municipality thames centre 2015 infrastructure roads · municipality of thames centre 2015 state of...
TRANSCRIPT
7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7
www.4roads.ca
Municipality of Thames Centre2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads
Prepared on Behalf of Stantec Consulting
7 Candle Crescent,
Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
December 7, 2015
The Corporation of the Municipality of Thames Centre 4305 Hamilton Road, Dorchester, Ontario, N0L 1G3 Attention: Mary Ellen Weatherhead, CPA, CGA, Dipl.M.A., C.M.T.P. Director of Financial Services /
Treasurer
Mike LeBlanc, Director of Operations and (Acting) Community Services
Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management and Pavement Engineering, Stantec Consulting
Subject: Thames Centre, State of the Infrastructure – Road, prepared on behalf of Stantec Consulting for the Municipality of Thames Centre
Dear Ms. Weatherhead, Mr. LeBlanc, and Mr. Dalziel,
4 Roads Management Services Inc. (4 Roads) is pleased to provide this report on the 2015 State of the Infrastructure ‐ Roads.
The 2015 project updated the condition data on the road sections, revised asset sectioning and developed costing and analysis on the entire road system database and reports on same.
All road sections have been reviewed and have estimated improvement and replacement costs. Calculations for Time of Need, Improvement and Replacement Costs and Performance modeling were developed utilizing WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation Software.
We trust that the information provided in this report will be beneficial to the Municipality of Thames Centre in the evolution of their Asset Management Plans.
Please do not hesitate to call or email if you require any further information or discussion on any aspect of the report. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this report. If 4 Roads Management Services Inc. may be of any further service, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Yours truly,
David Anderson, CET President, 4 Roads Management Services Inc. [email protected] 519 505 5065
7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7
www.4roads.ca
Municipality of Thames Centre
State of the Infrastructure for Roads
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
i
Executive Summary
In the fall of 2012, the Province of Ontario, introduced a requirement for an Asset Management Plan (AMP) as a prerequisite for municipalities seeking funding assistance for capital projects, from the province; effectively creating a conditional grant. To qualify for future infrastructure grants, municipalities were required to develop an AMP that is approved by council by December 2013. On April 26, 2013 the province announced that it had created a $100 million Infrastructure Fund for small, rural and northern municipalities.
Subsequently, the province has introduced further initiatives for infrastructure funding: the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) and the Small Communities Fund (SCF). An Asset Management Plan approved by Council is required as part of the submission for OCIF Applications. Asset Management Plans will be reviewed for comprehensiveness.
The Municipality of Thames Centre (MoTC) currently develops an AMP for the various asset groups, roads being one of them. A key component of the AMP is a ‘State of the Infrastructure’ (SotI) review of the asset or asset group. The following report provides the SotI review of the MoTC road system and also provides recommendations for budgets and road asset management.
The scope of this report includes:
Review and condition rating on the road assets within the MoTC road system
Development of current replacement costs for each road asset
Development/review of recommendations for improvement and associated costing on deficient
assets
Development of recommendations for annual budgets based on current costs for
amortization/capital depreciation and major program areas based on updated unit costs
provided by the MoTC where available. Where costs were not available, local and engineering
experience were used to develop representative costs
Development of an analysis on the effect of current and recommended budgets on overall
system performance
Provision of Level of Service recommendations
Provision of Asset Management Strategy recommendations
The 2015 State of the Infrastructure for Roads Report summarizes the road system survey conducted during the summer of 2015. The survey identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction treatment.
Further, the report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system in its entirety as well as by road section. Both information sources are used to develop programming and budgets. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project.
This report should not be confused with a road safety audit. A road safety audit is the formal safety performance examination of an existing or future road or intersection, which qualitatively estimates and reports on potential road safety issues, and identifies opportunities for improvements for all road users. Typically, and more predominantly in a lower tier, rural municipality on lower volume road sections, the
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
ii
road system has some deficiencies with the existing horizontal and vertical alignment. Road sections with potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignments are listed in Appendix D. These section should be reviewed to ensure that signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual.
MoTC provided updated traffic information and corrected road names which were entered into the database and utilized in the preparation of this report. Accurate and current traffic counts are critical in managing a road system and their importance cannot be overemphasized. Traffic counts establish road maintenance classifications for Minimum Maintenance Standards (MMS) purposes, as per Ontario Regulation 239/02 (Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads). Traffic counts are also used to determine appropriate geometry, structure, and cross‐section when the road is rehabilitated or reconstructed. The MoTC should continue/re‐instate their traffic counting program and include truck counts and dates. Traffic counts should be updated on a regular cycle, as a risk management exercise.
The MoTC staff provided information with respect to their database/network. As 4 Roads reviewed the road sections, some changes were made to the network data, to ensure the road sections were consistent and manageable. Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, traffic count or a combination of these factors. For example, new sections should be created as surface type, surface condition, cross‐section, or speed limit changes.
Data collection and road ratings were completed generally in accordance with the Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads from 1991 (Inventory Manual or IM).
Road conditions were evaluated during the field inspection. The ratings can be used as a standalone value, or incorporated into calculations performed by the software, that then classify the road section as a ‘Now’, ‘1 to 5’, or ‘6 to 10’ year need for maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction in six critical areas. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. Generally, the closer the timeline to reconstruction, the greater the deterioration of the road is. For example, a road may be categorized as a ‘6 to 10’ year need with a resurfacing recommendation; this road should be resurfaced as soon as possible to further defer the need to reconstruct.
Recommendations are made based on the defects observed and other information available in the database at the time of preparation of the report. Once a road asset reaches the project level, the municipality may end up selecting another alternative based on additional information, asset management strategy, development considerations or available funding.
‘NOW’ needs represent road sections that require reconstruction or major rehabilitation. ‘NOW’ needs are the backlog of work required on the road system; however, ‘NOW’ needs may not necessarily be the priority, depending on funding levels. Construction improvements identified within this time period are representative of roads that have little or no service life left and are in poor condition. Resurfacing treatments are never ‘NOW’ needs, with the following exceptions;
RW (Resurface and Widen)
PR1 or PR2 (Pulverize and resurface 1 or 2 lifts of asphalt)
When the surface type is inadequate for the traffic volume (gravel road over 400AADT)
When the surface is gravel and the roadside environment is Urban or Semi‐Urban
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
iii
‘1 to 5’ identifies road sections where reconstruction is anticipated within the next five years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), deferring the need to reconstruct.
‘6 to 10’ identifies road sections where reconstruction improvements are anticipated within six to ten years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct.
‘ADEQ’ identifies road sections that do not have reconstruction or resurfacing needs, although minor maintenance such as crack sealing or spot drainage may be required.
This report summarizes the needs identified through a number of tabular appendices.
When the Inventory Manual was originally developed, the Province provided funding for municipal road systems; the road systems were measured by their system adequacy. The system adequacy is the percentage of the road system that is not a “NOW” need.
The Inventory Manual provides direction that roads with a traffic volume of less than 50 vehicles per day are deemed to be adequate, even if they have structural, geometric, or drainage deficiencies that would otherwise be identified as being in a Time of Need and were to be corrected within the maintenance budget. This approach is directly parallel to Regulation 239/02, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads, which states that roads with less than 50 vehicles per day, and a speed limit of less than 80 km/hr., are classified as Class 6 with no standard for repair. This factor does have an effect on the system adequacy calculation.
However, for the purposes of this report, road sections with a traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day have been provided with a recommended treatment and associated improvement cost in order to provide a more accurate assessment of the total needs and conditions. (Although, the calculations will rate them as adequate due to the traffic count) The road system currently includes 13.286 km of road sections that had an actual or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day representing approximately 3.82% of the road system.
During the field review, and in reviewing the data and the needs for the road network, there were several unique aspects of the network that came to light:
The overall condition of the road system is good. However, this is influenced positively to some extent by the following factors:
o The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring, however, observations could not be made based on the worst case spring thaw conditions.
o As noted above, 3.82% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day.
Roads with a surface width less than the minimum tolerable standard were identified on 17.925km of road sections. Typically these road sections are low volume, however, the
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
iv
recommended correction would be a reconstruction of the section to produce the required width. As an interim solution, signage would reduce the municipality’s exposure.
The status and responsibilities as they relate to the boundary roads appears to be uncertain in a number of instances. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed.
Material gradation on gravel roads may not be in conformity with applicable OPSS standards and/or the material is being placed in too thin a lift causing a significant amount of float (loose gravel) on the road surface. This was only noticeable on some sections ‐not all gravel road sections.
Approximately 10.2% (35.584 km) of the road system requires resurfacing (hot mix asphalt or surface treatment). If not addressed, the resurfacing needs will become major rehabilitation or reconstruction needs at significantly greater cost.
Approximately 27.2% (94.659km) of the road system has a structural adequacy score of 15 or 16, indicating that those roads would be an additional resurfacing need in the next 1 to 3 year period (all surface types are included).
The budget recommendations in this report appear to be higher than current expenditures; however, the system appears to be performing well. There are a number of factors potentially contributing to this anomaly:
o Reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower volume roads appears to be undertaken by Road Operations staff and it does not appear that municipal equipment is charged against activities in the Operating Budget.
o The overall condition may have been influenced by unique accounting practices that have not been identified within the annual funding level over the last number of years.
o Anecdotal information is that the unit costs for gravel resurfacing is approximately 25% less than the unit costs for gravel in the subdivision construction ($13 vs $10).
o It appears that gravel roads are being upgraded to hard surface roads through the capital program, so this would offset, to some extent, the gravel road resurfacing requirement.
Based on the current review of the road system, the current system adequacy measure is 89.7% meaning that, 10.3% of the road system is deficient in the ‘NOW’ time period. The current system adequacy is at an acceptable level. As noted in the foregoing, there are a number of factors influencing the system adequacy.
Based on the current unit costs being experienced, the estimated total cost of recommended improvements is $27,733,786. The improvement costs include $14,109,782 for those roads identified as NOW needs and $13,624,004 is for road work required in the '1 to 10' year time period or for maintenance. Included in those amounts is $3,121,821 for work on road sections with a traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day or require only maintenance.
Based on the composition of the road system, budget recommendations have been developed for annual capital and maintenance programs as follows:
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
v
$162,758,900 to replace the road system. Annualized, this would be $3,255,200 for the roads capital/depreciation, excluding resurfacing, based upon a 50‐year life cycle. This would be similar to the PSAB 3150 amortization value using current replacement costs. The annualized value and 50 year life cycle assumes that there will be regular maintenance and resurfacing in addition to the depreciation costs. Section 8 of the report provides additional discussion on this subject.
$686,500 for average annual hot mix resurfacing, based upon a 19(18.7)‐year cycle. This would approximate an average of 3.2km per year.
$388,200 for average annual single surface treatment of existing surface‐treated roads, based on a seven‐year cycle, not including additional padding or geometric correction. This is approximately 15.7km per year.
$1,096,400 for average annual resurfacing gravel roads on a three‐year cycle (this does not include any additional gravel road conversion costs; nor ditching, re‐grading, dust control, etc.).
$23,700 for average annual crack sealing.
*NOTE: All of the above noted budget recommendations could change dependent upon the outcome status of the boundary roads review.
For modeling purposes, 4 Roads has created a funding level described as the ‘Preservation Budget’. The Preservation Budget is the total of the recommended funding levels for hot mix resurfacing, single surface treatment, gravel road resurfacing and crack sealing. This value has been calculated to be $2,194,800. The premise being that if the preservation and resurfacing programs are adequately funded then the system should be sustained. The performance modeling is discussed in Section 9 of this report. To clarify, the required funding level to sustain or improve the road system is not the total of all of the above recommendations. Sustainable funding has to be between the Preservation Budget and the Capital Depreciation. The preservation budget and performance model thereof are computer derived. Intangible values and decisions and the effects of other external forces cannot be incorporated into the model. As such the preservation model is the theoretical minimum required to maintain the system. From a more pragmatic perspective and to deal with the real life realities of maintaining a road system, this amount should be greater.
Municipal pavement and asset management strategies are critical to managing the performance of the road system, more so, if funding is limited. Funding constraints should push the strategy toward those programs that extend the life cycle of the road by providing the correct treatment at the optimum time. Resurfacing, rehabilitation, and preservation projects should be a higher priority than reconstruction projects. The objective is to “keep the good roads good”.
As the municipality advances the development of their Asset Management Plan (AMP), a paradigm shift will be required in the way that it approaches management of assets. Traditionally, municipalities have spent a fixed amount on capital and maintenance each year. As evidenced by Table ES.11, programs are not at a consistent funding level on an annual basis. The annual budget overall is met, however, the distribution of costs between traditional capital and maintenance activities varies. That variance is being driven by the demands of the road system based on condition, and project selection is based on condition and best Return on Investment. This concept has to be applied to all assets.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
vi
Re‐stated, instead of the traditional capital and maintenance line items, consider the gross budget as the annual re‐investment level, with program funding levels fluctuating within the gross amounts, but driven by asset condition.
The prime goal of any pavement management strategy should be to maintain overall system adequacy. The funding level for road‐related programming should be set at a sufficient level so as to ensure that overall system adequacy does not decrease over time.
In addition to the budgetary recommendations, the following recommendations are provided for the management of the road inventory.
1. The information and budget recommendations included in this report should be used to further develop and evolve the corporate Asset Management Plan.
2. A regular review of the condition of the road system should occur at a maximum four year interval. The review cycle be undertaken at a 4 year interval or segmented annually or bi‐annually.
3. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed.
4. The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and performance models should be updated annually.
5. The System Adequacy should be maintained at 60% or higher.
6. The weighted average Physical Condition should be at 70 or higher.
7. The Good to Very Good roads should be at 60% or higher.
8. Programming should be reviewed to ensure that resurfacing and preservation programs are optimized.
9. The overall road system should have traffic counts updated on a 3 to 5 year cycle. The counting should include the percentage of truck traffic and the date.
10. The gravel road conversion program should be continued.
11. Roads sections where potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignment have been identified, should be reviewed to ensure signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. (Listing provided in Appendix D)
12. Road sections with substandard width should be signed accordingly as an interim measure. (Table ES 5 provides a listing.)
13. The results and recommendations for programming within this report should be integrated with the other assets groups to ensure available funding is optimized.
14. Some consideration should be given to calculating equipment costs for activities and projects undertaken by Thames Centre staff to better reflect total project costs and to allow for more direct comparisons of alternate service delivery methodologies.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
vii
Summary Information All lengths are adjusted for owners’ share / boundary roads
Table ES 1: Roadside Environment and Surface Type
Surface Type
Roadside Environment
Total % of Total Rural Semi‐Urban Urban
Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km
Lane‐ km Cl‐km
Lane‐ km Cl‐km
Lane‐ km
Gravel, Stone, Other Loosetop 181.056 362.111 181.056 362.111 52.12% 52.12%
High Class Bit.‐asphalt 19.300 38.600 10.044 20.088 26.429 52.858 55.773 111.546 16.06% 16.06%
Low Class Bit.‐surface treated 99.203 198.405 11.338 22.676 110.541 221.081 31.82% 31.82%
Total 299.558 599.116 21.382 42.764 26.429 52.858 347.369 694.738
% of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61%
Table ES 2: Roadside Environment and Functional Class
Road Class
Roadside Environment
Total % of Total Rural Semi‐Urban Urban
Description Cl‐km
Lane‐ km
Cl‐km Lane‐km
Cl‐km Lane‐ km
Cl‐km Lane‐ km
Cl‐km Lane‐ km
100 Rural ‐ <50AADT 12.541 25.081 12.541 25.081 3.61% 3.61%
200 Rural – 50‐199 AADT 198.734 397.468 198.734 397.468 57.21% 57.21%
300 Rural ‐ 200‐399 AADT 21.326 42.651 21.326 42.651 6.14% 6.14%
400 Rural – 400‐999 AADT 58.576 117.152 58.576 117.152 16.86% 16.86%
500 Rural – 100‐1999
AADT 8.382 16.764 8.382 16.764 2.41% 2.41%
C/R Collector Residential 0.782 1.564 0.506 1.012 1.288 2.576 0.37% 0.37%
L/R Local Residential 17.755 35.51 24.21
8 48.436 41.973 83.946 12.08% 12.08%
LCI Local Commercial
industrial 2.845 5.69 1.705 3.41 4.55 9.1 1.31% 1.31%
Total 299.558 599.116 21.382 42.764 26.42
9 52.858 347.369 694.738
% of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61%
Table ES 3: Traffic Count Vs Count Year
Year Actual Count
(km) Estimated Count (km) TOTAL
% OF TOTAL
2010 333.329 4.144 337.473 97.15%
2015 9.896 9.896 2.85%
TOTAL 333.329 14.04 347.369
% OF TOTAL 95.96% 4.04%
Traffic data did not include dates
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
viii
Table ES 4: Road Sections with Substandard Width
Asset ID
CW Asset ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length
130 WHITTAKER LANE CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE WEST END 0.278
230 4618 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE LEWIS ROAD EAST END 0.58
240 4626 DOAN DRIVE WEST END 15M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD 1.5
470 4627 MARR ROAD GLADSTONE DRIVE END OF STREET 0.164
480 4807 MARR ROAD END OF STREET GLADSTONE DRIVE 0.12
650 4800 LACEY LANE CRAMPTON DRIVE NORTH END 0.152
1160 4523 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD CASHEL LANE 0.096
1170 4524 DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET 1.026
1300 4642 RATH STREET 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD MARSHALL STREET 0.137
1310 4643 MARSHALL STREET 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD RATH STREET 0.102
1315 IRWIN ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END 0.092
1510 FIVE POINTS ROAD BREEN ROAD SOUTH END 0.182
1550 4565 IRWIN ROAD NORTH END 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE 0.51
1570 5024 IRWIN ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE 0.032
1580 4631 IRWIN ROAD 32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE SOUTH END 0.765
1590 4466 LEWIS ROAD NORTH END 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE 0.625
1620 4611 LEWIS ROAD 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE) MOSSLEY DRIVE 1.431
1660 4623 LEWIS ROAD CRAMPTON DRIVE GLADSTONE DRIVE 1.434
1720 4560 BRADY ROAD 42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE MOSSLEY DRIVE 1.379
2200 4569 COW PATH 44M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) LOWER COW PATH 1.693
2210 5071 COW PATH LOWER COW PATH 780M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH ROAD 0.78
2230 4568 LOWER COW PATH COW PATH 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD(PVMT CHANGE) 1.058
2770 4930 GREGORY DRIVE WEST END BRIDGE 0.355
2780 4760 GREGORY DRIVE BRIDGE FAIRVIEW ROAD 0.617
3280 4997 STOREY DRIVE 1220M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD FAIRVIEW ROAD 1.22
4040 4488 BANKS ROAD 27M SOUTH OF 2‐ DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE) CULVERT 0.721
4050 4994 BANKS ROAD CULVERT TRAFALGAR STREET 0.617
4550 4901 SHEILS LANE NORTH END 8M NORTH OF 49‐ CATHERINE STREET (PVMT CHANGE) 0.259
Total 17.925
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx ix
Table ES 5: Average Traffic Count by MMS Class
MMS Class
3 4 5 6 Totals
Roadside Total AADT
# Assets
Ave AADT
Total AADT
# Assets
Ave AADT
Total AADT
# Assets
Ave AADT
Total AADT
# Assets
Ave AADT
Total AADT
# Assets
Ave AADT
R 14625 10 1463 61651 287 215 980 9 109 974 28 35 78230 334 234
S 22484 19 1183 10527 77 137 155 6 26 33166 102 325
U 43787 51 859 9718 85 114 70 3 23 53575 139 385
Total 14625 10 127922 357 21225 171 1199 37 164971 575
Average 1463 654 121 29 308
Table ES 6: MMS Class by Lanes and Roadside Environment
MMS Class 3 4 5 6 TOTAL % OF TOTAL
Lanes Roadside Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km
2 Rural 7.313 14.626 271.989 543.977 7.716 15.432 12.541 25.081 299.558 599.116 86.24% 86.24%
2 Semi‐Urban 0 0 5.423 10.846 15.42 30.84 0.539 1.078 21.382 42.764 6.16% 6.16%
2 Urban 0 0 8.856 17.712 17.367 34.734 0.206 0.412 26.429 52.858 7.61% 7.61%
TOTAL 7.313 14.626 286.268 572.535 40.503 81.006 13.286 26.571 347.369 694.738
% OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82%
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx x
Table ES 7: Time of Need by Length and MMS Class
3 4 5 6 TOTAL % OF TOTAL
TON Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km
NOW 0.091 0.182 3.567 7.134 2.324 4.648 5.982 11.964 1.72% 1.72%
1 to 5 1.797 3.594 125.765 251.529 14.859 29.718 142.421 284.841 41.00% 41.00%
6 to 10 4.534 9.068 128.29 256.579 17.194 34.388 13.286 26.571 163.303 326.606 47.01% 47.01%
ADEQ 0.891 1.782 28.647 57.293 6.126 12.252 35.664 71.327 10.27% 10.27%
TOTAL 7.313 14.626 286.268 572.535 40.503 81.006 13.286 26.571 347.369 694.738
% OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82%
System Adequacy % 87.8 87.8 90.0 90.0 84.9 84.9 100.0 100.0 89.7 89.7
Good to Very Good Overall % 86.6 86.6 88.7 88.7 79.1 79.1 100.0 100.0 88.0 88.0
*Good to Very Good in this table include the TON measure in all six critical areas.
Table ES 8: Speed limit Reduction Recommendations
Asset ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length AADT Speed Limit
Avg Oper Speed Geometrics
1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 0.08 1,616 80 60 NOW
1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD 43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 0.043 70 80 60 NOW
1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET 1.026 70 80 60 NOW
1190 CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 0.033 35 80 60 NOW
1400 PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE 0.371 239 80 55 NOW
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx xi
Table ES 9: Good to Very Good Roads by Structural Adequacy
Time of Need
MMS Class
Structural Adequacy 3 4 5 6 Length (km)
% of System Length
1 NOW 0 0.093 0.035 0 0.128 0.04%
2 NOW 0 0.266 0.202 0 0.468 1.57%
3 NOW 0 0 0.233 0.063 0.296 1.09%
4 NOW 0 3.383 1.323 0 4.706 17.29%
5 NOW 0 1.379 1.388 0 2.767 10.16%
6 NOW 0 4.483 1.057 0.146 5.686 20.89%
7 NOW 0.811 4.035 1.134 0.005 5.985 21.98%
8 1 to 5 0 5.741 0.445 0.361 6.547 24.05%
9 1 to 5 0 0 0.642 0 0.642 2.36%
10 1 to 5 0 2.093 0.518 0 2.611 0.39%
11 1 to 5 0.091 0.79 0.856 0 1.737 0.26%
12 6 to 10 0 61.863 4.47 2.074 68.407 10.24%
13 6 to 10 0 1.148 1.059 0 2.207 0.33%
14 6 to 10 1.797 16.677 2.096 0.033 20.603 3.08%
15 ADEQ 0 63.157 3.675 9.855 76.686 11.48%
16 ADEQ 0 14.102 3.871 0 17.973 2.69%
17 ADEQ 0 16.708 3.017 0.399 20.124 3.01%
18 ADEQ 3.208 58.17 3.531 0.227 65.136 9.75%
19 ADEQ 1.385 5.471 2.194 0 9.05 1.35%
20 ADEQ 0.021 26.711 8.757 0.123 35.612 5.28%
Grand Total 7.313 286.268 40.503 13.286 347.369
% Good to Very Good 87.7 92.2 80.7 95.7 90.9
*Good to Very Good Measured by Structural Adequacy only –not all critical areas
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx xii
Graph ES1: Estimated Remaining Service Life: Structural Adequacy Rating vs. Length
No Remaining Service
Life
1 to 10 Yrs Remaining
Service life
Greater than 10 Yrs
Remaining Service life
Poor Condition Fair to Good Condition Good to Excellent Condition
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx xiii
Table ES 10: Road System Needs Summary
Time of Need
1 to 5 6 to 10 ADEQ NOW TOTAL % OF TOTAL
Imp. ID Imp. Description Imp. Class Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km
Imp. Cost Km
CRK Crack Sealing Maint 18,192 9.096 18,192 9.096 0.05% 2.58%
GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel Maint 467,792 12.075 622,898 15.912 1,090,689 27.987 2.54% 7.42%
GRR2plus 150mm add'l gravel and minor ditching Maint 521,409 12.318 521,409 12.318 1.22% 3.26%
GRR 75mm of Granular A Maint 81,312 4.970 478,935 26.815 560,247 31.785 1.31% 8.42%
GRRplus Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching Maint 362,132 16.881 51,934 2.141 414,067 19.022 0.97% 5.04%
MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation Maint 145,416 4.627 145,416 4.627 0.34% 1.23%
RSpLimit Reduce Speed limit Maint 0 0.033 0 0.309 0 0.342 0.20%
SD Spot Drainage Maint 0 48.070 0 9.138 0 57.208 32.97%
DST Double Surface Treatment Rehab 2,396 0.066 2,396 0.066 0.00% 0.01%
PR2 Pulverize and Resurface 2 ‐ 100mm Rehab 50,453 0.222 544,847 2.257 2,042,713 8.594 2,638,013 11.073 8.43% 3.17%
PR3 Pulverize and Resurface 3 ‐ 150mm Rehab 209,553 0.401 209,553 0.401 0.67% 0.11%
R1rural R1 Rural Cross‐Section Rehab 27,922 0.193 115,812 0.866 143,734 1.059 0.46% 0.30%
R1urban R1 Urban Cross‐Section Rehab 70,611 0.212 873,347 2.510 943,958 2.722 3.02% 0.78%
R2urban R2 Urban Cross‐Section Rehab 244,314 0.536 244,314 0.536 0.78% 0.15%
SST Single Surface Treatment Rehab 156,012 6.547 21,837 0.977 177,849 7.524 2.34% 3.80%
SSTplus SST, Berm Removal, Geometric Correction, Minor Ditching Rehab 4,203 0.116 501,500 12.087 505,703 12.203 6.64% 6.16%
BS Base and Surface Const 618,320 2.390 262,465 1.075 46,215 0.151 1,511,524 7.030 2,438,524 10.646 32.02% 5.38%
BSgrav Base and Surface ‐ Gravel Const 2,342,336 19.328 172,600 1.704 2,514,936 21.032 33.02% 10.62%
NONE No Improvement Required Const 0 87.714 0 87.714 53.99%
REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural Const 1,286,874 2.093 1,138,177 3.085 1,530,679 4.934 4,518,397 14.217 8,474,128 24.329 386.85% 29.97%
RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer Const 33,115 0.063 3,113,420 3.482 3,146,534 3.545 143.64% 4.37%
RSS Reconstruction with Storm Sewers Const 252,095 0.154 577,853 0.353 2,714,175 1.631 3,544,123 2.138 161.79% 2.63%
TOTAL 2,557,188 5.982 7,944,996 142.421 3,121,821 163.303 14,109,782 35.664 27,733,786 347.369
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx xiv
Graph ES.2: Predicted System Performance at Varying Funding Levels
*Current Municipal budget does not appear to include equipment and machinery costs for construction work performed by municipal staff.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx xv
Table ES 11: 10 Year Program ‐Performance Model Output –Current Funding Level
Imp.Type Year
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Grand Total
BS 11,954 25,558 37,512
BSgrav 696,451 696,451
CRK 17,792 12,443 1,624 1,674 31,195 2,076 4,056 1,142 4,370 6,762 83,134
DST 2,396 2,396
GRR2 13,137 213,476 748,175 418,140 180,721 810,242 316,060 1,150,303 309,712 322,566 4,482,532
MICRO 2,741 35,569 11,663 3,061 37,592 3,474 54,799 22,271 2,389 173,559
PR2 205,859 44,110 381,979 352,588 20,960 136,670 1,142,166
R1 102,015 322,888 91,784 733,468 1,008,232 2,258,387
R1rural 27,922 107,258 8,553 143,733
R1urban 70,610 246,602 327,447 270,870 28,427 943,956
R2urban 244,314 244,314
RNS 211,750 208,176 204,602 181,372 805,900
SST 177,850 270,824 324,443 8,556 546,847 166,054 961,788 334,508 416,734 9,803 3,217,407
SSTplus 505,703 505,703
GRR2plus 45,708 79,939 125,647
Grand Total
1,486,680
1,486,545
1,485,384
1,486,364
1,486,361
1,486,106
1,486,427
1,485,953
1,486,555 1,486,422 14,862,797
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx xvi
Table ES 11: Improvement Type Abbreviation Summary
Code Description
R1 Basic Resurfacing
R2 Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift
RM Major Resurfacing
PR1 Pulverizing and Resurfacing
PR2 Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift
BS Tolerable standard for lower volume roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only. Improves drainage and
RW Resurface and Widen
REC Reconstruction
RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain,
RSS Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers, and manholes in addition to the
NC Proposed Road Construction
SRR Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement
SST Single Surface Treatment
SST+ Single Surface Treatment and minor ditching
SST++ Single Surface Treatment , 10% base repairs and minor ditching
GRR /GRR2 Gravel road resurfacing 1 lift or 2 lifts; 75mm or 150mm; Plus includes ditching for 10% of the length
Micro Microsurfacing
CRK Crack sealing
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 1
2 ASSET CONDITION RATING METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 32.1 Asset Condition Rating Methodology ................................................................................................... 3
Inventory Manual History ..................................................................................................... 3 Inventory Manual Overview ................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Types of Improvements ........................................................................................................................ 5
3 STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 73.1 Scope / Asset Type(s) ............................................................................................................................ 73.2 Road System Inventory and Classification ............................................................................................ 73.3 Surface Types and Roadside Environment ............................................................................................ 73.4 Minimum Maintenance Standard (MMS) Classification ....................................................................... 83.5 Functional / Existing / Design Classifications ...................................................................................... 103.6 Horizontal and Vertical Alignment ...................................................................................................... 113.7 Drainage .............................................................................................................................................. 13
Drainage Outlet and Master Planning ................................................................................ 163.8 Boundary Roads .................................................................................................................................. 16
4 ROAD SYSTEM CONDITION ......................................................................................................... 184.1 Road System Condition by Time of Need ............................................................................................ 184.2 Road System Adequacy ....................................................................................................................... 184.3 Road System Needs ............................................................................................................................. 19
Physical Condition .............................................................................................................. 22 Remaining Service Life ........................................................................................................ 22
4.4 Record of Assumptions –Time of Need (TON), Improvement and Replacement Costs ..................... 23
5 REPLACEMENT COST VALUATION ............................................................................................... 24
6 ASSET CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND PLAN UPDATES. ............................................................... 256.1 Condition Assessment Cycle Recommendation .................................................................................. 25
7 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) .............................................................................................................. 267.1 Current Level of Service Measurement .............................................................................................. 26
System Adequacy ............................................................................................................... 26 Physical Condition .............................................................................................................. 26 MPMP Good to Very Good ................................................................................................. 26
8 ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 278.1 Asset Management Overview ............................................................................................................. 278.2 Priority Rating vs. Condition Rating .................................................................................................... 288.3 Cross Asset Integration and Project Prioritization .............................................................................. 30
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
8.4 Gravel Roads Management Strategy .................................................................................................. 30
9 PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 349.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 349.2 Capital Depreciation ............................................................................................................................ 349.3 Hot Mix Resurfacing ............................................................................................................................ 359.4 Surface Treatment Resurfacing ........................................................................................................... 369.5 Gravel Road Resurfacing ..................................................................................................................... 369.6 Crack Sealing ....................................................................................................................................... 369.7 Annual Budget Adjustments ............................................................................................................... 36
Inflation .............................................................................................................................. 36 Plant Adjustment ................................................................................................................ 37
9.8 Performance Modeling‐ Budget Effect on System Performance ........................................................ 37 Asset Management Plan (AMP) and Strategy Analysis ...................................................... 37 Performance Model Overview ........................................................................................... 38
9.9 System Performance at Various Budget Levels .................................................................................. 389.10Record of Assumptions ‐Performance Modeling ................................................................................ 42
Pavement Classification for Modeling ................................................................................ 429.1110 Year Program .................................................................................................................................. 43
10 STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ ROADS RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 45
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
List of Tables Table 2.1: Road Improvement Types ................................................................................................... 5Table 2.2: Average Improvement Costs per Kilometre by Improvement Type ................................... 6Table 3.1: Surface Type and Roadside Environment Distribution ....................................................... 8Table 3.2: Regulation 239/02 Minimum Maintenance Standard Road Classification ......................... 9Table 3.3: Minimum Maintenance Standards Class Distribution ...................................................... 10Table 3.4: Functional Road Class Distribution .................................................................................... 10Table 3.5: Posted Speed vs. Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed ................................................... 12Table 3.6: Speed Limit Reduction Recommendations ....................................................................... 13Table 3.7: Drainage by Time of Need (Km) ........................................................................................ 15Table 3.8: Municipality of Thames Centre Boundary Roads .............................................................. 17Table 4.1: Roads System by Time of Need and MMS Class ............................................................... 18Table 4.2: Unit Costs .......................................................................................................................... 20Table 4.3: Improvement costs by Improvement Type and Time of Need ......................................... 21Table 5.1: Average Replacement Costs .............................................................................................. 24Table 8.1: Gravel Road Conversion Candidates ................................................................................. 32Table 9.1: Hot Mix Asphalt Roads by Asset Class and Life Cycle........................................................ 35Table 9.2: Sample Section Life Cycle .................................................................................................. 40Table 9.3: Road Asset Classes ............................................................................................................ 42Table 9.4: Performance Model Summary ‐ Ten Year Program .......................................................... 44
List of Figures
Figure 3.1: Safe StoLJLJing Distance (Table C2‐1 from MTO GeoƳeǘric Design Sǘandards for Ontario Highways) .......................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 3.2: Potentially Substandard Vertical and Horizontal Alignment ............................................ 12Figure 3.3: OPSS 200.10 ...................................................................................................................... 14Figure 3.4: Poor Shoulder Drainage .................................................................................................... 15Figure 4.1: Remaining Service Life ...................................................................................................... 22Figure 8.1: Treatment Cost vs. Deterioration ..................................................................................... 29Figure 8.2: Pavement Management‐ The Right Treatment at the Right Time .................................... 29Figure 9.1: Performance Modeling at Various Budget Levels ............................................................. 40Figure 9.2: Graphical Representation of a Typical Life Cycle and Strategy Cost Differential .............. 41Figure 9.3: Annual Expenditures Budget to Maintain ......................................................................... 41Figure 9.4: Treatment Selection vs. Condition (Asphalt Surfaces) ...................................................... 43
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
List of Appendices
Appendix A: Inventory Manual methodology Overview
Appendix B: Pavement Structure and Defects
Appendix C: Gravel Road Conversion
Appendix D: Potential Substandard Alignment
Appendix E: Deterioration Curve Detail
Appendix F: 10 Year Program Based on Current Budget
Appendix G: Critical Deficiencies by Asset ID
Appendix H: Needs Sorted by Time of Need and Improvement Category
Appendix I: Mapping – Roads by Surface Type
Appendix J: Mapping – Roadside Environment
Appendix K: Mapping – Roads by Time of Need and Improvement Type
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
1
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
1 Introduction and Background In the fall of 2012, the Province of Ontario, introduced a requirement for an Asset Management Plan (AMP) as a prerequisite for municipalities seeking funding assistance for capital projects, from the province; effectively creating a conditional grant. To qualify for future infrastructure grants, municipalities were required to develop an AMP that is approved by council by December 2013. On April 26, 2013 the province announced that it had created a $100 million Infrastructure Fund for small, rural and northern municipalities.
Subsequently, the province has introduced further initiatives for infrastructure funding: the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) and the Small Communities Fund (SCF). An Asset Management Plan approved by Council is required as part of the submission for OCIF Applications. Asset Management Plans will be reviewed for comprehensiveness.
Conditional Grants are not new to Ontario. Until the mid‐1990’s, Road Needs Studies (RNS) were completed by municipalities and submitted to the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) on an annual basis in order to receive provincial funding for their road programs.
The Municipality of Thames Centre (MoTC) currently develops an AMP for the various asset groups, roads being one of them. A key component of the AMP is a ‘State of the Infrastructure’ (SotI) review of the asset or asset group. This report provides the SotI review of the Municipality of Thames Centre road system and also provides recommendations for budgets and road asset management.
To put the language in a more current context, this report is essentially the State of the Infrastructure (SotI) for roads that has evolved into an asset management plan for the road assets.
The scope of this report includes:
Review and condition rating on the road assets within the MoTC road system
Development of current replacement costs for each road asset
Development/review of recommendations for improvement and associated costing on deficient
assets
Development of recommendations for annual budgets based on current costs for
amortization/capital depreciation and major program areas based on updated unit costs
provided by the municipality where available. Where costs were not available, local and
engineering experience were used to develop representative costs.
Development of an analysis on the effect of current and recommended budgets on overall
system performance.
Provision of Level of Service recommendations
Provision of Asset Management Strategy recommendations
The 2015 report summarizes the condition data survey conducted during the summer of 2015. The database identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction treatment.
Recommendations are made based on the defects observed and other information available in the database at the time of preparation of the report. Once a road asset reaches the project level, the
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
2
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
municipality may end up selecting another alternative based on additional information, asset management strategy, development considerations or available funding.
Road sections that will not be addressed in the immediate plan should be reviewed for advisory signage as a risk management exercise.
4 Roads believes that the content of this report satisfies the State of the infrastructure requirements and provides a solid foundation to further develop and evolve the Expected Levels of Services, Asset Management and Financing requirements. 4 Roads Management Services Inc. has prepared this report in a format that it believes will readily lend itself to integration with the corporate AMP.
The Inventory Manual methodology is discussed further in Section 2 of this report and Appendix A.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
3
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
2 Asset Condition Rating Methodology
2.1 Asset Condition Rating Methodology
The provincial requirements for AMP’s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road section reviews completed as part of this study follow the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, 1991.
Inventory Manual History
From the 1960’s until the mid‐1990’s, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) required the municipalities to regularly update the condition ratings of their road systems in a number of key areas. The process was originally created by the MTO, as a means to distribute conditional funding, on an equitable basis, between municipalities. The report was referred to as a ‘Road Needs Study’ (RNS) and was required in order to receive a conditional grant to subsidize the municipal road programs. After the introduction in the 1960’s by the MTO, the methodology evolved into the current format by the late 1970’s. The most current version of the Inventory Manual is dated 1991, and is the methodology used for this report. The practice was discontinued by a number of municipalities, when conditional funding for roads was eliminated in the mid‐1990’s.
Inventory Manual Overview
The Inventory Manual Methodology is a sound, consistent, asset management practice that still works well today, and in view of the increasing demands on efficiency and asset management, represents a sound asset management practice that should be repeated on a cyclical basis. The road section review identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended rehabilitation strategy.
The MoTC report summarizes the road system survey conducted during the summer 2015. The report provides an overview of the overall condition of the road system by road section, including such factors as structural adequacy, drainage, and surface condition. The study also provides an indication of apparent deficiencies in horizontal and vertical alignment elements, as per the Ministry of Transportation’s manual, “Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways”.
Further, the report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system, which may be used for programming and budgeting. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project.
Asset Management by its very nature is holistic. Managing a road network based solely on pavement condition would be critically deficient in scope in terms of the information required to make an informed decision as to the improvements required on a road section.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
4
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
The Inventory Manual offers a holistic review of each road section, developing a Time of Need (TON) or an Adequate rating in six areas that are critical to municipal decision making:
Geometrics*
Surface Type*
Surface Width*
Capacity*
Structural Adequacy
Drainage
The Inventory Manual describes the standards in four of the areas as ‘Minimum Tolerable Standards. (Identified with an asterisk above) To render an appropriate improvement recommendation, consideration should be given to each of the areas. Given the ‘Minimum Tolerable’ designation in the manual, 4 Roads has referred to the areas as ‘critical’.
Evaluations of each road section were completed generally in accordance with the MTO’s Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads (1991). Data collected was entered directly into WorkTech’s Asset Foundation software. Condition ratings, Time of Need, Priority Ratings, and associated costs were then calculated by the software, in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Unit costs for construction were provided by MoTC staff and through comparative analysis with similar municipalities.
Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, or a combination of these factors. As an example, section changes should occur as surface type, surface condition, cross‐section, or speed limit changes. Some changes were made during the field review to establish consistency.
The Condition Ratings, developed through the scoring in the Inventory Manual, classify roads as ‘NOW’, ‘1 to 5’, or ‘6 to 10’ year needs for reconstruction. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. For example, a road may be categorized as a ‘6 to 10’ year need with a resurfacing recommendation. This road should be resurfaced as soon as possible, to further defer the need to reconstruct.
Field data is obtained through a visual examination of the road system and includes: structural adequacy, level of service, maintenance demand, horizontal and vertical alignment, surface and shoulder width, surface condition, and drainage. The Condition Rating is calculated based upon a combination of other calculations and data.
To best utilize the database information and modern asset management concepts, it has to be understood that the Time of Need (TON) ratings are the estimated time before the road would require reconstruction. NOW needs are still roads that require reconstruction; however, it is not intended that ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’ year needs are to be acted on in that timeframe. The ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’ year needs are current candidates for resurfacing treatments that will elevate their structural status to ‘ADEQ’, and offer the greatest return on investment for a road authority (notwithstanding a drainage or capacity need, etc.). The Time of Need ratings from the Structural Adequacy perspective are described more fully in Appendix A.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
5
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
2.2 Types of Improvements
This report identifies ratings that are resultant from identification of deficiencies on each road section that equate to a TON in one or more of the six critical areas: Geometry, Surface Type, Surface Width, Capacity, Structural Adequacy, or Drainage. Based on the ratings and the deficiencies noted an improvement type recommendation is also provided.
