minutes - edl€¦ · vickie ohlman, vice president, csea lori hernandez, principal, morris school...
TRANSCRIPT
10
CYPRESS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Regular Meeting – Board of Trustees
January 15, 2015
MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order at 5:45 p.m. in the Board Room of the Central Administration Offices by President Kern, followed by the pledge of allegiance.
1. Call to Order
Steve Blount Candice Kern Sandra Lee Brian Nakamura Lydia Sondhi, Ph.D.
2. Roll Call Trustees Present
Beverly M. Hempstead, Superintendent Tim McLellan, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Marcos Rojas, Director, Technology Services Tandy Taylor, Director, Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment Bob Daley, Director, Maintenance/Operations/Transportation Lenette Brown, Director, Child Nutrition Services Debra Parker, Executive Assistant
Staff Present
Motion by Trustee Sondhi, second by Trustee Nakamura, carried unanimously, the agenda was approved as presented.
3. Approval of Agenda Motion No. 22
No public comments on Closed Session items. 4. Public Comments, Closed Session
Motion by Trustee Nakamura, second by Trustee Lee, carried unanimously, the Board adjourned to closed session to address the following items:
Closed Session Motion No. 23
Conference with Real Property Negotiators 4.A.1
Public Employee Performance Evaluation 4.A.2
The Board adjourned to closed session at 5:47 p.m., accompanied by Assistant Superintendent Tim McLellan and consultant Barry Blade. At 6:35 p.m., McLellan and Blade left the room.
The meeting reconvened to open session at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room. Closed Session Report: President Kern reported that the Board met in closed session to discuss real property negotiations and public employee performance evaluation, and no action or direction was given by the Board.
Regular Meeting – Board of Trustees: January 15, 2015 11 President Kern recognized Morris Principal Lori Hernandez for a presentation on the Gifted and Talented Education (GATE) Cluster Model at Morris School. Students from Audrey Jeans’ 5th grade class shared Depth and Complexity Icons, which are visual prompts designed to help students go beyond surface level understanding of a concept and enhance their ability to think critically. Students from Michelle Moore’s 6th grade class shared highlights from recent Project-Based Learning science activities.
4.A.3 Student Presentation: Morris School
Parent Patti Williamson shared with the Board how happy she is at Morris School and praised the principal, teachers, staff, and other families.
5. Public Comments, Open Session
President Kern recessed the meeting briefly to dismiss students.
Maureen Clair, President, ACT Donna Wittenberg, President, CSEA Vickie Ohlman, Vice President, CSEA Lori Hernandez, Principal, Morris School See guest register for others present
Public Recognition
Motion by Trustee Blount, second by Trustee Nakamura, carried unanimously, the minutes from the December 11, 2014 Board meeting were approved as presented.
6. Approval of Minutes: Regular Meeting December 11, 2014 Motion No. 24
Motion by Trustee Nakamura, second by Trustee Blount, carried unanimously, Consent Items 7.A.1 through 7.F.3 were approved as presented.
7. Consent Items Motion No. 25
The Board of Trustees approved acceptance of gifts received during the period December 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. (7.A.1 Exhibit A)
7.A.1 Acceptance of Gifts
The Board of Trustees approved acceptance of the grants received during the period December 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. (7.B.1 Exhibit A)
7.B.1 Acceptance of Grants
Discussion: Trustee Sondhi asked about the application and oversight process for grants. Tandy Taylor explained that most grants fall under curriculum and, therefore, her department has primary oversight. She explained that teachers apply for small grants, typically under $2,000, which are then presented to the Board for acceptance. Larger grants involving more substantial requirements are presented for Board approval prior to applying. Sondhi commended those individuals who go above and beyond to apply for grants that facilitate opportunities for students in the classroom.
The Board of Trustees approved Human Resources Report, Certificated, listing Certificated employee transactions occurring since the December 11, 2014 report. (7.E.1 Exhibit A)
7.E.1 Human Resources Report, Certificated
Regular Meeting – Board of Trustees: January 15, 2015 12 The Board of Trustees approved Human Resources Report, Classified, listing Classified employee transactions occurring since the December 11, 2014 report. (7.E.2 Exhibit A)
7.E.2 Human Resources Report, Classified
The Board of Trustees ratified purchase orders processed from December 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. (7.F.1 Exhibit A)
7.F.1 Purchase Order Report
The Board of Trustees ratified the check report for the period December 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. (7.F.2 Exhibit A)
7.F.2 Check Report
The Board of Trustees approved the Agreement for Special Services/ Fiscal Budget Services with School Services of California, Inc. for the period February 1, 2015, through January 31, 2016, at the annual rate of $2,580.
