mtor-dependent proliferation defect in human es-derived ... · journal of cell science...
TRANSCRIPT
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
mTOR-dependent proliferation defect in humanES-derived neural stem cells affected by myotonicdystrophy type 1
Jerome Alexandre Denis1,*, Morgane Gauthier1,`, Latif Rachdi2,`, Sophie Aubert3,`, Karine Giraud-Triboult3,Pauline Poydenot3, Alexandra Benchoua3, Benoite Champon3, Yves Maury3, Christine Baldeschi1,Raphael Scharfmann2, Genevieve Pietu1, Marc Peschanski1 and Cecile Martinat1,§
1INSERM/UEVE U-861, I-STEM, AFM, Institute for Stem Cell Therapy and Exploration of Monogenic Diseases, 5 rue Henri Desbrueres, 91030 Evrycedex, France2INSERM U-845 Research Center ‘Growth and Signaling’, Faculty of Medicine Paris Necker, 156 rue de Vaugirard, 75730 Paris cedex 15, France3CECS, I-STEM, AFM, Institute for Stem Cell Therapy and Exploration of Monogenic Diseases, 5 rue Henri Desbrueres, 91030 Evry cedex, France
*Present address: APHP, Saint Louis-Lariboisiere-Fernand Widal University Hospitals, Lariboisiere Hospital, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, BiologicalResource Center, UMRS/INSERM U-942, 2 rue Ambroise Pare 75475 Paris cedex, 10, France`These authors contributed equally to this work§Author for correspondence ([email protected])
Accepted 4 January 2013Journal of Cell Science 126, 1763–1772� 2013. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltddoi: 10.1242/jcs.116285
SummaryPatients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 exhibit a diversity of symptoms that affect many different organs. Among these are cognitive
dysfunctions, the origin of which has remained elusive, partly because of the difficulty in accessing neural cells. Here, we have takenadvantage of pluripotent stem cell lines derived from embryos identified during a pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for mutant-genecarriers, to produce early neuronal cells. Functional characterization of these cells revealed reduced proliferative capacity and increased
autophagy linked to mTOR signaling pathway alterations. Interestingly, loss of function of MBNL1, an RNA-binding protein whosefunction is defective in DM1 patients, resulted in alteration of mTOR signaling, whereas gain-of-function experiments rescued thephenotype. Collectively, these results provide a mechanism by which DM1 mutation might affect a major signaling pathway and
highlight the pertinence of using pluripotent stem cells to study neuronal defects.
Key words: Neural stem cells, Human embryonic stem cells, Pathological modeling, Myotonic dystrophy type 1, mTOR signaling pathways
IntroductionOwing to their ability to differentiate into a large spectrum of
cell types, human disease-specific pluripotent stem cells of
embryonic origin (hESCs), or more recently cells derived from
the reprogramming of somatic cells (hiPSCs), appear to be a
unique material in which to correlate molecular and functional
pathological mechanisms within difficult-to-obtain cell
populations (Maury et al., 2011). In the context of human
neurological disorders, most of our current knowledge about
molecular and cellular phenotypes has been gathered from
studies in postmortem brain tissues, which are typically the end-
stage of the disease and consequently may not be a fair
illustration of how the disease developed. Human disease-
specific pluripotent stem cells provide a unique opportunity to
complement findings in human biopsies and animal models by
analyzing the first stages of disease progression and deciphering
molecular mechanisms that could be at the origin of a disease-
related functional phenotype.
Over the past few years, a growing number of studies have
demonstrated the usefulness of this approach to study both
neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. For
example, pre-implantation genetically diagnosed embryos have
been used to analyze molecular and functional defects in hESCs-
derived neurons carrying a mutant gene responsible for fragile X
(Eiges et al., 2007) and in motoneurons with myotonic dystrophy
type 1 (DM1) (Marteyn et al., 2011). Other early childhood-onset
monogenic disorders, such as Rett syndrome, familial
dysautonomia disorder and spinal muscular atrophy, have been
studied following the generation of hiPSCs from patients, and a
defective neuronal phenotype associated with the expression of the
mutant gene (Ebert et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2009).
Human iPSCs have also been instrumental in deciphering a
familial case of the late-onset neurodegenerative Parkinson’s
disease, associating the expression of a mutant gene with an
increased sensitivity of hiPSCs-derived dopamine neurons to
oxidative stress (Seibler et al., 2011).
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is an autosomal dominant
neuromuscular disorder with late clinical onset, caused by the
expansion of trinucleotide CTG repeats in the 39-untranslated
region of the DMPK gene (Mahadevan et al., 1992). At the
skeletal muscle level, three main molecular events can be
described: (1) formation of nuclear foci that are composed at least
of mutant DMPK mRNA and recruited RNA-binding proteins,
such as splicing regulators and transcription factors (Ebralidze
et al., 2004; Mankodi et al., 2001; Timchenko and Caskey, 1996);
(2) disturbance of specific gene expression (Mankodi et al., 2002;
Savkur et al., 2001; Yadava et al., 2008); and (3) impairment of
cell proliferation and differentiation (Bigot et al., 2009; Furling
Research Article 1763
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
et al., 2001; Timchenko et al., 2001a). Although DM1 has long
been considered mainly as a muscle disorder, there is extensive
evidence for the involvement of the central nervous system.
Psychological dysfunction, mental retardation, excessive daytime
sleepiness, and neuropathological abnormalities have been
described in DM1 patients (Abe et al., 1994; Delaporte, 1998;
Modoni et al., 2004; Modoni et al., 2008; Perini et al., 1999;
Turnpenny et al., 1994). Nevertheless, in contrast to the
substantial advances in understanding DM1 muscle pathology,
the molecular and functional bases of DM1 in the central nervous
system are still largely unknown.
In looking for molecular and functional mechanisms that could
be implicated in neural development in DM1, we based our
approach upon DM1-specific human pluripotent stem cells and
their ability to differentiate into neural cells. We recently
demonstrated that human embryonic stem cells (hESCs)
obtained during pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for DM1
(Mateizel et al., 2006) represent a relevant cellular model for
DM1. In particular, these human DM1-specific pluripotent stem
cells have allowed us to discover new molecular mechanisms
impeding the connectivity between DM1 hESCs-derived motor
neurons and their muscle targets (Marteyn et al., 2011). To more
broadly analyze the molecular and functional effects of the DM1
mutation in neural cells, we have taken advantage of progress
made in neural differentiation protocols to obtain robust and
homogenous neural precursor cell populations (Chambers et al.,
2009). We show here that these neural cells exhibit a
proliferation deficiency linked to a DM1-related impairment in
mTOR signaling pathway activity, associated with increased
autophagy.