The key factor in providing an improvement type recommendation is the visual survey. During the visual survey, a determination is made as to whether the appearance and performance of a road relates to an underlying structural problem, or simply to aged surface materials. A road’s structural or drainage problem would tend to result in a reconstruction/ replacement treatment recommendation, whereas aged surface materials would result in a resurfacing/rehabilitation treatment recommendation. A determination of the root cause of the problem or the condition is critical; reconstructing a road that should have had some type of resurfacing treatment would be an ineffective use of available resources. For the purposes of this report, the standard improvement types and associated costing formulae identified in the Inventory Manual have been used. The table below provides a list of road improvements.
Table 2.1: Road Improvement Types
Code Description
R1 Basic Resurfacing
R2 Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift
RM Major Resurfacing
PR1 Pulverizing and Resurfacing
PR2 Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift
BS Tolerable standard for lower volume roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only. Improves drainage
RW Resurface and Widen
REC Reconstruction
RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain,
RSS Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers, and manholes in addition to the
NC Proposed Road Construction
SRR Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement
SST Single Surface Treatment
SST+ Single Surface Treatment and minor ditching
SST++ Single Surface Treatment , 10% base repairs and minor ditching
GRR Gravel road resurfacing 1 lift or 2 lifts; 75mm or 150mm; Plus includes ditching for 10% of the length
Micro Microsurfacing
CRK Crack sealing
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
6
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 2.2: Average Improvement Costs per Kilometre by Improvement Type
Roadside Environment
Rural Semi‐Urban Urban TOTAL Cost/km
Imp. Type Description Imp. Cost Length Imp. Cost Length Imp. Cost Length Imp. Cost Length $$
BS Base and Surface 1,732,961 8.11 705,562 2.55 0 0 2,438,524 10.65 228,948
BSgrav Base and Surface ‐ Gravel 2,514,936 22.4 0 0 0 0 2,514,936 22.4 112,264
CRK Crack Sealing 1,476 0.74 1,600 0.8 15,116 7.56 18,192 9.1 2,000
DST Double Surface Treatment 2,396 0.07 0 0 0 0 2,396 0.07 36,300
GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel 1,090,689 28.8 0 0 0 0 1,090,689 28.8 37,869
GRR2plus 150mm add'l gravel and minor ditching 521,409 12.96 0 0 0 0 521,409 12.96 40,226
GRR 75mm of Granular A 560,247 32.33 0 0 0 0 560,247 32.33 17,329
GRRplus Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching 414,067 19.69 0 0 0 0 414,067 19.69 21,026
MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 0 0 0 0 145,416 4.63 145,416 4.63 31,428
NONE No Improvement Required 0 83.72 0 4.94 0 7.5 0 96.16
‐
PR2 Pulverize and Resurface 2 ‐ 100mm 2,086,490 8.83 551,523 2.24 0 0 2,638,013 11.07 238,238
PR3 Pulverize and Resurface 3 ‐ 150mm 0 0 209,553 0.4 0 0 209,553 0.4 522,576
R1rural R1 Rural Cross‐Section 115,812 0.87 27,922 0.19 0 0 143,734 1.06 135,726
R1urban R1 Urban Cross‐Section 0 0 0 0 943,958 2.72 943,958 2.72 346,788
R2urban R2 Urban Cross‐Section 0 0 0 0 244,314 0.54 244,314 0.54 455,811
REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural 7,879,182 22.86 594,946 1.47 0 0 8,474,128 24.33 348,314
RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer 0 0 33,115 0.06 3,113,420 3.48 3,146,534 3.55 887,598
RSS Reconstruction with Storm Sewers 0 0 3,544,123 2.14 0 0 3,544,123 2.14 1,657,681
RSpLimit Reduce Speed limit 0 0.53 0 0 0 0 0 0.53
SD Spot Drainage 0 52.96 0 4.68 0 0 0 57.65
SST Single Surface Treatment 151,199 6.39 26,650 1.13 0 0 177,849 7.52 23,638
SSTplus
SST, Berm Removal, Geometric Correction, Minor Ditching 477,413 12.42 28,290 0.79 0 0 505,703 13.21 38,282
TOTAL 17,548,277 313.69 5,723,285 21.38 4,462,224 26.43 27,733,786 361.5
% OF TOTAL 63.27% 86.77% 20.64% 5.91% 16.09% 7.31%
Note: length is unadjusted for boundary roads
Appendix A includes fuller descriptions of each of the above noted improvements.
Appendix B of this report includes a discussion of Pavement Structure and defects.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
7
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
3 State of the Infrastructure
3.1 Scope / Asset Type(s)
This report addresses road assets only. The content will provide review and analysis of the road system from a number of perspectives including condition rating, functional classification, roadside environment, replacement cost and Regulation 239/02 classification.
3.2 Road System Inventory and Classification
Road sections within road systems may be classified in a number of ways, to illustrate their roadside environment, surface type, functional classification, and so forth. The classifications provide assistance in developing further information, with respect to the road system, such as replacement costs and performance expectations.
3.3 Surface Types and Roadside Environment
Roadside environment and surface type criteria of a road section are useful in characterization of the road section, and in determining costs for replacement, reconstruction and rehabilitation treatments.
The Inventory Manual classifies the roadside environment as Rural, Semi‐Urban or Urban. The classification is determined by length, servicing, and adjacent land use.
Rural Roads – within areas of sparse development, or where development is less than 50% of the frontage, including developed areas extending less than 300 m on one side or 200 m on both sides, with no curbs and gutters.
Semi‐Urban Roads – within areas where development exceeds 50% of the frontage for a minimum of 300 m on one side, or 200 m on both sides, with no curbs and gutters, with or without storm/combination sewers, or for subdivisions where the lot frontages are 30 m or greater.
Urban Roads – within areas where there are curbs and gutters on both sides, served with storm or combination sewers, or curb and gutter on one side, served with storm or combination sewers, or reversed paved shoulders with, or served by, storm or combination sewers, or for subdivisions with frontages less than 30 m.
Table 3.1 identifies the road system by surface type and roadside environment.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
8
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 3.1: Surface Type and Roadside Environment Distribution
Surface Type
Roadside Environment
Total % of Total Rural Semi‐Urban Urban
Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km
Lane‐ km Cl‐km
Lane‐ km Cl‐km
Lane‐ km
Gravel, Stone, Other Loosetop 181.056 362.111 181.056 362.111 52.12% 52.12%
High Class Bit.‐asphalt 19.300 38.600 10.044 20.088 26.429 52.858 55.773 111.546 16.06% 16.06%
Low Class Bit.‐surface treated 99.203 198.405 11.338 22.676 110.541 221.081 31.82% 31.82%
Total 299.558 599.116 21.382 42.764 26.429 52.858 347.369 694.738
% of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61%
3.4 Minimum Maintenance Standard (MMS) Classification
In November 2002, Regulation 239/02, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways (MMS) came into effect. Essentially, if a municipality met the standard and documented it, they would not be negligent per Section 44(3)c of the Municipal Act noted above. Regulation 239/02 provided for a review five years after its original implementation. A process to revise Regulation 239/02, chaired by the Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA), culminated in a revised regulation, Regulation 23/10, coming into effect in February 2010.
In the late fall of 2011, a court decision (Giuliani) was rendered that effectively created case law that negated the protection that the MMS afforded, and in particular, Tables 4 and 5 of the regulation (which address Snow Accumulation and Icy Roads). Essentially, the decision created a new standard that went beyond the MMS. The effect on a municipality is that a higher standard of weather monitoring and documentation and response to monitoring is required.
OGRA re‐called the MMS committee to further amend the regulation, to address the outcome of the Giuliani decision. As a result of the committee meetings and discussions with the province, Regulation 47/13 came into effect, amending Regulations 239/02 and 23/10, on January 25, 2013.
The Minimum Maintenance Standards do not have to be adopted by a municipal council per se. The regulation is provincial, applies to all municipalities, and is available for municipalities to use as a defense if they have met the standard and documented it. The more important issue would be to ensure that a municipality has the appropriate Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s) in place, and that they are followed and documented, rather than trying to reword or parallel the language of the regulation into a document that is municipality‐specific.
Traffic counts are important for a number of decision making purposes, with respect to the road system. Accurate, defensible traffic counts, in conjunction with the posted speed limits, are used in determining the MMS class of the respective road sections.
Roads are divided into six service classes by posted speed and traffic count, with Class 1 being the highest service level and Class 6 being the lowest. There are no service standards for Class 6 roads which have less than 50 vehicles per day. Table 3.2 shows Regulation 239/02’s traffic/speed/ classification
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
9
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
matrix.
Table 3.2: Regulation 239/02 Minimum Maintenance Standard Road Classification
Annual Average Daily Traffic
(number of motor vehicles per day) Posted or Statutory Speed Limit (kilometres per hour)
100 90 80 70 60 50 40
15, 000 or more 1 1 1 2 2 2 2
12, 000 ‐ 14, 999 1 1 1 2 2 3 3
10, 000 ‐ 11, 999 1 1 2 2 3 3 3
8, 000 ‐ 9, 999 1 1 2 3 3 3 3
6, 000 ‐ 7, 999 1 2 2 3 3 3 3
5, 000 ‐ 5, 999 1 2 2 3 3 3 3
4, 000 ‐ 4, 999 1 2 3 3 3 3 4
3, 000 ‐ 3, 999 1 2 3 3 3 4 4
2, 000 ‐ 2,999 1 2 3 3 4 4 4
1, 000 ‐ 1,999 1 3 3 3 4 4 5
500 ‐ 999 1 3 4 4 4 4 5
200 ‐ 499 1 3 4 4 5 5 5
50 ‐ 199 1 3 4 5 5 5 5
0 ‐ 49 1 3 6 6 6 6 6
As per the Regulation, different road classifications require different response times. For example, the response time that is required to remove snow accumulation is 12 hours for a Class 3 road, and 16 hours for a Class 4.
Response time is the time from when the municipality becomes aware that a condition exists, until the time that the condition is corrected or brought within the limits specified in the regulation. This may have a significant impact with respect to the equipment and staffing that may be required to meet the standard, particularly in the case of winter control. The implications are that this increased service level may require the municipality to increase the inspection frequency, staff, and machinery to deliver the service beyond the service delivery hours that may currently exist.
The distribution of the MMS Classes across the road system is detailed in Table 3.3.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
10
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 3.3: Minimum Maintenance Standards Class Distribution
MMS Class 3 4 5 6 TOTAL
Lanes Roadside Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km
Lane‐km Cl‐km
Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km
2 R 7.313 14.626 271.989 543.977 7.716 15.432 12.541 25.081 299.558 599.116
2 S 0 0 5.423 10.846 15.42 30.84 0.539 1.078 21.382 42.764
2 U 0 0 8.856 17.712 17.367 34.734 0.206 0.412 26.429 52.858
TOTAL 7.313 14.626 286.268 572.535 40.503 81.006 13.286 26.571 347.369 694.738
% OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82%
WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation automatically classifies road sections by the MMS once traffic data and speed limits have been entered.
3.5 Functional / Existing / Design Classifications
Roads are further classified within the database by classes such as Local, Collector, or Arterial and Residential or Industrial. Items 33 and 105 in the Inventory Manual provide further direction on determination of the Existing or Design Classes of road. Generally, the classifications are predicated on the existing use, roadside environment, and anticipated growth over either the ten‐ or twenty‐year planning horizon.
The road sections are classified by the rater, at the time of the field review. Table 3.4 identifies the Functional Road Class Distribution from the Inventory Manual
Table 3.4: Functional Road Class Distribution
Road Class
Roadside Environment
Total % of Total Rural Semi‐Urban Urban
Description Cl‐km
Lane‐ km
Cl‐km Lane‐km
Cl‐km Lane‐ km
Cl‐km Lane‐ km
Cl‐km Lane‐ km
100 Rural ‐ <50AADT 12.541 25.081 12.541 25.081 3.61% 3.61%
200 Rural – 50‐199 AADT 198.734 397.468 198.734 397.468 57.21% 57.21%
300 Rural ‐ 200‐399 AADT 21.326 42.651 21.326 42.651 6.14% 6.14%
400 Rural – 400‐999 AADT 58.576 117.152 58.576 117.152 16.86% 16.86%
500 Rural – 100‐1999
AADT 8.382 16.764 8.382 16.764 2.41% 2.41%
C/R Collector Residential 0.782 1.564 0.506 1.012 1.288 2.576 0.37% 0.37%
L/R Local Residential 17.755 35.51 24.218 48.436 41.973 83.946 12.08% 12.08%
LCI Local Commercial
industrial 2.845 5.69 1.705 3.41 4.55 9.1 1.31% 1.31%
Total 299.558 599.116 21.382 42.764 26.429 52.858 347.369 694.738
% of Total 86.24% 86.24% 6.16% 6.16% 7.61% 7.61%
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
11
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
3.6 Horizontal and Vertical Alignment
The changes in direction and elevation of the road are referred to as the horizontal and vertical alignment. The changes in direction should be designed and constructed such that the posted speed limit of the road section may be safely maintained throughout the section. If maintaining the posted speed in safety cannot be achieved, then the horizontal or vertical curve would be identified as substandard.
Lower volume roads that have not been reconstructed, tend to closely follow (or avoid) the existing contours of the land. In southern Ontario, which is relatively flat, there was a greater tendency to follow the alignments of the original Township surveys. However, where these roads were adjacent to larger streams and rivers, there was still a tendency to follow the topography. The result was/is a road alignment that tends to change vertical and horizontal direction frequently; at times without much notice.
When a new road is designed, one of the considerations is the Safe Stopping Distance (SSD). The calculation of the distance to stop safely from any given speed is based upon several factors, such as posted speed limit, reaction times, and friction. When road sections are evaluated for a road needs study, the number of vertical and horizontal curves that appear to be deficient are identified. The identification is based on whether there is sufficient SSD for the posted speed limit. The following table is an excerpt from the Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways, and indicates the SSD’s required for various design speeds.
Figure 3.1: Safe Stopping Distance (Table C2‐1 from MTO Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways)
On rural roads, one of the effects of substandard alignments is a decrease in the Average Operating Speed through the road section. An Average Operating Speed that is significantly lower than the posted
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
12
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
speed will result in a Geometric Need for the road section. The following table from the Inventory Manual identifies the limits that will trigger a geometric need for typical posted speed limits.
Table 3.5: Posted Speed vs. Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed
Item Speed
Legal Speed Limit 40 50 60 70 80 90
Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed 35 45 50 60 65 75
The following pictures were not taken in MoTC, but provide examples of potentially substandard alignments.
Figure 3.2: Potentially Substandard Vertical and Horizontal Alignment
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
13
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 3.6: Speed Limit Reduction Recommendations
Asset ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length AADT Speed Limit
Avg Oper Speed Geometrics
1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE
80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD
32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 0.08 1,616 80 60 NOW
1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE DORCHESTER ROAD
43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 0.043 70 80 60 NOW
1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE CASHEL LANE END OF STREET 1.026 70 80 60 NOW
1190 CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD
32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 0.033 35 80 60 NOW
1400 PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE 0.371 239 80 55 NOW
Appendix D includes a listing of all of the rural road sections with potentially sub‐standard vertical or horizontal alignments that should be reviewed for signage, speed reduction, or correction. Any signage should be in conformity with the Ontario Traffic Manual. The alignments have been referred to as ‘potentially substandard’ as the study undertaken is only a visual assessment of existing conditions. Further engineering review would be required to determine if the curves are substandard and if any additional signage or correction is required.
3.7 Drainage
Adequate drainage is critical to the performance of a road to maximize its’ life expectancy. Roads are designed, constructed, and maintained in order to minimize the amount of water that may enter, or flow over, the road structure.
In the case of water flowing over the road, assessment must be made of the circumstances on a site‐specific basis. Factors that should be considered include the traffic volumes of the road section, economic impacts to the loss of the use of the road, upgrade costs, and risks.
Water in a road base can cause different reactions at different times of the year. In non‐freezing conditions, the granular road base can become saturated. Too much water displaces the granular material; it removes the material’s ability to support the loads for which it was designed. Too much water in the granular material actually acts like a lubricant, and facilitates the displacement of the material under load. In freezing conditions, water in the road structure can cause frost heave, potholes, and pavement break‐up as the water freezes and expands. Generally, a saturated granular road base results in structural failure of the road.
Figure 3.3 provides an example of a rural road, illustrating what the relationship between the gravel road base and the drainage should be. The relationship is the same in an urban system, although not as obvious. Rural road drainage is typically achieved through roadside ditches. Rural road ditches should be a minimum of 500 mm below the granular road base, to ensure that the road base remains free from moisture and maintains its ability to carry loads.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
14
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Urban roads typically have a storm sewer pipe network that carries the minor storm event. The roadway itself is often part of the overland flow route for the major event. The drainage of the granular road base is accomplished through sub‐drains installed below the curb and gutter, lower than the lowest elevation of the granular base. This satisfies the same purpose as the ditch in a rural cross‐section, by providing an outlet to ensure that the granular base remains dry.
Figure 3.3: OPSS 200.10
Evaluations of the drainage scores were in part predicated upon the structural score. For example where a road section had virtually no ditch, or very minimal ditching but the road structure did not show any signs of failure typically observed when there is inadequate drainage, then generally a rating was between 12 and 14 and a ‘SD‐ (Spot Drainage) improvement noted. Where it was obvious that the inadequate ditch was exacerbating the distress on the road or there was occasional flooding, the score was further reduced, and the recommended improvement type was some type of major rehabilitation or reconstruction dependent upon the traffic volumes. Table 3.7 provides an overview of the drainage needs of the road system by Time of Need.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
15
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 3.7: Drainage by Time of Need (Km)
Roadside Environment 1 to 5 6 to 10 ADEQ TOTAL
Rural 155.541 144.018 299.558
Semi‐Urban 0.115 12.858 8.409 21.382
Urban 26.429 26.429
TOTAL 0.115 168.399 178.856 347.369
Maintenance of the drainage system(s) is critical to the long‐term performance of a road system. Low volume rural roads tend to have a winter maintenance program that includes the application of sand to improve traction. Over time, that sand builds up on the edge of the pavement, to a point where it effectively blocks runoff from getting to the ditch. The runoff is trapped at the edge of pavement, where it saturates that area of the road bed, contributing to the early failure of the edge of the pavement. This element of the road cross‐section is not scored as part of the overall evaluation.
Presence or absence of roadside berms is not evaluated during a road review. This is a maintenance issue. However, if roadside berms are not removed, the effect on the overall pavement is similar to not having a ditch. Water cannot drain from the road and it enters into the granular base potentially saturating it. The saturated base cannot support load. Figure 3.4 was not taken in the MoTC, but does illustrate the foregoing discussion.
Figure 3.4: Poor Shoulder Drainage
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
16
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Drainage Outlet and Master Planning
Correcting drainage issues is not quite as simple as digging a ditch or installing a storm sewer. In Ontario, Common Law for drainage is such that water cannot simply be collected and directed. It has to be directed to a legal, adequate outlet. There are two primary methodologies to achieve the legal outlet; a Class Environmental Assessment Process or a petition for a Municipal Drain under the Drainage Act. The ‘adequate’ component is an engineering function.
As MoTC reconstructs/rehabilitates sections of the road network in the urban and semi urban areas, a Master Drainage Plan should be developed as part of a Class Environmental Assessment process prior to the reconstruction process occurring, in order that both minor and major storm events are dealt with appropriately.
3.8 Boundary Roads
Boundary roads are roads that a municipality would have in common with the abutting municipality. In order to manage the joint responsibilities, a Boundary Road Agreement that identifies the responsibilities of both agencies is created. The agreements are usually in writing; however, some are informal.
The Boundary Road Agreement should identify costs sharing and responsibility arrangements for maintenance or capital works on the road section. From a risk management perspective, the agreement reduces the risk for one of the parties in the event of a claim, depending upon the content of the agreement.
Boundary road reporting can be dealt with in one of two ways: the length can be split to provide a more accurate depiction of the road system that is actually maintained by the agency, or they may not be adjusted. When MTO was providing subsidy, the roads were adjusted for reporting and accounting purposes. For the purposes of this report adjustment has been made to the road system sizes to account for the 50% sharing of the length of the boundary roads.
When a boundary is reconstructed on a day labour basis by the adjacent municipalities, the project should be treated no differently than if the work were being tendered. The exposure to risk for the municipality is no different. The assignment of the various aspects of the work should be clear and the timing for completion of the tasks clearly identified and adhered to. Table 3.8 identifies the MoTC boundary roads. Unless otherwise noted, tables in this report have been adjusted for boundary length.
The status and responsibilities as they relate to the boundary roads appears to be uncertain in a number of instances. There are also additional roads that have not been included in this report that are potentially boundary roads. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
17
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 3.8: Municipality of Thames Centre Boundary Roads
Adjacent Agency
Asset ID Street Name TOTAL
Township of South‐West Oxford 1370 PIGRAM ROAD 0.195
Township of South‐West Oxford 1375 PIGRAM ROAD 0.3
Township of South‐West Oxford 1380 PIGRAM ROAD 0.25
Township of South‐West Oxford 1390 PIGRAM ROAD 0.729
Township of South‐West Oxford 1400 PIGRAM ROAD 0.371
Township of South‐West Oxford 1410 PIGRAM ROAD 1.991
Township of South‐West Oxford 1420 PIGRAM ROAD 0.555
Township of South‐West Oxford 1430 PIGRAM ROAD 0.902
Township of Zorra 4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 1.072
Township of Zorra 4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 2.015
Township of Zorra 4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 3.082
Township of Zorra 4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 0.783
Township of Zorra 4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 2.303
Township of Zorra 4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 0.842
Township of Zorra 4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 1.715
Township of Zorra 4410 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 0.51
Township of Zorra 4420 COBBLE HILLS ROAD 0.078
Township of Zorra 4450 HUNT ROAD 0.054
Township of Zorra 4460 HUNT ROAD 1.289
Township of Zorra 4470 HUNT ROAD 0.063
Township of Zorra 4480 HUNT ROAD 0.042
Township of Zorra 4490 HUNT ROAD 1.343
Township of Zorra 4500 HUNT ROAD 0.01
Township of Zorra 4520 HUNT ROAD 1.09
Township of Middlesex Centre 2860 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 0.033
Township of Middlesex Centre 2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 0.92
Township of Middlesex Centre 2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 1.631
Township of Middlesex Centre 2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 0.875
Township of Middlesex Centre 2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 0.518
Township of Middlesex Centre 2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 0.441
Township of Middlesex Centre 2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 0.959
Township of Middlesex Centre 2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD 1.303
TOTAL 28.264
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
18
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
4 Road System Condition The provincial requirements for AMP’s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road section reviews follow the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, 1991.
4.1 Road System Condition by Time of Need
The Inventory Manual methodology results in overall rating of road sections by Time of Need (TON); NOW, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, or Adeq (Adequate). Table 4.1 below provides a breakdown of the road system by time of Need and MMS Class.
Table 4.1: Roads System by Time of Need and MMS Class
3 4 5 6 TOTAL
TON Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km Cl‐km Lane‐km
NOW 0.091 0.182 3.567 7.134 2.324 4.648 5.982 11.964
1 to 5 1.797 3.594 125.765 251.529 14.859 29.718 142.421 284.841
6 to 10 4.534 9.068 128.29 256.579 17.194 34.388 13.286 26.571 163.303 326.606
ADEQ 0.891 1.782 28.647 57.293 6.126 12.252 35.664 71.327
TOTAL 7.313 14.626 286.268 572.535 40.503 81.006 13.286 26.571 347.369 694.738
% OF TOTAL 2.11% 2.11% 82.41% 82.41% 11.66% 11.66% 3.82% 3.82%
System Adequacy 87.8 87.8 90.0 90.0 84.9 84.9 100.0 100.0 89.7 89.7
Good to Very Good Overall 86.6 86.6 88.7 88.7 79.1 79.1 100.0 100.0 88.0 88.0
4.2 Road System Adequacy
The system adequacy is a measure of the ratio of the ‘NOW’ needs to the total system, and includes needs from the six critical areas described earlier in the report. The overall TON is the most severe or earliest identified need. For example a road section may appear to be in good condition, but is identified as a NOW need for capacity, indicating that it requires additional lanes.
System Adequacy = Total System (km) – NOW Deficiencies (km) X 100
Total System (km)
The MoTC currently has a road system adequacy measure of 89.7%. The road system currently measures 347.369 centreline‐kilometres (adjusted for boundary roads), with 35.664 kilometres rated as deficient in the ‘NOW’ time period. Summarizing the system adequacy by surface type yields the following:
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
19
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
System adequacy of hard top roads is 89.4
System adequacy of gravel roads is 90.
Typically the system adequacy for gravel surface roads is lower. From other studies, it has been observed that if the gravel roads were evaluated during a spring break up period, there could be a reduction in adequacy of 30% or more.
The Inventory Manual provides direction that roads with a traffic volume of less than 50 vehicles per day are deemed to be adequate, even if they have structural, geometric, or drainage deficiencies that would otherwise be identified as being in a Time of Need and were to be corrected within the maintenance budget. This approach is directly parallel to Regulation 239/02, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads, which states that roads with less than 50 vehicles per day, and a speed limit of less than 80 km/hr., are classified as Class 6 with no standard for repair. This factor does have an effect on the system adequacy calculation.
Class 6 Roads(less than 50 vehicles per day) are adequate. This accounts for 13.286 km (3.8%) of the road system.
The traditional target adequacy for upper‐tier road systems (Regions and Counties) was 75%, while a lower‐tier’s target adequacy was 60%. Based on these former MTO targets, which were in effect when the municipal grant system was in place, the target adequacy for the MoTC should be 60%, as a minimum. The minimum target adequacies were established by MTO, to reflect the nature and purpose of the road system.
The results suggest that the overall condition of the road system is good. However, this is influenced to some extent by the following factors:
The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup which provide a more accurate assessment of the gravel road network which accounts for over have of the total road network in MoTC. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring.
The overall condition may have been influenced by Infrastructure Funds and Grants that have not been identified in the annual funding level but may have been received over the last 10 year period.
As noted above, 3.8% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day.
4.3 Road System Needs
Based on the unit costs identified in Table 4.2, the improvements costs have been calculated generally in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Table 4.3 identifies the improvement costs by Time of Need and Improvement Type.
The estimates provided in this report are in accordance with the formulae in the Inventory Manual, and utilize the unit costs as identified in Table 4.2. These costs include adjustment factors as per the
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
20
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Inventory Manual, such as Basic Construction, Terrain, Contingency Roadside Environment, and Engineering.
Table 4.2: Unit Costs
Item Unit 2015 Costs
$
Excavation m3 12.00
Hot Mix Asphalt t 105.00
Single Surface Treatment m2 2.75
Granular A t 13.00
Granular B t 10.00
Conc‐ Curb and Gutter‐place linear m 55.00
Conc‐ Curb and Gutter‐removal linear m 12.00
Subdrains linear m 20.00
Storm Sewer‐525mm linear m 400.00
Manholes ea 4,700
- manhole removed ea 1,000.00
- manholes‐Adjust ea 500.00
Catch Basins ea 2,000.0
Catch‐Basins‐ removed ea 400.00
Catch Basin Leads Linear m 175.00
Catchbasins ‐ adjust ea 350.00
Asphalt Planing m2 15.00
Asphalt Pulverizing m2 2.00
Crack Sealing m 2.00
For the purposes of this report, road sections with a traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day have been provided with recommended treatment and associated improvement cost; although the TON for these sections is defaulted to ADEQ, realistic improvement recommendations were made based on the observed conditions in order to provide a more accurate assessment of the total network needs.. (The calculations will rate them as adequate due to the traffic count) The road system currently includes 13.286 km of road sections that had an actual or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day. This represents approximately 3.8% of the road system. The total value of the needs identified in this report includes $1,894,022 on these roads sections that received an ADEQ rating related to the low traffic counts.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
21
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 4.3: Improvement costs by Improvement Type and Time of Need
Time of Need
1 to 5 6 to 10 ADEQ NOW TOTAL % OF TOTAL
Imp. ID Imp. Description Imp. Class Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km Imp. Cost Km
Imp. Cost Km
CRK Crack Sealing Maint 18,192 9.096 18,192 9.096 0.05% 2.58%
GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel Maint 467,792 12.075 622,898 15.912 1,090,689 27.987 2.54% 7.42%
GRR2plus 150mm add'l gravel and minor ditching Maint 521,409 12.318 521,409 12.318 1.22% 3.26%
GRR 75mm of Granular A Maint 81,312 4.970 478,935 26.815 560,247 31.785 1.31% 8.42%
GRRplus Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching Maint 362,132 16.881 51,934 2.141 414,067 19.022 0.97% 5.04%
MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation Maint 145,416 4.627 145,416 4.627 0.34% 1.23%
RSpLimit Reduce Speed limit Maint 0 0.033 0 0.309 0 0.342 0.20%
SD Spot Drainage Maint 0 48.070 0 9.138 0 57.208 32.97%
DST Double Surface Treatment Rehab 2,396 0.066 2,396 0.066 0.00% 0.01%
PR2 Pulverize and Resurface 2 ‐ 100mm Rehab 50,453 0.222 544,847 2.257 2,042,713 8.594 2,638,013 11.073 8.43% 3.17%
PR3 Pulverize and Resurface 3 ‐ 150mm Rehab 209,553 0.401 209,553 0.401 0.67% 0.11%
R1rural R1 Rural Cross‐Section Rehab 27,922 0.193 115,812 0.866 143,734 1.059 0.46% 0.30%
R1urban R1 Urban Cross‐Section Rehab 70,611 0.212 873,347 2.510 943,958 2.722 3.02% 0.78%
R2urban R2 Urban Cross‐Section Rehab 244,314 0.536 244,314 0.536 0.78% 0.15%
SST Single Surface Treatment Rehab 156,012 6.547 21,837 0.977 177,849 7.524 2.34% 3.80%
SSTplus SST, Berm Removal, Geometric Correction, Minor Ditching Rehab 4,203 0.116 501,500 12.087 505,703 12.203 6.64% 6.16%
BS Base and Surface Const 618,320 2.390 262,465 1.075 46,215 0.151 1,511,524 7.030 2,438,524 10.646 32.02% 5.38%
BSgrav Base and Surface ‐ Gravel Const 2,342,336 19.328 172,600 1.704 2,514,936 21.032 33.02% 10.62%
NONE No Improvement Required Const 0 87.714 0 87.714 53.99%
REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural Const 1,286,874 2.093 1,138,177 3.085 1,530,679 4.934 4,518,397 14.217 8,474,128 24.329 386.85% 29.97%
RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer Const 33,115 0.063 3,113,420 3.482 3,146,534 3.545 143.64% 4.37%
RSS Reconstruction with Storm Sewers Const 252,095 0.154 577,853 0.353 2,714,175 1.631 3,544,123 2.138 161.79% 2.63%
TOTAL 2,557,188 5.982 7,944,996 142.421 3,121,821 163.303 14,109,782 35.664 27,733,786 347.369
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
22
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Physical Condition
The Physical Condition is an alternate method of describing the condition of a road section or the average condition of the road system. The value is the structural adequacy converted to be expressed as a value out of 100, instead of 20. This methodology lends itself to modeling and comparators that may be more easily understood. There isn’t a 1:1 relationship between the weighted average physical condition and the system adequacy. As noted in the discussion on System Adequacy, that rating is strongly influenced by the newer roads and the roads deemed adequate due to actual or estimated traffic counts of less than 50 AADT. This rating is based purely on the condition of the road surface regardless of traffic count.
The Weighted Average Physical Condition of the road system is currently 74.9.
Remaining Service Life
As indicated previously, the Time of Need (TON) is really a prediction model in terms of an estimate based on current condition to the time for reconstruction. The TON then also provides an estimate of the remaining life in the road system/section. The following figure summarizes the structural adequacy ratings of the road system and illustrates the estimated remaining service life of the road system.
Figure 4.1: Remaining Service Life
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
23
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
4.4 Record of Assumptions –Time of Need (TON), Improvement and Replacement Costs
The methodology of this report is such that the Inventory Manual itself forms the basis of a large number of assumptions in terms of:
Dimensional requirements for the development of improvement and replacement costs
Structural requirements based on road classification
Time of needs based on the ratings and subsequent calculations
Assumptions for deterioration are included in Appendix E
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
24
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
5 Replacement Cost Valuation Program funding recommendations are a function of the dimensional information, surface type, roadside environment, and functional class of the individual assets. Recommended funding for the road system should include sufficient capital expenditures that would allow the replacement of infrastructure as the end of design life is approached, in addition to sufficient funding for maintenance, to ensure that that full life expectancy may be realized.
Budgetary recommendations in this report do not include items related to development and growth. The MoTC should consider those items as additional to the recommendations in this report. Generally, that type of improvement or expansion to the system would be funded from a different source, such as Development Charges.
The budget recommendations bear a direct relationship to the value of the road system. 4 Roads estimates the cost to replace the road system, to its current standard, at $162, 758,900. This estimate is based on the unit costs identified in Table 4.2. All formulae for improvement and replacement costs are as generally per the Inventory Manual Appendix F. Average replacement costs are identified in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Average Replacement Costs
R S U TOTAL
Functional Class
Replacement Cost Length
Replacement Cost Length
Replacement Cost Length
Replacement Cost
Length (km) $$ /km
100 3,322,273 13.783 3,322,273 13.783 241,041
200 58,984,538 209.428 58,984,538 209.428 281,646
300 7,601,898 23.521 7,601,898 23.521 323,196
400 32,839,553 58.576 32,839,553 58.576 560,632
500 5,151,413 8.382 5,151,413 8.382 614,580
C/R 396,981 0.782 879,663 0.506 1,276,644 1.288 991,183
L/R 7,628,851 17.755 41,490,028 24.218 49,118,879 41.973 1,170,249
LCI 1,472,871 2.845 2,990,776 1.705 4,463,647 4.55 981,021
TOTAL 107,899,675 313.69 9,498,703 21.382 45,360,467 26.429 162,758,845 361.501
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
25
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
6 Asset Condition Assessment and Plan Updates.
6.1 Condition Assessment Cycle Recommendation
4 Roads would recommend that the entire road system be reviewed on a maximum four year cycle. The evaluations may be undertaken annually, bi‐annually or at the four year interval.
The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and models should be updated annually.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
26
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
7 Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service has a different meaning for different interests. For instance, the cost per unit may not have an impact to a ratepayer whose chief concern may be service delivery. Similarly, cost or expenditure per unit may not illustrate the condition of the asset to the end user. Further, municipalities are required to report on various municipal performance measures (MPMP ‐ Municipal Performance Measures Program). LOS is Schedule 80, Statistical Info Section 11, Transportation Services, Line 1720 in the FIR report.
4 Roads believes that multiple service measures may be required to adequately relate the condition of an asset to the various user groups; condition, operating costs, and end user. The following sections identify various measurements of service of the road system
7.1 Current Level of Service Measurement
System Adequacy
As described earlier in the report, the system adequacy is the ratio of the “NOW’ need roads to the total system. This is a holistic measure as, using the Inventory Manual Methodology, needs are identified in six critical areas, not just the distress on the road surface.
The current system adequacy is 89.7%.
The System Adequacy should be maintained at 60% or higher.
Physical Condition
Physical condition is the Structural Adequacy rating multiplied by five to produce a rating of between 5 and 100. This is a measure of the amount of distress on the road however the scale is not linear.
The current weighted average Physical Condition of the road system is 74.9. This includes road sections with less than 50 AADT
The weighted average Physical Condition should be 60 or higher.
MPMP Good to Very Good
The province requires annual reporting on the percentage of roads that are rated as good to very good. It has been assumed that the 6‐10 and adequate roads are good to very good and this has been expressed as a percentage of the system.
Good to very good roads represent 88.0 % to 90.9% of the road system dependent upon the measures used. This includes road sections with less than 50 AADT.
The Good to Very Good roads should be 60% or higher.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
27
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
8 Asset Management Strategy
8.1 Asset Management Overview
Asset management has almost as many definitions as there are agencies that manage assets. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) defines asset management as
“... a strategic approach to managing transportation infrastructure. It focuses on business processes for resource allocation and utilization with the objective of better decision‐making based upon quality information and well‐defined objectives.”
The document entitled Managing Public Infrastructure Assets, 2001, prepared by AMSA, AMWA, WEF, and AWWA, defines asset management as:
“managing infrastructure assets to minimize the total cost of owning and operating them, while continuously delivering the service levels customers desire, at an acceptable level of risk.”
The Province of Ontario’s document ‘Building Together‐ Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans’ indicates:
“The asset management strategy is the set of actions that, taken together, has the lowest total cost‐ not the set of actions that each has the lowest cost individually”
Regardless of the source of the definition, the key themes that keep being repeated are;
Managing
Strategic
Effective
Efficient
$$$$$ !!
Service
Optimizing asset life cycle
Risk Management
As an absolute minimum, the objective of any asset management plan, or strategy, should be to ensure that the overall condition of an asset group does not diminish over time. The asset management strategy of an agency is heavily predicated, and inextricably linked, to the available funding.
Most agencies are not fully funded, and a large number are not even funded sufficiently as to maintain the current condition of their system. Given those circumstances, the strategy should be twofold:
Develop the financial plan in order that there is sufficient funding to maintain the condition of the road system.
Focus on a pavement management strategy that utilizes available funding on preservation and resurfacing programs as a priority. Reconstruction and replacement candidates will remain reconstruction and replacement candidates and cost increases will be incremental with
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
28
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
inflation. Preservation and resurfacing opportunities that are missed will escalate in cost by several hundred percent depending on site specifics.
8.2 Priority Rating vs. Condition Rating
Information in a database may be sorted and analyzed in numerous ways. Understanding what information a data field represents, is key to the analysis. The Inventory Manual has many rated and calculated data fields and thus provides for many ways to sort data. Some commonly used representations, or sorting of information, from the database include:
Priority Rating
Priority Guide Number
Structural Adequacy (Condition)
Priority Rating is a calculated field in the Inventory Manual, and is a function of the traffic count and the overall condition rating of the road section. This approach adds weight to the traffic count of the section. Although the word ‘priority’ is included in the field name, a road section that has a higher calculated ‘Priority Rating’ is not necessarily a higher priority in the broader sense of asset management.
Similarly, a road agency may choose to sort the road sections based on condition and cost per vehicle. The Priority Guide Number data field would assist in providing that analysis, as sorting on that parameter would prioritize road sections that have higher traffic and thus a lower cost per vehicle.
Developing a road capital program around the Priority Rating or Priority Guide Number fields will result in programming that would lead to a less efficient expenditure of funds and reduced system performance per budget dollar, as road sections with high traffic and in poor condition would be selected first, as opposed to selecting the best rehabilitation candidates at the appropriate time in their life cycles. The exception to this statement would be cases where rehabilitation funding is at a high enough level to ensure that the preservation program requirements can be met.
From a more current asset management perspective, project selection should be predicated by condition. (Structural Adequacy or Physical Condition). Figure 8.1 clearly illustrates the financial advantages of managing the road system by performing the right treatment at the right time of the asset life cycle. If appropriate strategies are not undertaken at the correct time, there is a less effective usage of the available funding.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
29
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Figure 8.1: Treatment Cost vs. Deterioration
Ideally, if a road is constructed and maintained with timely appropriate maintenance and resurfacing, the road system will reach a point where the majority of the activities will be preservation and resurfacing. Figure 8.2 clearly illustrates the effect on the life span of a pavement by applying the correct treatment at the correction time in the life cycle.
Figure 8.2: Pavement Management‐ The Right Treatment at the Right Time
Source: Wirtgen Cold Recycling Manual
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
30
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
If an agency’s budget is fully funded, the programming will include reconstruction, resurfacing, and preservation programs. Prioritization within the different programs will vary as demands are different. However, within the resurfacing and preservation programs, the pavement condition should drive the decision making.
Where funding is limited, resurfacing and preservation programs should be prioritized over the construction program. The effect of this approach will be that ‘NOW’ need roads will remain ‘NOW’ needs. However, by virtue of their ‘NOW’ need condition, ‘NOW’ need roads will require increased maintenance and likely generate increased complaints from the driving public. To deal with this eventuality, a municipality should create a ‘maintenance paving budget’, over and above the resurfacing budget. The purpose of this budget is to defer the reconstruction needs, and reduce maintenance efforts and complaints until the road can be reconstructed.
8.3 Cross Asset Integration and Project Prioritization
Prioritizing projects from a purely asset management perspective is a relatively straightforward exercise, regardless of funding level. Complications arise when the specific needs, commitments of the agency, and priorities of other utilities factor into the decision making process.
The road system is, in reality, a utility corridor. Multiple utilities in both urban and rural roadside environments will present conflicting demands and priorities in advancing projects. The Road Needs Study provides ratings that deal strictly with the condition of various factors as they relate to the road section. Those factors have to be considered in conjunction with needs and priorities that may exist for other utilities or pending development. In fact, the condition of other infrastructure within the road allowance may be the key element in the prioritization. For example, a road rated as a reconstruction project may have a relatively low priority rating, but a trunk storm sewer servicing a greater area may require immediate installation. The priority of the road is then dictated by the other utility, and should be integrated into the capital plan, to best serve all interests.
Less tangible priorities may also be project prioritization tools for some agencies. For example, an agency may want to advance projects that also include bus routes or bike lanes.
As a municipal road program is developed, opportunities to complete work on smaller sections adjacent to the main project, at a lesser cost than if completed as a stand‐alone project, should be considered to realize economies of scale, and complete improvements that may otherwise be passed over.
8.4 Gravel Roads Management Strategy
MoTC has a gravel road system of approximately 181 centre line kilometres. The budget recommendation is $1,096,400 annually, for the materials only.
Proper maintenance of a gravel road surface is deceptively expensive. Costs include gravel, dust control, and grading. Frequently, budget analysis proves that the per‐kilometre cost of gravel road maintenance is greater than the per‐kilometre cost for hard top maintenance.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
31
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
4 Roads understands that the MoTC has aggressively been converting their gravel roads to hard top. This practice should be continued. The gravel road conversion program should be integrated into the overall road asset management plan and further integrated into a maintenance /upgrade strategy that optimizes the existing MoTC resources and contracted services on an as required basis.