7.F.3 Renew Agreement with School Services of California
Motion by Trustee Sondhi, second by Trustee Lee, carried unanimously, the Board of Trustees voted to accept and file the Cypress School District Audit Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2014, prepared by Nigro & Nigro, PC. (8.F.1 Exhibit A)
8.F.1 Cypress School District Audit – 2013/14 Motion No. 26
Tandy Taylor, Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment, presented information regarding state and federal programs and accountability requirements.
9.B.1 State & Federal Programs and Accountability Presentation
On motion by Trustee Blount, second by Trustee Lee, carried unanimously, the Board of Trustees approved publication of the 2013-14 School Accountability Report Cards (SARCs) prepared by each school. (9.B.2 Exhibit A)
9.B.2 School Accountability Report Cards, 2013-14 Motion No. 27
On motion by Trustee Blount, second by Trustee Lee, the Board of Trustees accepted the 2014-2015 Quarterly Report of Williams Legis-lation Uniform Complaints indicating Cypress School District received no complaints during the second quarter of the 2014/15 school year.
9.D.1 Williams Uniform Complaints Motion No. 28
Trustee Nakamura wished everyone a Happy New Year. He attended the Rose Parade and saw the Cypress High School band perform. He also attended the Orange County Department of Education Outstanding Contributions to Education awards ceremony where retired Board Member David Giese was honored.
10. Announcements or Requests from the Board
Trustee Sondhi attended the California School Boards Association Annual Education Conference and New Board Member session and found it to be a very productive meeting. She shared emergency preparedness materials from Prep and Save, including a Student Earthquake/Emergency Kit, as well as information about Fresh Grade, a student e-Portfolio program. She had the opportunity to meet with Superintendent Hempstead and Assistant Superintendent McLellan for an overview of the Cypress School District Public Financing Corporation and also received laptop training with Technology Services Director Marcos Rojas.
EXHIBIT A 7.A.1
CYPRESS SCHOOL DISTRICT Cypress, California 90630
GIFTS TO DISTRICT December 1 – 31, 2014
SCHOOL DONOR CASH NON-CASH
Arnold Don C. Wood, DDS $10.00
King Kiwanis Club of La Palma 5 rulers, 3 bottles glue, 1 pack index cards, 22 packages crayons, 3 spiral notebooks
Landell Don C. Wood, DDS $16.00
Luther Don C. Wood, DDS $10.00
Morris Don C. Wood, DDS $20.00
Morris Lifetouch Studios $731.00
Vessels Don C. Wood, DDS $10.00
Vessels McDonalds/Dejon Enterprises, Inc. $664.08
Cash Subtotal $1,461.08
Year-to-Date Cash Total $31,373.27
14.1 EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A 7.B.1
CYPRESS SCHOOL DISTRICT Cypress, California
GRANTS AWARDED TO DISTRICT December 1 – 31, 2014
GRANTEE GRANTOR DESCRIPTION Arnold Elementary Jean Chen-Wu Kindergarten Teacher
Cotsen Foundation for the Art of Teaching
Funding for Teacher Professional Development, “Delving in Deeper with CGI”
Arnold Elementary Jean Chen-Wu
Target – Scholarship America
Funding for a field trip
Arnold Elementary Jean Chen-Wu Katherine Whitten Candice Earley Kyoko Michiue-Yue
Donors Choose Funding for “CGI Math, Here we Come!” project
Landell Elementary Mindy Pfafflin
Schools First Grant Funding for instructional supplies
14.2 EXHIBITS
Human Resources Report, Certificated January 15, 2015
EXHIBIT A 7.E.1
Additional Assignment Vessels teacher Sarah Baye will provide tutoring for two special education students for 45 minutes per day for 18 days between December 9, 2014 and February 18, 2015 (total 13.5 hours) and will be compensated at the helping teacher rate of pay ($39.10).