ResultsTwo human embryonic stem cell (hES) lines carrying large CTG
expansions (VUB03_DM and VUB24_DM) obtained from
independent couples, and one wild-type control cell line
(VUB01_WT) were successfully differentiated toward a
homogenous population of neural stem cells (NSCs). No
differences in morphology and in the expression of NSC-
specific markers such as Nestin and Sox2 were observed during
the differentiation process (Fig. 1A–C). Moreover, no difference
in neuronal differentiation was observed between control and
mutant cells at day 20 for most of the analyzed gene markers,
Fig. 1. Characterization of DM1-NSCs.
(A) Morphology and expression of specific neural
markers (SOX2 and Nestin) in NSCs derived from
WT-hESC and two DM1-hESC lines. Nuclei were
counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars: 20 mm.
(B) Quantification of Nestin expression by FACS
analysis. (C) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis
of hESC-derived NSCs. RT-PCR levels are presented
as the fold change relative to undifferentiated hESC
lines after normalization with 18S rRNA levels.
(D) Detection of mutant RNA with a (CAG)10-Cy3
probe staining and MBNL1 (Muscleblind) protein by
immunofluorescence. Nuclei were counterstained
using DAPI (blue). The number of foci per nucleus
was quantified using ArrayScan, and is presented for
each cell line as a pie chart. (E) Expression of
MBNL1 and CUGBP1 proteins measured by western
blot analysis after nucleus (N) and cytoplasm
(C) subcellular fractionation. Lamin and b-actin were
used as loading controls.
Journal of Cell Science 126 (8)1764
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
including SNAP25, DLG4 and MAPT, although we cannot
completely exclude a difference between DM1 and WT over
the time course of neuronal differentiation (supplementary
material Fig. S1). To validate their pathological relevance, we
performed in situ hybridization combined with immunostaining
which showed that DM1-NSCs and derived neurons harbored
intranuclear ribonucleoprotein aggregates (known as ‘foci’),
formed by the mutant RNA and the splice factor MBNL1,
which are typical of the disease (Fig. 1D and supplementary
material Fig. S1). The nuclear retention of MBNL1 was also
confirmed by western blotting (Fig. 1E).
Functional consequences of DM1 in neural stem cells
Quantitative analysis of doubling time by measurement of the ATP
concentration in cell cultures indicated that the proliferation rate of
DM1-NSCs was reduced compared to controls (Fig. 2A,B).
Consistent with this observation, a decreased number of Ki67-
positive cells was observed in DM1-NSC cultures (Fig. 2C), in
association with decreased PCNA gene expression and decreased
phosphorylation of the Rb protein (Fig. 2D,E). In addition,
expression of other cell cycle regulators was deregulated in DM1
cells in comparison with control, with increased p27kip1 (Fig. 2F)
and P15 proteins and decreased cyclin D1 and P21 (Fig. 2G).
Measurement of necrosis or apoptosis by annexinV and
propidium iodide staining, PARP cleavage and caspase-3
expression revealed no differences between DM1- and WT-
NSCs. Similarly, staining for b-galactosidase did not reveal any
differences in the proportion of senescent cells in the DM1- and
WT-NSC cultures (supplementary material Fig. S2). Altogether,
these results indicated that the reduced proliferative capacity of
DM1-NSCs was not associated with an increase in either cell
mortality or senescence.
Large cytoplasmic vacuoles were observed in DM1-NSCs,
suggesting the induction of autophagy (Fig. 3A). Confirming this
functional phenotype, increased expression of the autophagic
markers LC3B-II, p62 and ATG12 protein was observed in DM1-
NSCs (Fig. 3B–F), as well as significantly increased expression
of the lysosomal cathepsin B marker both at the mRNA and the
protein level (supplementary material Fig. S3). In addition, the
nucleofection of a plasmid encoding the LC3–GFP fusion
protein, used as a marker for autophagic vesicles and pre-
autophagic compartments, resulted in more LC3–GFP aggregates
in DM1-NSCs relative to controls (Fig. 3C,D). As a positive
control, treatment of WT-NSCs with either EBSS medium or
chloroquine resulted in an increased number of cells containing
LC3–GFP aggregates. No effect of chloroquine treatment was
Fig. 2. DM-NSCs exhibit lower proliferative capacity.
(A) Proliferation rate of WT-NSCs and DM1-NSCs
detected by quantification of intracytoplasmic ATP during
6 days in culture. (B) Analysis of the doubling time for
WT-NSCs and DM1-NSCs. (C) Decrease in the number of
Ki67-positive DM1-NSCs (VUB03_DM) after 48 hours in
culture in comparison with WT-NSCs. The number of
Sox2-positive cells was used as a control for the NSCs
phenotype. Ki67-positive cells were detected and
quantified using the automated ArrayScan Imager.
(D) Decreased expression of the proliferative marker PCNA
in DM1-NSCs in comparison with WT-NSCs, as revealed
by real-time RT-PCR analysis. RT-PCR levels are
presented as a fold change over control WT-NSCs after
normalization with 18S rRNA levels. (E) Decreased
expression level of phosphorylated Rb (S807–811) in
DM1-NSCs (VUB03_DM) compared with WT-NSCs, as
determined by western blotting. (F) Increased expression
level of P27 in DM1-NSCs compared with control NSCs as
revealed by western blotting. (G) Altered expression of
p15ink4B, p21waf1 and Cyclin D1 proteins in DM1-NSCs
determined by western blot analysis. All western blot
analyses were performed using protein extracted from
NSCs after 48 hours in culture. Band densities were
quantified using ImageJ software. Data are means 6 s.e.m.
of least three independent samples. One-way ANOVA with
Dunnett’s post-hoc test was performed; ns, not significant,
*P,0.05, **P,0.01, ***P,0.001.
Defect of mTOR signaling pathway in DM1 1765
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
observed on DM1-NSCs suggesting that these cells could not
accumulate additional autophagic vacuoles.
Alteration of mTOR signaling pathways in DM1 neural cells
To assess the central role of AKT/mTOR signaling pathways in
both cell-cycle control and autophagy, expression of their main
components, namely Akt, AMPK, GSK3a/b and rpS6 (Ser235/
236) (ribosomal protein S6) was systematically analyzed. Gene
expression and protein levels were unaltered for all of these
components, when analyzed by quantitative PCR and western
blotting, respectively (Fig. 4; supplementary material Fig. S4). In
contrast, analysis of the post-translational activation of these
proteins through phosphorylation revealed major differences
between DM1-NSCs and controls. Whereas phosphorylation of
the upstream components Akt (Ser473) and AMPK (Thr172)
appeared unaffected, the downstream GSK3a/b (Ser21/9) and
rpS6 (Ser235/236 and Ser240/245) were decreased in DM1-NSCs
(Fig. 4A,B) through a mechanism independent of a stress-
induced activation of P53 (supplementary material Fig. S4).