Road agencies in both Canada and the United States, have conducted studies that have generally indicated that, dependent upon local unit costs, gravel road conversion to hardtop, can be a cost‐effective strategy. One source indicates that this may be effective management for roads with traffic volumes as low as 100 AADT.
Appendix C of this report includes additional information on gravel road conversions including a flow chart to illustrate the decision matrix for conversion. Benefits to converting a gravel road include:
• Customer satisfaction • Reduced maintenance costs for routine maintenance • Reduced maintenance costs for winter maintenance
Based on the criteria identified in Appendix C, Table 8.1 identifies gravel road conversion candidates that meet the criteria for conversion.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
32
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 8.1: Gravel Road Conversion Candidates
Asset ID CW ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length
220 2320 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE BOT ROAD LEWIS ROAD 0.614
280 4945 DOAN DRIVE BRIDGE PIGRAM ROAD 0.257
710 2398 THOMPSON DRIVE 66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE) CULVERT 1.917
720 5243 THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT CULVERT 1.334
730 5244 THOMPSON DRIVE CULVERT 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) 0.327
800 4904 MOSSLEY DRIVE LEWIS ROAD RAIL TRACKS 0.536
1400 3507 PIGRAM ROAD CROMARTY DRIVE 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE 0.371
1500 3910 FIVE POINTS ROAD RAIL TRACKS BREEN ROAD 1.552
1630 4905 LEWIS ROAD MOSSLEY DRIVE RAIL TRACKS 0.189
1940 2300 HARRIS ROAD 70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE 2.167
2340 2277 TRAFALGAR STREET 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE) BANKS ROAD 1.746
2350 5257 TRAFALGAR STREET BANKS ROAD 17M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD 0.882
2490 3630 WYTON DRIVE 88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD(PVMT CHANGE) 47M WEST OF 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD 1.281
2560 3440 WYTON DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD CHERRY HILL ROAD 1.389
2570 5226 WYTON DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE 0.383
2640 3419 OLIVER DRIVE 38M EAST OF 27‐ OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD 1.358
2660 5267 OLIVER DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT 0.265
2670 3439 OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT RAIL TRACK 0.622
2680 4924 OLIVER DRIVE RAIL TRACK 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) 0.419
2690 3438 OLIVER DRIVE 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) PURPLE HILL ROAD 1.346
2700 5269 OLIVER DRIVE PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE 0.396
2710 3473 OLIVER DRIVE BRIDGE CHERRY HILL ROAD 0.994
2720 3472 OLIVER DRIVE CHERRY HILL ROAD 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD 1.333
2760 3501 EBENEZER DRIVE VALLEY VIEW ROAD EAST END 1.1
2790 3452 GREGORY DRIVE FAIRVIEW ROAD HERITAGE ROAD 1.395
2800 5518 GREGORY DRIVE HERITAGE ROAD 204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT 0.682
3110 3554 VALLEY VIEW ROAD 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE 3.401
3120 3450 VALLEY VIEW ROAD EBENEZER DRIVE 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD 3.099
3150 3449 VALLEY VIEW ROAD 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD CENTRE DRIVE 3.096
3300 3545 FAIRVIEW ROAD 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) STOREY DRIVE 0.85
3310 3451 FAIRVIEW ROAD STOREY DRIVE BRIDGE 0.602
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
33
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Asset ID CW ID Street Name From Desc To Desc Length
3320 5235 FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE 0.351
3330 5234 FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE 0.543
3340 5233 FAIRVIEW ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE 0.984
3350 3467 FAIRVIEW ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT 2.491
3360 5403 FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD 0.584
3390 5231 FAIRVIEW ROAD 21M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD CULVERT 0.782
3400 3466 FAIRVIEW ROAD CULVERT OLIVER DRIVE 2.291
3420 3622 FAIRVIEW ROAD OLIVER DRIVE 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE) 0.843
3550 5277 FAIRVIEW ROAD EVELYN DRIVE BRIDGE 1.365
3610 5237 HERITAGE ROAD 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD BRIDGE 0.533
3620 3430 HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE BRIDGE 1.938
3630 5236 HERITAGE ROAD BRIDGE GREGORY DRIVE 0.826
3640 3429 HERITAGE ROAD GREGORY DRIVE CULVERT AT #23124 2.455
3650 5271 HERITAGE ROAD CULVERT AT #23124 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD 0.657
3880 3437 PURPLE HILL ROAD 34M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) OLIVER DRIVE 3.074
3890 5268 PURPLE HILL ROAD OLIVER DRIVE CULVERT 0.687
3900 3436 PURPLE HILL ROAD CULVERT 44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) 2.369
3930 3404 PURPLE HILL ROAD 56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE) WYTON DRIVE 3.05
3940 3425 PURPLE HILL ROAD WYTON DRIVE 40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE) 3.062
3980 5222 PURPLE HILL ROAD PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE BRIDGE 0.425
3990 3424 PURPLE HILL ROAD BRIDGE 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK 1.969
4080 3443 CHERRY HILL ROAD 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD BRIDGE 1.631
4090 5274 CHERRY HILL ROAD CULVERT BRIDGE 0.508
4100 5238 CHERRY HILL ROAD BRIDGE RAIL TRACK 0.287
4120 4918 CHERRY HILL ROAD RAIL TRACK GREGORY DRIVE 0.907
4140 3442 CHERRY HILL ROAD GREGORY DRIVE PLOVER MILLS ROAD 3.088
4160 5270 CHERRY HILL ROAD 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD OLIVER DRIVE 3.102
4490 2132 HUNT ROAD 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE) 10M NORTH OF CATHERINE STREET 1.343
Total 78.048
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
34
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
9 Program Funding Recommendations
9.1 Overview
Program funding recommendations are a function of the dimensional information, surface type, roadside environment, functional class of the individual assets and current unit costing. Recommended funding for the road system should include sufficient capital expenditures that would allow the replacement of infrastructure as the end of design life is approached, in addition to sufficient funding for maintenance, to ensure that that full life expectancy may be realized.
Budgetary recommendations in this report do not include items related to development and growth; those should be considered as additional. Generally, that type of improvement or expansion to the system would be funded from a different source, such as Development Charges.
The budget recommendations bear a direct relationship to the value of the road system. 4 Roads estimates the cost to replace the road system, to its current standard, at $162,758,900. The budget recommendations provided in this report are based on the constitution of the road system. This represents an opportunity to develop a financial plan in concert with the asset management plan, for a phased implementation.
9.2 Capital Depreciation
The estimated replacement/depreciation value of the MoTC road system to the current standard is $162, 758,900. This equates to an annual capital depreciation of $3,255,200 over 50 years. The annual capital depreciation is strictly a function of the replacement cost and the design life, and would best be described as an ‘Accountaneering’ number. This estimate does not include bridges, culverts, cross culverts less than 3 m, sidewalks, or street lighting. The typical design life for a road structure is 50 years before reconstruction/replacement. If the life span is 50 years, then 2% of the replacement cost should be the annual contribution to the capital reserve, to ensure that it can be reconstructed in that time frame.
The estimated replacement/depreciation is based upon the replacement value of the road system over a 50‐year life cycle. However, the 50‐year life cycle can only be a reality if maintenance and preservation treatments such as crack sealing and hot mix asphalt overlays are delivered at the appropriate time. Inadequate maintenance and preservation will result in premature failure and increased life cycle costs.
Analogies to houses and cars sometimes make road maintenance easier to understand. If a house does not have the roof renewed within the correct time frame, there will be damage to the structure, below the roof, and if this is not dealt with, it will result in a rapid deterioration of the house. Similarly, roads require crack sealing and resurfacing at the appropriate time, during the life cycle, in order to maximize the life expectancy of the asset. Preservation and maintenance extend the useful life of the pavement, reducing life cycle costs.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
35
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
9.3 Hot Mix Resurfacing
Roads require major maintenance throughout the life cycle, in order to optimize and maximize the asset life span. Roads require resurfacing at the appropriate interval, for the respective class of road. Different agencies categorize the expense differently, usually dependent upon the dollar value; however, resurfacing is essentially a maintenance activity.
Resurfacing schedules are dependent upon traffic loading and the percentage of commercial traffic. Higher traffic volumes and percentages of commercial traffic shorten the interval between resurfacings. Optimal resurfacing intervals will vary from ten to twenty years (or more), depending upon the road function, classification, and quality of design and construction.
The Hot Mix Asphalt Resurfacing recommendation in this report is based upon the distribution of the Township’s hot mix asphalt inventory. As such, the optimal budget calculation will focus on the 19‐year interval (18.7), for hot mix roads.
Given the aforementioned, and the information with respect to surface type contained in Table 3.1 , the funding for the annual resurfacing program should be $686,500 per year on average, in order to maintain the system at its current adequacy level. This estimate is for the major resurfacing work only, and does not include any estimated costs for other pavement preservation activities or programs. Table 9.1 identifies the distribution of hot asphalt roads by asset class and the basis for the recommendation for the annual program budget recommendation.
Table 9.1: Hot Mix Asphalt Roads by Asset Class and Life Cycle
Asset Class L.C. Yrs
Average Annual Cost
Asset Qty. Unit Cost
Weighted Average
A/C‐R 20
A/C‐S 20
A/C‐U 20
HCB1‐R 10
HCB1‐S 10
HCB1‐U 10
HCB2‐R 12
HCB2‐S 12
HCB2‐U 12
HCB3‐R 15 $ 894 0.1 $ 8,941 0.025
HCB3‐S 15 $ 18,515 1.97 $ 9,398 0.499
HCB3‐U 15 $ 63,830 2.75 $ 23,211 0.696
HCB4‐R 20 $ 178,099 26.04 $ 6,839 8.352
HCB4‐S 20 $ 51,985 7.37 $ 7,054 2.364
HCB4‐U 20 $ 373,159 21.01 $ 17,761 6.739
TOTALS 59.2 18.7
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
36
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
9.4 Surface Treatment Resurfacing
Most agencies report that the average life of surface treated road is seven years. Similar to the concept applied to the development of the hot mix resurfacing recommendations, the surface‐treated road network should be completely resurfaced every seven years, or approximately 14% of the surface treated inventory in each calendar year.
At a unit cost of $2.75 per square metre, the annual program size should be $388,200, on average, exclusive of hot mix asphalt padding and other preparatory work.
9.5 Gravel Road Resurfacing
When MTO was providing maintenance subsidy, the standard practice for gravel road maintenance was to place approximately 75 mm of gravel on each gravel road section, every three years.
Since the conditional grant system was discontinued, a large number of municipalities have reduced the amount of gravel that has been placed on gravel roads, to the point where the gravel roads in the system are a major maintenance problem, particularly in the latter part of the winter and early spring. If the granular base is not replenished, the road structure will disappear through normal usage, and the remaining gravel typically becomes contaminated by other materials, such as the native soil and winter sand.
MoTC has 181 km of gravel surfaced roads, as per Table 3.1 of this report. Using the Town’s benchmark costing, the annual gravel resurfacing program size should be $1,096,400 per year, based on adding 75 mm of gravel, across the entire platform, every three years. This estimate does not include costs for re‐grading, dust control, or gravel road conversion.
9.6 Crack Sealing
Crack sealing is a preservation activity that extends the life of a hot mix asphalt surface. A program estimate is provided based on crack sealing one metre per two lane metre of pavement every five years at the unit cost provided by the MoTC. Based on that premise, the recommended average budget for crack sealing is $23,700 annually.
9.7 Annual Budget Adjustments
Inflation
The typical approach to annual budget adjustments is to adjust with some reference or consideration to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Public Works Departments have not fared well with this approach, as a large portion of the Public Works Budget is expended on commodities and services that typically vary/increase at a rate significantly higher than the CPI. Public Works Departments’ annual increases based solely on CPI, will generally result in a continual downward spiral in overall condition of the road system and service levels. Decreasing service levels increase risk. Ontario is becoming much more
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
37
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
litigious; therefore, the reduction in service levels increases the risk for a municipality, and the cost of service provision versus the cost of litigation should be considered.
In recent years, increases in fuel, asphalt, and salt have been disproportionate to the CPI. As such, consideration should be given to annual increases in road funding, over and above the CPI. Some municipalities provide for such disproportionate increases in their budget process, in order that the specific impacts of a commodity price increase and service delivery are considered.
Plant Adjustment
Most municipalities experience development‐related growth. Growth comes at a cost, both in the longer‐term, with additional resurfacing and replacement requirements, and in the shorter‐term, with Operational budgets. Operational budgets should be adjusted on a pro‐rata basis to account for the additional length of road that has to be maintained.
Capital budgets and forecasts should also be adjusted annually, to reflect the changes in the system, and integrated into the longer‐term financial plan.
9.8 Performance Modeling‐ Budget Effect on System Performance
Asset Management Plan (AMP) and Strategy Analysis
The asset management plan is a function of the strategy and available financing. The development process for all elements is iterative, concurrent and holistic on a number of levels. It is complex.
The provincial guidelines for the preparation of an AMP indicate that the following must be considered;
Options must be compared on Lifecycle cost‐ the total cost of constructing, maintaining, renewing and operating an infrastructure asset throughout its service life. Future costs must be discounted and inflation must be incorporated.
Assessment of all other relevant direct and indirect costs and benefits associated with each option.
o Direct benefits and Costs Efficiencies and network effects Investment scheduling to appropriately time expansion in asset lifecycles Safety Environmental Vulnerability to climate change
o Indirect Benefits and Costs Municipal wellbeing and costs Amenity values Value of culturally or historically significant sites Municipal image
Assessment of Risks associated with all potential options. Each option must be evaluated based on its potential risk, using an approach that allows for comparative analysis. Risks associated with each option can be scored based on quantitative measures when reasonable estimates can be made of the probability of the risk event happening and the cost associated with the risk
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
38
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
event. Qualitative measures can be used when reasonable estimates of probability and cost associated with the risk event cannot be made.
Significant effort (and expense) will be required to meet all of these requirements.
Performance Model Overview
A properly developed performance model will satisfy the majority of the requirements identified in the foregoing. Key elements of a Performance Model will include:
Deterioration Curves identifying anticipated deterioration of an appropriately constructed asset over the life cycle of the asset
‘Trigger’ points throughout the deterioration curve identifying appropriate treatments at condition ranges
Current costing for all treatments identified
To capture the essence of the provincial requirements, development and use of a Performance Model is recommended. Through modeling and the resultant outputs, the following may be addressed:
Review of options and lifecycle effects based on a Return on Investment Analysis
Efficiencies and network effects
Budget requirements to achieve LOS goals
It is respectfully suggested that a 10 year AMP can be developed through a Performance model, however, 4 Roads is of the opinion that a number of other requirements that the province has identified should not be addressed until they reach the project stage. Further, a number of those requirements would be addressed through a Class Environmental Assessment process.
Through performance modeling appropriate budget levels, programming and associated costs can be determined, delivering key elements of any plan that can be refined or revisited as circumstances change. Once a model is developed, then the effect of any alternatives may also be measured.
9.9 System Performance at Various Budget Levels
This report includes budget recommendations for various aspects of the programming that are typical to road departments. System performance can be predicted based on the level of funding.
4 Roads has prepared four different 50‐year performance models for the road system. The models have been prepared with the following parameters:
Zero budget – demonstrates the effect of no work being performed on the road system and how quickly it will deteriorate.
Existing budget – This budget includes the activities of those identified in the recommended budget to preserve the system: Hot Mix Asphalt resurfacing, surface treatment, crack sealing, and gravel road resurfacing.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
39
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Preservation budget – This includes the total dollar value of the budget recommendations for Hot Mix Asphalt resurfacing, surface treatment, crack sealing, and gravel road resurfacing.
Capital Depreciation / Amortization budget‐ full replacement cost of the road system annualized.
The Weighted Average Physical Condition of the road system is currently 74.9. The performance model calculations all begin with the current Physical Condition and for purposes of the graphing, the year‐end Physical Condition is displayed based on the effects that the improvements have had on the overall condition of the road system.
In reviewing the results of the performance models, it should be understood that, with the methodology being used, the trigger for a resurfacing activity of a hard surfaced road is a Physical Condition of 70.
At appropriate funding levels, the system condition improves over time. However, the improvement in terms of the Physical Condition will typically only increase to approximately the high 70’s to the low 80’s, depending on the system.
The initial observation from the graph is that the existing funding level does not appear to be sufficient to sustain the road system in the long term. This would be in conflict with the condition data as it appears that the road system is in relatively good condition overall.
Contributing factors to this apparent discrepancy include:
The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring.
The overall condition may have been influenced by Infrastructure Funds and Grants that have not been identified in the annual funding level.
As noted above, 3.8% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day.
Reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower volume roads appears to be undertaken by Road Operations staff and it does not appear that municipal equipment is charged against activities in the Operating Budget.
Anecdotal information is that the unit costs for gravel resurfacing is approximately 25% less than the unit costs for gravel in the subdivision construction ($13 vs $10).
It appears that gravel roads are being upgraded to hard surface roads through the capital program, so this would offset, to some extent, the gravel road resurfacing requirement.
It should be noted that the Capital depreciation model will typically only expend the full dollar value of that budget in the earlier years of the program. With adequate funding, once a road has been reconstructed, and if it is maintained and resurfaced at the correct condition, it should perform well for several decades.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
40
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Figure 9.1: Performance Modeling at Various Budget Levels
*Current Municipal budget does not appear to include equipment and machinery costs for construction work
performed by municipal staff.
The deterioration curves that have been used consider an average/typical performance for the various road classes. When used in the model at a reasonable funding level, the overall average system condition will remain at a similar level, as the model will treat the pavements as perpetual. This concept is illustrated in Table 9.2 using MoTC Section 1835: Neely Court, as an example.
Table 9.2: Sample Section Life Cycle
Asset ID 1835 Neely Court, 120m North of Durham St. to 29 ‐ Hamilton Rd
Year Imp. Type Cost Start Cond
End Cond
Yrs Hold Start Value End Value ROI
2017 RNS $ 234,980 24.99 100 111,248 445,169 1.44
2022 CRK $ 526 97 97 2 431,814 431,814 9.65
2034 MICRO $ 8,008 79.27 79.27 3 352,885 352,885 1.31
2041 R1 $ 87,277 69.47 97 309,259 431,814 1.53
2042 CRK $ 526 97 97 2 431,814 431,814 9.65
2054 MICRO $ 8,008 79.27 79.27 3 352,885 352,885 1.31
2061 R1 $ 87,277 69.47 97 309,259 431,814 1.53
2062 CRK $ 526 97 97 2 431,814 431,814 9.65
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
41
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Figure 9.2: Graphical Representation of a Typical Life Cycle and Strategy Cost Differential (Asphalt Road Surface)
Figure 9.3: Annual Expenditures Budget to Maintain
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
42
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
For the purposes of a short to mid‐term plan, considering the pavement as performing as a perpetual pavement does not pose a problem. The aggregate road base will deteriorate over time: however, the time frame where that may be contributory to the road decline would be beyond 50 years. Condition data is collected regularly, and monitoring and analysis would alert the municipality to changes that are occurring.
Figure 9.3 illustrates the typical effect on budget requirements by holding the condition of the system at a specified level. If the orange line represented the average annual expense, the budget years above that line would require debt financing or funding from reserves. Conversely, in those years where the funding requirement is less than the annual average, then the unspent funds would accumulate in a reserve.
Deterioration curves developed by 4 Roads have been utilized for development of funding and prediction models, and based on our experience with a large cross‐section of municipalities and resultant feedback, we believe that those deterioration profiles are representative. The models indicate that the overall condition of the road system will continue to increase over time to a point where the average physical condition will be in the high 70’s range. A physical condition beyond that level may be indicating an over‐expenditure/inefficiency in the programming. An average physical condition above 70 would indicate that the average road only requires maintenance and /or resurfacing.
9.10 Record of Assumptions ‐Performance Modeling
Pavement Classification for Modeling
In order to develop budget recommendations, 4 Roads adds an additional classification of roads differentiated by surface type, roadside environment and traffic volume. It is anticipated that each road classification will deteriorate at a different rate. Differentiation by roadside environment within a classification permits calculation of the different replacement costs to reflect the servicing and feature differences.
Table 9.3: Road Asset Classes
Asset Class Subtype Material AADT Low AADT High
A/C All A/C 1 100,000
CM All C/M 1 3,000
CON All CON 1 100,000
GST1 All G/S 1 10,000
HCB1 ART HCB 20,000 100,000
HCB2 ART HCB 10,000 20,000
HCB3 All HCB 1,000 10,000
HCB4 All HCB 1 1,000
ICB All ICB 1 3,000
LCB1 All LCB 1 2,000
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
43
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Figure 9.4 illustrates treatment selection by time and asset classes for hot mix roads. Typical treatments and/or improvements have been superimposed over the deterioration curves, to illustrate the general timelines for implementing the treatments. Other road asset classes have been treated similarly. An important concept to remember is that as a road deteriorates the cost of rehabilitation increases. The deterioration curves, improvement types, current unit costs and current condition ratings are essentially the assumptions used to develop budget and programming recommendations in this report. Appendix E provides detail on the deterioration curves for all road asset classes.
Figure 9.4: Treatment Selection vs. Condition (Asphalt Surfaces)
9.11 10 Year Program
Appendix F includes the results of a 10 Year program based on the ROI Performance model at the current funding level as identified in the following chart extracted from the 10 year Capital Budget.
The resultant project selection from the model may vary from the current program and forecast as the
model will select projects based on best ROI initially and then expend remaining funds on other projects.
The model can be a starting point for program development but has to be metered with decisions than
cannot be easily introduced into a model.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
44
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Table 9.4: Performance Model Summary ‐ Ten Year Program
Imp.Type
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Grand Total
BS 11,954 25,558 37,512
BSgrav 696,451 696,451
CRK 17,792 12,443 1,624 1,674 31,195 2,076 4,056 1,142 4,370 6,762 83,134
DST 2,396 2,396
GRR2 13,137 213,476 748,175 418,140 180,721 810,242 316,060 1,150,303 309,712 322,566 4,482,532
MICRO 2,741 35,569 11,663 3,061 37,592 3,474 54,799 22,271 2,389 173,559
PR2 205,859 44,110 381,979 352,588 20,960 136,670 1,142,166
R1 102,015 322,888 91,784 733,468 1,008,232 2,258,387
R1rura l 27,922 107,258 8,553 143,733
R1urban 70,610 246,602 327,447 270,870 28,427 943,956
R2urban 244,314 244,314
RNS 211,750 208,176 204,602 181,372 805,900
SST 177,850 270,824 324,443 8,556 546,847 166,054 961,788 334,508 416,734 9,803 3,217,407
SSTplus 505,703 505,703
GRR2plus 45,708 79,939 125,647
Grand Total 1,486,680 1,486,545 1,485,384 1,486,364 1,486,361 1,486,106 1,486,427 1,485,953 1,486,555 1,486,422 14,862,797
Year
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
45
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
10 State of the Infrastructure ‐ Roads Recommendations In addition to the budgetary recommendations, the following recommendations are provided for the
management of the road inventory.
1. The information and budget recommendations included in this report should be used to further develop and evolve the corporate Asset Management Plan.
2. A regular review of the condition of the road system should occur at a maximum four year interval. The review cycle be undertaken at a 4 year interval or segmented annually or bi‐annually.
3. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed.
4. The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and performance models should be updated annually.
5. The System Adequacy should be maintained at 60% or higher.
6. The weighted average Physical Condition should be at 70 or higher.
7. The Good to Very Good roads should be at 60% or higher.
8. Programming should be reviewed to ensure that resurfacing and preservation programs are optimized.
9. The overall road system should have traffic counts updated on a 3 to 5 year cycle. The counting should include the percentage of truck traffic and the date.
10. The gravel road conversion program should be continued.
11. Roads sections where potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignment have been identified, should be reviewed to ensure signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. (Listing provided in Appendix D)
12. Road sections with substandard width should be signed accordingly as an interim measure. (Table ES 5 provides a listing.)
13. The results and recommendations for programming within this report should be integrated with the other assets groups to ensure available funding is optimized.
14. Some consideration should be given to calculating equipment costs for activities and projects undertaken by Thames Centre staff to better reflect total project costs and to allow for more direct comparisons of alternate service delivery methodologies.
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix A. Inventory Manual Methodology Overview
Appendix A 1
Asset Condition Rating Methodology
The provincial requirements for AMP’s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road asset reviews generally conform to the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, 1991.
Inventory Manual History
From the 1960’s until the mid‐1990’s, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) required municipalities to regularly update the condition ratings of their road systems in a number of key areas. The process was originally created by the MTO as a means to distribute conditional funding, on an equitable basis, between municipalities. The reports were referred to as a ‘Road Need Study’ (RNS) and were required in order to receive a conditional grant to subsidize municipal road programs. After the introduction in the 1960’s by the MTO, the methodology evolved into the current format by the late 1970’s. The most current version of the Inventory Manual is dated 1991, and is the methodology used for this report and supported by WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation Software. The practice was discontinued by a number of municipalities when conditional funding for roads was eliminated in the mid 1990’s.
Inventory Manual Overview
The Inventory Manual Methodology is a sound, consistent, asset management practice that still works well today, and in view of the increasing demands on efficiency and asset management, represents a sound road asset inventorying and management system. Road system reviews should be repeated on a cyclical basis. The road section review identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended rehabilitation strategy.
To put terminology in a current context, the past Road Needs Study is now ‘The State of the Infrastructure Report (SotI)’. The SotI analyzes and summarizes the road system survey data collected (or provided) and provides an overview of the overall condition of the road system by road section, including such factors as structural adequacy, drainage, and surface condition. The study also provides an indication of apparent deficiencies in horizontal and vertical alignment elements, as per the Ministry of Transportation’s manual, “Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways”.
The report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system, which may be used for programming and budgeting. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project.
Asset Management by its’ very nature is holistic. Managing a road network based solely on pavement condition would be critically deficient in scope in terms of the information required to make an informed decision as to the improvements required on a road section.
Appendix A 2
The Inventory Manual offers a holistic review of each road section, developing a Time of Need (TON) or an Adequate rating in six areas that are critical to municipal decision making:
Geometrics
Surface Type
Surface Width
Capacity
Structural Adequacy
Drainage
Evaluations of each road section were completed generally in accordance with the MTO’s Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads (1991). Data collected was entered directly into WorkTech’s Asset Manager Foundation software. Condition ratings, Time of Need, Priority Ratings, and associated costs were then calculated by the software, in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Unit costs for construction are typically provided by municipal staff.
Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, or a combination of these factors. As an example, section changes should occur as surface type, surface condition, cross‐section, or speed limit changes.
The Condition Ratings, developed through the scoring in the Inventory Manual, classify roads as ‘NOW’, ‘1 to 5’, or ‘6 to 10’ year needs for reconstruction. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. For example, a road may be categorized as a ‘6 to 10’ year need with a resurfacing recommendation. This road should be resurfaced as soon as possible, to further defer the need to reconstruct.
Field data is obtained through a visual examination of the road system and includes: structural adequacy, level of service, maintenance demand, horizontal and vertical alignment, surface and shoulder width, surface condition, and drainage. The Condition Rating is calculated based upon a combination of other calculations and data.
To best utilize the database information and modern asset management concepts, it has to be understood that the Time of Need (TON) ratings are the estimated time before the road would require reconstruction. NOW needs are still roads that require reconstruction; however, it is not intended that ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’ year needs are to be acted on in that timeframe. The ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’ year needs are current candidates for resurfacing treatments that will elevate their structural status to ‘ADEQ’, and offer the greatest return on investment for a road authority(notwithstanding a drainage or capacity need, etc.).
Appendix A 3
‘NOW’ Needs
‘NOW’ needs represent the backlog of work required on the road system. A ‘NOW’ need is not necessarily the highest priority from asset management or return on investment perspectives. Construction improvements identified within this time period are representative of roads that have little or no service life left and are in poor condition. F Theoretically a resurfacing strategy is never a ‘NOW’ need, with the exceptions of a PR1 or PR2 treatment recommendation (Pulverize and resurface one or two lifts of asphalt) and where the surface type is inadequate for the traffic volume.
If a road with an improvement recommendation of “resurface” deteriorates too far, it becomes a ‘NOW’ construction need. A ‘NOW’ need rating may be triggered by substandard ratings in any of the Structural Adequacy, Surface Type, Surface Width, Capacity, Drainage, or Geometrics data fields.
‘1 to 5’ Year Needs
‘1 to 5’ Identifies road sections where reconstruction is anticipated within the next five years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct.
Appendix A 4
‘6 to 10’ Year Needs
‘6 to 10’ Identifies road sections where reconstruction improvements are anticipated within six to ten years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct.
‘ADEQ’
An ‘ADEQ’ rating encompasses a wide range of conditions that include the following:
Roads with a traffic volume of less than 50 vehicles per day will be deemed adequate, and deficiencies on those roads are to be corrected with the maintenance budgets
Gravel Roads with a structural adequacy rating that is not a ‘NOW’ need (more than 25% distress) is adequate; there is no further differentiation by time period
Roads that do not require improvement other than maintenance
Appendix A 5
INVENTORY MANUAL TREATMENTS
Table A.1: Road Improvement Types
Code Description
R1 Basic Resurfacing
R2 Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift
RM Major Resurfacing
PR1 Pulverizing and Resurfacing
PR2 Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift
BS Tolerable standard for lower volume roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only
RW Resurface and Widen
REC Reconstruction
RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain,
remove and replace curb and gutter, granular, and hot mix)
RSS Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers and manholes in addition to the
above)
NC Proposed Road Construction
SRR Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement
Micro* Microsurfacing (Preservation Activity)
SST* Application of a Single Surface Treatment
SSTplus* Single Surface Treatment, Geometric Padding/Correction, Ditch improvements
DST* Double Surface Treatment
*Additional Improvement Types developed by 4 Roads not included in the Inventory Manual
Types of Improvements
For each Type of Improvement (Item 104), there are a number of specific road improvements that are included in the total cost relative to the Roadside Environment (Item 32) and the Design Class (Item 105). The computer will check a number of Items on the appraisal sheet in order to select the appropriate factors and cross section standards and then calculate the Bench Mark Cost. For example, a Resurfacing and Widening improvement coded under Item 104 is a significantly different road cross section and cost when applied to a rural road vs. an urban arterial. The computer will make all of the necessary checks to arrive at the recommended improvement cost.
Described in the following pages are the road improvements and associated construction activities costed for each Type of Improvement listed under Item 104. Please note, that the Codes (CO) – Carry Over, (SR) – Spot Road, (SI) – Spot Intersection and (SD) – Spot Drainage are direct cost inputs and are not included in the Bench Mark Cost system.
Appendix A 6
(R1) ‐ BASIC RESURFACING
(Single Lift of Hot Mix – 50 mm)
Rural and Semi‐Urban Roads (Cross Section A)
(a) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced
(b) Single life of hot mix (50 mm)
(c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade
Urban Roads – Granular Base (Cross Section B‐1)
– Concrete Base (Cross Section C‐1)
(a) Minor base repairs for 10% of area to be resurfaced
(b) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced
(c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 50% of section length
(d) Planning 1.0m of existing pavement along both curbs
(e) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade
(f) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm)
(R2) ‐ BASIC RESURFACING
(Double Lift of Hot Mix – 100 mm)
Rural and Semi‐Urban Roads (Cross Section A)
(a) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced
(b) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm)
(c) Granular materials to raise shoulder to new surface grade
Urban Roads – Granular Base (Cross Section B‐1)
– Concrete Base (Cross Section C‐1)
(a) Minor base repairs for 10% of area to be resurfaced
(b) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced
(c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 50% of section length
(d) Planning 1.0 m of existing pavement along both curbs
(e) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade
(f) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm)
(RM) ‐ MAJOR RESURFACING
(Double Lift of Hot Mix – 100 mm)
Urban Roads (Arterials and Collectors) – Granular Base (Cross Section B‐1)
– Concrete Base (Cross Section C‐1)
(a) Base repairs for 50% of area to be resurfaced (b) Planning for 50% of area to be resurfaced (c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 50% of section length
(d) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade
(e) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm)
Appendix A 7
(PR1) ‐ PULVERIZING AND RESURFACING
(Single lift of Hot Mix – 50 mm)
Rural Roads (Cross Section A)
(a) Pulverize existing hard top surface (b) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm)
(c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade
(PR2) ‐ PULVERIZING AND RESURFACING (Double Lift of Hot Mix – 100 mm)
Rural Roads (Cross Section A)
(a) Pulverize existing hard top surface (b) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm)
(c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade
(BS) ‐ BASE AND SURFACE
Rural Roads – Tolerable Standard (50 to 100 AADT) (Cross Section D)
(a) Granular material for base
(b) Granular material for loose top surface
(c) Minimal shoulder widening
(d) Minor Ditching
Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section D)
(a) Placing granular material
(b) Minimal shoulder widening
(c) Double surface treatment
(d) Minor ditching
Rural Roads – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) (Cross Section D)
and
Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Cross Section D)
(a) Placing granular material
(b) Minimal shoulder widening
(c) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see table F‐1)
(d) Minor ditching
(RW) ‐ RESURFACE AND WIDEN
Rural Roads – Tolerable Standard (50 to 199 AADT) (Cross Section E)
(a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement
(c) Granular material for widening base
(d) Granular material for loose top surface
Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section E)
(a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement
(c) Granular material for widening base
(d) Double surface treatment
Appendix A 8
Rural Road – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) (Cross Section E)
and
Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Cross Section E)
(a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement
(c) Granular material for widening base
(d) Base Course of hot mix for widening
(e) Hot mix Padding for 20% of existing surface area
(f) Single life of hot mix (50 mm)
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section F)
(a) Excavating for widening (b) Curb and Gutter removal
(c) Catch Basin removal
(d) Base repair 10% of existing surface area (e) Granular material for widening
(f) Place catch basins and leads
(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Base course of hot mix for widening
(j) Hot mix padding for 20% of existing surface area
(k) Adjust manholes to new surface grade
(l) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm) curb to curb
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross section G)
(a) Excavating for widening (b) Curb and gutter removal
(c) Catch basin removal
(d) Base repair for 10% of existing surface area (e) Place new catch basins and leads (f) Granular material for widening
(g) Concrete base for widening (h) New curb and gutter (i) New subdrains
(j) Base course of hot mix for widening
(k) Hot mix padding for 20% of existing surface area
(l) Adjust manholes to new surface grade
(m) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm) curb to curb
Appendix A 9
(REC) ‐ RECONSTRUCTION (RURAL and SEMI‐URBAN)
Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section H)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Ditching and side culvert replacement
(c) Grading (d) Granular material
(e) Double surface treatment
Rural Roads – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) Cross Section H)
and
Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Cross Section H)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Ditching and side culvert replacement
(c) Grading (d) Granular material
(e) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table F‐1)
Rural and Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Concrete Surface)
(Cross Section P)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Ditching and side culvert replacement
(c) Grading (d) Granular Material
(e) Concrete base and surface
(RNS) ‐ RECONSTRUCTION NOMINAL STORM SEWERS (URBAN)
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section I)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Curb and gutter removal
(c) Granular base (d) New curb and gutter (e) New sub‐drains (f) Adjust manholes and catch basins
(g) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table F‐1)
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross Section J)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Curb and gutter removal
(c) Granular base (d) Concrete base (e) New curb and gutter (f) New sub‐drains
(g) Adjust manholes and catch basins
(h) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table H‐5)
Appendix A 10
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Surface (Cross Section O)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Curb and gutter removal
(c) Granular base (d) Concrete base and surface (e) New curb and gutter (f) New sub‐drains
(g) Adjust manholes and catch basins
(RSS) ‐ RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWERS
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section K)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Curb and gutter removal
(c) Storm sewer removal
(d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads
(e) New storm sewers
(f) New manhole and catch basins including leads
(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Granular base
(j) Hot mix (100/150 mm, see Table F‐1
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross Section L)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Curb and gutter removal
(c) Storm sewer removal
(d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads
(e) New storm sewers
(f) New manhole and catch basins including leads
(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Granular base
(j) Concrete base
(k) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table F‐1)
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Surface (Cross Section Q)
(a) Excavate base material
(b) Curb and gutter removal
(c) Storm sewer removal
(d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads
(e) New storm sewers
(f) New manhole and catch basins including leads
(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Granular base
(j) Concrete base and surface
Appendix A 11
(NC) ‐ PROPOSED ROAD CONSTRUCTION
Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 – 399 AADT) (Cross Section H)
(a) Grading (b) Ditching and cross culverts (c) Granular base (d) Double surface treatment
Rural Roads – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) (Cross Section H)
(a) Grading (b) Ditching and cross culverts (c) Granular base (d) Hot mix (50.100 mm, see Table F‐1)
Semi‐Urban Roads
New Construction does not apply to semi‐urban roads as there is no existing frontage development.
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section K)
(a) Grading (b) Storm Sewers
(c) Manholes and catch basins including leads
(d) Curb and gutter (e) Sub‐drains (f) Granular base
(g) Hot mix (100 mm/150 mm, see Table F‐1)
Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross Section L)
(a) Grading (b) Storm Sewers
(c) Manholes and catch basins including leads
(d) Curb and gutter (e) Sub‐drains (f) Granular base
(g) Concrete base (h) Hot mix (50 mm/100 mm , see Table F‐1)
Appendix A 12
(SRR) ‐ STORM SEWER INSTALLATION AND ROAD REINSTATEMENT (URBAN AND SEMI‐URBAN)
Urban and Semi‐Urban Roads – Granular Base (Cross Section M)
(a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers
(b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads
(c) New storm sewer including bedding
(d) Granular materials in trench
(e) Hot mix to restore surface grade (100/150 mm, see Table F‐1)
Urban and Semi‐Urban Roads – Concrete Base (Cross Section N)
(a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers
(b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads
(c) New storm sewers including bedding
(d) Granular material in trench
(e) Concrete base for trenched area (f) Hot mix to restore surface grade (50/100 mm, See Table F‐1)
Urban and Semi‐Urban Roads – Concrete Surface (Cross Section R)
(a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers
(b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads
(c) New storm sewers including bedding
(d) Granular material in trench
(e) Concrete base and surface for trenched area
(MICRO) SINGLE LIFT OF MICROSURFACING
Urban, Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a HCB (High Class Bituminous) surface type
(a) Unit cost per square metre of Microsurfacing
(SST) SINGLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT
Urban, Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type
(a) Unit cost per square metre of Single Surface Treatment
(SSTplus) SINGLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT, GEOMETRIC CORRECTION DITCHING
IMPROVEMENTS
Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type
(a) Unit cost per square metre of Single Surface Treatment
(b) 20% Surface area padding to 50mm to correct geometric deficiencies
(c) Earth Excavation allowance to provide for minor ditch improvements and berm removal
Appendix A 13
(DST) DOUBLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT
Urban, Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type
(a) Unit cost per square metre of Double Surface Treatment
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix B. Pavement Structure and Defects
Appendix B 1
Pavement Structure
To assist in understanding the content and methodology of the report, the following discussion provides an overview of how flexible and rigid pavement structures are designed and function. The majority of municipal roads would be described as having a flexible pavement structure. Hot mix asphalt, surface treatment, and gravel road surfaces are typical flexible pavement road structures. Other pavement structure types include rigid and composite, and are more typically found on 400 series highways, or on arterial roads of larger urban centres.
Flexible Pavement Road Structure
Load is applied to the pavement structure, and ultimately to the native sub‐grade, via wheel loads of vehicles. The pavement structure between the native sub‐grade and the load application point has to be designed such that the load that is transmitted to the sub‐grade is not greater than the sub‐grade’s ability to support the load. The figure below shows a typical flexible pavement structure and how applied load dissipates.
Load Distribution through Pavement Structure
Depth Below Surface Stress (psi) Stress (Kpa)
At Surface 90 620.50
8” (200 mm) Below 11 75.84
11” (275 mm) Below 7 48.26
16” (400 mm) Below 4 27.58
Surface materials experience the highest loading at the point of contact with the vehicle’s tire. Radial truck tires, running from 110 psi to 120 psi, can have an impact 20 times higher at the surface, than at the compacted sub‐grade. The loading actually occurs in three dimensions, in a conical fashion, dissipating both vertically and horizontally as it passes through the pavement structure. Loading
From MTO
Appendix B 2
decreases exponentially as it passes through the road structure. Therefore, materials of lesser strength or lesser quality can be used deeper in the road structure.
As a rule of thumb, the closer the road building materials are placed to the surface of the road, the higher the quality required. Similarly, the poorer the sub‐grade or native material, the deeper/stronger the road structure has to be to carry the same loads.
Traffic counts, and the percentage of trucks, are critical to structural design of the pavement. Depending upon the source, the effect of a single truck on the pavement structure can be equivalent to 2,000 to 8,000 passenger cars. The effect of farm machinery would be very similar to that of heavy trucks. However, the Highway Traffic does permit certain types of farm machinery and equipment to use the roads even during half load season, so this is an additional consideration when designing rural roads.
Pavement evaluation involves a review of each road section and an assessment of the type and extent of the distress(es) observed. Treatment recommendations are predicated by whether the cause of the major distress(es) is structural or non‐structural.
Flexible pavements will have age‐related distresses and wearing such as thermal cracking and oxidation. These distresses are non‐structural; however, once a crack develops and water enters the pavement structure, deterioration will accelerate. Poor construction practices, quality control, or materials may produce other non‐structural surface defects, such as segregation and raveling, which will also result in a reduced life expectancy of the surface asphalt.
Fatigue cracking indicates structural failure and can manifest itself in many forms, such as wheel path, alligator, and edge cracking. It can be localized or throughout a road section. When roads that have exhibited fatigue cracking are rehabilitated, there should be particular attention paid to the rehabilitation treatment, to ensure that the upgraded facility has sufficient structure.
