multiplication using historical methods joanne peeples el paso community college [email protected]

28
MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College [email protected]

Upload: collin-crawford

Post on 18-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS

Joanne PeeplesEl Paso Community [email protected]

Page 2: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

Increasingly students are entering college unable to

multiply or divide integers without using a calculator

(hence having little number sense). Rather than

repeat multiplication methods they have learned,

why not try Egyptian arithmetic, multiplication per

gelosia (“by jealousy”) or Napier’s bones? History

plus math is often a winning strategy.

Page 3: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

EGYPTIAN NUMBERS

Page 4: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

EGYPTIAN NUMBERS

23 ∩∩│││ or │∩│∩│

Add 23 ∩∩│││ 23 ∩∩│││ ______________ ∩∩∩∩││││││

Page 5: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

MULTIPLICATION

 

26 X 4

 

___26____________

1 4 2 8 4 16 8 32 16 64 32 128 Too Big! 32 is bigger than 26

 

26 = 16 + 10 = 16 + 8 + 2

Add: 64 + 32 + 8 = 104

Page 6: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

WHY DOES THIS WORK?

424242 134

4222 34

104426

Page 7: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

DIVISION (NO REMAINDER)

161 = 112 + 28 + 14 + 7 Therefore 161 7 = 16 +4+2+1 = 23

161 7

 

_____161___

1 7 2 14 4 28 8 5616 11232 224 Too Big! 224 is bigger than 161

Page 8: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

DIVISION (WITH REMAINDER)

84 11

_________84___

1 11

2 22

4 44

8 88 Too Big! 88 is bigger than 84

84 = 44 + 22 + 11 + 7 Therefore 84 11 = 4 + 2 + 1 = 7

with a remainder of 7 We would write 84 11 = 7 + 7/11

Page 9: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

EGYPTIAN FRACTIONS

││││ Four

││││ one-fourth

Write = =

3.14 = 3 + │││ ∩ ∩∩│││││

│││ ∩│││││

Page 10: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

EXAMPLE

Is this approximately 4, 3, or 2?

1310

1

2

13

1310

4586

Page 11: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

FRACTIONS DECREASE IN SIZE (SO THEY CAN BE USED FOR ESTIMATION.)

In a sense, Egyptian fractions are closer to “our” decimal system than “our” fractions.

141.325

1

10

13

Page 12: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

FRACTIONS NEVER REPEAT.

Writing as is wrong, since would be a bad approximation.

Writing as is acceptable since is a good approximation.

Page 13: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

FRACTIONS MUST NOT BE “CLOSE” TO EACH OTHER. Writing as is not acceptable, since and are

“too close” to each other.

Writing as is acceptable since an

approximation of is reasonable.

Page 14: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

A FRACTIONAL REPRESENTATION MAY NOT BE UNIQUE. Note : 1.75 = 175% = = so our representation of numbers is not unique.

Page 15: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

AND AS YOU MAY HAVE SEEN, ALL THE FRACTIONS ARE UNIT FRACTIONS.

Page 16: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

HOW DO YOU FIND A FRACTIONAL REPRESENTATION? 4 ÷ 7. Think of something you can divide, like bread.

each part is of a whole

So

loaf left

Page 17: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

loaves left

loaf left

of loaf

So

OR

45

Page 18: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

45

Do not cut!

Whole loaf of loaf

Half loaf of loaf

So

Page 19: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

WHAT IF THE AREA OF A TRIANGLE WHOSE BASE IS 37 UNITS AND HEIGHT IS 12 UNITS?

A = x base x height

x base

1 37 = 20 + 16 + 1

10 + 8 + = 18

2

22

(Write ││ as ) 2

Page 20: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

2

2

( base) height

Area of triangle is 24 + 192 + 6 = 222 sq. units.

18

1 12

2 24

4 48

8 96

16 192

6

Page 21: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

MULTIPLICATION PER GELOSIA 2,314 X 157 =

363,298 2 3 1 4

1

5

7

0 0 0 0

2 3 1

41 1 0 2

0 5 5

01 2 0 2

4 1 7

8

1 1

0

3

6

3 2 9 8

Page 22: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

NAPIER’S BONES

Page 23: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu
Page 24: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu
Page 25: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu
Page 26: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu
Page 27: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Reimer, David, Count Like an Egyptian, A Hands on Introduction to Ancient Mathematics. Published by the Princeton University Press, 2014.

Ifrah, Georges, The Universal History of Numbers. Published by John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2000  Napier, John, Rabdology, translated by William Frank Richardson.Volume 15 in the Charles Babbage Institute Reprint Series for the History of Computing. Published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Tomash Publishers, 1990

Page 28: MULTIPLICATION USING HISTORICAL METHODS Joanne Peeples El Paso Community College jpeeples@epcc.edu

THANK YOU!

[email protected]

PowerPoint Artist – Amie Stoker