national agriculture and livestock extension policy …faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/ssd150787.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP)
The Implementation Framework, Plan and Budget
Republic of South Sudan
GOVERNMENT OF SOUTH SUDAN(GOSS)
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY (MAF)MINISTRY OF ANIMAL RESOURCES AND FISHERIES
(MARF)
National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy
(NALEP)
The Implementation Framework, Plan and Budget
Prepared byAgriculture and Livestock Extension Task Force
JUBA, May 2011
This document is intended as a guidance resource to support the implementation of the National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP) in South Sudan for the next five years. Although each step in this Implementation Framework should be completed, the level of details depends on the circumstances of individual initiatives, projects and programmes. It is worth to note that it should include, at all levels, the involvement of all stakeholders in extension service provision, and be attractive for the private and non state actors (NSA) to participate in the delive-ry of extension services and the commercialization of agriculture.
Written by: Agriculture and Livestock Task Force.
Document published with the financial support of the European Commission and the technical assistance of FAO.
Photo credits: Cover: Woman working, Augustino AtillioPage 10: Fishermen, Augustino AtillioPage 11: Teak Forest Yambio, Purna Chhettri and Susan KilobiaPage 18: Poultry farming, Purna Chhettri and Susan KilobiaPage 25: Group meeting under Ficus tree, Purna Chhettri and Susan Kilobia
iii
Contents
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ivACKNOWLEDGEMENT vFOREWORD viEXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii
15 THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK (LOGFRAME) 315.1 The main narrative summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315.2 Key Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVIs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715.3 Main Means Of Verification (MOVs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915.4 The key Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
16 THE OPERATIONAL PLAN 1516.1 Specific Objectives, Results and Activity narratives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1516.2 The Workplan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
17 KEY IMPLEMENTING ACTORS AND INTERACTIONS 2717.1 The implementation institutional setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2717.2 The key implementing actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2917.3 Interactions of Implementing Actors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2917.4 The Regulatory Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31
18 THE BUDGET 3418.1 Budget structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3418.2 Total costs estimates (in USD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
ANNEXES 34Annex 1: The methodology followed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37Annex 2: The Logframe of the NALEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42Annex 3: The Operational Plan Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52Annex 4: Detailed Budget for NALEP implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58
iv
Abbreviations and Acronyms
ALSF Agriculture and Livestock Stakeholder ForumCAADP Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development ProgrammeCAHW Community Animal Health WorkerCBO Community Based OrganizationERCC Extension and Research Coordinating CommitteeESP Extension Service providerFAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsFBO Faith Based OrganizationFFS Farmer Field SchoolFINA Farmers’ Information Needs AssessmentGoSS Government of the Republic of South SudanLog Frame Logical FrameworkMAF Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryMARF Ministry of Animal Resources and FisheriesMDG Millennium Development GoalsMOV Means of VerificationNALEP National Agriculture and Livestock Extension PolicyNGO Non Governmental OrganizationNPA Norwegian peoples AidNSA Non State ActorOVI Objectively Verifiable IndicatorSMS Subject Matter SpecialistSPCRP Sudan Productive Capacity Recovery ProgrammeTDT Technology development and transfer UNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUSAID United States Agency for International DevelopmentUNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUSD United States Dollar
v
Acknowledgement
The NALEP document and its Implementation Framework is an outcome of a collaborative work carried out by a Task Force. First and foremost, the Task Force wishes to acknowledge the source of funding that enabled this work to be accomplished. In particular, we would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the European Commission (EC) and World Bank (WB) for the finalization of the National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy and its Implementation Framework. The Task Force is also grateful to the Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations (FAO) for the technical assistance provided through Ms. Michelle Glenn, who compiled inputs from States’ consultative workshops, Mr. John Preissing who critically revised the Implementation Framework and the policy document and made significant recommendations and Mr. Menwuyellet Moussie, for his relentless support and inputs.
Equally important, we are indebted to the members of the larger working group and the senior officials in the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) and Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries (MARF), for having read through the draft policy document and made invaluable comments, contributions and recommendations. Our sincere thanks go to Messrs Francis Luala and Simon Baka who helped in facilitating the consultative workshops at the States level.
The Taskforce would also like to thank all persons who assisted in the realization of the undertaking. Over 300 people were consulted in the course of this policy formulation and implementation framework process through workshops in the ten states of South Sudan and meetings with members of the technical committees in the MAF and MARF. We thank them for sharing their time, experiences, and insights so generously with us. We would also like to thank the Undersecretaries of the two ministries and acknowledge the efforts made by Dr Loro George Leju, Dr John Kanisio and Mr John Choul in initiating the process which formed the basis for our work.
Task Force core team:1. Mr Augustino Atillio, Director, Department of Extension, Ministry of Animal Resources
and Fisheries.2. Mr Joseph Brok, Director, Department of Extension, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.3. Dr Purna Chhetri, Extension Specialist, SPCRP, UN FAO.4. Mr Ezana Getahun, Programme Manager, Norwegian People’s Aid.5. Mr Arne Eriksson, Consultant, European Union.
vi
Foreword
This document presents the Implementation Framework, Plan and Budget of the National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy (NALEP). It is complementary to the main NALEP document. It is structured in four main sections, namely: the Logical Framework, the Operational Plan, The Key Implementing Actors and Interactions, and the Budget. The numeration of these sections is a continuation of the one of the main NALEP document.
The first three sections give an indication on what the Republic of South Sudan should do, would it be willing to guarantee for its farmers, animal raisers and fishermen a pluralistic extension system, most likely to transform its agriculture and livestock sector from a subsistence-systems-based one to a more efficient one capable to help the country achieve in a relatively short period of time food security, wealth creation and national economic growth through science based, market oriented, competitive and profitable agricultural and livestock systems.
The fourth section (The Budget) presents information on what the Republic of South Sudan needs at once to provide its crops producers, animal raisers, fishermen and people earning their living from natural resources from the forest with the kind of effective and efficient extension services. Otherwise, it theoretically represents the maximum costs that Government of South Sudan and all stakeholders may need to secure in order to guarantee ideal extension services to a vast majority of producers to achieve the goal mentioned above.
In practice, however this document is a kind of guide to which to refer, or from which to tap to design any proper extension action for any segment of the national territory, or to the benefit of any socio-economic segment of the population, to achieve an optimal transformation of their agricultural and livestock systems, provided a certain number of key conditions (peace, environment stability, GoSS’ commitment to NALEP implementation…) are durably met.
The content stems from the entire NALEP document. Mention of specific sections or sub-sections however is made wherever it is deemed necessary.
vii
Executive Summary
South Sudan is going through rapid transformation. Since the installation of Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) and the semi autonomous Government in 2005, South Sudan has been committed to meeting the dreams and aspirations of its people. As more than 90 percent of the people depend on agriculture and livestock for their livelihood, the provision of efficient, effective and participatory extension services is seen as key in achieving these national goals. To strengthen extension services provision, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) and Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries (MARF) have developed National Agriculture and Livestock Extension Policy Directives. This policy document along with its accompanying Implementation Framework is aimed at promoting the development of extension services that can contribute to the wellbeing of the people of South Sudan.
In recognizing the role that the private sector can play in extension provision and the need to make extension services responsible and accountable to client needs, the new policy have features that: 1) calls for the adoption of pluralistic and participatory extension services; 2) encourages the privatization of extension services; 3) ensures that research priorities and extension messages meet farmer needs; 4) focuses on developing human resources to commensurate with emerging needs; 5) promotes the use of multiple approaches to meet diversified client needs and agro-ecological zones; 6) promotes empowerment of clientele and service providers; 7) seeks to assure that extension facilitating factors vital to motivate extension service providers (ESPs) are considered in agriculture development activities; 8) address the financing of extension services; and 9) provides a focus on cross cutting issues such as HIV/AIDS, gender and environment affecting agricultural development.
The National Agriculture and Livestock Policy and its Implementation Framework have been developed through a participatory process which was led by the Directors of Departments of Extension from MAF and MARF supported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations’ Sudan Productive Capacity Recovery Programme (SPCRP) and the Support to Agriculture and Forestry Programme, supported by the Multi-Donor Trust Fund. The new policy indeed builds on the past work done by the two ministries. The Task Force reviewed and improved the policy directives based
viii
on emerging needs and gap analysis, supported by state level sharing and validation workshops where key stakeholders from the government, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), private sector and farmer unions/associations were invited to contribute. Indeed the process and the product can be considered home grown.
The National Agriculture and Livestock Policy Directives are also accompanied by implementation guidelines, developed through a consultative process through State level consultative workshops. The challenge ahead will be to develop State level extension implementation strategies. The GoSS, with the support of key partners, presents in this document the operationalization of the policy through the development of a detailed implementation framework along with budgets, time frame and monitoring indicators designed to meet the demands of individual states in line with the guiding principles of NALEP.
1
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK
2
3
15 THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK (LOGFRAME)
The complete Log frame table of the NALEP is presented in Annex 2.
The design of the NALEP Logical Framework (Log frame), Operational Plan and its budget was prepared by the Agriculture and Livestock Extension Task Force with the support of Mr. Nehru Essomba (SPCRP, international consultant) as well as key national level stakeholders through different consultations and a validation workshop. The NALEP Log frame is harmonized with the NALEP policy document and it has 10 specific objectives that are expected to be completed by the end of July 2016 (the time frame for the operational plan starts in July 2011 for a five years period till July 2016).
15.1 The Main Narrative Summaries
The five main narrative summaries of the Log frame (Goal, Overall Objective, Specific Objectives, Results, and Activities) stem from the content of Section 3 (Policy on agriculture and livestock extension services) of the main NALEP document. The numeration of Results is nested to the one of Specific Objectives (example: Result 1.1. = Result number 1 of Specific Objective number 1), and the one of Activities to the one of Results (example: Activity 3.1.3 = Activity number 3 of Result number 3.1).
The Goal
The Goal targeted through the NALEP implementation is:To transform agriculture and livestock from traditional/subsistence systems to achieve food security, wealth creation and national economic growth through science based, market oriented, competitive and profitable agricultural and livestock systems.
It corresponds to the NALEP mission as defined in section 3.2 of the main document.
The Overall Objective
The Overall Objective to be reached is:To guide the establishment and implementation of a pluralistic extension system which will be instrumental in achieving national agricultural and livestock goals, efficiently contribute to the national economy and reduction of poverty, through developing
4
and improving the efficiency of sustainable agriculture, livestock, water, forestry and rangeland resource sub-sector activities, based on sound environmental practices.
It corresponds to the NALEP objective presented in Section 3.
The Specific Objectives
The ten Specific Objectives are formulated as below:1. To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension
services to a broad clientele at all levels2. To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels3. To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods4. To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural
services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages5. To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among
ESPs at all levels6. To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service
providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT)
7. To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery
8. To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services
9. To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension
10. Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs
They derive from the eleven policy statements contained in section 3.4 of the main NALEP document.
The Results
The thirteen results are as follows:1.1. NALEP is endorsed at the highest possible level of the GoSS within one year.1.2. NALEP is adopted by States and implemented at all levels starting second year.
5
1.3. International partnerships are built around NALEP in support of its implementation starting first year.
2.1. Range of appropriate and needs-based extension services are delivered to a broad range of clientele starting second year.
3.1. Relevant and appropriate extension approaches, methods and guidelines are developed and documented starting first year, and disseminated starting second year.
4.1. Rural Households have access to improved skills, tools and techniques for their adoption and use starting third year.
5.1. The setup of institutional arrangements for the implementation of the NALEP is functional at all levels starting second year.
6.1. Capacity of training institutions is strengthened starting second year.6.2. Capacity of human resources is strengthened at all levels starting second year.7.1. Support for extension facilitation factors (markets, inputs, credit facilities,
infrastructures, irrigation facilities, subsidies…) is increased starting second year.
8.1. The promotion of cross cutting issues is enhanced and mainstreamed in all extension programmes starting first year.
9.1. Funding of extension service delivery is shared between the public, private, NSAs and the farmers themselves starting second year.
10.1. A strategic and an operational plan for agricultural research, extension and education are developed for GoSS and State levels starting second year.
They derive from the understatements of the eleven policy statements contained in section 3.4 of the main NALEP document.
