mukeesh@
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
1/26
Risk Factors ForRisk Factors For
Cutaneous Adverse DrugCutaneous Adverse Drug
ReactionsReactions
Mukesh Kumar SharmaMukesh Kumar Sharma
(Intern)(Intern)
Doctor of pharmacyDoctor of pharmacy
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
2/26
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
Complications of drug therapy are a majorComplications of drug therapy are a major
cause of patient morbidity and account for acause of patient morbidity and account for a
significant number of deathssignificant number of deaths
Drug eruptions are distinct disease entities andDrug eruptions are distinct disease entities and
must be approached as any othermust be approached as any other cutaneouscutaneous
diseasedisease
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
3/26
All drugs are
dangerous
No Drugs are
Dangerous if
used properly
How dangerous a drug is depends
on the skill of the prescriber
The most dangerousdrugs have the
greatest potential for
benefit
Some drugs aredangerous in acute
poisoning but not
when used
therapeutically
Some drugs have
a low therapeutic
ratio
Some drugs have a
low incidence of
horrendous effects
Some adverseeffects can be
predicted if you
know the
pharmacology (Type
A); some are not
(Type B)
Some adverse
effects occur after
a delay or after
stopping
BADGOOD
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
4/26
RISK BENEFIT
When prescribing drugs a doctor must assess risk to
benefit ratio in the individual patient by
Choosing an appropriate class of drug then an
appropriate individual agent
Is it effective ?
What are the chances of adverse effect ?
Are there features in this patient which affect
choice eg other drugs, organ failure, aged
Tailoring the dose
Considering duration of treatment
The Risk to Benefit Ratio
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
5/26
Risk factorsRisk factors DrugDrug--related factorsrelated factors
Nature of the drugNature of the drug
Degree of exposure (dose, duration, frequency)Degree of exposure (dose, duration, frequency)
Route of administrationRoute of administration
CrossCross--sensitizationsensitization
Interactions between drugsInteractions between drugs
HostHost--related factorsrelated factors
AgeAge
SexSex
Genetic factors (HLA type,Genetic factors (HLA type, AcetylatorAcetylator status)status)
Concurrent medical illness (e.g.Concurrent medical illness (e.g. EbsteinEbstein--Barr Virus (EBV), human immunodeficiencyBarr Virus (EBV), human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV), asthma)virus (HIV), asthma)
Previous drug reactionPrevious drug reaction
Multiple allergy syndromeMultiple allergy syndrome
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
6/26
DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
Nature of the drugNature of the drug
HaptenHapten concept (intrinsically reactive)concept (intrinsically reactive)
ProPro--haptenhapten concept (requires conversion to reactive intermediates)concept (requires conversion to reactive intermediates)
Danger concept (drug relatedDanger concept (drug related cytotoxicitycytotoxicity enhancing immune response)enhancing immune response)
Pharmacological interaction concept (direct nonPharmacological interaction concept (direct non--covalent binding tocovalent binding to
immune receptors, Timmune receptors, T--cell receptors, MHC)cell receptors, MHC)
Interactions between drugsInteractions between drugs
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
7/26
DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
Degree of exposureDegree of exposure
DoseDose
durationduration
frequencyfrequency
intermittent repeated administrationintermittent repeated administration
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
8/26
DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
RouteRoute
TopicalTopical
oraloral
parenteralparenteral
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
9/26
DrugDrug--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
CrossCross--sensitizationsensitization
Reactivity either to drugs with a close structural chemical relationshipReactivity either to drugs with a close structural chemical relationship
or to immunochemically similar metabolitesor to immunochemically similar metabolites
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
10/26
HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
AgeAge
Most of the studies among children and adults not comparableMost of the studies among children and adults not comparable
PLEASE ELABORATE ON THIS.PLEASE ELABORATE ON THIS.
