municipality thames centre 2015 infrastructure roads · municipality of thames centre 2015 state of...

176
7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7 www.4roads.ca Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads Prepared on Behalf of Stantec Consulting

Upload: vuhanh

Post on 21-Apr-2018

231 views

Category:

Documents


12 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

 

                    7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7 

               www.4roads.ca 

 

Municipality of Thames Centre2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads

Prepared on Behalf of Stantec Consulting

Page 2: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 7 Candle Crescent, 

Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7  

RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

December 7, 2015 

The Corporation of the Municipality of Thames Centre 4305 Hamilton Road, Dorchester, Ontario, N0L 1G3   Attention:  Mary Ellen Weatherhead, CPA, CGA, Dipl.M.A., C.M.T.P. Director of Financial Services / 

Treasurer  

  Mike LeBlanc, Director of Operations and (Acting) Community Services  

  Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management and Pavement Engineering, Stantec Consulting 

Subject:  Thames Centre, State of the Infrastructure – Road, prepared on behalf of Stantec Consulting for the Municipality of Thames Centre  

  Dear Ms. Weatherhead, Mr. LeBlanc, and Mr. Dalziel, 

4 Roads Management Services Inc. (4 Roads) is pleased to provide this report on the 2015 State of the Infrastructure ‐ Roads.  

The 2015 project updated the condition data on the road sections, revised asset sectioning and developed costing and analysis on the entire road system database and reports on same.  

All road sections have been reviewed and have estimated improvement and replacement costs. Calculations for Time of Need, Improvement and Replacement Costs and Performance modeling were developed utilizing WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation Software.  

We trust that the information provided in this report will be beneficial to the Municipality of Thames Centre in the evolution of their Asset Management Plans. 

Please do not hesitate to call or email if you require any further information or discussion on any aspect of the report. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this report. If 4 Roads Management Services Inc. may be of any further service, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. 

Yours truly, 

 

 

David Anderson, CET President, 4 Roads Management Services Inc. [email protected] 519 505 5065

Page 3: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    

 

7 Candle Crescent, Kitchener Ontario, N2P 2K7 

www.4roads.ca 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipality of Thames Centre 

State of the Infrastructure for Roads 

 

Page 4: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

i

Executive Summary 

In the fall of 2012, the Province of Ontario, introduced a requirement for an Asset Management Plan (AMP) as a prerequisite for municipalities seeking funding assistance for capital projects, from the province; effectively creating a conditional grant. To qualify for future infrastructure grants, municipalities were required to develop an AMP that is approved by council by December 2013. On April 26, 2013 the province announced that it had created a $100 million Infrastructure Fund for small, rural and northern municipalities.  

Subsequently, the province has introduced further initiatives for infrastructure funding: the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) and the Small Communities Fund (SCF). An Asset Management Plan approved by Council is required as part of the submission for OCIF Applications. Asset Management Plans will be reviewed for comprehensiveness. 

The Municipality of Thames Centre (MoTC) currently develops an AMP for the various asset groups, roads being one of them. A key component of the AMP is a ‘State of the Infrastructure’ (SotI) review of the asset or asset group. The following report provides the SotI review of the MoTC road system and also provides recommendations for budgets and road asset management. 

The scope of this report includes: 

Review and condition rating on the road assets within the MoTC road system  

Development of current replacement costs for each road asset  

Development/review of recommendations for improvement and associated costing on deficient 

assets 

Development of recommendations for annual budgets based on current costs for 

amortization/capital depreciation and major program areas based on updated unit costs 

provided by the MoTC where available. Where costs were not available, local and engineering 

experience were used to develop representative costs 

Development of an analysis on the effect of current and recommended budgets on overall 

system performance 

Provision of Level of Service recommendations 

Provision of Asset Management Strategy recommendations 

The 2015 State of the Infrastructure for Roads Report summarizes the road system survey conducted during the summer of 2015. The survey identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction treatment.  

Further, the report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system in its entirety as well as by road section. Both information sources are used to develop programming and budgets. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project.  

This report should not be confused with a road safety audit. A road safety audit is the formal safety performance examination of an existing or future road or intersection, which qualitatively estimates and reports on potential road safety issues, and identifies opportunities for improvements for all road users. Typically, and more predominantly in a lower tier, rural municipality on lower volume road sections, the 

Page 5: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

ii

road system has some deficiencies with the existing horizontal and vertical alignment. Road sections with potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignments are listed in Appendix D. These section should be reviewed to ensure that signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. 

MoTC provided updated traffic information and corrected road names which were entered into the database and utilized in the preparation of this report.  Accurate and current traffic counts are critical in managing a road system and their importance cannot be overemphasized. Traffic counts establish road maintenance classifications for Minimum Maintenance Standards (MMS) purposes, as per Ontario Regulation 239/02 (Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads). Traffic counts are also used to determine appropriate geometry, structure, and cross‐section when the road is rehabilitated or reconstructed. The MoTC should continue/re‐instate their traffic counting program and include truck counts and dates. Traffic counts should be updated on a regular cycle, as a risk management exercise.  

The MoTC staff provided information with respect to their database/network. As 4 Roads reviewed the road sections, some changes were made to the network data, to ensure the road sections were consistent and manageable.  Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, traffic count or a combination of these factors. For example, new sections should be created as surface type, surface condition, cross‐section, or speed limit changes.  

Data collection and road ratings were completed generally in accordance with the Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads from 1991 (Inventory Manual or IM).  

Road conditions were evaluated during the field inspection. The ratings can be used as a standalone value, or incorporated into calculations performed by the software, that then classify the road section as a ‘Now’, ‘1 to 5’, or ‘6 to 10’ year need for maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction in six critical areas. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. Generally, the closer the timeline to reconstruction, the greater the deterioration of the road is.  For example, a road may be categorized as a ‘6 to 10’ year need with a resurfacing recommendation; this road should be resurfaced as soon as possible to further defer the need to reconstruct. 

Recommendations are made based on the defects observed and other information available in the database at the time of preparation of the report. Once a road asset reaches the project level, the municipality may end up selecting another alternative based on additional information, asset management strategy, development considerations or available funding. 

‘NOW’ needs represent road sections that require reconstruction or major rehabilitation. ‘NOW’ needs are the backlog of work required on the road system; however, ‘NOW’ needs may not necessarily be the priority, depending on funding levels. Construction improvements identified within this time period are representative of roads that have little or no service life left and are in poor condition.  Resurfacing treatments are never ‘NOW’ needs, with the following exceptions; 

RW (Resurface and Widen)  

PR1 or PR2 (Pulverize and resurface 1 or 2 lifts of asphalt) 

When the surface type is inadequate for the traffic volume (gravel road over 400AADT) 

When the surface is gravel and the roadside environment is Urban or Semi‐Urban 

Page 6: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

iii

‘1 to 5’ identifies road sections where reconstruction is anticipated within the next five years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), deferring the need to reconstruct.  

‘6 to 10’ identifies road sections where reconstruction improvements are anticipated within six to ten years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct. 

‘ADEQ’ identifies road sections that do not have reconstruction or resurfacing needs, although minor maintenance such as crack sealing or spot drainage may be required. 

This report summarizes the needs identified through a number of tabular appendices.  

When the Inventory Manual was originally developed, the Province provided funding for municipal road systems; the road systems were measured by their system adequacy. The system adequacy is the percentage of the road system that is not a “NOW” need.  

The Inventory Manual provides direction that roads with a traffic volume of less than 50 vehicles per day are deemed to be adequate, even if they have structural, geometric, or drainage deficiencies that would otherwise be identified as being in a Time of Need and were to be corrected within the maintenance budget. This approach is directly parallel to Regulation 239/02, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads, which states that roads with less than 50 vehicles per day, and a speed limit of less than 80 km/hr., are classified as Class 6 with no standard for repair. This factor does have an effect on the system adequacy calculation. 

However, for the purposes of this report, road sections with a traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day have been provided with a recommended treatment and associated improvement cost in order to provide a more accurate assessment of the total needs and conditions. (Although, the calculations will rate them as adequate due to the traffic count) The road system currently includes 13.286 km of road sections that had an actual or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day representing approximately 3.82% of the road system. 

During the field review, and in reviewing the data and the needs for the road network, there were several unique aspects of the network that came to light: 

The overall condition of the road system is good. However, this is influenced positively to some extent by the following factors: 

o The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring, however, observations could not be made based on the worst case spring thaw conditions. 

o As noted above, 3.82% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day. 

Roads with a surface width less than the minimum tolerable standard were identified on 17.925km of road sections. Typically these road sections are low volume, however, the 

Page 7: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

iv

recommended correction would be a reconstruction of the section to produce the required width. As an interim solution, signage would reduce the municipality’s exposure. 

The status and responsibilities as they relate to the boundary roads appears to be uncertain in a number of instances. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. 

Material gradation on gravel roads may not be in conformity with applicable OPSS standards and/or the material is being placed in too thin a lift causing a significant amount of float (loose gravel) on the road surface. This was only noticeable on some sections ‐not all gravel road sections. 

Approximately 10.2% (35.584 km) of the road system requires resurfacing (hot mix asphalt or surface treatment). If not addressed, the resurfacing needs will become major rehabilitation or reconstruction needs at significantly greater cost.  

Approximately 27.2% (94.659km) of the road system has a structural adequacy score of 15 or 16, indicating that those roads would be an additional resurfacing need in the next 1 to 3 year period (all surface types are included). 

The budget recommendations in this report appear to be higher than current expenditures; however, the system appears to be performing well. There are a number of factors potentially contributing to this anomaly: 

o Reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower volume roads appears to be undertaken by Road Operations staff and it does not appear that municipal equipment is charged against activities in the Operating Budget. 

o  The overall condition may have been influenced by unique accounting practices that have not been identified within the annual funding level over the last number of years. 

o Anecdotal information is that the unit costs for gravel resurfacing is approximately 25% less than the unit costs for gravel in the subdivision construction ($13 vs $10). 

o It appears that gravel roads are being upgraded to hard surface roads through the capital program, so this would offset, to some extent, the gravel road resurfacing requirement. 

Based on the current review of the road system, the current system adequacy measure is 89.7% meaning that, 10.3% of the road system is deficient in the ‘NOW’ time period. The current system adequacy is at an acceptable level. As noted in the foregoing, there are a number of factors influencing the system adequacy. 

Based on the current unit costs being experienced, the estimated total cost of recommended improvements is $27,733,786. The improvement costs include $14,109,782 for those roads identified as NOW needs and $13,624,004 is for road work required in the '1 to 10' year time period or for maintenance. Included in those amounts is $3,121,821 for work on road sections with a traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day or require only maintenance.  

Based on the composition of the road system, budget recommendations have been developed for annual capital and maintenance programs as follows: 

Page 8: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

v

$162,758,900 to replace the road system. Annualized, this would be $3,255,200 for the roads capital/depreciation, excluding resurfacing, based upon a 50‐year life cycle. This would be similar to the PSAB 3150 amortization value using current replacement costs. The annualized value and 50 year life cycle assumes that there will be regular maintenance and resurfacing in addition to the depreciation costs. Section 8 of the report provides additional discussion on this subject. 

$686,500 for average annual hot mix resurfacing, based upon a 19(18.7)‐year cycle. This would approximate an average of 3.2km per year. 

$388,200 for average annual single surface treatment of existing surface‐treated roads, based on a seven‐year cycle, not including additional padding or geometric correction. This is approximately 15.7km per year. 

$1,096,400 for average annual resurfacing gravel roads on a three‐year cycle (this does not include any additional gravel road conversion costs; nor ditching, re‐grading, dust control, etc.). 

$23,700 for average annual crack sealing. 

*NOTE: All of the above noted budget recommendations could change dependent upon the outcome status of the boundary roads review. 

For modeling purposes, 4 Roads has created a funding level described as the ‘Preservation Budget’. The Preservation Budget is the total of the recommended funding levels for hot mix resurfacing, single surface treatment, gravel road resurfacing and crack sealing. This value has been calculated to be $2,194,800. The premise being that if the preservation and resurfacing programs are adequately funded then the system should be sustained. The performance modeling is discussed in Section 9 of this report. To clarify, the required funding level to sustain or improve the road system is not the total of all of the above recommendations. Sustainable funding has to be between the Preservation Budget and the Capital Depreciation. The preservation budget and performance model thereof are computer derived. Intangible values and decisions and the effects of other external forces cannot be incorporated into the model. As such the preservation model is the theoretical minimum required to maintain the system. From a more pragmatic perspective and to deal with the real life realities of maintaining a road system, this amount should be greater. 

Municipal pavement and asset management strategies are critical to managing the performance of the road system, more so, if funding is limited. Funding constraints should push the strategy toward those programs that extend the life cycle of the road by providing the correct treatment at the optimum time. Resurfacing, rehabilitation, and preservation projects should be a higher priority than reconstruction projects. The objective is to “keep the good roads good”. 

As the municipality advances the development of their Asset Management Plan (AMP), a paradigm shift will be required in the way that it approaches management of assets. Traditionally, municipalities have spent a fixed amount on capital and maintenance each year. As evidenced by Table ES.11, programs are not at a consistent funding level on an annual basis. The annual budget overall is met, however, the distribution of costs between traditional capital and maintenance activities varies. That variance is being driven by the demands of the road system based on condition, and project selection is based on condition and best Return on Investment. This concept has to be applied to all assets.  

Page 9: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

vi

Re‐stated, instead of the traditional capital and maintenance line items, consider the gross budget as the annual re‐investment level, with program funding levels fluctuating within the gross amounts, but driven by asset condition.  

The prime goal of any pavement management strategy should be to maintain overall system adequacy. The funding level for road‐related programming should be set at a sufficient level so as to ensure that overall system adequacy does not decrease over time.  

In addition to the budgetary recommendations, the following recommendations are provided for the management of the road inventory. 

1. The information and budget recommendations included in this report should be used to further develop and evolve the corporate Asset Management Plan. 

2. A regular review of the condition of the road system should occur at a maximum four year interval. The review cycle be undertaken at a 4 year interval or segmented annually or bi‐annually. 

3. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. 

4. The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and performance models should be updated annually. 

5. The System Adequacy should be maintained at 60% or higher. 

6. The weighted average Physical Condition should be at 70 or higher. 

7. The Good to Very Good roads should be at 60% or higher. 

8. Programming should be reviewed to ensure that resurfacing and preservation programs are optimized. 

9. The overall road system should have traffic counts updated on a 3 to 5 year cycle. The counting should include the percentage of truck traffic and the date. 

10. The gravel road conversion program should be continued. 

11. Roads sections where potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignment have been identified, should be reviewed to ensure signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. (Listing provided in Appendix D) 

12. Road sections with substandard width should be signed accordingly as an interim measure. (Table ES 5 provides a listing.) 

13. The results and recommendations for programming within this report should be integrated with the other assets groups to ensure available funding is optimized. 

14. Some consideration should be given to calculating equipment costs for activities and projects undertaken by Thames Centre staff to better reflect total project costs and to allow for more direct comparisons of alternate service delivery methodologies.  

Page 10: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

vii

Summary Information All lengths are adjusted for owners’ share / boundary roads 

 Table ES 1: Roadside Environment and Surface Type 

Surface Type 

Roadside Environment 

Total  % of Total Rural  Semi‐Urban  Urban 

Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km Lane‐km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km 

Gravel, Stone, Other Loosetop  181.056  362.111            181.056  362.111  52.12%  52.12% 

High Class Bit.‐asphalt  19.300  38.600  10.044  20.088  26.429  52.858  55.773  111.546  16.06%  16.06% 

Low Class Bit.‐surface treated  99.203  198.405  11.338  22.676       110.541  221.081  31.82%  31.82% 

Total  299.558  599.116  21.382  42.764  26.429  52.858  347.369  694.738       

% of Total  86.24%  86.24%  6.16%  6.16%  7.61%  7.61%             

 

Table ES 2: Roadside Environment and Functional Class 

Road Class 

  Roadside Environment 

Total  % of Total   Rural  Semi‐Urban  Urban 

Description Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km 

Cl‐km Lane‐km 

Cl‐km Lane‐ km 

Cl‐km Lane‐ km 

Cl‐km Lane‐ km 

100  Rural ‐ <50AADT  12.541  25.081          12.541  25.081  3.61%  3.61% 

200  Rural – 50‐199 AADT  198.734  397.468          198.734  397.468  57.21%  57.21% 

300  Rural ‐  200‐399 AADT  21.326  42.651          21.326  42.651  6.14%  6.14% 

400  Rural – 400‐999 AADT  58.576  117.152          58.576  117.152  16.86%  16.86% 

500 Rural – 100‐1999 

AADT  8.382  16.764          8.382  16.764  2.41%  2.41% 

C/R  Collector Residential      0.782  1.564  0.506  1.012  1.288  2.576  0.37%  0.37% 

L/R  Local Residential      17.755  35.51 24.21

8  48.436  41.973  83.946  12.08%  12.08% 

LCI Local Commercial 

industrial      2.845  5.69  1.705  3.41  4.55  9.1  1.31%  1.31% 

Total    299.558  599.116  21.382  42.764 26.42

9  52.858  347.369  694.738     

% of Total    86.24%  86.24%  6.16%  6.16%  7.61%  7.61%         

 

Table ES 3: Traffic Count Vs Count Year 

Year Actual Count 

(km) Estimated Count (km)  TOTAL 

% OF TOTAL 

2010  333.329  4.144  337.473  97.15% 

2015    9.896  9.896  2.85% 

TOTAL  333.329  14.04  347.369   

% OF TOTAL  95.96%  4.04%     

Traffic data did not include dates   

Page 11: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

viii

Table ES 4: Road Sections with Substandard Width 

Asset ID 

CW Asset ID  Street Name  From Desc  To Desc  Length 

130     WHITTAKER LANE  CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE  WEST END  0.278 

230  4618 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE  LEWIS ROAD  EAST END  0.58 

240  4626  DOAN DRIVE  WEST END  15M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD  1.5 

470  4627  MARR ROAD  GLADSTONE DRIVE  END OF STREET  0.164 

480  4807  MARR ROAD  END OF STREET  GLADSTONE DRIVE  0.12 

650  4800  LACEY LANE  CRAMPTON DRIVE  NORTH END  0.152 

1160  4523  DONNYBROOK DRIVE  43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  CASHEL LANE  0.096 

1170  4524  DONNYBROOK DRIVE  CASHEL LANE  END OF STREET  1.026 

1300  4642  RATH STREET  29‐ HAMILTON ROAD  MARSHALL STREET  0.137 

1310  4643  MARSHALL STREET  30‐ PUTNAM ROAD  RATH STREET  0.102 

1315     IRWIN ROAD  BREEN ROAD  SOUTH END  0.092 

1510     FIVE POINTS ROAD  BREEN ROAD  SOUTH END  0.182 

1550  4565  IRWIN ROAD  NORTH END  33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE   0.51 

1570  5024  IRWIN ROAD  CROMARTY DRIVE  32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE   0.032 

1580  4631  IRWIN ROAD  32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE  SOUTH END  0.765 

1590  4466  LEWIS ROAD  NORTH END  39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE   0.625 

1620  4611  LEWIS ROAD 52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)  MOSSLEY DRIVE  1.431 

1660  4623  LEWIS ROAD  CRAMPTON DRIVE  GLADSTONE DRIVE  1.434 

1720  4560  BRADY ROAD  42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE  MOSSLEY DRIVE  1.379 

2200  4569  COW PATH 44M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)  LOWER COW PATH  1.693 

2210  5071  COW PATH  LOWER COW PATH 780M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH ROAD  0.78 

2230  4568  LOWER COW PATH  COW PATH 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)  1.058 

2770  4930  GREGORY DRIVE  WEST END  BRIDGE  0.355 

2780  4760  GREGORY DRIVE  BRIDGE  FAIRVIEW ROAD  0.617 

3280  4997  STOREY DRIVE  1220M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD  FAIRVIEW ROAD  1.22 

4040  4488  BANKS ROAD 27M SOUTH OF 2‐ DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE)  CULVERT  0.721 

4050  4994  BANKS ROAD  CULVERT  TRAFALGAR STREET  0.617 

4550  4901  SHEILS LANE  NORTH END 8M NORTH OF 49‐ CATHERINE STREET (PVMT CHANGE)  0.259 

            Total  17.925 

  

Page 12: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  ix 

  

Table ES 5: Average Traffic Count by MMS Class 

   MMS Class          

   3  4  5  6  Totals 

Roadside Total AADT 

# Assets 

Ave AADT 

Total AADT 

# Assets 

Ave AADT 

Total AADT 

# Assets 

Ave AADT 

Total AADT 

# Assets 

Ave AADT 

Total AADT 

# Assets 

Ave AADT 

R  14625  10  1463  61651  287  215  980  9  109  974  28  35  78230  334  234 

S           22484  19  1183  10527  77  137  155  6  26  33166  102  325 

U           43787  51  859  9718  85  114  70  3  23  53575  139  385 

Total  14625  10    127922  357    21225  171    1199  37    164971  575   

Average        1463        654        121        29        308 

 

Table ES 6: MMS Class by Lanes and Roadside Environment 

MMS Class  3  4  5  6  TOTAL  % OF TOTAL 

Lanes  Roadside  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km 

2  Rural  7.313  14.626  271.989  543.977  7.716  15.432  12.541  25.081  299.558  599.116  86.24%  86.24% 

2 Semi‐Urban  0  0  5.423  10.846  15.42  30.84  0.539  1.078  21.382  42.764  6.16%  6.16% 

2  Urban  0  0  8.856  17.712  17.367  34.734  0.206  0.412  26.429  52.858  7.61%  7.61% 

TOTAL  7.313  14.626  286.268  572.535  40.503  81.006  13.286  26.571  347.369  694.738     

% OF TOTAL  2.11%  2.11%  82.41%  82.41%  11.66%  11.66%  3.82%  3.82%         

 

   

Page 13: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  x 

 

Table ES 7: Time of Need by Length and MMS Class 

   3     4     5     6     TOTAL    % OF TOTAL    

TON  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km 

NOW  0.091  0.182  3.567  7.134  2.324  4.648      5.982  11.964  1.72%  1.72% 

1 to 5  1.797  3.594  125.765  251.529  14.859  29.718      142.421  284.841  41.00%  41.00% 

6 to 10  4.534  9.068  128.29  256.579  17.194  34.388  13.286  26.571  163.303  326.606  47.01%  47.01% 

ADEQ  0.891  1.782  28.647  57.293  6.126  12.252      35.664  71.327  10.27%  10.27% 

TOTAL  7.313  14.626  286.268  572.535  40.503  81.006  13.286  26.571  347.369  694.738     

% OF TOTAL  2.11%  2.11%  82.41%  82.41%  11.66%  11.66%  3.82%  3.82%         

System Adequacy %  87.8  87.8  90.0  90.0  84.9  84.9  100.0  100.0  89.7  89.7     

Good to Very Good Overall %  86.6  86.6  88.7  88.7  79.1  79.1  100.0  100.0  88.0  88.0     

*Good to Very Good in this table include the TON measure in all six critical areas. 

Table ES 8:  Speed limit Reduction Recommendations 

Asset ID  Street Name  From Desc  To Desc  Length  AADT Speed Limit 

Avg Oper Speed  Geometrics 

1140  DONNYBROOK DRIVE 80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  0.08  1,616  80  60  NOW 

1150  DONNYBROOK DRIVE  DORCHESTER ROAD 43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  0.043  70  80  60  NOW 

1170  DONNYBROOK DRIVE  CASHEL LANE  END OF STREET  1.026  70  80  60  NOW 

1190  CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  0.033  35  80  60  NOW 

1400  PIGRAM ROAD  CROMARTY DRIVE 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE  0.371  239  80  55  NOW 

    

Page 14: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  xi 

Table ES 9: Good to Very Good Roads by Structural Adequacy 

  

Time of Need 

MMS Class      

Structural Adequacy  3  4  5  6  Length (km) 

% of System Length 

1  NOW  0  0.093  0.035  0  0.128  0.04% 

2  NOW  0  0.266  0.202  0  0.468  1.57% 

3  NOW  0  0  0.233  0.063  0.296  1.09% 

4  NOW  0  3.383  1.323  0  4.706  17.29% 

5  NOW  0  1.379  1.388  0  2.767  10.16% 

6  NOW  0  4.483  1.057  0.146  5.686  20.89% 

7  NOW  0.811  4.035  1.134  0.005  5.985  21.98% 

8  1 to 5  0  5.741  0.445  0.361  6.547  24.05% 

9  1 to 5  0  0  0.642  0  0.642  2.36% 

10  1 to 5  0  2.093  0.518  0  2.611  0.39% 

11  1 to 5  0.091  0.79  0.856  0  1.737  0.26% 

12  6 to 10  0  61.863  4.47  2.074  68.407  10.24% 

13  6 to 10  0  1.148  1.059  0  2.207  0.33% 

14  6 to 10  1.797  16.677  2.096  0.033  20.603  3.08% 

15  ADEQ  0  63.157  3.675  9.855  76.686  11.48% 

16  ADEQ  0  14.102  3.871  0  17.973  2.69% 

17  ADEQ  0  16.708  3.017  0.399  20.124  3.01% 

18  ADEQ  3.208  58.17  3.531  0.227  65.136  9.75% 

19  ADEQ  1.385  5.471  2.194  0  9.05  1.35% 

20  ADEQ  0.021  26.711  8.757  0.123  35.612  5.28% 

  Grand Total  7.313  286.268  40.503  13.286  347.369   

% Good to Very Good   87.7  92.2  80.7  95.7  90.9   

*Good to Very Good Measured by Structural Adequacy only –not all critical areas 

Page 15: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  xii 

Graph ES1: Estimated Remaining Service Life: Structural Adequacy Rating vs. Length 

 

   

No Remaining Service 

Life 

1 to 10 Yrs Remaining 

Service life 

Greater than 10 Yrs 

Remaining Service life 

Poor Condition Fair to Good Condition  Good to Excellent Condition 

Page 16: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  xiii 

Table ES 10: Road System Needs Summary 

         Time of Need             

         1 to 5  6 to 10  ADEQ  NOW  TOTAL  % OF TOTAL 

Imp. ID  Imp. Description Imp. Class  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km 

Imp. Cost  Km 

CRK   Crack Sealing  Maint            18,192  9.096       18,192  9.096  0.05%  2.58% 

GRR2         150mm of additional Gravel  Maint       467,792  12.075  622,898  15.912       1,090,689  27.987  2.54%  7.42% 

GRR2plus     150mm add'l gravel and minor ditching  Maint       521,409  12.318            521,409  12.318  1.22%  3.26% 

GRR   75mm of Granular A  Maint       81,312  4.970  478,935  26.815       560,247  31.785  1.31%  8.42% 

GRRplus      Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching  Maint       362,132  16.881  51,934  2.141       414,067  19.022  0.97%  5.04% 

MICRO   Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation  Maint            145,416  4.627       145,416  4.627  0.34%  1.23% 

RSpLimit   Reduce Speed limit  Maint            0  0.033  0  0.309  0  0.342     0.20% 

SD   Spot Drainage  Maint       0  48.070  0  9.138       0  57.208     32.97% 

DST   Double Surface Treatment  Rehab  2,396  0.066                 2,396  0.066  0.00%  0.01% 

PR2   Pulverize and Resurface 2 ‐ 100mm  Rehab  50,453  0.222  544,847  2.257       2,042,713  8.594  2,638,013  11.073  8.43%  3.17% 

PR3          Pulverize and Resurface 3 ‐ 150mm  Rehab                 209,553  0.401  209,553  0.401  0.67%  0.11% 

R1rural      R1 Rural Cross‐Section  Rehab  27,922  0.193  115,812  0.866            143,734  1.059  0.46%  0.30% 

R1urban      R1 Urban Cross‐Section  Rehab  70,611  0.212  873,347  2.510            943,958  2.722  3.02%  0.78% 

R2urban      R2 Urban Cross‐Section  Rehab  244,314  0.536                 244,314  0.536  0.78%  0.15% 

SST   Single Surface Treatment  Rehab       156,012  6.547  21,837  0.977       177,849  7.524  2.34%  3.80% 

SSTplus     SST, Berm Removal, Geometric Correction, Minor Ditching  Rehab  4,203  0.116  501,500  12.087            505,703  12.203  6.64%  6.16% 

BS   Base and Surface  Const  618,320  2.390  262,465  1.075  46,215  0.151  1,511,524  7.030  2,438,524  10.646  32.02%  5.38% 

BSgrav       Base and Surface ‐ Gravel  Const       2,342,336  19.328  172,600  1.704       2,514,936  21.032  33.02%  10.62% 

NONE   No Improvement Required  Const            0  87.714       0  87.714     53.99% 

REC   Reconstruction ‐ Rural  Const  1,286,874  2.093  1,138,177  3.085  1,530,679  4.934  4,518,397  14.217  8,474,128  24.329  386.85%  29.97% 

RNS   Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer  Const            33,115  0.063  3,113,420  3.482  3,146,534  3.545  143.64%  4.37% 

RSS   Reconstruction with Storm Sewers  Const  252,095  0.154  577,853  0.353       2,714,175  1.631  3,544,123  2.138  161.79%  2.63% 

TOTAL        2,557,188  5.982  7,944,996  142.421  3,121,821  163.303  14,109,782  35.664  27,733,786  347.369       

Page 17: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  xiv 

 

Graph ES.2: Predicted System Performance at Varying Funding Levels 

 

*Current Municipal budget does not appear to include equipment and machinery costs for construction work performed by municipal staff. 

 

   

Page 18: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  xv 

Table ES 11: 10 Year Program ‐Performance Model Output –Current Funding Level 

Imp.Type  Year    

   2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  Grand Total 

BS           11,954  25,558                                37,512 

BSgrav  696,451                                           696,451 

CRK  17,792   12,443   1,624  1,674  31,195  2,076  4,056   1,142  4,370             6,762                 83,134 

DST  2,396                                               2,396 

GRR2  13,137   213,476   748,175  418,140  180,721  810,242  316,060   1,150,303  309,712         322,566            4,482,532 

MICRO  2,741   35,569   11,663  3,061  37,592  3,474  54,799      22,271             2,389               173,559 

PR2     205,859   44,110  381,979  352,588     20,960                136,670            1,142,166 

R1           102,015     322,888  91,784      733,468      1,008,232            2,258,387 

R1rural        27,922     107,258     8,553                         143,733 

R1urban  70,610   246,602   327,447  270,870        28,427                         943,956 

R2urban     244,314                                        244,314 

RNS     211,750      208,176  204,602  181,372                           805,900 

SST  177,850   270,824   324,443  8,556  546,847  166,054  961,788   334,508  416,734             9,803            3,217,407 

SSTplus  505,703                                           505,703 

GRR2plus     45,708      79,939                                 125,647 

Grand Total    

1,486,680     

1,486,545    

1,485,384   

1,486,364   

1,486,361   

1,486,106   

1,486,427    

1,485,953   

1,486,555      1,486,422          14,862,797 

 

 

   

Page 19: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx  xvi 

Table ES 11: Improvement Type Abbreviation Summary 

Code  Description 

R1  Basic Resurfacing 

R2  Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift 

RM  Major Resurfacing 

PR1  Pulverizing and Resurfacing 

PR2  Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift  

BS  Tolerable standard for lower volume roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only. Improves drainage and 

RW  Resurface and Widen 

REC  Reconstruction 

RNS  Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain, 

RSS  Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers, and manholes in addition to the 

NC  Proposed Road Construction 

SRR  Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement 

SST  Single Surface Treatment 

SST+  Single Surface Treatment and minor ditching 

SST++  Single Surface Treatment , 10% base repairs and minor ditching 

GRR /GRR2  Gravel road resurfacing 1 lift or 2 lifts; 75mm or 150mm; Plus includes ditching for 10% of the length 

Micro  Microsurfacing 

CRK  Crack sealing 

 

Page 20: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

  

Contents 

1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 1

2 ASSET CONDITION RATING METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 32.1 Asset Condition Rating Methodology ................................................................................................... 3

Inventory Manual History ..................................................................................................... 3 Inventory Manual Overview ................................................................................................. 3

2.2 Types of Improvements ........................................................................................................................ 5

3 STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................................. 73.1 Scope / Asset Type(s) ............................................................................................................................ 73.2 Road System Inventory and Classification ............................................................................................ 73.3 Surface Types and Roadside Environment ............................................................................................ 73.4 Minimum Maintenance Standard (MMS) Classification ....................................................................... 83.5 Functional / Existing / Design Classifications ...................................................................................... 103.6 Horizontal and Vertical Alignment ...................................................................................................... 113.7 Drainage .............................................................................................................................................. 13

Drainage Outlet and Master Planning ................................................................................ 163.8 Boundary Roads .................................................................................................................................. 16

4 ROAD SYSTEM CONDITION ......................................................................................................... 184.1 Road System Condition by Time of Need ............................................................................................ 184.2 Road System Adequacy ....................................................................................................................... 184.3 Road System Needs ............................................................................................................................. 19

Physical Condition .............................................................................................................. 22 Remaining Service Life ........................................................................................................ 22

4.4 Record of Assumptions –Time of Need (TON), Improvement and Replacement Costs ..................... 23

5 REPLACEMENT COST VALUATION ............................................................................................... 24

6 ASSET CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND PLAN UPDATES. ............................................................... 256.1 Condition Assessment Cycle Recommendation .................................................................................. 25

7 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) .............................................................................................................. 267.1 Current Level of Service Measurement .............................................................................................. 26

System Adequacy ............................................................................................................... 26 Physical Condition .............................................................................................................. 26 MPMP Good to Very Good ................................................................................................. 26

8 ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 278.1 Asset Management Overview ............................................................................................................. 278.2 Priority Rating vs. Condition Rating .................................................................................................... 288.3 Cross Asset Integration and Project Prioritization .............................................................................. 30

Page 21: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

  

8.4 Gravel Roads Management Strategy .................................................................................................. 30

9 PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 349.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 349.2 Capital Depreciation ............................................................................................................................ 349.3 Hot Mix Resurfacing ............................................................................................................................ 359.4 Surface Treatment Resurfacing ........................................................................................................... 369.5 Gravel Road Resurfacing ..................................................................................................................... 369.6 Crack Sealing ....................................................................................................................................... 369.7 Annual Budget Adjustments ............................................................................................................... 36

Inflation .............................................................................................................................. 36 Plant Adjustment ................................................................................................................ 37

9.8 Performance Modeling‐ Budget Effect on System Performance ........................................................ 37 Asset Management Plan (AMP) and Strategy Analysis ...................................................... 37 Performance Model Overview ........................................................................................... 38

9.9 System Performance at Various Budget Levels .................................................................................. 389.10Record of Assumptions ‐Performance Modeling ................................................................................ 42

Pavement Classification for Modeling ................................................................................ 429.1110 Year Program .................................................................................................................................. 43

10 STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE ‐ ROADS RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 45 

   

Page 22: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

  

 

List of Tables Table 2.1:   Road Improvement Types ................................................................................................... 5Table 2.2:   Average Improvement Costs per Kilometre by Improvement Type ................................... 6Table 3.1:  Surface Type and Roadside Environment Distribution ....................................................... 8Table 3.2:   Regulation 239/02 Minimum Maintenance Standard Road Classification ......................... 9Table 3.3:   Minimum Maintenance Standards Class Distribution ...................................................... 10Table 3.4:   Functional Road Class Distribution .................................................................................... 10Table 3.5:   Posted Speed vs. Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed ................................................... 12Table 3.6:   Speed Limit Reduction Recommendations ....................................................................... 13Table 3.7:   Drainage by Time of Need (Km) ........................................................................................ 15Table 3.8:   Municipality of Thames Centre Boundary Roads .............................................................. 17Table 4.1:   Roads System by Time of Need and MMS Class ............................................................... 18Table 4.2:   Unit Costs .......................................................................................................................... 20Table 4.3:   Improvement costs by Improvement Type and Time of Need ......................................... 21Table 5.1:   Average Replacement Costs .............................................................................................. 24Table 8.1:   Gravel Road Conversion Candidates ................................................................................. 32Table 9.1:   Hot Mix Asphalt Roads by Asset Class and Life Cycle........................................................ 35Table 9.2:   Sample Section Life Cycle .................................................................................................. 40Table 9.3:   Road Asset Classes ............................................................................................................ 42Table 9.4:   Performance Model Summary ‐ Ten Year Program .......................................................... 44 

List of Figures 

Figure 3.1:    Safe StoLJLJing Distance (Table C2‐1 from MTO GeoƳeǘric Design Sǘandards for Ontario   Highways) .......................................................................................................................... 11

Figure 3.2:   Potentially Substandard Vertical and Horizontal Alignment ............................................ 12Figure 3.3:   OPSS 200.10 ...................................................................................................................... 14Figure 3.4:   Poor Shoulder Drainage .................................................................................................... 15Figure 4.1:   Remaining Service Life ...................................................................................................... 22Figure 8.1:   Treatment Cost vs. Deterioration ..................................................................................... 29Figure 8.2:   Pavement Management‐ The Right Treatment at the Right Time .................................... 29Figure 9.1:   Performance Modeling at Various Budget Levels ............................................................. 40Figure 9.2:   Graphical Representation of a Typical Life Cycle and Strategy Cost Differential .............. 41Figure 9.3:   Annual Expenditures Budget to Maintain ......................................................................... 41Figure 9.4:   Treatment Selection vs. Condition (Asphalt Surfaces) ...................................................... 43

    

Page 23: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

  

List of Appendices 

Appendix A:    Inventory Manual methodology Overview 

Appendix B:   Pavement Structure and Defects 

Appendix C:   Gravel Road Conversion 

Appendix D:   Potential Substandard Alignment 

Appendix E:   Deterioration Curve Detail 

Appendix F:    10 Year Program Based on Current Budget 

Appendix G:   Critical Deficiencies by Asset ID 

Appendix H:   Needs Sorted by Time of Need and Improvement Category 

Appendix I:   Mapping – Roads by Surface Type 

Appendix J:   Mapping – Roadside Environment 

Appendix K:   Mapping – Roads by Time of Need and Improvement Type 

 

 

Page 24: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

1 Introduction and Background  In the fall of 2012, the Province of Ontario, introduced a requirement for an Asset Management Plan (AMP) as a prerequisite for municipalities seeking funding assistance for capital projects, from the province; effectively creating a conditional grant. To qualify for future infrastructure grants, municipalities were required to develop an AMP that is approved by council by December 2013. On April 26, 2013 the province announced that it had created a $100 million Infrastructure Fund for small, rural and northern municipalities.  

Subsequently, the province has introduced further initiatives for infrastructure funding: the Ontario Community Infrastructure Fund (OCIF) and the Small Communities Fund (SCF). An Asset Management Plan approved by Council is required as part of the submission for OCIF Applications. Asset Management Plans will be reviewed for comprehensiveness. 

Conditional Grants are not new to Ontario. Until the mid‐1990’s, Road Needs Studies (RNS) were completed by municipalities and submitted to the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) on an annual basis in order to receive provincial funding for their road programs.  

The Municipality of Thames Centre (MoTC) currently develops an AMP for the various asset groups, roads being one of them. A key component of the AMP is a ‘State of the Infrastructure’ (SotI) review of the asset or asset group. This report provides the SotI review of the Municipality of Thames Centre road system and also provides recommendations for budgets and road asset management. 

To put the language in a more current context, this report is essentially the State of the Infrastructure (SotI) for roads that has evolved into an asset management plan for the road assets. 

The scope of this report includes: 

Review and condition rating on the road assets within the MoTC road system  

Development of current replacement costs for each road asset  

Development/review of recommendations for improvement and associated costing on deficient 

assets 

Development of recommendations for annual budgets based on current costs for 

amortization/capital depreciation and major program areas based on updated unit costs 

provided by the municipality where available. Where costs were not available, local and 

engineering experience were used to develop representative costs. 

Development of an analysis on the effect of current and recommended budgets on overall 

system performance. 

Provision of Level of Service recommendations 

Provision of Asset Management Strategy recommendations 

The 2015 report summarizes the condition data survey conducted during the summer of 2015. The database identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended maintenance, rehabilitation or reconstruction treatment. 

Recommendations are made based on the defects observed and other information available in the database at the time of preparation of the report. Once a road asset reaches the project level, the 

Page 25: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

municipality may end up selecting another alternative based on additional information, asset management strategy, development considerations or available funding. 

Road sections that will not be addressed in the immediate plan should be reviewed for advisory signage as a risk management exercise. 

4 Roads believes that the content of this report satisfies the State of the infrastructure requirements and provides a solid foundation to further develop and evolve the Expected Levels of Services, Asset Management and Financing requirements. 4 Roads Management Services Inc. has prepared this report in a format that it believes will readily lend itself to integration with the corporate AMP. 

The Inventory Manual methodology is discussed further in Section 2 of this report and Appendix A. 

   

Page 26: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

2 Asset Condition Rating Methodology 

2.1 Asset Condition Rating Methodology 

The provincial requirements for AMP’s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road section reviews completed as part of this study follow the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, 1991. 

Inventory Manual History 

From the 1960’s until the mid‐1990’s, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) required the municipalities to regularly update the condition ratings of their road systems in a number of key areas. The process was originally created by the MTO, as a means to distribute conditional funding, on an equitable basis, between municipalities. The report was referred to as a ‘Road Needs Study’ (RNS) and was required in order to receive a conditional grant to subsidize the municipal road programs. After the introduction in the 1960’s by the MTO, the methodology evolved into the current format by the late 1970’s. The most current version of the Inventory Manual is dated 1991, and is the methodology used for this report. The practice was discontinued by a number of municipalities, when conditional funding for roads was eliminated in the mid‐1990’s.  

Inventory Manual Overview  

The Inventory Manual Methodology is a sound, consistent, asset management practice that still works well today, and in view of the increasing demands on efficiency and asset management, represents a sound asset management practice that should be repeated on a cyclical basis. The road section review identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended rehabilitation strategy. 

The MoTC report summarizes the road system survey conducted during the summer 2015. The report provides an overview of the overall condition of the road system by road section, including such factors as structural adequacy, drainage, and surface condition. The study also provides an indication of apparent deficiencies in horizontal and vertical alignment elements, as per the Ministry of Transportation’s manual, “Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways”.  

Further, the report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system, which may be used for programming and budgeting. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project. 

Asset Management by its very nature is holistic. Managing a road network based solely on pavement condition would be critically deficient in scope in terms of the information required to make an informed decision as to the improvements required on a road section.  

Page 27: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

The Inventory Manual offers a holistic review of each road section, developing a Time of Need (TON) or an Adequate rating in six areas that are critical to municipal decision making: 

Geometrics* 

Surface Type* 

Surface Width* 

Capacity* 

Structural Adequacy 

Drainage  

The Inventory Manual describes the standards in four of the areas as ‘Minimum Tolerable Standards. (Identified with an asterisk above) To render an appropriate improvement recommendation, consideration should be given to each of the areas. Given the ‘Minimum Tolerable’ designation in the manual, 4 Roads has referred to the areas as ‘critical’. 

Evaluations of each road section were completed generally in accordance with the MTO’s Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads (1991). Data collected was entered directly into WorkTech’s Asset Foundation software. Condition ratings, Time of Need, Priority Ratings, and associated costs were then calculated by the software, in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Unit costs for construction were provided by MoTC staff and through comparative analysis with similar municipalities. 

Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, or a combination of these factors. As an example, section changes should occur as surface type, surface condition, cross‐section, or speed limit changes. Some changes were made during the field review to establish consistency. 

The Condition Ratings, developed through the scoring in the Inventory Manual, classify roads as ‘NOW’, ‘1 to 5’, or ‘6 to 10’ year needs for reconstruction. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. For example, a road may be categorized as a ‘6 to 10’ year need with a resurfacing recommendation. This road should be resurfaced as soon as possible, to further defer the need to reconstruct. 

Field data is obtained through a visual examination of the road system and includes: structural adequacy, level of service, maintenance demand, horizontal and vertical alignment, surface and shoulder width, surface condition, and drainage. The Condition Rating is calculated based upon a combination of other calculations and data.  

To best utilize the database information and modern asset management concepts, it has to be understood that the Time of Need (TON) ratings are the estimated time before the road would require reconstruction. NOW needs are still roads that require reconstruction; however, it is not intended that ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’ year needs are to be acted on in that timeframe. The ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’  year needs are current candidates for resurfacing treatments that will elevate their structural status to ‘ADEQ’, and offer the greatest return on investment for a road authority (notwithstanding a drainage or capacity need, etc.). The Time of Need ratings from the Structural Adequacy perspective are described more fully in Appendix A. 

Page 28: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

2.2 Types of Improvements 

This report identifies ratings that are resultant from identification of deficiencies on each road section that equate to a TON in one or more of the six critical areas: Geometry, Surface Type, Surface Width, Capacity, Structural Adequacy, or Drainage. Based on the ratings and the deficiencies noted an improvement type recommendation is also provided. 

The key factor in providing an improvement type recommendation is the visual survey. During the visual survey, a determination is made as to whether the appearance and performance of a road relates to an underlying structural problem, or simply to aged surface materials. A road’s structural or drainage problem would tend to result in a reconstruction/ replacement treatment recommendation, whereas aged surface materials would result in a resurfacing/rehabilitation treatment recommendation. A determination of the root cause of the problem or the condition is critical; reconstructing a road that should have had some type of resurfacing treatment would be an ineffective use of available resources. For the purposes of this report, the standard improvement types and associated costing formulae identified in the Inventory Manual have been used. The table below provides a list of road improvements. 