Additional Compensation, BTSA/Induction Program Mentors The following teachers will serve as mentors to one or more BTSA/Induction participating teachers during the 2014/15 academic year and will be paid a stipend not to exceed $1,200 per teacher served, payable in two installments: Name Participating Teachers Total Not To Exceed Jeans, Audrey 5 $6,000 Ortiz, Isis 3 $3,600
Additional Compensation, BTSA/Induction Program Lead Mentor Audrey Jeans will serve as lead mentor for the District’s BTSA/Induction program for the 2014/15 academic year and will be paid a stipend not to exceed $2,000, payable in two installments.
Conference Requests Conference attendance requests have been received as follows: Event Location Cost Dates ACSA 2015 Every Child Counts Symposium Monterey $1,400 1/14-16/15 Funding Source: MAA Funds Attendee: Novy, Jodi Connect Institute Tustin $271.40 ea 02/25-27/15 Funding Source: General Fund Attendees: Gautreau, Julie Taylor, Tandy Aeries SIS Spring 2015 Users’ Conference Ontario $605.28 03/09-10/15 Funding Source: General Fund Attendee: Taylor, Tandy
Employment, Substitutes Name Effective Date Buksa, Kimberly 12/11/14 Button, Lindsey 12/12/14 Duck, Krystal 12/11/14 Fagan, Kimberly 12/17/14 Merz Hoffmeister, Michelle 12/18/14 Mott, Doreen 12/10/14 Nasreen, Tayeba 12/11/14 Ragas, Kimberly 12/03/14 Swails, Bernadette 12/03/14
14.3 EXHIBITS
Human Resources Report, Classified January 15, 2015
EXHIBIT A 7.E.2
Conference Requests Conference attendance requests have been received as follows:
Event Location Cost Dates Connect Institute Tustin $271.40 02/25-27/15 Funding Source: General Fund Attendee: Rojas, Marcos Aeries SIS Spring 2015 Users’ Conference Ontario 03/09-10/15 Funding Source: General Fund Attendees: Rojas, Marcos $605.28 Mun, Aerin $614.15 Employment, Probationary Status Name Classification Location Effective Date Cole, Mercedes Licensed Vocational Nurse SE/Student Svcs. 12/18/14 Lanzarotta, Gabriella Paraeducator/SH-PT Vessels 01/12/15 Lopp, Teressa Credentials Analyst/HR
Specialist Human Resources 12/31/14
Employment, Substitutes Name Effective Date Abel, Alison 12/04/14 Chawla, Fatima 12/19/14 Kissinger, Erin 12/30/14
14.4 EXHIBITS
AC
CO
UN
TP
SEU
DO
/ O
BJE
CT
DE
SCR
IPT
ION
AC
CO
UN
TN
UM
BE
RA
MO
UN
TT
OT
AL
VE
ND
OR
FR
OM
12/0
1/20
14T
O12
/31/
2014
BO
AR
D O
F T
RU
STE
ES
ME
ET
ING
01/1
5/20
15
CY
PR
ESS
SD
PU
RC
HA
SE O
RD
ER
DE
TA
IL R
EP
OR
T
PO
PO
NU
MB
ER
Mod
erni
zatio
n -
Arn
old
/ Oth
er C
osts
- P
lann
ing
4031
5108
50 6
260
CH
IPM
AN
RE
LO
CA
TIO
NS
225.
00I1
6B00
2222
5.00
Mod
erni
zatio
n -
Arn
old
/ Non
-Cap
italiz
ed E
quip
men
t40
3151
0850
441
1A
+ IN
TE
RA
CT
IVE
TE
CH
NO
LO
GIE
S21
2.40
I16B
0023
212.
40
Fisc
al S
ervi
ces
/ Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0104
1107
30 4
314
STA
PL
ES
BU
SIN
ESS
AD
VA
NT
AG
E48
3.26
I16C
0119
483.
26
Titl
e II
-Par
t A-I
mpr
Tch
r Q
lty /
Tra
vel &
Con
fere
nce
0143
1772
10 5
202
NST
A C
ON
VE
NT
ION
S18
5.00
I16C
0120
185.
00
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Ins
truc
tiona
l Sup
plie
s01
3111
0100
431
1O
FF
ICE
DE
PO
T32
3.54
I16C
0121
323.
54
Fisc
al S
ervi
ces
/ Non
-Cap
italiz
ed E
quip
men
t01
0411
0730
441
1ST
AP
LE
S B
USI
NE
SS A
DV
AN
TA
GE
1,09
0.12
I16C
0122
1,09
0.12
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Fie
ld T
rip
Exp
endi
ture
s01
3711
0100
581
1H
OL
INSW
OR
TH
, JE
SSIC
A15
0.00
I16C
0123
150.