To eliminate the possibility of a non-specific effect of the
growth factors present in the medium [i.e. epidermal growth
factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) and brain-derived
neurotrophic factor (BDNF)] on mTOR signaling pathway
activity, NSCs were starved for 48 hours and then treated for 1
hour with each factor alone or in combination. No effect of EGF
and/or BDNF was observed on phosphorylated rpS6 (Ser235/
236) levels. Treatment with FGF2 resulted in a dramatic increase
in phosphorylated rpS6 (Ser235/236) through the activation of
phospho-Erk1/2, equally in DM1- and WT-NSCs (Fig. 4C,E). The
effect of FGF2-mediated ERK1/2 activation on the phosphorylation
of rpS6 was transient, as it disappeared 48 hours after treatment. As
all our experiments were performed 48 hours after treatment with
growth factors, these results suggest that there might be a differential
impact of growth factors in the medium on mTOR signaling
pathways in DM1- and WT-NSCs.
Molecular correlates of functional defects in DM1 neural
cells
A potential link between the functional defects in proliferation and
autophagy observed in DM1-NSCs and the decreased activation of
mTOR signaling was explored by analyzing the functional
consequences of a partial pharmacological blockade of the
pathway in WT-NSCs. Cells were treated with rapamycin, a
specific mTOR inhibitor. Rapamycin provoked a dramatic decrease
in phosphorylated rpS6 (Ser235/236) (P-rpS6) without substantial
modulation of either phosphorylated Akt (Ser473), GSK3a(Ser21)
or GSK3b (Ser9) (Fig. 5A,B; supplementary material Fig. S4).
Functional defects associated with this molecular alteration were
reminiscent of the phenotype described above for DM1-NSCs, as
rapamycin-treated WT-NSCs exhibited impaired proliferative
capacity (Fig. 5C,D; supplementary material Fig. S4) and
induction of autophagy, as shown by LC3–GFP aggregation after
transfection with the fusion protein plasmid (Fig. 5E,F).
Association of mTOR signaling alterations with expression of
the mutant DMPK gene was controlled by transient transfection
of WT-NSCs with a plasmid containing an extended stretch of
Fig. 3. Induction of autophagy in DM-NSCs. (A) Phase-
contrast microscopy of cytoplasmic vacuoles in DM1-NSCs
compared with control cells after 24 hours in culture.
(B) Increased expression level of LC3B-II in DM1-NSCs
(VUB03_DM) as determined by western blotting after
48 hours in culture. (C) Nucleofection of DM1- and WT-
NSCs with a plasmid expressing a LC3–GFP fusion for
48 hours (VUB03_DM and VUB01_WT, respectively).
(D) Increased number of cells containing LC3–GFP dots in
the cytoplasm of DM1-NSCs, as quantified using the
automated ArrayScan Imager. EBSS and chloroquine at
50 mM were used as positive controls. Data are presented as
the percentages of positive cells. (E) Detection by
immunostaining of two autophagic markers p62 and ATG12
in WT and DM1-NSCs (VUB03_DM and VUB01_WT,
respectively). Data are expressed as means 6 s.e.m. of at
least three independent samples. One-way ANOVA with
Dunnett’s post-hoc test was performed; ns, not significant,
*P,0.05, **P,0.01, ***P,0.001.
Journal of Cell Science 126 (8)1766
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
960 CTG repeats. Treated cells exhibited a profound decrease in
P-rpS6 as well as P-GSK3b, which was consistent with our
working hypothesis (Fig. 6A,B; supplementary material Fig. S5).
The main consequence of the presence of an extended stretch of
CUG repeats in DM1-NSCs is the decreased bioavailability of the
MBNL1 protein due to its sequestration in intranuclear foci. To
reproduce this phenomenon in WT-NSCs, MBNL1 gene
expression was knocked down using specific siRNAs. MBNL1-
depleted cells exhibited significantly decreased levels of P-rpS6
and, to a lesser extent, decreased levels of P-GSK3a/b (Ser21/9)
(Fig. 6C). Conversely, overexpression of MBNL1 in DM1-NSCs
elicited a partial restoration of the phosphorylation of rpS6
(Ser232/236) (Fig. 6D). These changes in MBNL1 expression inDM1- and WT-NSCs led to altered proliferation and autophagy(Fig. 6E,F).
DiscussionThe primary finding of the current study was the identification of
an altered mTOR signaling pathway, which results in reducedproliferative capacity and induction of autophagy in neural cellsderived from DM1 gene-carrying human embryonic stem cells.
This alteration in the mTOR signaling pathway could bereproduced by reducing the bioavailability of the RNA-bindingprotein MBNL1 in WT cells, mimicking the defect associated
Fig. 4. mTOR signaling pathway is defective in DM1-NSCs. (A) Expression level of key modulators of Akt/mTOR signaling in DM1-NSCs and WT-NSCs
including: phospho(Ser473)-Akt, phospho(Thr172)-AMPKa, phospho(Ser21/9)-GSK3a/b and phospho(Ser235–236)-ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) and the
corresponding total forms. Cell lysates were obtained after 48 hours in culture. (B) Decreased phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein at serine 235–236 and
serine 240–245 in DM1-NSCs compared with control NSCs after 48 hours in culture. (C) Effect of the different growth factors required for NSC culture (i.e. EGF,
FGF2, BDNF) on the phosphorylation of P-rpS6 (Ser235–236). DM1-NSCs and WT-NSCs were growth-factor starved for 48 hours and subsequently treated for 1
hour with or without each of the growth factors. (D) FGF2 dose–response analysis of DM1- and WT-NSCs after growth factor starvation and treatment with 1–100
nM FGF2 for 1 hour. The expression level of rpS6 and ERK1/2 was analyzed. (E) Kinetics of FGF2 treatment on DM1-and WT-NSCs as determined by the
expression of rpS6 and ERK1. Cells were starved for 48 hours and then treated for various durations with 10 nM FGF2. Western blots were quantified using
ImageJ software and quantitative data are presented as the phosphorylated form normalized to the total form. VUB03_DM cells were used as a source for DM1-
NSCs. Data are expressed as means 6 s.e.m. of three independent samples. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test was performed; ns, not significant,
*P,0.05, **P,0.01, ***P,0.001.
