more efficient malolactic fermentation by directed ... · more efficient malolactic fermentation by...

1
Contact: Name Phone: +61 8 8313 0402 Email: [email protected] www.adelaide.edu.au More efficient malolactic fermentation by directed evolution of Lactobacillus plantarum Acknowledgements: This work is supported by Wine Australia (Project # UA1302) Wine Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology Laboratory (University of Adelaide 1 ) 1 The University of Adelaide is a member of the Wine Innovation Cluster Krista Sumby*, Paul R Grbin , Vladimir Jiranek University of Adelaide Department of Wine and Food Science, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia Introduction: Lactobacillus plantarum (Figure 1) is the LAB most typically used as an alternative to O. oeni in winemaking to carry out MLF. If a homofermetative strain is chosen Lb. plantarum will not increase volatile acidity and has a large potential to contribute positively to wine aroma. An important requirement of MLF is that the process is reliably completed in a timely manner. When an LAB starter strain is added to wine, it encounters multiple stressors, including low pH and high ethanol concentrations. Directed evolution (DE) was used to improve Lb. plantarum for more efficient and reliable MLF. The best isolates from the micro-plate screen (Figure 4) were selected for further screening in larger 50 ml cultures in Red FCDGJM (15% ethanol, pH 3.5) (Figure 5). Figure 4: Screening of adapted strains, micro-plate scale. Figure 5: Screening of best isolates from micro-plate screen in 50 ml FCDGJM (lab-scale). Hypothesis: Lb. plantarum will stabily adapt to its environment through evolution when placed under continuing and increasing stress conditions. Method: DE by continuous culture of improve Lb. plantarum (Lallemand) in fermented Chemically Defined Grape Juice Media (FCDGJM) (Figure 2). Over time ethanol was increased and pH decreased, for 300 generations. DE mixed culture Isolate single clones Identify the best strains by micro & larger-scale screening 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 0 1 2 3 Time (h) L-malic acid (g/L) Mix continious culture Parent Continuous culture isolates Figure 2: Continuous culture of Lb. plantarum. Figure 1: Lb. plantarum 1000x magnification. Figure 3: Screening for improved isolates. Conclusion: DE has been used as a tool to improve Lb. plantarum and thereby improve its ability to complete MLF under difficult wine conditions. Isolates capable of faster MLF were found through a 2-step screening process. Evaluation of strain improvement: Screening of isolates from the continuous culture was performed in Red FCDGJM (14.5% ethanol, pH 3.3) at micro-plate scale and then 50ml scale to select for evolved strains (Figure 3). 0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 192 0 1 2 3 Time (hour) L-malic acid (g/L) Parent Continuous culture isolates Improved isolates

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Contact: Name Phone: +61 8 8313 0402 Email: [email protected]

    www.adelaide.edu.au

    More efficient malolactic fermentation by directed evolution of Lactobacillus plantarum

    Acknowledgements: This work is supported by Wine Australia (Project # UA1302) Wine Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology Laboratory (University of Adelaide1) 1The University of Adelaide is a member of the Wine Innovation Cluster

    Krista Sumby*, Paul R Grbin, Vladimir Jiranek

    University of Adelaide Department of Wine and Food Science, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia

    Introduction: •  Lactobacillus plantarum (Figure 1) is the LAB most

    typically used as an alternative to O. oeni in winemaking to carry out MLF.

    •  If a homofermetative strain is chosen Lb. plantarum

    will not increase volatile acidity and has a large potential to contribute positively to wine aroma.

    •  An important requirement of MLF is that the process is reliably completed in a timely manner.

    •  When an LAB starter strain is added to wine, it encounters multiple stressors, including low pH and high ethanol concentrations.

    •  Directed evolution (DE) was used to improve Lb. plantarum for more efficient and reliable MLF.

    •  The best isolates from the micro-plate screen (Figure 4) were selected for further screening in larger 50 ml cultures in Red FCDGJM (15% ethanol, pH 3.5) (Figure 5).

    Figure 4: Screening of adapted strains, micro-plate scale.

    Figure 5: Screening of best isolates from micro-plate screen in 50 ml FCDGJM (lab-scale).

    Hypothesis: •  Lb. plantarum will stabily adapt to its environment

    through evolution when placed under continuing and increasing stress conditions.

    Method: •  DE by continuous culture

    of improve Lb. plantarum (Lallemand) in fermented Chemically Defined Grape Juice Media (FCDGJM) (Figure 2).

    •  Over time ethanol was increased and pH decreased, for 300 generations.

    DE mixed culture

    Isolate single clones

    Identify the best strains by micro & larger-scale screening

    0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 1920

    1

    2

    3

    Time (h)

    L-m

    alic

    aci

    d (g

    /L)

    Mix continious cultureParent

    Continuous culture isolates

    Figure 2: Continuous culture of Lb. plantarum.

    Figure 1: Lb. plantarum 1000x magnification.

    Figure 3: Screening for improved isolates.

    Conclusion: DE has been used as a tool to improve Lb. plantarum and thereby improve its ability to complete MLF under difficult wine conditions. Isolates capable of faster MLF were found through a 2-step screening process.

    Evaluation of strain improvement: •  Screening of isolates from the continuous culture was

    performed in Red FCDGJM (14.5% ethanol, pH 3.3) at micro-plate scale and then 50ml scale to select for evolved strains (Figure 3).

    0 24 48 72 96 120 144 168 1920

    1

    2

    3

    Time (hour)

    L-m

    alic

    aci

    d (g

    /L)

    ParentContinuous culture isolates

    Improved isolates