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention NA

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Project deals with energy renovation of public pool in Osijek, constructed in 1998 with an annual consumption of 2.770 MWh

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 11

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Replacement of existing conventional boilers with condensing boilers,

Installation of solar thermal plant, HVAC reconstruction – new air

handling units, Installation of new frequency regulated filter pumps

Potential Energy savings 1327628 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 47000€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 155t

Cost of investment 426000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 11 years EPC project with a grant of 50%, 45% debt and 15% equity, invested by the EPC provider

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 38% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments Additional savings can be achieved by taking water savings in to account

Page 74: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

74

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP31 HEALTH HR’5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Health

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far EIHP

Location and climatic region Crikvenica, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Specialised hospital / Thalassotherapy

Surface in m² NA

Annual energy use ~ 2 786 MWh

Main energy use Pools

Main energy source Fuel

Energy use per m² before intervention NA

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Project deals with energy renovation of public specialized hospital in Crikvenica, constructed form 1922 till 2014 with some medium reconstructions in last 10 year

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 12

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Installation of heat pump for heating and DHW, Installation of solar

thermal plant, Substitution of conventional lamps with LED lamps,

Capacitive power factor correction

Potential Energy savings 1110067 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 60000€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 355t

Cost of investment 500000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 5 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 12 years EPC project with a grant of 35%, 46% debt and 19% equity, invested by the EPC provider

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 40% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments The EPC provider, for the duration of the EPC, will receive the 100% of the obtained savings in order to operate the contract making sure maximum savings are achieved and repay the debt.

Page 75: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

75

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP32 HOSPITALITY IT’1

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hotel

Surface in m² 4000m²

Annual energy use ~ 1 136 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 283.9 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Improve EE in the hotel

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Occupancy and presence sensors,

Substitution of a low efficiency chiller with inverter chiller, HVAC

schedule definition, Substitution of windows, Thermal insulation of

building envelope (it’s a partial renovation: only interior façade),

Substitution of conventional boiler with condensing boiler

Potential Energy savings 543466 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 62092€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 83t

Cost of investment 441000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 6 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financed scenario with 20% debt and 80% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 37% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments it is possible to take advantage of a 65% tax credit on the investment costs available during the first 10 years following the investment.

Page 76: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

76

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP33 HOSPITALITY IT’2

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Hostel

Surface in m² 2682m²

Annual energy use ~ 370 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 138 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Improve EE in the hostel

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Thermal insulation of building envelope, Substitution of conventional

lamps, Occupancy and presence sensors combined with photocell,

Substitution of conventional boiler with condensing boiler

Potential Energy savings 192266 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 16929 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 23t

Cost of investment 133446 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financial scenario basing on a 20% grant, 70% debt and 30% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing B : Medium-High Profitability, medium-low likelihood of bad performance, medium-short payback time, with a medium-high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 52% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments To reinforce the profitability, it is possible to take advantage of a 65% tax credit on the investment costs available during the first 10 years following the investment.

Page 77: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

77

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP34 COMMERCE IT’3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Commerce

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Shopping mall

Surface in m² 73753 m²

Annual energy use ~ 10 620 MWh

Main energy use Heating and cooling

Main energy source Gas and electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 144 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective The Shopping mall management wants to reach a better energy performance

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 6

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

HVAC schedule definition, Substitution of conventional lamps, Variable

frequency drives for pumps, Photovoltaic plant

Potential Energy savings 753736 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 179000 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 508t

Cost of investment 529083 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 2 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing EPC financial scenario of 80% debt and 20% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment The facility can save 10.4% of its total yearly energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments

If the investment will be done within December 2018, it can receive a 50% tax refund in 10 years. Without the subsidy the investment still remains A rated. The PV plant energy production do not contribute to energy savings, but has been accounted in CO2 savings and in the economic and financial costs and revenues.

Page 78: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

78

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP35 TERTIARY SERVICES IT’4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Financial services

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Bank office

Surface in m² 6560 m²

Annual energy use ~ 1 202 MWh

Main energy use Heating and cooling

Main energy source Gas and electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 183.3 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Heating and cooling are the main consumption items, therefore an intervention on the envelope could be very appreciated also in terms of internal comfort

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 20

Sustainable Energy measures recommended Substitution of windows, Thermal insulation of building envelope

Potential Energy savings 284 950 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 41 716 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 57t

Cost of investment 490130 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 9 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Equity financing

GREPCon Project Rating

Equity financing D : Medium-Low Profitability, medium-high likelihood of bad performance, medium-long payback time, with a medium-low level of security in the financing

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment By the financial analysis this intervention seems to be not very interesting, but the value increase of the building and the renovation needs made the investment possible.