Defect of mTOR signaling pathway in DM1 1767
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
with the expression of the DM1 mutation. The functional
abnormalities associated with the altered mTOR pathway might
contribute to the neurological aspects of this disease. This study
further highlights the value of mutant gene-carrying human stem
cell lines obtained from pre-implantation genetically diagnosed
embryos in helping to decipher the molecular mechanisms and
the functional consequences related to these mutations.
Molecular mechanisms involved in DM1 pathophysiology
have been mainly identified by using animal models. Few human
cell culture models have been developed; most are based on the
use of muscle precursor cells derived from congenital forms of
DM1, which are characterized by very large stretches of CTG
repeats (.2000). Myoblasts derived from congenital forms of
DM1 have alteration in various cell-cycle modulators, including
p21 and cyclin D1 (Timchenko et al., 2001b; Timchenko et al.,
2004). They also exhibit premature senescence through a p16-
dependent mechanism and defect in p38MAPK and ERK MEK
(Bigot et al., 2009), leading to defective proliferation and
differentiation (Beffy et al., 2010; Bigot et al., 2009; Timchenko
et al., 2001b; Timchenko et al., 2004). In addition, the induction
of autophagy has been recently observed in myoblasts derived
from congenital DM1 patients; a link to a p53-dependent
inhibition of mTOR pathway in response to metabolic stress
has been hypothesized (Beffy et al., 2010).
Our results have in part confirmed these data, by extending them
to DM1 neural precursor cells, in which altered proliferation and
induction of autophagy were observed. However, molecular
mechanisms responsible for those effects were not similar as
neither persistent activation of the FGF2-dependent MEK–ERK
pathway nor abnormal p53 activation was observed in DM1-NSCs.
Therefore, the current results do not support the hypothesis of a
cellular stress response in DM1 cells, which would be secondarily
responsible for the mTOR signaling pathway alterations.
Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that these
discrepancies are due to the differences between either the cell
types analyzed or the number of CTG repeats in the two cellular
systems. Indeed, mTOR signaling was altered in the current study
in the presence of only 1000 CTG repeats in DM1-NSCs or after
transfection of a plasmid with 960 repeats in WT-NSCs, i.e. in
conditions that are unlikely to be linked with congenital forms of
the disease.
Conversely, our data point to a specific defect in the activity of
the glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) being involved in the
disease. GSK3 activity is inhibited through phosphorylation of
serine 21 in GSK-3a and serine 9 in GSK-3b, which have been
identified as targets of Akt and AMPK (Fang et al., 2000). The
inhibition of GSK3 may participate in the activation of mTOR,
which results in the increased phosphorylation of rpS6
(Jastrzebski et al., 2007). According to this cascade of events
and in the absence of any alteration in the activation of Akt or
AMPK in DM1 neural cells, the decreased mTOR-dependent
phosphorylation of rpS6 can be directly associated with this
decreased inhibition of GSK3. Alternatively, as GSK3 acts as an
integrator of Akt and Wnt signals, the observed alteration of the
GSK3/mTOR pathway is related to a Wnt defect (Ma et al., 2010;
Vigneron et al., 2011). Consistent with the results of the current
study, alteration of GSK3 phosphorylation was also observed in a
rat PC12 cell line expressing 90 CUG repeats, which resulted in
Fig. 5. The mTOR defect is correlated with
decreased proliferation and induction of autophagy
in DM-NSCs. (A) Effect of rapamycin treatment on the
expression of key players of the Akt/mTOR signaling
pathway in DM1-and WT-NSCs, determined by
western blot analysis. (B) Detection, by
immunofluorescence, of P-rpS6 (Ser235–236) in DM1-
and WT-NSCs after treatment with rapamycin (10 nM)
for 48 hours. (C) Effect of rapamycin treatment (10 nM
for 4 days) on proliferation rate of WT-NSCs as
determined by measuring intracytoplasmic ATP.
(D) Quantification of the proliferation index of the WT-
NSCs with or without rapamycin treatment (10 nM) for
4 days. Data are presented as the mean signal [ATP] at
day x+1/x compared with the control condition
(arbitrarily 100%). (E) Detection of autophagy using
anti-LC3B antibody in WT-NSCs treated with
rapamycin (10 nM) or treated with chloroquine
(50 mM) for 6 hours. (F) Quantification of
autophagosomes after transfection of WT-NSCs with a
plasmid expressing LC3–GFP fusion protein for
48 hours and treatment with rapamycin and/or
chloroquine for 6 hours. Data are presented as a
percentage of positive cells quantified using the
automated ArrayScan Imager. Statistical data are
expressed as means 6 s.e.m. of at least three
independent samples. One-way ANOVA with
Dunnett’s post-hoc test was performed; **P,0.01,
***P,0.001.
Journal of Cell Science 126 (8)1768
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
altered expression and phosphorylation of Tau (Hernandez-
Hernandez et al., 2006). Given the crucial role of Tau in
neurodegenerative diseases, further investigations into whether
the decreased GSK3 phosphorylation observed in DM1-NSCs
could lead to defects in Tau expression would be of interest.
Mechanisms by which the mutation causing DM1 could
modulate the phosphorylation of specific molecular targets of themTOR signaling pathways remain to be determined. Three main
hypotheses may be proposed: (1) haploinsufficiency of the
DMPK gene (Reddy et al., 1996); (2) alteration of the expression
of neighboring genes such as SIX5 and DMDW (Klesert et al.,
2000; Sarkar et al., 2000); (3) toxic gain-of-function of the
mutant mRNA because of the sequestration of proteins involved
in RNA processing, such as the MBNL1 protein (Ranum and
Cooper, 2006). Although several lines of evidence suggest that
the toxic gain-of-function of the mutant RNA corresponds to the
main mechanism by which the mutation resulting in DM1 causes
the complex pattern of the disease, the contributions of each of
these mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. As an example,
insulin-resistance associated with DM1 has been correlated with
both DMPK haploinsufficiency and aberrant regulation of
alternate splicing of the insulin receptor because of the loss of
bioavailability of MBNL1 (Llagostera et al., 2007; Savkur et al.,
2001). The current results following gain- or loss-of-function of
MBNL1 support the hypothesis of a potential role for a toxic
RNA mechanism in mTOR signaling alterations that involves
Fig. 6. mTOR signaling defect in DM1-
NSCs is related to MBNL1. (A) Decreased
expression level of P-rpS6 after transfection of
WT-NSCs with a plasmid expressing 960 CTG
for 24 hours. (B) Western blots were analyzed
using ImageJ software and quantitative data are
presented as the phosphorylated form
normalized to the total form. (C) Expression
level of the key modulators of the Akt/mTOR
signaling pathway in WT-NSCs nucleofected
with a SiRNA targeting MBNL1 or with a
siScramble RNA for 48 hours. Data are
presented as the phosphorylated form
normalized to the total form. (D) Effect of the
overexpression of MBNL1 in DM1-NSCs on
the expression level of the key modulators of
the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Cells were
nucleofected with a plasmid encoding the
43 kDa isoform of the MBNL1 protein
(pMBNL1) or mock nucleofected for 48 hours.