The Activities
The thirty-nine activities defined under the results above are the following:1.1.1. Present the NALEP, its Implementation and Regulatory Frameworks to the
Council of Ministers through MAF and MARF (year 1)1.1.2. Allocate and mobilize appropriate resources for the implementation of NALEP
at all levels (years 1-5)1.2.1. Launch and disseminate the NALEP to the States (year 1)1.2.2. Implement the reform of extension organization and management structures at
GoSS, State and County levels (years 2-5)1.3.1. Initiate and formalize as many international partnerships as possible around the
6
NALEP implementation framework, including with the implementation process of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) (years 1-5)
2.1.1. Develop gender sensitive norms, standards, guidelines and a system of registration for ESPs (years 1-2)
2.1.2. Conduct farmers’ information needs assessment at all levels (FINA) (years 1-2)
2.1.3. Plan and implement extension programmes based on FINA (years 2-5)2.1.4. Establish multi lateral and bi lateral partnerships to harmonize and coordinate
the delivery of extension services (years 1-5)2.1.5. Facilitate the implementation of NALEP through increased resources for
extension (years 1-5)3.1.1. Create (year 1) and sustain a database of appropriate documents on participatory
extension approaches and methods (years 1-5)3.1.2. Identify, test, adapt and upscale relevant participatory extension approaches
and methods (years 1-5)3.1.3. Develop appropriate extension packages and messages based on agro ecological
and socio-economic situations (years 1-5)4.1.1. Facilitate the formation of groups and associations for easy access to extension
services, inputs and technologies (years 1-5)4.1.2. Increase women representation in all extension activities at all levels to better
reach female farmers and women-headed households (years 1-5)4.1.3. Provide needs-based training and advice to ESPs and clientele using different
approaches, including FFS (years 1-5)4.1.4. Disseminate extension packages using cost effective methods and approaches
(years 2-5)4.1.5. Establish farmers information centers at Payam level (years 2-5)5.1.1. Develop ToR and implementation guidelines for the NALEP implementation
committee, fora and professional working groups(year 1)5.1.2. Establish NALEP implementation committee at GoSS level (year 1)5.1.3. Establish professionals working groups at national and State levels (year 1)5.1.4. Establish NALEP agriculture and livestock stakeholder fora at all levels (year
1)6.1.1. Update and implement training curriculum of training centers and institutes of
MAF and MARF (years 1-5)6.1.2. Develop minimum staffing levels with minimum qualification and experience
required for ESPs (years 1-2)6.2.1. Develop norms, standards and guidelines for ESPs (year 1)
7
6.2.2. Assess training needs of ESPs, including state and NSAs at all levels (years 1-2)
6.2.3. Identify and train ESPs according to needs identified (years 2-5)7.1.1. Develop a communication strategy for advocacy, lobbying and facilitation in
favor of extension services using all available channels (radio, TV, internet…) at all levels, mobilize resources and implement (years 2-5)
7.1.2. Facilitate the establishment of linkages of farmers to providers of facilitation factors (traders, market information sources, input suppliers, micro-credit institutions, irrigation…) (years 1-5)
7.1.3. Develop a clear strategy on subsidies for farmers (years 1-5)8.1.1. Conduct a study to identify and prioritize cross cutting issues in agriculture and
livestock extension services specific to Southern Sudan (year 1)8.1.2. Develop capacity through the training of ESPs on cross-cutting issues identified
and ways to address it (years 2-5)8.1.3. Institute a yearly national conference and follow-up meetings at State, County
and Payam on the promotion and mainstreaming of cross cutting issues in extension programmes (year 1)
9.1.1. Organize a study to delineate areas of intervention for private and public extension services (year 1)
9.1.2. Develop and establish a sustainable funding mechanism in favor of extension services, based on the results and recommendations of the study (years 2-3)
9.1.3. Initiate and establish a donor coordination meeting to mobilize financial support for a coordinated extension service delivery (year 1)
10.1.1. Develop a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 1-2)
10.1.2. Mobilize resources necessary for the implementation of a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 2-5)
10.1.3. Support existing training institutions and other educational facilities to carry out adaptive research with on-farm trials and on-station research (years 2-5)
15.2 Key Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVIs)
Key Objectively Verifiable Objectives (OVIS) of the effective implementation of NALEP are the following:
8
For the goal
• Increase in the percentage of population living in food security at all levels• Decrease in the percentage of the population living below poverty line (less than
USD 2 /day)• Increase in the contribution of agriculture and livestock to national economic
growth• Increase in technology adoption in agricultural and livestock development• Increase in the rate of market-oriented agricultural and livestock production
systems
For the Overall Objective
• Increase in the number of private and NSAs in extension systems• Presence of farmers and farmers institutions in decision-making bodies of ESPs• Increase in the number of farmers organizations• Increase in the demand for extension services• Increase in the production and productivity in crops, livestock, fisheries and forest
products• Increase in the agricultural input use index at all levels
For Specific Objectives
• Official endorsement of the NALEP by the GoSS Council of Ministers and States• At least 8 of the 10 states implement NALEP by end of year 2, and all the 10 by year
5• Increase in the number of female staff of the extension service system by 5 to 10%
every year, at all levels• Existence of a national database on extension participatory approaches and methods
by end of year 2• Increase in the number of extension recipients groups and associations at the levels
of Payams and counties• Existence of the NALEP implementation Committee and its organs at GoSS level• Existence of rehabilitated infrastructures in training centers and institutes of MAF
and MARF; at least 4 of the 6 centers fully rehabilitated, and equipped with essential resources
9
• Existence of a national communication strategy for advocacy, lobbying and facilitation in favor of extension services
• Effective institution of a yearly national conference on the promotion and mainstreaming of cross cutting issues in extension programmes
• Existence of a functional funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension
• Existence of a strategic and an operational plans documents for agricultural research, extension and education
For Results
• Increase in quality and quantity of human resources allocated to extension services by GoSS, States and NGOs
• Increase in the number of private and NSAs participating effectively in extension service delivery and the commercialization of agriculture at all levels
• Increase in the number of partnerships between GoSS and international stakeholders backing up agricultural technology development, extension, and education
• Quality of extension packages and documents produced by ESPs• Appropriateness of extension approaches and methods to ecological and socio-
economic situations of the country• Participation of rural organizations in NALEP-inspired platforms of exchanges (fora)
and decision making bodies (committees and working groups) at all levels• Existence of updated curriculum of training centers and institutes of MAF and
MARF• Existence of administrative instructions indicating minimum staffing levels at all
levels• Existence of a strategy on subsidies to farmers
15.3 Main Means Of Verification (MOVs)
Some of the main MOVs of most of the indicators above are listed below:
For the Goal
• National and international reports (World Bank, International Monetary Fund…) on the state of the national economy
10
• International reports (UNDP, FAO…) on the state of development, agricultural development, food security
• MDG reports• National reports on the state of development, agricultural development, food
security
For the Overall Objective
• International reports (UNDP, FAO…) on the state of development, agricultural development, food security
• Periodic reports of NALEP-related projects/programmes• National reports on the state of development, agricultural development, food
security
For the Specific Objectives and Results
• Official Journal of the Southern Sudan• Laws and rules of GoSS and States concerning agriculture, livestock, and forestry
development, with regard to extensions services, and the involvement of private and NSAs, and the commercialization of agriculture
• Periodic reports of NALEP-related projects/programmes• Annual budget allocations of MAF, MARF, NGOS, and States ministries in charge of
agriculture, livestock, and forests• Reports on extension services and activities by MAF, MARF, NGOS, and States
ministries in charge of agriculture, livestock, and forests• Project portfolios of GoSS international partners• Reports of ESPS active in the field• Extension documents produced by ESPs• Farmers and farmers’ organizations surveys• Reports of NGOS and other stakeholders on extension service
11
15.4 The Key Assumptions
Some of the key assumptions formulated in view of the achievement of results and objectives defined above are given below:
• The Republic of South Sudan suffers no major conflict outbreak• No major climatic disaster occurs• NALEP is effectively and sustainably implemented• NALEP is complemented by other appropriate development programmes/projects• GoSS and States are committed to supporting extension services in general, and
NALEP and related activities at all levels, in particular• All stakeholders are committed to supporting NALEP and extension services at all
levels• GoSS and States are effectively committed to empowering the farmers and supporting
farmers’ organizations, and ESPs• The decentralization process is effective• Laws and rules are effectively implemented• MAF and MARF secure appropriate resources and appropriate partners
13
OPERATIONAL PLAN
14
15
16 THE OPERATIONAL PLAN
16.1 Specific Objectives, Results and Activity Narratives
1 To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension services to a broad clientele at all levels1.1. The NALEP is endorsed at the highest possible level of the GoSS within one
year1.1.1. Present the NALEP, its Implementation and Regulatory Frameworks to the
Council of Ministers through MAF and MARF (year 1)The Task Force will prepare all working all working documents that MAF and MARF will need to present the NALEP document and its Implementation, Plan and Budget annex document to the Council of Ministers. For the NALEP Regulatory Framework, the Task Force will need to have a suitable consultant for assistance with regard to working documents needed by MAF and MARF in terms of law(s), rules and regulations necessary for NALEP sustainability and its functional modalities, the creation of NALEP-related new institutions, procedures and modalities of interactions among stakeholders involved in NALEP implementation.
1.1.2. Allocate and mobilize appropriate resources for the implementation of NALEP at all levels (years 1-5)
1.2. NALEP is adopted by States and implemented at all levels starting second year1.2.1. Launch and disseminate the NALEP to the States (year 1)
GoSS Officials at all levels and all stakeholders involved in NALEP implementation should be involved. This activity will include field visits, meetings all levels, within a coherent programme schedule, and a lot of communication through all media (newspaper, radio, television, internet…) at all levels.
1.2.2. Implement the reform of extension organization and management structures at GoSS, State and County levels (years 2-5)This activity will deal with making the institutional setup proposed for NALEP functional. It will require, after the appropriate regulatory framework is in place, to work on allocating and making available resources at all levels. Meetings, field visits, monitoring, communication actions will be necessary for that.
16
1.3. International partnerships are built around NALEP in support of its implementation starting first year.1.3.1. Initiate and formalize as many international partnerships as possible around
the NALEP implementation framework, including with the implementation process of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) (years 1-5)
MAF and MARF will organize a Roundtable of Development Partners for the implementation of NALEP at the national level. All partners involved in development technical assistance, financing, and activities should be invited to initiate discussions on what could be done, how, where and by whom. A permanent organ to periodically monitor the process should be established early during year 1. This organ should meet regularly every year.
MAF and MARF will also ensure, in particular, that GoSS adhere to the CAADP and its financing process at the level of the African Union (AU) and of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), as well as to the AU 2003 Maputo Declaration on Agriculture and Food Security, in case the Government of Sudan was not already involved. In case this latter was already involved, MAF and MARF should strengthen linkages with these processes and in particular engage in the formulation of a Compact Plan, which will be national agricultural investment plan with the CAADP framework for the financing of agriculture in the Republic of South Sudan. Technical assistance in this endeavour could be sought from partners such as FAO, the World Bank…
2 To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels
2.1. Range of appropriate and needs-based extension services are delivered to a broad range of clientele starting second year2.1.1. Develop gender sensitive norms, standards, guidelines and a system of
registration for ESPs (years 1-2)
This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF develop normative documents needed.
17
2.1.2. Conduct farmers’ information needs assessment at all levels (FINA) (years 1-2)This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF conduct a survey at all levels, using a FINA approach.
2.1.3. Plan and implement extension programmes based on FINA (years 2-5)
2.1.4. Establish multi lateral and bi-lateral partnerships to harmonize and coordinate the delivery of extension services (years 1-5)This activity will be implemented by MAF and MARF alongside Activity 1.3.1.
2.1.5. Facilitate the implementation of NALEP through increased resources for extension (years 1-5)This activity concerns all partners (GoSS, States, Development Partners, NGOS and other Stakeholders).
3 To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods3.1. Relevant and appropriate extension approaches, methods and guidelines are
developed and documented starting first year, and disseminated starting second year3.1.1. Create (year 1) and sustain a database of appropriate documents on
participatory extension approaches and methods (years 1-5)This activity will require that MAF and MARF search for appropriate technical assistance from well indicated Development Partners during year 1.
3.1.2. Identify, test, adapt and upscale relevant participatory extension approaches and methods (years 1-5)
3.1.3. Develop appropriate extension packages and messages based on agro ecological and socio-economic situations (years 1-5)
4 To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages
4.1. Rural Households have access to improved skills, tools and techniques for their adoption and use starting third year
18
4.1.1. Facilitate the formation of groups and associations for easy access to extension services, inputs and technologies (years 1-5)
4.1.2. Increase women representation in all extension activities at all levels to better reach female farmers and women-headed households (years 1-5)
4.1.3. Provide needs-based training and advice to ESPs and clientele using different approaches, including FFS (years 1-5)
4.1.4. Disseminate extension packages using cost effective methods and approaches (years 2-5)
4.1.5. Establish farmers information centers at Payam level (years 2-5)
5 To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among ESPs at all levels
5.1.1. Develop ToR and implementation guidelines for the NALEP implementation committee, fora and professional working groups (year 1)This activity will be undertaken with the assistance of an appropriate consultant who will draft the working document to be finalized by the Task Force. It should be conducted in coherence with Activity 1.1.1
5.1.2. Establish NALEP implementation committee at GoSS level (year 1)
5.1.3. Establish professionals working groups at national and State levels (year 1)
5.1.4. Establish NALEP agriculture and livestock stakeholder fora at all levels (year 1)
6 To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT)
6.1. Capacity of training institutions is strengthened starting second year6.1.1. Update and implement training curriculum of training centers and institutes
of MAF and MARF (years 1-5)The updating exercise will be undertaken in year 1 with the assistance of an appropriate consultant who will draft the working document to be finalized by the Task Force.
19
6.1.2. Develop minimum staffing levels with minimum qualification and experience required for ESPs (years 1-2)
6.2. Capacity of human resources is strengthened at all levels starting second year6.2.1. Develop norms, standards and guidelines for ESPs (year 1)
This activity will be undertaken with the assistance of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants who will draft the working document to be finalized by the Task Force. It should be conducted in coherence with Activity 1.1.1
6.2.2. Assess training needs of ESPs, including state and NSAs at all levels (years 1-2)
This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF conduct a survey at all levels.
6.2.3. Identify and train ESPs according to needs identified (years 2-5)
7 To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery
7.1. Support for extension facilitation factors (markets, inputs, credit facilities, infrastructures, irrigation facilities, subsidies…) is increased starting second year7.1.1. Develop a communication strategy for advocacy, lobbying and facilitation in
favor of extension services using all available channels (radio, TV, internet…) at all levels, mobilize resources and implement (years 2-5)This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF
7.1.2. Facilitate the establishment of linkages of farmers to providers of facilitation factors (traders, market information sources, input suppliers, micro-credit institutions, irrigation…) (years 1-5)
7.1.3. Develop a clear strategy on subsidies for farmers (years 1-5) This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF
20
8 To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services
8.1. The promotion of cross cutting issues is enhanced and mainstreamed in all extension programmes starting first year8.1.1. Conduct a study to identify and prioritize cross cutting issues in agriculture
and livestock extension services specific to Southern Sudan (year 1)This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF
8.1.2. Develop capacity through the training of ESPs on cross-cutting issues identified and ways to address it (years 2-5)
8.1.3. Institute a yearly national conference and follow-up meetings at State, County and Payam on the promotion and mainstreaming of cross cutting issues in extension programmes (year 1)
9 To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension
9.1. Funding of extension service delivery is shared between the public, private, NSAs and the farmers themselves starting second year9.1.1. Organize a study to delineate areas of intervention for private and public
extension services (year 1)This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF
9.1.2. Develop and establish a sustainable funding mechanism in favor of extension services, based on the results and recommendations of the study (years 2-3)This activity will require the hiring of an appropriate consultant or team of consultants to assist MAF and MARF
9.1.3. Initiate and establish a donor coordination meeting to mobilize financial support for a coordinated extension service delivery (year 1)
21
10 Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs10.1. A strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and
education are developed for GoSS and State levels starting second year
10.1.1. Develop a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 1-2)MAF and MARF may need to request an appropriate technical assistance with FAO or any other well indicated Development Partner.
10.1.2. Mobilize resources necessary for the implementation of a strategic and an operational plans for agricultural research, extension and education at Goss and State levels (years 2-5)
10.1.3. Support existing training institutions and other educational facilities to carry out adaptive research with on-farm trials and on-station research (years 2-5)
16.2 The Workplan
The NALEP Workplan is presented in Figure 5 below. It shows the sequence of implementation of activities, according to deadlines already provided in their narratives above within a five-year timeframe. The starting point of NALEP is the month of July 2011. Annual deadlines for activities are therefore fixed at every month of July up till 2016.
22
Specific Objective Results Activities
Deadline (July 2016)
July-12
July-13
July-14
July-15
July-16
1. To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension services to a broad clientele at all levels
1.1 1.1.1
1.1.2
1.2 1.2.1
1.2.2
1.31.3.1
2. To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels
2.1 2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
3. To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods
3.1 3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
4. To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages
4. 1 4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.1.5
5. To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among ESPs at all levels
5.1 5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
6. To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT)
6.1 6.1.1
6.1.2
6.2 6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
23
7. To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery
7.1 7.1.1
7.1.2
7.1.3
8. To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services
8.1 8.1.1
8.1.2
8.1.3
9. To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development…
9.1 9.1.1
9.1.2
10. Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs
10.1 10.1.1
10.1.2
10.1.3
Specific Objective Results Activities
Deadline (July 2016)
July-12
July-13
July-14
July-15
July-16
25
KEY IMPLEMENTING ACTORS AND INTERACTIONS
26
27
17 KEY IMPLEMENTING ACTORS AND INTERACTIONS
17.1 The Implementation Institutional Setup
The institutional setup proposed for NALEP implementation is given in Figure 6. It multi layered structure, which will carry responsibilities going beyond NALEP, will covers the GoSS, State, County and Payam levels. It has been thoroughly described in Section 4.4 of the main document.
On top, at the GOSS level, will be the Inter-ministerial Steering Committee. The Technical Committee established under it will include all key sector stakeholders. A NALEP Implementation Committee will be formed under this latter to coordinate the work of making the policy operational. The implementation committee will have a number of Working Groups under it including notably, the one in charge of Extension and Research Coordination.
28
Figure 6: The institutional setup proposed for the implementation of NALEP
Interministerial Technical Committee (GOSS)
State Agriculture & Livestock Stakeholder
County Agriculture & Livestock Stakeholder
Payam Agriculture & Livestock Stakeholder
Extension Clientele Groups
NALEPimplementationSub-Committee
OtherSub-Committees
Ext. & ResearchCoordinatingCommittee
OtherCommittees
Ext. & ResearchCoordinatingCommittee
OtherCommittees
PayamImplementation
Team
Working Groups(e. g Ext. & Res.Coordination)
Other WorkingGroups
GoSS Level
State Level
County Level
Grass Root Level
Payam Level
29
17.2 The key implementing actors
Within and beyond the institutional setup presented above, actors to be involved in NALEP implementation can be grouped under four main categories: Government bodies, Development Partners, Extension Service Providers and the Extension Clientele itself. The Government bodies comprise the GoSS, the governments of States, the Counties and Payams administrations, and all the field lower structures controlled by the Government. Extension Service Providers include public as well private and non state actors. Research institutions, Higher Education Institutions, NGOs, CBOs, Public extensions providers, etc belong to this last group. The category of Development Partners would basically include multilateral as well as bilateral donors, development agencies of the United Nations system and international NGOs.
17.3 Interactions of Implementing Actors
Actors involved in the implementation of NALEP could interact among themselves in many ways, formally (through agreements, contracts or any other formal links) or not. These various links inter-related or not, are summarized in Figure 3.
Partnerships will be one category of these links. They will concern two or more actors of the Government bodies (GoSS or States), the Development Partners and the Extension Service Providers, in situations where actors concerned will come together to cooperate in favor of extension service delivery or organization.