Status of project Planning

General Comments A part of the investment can be recovered from the income tax payments. As an EPC project, this investment would result in a lower E GREPCon rating

Page 79: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

79

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP36 EDUCATION IT’5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Education

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Primary school

Surface in m² 2333 m²

Annual energy use ~ 377 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 161.6 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Reduce energy use

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 15

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Installation of biomass boiler for

heating, Thermal insulation of building envelope, Photovoltaic plant

Potential Energy savings 172306 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 42651 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 35t

Cost of investment 268 385 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing EPC financial scenario of 20% grant, 56% debt and 24% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 45% of total energy costs with rapid ROI

Status of project Already validated, start 2018

General Comments none

Page 80: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

80

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP37 LEISURE IT’6

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Leisure

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Sport centre

Surface in m² 1963 m²

Annual energy use ~ 517 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 263.3 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Client interested in EPC to enhance energy efficiency

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 15

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of windows, Thermal insulation of building envelope,

Substitution of conventional boiler with condensing boiler, Occupancy

and presence sensors

Potential Energy savings 266306 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 19665 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 60t

Cost of investment 139976 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 7 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing EPC financial scenario of 10% grant, 60% debt and 40% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing C : Medium Profitability, medium likelihood of bad performance, medium payback time, with a medium level of security in the financing

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 52% of total energy costs

Status of project The project could be started before the end 2018

General Comments

Potential for a 65% tax credit for the client during the first 10 years (6, 5% of the investment can be recovered annually from the income tax payments). A client financed scenario has a better result, reaching an A GREPCon Rating

Page 81: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

81

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP38 LEISURE IT’7

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Leisure

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Sport centre

Surface in m² 4260 m²

Annual energy use ~ 2 004 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 470.5 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective

The sport center was built in 2000, but the energy performance is not very high. The administration board is interested in enhancing its energy performance. There is a considerable potential in the improvement of the lighting system

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 11

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Occupancy and presence sensors,

Photocells to dim luminous flux based on natural light, Substitution of a

low efficiency chiller with inverter chiller, Thermostatic valves for

radiators; Thermal insulation of building envelope

Potential Energy savings 253089 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 21742€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 59t

Cost of investment 91516 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing EPC financial scenario 80% debt and 20% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 12% of total energy costs

Status of project Planning

General Comments A 65% / 50% tax credit for the client during the first 10 years

Page 82: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

82

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP39 OFFICE IT’8

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Office

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices

Surface in m² 5270 m²

Annual energy use ~ 640 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Fuel

Energy use per m² before intervention 121.4 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective The building needs several interventions, first of all the substitution of the existing fuel boiler

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 8

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Substitution of a conventional boiler

by condensation boiler, PV plant

Potential Energy savings 119503 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 35267€/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 28t

Cost of investment 143285 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financial scenario 80% debt and 20% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing B : Medium-High Profitability, medium-low likelihood of bad performance, medium-short payback time, with a medium-high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 40% of total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments A larger refurbishment would be needed and could reduce the consumption by 60-70 %, but the investment is too large for the client.

Page 83: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

83

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP40 EDUCATION IT’9

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Education

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building School

Surface in m² 2867 m²

Annual energy use ~ 338 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 118 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective The building needs several interventions, affecting also the outer envelope

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 10

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Thermal insulation of building

envelope, Substitution of a conventional boiler by condensation boiler,

PV plant

Potential Energy savings 205 000 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 19713 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 45t

Cost of investment 189000 €

Payback period (estimated or real) 7 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financial scenario 60% debt and 40% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 68% of total energy costs

Status of project Planning

General Comments

The building needs an overall refurbishment, and the owner intends to reach also an energy performance upgrade. The realization with an EPC scheme would reach a lower financial performance, giving the project an D GREPCon Rating

Page 84: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

84

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP41 LEISURE IT’10

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Leisure

Type of project (EPC/other) Other

Service provider / facilitator involved so far Ambiente Italia

Location and climatic region NA

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Sport centre

Surface in m² 2439 m²

Annual energy use ~ 219 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 89.8 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective The sport hall was built in the ‘70, and has a very large energy use

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 9

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Thermal insulation of building

envelope (Roof only), Substitution of a conventional boiler by

condensation boiler

Potential Energy savings 105356 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 11122 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 23.4t

Cost of investment 93923€

Payback period (estimated or real) 7 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing Client financial scenario 80% debt and 20% equity

GREPCon Project Rating

Client financing C : Medium Profitability, medium likelihood of bad performance, medium payback time, with a medium level of security in the financing

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 47% of total energy costs

Status of project Planning

General Comments

There is a 50% tax credit for the client during the first 10 years (5% respectively of the investment can be recovered annually from the income tax payments). The realization with an EPC Financed scheme would reach a E GREPCon Rating