Quantitative data are presented as
phosphorylated form normalized to their total
form. Western blots were quantified using
ImageJ software. (E) Effect of the
downregulation of MBNL1 in WT-NSCs and
the overexpression of MBNL1 in DM1-NSCs
on proliferation. Proliferation was measured by
immunostaining for Ki67 48 hours after
nucleofection. (F) Effect of the downregulation
of MBNL1 in WT-NSCs and the
overexpression of MBNL1 in DM1-NSCs on
the induction of autophagy. Cells were co-
nucleofected with a plasmid expressing the
LC3–GFP protein fusion and autophagy was
quantified 48 hours after nucleofection by
measuring the number of cells containing
LC3–GFP dots. Data are expressed as means 6
s.e.m. of at least three independent samples.
One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc test
was performed, *P,0.05, **P,0.01.
Defect of mTOR signaling pathway in DM1 1769
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
loss of MBNL1 bioavailability. Further studies will be required to
determine the mechanism by which MBNL1 may modulate theGSK3/mTOR signaling pathway. However, it is worth
mentioning that the effect of gain- and loss-of-function of
MBNL1 is less pronounced on proliferation than on autophagy,
which suggests the involvement of other modulators in theproliferation phenotype. Accordingly, CUGBP1, another RNA-
binding protein whose expression is affected by the presence of
the DM1 mutation, has been shown to affect the expression ofcell-cycle inhibitor p21 expression in DM1.
A large number of neurological abnormalities have beenreported in patients both at the clinical and histological levels (de
Leon and Cisneros, 2008). Central nervous system involvement
in DM1 implicates cognitive impairment, hypersomnolence, and
personality and behavioral disturbances (Abe et al., 1994;Delaporte, 1998; Meola et al., 2003; Modoni et al., 2008;
Turnpenny et al., 1994). Grey matter reduction has also been
described in various cortical regions, the hippocampus and thethalamus of DM1 patients (Minnerop et al., 2008; Minnerop et al.,
2011; Weber et al., 2010). At the molecular level, nuclear
aggregation of mutant mRNAs in combination with MBNL1 has
been described in cortical and subcortical neuronal cells of DM1patients post-mortem (Jiang et al., 2004). Alternative splicing of N-
methyl-D-aspartate receptor1 (NMDAR1), amyloid beta precursor
protein (APP) and microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) isabnormally regulated in DM1 brain tissue samples, even though
direct involvement of MBNL1 in these splice defects has not been
demonstrated (Jiang et al., 2004). However, the functional
consequences as well as the precise neuropathologicalcontributions of these molecular abnormalities are still unclear.
MBNL1 knockout mice exhibit cognitive impairments, suggesting
that MBNL1 loss-of-function might be implicated in theneuropathology of DM1 (Matynia et al., 2010). The MBNL1
knockout mouse model has also identified novel splicing defects in
the brain, including Sorbs1, Dclk1 and Camk2d (Suenaga et al.,
2012), but these genes have not been associated with clinicalsymptoms, yet. Lastly, a very recent study using a MBNL2
knockout mouse model suggests an essential role for this gene in
the DM1 developing brain (Charizanis et al., 2012). However, thisconclusion needs to be qualified in the light of redundant functions
of the different types of MBNL1 and MBNL2 proteins (Wang
et al., 2012).
The results of the current study shed some light on the
neuropathology of DM1, as we have identified an MBNL1-
dependent mTOR signaling defect, leading to functionalabnormalities, in neural precursors that have been shown by
previous authors to exhibit a telencephalic phenotype (Chambers
et al., 2009). Tentatively, and subject to further validation, onemay relate the proliferation defects observed in DM1-NSCs to
the reduced volume of the grey matter in DM1 patients. mTOR-
dependent induction of autophagy may also participate in the
neuropathology, as a similar process has been suggested to play arole in other neurological disorders involving abnormal protein
aggregations, such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s
diseases (Garelick and Kennedy, 2011).
Materials and MethodsCell cultures
hES cells were propagated as previously described (Marteyn et al., 2011). Thedifferentiation of hES into NSCs was performed using a SMAD inhibitor protocol(Chambers et al., 2009). Briefly, hES colonies were mechanically dissociated andincubated in suspension with N2B27 medium containing DMEM/F12 medium
with Glutamax I mixed with neurobasal medium; N2 supplement; B27 supplementwithout vitamin A; b-mercaptoethanol (all from Invitrogen) (1:1 vol). Thefollowing were also added: human recombinant noggin, a BMP pathway inhibitor,used at 300 ng/ml (PeproTech); SB-431542, a TGFb pathway inhibitor, used at20 mM (Tocris); and Y-27632, a ROCK inhibitor, used at 20 mM (Calbiochem).After 6 hours, aggregates were transferred to a dish pre-coated with 0.01%polyornithine (Sigma) and laminin 1 ng/ml (Sigma) and maintained with medium(without Y-27632). After the appearance of neural rosettes following 8–10 days ofdifferentiation, the medium was replaced with the N2B27 medium supplementedwith EGF at 10 ng/ml (R&D Systems), FGF2 at 10 ng/ml (PeproTech) and humanBDNF (hBDNF) at 20 ng/ml (R&D Systems). For differentiation into neurons,NSCs were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells per cm2 on polyornithine/laminin-coated dishes in N2B27 medium containing hBDNF but without EGF and FGF2.Medium was changed every other day for 20 days. Treatment with chemicalcompounds such as rapamycin (Cell Signaling), chloroquine and bafilomycin(Sigma) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Senescence, apoptosis and proliferation assay
A senescence assay was performed using a senescence detection kit based on b-galactosidase activity, as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam). Apoptosisassay was performed using Vybrant Apoptosis Assay Kit (Molecular Probes)according to manufacturer’s recommendations and proliferation was measuredusing CTG Cell Titer GloH (Promega). Briefly, at day 1 NSCs were plated in 96-well plates in 100 ml medium at 2000 cells/cm2. CellTiter-GloH reagent (Promega)was added to the cells and the bioluminescence signal was read 40 minutes later onan AnalystGT microplate reader (Molecular devices).