Financing will be another reason for interaction. It will correspond to situations where a donor (Government body or a Development partner) or a group of donors will provide financial resources for actions of extension service delivery or supervision/coordination of this latter. It would involve the donor(s), the beneficiaries, and the specific implementing actor(s).
A typical supervision situation will be one where an actor, usually a technical public body, will have the responsibility to look over activities implemented by Extension Service Providers to ensure that the service is provided within the norms in enforcement. The alter ego of this situation will be one of reporting, in which the supervisee(s) will have to report to the supervisor(s) and other stakeholder(s) on activities convened.
30
Fig
ure
7: A
n il
lust
rati
on
of
inte
ract
ion
s th
at m
ay e
xist
am
on
g t
he
mai
n a
cto
rs o
f N
ALE
P im
ple
men
tati
on
Gov
ern
men
t B
od
ies
The NALEP implementation
Extension Service Providers
Dev
elo
pm
nt
Part
ner
s
Exte
nsi
on
Clie
nte
le G
rou
ps
Inte
rmin
iste
rial
Tec
hn
ical
Co
mm
itte
e (G
OSS
)
Stat
e A
gri
cult
ure
& L
ives
tock
Sta
keh
old
er
Co
un
ty A
gri
cult
ure
& L
ives
tock
Sta
keh
old
er
Paya
m A
gri
cult
ure
& L
ives
tock
Sta
keh
old
er
Exte
nsi
on
Clie
nte
le G
rou
ps
NA
LEP
imp
lem
enta
tio
nSu
b-C
om
mit
tee
Oth
erSu
b-C
om
mit
tees
Ext.
& R
esea
rch
Co
ord
inat
ing
Co
mm
itte
e
Oth
erC
om
mit
tees
Ext.
& R
esea
rch
Co
ord
inat
ing
Co
mm
itte
eO
ther
Co
mm
itte
es
Paya
mIm
ple
men
tati
on
Team
Wo
rkin
g G
rou
ps
(e. g
Ext
. & R
es.
Co
ord
inat
ion
)
Oth
er W
ork
ing
Gro
up
s
Go
SS L
evel
Stat
e Le
vel
Co
un
ty L
evel
Gra
ss R
oo
t Lev
el
Paya
m L
evel
31
17.4 The Regulatory Framework
The regulatory framework will be constituted of all NALEP-related official documents (laws, rules, norms, guidelines…) in enforcement the Republic of Sudan, which would provide the foundation for the various actions undertaken to be legal and guarantee conditions of their effectiveness and efficiency in extension services delivery. In case some of these documents may not be available, it will be necessary to have them established and approved / endorsed by the appropriate authorities. Figure 4 illustrates the backgorund provided by the Regulatory Framework for NALEP implementing actors and their interactions.
It is important that the regulatory framework be conducive for all actors, so as to enable them to efficiently participate in the interactions in which they will be involved. It will be necessary that it be closely monitored by Government authorities to that end. Three main areas will be of interest for making the regulatory framework conducive:
• The creation of new NALEP-inspired bodies. The organs of the institutional setup for the implementation of NALEP should receive some kind of official or legal existence, through
Figure 8: An illustration of the background constituted by the Regulatory Framework for NALEP implementation
Government Bodies
The
NA
LEP
imp
lem
enta
tio
n
Exte
nsi
on
Ser
vice
Pro
vid
ers
Developmnt Partners
Extension Clientele Groups
Regulatory
32
official documents carrying the clear description of their mandates, their structure, the role of various factors involved, etc.
• The procedures and modalities guidelines for interactions described above. A minimum codification and formalization of the various types of interactions to be established for the implementation of NALEP will be indispensable, to avoid overlapping and redundancy, and promote synergy as much as possible in the process.
• The normative framework for ESPs, which will include the norms and guidelines, and other documents presenting the instructions to be followed or respected by all actors in their involvement with NALEP implementation.
33
THE BUDGET
34
18 THE BUDGET
18.1 Budget Structure
The budget is structured in two main components: the General Costs, and the Specific Operational Costs for Activities. The first component presents estimated costs under three sub-components: the GoSS, the State and the County levels. Every sub-component includes itemized costs for the rehabilitation of infrastructures, non expendable procurement, and expendable procurement, the personnel, contracts with ESPs, training, travels, and general operation costs. The second component presents exclusively operational costs that would be needed to implement the 39 specific activities identified for the NALEP.
As indicated in the foreword of this document, this budget presents information on what the Republic of South Sudan could need at once if it were to provide its crops producers, animal raisers, fishermen and people getting their living out natural resources from the forest with ideal extension services, over the entire national territory and for the benefit of all the agricultural and livestock systems, in the most efficient and effective way. Otherwise, it theoretically represents the maximum costs that GoSS and all stakeholders would need to secure, in order to guarantee ideal extension services to all its producers, through NALEP implementation.
18.2 Total Costs Estimates (in USD)
The total budget necessary to implement the NALEP over the entire national territory, under the conditions presented in the foreword of this document amounts to USD 137,837,631 (one hundred thirty seven million eight hundred thirty seven thousand six hundred thirty one US dollars), of which USD 108,408,706 (one hundred eight million four hundred eight thousand and seven hundred and six US dollars) would fall under General Costs and USD 29,428,925 (twenty nine million four hundred twenty eight thousand and nine hundred twenty five US dollars) under Specific Operational Costs for Activities.
35
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
A. General Costs
A.1 GoSS Level 1,783 033 1,266,357 1,310,679 1,588,830 1,404,033 7,352,932
A.2 State Level 6,466,333 3,566,955 3,691,798 5,229,083 3,954,747 22,908,917
A.3 County Level 20,795,603 12,476,203 12,912,870 18,129,591 13,832,590 78,146,857
Sub-total A – General Costs
29,044,969 17,309,515 17,915,348 24,947,504 19,191,369 108,408,706
B. Specific Operational Costs for Activities
B.1 Specific Objective 1
185,000 46,575 48,205 49,892 51,639 381,311
B.2 Specific Objective 2
65,000 77,625 21,425 22,174 22,950 209,174
B.3 Specific Objective 3
530,000 439,875 337,436 349,246 361,470 2,018,027
B.4 Specific Objective 4
95,000 4,005,450 4,145,641 4,290,738 4,440,914 16,977,743
B.5 Specific Objective 5
290,000 217,350 224,957 232,831 240,980 1,206,118
B.6 Specific Objective 6
170,000 181,125 80,342 83,154 86,064 600,685
B.7 Specific Objective 7
70,000 124,200 53,561 55,436 57,376 360,573
B.8 Specific Objective 8
200,000 51,570 53,561 55,436 57,376 418,123
B.9 Specific Objective 9
100,000 113,850 107,123 0 0 320,973
B.10 Specific Objective 10
150,000 1,728,450 1,628,262 1,685,251 1,744,235 6,936,198
Sub-total B – Specific Operational Costs
1,855,000 6,986,250 6,700,512 6,824,159 7,063,004 29,428,925
Grand Total 30,899,969 24,295,250 24,615,861 31,771,663 26,254,373 137,837,631
Table 1: The total estimates costs (in USD) for the NALEP implementation over a 5-year period
36
This total amount would be fragmented into USD 30,899,969 (thirty million eight hundred ninety nine thousand and nine hundred sixty nine US dollars) for the first year of implementation, USD 24,295,250 (twenty four million two hundred ninety five thousand and two hundred fifty US dollars) for the second year, USD 24,615,861 (twenty four million six hundred fifteen thousand and eight hundred sixty one US dollars) for the third year, USD 31,771,663 (thirty one million seven hundred seventy one thousand and six hundred sixty three US dollars) for the fourth year, and USD 26,254,373 (twenty six million two hundred fifty four thousand and three hundred seventy three US dollars).
37
ANNEXES
Annex 1: The Methodology Followed
The formulation of the draft of this document was conducted by the NALEP Task Force in an iterative process within and between four progressive steps:
1 The Log frame
A standard Log frame table was adapted to fit the specific case of the NALEP. It was not developed out of a standard Logical Framework Approach, as it was meant to translate the content of the already existing NALEP main document into action.
Thus the five main narrative summaries of the Log frame (Goal, Overall Objective, Specific Objectives, Results, and Activities) were defined based on the content of Section 3 (Policy on agriculture and livestock extension services) of the main NALEP document, as was mentioned in section 15.1.
The ten Specific Objectives were derived from the eleven Policy Statements presented in section 3.4 of the main NALEP document. Their correspondence with these latter is presented in Table A1.a below.
The Results expected under each Specific Objective as well as corresponding Activities could be defined after that, before the OVIs, MOVs and assumptions could be worked out. Assumptions were not developed for Results, as OVIs, MOVs and Assumptions were not elaborated for Activities.
2 Operational plan worksheet
The Operational Plan Worksheet was developed to present Specific Objectives, Results, and Activities in a logic sequence, and for every Activity, the key implementing actors, the specific operational costs, and the deadline to have it completed. It should be mentioned that the specific operational cost (titled Indicative cost in the worksheet) column was completed after the budget was finalized. The starting for NALEP implementation was fixed to July 2011.
38
3 Budget
Quantities considered for some of the budgetary lines are given in Table A1.b. Items concerned were Vehicles, Data processing equipments, and Printing and reproduction materials. The number of States considered was 10, the number of Counties 79 and the number of Payam (for bicycles) was 513.
The base of some of the lump sum calculations is given in Table A1.c. The budgetary lines concerned were the Rehabilitation of infrastructures, Non expendable procurement, Expendable procurement, Personnel, Contracts with ESPs, Training, Travels and General operations expenses. Costs were estimated on a yearly base, except where specifically mentioned.
Vehicle operation and maintenance was estimated on the base of 1/3 of the procurement of the vehicle. Insurance was estimated at 2% of the vehicle or equipment cost.
The year 2011 served as a reference for all costs estimates. Beginning from year 2 (2012), the inflation rate considered was estimated at 3.5%. Costs estimates were adjusted to this rate using the inflation rate index of value 1.035 in year 2, value 1.071225 in year 3, value 1.108718 in year 4 and value 1.147523 in year 5.
4 Validation workshop
The draft NALEP Log frame, Operational plan Worksheet, and Budget were presented to a panel of GoSS authorities from MAF and MARF, in presence of representatives of main Development Partners. The finalization of the document was made based on their amendments, comments and recommendations.
39
Table A1.a: Correspondence between the NALEP statements and the specific objectives
N° NALEP Policy Statements N° Specific Objective
1 Extension services provision and organization: The Government will create capacity for quality extension services to the large number of clients, and encourage broad involvement of stakeholders in service provision
2 To provide a quality and effective extension service to a broad clientele at all levels
2 Privatization and commercialization: The government will create a favorable environment for private sector participation in extension service provision.
1 To create a favorable and enabling environment for quality and effective extension services to a broad clientele at all levels
3 Extension approaches and methods: Extension service providers will use and test multiple approaches and methods aiming at developing models for reaching various clienteles.
3 To promote a wide range of participatory extension approaches and methods
4 Contents and choice of extension messages: Contents and choice of extension messages will be developed based on clients’ socio-economic and cultural context.
5 Clientele empowerment: The service providers, public or private, will contribute to clientele empowerment.
4 To empower rural households and their institutions for the use of appropriate rural services and the adoption of appropriate extension messages1
6 Stakeholder coordination and networking: Strengthen coordination and networking among extension service providers, clientele and other stakeholders.
5 To strengthen stakeholders linkages, and the coordination and networking among ESPs at all levels
7 Human Resource Development of extension service providers: Extension service personnel will be recruited, trained and equipped to respond to the emerging needs of the clientele, including gender considerations.
6 To develop and strengthen human and institutional capacity of extension service providers at all levels including training institutions, for a more effective technology development and transfer (TDT)
8 Technology Development and Packaging: The government will develop a strategy to promote research, extension and farmers linkages
10 Develop an effective research- extension – user partnership and linkages that will facilitate a research system responsive to farmers needs
9 Extension facilitating factors: Extension service providers will contribute to improved access to extension facilitating factors by strengthening linkages between agriculture, livestock and rural development actors.
7 To promote the provision of facilitating factors for effective extension service delivery
10 Financing of extension services: The government will ensure that private and public financial allocation is sufficient to meet the requirements of extension services.
9 To develop an effective and sustainable funding mechanism in favor of technology development and rural extension
11 Mainstreaming crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services delivery: ESPs will address relevant cross-cutting issues in their extension activities
8 To promote and mainstream crosscutting issues in agriculture and livestock extension services
40
Table A1.b: Quantities and cost per unit of some of the items appearing in the NALEP Budget
Description Year 1
Year 4 Total Cost/unit
(US$)GoSS level
Vehicles4WD 2 2 4 45,000Pick-up 2 2 4 35,000
Data processing equipmentsComputer + access. 10 10 20 3,000
Printing and reproduction materials Large size Photocopier + access. 2 2 4 3,000Medium size Photocopier + access. 4 4 8 1,500Small size Photocopier + access. 10 10 20 750
State levelVehicles
4WD 10 10 20 45,000Pick-up 20 20 40 35,000
Data processing equipmentsComputer + access. 20 20 40 3,000
Printing and reproduction materialsLarge size Photocopier + access. 10 10 20 3,000Medium size Photocopier + access. 10 10 20 1,500Small size Photocopier + access. 20 20 40 750
County levelVehicles
4WD pick-up hard top 79 79 158 35,000 Motorbikes 316 316 632 3,000 Bicycles for Payams 513 513 1026 100
Data processing equipmentsComputer + access. 158 158 316 3,000
Printing and reproduction materialsSmall size Photocopier + access. 79 79 158 750
41
Table A1.c: Base of lump sum calculations per year (USD) of the NALEP Budget
Description GoSS Per State
Per County
A.1.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (yr 1) 200,000 100,000 50,000
A.1.b Non expendable procurement
Office furniture (year 1) 150,000 75,000 30,000
Agricultural equipment 20,000 10,000 5,000
A.1.c Expendable procurement
Data processing supplies 15,000 7,500 2,500
Printing and reproduction supplies 20,000 10,000 5,000
Office stationery 25,000 12,500 6,250
Agricultural inputs 10,000 5,000 2,500
A.2.d Personnel
Salary supplements 240,000 60,000 60,000
Consultants 100,000
Other personnel costs (5% personnel) 17,000 3,000 1,000
A.2.e Contracts with ESPs 200,000 50,000 10,000
A.2.f Training 200,000 50,000 10,000
A.2.g Travels
Local travels 150,000 50,000 12,000
International travels 50,000
A.2.h General operation expenses
Coordination meetings 60,000 24,000 12,000
Miscellaneous 50,000 20,000 10,000
42
An
nex
2:
The
Log
fra
me
of
the
NA
LEP
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
s
Go
al
To t
rans
form
agr
icul
ture
and
live
stoc
k fr
om
trad
ition
al/s
ubsi
sten
ce s
yste
ms
to a
chie
ve f
ood
secu
rity,
wea
lth c
reat
ion
and
natio
nal e
cono
mic
grow
th t
hrou
gh s
cien
ce b
ased
, mar
ket
orie
nted
,
com
petit
ive
and
profi
tabl
e ag
ricul
tura
l and
lives
tock
sys
tem
s
• In
crea
se in
th
e p
erce
nta
ge
of
po
pu
lati
on
livi
ng
in f
oo
d s
ecu
rity
at
all
leve
ls•
Dec
reas
e in
th
e p
erce
nta
ge
of
the
po
pu
lati
on
livi
ng
bel
ow
po
vert
y lin
e (l
ess
than
USD
2 /d
ay)
• In
crea
se in
th
e co
ntr
ibu
tio
n
of
agri
cult
ure
an
d li
vest
ock
to
n
atio
nal
eco
no
mic
gro
wth
• In
crea
se in
tec
hn
olo
gy
ado
pti
on
in
ag
ricu
ltu
ral a
nd
live
sto
ck
dev
elo
pm
ent
• In
crea
se in
th
e ra
te o
f m
arke
t-o
rien
ted
ag
ricu
ltu
ral a
nd
live
sto
ck
pro
du
ctio
n s
yste
ms
• N
atio
nal
an
d in
tern
atio
nal
rep
ort
s (W
orl
d B
ank,
Inte
rnat
ion
al m
on
etar
y Fu
nd
…)
on
th
e st
ate
of
the
nat
ion
al
eco
no
my
• In
tern
atio
nal
rep
ort
s (U
ND
P, F
AO
…)
on
th
e st
ate
of
dev
elo
pm
ent,
ag
ricu
ltu
ral d
evel
op
men
t, f
oo
d
secu
rity
• M
DG
rep
ort
s•
Nat
ion
al r
epo
rts
on
th
e st
ate
of
dev
elo
pm
ent,
ag
ricu
ltu
ral
dev
elo
pm
ent,
fo
od
sec
uri
ty
• Th
e So
uth
ern
Su
dan
su
ffer
s n
o m
ajo
r co
nfl
ict
ou
tbre
ak•
No
maj
or
clim
atic
dis
aste
r o
ccu
rs•
NA
LEP
is e
ffec
tive
ly a
nd
su
stai
nab
ly im
ple
men
ted
an
d c
om
ple
men
ted
b
y o
ther
ap
pro
pri
ate
dev
elo
pm
ent
pro
gra
mm
es/
pro
ject
s
Ove
rall
Ob
ject
ive
43
To g
uide
the
est
ablis
hmen
t an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of a
plu
ralis
tic e
xten
sion
sys
tem
whi
ch w
ill b
e
inst
rum
enta
l in
achi
evin
g na
tiona
l agr
icul
tura
l
and
lives
tock
goa
ls, e
ffici
ently
con
trib
ute
to t
he
natio
nal e
cono
my
and
redu
ctio
n of
pov
erty
,
thro
ugh
deve
lopi
ng a
nd im
prov
ing
the
effic
ienc
y
of s
usta
inab
le a
gric
ultu
re, l
ives
tock
, wat
er, f
ores
try
and
rang
elan
d re
sour
ce s
ub-s
ecto
r ac
tiviti
es,
base
d on
sou
nd e
nviro
nmen
tal p
ract
ices
.