Page 85: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

85

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP42 HOSPITALITY PT’1

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far PSE

Location and climatic region Lisbon, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Senior residences building with apartments, restaurants/bar, gymnasium, leisure rooms, gardens, kitchen and technical areas

Surface in m² 15724 m²

Annual energy use ~ 737 MWh

Main energy use HVAC

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 46.9 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Exploit large potential for EE and RES

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 15

Sustainable Energy measures recommended Substitution of conventional lamps, Solar thermal plant, PV plant

Potential Energy savings 140300 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 58023 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 81.3t

Cost of investment 165673€

Payback period (estimated or real) 2 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 15 years EPC contract scenario, with 80% financing by ESCO and 20% by the Client

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC Contract A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 43% of total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Planning

General Comments Currently under review

Page 86: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

86

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP43 EDUCATION PT’2

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Hospitality

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far PSE

Location and climatic region Lisbon, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building School building with classrooms, laboratories, gymnasium, offices, bar, kitchen and technical areas

Surface in m² 8621 m²

Annual energy use ~ 654 MWh

Main energy use Heating

Main energy source Electricity and gas

Energy use per m² before intervention 75.9 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Exploit large potential for EE and RES

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 20

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Solar thermal plant, PV plant,

Building Management System

Potential Energy savings 78112 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 13971 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 24t

Cost of investment 89000€

Payback period (estimated or real) 4 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 20 years EPC contract scenario, with 80% financing by ESCO and 20% by the Client

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC Contract B : Medium-High Profitability, medium-low likelihood of bad performance, medium-short payback time, with a medium-high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 18% of total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Under review

General Comments Although the Client financing could reach an A GREPCon rating, the Client prefers the EPC scheme

Page 87: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

87

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP44 TERTIARY SERVICES PT’3

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Tertiary services

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far PSE

Location and climatic region Lisbon, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Office building with offices, shopping and technical areas

Surface in m² 5475 m²

Annual energy use ~ 352 MWh

Main energy use Lighting

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 64.2 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Exploit large potential for EE

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 15

Sustainable Energy measures recommended Substitution of conventional lamps, Building Management System

Potential Energy savings 67018 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 11105 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 7t

Cost of investment 48000€

Payback period (estimated or real) 2 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 15 years EPC contract scenario, with 80% financing by ESCO and 20% by the Client

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC Contract A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 19% of total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Under review

General Comments None

Page 88: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

88

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP45 OFFICES PT’4

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Tertiary services

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far PSE

Location and climatic region Lisbon, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices building with office rooms, open space, conference rooms, WC, kitchen, common areas and technical areas

Surface in m² 10 434m²

Annual energy use in kWh ~ 781 MWh

Main energy use HVAC

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 74.8 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Exploit large potential for EE

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 15

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Substitution of conventional boiler

for condensing boiler

Potential Energy savings 108972 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 18758 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 7.8t

Cost of investment 18758€

Payback period (estimated or real) 2 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 15 years EPC contract scenario, with 70% financing by ESCO and 30% by the Client

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC Contract A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 15% of total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Under review

General Comments Client shared savings 7%

Page 89: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

89

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

PP46 OFFICES PT’5

1. Introduction

Name of client Confidential

Segment of activity Tertiary services

Type of project (EPC/other) EPC

Service provider / facilitator involved so far PSE

Location and climatic region Lisbon, Mediterranean

2. Facility and initial situation

Type of building Offices building with office rooms, open space, conference rooms, WC, kitchen, common areas and technical areas

Surface in m² 13400m²

Annual energy use ~ 660 MWh

Main energy use HVAC

Main energy source Electricity

Energy use per m² before intervention 49.2 kWh/m²

3. Project Specifications

Main objective Exploit large potential for EE

Project Duration (in years) as proposed 20

Sustainable Energy measures recommended

Substitution of conventional lamps, Substitution of conventional boiler

for condensing boiler

Potential Energy savings 84902 kWh/y

Corresponding financial savings 13400 €/year

CO2 emissions saved (estimations) Total: ~ 6t

Cost of investment 52679€

Payback period (estimated or real) 3 years

Achieved savings (if already implemented) N.A.

Financing 20 years EPC contract scenario, with 70% financing by ESCO and 30% by the Client

GREPCon Project Rating

EPC Contract A : High Profitability, low likelihood of bad performance, very robust structure, short payback time, with a high level of security in the loan

4. Additional comments

Best Practice criteria assessment Facilities can save 13% of total energy costs with short ROI

Status of project Under review

General Comments Client shared savings 5%

Page 90: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES

90

Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application

16/10/2018

Page 91: NATIONAL TERTIARY SECTOR ANALYSIS€¦ · Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES application 16/10/2018 DOCUMENT TITLE Fact sheets on best-practice tertiary sector EE/RES