00
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Ins
truc
tiona
l Sup
plie
s01
4211
0100
431
1P
ER
EZ
, TR
AC
EY
380.
00I1
6C01
2438
0.00
Fisc
al S
ervi
ces
/ Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0104
1107
30 4
314
OF
FIC
E D
EP
OT
691.
86I1
6C01
2569
1.86
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0138
1101
00 4
314
OF
FIC
E D
EP
OT
644.
27I1
6C01
2664
4.27
Hum
an R
esou
rces
Ser
vice
s / T
B/F
lu/E
xam
s01
0511
0740
581
7O
CC
UP
AT
ION
AL
HE
AL
TH
CE
NT
ER
S O
F61
.00
I16C
0127
61.0
0
Lib
rary
/Med
ia/T
echn
olog
y / O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
3711
0240
431
4O
FF
ICE
DE
PO
T1,
216.
04I1
6C01
281,
216.
04
Med
i-C
al I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Tra
vel &
Con
fere
nce
0109
1801
00 5
202
SEL
L, M
ITR
A40
3.80
I16C
0129
403.
80
Plan
t Mai
nt/O
per
/ Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0136
1108
10 4
314
WA
XIE
EN
TE
RP
RIS
ES
INC
.2,
505.
29I1
6C01
302,
505.
29
Cen
tral
Sup
port
/ O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
0411
0750
431
4ST
AP
LE
S B
USI
NE
SS A
DV
AN
TA
GE
120.
80I1
6C01
3112
0.80
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Ins
truc
tiona
l Sup
plie
s01
4211
0100
431
1O
FF
ICE
DE
PO
T70
3.13
I16C
0132
703.
13
Cen
tral
Sup
port
/ O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
0211
0750
431
4ST
AP
LE
S B
USI
NE
SS A
DV
AN
TA
GE
109.
39I1
6C01
3410
9.39
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Ins
truc
tiona
l Sup
plie
s01
4011
0100
431
1O
FF
ICE
DE
PO
T45
2.76
I16C
0135
452.
76
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Ins
truc
tiona
l Sup
plie
s01
3111
0100
431
1O
FF
ICE
DE
PO
T53
2.58
I16C
0136
532.
58
Food
Ser
vice
s / E
quip
Ren
t/Rep
air
Non
-Ins
tr13
1774
0370
561
0IN
DU
STR
IAL
EL
EC
TR
IC51
6.55
I16F
0034
516.
55
Faci
litie
s &
Ope
ratio
ns /
Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0114
1108
10 4
314
CW
IN
DU
STR
IES
2,00
0.00
I16M
0020
2,00
0.00
Faci
litie
s &
Ope
ratio
ns /
Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0114
1108
10 4
314
AIR
EM
AST
ER
S25
0.00
I16M
0021
250.
00
Faci
litie
s &
Ope
ratio
ns /
Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0114
1108
10 4
314
OF
FIC
E D
EP
OT
172.
79I1
6M00
2317
2.79
SH/I
NST
RU
CT
ION
AL
/ In
stru
ctio
nal S
uppl
ies
0109
1621
10 4
311
TA
RG
ET
ST
OR
ES
450.
00I1
6R01
7545
0.00
EM
DA
VI
<V
er. 0
2070
3>PO
010
Use
r ID
:Pa
ge N
o.:
1C
urre
nt D
ate:
12/2
3/20
14R
epor
t ID
:12
:02:
56C
urre
nt T
ime:
EXHIBIT A 7.F.1 - Page 1 of 3
14.5 EXHIBITS
AC
CO
UN
TP
SEU
DO
/ O
BJE
CT
DE
SCR
IPT
ION
AC
CO
UN
TN
UM
BE
RA
MO
UN
TT
OT
AL
VE
ND
OR
FR
OM
12/0
1/20
14T
O12
/31/
2014
BO
AR
D O
F T
RU
STE
ES
ME
ET
ING
01/1
5/20
15
CY
PR
ESS
SD
PU
RC
HA
SE O
RD
ER
DE
TA
IL R
EP
OR
T
PO
PO
NU
MB
ER
SH/I
NST
RU
CT
ION
AL
/ In
stru
ctio
nal S
uppl
ies
0109
1621
10 4
311
TA
RG
ET
ST
OR
ES
450.
