mukeesh@

Upload: mukesh-kumar-sharma

Post on 09-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    1/26

    Risk Factors ForRisk Factors For

    Cutaneous Adverse DrugCutaneous Adverse Drug

    ReactionsReactions

    Mukesh Kumar SharmaMukesh Kumar Sharma

    (Intern)(Intern)

    Doctor of pharmacyDoctor of pharmacy

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    2/26

    INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION

    Complications of drug therapy are a majorComplications of drug therapy are a major

    cause of patient morbidity and account for acause of patient morbidity and account for a

    significant number of deathssignificant number of deaths

    Drug eruptions are distinct disease entities andDrug eruptions are distinct disease entities and

    must be approached as any othermust be approached as any other cutaneouscutaneous

    diseasedisease

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    3/26

    All drugs are

    dangerous

    No Drugs are

    Dangerous if

    used properly

    How dangerous a drug is depends

    on the skill of the prescriber

    The most dangerousdrugs have the

    greatest potential for

    benefit

    Some drugs aredangerous in acute

    poisoning but not

    when used

    therapeutically

    Some drugs have

    a low therapeutic

    ratio

    Some drugs have a

    low incidence of

    horrendous effects

    Some adverseeffects can be

    predicted if you

    know the

    pharmacology (Type

    A); some are not

    (Type B)

    Some adverse

    effects occur after

    a delay or after

    stopping

    BADGOOD

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    4/26

    RISK BENEFIT

    When prescribing drugs a doctor must assess risk to

    benefit ratio in the individual patient by

    Choosing an appropriate class of drug then an

    appropriate individual agent

    Is it effective ?

    What are the chances of adverse effect ?

    Are there features in this patient which affect

    choice eg other drugs, organ failure, aged

    Tailoring the dose

    Considering duration of treatment

    The Risk to Benefit Ratio

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    5/26

    Risk factorsRisk factors DrugDrug--related factorsrelated factors

    Nature of the drugNature of the drug

    Degree of exposure (dose, duration, frequency)Degree of exposure (dose, duration, frequency)

    Route of administrationRoute of administration

    CrossCross--sensitizationsensitization

    Interactions between drugsInteractions between drugs

    HostHost--related factorsrelated factors

    AgeAge

    SexSex

    Genetic factors (HLA type,Genetic factors (HLA type, AcetylatorAcetylator status)status)

    Concurrent medical illness (e.g.Concurrent medical illness (e.g. EbsteinEbstein--Barr Virus (EBV), human immunodeficiencyBarr Virus (EBV), human immunodeficiency

    virus (HIV), asthma)virus (HIV), asthma)

    Previous drug reactionPrevious drug reaction

    Multiple allergy syndromeMultiple allergy syndrome

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    6/26

    DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    Nature of the drugNature of the drug

    HaptenHapten concept (intrinsically reactive)concept (intrinsically reactive)

    ProPro--haptenhapten concept (requires conversion to reactive intermediates)concept (requires conversion to reactive intermediates)

    Danger concept (drug relatedDanger concept (drug related cytotoxicitycytotoxicity enhancing immune response)enhancing immune response)

    Pharmacological interaction concept (direct nonPharmacological interaction concept (direct non--covalent binding tocovalent binding to

    immune receptors, Timmune receptors, T--cell receptors, MHC)cell receptors, MHC)

    Interactions between drugsInteractions between drugs

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    7/26

    DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    Degree of exposureDegree of exposure

    DoseDose

    durationduration

    frequencyfrequency

    intermittent repeated administrationintermittent repeated administration

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    8/26

    DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    RouteRoute

    TopicalTopical

    oraloral

    parenteralparenteral

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    9/26

    DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    CrossCross--sensitizationsensitization

    Reactivity either to drugs with a close structural chemical relationshipReactivity either to drugs with a close structural chemical relationship

    or to immunochemically similar metabolitesor to immunochemically similar metabolites

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    10/26

    HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    AgeAge

    Most of the studies among children and adults not comparableMost of the studies among children and adults not comparable

    PLEASE ELABORATE ON THIS.PLEASE ELABORATE ON THIS.