Wheelpath Fatigue Cracking
Appendix B 3
Flexible Pavement Road Structure Design
There are a number of flexible pavement structural design methodologies and associated software. The simplest way to describe structural design may be the Granular Base Equivalency (GBE) Methodology. This GBE methodology is still used in Ontario, by a number of agencies, and is frequently used as a cross‐check where more sophisticated analysis has been undertaken.
The measurement is unit‐less and relates to the structural value of one millimetre of Granular ‘A’ material. The relationship of the typical road building materials is expressed in either of the two following ways:
1 mm of HMA = 2 mm of Granular A = 3 mm of Granular B
Or
HMA = 2, Granular A = 1, Granular B = 0.67
To gain some perspective on what this means in terms of typical construction activities, the following table indicates a typical subdivision road construction as expressed in GBE.
Granular Base Equivalency
Material Example 1
Depth
Granular Base
Equivalency
Example 2
Depth
Granular Base
Equivalency
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 100 200 150 300
Granular A 150 150 300 300
Granular B 300 200 0 0
TOTAL 550 550 450 600
When reconstruction and rehabilitation projects are undertaken, and use of alternate materials and/or road structure is contemplated, the GBE concept is important to bear in mind, as different treatments such as Expanded Asphalt and Cold in Place recycling also have a structural value. For design purposes, it may be prudent to use a conservative equivalency of 1.5 for these products (although, some sources indicate GBE’s of up to 1.8).
As an example, if a 200 mm pavement is replaced with 150 mm of Expanded Asphalt or Cold in Place Recycling, with a 50 mm overlay of Hot Mix asphalt, a pavement structure with a GBE of 400 is replaced by a pavement structure with a GBE of 325; a significant difference. Premature failure will be the result of an under‐designed pavement structure, wasting resources and available funding.
The purpose of this example is to illustrate the different structural values that products have. Expanded Asphalt and Cold in Place recycling are both excellent products to rehabilitate pavement structures when used appropriately.
The MTO’s Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual is an excellent resource for use in pavement structure design and rehabilitation, and is available from the online MTO Catalog.
Appendix B 4
Thin Lift Pavements
Hot mix asphalt mixes are designed in Ontario either by the Marshall Method or the Superpave Method. Through time, this has resulted in a number of commonly used mixes that are typically sorted by size. One of the parameters used to describe that sizing is the Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (NMAS).
In the Marshall Mix Method, typical mix designations are HL1, HL2, HL3, HL4, and HL8. In the Superpave mix design methodology, mixes are designated by the NMAS.
The following table identifies the NMAS for the more commonly used mixes, and indicates recommended minimum lift thicknesses for them.
Recommended Minimum Lift Thicknesses
Mix Type NMAS (mm) Lift Thickness Range (mm)
SP 9.5 9.5 30 to 40
SP 12.5 12.5 40 to 50
SP 19 19.0 60 to 80
HL3 13.2 40 to 55
HL4 16.0 50 to 65
HL8 19.0 60 to 80
Thin Lift Pavement
*Thin lift with inappropriate aggregate size
Appendix B 5
Rigid Pavement Structure
Rigid Pavements are constructed of concrete, or concrete with an asphalt wearing surface. The fundamental difference between a flexible pavement and a rigid pavement is the method in which the load is transferred. Whereas the flexible pavement disperses load through the pavement structure in a conical fashion, with a higher point load directly beneath the loading point, the rigid pavement structure distributes that load in a beam‐like fashion, more evenly across the pavement structure. Rigid pavements may have an exposed concrete wearing surface, or they may be covered with an asphaltic concrete wearing surface.
The resulting rigid pavement structure is usually thinner overall, when compared to a flexible pavement, designed to accommodate the same traffic loading. This does not necessarily translate into a reduced cost of construction. Any comparison of costs between flexible and rigid pavements should be on a life cycle basis, for the most accurate assessment.
Older concrete pavements were prone to failure at joints, as load transfer caused a slight movement in the concrete slab, and with the intrusion of water, a structural failure. Newer concrete pavements are designed with improved load transfer technology.
Figure 1 Flexible vs. Rigid Pavement Structure(s)
Flexible Pavement Distresses and Treatment Selection
Treatment recommendation is dependent upon the condition of the road section at the time of the review.
Treatment Selection – Critical Area Analysis
When using the Inventory Manual methodology all of the ‘holistic’ needs are considered in the recommendation. For example, a road may appear to require only a resurfacing, however, when the other critical areas are reviewed, there may be a capacity problem which would then result in a recommendation to resurface and widen (RW) that would address both the pavement condition and the need for additional lanes. Another example would be where the pavement is exhibiting some type of
Appendix B 6
distress but there is also poor drainage. The recommendation would then be to reconstruct (REC if rural, RSS if urban).
Treatment Selection for Non‐Structural Rehabilitation
Resurfacing recommendations are predicated upon the type and extent of distress noted. For example, all pavements will develop thermal/transverse cracking as they age. As the age of the pavement increases, the frequency of the cracking increases. If the spacing of he cracks is still greater than 10m, then the R1 – resurface with one lift of asphalt – treatment will typically be sufficient to restore the road as the treatment provides for overlay and base asphalt repair. However, if the frequency of transverse cracking , which may have become transverse alligator cracking if left unattended too long, then the recommendation will be more extensive, such as a PR2‐ Pulverize and resurface with 2 lifts of asphalt. The following illustrates transverse cracking.
Transverse /Thermal cracking
Treatment Selection for Structural Rehabilitation
Road sections exhibiting structural failure such as fatigue cracking require a more extensive rehabilitation to restore the performance of the road section. In simple terms, placing a single lift of asphalt over structurally failed asphalt will guarantee the same failure in a very short time period. Unless the single lift overlay is placed knowingly as a holding strategy, it should be avoided on structurally deficient pavements. For pavements that have failed structurally or have too much transverse cracking, the recommendation is typically PR2 as a minimum provided the drainage is adequate or requires only minor improvement.
Reflective Cracking
Paving over an active crack(s) will result in a crack(s) in the same location with 2 to 3 years. As a rule of thumb, the crack will migrate through at approximately 25mm per year. Therefore it would be
Appendix B 7
anticipated that if a 50mm overlay is placed, then the cracking would reappear in approximately 2 years. This is not an efficient usage of available funding.
Structurally Failed Pavement
The above figure illustrates a pavement that has failed both structurally and has very frequent severe transverse cracks. Placement of a 50mm overlay over this type of pavement condition will result in rapid failure is not recommended. The figure below illustrates a newer pavement that already has very frequent transverse cracks appearing, likely the result of paving over a failed pavement. Under normal circumstances, the first transverse cracks generally appear in approximately 4 to 6 years and the cracks are 40m to 50m or more apart.
Reflective Transverse Cracking on Newer Pavement
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix C. Gravel Road Conversion
Appendix C 1
Gravel Road Conversion
Gravel Road Maintenance Overview
Gravel roads tend to be the ‘forgotten’ asset. Gravel roads form a component of the road asset group for the municipality and should be managed as any other asset.
One of the difficulties in determining the deterioration of a gravel road is that the wearing surface and the granular layers are one and the same, so the extent of deterioration may not be as obvious until the deterioration is significant. Appropriate gravel road maintenance can be deceptively expensive and frequently, budget analysis proves that the per‐kilometre cost of gravel road maintenance is greater than the per‐kilometre cost for hard top maintenance. This is further exacerbated as traffic volume on a gravel road increases.
Like other road assets, gravel roads have lifecycle maintenance and rehabilitation costs that should be addressed as part of any asset management plan. Life cycle costs include regular addition of gravel, dust control, grading and labour. Grading will typically include equipment costs for a motor grader. A Net Present Value (NPV) assessment comparing life cycle of a gravel surface vs. hard top surface would be a key element in determining the merit of converting a gravel road to hard top.
NPV Analysis Components
Process
Given the above noted, a Net Present Value (NPV) assessment of the gravel road, in comparison with a surface treated road section or other hard top surface, should be undertaken as it may be more cost‐effective to convert/upgrade the gravel road to a surface treated road.
Road agencies in both Canada and the United States, have conducted studies that have generally indicated that, dependent upon local unit costs, gravel road conversion to hardtop, can be a cost‐effective strategy. One source indicates that this may be effective management for roads with traffic volumes as low as 100 AADT.
It is preferable to address the cost comparisons over a period of time where the life cycles may conclude concurrently. For instance, if the gravel maintenance is on a three year basis and the surface treatment is seven, then the cycles coincide at 21 years. Total life cycle cost over that time period should be considered.
Gravel
This report provides an annual cost for maintenance costs for 75mm of additional gravel to be added every three years and does not included regular grading or dust control. This was a typical standard that was used in the past by many municipalities. Due to the natural life cycle wear and tear, maintenance and winter control activities, gravel roads require additional gravel on a regular basis to ensure continuing performance.
Equipment
As part of a holistic review of service delivery, consideration should be given to the equipment hourly rates and replacement. Accurate hourly rates are required to provide a true assessment. Equipment rates should include capital depreciation and operating costs.
Appendix C 2
One of the factors driving the overall cost is the equipment that is required to properly maintain a gravel road system‐ particularly graders. Part of the gravel road conversion analysis should include:
Has the hourly rate for the equipment been calculated properly to include capital depreciation and maintenance costs? A new grader will cost $ $300,000 and upward. At a 20‐year life span, there is a minimum of $15,000 in capital depreciation, alone, on the grader. What is the current rate for the grader? If there is not full cost recovery on the grader hourly rate, then the cost for gravel road maintenance is not accurate either.
Is the grader used for any other purpose/activities?
What is the length of the gravel road system? A commonly used length of gravel roads used to justify a grader is 75 kilometres of gravel.
How many hours per year is the grader operated?
Are there other pieces of equipment that could be used or rented to maintain the gravel roads?
Surface Treatment or other hard top
Whatever other surface type is being compared with the gravel road surface should include the same
factors as for gravel so there is a 1:1 comparison.
Additional Factors and Considerations
If the argument for conversion may be made from a financial perspective, then there are additional factors that should be considered from physical and risk perspectives. Other factors for consideration include:
Platform width
Drainage
Structural Adequacy
Traffic Volume and Type
The figure below provides a graphical illustration of the different factors and decision flow that may be considered in developing a case to convert a gravel road to hard top.
Benefits to converting a gravel road include:
Customer satisfaction
Reduced maintenance costs for routine maintenance
Reduced maintenance costs for winter maintenance
Reduced complaints
Appendix C 3
Gravel Road Conversion Matrix
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix D. Potential Substandard Alignment
Geometric Needs by Street NameCurrent Insp - Rural w/Curve Needs Only
Length AADT LimitRDSD Op. Speed H.Curve H. SSD V. CurveTo Description V.SSDFrom DescriptionID Street Name TON 0.142 619 80R 70 1 0 0142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL
LIMIT (BRIDGE) 0MUNICIPAL LIMIT0005 AVON DRIVE ADEQ
0.112 617 80R 65 1 0 0112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD
029- HAMILTON ROAD1220 BREEN ROAD ADEQ
0.892 298 80R 80 1 0 0PIGRAM ROAD 0FIVE POINTS ROAD1280 BREEN ROAD ADEQ 0.033 35 80R 60 1 0 032- DORCHESTER ROAD 033M SOUTH OF 32-
DORCHESTER ROAD1190 CASHEL LANE NOW
1.393 100 80R 80 2 0 0VALLEY VIEW ROAD 0PROSPECT HILL ROAD2600 CENTRE DRIVE ADEQ 0.679 100 80R 65 2 0 0DUNDAS STREET 090M NORTH OF RAILWAY
TRACK4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ
3.082 100 80R 80 0 0 0WYTON DRIVE 128- THORNDALE ROAD4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ 1.693 191 80R 65 3 0 0LOWER COW PATH 044M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2200 COW PATH ADEQ
3.678 216 80R 80 3 0 0DORCHESTER ROAD 074- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0900 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ 1.026 70 80R 60 1 0 0END OF STREET 0CASHEL LANE1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NOW 0.080 1,616 80R 60 1 0 032- DORCHESTER ROAD 080M WEST OF 32-
DORCHESTER ROAD1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NOW
0.043 70 80R 60 1 0 043M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD
0DORCHESTER ROAD1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NOW
1.364 100 80R 75 2 0 0VALLEY VIEW ROAD 057M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD
2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ
1.100 100 50R 50 2 0 0EAST END 0VALLEY VIEW ROAD2760 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ 1.403 100 80R 80 2 0 0FAIRVIEW ROAD 027- NISSOURI ROAD2400 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ 1.058 81 80R 65 2 0 017M NORTH OF HAMILTON
ROAD(PVMT CHANGE) 0COW PATH2230 LOWER COW PATH ADEQ
0.250 100 50R 45 1 0 0CHRISTIE DRIVE 0250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE
5225 MILL ROAD ADEQ
1.475 433 80R 70 1 0 0DONNYBROOK DRIVE 0250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE
5230 MILL ROAD ADEQ
0.195 257 80R 80 1 0 0300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD
0BREEN ROAD1370 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ
0.371 239 80R 55 2 0 0370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
0CROMARTY DRIVE1400 PIGRAM ROAD NOW
1.991 239 80R 80 1 0 0EBENEZER ROAD 0370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
1410 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ
0.920 100 80R 70 2 0 0SIXTEEN MILE ROAD 033M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ
3.085 100 60R 60 6 0 0WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG 0THORNDALE ROAD3170 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ 3.122 100 80R 80 2 0 0THORNDALE ROAD 0CENTRE DRIVE3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ 0.278 20 80R 65 1 0 0WEST END 0CONSERVATION AREA
ENTRANCE0130 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ
0.516 166 80R 65 1 0 0CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE
0AVON DRIVE0120 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ
1.404 100 80R 75 4 0 0REBECCA ROAD 0LAKESIDE DRIVE2480 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.389 100 80R 80 2 0 0CHERRY HILL ROAD 0PURPLE HILL ROAD2560 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.406 100 80R 80 2 0 0FAIRVIEW ROAD 027- NISSOURI ROAD2510 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.395 100 80R 80 2 0 0PURPLE HILL ROAD 0HERITAGE ROAD2550 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.281 100 80R 70 2 0 047M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI
ROAD 088M EAST OF REBECCA
ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)2490 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 4:48PM Page: 1
Geometric Needs by Street NameCurrent Insp - Rural w/Curve Needs Only
Length AADT LimitRDSD Op. Speed H.Curve H. SSD V. CurveTo Description V.SSDFrom DescriptionID Street Name TON 36.856
Run: DEC 4,2015 4:48PM Page: 2
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix E. Deterioration Curve Detail
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 1
Asset Classes
In order to utilize the Best Practice and Performance Modeling modules of WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation (WT), assets must be defined by an asset class. Table 1 identifies the road asset classes that have been developed for use in WT by 4 Roads Management Services Inc.
Table 1: Road Asset Classes
Asset Class Subtype Material RDSE Envt AADT Low AADT High
A/C‐R All A/C R 1 100,000
A/C‐S All A/C S 1 100,000
A/C‐U All A/C U 1 100,000
CM1‐R All C/M R 1 3,000
CM1‐S All C/M S 1 3,000
CM1‐U All C/M U 1 3,000
CON‐R All CON R 1 100,000
CON‐S All CON S 1 100,000
CON‐U All CON U 1 100,000
GST1‐R All G/S R 1 10,000
GST1‐S All G/S S 1 10,000
HCB1‐R ART HCB R 20,000 100,000
HCB1‐S ART HCB S 20,000 100,000
HCB1‐U ART HCB U 20,000 100,000
HCB2‐R ART HCB R 10,000 20,000
HCB2‐S ART HCB S 10,000 20,000
HCB2‐U ART HCB U 10,000 20,000
HCB3‐R All HCB R 1,000 10,000
HCB3‐S All HCB S 1,000 10,000
HCB3‐U All HCB U 1,000 10,000
HCB4‐R All HCB R 1 1,000
HCB4‐S All HCB S 1 1,000
HCB4‐U All HCB U 1 1,000
ICB‐S All ICB S 1 3,000
ICB‐U All ICB U 1 3,000
ICB1‐R All ICB R 1 3,000
LCB1‐R All LCB R 1 2,000
LCB1‐S All LCB S 1 2,000
LCB1‐U All LCB U 1 2,000
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 2
Conventional wisdom has been to define road assets by their functional classes such as Arterial, Collector or Local and then further differentiate by usage, such as residential or commercial. From a performance modeling perspective, using the functional classification will only work to a point, as the traffic on a functional class will vary between agencies.
4 Roads believes that the performance/deterioration of a road section is more predictable based on surface type and traffic volume rather than by functional class. Based on that philosophy, Table 1 was created identifying Road Asset Classification by Surface Type, Traffic Volume and Roadside Environment. Roadside Environment has been added to permit the calculation of different replacement costs between rural and urban cross‐sections.
Deterioration Curves
When using the Inventory Manual (IM) methodology, Structural Adequacy is a measurement of the percentage of the surface of the road that is exhibiting distress. The rater will consider the type of distress as well as the other critical areas (surface width, capacity, geometry, drainage and surface width) in order to provide a recommendation for an improvement. In the IM, any, or multiple of the critical areas, may produce a Time of Need (TON). The overall TON of the road section is the worst of all of the TON’s. For example, if five of the TON’s are ADEQ, and one is NOW, the section is a NOW need.
It would be possible, but very difficult, to develop performance models around all of the critical areas. So for the purposes of the performance modeling, Structural Adequacy (distress) has been selected to be the driver in the decisions with respect to the model.
In the early years of the model, if a project is selected that has an identified improvement type, that improvement will be used for the project in the year that it is selected. In the later years, presumably after all current deficiencies have been corrected the model will revert to the assigned asset class for deterioration and project selection based on estimated condition.
All deterioration curves relate to the ‘Physical Condition’ data field in WorkTech. Physical Condition is the Structural Adequacy multiplied by 5 to produce a score from 5 to 100. The Physical Condition deterioration curve is specific to the Inventory Manual and therefore the trigger points and definition of the curve will be different than other methodologies. It should be noted that different evaluation methodologies will produce varying deterioration curves and trigger points. Familiarity with the rating system being utilized is essential.
The deterioration curves are the same for each asset class regardless of roadside environment. For urban sections, the improvement is RSS‐ Reconstruction with Storm Sewers, rather than REC‐ Reconstruction Rural.
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 3
Figure 1: Physical Condition versus Improvement Selection
Where the MTO PCI / Inventory Manual Condition Rating format is being used, the PCI data is entered to produce a PCI score from different formulas that represent the defects and weightings by surface type. The PCI score is then used to approximate a Structural Adequacy score (and a Physical Condition). Table 2 identifies the approximations to convert PCI to Structural Adequacy and a Time of Need.
Table 2: PCI to Structural Adequacy Approximations
Time of
Need
ASTM
6344
Structural
Adequacy
Physical
Condition
MTO PCI Surface Condition Description Approximation
PCI to SA
NOW 1‐39 1 to 7 1 to 35 1 to 55 Now Needs –
Reconstruction or
Major Rehabilitation
Poor to Very
Poor to Failed
IF PCI <=55 then, PCI / 8 = SA
1 to 5 40‐55 8 to 11 36 to 55 56 to 75 1 to 5 year Needs – R2
/more extensive
rehabilitation
Fair / Passable IF PCI >55<=75 then, PCI / 7 =SA
6 to 10 55‐70 12 to 14 56to 70 76 to 85 6 to 10 year Needs –
R1 Resurfacing
Good IF PCI >75<=85 then, PCI / 6 =SA
ADEQ 71‐100 15 to 20 75 to 100 86 to 100 Adequate –
Maintenance and
Preservation
Satisfactory/
Good/ Excellent
If PCI >85 then, PCI /5.4 =SA
Once a Structural Adequacy Score has been determined, the TON is also calculated. What this achieves is the detail of PCI data collection and the strength of the holistic evaluation of the Inventory Manual.
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 4
Improvement Types‐ Effect on the Asset
Appendix A of this report includes a summary of the improvement types that are included in the inventory Manual. In WorkTech there is no restriction on what may be developed as an improvement type for a road agency. However, regardless of the improvement types that are used the effect that the improvement has on the asset has to be understood in order to use performance modeling.
The following table identifies a number of improvement types and further identifies the effect that they have on a road asset. A similar approach may be taken with other assets.
Code Description Effect on the Asset
R1 Basic Resurfacing – Single Lift Increase Physical Condition to 97
R2 Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift Increase Physical Condition to 100
RM Major Resurfacing Increase Physical Condition to 100
PR1 Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Single Lift Increase Physical Condition to 95
PR2 Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift Increase Physical Condition to 100
BS Base and Surface Tolerable – Tolerable standard for lower volume
roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only Increase Physical Condition to 95
RW Resurface and Widen Increase Physical Condition to 97
REC Reconstruction Increase Physical Condition to 100
RNS
Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer,
adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain, remove and replace
curb and gutter, granular, and hot mix)
Increase Physical Condition to 100
RSS Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm
sewers and manholes in addition to the above) Increase Physical Condition to 100
NC Proposed Road Construction Increase Physical Condition to 100
SRR Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement No effect
CRK Crack Sealing Hold Physical Condition for 2 Years
MICRO Microsurfacing Hold Physical Condition for 3 years
GRR Gravel Road Resurfacing – add 75mm Hold Physical Condition for 3 years
GRR2 Gravel Road Resurfacing ‐ Add 150mm Increase Physical Condition by 20
The effect that a treatment has on an asset is critical to the analysis. Inaccurate determination of the effect of a treatment on an asset will produce an inaccurate – and indefensible‐ result. The following chart is a comparison of the deterioration of a road section without any treatment applied versus a road section that has appropriate treatment at the optimal condition, producing a more cost effective life cycle.
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 5
Figure 2, shown below, illustrates several different aspects of performance model output including the effect of a treatment on an asset and the effect of multiple treatments undertaken at the optimal asset condition to produce a cost effective management strategy.
Figure 2: Performance Model – Effect of Treatment on Asset
Deterioration Curves by Surface Type and Traffic Volume
The following pages includes tables and graphs indicating the anticipated performance of an
appropriately constructed road asset and the condition triggers for treatments. The deterioration curves
by asset class used in concert with the table indicating the treatment effect on the asset, and the
agency’s unit costs, will produce a performance model that demonstrates the effect on the system at
various budget levels and produce a program based on input parameters.
New Construction
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 6
Gravel Roads‐ All Roadsides, all AADT
Year Condition Imp Typet Description
1 100 NONE No Improvement Required
2 92.45 NONE No Improvement Required
3 86.21 GRR 75mm of Granular A
4 80.43 GRR 75mm of Granular A
5 75.11 GRR 75mm of Granular A
6 70.21 GRR 75mm of Granular A
7 65.7 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
8 61.55 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
9 57.75 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
10 54.27 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
11 51.07 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
12 48.15 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
13 45.48 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
14 43.04 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
15 40.81 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
16 38.77 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
17 36.9 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
18 35.2 GRR2 150mm of additional Gravel
19 33.63 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
20 32.19 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
21 30.86 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
22 29.64 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
23 28.51 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
24 27.45 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
25 26.47 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
30 22.28 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
35 18.88 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
40 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
45 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
50 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 7
HCB1 All Roadsides‐ AADT > 20,000, assumes 10% Commercial
>Year Condition Imp. Type Description
1 100 NONE No Improvement Required
2 98.61 NONE No Improvement Required
3 94.19 NONE No Improvement Required
4 89.83 CRK Crack Sealing
5 85.55 CRK Crack Sealing
6 81.36 CRK Crack Sealing
7 77.26 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
8 73.28 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
9 69.4 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
10 65.65 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
11 62.02 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
12 58.54 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
13 55.19 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
14 52 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
15 48.96 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
16 46.08 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
17 43.36 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
18 40.81 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
19 38.41 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
20 36.19 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
22 32.24 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
23 30.51 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
24 28.95 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
25 27.55 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
26 26.3 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
27 25.21 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
28 24.27 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
29 23.47 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
30 22.82 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
35 21.31 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
40 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
50 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 8
HCB 2 All Roadsides‐ AADT >10,000 <20,000, Assumes 10% Commercial
>Year Condition Imp. Type Description
1 100 NONE No Improvement Required
2 98.79 NONE No Improvement Required
3 94.85 NONE No Improvement Required
4 91.01 CRK Crack Sealing
5 87.29 CRK Crack Sealing
6 83.68 CRK Crack Sealing
7 80.18 CRK2 Crack Sealing
8 76.79 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
9 73.51 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
10 70.33 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
11 67.26 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
12 64.28 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
13 61.41 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
14 58.63 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
15 55.95 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
16 53.38 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
17 50.89 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
18 48.5 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
19 46.2 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
20 43.99 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
21 41.87 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
22 39.84 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
23 37.89 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
24 36.03 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
25 34.26 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
26 32.56 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
27 30.95 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
28 29.42 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
29 27.97 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
30 26.59 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
35 20.86 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
40 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
50 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 9
HCB 3 All Roadsides – AADT 1,000 < 10,000, Assumes 10% Commercial
>Year Condition Imp. Type Description
1 100 NONE No Improvement Required
2 99.44 NONE No Improvement Required
3 97.46 NONE No Improvement Required
4 95.29 NONE No Improvement Required
5 92.95 CRK Crack Sealing
6 90.48 CRK Crack Sealing
7 87.88 CRK2 Crack Sealing
8 85.18 CRK2 Crack Sealing
9 82.4 CRK2 Crack Sealing
10 79.56 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
11 76.67 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
12 73.76 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
13 70.83 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
14 67.91 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
15 65.01 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
16 62.14 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
17 59.31 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
18 56.54 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
19 53.83 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
20 51.19 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
21 48.63 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
22 46.17 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
23 43.8 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
24 41.53 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
25 39.37 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
26 37.31 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
27 35.37 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
28 33.54 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
29 31.82 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
30 30.22 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
35 23.83 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
40 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
45 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
50 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 10
HCB 4 All Roadsides‐ AADT <1,000, Assumes 5% Commercial
>Year Condition Imp. Type Description
1 100 NONE No Improvement Required
2 99.44 NONE No Improvement Required
3 97.46 NONE No Improvement Required
4 95.29 NONE No Improvement Required
5 92.95 CRK Crack Sealing
6 90.48 CRK Crack Sealing
7 87.88 CRK2 Crack Sealing
8 85.18 CRK2 Crack Sealing
9 82.4 CRK2 Crack Sealing
10 79.56 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
11 76.67 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
12 73.76 MICRO Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation
13 70.83 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
14 67.91 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
15 65.01 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
16 62.14 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
17 59.31 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
18 56.54 R1 Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm
19 53.83 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
20 51.19 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
21 48.63 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
22 46.17 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
23 43.8 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
24 41.53 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
25 39.37 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
26 37.31 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
27 35.37 R2 Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm
28 33.54 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
29 31.82 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
30 30.22 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
40 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
45 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
50 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves
for Roads
Appendix E 11
LCB All roadsides – All AADT’s
Year Condition Imp. Type Description
1 100 NONE No Improvement Required
2 98.61 NONE No Improvement Required
3 94.19 NONE No Improvement Required
4 89.84 NONE No Improvement Required
5 85.56 NONE No Improvement Required
6 81.36 NONE No Improvement Required
7 77.26 SST Single Surface Treatment
8 73.28 SST Single Surface Treatment
9 69.4 SST Single Surface Treatment
10 65.65 SST Single Surface Treatment
11 62.02 SST Single Surface Treatment
12 58.54 SST Single Surface Treatment
13 55.19 SST Single Surface Treatment
14 52 SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction
15 48.96 SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction
16 46.08 SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction
17 43.36 SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction
18 40.81 SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction
19 38.41 SSTplus SST plus Padding / geometric correction
20 36.19 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
21 34.13 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
22 32.24 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
23 30.51 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
24 28.95 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
25 27.55 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
30 22.82 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
35 21.31 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
40 21.92 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
45 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
50 20 REC Reconstruction ‐ Rural
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix F. 10 Year Program Based on Existing Funding Level
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2016 350 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐23M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) BSgrav 75,975$ 40 95 2.426
2016 570 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐LACEY LANE BSgrav 38,770$ 40 95 1.238
2016 580 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LACEY LANE‐to‐441M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD BSgrav 43,625$ 40 95 1.393
2016 820 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) BSgrav 52,268$ 60 95 1.669
2016 1370 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) BREEN ROAD‐to‐300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD BSgrav 6,107$ 60 95 0.195
2016 1410 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐EBENEZER ROAD BSgrav 62,352$ 60 95 1.991
2016 1420 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER ROAD‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 17,381$ 60 95 0.555
2016 2390 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 18M EAST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐HUNT ROAD BSgrav 86,028$ 60 95 2.747
2016 3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) CENTRE DRIVE‐to‐THORNDALE ROAD BSgrav 97,772$ 60 95 3.122
2016 4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE) BSgrav 94,797$ 60 95 3.027
2016 1740 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 33,039$ 60 95 1.055
2016 860 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 128M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FORBES ROAD BSgrav 49,720$ 60 95 1.707
2016 1800 SHAIN ROAD ( to ) 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END BSgrav 20,325$ 60 95 0.649
2016 1690 EATON ROAD ( to ) NORTH END‐to‐31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE BSgrav 18,292$ 75 95 0.628
2016 6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐PRIVATE ROAD CRK 108$ 85 85 2 0.054
2016 880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE‐to‐EAST END CRK 596$ 80 80 2 0.298
2016 5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 256$ 85 85 2 0.128
2016 5620 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CANTERBURY DRIVE CRK 886$ 90 90 2 0.443
2016 4760 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK CRK 80$ 90 90 2 0.04
2016 5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE CRK 596$ 90 90 2 0.298
2016 5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE CRK 200$ 90 90 2 0.1
2016 4940 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) AMBER DRIVE‐to‐EAST END CRK 90$ 85 85 2 0.045
2016 6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT CRK 196$ 85 85 2 0.098
2016 4870 AMBER DRIVE ( to ) LINWOOD DRIVE‐to‐MARION STREET CRK 358$ 85 85 2 0.179
2016 5500 THE PARKWAY ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐CARLETON COURT CRK 128$ 85 85 2 0.064
2016 5610 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 456$ 85 85 2 0.228
2016 6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT CRK 440$ 85 85 2 0.22
2016 6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MANLEY PLACE CRK 140$ 85 85 2 0.07
2016 6140 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY PLACE‐to‐MANLEY DRIVE CRK 648$ 85 85 2 0.324
2016 6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY DRIVE‐to‐61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE CRK 122$ 85 85 2 0.061
2016 6200 MANLEY DRIVE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 598$ 85 85 2 0.299
2016 6210 MANLEY PLACE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐END OF STREET CRK 120$ 85 85 2 0.06
2016 1910 HUDSON DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY CRK 1,024$ 85 85 2 0.512
2016 6760 GERALD PARKWAY ( to ) WEST END‐to‐27‐ NISSOURI ROAD CRK 1,370$ 95 95 2 0.685
Page 1 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2016 4780 MINNIE STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐CATHERINE STREET CRK 66$ 85 85 2 0.033
2016 4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐AMBER DRIVE CRK 494$ 80 80 2 0.247
2016 5280 BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 202$ 80 80 2 0.101
2016 5510 THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 326$ 80 80 2 0.163
2016 5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 968$ 80 80 2 0.484
2016 5570 PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 204$ 80 80 2 0.102
2016 5580 PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 706$ 95 95 2 0.353
2016 5870 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE CRK 246$ 95 95 2 0.123
2016 5900 RINESS DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐LACROIX AVENUE CRK 368$ 95 95 2 0.184
2016 6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE CRK 142$ 80 80 2 0.071
2016 4020 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK‐to‐2‐ DUNDAS STREET CRK 1,220$ 85 85 2 0.61
2016 5590 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) WEST END‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 186$ 90 90 2 0.093
2016 5270 ANN STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 204$ 90 90 2 0.102
2016 5540 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐THE PARKWAY CRK 782$ 90 90 2 0.391
2016 5600 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 196$ 90 90 2 0.098
2016 5850 TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE‐to‐QUAIL RUN DRIVE CRK 798$ 90 90 2 0.399
2016 5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐MITCHELL COURT CRK 202$ 90 90 2 0.101
2016 6010 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE CRK 368$ 90 90 2 0.184
2016 6030 MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE (W)‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE (E) CRK 754$ 90 90 2 0.377
2016 1970 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) WEST END‐to‐STARDUST DRIVE CRK 110$ 80 80 2 0.055
2016 3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE CRK 80$ 80 80 2 0.04
2016 5640 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT CRK 582$ 90 90 2 0.291
2016 2686 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐HERITAGE ROAD CRK 176$ 95 95 2 0.088
2016 700 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (P DST 2,396$ 40 95 0.066
2016 640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 13,137$ 60 80 0.401
2016 5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT MICRO 2,741$ 75 75 3 0.09
2016 5990 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE R1urban 34,375$ 55 97 0.102
2016 6000 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE R1urban 36,235$ 55 97 0.11
2016 5040 CARL STREET ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET SST 1,435$ 60 95 0.069
2016 5070 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,402$ 60 95 0.112
2016 5050 RUTH STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,483$ 60 95 0.114
2016 5080 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 3,006$ 60 95 0.138
2016 1600 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRIV SST 901$ 60 95 0.039
2016 1230 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 37,861$ 70 95 1.639
Page 2 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2016 2110 MARION STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHA SST 7,993$ 70 95 0.346
2016 950 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 45,738$ 70 95 1.848
2016 1560 IRWIN ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRI SST 653$ 70 95 0.033
2016 1757A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST 9,900$ 70 95 0.4
2016 1758A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE SST 7,425$ 70 95 0.3
2016 4570 HARRIS STREET ( to ) 49‐ CATHERINE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 3,770$ 70 95 0.168
2016 2850 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST 33,100$ 70 95 1.374
2016 1330 ROBINSON ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐FIVE POINTS ROAD SST 21,183$ 65 95 0.944
2016 5010 ROSS STREET ( to ) PATRICIA AVENUE‐to‐DAVID STREET SSTplus 4,203$ 55 95 0.116
2016 5020 ROSS STREET ( to ) DAVID STREET‐to‐RUTH STREET SSTplus 7,464$ 60 95 0.206
2016 5030 ROSS STREET ( to ) RUTH STREET‐to‐CARL STREET SSTplus 6,848$ 60 95 0.189
2016 5060 DAVID STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SSTplus 7,392$ 60 95 0.204
2016 30 AVON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SSTplus 58,610$ 70 95 1.542
2016 40 AVON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SSTplus 19,385$ 70 95 0.51
2016 50 AVON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SSTplus 121,135$ 70 95 3.187
2016 2120 MARION STREET ( to ) 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)‐to‐CLARA STREET SSTplus 21,855$ 70 95 0.575
2016 960 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD SSTplus 95,376$ 70 95 2.452
2016 2270 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐21M WEST OF 32‐ SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHA SSTplus 71,494$ 70 95 1.797
2016 5 AVON DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT (BRIDGE) SSTplus 5,397$ 70 95 0.142
2016 2805 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT‐to‐WEST WELLBURN LIMIT SSTplus 7,573$ 65 95 0.204
2016 4750 MINNIE STREET ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐HARRIS STREET SSTplus 2,383$ 70 95 0.071
2016 4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐28‐ THORNDALE ROAD SSTplus 76,588$ 70 95 2.015
1,486,680$
Page 3 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2017 4710 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐CLARA STREET CRK 440$ 82.4 82.4 2 0.22
2017 3830 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CHARLES STREET CRK 332$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.166
2017 3840 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) CHARLES STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET CRK 234$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.117
2017 4690 EVA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END CRK 444$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.222
2017 4890 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END CRK 144$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.072
2017 4920 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END CRK 178$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.089
2017 4700 MINNIE STREET ( to ) WEST END‐to‐MINNIE STREET CRK 90$ 89.73 89.73 2 0.045
2017 5550 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) THE PARKWAY‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 374$ 89.73 89.73 2 0.187
2017 5360 QUEEN STREET ( to ) GEORGE STREET‐to‐BRIDGE STREET CRK 244$ 94.55 94.55 2 0.122
2017 5990 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE CRK 204$ 97 97 2 0.102
2017 1920 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE‐to‐EAST END CRK 400$ 89.84 89.84 2 0.2
2017 4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT CRK 783$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.783
2017 4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE CRK 2,303$ 83.76 83.76 2 2.303
2017 6000 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 220$ 97 97 2 0.11
2017 4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐WYTON DRIVE CRK 3,082$ 89.73 89.73 2 3.082
2017 4470 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐MARION STREET CRK 63$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.063
2017 4480 HUNT ROAD ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 42$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.042
2017 1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 160$ 87.88 87.88 2 0.08
2017 4420 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) 78M NORTH OF 2‐DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐DUNDAS STREE CRK 78$ 94.55 94.55 2 0.078
2017 3450 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 350M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐28‐ THORNDALE ROAD CRK 700$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.35
2017 370 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐22M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 44$ 89.73 89.73 2 0.022
2017 3190 REBECCA ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE ‐ WEST LEG‐to‐WYTON DRIVE ‐ EAST LEG CRK 334$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.167
2017 3200 REBECCA ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE ‐ EAST LEG‐to‐SCATCHERED LANE CRK 268$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.134
2017 2730 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD CRK 98$ 83.76 83.76 2 0.049
2017 4240 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 80$ 89.73 89.73 2 0.04
2017 4830 THAMES STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐CHARLES STREET CRK 232$ 89.73 89.73 2 0.116
2017 4850 HILL STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐CHARLES STREET CRK 230$ 89.73 89.73 2 0.115
2017 4800 CHARLES STREET ( to ) THAMES STREET‐to‐HILL STREET CRK 226$ 89.73 89.73 2 0.113
2017 3960 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE CRK 202$ 94.55 94.55 2 0.101
2017 6620 AGNES STREET ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET‐to‐MAIN STREET CRK 214$ 94.55 94.55 2 0.107
2017 1390 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 13,647$ 57.75 77.75 0.729
2017 1430 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐MOUNT ELGIN DRIVE GRR2 16,885$ 57.75 77.75 0.902
2017 790 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 379M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 69,886$ 57.75 77.75 2.074
2017 560 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 85,820$ 57.75 77.75 2.445
Page 4 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2017 630 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) FORBES ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 18,215$ 57.75 77.75 0.556
2017 430 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 9,023$ 57.75 77.75 0.241
2017 4460 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (P GRR2plus 45,708$ 57.75 77.75 1.289
2017 5090 MILL ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MILL ROAD MICRO 8,313$ 73.76 73.76 3 0.261
2017 5180 MILL ROAD ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK MICRO 12,995$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.408
2017 5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐OAKWOOD PLACE MICRO 6,923$ 73.76 73.76 3 0.23
2017 5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT‐to‐BYRON AVENUE MICRO 3,532$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.116
2017 4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐WEST END MICRO 1,488$ 74.48 74.48 3 0.05
2017 6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐END OF STREET MICRO 2,318$ 79.27 79.27 3 0.077
2017 1060 BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE PR2 205,859$ 34.13 100 0.811
2017 4660 CLARA STREET ( to ) EVA STREET‐to‐IDA STREET R1urban 60,507$ 59.1 97 0.181
2017 5150 TINER AVENUE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK R1urban 86,613$ 64.32 97 0.257
2017 5160 TINER AVENUE ( to ) TINER WALK‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE R1urban 99,482$ 64.32 97 0.302
2017 5330 PONDVIEW COURT ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐SOUTH END R2urban 175,071$ 48.82 100 0.387
2017 4680 IDA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END R2urban 69,243$ 53.91 100 0.149
2017 1860 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) WRIGHT STREET‐to‐35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET RNS 31,271$ 5 100 0.035
2017 6660 PARK LANE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD RNS 180,479$ 10 100 0.202
2017 4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT SST 9,725$ 77.27 95 0.842
2017 4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 19,808$ 77.27 95 1.715
2017 4450 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD SST 535$ 77.27 95 0.054
2017 2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FIFTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐EBENEZER DRIVE SST 10,106$ 77.27 95 0.875
2017 980 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) IRWIN ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SST 18,291$ 73.27 95 0.749
2017 530 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 33,703$ 77.27 95 1.459
2017 970 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐IRWIN ROAD SST 30,159$ 77.27 95 1.235
2017 520 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 45,614$ 77.27 95 1.843
2017 930 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐EATON ROAD SST 30,542$ 77.27 95 1.234
2017 1240 BREEN ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 4,555$ 77.27 95 0.203
2017 990 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 18,657$ 77.27 95 0.764
2017 5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER AVENUE SST 2,657$ 77.26 95 0.115
2017 5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD SST 3,026$ 77.26 95 0.131
2017 1700 EATON ROAD ( to ) 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE SST 665$ 77.27 95 0.031
2017 3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT‐to‐WYTON DRIVE SST 42,781$ 77.27 95 1.852
1,486,545$
Page 5 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2018 5150 TINER AVENUE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK CRK 514$ 97 97 2 0.257
2018 4660 CLARA STREET ( to ) EVA STREET‐to‐IDA STREET CRK 362$ 97 97 2 0.181
2018 5160 TINER AVENUE ( to ) TINER WALK‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE CRK 604$ 97 97 2 0.302
2018 1600 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRIV CRK 78$ 94.55 94.55 2 0.039
2018 1560 IRWIN ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRI CRK 66$ 94.55 94.55 2 0.033
2018 4520 HUNT ROAD ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐SOUTH END GRR2 15,304$ 65.7 85.7 1.09
