model lsw formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) cfc-12 inventories, (black) mixed...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also shown are selected published estimates based on in-situ measurements (cyan, gray and blue) and on a model experiment (magenta).
Smethie & Fine (2000)
Rhein et al. (2002)Kieke et al. (2007)
Böning et al. (2003)
using T45°N – T65°N below =27.68 kg m-3
using LS =27.68 kg m-3 outcrop area and m.l.d.using CFC-12 inventories
![Page 2: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Deep water formation, the strength of the subpolar gyre, and the AMOC in the subpolar
NA
Monika Rhein, IUP, Universität Bremen
![Page 4: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
•Does the observed changes affect the MOC ?
• What is the meridional heat and volume transport in the subpolar
North Atlantic ?
• What role plays the interior transport versus boundary current
transport?
![Page 5: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Moorings (red) and PIES (yellow), PIES B12-B15 deployed Aug. 2006, data received August 2008, continued at least to 2012
B12
B13
B14
B15
![Page 6: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Meridional heat and volume transport across 47°NWhat signal is to be expected ?
![Page 7: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
- Positive MOC anomalies follow periods of intensified LSW formation
-- Amplitude of decadal MOC variability: ~ 2 Sv at 45°N
NAO+ 8Sv
0
Effect of variable thermohaline forcing in isolation ORCA-HEAT+FW: climatological wind stress; interannual heat and fw fluxes
Labrador Sea Water formation (Sv)
MOC anomalies
(C.I.= 0.5 Sv)
Böning and Biastoch, 2008
![Page 8: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ORCA cases:
HEAT+FW
REF
WIND
3
Sv
0
-3
Superposition of wind-driven MOC anomalies
Böning and Biastoch, 2008
![Page 9: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Strength of MOC dependent on density of Overflows Strength of MOC dependent on density of Overflows
Latif et al., 2006
Observed density decreaseduring the last 4 decades
(due to freshening)
![Page 10: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
black: based on monthly, red: based on 2-yr-filtered time series
Correlation volume and heat transport (ORCA 0.5°)
Böning and Biastoch, 2008
![Page 11: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• MOC strength at 43°N between 13 and 21 Sv
• Results strongly dependent on constraints used in inverse models
• Relation between MOC, deep water formation and subpolar gyre strength ?
• Time series of mass AND heat transport needed ! Expected annual variability : 2 - 3 Sv ?
• in subpolar North Atlantic , mass and heat flow not correlated ?
• Measure annual mean volume and heat transport with uncertainty < +/- 10 %.
![Page 12: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Planned Bremen array at 47°N, proposal submitted Nov 2008
![Page 13: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Boundary current array,. Background: meridional velocity from LADCP (August 2008). Black lines: isopycnals
Will be deployed in 2009 - 2010
![Page 14: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Time series of the meridional mass and heat transport:
Separate velocity field V in
Vrel : geostrophic velocity relative to reference level
Vfluc : geostrophic velocity fluctuations at the reference level
Vmean : mean velocity in the reference level
Objective: measure directly the mean velocity at the reference level
![Page 15: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Geostrophic velocity relative to reference level from travel time of C-PIES
Reference level: depth of moored C-PIES
The geostrophic fluctuations at the reference level: calculate from pressure fluctuations p‘ measured by C-PIES
-- mean pressure cannot be used: unknown drift,...
Geostrophic velocity relative to reference level from travel time of C-PIES
Reference level: depth of moored C-PIES
The geostrophic fluctuations at the reference level: calculate from pressure fluctuations p‘ measured by C-PIES
-- mean pressure cannot be used: unknown drift,...
![Page 16: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Mean velocity at the reference level directly measured by current meter attached to the C-PIES (located above the bottom boundary layer)
Horizontal resolution must be sufficient to resolve mean velocity field
Mean velocity at the reference level directly measured by current meter attached to the C-PIES (located above the bottom boundary layer)
Horizontal resolution must be sufficient to resolve mean velocity field
![Page 17: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Meridional velocity at 47°N from sc-ADCP data, 2005 N/O THALASSA
C. Mertens
![Page 18: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
S. Hüttl, C. Böning
Meridional velocity at 47°N annual mean 1996-2004
1/12° FLAME model
![Page 19: Model LSW formation rate (2 yr averages) estimated from: (red) CFC-12 inventories, (black) mixed layer depth and (green) volume transport residual. Also](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022081603/56649ea05503460f94ba2980/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Rossby Radius of deformation : 20 km
Observed horizontal scales of NAC eddies and meanders : 100 km
Mean horizontal distance between the C-PIES: 70-90 km 30 C-PIES are needed