Table 2.1: Road Improvement Types 

Code  Description 

R1  Basic Resurfacing 

R2  Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift 

RM  Major Resurfacing 

PR1  Pulverizing and Resurfacing 

PR2  Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift  

BS  Tolerable standard for lower volume roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only. Improves drainage 

RW  Resurface and Widen 

REC  Reconstruction 

RNS  Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain, 

RSS  Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers, and manholes in addition to the 

NC  Proposed Road Construction 

SRR  Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement 

SST  Single Surface Treatment 

SST+  Single Surface Treatment and minor ditching 

SST++  Single Surface Treatment , 10% base repairs and minor ditching 

GRR  Gravel road resurfacing 1 lift or 2 lifts; 75mm or 150mm; Plus includes ditching for 10% of the length 

Micro  Microsurfacing 

CRK  Crack sealing 

   

Page 29: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 2.2: Average Improvement Costs per Kilometre by Improvement Type 

      Roadside Environment          

      Rural    Semi‐Urban     Urban     TOTAL     Cost/km 

Imp. Type  Description  Imp. Cost  Length  Imp. Cost  Length  Imp. Cost  Length  Imp. Cost  Length  $$ 

BS   Base and Surface  1,732,961  8.11  705,562  2.55  0  0  2,438,524  10.65  228,948 

BSgrav       Base and Surface ‐ Gravel  2,514,936  22.4  0  0  0  0  2,514,936  22.4  112,264 

CRK   Crack Sealing  1,476  0.74  1,600  0.8  15,116  7.56  18,192  9.1  2,000 

DST  Double Surface Treatment  2,396  0.07  0  0  0  0  2,396  0.07  36,300 

GRR2        150mm of additional Gravel  1,090,689  28.8  0  0  0  0  1,090,689  28.8  37,869 

GRR2plus    150mm add'l gravel and minor ditching  521,409  12.96  0  0  0  0  521,409  12.96  40,226 

GRR   75mm of Granular A  560,247  32.33  0  0  0  0  560,247  32.33  17,329 

GRRplus     Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching  414,067  19.69  0  0  0  0  414,067  19.69  21,026 

MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation  0  0  0  0  145,416  4.63  145,416  4.63  31,428 

NONE  No Improvement Required  0  83.72  0  4.94  0  7.5  0  96.16 

                    ‐   

PR2  Pulverize and Resurface 2 ‐ 100mm  2,086,490  8.83  551,523  2.24  0  0  2,638,013  11.07  238,238 

PR3         Pulverize and Resurface 3 ‐ 150mm  0  0  209,553  0.4  0  0  209,553  0.4  522,576 

R1rural      R1 Rural Cross‐Section  115,812  0.87  27,922  0.19  0  0  143,734  1.06  135,726 

R1urban      R1 Urban Cross‐Section  0  0  0  0  943,958  2.72  943,958  2.72  346,788 

R2urban      R2 Urban Cross‐Section  0  0  0  0  244,314  0.54  244,314  0.54  455,811 

REC   Reconstruction ‐ Rural  7,879,182  22.86  594,946  1.47  0  0  8,474,128  24.33  348,314 

RNS  Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer  0  0  33,115  0.06  3,113,420  3.48  3,146,534  3.55  887,598 

RSS  Reconstruction with Storm Sewers  0  0  3,544,123  2.14  0  0  3,544,123  2.14  1,657,681 

RSpLimit   Reduce Speed limit  0  0.53  0  0  0  0  0  0.53    

SD   Spot Drainage  0  52.96  0  4.68  0  0  0  57.65    

SST   Single Surface Treatment  151,199  6.39  26,650  1.13  0  0  177,849  7.52  23,638 

SSTplus    

 SST, Berm Removal, Geometric Correction, Minor Ditching  477,413  12.42  28,290  0.79  0  0  505,703  13.21  38,282 

TOTAL     17,548,277  313.69  5,723,285  21.38  4,462,224  26.43  27,733,786  361.5    

% OF TOTAL     63.27%  86.77%  20.64%  5.91%  16.09%  7.31%          

Note: length is unadjusted for boundary roads 

Appendix A includes fuller descriptions of each of the above noted improvements. 

Appendix B of this report includes a discussion of Pavement Structure and defects.   

Page 30: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

3 State of the Infrastructure 

3.1 Scope / Asset Type(s) 

This report addresses road assets only. The content will provide review and analysis of the road system from a number of perspectives including condition rating, functional classification, roadside environment, replacement cost and Regulation 239/02 classification.  

3.2 Road System Inventory and Classification 

Road sections within road systems may be classified in a number of ways, to illustrate their roadside environment, surface type, functional classification, and so forth. The classifications provide assistance in developing further information, with respect to the road system, such as replacement costs and performance expectations. 

3.3 Surface Types and Roadside Environment 

Roadside environment and surface type criteria of a road section are useful in characterization of the road section, and in determining costs for replacement, reconstruction and rehabilitation treatments. 

The Inventory Manual classifies the roadside environment as Rural, Semi‐Urban or Urban. The classification is determined by length, servicing, and adjacent land use.  

Rural Roads – within areas of sparse development, or where development is less than 50% of the frontage, including developed areas extending less than 300 m on one side or 200 m on both sides, with no curbs and gutters. 

Semi‐Urban Roads – within areas where development exceeds 50% of the frontage for a minimum of 300 m on one side, or 200 m on both sides, with no curbs and gutters, with or without storm/combination sewers, or for subdivisions where the lot frontages are 30 m or greater. 

Urban Roads – within areas where there are curbs and gutters on both sides, served with storm or combination sewers, or curb and gutter on one side, served with storm or combination sewers, or reversed paved shoulders with, or served by, storm or combination sewers, or for subdivisions with frontages less than 30 m.  

Table 3.1 identifies the road system by surface type and roadside environment. 

   

Page 31: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 3.1: Surface Type and Roadside Environment Distribution 

Surface Type 

Roadside Environment 

Total  % of Total Rural  Semi‐Urban  Urban 

Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km Lane‐km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km 

Gravel, Stone, Other Loosetop  181.056  362.111            181.056  362.111  52.12%  52.12% 

High Class Bit.‐asphalt  19.300  38.600  10.044  20.088  26.429  52.858  55.773  111.546  16.06%  16.06% 

Low Class Bit.‐surface treated  99.203  198.405  11.338  22.676       110.541  221.081  31.82%  31.82% 

Total  299.558  599.116  21.382  42.764  26.429  52.858  347.369  694.738       

% of Total  86.24%  86.24%  6.16%  6.16%  7.61%  7.61%             

3.4 Minimum Maintenance Standard (MMS) Classification 

In November 2002, Regulation 239/02, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways (MMS) came into effect. Essentially, if a municipality met the standard and documented it, they would not be negligent per Section 44(3)c of the Municipal Act noted above. Regulation 239/02 provided for a review five years after its original implementation. A process to revise Regulation 239/02, chaired by the Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA), culminated in a revised regulation, Regulation 23/10, coming into effect in February 2010. 

In the late fall of 2011, a court decision (Giuliani) was rendered that effectively created case law that negated the protection that the MMS afforded, and in particular, Tables 4 and 5 of the regulation (which address Snow Accumulation and Icy Roads). Essentially, the decision created a new standard that went beyond the MMS. The effect on a municipality is that a higher standard of weather monitoring and documentation and response to monitoring is required.  

OGRA re‐called the MMS committee to further amend the regulation, to address the outcome of the Giuliani decision. As a result of the committee meetings and discussions with the province, Regulation 47/13 came into effect, amending Regulations 239/02 and 23/10, on January 25, 2013. 

The Minimum Maintenance Standards do not have to be adopted by a municipal council per se. The regulation is provincial, applies to all municipalities, and is available for municipalities to use as a defense if they have met the standard and documented it. The more important issue would be to ensure that a municipality has the appropriate Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s) in place, and that they are followed and documented, rather than trying to reword or parallel the language of the regulation into a document that is municipality‐specific. 

Traffic counts are important for a number of decision making purposes, with respect to the road system. Accurate, defensible traffic counts, in conjunction with the posted speed limits, are used in determining the MMS class of the respective road sections.  

Roads are divided into six service classes by posted speed and traffic count, with Class 1 being the highest service level and Class 6 being the lowest. There are no service standards for Class 6 roads which have less than 50 vehicles per day. Table 3.2 shows Regulation 239/02’s traffic/speed/ classification 

Page 32: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

matrix.  

Table 3.2: Regulation 239/02 Minimum Maintenance Standard Road Classification 

Annual Average Daily Traffic  

(number of motor vehicles per day) Posted or Statutory Speed Limit (kilometres per hour) 

   100  90  80  70  60  50  40 

15, 000 or more  1  1  1  2  2  2  2 

12, 000 ‐ 14, 999  1  1  1  2  2  3  3 

10, 000 ‐ 11, 999  1  1  2  2  3  3  3 

8, 000 ‐ 9, 999  1  1  2  3  3  3  3 

6, 000 ‐ 7, 999  1  2  2  3  3  3  3 

5, 000 ‐ 5, 999  1  2  2  3  3  3  3 

4, 000 ‐ 4, 999  1  2  3  3  3  3  4 

3, 000 ‐ 3, 999  1  2  3  3  3  4  4 

2, 000 ‐ 2,999  1  2  3  3  4  4  4 

1, 000 ‐ 1,999  1  3  3  3  4  4  5 

500 ‐ 999  1  3  4  4  4  4  5 

200 ‐ 499  1  3  4  4  5  5  5 

50 ‐ 199  1  3  4  5  5  5  5 

 0 ‐ 49  1  3  6  6  6  6  6 

 

 

As per the Regulation, different road classifications require different response times. For example, the response time that is required to remove snow accumulation is 12 hours for a Class 3 road, and 16 hours for a Class 4.  

Response time is the time from when the municipality becomes aware that a condition exists, until the time that the condition is corrected or brought within the limits specified in the regulation. This may have a significant impact with respect to the equipment and staffing that may be required to meet the standard, particularly in the case of winter control. The implications are that this increased service level may require the municipality to increase the inspection frequency, staff, and machinery to deliver the service beyond the service delivery hours that may currently exist.   

The distribution of the MMS Classes across the road system is detailed in Table 3.3. 

Page 33: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

10 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 3.3: Minimum Maintenance Standards Class Distribution 

MMS Class  3  4  5  6  TOTAL 

Lanes  Roadside  Cl‐km Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐km  Cl‐km 

Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km 

2  R  7.313  14.626  271.989  543.977  7.716  15.432  12.541  25.081  299.558  599.116 

2  S  0  0  5.423  10.846  15.42  30.84  0.539  1.078  21.382  42.764 

2  U  0  0  8.856  17.712  17.367  34.734  0.206  0.412  26.429  52.858 

TOTAL  7.313  14.626  286.268  572.535  40.503  81.006  13.286  26.571  347.369  694.738 

% OF TOTAL  2.11%  2.11%  82.41%  82.41%  11.66%  11.66%  3.82%  3.82%     

 

WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation automatically classifies road sections by the MMS once traffic data and speed limits have been entered. 

3.5 Functional / Existing / Design Classifications 

Roads are further classified within the database by classes such as Local, Collector, or Arterial and Residential or Industrial. Items 33 and 105 in the Inventory Manual provide further direction on determination of the Existing or Design Classes of road. Generally, the classifications are predicated on the existing use, roadside environment, and anticipated growth over either the ten‐ or twenty‐year planning horizon. 

The road sections are classified by the rater, at the time of the field review. Table 3.4 identifies the Functional Road Class Distribution from the Inventory Manual 

Table 3.4: Functional Road Class Distribution 

Road Class 

  Roadside Environment 

Total  % of Total   Rural  Semi‐Urban  Urban 

Description Cl‐km 

Lane‐ km 

Cl‐km Lane‐km 

Cl‐km Lane‐ km 

Cl‐km Lane‐ km 

Cl‐km Lane‐ km 

100  Rural ‐ <50AADT  12.541  25.081          12.541  25.081  3.61%  3.61% 

200  Rural – 50‐199 AADT  198.734  397.468          198.734  397.468  57.21%  57.21% 

300  Rural ‐  200‐399 AADT  21.326  42.651          21.326  42.651  6.14%  6.14% 

400  Rural – 400‐999 AADT  58.576  117.152          58.576  117.152  16.86%  16.86% 

500 Rural – 100‐1999 

AADT  8.382  16.764          8.382  16.764  2.41%  2.41% 

C/R  Collector Residential      0.782  1.564  0.506  1.012  1.288  2.576  0.37%  0.37% 

L/R  Local Residential      17.755  35.51  24.218  48.436  41.973  83.946  12.08%  12.08% 

LCI Local Commercial 

industrial      2.845  5.69  1.705  3.41  4.55  9.1  1.31%  1.31% 

Total    299.558  599.116  21.382  42.764  26.429  52.858  347.369  694.738     

% of Total    86.24%  86.24%  6.16%  6.16%  7.61%  7.61%         

Page 34: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

11 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

3.6 Horizontal and Vertical Alignment 

The changes in direction and elevation of the road are referred to as the horizontal and vertical alignment. The changes in direction should be designed and constructed such that the posted speed limit of the road section may be safely maintained throughout the section. If maintaining the posted speed in safety cannot be achieved, then the horizontal or vertical curve would be identified as substandard. 

Lower volume roads that have not been reconstructed, tend to closely follow (or avoid) the existing contours of the land. In southern Ontario, which is relatively flat, there was a greater tendency to follow the alignments of the original Township surveys. However, where these roads were adjacent to larger streams and rivers, there was still a tendency to follow the topography. The result was/is a road alignment that tends to change vertical and horizontal direction frequently; at times without much notice. 

When a new road is designed, one of the considerations is the Safe Stopping Distance (SSD). The calculation of the distance to stop safely from any given speed is based upon several factors, such as posted speed limit, reaction times, and friction. When road sections are evaluated for a road needs study, the number of vertical and horizontal curves that appear to be deficient are identified. The identification is based on whether there is sufficient SSD for the posted speed limit. The following table is an excerpt from the Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways, and indicates the SSD’s required for various design speeds. 

Figure 3.1: Safe Stopping Distance (Table C2‐1 from MTO Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways) 

 

On rural roads, one of the effects of substandard alignments is a decrease in the Average Operating Speed through the road section. An Average Operating Speed that is significantly lower than the posted 

Page 35: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

12 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

speed will result in a Geometric Need for the road section. The following table from the Inventory Manual identifies the limits that will trigger a geometric need for typical posted speed limits. 

 

Table 3.5: Posted Speed vs. Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed 

Item  Speed 

Legal Speed Limit  40  50  60  70  80  90 

Minimum Tolerable Operating Speed  35  45  50  60  65  75 

 

The following pictures were not taken in MoTC, but provide examples of potentially substandard alignments.

Figure 3.2: Potentially Substandard Vertical and Horizontal Alignment 

 

 

Page 36: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

13 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 3.6: Speed Limit Reduction Recommendations 

Asset ID  Street Name  From Desc  To Desc  Length  AADT Speed Limit 

Avg Oper Speed  Geometrics 

1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE 

80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 

32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  0.08  1,616  80  60  NOW 

1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE  DORCHESTER ROAD 

43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  0.043  70  80  60  NOW 

1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE  CASHEL LANE  END OF STREET  1.026  70  80  60  NOW 

1190  CASHEL LANE 33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD 

32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD  0.033  35  80  60  NOW 

1400  PIGRAM ROAD  CROMARTY DRIVE 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE  0.371  239  80  55  NOW 

 

Appendix D includes a listing of all of the rural road sections with potentially sub‐standard vertical or horizontal alignments that should be reviewed for signage, speed reduction, or correction. Any signage should be in conformity with the Ontario Traffic Manual. The alignments have been referred to as ‘potentially substandard’ as the study undertaken is only a visual assessment of existing conditions. Further engineering review would be required to determine if the curves are substandard and if any additional signage or correction is required.  

3.7 Drainage 

Adequate drainage is critical to the performance of a road to maximize its’ life expectancy. Roads are designed, constructed, and maintained in order to minimize the amount of water that may enter, or flow over, the road structure.  

In the case of water flowing over the road, assessment must be made of the circumstances on a site‐specific basis. Factors that should be considered include the traffic volumes of the road section, economic impacts to the loss of the use of the road, upgrade costs, and risks. 

Water in a road base can cause different reactions at different times of the year. In non‐freezing conditions, the granular road base can become saturated. Too much water displaces the granular material; it removes the material’s ability to support the loads for which it was designed. Too much water in the granular material actually acts like a lubricant, and facilitates the displacement of the material under load. In freezing conditions, water in the road structure can cause frost heave, potholes, and pavement break‐up as the water freezes and expands. Generally, a saturated granular road base results in structural failure of the road. 

Figure 3.3 provides an example of a rural road, illustrating what the relationship between the gravel road base and the drainage should be. The relationship is the same in an urban system, although not as obvious. Rural road drainage is typically achieved through roadside ditches. Rural road ditches should be a minimum of 500 mm below the granular road base, to ensure that the road base remains free from moisture and maintains its ability to carry loads.  

Page 37: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

14 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Urban roads typically have a storm sewer pipe network that carries the minor storm event. The roadway itself is often part of the overland flow route for the major event. The drainage of the granular road base is accomplished through sub‐drains installed below the curb and gutter, lower than the lowest elevation of the granular base. This satisfies the same purpose as the ditch in a rural cross‐section, by providing an outlet to ensure that the granular base remains dry. 

Figure 3.3: OPSS 200.10 

 

 

Evaluations of the drainage scores were in part predicated upon the structural score. For example where a road section had virtually no ditch, or very minimal ditching but the road structure did not show any signs of failure typically observed when there is inadequate drainage, then generally a rating was between 12 and 14 and a ‘SD‐ (Spot Drainage) improvement noted. Where it was obvious that the inadequate ditch was exacerbating the distress on the road or there was occasional flooding, the score was further reduced, and the recommended improvement type was some type of major rehabilitation or reconstruction dependent upon the traffic volumes. Table 3.7 provides an overview of the drainage needs of the road system by Time of Need. 

   

Page 38: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

15 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 3.7: Drainage by Time of Need (Km) 

Roadside Environment  1 to 5  6 to 10  ADEQ  TOTAL 

Rural    155.541  144.018  299.558 

Semi‐Urban  0.115  12.858  8.409  21.382 

Urban      26.429  26.429 

TOTAL  0.115  168.399  178.856  347.369 

 

Maintenance of the drainage system(s) is critical to the long‐term performance of a road system. Low volume rural roads tend to have a winter maintenance program that includes the application of sand to improve traction. Over time, that sand builds up on the edge of the pavement, to a point where it effectively blocks runoff from getting to the ditch. The runoff is trapped at the edge of pavement, where it saturates that area of the road bed, contributing to the early failure of the edge of the pavement. This element of the road cross‐section is not scored as part of the overall evaluation.  

Presence or absence of roadside berms is not evaluated during a road review. This is a maintenance issue. However, if roadside berms are not removed, the effect on the overall pavement is similar to not having a ditch. Water cannot drain from the road and it enters into the granular base potentially saturating it. The saturated base cannot support load. Figure 3.4 was not taken in the MoTC, but does illustrate the foregoing discussion. 

 

Figure 3.4: Poor Shoulder Drainage 

 

 

 

Page 39: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

16 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Drainage Outlet and Master Planning 

Correcting drainage issues is not quite as simple as digging a ditch or installing a storm sewer. In Ontario, Common Law for drainage is such that water cannot simply be collected and directed. It has to be directed to a legal, adequate outlet. There are two primary methodologies to achieve the legal outlet; a Class Environmental Assessment Process or a petition for a Municipal Drain under the Drainage Act. The ‘adequate’ component is an engineering function. 

As MoTC reconstructs/rehabilitates sections of the road network in the urban and semi urban areas, a Master Drainage Plan should be developed as part of a Class Environmental Assessment process prior to the reconstruction process occurring, in order that both minor and major storm events are dealt with appropriately. 

3.8 Boundary Roads 

Boundary roads are roads that a municipality would have in common with the abutting municipality. In order to manage the joint responsibilities, a Boundary Road Agreement that identifies the responsibilities of both agencies is created. The agreements are usually in writing; however, some are informal.  

The Boundary Road Agreement should identify costs sharing and responsibility arrangements for maintenance or capital works on the road section.  From a risk management perspective, the agreement reduces the risk for one of the parties in the event of a claim, depending upon the content of the agreement.  

Boundary road reporting can be dealt with in one of two ways: the length can be split to provide a more accurate depiction of the road system that is actually maintained by the agency, or they may not be adjusted.  When MTO was providing subsidy, the roads were adjusted for reporting and accounting purposes. For the purposes of this report adjustment has been made to the road system sizes to account for the 50% sharing of the length of the boundary roads.  

When a boundary is reconstructed on a day labour basis by the adjacent municipalities, the project should be treated no differently than if the work were being tendered. The exposure to risk for the municipality is no different. The assignment of the various aspects of the work should be clear and the timing for completion of the tasks clearly identified and adhered to. Table 3.8 identifies the MoTC boundary roads. Unless otherwise noted, tables in this report have been adjusted for boundary length. 

The status and responsibilities as they relate to the boundary roads appears to be uncertain in a number of instances. There are also additional roads that have not been included in this report that are potentially boundary roads. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. 

   

Page 40: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

17 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 3.8: Municipality of Thames Centre Boundary Roads 

Adjacent Agency 

        

Asset ID  Street Name  TOTAL 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1370  PIGRAM ROAD  0.195 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1375  PIGRAM ROAD  0.3 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1380  PIGRAM ROAD  0.25 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1390  PIGRAM ROAD  0.729 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1400  PIGRAM ROAD  0.371 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1410  PIGRAM ROAD  1.991 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1420  PIGRAM ROAD  0.555 

Township of South‐West Oxford  1430  PIGRAM ROAD  0.902 

Township of Zorra  4330  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  1.072 

Township of Zorra  4340  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  2.015 

Township of Zorra  4360  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  3.082 

Township of Zorra  4370  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  0.783 

Township of Zorra  4380  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  2.303 

Township of Zorra  4390  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  0.842 

Township of Zorra  4400  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  1.715 

Township of Zorra  4410  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  0.51 

Township of Zorra  4420  COBBLE HILLS ROAD  0.078 

Township of Zorra  4450  HUNT ROAD  0.054 

Township of Zorra  4460  HUNT ROAD  1.289 

Township of Zorra  4470  HUNT ROAD  0.063 

Township of Zorra  4480  HUNT ROAD  0.042 

Township of Zorra  4490  HUNT ROAD  1.343 

Township of Zorra  4500  HUNT ROAD  0.01 

Township of Zorra  4520  HUNT ROAD  1.09 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2860  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  0.033 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2870  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  0.92 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2880  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  1.631 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2890  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  0.875 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2900  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  0.518 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2910  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  0.441 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2920  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  0.959 

Township of Middlesex Centre  2930  PROSPECT HILL ROAD  1.303 

TOTAL        28.264 

   

Page 41: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

18 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

4 Road System Condition The provincial requirements for AMP’s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road section reviews follow the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, 1991. 

4.1 Road System Condition by Time of Need 

The Inventory Manual methodology results in overall rating of road sections by Time of Need (TON); NOW, 1 to 5, 6 to 10, or Adeq (Adequate). Table 4.1  below provides a breakdown of the road system by time of Need and MMS Class.  

Table 4.1: Roads System by Time of Need and MMS Class 

   3  4  5  6  TOTAL 

TON  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km  Cl‐km  Lane‐km 

NOW  0.091  0.182  3.567  7.134  2.324  4.648      5.982  11.964 

1 to 5  1.797  3.594  125.765  251.529  14.859  29.718      142.421  284.841 

6 to 10  4.534  9.068  128.29  256.579  17.194  34.388  13.286  26.571  163.303  326.606 

ADEQ  0.891  1.782  28.647  57.293  6.126  12.252      35.664  71.327 

TOTAL  7.313  14.626  286.268  572.535  40.503  81.006  13.286  26.571  347.369  694.738 

% OF TOTAL  2.11%  2.11%  82.41%  82.41%  11.66%  11.66%  3.82%  3.82%     

System Adequacy  87.8  87.8  90.0  90.0  84.9  84.9  100.0  100.0  89.7  89.7 

Good to Very Good Overall  86.6  86.6  88.7  88.7  79.1  79.1  100.0  100.0  88.0  88.0 

 

4.2 Road System Adequacy 

The system adequacy is a measure of the ratio of the ‘NOW’ needs to the total system, and includes needs from the six critical areas described earlier in the report. The overall TON is the most severe or earliest identified need.  For example a road section may appear to be in good condition, but is identified as a NOW need for capacity, indicating that it requires additional lanes. 

 

System Adequacy = Total System (km) – NOW Deficiencies (km) X 100 

          Total System (km) 

 

The MoTC currently has a road system adequacy measure of 89.7%. The road system currently measures 347.369 centreline‐kilometres (adjusted for boundary roads), with 35.664 kilometres rated as deficient in the ‘NOW’ time period. Summarizing the system adequacy by surface type yields the following: 

Page 42: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

19 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

System adequacy of hard top roads is 89.4 

System adequacy of gravel roads is 90.  

Typically the system adequacy for gravel surface roads is lower. From other studies, it has been observed that if the gravel roads were evaluated during a spring break up period, there could be a reduction in adequacy of 30% or more. 

The Inventory Manual provides direction that roads with a traffic volume of less than 50 vehicles per day are deemed to be adequate, even if they have structural, geometric, or drainage deficiencies that would otherwise be identified as being in a Time of Need and were to be corrected within the maintenance budget. This approach is directly parallel to Regulation 239/02, Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Roads, which states that roads with less than 50 vehicles per day, and a speed limit of less than 80 km/hr., are classified as Class 6 with no standard for repair. This factor does have an effect on the system adequacy calculation. 

Class 6 Roads(less than 50 vehicles per day) are adequate. This accounts for 13.286 km (3.8%) of the road system. 

The traditional target adequacy for upper‐tier road systems (Regions and Counties) was 75%, while a lower‐tier’s target adequacy was 60%. Based on these former MTO targets, which were in effect when the municipal grant system was in place, the target adequacy for the MoTC should be 60%, as a minimum. The minimum target adequacies were established by MTO, to reflect the nature and purpose of the road system.  

The results suggest that the overall condition of the road system is good. However, this is influenced to some extent by the following factors: 

The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup which provide a more accurate assessment of the gravel road network which accounts for over have of the total road network in MoTC. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring. 

The overall condition may have been influenced by Infrastructure Funds and Grants that have not been identified in the annual funding level but may have been received over the last 10 year period. 

As noted above, 3.8% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day. 

4.3 Road System Needs 

Based on the unit costs identified in Table 4.2, the improvements costs have been calculated generally in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Table 4.3 identifies the improvement costs by Time of Need and Improvement Type. 

The estimates provided in this report are in accordance with the formulae in the Inventory Manual, and utilize the unit costs as identified in Table 4.2. These costs include adjustment factors as per the 

Page 43: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

20 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Inventory Manual, such as Basic Construction, Terrain, Contingency Roadside Environment, and Engineering. 

Table 4.2: Unit Costs 

Item  Unit 2015 Costs 

Excavation  m3  12.00 

Hot Mix Asphalt  t  105.00 

Single Surface Treatment  m2  2.75 

Granular A  t  13.00 

Granular B  t  10.00 

Conc‐ Curb and Gutter‐place  linear m  55.00 

Conc‐ Curb and Gutter‐removal  linear m  12.00 

Subdrains  linear m  20.00 

Storm Sewer‐525mm  linear m  400.00 

Manholes  ea  4,700 

- manhole removed  ea  1,000.00 

- manholes‐Adjust  ea  500.00 

Catch Basins  ea  2,000.0 

Catch‐Basins‐ removed  ea  400.00 

Catch Basin Leads  Linear m  175.00 

Catchbasins ‐ adjust  ea  350.00 

Asphalt Planing  m2  15.00 

Asphalt Pulverizing  m2  2.00 

Crack Sealing  m  2.00 

 

 

For the purposes of this report, road sections with a traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day have been provided with recommended treatment and associated improvement cost; although the TON for these sections is defaulted to ADEQ, realistic improvement recommendations were made based on the observed conditions in order to provide a more accurate assessment of the total network needs.. (The calculations will rate them as adequate due to the traffic count) The road system currently includes 13.286 km of road sections that had an actual or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day. This represents approximately 3.8% of the road system. The total value of the needs identified in this report includes $1,894,022 on these roads sections that received an ADEQ rating related to the low traffic counts. 

 

Page 44: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

21 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 4.3: Improvement costs by Improvement Type and Time of Need 

         Time of Need             

         1 to 5  6 to 10  ADEQ  NOW  TOTAL  % OF TOTAL 

Imp. ID  Imp. Description Imp. Class  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km  Imp. Cost  Km 

Imp. Cost  Km 

CRK   Crack Sealing  Maint            18,192  9.096       18,192  9.096  0.05%  2.58% 

GRR2         150mm of additional Gravel  Maint       467,792  12.075  622,898  15.912       1,090,689  27.987  2.54%  7.42% 

GRR2plus     150mm add'l gravel and minor ditching  Maint       521,409  12.318            521,409  12.318  1.22%  3.26% 

GRR   75mm of Granular A  Maint       81,312  4.970  478,935  26.815       560,247  31.785  1.31%  8.42% 

GRRplus      Maintenance Gravel and Minor Ditching  Maint       362,132  16.881  51,934  2.141       414,067  19.022  0.97%  5.04% 

MICRO   Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation  Maint            145,416  4.627       145,416  4.627  0.34%  1.23% 

RSpLimit   Reduce Speed limit  Maint            0  0.033  0  0.309  0  0.342     0.20% 

SD   Spot Drainage  Maint       0  48.070  0  9.138       0  57.208     32.97% 

DST   Double Surface Treatment  Rehab  2,396  0.066                 2,396  0.066  0.00%  0.01% 

PR2   Pulverize and Resurface 2 ‐ 100mm  Rehab  50,453  0.222  544,847  2.257       2,042,713  8.594  2,638,013  11.073  8.43%  3.17% 

PR3          Pulverize and Resurface 3 ‐ 150mm  Rehab                 209,553  0.401  209,553  0.401  0.67%  0.11% 

R1rural      R1 Rural Cross‐Section  Rehab  27,922  0.193  115,812  0.866            143,734  1.059  0.46%  0.30% 

R1urban      R1 Urban Cross‐Section  Rehab  70,611  0.212  873,347  2.510            943,958  2.722  3.02%  0.78% 

R2urban      R2 Urban Cross‐Section  Rehab  244,314  0.536                 244,314  0.536  0.78%  0.15% 

SST   Single Surface Treatment  Rehab       156,012  6.547  21,837  0.977       177,849  7.524  2.34%  3.80% 

SSTplus     SST, Berm Removal, Geometric Correction, Minor Ditching  Rehab  4,203  0.116  501,500  12.087            505,703  12.203  6.64%  6.16% 

BS   Base and Surface  Const  618,320  2.390  262,465  1.075  46,215  0.151  1,511,524  7.030  2,438,524  10.646  32.02%  5.38% 

BSgrav       Base and Surface ‐ Gravel  Const       2,342,336  19.328  172,600  1.704       2,514,936  21.032  33.02%  10.62% 

NONE   No Improvement Required  Const            0  87.714       0  87.714     53.99% 

REC   Reconstruction ‐ Rural  Const  1,286,874  2.093  1,138,177  3.085  1,530,679  4.934  4,518,397  14.217  8,474,128  24.329  386.85%  29.97% 

RNS   Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewer  Const            33,115  0.063  3,113,420  3.482  3,146,534  3.545  143.64%  4.37% 

RSS   Reconstruction with Storm Sewers  Const  252,095  0.154  577,853  0.353       2,714,175  1.631  3,544,123  2.138  161.79%  2.63% 

TOTAL        2,557,188  5.982  7,944,996  142.421  3,121,821  163.303  14,109,782  35.664  27,733,786  347.369       

 

Page 45: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

22 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Physical Condition 

The Physical Condition is an alternate method of describing the condition of a road section or the average condition of the road system. The value is the structural adequacy converted to be expressed as a value out of 100, instead of 20. This methodology lends itself to modeling and comparators that may be more easily understood. There isn’t a 1:1 relationship between the weighted average physical condition and the system adequacy. As noted in the discussion on System Adequacy, that rating is strongly influenced by the newer roads and the roads deemed adequate due to actual or estimated traffic counts of less than 50 AADT.  This rating is based purely on the condition of the road surface regardless of traffic count. 

The Weighted Average Physical Condition of the road system is currently 74.9.  

 

Remaining Service Life 

As indicated previously, the Time of Need (TON) is really a prediction model in terms of an estimate based on current condition to the time for reconstruction. The TON then also provides an estimate of the remaining life in the road system/section. The following figure summarizes the structural adequacy ratings of the road system and illustrates the estimated remaining service life of the road system. 

Figure 4.1: Remaining Service Life  

 

 

Page 46: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

23 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

4.4 Record of Assumptions –Time of Need (TON), Improvement and Replacement Costs 

The methodology of this report is such that the Inventory Manual itself forms the basis of a large number of assumptions in terms of: 

Dimensional requirements for the development of improvement and replacement costs 

Structural requirements based on road classification 

Time of needs based on the ratings and subsequent calculations 

Assumptions for deterioration are included in Appendix E 

   

Page 47: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

24 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

5 Replacement Cost Valuation Program funding recommendations are a function of the dimensional information, surface type, roadside environment, and functional class of the individual assets. Recommended funding for the road system should include sufficient capital expenditures that would allow the replacement of infrastructure as the end of design life is approached, in addition to sufficient funding for maintenance, to ensure that that full life expectancy may be realized. 

Budgetary recommendations in this report do not include items related to development and growth. The MoTC should consider those items as additional to the recommendations in this report. Generally, that type of improvement or expansion to the system would be funded from a different source, such as Development Charges. 

The budget recommendations bear a direct relationship to the value of the road system. 4 Roads estimates the cost to replace the road system, to its current standard, at $162, 758,900. This estimate is based on the unit costs identified in Table 4.2. All formulae for improvement and replacement costs are as generally per the Inventory Manual Appendix F. Average replacement costs are identified in Table 5.1.  

Table 5.1: Average Replacement Costs 

   R  S  U  TOTAL    

Functional Class 

Replacement Cost  Length 

Replacement Cost  Length 

Replacement Cost  Length 

Replacement Cost 

Length (km)  $$ /km 

100  3,322,273  13.783          3,322,273  13.783  241,041 

200  58,984,538  209.428          58,984,538  209.428  281,646 

300  7,601,898  23.521          7,601,898  23.521  323,196 

400  32,839,553  58.576          32,839,553  58.576  560,632 

500  5,151,413  8.382          5,151,413  8.382  614,580 

C/R      396,981  0.782  879,663  0.506  1,276,644  1.288  991,183 

L/R      7,628,851  17.755  41,490,028  24.218  49,118,879  41.973  1,170,249 

LCI      1,472,871  2.845  2,990,776  1.705  4,463,647  4.55  981,021 

TOTAL  107,899,675  313.69  9,498,703  21.382  45,360,467  26.429  162,758,845  361.501   

 

 

   

Page 48: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

25 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

6  Asset Condition Assessment and Plan Updates. 

6.1 Condition Assessment Cycle Recommendation  

4 Roads would recommend that the entire road system be reviewed on a maximum four year cycle. The evaluations may be undertaken annually, bi‐annually or at the four year interval. 

The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and models should be updated annually. 

   

Page 49: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

26 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

7 Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service has a different meaning for different interests. For instance, the cost per unit may not have an impact to a ratepayer whose chief concern may be service delivery. Similarly, cost or expenditure per unit may not illustrate the condition of the asset to the end user. Further, municipalities are required to report on various municipal performance measures (MPMP ‐ Municipal Performance Measures Program). LOS is Schedule 80, Statistical Info Section 11, Transportation Services, Line 1720 in the FIR report. 

4 Roads believes that multiple service measures may be required to adequately relate the condition of an asset to the various user groups; condition, operating costs, and end user. The following sections identify various measurements of service of the road system  

7.1 Current Level of Service Measurement 

System Adequacy 

As described earlier in the report, the system adequacy is the ratio of the “NOW’ need roads to the total system. This is a holistic measure as, using the Inventory Manual Methodology, needs are identified in six critical areas, not just the distress on the road surface. 

The current system adequacy is 89.7%. 

The System Adequacy should be maintained at 60% or higher. 

 

Physical Condition 

Physical condition is the Structural Adequacy rating multiplied by five to produce a rating of between 5 and 100. This is a measure of the amount of distress on the road however the scale is not linear.  

The current weighted average Physical Condition of the road system is 74.9. This includes road sections with less than 50 AADT 

The weighted average Physical Condition should be 60 or higher. 

 

MPMP Good to Very Good 

The province requires annual reporting on the percentage of roads that are rated as good to very good. It has been assumed that the 6‐10 and adequate roads are good to very good and this has been expressed as a percentage of the system.  

Good to very good roads represent 88.0 % to 90.9% of the road system dependent upon the measures used. This includes road sections with less than 50 AADT. 

The Good to Very Good roads should be 60% or higher. 

   

Page 50: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

27 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

8 Asset Management Strategy 

8.1 Asset Management Overview 

Asset management has almost as many definitions as there are agencies that manage assets. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) defines asset management as 

 “...  a  strategic  approach  to  managing  transportation  infrastructure.  It  focuses  on  business processes  for  resource  allocation  and utilization with  the objective of better decision‐making based upon quality information and well‐defined objectives.”  

The document entitled Managing Public Infrastructure Assets, 2001, prepared by AMSA, AMWA, WEF, and AWWA, defines asset management as:  

“managing infrastructure assets to minimize the total cost of owning and operating them, while continuously delivering the service levels customers desire, at an acceptable level of risk.” 

The Province of Ontario’s document  ‘Building Together‐ Guide for Municipal Asset Management Plans’ indicates: 

“The asset management strategy is the set of actions that, taken together, has the lowest total cost‐ not the set of actions that each has the lowest cost individually” 

Regardless of the source of the definition, the key themes that keep being repeated are; 

Managing 

Strategic 

Effective 

Efficient 

$$$$$  !! 

Service 

Optimizing asset life cycle 

Risk Management 

As an absolute minimum, the objective of any asset management plan, or strategy, should be to ensure that the overall condition of an asset group does not diminish over time. The asset management strategy of an agency is heavily predicated, and inextricably linked, to the available funding. 

Most agencies are not fully funded, and a large number are not even funded sufficiently as to maintain the current condition of their system. Given those circumstances, the strategy should be twofold: 

Develop the financial plan in order that there is sufficient funding to maintain the condition of the road system. 

Focus on a pavement management strategy that utilizes available funding on preservation and resurfacing programs as a priority. Reconstruction and replacement candidates will remain reconstruction and replacement candidates and cost increases will be incremental with 

Page 51: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

28 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

inflation. Preservation and resurfacing opportunities that are missed will escalate in cost by several hundred percent depending on site specifics. 

8.2 Priority Rating vs. Condition Rating 

Information in a database may be sorted and analyzed in numerous ways. Understanding what information a data field represents, is key to the analysis. The Inventory Manual has many rated and calculated data fields and thus provides for many ways to sort data. Some commonly used representations, or sorting of information, from the database include: 

Priority Rating 

Priority Guide Number 

Structural Adequacy (Condition) 

Priority Rating is a calculated field in the Inventory Manual, and is a function of the traffic count and the overall condition rating of the road section. This approach adds weight to the traffic count of the section. Although the word ‘priority’ is included in the field name, a road section that has a higher calculated ‘Priority Rating’ is not necessarily a higher priority in the broader sense of asset management. 

Similarly, a road agency may choose to sort the road sections based on condition and cost per vehicle. The Priority Guide Number data field would assist in providing that analysis, as sorting on that parameter would prioritize road sections that have higher traffic and thus a lower cost per vehicle. 

Developing a road capital program around the Priority Rating or Priority Guide Number fields will result in programming that would lead to a less efficient expenditure of funds and reduced system performance per budget dollar, as road sections with high traffic and in poor condition would be selected first, as opposed to selecting the best rehabilitation candidates at the appropriate time in their life cycles. The exception to this statement would be cases where rehabilitation funding is at a high enough level to ensure that the preservation program requirements can be met. 

From a more current asset management perspective, project selection should be predicated by condition. (Structural Adequacy or Physical Condition). Figure 8.1 clearly illustrates the financial advantages of managing the road system by performing the right treatment at the right time of the asset life cycle. If appropriate strategies are not undertaken at the correct time, there is a less effective usage of the available funding. 

   

Page 52: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

29 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Figure 8.1: Treatment Cost vs. Deterioration 

 

 

Ideally, if a road is constructed and maintained with timely appropriate maintenance and resurfacing, the road system will reach a point where the majority of the activities will be preservation and resurfacing. Figure 8.2 clearly illustrates the effect on the life span of a pavement by applying the correct treatment at the correction time in the life cycle. 

Figure 8.2: Pavement Management‐ The Right Treatment at the Right Time 

 

 Source: Wirtgen Cold Recycling Manual 

Page 53: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

30 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

If an agency’s budget is fully funded, the programming will include reconstruction, resurfacing, and preservation programs. Prioritization within the different programs will vary as demands are different. However, within the resurfacing and preservation programs, the pavement condition should drive the decision making. 

Where funding is limited, resurfacing and preservation programs should be prioritized over the construction program. The effect of this approach will be that ‘NOW’ need roads will remain ‘NOW’ needs. However, by virtue of their ‘NOW’ need condition, ‘NOW’ need roads will require increased maintenance and likely generate increased complaints from the driving public. To deal with this eventuality, a municipality should create a ‘maintenance paving budget’, over and above the resurfacing budget. The purpose of this budget is to defer the reconstruction needs, and reduce maintenance efforts and complaints until the road can be reconstructed.  

8.3 Cross Asset Integration and Project Prioritization 

Prioritizing projects from a purely asset management perspective is a relatively straightforward exercise, regardless of funding level. Complications arise when the specific needs, commitments of the agency, and priorities of other utilities factor into the decision making process. 

The road system is, in reality, a utility corridor. Multiple utilities in both urban and rural roadside environments will present conflicting demands and priorities in advancing projects. The Road Needs Study provides ratings that deal strictly with the condition of various factors as they relate to the road section. Those factors have to be considered in conjunction with needs and priorities that may exist for other utilities or pending development. In fact, the condition of other infrastructure within the road allowance may be the key element in the prioritization. For example, a road rated as a reconstruction project may have a relatively low priority rating, but a trunk storm sewer servicing a greater area may require immediate installation. The priority of the road is then dictated by the other utility, and should be integrated into the capital plan, to best serve all interests. 

Less tangible priorities may also be project prioritization tools for some agencies. For example, an agency may want to advance projects that also include bus routes or bike lanes. 

As a municipal road program is developed, opportunities to complete work on smaller sections adjacent to the main project, at a lesser cost than if completed as a stand‐alone project, should be considered to realize economies of scale, and complete improvements that may otherwise be passed over.  

8.4 Gravel Roads Management Strategy 

MoTC has a gravel road system of approximately 181 centre line kilometres. The budget recommendation is $1,096,400 annually, for the materials only.  

Proper maintenance of a gravel road surface is deceptively expensive. Costs include gravel, dust control, and grading. Frequently, budget analysis proves that the per‐kilometre cost of gravel road maintenance is greater than the per‐kilometre cost for hard top maintenance.  

Page 54: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

31 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

4 Roads understands that the MoTC has aggressively been converting their gravel roads to hard top. This practice should be continued. The gravel road conversion program should be integrated into the overall road asset management plan and further integrated into a maintenance /upgrade strategy that optimizes the existing MoTC resources and contracted services on an as required basis. 

Road agencies in both Canada and the United States, have conducted studies that have generally indicated that, dependent upon local unit costs, gravel road conversion to hardtop, can be a cost‐effective strategy. One source indicates that this may be effective management for roads with traffic volumes as low as 100 AADT. 

Appendix C of this report includes additional information on gravel road conversions including a flow chart to illustrate the decision matrix for conversion. Benefits to converting a gravel road include: 

•  Customer satisfaction •  Reduced maintenance costs for routine maintenance •  Reduced maintenance costs for winter maintenance  

Based on the criteria identified in Appendix C, Table 8.1 identifies gravel road conversion candidates that meet the criteria for conversion. 