Mean doubling time (Tmean) was calculated for each cell line as follows:
Tmean~Xday6
day~0
Ln(2)day(xz1){day(x)
Ln ncellsday(xz1)ð Þ{ ncellsday(x)ð Þ =6,
The number of cells (ncells) at a defined time of the experiment was calculatedusing a calibration curve obtained by serial dilution of a defined number of cellsand correlated to the luminescence signal (proportional to the intracellularconcentration of ATP).
RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA from cells was extracted using the ‘RNeasy Mini Kit Protocol’(Qiagen). Reverse transcription was performed with SuperScript III reversetranscriptase (Invitrogen) and real-time PCR were performed with SyberGreenPCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on a Chromo4 real-time system (Bio-Rad)as previously described (Marteyn et al., 2011). Primers are listed in supplementarymaterial Table S1.
Nucleofection experiments with p960-CTG, siMBNL1 and the expressionplasmid MBNL1
The sequence encoding the 43 kDa isoform of MBNL1 inserted in the pCDNA3.1vector and the plasmid (CTG)960 were kindly provided by Dr Nicolas Charlet(CERBM-GIE, Illkirch, France). The plasmid expressing the LC3–GFP fusionprotein was kindly provided by Prof. Codogno (INSERM U984, Chatenay-Malabry, France). The siRNA sequence for MBNL1 knock-down was previouslydescribed (Dansithong et al., 2005).
These expression vectors and siRNAs were nucleofected into NSCs using theRat Neural Stem Cell Nucleofector Kit (Lonza) according to the manufacturer’sinstructions.
Immunocytochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization
Immunocytochemisty and fluorescent in situ hybridization were performed aspreviously described (Marteyn et al., 2011). Primary antibodies are listed insupplementary material Table S2. Immunostaining was analyzed byepifluorescence microscopy with the Zeiss Imager Z1 and the Zeiss Axiovert40CFL, and images were captured with the Zeiss Axiocam mRM.
ArrayScan analysis
The number of nuclei with foci, the number of foci per nucleus and the number ofcells with at least two LC3–eGFP-positive autophagosomes were counted using theArrayScan VTI HCS Reader (Cellomics). Data were examined using the CellSelecting software (Cellomics) as previously described (Marteyn et al., 2011).
SDS poly-acrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting
Cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Sigma) supplemented with anti-proteasecocktail (Sigma) and anti-phosphatase (Roche). Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionswere extracted using the NE-PER Kit (Thermoscientific). The proteinconcentration of the cell extracts was measured at 562 nm using the PierceHBCA Protein Assay Kit (Perbio Thermo Scientific) according to themanufacturer’s instructions and using a plate analyzer (Biotek). SDS-PAGE was
Journal of Cell Science 126 (8)1770
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
performed using NuPAGEH Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen); 10–30 mg oftotal protein was loaded per lane. iBlotH Gel Transfer Stack (Invitrogen) was usedfor the transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5%non-fat milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 hour(except for MBNL1 antibody which requires 2% fetal calf Serum in PBST), thenincubated overnight at 4 C in 5% non-fat milk in PBST (except for MBNL1 inPBST only) with primary antibodies at the appropriate dilution. The antibodiesused are listed in supplementary material Table S2. Immunoreactive bands wererevealed using the Amersham ECL PlusTM Western Blotting Detection Reagents(GE Healthcare). Equal protein loading was verified by the detection of actin.Quantification was performed using ImageJ software (NIH).
Statistical analysis
All the data are given as means 6 standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) and wereanalyzed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. All the statistical tests wereperformed at least three times and one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-hoc testwas used.
AcknowledgementsWe thank Dr Genevieve Gourdon (INSERM U781, Paris, France) forperforming CTG repeats analysis; Karen Sermon (AZ-VUBBrussels, Belgium) for providing DM1 and control hES cell lines;Dr Nicolas Charlet (INSERM, Strasbourg, France) and Dr GlenMorris for providing us with resources; Prof. Patrice Codogno andIsabelle Beau (INSERM U984) for the LC3BeGFP construction andtheir very helpful advice concerning autophagy; Dr Denis Furling(INSERM U787, Paris, France), Dr Nicolas Sergeant and Dr Marie-Laure Caillet-Boudin (INSERM U815, Lille, France) for theirhelpful discussions and their expertise on the field of myotonicdystrophy disease; and Dr Delphine Laustriat, Dr FabriceCasagrande, Julien Come, Pauline Georges, Jacqueline Gide andRemi Vernet (UMR861, CES, I-Stem, Evry, France) for technicalassistance.
Author contributionsJ.A.D. designed and performed experiments and analyzed data;M.G., L.R. and S.A. contributed equally to this work; M.G.performed gain and loss of function experiments and L.R. and S.A.performed western blot analyses for mTOR signaling pathway;K.G.T, P.P., B.C., Y.M. and C.B. participated differentially todifferent technical aspects of this project; A.B. helped with thedifferentiation of neural stem cells from hESCs; R.S. and G.P.contributed to the design of the project; M.P. and C.M. supervisedthe project.
FundingThis work was supported by the Association Francaise contre lesMyopathies, MediCen (IngeCell program); the EuropeanCommission (FP6, STEM-HD) [grant number LSHB-CT-2006-037349]; and Genopole.
Supplementary material available online at
http://jcs.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/jcs.116285/-/DC1
ReferencesAbe, K., Fujimura, H., Toyooka, K., Yorifuji, S., Nishikawa, Y., Hazama, T. and
Yanagihara, T. (1994). Involvement of the central nervous system in myotonic
dystrophy. J. Neurol. Sci. 127, 179-185.
Beffy, P., Del Carratore, R., Masini, M., Furling, D., Puymirat, J., Masiello, P. and
Simili, M. (2010). Altered signal transduction pathways and induction of autophagy
in human myotonic dystrophy type 1 myoblasts. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 42, 1973-
1983.
Bigot, A., Klein, A. F., Gasnier, E., Jacquemin, V., Ravassard, P., Butler-Browne,
G., Mouly, V. and Furling, D. (2009). Large CTG repeats trigger p16-dependent
premature senescence in myotonic dystrophy type 1 muscle precursor cells.
Am J Pathol. 174, 1435-1442
Chambers, S. M., Fasano, C. A., Papapetrou, E. P., Tomishima, M., Sadelain,
M. and Studer, L. (2009). Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS
cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 275-280.
Charizanis, K., Lee, K. Y., Batra, R., Goodwin, M., Zhang, C., Yuan, Y., Shiue, L.,
Cline, M., Scotti, M. M., Xia, G. et al. (2012). Muscleblind-like 2-mediated
alternative splicing in the developing brain and dysregulation in myotonic dystrophy.