00I1
6R01
7645
0.00
SH/I
NST
RU
CT
ION
AL
/ In
stru
ctio
nal S
uppl
ies
0109
1621
10 4
311
TA
RG
ET
ST
OR
ES
450.
00I1
6R01
7745
0.00
SUPP
/UN
DU
PLIC
AT
ED
TE
CH
NO
LO
GY
/ In
stru
ctio
nal
0130
2162
40 4
311
DA
TA
IM
PR
ESS
ION
S60
7.32
I16R
0178
607.
32
Prin
t Sho
p/In
stru
ctio
nal /
Pri
ntin
g Su
pplie
s01
0310
3100
431
2R
ICO
H82
9.44
I16R
0179
829.
44
Prin
t Sho
p/In
stru
ctio
nal /
Pri
ntin
g Su
pplie
s01
0310
3100
431
2D
UP
LO
777.
60I1
6R01
8077
7.60
Fisc
al S
ervi
ces
/ Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0104
1107
30 4
314
CD
W-G
1,98
6.86
I16R
0181
1,98
6.86
RSP
NSH
/Ins
truc
tiona
l / O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
0916
3120
431
4C
DW
-G70
.63
I16R
0182
70.6
3
Inst
ruct
iona
l Sta
ff D
evel
/ O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
3111
0220
431
4A
PP
LE
IN
C.
500.
00I1
6R01
8350
0.00
Lib
rary
/Med
ia/T
echn
olog
y / O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
4011
0240
431
4B
LU
E L
AB
EL
PO
WE
R18
8.68
I16R
0184
188.
68
IASA
Ti I
/Ins
truc
tiona
l / I
nstr
uctio
nal S
uppl
ies
0136
2211
00 4
311
RE
AD
NA
TU
RA
LL
Y64
.80
I16R
0185
64.8
0
Prin
t Sho
p/In
stru
ctio
nal /
Pri
ntin
g Su
pplie
s01
0310
3100
431
2C
DW
-G44
8.95
I16R
0186
448.
95
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Fie
ld T
rip
Exp
endi
ture
s01
4211
0100
581
1H
ER
ITA
GE
MU
SEU
M86
4.00
I16R
0187
864.
00
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Fie
ld T
rip
Exp
endi
ture
s01
4211
0100
581
1E
NV
IRO
NM
EN
TA
L N
AT
UR
E C
EN
TE
R62
4.00
I16R
0188
624.
00
Inse
rvic
e Pr
oj/I
nstr
/ T
rave
l & C
onfe
renc
e01
0311
0100
520
2T
UST
IN P
UB
LIC
SC
HO
OL
S F
OU
ND
AT
I74
7.00
I16R
0189
747.
00
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Ins
truc
tiona
l Sup
plie
s01
4011
0100
431
1U
S G
AM
ES
274.
94I1
6R01
9027
4.94
Titl
e II
Par
t A-I
mpr
Tch
r Q
lty /
Inst
ruct
iona
l Sup
plie
s01
0317
7214
431
1T
HIN
KIN
G M
AP
S IN
C1,
276.
80I1
6R01
911,
276.
80
Inse
rvic
e Pr
oj/I
nstr
/ O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
0311
0100
431
4C
DW
-G30
5.12
I16R
0192
305.
12
Titl
e II
-Par
t A-I
mpr
Tch
r Q
lty /
Tra
vel &
Con
fere
nce
0143
1772
10 5
202
CR
EA
TIV
E M
AT
HE
MA
TIC
S22
5.00
I16R
0193
225.
00
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Fie
ld T
rip
Exp
endi
ture
s01
3111
0100
581
1F
RIE
ND
S O
F A
RT
S E
DU
CA
TIO
N90
.00
I16R
0194
90.0
0
Cla
ssro
om/I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Fie
ld T
rip
Exp
endi
ture
s01
3111
0100
581
1K
NO
TT
'S B
ER
RY
FA
RM
2,56
2.00
I16R
0195
2,56
2.00
Inse
rvic
e Pr
oj/I
nstr
/ T
rave
l & C
onfe
renc
e01
0311
0100
520
2O
RA
NG
E C
OU
NT
Y D
EP
T. E
DU
CA
TIO
N45
.00
I16R
0196
45.0
0
Hum
an R
esou
rces
Ser
vice
s / T
rave
l & C
onfe
renc
e01
0511
0740
520
2A
CSA
439.