This
ob
ject
ive
will
be
ach
ieve
d t
hro
ug
h:
• Th
e em
po
wer
men
t o
f fa
rmer
s to
ad
equ
atel
y re
spo
nd
to
fo
od
sec
uri
ty
issu
es a
nd
th
e g
row
ing
dem
and
s o
f d
om
esti
c an
d in
tern
atio
nal
mar
kets
fo
r cr
op
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
pro
du
cts
thro
ug
h t
he
tran
sfer
of
adap
ted
res
earc
h
tech
no
log
ies,
• O
rgan
izin
g f
arm
ers
in v
iab
le r
ura
l o
rgan
izat
ion
s, P
rovi
sio
n o
f ru
ral
advi
sory
an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce, a
nd
ru
ral
cred
it; s
up
ply
/mar
keti
ng
of
imp
rove
d
farm
inp
ut
and
ou
tpu
t; im
pro
vem
ent,
co
mm
erci
aliz
atio
n a
nd
inte
nsi
fica
tio
n o
f fa
rmin
g s
yste
ms
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
of
pri
vate
an
d N
SAs
in e
xten
sio
n s
yste
ms
• Pr
esen
ce o
f fa
rmer
s an
d f
arm
ers
inst
itu
tio
ns
in d
ecis
ion
-mak
ing
b
od
ies
of
ESPs
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
of
farm
ers
org
aniz
atio
ns
• In
crea
se in
th
e d
eman
d f
or
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
s•
Incr
ease
in t
he
pro
du
ctio
n a
nd
p
rod
uct
ivit
y in
cro
ps,
live
sto
ck,
fish
erie
s an
d f
ore
st p
rod
uct
s•
Incr
ease
in t
he
agri
cult
ura
l in
pu
t u
se in
dex
at
all l
evel
s
• In
tern
atio
nal
rep
ort
s (U
ND
P, F
AO
…)
on
th
e st
ate
of
dev
elo
pm
ent,
ag
ricu
ltu
ral d
evel
op
men
t, f
oo
d
secu
rity
• Pe
rio
dic
rep
ort
s o
f N
ALE
P-re
late
d
pro
ject
s/p
rog
ram
mes
• N
atio
nal
rep
ort
s o
n t
he
stat
e o
f d
evel
op
men
t, a
gri
cult
ura
l d
evel
op
men
t, f
oo
d s
ecu
rity
• G
oSS
is c
om
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
NA
LEP
as a
w
ho
le a
nd
its
acti
viti
es a
t al
l lev
els
• G
oSS
an
d S
tate
s ar
e ef
fect
ivel
y co
mm
itte
d t
o
emp
ow
erin
g t
he
farm
ers
and
su
pp
ort
ing
far
mer
s o
rgan
izat
ion
, an
d E
SPs
• D
ecen
tral
izat
ion
pro
cess
is
effe
ctiv
e
44
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
sSp
ecifi
c o
bje
ctiv
es
1.
To c
reat
e a
favo
rab
le a
nd
en
ablin
g
envi
ron
men
t fo
r q
ual
ity
and
ef
fect
ive
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
s to
a
bro
ad c
lien
tele
at
all l
evel
s
It s
ho
uld
incl
ud
e, a
t al
l lev
els,
th
e in
volv
emen
t o
f al
l sta
keh
old
ers
in
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
pro
visi
on
, an
d b
e at
trac
tive
fo
r th
e p
riva
te a
nd
no
n
stat
e ac
tors
(N
SA)
to p
arti
cip
ate
in t
he
del
iver
y o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
and
th
e co
mm
erci
aliz
atio
n o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re
• O
ffici
al e
nd
ors
emen
t o
f th
e N
ALE
P b
y th
e G
oSS
Co
un
cil o
f M
inis
ters
an
d
Stat
es•
Incr
ease
in fi
nan
cial
res
ou
rces
al
loca
ted
to
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
s b
y G
oSS
, Sta
tes,
NG
Os
and
par
tner
s•
Incr
ease
in q
ual
ity
and
qu
anti
ty
of
hu
man
res
ou
rces
allo
cate
d t
o
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
s b
y G
oSS
, Sta
tes
and
N
GO
s•
Ava
ilab
ility
of
an u
pd
ated
reg
ula
tory
fr
amew
ork
fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral
tech
no
log
y d
evel
op
men
t, e
xten
sio
n,
and
ed
uca
tio
n
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
of
par
tner
ship
s b
etw
een
Go
SS a
nd
in
tern
atio
nal
sta
keh
old
ers
bac
kin
g u
p
agri
cult
ura
l tec
hn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent,
ex
ten
sio
n, a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
an
d t
he
div
ersi
ty o
f ac
tive
ESP
S at
all
leve
ls•
Incr
ease
in t
he
nu
mb
er o
f p
riva
te
and
NSA
s p
arti
cip
atin
g e
ffec
tive
ly
in e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce d
eliv
ery
and
th
e co
mm
erci
aliz
atio
n o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re a
t al
l lev
els
• Ex
iste
nce
of
exte
nsi
on
co
mm
itte
es,
fora
an
d w
ork
ing
gro
up
s at
all
leve
ls
• O
ffici
al J
ou
rnal
of
the
Sou
ther
n
Sud
an•
Law
s an
d r
ule
s o
f G
oSS
an
d S
tate
s co
nce
rnin
g a
gri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck,
and
fo
rest
ry d
evel
op
men
t, w
ith
re
gar
d t
o e
xten
sio
ns
serv
ices
, an
d t
he
invo
lvem
ent
of
pri
vate
an
d N
SAs,
an
d
the
com
mer
cial
izat
ion
of
agri
cult
ure
• Pe
rio
dic
rep
ort
s o
f N
ALE
P-re
late
d
pro
ject
s/p
rog
ram
mes
• A
nn
ual
bu
dg
et a
lloca
tio
ns
of
MA
F,
MA
RF,
NG
OS,
an
d S
tate
s m
inis
trie
s in
ch
arg
e o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re, l
ives
tock
, an
d
fore
sts
• R
epo
rts
on
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
s an
d
acti
viti
es b
y M
AF,
MA
RF,
NG
OS,
an
d S
tate
s m
inis
trie
s in
ch
arg
e o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re, l
ives
tock
, an
d f
ore
sts
• Pr
oje
ct p
ort
folio
s o
f G
oSS
in
tern
atio
nal
par
tner
s
• La
ws
and
ru
les
are
effe
ctiv
ely
imp
lem
ente
d•
Dec
entr
aliz
atio
n p
roce
ss is
ef
fect
ive
• G
oSS
an
d a
nd
Sta
tes
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
45
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
s2.
To
pro
vid
e a
qu
alit
y an
d e
ffec
tive
ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce t
o a
bro
ad
clie
nte
le a
t al
l lev
els
• A
t le
ast
8 o
f th
e 10
sta
tes
imp
lem
ent
NA
LEP
by
end
of
year
2, a
nd
all
the
10 b
y ye
ar 5
• Ex
iste
nce
of
gen
der
sen
siti
ve n
orm
s,
stan
dar
ds
and
gu
idel
ines
do
cum
ents
fo
r ES
Ps•
Incr
ease
in t
he
nu
mb
er o
f ex
ten
sio
n
pro
ject
s/p
rog
ram
mes
bei
ng
act
ual
ly
imp
lem
ente
d a
nd
th
eir
nat
ion
al
terr
ito
ry c
ove
rag
e•
Incr
ease
in t
he
nu
mb
er o
f ES
Ps
effe
ctiv
ely
op
erat
ion
al in
th
e fi
eld
• Im
pro
ved
qu
alit
y o
f ex
ten
sio
n
pac
kag
es a
nd
do
cum
ents
pro
du
ced
b
y ES
Ps•
Incr
ease
in t
he
nu
mb
er o
f fa
rmer
s o
rgan
izat
ion
s, a
nd
ho
use
ho
ld
ben
efiti
ng
fro
m e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
pro
visi
on
• In
crea
se in
th
e q
uan
tity
an
d
qu
alit
y o
f co
mm
od
itie
s an
d o
ther
ag
ricu
ltu
ral p
rod
uce
s co
min
g f
rom
ru
ral a
reas
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
of
fem
ale
staf
f o
f th
e ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce s
yste
m
by
5 to
10%
eve
ry y
ear,
at a
ll le
vels
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f ES
PS a
ctiv
e in
th
e fi
eld
• Ex
ten
sio
n d
ocu
men
ts p
rod
uce
d b
y ES
Ps•
Farm
ers
and
far
mer
s o
rgan
izat
ion
s su
rvey
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f N
GO
S a
nd
oth
er
stak
eho
lder
s o
n e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
3.
To p
rom
ote
a w
ide
ran
ge
of
par
tici
pat
ory
ext
ensi
on
ap
pro
ach
es
and
met
ho
ds
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a n
atio
nal
dat
abas
e o
n
exte
nsi
on
par
tici
pat
ory
ap
pro
ach
es
and
met
ho
ds
by
end
of
year
2•
Ap
pro
pri
aten
ess
of
exte
nsi
on
ap
pro
ach
es a
nd
met
ho
ds
to
eco
log
ical
an
d s
oci
o-e
con
om
ic
situ
atio
ns
of
the
cou
ntr
y•
Mo
re t
han
50%
of
Paya
ms
and
co
un
ties
co
vere
d b
y ex
ten
sio
n
serv
ices
by
year
5
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f ES
PS a
ctiv
e in
th
e fi
eld
• Ex
ten
sio
n d
ocu
men
ts p
rod
uce
d b
y ES
Ps•
Farm
ers
and
far
mer
s o
rgan
izat
ion
s su
rvey
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f N
GO
S a
nd
oth
er
stak
eho
lder
s o
n e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
4.
To e
mp
ow
er r
ura
l ho
use
ho
lds
and
th
eir
inst
itu
tio
ns
for
the
use
of
app
rop
riat
e ru
ral s
ervi
ces
and
th
e ad
op
tio
n o
f ap
pro
pri
ate
exte
nsi
on
m
essa
ges
• Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
of
key
rura
l o
rgan
izat
ion
s in
NA
LEP-
insp
ired
p
latf
orm
s o
f ex
chan
ges
(fo
ra)
and
d
ecis
ion
mak
ing
bo
die
s (c
om
mit
tees
an
d w
ork
ing
gro
up
s) a
t al
l lev
els
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
of
exte
nsi
on
re
cip
ien
ts g
rou
ps
and
ass
oci
atio
ns
at
the
leve
ls o
f Pa
yam
s an
d c
ou
nti
es•
Incr
ease
in t
he
fem
ale
staf
f ra
tio
of
the
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
sys
tem
at
all
leve
ls
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f N
ALE
P-in
spir
ed f
ora
an
d
dec
isio
n m
akin
g b
od
ies
• Fa
rmer
s an
d f
arm
ers
org
aniz
atio
ns
surv
eys
• R
epo
rts
of
NG
OS
and
oth
er
stak
eho
lder
s o
n e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
46
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
s5.
To
str
eng
then
sta
keh
old
ers
linka
ges
, an
d t
he
coo
rdin
atio
n a
nd
n
etw
ork
ing
am
on
g E
SPs
at a
ll le
vels
• Ex
iste
nce
of
the
NA
LEP
imp
lem
enta
tio
n C
om
mit
tee
and
its
org
ans
at G
oSS
leve
l•
Exis
ten
ce o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re a
nd
live
sto
ck
stak
eho
lder
fo
ra a
nd
its
org
ans
at
Stat
e, C
ou
nty
, an
d P
ayam
leve
ls•
Exis
ten
ce o
f N
ALE
P-in
spir
ed
pla
tfo
rms
of
exch
ang
es (
fora
) an
d o
f d
ecis
ion
mak
ing
bo
die
s (c
om
mit
tees
an
d w
ork
ing
gro
up
s) a
t al
l lev
els
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f N
ALE
P-in
spir
ed f
ora
an
d
dec
isio
n m
akin
g b
od
ies
• R
epo
rts
of
NG
OS
and
oth
er
stak
eho
lder
s o
n e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
6.
To d
evel
op
an
d s
tren
gth
en h
um
an
and
inst
itu
tio
nal
cap
acit
y o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce p
rovi
der
s at
all
leve
ls in
clu
din
g t
rain
ing
inst
itu
tio
ns,
fo
r a
mo
re e
ffec
tive
tec
hn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
tra
nsf
er (
TDT)
The
inst
itu
tio
nal
cap
acit
y st
ren
gth
enin
g
sho
uld
aim
at
pro
mo
tin
g e
ffec
tive
re
sear
ch-e
xten
sio
n-u
ser
par
tner
ship
an
d
linka
ges
in T
DT
• Ex
iste
nce
of
up
gra
ded
ext
ensi
on
tr
ain
ing
sta
ff•
Exis
ten
ce o
f u
pd
ated
ext
ensi
on
cu
rric
ulu
m o
f tr
ain
ing
cen
ters
an
d
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Exis
ten
ce o
f re
hab
ilita
ted
in
fras
tru
ctu
res
in t
rain
ing
cen
ters
an
d
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F; a
t le
ast
4 o
f th
e 6
cen
ters
fu
lly r
ehab
ilita
ted
, an
d e
qu
ipp
ed w
ith
ess
enti
al
reso
urc
es•
Exis
ten
ce o
f ad
min
istr
ativ
e in
stru
ctio
ns
ind
icat
ing
min
imu
m
staf
fin
g le
vels
at
all l
evel
s
• W
ork
ing
do
cum
ents
on
no
rms,
st
and
ard
s an
d g
uid
elin
es d
ocu
men
ts
for
ESPs
• Fi
eld
vis
its
in t
rain
ing
cen
ters
an
d
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Trai
nin
g m
anu
als
of
trai
nin
g c
ente
rs
and
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Dis
cuss
ion
s w
ith
tra
inee
s o
f tr
ain
ing
ce
nte
rs a
nd
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Vis
its
to M
AF
and
MA
RF
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
7.