   

Page 55: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

32 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Table 8.1: Gravel Road Conversion Candidates 

Asset ID  CW ID  Street Name  From Desc  To Desc  Length 

220  2320  HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE  BOT ROAD  LEWIS ROAD  0.614 

280  4945  DOAN DRIVE  BRIDGE  PIGRAM ROAD  0.257 

710  2398  THOMPSON DRIVE 66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)  CULVERT  1.917 

720  5243  THOMPSON DRIVE  CULVERT  CULVERT  1.334 

730  5244  THOMPSON DRIVE  CULVERT 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)  0.327 

800  4904  MOSSLEY DRIVE  LEWIS ROAD  RAIL TRACKS  0.536 

1400  3507  PIGRAM ROAD  CROMARTY DRIVE  370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE  0.371 

1500  3910  FIVE POINTS ROAD  RAIL TRACKS  BREEN ROAD  1.552 

1630  4905  LEWIS ROAD  MOSSLEY DRIVE  RAIL TRACKS  0.189 

1940  2300  HARRIS ROAD 70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)  39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE  2.167 

2340  2277  TRAFALGAR STREET 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)  BANKS ROAD  1.746 

2350  5257  TRAFALGAR STREET  BANKS ROAD  17M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD  0.882 

2490  3630  WYTON DRIVE 88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)  47M WEST OF 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD  1.281 

2560  3440  WYTON DRIVE  PURPLE HILL ROAD  CHERRY HILL ROAD  1.389 

2570  5226  WYTON DRIVE  CHERRY HILL ROAD  BRIDGE  0.383 

2640  3419  OLIVER DRIVE  38M EAST OF 27‐ OLIVER DRIVE  FAIRVIEW ROAD  1.358 

2660  5267  OLIVER DRIVE  FAIRVIEW ROAD  CULVERT  0.265 

2670  3439  OLIVER DRIVE  CULVERT  RAIL TRACK  0.622 

2680  4924  OLIVER DRIVE  RAIL TRACK 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)  0.419 

2690  3438  OLIVER DRIVE 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)  PURPLE HILL ROAD  1.346 

2700  5269  OLIVER DRIVE  PURPLE HILL ROAD  BRIDGE  0.396 

2710  3473  OLIVER DRIVE  BRIDGE  CHERRY HILL ROAD  0.994 

2720  3472  OLIVER DRIVE  CHERRY HILL ROAD  49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD  1.333 

2760  3501  EBENEZER DRIVE  VALLEY VIEW ROAD  EAST END  1.1 

2790  3452  GREGORY DRIVE  FAIRVIEW ROAD  HERITAGE ROAD  1.395 

2800  5518  GREGORY DRIVE  HERITAGE ROAD  204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT  0.682 

3110  3554  VALLEY VIEW ROAD 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD  EBENEZER DRIVE  3.401 

3120  3450  VALLEY VIEW ROAD  EBENEZER DRIVE  16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD  3.099 

3150  3449  VALLEY VIEW ROAD  16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD  CENTRE DRIVE  3.096 

3300  3545  FAIRVIEW ROAD 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)  STOREY DRIVE  0.85 

3310  3451  FAIRVIEW ROAD  STOREY DRIVE  BRIDGE  0.602 

Page 56: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

33 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Asset ID  CW ID  Street Name  From Desc  To Desc  Length 

3320  5235  FAIRVIEW ROAD  BRIDGE  BRIDGE  0.351 

3330  5234  FAIRVIEW ROAD  BRIDGE  BRIDGE  0.543 

3340  5233  FAIRVIEW ROAD  BRIDGE  GREGORY DRIVE  0.984 

3350  3467  FAIRVIEW ROAD  GREGORY DRIVE  CULVERT  2.491 

3360  5403  FAIRVIEW ROAD  CULVERT  16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD  0.584 

3390  5231  FAIRVIEW ROAD 21M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD  CULVERT  0.782 

3400  3466  FAIRVIEW ROAD  CULVERT  OLIVER DRIVE  2.291 

3420  3622  FAIRVIEW ROAD  OLIVER DRIVE 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE)  0.843 

3550  5277  FAIRVIEW ROAD  EVELYN DRIVE  BRIDGE  1.365 

3610  5237  HERITAGE ROAD 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD  BRIDGE  0.533 

3620  3430  HERITAGE ROAD  BRIDGE  BRIDGE  1.938 

3630  5236  HERITAGE ROAD  BRIDGE  GREGORY DRIVE  0.826 

3640  3429  HERITAGE ROAD  GREGORY DRIVE  CULVERT AT #23124  2.455 

3650  5271  HERITAGE ROAD  CULVERT AT #23124  16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD  0.657 

3880  3437  PURPLE HILL ROAD 34M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)  OLIVER DRIVE  3.074 

3890  5268  PURPLE HILL ROAD  OLIVER DRIVE  CULVERT  0.687 

3900  3436  PURPLE HILL ROAD  CULVERT 44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)  2.369 

3930  3404  PURPLE HILL ROAD 56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)  WYTON DRIVE  3.05 

3940  3425  PURPLE HILL ROAD  WYTON DRIVE 40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)  3.062 

3980  5222  PURPLE HILL ROAD PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE  BRIDGE  0.425 

3990  3424  PURPLE HILL ROAD  BRIDGE  49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK  1.969 

4080  3443  CHERRY HILL ROAD 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD  BRIDGE  1.631 

4090  5274  CHERRY HILL ROAD  CULVERT  BRIDGE  0.508 

4100  5238  CHERRY HILL ROAD  BRIDGE  RAIL TRACK  0.287 

4120  4918  CHERRY HILL ROAD  RAIL TRACK  GREGORY DRIVE  0.907 

4140  3442  CHERRY HILL ROAD  GREGORY DRIVE  PLOVER MILLS ROAD  3.088 

4160  5270  CHERRY HILL ROAD  16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD  OLIVER DRIVE  3.102 

4490  2132  HUNT ROAD 42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)  10M NORTH OF CATHERINE STREET  1.343 

        Total  78.048 

   

Page 57: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

34 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

9 Program Funding Recommendations 

9.1 Overview 

Program funding recommendations are a function of the dimensional information, surface type, roadside environment, functional class of the individual assets and current unit costing. Recommended funding for the road system should include sufficient capital expenditures that would allow the replacement of infrastructure as the end of design life is approached, in addition to sufficient funding for maintenance, to ensure that that full life expectancy may be realized. 

Budgetary recommendations in this report do not include items related to development and growth; those should be considered as additional. Generally, that type of improvement or expansion to the system would be funded from a different source, such as Development Charges. 

The budget recommendations bear a direct relationship to the value of the road system. 4 Roads estimates the cost to replace the road system, to its current standard, at $162,758,900. The budget recommendations provided in this report are based on the constitution of the road system. This represents an opportunity to develop a financial plan in concert with the asset management plan, for a phased implementation. 

9.2 Capital Depreciation 

The estimated replacement/depreciation value of the MoTC road system to the current standard is $162, 758,900. This equates to an annual capital depreciation of $3,255,200 over 50 years. The annual capital depreciation is strictly a function of the replacement cost and the design life, and would best be described as an ‘Accountaneering’ number. This estimate does not include bridges, culverts, cross culverts less than 3 m, sidewalks, or street lighting. The typical design life for a road structure is 50 years before reconstruction/replacement. If the life span is 50 years, then 2% of the replacement cost should be the annual contribution to the capital reserve, to ensure that it can be reconstructed in that time frame.  

The estimated replacement/depreciation is based upon the replacement value of the road system over a 50‐year life cycle. However, the 50‐year life cycle can only be a reality if maintenance and preservation treatments such as crack sealing and hot mix asphalt overlays are delivered at the appropriate time. Inadequate maintenance and preservation will result in premature failure and increased life cycle costs.  

Analogies to houses and cars sometimes make road maintenance easier to understand. If a house does not have the roof renewed within the correct time frame, there will be damage to the structure, below the roof, and if this is not dealt with, it will result in a rapid deterioration of the house. Similarly, roads require crack sealing and resurfacing at the appropriate time, during the life cycle, in order to maximize the life expectancy of the asset. Preservation and maintenance extend the useful life of the pavement, reducing life cycle costs.  

Page 58: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

35 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

9.3 Hot Mix Resurfacing 

Roads require major maintenance throughout the life cycle, in order to optimize and maximize the asset life span. Roads require resurfacing at the appropriate interval, for the respective class of road. Different agencies categorize the expense differently, usually dependent upon the dollar value; however, resurfacing is essentially a maintenance activity.  

Resurfacing schedules are dependent upon traffic loading and the percentage of commercial traffic. Higher traffic volumes and percentages of commercial traffic shorten the interval between resurfacings. Optimal resurfacing intervals will vary from ten to twenty years (or more), depending upon the road function, classification, and quality of design and construction. 

The Hot Mix Asphalt Resurfacing recommendation in this report is based upon the distribution of the Township’s hot mix asphalt inventory. As such, the optimal budget calculation will focus on the 19‐year interval (18.7), for hot mix roads. 

Given the aforementioned, and the information with respect to surface type contained in Table 3.1 , the funding for the annual resurfacing program should be $686,500 per year on average, in order to maintain the system at its current adequacy level.  This estimate is for the major resurfacing work only, and does not include any estimated costs for other pavement preservation activities or programs.  Table 9.1 identifies the distribution of hot asphalt roads by asset class and the basis for the recommendation for the annual program budget recommendation.  

Table 9.1: Hot Mix Asphalt Roads by Asset Class and Life Cycle 

Asset Class  L.C. Yrs 

Average Annual Cost 

Asset Qty.  Unit Cost 

Weighted Average 

A/C‐R  20         

A/C‐S  20         

A/C‐U  20         

HCB1‐R  10         

HCB1‐S  10         

HCB1‐U  10         

HCB2‐R  12         

HCB2‐S  12         

HCB2‐U  12         

HCB3‐R  15   $              894  0.1   $        8,941  0.025 

HCB3‐S  15   $         18,515  1.97   $        9,398  0.499 

HCB3‐U  15   $         63,830  2.75   $      23,211  0.696 

HCB4‐R  20   $      178,099  26.04   $        6,839  8.352 

HCB4‐S  20   $         51,985  7.37   $        7,054  2.364 

HCB4‐U  20   $      373,159  21.01   $      17,761  6.739 

TOTALS       59.2    18.7 

Page 59: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

36 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

9.4 Surface Treatment Resurfacing 

Most agencies report that the average life of surface treated road is seven years. Similar to the concept applied to the development of the hot mix resurfacing recommendations, the surface‐treated road network should be completely resurfaced every seven years, or approximately 14% of the surface treated inventory in each calendar year.  

At a unit cost of $2.75 per square metre, the annual program size should be $388,200, on average, exclusive of hot mix asphalt padding and other preparatory work. 

9.5 Gravel Road Resurfacing 

When MTO was providing maintenance subsidy, the standard practice for gravel road maintenance was to place approximately 75 mm of gravel on each gravel road section, every three years.  

Since the conditional grant system was discontinued, a large number of municipalities have reduced the amount of gravel that has been placed on gravel roads, to the point where the gravel roads in the system are a major maintenance problem, particularly in the latter part of the winter and early spring. If the granular base is not replenished, the road structure will disappear through normal usage, and the remaining gravel typically becomes contaminated by other materials, such as the native soil and winter sand.  

MoTC has 181 km of gravel surfaced roads, as per Table 3.1 of this report. Using the Town’s benchmark costing, the annual gravel resurfacing program size should be $1,096,400 per year, based on adding 75 mm of gravel, across the entire platform, every three years. This estimate does not include costs for re‐grading, dust control, or gravel road conversion. 

9.6 Crack Sealing 

Crack sealing is a preservation activity that extends the life of a hot mix asphalt surface. A program estimate is provided based on crack sealing one metre per two lane metre of pavement every five years at the unit cost provided by the MoTC. Based on that premise, the recommended average budget for crack sealing is $23,700 annually. 

9.7 Annual Budget Adjustments 

Inflation 

The typical approach to annual budget adjustments is to adjust with some reference or consideration to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Public Works Departments have not fared well with this approach, as a large portion of the Public Works Budget is expended on commodities and services that typically vary/increase at a rate significantly higher than the CPI. Public Works Departments’ annual increases based solely on CPI, will generally result in a continual downward spiral in overall condition of the road system and service levels. Decreasing service levels increase risk. Ontario is becoming much more 

Page 60: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

37 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

litigious; therefore, the reduction in service levels increases the risk for a municipality, and the cost of service provision versus the cost of litigation should be considered. 

In recent years, increases in fuel, asphalt, and salt have been disproportionate to the CPI. As such, consideration should be given to annual increases in road funding, over and above the CPI. Some municipalities provide for such disproportionate increases in their budget process, in order that the specific impacts of a commodity price increase and service delivery are considered. 

Plant Adjustment 

Most municipalities experience development‐related growth. Growth comes at a cost, both in the longer‐term, with additional resurfacing and replacement requirements, and in the shorter‐term, with Operational budgets. Operational budgets should be adjusted on a pro‐rata basis to account for the additional length of road that has to be maintained. 

Capital budgets and forecasts should also be adjusted annually, to reflect the changes in the system, and integrated into the longer‐term financial plan. 

9.8 Performance Modeling‐ Budget Effect on System Performance 

Asset Management Plan (AMP) and Strategy Analysis 

The asset management plan is a function of the strategy and available financing. The development process for all elements is iterative, concurrent and holistic on a number of levels.  It is complex. 

The provincial guidelines for the preparation of an AMP indicate that the following must be considered; 

Options must be compared on Lifecycle cost‐ the total cost of constructing, maintaining, renewing and operating an infrastructure asset throughout its service life. Future costs must be discounted and inflation must be incorporated. 

Assessment of all other relevant direct and indirect costs and benefits associated with each option. 

o Direct benefits and Costs  Efficiencies and network effects  Investment scheduling to appropriately time expansion in asset lifecycles  Safety  Environmental  Vulnerability to climate change 

o Indirect Benefits and Costs  Municipal wellbeing and costs  Amenity values  Value of culturally or historically significant sites  Municipal image 

Assessment of Risks associated with all potential options. Each option must be evaluated based on its potential risk, using an approach that allows for comparative analysis. Risks associated with each option can be scored based on quantitative measures when reasonable estimates can be made of the probability of the risk event happening and the cost associated with the risk 

Page 61: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

38 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

event. Qualitative measures can be used when reasonable estimates of probability and cost associated with the risk event cannot be made. 

 

Significant effort (and expense) will be required to meet all of these requirements. 

 

Performance Model Overview 

A properly developed performance model will satisfy the majority of the requirements identified in the foregoing. Key elements of a Performance Model will include: 

Deterioration Curves identifying anticipated deterioration of an appropriately constructed asset over the life cycle of the asset 

‘Trigger’ points throughout the deterioration curve identifying appropriate treatments at condition ranges 

Current costing for all treatments identified  

To capture the essence of the provincial requirements, development and use of a Performance Model is recommended. Through modeling and the resultant outputs, the following may be addressed: 

Review of options and lifecycle effects based on a Return on Investment Analysis 

Efficiencies and network effects 

Budget requirements to achieve LOS goals  

It is respectfully suggested that a 10 year AMP can be developed through a Performance model, however, 4 Roads is of the opinion that a number of other requirements that the province has identified should not be addressed until they reach the project stage. Further, a number of those requirements would be addressed through a Class Environmental Assessment process. 

Through performance modeling appropriate budget levels, programming and associated costs can be determined, delivering key elements of any plan that can be refined or revisited as circumstances change. Once a model is developed, then the effect of any alternatives may also be measured. 

9.9 System Performance at Various Budget Levels 

This report includes budget recommendations for various aspects of the programming that are typical to road departments. System performance can be predicted based on the level of funding. 

4 Roads has prepared four different 50‐year performance models for the road system. The models have been prepared with the following parameters: 

Zero budget – demonstrates the effect of no work being performed on the road system and how quickly it will deteriorate. 

Existing budget – This budget includes the activities of those identified in the recommended budget to preserve the system: Hot Mix Asphalt resurfacing, surface treatment, crack sealing, and gravel road resurfacing.  

Page 62: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

39 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Preservation budget – This includes the total dollar value of the budget recommendations for Hot Mix Asphalt resurfacing, surface treatment, crack sealing, and gravel road resurfacing. 

Capital Depreciation / Amortization budget‐ full replacement cost of the road system annualized. 

The Weighted Average Physical Condition of the road system is currently 74.9. The performance model calculations all begin with the current Physical Condition and for purposes of the graphing, the year‐end Physical Condition is displayed based on the effects that the improvements have had on the overall condition of the road system. 

In reviewing the results of the performance models, it should be understood that, with the methodology being used, the trigger for a resurfacing activity of a hard surfaced road is a Physical Condition of 70.  

At appropriate funding levels, the system condition improves over time. However, the improvement in terms of the Physical Condition will typically only increase to approximately the high 70’s to the low 80’s, depending on the system. 

The initial observation from the graph is that the existing funding level does not appear to be sufficient to sustain the road system in the long term. This would be in conflict with the condition data as it appears that the road system is in relatively good condition overall. 

Contributing factors to this apparent discrepancy include: 

The gravel road system was not reviewed during the spring breakup. Field observations and staff input on performance history were considered in the development of the scoring. 

The overall condition may have been influenced by Infrastructure Funds and Grants that have not been identified in the annual funding level. 

As noted above, 3.8% of the system is deemed adequate due to having a counted or estimated traffic count of less than 50 vehicles per day. 

Reconstruction and rehabilitation of lower volume roads appears to be undertaken by Road Operations staff and it does not appear that municipal equipment is charged against activities in the Operating Budget. 

Anecdotal information is that the unit costs for gravel resurfacing is approximately 25% less than the unit costs for gravel in the subdivision construction ($13 vs $10). 

It appears that gravel roads are being upgraded to hard surface roads through the capital program, so this would offset, to some extent, the gravel road resurfacing requirement. 

It should be noted that the Capital depreciation model will typically only expend the full dollar value of that budget in the earlier years of the program. With adequate funding, once a road has been reconstructed, and if it is maintained and resurfaced at the correct condition, it should perform well for several decades. 

   

Page 63: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

40 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Figure 9.1: Performance Modeling at Various Budget Levels 

 

*Current Municipal budget does not appear to include equipment and machinery costs for construction work 

performed by municipal staff. 

 

The deterioration curves that have been used consider an average/typical performance for the various road classes. When used in the model at a reasonable funding level, the overall average system condition will remain at a similar level, as the model will treat the pavements as perpetual. This concept is illustrated in Table 9.2 using MoTC Section 1835: Neely Court, as an example. 

Table 9.2: Sample Section Life Cycle 

Asset ID 1835 Neely Court, 120m North of Durham St. to 29 ‐ Hamilton Rd 

Year  Imp. Type  Cost Start Cond 

End Cond 

Yrs Hold  Start Value  End Value  ROI 

2017  RNS   $          234,980   24.99  100                111,248              445,169   1.44 

2022  CRK   $                 526   97  97  2             431,814              431,814   9.65 

2034  MICRO   $              8,008   79.27  79.27  3             352,885              352,885   1.31 

2041  R1   $            87,277   69.47  97                309,259              431,814   1.53 

2042  CRK   $                 526   97  97  2             431,814              431,814   9.65 

2054  MICRO   $              8,008   79.27  79.27  3             352,885              352,885   1.31 

2061  R1   $            87,277   69.47  97                309,259              431,814   1.53 

2062  CRK   $                 526   97  97  2             431,814              431,814   9.65 

Page 64: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

41 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Figure 9.2: Graphical Representation of a Typical Life Cycle and Strategy Cost Differential  (Asphalt Road Surface) 

 

Figure 9.3: Annual Expenditures Budget to Maintain 

 

Page 65: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

42 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

For the purposes of a short to mid‐term plan, considering the pavement as performing as a perpetual pavement does not pose a problem. The aggregate road base will deteriorate over time: however, the time frame where that may be contributory to the road decline would be beyond 50 years. Condition data is collected regularly, and monitoring and analysis would alert the municipality to changes that are occurring.  

Figure 9.3 illustrates the typical effect on budget requirements by holding the condition of the system at a specified level. If the orange line represented the average annual expense, the budget years above that line would require debt financing or funding from reserves. Conversely, in those years where the funding requirement is less than the annual average, then the unspent funds would accumulate in a reserve. 

Deterioration curves developed by 4 Roads have been utilized for development of funding and prediction models, and based on our experience with a large cross‐section of municipalities and resultant feedback, we believe that those deterioration profiles are representative. The models indicate that the overall condition of the road system will continue to increase over time to a point where the average physical condition will be in the high 70’s range. A physical condition beyond that level may be indicating an over‐expenditure/inefficiency in the programming. An average physical condition above 70 would indicate that the average road only requires maintenance and /or resurfacing. 

9.10 Record of Assumptions ‐Performance Modeling  

Pavement Classification for Modeling 

In order to develop budget recommendations, 4 Roads adds an additional classification of roads differentiated by surface type, roadside environment and traffic volume. It is anticipated that each road classification will deteriorate at a different rate. Differentiation by roadside environment within a classification permits calculation of the different replacement costs to reflect the servicing and feature differences. 

Table 9.3: Road Asset Classes 

Asset Class  Subtype  Material  AADT Low  AADT High 

A/C  All  A/C  1  100,000 

CM  All  C/M  1  3,000 

CON  All  CON  1  100,000 

GST1  All  G/S  1  10,000 

HCB1  ART  HCB  20,000  100,000 

HCB2  ART  HCB  10,000  20,000 

HCB3  All  HCB  1,000  10,000 

HCB4  All  HCB  1  1,000 

ICB  All  ICB  1  3,000 

LCB1  All  LCB  1  2,000 

 

Page 66: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

43 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

Figure 9.4 illustrates treatment selection by time and asset classes for hot mix roads. Typical treatments and/or improvements have been superimposed over the deterioration curves, to illustrate the general timelines for implementing the treatments. Other road asset classes have been treated similarly. An important concept to remember is that as a road deteriorates the cost of rehabilitation increases. The deterioration curves, improvement types, current unit costs and current condition ratings are essentially the assumptions used to develop budget and programming recommendations in this report.  Appendix E provides detail on the deterioration curves for all road asset classes. 

Figure 9.4: Treatment Selection vs. Condition (Asphalt Surfaces) 

 

 

9.11  10 Year Program 

Appendix F includes the results of a 10 Year program based on the ROI Performance model at the current funding level as identified in the following chart extracted from the 10 year Capital Budget. 

The resultant project selection from the model may vary from the current program and forecast as the 

model will select projects based on best ROI initially and then expend remaining funds on other projects. 

The model can be a starting point for program development but has to be metered with decisions than 

cannot be easily introduced into a model. 

 

Page 67: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

44 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

Table 9.4: Performance Model Summary ‐ Ten Year Program 

 

 

 

 

 

Imp.Type

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Grand Total

BS 11,954         25,558         37,512              

BSgrav 696,451       696,451            

CRK 17,792         12,443         1,624           1,674           31,195         2,076           4,056           1,142           4,370           6,762           83,134              

DST 2,396           2,396                

GRR2 13,137         213,476       748,175       418,140       180,721       810,242       316,060       1,150,303    309,712       322,566       4,482,532         

MICRO 2,741           35,569         11,663         3,061           37,592         3,474           54,799         22,271         2,389           173,559            

PR2 205,859       44,110         381,979       352,588       20,960         136,670       1,142,166         

R1 102,015       322,888       91,784         733,468       1,008,232    2,258,387         

R1rura l 27,922         107,258       8,553           143,733            

R1urban 70,610         246,602       327,447       270,870       28,427         943,956            

R2urban 244,314       244,314            

RNS 211,750       208,176       204,602       181,372       805,900            

SST 177,850       270,824       324,443       8,556           546,847       166,054       961,788       334,508       416,734       9,803           3,217,407         

SSTplus 505,703       505,703            

GRR2plus 45,708         79,939         125,647            

Grand Total 1,486,680    1,486,545    1,485,384    1,486,364    1,486,361    1,486,106    1,486,427    1,485,953    1,486,555    1,486,422    14,862,797       

Year

Page 68: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

45 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

10  State of the Infrastructure ‐ Roads Recommendations In addition to the budgetary recommendations, the following recommendations are provided for the 

management of the road inventory. 

1. The information and budget recommendations included in this report should be used to further develop and evolve the corporate Asset Management Plan. 

2. A regular review of the condition of the road system should occur at a maximum four year interval. The review cycle be undertaken at a 4 year interval or segmented annually or bi‐annually. 

3. The boundary road agreements with the adjacent municipalities should be confirmed. 

4. The unit costs, budget recommendations, update history and performance models should be updated annually. 

5. The System Adequacy should be maintained at 60% or higher. 

6. The weighted average Physical Condition should be at 70 or higher. 

7. The Good to Very Good roads should be at 60% or higher. 

8. Programming should be reviewed to ensure that resurfacing and preservation programs are optimized. 

9. The overall road system should have traffic counts updated on a 3 to 5 year cycle. The counting should include the percentage of truck traffic and the date. 

10. The gravel road conversion program should be continued. 

11. Roads sections where potentially substandard horizontal and vertical alignment have been identified, should be reviewed to ensure signage is in compliance with the Ontario Traffic Manual. (Listing provided in Appendix D) 

12. Road sections with substandard width should be signed accordingly as an interim measure. (Table ES 5 provides a listing.) 

13. The results and recommendations for programming within this report should be integrated with the other assets groups to ensure available funding is optimized. 

14. Some consideration should be given to calculating equipment costs for activities and projects undertaken by Thames Centre staff to better reflect total project costs and to allow for more direct comparisons of alternate service delivery methodologies.  

 

 

Page 69: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix A.  Inventory Manual Methodology Overview 

   

Page 70: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 1  

Asset Condition Rating Methodology 

The provincial requirements for AMP’s include asset condition assessment in accordance with standard engineering practices. The road asset reviews generally conform to the methodology of the Ministry of Transportation Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads, 1991. 

Inventory Manual History 

From the 1960’s until the mid‐1990’s, the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) required municipalities to regularly update the condition ratings of their road systems in a number of key areas. The process was originally created by the MTO as a means to distribute conditional funding, on an equitable basis, between municipalities. The reports were referred to as a ‘Road Need Study’ (RNS) and were required in order to receive a conditional grant to subsidize municipal road programs. After the introduction in the 1960’s by the MTO, the methodology evolved into the current format by the late 1970’s. The most current version of the Inventory Manual is dated 1991, and is the methodology used for this report and supported by WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation Software. The practice was discontinued by a number of municipalities when conditional funding for roads was eliminated in the mid 1990’s.  

Inventory Manual Overview  

The Inventory Manual Methodology is a sound, consistent, asset management practice that still works well today, and in view of the increasing demands on efficiency and asset management, represents a sound road asset inventorying and management system. Road system reviews should be repeated on a cyclical basis. The road section review identifies the condition of each road asset by its time of need and recommended rehabilitation strategy. 

To put terminology in a current context, the past Road Needs Study is now ‘The State of the Infrastructure Report (SotI)’. The SotI analyzes and summarizes the road system survey data collected (or provided) and provides an overview of the overall condition of the road system by road section, including such factors as structural adequacy, drainage, and surface condition. The study also provides an indication of apparent deficiencies in horizontal and vertical alignment elements, as per the Ministry of Transportation’s manual, “Geometric Design Standards for Ontario Highways”.  

The report provides an overview of the physical and financial needs of the road system, which may be used for programming and budgeting. However, once a road section reaches the project design stage, further detailed review, investigation, and design will be required to address the specific requirements of the project. 

Asset Management by its’ very nature is holistic. Managing a road network based solely on pavement condition would be critically deficient in scope in terms of the information required to make an informed decision as to the improvements required on a road section.  

   

Page 71: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 2  

The Inventory Manual offers a holistic review of each road section, developing a Time of Need (TON) or an Adequate rating in six areas that are critical to municipal decision making: 

Geometrics 

Surface Type 

Surface Width 

Capacity 

Structural Adequacy 

Drainage  

Evaluations of each road section were completed generally in accordance with the MTO’s Inventory Manual for Municipal Roads (1991). Data collected was entered directly into WorkTech’s Asset Manager Foundation software. Condition ratings, Time of Need, Priority Ratings, and associated costs were then calculated by the software, in accordance with the Inventory Manual. Unit costs for construction are typically provided by municipal staff. 

Road sections should be reasonably consistent throughout their length, according to roadside environment, surface type, condition, cross section, speed limit, or a combination of these factors. As an example, section changes should occur as surface type, surface condition, cross‐section, or speed limit changes. 

The Condition Ratings, developed through the scoring in the Inventory Manual, classify roads as ‘NOW’, ‘1 to 5’, or ‘6 to 10’ year needs for reconstruction. The Time of Need is a prediction of the time until the road requires reconstruction, not the time frame until action is required. For example, a road may be categorized as a ‘6 to 10’ year need with a resurfacing recommendation. This road should be resurfaced as soon as possible, to further defer the need to reconstruct. 

Field data is obtained through a visual examination of the road system and includes: structural adequacy, level of service, maintenance demand, horizontal and vertical alignment, surface and shoulder width, surface condition, and drainage. The Condition Rating is calculated based upon a combination of other calculations and data.  

To best utilize the database information and modern asset management concepts, it has to be understood that the Time of Need (TON) ratings are the estimated time before the road would require reconstruction. NOW needs are still roads that require reconstruction; however, it is not intended that ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’ year needs are to be acted on in that timeframe. The ‘1 to 5’ and ‘6 to 10’  year needs are current candidates for resurfacing treatments that will elevate their structural status to ‘ADEQ’, and offer the greatest return on investment for a road authority(notwithstanding a drainage or capacity need, etc.).  

   

Page 72: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 3  

‘NOW’ Needs 

‘NOW’ needs represent the backlog of work required on the road system. A ‘NOW’ need is not necessarily the highest priority from asset management or return on investment perspectives. Construction improvements identified within this time period are representative of roads that have little or no service life left and are in poor condition. F Theoretically a resurfacing strategy is never a ‘NOW’ need, with the exceptions of a PR1 or PR2 treatment recommendation (Pulverize and resurface one or two lifts of asphalt) and where the surface type is inadequate for the traffic volume.  

If a road with an improvement recommendation of “resurface” deteriorates too far, it becomes a ‘NOW’ construction need. A ‘NOW’ need rating may be triggered by substandard ratings in any of the Structural Adequacy, Surface Type, Surface Width, Capacity, Drainage, or Geometrics data fields. 

 

 

 

 

‘1 to 5’ Year Needs 

‘1 to 5’ Identifies road sections where reconstruction is anticipated within the next five years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 73: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 4  

 

‘6 to 10’ Year Needs 

‘6 to 10’ Identifies road sections where reconstruction improvements are anticipated within six to ten years, based upon a review of their current condition. These roads can be good candidates for resurfacing treatments that would extend the life of the road (depending on any other deficiencies), thus deferring the need to reconstruct.  

 

 

 

 

‘ADEQ’ 

An ‘ADEQ’ rating encompasses a wide range of conditions that include the following: 

Roads with a traffic volume of less than 50 vehicles per day will be deemed adequate, and deficiencies on those roads are to be corrected with the maintenance budgets 

Gravel Roads with a structural adequacy rating that is not a ‘NOW’ need (more than 25% distress) is adequate; there is no further differentiation by time period 

Roads that do not require improvement other than maintenance 

   

Page 74: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 5  

INVENTORY MANUAL TREATMENTS 

 

Table A.1: Road Improvement Types 

Code  Description 

R1  Basic Resurfacing 

R2  Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift 

RM  Major Resurfacing 

PR1  Pulverizing and Resurfacing 

PR2  Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift  

BS  Tolerable standard for lower volume roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only 

RW  Resurface and Widen 

REC  Reconstruction 

RNS Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain, 

remove and replace curb and gutter, granular, and hot mix) 

RSS Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm sewers and manholes in addition to the 

above) 

NC  Proposed Road Construction 

SRR  Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement 

Micro*  Microsurfacing (Preservation Activity) 

SST*  Application of a Single Surface Treatment 

SSTplus*  Single Surface Treatment, Geometric Padding/Correction, Ditch improvements 

DST*  Double Surface Treatment 

   *Additional Improvement Types developed by 4 Roads not included in the Inventory Manual 

 

Types of Improvements 

For each Type of Improvement (Item 104), there are a number of specific road improvements that are included in the total cost relative to the Roadside Environment (Item 32) and the Design Class (Item 105).  The computer will check a number of Items on the appraisal sheet in order to select the appropriate factors and cross section standards and then calculate the Bench Mark Cost.  For example, a Resurfacing and Widening improvement coded under Item 104 is a significantly different road cross section and cost when applied to a rural road vs. an urban arterial.  The computer will make all of the necessary checks to arrive at the recommended improvement cost.   

Described in the following pages are the road improvements and associated construction activities costed for each Type of Improvement listed under Item 104.  Please note, that the Codes (CO) – Carry Over, (SR) – Spot Road, (SI) – Spot Intersection and (SD) – Spot Drainage are direct cost inputs and are not included in the Bench Mark Cost system. 

Page 75: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 6  

(R1)  ‐  BASIC RESURFACING  

(Single Lift of Hot Mix – 50 mm) 

Rural and Semi‐Urban Roads (Cross Section A) 

(a) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced 

(b) Single life of hot mix (50 mm) 

(c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade 

Urban Roads – Granular Base (Cross Section B‐1) 

      – Concrete Base (Cross Section C‐1) 

(a) Minor base repairs for 10% of area to be resurfaced 

(b) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced 

(c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 50% of section length 

(d) Planning 1.0m of existing pavement along both curbs 

(e) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade 

(f) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm) 

 

(R2)  ‐  BASIC RESURFACING  

(Double Lift of Hot Mix – 100 mm) 

Rural and Semi‐Urban Roads (Cross Section A) 

(a) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced 

(b) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm) 

(c) Granular materials to raise shoulder to new surface grade 

Urban Roads – Granular Base (Cross Section B‐1) 

    – Concrete Base (Cross Section C‐1) 

(a) Minor base repairs for 10% of area to be resurfaced 

(b) Hot mix padding for 20% of area to be resurfaced 

(c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 50% of section length 

(d) Planning 1.0 m of existing pavement along both curbs 

(e) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade 

(f) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm)  

(RM)  ‐  MAJOR RESURFACING  

(Double Lift of Hot Mix – 100 mm) 

Urban Roads (Arterials and Collectors) – Granular Base (Cross Section B‐1) 

             – Concrete Base (Cross Section C‐1) 

(a) Base repairs for 50% of area to be resurfaced (b) Planning for 50% of area to be resurfaced (c) Curb removal and replacement on both sides for 50% of section length 

(d) Adjust manholes and catch basins to new surface grade 

(e) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm)  

Page 76: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 7  

(PR1)  ‐  PULVERIZING AND RESURFACING 

(Single lift of Hot Mix – 50 mm) 

Rural Roads (Cross Section A) 

(a) Pulverize existing hard top surface (b) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm) 

(c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade 

 

(PR2)  ‐  PULVERIZING AND RESURFACING (Double Lift of Hot Mix – 100 mm) 

Rural Roads (Cross Section A) 

(a) Pulverize existing hard top surface (b) Double lift of hot mix (100 mm) 

(c) Granular material to raise shoulders to new surface grade 

 

(BS)  ‐  BASE AND SURFACE 

Rural Roads – Tolerable Standard (50 to 100 AADT) (Cross Section D) 

(a) Granular material for base 

(b) Granular material for loose top surface 

(c) Minimal shoulder widening 

(d) Minor Ditching 

Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section D) 

(a) Placing granular material  

(b) Minimal shoulder widening 

(c) Double surface treatment 

(d) Minor ditching 

Rural Roads – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) (Cross Section D) 

and 

Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Cross Section D) 

(a) Placing granular material  

(b) Minimal shoulder widening 

(c) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see table F‐1) 

(d) Minor ditching 

 

(RW)  ‐  RESURFACE AND WIDEN 

Rural Roads – Tolerable Standard (50 to 199 AADT) (Cross Section E) 

(a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement 

(c) Granular material for widening base 

(d) Granular material for loose top surface 

Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section E) 

(a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement 

(c) Granular material for widening base 

(d) Double surface treatment 

Page 77: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 8  

Rural Road – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) (Cross Section E) 

and 

Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Cross Section E) 

(a) Excavating for widening (b) Ditching and side culvert replacement 

(c) Granular material for widening base 

(d) Base Course of hot mix for widening 

(e) Hot mix Padding for 20% of existing surface area 

(f) Single life of hot mix (50 mm) 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section F) 

(a) Excavating for widening  (b) Curb and Gutter removal 

(c) Catch Basin removal 

(d) Base repair 10% of existing surface area (e) Granular material for widening 

(f) Place catch basins and leads 

(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Base course of hot mix for widening 

(j) Hot mix padding for 20% of existing surface area 

(k) Adjust manholes to new surface grade 

(l) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm) curb to curb 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross section G) 

(a) Excavating for widening (b) Curb and gutter removal 

(c) Catch basin removal 

(d) Base repair for 10% of existing surface area (e) Place new catch basins and leads (f) Granular material for widening 

(g) Concrete base for widening (h) New curb and gutter (i) New subdrains 

(j) Base course of hot mix for widening 

(k) Hot mix padding for 20% of existing surface area 

(l) Adjust manholes to new surface grade 

(m) Single lift of hot mix (50 mm) curb to curb    

Page 78: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 9  

(REC)  ‐  RECONSTRUCTION (RURAL and SEMI‐URBAN) 

Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 to 399 AADT) (Cross Section H) 

(a) Excavate base material 

(b) Ditching and side culvert replacement 

(c) Grading  (d) Granular material 

(e) Double surface treatment 

Rural Roads – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) Cross Section H) 

and  

Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Cross Section H) 

(a) Excavate base material  

(b) Ditching and side culvert replacement 

(c) Grading  (d) Granular material  

(e) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table F‐1) 

 

Rural and Semi‐Urban Roads – Design Standard (Concrete Surface)  

(Cross Section P) 

(a) Excavate base material  

(b) Ditching and side culvert replacement 

(c) Grading  (d) Granular Material  

(e) Concrete base and surface  

(RNS)  ‐  RECONSTRUCTION NOMINAL STORM SEWERS (URBAN) 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section I) 

(a) Excavate base material 

(b) Curb and gutter removal  

(c) Granular base (d) New curb and gutter (e) New sub‐drains (f) Adjust manholes and catch basins 

(g) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table F‐1) 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross Section J) 

(a) Excavate base material  

(b) Curb and gutter removal  

(c) Granular base (d) Concrete base (e) New curb and gutter (f) New sub‐drains 

(g) Adjust manholes and catch basins 

(h) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table H‐5) 

 

Page 79: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 10  

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Surface (Cross Section O) 

(a) Excavate base material  

(b) Curb and gutter removal 

(c) Granular base (d) Concrete base and surface  (e) New curb and gutter (f) New sub‐drains 

(g) Adjust manholes and catch basins  

(RSS) ‐  RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWERS 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section K) 

(a) Excavate base material 

(b) Curb and gutter removal 

(c) Storm sewer removal 

(d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads 

(e) New storm sewers 

(f) New manhole and catch basins including leads 

(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Granular base 

(j) Hot mix (100/150 mm, see Table F‐1 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross Section L) 

(a) Excavate base material 

(b) Curb and gutter removal 

(c) Storm sewer removal 

(d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads 

(e) New storm sewers 

(f) New manhole and catch basins including leads 

(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Granular base 

(j) Concrete base 

(k) Hot mix (50/100 mm, see Table F‐1) 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Surface (Cross Section Q) 

(a) Excavate base material  

(b) Curb and gutter removal  

(c) Storm sewer removal 

(d) Manhole and Catch Basin removal including leads 

(e) New storm sewers 

(f) New manhole and catch basins including leads 

(g) New curb and gutter (h) New sub‐drains (i) Granular base 

(j) Concrete base and surface   

Page 80: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 11  

(NC)  ‐  PROPOSED ROAD CONSTRUCTION 

Rural Roads – Design Standard (200 – 399 AADT) (Cross Section H) 

(a) Grading  (b) Ditching and cross culverts (c) Granular base (d) Double surface treatment 

Rural Roads – Design Standard (400 plus AADT) (Cross Section H) 

(a) Grading  (b) Ditching and cross culverts (c) Granular base (d) Hot mix (50.100 mm, see Table F‐1) 

Semi‐Urban Roads 

New Construction does not apply to semi‐urban roads as there is no existing frontage development.   

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Granular Base (Cross Section K) 

(a) Grading  (b) Storm Sewers 

(c) Manholes and catch basins including leads 

(d) Curb and gutter (e) Sub‐drains (f) Granular base 

(g) Hot mix (100 mm/150 mm, see Table F‐1) 

Urban Roads – Design Standard – Concrete Base (Cross Section L) 

(a) Grading (b) Storm Sewers 

(c) Manholes and catch basins including leads 

(d) Curb and gutter (e) Sub‐drains (f) Granular base 

(g) Concrete base (h) Hot mix (50 mm/100 mm , see Table F‐1) 

   

Page 81: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 12  

(SRR) ‐  STORM SEWER INSTALLATION AND ROAD REINSTATEMENT (URBAN AND SEMI‐URBAN) 

Urban and Semi‐Urban Roads – Granular Base (Cross Section M) 

(a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers 

(b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads 

(c) New storm sewer including bedding 

(d) Granular materials in trench 

(e) Hot mix to restore surface grade (100/150 mm, see Table F‐1) 

Urban and Semi‐Urban Roads – Concrete Base (Cross Section N) 

(a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers 

(b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads 

(c) New storm sewers including bedding 

(d) Granular material in trench 

(e) Concrete base for trenched area (f) Hot mix to restore surface grade (50/100 mm, See Table F‐1) 

Urban and Semi‐Urban Roads – Concrete Surface (Cross Section R) 

(a) Trenching and removal of existing storm sewers 

(b) New manholes and adjust catch basin leads 

(c) New storm sewers including bedding 

(d) Granular material in trench 

(e) Concrete base and surface for trenched area  

(MICRO)  SINGLE LIFT OF MICROSURFACING 

Urban, Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a HCB (High Class Bituminous) surface type 

(a) Unit cost per square metre of Microsurfacing

 (SST)  SINGLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT 

Urban, Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type 

(a) Unit cost per square metre of Single Surface Treatment 

 (SSTplus)  SINGLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT, GEOMETRIC CORRECTION DITCHING 

IMPROVEMENTS 

 Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type 

(a) Unit cost per square metre of Single Surface Treatment 

(b) 20% Surface area padding to 50mm to correct geometric deficiencies 

(c) Earth Excavation allowance to provide for minor ditch improvements and berm removal 

    

Page 82: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix A 13  

(DST)  DOUBLE LIFT OF SURFACE TREATMENT 

Urban, Semi‐Urban and Rural Roads with a LCB (Low Class Bituminous) surface type 

(a) Unit cost per square metre of Double Surface Treatment 

 

 

 

Page 83: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix B. Pavement Structure and Defects

Page 84: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    Appendix B 1  

Pavement Structure 

To assist in understanding the content and methodology of the report, the following discussion provides an overview of how flexible and rigid pavement structures are designed and function. The majority of municipal roads would be described as having a flexible pavement structure. Hot mix asphalt, surface treatment, and gravel road surfaces are typical flexible pavement road structures. Other pavement structure types include rigid and composite, and are more typically found on 400 series highways, or on arterial roads of larger urban centres.  

 

Flexible Pavement Road Structure 

Load is applied to the pavement structure, and ultimately to the native sub‐grade, via wheel loads of vehicles. The pavement structure between the native sub‐grade and the load application point has to be designed such that the load that is transmitted to the sub‐grade is not greater than the sub‐grade’s ability to support the load.  The figure below shows a typical flexible pavement structure and how applied load dissipates.  

Load Distribution through Pavement Structure 

 

 

Depth Below Surface Stress (psi) Stress (Kpa)

At Surface  90  620.50 

8” (200 mm) Below  11  75.84 

11” (275 mm) Below  7  48.26 

16” (400 mm) Below  4  27.58 

 

Surface materials experience the highest loading at the point of contact with the vehicle’s tire. Radial truck tires, running from 110 psi to 120 psi, can have an impact 20 times higher at the surface, than at the compacted sub‐grade. The loading actually occurs in three dimensions, in a conical fashion, dissipating both vertically and horizontally as it passes through the pavement structure. Loading 

From MTO 

Page 85: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    Appendix B 2  

decreases exponentially as it passes through the road structure. Therefore, materials of lesser strength or lesser quality can be used deeper in the road structure.  

As a rule of thumb, the closer the road building materials are placed to the surface of the road, the higher the quality required. Similarly, the poorer the sub‐grade or native material, the deeper/stronger the road structure has to be to carry the same loads. 

Traffic counts, and the percentage of trucks, are critical to structural design of the pavement. Depending upon the source, the effect of a single truck on the pavement structure can be equivalent to 2,000 to 8,000 passenger cars. The effect of farm machinery would be very similar to that of heavy trucks. However, the Highway Traffic does permit certain types of farm machinery and equipment to use the roads even during half load season, so this is an additional consideration when designing rural roads. 

Pavement evaluation involves a review of each road section and an assessment of the type and extent of the distress(es) observed. Treatment recommendations are predicated by whether the cause of the major distress(es) is structural or non‐structural. 

Flexible pavements will have age‐related distresses and wearing such as thermal cracking and oxidation. These distresses are non‐structural; however, once a crack develops and water enters the pavement structure, deterioration will accelerate. Poor construction practices, quality control, or materials may produce other non‐structural surface defects, such as segregation and raveling, which will also result in a reduced life expectancy of the surface asphalt.  

Fatigue cracking indicates structural failure and can manifest itself in many forms, such as wheel path, alligator, and edge cracking. It can be localized or throughout a road section. When roads that have exhibited fatigue cracking are rehabilitated, there should be particular attention paid to the rehabilitation treatment, to ensure that the upgraded facility has sufficient structure. 

Wheelpath Fatigue Cracking 

 

 

Page 86: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    Appendix B 3  

Flexible Pavement Road Structure Design 

There are a number of flexible pavement structural design methodologies and associated software. The simplest way to describe structural design may be the Granular Base Equivalency (GBE) Methodology. This GBE methodology is still used in Ontario, by a number of agencies, and is frequently used as a cross‐check where more sophisticated analysis has been undertaken. 

The measurement is unit‐less and relates to the structural value of one millimetre of Granular ‘A’ material. The relationship of the typical road building materials is expressed in either of the two following ways: 

1 mm of HMA = 2 mm of Granular A = 3 mm of Granular B 

Or 

HMA = 2, Granular A = 1, Granular B = 0.67 

 

To gain some perspective on what this means in terms of typical construction activities, the following table indicates a typical subdivision road construction as expressed in GBE.  

Granular Base Equivalency 

Material Example 1 

Depth 

Granular Base 

Equivalency 

Example 2 

Depth 

Granular Base 

Equivalency 

Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)  100  200  150  300 

Granular A  150  150  300  300 

Granular B  300  200  0  0 

TOTAL  550  550  450  600 

 

When reconstruction and rehabilitation projects are undertaken, and use of alternate materials and/or road structure is contemplated, the GBE concept is important to bear in mind, as different treatments such as Expanded Asphalt and Cold in Place recycling also have a structural value. For design purposes, it may be prudent to use a conservative equivalency of 1.5 for these products (although, some sources indicate GBE’s of up to 1.8). 