DRUG REACTIONS IN EXTREMES OF AGEDRUG REACTIONS IN EXTREMES OF AGE WHETHERWHETHER
UNCOMMON ORMORE COMMONUNCOMMON ORMORE COMMON
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
11/26
HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
SexSex
No evidence, with the possible exception ofNo evidence, with the possible exception of cutaneouscutaneous reactions, thatreactions, that
allergic drug reactions are more common in females than in males.allergic drug reactions are more common in females than in males.
WHAT IS THE MEANING?WHAT IS THE MEANING?
DO YOU MEAN THAT ALLERGIC DRUG REACTION ISDO YOU MEAN THAT ALLERGIC DRUG REACTION IS
MORE COMMON IN FEMALES, ORTHAT OTHERMORE COMMON IN FEMALES, ORTHAT OTHERDRUG REACTIONS (OTHERTHAN ALLERGIC) AREDRUG REACTIONS (OTHERTHAN ALLERGIC) ARE
MORE COMMON IN FEMALESMORE COMMON IN FEMALES
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
12/26
HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
Genetic risk factorsGenetic risk factors
Immunogenetic disposition together with race:Immunogenetic disposition together with race:
HLAHLA--B*1502:B*1502: Carbamazepine:Carbamazepine: SJS/TEN, DRESS; HanSJS/TEN, DRESS; Han
Chinese but not CaucasiansChinese but not Caucasians
HLAHLA--B*5801:B*5801: Allopurinol:Allopurinol: DHSDHS//DRESS like, Han ChineseDRESS like, Han Chinese
HLAHLA--B*5701:B*5701: Abacavir:Abacavir: DRESS like, Caucasians, but notDRESS like, Caucasians, but not
Hispanics orAfricansHispanics orAfricans
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
13/26
HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
Viral infections & autoimmunityViral infections & autoimmunity::
Generalized immune stimulationGeneralized immune stimulation in the frame ofin the frame of
Acute EBV infections: maculopapular exanthem with aminopenicillinsAcute EBV infections: maculopapular exanthem with aminopenicillins
HIV infections:HIV infections:
Sulfonamides: MPE, SJS/TEN, DRESSSulfonamides: MPE, SJS/TEN, DRESS
SJS/TEN to various drugs is 500 fold more frequentSJS/TEN to various drugs is 500 fold more frequent
Nevirapine and abacavir: frequent side effectsNevirapine and abacavir: frequent side effects
Drug induced autoimmunity:Drug induced autoimmunity:
DrugDrug--induced Lupusinduced Lupus
DrugDrug--induced vasculitisinduced vasculitis
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
14/26
HostHost--related risk factorsrelated risk factors
Previous drug reactionPrevious drug reaction
Multiple allergy syndromeMultiple allergy syndrome
May have a predilection to more than one nonMay have a predilection to more than one non--crosscross--reactingreacting
medication, but the existence of this condition is controversialmedication, but the existence of this condition is controversial
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
15/26
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
16/26
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
17/26
Causality Assessment of SuspectedCausality Assessment of Suspected
Adverse Drug ReactionAdverse Drug Reaction
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
18/26
IntroductionIntroduction
CausalityCausality assessmentassessment partpart ofof thethe 11stst stepstep inin
casecase assessmentassessment andand isis basedbased onon aa generalgeneral
systemsystem thatthat isis intendedintended forfor allall reactionsreactions andand allall
drugdrug
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
19/26
Case causality assessmentCase causality assessment
How close is the relationship between drugHow close is the relationship between drug
and event?and event?
Did the drug cause the event?Did the drug cause the event?
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
20/26
How to assess causality?How to assess causality?
Assessing the strength of the relationship betweenAssessing the strength of the relationship betweenthe drug and the event.the drug and the event.
Can seldom say without any doubt that a specificCan seldom say without any doubt that a specificdrug caused a specific reactiondrug caused a specific reaction
Use the accumulation of case reports at nationalUse the accumulation of case reports at national
level is immensely valuable providing the meanslevel is immensely valuable providing the meansfor determining real cause and effect.for determining real cause and effect.