00I1
6R01
9743
9.00
Fisc
al S
ervi
ces
/ Oth
er S
uppl
ies
0104
1107
30 4
314
RR
DO
NN
EL
LY
CO
48.9
1I1
6R01
9848
.91
Med
i-C
al I
nstr
uctio
nal /
Tra
vel &
Con
fere
nce
0109
1801
00 5
202
AC
SA75
0.00
I16R
0199
750.
00
EM
DA
VI
<V
er. 0
2070
3>PO
010
Use
r ID
:Pa
ge N
o.:
2C
urre
nt D
ate:
12/2
3/20
14R
epor
t ID
:12
:02:
56C
urre
nt T
ime:
EXHIBIT A 7.F.1 - Page 2 of 3
14.6 EXHIBITS
AC
CO
UN
TP
SEU
DO
/ O
BJE
CT
DE
SCR
IPT
ION
AC
CO
UN
TN
UM
BE
RA
MO
UN
TT
OT
AL
VE
ND
OR
FR
OM
12/0
1/20
14T
O12
/31/
2014
BO
AR
D O
F T
RU
STE
ES
ME
ET
ING
01/1
5/20
15
CY
PR
ESS
SD
PU
RC
HA
SE O
RD
ER
DE
TA
IL R
EP
OR
T
PO
PO
NU
MB
ER
Lib
rary
& M
edia
Ins
truc
t / O
ther
Con
trac
t Ser
vice
0108
1102
40 5
806
ME
ND
TR
ON
IX57
8.66
I16T
0025
578.
66
Lib
rary
& M
edia
Ins
truc
t / N
on C
apita
lized
Com
pute
r E
qpt
0108
1102
40 4
414
CD
W-G
167.
89I1
6T00
2616
7.89
Lib
rary
& M
edia
Ins
truc
t / N
on C
apita
lized
Com
pute
r E
qpt
0108
1102
40 4
414
AN
IXT
ER
227.
30I1
6T00
2722
7.30
Lib
rary
& M
edia
Ins
truc
t / O
ther
Sup
plie
s01
0811
0240
431
4W
AR
ESD
IRE
CT
.CO
M10
5.76
I16T
0028
105.
76
Lib
rary
& M
edia
Ins
truc
t / N
on C
apita
lized
Com
pute
r E
qpt
0108
1102
40 4
414
CD
W-G
3,06
0.61
I16T
0029
3,06
0.61
Pupi
l Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
/ Equ
ip R
ent/R
epai
r N
on-I
nstr
0118
2443
60 5
610
CO
AST
LIN
E E
QU
IPM
EN
T4,
000.
00I1
6X00
904,
000.
00
35,6
91.9
0F
und
01 T
otal
:51
6.55
Fun
d 13
Tot
al:
437.
40F
und
40 T
otal
:
36,6
45.8
5T
otal
Am
ount
of
Pur
chas
e O
rder
s:
EXHIBIT A 7.F.1 - Page 3 of 3
14.7 EXHIBITS
CYPRESS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cypress, CA 90630
January 15, 2015
A – CHECKS: PAYROLL
Payroll 5A Certificated $ 1,536,387.50
Payroll 5B Classified 492,248.72
Payroll Total $ 2,028,636.22
B – CHECKS: OTHER EXPENDITURES
Checks #40502-40676
General Fund $243,530.31
Cafeteria Fund 58,404.97
Special Reserve 28,681.09
Health & Welfare Insurance Fund 263,383.10
Expenditure Total $593,999.47
EXHIBIT A 7.F.2 - Page 1 of 6
14.8 EXHIBITS
CYPRESS SD 01/05/15 Check Register - One Line Page 1
MON, JAN 05, 2015, 8:48 AM --req: EMDAVI----leg: 16 ----loc: 16FISCAL--job: 14414032 #J061--prog: CK500 <1.43>--report id: CKREG1--
SORT: Check ID & No
SELECT Check Dates: 12/1/2014-12/31/2014
Check ID/# Payee ID Payee Name First Reference Subs Check Date Cancel Dt Replaced By Type Check Amount
=========== ============ ============================== ================ ==== ========== ========== =========== ==== ==============
16 00040502 V1603256 BASIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES TEA 4105 OH 12/01/2014 MW 165.00
16 00040503 V1600768 CDW-G QT42159 OH 12/01/2014 MW 453.60
16 00040504 V1602899 GATEWAY-PRIMARY & MULTISPECIAL 26828 OH 12/01/2014 MW 207.00