As an example, if a 200 mm pavement is replaced with 150 mm of Expanded Asphalt or Cold in Place Recycling, with a 50 mm overlay of Hot Mix asphalt, a pavement structure with a GBE of 400 is replaced by a pavement structure with a GBE of 325; a significant difference. Premature failure will be the result of an under‐designed pavement structure, wasting resources and available funding.  

The purpose of this example is to illustrate the different structural values that products have. Expanded Asphalt and Cold in Place recycling are both excellent products to rehabilitate pavement structures when used appropriately. 

The MTO’s Pavement Design and Rehabilitation Manual is an excellent resource for use in pavement structure design and rehabilitation, and is available from the online MTO Catalog. 

 

Page 87: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    Appendix B 4  

Thin Lift Pavements 

Hot mix asphalt mixes are designed in Ontario either by the Marshall Method or the Superpave Method. Through time, this has resulted in a number of commonly used mixes that are typically sorted by size. One of the parameters used to describe that sizing is the Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size (NMAS). 

In the Marshall Mix Method, typical mix designations are HL1, HL2, HL3, HL4, and HL8. In the Superpave mix design methodology, mixes are designated by the NMAS.  

The following table identifies the NMAS for the more commonly used mixes, and indicates recommended minimum lift thicknesses for them. 

 

Recommended Minimum Lift Thicknesses 

Mix Type  NMAS (mm)  Lift Thickness Range (mm) 

SP 9.5  9.5  30 to 40 

SP 12.5  12.5  40 to 50 

SP 19  19.0  60 to 80 

HL3  13.2  40 to 55 

HL4  16.0  50 to 65 

HL8  19.0  60 to 80 

 

Thin Lift Pavement 

     

*Thin lift with inappropriate aggregate size   

Page 88: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    Appendix B 5  

Rigid Pavement Structure 

Rigid Pavements are constructed of concrete, or concrete with an asphalt wearing surface. The fundamental difference between a flexible pavement and a rigid pavement is the method in which the load is transferred. Whereas the flexible pavement disperses load through the pavement structure in a conical fashion, with a higher point load directly beneath the loading point, the rigid pavement structure distributes that load in a beam‐like fashion, more evenly across the pavement structure. Rigid pavements may have an exposed concrete wearing surface, or they may be covered with an asphaltic concrete wearing surface.  

The resulting rigid pavement structure is usually thinner overall, when compared to a flexible pavement, designed to accommodate the same traffic loading. This does not necessarily translate into a reduced cost of construction. Any comparison of costs between flexible and rigid pavements should be on a life cycle basis, for the most accurate assessment. 

Older concrete pavements were prone to failure at joints, as load transfer caused a slight movement in the concrete slab, and with the intrusion of water, a structural failure. Newer concrete pavements are designed with improved load transfer technology.

 

Figure 1 Flexible vs. Rigid Pavement Structure(s)

 

 

Flexible Pavement Distresses and Treatment Selection 

Treatment recommendation is dependent upon the condition of the road section at the time of the review.  

 

Treatment Selection – Critical Area Analysis 

When using the Inventory Manual methodology all of the ‘holistic’ needs are considered in the recommendation. For example, a road may appear to require only a resurfacing, however, when the other critical areas are reviewed, there may be a capacity problem which would then result in a recommendation to resurface and widen (RW) that would address both the pavement condition and the need for additional lanes. Another example would be where the pavement is exhibiting some type of 

Page 89: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    Appendix B 6  

distress but there is also poor drainage. The recommendation would then be to reconstruct (REC if rural, RSS if urban). 

 

Treatment Selection for Non‐Structural Rehabilitation 

Resurfacing recommendations are predicated upon the type and extent of distress noted. For example, all pavements will develop thermal/transverse cracking as they age. As the age of the pavement increases, the frequency of the cracking increases. If the spacing of he cracks is still greater than 10m, then the R1 – resurface with one lift of asphalt – treatment will typically be sufficient to restore the road as the treatment provides for overlay and base asphalt repair. However, if the frequency of transverse cracking , which may have become transverse alligator cracking if left unattended too long, then the recommendation will be more extensive, such as a PR2‐ Pulverize and resurface with 2 lifts of asphalt.  The following illustrates transverse cracking. 

Transverse /Thermal cracking 

 

  

Treatment Selection for Structural Rehabilitation 

Road sections exhibiting structural failure such as fatigue cracking require a more extensive rehabilitation to restore the performance of the road section. In simple terms, placing a single lift of asphalt over structurally failed asphalt will guarantee the same failure in a very short time period. Unless the single lift overlay is placed knowingly as a holding strategy, it should be avoided on structurally deficient pavements. For pavements that have failed structurally or have too much transverse cracking, the recommendation is typically PR2 as a minimum provided the drainage is adequate or requires only minor improvement. 

 

Reflective Cracking 

Paving over an active crack(s) will result in a crack(s) in the same location with 2 to 3 years. As a rule of thumb, the crack will migrate through at approximately 25mm per year. Therefore it would be 

Page 90: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

    Appendix B 7  

anticipated that if a 50mm overlay is placed, then the cracking would reappear in approximately 2 years. This is not an efficient usage of available funding. 

 

Structurally Failed Pavement 

 

 

The above figure illustrates a pavement that has failed both structurally and has very frequent severe transverse cracks. Placement of a 50mm overlay over this type of pavement condition will result in rapid failure is not recommended. The figure below illustrates a newer pavement that already has very frequent transverse cracks appearing, likely the result of paving over a failed pavement. Under normal circumstances, the first transverse cracks generally appear in approximately 4 to 6 years and the cracks are 40m to 50m or more apart.  

Reflective Transverse Cracking on Newer Pavement 

Page 91: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix C. Gravel Road Conversion

Page 92: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix C 1  

Gravel Road Conversion 

Gravel Road Maintenance Overview 

Gravel roads tend to be the ‘forgotten’ asset. Gravel roads form a component of the road asset group for the municipality and should be managed as any other asset.  

One of the difficulties in determining the deterioration of a gravel road is that the wearing surface and the granular layers are one and the same, so the extent of deterioration may not be as obvious until the deterioration is significant. Appropriate gravel road maintenance can be deceptively expensive and frequently, budget analysis proves that the per‐kilometre cost of gravel road maintenance is greater than the per‐kilometre cost for hard top maintenance. This is further exacerbated as traffic volume on a gravel road increases. 

Like other road assets, gravel roads have lifecycle maintenance and rehabilitation costs that should be addressed as part of any asset management plan. Life cycle costs include regular addition of gravel, dust control, grading and labour. Grading will typically include equipment costs for a motor grader. A Net Present Value (NPV) assessment comparing life cycle of a gravel surface vs. hard top surface would be a key element in determining the merit of converting a gravel road to hard top. 

NPV Analysis Components 

Process 

Given the above noted, a Net Present Value (NPV) assessment of the gravel road, in comparison with a surface treated road section or other hard top surface, should be undertaken as it may be more cost‐effective to convert/upgrade the gravel road to a surface treated road.  

Road agencies in both Canada and the United States, have conducted studies that have generally indicated that, dependent upon local unit costs, gravel road conversion to hardtop, can be a cost‐effective strategy. One source indicates that this may be effective management for roads with traffic volumes as low as 100 AADT. 

It is preferable to address the cost comparisons over a period of time where the life cycles may conclude concurrently. For instance, if the gravel maintenance is on a three year basis and the surface treatment is seven, then the cycles coincide at 21 years. Total life cycle cost over that time period should be considered. 

Gravel 

This report provides an annual cost for maintenance costs for 75mm of additional gravel to be added every three years and does not included regular grading or dust control. This was a typical standard that was used in the past by many municipalities. Due to the natural life cycle wear and tear, maintenance and winter control activities, gravel roads require additional gravel on a regular basis to ensure continuing performance.  

Equipment 

As part of a holistic review of service delivery, consideration should be given to the equipment hourly rates and replacement. Accurate hourly rates are required to provide a true assessment. Equipment rates should include capital depreciation and operating costs.  

Page 93: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix C 2  

One of the factors driving the overall cost is the equipment that is required to properly maintain a gravel road system‐ particularly graders. Part of the gravel road conversion analysis should include: 

Has the hourly rate for the equipment been calculated properly to include capital depreciation and maintenance costs?  A new grader will cost $ $300,000 and upward. At a 20‐year life span, there is a minimum of $15,000 in capital depreciation, alone, on the grader. What is the current rate for the grader? If there is not full cost recovery on the grader hourly rate, then the cost for gravel road maintenance is not accurate either. 

Is the grader used for any other purpose/activities? 

What is the length of the gravel road system? A commonly used length of gravel roads used to justify a grader is 75 kilometres of gravel. 

How many hours per year is the grader operated?  

Are there other pieces of equipment that could be used or rented to maintain the gravel roads?  

Surface Treatment or other hard top 

Whatever other surface type is being compared with the gravel road surface should include the same 

factors as for gravel so there is a 1:1 comparison. 

Additional Factors and Considerations 

If the argument for conversion may be made from a financial perspective, then there are additional factors that should be considered from physical and risk perspectives. Other factors for consideration include: 

Platform width 

Drainage 

Structural Adequacy 

Traffic Volume and Type 

The figure below provides a graphical illustration of the different factors and decision flow that may be considered in developing a case to convert a gravel road to hard top. 

Benefits to converting a gravel road include: 

Customer satisfaction 

Reduced maintenance costs for routine maintenance 

Reduced maintenance costs for winter maintenance 

Reduced complaints 

 

 

 

Page 94: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

 

    Appendix C 3  

Gravel Road Conversion Matrix 

Page 95: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix D. Potential Substandard Alignment

Page 96: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Geometric Needs by Street NameCurrent Insp - Rural w/Curve Needs Only

Length AADT LimitRDSD Op. Speed H.Curve H. SSD V. CurveTo Description V.SSDFrom DescriptionID Street Name TON 0.142 619 80R 70 1 0 0142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL

LIMIT (BRIDGE) 0MUNICIPAL LIMIT0005 AVON DRIVE ADEQ

0.112 617 80R 65 1 0 0112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD

029- HAMILTON ROAD1220 BREEN ROAD ADEQ

0.892 298 80R 80 1 0 0PIGRAM ROAD 0FIVE POINTS ROAD1280 BREEN ROAD ADEQ 0.033 35 80R 60 1 0 032- DORCHESTER ROAD 033M SOUTH OF 32-

DORCHESTER ROAD1190 CASHEL LANE NOW

1.393 100 80R 80 2 0 0VALLEY VIEW ROAD 0PROSPECT HILL ROAD2600 CENTRE DRIVE ADEQ 0.679 100 80R 65 2 0 0DUNDAS STREET 090M NORTH OF RAILWAY

TRACK4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ

3.082 100 80R 80 0 0 0WYTON DRIVE 128- THORNDALE ROAD4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ 1.693 191 80R 65 3 0 0LOWER COW PATH 044M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2200 COW PATH ADEQ

3.678 216 80R 80 3 0 0DORCHESTER ROAD 074- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0900 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ 1.026 70 80R 60 1 0 0END OF STREET 0CASHEL LANE1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NOW 0.080 1,616 80R 60 1 0 032- DORCHESTER ROAD 080M WEST OF 32-

DORCHESTER ROAD1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NOW

0.043 70 80R 60 1 0 043M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD

0DORCHESTER ROAD1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NOW

1.364 100 80R 75 2 0 0VALLEY VIEW ROAD 057M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD

2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ

1.100 100 50R 50 2 0 0EAST END 0VALLEY VIEW ROAD2760 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ 1.403 100 80R 80 2 0 0FAIRVIEW ROAD 027- NISSOURI ROAD2400 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ 1.058 81 80R 65 2 0 017M NORTH OF HAMILTON

ROAD(PVMT CHANGE) 0COW PATH2230 LOWER COW PATH ADEQ

0.250 100 50R 45 1 0 0CHRISTIE DRIVE 0250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE

5225 MILL ROAD ADEQ

1.475 433 80R 70 1 0 0DONNYBROOK DRIVE 0250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE

5230 MILL ROAD ADEQ

0.195 257 80R 80 1 0 0300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD

0BREEN ROAD1370 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ

0.371 239 80R 55 2 0 0370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

0CROMARTY DRIVE1400 PIGRAM ROAD NOW

1.991 239 80R 80 1 0 0EBENEZER ROAD 0370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

1410 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ

0.920 100 80R 70 2 0 0SIXTEEN MILE ROAD 033M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ

3.085 100 60R 60 6 0 0WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG 0THORNDALE ROAD3170 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ 3.122 100 80R 80 2 0 0THORNDALE ROAD 0CENTRE DRIVE3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ 0.278 20 80R 65 1 0 0WEST END 0CONSERVATION AREA

ENTRANCE0130 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ

0.516 166 80R 65 1 0 0CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE

0AVON DRIVE0120 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ

1.404 100 80R 75 4 0 0REBECCA ROAD 0LAKESIDE DRIVE2480 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.389 100 80R 80 2 0 0CHERRY HILL ROAD 0PURPLE HILL ROAD2560 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.406 100 80R 80 2 0 0FAIRVIEW ROAD 027- NISSOURI ROAD2510 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.395 100 80R 80 2 0 0PURPLE HILL ROAD 0HERITAGE ROAD2550 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ 1.281 100 80R 70 2 0 047M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI

ROAD 088M EAST OF REBECCA

ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)2490 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 4:48PM Page: 1

Page 97: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Geometric Needs by Street NameCurrent Insp - Rural w/Curve Needs Only

Length AADT LimitRDSD Op. Speed H.Curve H. SSD V. CurveTo Description V.SSDFrom DescriptionID Street Name TON 36.856

Run: DEC 4,2015 4:48PM Page: 2

Page 98: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix E. Deterioration Curve Detail

Page 99: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 1  

Asset Classes 

In order to utilize the Best Practice and Performance Modeling modules of WorkTech Asset Manager Foundation (WT), assets must be defined by an asset class. Table 1 identifies the road asset classes that have been developed for use in WT by 4 Roads Management Services Inc. 

Table 1: Road Asset Classes 

Asset Class  Subtype  Material  RDSE Envt  AADT Low  AADT High 

A/C‐R  All  A/C  R  1  100,000 

A/C‐S  All  A/C  S  1  100,000 

A/C‐U  All  A/C  U  1  100,000 

CM1‐R  All  C/M  R  1  3,000 

CM1‐S  All  C/M  S  1  3,000 

CM1‐U  All  C/M  U  1  3,000 

CON‐R  All  CON  R  1  100,000 

CON‐S  All  CON  S  1  100,000 

CON‐U  All  CON  U  1  100,000 

GST1‐R  All  G/S  R  1  10,000 

GST1‐S  All  G/S  S  1  10,000 

HCB1‐R  ART  HCB  R  20,000  100,000 

HCB1‐S  ART  HCB  S  20,000  100,000 

HCB1‐U  ART  HCB  U  20,000  100,000 

HCB2‐R  ART  HCB  R  10,000  20,000 

HCB2‐S  ART  HCB  S  10,000  20,000 

HCB2‐U  ART  HCB  U  10,000  20,000 

HCB3‐R  All  HCB  R  1,000  10,000 

HCB3‐S  All  HCB  S  1,000  10,000 

HCB3‐U  All  HCB  U  1,000  10,000 

HCB4‐R  All  HCB  R  1  1,000 

HCB4‐S  All  HCB  S  1  1,000 

HCB4‐U  All  HCB  U  1  1,000 

ICB‐S  All  ICB  S  1  3,000 

ICB‐U  All  ICB  U  1  3,000 

ICB1‐R  All  ICB  R  1  3,000 

LCB1‐R  All  LCB  R  1  2,000 

LCB1‐S  All  LCB  S  1  2,000 

LCB1‐U  All  LCB  U  1  2,000 

 

Page 100: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 2  

Conventional wisdom has been to define road assets by their functional classes such as Arterial, Collector or Local and then further differentiate by usage, such as residential or commercial. From a performance modeling perspective, using the functional classification will only work to a point, as the traffic on a functional class will vary between agencies. 

4 Roads believes that the performance/deterioration of a road section is more predictable based on surface type and traffic volume rather than by functional class. Based on that philosophy, Table 1 was created identifying Road Asset Classification by Surface Type, Traffic Volume and Roadside Environment. Roadside Environment has been added to permit the calculation of different replacement costs between rural and urban cross‐sections. 

Deterioration Curves 

When using the Inventory Manual (IM) methodology, Structural Adequacy is a measurement of the percentage of the surface of the road that is exhibiting distress. The rater will consider the type of distress as well as the other critical areas (surface width, capacity, geometry, drainage and surface width) in order to provide a recommendation for an improvement. In the IM, any, or multiple of the critical areas, may produce a Time of Need (TON). The overall TON of the road section is the worst of all of the TON’s. For example, if five of the TON’s are ADEQ, and one is NOW, the section is a NOW need. 

It would be possible, but very difficult, to develop performance models around all of the critical areas. So for the purposes of the performance modeling, Structural Adequacy (distress) has been selected to be the driver in the decisions with respect to the model. 

In the early years of the model, if a project is selected that has an identified improvement type, that improvement will be used for the project in the year that it is selected. In the later years, presumably after all current deficiencies have been corrected the model will revert to the assigned asset class for deterioration and project selection based on estimated condition. 

All deterioration curves relate to the ‘Physical Condition’ data field in WorkTech. Physical Condition is the Structural Adequacy multiplied by 5 to produce a score from 5 to 100. The Physical Condition deterioration curve is specific to the Inventory Manual and therefore the trigger points and definition of the curve will be different than other methodologies. It should be noted that different evaluation methodologies will produce varying deterioration curves and trigger points. Familiarity with the rating system being utilized is essential. 

The deterioration curves are the same for each asset class regardless of roadside environment. For urban sections, the improvement is RSS‐ Reconstruction with Storm Sewers, rather than REC‐ Reconstruction Rural. 

   

Page 101: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 3  

Figure 1: Physical Condition versus Improvement Selection 

 

Where the MTO PCI / Inventory Manual Condition Rating format is being used, the PCI data is entered to produce a PCI score from different formulas that represent the defects and weightings by surface type. The PCI score is then used to approximate a Structural Adequacy score (and a Physical Condition). Table 2 identifies the approximations to convert PCI to Structural Adequacy and a Time of Need. 

Table 2: PCI to Structural Adequacy Approximations 

Time of 

Need 

ASTM 

6344 

Structural 

Adequacy 

Physical 

Condition 

MTO PCI  Surface Condition  Description  Approximation 

PCI to SA 

NOW  1‐39  1 to 7  1 to 35  1 to 55  Now Needs –

Reconstruction or 

Major Rehabilitation 

Poor to Very 

Poor to Failed 

IF PCI <=55 then, PCI / 8 = SA 

1 to 5  40‐55  8 to 11  36 to 55  56 to 75  1 to 5 year Needs – R2 

/more extensive 

rehabilitation 

Fair / Passable  IF PCI >55<=75 then, PCI / 7 =SA 

6 to 10  55‐70  12 to 14  56to 70  76 to 85  6 to 10 year Needs – 

R1 Resurfacing 

Good  IF PCI >75<=85 then, PCI / 6 =SA 

ADEQ  71‐100  15 to 20  75 to 100  86 to 100 Adequate – 

Maintenance and 

Preservation 

Satisfactory/ 

Good/ Excellent 

If PCI >85 then, PCI /5.4 =SA 

Once a Structural Adequacy Score has been determined, the TON is also calculated. What this achieves is the detail of PCI data collection and the strength of the holistic evaluation of the Inventory Manual. 

Page 102: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 4  

Improvement Types‐ Effect on the Asset 

Appendix A of this report includes a summary of the improvement types that are included in the inventory Manual. In WorkTech there is no restriction on what may be developed as an improvement type for a road agency. However, regardless of the improvement types that are used the effect that the improvement has on the asset has to be understood in order to use performance modeling. 

The following table identifies a number of improvement types and further identifies the effect that they have on a road asset. A similar approach may be taken with other assets. 

Code  Description  Effect on the Asset 

R1  Basic Resurfacing – Single Lift  Increase Physical Condition to 97 

R2  Basic Resurfacing – Double Lift  Increase Physical Condition to 100

RM  Major Resurfacing  Increase Physical Condition to 100

PR1  Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Single Lift  Increase Physical Condition to 95

PR2  Pulverizing and Resurfacing – Double Lift   Increase Physical Condition to 100

BS Base and Surface Tolerable – Tolerable standard for lower volume 

roads – Rural and Semi‐Urban Cross sections only Increase Physical Condition to 95

RW  Resurface and Widen  Increase Physical Condition to 97

REC  Reconstruction  Increase Physical Condition to 100

RNS 

Reconstruction Nominal Storm Sewers (Urban: no new sewer, 

adjust manholes, catch basins, add sub‐drain, remove and replace 

curb and gutter, granular, and hot mix) 

Increase Physical Condition to 100

RSS Reconstruction including Installation of Storm Sewers (New storm 

sewers and manholes in addition to the above) Increase Physical Condition to 100

NC  Proposed Road Construction  Increase Physical Condition to 100

SRR  Storm Sewer Installation and Road Reinstatement  No effect

CRK  Crack Sealing  Hold Physical Condition for 2 Years 

MICRO  Microsurfacing  Hold Physical Condition for 3 years 

GRR  Gravel Road Resurfacing – add 75mm  Hold Physical Condition for 3 years 

GRR2  Gravel Road Resurfacing ‐  Add 150mm  Increase Physical Condition by 20 

 

The effect that a treatment has on an asset is critical to the analysis. Inaccurate determination of the effect of a treatment on an asset will produce an inaccurate – and indefensible‐ result. The following chart is a comparison of the deterioration of a road section without any treatment applied versus a road section that has appropriate treatment at the optimal condition, producing a more cost effective life cycle. 

Page 103: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 5  

Figure 2, shown below, illustrates several different aspects of performance model output including the effect of a treatment on an asset and the effect of multiple treatments undertaken at the optimal asset condition to produce a cost effective management strategy. 

Figure 2: Performance Model – Effect of Treatment on Asset 

 

 

Deterioration Curves by Surface Type and Traffic Volume 

The following pages includes tables and graphs indicating the anticipated performance of an 

appropriately constructed road asset and the condition triggers for treatments. The deterioration curves 

by asset class used in concert with the table indicating the treatment effect on the asset, and the 

agency’s unit costs, will produce a performance model that demonstrates the effect on the system at 

various budget levels and produce a program based on input parameters. 

 

New Construction 

Page 104: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 6  

Gravel Roads‐  All Roadsides, all AADT 

 

   

Year  Condition Imp Typet  Description 

1  100  NONE  No Improvement Required 

2  92.45  NONE  No Improvement Required 

3  86.21  GRR  75mm of Granular A 

4  80.43  GRR  75mm of Granular A 

5  75.11  GRR  75mm of Granular A 

6  70.21  GRR  75mm of Granular A 

7  65.7  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

8  61.55  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

9  57.75  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

10  54.27  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

11  51.07  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

12  48.15  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

13  45.48  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

14  43.04  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

15  40.81  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

16  38.77  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

17  36.9  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

18  35.2  GRR2  150mm of additional Gravel 

19  33.63  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

20  32.19  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

21  30.86  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

22  29.64  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

23  28.51  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

24  27.45  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

25  26.47  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

30  22.28  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

35  18.88  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

40  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

45  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

50  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

Page 105: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 7  

HCB1 All Roadsides‐ AADT > 20,000, assumes 10% Commercial 

   

>Year  Condition Imp. Type  Description 

1  100  NONE  No Improvement Required 

2  98.61  NONE  No Improvement Required 

3  94.19  NONE  No Improvement Required 

4  89.83  CRK  Crack Sealing 

5  85.55  CRK  Crack Sealing 

6  81.36  CRK  Crack Sealing 

7  77.26  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

8  73.28  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

9  69.4  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

10  65.65  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

11  62.02  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

12  58.54  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

13  55.19  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

14  52  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

15  48.96  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

16  46.08  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

17  43.36  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

18  40.81  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

19  38.41  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

20  36.19  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

22  32.24  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

23  30.51  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

24  28.95  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

25  27.55  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

26  26.3  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

27  25.21  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

28  24.27  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

29  23.47  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

30  22.82  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

35  21.31  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

40  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

50  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

Page 106: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 8  

HCB 2 All Roadsides‐ AADT >10,000 <20,000, Assumes 10% Commercial 

   

>Year  Condition Imp. Type  Description 

1  100  NONE  No Improvement Required 

2  98.79  NONE  No Improvement Required 

3  94.85  NONE  No Improvement Required 

4  91.01  CRK  Crack Sealing 

5  87.29  CRK  Crack Sealing 

6  83.68  CRK  Crack Sealing 

7  80.18  CRK2  Crack Sealing 

8  76.79  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

9  73.51  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

10  70.33  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

11  67.26  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

12  64.28  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

13  61.41  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

14  58.63  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

15  55.95  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

16  53.38  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

17  50.89  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

18  48.5  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

19  46.2  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

20  43.99  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

21  41.87  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

22  39.84  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

23  37.89  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

24  36.03  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

25  34.26  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

26  32.56  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

27  30.95  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

28  29.42  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

29  27.97  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

30  26.59  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

35  20.86  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

40  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

50  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

Page 107: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 9  

HCB 3 All Roadsides – AADT 1,000 < 10,000, Assumes 10% Commercial 

>Year  Condition Imp. Type  Description 

1  100  NONE  No Improvement Required 

2  99.44  NONE  No Improvement Required 

3  97.46  NONE  No Improvement Required 

4  95.29  NONE  No Improvement Required 

5  92.95  CRK  Crack Sealing 

6  90.48  CRK  Crack Sealing 

7  87.88  CRK2  Crack Sealing 

8  85.18  CRK2  Crack Sealing 

9  82.4  CRK2  Crack Sealing 

10  79.56  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

11  76.67  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

12  73.76  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation  

13  70.83  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

14  67.91  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

15  65.01  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

16  62.14  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

17  59.31  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

18  56.54  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

19  53.83  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

20  51.19  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

21  48.63  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

22  46.17  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

23  43.8  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

24  41.53  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

25  39.37  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

26  37.31  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

27  35.37  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

28  33.54  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

29  31.82  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

30  30.22  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

35  23.83  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

40  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

45  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

50  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

 

Page 108: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 10  

HCB 4 All Roadsides‐ AADT <1,000, Assumes 5% Commercial 

>Year  Condition Imp. Type  Description 

1  100  NONE  No Improvement Required 

2  99.44  NONE  No Improvement Required 

3  97.46  NONE  No Improvement Required 

4  95.29  NONE  No Improvement Required 

5  92.95  CRK  Crack Sealing 

6  90.48  CRK  Crack Sealing 

7  87.88  CRK2  Crack Sealing 

8  85.18  CRK2  Crack Sealing 

9  82.4  CRK2  Crack Sealing 

10  79.56  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

11  76.67  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation 

12  73.76  MICRO  Microsurfacing ‐Pavement Preservation  

13  70.83  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

14  67.91  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

15  65.01  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

16  62.14  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

17  59.31  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

18  56.54  R1  Basic Resurfacing 1 ‐ 50mm 

19  53.83  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

20  51.19  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

21  48.63  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

22  46.17  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

23  43.8  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

24  41.53  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

25  39.37  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

26  37.31  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

27  35.37  R2  Basic Resurfacing 2 ‐ 100mm 

28  33.54  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

29  31.82  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

30  30.22  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

40  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

45  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

50  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

   

Page 109: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

WorkTech Asset Classes and Deterioration Curves  

for Roads  

    Appendix E 11  

LCB All roadsides – All AADT’s 

Year  Condition Imp. Type  Description 

1  100  NONE  No Improvement Required 

2  98.61  NONE  No Improvement Required 

3  94.19  NONE  No Improvement Required 

4  89.84  NONE  No Improvement Required 

5  85.56  NONE  No Improvement Required 

6  81.36  NONE  No Improvement Required 

7  77.26  SST  Single Surface Treatment 

8  73.28  SST  Single Surface Treatment 

9  69.4  SST  Single Surface Treatment 

10  65.65  SST  Single Surface Treatment 

11  62.02  SST  Single Surface Treatment 

12  58.54  SST  Single Surface Treatment 

13  55.19  SST  Single Surface Treatment 

14  52  SSTplus  SST plus Padding / geometric correction 

15  48.96  SSTplus  SST plus Padding / geometric correction 

16  46.08  SSTplus  SST plus Padding / geometric correction 

17  43.36  SSTplus  SST plus Padding / geometric correction 

18  40.81  SSTplus  SST plus Padding / geometric correction 

19  38.41  SSTplus  SST plus Padding / geometric correction 

20  36.19  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

21  34.13  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

22  32.24  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

23  30.51  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

24  28.95  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

25  27.55  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

30  22.82  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

35  21.31  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

40  21.92  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

45  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

50  20  REC  Reconstruction ‐ Rural 

Page 110: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix F. 10 Year Program Based on Existing Funding Level

Page 111: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2016 350 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐23M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) BSgrav 75,975$          40 95 2.426

2016 570 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐LACEY LANE BSgrav 38,770$          40 95 1.238

2016 580 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LACEY LANE‐to‐441M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD BSgrav 43,625$          40 95 1.393

2016 820 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) BSgrav 52,268$          60 95 1.669

2016 1370 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) BREEN ROAD‐to‐300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD BSgrav 6,107$            60 95 0.195

2016 1410 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐EBENEZER ROAD BSgrav 62,352$          60 95 1.991

2016 1420 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER ROAD‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 17,381$          60 95 0.555

2016 2390 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 18M EAST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐HUNT ROAD BSgrav 86,028$          60 95 2.747

2016 3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) CENTRE DRIVE‐to‐THORNDALE ROAD BSgrav 97,772$          60 95 3.122

2016 4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE) BSgrav 94,797$          60 95 3.027

2016 1740 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 33,039$          60 95 1.055

2016 860 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 128M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FORBES ROAD BSgrav 49,720$          60 95 1.707

2016 1800 SHAIN ROAD ( to ) 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END BSgrav 20,325$          60 95 0.649

2016 1690 EATON ROAD ( to ) NORTH END‐to‐31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE BSgrav 18,292$          75 95 0.628

2016 6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐PRIVATE ROAD CRK 108$                85 85 2 0.054

2016 880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE‐to‐EAST END CRK 596$                80 80 2 0.298

2016 5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 256$                85 85 2 0.128

2016 5620 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CANTERBURY DRIVE CRK 886$                90 90 2 0.443

2016 4760 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK CRK 80$                  90 90 2 0.04

2016 5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE CRK 596$                90 90 2 0.298

2016 5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE CRK 200$                90 90 2 0.1

2016 4940 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) AMBER DRIVE‐to‐EAST END CRK 90$                  85 85 2 0.045

2016 6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT CRK 196$                85 85 2 0.098

2016 4870 AMBER DRIVE ( to ) LINWOOD DRIVE‐to‐MARION STREET CRK 358$                85 85 2 0.179

2016 5500 THE PARKWAY ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐CARLETON COURT CRK 128$                85 85 2 0.064

2016 5610 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 456$                85 85 2 0.228

2016 6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT CRK 440$                85 85 2 0.22

2016 6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MANLEY PLACE CRK 140$                85 85 2 0.07

2016 6140 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY PLACE‐to‐MANLEY DRIVE CRK 648$                85 85 2 0.324

2016 6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY DRIVE‐to‐61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE CRK 122$                85 85 2 0.061

2016 6200 MANLEY DRIVE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 598$                85 85 2 0.299

2016 6210 MANLEY PLACE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐END OF STREET CRK 120$                85 85 2 0.06

2016 1910 HUDSON DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY CRK 1,024$            85 85 2 0.512

2016 6760 GERALD PARKWAY ( to ) WEST END‐to‐27‐ NISSOURI ROAD CRK 1,370$            95 95 2 0.685

Page 1 of 23

Page 112: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2016 4780 MINNIE STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐CATHERINE STREET CRK 66$                  85 85 2 0.033

2016 4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐AMBER DRIVE CRK 494$                80 80 2 0.247

2016 5280 BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 202$                80 80 2 0.101

2016 5510 THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 326$                80 80 2 0.163

2016 5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 968$                80 80 2 0.484

2016 5570 PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 204$                80 80 2 0.102

2016 5580 PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 706$                95 95 2 0.353

2016 5870 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE CRK 246$                95 95 2 0.123

2016 5900 RINESS DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐LACROIX AVENUE CRK 368$                95 95 2 0.184

2016 6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE CRK 142$                80 80 2 0.071

2016 4020 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK‐to‐2‐ DUNDAS STREET CRK 1,220$            85 85 2 0.61

2016 5590 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) WEST END‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 186$                90 90 2 0.093

2016 5270 ANN STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 204$                90 90 2 0.102

2016 5540 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐THE PARKWAY CRK 782$                90 90 2 0.391

2016 5600 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 196$                90 90 2 0.098

2016 5850 TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE‐to‐QUAIL RUN DRIVE CRK 798$                90 90 2 0.399

2016 5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐MITCHELL COURT CRK 202$                90 90 2 0.101

2016 6010 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE CRK 368$                90 90 2 0.184

2016 6030 MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE (W)‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE (E) CRK 754$                90 90 2 0.377

2016 1970 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) WEST END‐to‐STARDUST DRIVE CRK 110$                80 80 2 0.055

2016 3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE CRK 80$                  80 80 2 0.04

2016 5640 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT CRK 582$                90 90 2 0.291

2016 2686 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐HERITAGE ROAD CRK 176$                95 95 2 0.088

2016 700 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (P DST 2,396$            40 95 0.066

2016 640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 13,137$          60 80 0.401

2016 5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT MICRO 2,741$            75 75 3 0.09

2016 5990 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE R1urban 34,375$          55 97 0.102

2016 6000 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE R1urban 36,235$          55 97 0.11

2016 5040 CARL STREET ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET SST 1,435$            60 95 0.069

2016 5070 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,402$            60 95 0.112

2016 5050 RUTH STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,483$            60 95 0.114

2016 5080 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 3,006$            60 95 0.138

2016 1600 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRIV SST 901$                60 95 0.039

2016 1230 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 37,861$          70 95 1.639

Page 2 of 23

Page 113: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2016 2110 MARION STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHA SST 7,993$            70 95 0.346

2016 950 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 45,738$          70 95 1.848

2016 1560 IRWIN ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRI SST 653$                70 95 0.033

2016 1757A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST 9,900$            70 95 0.4

2016 1758A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE SST 7,425$            70 95 0.3

2016 4570 HARRIS STREET ( to ) 49‐ CATHERINE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 3,770$            70 95 0.168

2016 2850 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST 33,100$          70 95 1.374

2016 1330 ROBINSON ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐FIVE POINTS ROAD SST 21,183$          65 95 0.944

2016 5010 ROSS STREET ( to ) PATRICIA AVENUE‐to‐DAVID STREET SSTplus 4,203$            55 95 0.116

2016 5020 ROSS STREET ( to ) DAVID STREET‐to‐RUTH STREET SSTplus 7,464$            60 95 0.206

2016 5030 ROSS STREET ( to ) RUTH STREET‐to‐CARL STREET SSTplus 6,848$            60 95 0.189

2016 5060 DAVID STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SSTplus 7,392$            60 95 0.204

2016 30 AVON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SSTplus 58,610$          70 95 1.542

2016 40 AVON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SSTplus 19,385$          70 95 0.51

2016 50 AVON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SSTplus 121,135$        70 95 3.187

2016 2120 MARION STREET ( to ) 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)‐to‐CLARA STREET SSTplus 21,855$          70 95 0.575

2016 960 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD SSTplus 95,376$          70 95 2.452

2016 2270 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐21M WEST OF 32‐ SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHA SSTplus 71,494$          70 95 1.797

2016 5 AVON DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT (BRIDGE) SSTplus 5,397$            70 95 0.142

2016 2805 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT‐to‐WEST WELLBURN LIMIT SSTplus 7,573$            65 95 0.204

2016 4750 MINNIE STREET ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐HARRIS STREET SSTplus 2,383$            70 95 0.071

2016 4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐28‐ THORNDALE ROAD SSTplus 76,588$          70 95 2.015

1,486,680$   

Page 3 of 23

Page 114: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2017 4710 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐CLARA STREET CRK 440$                82.4 82.4 2 0.22

2017 3830 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CHARLES STREET CRK 332$                92.95 92.95 2 0.166

2017 3840 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) CHARLES STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET CRK 234$                92.95 92.95 2 0.117

2017 4690 EVA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END CRK 444$                83.76 83.76 2 0.222

2017 4890 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END CRK 144$                83.76 83.76 2 0.072

2017 4920 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END CRK 178$                83.76 83.76 2 0.089

2017 4700 MINNIE STREET ( to ) WEST END‐to‐MINNIE STREET CRK 90$                  89.73 89.73 2 0.045

2017 5550 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) THE PARKWAY‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 374$                89.73 89.73 2 0.187

2017 5360 QUEEN STREET ( to ) GEORGE STREET‐to‐BRIDGE STREET CRK 244$                94.55 94.55 2 0.122

2017 5990 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE CRK 204$                97 97 2 0.102

2017 1920 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE‐to‐EAST END CRK 400$                89.84 89.84 2 0.2

2017 4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT CRK 783$                83.76 83.76 2 0.783

2017 4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE CRK 2,303$            83.76 83.76 2 2.303

2017 6000 MITCHELL COURT ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 220$                97 97 2 0.11

2017 4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐WYTON DRIVE CRK 3,082$            89.73 89.73 2 3.082

2017 4470 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐MARION STREET CRK 63$                  83.76 83.76 2 0.063

2017 4480 HUNT ROAD ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 42$                  83.76 83.76 2 0.042

2017 1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 160$                87.88 87.88 2 0.08

2017 4420 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) 78M NORTH OF 2‐DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐DUNDAS STREE CRK 78$                  94.55 94.55 2 0.078

2017 3450 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 350M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐28‐ THORNDALE ROAD CRK 700$                83.76 83.76 2 0.35

2017 370 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐22M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 44$                  89.73 89.73 2 0.022

2017 3190 REBECCA ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE ‐ WEST LEG‐to‐WYTON DRIVE ‐ EAST LEG CRK 334$                83.76 83.76 2 0.167

2017 3200 REBECCA ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE ‐ EAST LEG‐to‐SCATCHERED LANE CRK 268$                83.76 83.76 2 0.134

2017 2730 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD CRK 98$                  83.76 83.76 2 0.049

2017 4240 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 80$                  89.73 89.73 2 0.04

2017 4830 THAMES STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐CHARLES STREET CRK 232$                89.73 89.73 2 0.116

2017 4850 HILL STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐CHARLES STREET CRK 230$                89.73 89.73 2 0.115

2017 4800 CHARLES STREET ( to ) THAMES STREET‐to‐HILL STREET CRK 226$                89.73 89.73 2 0.113

2017 3960 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐PAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE CRK 202$                94.55 94.55 2 0.101

2017 6620 AGNES STREET ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET‐to‐MAIN STREET CRK 214$                94.55 94.55 2 0.107

2017 1390 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 13,647$          57.75 77.75 0.729

2017 1430 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐MOUNT ELGIN DRIVE GRR2 16,885$          57.75 77.75 0.902

2017 790 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 379M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 69,886$          57.75 77.75 2.074

2017 560 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 85,820$          57.75 77.75 2.445

Page 4 of 23

Page 115: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2017 630 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) FORBES ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 18,215$          57.75 77.75 0.556

2017 430 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 9,023$            57.75 77.75 0.241

2017 4460 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (P GRR2plus 45,708$          57.75 77.75 1.289

2017 5090 MILL ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MILL ROAD MICRO 8,313$            73.76 73.76 3 0.261

2017 5180 MILL ROAD ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK MICRO 12,995$          79.56 79.56 3 0.408

2017 5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐OAKWOOD PLACE MICRO 6,923$            73.76 73.76 3 0.23

2017 5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT‐to‐BYRON AVENUE MICRO 3,532$            79.56 79.56 3 0.116

2017 4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐WEST END MICRO 1,488$            74.48 74.48 3 0.05

2017 6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐END OF STREET MICRO 2,318$            79.27 79.27 3 0.077

2017 1060 BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE PR2 205,859$        34.13 100 0.811

2017 4660 CLARA STREET ( to ) EVA STREET‐to‐IDA STREET R1urban 60,507$          59.1 97 0.181

2017 5150 TINER AVENUE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK R1urban 86,613$          64.32 97 0.257

2017 5160 TINER AVENUE ( to ) TINER WALK‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE R1urban 99,482$          64.32 97 0.302

2017 5330 PONDVIEW COURT ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐SOUTH END R2urban 175,071$        48.82 100 0.387

2017 4680 IDA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END R2urban 69,243$          53.91 100 0.149

2017 1860 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) WRIGHT STREET‐to‐35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET RNS 31,271$          5 100 0.035

2017 6660 PARK LANE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD RNS 180,479$        10 100 0.202

2017 4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT SST 9,725$            77.27 95 0.842

2017 4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 19,808$          77.27 95 1.715

2017 4450 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD SST 535$                77.27 95 0.054

2017 2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FIFTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐EBENEZER DRIVE SST 10,106$          77.27 95 0.875

2017 980 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) IRWIN ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SST 18,291$          73.27 95 0.749

2017 530 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 33,703$          77.27 95 1.459

2017 970 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐IRWIN ROAD SST 30,159$          77.27 95 1.235

2017 520 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 45,614$          77.27 95 1.843

2017 930 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐EATON ROAD SST 30,542$          77.27 95 1.234

2017 1240 BREEN ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 4,555$            77.27 95 0.203

2017 990 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 18,657$          77.27 95 0.764

2017 5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER AVENUE SST 2,657$            77.26 95 0.115

2017 5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD SST 3,026$            77.26 95 0.131

2017 1700 EATON ROAD ( to ) 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE SST 665$                77.27 95 0.031

2017 3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT‐to‐WYTON DRIVE SST 42,781$          77.27 95 1.852

1,486,545$   

Page 5 of 23

Page 116: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2018 5150 TINER AVENUE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK CRK 514$                97 97 2 0.257

2018 4660 CLARA STREET ( to ) EVA STREET‐to‐IDA STREET CRK 362$                97 97 2 0.181

2018 5160 TINER AVENUE ( to ) TINER WALK‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE CRK 604$                97 97 2 0.302

2018 1600 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRIV CRK 78$                  94.55 94.55 2 0.039

2018 1560 IRWIN ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CROMARTY DRI CRK 66$                  94.55 94.55 2 0.033

2018 4520 HUNT ROAD ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐SOUTH END GRR2 15,304$          65.7 85.7 1.09

2018 1400 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 6,337$            65.7 85.7 0.371

2018 270 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 17M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 72,138$          65.7 85.7 2.569

2018 3250 NISSOURI ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐NORTH END GRR2 48,550$          65.7 85.7 1.596

2018 810 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 20,757$          65.7 85.7 0.672

2018 1730 BRADY ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 6,486$            65.7 85.7 0.21

2018 750 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 12,323$          65.7 85.7 0.393

2018 760 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐340M WEST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 34,962$          65.7 85.7 1.115

2018 1530 FORBES ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2 47,692$          65.7 85.7 1.521

2018 1650 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 19,127$          65.7 85.7 0.61

2018 210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 412M EAST OF 73 ‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BOT ROAD GRR2 45,381$          65.7 85.7 1.426

2018 720 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 43,702$          65.7 85.7 1.334

2018 800 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 17,810$          65.7 85.7 0.536

2018 1940 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐39M NORTH  GRR2 75,048$          65.7 85.7 2.167

2018 1540 FORBES ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 40,448$          65.7 85.7 1.271

2018 2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD‐to‐VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR2 43,408$          65.7 85.7 1.364

2018 280 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 8,419$            65.7 85.7 0.257

2018 710 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 62,801$          65.7 85.7 1.917

2018 1180 CASHEL LANE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2 3,669$            65.7 85.7 0.112

2018 1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐BREEN ROAD GRR2 58,107$          65.7 85.7 1.552

2018 2700 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 14,826$          65.7 85.7 0.396

2018 4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 31,411$          65.7 85.7 0.907

2018 410 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) MARR ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 19,469$          54.27 74.27 0.52

2018 5250 CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐EAST END MICRO 4,770$            76.91 76.91 3 0.177

2018 6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE MICRO 6,893$            72 72 3 0.229

2018 3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET‐to‐MONTEITH AVENUE PR2 36,637$          27.75 100 0.161

2018 3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐34M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD (P PR2 7,473$            20 100 0.034

2018 2020 MARION STREET ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐LUDWIG STREET R1rural 27,922$          51.19 97 0.193

2018 890 GUEST LANE ( to ) HILLVIEW DRIVE‐to‐EAST END R1urban 51,769$          65.65 97 0.156

Page 6 of 23

Page 117: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2018 4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐VILLAGE GATE DRIVE R1urban 97,764$          66.91 97 0.299

2018 5200 TINER WALK ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD R1urban 29,318$          66.91 97 0.089

2018 5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE R1urban 54,682$          66.91 97 0.166

2018 4880 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban 47,123$          66.91 97 0.142

2018 4910 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban 46,791$          66.91 97 0.141

2018 870 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐GUEST LANE SST 5,541$            77.27 95 0.193

2018 2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER DRIVE‐to‐FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 5,983$            77.27 95 0.518

2018 2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐SIXTEEN MILE ROAD SST 10,626$          77.27 95 0.92

2018 2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) SIXTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐FIFTEEN MILE ROAD SST 18,838$          77.27 95 1.631

2018 2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 5,094$            77.27 95 0.441

2018 2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐THIRTEEN MILE ROAD SST 11,076$          77.27 95 0.959

2018 2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) THIRTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD SST 15,050$          77.27 95 1.303

2018 460 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD SST 15,325$          77.27 95 0.774