Neuron 75, 437-450.
Dansithong, W., Paul, S., Comai, L. and Reddy, S. (2005). MBNL1 is the primary
determinant of focus formation and aberrant insulin receptor splicing in DM1. J. Biol.
Chem. 280, 5773-5780.
de Leon, M. B. and Cisneros, B. (2008). Myotonic dystrophy 1 in the nervous system:
from the clinic to molecular mechanisms. J. Neurosci. Res. 86, 18-26.
Delaporte, C. (1998). Personality patterns in patients with myotonic dystrophy. Arch.
Neurol. 55, 635-640.
Ebert, A. D., Yu, J., Rose, F. F., Jr, Mattis, V. B., Lorson, C. L., Thomson, J. A. and
Svendsen, C. N. (2009). Induced pluripotent stem cells from a spinal muscular
atrophy patient. Nature 457, 277-280.
Ebralidze, A., Wang, Y., Petkova, V., Ebralidse, K. and Junghans, R. P. (2004).
RNA leaching of transcription factors disrupts transcription in myotonic dystrophy.
Science 303, 383-387.
Eiges, R., Urbach, A., Malcov, M., Frumkin, T., Schwartz, T., Amit, A., Yaron, Y.,
Eden, A., Yanuka, O., Benvenisty, N. et al. (2007). Developmental study of fragile
X syndrome using human embryonic stem cells derived from preimplantation
genetically diagnosed embryos. Cell Stem Cell 1, 568-577.
Fang, X., Yu, S. X., Lu, Y., Bast, R. C., Jr, Woodgett, J. R. and Mills, G. B. (2000).
Phosphorylation and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 by protein kinase A.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11960-11965.
Furling, D., Coiffier, L., Mouly, V., Barbet, J. P., St Guily, J. L., Taneja, K.,
Gourdon, G., Junien, C. and Butler-Browne, G. S. (2001). Defective satellite cells
in congenital myotonic dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2079-2087.
Garelick, M. G. and Kennedy, B. K. (2011). TOR on the brain. Exp. Gerontol. 46, 155-
163.
Hernandez-Hernandez, O., Bermudez-de-Leon, M., Gomez, P., Velazquez-
Bernardino, P., Garcıa-Sierra, F. and Cisneros, B. (2006). Myotonic dystrophy
expanded CUG repeats disturb the expression and phosphorylation of tau in PC12
cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 84, 841-851.
Jastrzebski, K., Hannan, K. M., Tchoubrieva, E. B., Hannan, R. D. and Pearson,
R. B. (2007). Coordinate regulation of ribosome biogenesis and function by the
ribosomal protein S6 kinase, a key mediator of mTOR function. Growth Factors 25,
209-226.
Jiang, H., Mankodi, A., Swanson, M. S., Moxley, R. T. and Thornton, C. A. (2004).
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is associated with nuclear foci of mutant RNA,
sequestration of muscleblind proteins and deregulated alternative splicing in neurons.
Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 3079-3088.
Kim, J. E., O’Sullivan, M. L., Sanchez, C. A., Hwang, M., Israel, M. A., Brennand,
K., Deerinck, T. J., Goldstein, L. S., Gage, F. H., Ellisman, M. H. et al. (2011).
Investigating synapse formation and function using human pluripotent stem cell-
derived neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3005-3010.
Klesert, T. R., Cho, D. H., Clark, J. I., Maylie, J., Adelman, J., Snider, L., Yuen,
E. C., Soriano, P. and Tapscott, S. J. (2000). Mice deficient in Six5 develop
cataracts: implications for myotonic dystrophy. Nat. Genet. 25, 105-109.
Lee, G., Papapetrou, E. P., Kim, H., Chambers, S. M., Tomishima, M. J., Fasano,
C. A., Ganat, Y. M., Menon, J., Shimizu, F., Viale, A. et al. (2009). Modelling
pathogenesis and treatment of familial dysautonomia using patient-specific iPSCs.
Nature 461, 402-406.
Llagostera, E., Catalucci, D., Marti, L., Liesa, M., Camps, M., Ciaraldi, T. P.,
Kondo, R., Reddy, S., Dillmann, W. H., Palacin, M. et al. (2007). Role of myotonic
dystrophy protein kinase (DMPK) in glucose homeostasis and muscle insulin action.
PLoS ONE 2, e1134.
Ma, Y., Jin, J., Dong, C., Cheng, E. C., Lin, H., Huang, Y. and Qiu, C. (2010). High-
efficiency siRNA-based gene knockdown in human embryonic stem cells. RNA 16,
2564-2569.
Mahadevan, M., Tsilfidis, C., Sabourin, L., Shutler, G., Amemiya, C., Jansen, G.,
Neville, C., Narang, M., Barcelo, J., O’Hoy, K. et al. (1992). Myotonic dystrophy
mutation: an unstable CTG repeat in the 39 untranslated region of the gene. Science
255, 1253-1255.
Mankodi, A., Urbinati, C. R., Yuan, Q. P., Moxley, R. T., Sansone, V., Krym, M.,
Henderson, D., Schalling, M., Swanson, M. S. and Thornton, C. A. (2001).
Muscleblind localizes to nuclear foci of aberrant RNA in myotonic dystrophy types 1
and 2. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2165-2170.
Mankodi, A., Takahashi, M. P., Jiang, H., Beck, C. L., Bowers, W. J., Moxley, R. T.,
Cannon, S. C. and Thornton, C. A. (2002). Expanded CUG repeats trigger aberrant
splicing of ClC-1 chloride channel pre-mRNA and hyperexcitability of skeletal
muscle in myotonic dystrophy. Mol. Cell 10, 35-44.
Marteyn, A., Maury, Y., Gauthier, M. M., Lecuyer, C., Vernet, R., Denis, J. A.,
Pietu, G., Peschanski, M. and Martinat, C. (2011). Mutant human embryonic stem
cells reveal neurite and synapse formation defects in type 1 myotonic dystrophy. Cell
Stem Cell 8, 434-444.
Mateizel, I., De Temmerman, N., Ullmann, U., Cauffman, G., Sermon, K., Van de
Velde, H., De Rycke, M., Degreef, E., Devroey, P., Liebaers, I. et al. (2006).
Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines from embryos obtained after IVF and
after PGD for monogenic disorders. Hum. Reprod. 21, 503-511.