2018 1400 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 6,337$ 65.7 85.7 0.371
2018 270 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 17M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 72,138$ 65.7 85.7 2.569
2018 3250 NISSOURI ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐NORTH END GRR2 48,550$ 65.7 85.7 1.596
2018 810 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 20,757$ 65.7 85.7 0.672
2018 1730 BRADY ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 6,486$ 65.7 85.7 0.21
2018 750 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 12,323$ 65.7 85.7 0.393
2018 760 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐340M WEST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 34,962$ 65.7 85.7 1.115
2018 1530 FORBES ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2 47,692$ 65.7 85.7 1.521
2018 1650 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 19,127$ 65.7 85.7 0.61
2018 210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 412M EAST OF 73 ‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BOT ROAD GRR2 45,381$ 65.7 85.7 1.426
2018 720 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 43,702$ 65.7 85.7 1.334
2018 800 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 17,810$ 65.7 85.7 0.536
2018 1940 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐39M NORTH GRR2 75,048$ 65.7 85.7 2.167
2018 1540 FORBES ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 40,448$ 65.7 85.7 1.271
2018 2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD‐to‐VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR2 43,408$ 65.7 85.7 1.364
2018 280 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 8,419$ 65.7 85.7 0.257
2018 710 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 62,801$ 65.7 85.7 1.917
2018 1180 CASHEL LANE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2 3,669$ 65.7 85.7 0.112
2018 1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐BREEN ROAD GRR2 58,107$ 65.7 85.7 1.552
2018 2700 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 14,826$ 65.7 85.7 0.396
2018 4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 31,411$ 65.7 85.7 0.907
2018 410 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) MARR ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 19,469$ 54.27 74.27 0.52
2018 5250 CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐EAST END MICRO 4,770$ 76.91 76.91 3 0.177
2018 6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE MICRO 6,893$ 72 72 3 0.229
2018 3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET‐to‐MONTEITH AVENUE PR2 36,637$ 27.75 100 0.161
2018 3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐34M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD (P PR2 7,473$ 20 100 0.034
2018 2020 MARION STREET ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐LUDWIG STREET R1rural 27,922$ 51.19 97 0.193
2018 890 GUEST LANE ( to ) HILLVIEW DRIVE‐to‐EAST END R1urban 51,769$ 65.65 97 0.156
Page 6 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2018 4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐VILLAGE GATE DRIVE R1urban 97,764$ 66.91 97 0.299
2018 5200 TINER WALK ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD R1urban 29,318$ 66.91 97 0.089
2018 5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE R1urban 54,682$ 66.91 97 0.166
2018 4880 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban 47,123$ 66.91 97 0.142
2018 4910 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban 46,791$ 66.91 97 0.141
2018 870 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐GUEST LANE SST 5,541$ 77.27 95 0.193
2018 2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER DRIVE‐to‐FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 5,983$ 77.27 95 0.518
2018 2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐SIXTEEN MILE ROAD SST 10,626$ 77.27 95 0.92
2018 2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) SIXTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐FIFTEEN MILE ROAD SST 18,838$ 77.27 95 1.631
2018 2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 5,094$ 77.27 95 0.441
2018 2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐THIRTEEN MILE ROAD SST 11,076$ 77.27 95 0.959
2018 2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) THIRTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD SST 15,050$ 77.27 95 1.303
2018 460 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD SST 15,325$ 77.27 95 0.774
2018 940 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) EATON ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 14,726$ 77.27 95 0.595
2018 1754 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐THOMPSON DRIVE SST 36,525$ 77.27 95 1.419
2018 1000 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 7,531$ 77.27 95 0.326
2018 450 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 50,037$ 77.27 95 2.049
2018 5470 ALMA STREET ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 2,069$ 77.26 95 0.114
2018 5480 ALMA STREET ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐THAMES CRESCENT SST 2,051$ 77.26 95 0.113
2018 1960 STARDUST DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY SST 14,137$ 77.26 95 0.612
2018 320 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐DORCHESTER SST 11,033$ 77.26 95 0.499
2018 1995 LANES ROAD ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END SST 4,196$ 77.26 95 0.187
2018 1610 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANG SST 1,030$ 77.27 95 0.052
2018 680 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHES SST 29,486$ 77.27 95 1.314
2018 3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐RIVERVIEW DRIVE SST 7,088$ 77.27 95 0.358
2018 3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) RIVERVIEW DRIVE‐to‐WYE CREEK DRIVE SST 5,564$ 77.27 95 0.281
2018 1710 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE SST 873$ 77.27 95 0.042
2018 1750 BRADY ROAD ( to ) 30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE SST 673$ 77.27 95 0.03
2018 2740 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) PROSPECT HILL ROAD‐to‐57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD SST 1,279$ 77.27 95 0.057
2018 2510 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD SST 32,479$ 77.27 95 1.406
2018 4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK‐to‐DUNDAS STREET SST 16,133$ 77.27 95 0.679
1,485,384$
Page 7 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2019 440 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PUTNAM ROAD BS 11,954$ 10 95 0.063
2019 4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐VILLAGE GATE DRIVE CRK 598$ 97 97 2 0.299
2019 4880 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE CRK 284$ 97 97 2 0.142
2019 4910 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE CRK 282$ 97 97 2 0.141
2019 5200 TINER WALK ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD CRK 178$ 97 97 2 0.089
2019 5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE CRK 332$ 97 97 2 0.166
2019 1270 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FIVE POINTS ROAD GRR2 46,837$ 51.07 71.07 1.251
2019 1280 BREEN ROAD ( to ) FIVE POINTS ROAD‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 33,396$ 51.07 71.07 0.892
2019 2550 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,006$ 51.07 71.07 1.395
2019 2640 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 38M EAST OF 27‐ OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD GRR2 47,666$ 61.55 81.55 1.358
2019 2690 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,245$ 61.55 81.55 1.346
2019 3640 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) GREGORY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT AT #23124 GRR2 86,171$ 61.55 81.55 2.455
2019 4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 58,011$ 61.55 81.55 1.631
2019 610 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 370M EASTOF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 28,607$ 51.07 71.07 0.815
2019 620 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐FORBES ROAD GRR2 23,201$ 51.07 71.07 0.661
2019 1680 BOT ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐PAVEMENT CHANGE GRR2plus 42,857$ 51.07 71.07 1.294
2019 2580 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD GRR2plus 37,082$ 51.07 71.07 0.981
2019 6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 2,137$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.071
2019 3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE MICRO 924$ 79.27 79.27 3 0.04
2019 6470 HARRISON STREET ( to ) KING STREET LOOP‐to‐CUL‐DE‐SAC PR2 45,861$ 20 100 0.193
2019 2470 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD PR2 336,118$ 26.29 100 1.411
2019 4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1 102,015$ 69.47 97 0.312
2019 4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1urban 85,442$ 64.32 97 0.235
2019 4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE ( to ) ERIC DRIVE‐to‐MELVIN DRIVE R1urban 69,081$ 64.32 97 0.19
2019 5520 CARLETON COURT ( to ) THE PARKWAY‐to‐CARLETON COURT R1urban 116,347$ 64.32 97 0.32
2019 1840 WRIGHT STREET ( to ) 100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET‐to‐GOLF DRIVE RNS 208,176$ 15 100 0.233
2019 880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE‐to‐EAST END SST 8,556$ 77.27 95 0.298
1,486,364$
Page 8 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2020 4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐49M SOUTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVM BS 13,086$ 5 95 0.049
2020 3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)‐to‐28‐ THORND BS 12,472$ 5 95 0.044
2020 4960 NEWTON AVENUE ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐LUDWIG STREET CRK 402$ 97 97 2 0.201
2020 4970 NEWTON AVENUE ( to ) LUDWIG STREET‐to‐HAMILTON CRESCENT CRK 530$ 97 97 2 0.265
2020 4990 LUDWIG STREET ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐NEWTON AVENUE CRK 544$ 97 97 2 0.272
2020 6750 IDEAL DRIVE ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 564$ 97 97 2 0.282
2020 4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT CRK 470$ 97 97 2 0.235
2020 4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE ( to ) ERIC DRIVE‐to‐MELVIN DRIVE CRK 380$ 97 97 2 0.19
2020 5520 CARLETON COURT ( to ) THE PARKWAY‐to‐CARLETON COURT CRK 640$ 97 97 2 0.32
2020 5880 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ( to ) RINESS DRIVE‐to‐LACROIX AVENUE CRK 428$ 97 97 2 0.214
2020 1850 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐WRIGHT STREET CRK 810$ 97 97 2 0.405
2020 4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT CRK 624$ 97 97 2 0.312
2020 5350 QUEEN STREET ( to ) PONDVIEW COURT‐to‐GEORGE STREET CRK 262$ 97 97 2 0.131
2020 5890 LACROIX AVENUE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE CRK 208$ 97 97 2 0.104
2020 5910 RINESS DRIVE ( to ) LACROIX AVENUE‐to‐OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 284$ 97 97 2 0.142
2020 6120 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 360$ 97 97 2 0.18
2020 6280 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐LEESBORO TRAIL CRK 266$ 97 97 2 0.133
2020 6290 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) LEESBORO TRAIL‐to‐BROOKER TRAIL CRK 618$ 97 97 2 0.309
2020 6320 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) BROOKER TRAIL‐to‐SLAMMER TRAIL CRK 582$ 97 97 2 0.291
2020 6360 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) SLAMMER TRAIL‐to‐BROOKER TRAIL CRK 252$ 97 97 2 0.126
2020 6370 SLAMMER TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL‐to‐ELLIOTT TRAIL CRK 406$ 97 97 2 0.203
2020 6380 LEESBORO TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL‐to‐WILLIAM COURT CRK 500$ 97 97 2 0.25
2020 6390 LEESBORO TRAIL ( to ) WILLIAM COURT‐to‐UNNAMED STREET CRK 356$ 97 97 2 0.178
2020 6450 WILLIAM COURT ( to ) LEESBORO TRAIL‐to‐WEST END CRK 122$ 97 97 2 0.061
2020 6690 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐HUESTON DRIVE CRK 294$ 97 97 2 0.147
2020 6700 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) HUESTON DRIVE‐to‐COUNTRYSIDE LANE CRK 524$ 97 97 2 0.262
2020 6710 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE‐to‐HUESTON DRIVE CRK 230$ 97 97 2 0.115
2020 6720 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) HUESTON DRIVE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD CRK 166$ 97 97 2 0.083
2020 6730 HUESTON DRIVE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐MONTEITH AVENUE CRK 786$ 97 97 2 0.393
2020 2280 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 21M WEST OF 32‐ SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐32‐ SHAW ROAD CRK 42$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.021
2020 4980 HAMILTON CRESCENT ( to ) NEWTON AVENUE‐to‐MARION STREET CRK 652$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.326
2020 2860 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐33M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 33$ 97 97 2 0.033
2020 1250 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACK CRK 38$ 97 97 2 0.019
2020 1295 COUCH ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐401M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (BEND IN R CRK 738$ 97 97 2 0.369
Page 9 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2020 1260 BREEN ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 1,130$ 97 97 2 0.565
2020 1020 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐62M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANG CRK 124$ 97 97 2 0.062
2020 2830 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 475M EAST OF 27‐WELLBURN ROAD‐to‐CHERRY HILL ROAD CRK 1,846$ 97 97 2 0.923
2020 3480 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐PARK LANE CRK 280$ 97 97 2 0.14
2020 2300 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐RICHMOND STREET CRK 3,656$ 97 97 2 1.828
2020 2688 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 94$ 97 97 2 0.047
2020 3100 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐41M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 82$ 97 97 2 0.041
2020 1190 CASHEL LANE ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 66$ 97 97 2 0.033
2020 590 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 441M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD CRK 882$ 97 97 2 0.441
2020 1930 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT C CRK 140$ 97 97 2 0.07
2020 2240 LOWER COW PATH ( to ) 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON R CRK 34$ 97 97 2 0.017
2020 4790 CHARLES STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐THAMES STREET CRK 198$ 97 97 2 0.099
2020 250 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 15M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐PUTNAM ROAD CRK 30$ 97 97 2 0.015
2020 260 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐17M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 34$ 97 97 2 0.017
2020 2330 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANG CRK 54$ 97 97 2 0.027
2020 4230 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE CRK 68$ 97 97 2 0.034
2020 2190 COW PATH ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐44M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 88$ 97 97 2 0.044
2020 2430 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD CRK 2,784$ 97 97 2 1.392
2020 360 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 23M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD CRK 46$ 97 97 2 0.023
2020 2630 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐38M EAST OF 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD CRK 76$ 97 97 2 0.038
2020 2825 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) EAST WELLBURN LIMIT‐to‐475M EAST OF 27‐WELLBURN ROAD CRK 510$ 97 97 2 0.255
2020 770 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 340M WEST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD CRK 680$ 97 97 2 0.34
2020 2820 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ WELLBURN ROAD‐to‐EAST WELLBURN LIMIT CRK 440$ 97 97 2 0.22
2020 3600 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐39M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 78$ 97 97 2 0.039
2020 5290 GEORGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐MAPLE CRESCENT CRK 178$ 97 97 2 0.089
2020 6740 BOT ROAD ( to ) 12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐AVON DRIVE CRK 24$ 97 97 2 0.012
2020 1880 FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐76M SOUTH OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT C CRK 152$ 97 97 2 0.076
2020 3490 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) PARK LANE‐to‐MEADOWBROOK LANE CRK 280$ 97 97 2 0.14
2020 4070 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 88$ 97 97 2 0.044
2020 200 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐412M EAST OF 73 ‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 824$ 97 97 2 0.412
2020 6530 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD‐to‐LIONS LANE CRK 304$ 97 97 2 0.152
2020 6540 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) LIONS LANE‐to‐MARIA STREET CRK 282$ 97 97 2 0.141
2020 6550 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) MARIA STREET‐to‐AGNES STREET CRK 256$ 97 97 2 0.128
2020 6560 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) AGNES STREET‐to‐RAILWAY STREET CRK 220$ 97 97 2 0.11
Page 10 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2020 6610 AGNES STREET ( to ) KING STREET‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK 258$ 97 97 2 0.129
2020 6630 AGNES STREET ( to ) MAIN STREET‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 142$ 97 97 2 0.071
2020 1490 FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) ROBINSON ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS CRK 146$ 97 97 2 0.073
2020 6570 LIONS LANE ( to ) KING STREET‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK 260$ 97 97 2 0.13
2020 6580 MARIA STREET ( to ) KING STREET‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK 260$ 97 97 2 0.13
2020 1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 86$ 97 97 2 0.043
2020 3290 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐37M SOUTH OF HY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 74$ 97 97 2 0.037
2020 4030 BANKS ROAD ( to ) 2‐ DUNDAS STREET‐to‐27M SOUTH OF 2‐ DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHAN CRK 54$ 97 97 2 0.027
2020 5310 MAPLE CRESCENT ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐GEORGE STREET CRK 386$ 97 97 2 0.193
2020 6590 MAIN STREET ( to ) WEST END‐to‐RAILWAY STREET CRK 82$ 97 97 2 0.041
2020 6600 MAIN STREET ( to ) RAILWAY STREET‐to‐AGNES STREET CRK 308$ 97 97 2 0.154
2020 640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 13,137$ 65.7 85.7 0.401
2020 3110 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐EBENEZER DRIVE GRR2 135,292$ 57.75 77.75 3.401
2020 340 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 32,292$ 48.15 68.15 0.92
2020 5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE MICRO 3,853$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.128
2020 4710 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐CLARA STREET MICRO 6,699$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.22
2020 5130 WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE MICRO 12,995$ 72 72 3 0.408
2020 5260 ELIZABETH STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD MICRO 3,010$ 72 72 3 0.1
2020 5390 QUEEN STREET ( to ) ANN STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH STREET MICRO 4,244$ 72 72 3 0.141
2020 6250 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL COURT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MICRO 3,040$ 72 72 3 0.101
2020 6260 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MICRO 2,769$ 72 72 3 0.092
2020 4780 MINNIE STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐CATHERINE STREET MICRO 982$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.033
2020 2460 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CHERRY HILL ROAD PR2 247,631$ 29.36 100 1.107
2020 2450 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐CULVERT PR2 63,222$ 24.98 100 0.29
2020 1050 BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PR2 20,194$ 43.36 100 0.091
2020 3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MEADOWBROOK LANE‐to‐ CULVERT PR2 21,541$ 24.98 100 0.098
2020 1220 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD R1rural 14,519$ 61.71 97 0.112
2020 2140 MARION STREET ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE R1rural 92,739$ 61.71 97 0.689
2020 6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) PARK LANE‐to‐MEADOWBROOK LANE RNS 78,624$ 20 100 0.088
2020 6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐PARK LANE RNS 125,978$ 22.73 100 0.141
2020 4410 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐78M NORTH OF 2‐DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE) SST 5,891$ 77.27 95 0.51
2020 1090 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) FERRAR ROAD‐to‐HUDSON DRIVE SST 16,484$ 77.27 95 0.675
2020 1100 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE‐to‐HARRIS ROAD SST 9,182$ 77.27 95 0.376
2020 1120 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE‐to‐80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER RO SST 15,873$ 77.27 95 0.65
Page 11 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2020 5230 MILL ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE‐to‐DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST 31,639$ 77.27 95 1.475
2020 540 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 8,940$ 77.27 95 0.387
2020 2130 MARION STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 48,926$ 77.27 95 2.118
2020 2170 CATHERINE STREET ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 33,380$ 77.27 95 1.445
2020 2180 CATHERINE STREET ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐HUNT ROAD EAST LEG SST 30,353$ 77.27 95 1.314
2020 500 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐CULVERT ‐ 822M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHE SST 19,259$ 77.27 95 0.822
2020 1756 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE SST 27,968$ 77.27 95 1.13
2020 1757 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST 25,740$ 77.27 95 1.04
2020 1080 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐FERRAR ROAD SST 39,389$ 77.27 95 1.613
2020 1110 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) HARRIS ROAD‐to‐298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE SST 11,331$ 77.27 95 0.464
2020 510 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT ‐ 822M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐DORCHESTER SST 67,432$ 77.27 95 2.878
2020 1755 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) THOMPSON DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT SST 4,554$ 77.27 95 0.184
2020 5450 TERRENCE AVENUE ( to ) THAMES CRESCENT‐to‐ALMA STREET SST 3,684$ 77.26 95 0.203
2020 5460 TERRENCE AVENUE ( to ) ALMA STREET‐to‐THAMES CRESCENT SST 3,104$ 77.26 95 0.171
2020 5420 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐ALMA STREET SST 5,770$ 77.26 95 0.269
2020 5430 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) ALMA STREET‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 5,191$ 77.26 95 0.242
2020 330 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR SST 6,039$ 77.26 95 0.305
2020 1910 HUDSON DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY SST 12,503$ 77.26 95 0.512
2020 5440 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD SST 2,599$ 77.26 95 0.125
2020 5410 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 2,467$ 77.26 95 0.115
2020 120 WHITTAKER LANE ( to ) AVON DRIVE‐to‐CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE SST 10,217$ 77.27 95 0.516
2020 290 SCOTLAND DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST 47,678$ 77.27 95 2.408
2020 3430 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BRIDGE SST 13,464$ 77.27 95 0.6
2020 3435 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐BRIDGE SST 10,547$ 77.27 95 0.47
2020 740 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐DORCHESTER SST 832$ 77.27 95 0.042
2020 2520 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD‐to‐70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) SST 1,386$ 77.27 95 0.07
2020 3660 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐51M SOUTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVM SST 1,010$ 77.27 95 0.051
2020 2335 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐91M EAST OF RIC SST 1,373$ 77.27 95 0.064
2020 660 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY SST 21,789$ 77.27 95 0.971
2020 2590 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST 853$ 77.27 95 0.038
1,486,361$
Page 12 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2021 2020 MARION STREET ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐LUDWIG STREET CRK 386$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.193
2021 2140 MARION STREET ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE CRK 1,378$ 97 97 2 0.689
2021 1220 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 224$ 97 97 2 0.112
2021 3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)‐to‐28‐ THORND CRK 88$ 95 95 2 0.044
2021 1890 FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 76M SOUTH OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐33M NORTH GRR2 70,422$ 65.7 85.7 2.315
2021 1640 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 15,244$ 65.7 85.7 0.479
2021 4460 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (P GRR2 42,228$ 65.7 85.7 1.289
2021 790 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 379M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 69,886$ 65.7 85.7 2.074
2021 3620 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 66,210$ 65.7 85.7 1.938
2021 560 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 85,820$ 65.7 85.7 2.445
2021 3610 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 18,708$ 65.7 85.7 0.533
2021 220 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) BOT ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 20,115$ 65.7 85.7 0.614
2021 630 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) FORBES ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 18,215$ 65.7 85.7 0.556
2021 730 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 10,713$ 65.7 85.7 0.327
2021 1630 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 6,192$ 65.7 85.7 0.189
2021 2680 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 13,726$ 65.7 85.7 0.419
2021 2340 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BANKS ROAD GRR2 63,736$ 65.7 85.7 1.746
2021 2660 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 8,805$ 65.7 85.7 0.265
2021 2670 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACK GRR2 20,668$ 65.7 85.7 0.622
2021 410 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) MARR ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 19,469$ 65.7 85.7 0.52
2021 430 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 9,023$ 65.7 85.7 0.241
2021 1390 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 27,294$ 65.7 85.7 0.729
2021 3310 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) STOREY DRIVE‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 22,539$ 65.7 85.7 0.602
2021 3360 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD GRR2 19,678$ 65.7 85.7 0.584
2021 3900 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) GRR2 88,695$ 65.7 85.7 2.369
2021 3300 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐STOREY GRR2 32,620$ 65.7 85.7 0.85
2021 2350 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) BANKS ROAD‐to‐17M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD GRR2 30,958$ 65.7 85.7 0.882
2021 3390 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 21M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 29,278$ 65.7 85.7 0.782
2021 5570 PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE MICRO 3,070$ 74.48 74.48 3 0.102
2021 4480 HUNT ROAD ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE) MICRO 404$ 79.27 79.27 3 0.042
2021 4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT R1 69,541$ 69.47 97 1.072
2021 5090 MILL ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MILL ROAD R1 91,219$ 70.84 97 0.261
2021 4650 CLARA STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐EVA STREET R1 56,496$ 69.47 97 0.169
2021 5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐OAKWOOD PLACE R1 75,765$ 70.84 97 0.23
Page 13 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2021 5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT R1 29,867$ 70.84 97 0.09
2021 5830 MITCHELL AVENUE ( to ) SCARLETT CIRCLE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT RNS 181,372$ 22.17 100 0.203
2021 5650 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD SST 3,991$ 77.27 95 0.139
2021 5630 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) CANTERBURY DRIVE‐to‐OAKWOOD DRIVE SST 7,761$ 77.27 95 0.201
2021 3780 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐MARION STREET SST 33,365$ 77.27 95 1.385
2021 3800 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 9,955$ 77.27 95 0.419
2021 3770 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) TRAFALGAR STREET‐to‐25‐ GORE ROAD SST 32,779$ 77.27 95 1.419
2021 3760 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) 2‐ DUNDAS STREET‐to‐TRAFALGAR STREET SST 32,741$ 77.27 95 1.378
2021 600 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐370M EASTOF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 8,181$ 77.26 95 0.37
2021 5225 MILL ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE SST 5,775$ 77.27 95 0.25
2021 2480 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) LAKESIDE DRIVE‐to‐REBECCA ROAD SST 31,506$ 77.27 95 1.404
1,486,106$
Page 14 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2022 4650 CLARA STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐EVA STREET CRK 338$ 97 97 2 0.169
2022 4680 IDA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END CRK 298$ 97 97 2 0.149
2022 5330 PONDVIEW COURT ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 774$ 97 97 2 0.387
2022 6660 PARK LANE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD CRK 404$ 97 97 2 0.202
2022 4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐49M SOUTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVM CRK 98$ 94.55 94.55 2 0.049
2022 4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT CRK 2,144$ 97 97 2 1.072
2022 1680 BOT ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐PAVEMENT CHANGE GRR2 39,363$ 65.7 85.7 1.294
2022 2580 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD GRR2 34,433$ 65.7 85.7 0.981
2022 1270 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FIVE POINTS ROAD GRR2 46,837$ 65.7 85.7 1.251
2022 1280 BREEN ROAD ( to ) FIVE POINTS ROAD‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 33,396$ 65.7 85.7 0.892
2022 2550 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,006$ 65.7 85.7 1.395
2022 340 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 32,292$ 65.7 85.7 0.92
2022 610 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 370M EASTOF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 28,607$ 65.7 85.7 0.815
2022 620 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐FORBES ROAD GRR2 23,201$ 65.7 85.7 0.661
2022 3630 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 30,925$ 61.55 81.55 0.826
2022 5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE MICRO 8,970$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.298
2022 5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE MICRO 3,010$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.1
2022 4760 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK MICRO 1,218$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.04
2022 5190 MILL ROAD ( to ) TINER WALK‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE MICRO 10,686$ 66.91 66.91 3 0.355
2022 6040 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT ( to ) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N)‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) MICRO 11,498$ 66.91 66.91 3 0.382
2022 6050 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT ( to ) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)‐to‐FOREST GROVE LANE MICRO 13,274$ 66.91 66.91 3 0.441
2022 5400 QUEEN STREET ( to ) ELIZABETH STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD MICRO 5,481$ 66.91 66.91 3 0.18
2022 4470 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐MARION STREET MICRO 662$ 76.91 76.91 3 0.063
2022 2070 MARION STREET ( to ) MELVIN DRIVE‐to‐LINWOOD DRIVE PR2 20,960$ 26.08 100 0.085
2022 4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐WEST END R1 16,349$ 69.47 97 0.05
2022 6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE R1 75,435$ 69.47 97 0.229
2022 690 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE R1rural 8,553$ 56.5 97 0.065
2022 5530 CARLETON COURT ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐NORTH END R1urban 28,427$ 56.5 97 0.032
2022 5640 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT SST 8,355$ 77.27 95 0.291
2022 6365 BROOKER TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL‐to‐KING STREET SST 9,962$ 77.27 95 0.347
2022 1870 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET‐to‐CUL‐DE‐SAC SST 3,253$ 77.27 95 0.106
2022 1375 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD‐to‐SALFORD ROAD SST 3,564$ 77.27 95 0.3
2022 1380 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) SALFORD RD‐to‐250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD SST 3,094$ 77.27 95 0.25
2022 490 WESTMINSTER DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST 53,595$ 77.27 95 2.424
Page 15 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2022 140 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐SHAIN ROAD SST 55,315$ 77.27 95 2.465
2022 30 AVON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 35,620$ 77.27 95 1.542
2022 40 AVON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SST 11,781$ 77.27 95 0.51
2022 50 AVON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 73,620$ 77.27 95 3.187
2022 1230 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 37,861$ 77.27 95 1.639
2022 2110 MARION STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHA SST 7,993$ 77.27 95 0.346
2022 2120 MARION STREET ( to ) 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)‐to‐CLARA STREET SST 13,283$ 77.27 95 0.575
2022 150 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) SHAIN ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 19,721$ 77.27 95 0.83
2022 960 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD SST 58,260$ 77.27 95 2.452
2022 1759 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST 12,994$ 77.27 95 0.525
2022 2270 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐21M WEST OF 32‐ SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHA SST 43,883$ 77.27 95 1.797
2022 5 AVON DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT (BRIDGE) SST 3,280$ 77.27 95 0.142
2022 160 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 9,517$ 77.27 95 0.412
2022 170 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT ‐ 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD SST 50,012$ 77.27 95 2.165
2022 180 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT ‐ 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT ‐ 2900M EA SST 17,025$ 77.27 95 0.737
2022 190 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT ‐ 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 18,272$ 77.27 95 0.791
2022 950 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 45,738$ 77.27 95 1.848
2022 1758 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) 300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 15,444$ 77.27 95 0.624
2022 4750 MINNIE STREET ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐HARRIS STREET SST 1,406$ 77.26 95 0.071
2022 1920 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE‐to‐EAST END SST 4,884$ 77.26 95 0.2
2022 5040 CARL STREET ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET SST 1,435$ 77.26 95 0.069
2022 5070 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,402$ 77.26 95 0.112
2022 5010 ROSS STREET ( to ) PATRICIA AVENUE‐to‐DAVID STREET SST 2,526$ 77.26 95 0.116
2022 5020 ROSS STREET ( to ) DAVID STREET‐to‐RUTH STREET SST 4,487$ 77.26 95 0.206
2022 5030 ROSS STREET ( to ) RUTH STREET‐to‐CARL STREET SST 4,116$ 77.26 95 0.189
2022 5050 RUTH STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,483$ 77.26 95 0.114
2022 5060 DAVID STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 4,443$ 77.26 95 0.204
2022 5080 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 3,006$ 77.26 95 0.138
2022 1980 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) STARDUST DRIVE‐to‐STARLIGHT LANE SST 3,742$ 77.26 95 0.162
2022 1990 STARLIGHT LANE ( to ) MOONLIGHT WAY‐to‐NORTH END SST 7,531$ 77.26 95 0.326
2022 1757A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST 9,900$ 77.26 95 0.4
2022 1758A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE SST 7,425$ 77.26 95 0.3
2022 900 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 82,534$ 77.27 95 3.678
2022 4570 HARRIS STREET ( to ) 49‐ CATHERINE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 3,770$ 77.27 95 0.168
Page 16 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2022 5370 QUEEN STREET ( to ) BRIDGE STREET‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 6,816$ 77.26 95 0.243
2022 1900 FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST 632$ 77.27 95 0.033
2022 700 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (P SST 1,307$ 77.27 95 0.066
2022 1790 SHAIN ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST 337$ 77.27 95 0.017
2022 2805 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT‐to‐WEST WELLBURN LIMIT SST 4,578$ 77.27 95 0.204
2022 3530 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE SST 69,609$ 77.27 95 3.102
2022 3570 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐2‐ DUNDAS STREET SST 39,893$ 77.27 95 1.752
2022 4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐28‐ THORNDALE ROAD SST 46,547$ 77.27 95 2.015
2022 2850 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST 33,100$ 77.27 95 1.374
2022 1760 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST 446$ 77.27 95 0.018
2022 1950 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST 991$ 77.27 95 0.039
1,486,427$
Page 17 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2023 5530 CARLETON COURT ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐NORTH END CRK 64$ 97 97 2 0.032
2023 4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐WEST END CRK 100$ 97 97 2 0.05
2023 6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 458$ 97 97 2 0.229
2023 3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET‐to‐MONTEITH AVENUE CRK 322$ 97 97 2 0.161
2023 690 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE CRK 130$ 97 97 2 0.065
2023 3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐34M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD (P CRK 68$ 97 97 2 0.034
2023 270 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 17M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 72,138$ 65.7 85.7 2.569
2023 1800 SHAIN ROAD ( to ) 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END GRR2 18,224$ 65.7 85.7 0.649
2023 4520 HUNT ROAD ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐SOUTH END GRR2 30,607$ 65.7 85.7 1.09
2023 3250 NISSOURI ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐NORTH END GRR2 48,550$ 65.7 85.7 1.596
2023 810 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 20,757$ 65.7 85.7 0.672
2023 1730 BRADY ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 6,486$ 65.7 85.7 0.21
2023 1740 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 32,587$ 65.7 85.7 1.055
2023 750 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 12,323$ 65.7 85.7 0.393
2023 760 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐340M WEST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 34,962$ 65.7 85.7 1.115
2023 1530 FORBES ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2 47,692$ 65.7 85.7 1.521
2023 1650 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 19,127$ 65.7 85.7 0.61
2023 210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 412M EAST OF 73 ‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BOT ROAD GRR2 45,381$ 65.7 85.7 1.426
2023 580 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LACEY LANE‐to‐441M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD GRR2 45,635$ 65.7 85.7 1.393
2023 720 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 43,702$ 65.7 85.7 1.334
2023 800 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 17,810$ 65.7 85.7 0.536
2023 1400 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 12,675$ 65.7 85.7 0.371
2023 3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) CENTRE DRIVE‐to‐THORNDALE ROAD GRR2 106,660$ 65.7 85.7 3.122
2023 1690 EATON ROAD ( to ) NORTH END‐to‐31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 19,104$ 65.7 85.7 0.628
2023 1940 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐39M NORTH GRR2 75,048$ 65.7 85.7 2.167
2023 350 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐23M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 85,153$ 65.7 85.7 2.426
2023 570 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐LACEY LANE GRR2 43,454$ 65.7 85.7 1.238
2023 820 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 58,582$ 65.7 85.7 1.669
2023 2390 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 18M EAST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐HUNT ROAD GRR2 96,420$ 65.7 85.7 2.747
2023 860 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 128M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FORBES ROAD GRR2 53,525$ 65.7 85.7 1.707
2023 1540 FORBES ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 40,448$ 65.7 85.7 1.271
2023 2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD‐to‐VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR2 43,408$ 65.7 85.7 1.364
2023 280 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 8,419$ 65.7 85.7 0.257
2023 1180 CASHEL LANE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2 3,669$ 65.7 85.7 0.112
Page 18 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2023 1370 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) BREEN ROAD‐to‐300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD GRR2 7,757$ 65.7 85.7 0.195
2023 6760 GERALD PARKWAY ( to ) WEST END‐to‐27‐ NISSOURI ROAD SST 23,509$ 77.27 95 0.685
2023 530 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 33,703$ 77.27 95 1.459
2023 970 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐IRWIN ROAD SST 30,159$ 77.27 95 1.235
2023 980 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) IRWIN ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SST 18,291$ 77.27 95 0.749
2023 520 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 45,614$ 77.27 95 1.843
2023 930 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐EATON ROAD SST 30,542$ 77.27 95 1.234
2023 1240 BREEN ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 4,555$ 77.27 95 0.203
2023 990 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 18,657$ 77.27 95 0.764
2023 5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER AVENUE SST 2,657$ 77.26 95 0.115
2023 5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD SST 3,026$ 77.26 95 0.131
2023 1700 EATON ROAD ( to ) 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE SST 665$ 77.27 95 0.031
2023 4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT SST 19,450$ 77.27 95 0.842
2023 4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 39,617$ 77.27 95 1.715
2023 4450 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD SST 1,069$ 77.27 95 0.054
2023 2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FIFTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐EBENEZER DRIVE SST 20,213$ 77.27 95 0.875
2023 3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT‐to‐WYTON DRIVE SST 42,781$ 77.27 95 1.852
1,485,953$
Page 19 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2024 5090 MILL ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MILL ROAD CRK 522$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.261
2024 5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐OAKWOOD PLACE CRK 460$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.23
2024 5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT CRK 180$ 92.95 92.95 2 0.09
2024 2470 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD CRK 2,822$ 97 97 2 1.411
2024 6470 HARRISON STREET ( to ) KING STREET LOOP‐to‐CUL‐DE‐SAC CRK 386$ 97 97 2 0.193
2024 710 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 62,801$ 61.55 81.55 1.917
2024 1410 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐EBENEZER ROAD GRR2 74,543$ 61.55 81.55 1.991
2024 1420 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER ROAD‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 20,779$ 61.55 81.55 0.555
2024 1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐BREEN ROAD GRR2 58,107$ 61.55 81.55 1.552
2024 2700 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 14,826$ 61.55 81.55 0.396
2024 2690 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,245$ 65.7 85.7 1.346
2024 4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 31,411$ 61.55 81.55 0.907
2024 3840 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) CHARLES STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET MICRO 2,948$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.117
2024 5590 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) WEST END‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE MICRO 2,799$ 79.27 79.27 3 0.093
2024 6240 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLEWOOD PLACE‐to‐MITCHELL COURT MICRO 3,130$ 66.91 66.91 3 0.104
2024 6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT MICRO 2,950$ 72 72 3 0.098
2024 3830 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CHARLES STREET MICRO 5,810$ 79.56 79.56 3 0.166
2024 5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐MITCHELL COURT MICRO 2,828$ 79.27 79.27 3 0.101
2024 6210 MANLEY PLACE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐END OF STREET MICRO 1,806$ 72 72 3 0.06
2024 5180 MILL ROAD ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK R1 142,596$ 67.92 97 0.408
2024 5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE R1 159,435$ 66.91 97 0.484
2024 4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐AMBER DRIVE R1 81,968$ 66.91 97 0.247
2024 5510 THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD R1 54,092$ 66.91 97 0.163
2024 5250 CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐EAST END R1 54,418$ 69.47 97 0.177
2024 5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT‐to‐BYRON AVENUE R1 38,495$ 67.92 97 0.116
2024 5280 BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD R1 34,503$ 66.91 97 0.101
2024 5130 WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE R1 142,596$ 69.47 97 0.408
2024 6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐END OF STREET R1 25,365$ 69.47 97 0.077
2024 870 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐GUEST LANE SST 5,541$ 77.27 95 0.193
2024 890 GUEST LANE ( to ) HILLVIEW DRIVE‐to‐EAST END SST 4,479$ 77.27 95 0.156
2024 1860 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) WRIGHT STREET‐to‐35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET SST 1,074$ 77.27 95 0.035
2024 1060 BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST 20,072$ 77.27 95 0.811
2024 460 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD SST 15,325$ 77.27 95 0.774
2024 940 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) EATON ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 14,726$ 77.27 95 0.595
Page 20 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2024 1754 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐THOMPSON DRIVE SST 36,525$ 77.27 95 1.419
2024 1000 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 7,531$ 77.27 95 0.326
2024 450 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 50,037$ 77.27 95 2.049
2024 5470 ALMA STREET ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 2,069$ 77.26 95 0.114
2024 5480 ALMA STREET ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐THAMES CRESCENT SST 2,051$ 77.26 95 0.113
2024 1960 STARDUST DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY SST 14,137$ 77.26 95 0.612
2024 320 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐DORCHESTER SST 11,033$ 77.26 95 0.499
2024 1995 LANES ROAD ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END SST 4,196$ 77.26 95 0.187
2024 1610 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANG SST 1,030$ 77.27 95 0.052
2024 680 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHES SST 29,486$ 77.27 95 1.314
2024 2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER DRIVE‐to‐FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 11,966$ 77.27 95 0.518
2024 3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐RIVERVIEW DRIVE SST 7,088$ 77.27 95 0.358
2024 3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) RIVERVIEW DRIVE‐to‐WYE CREEK DRIVE SST 5,564$ 77.27 95 0.281
2024 1710 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE SST 873$ 77.27 95 0.042
2024 1750 BRADY ROAD ( to ) 30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE SST 673$ 77.27 95 0.03
2024 2740 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) PROSPECT HILL ROAD‐to‐57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD SST 1,279$ 77.27 95 0.057
2024 2510 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD SST 32,479$ 77.27 95 1.406
2024 2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐SIXTEEN MILE ROAD SST 21,252$ 77.27 95 0.92
2024 2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) SIXTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐FIFTEEN MILE ROAD SST 37,676$ 77.27 95 1.631
2024 2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 10,187$ 77.27 95 0.441
2024 2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐THIRTEEN MILE ROAD SST 22,153$ 77.27 95 0.959
2024 2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) THIRTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD SST 30,099$ 77.27 95 1.303
2024 4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK‐to‐DUNDAS STREET SST 16,133$ 77.27 95 0.679
1,486,555$
Page 21 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2025 5130 WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE CRK 816$ 97 97 2 0.408
2025 4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐AMBER DRIVE CRK 494$ 97 97 2 0.247
2025 5250 CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐EAST END CRK 354$ 97 97 2 0.177
2025 5280 BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 202$ 97 97 2 0.101
2025 5510 THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 326$ 97 97 2 0.163
2025 5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 968$ 97 97 2 0.484
2025 6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐END OF STREET CRK 154$ 97 97 2 0.077
2025 6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐PARK LANE CRK 282$ 97 97 2 0.141
2025 6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) PARK LANE‐to‐MEADOWBROOK LANE CRK 176$ 97 97 2 0.088
2025 2460 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CHERRY HILL ROAD CRK 2,214$ 97 97 2 1.107
2025 2450 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐CULVERT CRK 580$ 97 97 2 0.29
2025 3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MEADOWBROOK LANE‐to‐ CULVERT CRK 196$ 97 97 2 0.098
2025 640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 13,137$ 65.7 85.7 0.401
2025 2640 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 38M EAST OF 27‐ OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD GRR2 47,666$ 61.55 81.55 1.358
2025 3640 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) GREGORY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT AT #23124 GRR2 86,171$ 61.55 81.55 2.455
2025 4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 117,581$ 57.75 77.75 3.027
2025 4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 58,011$ 61.55 81.55 1.631
2025 5140 MILL COURT ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐END OF STREET MICRO 2,389$ 59.1 59.1 3 0.075
2025 3460 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET PR2 30,259$ 31.1 100 0.131
2025 4670 CLARA STREET ( to ) IDA STREET‐to‐MARION STREET PR2 106,411$ 21.51 100 0.423
2025 4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT R1 50,681$ 69.47 97 0.783
2025 4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE R1 148,860$ 69.47 97 2.303
2025 5260 ELIZABETH STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD R1 32,941$ 66.91 97 0.1
2025 5390 QUEEN STREET ( to ) ANN STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH STREET R1 46,447$ 66.91 97 0.141
2025 6250 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL COURT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT R1 33,271$ 66.91 97 0.101
2025 6260 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT R1 30,306$ 66.91 97 0.092
2025 6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐PRIVATE ROAD R1 21,742$ 65.01 97 0.054
2025 5610 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD R1 75,106$ 69.47 97 0.228
2025 6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT R1 72,471$ 69.47 97 0.22
2025 6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MANLEY PLACE R1 23,059$ 69.47 97 0.07
2025 6140 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY PLACE‐to‐MANLEY DRIVE R1 106,729$ 69.47 97 0.324
2025 6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY DRIVE‐to‐61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE R1 20,094$ 69.47 97 0.061
2025 6200 MANLEY DRIVE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT R1 98,494$ 69.47 97 0.299
2025 4870 AMBER DRIVE ( to ) LINWOOD DRIVE‐to‐MARION STREET R1 59,402$ 69.47 97 0.179
Page 22 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level
Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost
Start
Cond
End
Cond
Yrs
Hold
Length
(Km)
2025 4890 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END R1 23,893$ 69.47 97 0.072
2025 4920 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END R1 29,535$ 69.47 97 0.089
2025 5500 THE PARKWAY ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐CARLETON COURT R1 21,239$ 69.47 97 0.064
2025 4690 EVA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END R1 74,213$ 69.47 97 0.222
2025 6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE R1 23,388$ 70.84 97 0.071
2025 4940 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) AMBER DRIVE‐to‐EAST END R1 16,361$ 69.47 97 0.045
2025 880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE‐to‐EAST END SST 8,556$ 77.27 95 0.298
2025 440 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PUTNAM ROAD SST 1,247$ 77.27 95 0.063