    DRUG REACTIONS IN EXTREMES OF AGEDRUG REACTIONS IN EXTREMES OF AGE WHETHERWHETHER

    UNCOMMON ORMORE COMMONUNCOMMON ORMORE COMMON

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    11/26

    HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    SexSex

    No evidence, with the possible exception ofNo evidence, with the possible exception of cutaneouscutaneous reactions, thatreactions, that

    allergic drug reactions are more common in females than in males.allergic drug reactions are more common in females than in males.

    WHAT IS THE MEANING?WHAT IS THE MEANING?

    DO YOU MEAN THAT ALLERGIC DRUG REACTION ISDO YOU MEAN THAT ALLERGIC DRUG REACTION IS

    MORE COMMON IN FEMALES, ORTHAT OTHERMORE COMMON IN FEMALES, ORTHAT OTHERDRUG REACTIONS (OTHERTHAN ALLERGIC) AREDRUG REACTIONS (OTHERTHAN ALLERGIC) ARE

    MORE COMMON IN FEMALESMORE COMMON IN FEMALES

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    12/26

    HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    Genetic risk factorsGenetic risk factors

    Immunogenetic disposition together with race:Immunogenetic disposition together with race:

    HLAHLA--B*1502:B*1502: Carbamazepine:Carbamazepine: SJS/TEN, DRESS; HanSJS/TEN, DRESS; Han

    Chinese but not CaucasiansChinese but not Caucasians

    HLAHLA--B*5801:B*5801: Allopurinol:Allopurinol: DHSDHS//DRESS like, Han ChineseDRESS like, Han Chinese

    HLAHLA--B*5701:B*5701: Abacavir:Abacavir: DRESS like, Caucasians, but notDRESS like, Caucasians, but not

    Hispanics orAfricansHispanics orAfricans

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    13/26

    HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    Viral infections & autoimmunityViral infections & autoimmunity::

    Generalized immune stimulationGeneralized immune stimulation in the frame ofin the frame of

    Acute EBV infections: maculopapular exanthem with aminopenicillinsAcute EBV infections: maculopapular exanthem with aminopenicillins

    HIV infections:HIV infections:

    Sulfonamides: MPE, SJS/TEN, DRESSSulfonamides: MPE, SJS/TEN, DRESS

    SJS/TEN to various drugs is 500 fold more frequentSJS/TEN to various drugs is 500 fold more frequent

    Nevirapine and abacavir: frequent side effectsNevirapine and abacavir: frequent side effects

    Drug induced autoimmunity:Drug induced autoimmunity:

    DrugDrug--induced Lupusinduced Lupus

    DrugDrug--induced vasculitisinduced vasculitis

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    14/26

    HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors

    Previous drug reactionPrevious drug reaction

    Multiple allergy syndromeMultiple allergy syndrome

    May have a predilection to more than one nonMay have a predilection to more than one non--crosscross--reactingreacting

    medication, but the existence of this condition is controversialmedication, but the existence of this condition is controversial

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    15/26

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    16/26

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    17/26

    Causality Assessment of SuspectedCausality Assessment of Suspected

    Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    18/26

    IntroductionIntroduction

    CausalityCausality assessmentassessment partpart ofof thethe 11stst stepstep inin

    casecase assessmentassessment andand isis basedbased onon aa generalgeneral

    systemsystem thatthat isis intendedintended forfor allall reactionsreactions andand allall

    drugdrug

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    19/26

    Case causality assessmentCase causality assessment

    How close is the relationship between drugHow close is the relationship between drug

    and event?and event?

    Did the drug cause the event?Did the drug cause the event?

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    20/26

    How to assess causality?How to assess causality?

    Assessing the strength of the relationship betweenAssessing the strength of the relationship betweenthe drug and the event.the drug and the event.

    Can seldom say without any doubt that a specificCan seldom say without any doubt that a specificdrug caused a specific reactiondrug caused a specific reaction

    Use the accumulation of case reports at nationalUse the accumulation of case reports at national

    level is immensely valuable providing the meanslevel is immensely valuable providing the meansfor determining real cause and effect.for determining real cause and effect.

