mobile backhaul 101
DESCRIPTION
An overview of the mobile backhaul market, the demands being placed on backhaul networks by wireless technologies such as 4G LTE, and technologies such as Carrier Ethernet that can help create more robust mobile backhaul networks.TRANSCRIPT
© Ciena
Mobile Backhaul 101 The Basics of Mobile Backhaul using
Carrier Ethernet
© Ciena
Market Dynamics Driving Changes in
Backhaul Networks
3 © Ciena
Mobile Subscribers Keep Growing
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Bil
lio
ns
CY06 CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10 CY11
Worldwide Mobile Subscribers
Source: Infonetics Research, March 2008
4 © Ciena
Mobile Backhaul Connections
Are Increasing Worldwide
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Co
nn
ec
tio
ns
(K
)
CY05 CY06 CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10
Calendar Year
New Connections Installed Connections
Source: Infonetics Research
5 © Ciena
Data Traffic Is Growing Rapidly
0
5
10
15
20
25
Mb
ps
CY05 CY06 CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10
Calendar Year
SONET/SDH PDH and ATM over PDH New Ethernet Wireline
Worldwide Average Bandwidth per Installed Connection (Mpbs)
Source: Infonetics Research
6 © Ciena
Data Dramatically Increases Traffic Load
Source: T-Mobile EuropeSource: T-Mobile Europe
T-Mobile adds HSDPA
7 © Ciena
4G Mobile Networks Are Going Live
Source: Light Reading Backhaul Tracker, October 2009
8 © Ciena
The 4G Marketplace
Major carriers committed to LTE include 39 LTE network commitments in 19 countries (Source: GSA)
LTE Rollouts 14 LTE networks anticipated to be in service by end 2010 (GSA)
31 LTE networks anticipated to be in service by end 2012 (GSA)
136 million subscribers expected by end 2014 (Pyramid Research May 2009)
$70 Billion service by 2014 (Source:Juniper Research)
9 © Ciena
Causing an Even Greater Growth in Demand
Source: Light Reading Backhaul Tracker, October, 2009
10 © Ciena
Cost is driving MNOs from TDM to Ethernet
Ethernet Provides Bandwidth at
Reduced Cost per Bit
© Ciena
Ethernet Backhaul Technology Choices
12 © Ciena
Ethernet Backhaul – Network Choices
Legacy Ethernet (No MEF compliance)
Carrier Class Ethernet (MEF compliance) 1. Connection-less Ethernet
802.1Q or 802.1ad or 802.1ah: VLANs
2. Connection Oriented Ethernet 802.1Qay (PBB-TE): VLANs
MPLS-TP: Traffic Engineered PWs over LSP
3. IP control plane based IP or MPLS VPNs IP VPN: Ethernet over L2TPv3 over IP
MPLS VPN: Ethernet PW or VLAN over LSP
13 © Ciena
Backhaul Technology Comparison Key aspects Connectionless
Ethernet
IP VPNs MPLS MPLS-TP
(Work In Progress)
PBB/PBB-TE
Interoperability - Ethernet
MEF Ethernet UNI/ENNI
MEF Ethernet Services
Interoperability - other
MPLS NNI
ATM/FR/TDM/MPLS UNI
Transparency
Address & control protocols
Scalability
Network & Services
(Pt-Pt & MPt)
Reliability
50-100msec protection
Disjoint Working/Protect
paths
Manageability
Fault sectionalization
Service & Network OAM/PM
Deterministic Perf/QoS
Guaranteed rate,
latency/jitter/loss
Low CapEx and OpEx
Need IWF, dry Martini
L3
TBD
L2
FRR
1+1
Need IWF, dry Martini
Connection Oriented Ethernet
Need IWF (L2TP, GRE)
Need IWF (L2TP, GRE)
TBD
14 © Ciena
Meeting 4G Backhaul Requirements
OAM Carrier-class OAM (SONET-like)
Performance management
Protection mechanism support
QoS OAM & clock sync message delivery
High priority user traffic (VoIP, Video)
Managed traffic flows with multi-class QoS
Bandwidth
Management
Granular bandwidth control for better QoS management
Protection path management