1,486,422$
Page 23 of 23
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix G. Critical Deficiencies by Asset ID
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.129 100 6-10UPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6610 AGNES STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.107 100 6-10MAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6620 AGNES STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.071 100 6-10SOUTH ENDMAIN STREET6630 AGNES STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.114 100 ADEQTERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5470 ALMA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.113 100 ADEQTHAMES CRESCENTTERRENCE AVENUE5480 ALMA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.179 100 ADEQMARION STREETLINWOOD DRIVE4870 AMBER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.102 100 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5270 ANN STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.542 619 6-10DORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACKS0030 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.314 619 1-5RAIL TRACKS142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT
(BRIDGE)0020 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10
3.187 733 6-1073- ELGIN ROADCULVERT0050 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.510 733 6-10CULVERTDORCHESTER ROAD0040 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.142 619 6-10142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT
(BRIDGE)MUNICIPAL LIMIT0005 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ
0.617 89 NOWTRAFALGAR STREETCULVERT4050 BANKS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.721 89 NOWCULVERT27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)4040 BANKS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
0.027 89 ADEQ27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
2- DUNDAS STREET4030 BANKS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.294 50 6-10PAVEMENT CHANGEHARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1680 BOT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.012 50 ADEQAVON DRIVE12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE (PVMT
CHANGE)6740 BOT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.811 1,471 NOW74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
1060 BRADLEY AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10
0.091 1,471 1-591 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY1050 BRADLEY AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ PR21-5 ADEQADEQADEQ
1.055 44 ADEQ30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1740 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.030 44 ADEQCRAMPTON DRIVE30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE1750 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.379 83 NOWMOSSLEY DRIVE42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1720 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.042 83 6-1042M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1710 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.210 44 ADEQCULVERTMOSSLEY DRIVE1730 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.639 617 6-10BRIDGE112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD1230 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.203 617 ADEQ30- PUTNAM ROADBRIDGE1240 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.112 617 6-10112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1220 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ R1rural6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.892 298 6-10PIGRAM ROADFIVE POINTS ROAD1280 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.019 320 ADEQRAIL TRACK30- PUTNAM ROAD1250 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.251 320 6-10FIVE POINTS ROAD565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT
CHANGE)1270 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.565 320 ADEQ565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE)
RAIL TRACK1260 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.101 100 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5280 BRIDGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.347 100 ADEQKING STREETELLIOTT TRAIL6365 BROOKER TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.201 1,169 ADEQOAKWOOD DRIVECANTERBURY DRIVE5630 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.443 1,169 ADEQCANTERBURY DRIVEDORCHESTER ROAD5620 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.098 559 ADEQPARKVIEW DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5600 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 1
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.093 559 ADEQPINEHURST DRIVEWEST END5590 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.139 1,169 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADCHITTICK CRESCENT5650 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.291 1,169 ADEQCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD DRIVE5640 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.228 559 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADPARKVIEW DRIVE5610 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.177 100 ADEQEAST END29- HAMILTON ROAD5250 CALVERT PLACE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.105 920 NOWBYRON AVENUEHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5700 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.136 920 NOWHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5690 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.071 920 1-5SHERWOOD CRESCENTDORCHESTER ROAD5660 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RSS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.261 920 NOWHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5670 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.076 920 NOWSHERWOOD CRESCENTHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5680 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.069 100 6-10CATHERINE STREETROSS STREET5040 CARL STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.320 513 6-10CARLETON COURTTHE PARKWAY5520 CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.164 513 NOWDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5490 CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.032 100 6-10NORTH ENDCARLETON COURT5530 CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.112 35 ADEQ33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER
ROADDONNYBROOK DRIVE1180 CASHEL LANE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.033 35 ADEQ32- DORCHESTER ROAD33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD
1190 CASHEL LANE ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.445 677 ADEQBRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2170 CATHERINE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.314 677 ADEQHUNT ROAD EAST LEGBRIDGE2180 CATHERINE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.099 100 ADEQTHAMES STREETRICHMOND STREET4790 CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.265 100 ADEQCATHERINE STREETHILL STREET4810 CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.113 100 ADEQHILL STREETTHAMES STREET4800 CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.907 100 ADEQGREGORY DRIVERAIL TRACK4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.521 100 ADEQBRIDGEWYTON DRIVE4210 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 3.102 100 6-10OLIVER DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD4160 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.088 100 ADEQPLOVER MILLS ROADGREGORY DRIVE4140 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.508 100 6-10BRIDGECULVERT4090 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.227 100 6-10DUNDAS STREET90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.631 100 ADEQBRIDGE44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD
ROAD4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.044 100 ADEQ44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD4070 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
3.039 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
4200 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.049 100 NOW49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
28- THORNDALE ROAD4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
2.530 100 ADEQ34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
BRIDGE4220 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.034 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVE34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
4230 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.444 100 6-1090M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
4250 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.040 100 ADEQ40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
EVELYN DRIVE4240 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 2
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 3.027 100 6-1069M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)OLIVER DRIVE4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.069 100 NOW28- THORNDALE ROAD69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
4180 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.287 100 ADEQRAIL TRACKBRIDGE4100 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.353 100 6-10BYRON AVENUEOAKWOOD DRIVE5770 CHITTICK CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RSS6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.166 100 6-10MITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.131 100 6-10MILL ROADTINER AVENUE5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.115 100 6-10TINER AVENUEWHEELER AVENUE5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.181 545 6-10IDA STREETEVA STREET4660 CLARA STREET ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.169 545 ADEQEVA STREETMINNIE STREET4650 CLARA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.423 545 NOWMARION STREETIDA STREET4670 CLARA STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 2.303 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVECULVERT4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.783 100 ADEQCULVERTWYTON DRIVE4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 3.082 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE28- THORNDALE ROAD4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.072 100 ADEQBRIDGEOLIVER DRIVE4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.078 100 ADEQDUNDAS STREET78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET
(CULVERT)4420 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.842 100 ADEQCULVERTEVELYN DRIVE4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.015 100 6-1028- THORNDALE ROADBRIDGE4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.715 100 ADEQRAIL TRACKCULVERT4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.510 100 ADEQ78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACK4410 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.401 580 NOW30- PUTNAM ROAD401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (BEND IN ROAD)
1290 COUCH ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR3NOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.369 580 ADEQ401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (BEND IN ROAD)
29- HAMILTON ROAD1295 COUCH ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.141 100 NOWPARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.088 100 NOWMEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.780 191 NOW780M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH
ROADLOWER COW PATH2210 COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
1.693 191 NOWLOWER COW PATH44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
2200 COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
0.044 191 ADEQ44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
73- ELGIN ROAD2190 COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.445 223 6-10LEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0560 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.878 577 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-
WESTCHESTER BOURNE0510 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.556 166 ADEQCULVERTFORBES ROAD0630 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.401 166 ADEQPIGRAM ROADCULVERT0640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.238 180 6-10LACEY LANELEWIS ROAD0570 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.822 577 ADEQCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-
WESTCHESTER BOURNE74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0500 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.843 428 ADEQBRADY ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0520 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.459 428 ADEQRAIL TRACKSBRADY ROAD0530 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.387 428 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROADRAIL TRACKS0540 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 3
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.661 166 ADEQFORBES ROADBRIDGE0620 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.393 180 6-10441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADLACEY LANE0580 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.441 180 6-1030- PUTNAM ROAD441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0590 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.815 166 ADEQBRIDGE370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0610 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.370 166 ADEQ370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD30- PUTNAM ROAD0600 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.326 644 ADEQ30- PUTNAM ROADRAIL TRACKS1000 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 3.678 216 ADEQDORCHESTER ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0900 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.848 736 6-1073- ELGIN ROADBRADY ROAD0950 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.595 736 ADEQBRADY ROADEATON ROAD0940 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.234 736 ADEQEATON ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0930 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.452 751 6-10LEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0960 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.235 644 ADEQIRWIN ROADLEWIS ROAD0970 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.777 465 NOWFORBES ROAD62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD1030 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ NOWADEQ6-10 0.749 644 ADEQCULVERTIRWIN ROAD0980 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.764 644 ADEQRAIL TRACKSCULVERT0990 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.765 465 NOWPIGRAM ROADFORBES ROAD1040 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ NOWADEQ6-10 0.062 465 ADEQ62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)30- PUTNAM ROAD1020 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.129 100 1-5WEST ENDRICHMOND STREET4860 DALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.204 100 6-10ROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5060 DAVID STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.971 229 ADEQ971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL
BOUNDARYMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY0660 DINGMAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.314 229 6-1065M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE
971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
0680 DINGMAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.065 229 6-10WESTCHESTER BOURNE65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE
0690 DINGMAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1rural6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10
1.500 38 ADEQ15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADWEST END0240 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.015 38 ADEQPUTNAM ROAD15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0250 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.569 37 ADEQBRIDGE17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0270 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.017 37 ADEQ17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
PUTNAM ROAD0260 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.257 37 ADEQPIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0280 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.675 1,616 ADEQHUDSON DRIVEFERRAR ROAD1090 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.376 1,616 ADEQHARRIS ROADHUDSON DRIVE1100 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.464 1,616 ADEQ298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVEHARRIS ROAD1110 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.096 70 NOWCASHEL LANE43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER
ROAD1160 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
0.043 70 NOW43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD
DORCHESTER ROAD1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.026 70 NOWEND OF STREETCASHEL LANE1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ NOW RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.080 1,616 NOW32- DORCHESTER ROAD80M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER
ROAD1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.613 1,616 ADEQFERRAR ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1080 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.650 1,616 6-1080M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER
ROAD298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE1120 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 4
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 1.307 103 6-10AVON DRIVE18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE
DRIVE1770 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.018 103 ADEQ18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1760 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.419 800 ADEQTHOMPSON DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1754 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.184 800 ADEQCULVERTTHOMPSON DRIVE1755 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.130 800 ADEQCRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1756 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.040 800 ADEQ400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1757 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.624 800 6-10RAIL TRACKS300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE1758 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.525 100 ADEQHARRIETSVILLE DRIVERAIL TRACKS1759 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.400 800 6-10400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1757A DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.300 800 6-10300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1758A DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.115 308 NOWNEELY COURT29- HAMILTON ROAD1820 DURHAM STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ1-5 0.628 141 6-1031M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVENORTH END1690 EATON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.031 141 6-10CROMARTY DRIVE31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1700 EATON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.364 100 ADEQVALLEY VIEW ROAD57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL
ROAD2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.057 100 ADEQ57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD
PROSPECT HILL ROAD2740 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.100 100 6-10EAST ENDVALLEY VIEW ROAD2760 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.190 100 6-10MELVIN DRIVEERIC DRIVE4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.100 100 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5260 ELIZABETH STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.133 100 ADEQLEESBORO TRAIL27- NISSOURI ROAD6280 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.291 100 ADEQSLAMMER TRAILBROOKER TRAIL6320 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.126 100 ADEQBROOKER TRAILSLAMMER TRAIL6360 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.309 100 ADEQBROOKER TRAILLEESBORO TRAIL6290 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.142 142 6-10ELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4880 ERIC DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.072 10 ADEQNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4890 ERIC DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.222 100 ADEQWEST ENDCLARA STREET4690 EVA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.392 100 ADEQPURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2430 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.331 100 NOWHERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2410 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 1.403 100 NOWFAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2400 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.290 100 NOWCULVERTPURPLE HILL ROAD2450 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 1.107 100 NOWCHERRY HILL ROADCULVERT2460 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 1.411 100 NOWCOBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2470 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.098 100 NOW CULVERTMEADOWBROOK LANE3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.835 100 6-10350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROADRAIL TRACKS3440 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
2.291 100 ADEQOLIVER DRIVECULVERT3400 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.984 100 6-10GREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3340 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.543 100 6-10BRIDGEBRIDGE3330 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.602 100 6-10BRIDGESTOREY DRIVE3310 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.351 100 6-10BRIDGEBRIDGE3320 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.140 100 6-10MEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE3490 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 5
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 1.365 100 ADEQBRIDGEEVELYN DRIVE3550 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.470 100 6-10BRIDGERAIL TRACKS3435 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.843 100 ADEQ842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)OLIVER DRIVE3420 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.600 100 ADEQBRIDGE842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE)
3430 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
3.102 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3530 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.782 100 6-10CULVERT21M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS
ROAD3390 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.584 100 6-1016- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT3360 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.850 100 ADEQSTOREY DRIVE37M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)3300 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.037 100 ADEQ37M SOUTH OF HY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3290 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.491 100 6-10CULVERTGREGORY DRIVE3350 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.852 100 6-10WYTON DRIVE575M SOUTH OF CULVERT3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.575 100 6-10575M SOUTH OF CULVERT CULVERT3510 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BS6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.140 100 6-10PARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE3480 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.161 100 NOWMONTEITH AVENUEUPPER QUEEN STREET3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.131 100 1-5UPPER QUEEN STREET28- THORNDALE ROAD3460 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR21-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 1.752 100 ADEQ2- DUNDAS STREETBRIDGE3570 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.350 100 ADEQ28- THORNDALE ROAD350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROAD3450 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.076 50 ADEQ76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
29- HAMILTON ROAD1880 FERRAR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.315 50 6-1033M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE
76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
1890 FERRAR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.033 50 ADEQDONNYBROOK DRIVE33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE
1900 FERRAR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.182 15 ADEQSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1510 FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ 1.552 158 6-10BREEN ROADRAIL TRACKS1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.073 158 6-10RAIL TRACKSROBINSON ROAD1490 FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.521 62 6-10MOSSLEY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1530 FORBES ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.271 63 ADEQCRAMPTON DRIVEMOSSLEY DRIVE1540 FORBES ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.441 100 ADEQFOREST GROVE LANEFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)6050 FOREST GROVE
CRESCENTADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.382 100 ADEQFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N)6040 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT
ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.220 100 ADEQFOREST GROVE CRESCENTFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.054 1,152 ADEQPRIVATE ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.071 1,152 ADEQWOODVALE DRIVEPRIVATE ROAD6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.180 100 ADEQSOUTH ENDFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6120 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.098 100 ADEQFOREST GROVE CRESCENTWOODVALE DRIVE6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.089 100 6-10MAPLE CRESCENTQUEEN STREET5290 GEORGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.685 100 ADEQ27- NISSOURI ROADWEST END6760 GERALD PARKWAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.236 206 6-10MARR ROADLEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG0400 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 6
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.499 131 ADEQDORCHESTER ROAD499M WEST OF DORCHESTER
ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)0320 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.920 143 ADEQRAIL TRACKS305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)
0340 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.305 143 ADEQ305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)
DORCHESTER ROAD0330 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
3.136 131 NOW499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)
78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)
0310 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10
0.078 131 NOW78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)
74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0300 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
1.017 226 ADEQCULVERTCULVERT0420 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.520 226 6-10CULVERTMARR ROAD0410 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.049 315 ADEQBRIDGEPUTNAM ROAD0450 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.774 315 ADEQPIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0460 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.241 226 6-1063M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0430 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.063 226 NOWPUTNAM ROAD63M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0440 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10
2.426 143 6-1023M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
RAIL TRACKS0350 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.023 143 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROAD23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0360 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.430 206 6-10LEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0380 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.022 206 ADEQ22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
73- ELGIN ROAD0370 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.106 133 ADEQCUL-DE-SAC35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET1870 GOLF DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.035 133 NOW35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREETWRIGHT STREET1860 GOLF DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.405 133 ADEQWRIGHT STREET74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1850 GOLF DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.617 100 NOWFAIRVIEW ROADBRIDGE2780 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.355 20 ADEQBRIDGEWEST END2770 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.923 100 ADEQCHERRY HILL ROAD475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROAD2830 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.255 100 ADEQ475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROADEAST WELLBURN LIMIT2825 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.204 100 6-10WEST WELLBURN LIMIT204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN
LIMIT2805 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ
0.500 100 6-1027- WELLBURN ROADWEST WELLBURN LIMIT2810 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.682 100 6-10204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN
LIMITHERITAGE ROAD2800 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
1.395 100 6-10HERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2790 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.374 100 6-10COBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2850 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.220 100 6-10EAST WELLBURN LIMIT27- WELLBURN ROAD2820 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.156 129 6-10EAST ENDHILLVIEW DRIVE0890 GUEST LANE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.326 1,198 ADEQMARION STREETNEWTON AVENUE4980 HAMILTON CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.426 80 6-10BOT ROAD412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.412 80 6-10412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
73- ELGIN ROAD0200 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 7
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 2.165 743 ADEQCULVERT - 2165M EAST OF
DORCHESTER ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0170 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.791 743 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROADCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD
0190 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.737 743 ADEQCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD
CULVERT - 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD
0180 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.465 715 ADEQSHAIN ROADWESTCHESTER BOURNE0140 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.580 80 NOWEAST ENDLEWIS ROAD0230 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ 0.412 715 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACK0160 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.830 715 ADEQRAIL TRACKSHAIN ROAD0150 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.614 80 ADEQLEWIS ROADBOT ROAD0220 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.070 166 6-1070M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)29- HAMILTON ROAD1930 HARRIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
2.167 166 6-1039M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE
70M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
1940 HARRIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.039 166 ADEQDONNYBROOK DRIVE39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE
1950 HARRIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.126 168 1-5MINNIE STREETRAIL TRACK4590 HARRIS STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.168 168 6-10RAIL TRACK49- CATHERINE STREET4570 HARRIS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.434 100 6-10KING STREETKING STREET LOOP6490 HARRISON STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.264 100 NOWKING STREET LOOPCUL-DE-SAC6480 HARRISON STREET ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.193 100 NOWCUL-DE-SACKING STREET LOOP6470 HARRISON STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.618 100 1-5DUNDAS STREET77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS
(PVMT CHANGE)3750 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10
1.167 100 ADEQ77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS (PVMT CHANGE)
BRIDGE3730 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.310 100 6-10CULVERT51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
3670 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.051 100 6-1051M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
28- THORNDALE ROAD3660 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.533 100 ADEQBRIDGE39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
3610 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.039 100 ADEQ39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3600 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.331 100 6-10BRIDGE22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
3720 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.022 100 NOW22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
EVELYN DRIVE3710 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
3.060 100 6-1035M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
WYTON DRIVE3690 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.035 100 NOWEVELYN DRIVE35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
3700 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.826 100 ADEQGREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3630 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.938 100 6-10BRIDGEBRIDGE3620 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.455 100 ADEQCULVERT AT #23124GREGORY DRIVE3640 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.657 100 ADEQ16- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT AT #231243650 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.728 100 6-10WYTON DRIVECULVERT3680 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.063 30 ADEQCATHERINE STREETSOUTH END4840 HILL STREET ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 8
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.115 100 ADEQCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4850 HILL STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.298 111 ADEQEAST ENDGUEST LANE0880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.193 217 ADEQGUEST LANE73- ELGIN ROAD0870 HILLVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.512 433 ADEQMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1910 HUDSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.393 100 ADEQMONTEITH AVENUEMONTEITH AVENUE6730 HUESTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.090 46 ADEQSOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET4520 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.289 102 6-1063M NORTH OF MARION STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD4460 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.054 102 ADEQ54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD25- GORE ROAD4450 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.343 46 ADEQ10M NORTH OF CATHERINE
STREET42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
4490 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.042 46 ADEQ42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
MARION STREET4480 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.010 46 ADEQCATHERINE STREET10M NORTH OF CATHERINE STREET
4500 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.063 102 ADEQMARION STREET63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
4470 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.342 100 NOWCANTERBURY DRIVE (S)175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY DRIVE
5740 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT
ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.175 100 NOW175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY DRIVE
CANTERBURY DRIVE (N)5730 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT
ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10
0.149 100 1-5WEST ENDCLARA STREET4680 IDA STREET ADEQ ADEQ R2urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.282 100 ADEQSOUTH END28- THORNDALE ROAD6750 IDEAL DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.092 10 ADEQSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1315 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ 0.510 35 ADEQ33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1550 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
0.033 35 ADEQCROMARTY DRIVE33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
1560 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ
0.765 124 NOWSOUTH END32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE (PVT CHANGE)
1580 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
0.032 124 NOW32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE (PVT CHANGE)
CROMARTY DRIVE1570 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ REC6-10 ADEQNOWADEQ
0.152 22 ADEQNORTH ENDCRAMPTON DRIVE0650 LACEY LANE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.104 100 ADEQRINESS DRIVEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5890 LACROIX AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.358 100 ADEQRIVERVIEW DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.281 100 ADEQWYE CREEK DRIVERIVERVIEW DRIVE3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.187 20 ADEQSOUTH ENDDONNYBROOK DRIVE1995 LANES ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.178 100 ADEQUNNAMED STREETWILLIAM COURT6390 LEESBORO TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.250 100 ADEQWILLIAM COURTELLIOTT TRAIL6380 LEESBORO TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.469 37 ADEQHARRIETSVILLE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1670 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.625 58 NOW39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1590 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
0.039 58 6-10CROMARTY DRIVE39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
1600 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ
1.431 59 NOWMOSSLEY DRIVE52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
1620 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 9
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.052 59 ADEQ52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)CROMARTY DRIVE1610 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.189 60 ADEQRAIL TRACKSMOSSLEY DRIVE1630 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.610 60 6-10CRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1650 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.434 51 NOWGLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1660 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.479 60 ADEQCULVERTRAIL TRACKS1640 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.247 100 ADEQAMBER DRIVEMARION STREET4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.045 100 ADEQEAST ENDAMBER DRIVE4940 LINWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.130 100 6-10UPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6570 LIONS LANE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.058 81 NOW17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)COW PATH2230 LOWER COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10
0.017 81 6-1029- HAMILTON ROAD17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)
2240 LOWER COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.272 100 ADEQNEWTON AVENUEMARION STREET4990 LUDWIG STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.154 100 ADEQAGNES STREETRAILWAY STREET6600 MAIN STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.041 10 ADEQRAILWAY STREETWEST END6590 MAIN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.299 100 ADEQVALLEYVIEW CRESCENTVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6200 MANLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.060 70 ADEQEND OF STREETVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6210 MANLEY PLACE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.193 100 6-10GEORGE STREETQUEEN STREET5310 MAPLE CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.377 100 ADEQWOODVALE DRIVE (E)WOODVALE DRIVE (W)6030 MAPLERIDGE
CRESCENTADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.077 100 ADEQEND OF STREETWOODVALE DRIVE6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.130 100 6-10UPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6580 MARIA STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.166 1,857 NOWMELVIN DRIVERON-ALLEN DRIVE2060 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.105 1,857 NOWAMBER DRIVELINWOOD DRIVE2080 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.085 1,857 NOWLINWOOD DRIVEMELVIN DRIVE2070 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.272 1,857 NOWHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET2030 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.353 1,857 NOWRICHMOND STREETAMBER DRIVE2090 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.575 564 6-10CLARA STREET575M WEST OF CLARA STREET
(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)2120 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10
2.118 795 6-1073- ELGIN ROADCLARA STREET2130 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.093 557 1-5HUNT ROAD,EAST LEGBRIDGE2150 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ REC1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.689 557 6-10BRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2140 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ R1rural6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.346 564 6-10575M WEST OF CLARA STREET
(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)RICHMOND STREET2110 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ
0.351 1,857 NOWRON-ALLEN DRIVEHAMILTON CRESCENT2050 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.193 1,857 1-5LUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD2020 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ R1rural1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.164 20 ADEQEND OF STREETGLADSTONE DRIVE0470 MARR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.120 49 ADEQGLADSTONE DRIVEEND OF STREET0480 MARR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.102 45 ADEQRATH STREET30- PUTNAM ROAD1310 MARSHALL STREET ADEQ ADEQ REC1-5 ADEQNOW6-10 0.197 100 NOWEAST ENDCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6650 MEADOWBROOK LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.230 100 NOWCOUNTRYSIDE LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6640 MEADOWBROOK LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.141 141 6-10ELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4910 MELVIN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.089 40 ADEQNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4920 MELVIN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 10
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.075 100 ADEQEND OF STREETWHEELER AVENUE5140 MILL COURT ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.475 433 ADEQDONNYBROOK DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5230 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.355 433 ADEQCHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5190 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.408 1,354 ADEQTINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5180 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.261 1,354 ADEQMILL ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD5090 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.250 100 ADEQCHRISTIE DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5225 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.040 1,229 ADEQRAIL TRACKMINNIE STREET4760 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.033 1,229 ADEQCATHERINE STREETRAIL TRACK4780 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.137 100 1-5NORTH STREETCLARA STREET4730 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.045 20 ADEQMINNIE STREETWEST END4700 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.220 1,229 ADEQCLARA STREETMINNIE STREET4710 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.379 100 1-5VILLAGE GATE DRIVENORTH STREET4740 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.071 100 6-10HARRIS STREETVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4750 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.203 553 NOWCHITTICK CRESCENTSCARLETT CIRCLE5830 MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.146 553 NOWSCARLETT CIRCLEOAKWOOD DRIVE5810 MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.198 553 NOWMITCHELL COURTCHITTICK CRESCENT5840 MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.102 564 1-5MITCHELL AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5990 MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.184 564 ADEQWOODVALE DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE6010 MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.110 564 1-5TURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE6000 MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.083 100 ADEQFAIRVIEW ROADHUESTON DRIVE6720 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.262 100 ADEQCOUNTRYSIDE LANEHUESTON DRIVE6700 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.115 100 ADEQHUESTON DRIVECOUNTRYSIDE LANE6710 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.147 100 ADEQHUESTON DRIVETHORNDALE ROAD6690 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.055 496 ADEQSTARDUST DRIVEWEST END1970 MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.162 496 ADEQSTARLIGHT LANESTARDUST DRIVE1980 MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.200 433 ADEQEAST ENDHUDSON DRIVE1920 MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.393 162 ADEQCULVERTBRADY ROAD0750 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.669 84 6-10196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0820 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.196 84 NOW30- PUTNAM ROAD196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0830 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
1.707 84 6-10FORBES ROAD128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0860 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.128 84 NOW128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
30- PUTNAM ROAD0850 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.536 84 ADEQRAIL TRACKSLEWIS ROAD0800 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.115 162 ADEQ340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0760 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.340 162 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROAD340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0770 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
2.074 115 ADEQLEWIS ROAD379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0790 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.379 115 1-5379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
73- ELGIN ROAD0780 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10
0.672 84 6-10CULVERTRAIL TRACKS0810 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 11
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.263 80 NOW29- HAMILTON ROAD120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET1835 NEELY COURT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.120 80 NOW120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREETDURHAM STREET1830 NEELY COURT ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.265 100 ADEQHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET4970 NEWTON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.201 100 ADEQLUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD4960 NEWTON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.596 180 6-10NORTH END16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3250 NISSOURI ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.442 91 NOWEND OF STREETMINNIE STREET4640 NORTH STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.230 1,096 ADEQOAKWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.116 1,096 ADEQBYRON AVENUECHITTICK CRESCENT5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.090 1,096 ADEQCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD PLACE5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.298 1,829 ADEQMITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.100 1,829 ADEQRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.128 1,829 ADEQTURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.121 100 NOWEAST ENDOAKWOOD DRIVE5760 OAKWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 1.346 100 ADEQPURPLE HILL ROAD47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2690 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.358 100 ADEQFAIRVIEW ROAD38M EAST OF 27- OLIVER DRIVE2640 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.038 100 ADEQ38M EAST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2630 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.419 100 ADEQ88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACK2680 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.333 100 6-1049M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2720 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.049 100 6-10COBBLE HILLS ROAD49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2730 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.047 100 ADEQ47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)HERITAGE ROAD2688 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.088 100 ADEQHERITAGE ROAD88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
2686 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.622 100 ADEQRAIL TRACKCULVERT2670 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.265 100 ADEQCULVERTFAIRVIEW ROAD2660 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.994 100 6-10CHERRY HILL ROADBRIDGE2710 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.396 100 ADEQBRIDGEPURPLE HILL ROAD2700 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.202 100 NOWFAIRVIEW ROADCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6660 PARK LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.391 100 ADEQTHE PARKWAYBYRON AVENUE5540 PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.187 100 ADEQPINEHURST DRIVETHE PARKWAY5550 PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.484 100 ADEQPINEHURST DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.112 100 6-10ROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5070 PATRICIA AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.138 100 6-10ROSS STREETROSS STREET5080 PATRICIA AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.195 257 6-10300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROADBREEN ROAD1370 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.991 239 6-10EBENEZER ROAD370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY
DRIVE1410 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.555 239 6-10CRAMPTON DRIVEEBENEZER ROAD1420 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.300 257 ADEQSALFORD ROAD300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD1375 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.902 104 ADEQMOUNT ELGIN DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1430 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.250 257 ADEQ250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROADSALFORD RD1380 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.729 257 ADEQCROMARTY DRIVE250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD1390 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 12
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.371 239 NOW370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY
DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1400 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.353 100 ADEQPARKVIEW DRIVEPARKVIEW DRIVE5580 PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.102 100 ADEQPARKVIEW DRIVEBYRON AVENUE5570 PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.387 100 1-5SOUTH ENDQUEEN STREET5330 PONDVIEW COURT ADEQ ADEQ R2urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.631 100 ADEQFIFTEEN MILE ROADSIXTEEN MILE ROAD2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.518 100 ADEQFOURTEEN MILE ROADEBENEZER DRIVE2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.303 100 ADEQ16- PLOVER MILLS ROADTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.875 100 ADEQEBENEZER DRIVEFIFTEEN MILE ROAD2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.441 100 ADEQ440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE
ROADFOURTEEN MILE ROAD2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.920 100 ADEQSIXTEEN MILE ROAD33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.033 100 ADEQ33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD2860 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.959 100 ADEQTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD
2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.101 100 ADEQPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE
EVELYN DRIVE3960 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.034 100 NOW34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.687 100 ADEQCULVERTOLIVER DRIVE3890 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.425 100 6-10BRIDGEPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF
BRIDGE3980 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
3.062 100 6-1040M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
WYTON DRIVE3940 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.040 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVE40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.969 100 ADEQ49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKBRIDGE3990 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.369 100 6-1044M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)CULVERT3900 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.044 100 NOW28- THORNDALE ROAD44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)