Matynia, A., Ng, C. H., Dansithong, W., Chiang, A., Silva, A. J. and Reddy,
S. (2010). Muscleblind1, but not Dmpk or Six5, contributes to a complex phenotype
of muscular and motivational deficits in mouse models of myotonic dystrophy. PLoS
ONE 5, e9857.
Defect of mTOR signaling pathway in DM1 1771
Journ
alof
Cell
Scie
nce
Maury, Y., Gauthier, M., Peschanski, M. and Martinat, C. (2011). [Human
pluripotent stem cells: opening key for pathological modeling]. Med. Sci. (Paris) 27,
443-446.
Meola, G., Sansone, V., Perani, D., Scarone, S., Cappa, S., Dragoni, C., Cattaneo, E.,
Cotelli, M., Gobbo, C., Fazio, F. et al. (2003). Executive dysfunction and avoidant
personality trait in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM-1) and in proximal myotonic
myopathy (PROMM/DM-2). Neuromuscul. Disord. 13, 813-821.
Minnerop, M., Luders, E., Specht, K., Ruhlmann, J., Schneider-Gold, C., Schroder,
R., Thompson, P. M., Toga, A. W., Klockgether, T. and Kornblum, C. (2008).
Grey and white matter loss along cerebral midline structures in myotonic dystrophy
type 2. J. Neurol. 255, 1904-1909.
Minnerop, M., Weber, B., Schoene-Bake, J. C., Roeske, S., Mirbach, S., Anspach,
C., Schneider-Gold, C., Betz, R. C., Helmstaedter, C., Tittgemeyer, M. et al.
(2011). The brain in myotonic dystrophy 1 and 2: evidence for a predominant white
matter disease. Brain 134, 3530-3546.
Modoni, A., Silvestri, G., Pomponi, M. G., Mangiola, F., Tonali, P. A. and Marra,
C. (2004). Characterization of the pattern of cognitive impairment in myotonic
dystrophy type 1. Arch. Neurol. 61, 1943-1947.
Modoni, A., Silvestri, G., Vita, M. G., Quaranta, D., Tonali, P. A. and Marra,
C. (2008). Cognitive impairment in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1): a longitudinal
follow-up study. J. Neurol. 255, 1737-1742.
Perini, G. I., Menegazzo, E., Ermani, M., Zara, M., Gemma, A., Ferruzza, E.,
Gennarelli, M. and Angelini, C. (1999). Cognitive impairment and (CTG)n
expansion in myotonic dystrophy patients. Biol. Psychiatry 46, 425-431.
Ranum, L. P. and Cooper, T. A. (2006). RNA-mediated neuromuscular disorders.
Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 259-277.
Reddy, S., Smith, D. B., Rich, M. M., Leferovich, J. M., Reilly, P., Davis, B. M., Tran, K.,
Rayburn, H., Bronson, R., Cros, D. et al. (1996). Mice lacking the myotonic dystrophy
protein kinase develop a late onset progressive myopathy. Nat. Genet. 13, 325-335.
Sarkar, P. S., Appukuttan, B., Han, J., Ito, Y., Ai, C., Tsai, W., Chai, Y., Stout, J. T.
and Reddy, S. (2000). Heterozygous loss of Six5 in mice is sufficient to cause ocular
cataracts. Nat. Genet. 25, 110-114.
Savkur, R. S., Philips, A. V. and Cooper, T. A. (2001). Aberrant regulation of insulin
receptor alternative splicing is associated with insulin resistance in myotonic
dystrophy. Nat. Genet. 29, 40-47.
Seibler, P., Graziotto, J., Jeong, H., Simunovic, F., Klein, C. and Krainc, D. (2011).Mitochondrial Parkin recruitment is impaired in neurons derived from mutant PINK1induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Neurosci. 31, 5970-5976.
Suenaga, K., Lee, K. Y., Nakamori, M., Tatsumi, Y., Takahashi, M. P., Fujimura,
H., Jinnai, K., Yoshikawa, H., Du, H., Ares, M., Jr et al. (2012). Muscleblind-like 1knockout mice reveal novel splicing defects in the myotonic dystrophy brain. PLoS
ONE 7, e33218.Timchenko, L. T. and Caskey, C. T. (1996). Trinucleotide repeat disorders in humans:
discussions of mechanisms and medical issues. FASEB J. 10, 1589-1597.Timchenko, N. A., Cai, Z. J., Welm, A. L., Reddy, S., Ashizawa, T. and Timchenko,
L. T. (2001a). RNA CUG repeats sequester CUGBP1 and alter protein levels andactivity of CUGBP1. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 7820-7826.
Timchenko, N. A., Iakova, P., Cai, Z. J., Smith, J. R. and Timchenko, L. T. (2001b).Molecular basis for impaired muscle differentiation in myotonic dystrophy. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 21, 6927-6938.Timchenko, N. A., Patel, R., Iakova, P., Cai, Z. J., Quan, L. and Timchenko, L. T.
(2004). Overexpression of CUG triplet repeat-binding protein, CUGBP1, in miceinhibits myogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 13129-13139.
Turnpenny, P., Clark, C. and Kelly, K. (1994). Intelligence quotient profile inmyotonic dystrophy, intergenerational deficit, and correlation with CTG amplification.J. Med. Genet. 31, 300-305.
Vigneron, F., Dos Santos, P., Lemoine, S., Bonnet, M., Tariosse, L., Couffinhal, T.,
Duplaa, C. and Jaspard-Vinassa, B. (2011). GSK-3b at the crossroads in thesignalling of heart preconditioning: implication of mTOR and Wnt pathways.Cardiovasc. Res. 90, 49-56.
Wang, E. T., Cody, N. A., Jog, S., Biancolella, M., Wang, T. T., Treacy, D. J., Luo,
S., Schroth, G. P., Housman, D. E., Reddy, S. et al. (2012). Transcriptome-wideregulation of pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA localization by muscleblind proteins.Cell 150, 710-724.
Weber, Y. G., Roebling, R., Kassubek, J., Hoffmann, S., Rosenbohm, A., Wolf, M.,Steinbach, P., Jurkat-Rott, K., Walter, H., Reske, S. N. et al. (2010). Comparativeanalysis of brain structure, metabolism, and cognition in myotonic dystrophy 1 and 2.Neurology 74, 1108-1117.
Yadava, R. S., Frenzel-McCardell, C. D., Yu, Q., Srinivasan, V., Tucker, A. L.,
Puymirat, J., Thornton, C. A., Prall, O. W., Harvey, R. P. and Mahadevan, M. S.(2008). RNA toxicity in myotonic muscular dystrophy induces NKX2-5 expression.Nat. Genet. 40, 61-68.
Journal of Cell Science 126 (8)1772