n107c/cec.3: a phase iii trial of post-operative stereotactic

6
N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Compared with Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) for Resected Metastatic Brain Disease P. D. Brown 1,2 , K. V. Ballman 3 , J. Cerhan 1 , S. K. Anderson 1 , X. W. Carrero 1 , A. C. Whitton 4 , J. Greenspoon 4 , I. F. Parney 1 , N. N. Laack 1 , J. B. Ashman 5 , J. P. Bahary 6 , C. G. Hadjipanayis 7 , J. J. Urbanic 8 , F. G. Barker II 9 , E. Farace 10 , D. Khuntia 11 , C. Giannini 1 , J. C. Buckner 1 , E. Galanis 1 , and D. Roberge 6 1 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3 Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 4 Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 5 Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 6 Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada, 7 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 8 University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 9 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 10 Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 11 Western Radiation Oncology, Mountain View, CA

Upload: lamnhan

Post on 10-Feb-2017

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic

N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Compared with Whole Brain

Radiotherapy (WBRT) for Resected Metastatic Brain Disease

P. D. Brown1,2, K. V. Ballman3, J. Cerhan1, S. K. Anderson1, X. W. Carrero1, A. C. Whitton4, J. Greenspoon4, I. F. Parney1, N. N. Laack1, J. B. Ashman5, J. P. Bahary6, C. G. Hadjipanayis7, J. J. Urbanic8,

F. G. Barker II9, E. Farace10, D. Khuntia11, C. Giannini1, J. C. Buckner1, E. Galanis1, and D. Roberge6

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 3Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 4Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 5Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 6Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada, 7Winship

Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 8University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 9Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 10Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 11Western Radiation Oncology, Mountain View, CA

Page 2: N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic

Background

• WBRT standard of care after resection of brain metastasis to improve local control

• However WBRT after resection

• No survival benefit

• Side effects (hair loss, fatigue, skin redness)

• Concerns cognitive impact

• Growing practice of SRS to the surgical cavity to reduce risk cognitive toxicity• Despite no level I efficacy data Post-Op SRS

• Despite costs of SRS

• Need to prospectively evaluate and compare SRS surgical bed to WBRT, the standard of care

Page 3: N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic

Method

Resected

Brain

Met*

Stratify

Age (18 to 59 vs. ≥ 60)

Extra-Cranial Disease Controlled (≤ 3 vs. > 3 mo)

Number Pre-Op Brain Mets (1 vs. 2-4)

Histology (Lung vs. Radioresistant vs. Other)

Resection Cavity Max Diam(≤ 3cm vs. > 3cm)

Institution

Randomize

WBRT +SRS unresect mets

SRS + SRS unresected mets

Patient Assessments:• MRI• Quality of Life (QOL) • Cognitive Battery

Eligibility Criteria:• S/P resection 1 lesion• 0-3 unresected mets• No chemo during radiation

Primary Endpoints:I: Cognitive Deterioration Free SurvivalII: Overall Survival

*194 patients, 59% Lung Primary Tumor, 77% single metastasis

Page 4: N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic

Results

No Difference in Survival

SRS

WBRT

Worse Cognitive Function with WBRT

Page 5: N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic

However, with WBRT…- Worse quality of life (QOL)

- More toxicity

- Longer treatment course and delayed systemic therapy

SRS

WBRT

Results

Surgical bed control similar, although long-term better with WBRT

Page 6: N107C/CEC.3: A Phase III Trial of Post-Operative Stereotactic

Conclusions

Post-Op SRS for patients with resected brain metastases should also be a standard of care with equivalent survival, better preservation of cognitive function and QOL, and less toxicity than WBRT.