3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
3.050 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)
3930 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.056 100 NOW56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)
28- THORNDALE ROAD3920 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
3.074 100 ADEQOLIVER DRIVE34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
3880 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.610 100 ADEQ2- DUNDAS STREET49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4020 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.123 100 ADEQRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5870 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.214 100 ADEQLACROIX AVENUERINESS DRIVE5880 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.180 513 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADELIZABETH STREET5400 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.141 513 ADEQELIZABETH STREETANN STREET5390 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.167 513 ADEQANN STREETDORCHESTER ROAD5380 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.131 100 ADEQGEORGE STREETPONDVIEW COURT5350 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.061 100 NOWPONDVIEW COURTWEST END5320 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 13
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.122 100 ADEQBRIDGE STREETGEORGE STREET5360 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.243 1,197 6-10DORCHESTER ROADBRIDGE STREET5370 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.116 100 NOWMAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6510 RAILWAY STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.146 100 NOWUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6500 RAILWAY STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.137 50 NOWMARSHALL STREET29- HAMILTON ROAD1300 RATH STREET ADEQ ADEQ REC1-5 ADEQNOW6-10 1.064 100 6-101063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACKRAIL TRACK3220 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR26-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.577 100 6-10RAIL TRACKSCATCHERED LANE3210 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR26-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 3.085 100 6-10WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEGTHORNDALE ROAD3170 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ REC6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.167 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEGWYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG3190 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.616 100 6-10ROBINS HILL ROAD1063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK3230 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR26-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.134 100 ADEQSCATCHERED LANEWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG3200 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.385 1,025 ADEQMARION STREET25- GORE ROAD3780 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.419 418 ADEQ25- GORE ROADTRAFALGAR STREET3770 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.378 466 6-10TRAFALGAR STREET2- DUNDAS STREET3760 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.166 1,538 ADEQCHARLES STREETRAIL TRACKS3830 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.419 1,538 ADEQRAIL TRACKSMARION STREET3800 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.117 1,391 ADEQCATHERINE STREETCHARLES STREET3840 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.083 50 1-5SOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET3850 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.184 100 ADEQLACROIX AVENUEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5900 RINESS DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.142 100 ADEQOAKWOOD DRIVELACROIX AVENUE5910 RINESS DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.944 198 ADEQFIVE POINTS ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1330 ROBINSON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SSTADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.265 265 NOWNORTH ENDMARION STREET4950 RON-ALLEN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.308 100 1-5PATRICIA AVENUEPATRICIA AVENUE5000 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.116 100 1-5DAVID STREETPATRICIA AVENUE5010 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.206 100 6-10RUTH STREETDAVID STREET5020 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.189 100 6-10CARL STREETRUTH STREET5030 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.114 100 6-10ROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5050 RUTH STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.269 86 NOW74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE29- HAMILTON ROAD1810 SAGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.186 100 NOWNORTH ENDMITCHELL AVENUE5800 SCARLETT CIRCLE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.081 20 ADEQWEST ENDREBECCA ROAD3240 SCATCHERED LANE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 2.408 212 6-10WESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0290 SCOTLAND DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.649 36 ADEQSOUTH END17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE
DRIVE1800 SHAIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.017 36 ADEQ17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1790 SHAIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.259 46 ADEQ8M NORTH OF 49- CATHERINE STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
NORTH END4550 SHEILS LANE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ
0.157 100 NOWSHERWOOD PLACEBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD PLACE
5715 SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ
0.199 100 NOWCANTERBURY DRIVESHERWOOD PLACE5720 SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.187 100 NOWBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD
PLACECANTERBURY DRIVE5710 SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10
0.120 100 NOWSHERWOOD CRESCENTEND OF STREET5750 SHERWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.203 100 ADEQELLIOTT TRAILELLIOTT TRAIL6370 SLAMMER TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 14
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.572 585 NOW73- ELGIN ROADWEST END1200 SLO-PITCH ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.612 496 ADEQMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1960 STARDUST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.326 496 ADEQNORTH ENDMOONLIGHT WAY1990 STARLIGHT LANE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.220 20 ADEQFAIRVIEW ROAD1220M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD3280 STOREY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.146 100 NOWKING STREETEND OF STREET6460 TEMPERANCE STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.203 100 6-10ALMA STREETTHAMES CRESCENT5450 TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.171 100 6-10THAMES CRESCENTALMA STREET5460 TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.125 100 6-1029- HAMILTON ROADTERRENCE AVENUE5440 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.115 100 6-10TERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5410 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.242 100 6-10TERRENCE AVENUEALMA STREET5430 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.269 100 6-10ALMA STREETTERRENCE AVENUE5420 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.065 30 ADEQCATHERINE STREETEND OF STREET4820 THAMES STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.116 100 ADEQCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4830 THAMES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.064 814 ADEQCARLETON COURTPARKVIEW DRIVE5500 THE PARKWAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.163 814 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5510 THE PARKWAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.327 118 ADEQ327M WEST OF DORCHESTER
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0730 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.042 118 ADEQDORCHESTER ROAD327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0740 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
1.917 118 ADEQCULVERT66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)
0710 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.066 118 1-566M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)
WESTCHESTER BOURNE0700 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ DST1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ
1.334 118 ADEQCULVERTCULVERT0720 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.257 100 6-10TINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5150 TINER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.302 100 6-10CHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5160 TINER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.089 100 6-10MILL ROADTINER AVENUE5200 TINER WALK ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.828 215 ADEQRICHMOND STREET32- SHAW ROAD2300 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.797 1,289 6-1021M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY2270 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ
0.021 1,289 ADEQ32- SHAW ROAD21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
2280 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.064 183 6-1091M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
2335 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.882 183 6-1017M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROADBANKS ROAD2350 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.746 183 ADEQBANKS ROAD91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)2340 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.027 183 ADEQ27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
RICHMOND STREET2330 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.017 183 NOW73- ELGIN ROAD17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD2370 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 2.747 151 6-10HUNT ROAD18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2390 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.018 151 NOW18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD2380 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.399 398 ADEQQUAIL RUN DRIVEOAKWOOD DRIVE5850 TURNBERRY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.101 398 ADEQMITCHELL COURTQUAIL RUN DRIVE5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.128 100 6-10AGNES STREETMARIA STREET6550 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 15
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.110 100 6-10RAILWAY STREETAGNES STREET6560 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.152 100 6-10LIONS LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6530 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.141 100 6-10MARIA STREETLIONS LANE6540 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.122 100 6-10THORNDALE ROADCENTRE DRIVE3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.401 100 ADEQEBENEZER DRIVE41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD
ROAD3110 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.041 100 ADEQ41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3100 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
3.096 100 6-10CENTRE DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3150 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.099 100 6-1016- PLOVER MILLS ROADEBENEZER DRIVE3120 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.324 618 ADEQMANLEY DRIVEMANLEY PLACE6140 VALLEYVIEW
CRESCENTADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.061 618 ADEQ61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVEMANLEY DRIVE6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT
ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.070 618 ADEQMANLEY PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT
ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.299 100 6-10VILLAGE GATE DRIVEVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT
ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ
0.312 100 ADEQVILLAGE GATE CRESCENTMINNIE STREET4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.050 100 ADEQWEST ENDVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.235 100 6-10VILLAGE GATE CRESCENTVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 2.424 650 6-10WESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0490 WESTMINSTER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.408 663 ADEQCHRISTIE DRIVEMILL COURT5130 WHEELER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.234 663 ADEQTINER AVENUEMILL ROAD5110 WHEELER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.150 663 ADEQMILL COURTTINER AVENUE5120 WHEELER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.032 100 ADEQWHEELER AVENUEEND OF STREET5170 WHEELER COURT ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.516 166 6-10CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCEAVON DRIVE0120 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.278 20 ADEQWEST ENDCONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE0130 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.061 100 ADEQWEST ENDLEESBORO TRAIL6450 WILLIAM COURT ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.229 578 ADEQFOXHOLLOW DRIVEMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.077 578 ADEQMAPLEWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6230 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.092 578 ADEQMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6260 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.104 578 ADEQMITCHELL COURTMAPLEWOOD PLACE6240 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.101 578 ADEQMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMITCHELL COURT6250 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.233 133 NOWGOLF DRIVE100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1840 WRIGHT STREET ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.100 133 NOWDURHAM STREET100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1845 WRIGHT STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.088 100 NOW88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)REBECCA ROAD2485 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10
1.278 100 6-10HERITAGE ROAD70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
2540 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
1.389 100 6-10CHERRY HILL ROADPURPLE HILL ROAD2560 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.383 100 6-10BRIDGECHERRY HILL ROAD2570 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.395 100 ADEQPURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2550 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.406 100 6-10FAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2510 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.404 100 6-10REBECCA ROADLAKESIDE DRIVE2480 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 16
Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch
Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.070 100 ADEQ70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)FAIRVIEW ROAD2520 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ
0.981 100 6-1038M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADBRIDGE2580 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.038 100 6-10COBBLE HILLS ROAD38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2590 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.281 100 6-1047M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2490 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10
0.047 100 NOW27- NISSOURI ROAD47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD2500 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 359.656
Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 17
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix H. Needs Sorted By Time of Need and Improvement Category
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name ImpSSTplus
1.542 619 58,610.076-10 26.00 RehabDORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACKS0030 AVON DRIVE SSTplus 0.142 619 5,397.296-10 26.00 Rehab142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT
(BRIDGE)MUNICIPAL LIMIT0005 AVON DRIVE SSTplus
1.797 1,289 71,493.796-10 25.00 Rehab21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY2270 TRAFALGAR STREET SSTplus
3.187 733 121,135.086-10 24.00 Rehab73- ELGIN ROADCULVERT0050 AVON DRIVE SSTplus 0.575 564 21,855.256-10 22.00 RehabCLARA STREET575M WEST OF CLARA STREET
(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)2120 MARION STREET SSTplus
2.452 751 95,375.696-10 20.00 RehabLEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0960 CROMARTY DRIVE SSTplus 0.510 733 19,384.656-10 16.00 RehabCULVERTDORCHESTER ROAD0040 AVON DRIVE SSTplus 0.071 100 2,383.416-10 15.00 RehabHARRIS STREETVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4750 MINNIE STREET SSTplus 0.116 100 4,203.051-5 15.00 RehabDAVID STREETPATRICIA AVENUE5010 ROSS STREET SSTplus 0.189 100 6,848.076-10 14.00 RehabCARL STREETRUTH STREET5030 ROSS STREET SSTplus 0.206 100 7,464.046-10 14.00 RehabRUTH STREETDAVID STREET5020 ROSS STREET SSTplus 0.204 100 7,391.576-10 14.00 RehabROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5060 DAVID STREET SSTplus 0.204 100 7,572.726-10 13.00 RehabWEST WELLBURN LIMIT204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN
LIMIT2805 GREGORY DRIVE SSTplus
2.015 100 76,588.396-10 11.00 Rehab28- THORNDALE ROADBRIDGE4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD SSTplus 13.210 505,703.07
SST 1.848 736 45,738.006-10 23.00 Rehab73- ELGIN ROADBRADY ROAD0950 CROMARTY DRIVE SST 0.168 168 3,769.926-10 19.00 RehabRAIL TRACK49- CATHERINE STREET4570 HARRIS STREET SST 0.400 800 9,900.006-10 18.00 Rehab400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1757A DORCHESTER ROAD SST 0.300 800 7,425.006-10 18.00 Rehab300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE
DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1758A DORCHESTER ROAD SST
0.944 198 21,183.36ADEQ 17.00 RehabFIVE POINTS ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1330 ROBINSON ROAD SST 1.639 617 37,860.906-10 17.00 RehabBRIDGE112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON
ROAD1230 BREEN ROAD SST
0.346 564 7,992.606-10 16.00 Rehab575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)
RICHMOND STREET2110 MARION STREET SST
0.039 58 900.906-10 13.00 RehabCROMARTY DRIVE39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
1600 LEWIS ROAD SST
0.114 100 2,482.926-10 13.00 RehabROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5050 RUTH STREET SST 0.138 100 3,005.646-10 13.00 RehabROSS STREETROSS STREET5080 PATRICIA AVENUE SST 0.069 100 1,434.526-10 13.00 RehabCATHERINE STREETROSS STREET5040 CARL STREET SST 0.112 100 2,402.406-10 12.00 RehabROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5070 PATRICIA AVENUE SST 0.033 35 653.40ADEQ 11.00 RehabCROMARTY DRIVE33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)1560 IRWIN ROAD SST
1.374 100 33,099.666-10 11.00 RehabCOBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2850 GREGORY DRIVE SST 7.524 177,849.22
R2urban 0.149 100 69,243.171-5 13.00 RehabWEST ENDCLARA STREET4680 IDA STREET R2urban
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 1
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.387 100 175,071.261-5 12.00 RehabSOUTH ENDQUEEN STREET5330 PONDVIEW COURT R2urban 0.536 244,314.43
R1urban 0.110 564 36,235.321-5 15.00 RehabTURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE6000 MITCHELL COURT R1urban 0.102 564 34,375.411-5 15.00 RehabMITCHELL AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5990 MITCHELL COURT R1urban 0.181 545 60,507.146-10 13.00 RehabIDA STREETEVA STREET4660 CLARA STREET R1urban 0.320 513 116,346.676-10 11.00 RehabCARLETON COURTTHE PARKWAY5520 CARLETON COURT R1urban 0.142 142 47,123.096-10 9.00 RehabELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4880 ERIC DRIVE R1urban 0.166 100 54,682.386-10 9.00 RehabMITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT R1urban 0.257 100 86,612.546-10 9.00 RehabTINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5150 TINER AVENUE R1urban 0.302 100 99,482.416-10 9.00 RehabCHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5160 TINER AVENUE R1urban 0.089 100 29,317.676-10 8.00 RehabMILL ROADTINER AVENUE5200 TINER WALK R1urban 0.141 141 46,791.246-10 8.00 RehabELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4910 MELVIN DRIVE R1urban 0.156 129 51,769.036-10 8.00 RehabEAST ENDHILLVIEW DRIVE0890 GUEST LANE R1urban 0.032 100 28,427.486-10 8.00 RehabNORTH ENDCARLETON COURT5530 CARLETON COURT R1urban 0.235 100 85,442.086-10 8.00 RehabVILLAGE GATE CRESCENTVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE R1urban 0.299 100 97,764.376-10 8.00 RehabVILLAGE GATE DRIVEVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1urban 0.190 100 69,080.846-10 8.00 RehabMELVIN DRIVEERIC DRIVE4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban 2.722 943,957.67
R1rural 0.193 1,857 27,922.491-5 32.00 RehabLUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD2020 MARION STREET R1rural 0.112 617 14,518.986-10 25.00 Rehab112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON
ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1220 BREEN ROAD R1rural
0.689 557 92,739.426-10 16.00 RehabBRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2140 MARION STREET R1rural 0.065 229 8,553.236-10 13.00 RehabWESTCHESTER BOURNE65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER
BOURNE0690 DINGMAN DRIVE R1rural
1.059 143,734.12
PR3 0.401 580 209,553.15NOW 33.00 Rehab30- PUTNAM ROAD401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(BEND IN ROAD)1290 COUCH ROAD PR3
0.401 209,553.15
PR2 0.272 1,857 70,980.91NOW 38.00 RehabHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET2030 MARION STREET PR2 0.085 1,857 20,959.51NOW 35.00 RehabLINWOOD DRIVEMELVIN DRIVE2070 MARION STREET PR2 0.166 1,857 40,203.05NOW 34.00 RehabMELVIN DRIVERON-ALLEN DRIVE2060 MARION STREET PR2 0.811 1,471 205,859.32NOW 34.00 Rehab74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL
BOUNDARY1060 BRADLEY AVENUE PR2
0.353 1,857 87,181.29NOW 34.00 RehabRICHMOND STREETAMBER DRIVE2090 MARION STREET PR2 0.351 1,857 87,098.01NOW 34.00 RehabRON-ALLEN DRIVEHAMILTON CRESCENT2050 MARION STREET PR2 0.091 1,471 20,194.211-5 34.00 Rehab91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL
BOUNDARYMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY1050 BRADLEY AVENUE PR2
0.105 1,857 25,932.11NOW 32.00 RehabAMBER DRIVELINWOOD DRIVE2080 MARION STREET PR2
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 2
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.423 545 106,411.46NOW 28.00 RehabMARION STREETIDA STREET4670 CLARA STREET PR2 0.193 100 45,860.54NOW 24.00 RehabCUL-DE-SACKING STREET LOOP6470 HARRISON STREET PR2 0.161 100 36,636.94NOW 23.00 RehabMONTEITH AVENUEUPPER QUEEN STREET3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD PR2 1.107 100 247,630.98NOW 22.00 RehabCHERRY HILL ROADCULVERT2460 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 1.411 100 336,117.84NOW 22.00 RehabCOBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2470 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 1.403 100 336,171.99NOW 22.00 RehabFAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2400 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 0.290 100 63,222.43NOW 20.00 RehabCULVERTPURPLE HILL ROAD2450 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 0.034 100 7,473.29NOW 18.00 Rehab34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD PR2
1.331 100 303,432.23NOW 17.00 RehabHERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2410 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 0.131 100 30,258.961-5 17.00 RehabUPPER QUEEN STREET28- THORNDALE ROAD3460 FAIRVIEW ROAD PR2 0.098 100 21,540.64NOW 15.00 Rehab CULVERTMEADOWBROOK LANE3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD PR2 0.616 100 148,704.506-10 13.00 RehabROBINS HILL ROAD1063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK3230 REBECCA ROAD PR2 1.064 100 256,853.216-10 13.00 Rehab1063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACKRAIL TRACK3220 REBECCA ROAD PR2 0.577 100 139,289.766-10 13.00 RehabRAIL TRACKSCATCHERED LANE3210 REBECCA ROAD PR2
11.073 2,638,013.18
DST 0.066 118 2,395.801-5 19.00 Rehab66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER
BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)WESTCHESTER BOURNE0700 THOMPSON DRIVE DST
0.066 2,395.80
SD 1.596 180 0.006-10 28.00 MaintenanceNORTH END16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3250 NISSOURI ROAD SD 1.234 736 0.00ADEQ 23.00 MaintenanceEATON ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0930 CROMARTY DRIVE SD 0.516 166 0.006-10 22.00 MaintenanceCONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCEAVON DRIVE0120 WHITTAKER LANE SD 2.118 795 0.006-10 20.00 Maintenance73- ELGIN ROADCLARA STREET2130 MARION STREET SD 0.650 1,616 0.006-10 20.00 Maintenance80M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER
ROAD298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE1120 DONNYBROOK DRIVE SD
1.426 80 0.006-10 19.00 MaintenanceBOT ROAD412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SD
0.031 141 0.006-10 19.00 MaintenanceCROMARTY DRIVE31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1700 EATON ROAD SD 2.315 50 0.006-10 17.00 Maintenance33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK
DRIVE76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
1890 FERRAR ROAD SD
1.419 800 0.00ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceTHOMPSON DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1754 DORCHESTER ROAD SD 1.404 100 0.006-10 16.00 MaintenanceREBECCA ROADLAKESIDE DRIVE2480 WYTON DRIVE SD 1.393 100 0.006-10 16.00 MaintenanceVALLEY VIEW ROADPROSPECT HILL ROAD2600 CENTRE DRIVE SD 0.112 35 0.00ADEQ 15.00 Maintenance33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER
ROADDONNYBROOK DRIVE1180 CASHEL LANE SD
0.679 100 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceDUNDAS STREET90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD SD 0.434 100 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceKING STREETKING STREET LOOP6490 HARRISON STREET SD 0.243 1,197 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceDORCHESTER ROADBRIDGE STREET5370 QUEEN STREET SD 1.552 158 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceBREEN ROADRAIL TRACKS1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD SD 2.408 212 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceWESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0290 SCOTLAND DRIVE SD 0.131 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceMILL ROADTINER AVENUE5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE SD
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 3
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.115 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceTINER AVENUEWHEELER AVENUE5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE SD 1.314 229 0.006-10 14.00 Maintenance65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER
BOURNE971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
0680 DINGMAN DRIVE SD
1.852 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceWYTON DRIVE575M SOUTH OF CULVERT3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 0.602 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceBRIDGESTOREY DRIVE3310 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 0.327 118 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Maintenance327M WEST OF DORCHESTER
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0730 THOMPSON DRIVE SD
0.584 100 0.006-10 13.00 Maintenance16- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT3360 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 1.938 100 0.006-10 13.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEBRIDGE3620 HERITAGE ROAD SD 0.882 183 0.006-10 13.00 Maintenance17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROADBANKS ROAD2350 TRAFALGAR STREET SD 0.203 100 0.006-10 13.00 MaintenanceALMA STREETTHAMES CRESCENT5450 TERRENCE AVENUE SD 0.171 100 0.006-10 12.00 MaintenanceTHAMES CRESCENTALMA STREET5460 TERRENCE AVENUE SD 0.125 100 0.006-10 12.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADTERRENCE AVENUE5440 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.624 800 0.006-10 12.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKS300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE
DRIVE1758 DORCHESTER ROAD SD
0.051 100 0.006-10 12.00 Maintenance51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
28- THORNDALE ROAD3660 HERITAGE ROAD SD
1.406 100 0.006-10 12.00 MaintenanceFAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2510 WYTON DRIVE SD 0.049 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceCOBBLE HILLS ROAD49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2730 OLIVER DRIVE SD 2.491 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceCULVERTGREGORY DRIVE3350 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 1.378 466 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceTRAFALGAR STREET2- DUNDAS STREET3760 RICHMOND STREET SD 0.835 100 0.006-10 11.00 Maintenance350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROADRAIL TRACKS3440 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD
0.470 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceBRIDGERAIL TRACKS3435 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 3.102 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceOLIVER DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD4160 CHERRY HILL ROAD SD 0.042 83 0.006-10 11.00 Maintenance42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1710 BRADY ROAD SD 2.369 100 0.006-10 11.00 Maintenance44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)CULVERT3900 PURPLE HILL ROAD SD
0.193 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceGEORGE STREETQUEEN STREET5310 MAPLE CRESCENT SD 0.875 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceEBENEZER DRIVEFIFTEEN MILE ROAD2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD SD 0.089 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceMAPLE CRESCENTQUEEN STREET5290 GEORGE STREET SD 0.242 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceTERRENCE AVENUEALMA STREET5430 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.269 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceALMA STREETTERRENCE AVENUE5420 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.782 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceCULVERT21M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS
ROAD3390 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD
3.062 100 0.006-10 10.00 Maintenance40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
WYTON DRIVE3940 PURPLE HILL ROAD SD
0.441 180 0.006-10 10.00 Maintenance30- PUTNAM ROAD441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0590 CRAMPTON DRIVE SD 0.064 183 0.006-10 10.00 Maintenance91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
2335 TRAFALGAR STREET SD
2.465 715 0.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceSHAIN ROADWESTCHESTER BOURNE0140 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SD 0.115 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceTERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5410 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.110 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceRAILWAY STREETAGNES STREET6560 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD 0.129 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6610 AGNES STREET SD 0.128 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceAGNES STREETMARIA STREET6550 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 4
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.107 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceMAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6620 AGNES STREET SD 0.071 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceSOUTH ENDMAIN STREET6630 AGNES STREET SD 0.130 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6570 LIONS LANE SD 0.152 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceLIONS LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6530 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD 0.141 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceMARIA STREETLIONS LANE6540 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD 0.130 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6580 MARIA STREET SD 2.424 650 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceWESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0490 WESTMINSTER DRIVE SD 0.412 80 0.006-10 9.00 Maintenance412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)73- ELGIN ROAD0200 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SD
0.682 100 0.006-10 8.00 Maintenance204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT
HERITAGE ROAD2800 GREGORY DRIVE SD
0.038 100 0.006-10 8.00 MaintenanceCOBBLE HILLS ROAD38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2590 WYTON DRIVE SD 0.140 100 0.006-10 8.00 MaintenancePARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE3480 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 0.220 100 0.006-10 8.00 MaintenanceEAST WELLBURN LIMIT27- WELLBURN ROAD2820 GREGORY DRIVE SD 0.041 10 0.00ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceRAILWAY STREETWEST END6590 MAIN STREET SD 0.073 158 0.006-10 7.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKSROBINSON ROAD1490 FIVE POINTS ROAD SD 0.017 81 0.006-10 5.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROAD17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2240 LOWER COW PATH SD
0.070 166 0.006-10 5.00 Maintenance70M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
29- HAMILTON ROAD1930 HARRIS ROAD SD
0.140 100 0.006-10 5.00 MaintenanceMEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE3490 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 3.102 100 0.00ADEQ 4.00 MaintenanceEVELYN DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3530 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD
57.645 0.00
RSpLimit 0.080 1,616 0.00NOW 25.00 Maintenance32- DORCHESTER ROAD80M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER
ROAD1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE RSpLimit
0.371 239 0.00NOW 24.00 Maintenance370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
CROMARTY DRIVE1400 PIGRAM ROAD RSpLimit
0.043 70 0.00NOW 14.00 Maintenance43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD
DORCHESTER ROAD1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE RSpLimit
0.033 35 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Maintenance32- DORCHESTER ROAD33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD
1190 CASHEL LANE RSpLimit
0.527 0.00
MICRO 0.261 1,354 8,312.85ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceMILL ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD5090 MILL ROAD MICRO 0.408 1,354 12,994.80ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceTINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5180 MILL ROAD MICRO 0.230 1,096 6,923.00ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceOAKWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE MICRO 0.090 1,096 2,740.50ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD PLACE5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE MICRO 0.116 1,096 3,532.20ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceBYRON AVENUECHITTICK CRESCENT5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE MICRO 0.234 663 7,452.90ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceTINER AVENUEMILL ROAD5110 WHEELER AVENUE MICRO 0.408 663 12,994.80ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceCHRISTIE DRIVEMILL COURT5130 WHEELER AVENUE MICRO 0.150 663 4,777.50ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceMILL COURTTINER AVENUE5120 WHEELER AVENUE MICRO 0.167 513 5,845.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceANN STREETDORCHESTER ROAD5380 QUEEN STREET MICRO 0.180 513 5,481.00ADEQ 9.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADELIZABETH STREET5400 QUEEN STREET MICRO
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 5
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.141 513 4,244.10ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceELIZABETH STREETANN STREET5390 QUEEN STREET MICRO 0.229 578 6,892.90ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceFOXHOLLOW DRIVEMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6270 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.355 433 10,685.50ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceCHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5190 MILL ROAD MICRO 0.077 578 3,126.20ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMAPLEWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6230 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.092 578 2,769.20ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6260 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.101 578 3,040.10ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMITCHELL COURT6250 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.104 578 3,130.40ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceMITCHELL COURTMAPLEWOOD PLACE6240 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.075 100 2,388.75ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceEND OF STREETWHEELER AVENUE5140 MILL COURT MICRO 0.032 100 3,214.40ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceWHEELER AVENUEEND OF STREET5170 WHEELER COURT MICRO 0.077 100 2,317.70ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceEND OF STREETWOODVALE DRIVE6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE MICRO 0.100 100 3,010.00ADEQ 6.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5260 ELIZABETH STREET MICRO 0.177 100 4,770.15ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceEAST END29- HAMILTON ROAD5250 CALVERT PLACE MICRO 0.382 100 11,498.20ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N)6040 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT MICRO 0.441 100 13,274.10ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceFOREST GROVE LANEFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)6050 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT MICRO 4.627 145,416.25
GRRplus 0.543 100 10,995.756-10 25.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEBRIDGE3330 FAIRVIEW ROAD GRRplus 0.351 100 7,107.756-10 21.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEBRIDGE3320 FAIRVIEW ROAD GRRplus 1.389 100 28,127.256-10 19.00 MaintenanceCHERRY HILL ROADPURPLE HILL ROAD2560 WYTON DRIVE GRRplus 0.383 100 7,845.376-10 19.00 MaintenanceBRIDGECHERRY HILL ROAD2570 WYTON DRIVE GRRplus 1.100 100 20,988.006-10 19.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDVALLEY VIEW ROAD2760 EBENEZER DRIVE GRRplus 1.281 100 25,340.746-10 18.00 Maintenance47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2490 WYTON DRIVE GRRplus
0.984 100 20,386.516-10 18.00 MaintenanceGREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3340 FAIRVIEW ROAD GRRplus 1.469 37 26,309.79ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceHARRIETSVILLE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1670 LEWIS ROAD GRRplus 0.994 100 22,221.866-10 16.00 MaintenanceCHERRY HILL ROADBRIDGE2710 OLIVER DRIVE GRRplus 1.343 46 25,624.44ADEQ 15.00 Maintenance10M NORTH OF CATHERINE
STREET42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
4490 HUNT ROAD GRRplus
1.333 100 31,048.246-10 15.00 Maintenance49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2720 OLIVER DRIVE GRRplus 3.096 100 65,591.866-10 13.00 MaintenanceCENTRE DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3150 VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRRplus 1.395 100 30,860.196-10 12.00 MaintenanceHERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2790 GREGORY DRIVE GRRplus 3.099 100 70,006.416-10 11.00 Maintenance16- PLOVER MILLS ROADEBENEZER DRIVE3120 VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRRplus 0.508 100 11,713.466-10 10.00 MaintenanceBRIDGECULVERT4090 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRRplus 0.425 100 9,899.106-10 10.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF
BRIDGE3980 PURPLE HILL ROAD GRRplus
19.693 414,066.72
GRR2plus 1.294 50 42,857.286-10 21.00 MaintenancePAVEMENT CHANGEHARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1680 BOT ROAD GRR2plus 1.289 102 45,707.946-10 17.00 Maintenance63M NORTH OF MARION STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD4460 HUNT ROAD GRR2plus
0.981 100 37,081.806-10 16.00 Maintenance38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADBRIDGE2580 WYTON DRIVE GRR2plus 1.331 100 54,672.166-10 14.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)3720 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2plus
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 6
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 2.310 100 97,047.726-10 14.00 MaintenanceCULVERT51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)3670 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2plus
1.307 103 55,521.366-10 13.00 MaintenanceAVON DRIVE18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
1770 DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2plus
1.278 100 53,093.236-10 13.00 MaintenanceHERITAGE ROAD70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
2540 WYTON DRIVE GRR2plus
2.444 100 103,821.126-10 13.00 Maintenance90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
4250 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2plus
0.728 100 31,606.856-10 12.00 MaintenanceWYTON DRIVECULVERT3680 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2plus 12.962 521,409.46
GRR2 1.251 320 46,837.446-10 34.00 MaintenanceFIVE POINTS ROAD565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT
CHANGE)1270 BREEN ROAD GRR2
0.892 298 33,396.486-10 27.00 MaintenancePIGRAM ROADFIVE POINTS ROAD1280 BREEN ROAD GRR2 0.401 166 13,136.76ADEQ 25.00 MaintenancePIGRAM ROADCULVERT0640 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 2.445 223 85,819.506-10 20.00 MaintenanceLEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0560 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.729 257 27,293.76ADEQ 19.00 MaintenanceCROMARTY DRIVE250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD1390 PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 1.395 100 47,005.92ADEQ 19.00 MaintenancePURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2550 WYTON DRIVE GRR2 0.556 166 18,214.56ADEQ 18.00 MaintenanceCULVERTFORBES ROAD0630 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.815 166 28,606.50ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0610 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.661 166 23,201.10ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceFORBES ROADBRIDGE0620 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.241 226 9,023.046-10 17.00 Maintenance63M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0430 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2
1.017 226 38,076.48ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceCULVERTCULVERT0420 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2 0.920 143 32,292.00ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKS305M EAST OF DORCHESTER
ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)0340 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2
2.074 115 69,885.50ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceLEWIS ROAD379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0790 MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2
0.520 226 19,468.806-10 16.00 MaintenanceCULVERTMARR ROAD0410 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2 2.430 206 102,351.606-10 15.00 MaintenanceLEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0380 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2
1.236 206 49,168.086-10 15.00 MaintenanceMARR ROADLEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG0400 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2 0.902 104 33,770.88ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceMOUNT ELGIN DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1430 PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 3.060 100 121,726.806-10 13.00 Maintenance35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)WYTON DRIVE3690 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2
2.530 100 100,643.40ADEQ 12.00 Maintenance34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
BRIDGE4220 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2
3.039 100 120,891.42ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceWYTON DRIVE49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
4200 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2
0.521 100 20,725.38ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEWYTON DRIVE4210 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2 1.167 100 49,154.04ADEQ 11.00 Maintenance77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS
(PVMT CHANGE)BRIDGE3730 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2
28.802 1,090,689.44
GRR 0.610 60 9,563.586-10 24.00 MaintenanceCRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1650 LEWIS ROAD GRR
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 7
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 2.569 37 36,068.76ADEQ 23.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0270 DOAN DRIVE GRR
1.090 46 15,303.60ADEQ 22.00 MaintenanceSOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET4520 HUNT ROAD GRR 1.521 62 23,846.246-10 22.00 MaintenanceMOSSLEY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1530 FORBES ROAD GRR 0.672 84 10,378.376-10 22.00 MaintenanceCULVERTRAIL TRACKS0810 MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR 1.364 100 21,703.97ADEQ 19.00 MaintenanceVALLEY VIEW ROAD57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL
ROAD2750 EBENEZER DRIVE GRR
2.167 166 37,523.776-10 18.00 Maintenance39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE
70M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
1940 HARRIS ROAD GRR
1.917 118 31,400.46ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceCULVERT66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)
0710 THOMPSON DRIVE GRR
1.334 118 21,850.92ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceCULVERTCULVERT0720 THOMPSON DRIVE GRR 1.271 63 20,224.15ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceCRAMPTON DRIVEMOSSLEY DRIVE1540 FORBES ROAD GRR 0.210 44 3,243.24ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceCULVERTMOSSLEY DRIVE1730 BRADY ROAD GRR 1.358 100 23,832.90ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceFAIRVIEW ROAD38M EAST OF 27- OLIVER DRIVE2640 OLIVER DRIVE GRR 0.536 84 8,905.10ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKSLEWIS ROAD0800 MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR 0.907 100 15,705.61ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceGREGORY DRIVERAIL TRACK4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR 1.346 100 23,622.30ADEQ 13.00 MaintenancePURPLE HILL ROAD47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2690 OLIVER DRIVE GRR
1.631 100 29,005.70ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR
0.257 37 4,209.66ADEQ 13.00 MaintenancePIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0280 DOAN DRIVE GRR 2.455 100 43,085.25ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceCULVERT AT #23124GREGORY DRIVE3640 HERITAGE ROAD GRR 0.657 100 12,606.52ADEQ 11.00 Maintenance16- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT AT #231243650 HERITAGE ROAD GRR 3.088 100 59,975.14ADEQ 11.00 MaintenancePLOVER MILLS ROADGREGORY DRIVE4140 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR 3.401 100 67,645.89ADEQ 11.00 MaintenanceEBENEZER DRIVE41M SOUTH OF HWY 7-
ELGINFIELD ROAD3110 VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR
1.969 100 40,545.65ADEQ 9.00 Maintenance49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKBRIDGE3990 PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR 32.330 560,246.78
CRK 0.033 1,229 66.00ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceCATHERINE STREETRAIL TRACK4780 MINNIE STREET CRK 0.512 433 1,024.00ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1910 HUDSON DRIVE CRK 0.200 433 400.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDHUDSON DRIVE1920 MOONLIGHT WAY CRK 0.163 814 326.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5510 THE PARKWAY CRK 0.128 1,829 256.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceTURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.298 1,829 596.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceMITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.071 1,152 142.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceWOODVALE DRIVEPRIVATE ROAD6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.054 1,152 108.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenancePRIVATE ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.040 100 80.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceEVELYN DRIVE40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD CRK
0.100 1,829 200.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.324 618 648.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceMANLEY DRIVEMANLEY PLACE6140 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 0.055 496 110.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceSTARDUST DRIVEWEST END1970 MOONLIGHT WAY CRK 0.228 559 456.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceDORCHESTER ROADPARKVIEW DRIVE5610 BYRON AVENUE CRK
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 8
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.064 814 128.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceCARLETON COURTPARKVIEW DRIVE5500 THE PARKWAY CRK 0.061 618 122.00ADEQ 8.00 Maintenance61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVEMANLEY DRIVE6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 0.070 618 140.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMANLEY PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 0.443 1,169 886.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceCANTERBURY DRIVEDORCHESTER ROAD5620 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.291 1,169 582.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD DRIVE5640 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.040 1,229 80.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKMINNIE STREET4760 MINNIE STREET CRK 0.098 559 196.00ADEQ 7.00 MaintenancePARKVIEW DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5600 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.298 111 596.00ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDGUEST LANE0880 HILLVIEW DRIVE CRK 0.247 100 494.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceAMBER DRIVEMARION STREET4930 LINWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.179 100 358.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceMARION STREETLINWOOD DRIVE4870 AMBER DRIVE CRK 0.093 559 186.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenancePINEHURST DRIVEWEST END5590 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.102 100 204.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenancePARKVIEW DRIVEBYRON AVENUE5570 PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 0.484 100 968.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenancePINEHURST DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 0.399 398 798.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceQUAIL RUN DRIVEOAKWOOD DRIVE5850 TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 0.184 564 368.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceWOODVALE DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE6010 MITCHELL COURT CRK 0.101 398 202.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceMITCHELL COURTQUAIL RUN DRIVE5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 0.610 100 1,220.00ADEQ 6.00 Maintenance2- DUNDAS STREET49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4020 PURPLE HILL ROAD CRK 0.101 100 202.00ADEQ 6.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5280 BRIDGE STREET CRK 0.088 100 176.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceHERITAGE ROAD88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2686 OLIVER DRIVE CRK
0.220 100 440.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceFOREST GROVE CRESCENTFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.060 70 120.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceEND OF STREETVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6210 MANLEY PLACE CRK 0.098 100 196.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceFOREST GROVE CRESCENTWOODVALE DRIVE6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.299 100 598.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceVALLEYVIEW CRESCENTVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6200 MANLEY DRIVE CRK 0.045 100 90.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDAMBER DRIVE4940 LINWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.391 100 782.00ADEQ 4.00 MaintenanceTHE PARKWAYBYRON AVENUE5540 PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 0.377 100 754.00ADEQ 4.00 MaintenanceWOODVALE DRIVE (E)WOODVALE DRIVE (W)6030 MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT CRK 0.102 100 204.00ADEQ 4.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5270 ANN STREET CRK 0.123 100 246.00ADEQ 2.00 MaintenanceRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5870 QUAIL RUN DRIVE CRK 0.184 100 368.00ADEQ 2.00 MaintenanceLACROIX AVENUEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5900 RINESS DRIVE CRK 0.353 100 706.00ADEQ 2.00 MaintenancePARKVIEW DRIVEPARKVIEW DRIVE5580 PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 0.685 100 1,370.00ADEQ 2.00 Maintenance27- NISSOURI ROADWEST END6760 GERALD PARKWAY CRK 9.096 18,192.00
RSS 0.265 265 478,064.19NOW 40.00 ConstNORTH ENDMARION STREET4950 RON-ALLEN DRIVE RSS 0.115 308 188,252.39NOW 34.00 ConstNEELY COURT29- HAMILTON ROAD1820 DURHAM STREET RSS 0.261 920 427,251.08NOW 33.00 ConstHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5670 CANTERBURY DRIVE RSS 0.100 133 163,697.73NOW 26.00 ConstDURHAM STREET100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1845 WRIGHT STREET RSS 0.175 100 286,471.03NOW 24.00 Const175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY
DRIVECANTERBURY DRIVE (N)5730 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT RSS
0.120 80 196,437.28NOW 24.00 Const120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREETDURHAM STREET1830 NEELY COURT RSS 0.146 100 238,998.69NOW 24.00 ConstUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6500 RAILWAY STREET RSS
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 9
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.116 100 189,889.37NOW 24.00 ConstMAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6510 RAILWAY STREET RSS 0.071 920 116,225.391-5 23.00 ConstSHERWOOD CRESCENTDORCHESTER ROAD5660 CANTERBURY DRIVE RSS 0.146 100 238,998.69NOW 22.00 ConstKING STREETEND OF STREET6460 TEMPERANCE STREET RSS 0.187 100 306,114.76NOW 19.00 ConstBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD
PLACECANTERBURY DRIVE5710 SHERWOOD CRESCENT RSS
0.083 50 135,869.121-5 16.00 ConstSOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET3850 RICHMOND STREET RSS 0.353 100 577,852.996-10 14.00 ConstBYRON AVENUEOAKWOOD DRIVE5770 CHITTICK CRESCENT RSS 2.138 3,544,122.71
RNS 0.136 920 121,510.53NOW 26.00 ConstHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5690 CANTERBURY DRIVE RNS 0.076 920 67,902.94NOW 26.00 ConstSHERWOOD CRESCENTHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5680 CANTERBURY DRIVE RNS 0.105 920 93,813.28NOW 26.00 ConstBYRON AVENUEHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5700 CANTERBURY DRIVE RNS 0.203 553 181,372.34NOW 22.00 ConstCHITTICK CRESCENTSCARLETT CIRCLE5830 MITCHELL AVENUE RNS 0.146 553 130,445.14NOW 22.00 ConstSCARLETT CIRCLEOAKWOOD DRIVE5810 MITCHELL AVENUE RNS 0.164 513 146,527.41NOW 22.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5490 CARLETON COURT RNS 0.198 553 176,905.05NOW 21.00 ConstMITCHELL COURTCHITTICK CRESCENT5840 MITCHELL AVENUE RNS 0.035 133 31,271.10NOW 21.00 Const35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREETWRIGHT STREET1860 GOLF DRIVE RNS 0.063 30 33,114.79ADEQ 20.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETSOUTH END4840 HILL STREET RNS 0.233 133 208,176.13NOW 19.00 ConstGOLF DRIVE100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1840 WRIGHT STREET RNS 0.202 100 180,478.89NOW 19.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROADCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6660 PARK LANE RNS 0.088 100 78,624.46NOW 17.00 ConstMEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE RNS 0.186 100 166,183.53NOW 17.00 ConstNORTH ENDMITCHELL AVENUE5800 SCARLETT CIRCLE RNS 0.230 100 205,495.76NOW 17.00 ConstCOUNTRYSIDE LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6640 MEADOWBROOK LANE RNS 0.342 100 305,563.26NOW 17.00 ConstCANTERBURY DRIVE (S)175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY
DRIVE5740 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT RNS
0.263 80 234,979.93NOW 16.00 Const29- HAMILTON ROAD120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET1835 NEELY COURT RNS 0.197 100 176,011.58NOW 16.00 ConstEAST ENDCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6650 MEADOWBROOK LANE RNS 0.141 100 125,977.83NOW 16.00 ConstPARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE RNS 0.120 100 107,215.18NOW 15.00 ConstSHERWOOD CRESCENTEND OF STREET5750 SHERWOOD PLACE RNS 0.199 100 177,798.50NOW 15.00 ConstCANTERBURY DRIVESHERWOOD PLACE5720 SHERWOOD CRESCENT RNS 0.061 100 56,893.51NOW 15.00 ConstPONDVIEW COURTWEST END5320 QUEEN STREET RNS 0.157 100 140,273.18NOW 15.00 ConstSHERWOOD PLACEBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD
PLACE5715 SHERWOOD CRESCENT RNS
3.545 3,146,534.32
REC 0.765 124 232,914.87NOW 35.00 ConstSOUTH END32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE
(PVT CHANGE)1580 IRWIN ROAD REC
0.572 585 226,909.92NOW 34.00 Const73- ELGIN ROADWEST END1200 SLO-PITCH ROAD REC 0.617 100 187,854.21NOW 33.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROADBRIDGE2780 GREGORY DRIVE REC 1.693 191 571,319.24NOW 33.00 ConstLOWER COW PATH44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2200 COW PATH REC
0.096 70 29,228.54NOW 31.00 ConstCASHEL LANE43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD
1160 DONNYBROOK DRIVE REC
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 10
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.269 86 106,711.14NOW 31.00 Const74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE29- HAMILTON ROAD1810 SAGE STREET REC 1.434 51 436,601.20NOW 30.00 ConstGLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1660 LEWIS ROAD REC 1.058 81 290,542.12NOW 29.00 Const17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)COW PATH2230 LOWER COW PATH REC
0.780 191 263,218.55NOW 29.00 Const780M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH ROAD
LOWER COW PATH2210 COW PATH REC
0.278 20 84,640.96ADEQ 28.00 ConstWEST ENDCONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE0130 WHITTAKER LANE REC 1.026 70 281,754.46NOW 27.00 ConstEND OF STREETCASHEL LANE1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE REC 0.137 50 54,347.31NOW 27.00 ConstMARSHALL STREET29- HAMILTON ROAD1300 RATH STREET REC 1.431 59 435,687.82NOW 27.00 ConstMOSSLEY DRIVE52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)1620 LEWIS ROAD REC
0.032 124 10,798.71NOW 26.00 Const32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE (PVT CHANGE)
CROMARTY DRIVE1570 IRWIN ROAD REC
1.379 83 419,855.68NOW 26.00 ConstMOSSLEY DRIVE42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1720 BRADY ROAD REC 0.259 46 78,856.14ADEQ 26.00 Const8M NORTH OF 49- CATHERINE
STREET (PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END4550 SHEILS LANE REC
0.102 45 40,462.96ADEQ 26.00 ConstRATH STREET30- PUTNAM ROAD1310 MARSHALL STREET REC 0.355 20 108,084.68ADEQ 25.00 ConstBRIDGEWEST END2770 GREGORY DRIVE REC 0.617 89 169,437.13NOW 24.00 ConstTRAFALGAR STREETCULVERT4050 BANKS ROAD REC 0.721 89 197,997.05NOW 24.00 ConstCULVERT27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS
STREET (PVMT CHANGE)4040 BANKS ROAD REC
1.220 20 371,445.93ADEQ 24.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROAD1220M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD3280 STOREY DRIVE REC 1.500 38 456,695.82ADEQ 24.00 Const15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADWEST END0240 DOAN DRIVE REC 0.264 100 116,029.61NOW 23.00 ConstKING STREET LOOPCUL-DE-SAC6480 HARRISON STREET REC 0.625 58 277,428.21NOW 23.00 Const39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1590 LEWIS ROAD REC
0.120 49 32,953.74ADEQ 23.00 ConstGLADSTONE DRIVEEND OF STREET0480 MARR ROAD REC 0.121 100 50,485.24NOW 22.00 ConstEAST ENDOAKWOOD DRIVE5760 OAKWOOD PLACE REC 0.510 35 155,276.58ADEQ 22.00 Const33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1550 IRWIN ROAD REC
2.093 557 1,286,873.871-5 22.00 ConstHUNT ROAD,EAST LEGBRIDGE2150 MARION STREET REC 0.580 80 159,276.40NOW 21.00 ConstEAST ENDLEWIS ROAD0230 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE REC 0.164 20 49,932.07ADEQ 21.00 ConstEND OF STREETGLADSTONE DRIVE0470 MARR ROAD REC 0.092 10 25,264.53ADEQ 20.00 ConstSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1315 IRWIN ROAD REC 0.152 22 46,278.51ADEQ 20.00 ConstNORTH ENDCRAMPTON DRIVE0650 LACEY LANE REC 3.085 100 1,138,177.456-10 19.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE - WEST LEGTHORNDALE ROAD3170 REBECCA ROAD REC 0.182 15 80,787.09ADEQ 17.00 ConstSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1510 FIVE POINTS ROAD REC
24.329 8,474,127.74
NONE 0.393 162 0.00ADEQ 25.00 ConstCULVERTBRADY ROAD0750 MOSSLEY DRIVE NONE 0.749 644 0.00ADEQ 25.00 ConstCULVERTIRWIN ROAD0980 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 0.774 315 0.00ADEQ 23.00 ConstPIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0460 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE 0.595 736 0.00ADEQ 22.00 ConstBRADY ROADEATON ROAD0940 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 1.235 644 0.00ADEQ 22.00 ConstIRWIN ROADLEWIS ROAD0970 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 11
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.675 1,616 0.00ADEQ 22.00 ConstHUDSON DRIVEFERRAR ROAD1090 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 1.475 433 0.00ADEQ 20.00 ConstDONNYBROOK DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5230 MILL ROAD NONE 1.115 162 0.00ADEQ 19.00 Const340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0760 MOSSLEY DRIVE NONE
0.376 1,616 0.00ADEQ 19.00 ConstHARRIS ROADHUDSON DRIVE1100 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 0.464 1,616 0.00ADEQ 19.00 Const298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVEHARRIS ROAD1110 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 0.764 644 0.00ADEQ 19.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSCULVERT0990 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 1.613 1,616 0.00ADEQ 17.00 ConstFERRAR ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1080 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 0.326 644 0.00ADEQ 16.00 Const30- PUTNAM ROADRAIL TRACKS1000 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 0.387 428 0.00ADEQ 16.00 Const73- ELGIN ROADRAIL TRACKS0540 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE 0.184 800 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstCULVERTTHOMPSON DRIVE1755 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 1.130 800 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstCRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1756 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 1.445 677 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstBRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2170 CATHERINE STREET NONE 0.300 257 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstSALFORD ROAD300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD1375 PIGRAM ROAD NONE 0.250 100 0.00ADEQ 15.00 ConstCHRISTIE DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5225 MILL ROAD NONE 1.843 428 0.00ADEQ 15.00 ConstBRADY ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0520 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE 0.419 1,538 0.00ADEQ 15.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSMARION STREET3800 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.203 617 0.00ADEQ 14.00 Const30- PUTNAM ROADBRIDGE1240 BREEN ROAD NONE 1.314 677 0.00ADEQ 14.00 ConstHUNT ROAD EAST LEGBRIDGE2180 CATHERINE STREET NONE 2.049 315 0.00ADEQ 14.00 ConstBRIDGEPUTNAM ROAD0450 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE 1.459 428 0.00ADEQ 14.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSBRADY ROAD0530 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE 0.565 320 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT
CHANGE)RAIL TRACK1260 BREEN ROAD NONE
0.419 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
RAIL TRACK2680 OLIVER DRIVE NONE
0.021 1,289 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const32- SHAW ROAD21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
2280 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE
0.113 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstTHAMES CRESCENTTERRENCE AVENUE5480 ALMA STREET NONE 0.518 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstFOURTEEN MILE ROADEBENEZER DRIVE2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE 0.114 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstTERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5470 ALMA STREET NONE 0.265 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETHILL STREET4810 CHARLES STREET NONE 0.054 102 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD25- GORE ROAD4450 HUNT ROAD NONE 0.822 577 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-
WESTCHESTER BOURNE74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0500 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE
1.040 800 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1757 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 0.479 60 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCULVERTRAIL TRACKS1640 LEWIS ROAD NONE 0.622 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstRAIL TRACKCULVERT2670 OLIVER DRIVE NONE 0.265 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCULVERTFAIRVIEW ROAD2660 OLIVER DRIVE NONE 2.878 577 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROADCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-
WESTCHESTER BOURNE0510 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE
0.499 131 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROAD499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)
0320 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE
0.063 102 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstMARION STREET63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
4470 HUNT ROAD NONE
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 12
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.042 46 0.00ADEQ 12.00 Const42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)MARION STREET4480 HUNT ROAD NONE
0.614 80 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstLEWIS ROADBOT ROAD0220 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE 0.189 60 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSMOSSLEY DRIVE1630 LEWIS ROAD NONE 0.350 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const28- THORNDALE ROAD350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROAD3450 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE
0.412 715 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACK0160 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE 0.113 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstHILL STREETTHAMES STREET4800 CHARLES STREET NONE 0.116 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4830 THAMES STREET NONE 0.115 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4850 HILL STREET NONE 0.281 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstWYE CREEK DRIVERIVERVIEW DRIVE3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE NONE 1.746 183 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstBANKS ROAD91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET
(PVMT CHANGE)2340 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE
0.027 89 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
2- DUNDAS STREET4030 BANKS ROAD NONE
0.533 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstBRIDGE39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
3610 HERITAGE ROAD NONE
0.305 143 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)
DORCHESTER ROAD0330 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE
0.971 229 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY0660 DINGMAN DRIVE NONE
0.396 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstBRIDGEPURPLE HILL ROAD2700 OLIVER DRIVE NONE 0.369 580 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(BEND IN ROAD)29- HAMILTON ROAD1295 COUCH ROAD NONE
1.385 1,025 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstMARION STREET25- GORE ROAD3780 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.167 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEGWYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG3190 REBECCA ROAD NONE 2.303 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstEVELYN DRIVECULVERT4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.783 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCULVERTWYTON DRIVE4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 1.072 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstBRIDGEOLIVER DRIVE4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 2.165 743 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCULVERT - 2165M EAST OF
DORCHESTER ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0170 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE
0.842 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCULVERTEVELYN DRIVE4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.057 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 Const57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL
ROADPROSPECT HILL ROAD2740 EBENEZER DRIVE NONE
0.358 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstRIVERVIEW DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE NONE 0.220 1,229 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCLARA STREETMINNIE STREET4710 MINNIE STREET NONE 1.715 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstRAIL TRACKCULVERT4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.052 59 0.00ADEQ 10.00 Const52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)CROMARTY DRIVE1610 LEWIS ROAD NONE
0.830 715 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSHAIN ROAD0150 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE 0.169 545 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstEVA STREETMINNIE STREET4650 CLARA STREET NONE 1.631 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstFIFTEEN MILE ROADSIXTEEN MILE ROAD2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE 1.303 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const16- PLOVER MILLS ROADTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE 0.030 44 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstCRAMPTON DRIVE30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE1750 BRADY ROAD NONE 0.370 166 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD30- PUTNAM ROAD0600 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 13
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.340 162 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const73- ELGIN ROAD340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0770 MOSSLEY DRIVE NONE
0.920 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstSIXTEEN MILE ROAD33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE
0.850 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstSTOREY DRIVE37M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
3300 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE
0.959 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD
2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE
0.040 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
EVELYN DRIVE4240 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE
0.033 50 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstDONNYBROOK DRIVE33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE
1900 FERRAR ROAD NONE
3.050 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)
3930 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE
0.826 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstGREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3630 HERITAGE ROAD NONE 0.187 20 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstSOUTH ENDDONNYBROOK DRIVE1995 LANES ROAD NONE 1.419 418 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const25- GORE ROADTRAFALGAR STREET3770 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.441 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE
ROADFOURTEEN MILE ROAD2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE
0.070 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
FAIRVIEW ROAD2520 WYTON DRIVE NONE
0.018 103 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1760 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE
3.082 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE28- THORNDALE ROAD4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.134 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstSCATCHERED LANEWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG3200 REBECCA ROAD NONE 2.291 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstOLIVER DRIVECULVERT3400 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE 0.791 743 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const73- ELGIN ROADCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF
DORCHESTER ROAD0190 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE
0.737 743 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD
CULVERT - 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD
0180 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE
0.687 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstCULVERTOLIVER DRIVE3890 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE 0.039 166 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstDONNYBROOK DRIVE39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK
DRIVE1950 HARRIS ROAD NONE
0.042 118 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROAD327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0740 THOMPSON DRIVE NONE
0.250 257 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROADSALFORD RD1380 PIGRAM ROAD NONE 0.843 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)OLIVER DRIVE3420 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE
0.326 1,198 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstMARION STREETNEWTON AVENUE4980 HAMILTON CRESCENT NONE 0.287 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstRAIL TRACKBRIDGE4100 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE 0.612 496 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1960 STARDUST DRIVE NONE 0.154 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstAGNES STREETRAILWAY STREET6600 MAIN STREET NONE 0.099 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstTHAMES STREETRICHMOND STREET4790 CHARLES STREET NONE 3.678 216 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0900 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 0.022 206 0.00ADEQ 7.00 Const22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)73- ELGIN ROAD0370 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE
0.038 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 Const38M EAST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2630 OLIVER DRIVE NONE
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 14
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.050 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstWEST ENDVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE NONE 0.312 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstVILLAGE GATE CRESCENTMINNIE STREET4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE NONE 3.074 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstOLIVER DRIVE34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)3880 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE
0.600 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstBRIDGE842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE)
3430 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE
0.027 183 0.00ADEQ 7.00 Const27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)
RICHMOND STREET2330 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE
0.078 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstDUNDAS STREET78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET (CULVERT)
4420 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE
0.525 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstHARRIETSVILLE DRIVERAIL TRACKS1759 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 0.101 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF
BRIDGEEVELYN DRIVE3960 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE
0.012 50 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstAVON DRIVE12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
6740 BOT ROAD NONE
0.193 217 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstGUEST LANE73- ELGIN ROAD0870 HILLVIEW DRIVE NONE 1.365 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstBRIDGEEVELYN DRIVE3550 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE 0.047 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)HERITAGE ROAD2688 OLIVER DRIVE NONE
0.255 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROAD
EAST WELLBURN LIMIT2825 GREGORY DRIVE NONE
1.392 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstPURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2430 EVELYN DRIVE NONE 0.923 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstCHERRY HILL ROAD475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN
ROAD2830 GREGORY DRIVE NONE
0.034 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstEVELYN DRIVE34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
4230 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE
0.222 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstWEST ENDCLARA STREET4690 EVA STREET NONE 1.828 215 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstRICHMOND STREET32- SHAW ROAD2300 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE 1.752 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const2- DUNDAS STREETBRIDGE3570 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE 0.510 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS
STREET (PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACK4410 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE
0.019 320 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstRAIL TRACK30- PUTNAM ROAD1250 BREEN ROAD NONE 0.023 143 0.00ADEQ 5.00 Const73- ELGIN ROAD23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0360 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE
0.044 191 0.00ADEQ 5.00 Const44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
73- ELGIN ROAD2190 COW PATH NONE
0.166 1,538 0.00ADEQ 5.00 ConstCHARLES STREETRAIL TRACKS3830 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.062 465 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)30- PUTNAM ROAD1020 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE
0.017 36 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1790 SHAIN ROAD NONE
0.015 38 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstPUTNAM ROAD15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0250 DOAN DRIVE NONE 0.017 37 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)PUTNAM ROAD0260 DOAN DRIVE NONE
0.041 100 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3100 VALLEY VIEW ROAD NONE
0.201 1,169 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstOAKWOOD DRIVECANTERBURY DRIVE5630 BYRON AVENUE NONE 0.045 20 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstMINNIE STREETWEST END4700 MINNIE STREET NONE
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 15
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.117 1,391 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETCHARLES STREET3840 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.072 10 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4890 ERIC DRIVE NONE 0.089 40 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4920 MELVIN DRIVE NONE 0.139 1,169 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const29- HAMILTON ROADCHITTICK CRESCENT5650 BYRON AVENUE NONE 0.187 100 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstPINEHURST DRIVETHE PARKWAY5550 PARKVIEW DRIVE NONE 0.076 50 0.00ADEQ 3.00 Const76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)29- HAMILTON ROAD1880 FERRAR ROAD NONE
0.044 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD4070 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE
0.037 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const37M SOUTH OF HY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3290 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE
0.033 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD2860 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE
0.039 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3600 HERITAGE ROAD NONE
0.347 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstKING STREETELLIOTT TRAIL6365 BROOKER TRAIL NONE 0.405 133 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstWRIGHT STREET74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1850 GOLF DRIVE NONE 0.180 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstSOUTH ENDFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6120 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE NONE 0.122 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstBRIDGE STREETGEORGE STREET5360 QUEEN STREET NONE 0.131 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstGEORGE STREETPONDVIEW COURT5350 QUEEN STREET NONE 0.106 133 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstCUL-DE-SAC35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET1870 GOLF DRIVE NONE 0.326 496 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstNORTH ENDMOONLIGHT WAY1990 STARLIGHT LANE NONE 0.162 496 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstSTARLIGHT LANESTARDUST DRIVE1980 MOONLIGHT WAY NONE 0.133 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstLEESBORO TRAIL27- NISSOURI ROAD6280 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.309 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstBROOKER TRAILLEESBORO TRAIL6290 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.250 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstWILLIAM COURTELLIOTT TRAIL6380 LEESBORO TRAIL NONE 0.147 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstHUESTON DRIVETHORNDALE ROAD6690 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.083 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROADHUESTON DRIVE6720 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.393 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstMONTEITH AVENUEMONTEITH AVENUE6730 HUESTON DRIVE NONE 0.262 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstCOUNTRYSIDE LANEHUESTON DRIVE6700 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.115 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstHUESTON DRIVECOUNTRYSIDE LANE6710 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.104 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstRINESS DRIVEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5890 LACROIX AVENUE NONE 0.142 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstOAKWOOD DRIVELACROIX AVENUE5910 RINESS DRIVE NONE 0.214 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstLACROIX AVENUERINESS DRIVE5880 QUAIL RUN DRIVE NONE 0.178 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstUNNAMED STREETWILLIAM COURT6390 LEESBORO TRAIL NONE 0.061 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstWEST ENDLEESBORO TRAIL6450 WILLIAM COURT NONE 0.291 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstSLAMMER TRAILBROOKER TRAIL6320 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.126 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstBROOKER TRAILSLAMMER TRAIL6360 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.203 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstELLIOTT TRAILELLIOTT TRAIL6370 SLAMMER TRAIL NONE 0.272 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstNEWTON AVENUEMARION STREET4990 LUDWIG STREET NONE 0.265 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET4970 NEWTON AVENUE NONE 0.201 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstLUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD4960 NEWTON AVENUE NONE
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 16
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.282 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstSOUTH END28- THORNDALE ROAD6750 IDEAL DRIVE NONE
96.163 0.00
BSgrav 0.649 36 63,090.20ADEQ 24.00 ConstSOUTH END17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE
DRIVE1800 SHAIN ROAD BSgrav
0.195 257 24,310.146-10 24.00 Const300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROADBREEN ROAD1370 PIGRAM ROAD BSgrav 0.628 141 59,986.946-10 23.00 Const31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVENORTH END1690 EATON ROAD BSgrav 1.393 180 150,713.966-10 23.00 Const441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADLACEY LANE0580 CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 1.238 180 140,742.036-10 22.00 ConstLACEY LANELEWIS ROAD0570 CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 2.426 143 275,799.816-10 21.00 Const23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACKS0350 GLADSTONE DRIVE BSgrav
1.707 84 166,540.866-10 20.00 ConstFORBES ROAD128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
0860 MOSSLEY DRIVE BSgrav
1.055 44 109,509.89ADEQ 19.00 Const30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1740 BRADY ROAD BSgrav 1.991 239 237,279.816-10 19.00 ConstEBENEZER ROAD370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY
DRIVE1410 PIGRAM ROAD BSgrav
3.122 100 348,067.166-10 19.00 ConstTHORNDALE ROADCENTRE DRIVE3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD BSgrav 2.747 151 312,292.706-10 18.00 ConstHUNT ROAD18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)2390 TRAFALGAR STREET BSgrav
0.555 239 66,142.796-10 17.00 ConstCRAMPTON DRIVEEBENEZER ROAD1420 PIGRAM ROAD BSgrav 1.669 84 189,740.276-10 16.00 Const196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0820 MOSSLEY DRIVE BSgrav
3.027 100 370,719.486-10 14.00 Const69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
OLIVER DRIVE4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD BSgrav
22.402 2,514,936.04
BS 0.765 465 212,928.89NOW 36.00 ConstPIGRAM ROADFORBES ROAD1040 CROMARTY DRIVE BS 0.442 91 115,718.61NOW 33.00 ConstEND OF STREETMINNIE STREET4640 NORTH STREET BS 1.777 465 494,607.37NOW 30.00 ConstFORBES ROAD62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD1030 CROMARTY DRIVE BS 0.063 226 11,953.77NOW 28.00 ConstPUTNAM ROAD63M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0440 GLADSTONE DRIVE BS
0.044 100 12,472.39NOW 26.00 Const28- THORNDALE ROAD44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)
3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD BS
0.018 151 4,512.20NOW 25.00 Const18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD2380 TRAFALGAR STREET BS 0.078 131 20,831.51NOW 25.00 Const78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER
BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0300 GLADSTONE DRIVE BS
0.081 20 21,206.35ADEQ 25.00 ConstWEST ENDREBECCA ROAD3240 SCATCHERED LANE BS 0.049 100 13,086.47NOW 24.00 Const49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE
ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)28- THORNDALE ROAD4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD BS
0.056 100 15,720.96NOW 23.00 Const56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)
28- THORNDALE ROAD3920 PURPLE HILL ROAD BS
0.069 100 18,427.88NOW 23.00 Const28- THORNDALE ROAD69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
4180 CHERRY HILL ROAD BS
0.017 183 4,400.86NOW 22.00 Const73- ELGIN ROAD17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD2370 TRAFALGAR STREET BS
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 17
Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch
LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.065 30 17,017.45ADEQ 22.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETEND OF STREET4820 THAMES STREET BS 0.314 619 92,010.261-5 22.00 ConstRAIL TRACKS142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT
(BRIDGE)0020 AVON DRIVE BS
0.126 168 32,987.671-5 22.00 ConstMINNIE STREETRAIL TRACK4590 HARRIS STREET BS 3.136 131 452,735.17NOW 21.00 Const499M WEST OF DORCHESTER
ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)
0310 GLADSTONE DRIVE BS
0.047 100 12,423.92NOW 20.00 Const27- NISSOURI ROAD47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD2500 WYTON DRIVE BS 0.196 84 51,810.35NOW 20.00 Const30- PUTNAM ROAD196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)0830 MOSSLEY DRIVE BS
0.379 100 109,762.681-5 20.00 ConstVILLAGE GATE DRIVENORTH STREET4740 MINNIE STREET BS 0.022 100 5,394.69NOW 19.00 Const22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE
(PVMT CHANGE)EVELYN DRIVE3710 HERITAGE ROAD BS
0.618 100 117,260.831-5 19.00 ConstDUNDAS STREET77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS (PVMT CHANGE)
3750 HERITAGE ROAD BS
0.035 100 8,582.48NOW 18.00 ConstEVELYN DRIVE35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)
3700 HERITAGE ROAD BS
0.128 84 33,135.90NOW 18.00 Const128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)
30- PUTNAM ROAD0850 MOSSLEY DRIVE BS
0.010 46 7,991.05ADEQ 18.00 ConstCATHERINE STREET10M NORTH OF CATHERINE STREET
4500 HUNT ROAD BS
0.308 100 86,027.181-5 18.00 ConstPATRICIA AVENUEPATRICIA AVENUE5000 ROSS STREET BS 0.088 100 22,780.93NOW 17.00 Const88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)REBECCA ROAD2485 WYTON DRIVE BS
0.137 100 39,863.871-5 17.00 ConstNORTH STREETCLARA STREET4730 MINNIE STREET BS 0.129 100 35,654.571-5 17.00 ConstWEST ENDRICHMOND STREET4860 DALE DRIVE BS 0.379 115 104,752.561-5 16.00 Const379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD
(PVMT CHANGE)73- ELGIN ROAD0780 MOSSLEY DRIVE BS
0.500 100 142,571.556-10 14.00 Const27- WELLBURN ROADWEST WELLBURN LIMIT2810 GREGORY DRIVE BS 0.575 100 119,893.496-10 13.00 Const575M SOUTH OF CULVERT CULVERT3510 FAIRVIEW ROAD BS
10.651 2,438,523.86
361.501 27,733,785.96
361.501 27,733,785.96
Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 18
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix I. Mapping‐ Roads by Surface Type
Avon
Putnam
Evelyn
Belton
Mossley
Derwent Crampton
Wellburn
St. Ives
Mill Pond
MudLakes
Nilestown
Gladstone
Thorndale
Wye Creek
Dorchester
Piney Creek
CobbleHill
Caddy Creek
Salmonville
Newall Drain
Beattie Pond
Foster Ponds
PloverMills
CherryGrove
Harrietsville
Three Bridges
Fanshawe Lake
GregoryCreek
ReynoldsCreek
Dorchester Swamp
FriendlyCorners
FitzpatrickDrain
North Branch Drain
170
2390
790
450
4220
710
3350
3640
4250
950
520
3900
1890
3670
4380
3400
860820
1940
2130
2150
4340
1410
3990
240
3620
530
210
3520
2300
580
2270
1030
3570
2340
720
4400
680
1230
2880
4080
570
1080
400
970930
3250
1500
1530
1670
2200
5230
760
2170
1660
1620
3770
1754
2470
2510
2400
2550
2790
2430
2600
2480
2560
3780
1720
3760
2850
3550
2750
2640
2690
4490
2720
3720
2410
420
2180
1770
2930
1680
50
900
310
510
3110
270
140
960
560
380350490
290
3530
4160
3160
3120
3150
4140
4360
3880
39403690
3930
4200
4170
3170
30
4460
2540
1540
660
1270
2490
3280
340
3730
1756
2460
4520
150
2760
4330
500
3220
1740
1757
190
460
990
2710
3340
2580
2230
980
180
2920
40
1330
2830
4120
1430
2870
1280
2350
810
2890
620
3300
3420
4390
3440
3630
1060
220
4370
3390
2210
940
1170
1580
1040
230
3680
630
4040
1390
800
2140
3890
6760
2800
410
1090
120
1120
4270
3650
320
1800
1690 15
90
1758
2670
3750
4050
2780
3230
1960
1650
4020
3310
3430
20
3360
3210
2120
3510
590
12001260
1420
3330
200160
3610
1759
640
4210
2900
750
1910
1550
4410
4090
540
2810
1110
780
1640
3435
5
770
2910
730
3980
4670
2680
3800
330
2700
1100
1290
2570
1295
3040
2110
130
2770
2090
3320
3450
280
1000
1990
430
1400
1375
2450
4100
880
3050
6750
2660
4550
830
2825
1380
470
1730
2805
1240
650
1630
1510
3190
1180
300
1220
610600
1757
A17
58A
2820
870890
1370
1995
1755
850
1980
480
1920
1300
3200
1310
3960
1160
1315
1050
2686
2485
700
690
440
3240
4420
1140
1880
1490
2520
1930
4180
2335
4470
1020
2740
3920
1970
740
4450
1610
3660
2730
4190
2688
2500
4070
2190
3910
4480
1710
3100
3950
1150
4240
1950
1600
3600
2630
2590
3290
3700
3875
4230
2860
1900
1190
1560
15701700
1750
360370
2330
4030
3710
260
2280
250
1250
2380
1760
1790
2370
2240
6740
2620
4500
FAIRVIEW ROAD
HERITAGE ROAD
AVON DRIVE
CHERRY HILL ROAD
COBBLE HILLS ROAD
NISSOURI ROAD
HAMILTON ROAD
CRAMPTON DRIVE
CROMARTY DRIVE
GORE ROAD
GLADSTONE DRIVE
PURPLE HILL ROAD
VALLEY VIEW ROAD
ELGI
N RO
AD
WYTON DRIVE
PIGRA
M RO
AD
PROSPECT HILL ROAD
MOSSLEY DRIVE
DUNDAS STREET
ELGINFIELD ROAD
PUTN
AM R
OAD
OLIVER DRIVE
EVELYN DRIVE
HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
PLOVER MILLS ROAD
TRAFALGAR STREET
MARION STREET
CATHERINE STREET
GREGORY DRIVE
DORC
HEST
ER R
OAD
HWY 401 EAST
WELLBURN ROAD
HWY 401 WEST
BREEN ROAD
REBECCA ROAD
DOAN DRIVE
HUNT ROAD
SHAW ROAD
THORNDALE ROAD
WEST
CHES
TER
BOUR
NE
MILL
ROA
D
COW PATH
THOMPSON DRIVE FORB
ES R
OAD
DONNYBROOK DRIVE
FERR
AR R
OAD
HARR
IS RO
AD
RICHMOND STREET
EBENEZER DRIVE
SCOTLAND DRIVE
BOT R
OAD
LEWI
S ROA
D
WESTMINSTER DRIVE
IRWIN
ROA
D
KING STREET
STOREY DRIVE
CENTRE DRIVE
LAKESIDE DRIVE
ROBIN'S HILL ROAD
LOWE
R CO
W PA
TH
OAKW
OOD
DRIVE
MINNIE STREET
OLALONDO ROAD
ROSS STREET
TINER AVENUE
SLO-PITCH ROAD
QUEEN STREET
ELLIOTT TRAIL
FOXHOLLOW DRIVE
NEWTON AVENUE
WYTON DRIVE
THORNDALE ROAD
HUNT ROAD
HUNT ROAD
PUTN
AM R
OAD
CATHERINE STREET
RICHMOND STREET
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT No.
DRAWING No.
DECEMBER - 2015
--- 162010406
1
DRAWING
PROJECT
CLIENT
2015 Road Needs Study
SURFACE TYPEINVENTORY
Thames Centre
NOTES:This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties,except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any partythat modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent.
NORT
H
LegendSURFACE TYPE
GRAVEL, STONE OR OTHER LOOSETOP
HIGH CLASS BITUMINOUS ASPHALT
LOW CLASS BITUMINOUS SURFACE TREATED
Road_SectionOTHER FEATURES
ROADS
COUNTY BOUNDARY
WATERCOURSE
2
Kilometers
1890
1940
5230
3780
2120
5620
4640
4670
3800
5130
5180
5850
5540
4740
5330
2110
2090
2050
5560
5580
4980
5520
5770
5190
4600
5160
5960
5640
2030
4990
4970 4950
6140
6200
4550
5670
5150
5370
5090
5110
5420
5610
6110
4690
60506040
4710
5930
62705225
5020
5060
5450 5430
5830
4930
5630
4960
5880
4810
5840
2020
4900
5030
4630
4610
5710
4660
5900
4870
5740
5460
4650
6120
4570
5380
2060
5730
5490
5510
3830
5720 5780
5400
5715
5550
4680
6030
5120
5810
5800
4880
5910
5390
4910
5310
5650
5250
6010
5000
5080
4730
5220
5350
4860
5970
4590
5440
5870
5360
3840
4830
5950
5690
5010
5410
5210
4850
5470
48005050
5480
5070
6000
5760
2080
5700
6240
5570
5750
5990
5270
58605280
4790
6100
6250
5590
5940
5200
4920
3850
6230
4890
5660
5140
4750
6130
1930
5040
4820
5500
4840
6150
5320
4620
4700
4780
5170
5530
58905980
5260
5600
62605290
2070
6020
5680
6090
6210
6080
4940
4760
3810
HAMILTON ROAD
CATHERINE STREET
MARION STREET
MILL ROAD
BYRON AVENUE
DORCHESTER ROAD
HARRIS ROAD
RICHMOND STREET
MINNIE STREET
CLARA STREET
ELGIN ROAD
WHEELER AVENUETINER AVENUE
SHAW ROAD
QUEEN STREET
RINESS DRIVE
FOXHOLLOW DRIVE
MITCHELL AVENUE
NORT
H ST
REET
NEWTON AVENUE
TURNBERRY DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE
VILLAGE GATE DRIVE
PARKVIEW DRIVE
THAM
ES C
RESC
ENTPONDVIEW COURT
BRIDGE STREET
SHEILS LANE
STREET B
HARRIS STREET
EVA STREET
HAMILTON CRESCENT
RON-ALLEN DRIVE
LINWOOD DRIVE
DAVID STREET
ARENA ENTRANCE
FOREST GROVE CRESCENT
RUTH STREET
JANE
STRE
ET
QUEEN STREET
KING STREET
FAIRVIEW ROAD
NISSOURI ROAD
THORNDALE ROAD
ELLIOTT TRAILMONTEITH AVENUE
UPPER QUEEN STREET
AGNES STREET
HARRISON STREET
LEESBORO TRAIL
MEADOWBROOK LANE
HUESTON DRIVE
PARK LANE
RAILW
AY ST
REET
SLAMMER TRAIL
LIONS LANE
TEMPERANCE STREET
WILLIAM COURT
3450
6490
6290
6730
6365
63206380
6640
3510
6700
6660
6370
6650
6480
6470
3470
6600
6530
6690
6460
6540
6670
34803490
6500
6390
6280
3460
6570
65806610
6550
6360
6510
6710
6560 6620
3500
6680
6720
6630
6450
6590
THORNDALE
DORCHESTER
GOLF DRIVE
NEELY
COURT
SAGE STREETWRIGHT STREET
1850
1830
1840
1810
1820
18701860
NILESTOWN
100Meters
100Meters
110Meters
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix J. Mapping ‐ Roadside Environment
Avon
Putnam
Evelyn
Belton
Mossley
Derwent Crampton
Wellburn
St. Ives
Mill Pond
MudLakes
Nilestown
Gladstone
Thorndale
Wye Creek
Dorchester
Piney Creek
CobbleHill
Caddy Creek
Salmonville
Newall Drain
Beattie Pond
Foster Ponds
PloverMills
CherryGrove
Harrietsville
Three Bridges
Fanshawe Lake
GregoryCreek
ReynoldsCreek
Dorchester Swamp
FriendlyCorners
FitzpatrickDrain
North Branch Drain
170
2390
790
450
4220
710
3350
3640
4250
950
520
3900
1890
3670
4380
3400
860820
1940
2130
2150
4340
1410
3990
240
3620
530
210
3520
2300
580
2270
1030
3570
2340
720
4400
680
1230
2880
4080
570
1080
400
970930
3250
1500
1530
1670
2200
5230
760
2170
1660
1620
3770
1754
2470
2510
2400
2550
2790
2430
2600
2480
2560
3780
1720
3760
2850
3550
2750
2640
2690
4490
2720
3720
2410
420
2180
1770
2930
1680
50
900
310
510
3110
270
140
960
560
380350490
290
3530
4160
3160
3120
3150
4140
4360
3880
39403690
3930
4200
4170
3170
30
4460
2540
1540
660
1270
2490
3280
340
3730
1756
2460
4520
150
2760
4330
500
3220
1740
1757
190
460
990
2710
3340
2580
2230
980
180
2920
40
1330
2830
4120
1430
2870
1280
2350
810
2890
620
3300
3420
4390
3440
3630
1060
220
4370
3390
2210
940
1170
1580
1040
230
3680
630
4040
1390
800
2140
3890
6760
2800
410
1090
120
1120
4270
3650
320
1800
1690 15
90
1758
2670
3750
4050
2780
3230
1960
1650
4020
3310
3430
20
3360
3210
2120
3510
590
12001260
1420
3330
200160
3610
1759
640
4210
2900
750
1910
1550
4410
4090
540
2810
1110
780
1640
3435
5
770
2910
730
3980
4670
2680
3800
330
2700
1100
1290
2570
1295
3040
2110
130
2770
2090
3320
3450
280
1000
1990
430
1400
1375
2450
4100
880
3050
6750
2660
4550
830
2825
1380
470
1730
2805
1240
650
1630
1510
3190
1180
300
1220
610600
1757
A17
58A
2820
870890
1370
1995
1755
850
1980
480
1920
1300
3200
1310
3960
1160
1315
1050
2686
2485
700
690
440
3240
4420
1140
1880
1490
2520
1930
4180
2335
4470
1020
2740
3920
1970
740
4450
1610
3660
2730
4190
2688
2500
4070
2190
3910
4480
1710
3100
3950
1150
4240
1950
1600
3600
2630
2590
3290
3700
3875
4230
2860
1900
1190
1560
15701700
1750
360370
2330
4030
3710
260
2280
250
1250
2380
1760
1790
2370
2240
6740
2620
4500
FAIRVIEW ROAD
HERITAGE ROAD
AVON DRIVE
CHERRY HILL ROAD
COBBLE HILLS ROAD
NISSOURI ROAD
HAMILTON ROAD
CRAMPTON DRIVE
CROMARTY DRIVE
GORE ROAD
GLADSTONE DRIVE
PURPLE HILL ROAD
VALLEY VIEW ROAD
ELGI
N RO
AD
WYTON DRIVE
PIGRA
M RO
AD
PROSPECT HILL ROAD
MOSSLEY DRIVE
DUNDAS STREET
ELGINFIELD ROAD
PUTN
AM R
OAD
OLIVER DRIVE
EVELYN DRIVE
HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
PLOVER MILLS ROAD
TRAFALGAR STREET
MARION STREET
CATHERINE STREET
GREGORY DRIVE
DORC
HEST
ER R
OAD
HWY 401 EAST
WELLBURN ROAD
HWY 401 WEST
BREEN ROAD
REBECCA ROAD
DOAN DRIVE
HUNT ROAD
SHAW ROAD
THORNDALE ROAD
WEST
CHES
TER
BOUR
NE
MILL
ROA
D
COW PATH
THOMPSON DRIVE FORB
ES R
OAD
DONNYBROOK DRIVE
FERR
AR R
OAD
HARR
IS RO
AD
RICHMOND STREET
EBENEZER DRIVE
SCOTLAND DRIVE
BOT R
OAD
LEWI
S ROA
D
WESTMINSTER DRIVE
IRWIN
ROA
D
KING STREET
STOREY DRIVE
CENTRE DRIVE
LAKESIDE DRIVE
ROBIN'S HILL ROAD
LOWE
R CO
W PA
TH
OAKW
OOD
DRIVE
MINNIE STREET
OLALONDO ROAD
ROSS STREET
TINER AVENUE
SLO-PITCH ROAD
QUEEN STREET
ELLIOTT TRAIL
FOXHOLLOW DRIVE
NEWTON AVENUE
WYTON DRIVE
THORNDALE ROAD
HUNT ROAD
HUNT ROAD
PUTN
AM R
OAD
CATHERINE STREET
RICHMOND STREET
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT No.
DRAWING No.
DECEMBER - 2015
--- 162010406
2
DRAWING
PROJECT
CLIENT
2015 Road Needs Study
ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT
Thames Centre
NOTES:This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties,except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any partythat modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent.
NORT
H
LegendROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT
RURAL
SEMI-URBAN
URBANOTHER FEATURES
ROADS
COUNTY BOUNDARY
WATERCOURSE
2
Kilometers
1890
1940
5230
3780
2120
5620
4640
4670
3800
5130
5180
5850
5540
4740
5330
2110
2090
2050
5560
5580
4980
5520
5770
5190
4600
5160
5960
5640
2030
4990
4970 4950
6140
6200
4550
5670
5150
5370
5090
5110
5420
5610
6110
4690
60506040
4710
5930
62705225
5020
5060
5450 5430
5830
4930
5630
4960
5880
4810
5840
2020
4900
5030
4630
4610
5710
4660
5900
4870
5740
5460
4650
6120
4570
5380
2060
5730
5490
5510
3830
5720 5780
5400
5715
5550
4680
6030
5120
5810
5800
4880
5910
5390
4910
5310
5650
5250
6010
5000
5080
4730
5220
5350
4860
5970
4590
5440
5870
5360
3840
4830
5950
5690
5010
5410
5210
4850
5470
48005050
5480
5070
6000
5760
2080
5700
6240
5570
5750
5990
5270
58605280
4790
6100
6250
5590
5940
5200
4920
3850
6230
4890
5660
5140
4750
6130
1930
5040
4820
5500
4840
6150
5320
4620
4700
4780
5170
5530
58905980
5260
5600
62605290
2070
6020
5680
6090
6210
6080
4940
4760
3810
HAMILTON ROAD
CATHERINE STREET
MARION STREET
MILL ROAD
BYRON AVENUE
DORCHESTER ROAD
HARRIS ROAD
RICHMOND STREET
MINNIE STREET
CLARA STREET
ELGIN ROAD
WHEELER AVENUETINER AVENUE
SHAW ROAD
QUEEN STREET
RINESS DRIVE
FOXHOLLOW DRIVE
MITCHELL AVENUE
NORT
H ST
REET
NEWTON AVENUE
TURNBERRY DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE
VILLAGE GATE DRIVE
PARKVIEW DRIVE
THAM
ES C
RESC
ENTPONDVIEW COURT
BRIDGE STREET
SHEILS LANE
STREET B
HARRIS STREET
EVA STREET
HAMILTON CRESCENT
RON-ALLEN DRIVE
LINWOOD DRIVE
DAVID STREET
ARENA ENTRANCE
FOREST GROVE CRESCENT
RUTH STREET
JANE
STRE
ET
QUEEN STREET
KING STREET
FAIRVIEW ROAD
NISSOURI ROAD
THORNDALE ROAD
ELLIOTT TRAILMONTEITH AVENUE
UPPER QUEEN STREET
AGNES STREET
HARRISON STREET
LEESBORO TRAIL
MEADOWBROOK LANE
HUESTON DRIVE
PARK LANE
RAILW
AY ST
REET
SLAMMER TRAIL
LIONS LANE
TEMPERANCE STREET
WILLIAM COURT
3450
6490
6290
6730
6365
63206380
6640
3510
6700
6660
6370
6650
6480
6470
3470
6600
6530
6690
6460
6540
6670
34803490
6500
6390
6280
3460
6570
65806610
6550
6360
6510
6710
6560 6620
3500
6680
6720
6630
6450
6590
THORNDALE
DORCHESTER
GOLF DRIVE
NEELY
COURT
SAGE STREETWRIGHT STREET
1850
1830
1840
1810
1820
18701860
NILESTOWN
100Meters
100Meters
110Meters
Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015
RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx
Appendix K. Mapping‐ Roads by Improvement Time of Need and Type
Avon
Putnam
Evelyn
Belton
Mossley
Derwent Crampton
Wellburn
St. Ives
Mill Pond
MudLakes
Nilestown
Gladstone
Thorndale
Wye Creek
Dorchester
Piney Creek
CobbleHill
Caddy Creek
Salmonville
Newall Drain
Beattie Pond
Foster Ponds
PloverMills
CherryGrove
Harrietsville
Three Bridges
Fanshawe Lake
GregoryCreek
ReynoldsCreek
Dorchester Swamp
FriendlyCorners
FitzpatrickDrain
North Branch Drain
170
2390
790
450
4220
710
3350
3640
4250
950
520
3900
1890
3670
4380
3400
860820
1940
2130
2150
4340
1410
3990
240
3620
530
210
3520
2300
580
2270
1030
3570
2340
720
4400
680
1230
2880
4080
570
1080
400
970930
3250
1500
1530
1670
2200
5230
760
2170
1660
1620
3770
1754
2470
2510
2400
2550
2790
2430
2600
2480
2560
3780
1720
3760
2850
3550
2750
2640
2690
4490
2720
3720
2410
420
2180
1770
2930
1680
50
900
310
510
3110
270
140
960
560
380350490
290
3530
4160
3160
3120
3150
4140
4360
3880
39403690
3930
4200
4170
3170
30
4460
2540
1540
660
1270
2490
3280
340
3730
1756
2460
4520
150
2760
4330
500
3220
1740
1757
190
460
990
2710
3340
2580
2230
980
180
2920
40
1330
2830
4120
1430
2870
1280
2350
810
2890
620
3300
3420
4390
3440
3630
1060
220
4370
3390
2210
940
1170
1580
1040
230
3680
630
4040
1390
800
2140
3890
6760
2800
410
1090
120
1120
4270
3650
320
1800
1690 15
90
1758
2670
3750
4050
2780
3230
1960
1650
4020
3310
3430
20
3360
3210
2120
3510
590
12001260
1420
3330
200160
3610
1759
640
4210
2900
750
1910
1550
4410
4090
540
2810
1110
780
1640
3435
5
770
2910
730
3980
4670
2680
3800
330
2700
1100
1290
2570
1295
3040
2110
130
2770
2090
3320
3450
280
1000
1990
430
1400
1375
2450
4100
880
3050
6750
2660
4550
830
2825
1380
470
1730
2805
1240
650
1630
1510
3190
1180
300
1220
610600
1757
A17
58A
2820
870890
1370
1995
1755
850
1980
480
1920
1300
3200
1310
3960
1160
1315
1050
2686
2485
700
690
440
3240
4420
1140
1880
1490
2520
1930
4180
2335
4470
1020
2740
3920
1970
740
4450
1610
3660
2730
4190
2688
2500
4070
2190
3910
4480
1710
3100
3950
1150
4240
1950
1600
3600
2630
2590
3290
3700
3875
4230
2860
1900
1190
1560
15701700
1750
360370
2330
4030
3710
260
2280
250
1250
2380
1760
1790
2370
2240
6740
2620
4500
FAIRVIEW ROAD
HERITAGE ROAD
AVON DRIVE
CHERRY HILL ROAD
COBBLE HILLS ROAD
NISSOURI ROAD
HAMILTON ROAD
CRAMPTON DRIVE
CROMARTY DRIVE
GORE ROAD
GLADSTONE DRIVE
PURPLE HILL ROAD
VALLEY VIEW ROAD
ELGI
N RO
AD
WYTON DRIVE
PIGRA
M RO
AD
PROSPECT HILL ROAD
MOSSLEY DRIVE
DUNDAS STREET
ELGINFIELD ROAD
PUTN
AM R
OAD
OLIVER DRIVE
EVELYN DRIVE
HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE
PLOVER MILLS ROAD
TRAFALGAR STREET
MARION STREET
CATHERINE STREET
GREGORY DRIVE
DORC
HEST
ER R
OAD
HWY 401 EAST
WELLBURN ROAD
HWY 401 WEST
BREEN ROAD
REBECCA ROAD
DOAN DRIVE
HUNT ROAD
SHAW ROAD
THORNDALE ROAD
WEST
CHES
TER
BOUR
NE
MILL
ROA
D
COW PATH
THOMPSON DRIVE FORB
ES R
OAD
DONNYBROOK DRIVE
FERR
AR R
OAD
HARR
IS RO
AD
RICHMOND STREET
EBENEZER DRIVE
SCOTLAND DRIVE
BOT R
OAD
LEWI
S ROA
D
WESTMINSTER DRIVE
IRWIN
ROA
D
KING STREET
STOREY DRIVE
CENTRE DRIVE
LAKESIDE DRIVE
ROBIN'S HILL ROAD
LOWE
R CO
W PA
TH
OAKW
OOD
DRIVE
MINNIE STREET
OLALONDO ROAD
ROSS STREET
TINER AVENUE
SLO-PITCH ROAD
QUEEN STREET
ELLIOTT TRAIL
FOXHOLLOW DRIVE
NEWTON AVENUE
WYTON DRIVE
THORNDALE ROAD
HUNT ROAD
HUNT ROAD
PUTN
AM R
OAD
CATHERINE STREET
RICHMOND STREET
SCALE:
DATE:
PROJECT No.
DRAWING No.
DECEMBER - 2015
--- 162010406
3
DRAWING
PROJECT
CLIENT
2015 Road Needs Study
TYPE AND TIMEOF IMPROVEMENT
Thames Centre
NOTES:This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties,except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any partythat modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent.
NORT
H
LegendTIME OF NEED
NOW CONSTRUCTION NEED
1 TO 5 YEAR CONSTRUCTION NEED
6 TO 10 YEAR CONSTRUCTION NEED
NOW RESURFACING NEED
1 TO 5 YEAR RESURFACING NEED
6 TO 10 YEAR RESURFACING NEED
ADEQUATE
NOW MAINTENANCE NEED
6 TO 10 YEAR MAINTENANCE NEEDOTHER FEATURES
ROADS
COUNTY BOUNDARY
WATERCOURSE
2
Kilometers
1890
1940
5230
3780
2120
5620
4640
4670
3800
5130
5180
5850
5540
4740
5330
2110
2090
2050
5560
5580
4980
5520
5770
5190
4600
5160
5960
5640
2030
4990
4970 4950
6140
6200
4550
5670
5150
5370
5090
5110
5420
5610
6110
4690
60506040
4710
5930
62705225
5020
5060
5450 5430
5830
4930
5630
4960
5880
4810
5840
2020
4900
5030
4630
4610
5710
4660
5900
4870
5740
5460
4650
6120
4570
5380
2060
5730
5490
5510
3830
5720 5780
5400
5715
5550
4680
6030
5120
5810
5800
4880
5910
5390
4910
5310
5650
5250
6010
5000
5080
4730
5220
5350
4860
5970
4590
5440
5870
5360
3840
4830
5950
5690
5010
5410
5210
4850
5470
48005050
5480
5070
6000
5760
2080
5700
6240
5570
5750
5990
5270
58605280
4790
6100
6250
5590
5940
5200
4920
3850
6230
4890
5660
5140
4750
6130
1930
5040
4820
5500
4840
6150
5320
4620
4700
4780
5170
5530
58905980
5260
5600
62605290
2070
6020
5680
6090
6210
6080
4940
4760
3810
HAMILTON ROAD
CATHERINE STREET
MARION STREET
MILL ROAD
BYRON AVENUE
DORCHESTER ROAD
HARRIS ROAD
RICHMOND STREET
MINNIE STREET
CLARA STREET
ELGIN ROAD
WHEELER AVENUETINER AVENUE
SHAW ROAD
QUEEN STREET
RINESS DRIVE
FOXHOLLOW DRIVE
MITCHELL AVENUE
NORT
H ST
REET
NEWTON AVENUE
TURNBERRY DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE
VILLAGE GATE DRIVE
PARKVIEW DRIVE
THAM
ES C
RESC
ENTPONDVIEW COURT
BRIDGE STREET
SHEILS LANE
STREET B
HARRIS STREET
EVA STREET
HAMILTON CRESCENT
RON-ALLEN DRIVE
LINWOOD DRIVE
DAVID STREET
ARENA ENTRANCE
FOREST GROVE CRESCENT
RUTH STREET
JANE
STRE
ET
QUEEN STREET
KING STREET
FAIRVIEW ROAD
NISSOURI ROAD
THORNDALE ROAD
ELLIOTT TRAILMONTEITH AVENUE
UPPER QUEEN STREET
AGNES STREET
HARRISON STREET
LEESBORO TRAIL
MEADOWBROOK LANE
HUESTON DRIVE
PARK LANE
RAILW
AY ST
REET
SLAMMER TRAIL
LIONS LANE
TEMPERANCE STREET
WILLIAM COURT
3450
6490
6290
6730
6365
63206380
6640
3510
6700
6660
6370
6650
6480
6470
3470
6600
6530
6690
6460
6540
6670
34803490
6500
6390
6280
3460
6570
65806610
6550
6360
6510
6710
6560 6620
3500
6680
6720
6630
6450
6590
THORNDALE
DORCHESTER
GOLF DRIVE
NEELY
COURT
SAGE STREETWRIGHT STREET
1850
1830
1840
1810
1820
18701860
NILESTOWN
100Meters
100Meters
100Meters