Use epidemiological studies to confirm causalityUse epidemiological studies to confirm causality
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
21/26
Methods of Causality AssessmentMethods of Causality Assessment
There were several method that can be use to make a causality assessment of ADRsThere were several method that can be use to make a causality assessment of ADRs
reports:reports:--
The literature (9 points of considerationThe literature (9 points of consideration MorgesMorges, Switzerland , 1981), Switzerland , 1981)
Probability calculation (Probability calculation (BayesBayes Theorem) Theorem)
EtiologicalEtiological Diagnostic Systems (Diagnostic Systems (BnchiousBnchious group method)group method)
French imputation systemsFrench imputation systems
The European ABO SystemsThe European ABO Systems
The US Reasonable Possibility SystemsThe US Reasonable Possibility Systems
TheThe NaranjoNaranjo ADRProbability ScaleADRProbability Scale
WHOCausality CategoriesWHOCausality Categories
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
22/26
TheThe NaranjoNaranjo ADR Probability ScaleADR Probability ScaleQuestions Yes No Dont
Know1) Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction? +1 0 0
2) Did the ADR appear after the suspected drug was administered? +2 -1 0
3) Did the ADR improve when the drug was discontinued? +1 0 0
4) Did the ADR appear with re-challenge? +2 -1 0
5) Are there alternative causes for the ADR? -1 +2 0
6) Did the reaction appear when placebo was given? -1 +1 0
7) Was the drug detected in blood at toxic levels? +1 0 0
8) Was the reaction more severe when the dose was increased, or
less severe when the dose was decreased?
+1 0 0
9) Did the patient have a similar reaction to the same or similar
drug in any previous exposure?
+1 0 0
10) Was the ADR confirmed by any objective evidence? +1 0 0
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
23/26
TheThe NaranjoNaranjo Probability ScaleProbability Scale
The score :The score :--
> 8 = Highly probable> 8 = Highly probable55--8 = probable8 = probable
11--4 = possible4 = possible
0 = doubtful0 = doubtful
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
24/26
How to do the causality assessmentHow to do the causality assessment
Case 1Case 1
A 42A 42--yearyear--old female experienced vomitingold female experienced vomitingduring treatment with 200mcgduring treatment with 200mcg PulmicortPulmicort atat
night by inhalation for her asthma. The onsetnight by inhalation for her asthma. The onsetof the reaction was on 3of the reaction was on 3rdrd August 2006 until 5August 2006 until 5thth
August 2006. She been prescribed this drugAugust 2006. She been prescribed this drugsince end of July. The drug was stopped on thesince end of July. The drug was stopped on the
55thth of August and patient recovered. Noof August and patient recovered. Norechallengerechallenge performed and her doctor changeperformed and her doctor changethe drug.the drug.
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
25/26
Case 2Case 2
A 68A 68--yearyear--old male patient was started withold male patient was started withCrestorCrestor on the 29on the 29thth Jan. 2007 for hisJan. 2007 for hishyperlipidaemiahyperlipidaemia. On the 2. On the 2ndnd of Feb. 07, patientof Feb. 07, patient
felt very ill. Upon admission, the diagnosis wasfelt very ill. Upon admission, the diagnosis wasmyositismyositis and abnormal hepatic function (ALT:and abnormal hepatic function (ALT:100 units/ml). Patient also took100 units/ml). Patient also took SandimmunSandimmunNeoralNeoral for his bonefor his bone marrow transplantmarrow transplant
rejection since October 2006.rejection since October 2006. CrestorCrestor waswasdiscontinued and patient recovered a few daysdiscontinued and patient recovered a few dayslater. Nolater. No rechallengerechallenge been performed.been performed.
-
8/8/2019 mukeesh@
26/26
IF POSSIBLE, PLEASE MENTIONIN BRIEF ABOUT ALL THE VARIOUS
METHODS OF CASUALTYASSESSMENTAS GIVENIN SLIDE 21. (2-3
SENTENCES FOR EACH, WILL SUFFICE)
EXPLAINABOUT WHO CAUSALTY SCORE IN DETAIL IF POSSIBLE