To p
rom
ote
th
e p
rovi
sio
n o
f fa
cilit
atin
g f
acto
rs f
or
effe
ctiv
e ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce d
eliv
ery
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a n
atio
nal
co
mm
un
icat
ion
str
ateg
y fo
r ad
voca
cy,
lob
byi
ng
an
d f
acili
tati
on
in f
avo
r o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
• Ex
iste
nce
of
linka
ges
of
farm
ers
to p
rovi
der
s o
f fa
cilit
atin
g f
acto
rs
(tra
der
s, in
pu
ts s
up
plie
rs, m
icro
-cre
dit
in
stit
uti
on
s…)
for
exte
nsi
on
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a st
rate
gy
on
su
bsi
die
s to
fa
rmer
s
• W
ork
ing
do
cum
ents
of
and
rep
ort
s o
n t
he
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
a n
atio
nal
co
mm
un
icat
ion
str
ateg
y fo
r ad
voca
cy,
lob
byi
ng
an
d f
acili
tati
on
in f
avo
r o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Vis
its
to M
AF,
MA
RF,
an
d S
tate
s
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
8.
To p
rom
ote
an
d m
ain
stre
am
cro
sscu
ttin
g is
sues
in a
gri
cult
ure
an
d li
vest
ock
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
s
• Ex
iste
nce
of
an o
ffici
al p
rio
rity
list
of
cutt
ing
acr
oss
issu
es in
ag
ricu
ltu
ral
and
live
sto
ck e
xten
sio
n•
Effe
ctiv
e in
stit
uti
on
of
a ye
arly
n
atio
nal
co
nfe
ren
ce o
n t
he
pro
mo
tio
n a
nd
mai
nst
ream
ing
of
cro
ss c
utt
ing
issu
es in
ext
ensi
on
p
rog
ram
mes
• A
rch
ives
of
the
dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsi
on
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Rep
ort
s o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF
• W
ork
ing
do
cum
ents
of
and
re
po
rts
on
th
e o
rgan
izat
ion
of
a ye
arly
nat
ion
al c
on
fere
nce
on
th
e p
rom
oti
on
an
d m
ain
stre
amin
g o
f cr
oss
cu
ttin
g is
sues
in e
xten
sio
n
pro
gra
mm
e
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
47
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
s9.
To
dev
elo
p a
n e
ffec
tive
an
d
sust
ain
able
fu
nd
ing
mec
han
ism
in
favo
ur
of
tech
no
log
y d
evel
op
men
t an
d r
ura
l ext
ensi
on
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a fu
nct
ion
al f
un
din
g
mec
han
ism
in f
avo
ur
of
tech
no
log
y d
evel
op
men
t an
d r
ura
l ext
ensi
on
• W
ork
ing
do
cum
ents
of
and
rep
ort
s o
n t
he
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
a fu
nct
ion
al
fun
din
g m
ech
anis
m in
fav
ou
r o
f te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ru
ral
exte
nsi
on
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F an
d S
tate
s m
inis
trie
s in
ch
arg
e o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re,
lives
tock
an
d f
ore
sts
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F in
stit
uti
on
s in
ch
arg
e o
f te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ru
ral e
xten
sio
n
• V
isit
s to
MA
F an
d M
AR
F in
stit
uti
on
s in
ch
arg
e o
f te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ru
ral e
xten
sio
n
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
10.
Dev
elo
p a
n e
ffec
tive
res
earc
h-
exte
nsi
on
– u
ser
par
tner
ship
an
d li
nka
ges
th
at w
ill f
acili
tate
a
rese
arch
sys
tem
res
po
nsi
ve t
o
farm
ers
nee
ds
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a st
rate
gic
an
d a
n
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s d
ocu
men
ts f
or
agri
cult
ura
l res
earc
h, e
xten
sio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n
• R
epo
rts
and
wo
rkin
g d
ocu
men
ts o
n
the
stra
teg
ic a
nd
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral r
esea
rch
, ext
ensi
on
an
d e
du
cati
on
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Vis
its
to M
AF
and
MA
RF
• A
ll st
akeh
old
ers
are
com
mit
ted
to
su
pp
ort
ing
N
ALE
P an
d e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
at a
ll le
vels
• M
AF
and
MA
RF
secu
re
app
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
an
d
app
rop
riat
e p
artn
ers
Res
ult
s
1.1.
Th
e N
ALE
P is
en
do
rsed
at
the
hig
hes
t p
oss
ible
leve
l of
the
Go
SS
wit
hin
on
e ye
ar
• O
ffici
al e
nd
ors
emen
t o
f th
e N
ALE
P b
y th
e G
oSS
Co
un
cil o
f M
inis
ters
an
d
Stat
es•
Ava
ilab
ility
of
an u
pd
ated
reg
ula
tory
fr
amew
ork
fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral
tech
no
log
y d
evel
op
men
t, e
xten
sio
n,
and
ed
uca
tio
n
• O
ffici
al J
ou
rnal
of
the
Sou
ther
n
Sud
an•
Law
s an
d r
ule
s o
f G
oSS
an
d S
tate
s co
nce
rnin
g a
gri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck,
and
fo
rest
ry d
evel
op
men
t, w
ith
re
gar
d t
o e
xten
sio
ns
serv
ices
, an
d t
he
invo
lvem
ent
of
pri
vate
an
d N
SAs,
an
d
the
com
mer
cial
izat
ion
of
agri
cult
ure
1.2.
NA
LEP
is a
do
pte
d b
y St
ates
an
d
imp
lem
ente
d a
t al
l lev
els
star
tin
g
seco
nd
yea
r
• Ev
olu
tio
n o
f th
e in
stit
uti
on
al s
etu
p o
f th
e ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce s
yste
m•
Am
ou
nt
of
fin
anci
al r
eso
urc
es
allo
cate
d t
o e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
by
Go
SS, S
tate
s, N
GO
s an
d p
artn
ers
• In
crea
se in
qu
alit
y an
d q
uan
tity
o
f h
um
an r
eso
urc
es a
lloca
ted
to
ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
by
Go
SS, S
tate
s an
d
NG
Os
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
of
pri
vate
an
d N
SAs
par
tici
pat
ing
eff
ecti
vely
in
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
del
iver
y an
d t
he
com
mer
cial
izat
ion
of
agri
cult
ure
at
all l
evel
s
• La
ws
and
ru
les
of
Go
SS a
nd
Sta
tes
con
cern
ing
ag
ricu
ltu
re, l
ives
tock
, an
d f
ore
stry
dev
elo
pm
ent,
wit
h
reg
ard
to
ext
ensi
on
s se
rvic
es, a
nd
th
e in
volv
emen
t o
f p
riva
te a
nd
NSA
s, a
nd
th
e co
mm
erci
aliz
atio
n o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re•
Peri
od
ic r
epo
rts
of
NA
LEP-
rela
ted
p
roje
cts/
pro
gra
mm
es•
An
nu
al b
ud
get
allo
cati
on
s o
f M
AF,
M
AR
F, N
GO
S, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in
char
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck, a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Rep
ort
s o
n e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
and
ac
tivi
ties
by
MA
F, M
AR
F, N
GO
S,
and
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck, a
nd
fo
rest
s Pr
oje
ct p
ort
folio
s o
f G
oSS
in
tern
atio
nal
par
tner
s
48
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
s1.
3. I
nte
rnat
ion
al p
artn
ersh
ips
are
bu
ilt
aro
un
d N
ALE
P in
su
pp
ort
of
its
imp
lem
enta
tio
n s
tart
ing
firs
t ye
ar
• In
crea
se in
th
e n
um
ber
of
par
tner
ship
s b
etw
een
Go
SS a
nd
in
tern
atio
nal
sta
keh
old
ers
bac
kin
g u
p
agri
cult
ura
l tec
hn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent,
ex
ten
sio
n, a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n
• Pe
rio
dic
rep
ort
s o
f N
ALE
P-re
late
d
pro
ject
s/p
rog
ram
mes
• R
epo
rts
on
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
s an
d
acti
viti
es b
y M
AF,
MA
RF,
NG
OS,
an
d S
tate
s m
inis
trie
s in
ch
arg
e o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re, l
ives
tock
, an
d f
ore
sts
• Pr
oje
ct p
ort
folio
s o
f G
oSS
in
tern
atio
nal
par
tner
s2.
1. R
ang
e o
f ap
pro
pri
ate
and
nee
ds-
bas
ed e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
are
del
iver
ed t
o a
bro
ad r
ang
e o
f cl
ien
tele
sta
rtin
g s
eco
nd
yea
r
• Q
ual
ity
of
exte
nsi
on
pac
kag
es a
nd
d
ocu
men
ts p
rod
uce
d b
y ES
Ps•
Incr
ease
in t
he
qu
anti
ty a
nd
q
ual
ity
of
com
mo
dit
ies
and
oth
er
agri
cult
ura
l pro
du
ces
com
ing
fro
m
rura
l are
as t
o t
he
mar
kets
• In
crea
se in
fem
ale
staf
f ra
tio
of
the
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
sys
tem
at
all l
evel
s
• R
epo
rts
of
ESPS
act
ive
in t
he
fiel
d•
Exte
nsi
on
do
cum
ents
pro
du
ced
by
ESPs
• Fa
rmer
s an
d f
arm
ers
org
aniz
atio
ns
surv
eys
• R
epo
rts
of
NG
OS
an
d o
ther
st
akeh
old
ers
on
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
3.1.
Rel
evan
t an
d a
pp
rop
riat
e ex
ten
sio
n a
pp
roac
hes
, met
ho
ds
and
gu
idel
ines
are
dev
elo
ped
an
d
do
cum
ente
d s
tart
ing
firs
t ye
ar, a
nd
d
isse
min
ated
sta
rtin
g s
eco
nd
yea
r
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a n
atio
nal
dat
abas
e o
n
exte
nsi
on
par
tici
pat
ory
ext
ensi
on
ap
pro
ach
es a
nd
met
ho
ds
• A
pp
rop
riat
enes
s o
f ex
ten
sio
n
app
roac
hes
an
d m
eth
od
s to
ec
olo
gic
al a
nd
so
cio
-eco
no
mic
si
tuat
ion
s o
f th
e co
un
try
• R
epo
rts
of
ESPS
act
ive
in t
he
fiel
d•
Exte
nsi
on
do
cum
ents
pro
du
ced
by
ESPs
• Fa
rmer
s an
d f
arm
ers
org
aniz
atio
ns
surv
eys
• R
epo
rts
of
NG
OS
an
d o
ther
st
akeh
old
ers
on
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
4.1.
Ru
ral H
ou
seh
old
s h
ave
acce
ss
to im
pro
ved
ski
lls, t
oo
ls a
nd
te
chn
iqu
es f
or
thei
r ad
op
tio
n a
nd
u
se s
tart
ing
th
ird
yea
r
• Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
of
rura
l org
aniz
atio
ns
in N
ALE
P-in
spir
ed p
latf
orm
s o
f ex
chan
ges
(fo
ra)
and
dec
isio
n m
akin
g
bo
die
s (c
om
mit
tees
an
d w
ork
ing
g
rou
ps)
at
all l
evel
s•
Incr
ease
in f
emal
e st
aff
rati
o o
f th
e ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce s
yste
m a
t al
l lev
els
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f N
ALE
P-in
spir
ed f
ora
an
d
dec
isio
n m
akin
g b
od
ies
• Fa
rmer
s an
d f
arm
ers
org
aniz
atio
ns
surv
eys
• R
epo
rts
of
NG
OS
and
oth
er
stak
eho
lder
s o
n e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce5.
1. T
he
setu
p o
f in
stit
uti
on
al
arra
ng
emen
ts f
or
the
imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f th
e N
ALE
P is
fu
nct
ion
al a
t al
l lev
els
star
tin
g
seco
nd
yea
r
• Ex
iste
nce
of
the
NA
LEP
imp
lem
enta
tio
n C
om
mit
tee
and
its
org
ans
at G
oSS
leve
l•
Exis
ten
ce o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re a
nd
live
sto
ck
stak
eho
lder
fo
ra a
nd
its
org
ans
at
Stat
e, C
ou
nty
, an
d P
ayam
leve
ls•
NA
LEP-
insp
ired
pla
tfo
rms
of
exch
ang
es (
fora
) an
d o
f d
ecis
ion
m
akin
g b
od
ies
(co
mm
itte
es a
nd
w
ork
ing
gro
up
s) a
t al
l lev
els
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Rep
ort
s o
f N
ALE
P-in
spir
ed f
ora
an
d
dec
isio
n m
akin
g b
od
ies
• R
epo
rts
of
NG
OS
and
oth
er
stak
eho
lder
s o
n e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce
49
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
s6.
1. C
apac
ity
of
trai
nin
g in
stit
uti
on
s is
st
ren
gth
ened
sta
rtin
g s
eco
nd
yea
r•
Exis
ten
ce o
f u
pd
ated
cu
rric
ulu
m o
f tr
ain
ing
cen
ters
an
d in
stit
ute
s o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF
• Ex
iste
nce
of
reh
abili
tate
d
infr
astr
uct
ure
s in
tra
inin
g c
ente
rs a
nd
in
stit
ute
s o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF
• Fi
eld
vis
its
in t
rain
ing
cen
ters
an
d
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Trai
nin
g m
anu
als
of
trai
nin
g c
ente
rs
and
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Dis
cuss
ion
s w
ith
tra
inee
s o
f tr
ain
ing
ce
nte
rs a
nd
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF
6.2.
Cap
acit
y o
f h
um
an r
eso
urc
es is
st
ren
gth
ened
at
all l
evel
s st
arti
ng
se
con
d y
ear
• Ex
iste
nce
of
adm
inis
trat
ive
inst
ruct
ion
s in
dic
atin
g m
inim
um
st
affi
ng
leve
ls a
t al
l lev
els
• W
ork
ing
do
cum
ents
on
no
rms,
st
and
ard
s an
d g
uid
elin
es d
ocu
men
ts
for
ESPs
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Vis
its
to M
AF
and
MA
RF
7.1.
Su
pp
ort
fo
r ex
ten
sio
n f
acili
tati
on
fa
cto
rs (
mar
kets
, in
pu
ts, c
red
it
faci
litie
s, in
fras
tru
ctu
res,
irri
gat
ion
fa
cilit
ies,
su
bsi
die
s…)
is in
crea
sed
st
arti
ng
sec
on
d y
ear
• Ex
iste
nce
of
linka
ges
of
farm
ers
to p
rovi
der
s o
f fa
cilit
atin
g f
acto
rs
(tra
der
s, in
pu
ts s
up
plie
rs, m
icro
-cre
dit
in
stit
uti
on
s…)
for
exte
nsi
on
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a st
rate
gy
on
su
bsi
die
s to
fa
rmer
s
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F, a
nd
Sta
tes
min
istr
ies
in c
har
ge
of
agri
cult
ure
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fo
rest
s•
Vis
its
to M
AF,
MA
RF,
an
d S
tate
s
8.1.
Th
e p
rom
oti
on
of
cro
ss
cutt
ing
issu
es is
en
han
ced
an
d
mai
nst
ream
ed in
all
exte
nsi
on
p
rog
ram
mes
sta
rtin
g fi
rst
year
• Ex
iste
nce
of
an o
ffici
al p
rio
rity
list
of
cutt
ing
acr
oss
issu
es in
ag
ricu
ltu
ral
and
live
sto
ck e
xten
sio
n•
Effe
ctiv
e in
stit
uti
on
of
a ye
arly
n
atio
nal
co
nfe
ren
ce o
n t
he
pro
mo
tio
n a
nd
mai
nst
ream
ing
of
cro
ss c
utt
ing
issu
es in
ext
ensi
on
p
rog
ram
mes
• A
rch
ives
of
the
dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsi
on
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F•
Rep
ort
s o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF
• W
ork
ing
do
cum
ents
of
and
re
po
rts
on
th
e o
rgan
izat
ion
of
a ye
arly
nat
ion
al c
on
fere
nce
on
th
e p
rom
oti
on
an
d m
ain
stre
amin
g o
f cr
oss
cu
ttin
g is
sues
in e
xten
sio
n
pro
gra
mm
e9.