2018 940 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) EATON ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 14,726$          77.27 95 0.595

2018 1754 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐THOMPSON DRIVE SST 36,525$          77.27 95 1.419

2018 1000 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 7,531$            77.27 95 0.326

2018 450 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 50,037$          77.27 95 2.049

2018 5470 ALMA STREET ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 2,069$            77.26 95 0.114

2018 5480 ALMA STREET ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐THAMES CRESCENT SST 2,051$            77.26 95 0.113

2018 1960 STARDUST DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY SST 14,137$          77.26 95 0.612

2018 320 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐DORCHESTER SST 11,033$          77.26 95 0.499

2018 1995 LANES ROAD ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END SST 4,196$            77.26 95 0.187

2018 1610 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANG SST 1,030$            77.27 95 0.052

2018 680 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHES SST 29,486$          77.27 95 1.314

2018 3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐RIVERVIEW DRIVE SST 7,088$            77.27 95 0.358

2018 3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) RIVERVIEW DRIVE‐to‐WYE CREEK DRIVE SST 5,564$            77.27 95 0.281

2018 1710 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE SST 873$                77.27 95 0.042

2018 1750 BRADY ROAD ( to ) 30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE SST 673$                77.27 95 0.03

2018 2740 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) PROSPECT HILL ROAD‐to‐57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD SST 1,279$            77.27 95 0.057

2018 2510 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD SST 32,479$          77.27 95 1.406

2018 4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK‐to‐DUNDAS STREET SST 16,133$          77.27 95 0.679

1,485,384$   

Page 7 of 23

Page 118: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2019 440 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PUTNAM ROAD BS 11,954$          10 95 0.063

2019 4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐VILLAGE GATE DRIVE CRK 598$                97 97 2 0.299

2019 4880 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE CRK 284$                97 97 2 0.142

2019 4910 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH DRIVE CRK 282$                97 97 2 0.141

2019 5200 TINER WALK ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD CRK 178$                97 97 2 0.089

2019 5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE CRK 332$                97 97 2 0.166

2019 1270 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FIVE POINTS ROAD GRR2 46,837$          51.07 71.07 1.251

2019 1280 BREEN ROAD ( to ) FIVE POINTS ROAD‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 33,396$          51.07 71.07 0.892

2019 2550 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,006$          51.07 71.07 1.395

2019 2640 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 38M EAST OF 27‐ OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD GRR2 47,666$          61.55 81.55 1.358

2019 2690 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,245$          61.55 81.55 1.346

2019 3640 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) GREGORY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT AT #23124 GRR2 86,171$          61.55 81.55 2.455

2019 4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 58,011$          61.55 81.55 1.631

2019 610 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 370M EASTOF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 28,607$          51.07 71.07 0.815

2019 620 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐FORBES ROAD GRR2 23,201$          51.07 71.07 0.661

2019 1680 BOT ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐PAVEMENT CHANGE GRR2plus 42,857$          51.07 71.07 1.294

2019 2580 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD GRR2plus 37,082$          51.07 71.07 0.981

2019 6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 2,137$            79.56 79.56 3 0.071

2019 3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE MICRO 924$                79.27 79.27 3 0.04

2019 6470 HARRISON STREET ( to ) KING STREET LOOP‐to‐CUL‐DE‐SAC PR2 45,861$          20 100 0.193

2019 2470 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD PR2 336,118$        26.29 100 1.411

2019 4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1 102,015$        69.47 97 0.312

2019 4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1urban 85,442$          64.32 97 0.235

2019 4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE ( to ) ERIC DRIVE‐to‐MELVIN DRIVE R1urban 69,081$          64.32 97 0.19

2019 5520 CARLETON COURT ( to ) THE PARKWAY‐to‐CARLETON COURT R1urban 116,347$        64.32 97 0.32

2019 1840 WRIGHT STREET ( to ) 100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET‐to‐GOLF DRIVE RNS 208,176$        15 100 0.233

2019 880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE‐to‐EAST END SST 8,556$            77.27 95 0.298

1,486,364$   

Page 8 of 23

Page 119: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2020 4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐49M SOUTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVM BS 13,086$          5 95 0.049

2020 3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)‐to‐28‐ THORND BS 12,472$          5 95 0.044

2020 4960 NEWTON AVENUE ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐LUDWIG STREET CRK 402$                97 97 2 0.201

2020 4970 NEWTON AVENUE ( to ) LUDWIG STREET‐to‐HAMILTON CRESCENT CRK 530$                97 97 2 0.265

2020 4990 LUDWIG STREET ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐NEWTON AVENUE CRK 544$                97 97 2 0.272

2020 6750 IDEAL DRIVE ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 564$                97 97 2 0.282

2020 4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT CRK 470$                97 97 2 0.235

2020 4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE ( to ) ERIC DRIVE‐to‐MELVIN DRIVE CRK 380$                97 97 2 0.19

2020 5520 CARLETON COURT ( to ) THE PARKWAY‐to‐CARLETON COURT CRK 640$                97 97 2 0.32

2020 5880 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ( to ) RINESS DRIVE‐to‐LACROIX AVENUE CRK 428$                97 97 2 0.214

2020 1850 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐WRIGHT STREET CRK 810$                97 97 2 0.405

2020 4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT CRK 624$                97 97 2 0.312

2020 5350 QUEEN STREET ( to ) PONDVIEW COURT‐to‐GEORGE STREET CRK 262$                97 97 2 0.131

2020 5890 LACROIX AVENUE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE CRK 208$                97 97 2 0.104

2020 5910 RINESS DRIVE ( to ) LACROIX AVENUE‐to‐OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 284$                97 97 2 0.142

2020 6120 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 360$                97 97 2 0.18

2020 6280 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐LEESBORO TRAIL CRK 266$                97 97 2 0.133

2020 6290 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) LEESBORO TRAIL‐to‐BROOKER TRAIL CRK 618$                97 97 2 0.309

2020 6320 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) BROOKER TRAIL‐to‐SLAMMER TRAIL CRK 582$                97 97 2 0.291

2020 6360 ELLIOTT TRAIL ( to ) SLAMMER TRAIL‐to‐BROOKER TRAIL CRK 252$                97 97 2 0.126

2020 6370 SLAMMER TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL‐to‐ELLIOTT TRAIL CRK 406$                97 97 2 0.203

2020 6380 LEESBORO TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL‐to‐WILLIAM COURT CRK 500$                97 97 2 0.25

2020 6390 LEESBORO TRAIL ( to ) WILLIAM COURT‐to‐UNNAMED STREET CRK 356$                97 97 2 0.178

2020 6450 WILLIAM COURT ( to ) LEESBORO TRAIL‐to‐WEST END CRK 122$                97 97 2 0.061

2020 6690 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐HUESTON DRIVE CRK 294$                97 97 2 0.147

2020 6700 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) HUESTON DRIVE‐to‐COUNTRYSIDE LANE CRK 524$                97 97 2 0.262

2020 6710 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE‐to‐HUESTON DRIVE CRK 230$                97 97 2 0.115

2020 6720 MONTEITH AVENUE ( to ) HUESTON DRIVE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD CRK 166$                97 97 2 0.083

2020 6730 HUESTON DRIVE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐MONTEITH AVENUE CRK 786$                97 97 2 0.393

2020 2280 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 21M WEST OF 32‐ SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐32‐ SHAW ROAD CRK 42$                  92.95 92.95 2 0.021

2020 4980 HAMILTON CRESCENT ( to ) NEWTON AVENUE‐to‐MARION STREET CRK 652$                92.95 92.95 2 0.326

2020 2860 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐33M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 33$                  97 97 2 0.033

2020 1250 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACK CRK 38$                  97 97 2 0.019

2020 1295 COUCH ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐401M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (BEND IN R CRK 738$                97 97 2 0.369

Page 9 of 23

Page 120: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2020 1260 BREEN ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 1,130$            97 97 2 0.565

2020 1020 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐62M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANG CRK 124$                97 97 2 0.062

2020 2830 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 475M EAST OF 27‐WELLBURN ROAD‐to‐CHERRY HILL ROAD CRK 1,846$            97 97 2 0.923

2020 3480 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐PARK LANE CRK 280$                97 97 2 0.14

2020 2300 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐RICHMOND STREET CRK 3,656$            97 97 2 1.828

2020 2688 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 94$                  97 97 2 0.047

2020 3100 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐41M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 82$                  97 97 2 0.041

2020 1190 CASHEL LANE ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 66$                  97 97 2 0.033

2020 590 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 441M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD CRK 882$                97 97 2 0.441

2020 1930 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT C CRK 140$                97 97 2 0.07

2020 2240 LOWER COW PATH ( to ) 17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON R CRK 34$                  97 97 2 0.017

2020 4790 CHARLES STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐THAMES STREET CRK 198$                97 97 2 0.099

2020 250 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 15M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐PUTNAM ROAD CRK 30$                  97 97 2 0.015

2020 260 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐17M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 34$                  97 97 2 0.017

2020 2330 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANG CRK 54$                  97 97 2 0.027

2020 4230 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE CRK 68$                  97 97 2 0.034

2020 2190 COW PATH ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐44M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 88$                  97 97 2 0.044

2020 2430 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD CRK 2,784$            97 97 2 1.392

2020 360 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 23M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD CRK 46$                  97 97 2 0.023

2020 2630 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐38M EAST OF 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD CRK 76$                  97 97 2 0.038

2020 2825 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) EAST WELLBURN LIMIT‐to‐475M EAST OF 27‐WELLBURN ROAD CRK 510$                97 97 2 0.255

2020 770 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 340M WEST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD CRK 680$                97 97 2 0.34

2020 2820 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ WELLBURN ROAD‐to‐EAST WELLBURN LIMIT CRK 440$                97 97 2 0.22

2020 3600 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐39M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 78$                  97 97 2 0.039

2020 5290 GEORGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐MAPLE CRESCENT CRK 178$                97 97 2 0.089

2020 6740 BOT ROAD ( to ) 12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐AVON DRIVE CRK 24$                  97 97 2 0.012

2020 1880 FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐76M SOUTH OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT C CRK 152$                97 97 2 0.076

2020 3490 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) PARK LANE‐to‐MEADOWBROOK LANE CRK 280$                97 97 2 0.14

2020 4070 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 88$                  97 97 2 0.044

2020 200 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐412M EAST OF 73 ‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) CRK 824$                97 97 2 0.412

2020 6530 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD‐to‐LIONS LANE CRK 304$                97 97 2 0.152

2020 6540 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) LIONS LANE‐to‐MARIA STREET CRK 282$                97 97 2 0.141

2020 6550 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) MARIA STREET‐to‐AGNES STREET CRK 256$                97 97 2 0.128

2020 6560 UPPER QUEEN STREET ( to ) AGNES STREET‐to‐RAILWAY STREET CRK 220$                97 97 2 0.11

Page 10 of 23

Page 121: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2020 6610 AGNES STREET ( to ) KING STREET‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK 258$                97 97 2 0.129

2020 6630 AGNES STREET ( to ) MAIN STREET‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 142$                97 97 2 0.071

2020 1490 FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) ROBINSON ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS CRK 146$                97 97 2 0.073

2020 6570 LIONS LANE ( to ) KING STREET‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK 260$                97 97 2 0.13

2020 6580 MARIA STREET ( to ) KING STREET‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET CRK 260$                97 97 2 0.13

2020 1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐43M EAST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 86$                  97 97 2 0.043

2020 3290 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐37M SOUTH OF HY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD CRK 74$                  97 97 2 0.037

2020 4030 BANKS ROAD ( to ) 2‐ DUNDAS STREET‐to‐27M SOUTH OF 2‐ DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHAN CRK 54$                  97 97 2 0.027

2020 5310 MAPLE CRESCENT ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐GEORGE STREET CRK 386$                97 97 2 0.193

2020 6590 MAIN STREET ( to ) WEST END‐to‐RAILWAY STREET CRK 82$                  97 97 2 0.041

2020 6600 MAIN STREET ( to ) RAILWAY STREET‐to‐AGNES STREET CRK 308$                97 97 2 0.154

2020 640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 13,137$          65.7 85.7 0.401

2020 3110 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) 41M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐EBENEZER DRIVE GRR2 135,292$        57.75 77.75 3.401

2020 340 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 32,292$          48.15 68.15 0.92

2020 5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL AVENUE‐to‐TURNBERRY DRIVE MICRO 3,853$            79.56 79.56 3 0.128

2020 4710 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐CLARA STREET MICRO 6,699$            79.56 79.56 3 0.22

2020 5130 WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE MICRO 12,995$          72 72 3 0.408

2020 5260 ELIZABETH STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD MICRO 3,010$            72 72 3 0.1

2020 5390 QUEEN STREET ( to ) ANN STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH STREET MICRO 4,244$            72 72 3 0.141

2020 6250 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL COURT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MICRO 3,040$            72 72 3 0.101

2020 6260 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT MICRO 2,769$            72 72 3 0.092

2020 4780 MINNIE STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐CATHERINE STREET MICRO 982$                79.56 79.56 3 0.033

2020 2460 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CHERRY HILL ROAD PR2 247,631$        29.36 100 1.107

2020 2450 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐CULVERT PR2 63,222$          24.98 100 0.29

2020 1050 BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY PR2 20,194$          43.36 100 0.091

2020 3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MEADOWBROOK LANE‐to‐ CULVERT PR2 21,541$          24.98 100 0.098

2020 1220 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD R1rural 14,519$          61.71 97 0.112

2020 2140 MARION STREET ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE R1rural 92,739$          61.71 97 0.689

2020 6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) PARK LANE‐to‐MEADOWBROOK LANE RNS 78,624$          20 100 0.088

2020 6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐PARK LANE RNS 125,978$        22.73 100 0.141

2020 4410 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐78M NORTH OF 2‐DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE) SST 5,891$            77.27 95 0.51

2020 1090 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) FERRAR ROAD‐to‐HUDSON DRIVE SST 16,484$          77.27 95 0.675

2020 1100 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE‐to‐HARRIS ROAD SST 9,182$            77.27 95 0.376

2020 1120 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE‐to‐80M WEST OF 32‐ DORCHESTER RO SST 15,873$          77.27 95 0.65

Page 11 of 23

Page 122: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2020 5230 MILL ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE‐to‐DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST 31,639$          77.27 95 1.475

2020 540 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 8,940$            77.27 95 0.387

2020 2130 MARION STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 48,926$          77.27 95 2.118

2020 2170 CATHERINE STREET ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 33,380$          77.27 95 1.445

2020 2180 CATHERINE STREET ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐HUNT ROAD EAST LEG SST 30,353$          77.27 95 1.314

2020 500 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐CULVERT ‐ 822M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHE SST 19,259$          77.27 95 0.822

2020 1756 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE SST 27,968$          77.27 95 1.13

2020 1757 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST 25,740$          77.27 95 1.04

2020 1080 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐FERRAR ROAD SST 39,389$          77.27 95 1.613

2020 1110 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ( to ) HARRIS ROAD‐to‐298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE SST 11,331$          77.27 95 0.464

2020 510 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT ‐ 822M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐DORCHESTER SST 67,432$          77.27 95 2.878

2020 1755 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) THOMPSON DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT SST 4,554$            77.27 95 0.184

2020 5450 TERRENCE AVENUE ( to ) THAMES CRESCENT‐to‐ALMA STREET SST 3,684$            77.26 95 0.203

2020 5460 TERRENCE AVENUE ( to ) ALMA STREET‐to‐THAMES CRESCENT SST 3,104$            77.26 95 0.171

2020 5420 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐ALMA STREET SST 5,770$            77.26 95 0.269

2020 5430 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) ALMA STREET‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 5,191$            77.26 95 0.242

2020 330 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR  SST 6,039$            77.26 95 0.305

2020 1910 HUDSON DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY SST 12,503$          77.26 95 0.512

2020 5440 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD SST 2,599$            77.26 95 0.125

2020 5410 THAMES CRESCENT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 2,467$            77.26 95 0.115

2020 120 WHITTAKER LANE ( to ) AVON DRIVE‐to‐CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE SST 10,217$          77.27 95 0.516

2020 290 SCOTLAND DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST 47,678$          77.27 95 2.408

2020 3430 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BRIDGE SST 13,464$          77.27 95 0.6

2020 3435 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐BRIDGE SST 10,547$          77.27 95 0.47

2020 740 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐DORCHESTER  SST 832$                77.27 95 0.042

2020 2520 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD‐to‐70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) SST 1,386$            77.27 95 0.07

2020 3660 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐51M SOUTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVM SST 1,010$            77.27 95 0.051

2020 2335 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐91M EAST OF RIC SST 1,373$            77.27 95 0.064

2020 660 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY SST 21,789$          77.27 95 0.971

2020 2590 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST 853$                77.27 95 0.038

1,486,361$   

Page 12 of 23

Page 123: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2021 2020 MARION STREET ( to ) 32‐ SHAW ROAD‐to‐LUDWIG STREET CRK 386$                92.95 92.95 2 0.193

2021 2140 MARION STREET ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE CRK 1,378$            97 97 2 0.689

2021 1220 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 224$                97 97 2 0.112

2021 3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)‐to‐28‐ THORND CRK 88$                  95 95 2 0.044

2021 1890 FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 76M SOUTH OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐33M NORTH GRR2 70,422$          65.7 85.7 2.315

2021 1640 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 15,244$          65.7 85.7 0.479

2021 4460 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (P GRR2 42,228$          65.7 85.7 1.289

2021 790 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 379M EAST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 69,886$          65.7 85.7 2.074

2021 3620 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 66,210$          65.7 85.7 1.938

2021 560 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 85,820$          65.7 85.7 2.445

2021 3610 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) 39M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 18,708$          65.7 85.7 0.533

2021 220 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) BOT ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD GRR2 20,115$          65.7 85.7 0.614

2021 630 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) FORBES ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 18,215$          65.7 85.7 0.556

2021 730 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 10,713$          65.7 85.7 0.327

2021 1630 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 6,192$            65.7 85.7 0.189

2021 2680 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 13,726$          65.7 85.7 0.419

2021 2340 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BANKS ROAD GRR2 63,736$          65.7 85.7 1.746

2021 2660 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) FAIRVIEW ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 8,805$            65.7 85.7 0.265

2021 2670 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACK GRR2 20,668$          65.7 85.7 0.622

2021 410 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) MARR ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 19,469$          65.7 85.7 0.52

2021 430 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 9,023$            65.7 85.7 0.241

2021 1390 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 27,294$          65.7 85.7 0.729

2021 3310 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) STOREY DRIVE‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 22,539$          65.7 85.7 0.602

2021 3360 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD GRR2 19,678$          65.7 85.7 0.584

2021 3900 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐44M NORTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE) GRR2 88,695$          65.7 85.7 2.369

2021 3300 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 37M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐STOREY  GRR2 32,620$          65.7 85.7 0.85

2021 2350 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) BANKS ROAD‐to‐17M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD GRR2 30,958$          65.7 85.7 0.882

2021 3390 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 21M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 29,278$          65.7 85.7 0.782

2021 5570 PINEHURST DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐PARKVIEW DRIVE MICRO 3,070$            74.48 74.48 3 0.102

2021 4480 HUNT ROAD ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE) MICRO 404$                79.27 79.27 3 0.042

2021 4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT R1 69,541$          69.47 97 1.072

2021 5090 MILL ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MILL ROAD R1 91,219$          70.84 97 0.261

2021 4650 CLARA STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐EVA STREET R1 56,496$          69.47 97 0.169

2021 5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐OAKWOOD PLACE R1 75,765$          70.84 97 0.23

Page 13 of 23

Page 124: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2021 5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT R1 29,867$          70.84 97 0.09

2021 5830 MITCHELL AVENUE ( to ) SCARLETT CIRCLE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT RNS 181,372$        22.17 100 0.203

2021 5650 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD SST 3,991$            77.27 95 0.139

2021 5630 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) CANTERBURY DRIVE‐to‐OAKWOOD DRIVE SST 7,761$            77.27 95 0.201

2021 3780 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐MARION STREET SST 33,365$          77.27 95 1.385

2021 3800 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 9,955$            77.27 95 0.419

2021 3770 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) TRAFALGAR STREET‐to‐25‐ GORE ROAD SST 32,779$          77.27 95 1.419

2021 3760 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) 2‐ DUNDAS STREET‐to‐TRAFALGAR STREET SST 32,741$          77.27 95 1.378

2021 600 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐370M EASTOF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 8,181$            77.26 95 0.37

2021 5225 MILL ROAD ( to ) 250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE SST 5,775$            77.27 95 0.25

2021 2480 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) LAKESIDE DRIVE‐to‐REBECCA ROAD SST 31,506$          77.27 95 1.404

1,486,106$   

Page 14 of 23

Page 125: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2022 4650 CLARA STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐EVA STREET CRK 338$                97 97 2 0.169

2022 4680 IDA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END CRK 298$                97 97 2 0.149

2022 5330 PONDVIEW COURT ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐SOUTH END CRK 774$                97 97 2 0.387

2022 6660 PARK LANE ( to ) COUNTRYSIDE LANE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD CRK 404$                97 97 2 0.202

2022 4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐49M SOUTH OF 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD (PVM CRK 98$                  94.55 94.55 2 0.049

2022 4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT CRK 2,144$            97 97 2 1.072

2022 1680 BOT ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐PAVEMENT CHANGE GRR2 39,363$          65.7 85.7 1.294

2022 2580 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD GRR2 34,433$          65.7 85.7 0.981

2022 1270 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FIVE POINTS ROAD GRR2 46,837$          65.7 85.7 1.251

2022 1280 BREEN ROAD ( to ) FIVE POINTS ROAD‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 33,396$          65.7 85.7 0.892

2022 2550 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) HERITAGE ROAD‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,006$          65.7 85.7 1.395

2022 340 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 32,292$          65.7 85.7 0.92

2022 610 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) 370M EASTOF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 28,607$          65.7 85.7 0.815

2022 620 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐FORBES ROAD GRR2 23,201$          65.7 85.7 0.661

2022 3630 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 30,925$          61.55 81.55 0.826

2022 5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) BYRON AVENUE‐to‐MITCHELL AVENUE MICRO 8,970$            79.56 79.56 3 0.298

2022 5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) TURNBERRY DRIVE‐to‐RINESS DRIVE MICRO 3,010$            79.56 79.56 3 0.1

2022 4760 MINNIE STREET ( to ) MINNIE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK MICRO 1,218$            79.56 79.56 3 0.04

2022 5190 MILL ROAD ( to ) TINER WALK‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE MICRO 10,686$          66.91 66.91 3 0.355

2022 6040 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT ( to ) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N)‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S) MICRO 11,498$          66.91 66.91 3 0.382

2022 6050 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT ( to ) FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)‐to‐FOREST GROVE LANE MICRO 13,274$          66.91 66.91 3 0.441

2022 5400 QUEEN STREET ( to ) ELIZABETH STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD MICRO 5,481$            66.91 66.91 3 0.18

2022 4470 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐MARION STREET MICRO 662$                76.91 76.91 3 0.063

2022 2070 MARION STREET ( to ) MELVIN DRIVE‐to‐LINWOOD DRIVE PR2 20,960$          26.08 100 0.085

2022 4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐WEST END R1 16,349$          69.47 97 0.05

2022 6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE R1 75,435$          69.47 97 0.229

2022 690 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE R1rural 8,553$            56.5 97 0.065

2022 5530 CARLETON COURT ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐NORTH END R1urban 28,427$          56.5 97 0.032

2022 5640 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) OAKWOOD DRIVE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT SST 8,355$            77.27 95 0.291

2022 6365 BROOKER TRAIL ( to ) ELLIOTT TRAIL‐to‐KING STREET SST 9,962$            77.27 95 0.347

2022 1870 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) 35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET‐to‐CUL‐DE‐SAC SST 3,253$            77.27 95 0.106

2022 1375 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD‐to‐SALFORD ROAD SST 3,564$            77.27 95 0.3

2022 1380 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) SALFORD RD‐to‐250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD SST 3,094$            77.27 95 0.25

2022 490 WESTMINSTER DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST 53,595$          77.27 95 2.424

Page 15 of 23

Page 126: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2022 140 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐SHAIN ROAD SST 55,315$          77.27 95 2.465

2022 30 AVON DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 35,620$          77.27 95 1.542

2022 40 AVON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SST 11,781$          77.27 95 0.51

2022 50 AVON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 73,620$          77.27 95 3.187

2022 1230 BREEN ROAD ( to ) 112M EAST OF 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 37,861$          77.27 95 1.639

2022 2110 MARION STREET ( to ) RICHMOND STREET‐to‐575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHA SST 7,993$            77.27 95 0.346

2022 2120 MARION STREET ( to ) 575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)‐to‐CLARA STREET SST 13,283$          77.27 95 0.575

2022 150 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) SHAIN ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 19,721$          77.27 95 0.83

2022 960 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐LEWIS ROAD SST 58,260$          77.27 95 2.452

2022 1759 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST 12,994$          77.27 95 0.525

2022 2270 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐21M WEST OF 32‐ SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHA SST 43,883$          77.27 95 1.797

2022 5 AVON DRIVE ( to ) MUNICIPAL LIMIT‐to‐142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT (BRIDGE) SST 3,280$            77.27 95 0.142

2022 160 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 9,517$            77.27 95 0.412

2022 170 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT ‐ 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD SST 50,012$          77.27 95 2.165

2022 180 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT ‐ 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐CULVERT ‐ 2900M EA SST 17,025$          77.27 95 0.737

2022 190 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT ‐ 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 18,272$          77.27 95 0.791

2022 950 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐73‐ ELGIN ROAD SST 45,738$          77.27 95 1.848

2022 1758 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) 300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 15,444$          77.27 95 0.624

2022 4750 MINNIE STREET ( to ) VILLAGE GATE DRIVE‐to‐HARRIS STREET SST 1,406$            77.26 95 0.071

2022 1920 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) HUDSON DRIVE‐to‐EAST END SST 4,884$            77.26 95 0.2

2022 5040 CARL STREET ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET SST 1,435$            77.26 95 0.069

2022 5070 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,402$            77.26 95 0.112

2022 5010 ROSS STREET ( to ) PATRICIA AVENUE‐to‐DAVID STREET SST 2,526$            77.26 95 0.116

2022 5020 ROSS STREET ( to ) DAVID STREET‐to‐RUTH STREET SST 4,487$            77.26 95 0.206

2022 5030 ROSS STREET ( to ) RUTH STREET‐to‐CARL STREET SST 4,116$            77.26 95 0.189

2022 5050 RUTH STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 2,483$            77.26 95 0.114

2022 5060 DAVID STREET ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 4,443$            77.26 95 0.204

2022 5080 PATRICIA AVENUE ( to ) ROSS STREET‐to‐ROSS STREET SST 3,006$            77.26 95 0.138

2022 1980 MOONLIGHT WAY ( to ) STARDUST DRIVE‐to‐STARLIGHT LANE SST 3,742$            77.26 95 0.162

2022 1990 STARLIGHT LANE ( to ) MOONLIGHT WAY‐to‐NORTH END SST 7,531$            77.26 95 0.326

2022 1757A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVE SST 9,900$            77.26 95 0.4

2022 1758A DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) GLADSTONE DRIVE‐to‐300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE SST 7,425$            77.26 95 0.3

2022 900 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 82,534$          77.27 95 3.678

2022 4570 HARRIS STREET ( to ) 49‐ CATHERINE STREET‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 3,770$            77.27 95 0.168

Page 16 of 23

Page 127: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2022 5370 QUEEN STREET ( to ) BRIDGE STREET‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD SST 6,816$            77.26 95 0.243

2022 1900 FERRAR ROAD ( to ) 33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST 632$                77.27 95 0.033

2022 700 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (P SST 1,307$            77.27 95 0.066

2022 1790 SHAIN ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST 337$                77.27 95 0.017

2022 2805 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) 204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT‐to‐WEST WELLBURN LIMIT SST 4,578$            77.27 95 0.204

2022 3530 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE SST 69,609$          77.27 95 3.102

2022 3570 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐2‐ DUNDAS STREET SST 39,893$          77.27 95 1.752

2022 4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐28‐ THORNDALE ROAD SST 46,547$          77.27 95 2.015

2022 2850 GREGORY DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD SST 33,100$          77.27 95 1.374

2022 1760 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SST 446$                77.27 95 0.018

2022 1950 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐DONNYBROOK DRIVE SST 991$                77.27 95 0.039

1,486,427$   

Page 17 of 23

Page 128: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2023 5530 CARLETON COURT ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐NORTH END CRK 64$                  97 97 2 0.032

2023 4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ( to ) VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT‐to‐WEST END CRK 100$                97 97 2 0.05

2023 6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 458$                97 97 2 0.229

2023 3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) UPPER QUEEN STREET‐to‐MONTEITH AVENUE CRK 322$                97 97 2 0.161

2023 690 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE‐to‐WESTCHESTER BOURNE CRK 130$                97 97 2 0.065

2023 3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐34M SOUTH OF 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD (P CRK 68$                  97 97 2 0.034

2023 270 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) 17M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 72,138$          65.7 85.7 2.569

2023 1800 SHAIN ROAD ( to ) 17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END GRR2 18,224$          65.7 85.7 0.649

2023 4520 HUNT ROAD ( to ) CATHERINE STREET‐to‐SOUTH END GRR2 30,607$          65.7 85.7 1.09

2023 3250 NISSOURI ROAD ( to ) 16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD‐to‐NORTH END GRR2 48,550$          65.7 85.7 1.596

2023 810 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 20,757$          65.7 85.7 0.672

2023 1730 BRADY ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 6,486$            65.7 85.7 0.21

2023 1740 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 32,587$          65.7 85.7 1.055

2023 750 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 12,323$          65.7 85.7 0.393

2023 760 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐340M WEST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 34,962$          65.7 85.7 1.115

2023 1530 FORBES ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2 47,692$          65.7 85.7 1.521

2023 1650 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 19,127$          65.7 85.7 0.61

2023 210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ( to ) 412M EAST OF 73 ‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐BOT ROAD GRR2 45,381$          65.7 85.7 1.426

2023 580 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LACEY LANE‐to‐441M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD GRR2 45,635$          65.7 85.7 1.393

2023 720 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 43,702$          65.7 85.7 1.334

2023 800 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS GRR2 17,810$          65.7 85.7 0.536

2023 1400 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 12,675$          65.7 85.7 0.371

2023 3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ( to ) CENTRE DRIVE‐to‐THORNDALE ROAD GRR2 106,660$        65.7 85.7 3.122

2023 1690 EATON ROAD ( to ) NORTH END‐to‐31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE GRR2 19,104$          65.7 85.7 0.628

2023 1940 HARRIS ROAD ( to ) 70M SOUTH OF 29‐HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐39M NORTH  GRR2 75,048$          65.7 85.7 2.167

2023 350 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐23M WEST OF 73‐ ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 85,153$          65.7 85.7 2.426

2023 570 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐LACEY LANE GRR2 43,454$          65.7 85.7 1.238

2023 820 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 58,582$          65.7 85.7 1.669

2023 2390 TRAFALGAR STREET ( to ) 18M EAST OF 73‐ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐HUNT ROAD GRR2 96,420$          65.7 85.7 2.747

2023 860 MOSSLEY DRIVE ( to ) 128M EAST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐FORBES ROAD GRR2 53,525$          65.7 85.7 1.707

2023 1540 FORBES ROAD ( to ) MOSSLEY DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 40,448$          65.7 85.7 1.271

2023 2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) 57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD‐to‐VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR2 43,408$          65.7 85.7 1.364

2023 280 DOAN DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 8,419$            65.7 85.7 0.257

2023 1180 CASHEL LANE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐33M SOUTH OF 32‐ DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2 3,669$            65.7 85.7 0.112

Page 18 of 23

Page 129: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2023 1370 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) BREEN ROAD‐to‐300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD GRR2 7,757$            65.7 85.7 0.195

2023 6760 GERALD PARKWAY ( to ) WEST END‐to‐27‐ NISSOURI ROAD SST 23,509$          77.27 95 0.685

2023 530 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) BRADY ROAD‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 33,703$          77.27 95 1.459

2023 970 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) LEWIS ROAD‐to‐IRWIN ROAD SST 30,159$          77.27 95 1.235

2023 980 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) IRWIN ROAD‐to‐CULVERT SST 18,291$          77.27 95 0.749

2023 520 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 45,614$          77.27 95 1.843

2023 930 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) DORCHESTER ROAD‐to‐EATON ROAD SST 30,542$          77.27 95 1.234

2023 1240 BREEN ROAD ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 4,555$            77.27 95 0.203

2023 990 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACKS SST 18,657$          77.27 95 0.764

2023 5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER AVENUE SST 2,657$            77.26 95 0.115

2023 5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE ( to ) TINER AVENUE‐to‐MILL ROAD SST 3,026$            77.26 95 0.131

2023 1700 EATON ROAD ( to ) 31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐CROMARTY DRIVE SST 665$                77.27 95 0.031

2023 4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) EVELYN DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT SST 19,450$          77.27 95 0.842

2023 4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐RAIL TRACK SST 39,617$          77.27 95 1.715

2023 4450 HUNT ROAD ( to ) 25‐ GORE ROAD‐to‐54M SOUTH OF 25‐ GORE ROAD SST 1,069$            77.27 95 0.054

2023 2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FIFTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐EBENEZER DRIVE SST 20,213$          77.27 95 0.875

2023 3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 575M SOUTH OF CULVERT‐to‐WYTON DRIVE SST 42,781$          77.27 95 1.852

1,485,953$   

Page 19 of 23

Page 130: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2024 5090 MILL ROAD ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MILL ROAD CRK 522$                92.95 92.95 2 0.261

2024 5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐OAKWOOD PLACE CRK 460$                92.95 92.95 2 0.23

2024 5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) OAKWOOD PLACE‐to‐CHITTICK CRESCENT CRK 180$                92.95 92.95 2 0.09

2024 2470 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CHERRY HILL ROAD‐to‐COBBLE HILLS ROAD CRK 2,822$            97 97 2 1.411

2024 6470 HARRISON STREET ( to ) KING STREET LOOP‐to‐CUL‐DE‐SAC CRK 386$                97 97 2 0.193

2024 710 THOMPSON DRIVE ( to ) 66M EAST OF 74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐CULVERT GRR2 62,801$          61.55 81.55 1.917

2024 1410 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) 370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐EBENEZER ROAD GRR2 74,543$          61.55 81.55 1.991

2024 1420 PIGRAM ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER ROAD‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 20,779$          61.55 81.55 0.555

2024 1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐BREEN ROAD GRR2 58,107$          61.55 81.55 1.552

2024 2700 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 14,826$          61.55 81.55 0.396

2024 2690 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR2 47,245$          65.7 85.7 1.346

2024 4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) RAIL TRACK‐to‐GREGORY DRIVE GRR2 31,411$          61.55 81.55 0.907

2024 3840 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) CHARLES STREET‐to‐CATHERINE STREET MICRO 2,948$            79.56 79.56 3 0.117

2024 5590 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) WEST END‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE MICRO 2,799$            79.27 79.27 3 0.093

2024 6240 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLEWOOD PLACE‐to‐MITCHELL COURT MICRO 3,130$            66.91 66.91 3 0.104

2024 6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT MICRO 2,950$            72 72 3 0.098

2024 3830 RICHMOND STREET ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐CHARLES STREET MICRO 5,810$            79.56 79.56 3 0.166

2024 5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE ( to ) QUAIL RUN DRIVE‐to‐MITCHELL COURT MICRO 2,828$            79.27 79.27 3 0.101

2024 6210 MANLEY PLACE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐END OF STREET MICRO 1,806$            72 72 3 0.06

2024 5180 MILL ROAD ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐TINER WALK R1 142,596$        67.92 97 0.408

2024 5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE R1 159,435$        66.91 97 0.484

2024 4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐AMBER DRIVE R1 81,968$          66.91 97 0.247

2024 5510 THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD R1 54,092$          66.91 97 0.163

2024 5250 CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐EAST END R1 54,418$          69.47 97 0.177

2024 5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE ( to ) CHITTICK CRESCENT‐to‐BYRON AVENUE R1 38,495$          67.92 97 0.116

2024 5280 BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD R1 34,503$          66.91 97 0.101

2024 5130 WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE R1 142,596$        69.47 97 0.408

2024 6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐END OF STREET R1 25,365$          69.47 97 0.077

2024 870 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) 73‐ ELGIN ROAD‐to‐GUEST LANE SST 5,541$            77.27 95 0.193

2024 890 GUEST LANE ( to ) HILLVIEW DRIVE‐to‐EAST END SST 4,479$            77.27 95 0.156

2024 1860 GOLF DRIVE ( to ) WRIGHT STREET‐to‐35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET SST 1,074$            77.27 95 0.035

2024 1060 BRADLEY AVENUE ( to ) 91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐74‐ WESTCHESTER BOURNE SST 20,072$          77.27 95 0.811

2024 460 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) BRIDGE‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD SST 15,325$          77.27 95 0.774

2024 940 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) EATON ROAD‐to‐BRADY ROAD SST 14,726$          77.27 95 0.595

Page 20 of 23

Page 131: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2024 1754 DORCHESTER ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐THOMPSON DRIVE SST 36,525$          77.27 95 1.419

2024 1000 CROMARTY DRIVE ( to ) RAIL TRACKS‐to‐30‐ PUTNAM ROAD SST 7,531$            77.27 95 0.326

2024 450 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) PUTNAM ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE SST 50,037$          77.27 95 2.049

2024 5470 ALMA STREET ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐TERRENCE AVENUE SST 2,069$            77.26 95 0.114

2024 5480 ALMA STREET ( to ) TERRENCE AVENUE‐to‐THAMES CRESCENT SST 2,051$            77.26 95 0.113

2024 1960 STARDUST DRIVE ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐MOONLIGHT WAY SST 14,137$          77.26 95 0.612

2024 320 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)‐to‐DORCHESTER SST 11,033$          77.26 95 0.499

2024 1995 LANES ROAD ( to ) DONNYBROOK DRIVE‐to‐SOUTH END SST 4,196$            77.26 95 0.187

2024 1610 LEWIS ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANG SST 1,030$            77.27 95 0.052

2024 680 DINGMAN DRIVE ( to ) 971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY‐to‐65M WESTOF 74‐ WESTCHES SST 29,486$          77.27 95 1.314

2024 2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) EBENEZER DRIVE‐to‐FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 11,966$          77.27 95 0.518

2024 3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐RIVERVIEW DRIVE SST 7,088$            77.27 95 0.358

2024 3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE ( to ) RIVERVIEW DRIVE‐to‐WYE CREEK DRIVE SST 5,564$            77.27 95 0.281

2024 1710 BRADY ROAD ( to ) CROMARTY DRIVE‐to‐42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE SST 873$                77.27 95 0.042

2024 1750 BRADY ROAD ( to ) 30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE‐to‐CRAMPTON DRIVE SST 673$                77.27 95 0.03

2024 2740 EBENEZER DRIVE ( to ) PROSPECT HILL ROAD‐to‐57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD SST 1,279$            77.27 95 0.057

2024 2510 WYTON DRIVE ( to ) 27‐ NISSOURI ROAD‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD SST 32,479$          77.27 95 1.406

2024 2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 33M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐SIXTEEN MILE ROAD SST 21,252$          77.27 95 0.92

2024 2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) SIXTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐FIFTEEN MILE ROAD SST 37,676$          77.27 95 1.631

2024 2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD SST 10,187$          77.27 95 0.441

2024 2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) 440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐THIRTEEN MILE ROAD SST 22,153$          77.27 95 0.959

2024 2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ( to ) THIRTEEN MILE ROAD‐to‐16‐ PLOVER MILLS ROAD SST 30,099$          77.27 95 1.303

2024 4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK‐to‐DUNDAS STREET SST 16,133$          77.27 95 0.679

1,486,555$   

Page 21 of 23

Page 132: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2025 5130 WHEELER AVENUE ( to ) MILL COURT‐to‐CHRISTIE DRIVE CRK 816$                97 97 2 0.408

2025 4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) MARION STREET‐to‐AMBER DRIVE CRK 494$                97 97 2 0.247

2025 5250 CALVERT PLACE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐EAST END CRK 354$                97 97 2 0.177

2025 5280 BRIDGE STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD CRK 202$                97 97 2 0.101

2025 5510 THE PARKWAY ( to ) CARLETON COURT‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD CRK 326$                97 97 2 0.163

2025 5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ( to ) PINEHURST DRIVE‐to‐PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 968$                97 97 2 0.484

2025 6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ( to ) WOODVALE DRIVE‐to‐END OF STREET CRK 154$                97 97 2 0.077

2025 6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) MONTEITH AVENUE‐to‐PARK LANE CRK 282$                97 97 2 0.141

2025 6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ( to ) PARK LANE‐to‐MEADOWBROOK LANE CRK 176$                97 97 2 0.088

2025 2460 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐CHERRY HILL ROAD CRK 2,214$            97 97 2 1.107

2025 2450 EVELYN DRIVE ( to ) PURPLE HILL ROAD‐to‐CULVERT CRK 580$                97 97 2 0.29

2025 3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) MEADOWBROOK LANE‐to‐ CULVERT CRK 196$                97 97 2 0.098

2025 640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 13,137$          65.7 85.7 0.401

2025 2640 OLIVER DRIVE ( to ) 38M EAST OF 27‐ OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐FAIRVIEW ROAD GRR2 47,666$          61.55 81.55 1.358

2025 3640 HERITAGE ROAD ( to ) GREGORY DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT AT #23124 GRR2 86,171$          61.55 81.55 2.455

2025 4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) OLIVER DRIVE‐to‐69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE) GRR2 117,581$        57.75 77.75 3.027

2025 4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD ( to ) 44M SOUTH OF HWY 7‐ ELGINFIELD ROAD‐to‐BRIDGE GRR2 58,011$          61.55 81.55 1.631

2025 5140 MILL COURT ( to ) WHEELER AVENUE‐to‐END OF STREET MICRO 2,389$            59.1 59.1 3 0.075

2025 3460 FAIRVIEW ROAD ( to ) 28‐ THORNDALE ROAD‐to‐UPPER QUEEN STREET PR2 30,259$          31.1 100 0.131

2025 4670 CLARA STREET ( to ) IDA STREET‐to‐MARION STREET PR2 106,411$        21.51 100 0.423

2025 4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) WYTON DRIVE‐to‐CULVERT R1 50,681$          69.47 97 0.783

2025 4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ( to ) CULVERT‐to‐EVELYN DRIVE R1 148,860$        69.47 97 2.303

2025 5260 ELIZABETH STREET ( to ) QUEEN STREET‐to‐29‐ HAMILTON ROAD R1 32,941$          66.91 97 0.1

2025 5390 QUEEN STREET ( to ) ANN STREET‐to‐ELIZABETH STREET R1 46,447$          66.91 97 0.141

2025 6250 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MITCHELL COURT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT R1 33,271$          66.91 97 0.101

2025 6260 WOODVALE DRIVE ( to ) MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT‐to‐MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT R1 30,306$          66.91 97 0.092

2025 6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐PRIVATE ROAD R1 21,742$          65.01 97 0.054

2025 5610 BYRON AVENUE ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐DORCHESTER ROAD R1 75,106$          69.47 97 0.228

2025 6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) FOREST GROVE CRESCENT‐to‐FOREST GROVE CRESCENT R1 72,471$          69.47 97 0.22

2025 6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) 29‐ HAMILTON ROAD‐to‐MANLEY PLACE R1 23,059$          69.47 97 0.07

2025 6140 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY PLACE‐to‐MANLEY DRIVE R1 106,729$        69.47 97 0.324

2025 6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT ( to ) MANLEY DRIVE‐to‐61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVE R1 20,094$          69.47 97 0.061

2025 6200 MANLEY DRIVE ( to ) VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT‐to‐VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT R1 98,494$          69.47 97 0.299

2025 4870 AMBER DRIVE ( to ) LINWOOD DRIVE‐to‐MARION STREET R1 59,402$          69.47 97 0.179

Page 22 of 23

Page 133: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre10 Year Performance Model ‐Current Funding Level

Year Asset ID Street Name Description Imp. Type Cost

Start 

Cond

End 

Cond

Yrs 

Hold

Length 

(Km)

2025 4890 ERIC DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END R1 23,893$          69.47 97 0.072

2025 4920 MELVIN DRIVE ( to ) ELIZABETH DRIVE‐to‐NORTH END R1 29,535$          69.47 97 0.089

2025 5500 THE PARKWAY ( to ) PARKVIEW DRIVE‐to‐CARLETON COURT R1 21,239$          69.47 97 0.064

2025 4690 EVA STREET ( to ) CLARA STREET‐to‐WEST END R1 74,213$          69.47 97 0.222

2025 6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ( to ) PRIVATE ROAD‐to‐WOODVALE DRIVE R1 23,388$          70.84 97 0.071

2025 4940 LINWOOD DRIVE ( to ) AMBER DRIVE‐to‐EAST END R1 16,361$          69.47 97 0.045

2025 880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ( to ) GUEST LANE‐to‐EAST END SST 8,556$            77.27 95 0.298

2025 440 GLADSTONE DRIVE ( to ) 63M WEST OF 30‐ PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)‐to‐PUTNAM ROAD SST 1,247$            77.27 95 0.063

1,486,422$   

Page 23 of 23

Page 134: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix G. Critical Deficiencies by Asset ID  

Page 135: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.129 100 6-10UPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6610 AGNES STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.107 100 6-10MAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6620 AGNES STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.071 100 6-10SOUTH ENDMAIN STREET6630 AGNES STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.114 100 ADEQTERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5470 ALMA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.113 100 ADEQTHAMES CRESCENTTERRENCE AVENUE5480 ALMA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.179 100 ADEQMARION STREETLINWOOD DRIVE4870 AMBER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.102 100 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5270 ANN STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.542 619 6-10DORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACKS0030 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.314 619 1-5RAIL TRACKS142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT

(BRIDGE)0020 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10

3.187 733 6-1073- ELGIN ROADCULVERT0050 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.510 733 6-10CULVERTDORCHESTER ROAD0040 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.142 619 6-10142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT

(BRIDGE)MUNICIPAL LIMIT0005 AVON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ

0.617 89 NOWTRAFALGAR STREETCULVERT4050 BANKS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.721 89 NOWCULVERT27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)4040 BANKS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

0.027 89 ADEQ27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

2- DUNDAS STREET4030 BANKS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.294 50 6-10PAVEMENT CHANGEHARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1680 BOT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.012 50 ADEQAVON DRIVE12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE (PVMT

CHANGE)6740 BOT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.811 1,471 NOW74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY

1060 BRADLEY AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10

0.091 1,471 1-591 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY

MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY1050 BRADLEY AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ PR21-5 ADEQADEQADEQ

1.055 44 ADEQ30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1740 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.030 44 ADEQCRAMPTON DRIVE30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE1750 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.379 83 NOWMOSSLEY DRIVE42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1720 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.042 83 6-1042M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1710 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.210 44 ADEQCULVERTMOSSLEY DRIVE1730 BRADY ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.639 617 6-10BRIDGE112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD1230 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.203 617 ADEQ30- PUTNAM ROADBRIDGE1240 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.112 617 6-10112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1220 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ R1rural6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.892 298 6-10PIGRAM ROADFIVE POINTS ROAD1280 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.019 320 ADEQRAIL TRACK30- PUTNAM ROAD1250 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.251 320 6-10FIVE POINTS ROAD565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT

CHANGE)1270 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.565 320 ADEQ565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT CHANGE)

RAIL TRACK1260 BREEN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.101 100 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5280 BRIDGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.347 100 ADEQKING STREETELLIOTT TRAIL6365 BROOKER TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.201 1,169 ADEQOAKWOOD DRIVECANTERBURY DRIVE5630 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.443 1,169 ADEQCANTERBURY DRIVEDORCHESTER ROAD5620 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.098 559 ADEQPARKVIEW DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5600 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 1

Page 136: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.093 559 ADEQPINEHURST DRIVEWEST END5590 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.139 1,169 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADCHITTICK CRESCENT5650 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.291 1,169 ADEQCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD DRIVE5640 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.228 559 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADPARKVIEW DRIVE5610 BYRON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.177 100 ADEQEAST END29- HAMILTON ROAD5250 CALVERT PLACE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.105 920 NOWBYRON AVENUEHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5700 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.136 920 NOWHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5690 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.071 920 1-5SHERWOOD CRESCENTDORCHESTER ROAD5660 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RSS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.261 920 NOWHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5670 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.076 920 NOWSHERWOOD CRESCENTHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5680 CANTERBURY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.069 100 6-10CATHERINE STREETROSS STREET5040 CARL STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.320 513 6-10CARLETON COURTTHE PARKWAY5520 CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.164 513 NOWDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5490 CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.032 100 6-10NORTH ENDCARLETON COURT5530 CARLETON COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.112 35 ADEQ33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER

ROADDONNYBROOK DRIVE1180 CASHEL LANE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.033 35 ADEQ32- DORCHESTER ROAD33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD

1190 CASHEL LANE ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.445 677 ADEQBRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2170 CATHERINE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.314 677 ADEQHUNT ROAD EAST LEGBRIDGE2180 CATHERINE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.099 100 ADEQTHAMES STREETRICHMOND STREET4790 CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.265 100 ADEQCATHERINE STREETHILL STREET4810 CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.113 100 ADEQHILL STREETTHAMES STREET4800 CHARLES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.907 100 ADEQGREGORY DRIVERAIL TRACK4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.521 100 ADEQBRIDGEWYTON DRIVE4210 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 3.102 100 6-10OLIVER DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD4160 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.088 100 ADEQPLOVER MILLS ROADGREGORY DRIVE4140 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.508 100 6-10BRIDGECULVERT4090 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.227 100 6-10DUNDAS STREET90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.631 100 ADEQBRIDGE44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD

ROAD4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.044 100 ADEQ44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD4070 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

3.039 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

4200 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.049 100 NOW49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

28- THORNDALE ROAD4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

2.530 100 ADEQ34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

BRIDGE4220 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.034 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVE34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

4230 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.444 100 6-1090M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

4250 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.040 100 ADEQ40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

EVELYN DRIVE4240 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 2

Page 137: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 3.027 100 6-1069M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)OLIVER DRIVE4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.069 100 NOW28- THORNDALE ROAD69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

4180 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.287 100 ADEQRAIL TRACKBRIDGE4100 CHERRY HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.353 100 6-10BYRON AVENUEOAKWOOD DRIVE5770 CHITTICK CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RSS6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.166 100 6-10MITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.131 100 6-10MILL ROADTINER AVENUE5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.115 100 6-10TINER AVENUEWHEELER AVENUE5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.181 545 6-10IDA STREETEVA STREET4660 CLARA STREET ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.169 545 ADEQEVA STREETMINNIE STREET4650 CLARA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.423 545 NOWMARION STREETIDA STREET4670 CLARA STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 2.303 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVECULVERT4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.783 100 ADEQCULVERTWYTON DRIVE4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 3.082 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE28- THORNDALE ROAD4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.072 100 ADEQBRIDGEOLIVER DRIVE4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.078 100 ADEQDUNDAS STREET78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET

(CULVERT)4420 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.842 100 ADEQCULVERTEVELYN DRIVE4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.015 100 6-1028- THORNDALE ROADBRIDGE4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.715 100 ADEQRAIL TRACKCULVERT4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.510 100 ADEQ78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACK4410 COBBLE HILLS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.401 580 NOW30- PUTNAM ROAD401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (BEND IN ROAD)

1290 COUCH ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR3NOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.369 580 ADEQ401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (BEND IN ROAD)

29- HAMILTON ROAD1295 COUCH ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.141 100 NOWPARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.088 100 NOWMEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.780 191 NOW780M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH

ROADLOWER COW PATH2210 COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

1.693 191 NOWLOWER COW PATH44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

2200 COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

0.044 191 ADEQ44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

73- ELGIN ROAD2190 COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.445 223 6-10LEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0560 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.878 577 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-

WESTCHESTER BOURNE0510 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.556 166 ADEQCULVERTFORBES ROAD0630 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.401 166 ADEQPIGRAM ROADCULVERT0640 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.238 180 6-10LACEY LANELEWIS ROAD0570 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.822 577 ADEQCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-

WESTCHESTER BOURNE74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0500 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.843 428 ADEQBRADY ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0520 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.459 428 ADEQRAIL TRACKSBRADY ROAD0530 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.387 428 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROADRAIL TRACKS0540 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 3

Page 138: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.661 166 ADEQFORBES ROADBRIDGE0620 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.393 180 6-10441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADLACEY LANE0580 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.441 180 6-1030- PUTNAM ROAD441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0590 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.815 166 ADEQBRIDGE370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0610 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.370 166 ADEQ370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD30- PUTNAM ROAD0600 CRAMPTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.326 644 ADEQ30- PUTNAM ROADRAIL TRACKS1000 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 3.678 216 ADEQDORCHESTER ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0900 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.848 736 6-1073- ELGIN ROADBRADY ROAD0950 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.595 736 ADEQBRADY ROADEATON ROAD0940 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.234 736 ADEQEATON ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0930 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.452 751 6-10LEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0960 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.235 644 ADEQIRWIN ROADLEWIS ROAD0970 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.777 465 NOWFORBES ROAD62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD1030 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ NOWADEQ6-10 0.749 644 ADEQCULVERTIRWIN ROAD0980 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.764 644 ADEQRAIL TRACKSCULVERT0990 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.765 465 NOWPIGRAM ROADFORBES ROAD1040 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ NOWADEQ6-10 0.062 465 ADEQ62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)30- PUTNAM ROAD1020 CROMARTY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.129 100 1-5WEST ENDRICHMOND STREET4860 DALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.204 100 6-10ROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5060 DAVID STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.971 229 ADEQ971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL

BOUNDARYMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY0660 DINGMAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.314 229 6-1065M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE

971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY

0680 DINGMAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.065 229 6-10WESTCHESTER BOURNE65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE

0690 DINGMAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1rural6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10

1.500 38 ADEQ15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADWEST END0240 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.015 38 ADEQPUTNAM ROAD15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0250 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.569 37 ADEQBRIDGE17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0270 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.017 37 ADEQ17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

PUTNAM ROAD0260 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.257 37 ADEQPIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0280 DOAN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.675 1,616 ADEQHUDSON DRIVEFERRAR ROAD1090 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.376 1,616 ADEQHARRIS ROADHUDSON DRIVE1100 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.464 1,616 ADEQ298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVEHARRIS ROAD1110 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.096 70 NOWCASHEL LANE43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER

ROAD1160 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

0.043 70 NOW43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD

DORCHESTER ROAD1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.026 70 NOWEND OF STREETCASHEL LANE1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ NOW RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.080 1,616 NOW32- DORCHESTER ROAD80M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER

ROAD1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.613 1,616 ADEQFERRAR ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1080 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.650 1,616 6-1080M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER

ROAD298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE1120 DONNYBROOK DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 4

Page 139: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 1.307 103 6-10AVON DRIVE18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE

DRIVE1770 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.018 103 ADEQ18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1760 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.419 800 ADEQTHOMPSON DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1754 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.184 800 ADEQCULVERTTHOMPSON DRIVE1755 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.130 800 ADEQCRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1756 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.040 800 ADEQ400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1757 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.624 800 6-10RAIL TRACKS300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVE1758 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.525 100 ADEQHARRIETSVILLE DRIVERAIL TRACKS1759 DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.400 800 6-10400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1757A DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.300 800 6-10300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1758A DORCHESTER ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.115 308 NOWNEELY COURT29- HAMILTON ROAD1820 DURHAM STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ1-5 0.628 141 6-1031M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVENORTH END1690 EATON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.031 141 6-10CROMARTY DRIVE31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1700 EATON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.364 100 ADEQVALLEY VIEW ROAD57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL

ROAD2750 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.057 100 ADEQ57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL ROAD

PROSPECT HILL ROAD2740 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.100 100 6-10EAST ENDVALLEY VIEW ROAD2760 EBENEZER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.190 100 6-10MELVIN DRIVEERIC DRIVE4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.100 100 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5260 ELIZABETH STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.133 100 ADEQLEESBORO TRAIL27- NISSOURI ROAD6280 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.291 100 ADEQSLAMMER TRAILBROOKER TRAIL6320 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.126 100 ADEQBROOKER TRAILSLAMMER TRAIL6360 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.309 100 ADEQBROOKER TRAILLEESBORO TRAIL6290 ELLIOTT TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.142 142 6-10ELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4880 ERIC DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.072 10 ADEQNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4890 ERIC DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.222 100 ADEQWEST ENDCLARA STREET4690 EVA STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.392 100 ADEQPURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2430 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.331 100 NOWHERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2410 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 1.403 100 NOWFAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2400 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.290 100 NOWCULVERTPURPLE HILL ROAD2450 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 1.107 100 NOWCHERRY HILL ROADCULVERT2460 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 1.411 100 NOWCOBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2470 EVELYN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.098 100 NOW CULVERTMEADOWBROOK LANE3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.835 100 6-10350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROADRAIL TRACKS3440 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

2.291 100 ADEQOLIVER DRIVECULVERT3400 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.984 100 6-10GREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3340 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.543 100 6-10BRIDGEBRIDGE3330 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.602 100 6-10BRIDGESTOREY DRIVE3310 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.351 100 6-10BRIDGEBRIDGE3320 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.140 100 6-10MEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE3490 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 5

Page 140: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 1.365 100 ADEQBRIDGEEVELYN DRIVE3550 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.470 100 6-10BRIDGERAIL TRACKS3435 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.843 100 ADEQ842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)OLIVER DRIVE3420 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.600 100 ADEQBRIDGE842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE)

3430 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

3.102 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3530 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.782 100 6-10CULVERT21M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS

ROAD3390 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.584 100 6-1016- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT3360 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.850 100 ADEQSTOREY DRIVE37M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)3300 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.037 100 ADEQ37M SOUTH OF HY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3290 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.491 100 6-10CULVERTGREGORY DRIVE3350 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.852 100 6-10WYTON DRIVE575M SOUTH OF CULVERT3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.575 100 6-10575M SOUTH OF CULVERT CULVERT3510 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BS6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.140 100 6-10PARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE3480 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.161 100 NOWMONTEITH AVENUEUPPER QUEEN STREET3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.131 100 1-5UPPER QUEEN STREET28- THORNDALE ROAD3460 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR21-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 1.752 100 ADEQ2- DUNDAS STREETBRIDGE3570 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.350 100 ADEQ28- THORNDALE ROAD350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROAD3450 FAIRVIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.076 50 ADEQ76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

29- HAMILTON ROAD1880 FERRAR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.315 50 6-1033M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE

76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

1890 FERRAR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.033 50 ADEQDONNYBROOK DRIVE33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE

1900 FERRAR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.182 15 ADEQSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1510 FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ 1.552 158 6-10BREEN ROADRAIL TRACKS1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.073 158 6-10RAIL TRACKSROBINSON ROAD1490 FIVE POINTS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.521 62 6-10MOSSLEY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1530 FORBES ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.271 63 ADEQCRAMPTON DRIVEMOSSLEY DRIVE1540 FORBES ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.441 100 ADEQFOREST GROVE LANEFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)6050 FOREST GROVE

CRESCENTADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.382 100 ADEQFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N)6040 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT

ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.220 100 ADEQFOREST GROVE CRESCENTFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.054 1,152 ADEQPRIVATE ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.071 1,152 ADEQWOODVALE DRIVEPRIVATE ROAD6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.180 100 ADEQSOUTH ENDFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6120 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.098 100 ADEQFOREST GROVE CRESCENTWOODVALE DRIVE6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.089 100 6-10MAPLE CRESCENTQUEEN STREET5290 GEORGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.685 100 ADEQ27- NISSOURI ROADWEST END6760 GERALD PARKWAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.236 206 6-10MARR ROADLEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG0400 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 6

Page 141: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.499 131 ADEQDORCHESTER ROAD499M WEST OF DORCHESTER

ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)0320 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.920 143 ADEQRAIL TRACKS305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)

0340 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.305 143 ADEQ305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)

DORCHESTER ROAD0330 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

3.136 131 NOW499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)

78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)

0310 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10

0.078 131 NOW78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)

74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0300 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

1.017 226 ADEQCULVERTCULVERT0420 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.520 226 6-10CULVERTMARR ROAD0410 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.049 315 ADEQBRIDGEPUTNAM ROAD0450 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.774 315 ADEQPIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0460 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.241 226 6-1063M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0430 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.063 226 NOWPUTNAM ROAD63M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0440 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10

2.426 143 6-1023M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

RAIL TRACKS0350 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.023 143 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROAD23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0360 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.430 206 6-10LEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0380 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.022 206 ADEQ22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

73- ELGIN ROAD0370 GLADSTONE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.106 133 ADEQCUL-DE-SAC35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET1870 GOLF DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.035 133 NOW35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREETWRIGHT STREET1860 GOLF DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.405 133 ADEQWRIGHT STREET74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1850 GOLF DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.617 100 NOWFAIRVIEW ROADBRIDGE2780 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.355 20 ADEQBRIDGEWEST END2770 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.923 100 ADEQCHERRY HILL ROAD475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROAD2830 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.255 100 ADEQ475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROADEAST WELLBURN LIMIT2825 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.204 100 6-10WEST WELLBURN LIMIT204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN

LIMIT2805 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ

0.500 100 6-1027- WELLBURN ROADWEST WELLBURN LIMIT2810 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.682 100 6-10204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN

LIMITHERITAGE ROAD2800 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

1.395 100 6-10HERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2790 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.374 100 6-10COBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2850 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.220 100 6-10EAST WELLBURN LIMIT27- WELLBURN ROAD2820 GREGORY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.156 129 6-10EAST ENDHILLVIEW DRIVE0890 GUEST LANE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.326 1,198 ADEQMARION STREETNEWTON AVENUE4980 HAMILTON CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.426 80 6-10BOT ROAD412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.412 80 6-10412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

73- ELGIN ROAD0200 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 7

Page 142: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 2.165 743 ADEQCULVERT - 2165M EAST OF

DORCHESTER ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0170 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.791 743 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROADCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD

0190 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.737 743 ADEQCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD

CULVERT - 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD

0180 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.465 715 ADEQSHAIN ROADWESTCHESTER BOURNE0140 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.580 80 NOWEAST ENDLEWIS ROAD0230 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ 0.412 715 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACK0160 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.830 715 ADEQRAIL TRACKSHAIN ROAD0150 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.614 80 ADEQLEWIS ROADBOT ROAD0220 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.070 166 6-1070M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)29- HAMILTON ROAD1930 HARRIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

2.167 166 6-1039M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE

70M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

1940 HARRIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.039 166 ADEQDONNYBROOK DRIVE39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE

1950 HARRIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.126 168 1-5MINNIE STREETRAIL TRACK4590 HARRIS STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.168 168 6-10RAIL TRACK49- CATHERINE STREET4570 HARRIS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.434 100 6-10KING STREETKING STREET LOOP6490 HARRISON STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.264 100 NOWKING STREET LOOPCUL-DE-SAC6480 HARRISON STREET ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.193 100 NOWCUL-DE-SACKING STREET LOOP6470 HARRISON STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.618 100 1-5DUNDAS STREET77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS

(PVMT CHANGE)3750 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10

1.167 100 ADEQ77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS (PVMT CHANGE)

BRIDGE3730 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.310 100 6-10CULVERT51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

3670 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.051 100 6-1051M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

28- THORNDALE ROAD3660 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.533 100 ADEQBRIDGE39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

3610 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.039 100 ADEQ39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3600 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.331 100 6-10BRIDGE22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

3720 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.022 100 NOW22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

EVELYN DRIVE3710 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

3.060 100 6-1035M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

WYTON DRIVE3690 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.035 100 NOWEVELYN DRIVE35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

3700 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.826 100 ADEQGREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3630 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.938 100 6-10BRIDGEBRIDGE3620 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.455 100 ADEQCULVERT AT #23124GREGORY DRIVE3640 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.657 100 ADEQ16- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT AT #231243650 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.728 100 6-10WYTON DRIVECULVERT3680 HERITAGE ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.063 30 ADEQCATHERINE STREETSOUTH END4840 HILL STREET ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 8

Page 143: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.115 100 ADEQCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4850 HILL STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.298 111 ADEQEAST ENDGUEST LANE0880 HILLVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.193 217 ADEQGUEST LANE73- ELGIN ROAD0870 HILLVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.512 433 ADEQMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1910 HUDSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.393 100 ADEQMONTEITH AVENUEMONTEITH AVENUE6730 HUESTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.090 46 ADEQSOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET4520 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.289 102 6-1063M NORTH OF MARION STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD4460 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.054 102 ADEQ54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD25- GORE ROAD4450 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.343 46 ADEQ10M NORTH OF CATHERINE

STREET42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

4490 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.042 46 ADEQ42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

MARION STREET4480 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.010 46 ADEQCATHERINE STREET10M NORTH OF CATHERINE STREET

4500 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.063 102 ADEQMARION STREET63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

4470 HUNT ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.342 100 NOWCANTERBURY DRIVE (S)175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY DRIVE

5740 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT

ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.175 100 NOW175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY DRIVE

CANTERBURY DRIVE (N)5730 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT

ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10

0.149 100 1-5WEST ENDCLARA STREET4680 IDA STREET ADEQ ADEQ R2urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.282 100 ADEQSOUTH END28- THORNDALE ROAD6750 IDEAL DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.092 10 ADEQSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1315 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ 0.510 35 ADEQ33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1550 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

0.033 35 ADEQCROMARTY DRIVE33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

1560 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ

0.765 124 NOWSOUTH END32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE (PVT CHANGE)

1580 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

0.032 124 NOW32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE (PVT CHANGE)

CROMARTY DRIVE1570 IRWIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ REC6-10 ADEQNOWADEQ

0.152 22 ADEQNORTH ENDCRAMPTON DRIVE0650 LACEY LANE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.104 100 ADEQRINESS DRIVEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5890 LACROIX AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.358 100 ADEQRIVERVIEW DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.281 100 ADEQWYE CREEK DRIVERIVERVIEW DRIVE3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.187 20 ADEQSOUTH ENDDONNYBROOK DRIVE1995 LANES ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.178 100 ADEQUNNAMED STREETWILLIAM COURT6390 LEESBORO TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.250 100 ADEQWILLIAM COURTELLIOTT TRAIL6380 LEESBORO TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.469 37 ADEQHARRIETSVILLE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1670 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.625 58 NOW39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1590 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

0.039 58 6-10CROMARTY DRIVE39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

1600 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ

1.431 59 NOWMOSSLEY DRIVE52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

1620 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 9

Page 144: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.052 59 ADEQ52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)CROMARTY DRIVE1610 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.189 60 ADEQRAIL TRACKSMOSSLEY DRIVE1630 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.610 60 6-10CRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1650 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.434 51 NOWGLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1660 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.479 60 ADEQCULVERTRAIL TRACKS1640 LEWIS ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.247 100 ADEQAMBER DRIVEMARION STREET4930 LINWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.045 100 ADEQEAST ENDAMBER DRIVE4940 LINWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.130 100 6-10UPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6570 LIONS LANE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.058 81 NOW17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)COW PATH2230 LOWER COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10

0.017 81 6-1029- HAMILTON ROAD17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD(PVMT CHANGE)

2240 LOWER COW PATH ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.272 100 ADEQNEWTON AVENUEMARION STREET4990 LUDWIG STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.154 100 ADEQAGNES STREETRAILWAY STREET6600 MAIN STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.041 10 ADEQRAILWAY STREETWEST END6590 MAIN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.299 100 ADEQVALLEYVIEW CRESCENTVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6200 MANLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.060 70 ADEQEND OF STREETVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6210 MANLEY PLACE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.193 100 6-10GEORGE STREETQUEEN STREET5310 MAPLE CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.377 100 ADEQWOODVALE DRIVE (E)WOODVALE DRIVE (W)6030 MAPLERIDGE

CRESCENTADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.077 100 ADEQEND OF STREETWOODVALE DRIVE6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.130 100 6-10UPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6580 MARIA STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.166 1,857 NOWMELVIN DRIVERON-ALLEN DRIVE2060 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.105 1,857 NOWAMBER DRIVELINWOOD DRIVE2080 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.085 1,857 NOWLINWOOD DRIVEMELVIN DRIVE2070 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.272 1,857 NOWHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET2030 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.353 1,857 NOWRICHMOND STREETAMBER DRIVE2090 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.575 564 6-10CLARA STREET575M WEST OF CLARA STREET

(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)2120 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10

2.118 795 6-1073- ELGIN ROADCLARA STREET2130 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 2.093 557 1-5HUNT ROAD,EAST LEGBRIDGE2150 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ REC1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.689 557 6-10BRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2140 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ R1rural6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.346 564 6-10575M WEST OF CLARA STREET

(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)RICHMOND STREET2110 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ

0.351 1,857 NOWRON-ALLEN DRIVEHAMILTON CRESCENT2050 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.193 1,857 1-5LUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD2020 MARION STREET ADEQ ADEQ R1rural1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.164 20 ADEQEND OF STREETGLADSTONE DRIVE0470 MARR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.120 49 ADEQGLADSTONE DRIVEEND OF STREET0480 MARR ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.102 45 ADEQRATH STREET30- PUTNAM ROAD1310 MARSHALL STREET ADEQ ADEQ REC1-5 ADEQNOW6-10 0.197 100 NOWEAST ENDCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6650 MEADOWBROOK LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.230 100 NOWCOUNTRYSIDE LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6640 MEADOWBROOK LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.141 141 6-10ELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4910 MELVIN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.089 40 ADEQNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4920 MELVIN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 10

Page 145: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.075 100 ADEQEND OF STREETWHEELER AVENUE5140 MILL COURT ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.475 433 ADEQDONNYBROOK DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5230 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.355 433 ADEQCHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5190 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.408 1,354 ADEQTINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5180 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.261 1,354 ADEQMILL ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD5090 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.250 100 ADEQCHRISTIE DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5225 MILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.040 1,229 ADEQRAIL TRACKMINNIE STREET4760 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.033 1,229 ADEQCATHERINE STREETRAIL TRACK4780 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.137 100 1-5NORTH STREETCLARA STREET4730 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.045 20 ADEQMINNIE STREETWEST END4700 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.220 1,229 ADEQCLARA STREETMINNIE STREET4710 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.379 100 1-5VILLAGE GATE DRIVENORTH STREET4740 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.071 100 6-10HARRIS STREETVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4750 MINNIE STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.203 553 NOWCHITTICK CRESCENTSCARLETT CIRCLE5830 MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.146 553 NOWSCARLETT CIRCLEOAKWOOD DRIVE5810 MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.198 553 NOWMITCHELL COURTCHITTICK CRESCENT5840 MITCHELL AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.102 564 1-5MITCHELL AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5990 MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.184 564 ADEQWOODVALE DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE6010 MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.110 564 1-5TURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE6000 MITCHELL COURT ADEQ ADEQ R1urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.083 100 ADEQFAIRVIEW ROADHUESTON DRIVE6720 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.262 100 ADEQCOUNTRYSIDE LANEHUESTON DRIVE6700 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.115 100 ADEQHUESTON DRIVECOUNTRYSIDE LANE6710 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.147 100 ADEQHUESTON DRIVETHORNDALE ROAD6690 MONTEITH AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.055 496 ADEQSTARDUST DRIVEWEST END1970 MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.162 496 ADEQSTARLIGHT LANESTARDUST DRIVE1980 MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.200 433 ADEQEAST ENDHUDSON DRIVE1920 MOONLIGHT WAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.393 162 ADEQCULVERTBRADY ROAD0750 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.669 84 6-10196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0820 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.196 84 NOW30- PUTNAM ROAD196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0830 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

1.707 84 6-10FORBES ROAD128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0860 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.128 84 NOW128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

30- PUTNAM ROAD0850 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.536 84 ADEQRAIL TRACKSLEWIS ROAD0800 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.115 162 ADEQ340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0760 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.340 162 ADEQ73- ELGIN ROAD340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0770 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

2.074 115 ADEQLEWIS ROAD379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0790 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.379 115 1-5379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

73- ELGIN ROAD0780 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10

0.672 84 6-10CULVERTRAIL TRACKS0810 MOSSLEY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 11

Page 146: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.263 80 NOW29- HAMILTON ROAD120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET1835 NEELY COURT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.120 80 NOW120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREETDURHAM STREET1830 NEELY COURT ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.265 100 ADEQHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET4970 NEWTON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.201 100 ADEQLUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD4960 NEWTON AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.596 180 6-10NORTH END16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3250 NISSOURI ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.442 91 NOWEND OF STREETMINNIE STREET4640 NORTH STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.230 1,096 ADEQOAKWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.116 1,096 ADEQBYRON AVENUECHITTICK CRESCENT5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.090 1,096 ADEQCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD PLACE5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.298 1,829 ADEQMITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.100 1,829 ADEQRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.128 1,829 ADEQTURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.121 100 NOWEAST ENDOAKWOOD DRIVE5760 OAKWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 1.346 100 ADEQPURPLE HILL ROAD47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2690 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.358 100 ADEQFAIRVIEW ROAD38M EAST OF 27- OLIVER DRIVE2640 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.038 100 ADEQ38M EAST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2630 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.419 100 ADEQ88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACK2680 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.333 100 6-1049M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2720 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.049 100 6-10COBBLE HILLS ROAD49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2730 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.047 100 ADEQ47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)HERITAGE ROAD2688 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.088 100 ADEQHERITAGE ROAD88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

2686 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.622 100 ADEQRAIL TRACKCULVERT2670 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.265 100 ADEQCULVERTFAIRVIEW ROAD2660 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.994 100 6-10CHERRY HILL ROADBRIDGE2710 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.396 100 ADEQBRIDGEPURPLE HILL ROAD2700 OLIVER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.202 100 NOWFAIRVIEW ROADCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6660 PARK LANE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.391 100 ADEQTHE PARKWAYBYRON AVENUE5540 PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.187 100 ADEQPINEHURST DRIVETHE PARKWAY5550 PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.484 100 ADEQPINEHURST DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.112 100 6-10ROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5070 PATRICIA AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.138 100 6-10ROSS STREETROSS STREET5080 PATRICIA AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.195 257 6-10300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROADBREEN ROAD1370 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.991 239 6-10EBENEZER ROAD370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY

DRIVE1410 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.555 239 6-10CRAMPTON DRIVEEBENEZER ROAD1420 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.300 257 ADEQSALFORD ROAD300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD1375 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.902 104 ADEQMOUNT ELGIN DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1430 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.250 257 ADEQ250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROADSALFORD RD1380 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.729 257 ADEQCROMARTY DRIVE250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD1390 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 12

Page 147: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.371 239 NOW370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY

DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1400 PIGRAM ROAD ADEQ NOW RSpLimADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.353 100 ADEQPARKVIEW DRIVEPARKVIEW DRIVE5580 PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.102 100 ADEQPARKVIEW DRIVEBYRON AVENUE5570 PINEHURST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.387 100 1-5SOUTH ENDQUEEN STREET5330 PONDVIEW COURT ADEQ ADEQ R2urban1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.631 100 ADEQFIFTEEN MILE ROADSIXTEEN MILE ROAD2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.518 100 ADEQFOURTEEN MILE ROADEBENEZER DRIVE2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.303 100 ADEQ16- PLOVER MILLS ROADTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.875 100 ADEQEBENEZER DRIVEFIFTEEN MILE ROAD2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.441 100 ADEQ440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE

ROADFOURTEEN MILE ROAD2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.920 100 ADEQSIXTEEN MILE ROAD33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.033 100 ADEQ33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD2860 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.959 100 ADEQTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD

2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.101 100 ADEQPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF BRIDGE

EVELYN DRIVE3960 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.034 100 NOW34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR2NOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.687 100 ADEQCULVERTOLIVER DRIVE3890 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.425 100 6-10BRIDGEPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF

BRIDGE3980 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

3.062 100 6-1040M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

WYTON DRIVE3940 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.040 100 ADEQEVELYN DRIVE40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.969 100 ADEQ49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKBRIDGE3990 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 2.369 100 6-1044M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)CULVERT3900 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.044 100 NOW28- THORNDALE ROAD44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)

3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

3.050 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)

3930 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.056 100 NOW56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)

28- THORNDALE ROAD3920 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

3.074 100 ADEQOLIVER DRIVE34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

3880 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.610 100 ADEQ2- DUNDAS STREET49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4020 PURPLE HILL ROAD ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.123 100 ADEQRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5870 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.214 100 ADEQLACROIX AVENUERINESS DRIVE5880 QUAIL RUN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.180 513 ADEQ29- HAMILTON ROADELIZABETH STREET5400 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.141 513 ADEQELIZABETH STREETANN STREET5390 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.167 513 ADEQANN STREETDORCHESTER ROAD5380 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.131 100 ADEQGEORGE STREETPONDVIEW COURT5350 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.061 100 NOWPONDVIEW COURTWEST END5320 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 13

Page 148: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.122 100 ADEQBRIDGE STREETGEORGE STREET5360 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.243 1,197 6-10DORCHESTER ROADBRIDGE STREET5370 QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.116 100 NOWMAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6510 RAILWAY STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.146 100 NOWUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6500 RAILWAY STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.137 50 NOWMARSHALL STREET29- HAMILTON ROAD1300 RATH STREET ADEQ ADEQ REC1-5 ADEQNOW6-10 1.064 100 6-101063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACKRAIL TRACK3220 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR26-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.577 100 6-10RAIL TRACKSCATCHERED LANE3210 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR26-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 3.085 100 6-10WYTON DRIVE - WEST LEGTHORNDALE ROAD3170 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ REC6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.167 100 ADEQWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEGWYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG3190 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.616 100 6-10ROBINS HILL ROAD1063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK3230 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ PR26-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.134 100 ADEQSCATCHERED LANEWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG3200 REBECCA ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.385 1,025 ADEQMARION STREET25- GORE ROAD3780 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.419 418 ADEQ25- GORE ROADTRAFALGAR STREET3770 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.378 466 6-10TRAFALGAR STREET2- DUNDAS STREET3760 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.166 1,538 ADEQCHARLES STREETRAIL TRACKS3830 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.419 1,538 ADEQRAIL TRACKSMARION STREET3800 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.117 1,391 ADEQCATHERINE STREETCHARLES STREET3840 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.083 50 1-5SOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET3850 RICHMOND STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.184 100 ADEQLACROIX AVENUEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5900 RINESS DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.142 100 ADEQOAKWOOD DRIVELACROIX AVENUE5910 RINESS DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.944 198 ADEQFIVE POINTS ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1330 ROBINSON ROAD ADEQ ADEQ SSTADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.265 265 NOWNORTH ENDMARION STREET4950 RON-ALLEN DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.308 100 1-5PATRICIA AVENUEPATRICIA AVENUE5000 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ BS1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.116 100 1-5DAVID STREETPATRICIA AVENUE5010 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus1-5 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.206 100 6-10RUTH STREETDAVID STREET5020 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.189 100 6-10CARL STREETRUTH STREET5030 ROSS STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQ6-10 0.114 100 6-10ROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5050 RUTH STREET ADEQ ADEQ SST6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.269 86 NOW74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE29- HAMILTON ROAD1810 SAGE STREET ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.186 100 NOWNORTH ENDMITCHELL AVENUE5800 SCARLETT CIRCLE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.081 20 ADEQWEST ENDREBECCA ROAD3240 SCATCHERED LANE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 2.408 212 6-10WESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0290 SCOTLAND DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.649 36 ADEQSOUTH END17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE

DRIVE1800 SHAIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.017 36 ADEQ17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1790 SHAIN ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.259 46 ADEQ8M NORTH OF 49- CATHERINE STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

NORTH END4550 SHEILS LANE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOWADEQ

0.157 100 NOWSHERWOOD PLACEBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD PLACE

5715 SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ

0.199 100 NOWCANTERBURY DRIVESHERWOOD PLACE5720 SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.187 100 NOWBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD

PLACECANTERBURY DRIVE5710 SHERWOOD CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10

0.120 100 NOWSHERWOOD CRESCENTEND OF STREET5750 SHERWOOD PLACE ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.203 100 ADEQELLIOTT TRAILELLIOTT TRAIL6370 SLAMMER TRAIL ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 14

Page 149: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.572 585 NOW73- ELGIN ROADWEST END1200 SLO-PITCH ROAD ADEQ ADEQ RECNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.612 496 ADEQMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1960 STARDUST DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.326 496 ADEQNORTH ENDMOONLIGHT WAY1990 STARLIGHT LANE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.220 20 ADEQFAIRVIEW ROAD1220M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD3280 STOREY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.146 100 NOWKING STREETEND OF STREET6460 TEMPERANCE STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.203 100 6-10ALMA STREETTHAMES CRESCENT5450 TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.171 100 6-10THAMES CRESCENTALMA STREET5460 TERRENCE AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.125 100 6-1029- HAMILTON ROADTERRENCE AVENUE5440 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.115 100 6-10TERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5410 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.242 100 6-10TERRENCE AVENUEALMA STREET5430 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.269 100 6-10ALMA STREETTERRENCE AVENUE5420 THAMES CRESCENT ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.065 30 ADEQCATHERINE STREETEND OF STREET4820 THAMES STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.116 100 ADEQCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4830 THAMES STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.064 814 ADEQCARLETON COURTPARKVIEW DRIVE5500 THE PARKWAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.163 814 ADEQDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5510 THE PARKWAY ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.327 118 ADEQ327M WEST OF DORCHESTER

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0730 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.042 118 ADEQDORCHESTER ROAD327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0740 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

1.917 118 ADEQCULVERT66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)

0710 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.066 118 1-566M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)

WESTCHESTER BOURNE0700 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ DST1-5 ADEQADEQADEQ

1.334 118 ADEQCULVERTCULVERT0720 THOMPSON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.257 100 6-10TINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5150 TINER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.302 100 6-10CHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5160 TINER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 0.089 100 6-10MILL ROADTINER AVENUE5200 TINER WALK ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 1.828 215 ADEQRICHMOND STREET32- SHAW ROAD2300 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.797 1,289 6-1021M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY2270 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ SSTplus6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ

0.021 1,289 ADEQ32- SHAW ROAD21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

2280 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.064 183 6-1091M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

2335 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.882 183 6-1017M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROADBANKS ROAD2350 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.746 183 ADEQBANKS ROAD91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)2340 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.027 183 ADEQ27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

RICHMOND STREET2330 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.017 183 NOW73- ELGIN ROAD17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD2370 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 2.747 151 6-10HUNT ROAD18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2390 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.018 151 NOW18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD2380 TRAFALGAR STREET ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.399 398 ADEQQUAIL RUN DRIVEOAKWOOD DRIVE5850 TURNBERRY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.101 398 ADEQMITCHELL COURTQUAIL RUN DRIVE5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.128 100 6-10AGNES STREETMARIA STREET6550 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 15

Page 150: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.110 100 6-10RAILWAY STREETAGNES STREET6560 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.152 100 6-10LIONS LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6530 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.141 100 6-10MARIA STREETLIONS LANE6540 UPPER QUEEN STREET ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.122 100 6-10THORNDALE ROADCENTRE DRIVE3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ BSgravADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.401 100 ADEQEBENEZER DRIVE41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD

ROAD3110 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.041 100 ADEQ41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3100 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

3.096 100 6-10CENTRE DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3150 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 3.099 100 6-1016- PLOVER MILLS ROADEBENEZER DRIVE3120 VALLEY VIEW ROAD ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.324 618 ADEQMANLEY DRIVEMANLEY PLACE6140 VALLEYVIEW

CRESCENTADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.061 618 ADEQ61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVEMANLEY DRIVE6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT

ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.070 618 ADEQMANLEY PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT

ADEQ ADEQ CRKADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.299 100 6-10VILLAGE GATE DRIVEVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT

ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ

0.312 100 ADEQVILLAGE GATE CRESCENTMINNIE STREET4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.050 100 ADEQWEST ENDVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.235 100 6-10VILLAGE GATE CRESCENTVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ R1urban6-10 ADEQADEQADEQ 2.424 650 6-10WESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0490 WESTMINSTER DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.408 663 ADEQCHRISTIE DRIVEMILL COURT5130 WHEELER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.234 663 ADEQTINER AVENUEMILL ROAD5110 WHEELER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.150 663 ADEQMILL COURTTINER AVENUE5120 WHEELER AVENUE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.032 100 ADEQWHEELER AVENUEEND OF STREET5170 WHEELER COURT ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.516 166 6-10CONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCEAVON DRIVE0120 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.278 20 ADEQWEST ENDCONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE0130 WHITTAKER LANE ADEQ ADEQ RECADEQ ADEQNOW6-10 0.061 100 ADEQWEST ENDLEESBORO TRAIL6450 WILLIAM COURT ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.229 578 ADEQFOXHOLLOW DRIVEMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6270 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.077 578 ADEQMAPLEWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6230 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.092 578 ADEQMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6260 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.104 578 ADEQMITCHELL COURTMAPLEWOOD PLACE6240 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.101 578 ADEQMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMITCHELL COURT6250 WOODVALE DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ MICROADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 0.233 133 NOWGOLF DRIVE100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1840 WRIGHT STREET ADEQ ADEQ RNSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 0.100 133 NOWDURHAM STREET100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1845 WRIGHT STREET ADEQ ADEQ RSSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10 0.088 100 NOW88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)REBECCA ROAD2485 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQ6-10

1.278 100 6-10HERITAGE ROAD70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

2540 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

1.389 100 6-10CHERRY HILL ROADPURPLE HILL ROAD2560 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.383 100 6-10BRIDGECHERRY HILL ROAD2570 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.395 100 ADEQPURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2550 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2ADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ 1.406 100 6-10FAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2510 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.404 100 6-10REBECCA ROADLAKESIDE DRIVE2480 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 16

Page 151: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Critical Deficiencies by Street NameCurrent Inspection Batch

Length AADT Overall TONTo DescriptionFrom DescriptionID Street Name Cap. Geo ImpSA TypeWidthDrain 0.070 100 ADEQ70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)FAIRVIEW ROAD2520 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ NONEADEQ ADEQADEQADEQ

0.981 100 6-1038M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADBRIDGE2580 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRR2plADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 0.038 100 6-10COBBLE HILLS ROAD38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2590 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ SDADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10 1.281 100 6-1047M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2490 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ GRRpluADEQ ADEQADEQ6-10

0.047 100 NOW27- NISSOURI ROAD47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD2500 WYTON DRIVE ADEQ ADEQ BSNOW ADEQADEQADEQ 359.656

Run: DEC 4,2015 2:26PM Page: 17

Page 152: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix H. Needs Sorted By Time of Need and Improvement Category 

   

Page 153: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name ImpSSTplus

1.542 619 58,610.076-10 26.00 RehabDORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACKS0030 AVON DRIVE SSTplus 0.142 619 5,397.296-10 26.00 Rehab142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT

(BRIDGE)MUNICIPAL LIMIT0005 AVON DRIVE SSTplus

1.797 1,289 71,493.796-10 25.00 Rehab21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY2270 TRAFALGAR STREET SSTplus

3.187 733 121,135.086-10 24.00 Rehab73- ELGIN ROADCULVERT0050 AVON DRIVE SSTplus 0.575 564 21,855.256-10 22.00 RehabCLARA STREET575M WEST OF CLARA STREET

(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)2120 MARION STREET SSTplus

2.452 751 95,375.696-10 20.00 RehabLEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0960 CROMARTY DRIVE SSTplus 0.510 733 19,384.656-10 16.00 RehabCULVERTDORCHESTER ROAD0040 AVON DRIVE SSTplus 0.071 100 2,383.416-10 15.00 RehabHARRIS STREETVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4750 MINNIE STREET SSTplus 0.116 100 4,203.051-5 15.00 RehabDAVID STREETPATRICIA AVENUE5010 ROSS STREET SSTplus 0.189 100 6,848.076-10 14.00 RehabCARL STREETRUTH STREET5030 ROSS STREET SSTplus 0.206 100 7,464.046-10 14.00 RehabRUTH STREETDAVID STREET5020 ROSS STREET SSTplus 0.204 100 7,391.576-10 14.00 RehabROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5060 DAVID STREET SSTplus 0.204 100 7,572.726-10 13.00 RehabWEST WELLBURN LIMIT204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN

LIMIT2805 GREGORY DRIVE SSTplus

2.015 100 76,588.396-10 11.00 Rehab28- THORNDALE ROADBRIDGE4340 COBBLE HILLS ROAD SSTplus 13.210 505,703.07

SST 1.848 736 45,738.006-10 23.00 Rehab73- ELGIN ROADBRADY ROAD0950 CROMARTY DRIVE SST 0.168 168 3,769.926-10 19.00 RehabRAIL TRACK49- CATHERINE STREET4570 HARRIS STREET SST 0.400 800 9,900.006-10 18.00 Rehab400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1757A DORCHESTER ROAD SST 0.300 800 7,425.006-10 18.00 Rehab300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE

DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1758A DORCHESTER ROAD SST

0.944 198 21,183.36ADEQ 17.00 RehabFIVE POINTS ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1330 ROBINSON ROAD SST 1.639 617 37,860.906-10 17.00 RehabBRIDGE112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON

ROAD1230 BREEN ROAD SST

0.346 564 7,992.606-10 16.00 Rehab575M WEST OF CLARA STREET(SPEED LIMIT CHANGE)

RICHMOND STREET2110 MARION STREET SST

0.039 58 900.906-10 13.00 RehabCROMARTY DRIVE39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

1600 LEWIS ROAD SST

0.114 100 2,482.926-10 13.00 RehabROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5050 RUTH STREET SST 0.138 100 3,005.646-10 13.00 RehabROSS STREETROSS STREET5080 PATRICIA AVENUE SST 0.069 100 1,434.526-10 13.00 RehabCATHERINE STREETROSS STREET5040 CARL STREET SST 0.112 100 2,402.406-10 12.00 RehabROSS STREETCATHERINE STREET5070 PATRICIA AVENUE SST 0.033 35 653.40ADEQ 11.00 RehabCROMARTY DRIVE33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)1560 IRWIN ROAD SST

1.374 100 33,099.666-10 11.00 RehabCOBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2850 GREGORY DRIVE SST 7.524 177,849.22

R2urban 0.149 100 69,243.171-5 13.00 RehabWEST ENDCLARA STREET4680 IDA STREET R2urban

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 1

Page 154: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.387 100 175,071.261-5 12.00 RehabSOUTH ENDQUEEN STREET5330 PONDVIEW COURT R2urban 0.536 244,314.43