Oversubscription for low priority traffic
Protection Rapid protection
Managed bandwidth and QoS on failover
Node and link diverse paths
Topology Support more cost-effective topologies
uWave, copper, fiber hybrid support
Reduced tower footprint
Provisioning and
Management
Minimize provisioning cost/effort/complexity
SONET-like simplicity
MAC address management
Transition and
Convergence
Co-existence with legacy networks during transition
Convergence with residential and enterprise packet transport
15 © Ciena
Key 4G Objectives
Higher Speeds
– 100 Mbit/s peak downlink, 50 Mbit/s peak uplink
– Network MIMO and MBMS-Single Frequency Node (MBMS-SFN) requirements
– enable new applications
Lower Latencies
Less than 10 ms – enables high speed apps
Clock Synchronization
Phase and frequency clock synchronization
X2 Interface Support
Provide efficient delivery of tower to tower traffic
Backward Compatibility
Hand-over and roaming with existing GSM/EDGE/UMTS networks
© Ciena
Ethernet Backhaul Solutions
17 © Ciena
Solution: Example Ethernet Backhaul Architecture
Access Metro Edge Core
PE
P
P
ISP
National
MPLS PE
10Gig
Q-in-Q (Q)
PBB-TE (P)
H-VPLS (H)
10Gig
PBB-TE (P)
GigE (P)
Summary
Diverse path PBB-TE from every radio site
IEEE 802.1ag used throughout the network
Tiered resiliency solution for minimal impact to services
CIR/EIR per service and per tunnel
Advanced OAM features Y.1731, per service loop-backs, etc
Management for tunnel and service provisioning
18 © Ciena
Solution Component: Accelerating Installation,
Provisioning and Upgrades – Reduced OPEX
Automation leads to 75% less installation & configuration time
with zero touch upgrades
Network
Servers
3
4
OPERATOR
2
ESM
1 NOC creates work order
Switch Installed with no configuration
required by field personnel
NOC pushes service profile to server
Ethernet switch self-configures
19 © Ciena
Solution Component: Performance Management
PBB-TE
BEB
PBB-TE
BEB
PBB-TE
BCBs
Connection Oriented Ethernet with Y.1731 Performance Management
• Performance Management between Tunnel Endpoints
• Provides Service Independent Tunnel Monitoring
• Enhanced Scalability: 1,000’s of services may traverse the tunnel without the need to monitor every service
• Leverages 802.1ag frames for reduced overhead
• Multiple packets sent at 100ms interval to perform the test
• Frame Delay / Frame Delay Variation / Loss Measurement
• 2-way Delay Roundtrip Measurement
• 1-way Delay Measurement (requires common time base)
• Single Ended Frame-Loss (MEP to MEP)
PRIMARY
BACKUP
Y.1731 Performance Management
Y.1731 ETH-LM PM
20 © Ciena
Solution Component: Protection / Restoration
PBB-TE
BEB
PBB-TE
BEB
PBB-TE
BCBs
Connection Oriented Ethernet with 802.1ag CFM
• Single or Dual Homed
• Intelligent Tunnel Synchronization
• Tunnel Monitoring and Failure Detection
• 802.1ag CCMs (loss of 3 CCM indicates a fault)
• Rapid protection switching
• Optional automatic Reversion with configurable timers
• Configurable EtherTypes to facilitate vendor interoperability
802.3ah OAM – Physical Link
• Link Loopback
• Service Affecting
• Active or Passive per port config
• Errored frame seconds reported (Link Monitoring)
• Link based dying gasp reported (Fault Signaling)
• OAM Discovery
802.1ag CFM / Y.1731 Virtual Service
• Non Service Affecting
• Per VLAN/Tunnel MAC Ping (LoopBack)
• Per VLAN/Tunnel MAC Traceroute
• Per VLAN/Tunnel Continuity Check
• Constantly Checks Service State
• Reports Error if 3 CCMs are lost
• 10 msec to 10min intervals
• Maintenance End-Points & Intermediate-Points
• Y.1731 Alarm Indication Signal (AIS)