1. F
un
din
g o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce
del
iver
y is
sh
ared
bet
wee
n t
he
pu
blic
, pri
vate
, NSA
s an
d t
he
farm
ers
them
selv
es s
tart
ing
sec
on
d
year
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a fu
nct
ion
al f
un
din
g
mec
han
ism
in f
avo
ur
of
tech
no
log
y d
evel
op
men
t an
d r
ura
l ext
ensi
on
• W
ork
ing
do
cum
ents
of
and
rep
ort
s o
n t
he
dev
elo
pm
ent
of
a fu
nct
ion
al
fun
din
g m
ech
anis
m in
fav
ou
r o
f te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ru
ral
exte
nsi
on
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F, M
AR
F an
d S
tate
s m
inis
trie
s in
ch
arg
e o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re,
lives
tock
an
d f
ore
sts
• R
epo
rts
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F in
stit
uti
on
s in
ch
arg
e o
f te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ru
ral e
xten
sio
n
• V
isit
s to
MA
F an
d M
AR
F in
stit
uti
on
s in
ch
arg
e o
f te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ru
ral e
xten
sio
n10
.1. A
str
ateg
ic a
nd
an
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral r
esea
rch
, ext
ensi
on
an
d e
du
cati
on
are
dev
elo
ped
fo
r G
oSS
an
d S
tate
leve
ls s
tart
ing
se
con
d y
ear
• Ex
iste
nce
of
a st
rate
gic
an
d a
n
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s d
ocu
men
ts f
or
agri
cult
ura
l res
earc
h, e
xten
sio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n
• R
epo
rts
and
wo
rkin
g d
ocu
men
ts o
n
the
stra
teg
ic a
nd
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral r
esea
rch
, ext
ensi
on
an
d e
du
cati
on
50
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
sA
ctiv
itie
s
1.1.
1.
Pres
ent
the
NA
LEP,
its
Imp
lem
enta
tio
n a
nd
Reg
ula
tory
Fra
mew
ork
s to
th
e C
ou
nci
l of
Min
iste
rs t
hro
ug
h M
AF
and
MA
RF
(yea
r 1)
1.
1.2.
A
lloca
te a
nd
mo
bili
ze a
pp
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
fo
r th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
of
NA
LEP
at a
ll le
vels
(ye
ars
1-5)
1.
2.1.
La
un
ch a
nd
dis
sem
inat
e th
e N
ALE
P to
th
e St
ates
(ye
ar 1
) 1.
2.2.
Im
ple
men
t th
e re
form
of
exte
nsi
on
org
aniz
atio
n a
nd
man
agem
ent
stru
ctu
res
at G
oSS
, Sta
te a
nd
Co
un
ty le
vels
(ye
ars
2-5)
1.
3.1.
In
itia
te a
nd
fo
rmal
ize
as m
any
inte
rnat
ion
al p
artn
ersh
ips
as p
oss
ible
aro
un
d t
he
NA
LEP
imp
lem
enta
tio
n f
ram
ewo
rk, i
ncl
ud
ing
wit
h t
he
imp
lem
enta
tio
n p
roce
ss
of
the
Co
mp
reh
ensi
ve A
fric
a A
gri
cult
ure
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Pro
gra
mm
e (C
AA
DP)
(ye
ars
1-5)
2.1.
1.
Dev
elo
p g
end
er s
ensi
tive
no
rms,
sta
nd
ard
s, g
uid
elin
es a
nd
a s
yste
m o
f re
gis
trat
ion
fo
r ES
Ps (
year
s 1-
2)
2.1.
2.
Co
nd
uct
far
mer
s’ in
form
atio
n n
eed
s as
sess
men
t at
all
leve
ls (
FIN
A)
(yea
rs 1
-2)
2.1.
3.
Plan
an
d im
ple
men
t ex
ten
sio
n p
rog
ram
mes
bas
ed o
n F
INA
(ye
ars
2-5)
2.
1.4.
Es
tab
lish
mu
lti l
ater
al a
nd
bi l
ater
al p
artn
ersh
ips
to h
arm
on
ize
and
co
ord
inat
e th
e d
eliv
ery
of
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
s (y
ears
1-5
) 2.
1.5.
Fa
cilit
ate
the
imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f N
ALE
P th
rou
gh
incr
ease
d r
eso
urc
es f
or
exte
nsi
on
(ye
ars
1-5)
3.
1.1.
C
reat
e (y
ear
1) a
nd
su
stai
n a
dat
abas
e o
f ap
pro
pri
ate
do
cum
ents
on
par
tici
pat
ory
ext
ensi
on
ap
pro
ach
es a
nd
met
ho
ds
(yea
rs 1
-5)
3.1.
2.
Iden
tify
, tes
t, a
dap
t an
d u
psc
ale
rele
van
t p
arti
cip
ato
ry e
xten
sio
n a
pp
roac
hes
an
d m
eth
od
s (y
ears
1-5
) 3.
1.3.
D
evel
op
ap
pro
pri
ate
exte
nsi
on
pac
kag
es a
nd
mes
sag
es b
ased
on
ag
ro e
colo
gic
al a
nd
so
cio
-eco
no
mic
sit
uat
ion
s (y
ears
1-5
) 4.
1.1.
Fa
cilit
ate
the
form
atio
n o
f g
rou
ps
and
ass
oci
atio
ns
for
easy
acc
ess
to e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces,
inp
uts
an
d t
ech
no
log
ies
(yea
rs 1
-5)
4.1.
2.
Incr
ease
wo
men
rep
rese
nta
tio
n in
all
exte
nsi
on
act
ivit
ies
at a
ll le
vels
to
bet
ter
reac
h f
emal
e fa
rmer
s an
d w
om
en-h
ead
ed h
ou
seh
old
s (y
ears
1-5
)4.
1.3.
Pr
ovi
de
nee
ds-
bas
ed t
rain
ing
an
d a
dvi
ce t
o E
SPs
and
clie
nte
le u
sin
g d
iffe
ren
t ap
pro
ach
es, i
ncl
ud
ing
FFS
(ye
ars
1-5)
4.
1.4.
D
isse
min
ate
exte
nsi
on
pac
kag
es u
sin
g c
ost
eff
ecti
ve m
eth
od
s an
d a
pp
roac
hes
(ye
ars
2-5)
4.
1.5.
Es
tab
lish
far
mer
s in
form
atio
n c
ente
rs a
t Pa
yam
leve
l (ye
ars
2-5)
5.1.
1.
Dev
elo
p T
oR
an
d im
ple
men
tati
on
gu
idel
ines
fo
r th
e N
ALE
P im
ple
men
tati
on
co
mm
itte
e, f
ora
an
d p
rofe
ssio
nal
wo
rkin
g g
rou
ps(
year
1)
5.1.
2.
Esta
blis
h N
ALE
P im
ple
men
tati
on
co
mm
itte
e at
Go
SS le
vel (
year
1)
5.1.
3.
Esta
blis
h p
rofe
ssio
nal
s w
ork
ing
gro
up
s at
nat
ion
al a
nd
Sta
te le
vels
(ye
ar 1
)5.
1.4.
Es
tab
lish
NA
LEP
agri
cult
ure
an
d li
vest
ock
sta
keh
old
er f
ora
at
all l
evel
s (y
ear
1)6.
1.1.
U
pd
ate
and
imp
lem
ent
trai
nin
g c
urr
icu
lum
of
trai
nin
g c
ente
rs a
nd
inst
itu
tes
of
MA
F an
d M
AR
F (y
ears
1-5
)6.
1.2.
D
evel
op
min
imu
m s
taffi
ng
leve
ls w
ith
min
imu
m q
ual
ifica
tio
n a
nd
exp
erie
nce
req
uir
ed f
or
ESPs
(ye
ars
1-2)
6.2.
1.
Dev
elo
p n
orm
s, s
tan
dar
ds
and
gu
idel
ines
fo
r ES
Ps (
year
1)
6.2.
2.
Ass
ess
trai
nin
g n
eed
s o
f ES
Ps, i
ncl
ud
ing
sta
te a
nd
NSA
s at
all
leve
ls (
year
s 1-
2)6.
2.3.
Id
enti
fy a
nd
tra
in E
SPs
acco
rdin
g t
o n
eed
s id
enti
fied
(ye
ars
2-5)
6.3.
1.
Dev
elo
p a
str
ateg
ic a
nd
an
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral r
esea
rch
, ext
ensi
on
an
d e
du
cati
on
at
Go
ss a
nd
Sta
te le
vels
(ye
ars
1-2)
6.3.
2.
Mo
bili
ze r
eso
urc
es n
eces
sary
fo
r th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
of
a st
rate
gic
an
d a
n o
per
atio
nal
pla
ns
for
agri
cult
ura
l res
earc
h, e
xten
sio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n a
t G
oss
an
d S
tate
le
vels
(ye
ars
2-5)
7.1.
1.
Dev
elo
p a
co
mm
un
icat
ion
str
ateg
y fo
r ad
voca
cy, l
ob
byi
ng
an
d f
acili
tati
on
in f
avo
r o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
usi
ng
all
avai
lab
le c
han
nel
s (r
adio
, TV,
inte
rnet
…)
at a
ll le
vels
, mo
bili
ze r
eso
urc
es a
nd
imp
lem
ent
(yea
rs 2
-5)
7.1.
2.
Faci
litat
e th
e es
tab
lish
men
t o
f lin
kag
es o
f fa
rmer
s to
pro
vid
ers
of
faci
litat
ion
fac
tors
(tr
ader
s, m
arke
t in
form
atio
n s
ou
rces
, in
pu
t su
pp
liers
, mic
ro-c
red
it
inst
itu
tio
ns,
irri
gat
ion
…)
(yea
rs 1
-5)
7.1.
3.
Dev
elo
p a
cle
ar s
trat
egy
on
su
bsi
die
s fo
r fa
rmer
s (y
ears
1-5
)8.
1.1.
C
on
du
ct a
stu
dy
to id
enti
fy a
nd
pri
ori
tize
cro
ss c
utt
ing
issu
es in
ag
ricu
ltu
re a
nd
live
sto
ck e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
spec
ific
to S
ou
ther
n S
ud
an (
year
1)
8.1.
2.
Dev
elo
p c
apac
ity
thro
ug
h t
he
trai
nin
g o
f ES
Ps o
n c
ross
-cu
ttin
g is
sues
iden
tifi
ed a
nd
way
s to
ad
dre
ss it
(ye
ars
2-5)
8.
1.3.
In
stit
ute
a y
earl
y n
atio
nal
co
nfe
ren
ce a
nd
fo
llow
-up
mee
tin
gs
at S
tate
, Co
un
ty a
nd
Pay
am o
n t
he
pro
mo
tio
n a
nd
mai
nst
ream
ing
of
cro
ss c
utt
ing
issu
es in
ex
ten
sio
n p
rog
ram
mes
(ye
ar 1
) 9.
1.1.
O
rgan
ize
a st
ud
y to
del
inea
te a
reas
of
inte
rven
tio
n f
or
pri
vate
an
d p
ub
lic e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
(yea
r 1)
51
Nar
rati
ve S
um
mar
yO
bje
ctiv
ely
Ver
ifiab
le In
dic
ato
rsM
ean
s o
f V
erifi
cati
on
Ass
um
pti
on
s9.
1.2.
D
evel
op
an
d e
stab
lish
a s
ust
ain
able
fu
nd
ing
mec
han
ism
in f
avo
ur
of
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
s, b
ased
on
th
e re
sult
s an
d r
eco
mm
end
atio
ns
of
the
stu
dy
(yea
rs 2
-3)
9.1.
3.
Init
iate
an
d e
stab
lish
a d
on
or
coo
rdin
atio
n m
eeti
ng
to
mo
bili
ze fi
nan
cial
su
pp
ort
fo
r a
coo
rdin
ated
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
del
iver
y (y
ear
1)10
.1.1
. D
evel
op
a s
trat
egic
an
d a
n o
per
atio
nal
pla
ns
for
agri
cult
ura
l res
earc
h, e
xten
sio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n a
t G
oss
an
d S
tate
leve
ls (
year
s 1-
2)
10.1
.2.
Mo
bili
ze r
eso
urc
es n
eces
sary
fo
r th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
of
a st
rate
gic
an
d a
n o
per
atio
nal
pla
ns
for
agri
cult
ura
l res
earc
h, e
xten
sio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n a
t G
oss
an
d S
tate
le
vels
, an
d im
ple
men
t (y
ears
2-5
) 10
.1.3
. Su
pp
ort
exi
stin
g t
rain
ing
inst
itu
tio
ns
and
oth
er e
du
cati
on
al f
acili
ties
to
car
ry o
ut
adap
tive
res
earc
h w
ith
on
-far
m t
rial
s an
d o
n-s
tati
on
res
earc
h (
year
s 2-
5)
52
An
nex
3:
The
Op
erat
ion
al P
lan
Tab
le
Spec
ific
Ob
ject
ives
Res
ult
sA
ctiv
itie
sK
ey Im
ple
men
tin
gA
cto
rs
Ind
icat
ive
Bu
dg
et
(USD
)Ti
mel
ine
1.
To c
reat
e a
favo
rab
le
and
en
ablin
g
envi
ron
men
t fo
r q
ual
ity
and
eff
ecti
ve e
xten
sio
n
serv
ices
to
a b
road
cl
ien
tele
at
all l
evel
s
It s
ho
uld
incl
ud
e, a
t al
l le
vels
, th
e in
volv
emen
t o
f al
l sta
keh
old
ers
in e
xten
sio
n
serv
ice
pro
visi
on
, an
d b
e at
trac
tive
fo
r th
e p
riva
te
and
no
n s
tate
act
ors
(N
SA)
to p
arti
cip
ate
in t
he
del
iver
y o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
and
th
e co
mm
erci
aliz
atio
n o
f ag
ricu
ltu
re
1.
a.
The
NA
LEP
is
end
ors
ed a
t th
e h
igh
est
po
ssib
le le
vel
of
the
Go
SS w
ith
in
on
e ye
ara.
1.1.
1. P
rese
nt
the
NA
LEP,
its
Imp
lem
enta
tio
n a
nd
R
egu
lato
ry F
ram
ewo
rks
to t
he
Co
un
cil o
f M
inis
ters
th
rou
gh
MA
F an
d M
AR
F (y
ear
1)
NA
LEP
Task
For
ce, M
AF
and
MA
RF
10,0
00Ju
ly 2
012
1.1.
2. A
lloca
te a
nd
mo
bili
ze a
pp
rop
riat
e re
sou
rces
fo
r th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
of
NA
LEP
at a
ll le
vels
(ye
ars
1-5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
, Sta
tes
25,7
00Ju
ly 2
016
b.
NA
LEP
is a
do
pte
d
by
Stat
es a
nd
im
ple
men
ted
at
all
leve
ls s
tart
ing
sec
on
d
year
1.2.
1. L
aun
ch a
nd
dis
sem
inat
e th
e N
ALE
P to
th
e St
ates
(y
ear
1)M
AF,
MA
RF, S
tate
s15
0,00
0Ju
ly 2
012
1.2.
2. I
mp
lem
ent
the
refo
rm o
f ex
ten
sio
n o
rgan
izat
ion
an
d m
anag
emen
t st
ruct
ure
s at
Go
SS, S
tate
an
d
Co
un
ty le
vels
(ye
ars
2-5)
MA
F, M
ARF
, Sta
tes
82,8
00Ju
ly 2
016
c.
Inte
rnat
ion
al
par
tner
ship
s ar
e b
uilt
aro
un
d N
ALE
P in
su
pp
ort
of
its
imp
lem
enta
tio
n
star
tin
g fi
rst
year
1.3.
1. I
nit
iate
an
d f
orm
aliz
e as
man
y in
tern
atio
nal
p
artn
ersh
ips
as p
oss
ible
aro
un
d t
he
NA
LEP
imp
lem
enta
tio
n f
ram
ewo
rk, i
ncl
ud
ing
wit
h t
he
imp
lem
enta
tio
n p
roce
ss o
f th
e C
om
pre
hen
sive
A
fric
a A
gri
cult
ure
Dev
elo
pm
ent
Pro
gra
mm
e (C
AA
DP)
(ye
ars
1-5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
, and
inte
rnat
iona
l par
tner
s
102,
800
July
201
6
53
Spec
ific
Ob
ject
ives
Res
ult
sA
ctiv
itie
sK
ey Im
ple
men
tin
gA
cto
rs
Ind
icat
ive
Bu
dg
et
(USD
)Ti
mel
ine
2.