16 00040505 V1600346 GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY NOV 2014B OH 12/01/2014 MW 56.84
16 00040506 V1600133 OFFICE DEPOT 740762379001 OH 12/01/2014 MW 304.17
16 00040507 V1601675 SCIENCE OLYMPIAD 0509180-IN OH 12/01/2014 MW 52.95
16 00040508 V1602613 STAPLES CREDIT PLAN 1199088351 OH 12/01/2014 MW 354.15
16 00040509 V1600465 VAVRINEK-TRINE-DAY & CO. LLP 0109161-IN OH 12/01/2014 MW 1,056.78
16 00040510 V1603178 WARE DISPOSAL DEC 2014 OH 12/01/2014 MW 6,328.00
16 00040511 V1600397 WAXIE ENTERPRISES INC. 74944890 OH 12/01/2014 MW 3,009.79
16 00040512 V1602797 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITEC SH14-0733 OH 12/01/2014 MW 18,944.02
16 00040513 V1602527 PLATT SECURITY INC 031880 OH 12/01/2014 MW 2,240.00
16 00040514 V1601172 QUILL CORPORATION 5524242 OH 12/03/2014 MW 807.97
16 00040515 V1603302 !#1 TOUCH-SCREEN TABLET COMPUT 1201410 OH 12/04/2014 MW 425.00
16 00040516 V1603303 !ACE TUTORING SERVICES INC 201410 OH 12/04/2014 MW 120.00
16 00040517 V1603091 CAMBIUM LEARNING GROUP/VOYAGER RI1376105 OH 12/04/2014 MW 100.00
16 00040518 V1601934 CHEVRON 42835470 OH 12/04/2014 MW 3,677.84
16 00040519 V1600133 OFFICE DEPOT 741577060001 OH 12/04/2014 MW 980.43
16 00040520 V1603304 PROFESSIONAL TUTORS OF AMERICA 50997 OH 12/04/2014 MW 408.00
16 00040521 V1601172 QUILL CORPORATION 781034 OH 12/04/2014 MW 1,394.24
16 00040522 V1601851 RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION 5033472873 OH 12/04/2014 MW 1,845.81
16 00040523 V1602588 SPRINT 455006554-090 OH 12/04/2014 MW 101.36
16 00040524 V1603035 SUBWAY 11/24/14 OH 12/04/2014 MW 1,420.75
16 00040525 V1602453 A.M. ELECTRICAL SERVICES 8593 OH 12/05/2014 MW 460.00
16 00040526 V1602987 BIOLCHINO, MATTHEW NOV 2014 OH 12/05/2014 MW 103.04
16 00040527 V1600083 CERTIFIED TRANSPORTATION SERVI 01-119575 OH 12/05/2014 MW 1,684.80
16 00040528 V1602286 DIOCESE OF ORANGE OFFICE OF FA TECH14 OC OH 12/05/2014 MW 360.00
16 00040529 V1603306 EDUCATIONAL AND TUTORIAL SERVI 20141510 OH 12/05/2014 MW 174.90
16 00040530 V1600167 GREATER ANAHEIM SELPA 15049 REVISED OH 12/05/2014 MW 14,269.30
16 00040531 V1600133 OFFICE DEPOT 741940625001 OH 12/05/2014 MW 446.99
16 00040532 V1603000 A & R WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS I 824086 OH 12/05/2014 MW 16,072.95
16 00040533 V1603006 CHEMMARK 272705 OH 12/05/2014 MW 618.96
16 00040534 V1603007 CLEARBROOK FARMS INC AR NOV 2014 OH 12/05/2014 MW 8,214.62
16 00040535 V1603034 SUNRISE PRODUCE 01437104 OH 12/05/2014 MW 2,861.61
16 00040536 V1602891 River City Testing 40537 OH 12/05/2014 MW 350.00
16 00040537 V1602272 AALR & R PROFESSIONAL CORP.ATO 462947 OH 12/08/2014 MW 1,620.68
16 00040538 V1602272 AALR & R PROFESSIONAL CORP.ATO 462945 OH 12/08/2014 MW 2,362.07
16 00040539 V1602968 HEMSLEY, JIM 2 2014-15 OH 12/09/2014 MW 4,900.00