• Hierarchical Maintenance Domains (MD)
PRIMARY
BACKUP
802.1ag CFM Continuity Check Messages (CCM)
CCM ( + CCM.rdi from far-end MEP) (dual homed)
21 © Ciena
Solution Component: Service Guarantees Explicit QoS per Tunnel per Service
2R/3C QoS Maximizes the Dynamic
Bandwidth of a Packet-based Network
EIR – Excess (Peak) Information Rate Bandwidth Up To the EIR is Used When
Available
Bandwidth Above the EIR is Dropped
CIR – Committed Information Rate Bandwidth Up To the CIR Is Guaranteed
Both Unicast and Multicast may have
EIR/CIR
Ingress QoS Two Rate/Three-Color Policing CIR/EIR, 64kbps-1Gbps, 64kbps
increments Classification Ingress Port Customer VID CoS 802.1p IP Precedence Diff Serve MPLS EXP (LE-311v)
Egress QoS Two Rate/Three-Color Shaping CIR/EIR, 64Kbps-8Gbps, 64Kbps
increments RED Congestion Management Strict and WFQ Scheduling Classification Ingress/Egress Port Service VID CoS 802.1p IP Precedence Diff Serve MPLS EXP (LE-311v)
22 © Ciena
Solution Component: Multiservice over Ethernet
TDM
(NxE1)
Ethernet
(10/100)
FE GE
2G BSC
(GSM or
CDMA)
3G RNC
(UMTS R5/R6 or
CDMA2000)
GSM BTS
- W-CDMA NodeB (R5/R6)
- CDMA2000 Node B
TDM
(Ch STM1 to
64kbps level)
ATM
(STM1)
Gigabit Ethernet/IP
Pseudowire
GE
ATM
(NxE1 IMA)
W-CDMA
Node B (R4/R99)
3G RNC
(UMTS R99)
Multiservice platforms built for TDM, ATM and Ethernet backhaul
Voice, Data & Video isolation achieved via
Individual Pseudowires
Individual VLANs
Flexible & Cost effective
Carrier grade & QoS/CoS aware
True Carrier Ethernet
Access Aggregation
23 © Ciena
Solution Component: Synchronization over a
Packet Network
NodeB
BTS
E1/T1 Ethernet
3G RNC
Ethernet
Packet Switched Network
E1 /T1
Gateway
There are multiple ways to synchronize an end device over a packet infrastructure RAN :
GPS synchronization system at the cell-site and the head-end site
Traditional Network Synchronization (BITS, Line, Sonet/SDH, etc) at each end
Differential timing over PSN using RTP - distribution at BSC/RNC with recovery at cell-site
Adaptive Clock Recovery (ACR) with recovery at the cell-site using jitter buffers and PLLs
G.8261 Synchronous Ethernet - Uses physical layer for accurate frequency distribution
IEEE 1588v2 – Time and frequency distribution using time-stamp information exchange
GPS Synchronization
Direct E1/T1 Circuit
Differential Timing
Adaptive Timing
IEEE-1588v2
Synchronous Ethernet
Aggregator
3G
2G 2G
BSC
Timing Distribution Mechanisms:
Source Recovery
4G eNB
3G NB
4G MME S-GW P-GW
Ethernet
24 © Ciena
Solution Component: Time Synchronization
Sync-E (G.8261) provides frequency sync only
sufficient for 2G/3G non-TDD radio technology
Sync-E requires all devices along the path from
GM to radio be capable
IEEE 1588v2 (G.8262) provides frequency and
phase sync
Ordinary Clock (OC) at cell sites
Transparent Clock (TC) deployed strategically
Boundary Clock (BC) for regen & scalability
1588v2 can traverse non-1588v2 aware L2/L3
switches
To meet LTE radio timing requirements Sync-E for
frequency, 1588v2 for phase alignment and
frequency
Access
Ring
Access
Ring
Transport
Ring
Access
Ring
Transport
Ring
BC
BC
TC
TC
TC
OC
TC
TC TC
OC
OC
TC
OC
Evolved
Packet
Core
1588v2
SyncE
25 © Ciena
Summary
• Increasing mobile traffic demands force a migration to packet backhaul
• Ethernet architectures meets technical requirements (if it includes all the appropriate components)
• Scalable bandwidth
• Automated management
• Performance management
• Resiliance
• QoS
• Timing
• Pseudowire technology provides a seamless migration strategy to LTE backhaul
© Ciena
Thank You