To p
rovi
de
a q
ual
ity
and
eff
ecti
ve e
xten
sio
n
serv
ice
to a
bro
ad
clie
nte
le a
t al
l lev
els
1.
1.
1.
1.
d.
Ran
ge
of
app
rop
riat
e an
d n
eed
s-b
ased
ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
are
del
iver
ed t
o a
bro
ad
ran
ge
of
clie
nte
le
star
tin
g s
eco
nd
yea
ra.
a.
a.
a.
2.1.
1. D
evel
op
gen
der
sen
siti
ve n
orm
s, s
tan
dar
ds,
g
uid
elin
es a
nd
a s
yste
m o
f re
gis
trat
ion
fo
r ES
Ps
(yea
rs 1
-2)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n10
,175
July
201
3
2.1.
2. C
on
du
ct f
arm
ers’
info
rmat
ion
nee
ds
asse
ssm
ent
at a
ll le
vels
(FI
NA
) (y
ears
1-2
)M
AF
and
MA
RF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n, N
GO
s10
1,75
0
July
201
3
2.1.
3. P
lan
an
d im
ple
men
t ex
ten
sio
n p
rog
ram
mes
b
ased
on
FIN
A (
year
s 2-
5)M
AF
and
MA
RF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n, S
tate
min
istr
ies
of
agric
ultu
re, l
ives
tock
and
fore
stry
, NG
Os,
NSA
s, P
artn
ers…
41,4
00Ju
ly 2
016
2.1.
4. E
stab
lish
mu
lti l
ater
al a
nd
bi l
ater
al p
artn
ersh
ips
to h
arm
on
ize
and
co
ord
inat
e th
e d
eliv
ery
of
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
s (y
ears
1-5
)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
, NG
Os,
Part
ners
…
25,7
00Ju
ly 2
016
2.1.
5. F
acili
tate
th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
of
NA
LEP
thro
ug
h
incr
ease
d r
eso
urc
es f
or
exte
nsi
on
(ye
ars
1-5)
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agric
ultu
re, l
ives
tock
and
fore
stry
,
25,7
00Ju
ly 2
016
54
Spec
ific
Ob
ject
ives
Res
ult
sA
ctiv
itie
sK
ey Im
ple
men
tin
gA
cto
rsIn
dic
ativ
eB
ud
get
Tim
elin
e
3.
To p
rom
ote
a
wid
e ra
ng
e o
f p
arti
cip
ato
ry
exte
nsi
on
ap
pro
ach
es a
nd
m
eth
od
s
1.
e.
Rel
evan
t an
d
app
rop
riat
e ex
ten
sio
n
app
roac
hes
, m
eth
od
s an
d
gu
idel
ines
are
d
evel
op
ed a
nd
d
ocu
men
ted
st
arti
ng
firs
t ye
ar,
and
dis
sem
inat
ed
star
tin
g s
eco
nd
ye
ara.
3.1.
1. C
reat
e (y
ear
1) a
nd
su
stai
n a
dat
abas
e o
f ap
pro
pri
ate
do
cum
ents
on
par
tici
pat
ory
ex
ten
sio
n a
pp
roac
hes
an
d m
eth
od
s (y
ears
1-
5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n 20
3,50
0Ju
ly 2
016
3.1.
2. I
den
tify
, tes
t, a
dap
t an
d u
psc
ale
rele
van
t p
arti
cip
ato
ry e
xten
sio
n a
pp
roac
hes
an
d
met
ho
ds
(yea
rs 1
-5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n,
Rese
arch
cen
ters
, Uni
vers
ities
771,
000
July
201
6
3.1.
3. D
evel
op
ap
pro
pri
ate
exte
nsi
on
pac
kag
es
and
mes
sag
es b
ased
on
ag
ro e
colo
gic
al
and
so
cio
-eco
no
mic
sit
uat
ion
s (y
ears
1-5
)
MA
F, M
ARF
, NSA
s, a
nd p
rofe
ssio
nal
wor
king
gro
ups
564,
000
July
201
6
4.
To e
mp
ow
er
rura
l ho
use
ho
lds
and
th
eir
inst
itu
tio
ns
for
the
use
of
app
rop
riat
e ru
ral s
ervi
ces
and
th
e ad
op
tio
n o
f ap
pro
pri
ate
exte
nsi
on
m
essa
ges
1.
1.
1.
f.
Ru
ral H
ou
seh
old
s h
ave
acce
ss
to im
pro
ved
sk
ills,
to
ols
an
d
tech
niq
ues
fo
r th
eir
ado
pti
on
an
d u
se s
tart
ing
th
ird
yea
ra.
a.
a.
4.1.
1. F
acili
tate
th
e fo
rmat
ion
of
gro
up
s an
d
asso
ciat
ion
s fo
r ea
sy a
cces
s to
ext
ensi
on
se
rvic
es, i
np
uts
an
d t
ech
no
log
ies
(yea
rs
1-5)
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck
and
fore
stry
, Pub
lic E
SPs,
NG
OS,
NSA
s,
Part
ners
…
102,
800
July
201
6
4.1.
2. I
ncr
ease
wo
men
rep
rese
nta
tio
n in
all
exte
nsi
on
act
ivit
ies
at a
ll le
vels
to
bet
ter
reac
h f
emal
e fa
rmer
s an
d w
om
en-h
ead
ed
ho
use
ho
lds
(yea
rs 1
-5)
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck
and
fore
stry
, Pub
lic E
SPs,
NG
OS,
NSA
s,
Part
ners
…
128,
500
July
201
6
4.1.
3. P
rovi
de
nee
ds-
bas
ed t
rain
ing
an
d a
dvi
ce
to E
SPs
and
clie
nte
le u
sin
g d
iffe
ren
t ap
pro
ach
es, i
ncl
ud
ing
FFS
(ye
ars
1-5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n,
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fore
stry
, NG
Os,
NSA
s, P
artn
ers…
257,
000
July
201
6
4.1.
4. D
isse
min
ate
exte
nsi
on
pac
kag
es u
sin
g c
ost
ef
fect
ive
met
ho
ds
and
ap
pro
ach
es (
year
s 2-
5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n,
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fore
stry
, NG
Os,
NSA
s, P
artn
ers…
103,
500
July
201
6
4.1.
5. E
stab
lish
far
mer
s in
form
atio
n c
ente
rs a
t Pa
yam
leve
l (ye
ars
2-5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n,
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fore
stry
, NG
Os,
NSA
s, P
artn
ers…
15,5
25,0
00Ju
ly 2
016
55
Spec
ific
Ob
ject
ives
Res
ult
sA
ctiv
itie
sK
ey Im
ple
men
tin
gA
cto
rsIn
dic
ativ
eB
ud
get
Tim
elin
e
5.
To s
tren
gth
en
stak
eho
lder
s lin
kag
es, a
nd
th
e co
ord
inat
ion
an
d n
etw
ork
ing
am
on
g E
SPs
at
all l
evel
s
1.
1.
5.1.
Th
e se
tup
of
inst
itu
tio
nal
ar
ran
gem
ents
fo
r th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
o
f th
e N
ALE
P is
fu
nct
ion
al a
t al
l le
vels
sta
rtin
g
seco
nd
yea
ra.
a.
5.1.
1. D
evel
op
To
R a
nd
imp
lem
enta
tio
n
gu
idel
ines
fo
r th
e N
ALE
P im
ple
men
tati
on
co
mm
itte
e, f
ora
an
d p
rofe
ssio
nal
wo
rkin
g
gro
up
s (y
ear
1)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
, NG
OS,
NSA
s, P
artn
ers…
30,0
00Ju
ly 2
012
5.1.
2. E
stab
lish
NA
LEP
imp
lem
enta
tio
n
com
mit
tee
at G
oSS
leve
l (ye
ars
1-5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n,
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fore
stry
, NG
OS,
NSA
s, P
artn
ers…
257,
000
July
201
2
5.1.
3. E
stab
lish
pro
fess
ion
als
wo
rkin
g g
rou
ps
at
nat
ion
al a
nd
Sta
te le
vels
sta
rtin
g (
year
s 1-
5)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n,
Stat
e m
inis
trie
s of
agr
icul
ture
, liv
esto
ck a
nd
fore
stry
, NG
OS,
NSA
s, P
artn
ers…
308,
400
July
201
2
5.1.
4. E
stab
lish
NA
LEP
agri
cult
ure
an
d li
vest
ock
st
akeh
old
er f
ora
at
all l
evel
s st
arti
ng
(y
ears
1-5
)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
564,
000
July
201
2
6.
To d
evel
op
an
d
stre
ng
then
h
um
an a
nd
in
stit
uti
on
al
cap
acit
y o
f ex
ten
sio
n
serv
ice
pro
vid
ers
at a
ll le
vels
in
clu
din
g
trai
nin
g
inst
itu
tio
ns,
fo
r a
mo
re e
ffec
tive
te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
tra
nsf
er
(TD
T)
The
inst
itu
tio
nal
ca
pac
ity
stre
ng
then
ing
sh
ou
ld
aim
at
pro
mo
tin
g
effe
ctiv
e re
sear
ch-
exte
nsi
on
-use
r p
artn
ersh
ip a
nd
lin
kag
es in
TD
T
g.
Cap
acit
y o
f tr
ain
ing
in
stit
uti
on
s is
st
ren
gth
ened
st
arti
ng
sec
on
d
year
a.
6.1.
1. U
pd
ate
and
imp
lem
ent
trai
nin
g
curr
icu
lum
of
trai
nin
g c
ente
rs a
nd
in
stit
ute
s o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF
star
tin
g (
year
1-
5)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
153,
500
July
201
6
6.1.
2. R
ehab
ilita
te in
fras
tru
ctu
res
and
pro
vid
e ad
equ
ate
reso
urc
es s
tart
ing
(ye
ars
1-2)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, S
tate
s an
d Pa
rtne
rs…
101,
750
July
201
3
h.
Cap
acit
y o
f h
um
an r
eso
urc
es
is s
tren
gth
ened
at
all l
evel
s st
arti
ng
se
con
d y
ear
a.
a.
6.2.
1. D
evel
op
min
imu
m s
taffi
ng
leve
ls w
ith
m
inim
um
qu
alifi
cati
on
an
d e
xper
ien
ce
req
uir
ed f
or
ESPs
wit
hin
(ye
ar 1
)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
20,0
00Ju
ly 2
012
6.2.
2. A
sses
s tr
ain
ing
nee
ds
of
ESPs
, in
clu
din
g
stat
e an
d N
SAs
at a
ll le
vels
wit
hin
yea
r (y
ears
1-2
)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
101,
750
July
201
3
6.2.
3. I
den
tify
an
d t
rain
ESP
s ac
cord
ing
to
nee
ds
iden
tifi
ed (
year
s 2-
5)D
epar
tmen
ts o
f ex
tens
ion
of M
AF
and
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
207,
000
July
201
6
56
Spec
ific
Ob
ject
ives
Res
ult
sA
ctiv
itie
sK
ey Im
ple
men
tin
gA
cto
rsIn
dic
ativ
eB
ud
get
Tim
elin
e
7.
To p
rom
ote
th
e p
rovi
sio
n
of
faci
litat
ing
fa
cto
rs f
or
effe
ctiv
e ex
ten
sio
n
serv
ice
del
iver
y
1.
i. Su
pp
ort
fo
r ex
ten
sio
n
faci
litat
ion
fac
tors
(m
arke
ts, i
np
uts
, cr
edit
fac
iliti
es,
infr
astr
uct
ure
s,
irri
gat
ion
fac
iliti
es,
sub
sid
ies…
) is
in
crea
sed
sta
rtin
g
seco
nd
yea
ra.
7.1.
1. D
evel
op
a c
om
mu
nic
atio
n s
trat
egy
for
advo
cacy
, lo
bb
yin
g a
nd
fac
ilita
tio
n in
fa
vor
of
exte
nsi
on
ser
vice
s u
sin
g a
ll av
aila
ble
ch
ann
els
(rad
io, T
V, in
tern
et…
) at
all
leve
ls, m
ob
ilize
res
ou
rces
an
d
imp
lem
ent
(yea
rs 2
- 5
)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
144,
900
July
201
6
7.1.
2. F
acili
tate
th
e es
tab
lish
men
t o
f lin
kag
es o
f fa
rmer
s to
pro
vid
ers
of
faci
litat
ion
fac
tors
(t
rad
ers,
mar
ket
info
rmat
ion
so
urc
es,
inp
ut
sup
plie
rs, m
icro
-cre
dit
inst
itu
tio
ns,
ir
rig
atio
n…
) (y
ears
1-5
)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, S
tate
s, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
102,
800
July
201
6
7.1.
3. D
evel
op
a c
lear
str
ateg
y o
n s
ub
sid
ies
for
farm
ers
(yea
rs 1
-2)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
101,
750
July
201
3
8.
To p
rom
ote
an
d
mai
nst
ream
cr
oss
cutt
ing
is
sues
in
agri
cult
ure
an
d li
vest
ock
ex
ten
sio
n
serv
ices
j. Th
e p
rom
oti
on
o
f cr
oss
cu
ttin
g
issu
es is
en
han
ced
an
d m
ain
stre
amed
in
all
exte
nsi
on
p
rog
ram
mes
st
arti
ng
firs
t ye
ara.
a.
8.1.
1. C
on
du
ct a
stu
dy
to id
enti
fy a
nd
pri
ori
tize
cr
oss
cu
ttin
g is
sues
in a
gri
cult
ure
an
d
lives
tock
ext
ensi
on
ser
vice
s sp
ecifi
c to
So
uth
ern
Su
dan
(ye
ar 1
)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
100,
000
July
201
2
8.1.
2. D
evel
op
cap
acit
y th
rou
gh
th
e tr
ain
ing
of
ESPs
on
cro
ss-c
utt
ing
issu
es id
enti
fied
an
d
way
s to
ad
dre
ss it
(ye
ars
2-5)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
207,
000
July
201
6
8.1.
3. In
stit
ute
a y
earl
y n
atio
nal
co
nfe
ren
ce
and
fo
llow
-up
mee
tin
gs
at S
tate
, Co
un
ty
and
Pay
am o
n t
he
pro
mo
tio
n a
nd
m
ain
stre
amin
g o
f cr
oss
cu
ttin
g is
sues
in
exte
nsi
on
pro
gra
mm
es (
year
1)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, N
GO
s, N
SAs,
Par
tner
s…
100,
000
July
201
2
9.
To d
evel
op
an
ef
fect
ive
and
su
stai
nab
le
fun
din
g
mec
han
ism
in
fav
ou
r o
f te
chn
olo
gy
dev
elo
pm
ent
and
ru
ral
exte
nsi
on
1.
1.
k.
Fun
din
g o
f ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ce
del
iver
y is
sh
ared
bet
wee
n
the
pu
blic
, p
riva
te, N
SAs
and
th
e fa
rmer
s th
emse
lves
st
arti
ng
sec
on
d
year
a.
a.
9.1.
1. O
rgan
ize
a st
ud
y to
del
inea
te a
reas
o
f in
terv
enti
on
fo
r p
riva
te a
nd
pu
blic
ex
ten
sio
n s
ervi
ces
(yea
r 1)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
and
Par
tner
s10
0,00
0Ju
ly 2
012
9.1.
2. D
evel
op
an
d e
stab
lish
a s
ust
ain
able
fu
nd
ing
mec
han
ism
in f
avo
ur
of
exte
nsi
on
se
rvic
es, b
ased
on
th
e re
sult
s an
d
reco
mm
end
atio
ns
of
the
stu
dy
(yea
rs 2
-3)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
and
Par
tner
s20
7,00
0Ju
ly 2
014
9.1.