R1urban 0.110 564 36,235.321-5 15.00 RehabTURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE6000 MITCHELL COURT R1urban 0.102 564 34,375.411-5 15.00 RehabMITCHELL AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5990 MITCHELL COURT R1urban 0.181 545 60,507.146-10 13.00 RehabIDA STREETEVA STREET4660 CLARA STREET R1urban 0.320 513 116,346.676-10 11.00 RehabCARLETON COURTTHE PARKWAY5520 CARLETON COURT R1urban 0.142 142 47,123.096-10 9.00 RehabELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4880 ERIC DRIVE R1urban 0.166 100 54,682.386-10 9.00 RehabMITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5780 CHITTICK CRESCENT R1urban 0.257 100 86,612.546-10 9.00 RehabTINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5150 TINER AVENUE R1urban 0.302 100 99,482.416-10 9.00 RehabCHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5160 TINER AVENUE R1urban 0.089 100 29,317.676-10 8.00 RehabMILL ROADTINER AVENUE5200 TINER WALK R1urban 0.141 141 46,791.246-10 8.00 RehabELIZABETH DRIVEMARION STREET4910 MELVIN DRIVE R1urban 0.156 129 51,769.036-10 8.00 RehabEAST ENDHILLVIEW DRIVE0890 GUEST LANE R1urban 0.032 100 28,427.486-10 8.00 RehabNORTH ENDCARLETON COURT5530 CARLETON COURT R1urban 0.235 100 85,442.086-10 8.00 RehabVILLAGE GATE CRESCENTVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4610 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE R1urban 0.299 100 97,764.376-10 8.00 RehabVILLAGE GATE DRIVEVILLAGE GATE DRIVE4630 VILLAGE GATE CRESCENT R1urban 0.190 100 69,080.846-10 8.00 RehabMELVIN DRIVEERIC DRIVE4900 ELIZABETH DRIVE R1urban 2.722 943,957.67

R1rural 0.193 1,857 27,922.491-5 32.00 RehabLUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD2020 MARION STREET R1rural 0.112 617 14,518.986-10 25.00 Rehab112M EAST OF 29- HAMILTON

ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD1220 BREEN ROAD R1rural

0.689 557 92,739.426-10 16.00 RehabBRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2140 MARION STREET R1rural 0.065 229 8,553.236-10 13.00 RehabWESTCHESTER BOURNE65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER

BOURNE0690 DINGMAN DRIVE R1rural

1.059 143,734.12

PR3 0.401 580 209,553.15NOW 33.00 Rehab30- PUTNAM ROAD401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(BEND IN ROAD)1290 COUCH ROAD PR3

0.401 209,553.15

PR2 0.272 1,857 70,980.91NOW 38.00 RehabHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET2030 MARION STREET PR2 0.085 1,857 20,959.51NOW 35.00 RehabLINWOOD DRIVEMELVIN DRIVE2070 MARION STREET PR2 0.166 1,857 40,203.05NOW 34.00 RehabMELVIN DRIVERON-ALLEN DRIVE2060 MARION STREET PR2 0.811 1,471 205,859.32NOW 34.00 Rehab74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL

BOUNDARY1060 BRADLEY AVENUE PR2

0.353 1,857 87,181.29NOW 34.00 RehabRICHMOND STREETAMBER DRIVE2090 MARION STREET PR2 0.351 1,857 87,098.01NOW 34.00 RehabRON-ALLEN DRIVEHAMILTON CRESCENT2050 MARION STREET PR2 0.091 1,471 20,194.211-5 34.00 Rehab91 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL

BOUNDARYMUNICIPAL BOUNDARY1050 BRADLEY AVENUE PR2

0.105 1,857 25,932.11NOW 32.00 RehabAMBER DRIVELINWOOD DRIVE2080 MARION STREET PR2

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 2

Page 155: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.423 545 106,411.46NOW 28.00 RehabMARION STREETIDA STREET4670 CLARA STREET PR2 0.193 100 45,860.54NOW 24.00 RehabCUL-DE-SACKING STREET LOOP6470 HARRISON STREET PR2 0.161 100 36,636.94NOW 23.00 RehabMONTEITH AVENUEUPPER QUEEN STREET3470 FAIRVIEW ROAD PR2 1.107 100 247,630.98NOW 22.00 RehabCHERRY HILL ROADCULVERT2460 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 1.411 100 336,117.84NOW 22.00 RehabCOBBLE HILLS ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2470 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 1.403 100 336,171.99NOW 22.00 RehabFAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2400 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 0.290 100 63,222.43NOW 20.00 RehabCULVERTPURPLE HILL ROAD2450 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 0.034 100 7,473.29NOW 18.00 Rehab34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3875 PURPLE HILL ROAD PR2

1.331 100 303,432.23NOW 17.00 RehabHERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2410 EVELYN DRIVE PR2 0.131 100 30,258.961-5 17.00 RehabUPPER QUEEN STREET28- THORNDALE ROAD3460 FAIRVIEW ROAD PR2 0.098 100 21,540.64NOW 15.00 Rehab CULVERTMEADOWBROOK LANE3500 FAIRVIEW ROAD PR2 0.616 100 148,704.506-10 13.00 RehabROBINS HILL ROAD1063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACK3230 REBECCA ROAD PR2 1.064 100 256,853.216-10 13.00 Rehab1063 M SOUTH OF RAIL TRACKRAIL TRACK3220 REBECCA ROAD PR2 0.577 100 139,289.766-10 13.00 RehabRAIL TRACKSCATCHERED LANE3210 REBECCA ROAD PR2

11.073 2,638,013.18

DST 0.066 118 2,395.801-5 19.00 Rehab66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER

BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)WESTCHESTER BOURNE0700 THOMPSON DRIVE DST

0.066 2,395.80

SD 1.596 180 0.006-10 28.00 MaintenanceNORTH END16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3250 NISSOURI ROAD SD 1.234 736 0.00ADEQ 23.00 MaintenanceEATON ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0930 CROMARTY DRIVE SD 0.516 166 0.006-10 22.00 MaintenanceCONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCEAVON DRIVE0120 WHITTAKER LANE SD 2.118 795 0.006-10 20.00 Maintenance73- ELGIN ROADCLARA STREET2130 MARION STREET SD 0.650 1,616 0.006-10 20.00 Maintenance80M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER

ROAD298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVE1120 DONNYBROOK DRIVE SD

1.426 80 0.006-10 19.00 MaintenanceBOT ROAD412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0210 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SD

0.031 141 0.006-10 19.00 MaintenanceCROMARTY DRIVE31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1700 EATON ROAD SD 2.315 50 0.006-10 17.00 Maintenance33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK

DRIVE76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

1890 FERRAR ROAD SD

1.419 800 0.00ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceTHOMPSON DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1754 DORCHESTER ROAD SD 1.404 100 0.006-10 16.00 MaintenanceREBECCA ROADLAKESIDE DRIVE2480 WYTON DRIVE SD 1.393 100 0.006-10 16.00 MaintenanceVALLEY VIEW ROADPROSPECT HILL ROAD2600 CENTRE DRIVE SD 0.112 35 0.00ADEQ 15.00 Maintenance33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER

ROADDONNYBROOK DRIVE1180 CASHEL LANE SD

0.679 100 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceDUNDAS STREET90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4270 CHERRY HILL ROAD SD 0.434 100 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceKING STREETKING STREET LOOP6490 HARRISON STREET SD 0.243 1,197 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceDORCHESTER ROADBRIDGE STREET5370 QUEEN STREET SD 1.552 158 0.006-10 15.00 MaintenanceBREEN ROADRAIL TRACKS1500 FIVE POINTS ROAD SD 2.408 212 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceWESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0290 SCOTLAND DRIVE SD 0.131 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceMILL ROADTINER AVENUE5220 CHRISTIE DRIVE SD

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 3

Page 156: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.115 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceTINER AVENUEWHEELER AVENUE5210 CHRISTIE DRIVE SD 1.314 229 0.006-10 14.00 Maintenance65M WESTOF 74- WESTCHESTER

BOURNE971M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY

0680 DINGMAN DRIVE SD

1.852 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceWYTON DRIVE575M SOUTH OF CULVERT3520 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 0.602 100 0.006-10 14.00 MaintenanceBRIDGESTOREY DRIVE3310 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 0.327 118 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Maintenance327M WEST OF DORCHESTER

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0730 THOMPSON DRIVE SD

0.584 100 0.006-10 13.00 Maintenance16- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT3360 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 1.938 100 0.006-10 13.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEBRIDGE3620 HERITAGE ROAD SD 0.882 183 0.006-10 13.00 Maintenance17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROADBANKS ROAD2350 TRAFALGAR STREET SD 0.203 100 0.006-10 13.00 MaintenanceALMA STREETTHAMES CRESCENT5450 TERRENCE AVENUE SD 0.171 100 0.006-10 12.00 MaintenanceTHAMES CRESCENTALMA STREET5460 TERRENCE AVENUE SD 0.125 100 0.006-10 12.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADTERRENCE AVENUE5440 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.624 800 0.006-10 12.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKS300M SOUTH OF GLADTONE

DRIVE1758 DORCHESTER ROAD SD

0.051 100 0.006-10 12.00 Maintenance51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

28- THORNDALE ROAD3660 HERITAGE ROAD SD

1.406 100 0.006-10 12.00 MaintenanceFAIRVIEW ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2510 WYTON DRIVE SD 0.049 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceCOBBLE HILLS ROAD49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2730 OLIVER DRIVE SD 2.491 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceCULVERTGREGORY DRIVE3350 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 1.378 466 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceTRAFALGAR STREET2- DUNDAS STREET3760 RICHMOND STREET SD 0.835 100 0.006-10 11.00 Maintenance350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROADRAIL TRACKS3440 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD

0.470 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceBRIDGERAIL TRACKS3435 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 3.102 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceOLIVER DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD4160 CHERRY HILL ROAD SD 0.042 83 0.006-10 11.00 Maintenance42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1710 BRADY ROAD SD 2.369 100 0.006-10 11.00 Maintenance44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)CULVERT3900 PURPLE HILL ROAD SD

0.193 100 0.006-10 11.00 MaintenanceGEORGE STREETQUEEN STREET5310 MAPLE CRESCENT SD 0.875 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceEBENEZER DRIVEFIFTEEN MILE ROAD2890 PROSPECT HILL ROAD SD 0.089 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceMAPLE CRESCENTQUEEN STREET5290 GEORGE STREET SD 0.242 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceTERRENCE AVENUEALMA STREET5430 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.269 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceALMA STREETTERRENCE AVENUE5420 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.782 100 0.006-10 10.00 MaintenanceCULVERT21M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS

ROAD3390 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD

3.062 100 0.006-10 10.00 Maintenance40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

WYTON DRIVE3940 PURPLE HILL ROAD SD

0.441 180 0.006-10 10.00 Maintenance30- PUTNAM ROAD441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0590 CRAMPTON DRIVE SD 0.064 183 0.006-10 10.00 Maintenance91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

2335 TRAFALGAR STREET SD

2.465 715 0.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceSHAIN ROADWESTCHESTER BOURNE0140 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SD 0.115 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceTERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5410 THAMES CRESCENT SD 0.110 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceRAILWAY STREETAGNES STREET6560 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD 0.129 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6610 AGNES STREET SD 0.128 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceAGNES STREETMARIA STREET6550 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 4

Page 157: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.107 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceMAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6620 AGNES STREET SD 0.071 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceSOUTH ENDMAIN STREET6630 AGNES STREET SD 0.130 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6570 LIONS LANE SD 0.152 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceLIONS LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6530 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD 0.141 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceMARIA STREETLIONS LANE6540 UPPER QUEEN STREET SD 0.130 100 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6580 MARIA STREET SD 2.424 650 0.006-10 9.00 MaintenanceWESTCHESTER BOURNEMUNICIPAL LIMIT0490 WESTMINSTER DRIVE SD 0.412 80 0.006-10 9.00 Maintenance412M EAST OF 73 -ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)73- ELGIN ROAD0200 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE SD

0.682 100 0.006-10 8.00 Maintenance204M WEST OF THE WELLBURN LIMIT

HERITAGE ROAD2800 GREGORY DRIVE SD

0.038 100 0.006-10 8.00 MaintenanceCOBBLE HILLS ROAD38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROAD2590 WYTON DRIVE SD 0.140 100 0.006-10 8.00 MaintenancePARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE3480 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 0.220 100 0.006-10 8.00 MaintenanceEAST WELLBURN LIMIT27- WELLBURN ROAD2820 GREGORY DRIVE SD 0.041 10 0.00ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceRAILWAY STREETWEST END6590 MAIN STREET SD 0.073 158 0.006-10 7.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKSROBINSON ROAD1490 FIVE POINTS ROAD SD 0.017 81 0.006-10 5.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROAD17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2240 LOWER COW PATH SD

0.070 166 0.006-10 5.00 Maintenance70M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

29- HAMILTON ROAD1930 HARRIS ROAD SD

0.140 100 0.006-10 5.00 MaintenanceMEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE3490 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD 3.102 100 0.00ADEQ 4.00 MaintenanceEVELYN DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3530 FAIRVIEW ROAD SD

57.645 0.00

RSpLimit 0.080 1,616 0.00NOW 25.00 Maintenance32- DORCHESTER ROAD80M WEST OF 32- DORCHESTER

ROAD1140 DONNYBROOK DRIVE RSpLimit

0.371 239 0.00NOW 24.00 Maintenance370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

CROMARTY DRIVE1400 PIGRAM ROAD RSpLimit

0.043 70 0.00NOW 14.00 Maintenance43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD

DORCHESTER ROAD1150 DONNYBROOK DRIVE RSpLimit

0.033 35 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Maintenance32- DORCHESTER ROAD33M SOUTH OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD

1190 CASHEL LANE RSpLimit

0.527 0.00

MICRO 0.261 1,354 8,312.85ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceMILL ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD5090 MILL ROAD MICRO 0.408 1,354 12,994.80ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceTINER WALKWHEELER AVENUE5180 MILL ROAD MICRO 0.230 1,096 6,923.00ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceOAKWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD5930 OAKWOOD DRIVE MICRO 0.090 1,096 2,740.50ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD PLACE5940 OAKWOOD DRIVE MICRO 0.116 1,096 3,532.20ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceBYRON AVENUECHITTICK CRESCENT5950 OAKWOOD DRIVE MICRO 0.234 663 7,452.90ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceTINER AVENUEMILL ROAD5110 WHEELER AVENUE MICRO 0.408 663 12,994.80ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceCHRISTIE DRIVEMILL COURT5130 WHEELER AVENUE MICRO 0.150 663 4,777.50ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceMILL COURTTINER AVENUE5120 WHEELER AVENUE MICRO 0.167 513 5,845.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceANN STREETDORCHESTER ROAD5380 QUEEN STREET MICRO 0.180 513 5,481.00ADEQ 9.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADELIZABETH STREET5400 QUEEN STREET MICRO

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 5

Page 158: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.141 513 4,244.10ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceELIZABETH STREETANN STREET5390 QUEEN STREET MICRO 0.229 578 6,892.90ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceFOXHOLLOW DRIVEMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6270 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.355 433 10,685.50ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceCHRISTIE DRIVETINER WALK5190 MILL ROAD MICRO 0.077 578 3,126.20ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMAPLEWOOD PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6230 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.092 578 2,769.20ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMAPLERIDGE CRESCENT6260 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.101 578 3,040.10ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMAPLERIDGE CRESCENTMITCHELL COURT6250 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.104 578 3,130.40ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceMITCHELL COURTMAPLEWOOD PLACE6240 WOODVALE DRIVE MICRO 0.075 100 2,388.75ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceEND OF STREETWHEELER AVENUE5140 MILL COURT MICRO 0.032 100 3,214.40ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceWHEELER AVENUEEND OF STREET5170 WHEELER COURT MICRO 0.077 100 2,317.70ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceEND OF STREETWOODVALE DRIVE6020 MAPLEWOOD PLACE MICRO 0.100 100 3,010.00ADEQ 6.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5260 ELIZABETH STREET MICRO 0.177 100 4,770.15ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceEAST END29- HAMILTON ROAD5250 CALVERT PLACE MICRO 0.382 100 11,498.20ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)FOXHOLLOW DRIVE (N)6040 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT MICRO 0.441 100 13,274.10ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceFOREST GROVE LANEFOXHOLLOW DRIVE (S)6050 FOREST GROVE CRESCENT MICRO 4.627 145,416.25

GRRplus 0.543 100 10,995.756-10 25.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEBRIDGE3330 FAIRVIEW ROAD GRRplus 0.351 100 7,107.756-10 21.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEBRIDGE3320 FAIRVIEW ROAD GRRplus 1.389 100 28,127.256-10 19.00 MaintenanceCHERRY HILL ROADPURPLE HILL ROAD2560 WYTON DRIVE GRRplus 0.383 100 7,845.376-10 19.00 MaintenanceBRIDGECHERRY HILL ROAD2570 WYTON DRIVE GRRplus 1.100 100 20,988.006-10 19.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDVALLEY VIEW ROAD2760 EBENEZER DRIVE GRRplus 1.281 100 25,340.746-10 18.00 Maintenance47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2490 WYTON DRIVE GRRplus

0.984 100 20,386.516-10 18.00 MaintenanceGREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3340 FAIRVIEW ROAD GRRplus 1.469 37 26,309.79ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceHARRIETSVILLE DRIVEGLADSTONE DRIVE1670 LEWIS ROAD GRRplus 0.994 100 22,221.866-10 16.00 MaintenanceCHERRY HILL ROADBRIDGE2710 OLIVER DRIVE GRRplus 1.343 46 25,624.44ADEQ 15.00 Maintenance10M NORTH OF CATHERINE

STREET42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

4490 HUNT ROAD GRRplus

1.333 100 31,048.246-10 15.00 Maintenance49M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADCHERRY HILL ROAD2720 OLIVER DRIVE GRRplus 3.096 100 65,591.866-10 13.00 MaintenanceCENTRE DRIVE16- PLOVER MILLS ROAD3150 VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRRplus 1.395 100 30,860.196-10 12.00 MaintenanceHERITAGE ROADFAIRVIEW ROAD2790 GREGORY DRIVE GRRplus 3.099 100 70,006.416-10 11.00 Maintenance16- PLOVER MILLS ROADEBENEZER DRIVE3120 VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRRplus 0.508 100 11,713.466-10 10.00 MaintenanceBRIDGECULVERT4090 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRRplus 0.425 100 9,899.106-10 10.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF

BRIDGE3980 PURPLE HILL ROAD GRRplus

19.693 414,066.72

GRR2plus 1.294 50 42,857.286-10 21.00 MaintenancePAVEMENT CHANGEHARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1680 BOT ROAD GRR2plus 1.289 102 45,707.946-10 17.00 Maintenance63M NORTH OF MARION STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD4460 HUNT ROAD GRR2plus

0.981 100 37,081.806-10 16.00 Maintenance38M WEST OF COBBLE HILL ROADBRIDGE2580 WYTON DRIVE GRR2plus 1.331 100 54,672.166-10 14.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)3720 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2plus

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 6

Page 159: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 2.310 100 97,047.726-10 14.00 MaintenanceCULVERT51M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)3670 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2plus

1.307 103 55,521.366-10 13.00 MaintenanceAVON DRIVE18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

1770 DORCHESTER ROAD GRR2plus

1.278 100 53,093.236-10 13.00 MaintenanceHERITAGE ROAD70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

2540 WYTON DRIVE GRR2plus

2.444 100 103,821.126-10 13.00 Maintenance90M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

4250 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2plus

0.728 100 31,606.856-10 12.00 MaintenanceWYTON DRIVECULVERT3680 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2plus 12.962 521,409.46

GRR2 1.251 320 46,837.446-10 34.00 MaintenanceFIVE POINTS ROAD565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT

CHANGE)1270 BREEN ROAD GRR2

0.892 298 33,396.486-10 27.00 MaintenancePIGRAM ROADFIVE POINTS ROAD1280 BREEN ROAD GRR2 0.401 166 13,136.76ADEQ 25.00 MaintenancePIGRAM ROADCULVERT0640 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 2.445 223 85,819.506-10 20.00 MaintenanceLEWIS ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD0560 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.729 257 27,293.76ADEQ 19.00 MaintenanceCROMARTY DRIVE250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROAD1390 PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 1.395 100 47,005.92ADEQ 19.00 MaintenancePURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2550 WYTON DRIVE GRR2 0.556 166 18,214.56ADEQ 18.00 MaintenanceCULVERTFORBES ROAD0630 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.815 166 28,606.50ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0610 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.661 166 23,201.10ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceFORBES ROADBRIDGE0620 CRAMPTON DRIVE GRR2 0.241 226 9,023.046-10 17.00 Maintenance63M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0430 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2

1.017 226 38,076.48ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceCULVERTCULVERT0420 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2 0.920 143 32,292.00ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKS305M EAST OF DORCHESTER

ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)0340 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2

2.074 115 69,885.50ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceLEWIS ROAD379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0790 MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR2

0.520 226 19,468.806-10 16.00 MaintenanceCULVERTMARR ROAD0410 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2 2.430 206 102,351.606-10 15.00 MaintenanceLEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0380 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2

1.236 206 49,168.086-10 15.00 MaintenanceMARR ROADLEWIS ROAD SOUTH LEG0400 GLADSTONE DRIVE GRR2 0.902 104 33,770.88ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceMOUNT ELGIN DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1430 PIGRAM ROAD GRR2 3.060 100 121,726.806-10 13.00 Maintenance35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)WYTON DRIVE3690 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2

2.530 100 100,643.40ADEQ 12.00 Maintenance34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

BRIDGE4220 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2

3.039 100 120,891.42ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceWYTON DRIVE49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

4200 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2

0.521 100 20,725.38ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceBRIDGEWYTON DRIVE4210 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR2 1.167 100 49,154.04ADEQ 11.00 Maintenance77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS

(PVMT CHANGE)BRIDGE3730 HERITAGE ROAD GRR2

28.802 1,090,689.44

GRR 0.610 60 9,563.586-10 24.00 MaintenanceCRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1650 LEWIS ROAD GRR

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 7

Page 160: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 2.569 37 36,068.76ADEQ 23.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0270 DOAN DRIVE GRR

1.090 46 15,303.60ADEQ 22.00 MaintenanceSOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET4520 HUNT ROAD GRR 1.521 62 23,846.246-10 22.00 MaintenanceMOSSLEY DRIVECROMARTY DRIVE1530 FORBES ROAD GRR 0.672 84 10,378.376-10 22.00 MaintenanceCULVERTRAIL TRACKS0810 MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR 1.364 100 21,703.97ADEQ 19.00 MaintenanceVALLEY VIEW ROAD57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL

ROAD2750 EBENEZER DRIVE GRR

2.167 166 37,523.776-10 18.00 Maintenance39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE

70M SOUTH OF 29-HAMILTON ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

1940 HARRIS ROAD GRR

1.917 118 31,400.46ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceCULVERT66M EAST OF 74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)

0710 THOMPSON DRIVE GRR

1.334 118 21,850.92ADEQ 17.00 MaintenanceCULVERTCULVERT0720 THOMPSON DRIVE GRR 1.271 63 20,224.15ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceCRAMPTON DRIVEMOSSLEY DRIVE1540 FORBES ROAD GRR 0.210 44 3,243.24ADEQ 16.00 MaintenanceCULVERTMOSSLEY DRIVE1730 BRADY ROAD GRR 1.358 100 23,832.90ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceFAIRVIEW ROAD38M EAST OF 27- OLIVER DRIVE2640 OLIVER DRIVE GRR 0.536 84 8,905.10ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKSLEWIS ROAD0800 MOSSLEY DRIVE GRR 0.907 100 15,705.61ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceGREGORY DRIVERAIL TRACK4120 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR 1.346 100 23,622.30ADEQ 13.00 MaintenancePURPLE HILL ROAD47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2690 OLIVER DRIVE GRR

1.631 100 29,005.70ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceBRIDGE44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

4080 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR

0.257 37 4,209.66ADEQ 13.00 MaintenancePIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0280 DOAN DRIVE GRR 2.455 100 43,085.25ADEQ 13.00 MaintenanceCULVERT AT #23124GREGORY DRIVE3640 HERITAGE ROAD GRR 0.657 100 12,606.52ADEQ 11.00 Maintenance16- PLOVER MILLS ROADCULVERT AT #231243650 HERITAGE ROAD GRR 3.088 100 59,975.14ADEQ 11.00 MaintenancePLOVER MILLS ROADGREGORY DRIVE4140 CHERRY HILL ROAD GRR 3.401 100 67,645.89ADEQ 11.00 MaintenanceEBENEZER DRIVE41M SOUTH OF HWY 7-

ELGINFIELD ROAD3110 VALLEY VIEW ROAD GRR

1.969 100 40,545.65ADEQ 9.00 Maintenance49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKBRIDGE3990 PURPLE HILL ROAD GRR 32.330 560,246.78

CRK 0.033 1,229 66.00ADEQ 14.00 MaintenanceCATHERINE STREETRAIL TRACK4780 MINNIE STREET CRK 0.512 433 1,024.00ADEQ 12.00 MaintenanceMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1910 HUDSON DRIVE CRK 0.200 433 400.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDHUDSON DRIVE1920 MOONLIGHT WAY CRK 0.163 814 326.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5510 THE PARKWAY CRK 0.128 1,829 256.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceTURNBERRY DRIVEMITCHELL AVENUE5970 OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.298 1,829 596.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceMITCHELL AVENUEBYRON AVENUE5960 OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.071 1,152 142.00ADEQ 10.00 MaintenanceWOODVALE DRIVEPRIVATE ROAD6090 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.054 1,152 108.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenancePRIVATE ROAD29- HAMILTON ROAD6080 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.040 100 80.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceEVELYN DRIVE40M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)3950 PURPLE HILL ROAD CRK

0.100 1,829 200.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5980 OAKWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.324 618 648.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceMANLEY DRIVEMANLEY PLACE6140 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 0.055 496 110.00ADEQ 9.00 MaintenanceSTARDUST DRIVEWEST END1970 MOONLIGHT WAY CRK 0.228 559 456.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceDORCHESTER ROADPARKVIEW DRIVE5610 BYRON AVENUE CRK

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 8

Page 161: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.064 814 128.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceCARLETON COURTPARKVIEW DRIVE5500 THE PARKWAY CRK 0.061 618 122.00ADEQ 8.00 Maintenance61 M WEST OF MANLEY DRIVEMANLEY DRIVE6150 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 0.070 618 140.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceMANLEY PLACE29- HAMILTON ROAD6130 VALLEYVIEW CRESCENT CRK 0.443 1,169 886.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceCANTERBURY DRIVEDORCHESTER ROAD5620 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.291 1,169 582.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceCHITTICK CRESCENTOAKWOOD DRIVE5640 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.040 1,229 80.00ADEQ 8.00 MaintenanceRAIL TRACKMINNIE STREET4760 MINNIE STREET CRK 0.098 559 196.00ADEQ 7.00 MaintenancePARKVIEW DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5600 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.298 111 596.00ADEQ 7.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDGUEST LANE0880 HILLVIEW DRIVE CRK 0.247 100 494.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceAMBER DRIVEMARION STREET4930 LINWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.179 100 358.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceMARION STREETLINWOOD DRIVE4870 AMBER DRIVE CRK 0.093 559 186.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenancePINEHURST DRIVEWEST END5590 BYRON AVENUE CRK 0.102 100 204.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenancePARKVIEW DRIVEBYRON AVENUE5570 PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 0.484 100 968.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenancePINEHURST DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE5560 PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 0.399 398 798.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceQUAIL RUN DRIVEOAKWOOD DRIVE5850 TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 0.184 564 368.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceWOODVALE DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE6010 MITCHELL COURT CRK 0.101 398 202.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceMITCHELL COURTQUAIL RUN DRIVE5860 TURNBERRY DRIVE CRK 0.610 100 1,220.00ADEQ 6.00 Maintenance2- DUNDAS STREET49M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACK4020 PURPLE HILL ROAD CRK 0.101 100 202.00ADEQ 6.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5280 BRIDGE STREET CRK 0.088 100 176.00ADEQ 6.00 MaintenanceHERITAGE ROAD88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2686 OLIVER DRIVE CRK

0.220 100 440.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceFOREST GROVE CRESCENTFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6110 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.060 70 120.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceEND OF STREETVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6210 MANLEY PLACE CRK 0.098 100 196.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceFOREST GROVE CRESCENTWOODVALE DRIVE6100 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE CRK 0.299 100 598.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceVALLEYVIEW CRESCENTVALLEYVIEW CRESCENT6200 MANLEY DRIVE CRK 0.045 100 90.00ADEQ 5.00 MaintenanceEAST ENDAMBER DRIVE4940 LINWOOD DRIVE CRK 0.391 100 782.00ADEQ 4.00 MaintenanceTHE PARKWAYBYRON AVENUE5540 PARKVIEW DRIVE CRK 0.377 100 754.00ADEQ 4.00 MaintenanceWOODVALE DRIVE (E)WOODVALE DRIVE (W)6030 MAPLERIDGE CRESCENT CRK 0.102 100 204.00ADEQ 4.00 Maintenance29- HAMILTON ROADQUEEN STREET5270 ANN STREET CRK 0.123 100 246.00ADEQ 2.00 MaintenanceRINESS DRIVETURNBERRY DRIVE5870 QUAIL RUN DRIVE CRK 0.184 100 368.00ADEQ 2.00 MaintenanceLACROIX AVENUEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5900 RINESS DRIVE CRK 0.353 100 706.00ADEQ 2.00 MaintenancePARKVIEW DRIVEPARKVIEW DRIVE5580 PINEHURST DRIVE CRK 0.685 100 1,370.00ADEQ 2.00 Maintenance27- NISSOURI ROADWEST END6760 GERALD PARKWAY CRK 9.096 18,192.00

RSS 0.265 265 478,064.19NOW 40.00 ConstNORTH ENDMARION STREET4950 RON-ALLEN DRIVE RSS 0.115 308 188,252.39NOW 34.00 ConstNEELY COURT29- HAMILTON ROAD1820 DURHAM STREET RSS 0.261 920 427,251.08NOW 33.00 ConstHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5670 CANTERBURY DRIVE RSS 0.100 133 163,697.73NOW 26.00 ConstDURHAM STREET100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1845 WRIGHT STREET RSS 0.175 100 286,471.03NOW 24.00 Const175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY

DRIVECANTERBURY DRIVE (N)5730 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT RSS

0.120 80 196,437.28NOW 24.00 Const120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREETDURHAM STREET1830 NEELY COURT RSS 0.146 100 238,998.69NOW 24.00 ConstUPPER QUEEN STREETKING STREET6500 RAILWAY STREET RSS

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 9

Page 162: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.116 100 189,889.37NOW 24.00 ConstMAIN STREETUPPER QUEEN STREET6510 RAILWAY STREET RSS 0.071 920 116,225.391-5 23.00 ConstSHERWOOD CRESCENTDORCHESTER ROAD5660 CANTERBURY DRIVE RSS 0.146 100 238,998.69NOW 22.00 ConstKING STREETEND OF STREET6460 TEMPERANCE STREET RSS 0.187 100 306,114.76NOW 19.00 ConstBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD

PLACECANTERBURY DRIVE5710 SHERWOOD CRESCENT RSS

0.083 50 135,869.121-5 16.00 ConstSOUTH ENDCATHERINE STREET3850 RICHMOND STREET RSS 0.353 100 577,852.996-10 14.00 ConstBYRON AVENUEOAKWOOD DRIVE5770 CHITTICK CRESCENT RSS 2.138 3,544,122.71

RNS 0.136 920 121,510.53NOW 26.00 ConstHUNTINGTON CRESCENTSHERWOOD CRESCENT5690 CANTERBURY DRIVE RNS 0.076 920 67,902.94NOW 26.00 ConstSHERWOOD CRESCENTHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5680 CANTERBURY DRIVE RNS 0.105 920 93,813.28NOW 26.00 ConstBYRON AVENUEHUNTINGTON CRESCENT5700 CANTERBURY DRIVE RNS 0.203 553 181,372.34NOW 22.00 ConstCHITTICK CRESCENTSCARLETT CIRCLE5830 MITCHELL AVENUE RNS 0.146 553 130,445.14NOW 22.00 ConstSCARLETT CIRCLEOAKWOOD DRIVE5810 MITCHELL AVENUE RNS 0.164 513 146,527.41NOW 22.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROADCARLETON COURT5490 CARLETON COURT RNS 0.198 553 176,905.05NOW 21.00 ConstMITCHELL COURTCHITTICK CRESCENT5840 MITCHELL AVENUE RNS 0.035 133 31,271.10NOW 21.00 Const35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREETWRIGHT STREET1860 GOLF DRIVE RNS 0.063 30 33,114.79ADEQ 20.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETSOUTH END4840 HILL STREET RNS 0.233 133 208,176.13NOW 19.00 ConstGOLF DRIVE100M SOUTH OF DURHAM STREET1840 WRIGHT STREET RNS 0.202 100 180,478.89NOW 19.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROADCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6660 PARK LANE RNS 0.088 100 78,624.46NOW 17.00 ConstMEADOWBROOK LANEPARK LANE6680 COUNTRYSIDE LANE RNS 0.186 100 166,183.53NOW 17.00 ConstNORTH ENDMITCHELL AVENUE5800 SCARLETT CIRCLE RNS 0.230 100 205,495.76NOW 17.00 ConstCOUNTRYSIDE LANEFAIRVIEW ROAD6640 MEADOWBROOK LANE RNS 0.342 100 305,563.26NOW 17.00 ConstCANTERBURY DRIVE (S)175 M EAST OF CANTERBURY

DRIVE5740 HUNTINGTON CRESCENT RNS

0.263 80 234,979.93NOW 16.00 Const29- HAMILTON ROAD120M NORTH OF DURHAM STREET1835 NEELY COURT RNS 0.197 100 176,011.58NOW 16.00 ConstEAST ENDCOUNTRYSIDE LANE6650 MEADOWBROOK LANE RNS 0.141 100 125,977.83NOW 16.00 ConstPARK LANEMONTEITH AVENUE6670 COUNTRYSIDE LANE RNS 0.120 100 107,215.18NOW 15.00 ConstSHERWOOD CRESCENTEND OF STREET5750 SHERWOOD PLACE RNS 0.199 100 177,798.50NOW 15.00 ConstCANTERBURY DRIVESHERWOOD PLACE5720 SHERWOOD CRESCENT RNS 0.061 100 56,893.51NOW 15.00 ConstPONDVIEW COURTWEST END5320 QUEEN STREET RNS 0.157 100 140,273.18NOW 15.00 ConstSHERWOOD PLACEBEND 157M WEST OF SHERWOOD

PLACE5715 SHERWOOD CRESCENT RNS

3.545 3,146,534.32

REC 0.765 124 232,914.87NOW 35.00 ConstSOUTH END32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE

(PVT CHANGE)1580 IRWIN ROAD REC

0.572 585 226,909.92NOW 34.00 Const73- ELGIN ROADWEST END1200 SLO-PITCH ROAD REC 0.617 100 187,854.21NOW 33.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROADBRIDGE2780 GREGORY DRIVE REC 1.693 191 571,319.24NOW 33.00 ConstLOWER COW PATH44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2200 COW PATH REC

0.096 70 29,228.54NOW 31.00 ConstCASHEL LANE43M EAST OF 32- DORCHESTER ROAD

1160 DONNYBROOK DRIVE REC

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 10

Page 163: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.269 86 106,711.14NOW 31.00 Const74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE29- HAMILTON ROAD1810 SAGE STREET REC 1.434 51 436,601.20NOW 30.00 ConstGLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1660 LEWIS ROAD REC 1.058 81 290,542.12NOW 29.00 Const17M NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)COW PATH2230 LOWER COW PATH REC

0.780 191 263,218.55NOW 29.00 Const780M EAST OF LOWER COWPATH ROAD

LOWER COW PATH2210 COW PATH REC

0.278 20 84,640.96ADEQ 28.00 ConstWEST ENDCONSERVATION AREA ENTRANCE0130 WHITTAKER LANE REC 1.026 70 281,754.46NOW 27.00 ConstEND OF STREETCASHEL LANE1170 DONNYBROOK DRIVE REC 0.137 50 54,347.31NOW 27.00 ConstMARSHALL STREET29- HAMILTON ROAD1300 RATH STREET REC 1.431 59 435,687.82NOW 27.00 ConstMOSSLEY DRIVE52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)1620 LEWIS ROAD REC

0.032 124 10,798.71NOW 26.00 Const32M SOUTH OF CROMARTY CRIVE (PVT CHANGE)

CROMARTY DRIVE1570 IRWIN ROAD REC

1.379 83 419,855.68NOW 26.00 ConstMOSSLEY DRIVE42M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE1720 BRADY ROAD REC 0.259 46 78,856.14ADEQ 26.00 Const8M NORTH OF 49- CATHERINE

STREET (PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END4550 SHEILS LANE REC

0.102 45 40,462.96ADEQ 26.00 ConstRATH STREET30- PUTNAM ROAD1310 MARSHALL STREET REC 0.355 20 108,084.68ADEQ 25.00 ConstBRIDGEWEST END2770 GREGORY DRIVE REC 0.617 89 169,437.13NOW 24.00 ConstTRAFALGAR STREETCULVERT4050 BANKS ROAD REC 0.721 89 197,997.05NOW 24.00 ConstCULVERT27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS

STREET (PVMT CHANGE)4040 BANKS ROAD REC

1.220 20 371,445.93ADEQ 24.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROAD1220M WEST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD3280 STOREY DRIVE REC 1.500 38 456,695.82ADEQ 24.00 Const15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADWEST END0240 DOAN DRIVE REC 0.264 100 116,029.61NOW 23.00 ConstKING STREET LOOPCUL-DE-SAC6480 HARRISON STREET REC 0.625 58 277,428.21NOW 23.00 Const39M NORTH OF CROMARY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1590 LEWIS ROAD REC

0.120 49 32,953.74ADEQ 23.00 ConstGLADSTONE DRIVEEND OF STREET0480 MARR ROAD REC 0.121 100 50,485.24NOW 22.00 ConstEAST ENDOAKWOOD DRIVE5760 OAKWOOD PLACE REC 0.510 35 155,276.58ADEQ 22.00 Const33M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)NORTH END1550 IRWIN ROAD REC

2.093 557 1,286,873.871-5 22.00 ConstHUNT ROAD,EAST LEGBRIDGE2150 MARION STREET REC 0.580 80 159,276.40NOW 21.00 ConstEAST ENDLEWIS ROAD0230 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE REC 0.164 20 49,932.07ADEQ 21.00 ConstEND OF STREETGLADSTONE DRIVE0470 MARR ROAD REC 0.092 10 25,264.53ADEQ 20.00 ConstSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1315 IRWIN ROAD REC 0.152 22 46,278.51ADEQ 20.00 ConstNORTH ENDCRAMPTON DRIVE0650 LACEY LANE REC 3.085 100 1,138,177.456-10 19.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE - WEST LEGTHORNDALE ROAD3170 REBECCA ROAD REC 0.182 15 80,787.09ADEQ 17.00 ConstSOUTH ENDBREEN ROAD1510 FIVE POINTS ROAD REC

24.329 8,474,127.74

NONE 0.393 162 0.00ADEQ 25.00 ConstCULVERTBRADY ROAD0750 MOSSLEY DRIVE NONE 0.749 644 0.00ADEQ 25.00 ConstCULVERTIRWIN ROAD0980 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 0.774 315 0.00ADEQ 23.00 ConstPIGRAM ROADBRIDGE0460 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE 0.595 736 0.00ADEQ 22.00 ConstBRADY ROADEATON ROAD0940 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 1.235 644 0.00ADEQ 22.00 ConstIRWIN ROADLEWIS ROAD0970 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 11

Page 164: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.675 1,616 0.00ADEQ 22.00 ConstHUDSON DRIVEFERRAR ROAD1090 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 1.475 433 0.00ADEQ 20.00 ConstDONNYBROOK DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5230 MILL ROAD NONE 1.115 162 0.00ADEQ 19.00 Const340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0760 MOSSLEY DRIVE NONE

0.376 1,616 0.00ADEQ 19.00 ConstHARRIS ROADHUDSON DRIVE1100 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 0.464 1,616 0.00ADEQ 19.00 Const298M EAST OF STARDUST DRIVEHARRIS ROAD1110 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 0.764 644 0.00ADEQ 19.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSCULVERT0990 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 1.613 1,616 0.00ADEQ 17.00 ConstFERRAR ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1080 DONNYBROOK DRIVE NONE 0.326 644 0.00ADEQ 16.00 Const30- PUTNAM ROADRAIL TRACKS1000 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 0.387 428 0.00ADEQ 16.00 Const73- ELGIN ROADRAIL TRACKS0540 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE 0.184 800 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstCULVERTTHOMPSON DRIVE1755 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 1.130 800 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstCRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1756 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 1.445 677 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstBRIDGE73- ELGIN ROAD2170 CATHERINE STREET NONE 0.300 257 0.00ADEQ 16.00 ConstSALFORD ROAD300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROAD1375 PIGRAM ROAD NONE 0.250 100 0.00ADEQ 15.00 ConstCHRISTIE DRIVE250M SOUTH OF CHRISTIE DRIVE5225 MILL ROAD NONE 1.843 428 0.00ADEQ 15.00 ConstBRADY ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0520 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE 0.419 1,538 0.00ADEQ 15.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSMARION STREET3800 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.203 617 0.00ADEQ 14.00 Const30- PUTNAM ROADBRIDGE1240 BREEN ROAD NONE 1.314 677 0.00ADEQ 14.00 ConstHUNT ROAD EAST LEGBRIDGE2180 CATHERINE STREET NONE 2.049 315 0.00ADEQ 14.00 ConstBRIDGEPUTNAM ROAD0450 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE 1.459 428 0.00ADEQ 14.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSBRADY ROAD0530 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE 0.565 320 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const565M EAST OF RAIL TRACK (PVMT

CHANGE)RAIL TRACK1260 BREEN ROAD NONE

0.419 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const88M WEST OF HERITAGE ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

RAIL TRACK2680 OLIVER DRIVE NONE

0.021 1,289 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const32- SHAW ROAD21M WEST OF 32- SHAW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

2280 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE

0.113 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstTHAMES CRESCENTTERRENCE AVENUE5480 ALMA STREET NONE 0.518 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstFOURTEEN MILE ROADEBENEZER DRIVE2900 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE 0.114 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstTERRENCE AVENUE29- HAMILTON ROAD5470 ALMA STREET NONE 0.265 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETHILL STREET4810 CHARLES STREET NONE 0.054 102 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const54M SOUTH OF 25- GORE ROAD25- GORE ROAD4450 HUNT ROAD NONE 0.822 577 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-

WESTCHESTER BOURNE74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0500 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE

1.040 800 0.00ADEQ 13.00 Const400M N OF GLADSTONE DRIVECRAMPTON DRIVE1757 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 0.479 60 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCULVERTRAIL TRACKS1640 LEWIS ROAD NONE 0.622 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstRAIL TRACKCULVERT2670 OLIVER DRIVE NONE 0.265 100 0.00ADEQ 13.00 ConstCULVERTFAIRVIEW ROAD2660 OLIVER DRIVE NONE 2.878 577 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROADCULVERT - 822M EAST OF 74-

WESTCHESTER BOURNE0510 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE

0.499 131 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROAD499M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)

0320 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE

0.063 102 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstMARION STREET63M NORTH OF MARION STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

4470 HUNT ROAD NONE

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 12

Page 165: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.042 46 0.00ADEQ 12.00 Const42M SOUTH OF MARION STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)MARION STREET4480 HUNT ROAD NONE

0.614 80 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstLEWIS ROADBOT ROAD0220 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE 0.189 60 0.00ADEQ 12.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSMOSSLEY DRIVE1630 LEWIS ROAD NONE 0.350 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const28- THORNDALE ROAD350M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROAD3450 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE

0.412 715 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROADRAIL TRACK0160 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE 0.113 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstHILL STREETTHAMES STREET4800 CHARLES STREET NONE 0.116 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4830 THAMES STREET NONE 0.115 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstCHARLES STREETCATHERINE STREET4850 HILL STREET NONE 0.281 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstWYE CREEK DRIVERIVERVIEW DRIVE3050 LAKESIDE DRIVE NONE 1.746 183 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstBANKS ROAD91M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET

(PVMT CHANGE)2340 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE

0.027 89 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const27M SOUTH OF 2- DUNDAS STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

2- DUNDAS STREET4030 BANKS ROAD NONE

0.533 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstBRIDGE39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

3610 HERITAGE ROAD NONE

0.305 143 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const305M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (50 KM/HR ZONE)

DORCHESTER ROAD0330 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE

0.971 229 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const971 M EAST OF MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY

MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY0660 DINGMAN DRIVE NONE

0.396 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstBRIDGEPURPLE HILL ROAD2700 OLIVER DRIVE NONE 0.369 580 0.00ADEQ 11.00 Const401M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(BEND IN ROAD)29- HAMILTON ROAD1295 COUCH ROAD NONE

1.385 1,025 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstMARION STREET25- GORE ROAD3780 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.167 100 0.00ADEQ 11.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEGWYTON DRIVE - WEST LEG3190 REBECCA ROAD NONE 2.303 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstEVELYN DRIVECULVERT4380 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.783 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCULVERTWYTON DRIVE4370 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 1.072 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstBRIDGEOLIVER DRIVE4330 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 2.165 743 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCULVERT - 2165M EAST OF

DORCHESTER ROADDORCHESTER ROAD0170 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE

0.842 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCULVERTEVELYN DRIVE4390 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.057 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 Const57M EAST OF PROSPECT HLL

ROADPROSPECT HILL ROAD2740 EBENEZER DRIVE NONE

0.358 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstRIVERVIEW DRIVEWYTON DRIVE3040 LAKESIDE DRIVE NONE 0.220 1,229 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstCLARA STREETMINNIE STREET4710 MINNIE STREET NONE 1.715 100 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstRAIL TRACKCULVERT4400 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.052 59 0.00ADEQ 10.00 Const52M SOUTH OF CROMARTY DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)CROMARTY DRIVE1610 LEWIS ROAD NONE