    Use epidemiological studies to confirm causalityUse epidemiological studies to confirm causality

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    21/26

    Methods of Causality AssessmentMethods of Causality Assessment

    There were several method that can be use to make a causality assessment of ADRsThere were several method that can be use to make a causality assessment of ADRs

    reports:reports:--

    The literature (9 points of considerationThe literature (9 points of consideration MorgesMorges, Switzerland , 1981), Switzerland , 1981)

    Probability calculation (Probability calculation (BayesBayes Theorem) Theorem)

    EtiologicalEtiological Diagnostic Systems (Diagnostic Systems (BnchiousBnchious group method)group method)

    French imputation systemsFrench imputation systems

    The European ABO SystemsThe European ABO Systems

    The US Reasonable Possibility SystemsThe US Reasonable Possibility Systems

    TheThe NaranjoNaranjo ADRProbability ScaleADRProbability Scale

    WHOCausality CategoriesWHOCausality Categories

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    22/26

    TheThe NaranjoNaranjo ADR Probability ScaleADR Probability ScaleQuestions Yes No Dont

    Know1) Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction? +1 0 0

    2) Did the ADR appear after the suspected drug was administered? +2 -1 0

    3) Did the ADR improve when the drug was discontinued? +1 0 0

    4) Did the ADR appear with re-challenge? +2 -1 0

    5) Are there alternative causes for the ADR? -1 +2 0

    6) Did the reaction appear when placebo was given? -1 +1 0

    7) Was the drug detected in blood at toxic levels? +1 0 0

    8) Was the reaction more severe when the dose was increased, or

    less severe when the dose was decreased?

    +1 0 0

    9) Did the patient have a similar reaction to the same or similar

    drug in any previous exposure?

    +1 0 0

    10) Was the ADR confirmed by any objective evidence? +1 0 0

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    23/26

    TheThe NaranjoNaranjo Probability ScaleProbability Scale

    The score :The score :--

    > 8 = Highly probable> 8 = Highly probable55--8 = probable8 = probable

    11--4 = possible4 = possible

    0 = doubtful0 = doubtful

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    24/26

    How to do the causality assessmentHow to do the causality assessment

    Case 1Case 1

    A 42A 42--yearyear--old female experienced vomitingold female experienced vomitingduring treatment with 200mcgduring treatment with 200mcg PulmicortPulmicort atat

    night by inhalation for her asthma. The onsetnight by inhalation for her asthma. The onsetof the reaction was on 3of the reaction was on 3rdrd August 2006 until 5August 2006 until 5thth

    August 2006. She been prescribed this drugAugust 2006. She been prescribed this drugsince end of July. The drug was stopped on thesince end of July. The drug was stopped on the

    55thth of August and patient recovered. Noof August and patient recovered. Norechallengerechallenge performed and her doctor changeperformed and her doctor changethe drug.the drug.

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    25/26

    Case 2Case 2

    A 68A 68--yearyear--old male patient was started withold male patient was started withCrestorCrestor on the 29on the 29thth Jan. 2007 for hisJan. 2007 for hishyperlipidaemiahyperlipidaemia. On the 2. On the 2ndnd of Feb. 07, patientof Feb. 07, patient

    felt very ill. Upon admission, the diagnosis wasfelt very ill. Upon admission, the diagnosis wasmyositismyositis and abnormal hepatic function (ALT:and abnormal hepatic function (ALT:100 units/ml). Patient also took100 units/ml). Patient also took SandimmunSandimmunNeoralNeoral for his bonefor his bone marrow transplantmarrow transplant

    rejection since October 2006.rejection since October 2006. CrestorCrestor waswasdiscontinued and patient recovered a few daysdiscontinued and patient recovered a few dayslater. Nolater. No rechallengerechallenge been performed.been performed.

  • 8/8/2019 mukeesh@

    26/26

    IF POSSIBLE, PLEASE MENTIONIN BRIEF ABOUT ALL THE VARIOUS

    METHODS OF CASUALTYASSESSMENTAS GIVENIN SLIDE 21. (2-3

    SENTENCES FOR EACH, WILL SUFFICE)

    EXPLAINABOUT WHO CAUSALTY SCORE IN DETAIL IF POSSIBLE