3. I
nit
iate
an
d e
stab
lish
a d
on
or
coo
rdin
atio
n
mee
tin
g t
o m
ob
ilize
fin
anci
al s
up
po
rt f
or
a co
ord
inat
ed e
xten
sio
n s
ervi
ce d
eliv
ery
(yea
r 1)
MA
F an
d M
ARF
10,3
50Ju
ly 2
012
57
Spec
ific
Ob
ject
ives
Res
ult
sA
ctiv
itie
sK
ey Im
ple
men
tin
gA
cto
rsIn
dic
ativ
eB
ud
get
Tim
elin
e
10.
Dev
elo
p a
n
effe
ctiv
e re
sear
ch-
exte
nsi
on
– u
ser
par
tner
ship
an
d
linka
ges
th
at
will
fac
ilita
te a
re
sear
ch s
yste
m
resp
on
sive
to
fa
rmer
s n
eed
s
10.1
. A s
trat
egic
an
d a
n
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral
rese
arch
, ex
ten
sio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n a
re
dev
elo
ped
fo
r G
oSS
an
d S
tate
le
vels
sta
rtin
g
seco
nd
yea
r
10.1
.1.
Dev
elo
p a
str
ateg
ic a
nd
an
op
erat
ion
al
pla
ns
for
agri
cult
ura
l res
earc
h, e
xten
sio
n
and
ed
uca
tio
n a
t G
oss
an
d S
tate
leve
ls
(yea
rs 1
-2)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, D
epar
tmen
ts o
f re
sear
ch o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF, R
esea
rch
cent
ers,
Uni
vers
ities
305,
250
July
201
3
10.1
.2.
Mo
bili
ze r
eso
urc
es n
eces
sary
fo
r th
e im
ple
men
tati
on
of
a st
rate
gic
an
d a
n
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
s fo
r ag
ricu
ltu
ral r
esea
rch
, ex
ten
sio
n a
nd
ed
uca
tio
n a
t G
oss
an
d S
tate
le
vels
, an
d im
ple
men
t (y
ears
2-5
)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, D
epar
tmen
ts o
f re
sear
ch o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF, R
esea
rch
cent
ers,
Uni
vers
ities
82,8
00Ju
ly 2
016
10.1
.3.
Sup
po
rt e
xist
ing
tra
inin
g in
stit
uti
on
s an
d o
ther
ed
uca
tio
nal
fac
iliti
es t
o c
arry
o
ut
adap
tive
res
earc
h w
ith
on
-far
m t
rial
s an
d o
n-s
tati
on
res
earc
h (
year
s 2-
5)
Dep
artm
ents
of
exte
nsio
n of
MA
F an
d
MA
RF, D
epar
tmen
ts o
f re
sear
ch o
f M
AF
and
MA
RF, R
esea
rch
cent
ers,
Uni
vers
ities
6,21
0,00
0Ju
ly 2
016
58
Annex 4: Detailed Budget for NALEP implementation
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
A. General Costs
A.1 GoSS level
A.1.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (year 1)
200.000 0 0 0 0 200.000
A.1.b Non expendable procurement
0 0 0 0
Vehicles 160,000 0 0 177,395 0 337,395
4WD Jeep 90,000 0 0 99,785 0 189,785
4WD Pick-up 70,000 0 0 77,610 0 147,610
Data processing equipments 30,000 0 0 33,262 0 63,262
Printing and reproduction materials
19,500 0 0 21,620 0 41,120
Big photocopier + accessories
6,000 0 0 6,652 0 12,652
Medium photocopier + accessories
6,000 0 0 6,652 0 12,652
Small photocopier + accessories
7,500 0 0 8,315 0 15,815
Office furniture (year 1) 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000
Agricultural equipment for demonstration and adaptive trials
20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249
A.1.b Sub-total Non expendable procurement
379,500 20,700 21,425 254,451 22,950 699,026
A.1.c Expendable procurement 0 0 0 0
Data processing supplies 15,000 15,525 16,068 16,631 17,213 80,437
Printing and reproduction supplies
20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249
Office stationery 25,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 134,062
Agricultural inputs for demonstration and adaptive trials
10,000 10,350 10,712 11,087 11,475 53,625
A.1.c Sub-total Expendable procurement
70,000 72,450 74,986 77,610 80,327 375,373
A.1.d Personnel 0 0 0 0
Salaries and salary supplements
240,000 248,400 257,094 266,092 275,406 1,286,992
Consultants 100,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 536,247
Other personnel costs 17,000 17,595 18,211 18,848 19,508 91,162
Sub-total A.1.d Personnel 357,000 369,495 382,427 395,812 409,666 1,914,400
A.1.e Contracts with ESPs 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493
A.1.f Training 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493
A.1.g Travels 0 0 0 0
Local travels 150,000 155,250 160,684 166,308 172,128 804,370
International travels 50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123 Sub-total A.1.g Travels 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493
59
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
A.1.h General operation expenses 0 0 0 0 Vehicles operation and maintenance 53,333 55,200 57,132 59,132 61,201 285,998 Vehicles insurance 3,200 3,312 3,428 3,548 3,672 17,160 Equipment operation and maintenance 10,000 10,350 10,712 11,087 11,475 53,625 Coordination Meetings 60,000 62,100 64,274 66,523 68,851 321,748 Miscellaneous 50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123 Sub-total A.1.h General operation expenses
176,533 182,712 189,107 195,726 202,576 946,654
Sub-total A.1 GoSS level 1,783,033 1,266,357 1,310,679 1.588.830 1.404.033 7.352.932
A.2 State level
A.2.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (year 1)
1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
A.2.b Non expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 1,150,000 0 0 1,275,026 0 2,425,026
4WD Jeep 450,000 0 0 498,923 0 948,923 4WD Pick-up 700,000 0 0 776,103 0 1,476,103
Data processing equipments 60,000 0 0 66,523 0 126,523 Printing and reproduction materials 60,000 0 0 66,523 0 126,523
Big photocopier + accessories 30,000 0 0 33,262 0 63,262 Medium photocopier + accessories
15,000 0 0 16,631 0 31,631
Small photocopier + accessories 15,000 0 0 16,631 0 31,631 Office furniture (year 1) 750,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 Agricultural equipment for demonstration and adaptive trials
100,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 536,247
A.2.b Sub-total Non expendable procurement
2,120,000 103,500 107,123 1,518,943 114,752 3,964,318
A.2.c Expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Data processing supplies 75,000 77,625 80,342 83,154 86,064 402,185 Printing and reproduction supplies 100,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 536,247 Office stationery 125,000 129,375 133,903 138,590 143,440 670,308 Agricultural inputs for demonstration and adaptive trials
50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123
A.2.c Sub-total Expendable procurement 350,000 362,250 374,929 388,051 401,633 1,876,863 A.2.d Personnel 0 0 0 0 Salaries and salary supplements 600,000 621,000 642,735 665,231 688,514 3,217,480 Other personnel costs 30,000 31,050 32,137 33,262 34,426 160,874 A.2.d Sub-total Personnel 630,000 652,050 674,872 698,492 722,939 3,378,354 A.2.e Contracts with ESPs 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.f Training 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.g Travels 0 0 0 0 Local travels 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.g Sub-total Travels 500,000 517,500 535,613 554,359 573,762 2,681,233 A.2.h General operation expenses 0 0 0 0 Vehicles operation and maintenance 383,333 396,750 410,636 425,009 439,884 2,055,612 Vehicles insurance 23,000 23,805 24,638 25,501 26,393 123,337 Equipment operation and maintenance 20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249 Coordination Meetings 240,000 248,400 257,094 266,092 275,406 1,286,992 Miscellaneous 200,000 207,000 214,245 221,744 229,505 1,072,493 A.2.h Sub-total General operation expenses
866,333 896,655 928,038 960,519 994,137 4,645,683
Sub-total A.2 State level 6,466,333 3,566,955 3,691,798 5,229,083 3,954,747 22,908,917A.3 County level (including all levels below)
60
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
A.3.a Rehabilitation of infrastructures (year 1)
3,950,000 0 0 0 0 3,950,000
A.3.b Non expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 3,764,300 0 0 4,173,547 0 7,937,847
4WD pick-up hard top 2,765,000 0 0 3,065,605 0 5,830,605 Motorbikes 948,000 0 0 1,051,065 0 1,999,065 Bicycles for Payams 51,300 0 0 56,877 0 108,177
Data processing equipments 474,000 0 0 525,532 0 999,532 Printing and reproduction materials 59,250 0 0 65,692 0 124,942 Small photocopier + accessories 59,250 0 0 65,692 0 124,942 Office furniture (year 1) 493,750 0 0 0 0 493,750 Agricultural equipment for demonstration and adaptive trials
197,500 204,413 211,567 218,972 226,636 1,059,087
A.3.b Sub-total Non expendable procurement
4,988,800 204,413 211,567 4,983,742 226,636 10,615,158
A.3.c Expendable procurement 0 0 0 0 Data processing supplies 197,500 204,413 211,567 218,972 226,636 1,059,087 Printing and reproduction supplies 395,000 408,825 423,134 437,944 453,272 2,118,174 Office stationery 493,750 511,031 528,917 547,429 566,589 2,647,718 Agricultural inputs for demonstration and adaptive trials
197,500 204,413 211,567 218,972 226,636 1,059,087
A.3.c Sub-total Expendable procurement 1,283,750 1,328,681 1,375,185 1,423,317 1,473,133 6,884,066 A.3.d Personnel 0 0 0 0 Salaries and salary supplements 4,740,000 4,905,900 5,077,607 5,255,323 5,439,259 25,418,088 Other personnel costs 79,000 81,765 84,627 87,589 90,654 423,635 A.3.d Sub-total Personnel 4,819,000 4,987,665 5,162,233 5,342,911 5,529,913 25,841,723 A.3.e Contracts with ESPs 790,000 817,650 846,268 875,887 906,543 4,236,348 A.3.f Training 790,000 817,650 846,268 875,887 906,543 4,236,348 A.3.g Travels 0 0 0 0 Local travels 948,000 981,180 1,015,521 1,051,065 1,087,852 5,083,618 A.3.g Sub-total Travels 948,000 981,180 1,015,521 1,051,065 1,087,852 5,083,618 A.3.h General operation expenses 0 0 0 0 Vehicles operation and maintenance 1,254,767 1,298,684 1,344,137 1,391,182 1,439,874 6,728,643 Vehicles insurance 75,286 77,921 80,648 83,471 86,392 403,719 Equipment operation and maintenance 158,000 163,530 169,254 175,177 181,309 847,270 Coordination Meetings 948,000 981,180 1,015,521 1,051,065 1,087,852 5,083,618 Miscellaneous 790,000 817,650 846,268 875,887 906,543 4,236,348 A.3.h Sub-total General operation expenses
3,226,053 3,338,965 3,455,828 3,576,782 3,701,970 17,299,597
Sub-total A.3 County level (including all levels below)
20,795,603 12,476,203 12,912,870 18,129,591 13,832,590 78,146,857
Sub-total A General Costs 29,044,969 17,309,515 17,915,348 24,947,504 19,191,369 108,408,706 B. Specific Operational Costs for Activities
1.1.1. Present the NALEP, its Implementation and Regulatory … (year 1)
10,000 0 0 0 0 10,000
1.1.2. Allocate and mobilize appropriate resources for the … (years 1-5)
5,000 5,175 5,356 5,544 5,738 26,812
1.2.1. Launch and disseminate the NALEP to the States (year 1)
150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000
1.2.2. Implement the reform of extension organization … (years 2-5)
20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 87,249
61
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
1.3.1. Initiate and formalize as many int. partnerships … (years 1-5)
20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249
Sub-total Specific objective 1 185,000 46,575 48,205 49,892 51,639 381,3112.1.1. Develop gender sensitive norms, standards … (years 1-2)
5,000 5,175 0 0 0 10,175
2.1.2. Conduct farmers’ information needs… (years 1-2)
50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750
2.1.3. Plan and implement extension programmes… (years 2-5)
10,350 10,712 11,087 11,475 43,625
2.1.4. Establish multi lateral and bi lateral partnerships … (years 1-5)
5,000 5,175 5,356 5,544 5,738 26,812
2.1.5. Facilitate the implementation of NALEP … (years 1-5)
5,000 5,175 5,356 5,544 5,738 26,812
Sub-total Specific objective 2 65,000 77,625 21,425 22,174 22,950 209,1743.1.1. Create (year 1) and sustain a database … (years 1-5)
100,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 209,062
3.1.2. Identify, test, adapt and upscale relevant … (years 1-5)
150,000 155,250 160,684 166,308 172,128 804,370
3.1.3. Develop appropriate extension packages… (years 1-5)
150,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 586,247
Sub-total Specific objective 3 530,000 439,875 337,436 349,246 361,470 2,018,0274.1.1. Facilitate the formation of groups and associations … (years 1-5)
20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249
4.1.2. Increase women representation in all … (years 1-5)
25,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 134,062
4.1.3. Provide needs-based training and advice to ESPs… (years 1-5)
50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123
4.1.4. Disseminate extension packages using … (years 2-5)
25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 109,062
4.1.5. Establish farmers information centers… (years 2-5)
3,881,250 4,017,094 4,157,692 4,303,211 16,359,247
Sub-total Specific objective 4 95,000 4,005,450 4,145,641 4,290,738 4,440,914 16,977,7435.1.1. Develop ToR and implementation guidelines… (year 1)
30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000
5.1.2. Establish NALEP implementation… (years 1-5)
50,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 268,123
5.1.3. Establish professionals working groups … (years 1-5)
60,000 62,100 64,274 66,523 68,851 321,748
5.1.4. Establish NALEP agriculture and … (years 1-5)
150,000 103,500 107,123 110,872 114,752 586,247
Sub-total Specific objective 5 290,000 217,350 224,957 232,831 240,980 1,206,1186.1.1. Update and implement training curriculum… (year 1-5)
50,000 25,875 26,781 27,718 28,688 159,062
6.1.2. Rehabilitate infrastructures and provide … (years 1-2)
50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750
6.2.1. Develop minimum staffing levels with … (year 1)
20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
6.2.2. Assess training needs of ESPs, including… (years 1-2)
50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750
6.2.3. Identify and train ESPs according to… (years 2-5)
51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 218,123
Sub-total Specific objective 6 170,000 181,125 80,342 83,154 86,064 600,6857.1.1. Develop a communication strategy for… (years 2 - 5)
51,750 32,137 33,262 34,426 151,574
62
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
7.1.2. Facilitate the establishment of linkages… (years 1-5)
20,000 20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 107,249
7.1.3. Develop a clear strategy on subsidies… (years 1-2)
50,000 51,750 0 0 0 101,750
Sub-total Specific objective 7 70,000 124,200 53,561 55,436 57,376 360,5738.1.1. Conduct a study to identify and prioritize… (year 1)
100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
8.1.2. Develop capacity through the training of ESPs… (years 2-5)
51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 218,123
8.1.3. Institute a yearly national conference… (year 1)
100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
Sub-total Specific objective 8 200,000 51,750 53,561 55,436 57,376 418,1239.1.1. Organize a study to delineate areas of... (year 1)
100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
9.1.2. Develop and establish a sustainable funding… (years 2-3)
103,500 107,123 0 0 210,623
9.1.3. Initiate and establish donor coordination… (year 1)
10,350 0 0 0 10,350
Sub-total Specific objective 9 100,000 113,850 107,123 0 0 320,97310.1.1. Develop a strategic and an operational… (years 1-2)
150,000 155,250 0 0 0 305,250
10.1.2. Mobilize resources necessary for… (years 2-5)
20,700 21,425 22,174 22,950 87,249
10.1.3 Support existing training institutions... (years 2-5)
1,552,500 1,606,838 1,663,077 1,721,285 6,543,699
Sub-total Specific objective 10 150,000 1,728,450 1,628,262 1,685,251 1,744,235 6,936,198 Sub-total B Specific Operational Costs for Activities
1,855,000 6,986,250 6,700,512 6,824,159 7,063,004 29,428,925
C Grand Total 30,899,969 24,295,765 24,615,861 31,771,663 26,254,373 137,837,631
1 Takes into account gender issues of the NALEP statement n° 7