0.830 715 0.00ADEQ 10.00 ConstRAIL TRACKSHAIN ROAD0150 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE 0.169 545 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstEVA STREETMINNIE STREET4650 CLARA STREET NONE 1.631 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstFIFTEEN MILE ROADSIXTEEN MILE ROAD2880 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE 1.303 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const16- PLOVER MILLS ROADTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD2930 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE 0.030 44 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstCRAMPTON DRIVE30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVE1750 BRADY ROAD NONE 0.370 166 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const370M EASTOF 30- PUTNAM ROAD30- PUTNAM ROAD0600 CRAMPTON DRIVE NONE

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 13

Page 166: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.340 162 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const73- ELGIN ROAD340M WEST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0770 MOSSLEY DRIVE NONE

0.920 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstSIXTEEN MILE ROAD33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

2870 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE

0.850 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstSTOREY DRIVE37M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

3300 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE

0.959 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstTHIRTEEN MILE ROAD440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE ROAD

2920 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE

0.040 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const40M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

EVELYN DRIVE4240 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE

0.033 50 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstDONNYBROOK DRIVE33M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK DRIVE

1900 FERRAR ROAD NONE

3.050 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)

3930 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE

0.826 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstGREGORY DRIVEBRIDGE3630 HERITAGE ROAD NONE 0.187 20 0.00ADEQ 9.00 ConstSOUTH ENDDONNYBROOK DRIVE1995 LANES ROAD NONE 1.419 418 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const25- GORE ROADTRAFALGAR STREET3770 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.441 100 0.00ADEQ 9.00 Const440 M SOUTH OF FOURTEEN MILE

ROADFOURTEEN MILE ROAD2910 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE

0.070 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const70M EAST OF FAIRVIEW ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

FAIRVIEW ROAD2520 WYTON DRIVE NONE

0.018 103 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const18M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1760 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE

3.082 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstWYTON DRIVE28- THORNDALE ROAD4360 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE 0.134 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstSCATCHERED LANEWYTON DRIVE - EAST LEG3200 REBECCA ROAD NONE 2.291 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstOLIVER DRIVECULVERT3400 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE 0.791 743 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const73- ELGIN ROADCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF

DORCHESTER ROAD0190 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE

0.737 743 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstCULVERT - 2900M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD

CULVERT - 2165M EAST OF DORCHESTER ROAD

0180 HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE NONE

0.687 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstCULVERTOLIVER DRIVE3890 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE 0.039 166 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstDONNYBROOK DRIVE39M NORTH OF DONNYBROOK

DRIVE1950 HARRIS ROAD NONE

0.042 118 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROAD327M WEST OF DORCHESTER ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0740 THOMPSON DRIVE NONE

0.250 257 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const250M SOUTH OF SALFORD ROADSALFORD RD1380 PIGRAM ROAD NONE 0.843 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 Const842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)OLIVER DRIVE3420 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE

0.326 1,198 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstMARION STREETNEWTON AVENUE4980 HAMILTON CRESCENT NONE 0.287 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstRAIL TRACKBRIDGE4100 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE 0.612 496 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstMOONLIGHT WAYDONNYBROOK DRIVE1960 STARDUST DRIVE NONE 0.154 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstAGNES STREETRAILWAY STREET6600 MAIN STREET NONE 0.099 100 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstTHAMES STREETRICHMOND STREET4790 CHARLES STREET NONE 3.678 216 0.00ADEQ 8.00 ConstDORCHESTER ROAD74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0900 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE 0.022 206 0.00ADEQ 7.00 Const22M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)73- ELGIN ROAD0370 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE

0.038 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 Const38M EAST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD27- NISSOURI ROAD2630 OLIVER DRIVE NONE

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 14

Page 167: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.050 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstWEST ENDVILLAGE GATE CRESCENT4620 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE NONE 0.312 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstVILLAGE GATE CRESCENTMINNIE STREET4600 VILLAGE GATE DRIVE NONE 3.074 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstOLIVER DRIVE34M SOUTH OF 16- PLOVER MILLS

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)3880 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE

0.600 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstBRIDGE842M SOUTH OF OLIVER DRIVE(PVMT CHANGE)

3430 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE

0.027 183 0.00ADEQ 7.00 Const27M EAST OF RICHMOND STREET (PVMT CHANGE)

RICHMOND STREET2330 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE

0.078 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstDUNDAS STREET78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS STREET (CULVERT)

4420 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE

0.525 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstHARRIETSVILLE DRIVERAIL TRACKS1759 DORCHESTER ROAD NONE 0.101 100 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstPAVEMENT CHANGE SOUTH OF

BRIDGEEVELYN DRIVE3960 PURPLE HILL ROAD NONE

0.012 50 0.00ADEQ 7.00 ConstAVON DRIVE12M NORTH OF AVON DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

6740 BOT ROAD NONE

0.193 217 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstGUEST LANE73- ELGIN ROAD0870 HILLVIEW DRIVE NONE 1.365 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstBRIDGEEVELYN DRIVE3550 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE 0.047 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const47M EAST OF HERITAGE ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)HERITAGE ROAD2688 OLIVER DRIVE NONE

0.255 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN ROAD

EAST WELLBURN LIMIT2825 GREGORY DRIVE NONE

1.392 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstPURPLE HILL ROADHERITAGE ROAD2430 EVELYN DRIVE NONE 0.923 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstCHERRY HILL ROAD475M EAST OF 27-WELLBURN

ROAD2830 GREGORY DRIVE NONE

0.034 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstEVELYN DRIVE34M NORTH 0F EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

4230 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE

0.222 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstWEST ENDCLARA STREET4690 EVA STREET NONE 1.828 215 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstRICHMOND STREET32- SHAW ROAD2300 TRAFALGAR STREET NONE 1.752 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const2- DUNDAS STREETBRIDGE3570 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE 0.510 100 0.00ADEQ 6.00 Const78M NORTH OF 2-DUNDAS

STREET (PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACK4410 COBBLE HILLS ROAD NONE

0.019 320 0.00ADEQ 6.00 ConstRAIL TRACK30- PUTNAM ROAD1250 BREEN ROAD NONE 0.023 143 0.00ADEQ 5.00 Const73- ELGIN ROAD23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0360 GLADSTONE DRIVE NONE

0.044 191 0.00ADEQ 5.00 Const44M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

73- ELGIN ROAD2190 COW PATH NONE

0.166 1,538 0.00ADEQ 5.00 ConstCHARLES STREETRAIL TRACKS3830 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.062 465 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)30- PUTNAM ROAD1020 CROMARTY DRIVE NONE

0.017 36 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE1790 SHAIN ROAD NONE

0.015 38 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstPUTNAM ROAD15M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD0250 DOAN DRIVE NONE 0.017 37 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const17M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)PUTNAM ROAD0260 DOAN DRIVE NONE

0.041 100 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const41M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3100 VALLEY VIEW ROAD NONE

0.201 1,169 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstOAKWOOD DRIVECANTERBURY DRIVE5630 BYRON AVENUE NONE 0.045 20 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstMINNIE STREETWEST END4700 MINNIE STREET NONE

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 15

Page 168: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.117 1,391 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETCHARLES STREET3840 RICHMOND STREET NONE 0.072 10 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4890 ERIC DRIVE NONE 0.089 40 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstNORTH ENDELIZABETH DRIVE4920 MELVIN DRIVE NONE 0.139 1,169 0.00ADEQ 4.00 Const29- HAMILTON ROADCHITTICK CRESCENT5650 BYRON AVENUE NONE 0.187 100 0.00ADEQ 4.00 ConstPINEHURST DRIVETHE PARKWAY5550 PARKVIEW DRIVE NONE 0.076 50 0.00ADEQ 3.00 Const76M SOUTH OF 29- HAMILTON

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)29- HAMILTON ROAD1880 FERRAR ROAD NONE

0.044 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const44M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD4070 CHERRY HILL ROAD NONE

0.037 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const37M SOUTH OF HY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3290 FAIRVIEW ROAD NONE

0.033 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const33M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD2860 PROSPECT HILL ROAD NONE

0.039 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 Const39M SOUTH OF HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

HWY 7- ELGINFIELD ROAD3600 HERITAGE ROAD NONE

0.347 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstKING STREETELLIOTT TRAIL6365 BROOKER TRAIL NONE 0.405 133 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstWRIGHT STREET74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE1850 GOLF DRIVE NONE 0.180 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstSOUTH ENDFOREST GROVE CRESCENT6120 FOXHOLLOW DRIVE NONE 0.122 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstBRIDGE STREETGEORGE STREET5360 QUEEN STREET NONE 0.131 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstGEORGE STREETPONDVIEW COURT5350 QUEEN STREET NONE 0.106 133 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstCUL-DE-SAC35M NORTH OF WRIGHT STREET1870 GOLF DRIVE NONE 0.326 496 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstNORTH ENDMOONLIGHT WAY1990 STARLIGHT LANE NONE 0.162 496 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstSTARLIGHT LANESTARDUST DRIVE1980 MOONLIGHT WAY NONE 0.133 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstLEESBORO TRAIL27- NISSOURI ROAD6280 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.309 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstBROOKER TRAILLEESBORO TRAIL6290 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.250 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstWILLIAM COURTELLIOTT TRAIL6380 LEESBORO TRAIL NONE 0.147 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstHUESTON DRIVETHORNDALE ROAD6690 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.083 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstFAIRVIEW ROADHUESTON DRIVE6720 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.393 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstMONTEITH AVENUEMONTEITH AVENUE6730 HUESTON DRIVE NONE 0.262 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstCOUNTRYSIDE LANEHUESTON DRIVE6700 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.115 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstHUESTON DRIVECOUNTRYSIDE LANE6710 MONTEITH AVENUE NONE 0.104 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstRINESS DRIVEQUAIL RUN DRIVE5890 LACROIX AVENUE NONE 0.142 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstOAKWOOD DRIVELACROIX AVENUE5910 RINESS DRIVE NONE 0.214 100 0.00ADEQ 2.00 ConstLACROIX AVENUERINESS DRIVE5880 QUAIL RUN DRIVE NONE 0.178 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstUNNAMED STREETWILLIAM COURT6390 LEESBORO TRAIL NONE 0.061 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstWEST ENDLEESBORO TRAIL6450 WILLIAM COURT NONE 0.291 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstSLAMMER TRAILBROOKER TRAIL6320 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.126 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstBROOKER TRAILSLAMMER TRAIL6360 ELLIOTT TRAIL NONE 0.203 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstELLIOTT TRAILELLIOTT TRAIL6370 SLAMMER TRAIL NONE 0.272 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstNEWTON AVENUEMARION STREET4990 LUDWIG STREET NONE 0.265 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstHAMILTON CRESCENTLUDWIG STREET4970 NEWTON AVENUE NONE 0.201 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstLUDWIG STREET32- SHAW ROAD4960 NEWTON AVENUE NONE

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 16

Page 169: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.282 100 0.00ADEQ 0.00 ConstSOUTH END28- THORNDALE ROAD6750 IDEAL DRIVE NONE

96.163 0.00

BSgrav 0.649 36 63,090.20ADEQ 24.00 ConstSOUTH END17M SOUTH OF HARRIETSVILLE

DRIVE1800 SHAIN ROAD BSgrav

0.195 257 24,310.146-10 24.00 Const300M NORTH OF SALFORD ROADBREEN ROAD1370 PIGRAM ROAD BSgrav 0.628 141 59,986.946-10 23.00 Const31M NORTH OF CROMARTY DRIVENORTH END1690 EATON ROAD BSgrav 1.393 180 150,713.966-10 23.00 Const441M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROADLACEY LANE0580 CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 1.238 180 140,742.036-10 22.00 ConstLACEY LANELEWIS ROAD0570 CRAMPTON DRIVE BSgrav 2.426 143 275,799.816-10 21.00 Const23M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)RAIL TRACKS0350 GLADSTONE DRIVE BSgrav

1.707 84 166,540.866-10 20.00 ConstFORBES ROAD128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

0860 MOSSLEY DRIVE BSgrav

1.055 44 109,509.89ADEQ 19.00 Const30M NORTH OF CRAMPTON DRIVECULVERT1740 BRADY ROAD BSgrav 1.991 239 237,279.816-10 19.00 ConstEBENEZER ROAD370 M SOUTH OF CROMARTY

DRIVE1410 PIGRAM ROAD BSgrav

3.122 100 348,067.166-10 19.00 ConstTHORNDALE ROADCENTRE DRIVE3160 VALLEY VIEW ROAD BSgrav 2.747 151 312,292.706-10 18.00 ConstHUNT ROAD18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)2390 TRAFALGAR STREET BSgrav

0.555 239 66,142.796-10 17.00 ConstCRAMPTON DRIVEEBENEZER ROAD1420 PIGRAM ROAD BSgrav 1.669 84 189,740.276-10 16.00 Const196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)CULVERT0820 MOSSLEY DRIVE BSgrav

3.027 100 370,719.486-10 14.00 Const69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

OLIVER DRIVE4170 CHERRY HILL ROAD BSgrav

22.402 2,514,936.04

BS 0.765 465 212,928.89NOW 36.00 ConstPIGRAM ROADFORBES ROAD1040 CROMARTY DRIVE BS 0.442 91 115,718.61NOW 33.00 ConstEND OF STREETMINNIE STREET4640 NORTH STREET BS 1.777 465 494,607.37NOW 30.00 ConstFORBES ROAD62M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD1030 CROMARTY DRIVE BS 0.063 226 11,953.77NOW 28.00 ConstPUTNAM ROAD63M WEST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0440 GLADSTONE DRIVE BS

0.044 100 12,472.39NOW 26.00 Const28- THORNDALE ROAD44M NORTH OF 28- THORNDALE ROAD (PVMTCHANGE)

3910 PURPLE HILL ROAD BS

0.018 151 4,512.20NOW 25.00 Const18M EAST OF 73-ELGIN ROAD73- ELGIN ROAD2380 TRAFALGAR STREET BS 0.078 131 20,831.51NOW 25.00 Const78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER

BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)74- WESTCHESTER BOURNE0300 GLADSTONE DRIVE BS

0.081 20 21,206.35ADEQ 25.00 ConstWEST ENDREBECCA ROAD3240 SCATCHERED LANE BS 0.049 100 13,086.47NOW 24.00 Const49M SOUTH OF 28- THORNDALE

ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)28- THORNDALE ROAD4190 CHERRY HILL ROAD BS

0.056 100 15,720.96NOW 23.00 Const56M SOUTH OF THORNDALE ROAD (PVT CHANGE)

28- THORNDALE ROAD3920 PURPLE HILL ROAD BS

0.069 100 18,427.88NOW 23.00 Const28- THORNDALE ROAD69M NORTH O28 THORNDALEROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

4180 CHERRY HILL ROAD BS

0.017 183 4,400.86NOW 22.00 Const73- ELGIN ROAD17M WEST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD2370 TRAFALGAR STREET BS

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 17

Page 170: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Total Needs Summary by Improvement TypeCurrent Inspection Batch

LengthAADT Imp. CostTONPriority # Imp. ClassToFromAsset ID Street Name Imp 0.065 30 17,017.45ADEQ 22.00 ConstCATHERINE STREETEND OF STREET4820 THAMES STREET BS 0.314 619 92,010.261-5 22.00 ConstRAIL TRACKS142M EAST OF MUNICIPAL LIMIT

(BRIDGE)0020 AVON DRIVE BS

0.126 168 32,987.671-5 22.00 ConstMINNIE STREETRAIL TRACK4590 HARRIS STREET BS 3.136 131 452,735.17NOW 21.00 Const499M WEST OF DORCHESTER

ROAD (50KM/HR ZONE)78M EAST OF WESTCHESTER BOURNE (PVMT CHANGE)

0310 GLADSTONE DRIVE BS

0.047 100 12,423.92NOW 20.00 Const27- NISSOURI ROAD47M WEST OF 27- NISSOURI ROAD2500 WYTON DRIVE BS 0.196 84 51,810.35NOW 20.00 Const30- PUTNAM ROAD196M WEST OF 30 PUTNAM ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)0830 MOSSLEY DRIVE BS

0.379 100 109,762.681-5 20.00 ConstVILLAGE GATE DRIVENORTH STREET4740 MINNIE STREET BS 0.022 100 5,394.69NOW 19.00 Const22M SOUTH OF EVELYN DRIVE

(PVMT CHANGE)EVELYN DRIVE3710 HERITAGE ROAD BS

0.618 100 117,260.831-5 19.00 ConstDUNDAS STREET77M NORTH OF RAILWAY TRACKS (PVMT CHANGE)

3750 HERITAGE ROAD BS

0.035 100 8,582.48NOW 18.00 ConstEVELYN DRIVE35M NORTH OF EVELYN DRIVE (PVMT CHANGE)

3700 HERITAGE ROAD BS

0.128 84 33,135.90NOW 18.00 Const128M EAST OF 30- PUTNAM ROAD (PVMT CHANGE)

30- PUTNAM ROAD0850 MOSSLEY DRIVE BS

0.010 46 7,991.05ADEQ 18.00 ConstCATHERINE STREET10M NORTH OF CATHERINE STREET

4500 HUNT ROAD BS

0.308 100 86,027.181-5 18.00 ConstPATRICIA AVENUEPATRICIA AVENUE5000 ROSS STREET BS 0.088 100 22,780.93NOW 17.00 Const88M EAST OF REBECCA ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)REBECCA ROAD2485 WYTON DRIVE BS

0.137 100 39,863.871-5 17.00 ConstNORTH STREETCLARA STREET4730 MINNIE STREET BS 0.129 100 35,654.571-5 17.00 ConstWEST ENDRICHMOND STREET4860 DALE DRIVE BS 0.379 115 104,752.561-5 16.00 Const379M EAST OF 73- ELGIN ROAD

(PVMT CHANGE)73- ELGIN ROAD0780 MOSSLEY DRIVE BS

0.500 100 142,571.556-10 14.00 Const27- WELLBURN ROADWEST WELLBURN LIMIT2810 GREGORY DRIVE BS 0.575 100 119,893.496-10 13.00 Const575M SOUTH OF CULVERT CULVERT3510 FAIRVIEW ROAD BS

10.651 2,438,523.86

361.501 27,733,785.96

361.501 27,733,785.96

Run: DEC 4,2015 5:14PM Page: 18

Page 171: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix I. Mapping‐ Roads by Surface Type 

   

Page 172: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Avon

Putnam

Evelyn

Belton

Mossley

Derwent Crampton

Wellburn

St. Ives

Mill Pond

MudLakes

Nilestown

Gladstone

Thorndale

Wye Creek

Dorchester

Piney Creek

CobbleHill

Caddy Creek

Salmonville

Newall Drain

Beattie Pond

Foster Ponds

PloverMills

CherryGrove

Harrietsville

Three Bridges

Fanshawe Lake

GregoryCreek

ReynoldsCreek

Dorchester Swamp

FriendlyCorners

FitzpatrickDrain

North Branch Drain

170

2390

790

450

4220

710

3350

3640

4250

950

520

3900

1890

3670

4380

3400

860820

1940

2130

2150

4340

1410

3990

240

3620

530

210

3520

2300

580

2270

1030

3570

2340

720

4400

680

1230

2880

4080

570

1080

400

970930

3250

1500

1530

1670

2200

5230

760

2170

1660

1620

3770

1754

2470

2510

2400

2550

2790

2430

2600

2480

2560

3780

1720

3760

2850

3550

2750

2640

2690

4490

2720

3720

2410

420

2180

1770

2930

1680

50

900

310

510

3110

270

140

960

560

380350490

290

3530

4160

3160

3120

3150

4140

4360

3880

39403690

3930

4200

4170

3170

30

4460

2540

1540

660

1270

2490

3280

340

3730

1756

2460

4520

150

2760

4330

500

3220

1740

1757

190

460

990

2710

3340

2580

2230

980

180

2920

40

1330

2830

4120

1430

2870

1280

2350

810

2890

620

3300

3420

4390

3440

3630

1060

220

4370

3390

2210

940

1170

1580

1040

230

3680

630

4040

1390

800

2140

3890

6760

2800

410

1090

120

1120

4270

3650

320

1800

1690 15

90

1758

2670

3750

4050

2780

3230

1960

1650

4020

3310

3430

20

3360

3210

2120

3510

590

12001260

1420

3330

200160

3610

1759

640

4210

2900

750

1910

1550

4410

4090

540

2810

1110

780

1640

3435

5

770

2910

730

3980

4670

2680

3800

330

2700

1100

1290

2570

1295

3040

2110

130

2770

2090

3320

3450

280

1000

1990

430

1400

1375

2450

4100

880

3050

6750

2660

4550

830

2825

1380

470

1730

2805

1240

650

1630

1510

3190

1180

300

1220

610600

1757

A17

58A

2820

870890

1370

1995

1755

850

1980

480

1920

1300

3200

1310

3960

1160

1315

1050

2686

2485

700

690

440

3240

4420

1140

1880

1490

2520

1930

4180

2335

4470

1020

2740

3920

1970

740

4450

1610

3660

2730

4190

2688

2500

4070

2190

3910

4480

1710

3100

3950

1150

4240

1950

1600

3600

2630

2590

3290

3700

3875

4230

2860

1900

1190

1560

15701700

1750

360370

2330

4030

3710

260

2280

250

1250

2380

1760

1790

2370

2240

6740

2620

4500

FAIRVIEW ROAD

HERITAGE ROAD

AVON DRIVE

CHERRY HILL ROAD

COBBLE HILLS ROAD

NISSOURI ROAD

HAMILTON ROAD

CRAMPTON DRIVE

CROMARTY DRIVE

GORE ROAD

GLADSTONE DRIVE

PURPLE HILL ROAD

VALLEY VIEW ROAD

ELGI

N RO

AD

WYTON DRIVE

PIGRA

M RO

AD

PROSPECT HILL ROAD

MOSSLEY DRIVE

DUNDAS STREET

ELGINFIELD ROAD

PUTN

AM R

OAD

OLIVER DRIVE

EVELYN DRIVE

HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

PLOVER MILLS ROAD

TRAFALGAR STREET

MARION STREET

CATHERINE STREET

GREGORY DRIVE

DORC

HEST

ER R

OAD

HWY 401 EAST

WELLBURN ROAD

HWY 401 WEST

BREEN ROAD

REBECCA ROAD

DOAN DRIVE

HUNT ROAD

SHAW ROAD

THORNDALE ROAD

WEST

CHES

TER

BOUR

NE

MILL

ROA

D

COW PATH

THOMPSON DRIVE FORB

ES R

OAD

DONNYBROOK DRIVE

FERR

AR R

OAD

HARR

IS RO

AD

RICHMOND STREET

EBENEZER DRIVE

SCOTLAND DRIVE

BOT R

OAD

LEWI

S ROA

D

WESTMINSTER DRIVE

IRWIN

ROA

D

KING STREET

STOREY DRIVE

CENTRE DRIVE

LAKESIDE DRIVE

ROBIN'S HILL ROAD

LOWE

R CO

W PA

TH

OAKW

OOD

DRIVE

MINNIE STREET

OLALONDO ROAD

ROSS STREET

TINER AVENUE

SLO-PITCH ROAD

QUEEN STREET

ELLIOTT TRAIL

FOXHOLLOW DRIVE

NEWTON AVENUE

WYTON DRIVE

THORNDALE ROAD

HUNT ROAD

HUNT ROAD

PUTN

AM R

OAD

CATHERINE STREET

RICHMOND STREET

SCALE:

DATE:

PROJECT No.

DRAWING No.

DECEMBER - 2015

--- 162010406

1

DRAWING

PROJECT

CLIENT

2015 Road Needs Study

SURFACE TYPEINVENTORY

Thames Centre

NOTES:This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties,except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any partythat modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent.

NORT

H

LegendSURFACE TYPE

GRAVEL, STONE OR OTHER LOOSETOP

HIGH CLASS BITUMINOUS ASPHALT

LOW CLASS BITUMINOUS SURFACE TREATED

Road_SectionOTHER FEATURES

ROADS

COUNTY BOUNDARY

WATERCOURSE

2

Kilometers

1890

1940

5230

3780

2120

5620

4640

4670

3800

5130

5180

5850

5540

4740

5330

2110

2090

2050

5560

5580

4980

5520

5770

5190

4600

5160

5960

5640

2030

4990

4970 4950

6140

6200

4550

5670

5150

5370

5090

5110

5420

5610

6110

4690

60506040

4710

5930

62705225

5020

5060

5450 5430

5830

4930

5630

4960

5880

4810

5840

2020

4900

5030

4630

4610

5710

4660

5900

4870

5740

5460

4650

6120

4570

5380

2060

5730

5490

5510

3830

5720 5780

5400

5715

5550

4680

6030

5120

5810

5800

4880

5910

5390

4910

5310

5650

5250

6010

5000

5080

4730

5220

5350

4860

5970

4590

5440

5870

5360

3840

4830

5950

5690

5010

5410

5210

4850

5470

48005050

5480

5070

6000

5760

2080

5700

6240

5570

5750

5990

5270

58605280

4790

6100

6250

5590

5940

5200

4920

3850

6230

4890

5660

5140

4750

6130

1930

5040

4820

5500

4840

6150

5320

4620

4700

4780

5170

5530

58905980

5260

5600

62605290

2070

6020

5680

6090

6210

6080

4940

4760

3810

HAMILTON ROAD

CATHERINE STREET

MARION STREET

MILL ROAD

BYRON AVENUE

DORCHESTER ROAD

HARRIS ROAD

RICHMOND STREET

MINNIE STREET

CLARA STREET

ELGIN ROAD

WHEELER AVENUETINER AVENUE

SHAW ROAD

QUEEN STREET

RINESS DRIVE

FOXHOLLOW DRIVE

MITCHELL AVENUE

NORT

H ST

REET

NEWTON AVENUE

TURNBERRY DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE

VILLAGE GATE DRIVE

PARKVIEW DRIVE

THAM

ES C

RESC

ENTPONDVIEW COURT

BRIDGE STREET

SHEILS LANE

STREET B

HARRIS STREET

EVA STREET

HAMILTON CRESCENT

RON-ALLEN DRIVE

LINWOOD DRIVE

DAVID STREET

ARENA ENTRANCE

FOREST GROVE CRESCENT

RUTH STREET

JANE

STRE

ET

QUEEN STREET

KING STREET

FAIRVIEW ROAD

NISSOURI ROAD

THORNDALE ROAD

ELLIOTT TRAILMONTEITH AVENUE

UPPER QUEEN STREET

AGNES STREET

HARRISON STREET

LEESBORO TRAIL

MEADOWBROOK LANE

HUESTON DRIVE

PARK LANE

RAILW

AY ST

REET

SLAMMER TRAIL

LIONS LANE

TEMPERANCE STREET

WILLIAM COURT

3450

6490

6290

6730

6365

63206380

6640

3510

6700

6660

6370

6650

6480

6470

3470

6600

6530

6690

6460

6540

6670

34803490

6500

6390

6280

3460

6570

65806610

6550

6360

6510

6710

6560 6620

3500

6680

6720

6630

6450

6590

THORNDALE

DORCHESTER

GOLF DRIVE

NEELY

COURT

SAGE STREETWRIGHT STREET

1850

1830

1840

1810

1820

18701860

NILESTOWN

100Meters

100Meters

110Meters

Page 173: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix J. Mapping ‐ Roadside Environment 

   

Page 174: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Avon

Putnam

Evelyn

Belton

Mossley

Derwent Crampton

Wellburn

St. Ives

Mill Pond

MudLakes

Nilestown

Gladstone

Thorndale

Wye Creek

Dorchester

Piney Creek

CobbleHill

Caddy Creek

Salmonville

Newall Drain

Beattie Pond

Foster Ponds

PloverMills

CherryGrove

Harrietsville

Three Bridges

Fanshawe Lake

GregoryCreek

ReynoldsCreek

Dorchester Swamp

FriendlyCorners

FitzpatrickDrain

North Branch Drain

170

2390

790

450

4220

710

3350

3640

4250

950

520

3900

1890

3670

4380

3400

860820

1940

2130

2150

4340

1410

3990

240

3620

530

210

3520

2300

580

2270

1030

3570

2340

720

4400

680

1230

2880

4080

570

1080

400

970930

3250

1500

1530

1670

2200

5230

760

2170

1660

1620

3770

1754

2470

2510

2400

2550

2790

2430

2600

2480

2560

3780

1720

3760

2850

3550

2750

2640

2690

4490

2720

3720

2410

420

2180

1770

2930

1680

50

900

310

510

3110

270

140

960

560

380350490

290

3530

4160

3160

3120

3150

4140

4360

3880

39403690

3930

4200

4170

3170

30

4460

2540

1540

660

1270

2490

3280

340

3730

1756

2460

4520

150

2760

4330

500

3220

1740

1757

190

460

990

2710

3340

2580

2230

980

180

2920

40

1330

2830

4120

1430

2870

1280

2350

810

2890

620

3300

3420

4390

3440

3630

1060

220

4370

3390

2210

940

1170

1580

1040

230

3680

630

4040

1390

800

2140

3890

6760

2800

410

1090

120

1120

4270

3650

320

1800

1690 15

90

1758

2670

3750

4050

2780

3230

1960

1650

4020

3310

3430

20

3360

3210

2120

3510

590

12001260

1420

3330

200160

3610

1759

640

4210

2900

750

1910

1550

4410

4090

540

2810

1110

780

1640

3435

5

770

2910

730

3980

4670

2680

3800

330

2700

1100

1290

2570

1295

3040

2110

130

2770

2090

3320

3450

280

1000

1990

430

1400

1375

2450

4100

880

3050

6750

2660

4550

830

2825

1380

470

1730

2805

1240

650

1630

1510

3190

1180

300

1220

610600

1757

A17

58A

2820

870890

1370

1995

1755

850

1980

480

1920

1300

3200

1310

3960

1160

1315

1050

2686

2485

700

690

440

3240

4420

1140

1880

1490

2520

1930

4180

2335

4470

1020

2740

3920

1970

740

4450

1610

3660

2730

4190

2688

2500

4070

2190

3910

4480

1710

3100

3950

1150

4240

1950

1600

3600

2630

2590

3290

3700

3875

4230

2860

1900

1190

1560

15701700

1750

360370

2330

4030

3710

260

2280

250

1250

2380

1760

1790

2370

2240

6740

2620

4500

FAIRVIEW ROAD

HERITAGE ROAD

AVON DRIVE

CHERRY HILL ROAD

COBBLE HILLS ROAD

NISSOURI ROAD

HAMILTON ROAD

CRAMPTON DRIVE

CROMARTY DRIVE

GORE ROAD

GLADSTONE DRIVE

PURPLE HILL ROAD

VALLEY VIEW ROAD

ELGI

N RO

AD

WYTON DRIVE

PIGRA

M RO

AD

PROSPECT HILL ROAD

MOSSLEY DRIVE

DUNDAS STREET

ELGINFIELD ROAD

PUTN

AM R

OAD

OLIVER DRIVE

EVELYN DRIVE

HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

PLOVER MILLS ROAD

TRAFALGAR STREET

MARION STREET

CATHERINE STREET

GREGORY DRIVE

DORC

HEST

ER R

OAD

HWY 401 EAST

WELLBURN ROAD

HWY 401 WEST

BREEN ROAD

REBECCA ROAD

DOAN DRIVE

HUNT ROAD

SHAW ROAD

THORNDALE ROAD

WEST

CHES

TER

BOUR

NE

MILL

ROA

D

COW PATH

THOMPSON DRIVE FORB

ES R

OAD

DONNYBROOK DRIVE

FERR

AR R

OAD

HARR

IS RO

AD

RICHMOND STREET

EBENEZER DRIVE

SCOTLAND DRIVE

BOT R

OAD

LEWI

S ROA

D

WESTMINSTER DRIVE

IRWIN

ROA

D

KING STREET

STOREY DRIVE

CENTRE DRIVE

LAKESIDE DRIVE

ROBIN'S HILL ROAD

LOWE

R CO

W PA

TH

OAKW

OOD

DRIVE

MINNIE STREET

OLALONDO ROAD

ROSS STREET

TINER AVENUE

SLO-PITCH ROAD

QUEEN STREET

ELLIOTT TRAIL

FOXHOLLOW DRIVE

NEWTON AVENUE

WYTON DRIVE

THORNDALE ROAD

HUNT ROAD

HUNT ROAD

PUTN

AM R

OAD

CATHERINE STREET

RICHMOND STREET

SCALE:

DATE:

PROJECT No.

DRAWING No.

DECEMBER - 2015

--- 162010406

2

DRAWING

PROJECT

CLIENT

2015 Road Needs Study

ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT

Thames Centre

NOTES:This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties,except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any partythat modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent.

NORT

H

LegendROADSIDE ENVIRONMENT

RURAL

SEMI-URBAN

URBANOTHER FEATURES

ROADS

COUNTY BOUNDARY

WATERCOURSE

2

Kilometers

1890

1940

5230

3780

2120

5620

4640

4670

3800

5130

5180

5850

5540

4740

5330

2110

2090

2050

5560

5580

4980

5520

5770

5190

4600

5160

5960

5640

2030

4990

4970 4950

6140

6200

4550

5670

5150

5370

5090

5110

5420

5610

6110

4690

60506040

4710

5930

62705225

5020

5060

5450 5430

5830

4930

5630

4960

5880

4810

5840

2020

4900

5030

4630

4610

5710

4660

5900

4870

5740

5460

4650

6120

4570

5380

2060

5730

5490

5510

3830

5720 5780

5400

5715

5550

4680

6030

5120

5810

5800

4880

5910

5390

4910

5310

5650

5250

6010

5000

5080

4730

5220

5350

4860

5970

4590

5440

5870

5360

3840

4830

5950

5690

5010

5410

5210

4850

5470

48005050

5480

5070

6000

5760

2080

5700

6240

5570

5750

5990

5270

58605280

4790

6100

6250

5590

5940

5200

4920

3850

6230

4890

5660

5140

4750

6130

1930

5040

4820

5500

4840

6150

5320

4620

4700

4780

5170

5530

58905980

5260

5600

62605290

2070

6020

5680

6090

6210

6080

4940

4760

3810

HAMILTON ROAD

CATHERINE STREET

MARION STREET

MILL ROAD

BYRON AVENUE

DORCHESTER ROAD

HARRIS ROAD

RICHMOND STREET

MINNIE STREET

CLARA STREET

ELGIN ROAD

WHEELER AVENUETINER AVENUE

SHAW ROAD

QUEEN STREET

RINESS DRIVE

FOXHOLLOW DRIVE

MITCHELL AVENUE

NORT

H ST

REET

NEWTON AVENUE

TURNBERRY DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE

VILLAGE GATE DRIVE

PARKVIEW DRIVE

THAM

ES C

RESC

ENTPONDVIEW COURT

BRIDGE STREET

SHEILS LANE

STREET B

HARRIS STREET

EVA STREET

HAMILTON CRESCENT

RON-ALLEN DRIVE

LINWOOD DRIVE

DAVID STREET

ARENA ENTRANCE

FOREST GROVE CRESCENT

RUTH STREET

JANE

STRE

ET

QUEEN STREET

KING STREET

FAIRVIEW ROAD

NISSOURI ROAD

THORNDALE ROAD

ELLIOTT TRAILMONTEITH AVENUE

UPPER QUEEN STREET

AGNES STREET

HARRISON STREET

LEESBORO TRAIL

MEADOWBROOK LANE

HUESTON DRIVE

PARK LANE

RAILW

AY ST

REET

SLAMMER TRAIL

LIONS LANE

TEMPERANCE STREET

WILLIAM COURT

3450

6490

6290

6730

6365

63206380

6640

3510

6700

6660

6370

6650

6480

6470

3470

6600

6530

6690

6460

6540

6670

34803490

6500

6390

6280

3460

6570

65806610

6550

6360

6510

6710

6560 6620

3500

6680

6720

6630

6450

6590

THORNDALE

DORCHESTER

GOLF DRIVE

NEELY

COURT

SAGE STREETWRIGHT STREET

1850

1830

1840

1810

1820

18701860

NILESTOWN

100Meters

100Meters

110Meters

Page 175: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Municipality of Thames Centre, December 7, 2015 

 

 RPT_TC_SOTI_V6_20151123.docx 

 

 

 

 

Appendix K. Mapping‐ Roads by Improvement Time of   Need and Type  

Page 176: Municipality Thames Centre 2015 Infrastructure Roads · Municipality of Thames Centre 2015 State of the Infrastructure – Roads ... Andy Dalziel, Principal, Infrastructure Management

Avon

Putnam

Evelyn

Belton

Mossley

Derwent Crampton

Wellburn

St. Ives

Mill Pond

MudLakes

Nilestown

Gladstone

Thorndale

Wye Creek

Dorchester

Piney Creek

CobbleHill

Caddy Creek

Salmonville

Newall Drain

Beattie Pond

Foster Ponds

PloverMills

CherryGrove

Harrietsville

Three Bridges

Fanshawe Lake

GregoryCreek

ReynoldsCreek

Dorchester Swamp

FriendlyCorners

FitzpatrickDrain

North Branch Drain

170

2390

790

450

4220

710

3350

3640

4250

950

520

3900

1890

3670

4380

3400

860820

1940

2130

2150

4340

1410

3990

240

3620

530

210

3520

2300

580

2270

1030

3570

2340

720

4400

680

1230

2880

4080

570

1080

400

970930

3250

1500

1530

1670

2200

5230

760

2170

1660

1620

3770

1754

2470

2510

2400

2550

2790

2430

2600

2480

2560

3780

1720

3760

2850

3550

2750

2640

2690

4490

2720

3720

2410

420

2180

1770

2930

1680

50

900

310

510

3110

270

140

960

560

380350490

290

3530

4160

3160

3120

3150

4140

4360

3880

39403690

3930

4200

4170

3170

30

4460

2540

1540

660

1270

2490

3280

340

3730

1756

2460

4520

150

2760

4330

500

3220

1740

1757

190

460

990

2710

3340

2580

2230

980

180

2920

40

1330

2830

4120

1430

2870

1280

2350

810

2890

620

3300

3420

4390

3440

3630

1060

220

4370

3390

2210

940

1170

1580

1040

230

3680

630

4040

1390

800

2140

3890

6760

2800

410

1090

120

1120

4270

3650

320

1800

1690 15

90

1758

2670

3750

4050

2780

3230

1960

1650

4020

3310

3430

20

3360

3210

2120

3510

590

12001260

1420

3330

200160

3610

1759

640

4210

2900

750

1910

1550

4410

4090

540

2810

1110

780

1640

3435

5

770

2910

730

3980

4670

2680

3800

330

2700

1100

1290

2570

1295

3040

2110

130

2770

2090

3320

3450

280

1000

1990

430

1400

1375

2450

4100

880

3050

6750

2660

4550

830

2825

1380

470

1730

2805

1240

650

1630

1510

3190

1180

300

1220

610600

1757

A17

58A

2820

870890

1370

1995

1755

850

1980

480

1920

1300

3200

1310

3960

1160

1315

1050

2686

2485

700

690

440

3240

4420

1140

1880

1490

2520

1930

4180

2335

4470

1020

2740

3920

1970

740

4450

1610

3660

2730

4190

2688

2500

4070

2190

3910

4480

1710

3100

3950

1150

4240

1950

1600

3600

2630

2590

3290

3700

3875

4230

2860

1900

1190

1560

15701700

1750

360370

2330

4030

3710

260

2280

250

1250

2380

1760

1790

2370

2240

6740

2620

4500

FAIRVIEW ROAD

HERITAGE ROAD

AVON DRIVE

CHERRY HILL ROAD

COBBLE HILLS ROAD

NISSOURI ROAD

HAMILTON ROAD

CRAMPTON DRIVE

CROMARTY DRIVE

GORE ROAD

GLADSTONE DRIVE

PURPLE HILL ROAD

VALLEY VIEW ROAD

ELGI

N RO

AD

WYTON DRIVE

PIGRA

M RO

AD

PROSPECT HILL ROAD

MOSSLEY DRIVE

DUNDAS STREET

ELGINFIELD ROAD

PUTN

AM R

OAD

OLIVER DRIVE

EVELYN DRIVE

HARRIETSVILLE DRIVE

PLOVER MILLS ROAD

TRAFALGAR STREET

MARION STREET

CATHERINE STREET

GREGORY DRIVE

DORC

HEST

ER R

OAD

HWY 401 EAST

WELLBURN ROAD

HWY 401 WEST

BREEN ROAD

REBECCA ROAD

DOAN DRIVE

HUNT ROAD

SHAW ROAD

THORNDALE ROAD

WEST

CHES

TER

BOUR

NE

MILL

ROA

D

COW PATH

THOMPSON DRIVE FORB

ES R

OAD

DONNYBROOK DRIVE

FERR

AR R

OAD

HARR

IS RO

AD

RICHMOND STREET

EBENEZER DRIVE

SCOTLAND DRIVE

BOT R

OAD

LEWI

S ROA

D

WESTMINSTER DRIVE

IRWIN

ROA

D

KING STREET

STOREY DRIVE

CENTRE DRIVE

LAKESIDE DRIVE

ROBIN'S HILL ROAD

LOWE

R CO

W PA

TH

OAKW

OOD

DRIVE

MINNIE STREET

OLALONDO ROAD

ROSS STREET

TINER AVENUE

SLO-PITCH ROAD

QUEEN STREET

ELLIOTT TRAIL

FOXHOLLOW DRIVE

NEWTON AVENUE

WYTON DRIVE

THORNDALE ROAD

HUNT ROAD

HUNT ROAD

PUTN

AM R

OAD

CATHERINE STREET

RICHMOND STREET

SCALE:

DATE:

PROJECT No.

DRAWING No.

DECEMBER - 2015

--- 162010406

3

DRAWING

PROJECT

CLIENT

2015 Road Needs Study

TYPE AND TIMEOF IMPROVEMENT

Thames Centre

NOTES:This drawing has been prepared for the use of Stantec's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties,except as agreed by Stantec and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. Stantec accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any partythat modifies this drawing without Stantec's express written consent.

NORT

H

LegendTIME OF NEED

NOW CONSTRUCTION NEED

1 TO 5 YEAR CONSTRUCTION NEED

6 TO 10 YEAR CONSTRUCTION NEED

NOW RESURFACING NEED

1 TO 5 YEAR RESURFACING NEED

6 TO 10 YEAR RESURFACING NEED

ADEQUATE

NOW MAINTENANCE NEED

6 TO 10 YEAR MAINTENANCE NEEDOTHER FEATURES

ROADS

COUNTY BOUNDARY

WATERCOURSE

2

Kilometers

1890

1940

5230

3780

2120

5620

4640

4670

3800

5130

5180

5850

5540

4740

5330

2110

2090

2050

5560

5580

4980

5520

5770

5190

4600

5160

5960

5640

2030

4990

4970 4950

6140

6200

4550

5670

5150

5370

5090

5110

5420

5610

6110

4690

60506040

4710

5930

62705225

5020

5060

5450 5430

5830

4930

5630

4960

5880

4810

5840

2020

4900

5030

4630

4610

5710

4660

5900

4870

5740

5460

4650

6120

4570

5380

2060

5730

5490

5510

3830

5720 5780

5400

5715

5550

4680

6030

5120

5810

5800

4880

5910

5390

4910

5310

5650

5250

6010

5000

5080

4730

5220

5350

4860

5970

4590

5440

5870

5360

3840

4830

5950

5690

5010

5410

5210

4850

5470

48005050

5480

5070

6000

5760

2080

5700

6240

5570

5750

5990

5270

58605280

4790

6100

6250

5590

5940

5200

4920

3850

6230

4890

5660

5140

4750

6130

1930

5040

4820

5500

4840

6150

5320

4620

4700

4780

5170

5530

58905980

5260

5600

62605290

2070

6020

5680

6090

6210

6080

4940

4760

3810

HAMILTON ROAD

CATHERINE STREET

MARION STREET

MILL ROAD

BYRON AVENUE

DORCHESTER ROAD

HARRIS ROAD

RICHMOND STREET

MINNIE STREET

CLARA STREET

ELGIN ROAD

WHEELER AVENUETINER AVENUE

SHAW ROAD

QUEEN STREET

RINESS DRIVE

FOXHOLLOW DRIVE

MITCHELL AVENUE

NORT

H ST

REET

NEWTON AVENUE

TURNBERRY DRIVEPINEHURST DRIVE

VILLAGE GATE DRIVE

PARKVIEW DRIVE

THAM

ES C

RESC

ENTPONDVIEW COURT

BRIDGE STREET

SHEILS LANE

STREET B

HARRIS STREET

EVA STREET

HAMILTON CRESCENT

RON-ALLEN DRIVE

LINWOOD DRIVE

DAVID STREET

ARENA ENTRANCE

FOREST GROVE CRESCENT

RUTH STREET

JANE

STRE

ET

QUEEN STREET

KING STREET

FAIRVIEW ROAD

NISSOURI ROAD

THORNDALE ROAD

ELLIOTT TRAILMONTEITH AVENUE

UPPER QUEEN STREET

AGNES STREET

HARRISON STREET

LEESBORO TRAIL

MEADOWBROOK LANE

HUESTON DRIVE

PARK LANE

RAILW

AY ST

REET

SLAMMER TRAIL

LIONS LANE

TEMPERANCE STREET

WILLIAM COURT

3450

6490

6290

6730

6365

63206380

6640

3510

6700

6660

6370

6650

6480

6470

3470

6600

6530

6690

6460

6540

6670

34803490

6500

6390

6280

3460

6570

65806610

6550

6360

6510

6710

6560 6620

3500

6680

6720

6630

6450

6590

THORNDALE

DORCHESTER

GOLF DRIVE

NEELY

COURT

SAGE STREETWRIGHT STREET

1850

1830

1840

1810

1820

18701860

NILESTOWN

100Meters

100Meters

100Meters