ms decisions

27
Amy Bowen, Director of Service Development

Upload: ms-trust

Post on 22-Feb-2017

299 views

Category:

Healthcare


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MS Decisions

Amy Bowen, Director of Service Development

Page 2: MS Decisions

Agenda1. Background to MS Decisions2. How we ran the project3. How the resources work together to support your service4. How the site works5. Hot topics

Goals of treatment When to start treatment The consequences of no treatment Disability progression

6. Future development

Page 3: MS Decisions
Page 4: MS Decisions

Shared Decision MakingMS Trust core value:To provide evidence-based information to help people with MS make choices that are right for them in partnership with their MS team.

Shared decision making (SDM) is the conversation that happens between a patient and their health professional to reach a healthcare choice together. This conversation needs patients and professionals to understand what is important to the other person when choosing a treatment.

http://sdm.rightcare.nhs.uk/ (accessed 6-11-15)

Page 5: MS Decisions

Background to MS Decisions• Independent site - no funding from pharmaceutical companies has been taken for its

development or maintenance• Originally developed by a group of organisations led by the Department of Health

Medicines Partnership, with initial development funding from the Department of Health. • Integral role of the MS service at University College London NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) • 2006 - ownership and management of the website became the responsibility UCLH and

UCL who fully updated the site content in 2009. • During this time, the MS Trust supported by highlighting gaps, liaising with the

manufacturers and implementing edits recommended by the UCL editorial group.• 2014 - MS Trust took over the responsibility for the website • MSD now part of the MS Trust's own website. • Funded by the MS Trust with contributions from a number of grant funders

Page 6: MS Decisions

Survey feedbackMS Decisions review 2013

99% definitely/probably recommend site89% thought decision aid right length, 8% thought it too long16% of visits in 2012 (2,005) worked through interactive decision aid. Liked: clear plain English, unbiased, non-frightening, useful, step by step navigation, interactive decision making tool, audio and video elements

Page 7: MS Decisions

Survey feedback

Most helpful aspects of MS Decisions:81% Treatments overview65% Decision aid58% Side by side comparison of drugs

Most important criteria driving patient choice:96% Side effects87% Route of administration82% Efficacy51% Frequency of admin46% Disability progression

MS nurse survey November/December 2014103 nurses completed survey

75% Neuro confirms eligibility, gives brief overview and refers to MSSN

Page 8: MS Decisions

Survey feedback

Algorithm is no longer appropriate for making DMD choice:Agree strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Disagree strongly5% 25% 40% 30% 2%

What resources would you find most helpful to support patients choices? 77% Table of drugs with short answers to FAQs (option grid)72% Online resource that allows for tailored comparison of DMTs69% Publication on DMDs

Page 9: MS Decisions

Survey feedbackpwMS survey November/December 2014Demographics (gender, age, time since diagnosis)

Features liked:• Clear information• Easy to use• Unbiased and everything in one place• Decision aid• Drug info side by side in a grid• Injection videos • Level of detail

Page 10: MS Decisions

Survey feedback

Features not liked:• Out of date• Too much info / too little info

Improve or add:• More personal experiences –ve and

+ve• Update with new drugs• Update web technology• More detail on side effects• Information “layering” and in context

Page 11: MS Decisions

Project SponsorAmy Bowen

Steering Group

Project Manager Linden Muirhead

User Group Project Team

MST

Info OfficersJanice SykesDeryn Evans

Web Produ

cerLeni

Candan

External clinical advisor Pauline Shaw

External web develo

pers

Editorial Group

Manufacturers Group

Editorial GroupBelinda WellerDavid RogMatt CranerPaul MolyneuxOrla GrayNeil ScoldingOlga Ciccarelli

Anneka AppletonGail ClaytonHeidi ThompsonRuth StrossLou JarrettSam CalhounEsther Cockram

Deborah ClarkHilary BekkerElaine Cameron

User Group139 survey respondents35 reviewers

Steering GroupAlan ThompsonJeremy ChatawayBernie Porter

How we ran the project

Page 12: MS Decisions

Project Principles1. We need to give people choice about how they want to explore their options.2. Detailed comparison of 11 options side by side is impractical and overwhelming.3. Using shopping-type comparison filters to compare drugs will need to be

considered carefully to avoid over-simplification.4. People need a coherent, joined-up suite of resources to help them through the

decision making process.5. Not everyone who uses MS Decisions will have a shortlist of treatments.6. PwMS do not necessarily know the level of their disease activity.7. We need to always offer the options of treatment and no treatment, including the

implications of no treatment.8. (MS Decisions needs to be future-proof!)

Page 13: MS Decisions

Who might use MSD?You might be coming to MS Decisions because:

• you are looking for a general introduction to the range of DMDs that can be prescribed by a neurologist for RRMS so that you can get familiar with the options for treatment.

• you have seen your neurologist or MS nurse and talked about the possibility of starting treatment and want to know what to expect and what you need to consider

• your neurologist may have given you several specific options to consider and you want to compare these DMDs so that you can go to your next clinic visit with your own thoughts and questions

• you are already on a DMD and you are considering switching to another one.

Whatever your situation, MS Decisions can help you by:• providing reliable information about DMDs for RRMS in a format that makes it easy to compare• exploring topics that you might want to think through when making your decision• helping you prepare for your appointment with your neurologist or MS nurse

Page 14: MS Decisions
Page 15: MS Decisions
Page 16: MS Decisions
Page 17: MS Decisions
Page 18: MS Decisions
Page 19: MS Decisions

Getting to the sitewww.msdecisions.org.ukwww.mstrust.org.uk/msdecisions

Page 20: MS Decisions

Editorial ProcessEdits and updates on a quarterly basis • user recommended changes• new evidence on broad issues covered in guide to decision making or FAQs• A-Z changes

Off-cycle changes for • major changes in safety profile• new agents • new dosing schedules

Page 21: MS Decisions

Media coverage

Linden Muirhead
Don't know if you want to talk about comms at all, but if you do...
Page 22: MS Decisions

Uptake

• Over 25,000 page views across MS Decisions• 13th most visited part of the site with 1,427 users• 38% of traffic comes via Google; 19% from Facebook• Average of 8.5 page views per session• Low bounce rate of 4.2% (compared with 15% across the site)

Page 23: MS Decisions

Demographic

Page 24: MS Decisions

Feedback Fantastic..what an amazingly useful

resource!

Excellent and from the people who actually know what they’re

talking about. I went from no drugs for MS and straight to

Tysabri – wasn’t too keen but info like this would have helped a lot

at the time.

This is fantastic - it's SO important to learn as much as possible as quickly as possible about your

condition if you are diagnosed with MS so that you can make the right

decision, together with your neurologist, and move forwards. There are so many more options

available now and more are on the way.

Page 25: MS Decisions

Feedback

Sounds a good idea, but from experience you don’t get a choice of every drug on offer. Can depend on area. Not sure tablet form is widely

available either.

Found this information helpful as meeting my MS nurse next week, neurologist the week after, and

will be discussing starting a DMD

Very helpful to be able to compare the meds.

Page 26: MS Decisions

Tell us what you thinkEmail: [email protected]

Page 27: MS Decisions