16 00040540 V1603264 ASPIRAR-OXFORD TUTORING 1 OH 12/11/2014 MW 284.00
16 00040541 V1600083 CERTIFIED TRANSPORTATION SERVI 01-118875 OH 12/11/2014 MW 842.40
16 00040542 V1602379 DUPLO P172742 OH 12/11/2014 MW 788.88
16 00040543 V1603308 ENVIRONMENTAL NATURE CENTER 1415122 VESSELS OH 12/11/2014 MW 624.00
EXHIBIT A 7.F.2 - Page 2 of 6
14.9 EXHIBITS
CYPRESS SD 01/05/15 Check Register - One Line Page 2
MON, JAN 05, 2015, 8:48 AM --req: EMDAVI----leg: 16 ----loc: 16FISCAL--job: 14414032 #J061--prog: CK500 <1.43>--report id: CKREG1--
SORT: Check ID & No
SELECT Check Dates: 12/1/2014-12/31/2014
Check ID/# Payee ID Payee Name First Reference Subs Check Date Cancel Dt Replaced By Type Check Amount
=========== ============ ============================== ================ ==== ========== ========== =========== ==== ==============
16 00040544 V1602860 EYE CARE CENTER 270753 OH 12/11/2014 MW 225.00
16 00040545 V1601265 GAS COMPANY, THE DEC 2014 OH 12/11/2014 MW 905.71
16 00040546 V1600585 HERITAGE MUSEUM 10877 VESSELS OH 12/11/2014 MW 864.00
16 00040547 V1603305 HOLINSWORTH, JESSICA REIMB 02/02/15 OH 12/11/2014 MW 150.00
16 00040548 V1603297 MOBILE MINDS TUTORING 2 OH 12/11/2014 MW 770.00
16 00040549 V1600517 PEREZ, TRACEY REIMB 12/03/14 OH 12/11/2014 MW 380.00
16 00040550 V1600319 REVOLVING CASH FUND NOV 2014 OH 12/11/2014 MW 7.42
16 00040551 V1603015 GOLD STAR FOODS 1178247 OH 12/11/2014 MW 9,436.29
16 00040552 V1603051 HUBERT COMPANY 991820 OH 12/11/2014 MW 1,022.21
16 00040553 V1603024 P & R PAPER SUPPLY CO 10041271-00 OH 12/11/2014 MW 1,000.26
16 00040554 V1603025 PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA 7246 OH 12/11/2014 MW 3,425.43
16 00040555 V1600319 REVOLVING CASH FUND NOV 2014 OH 12/11/2014 MW 9.10
16 00040556 V1603035 SUBWAY 120814 OH 12/11/2014 MW 990.00
16 00040557 V1603145 SUPPLY SOLUTIONS 38943 OH 12/11/2014 MW 1,155.00
16 00040558 V1603106 CHIPMAN RELOCATIONS 449G-413-4-R--/1 OH 12/11/2014 MW 225.00
16 00040559 V1602983 AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INS. CO DEC 2014 OH 12/11/2014 MW 181.75
16 00040560 V1602321 SISC 111 DEC 2014 OH 12/11/2014 MW 726.75
16 00040561 V1600003 ACS BILLING SERVICE NOV 2014 OH 12/12/2014 MW 1,315.40
16 00040562 V1602493 ANAHEIM GLASS INC IO19523 OH 12/12/2014 MW 631.18
16 00040563 V1602263 APPLE INC. 2542767157 OH 12/12/2014 MW 500.00
16 00040564 V1602152 BK ELECTRIC S2933407-002 OH 12/12/2014 MW 688.03
16 00040565 V1603241 BLUE LABEL POWER 5702 OH 12/12/2014 MW 305.10
16 00040566 V1600077 CARSON LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 446886 OH 12/12/2014 MW 920.16
16 00040567 V1600768 CDW-G RC96550 OH 12/12/2014 MW 1,986.86
16 00040568 V1601898 CYPRESS LOCK AND SAFE 18097 OH 12/12/2014 MW 673.28
16 00040569 V1600118 D & D REFRIGERATION INC. 35541 OH 12/12/2014 MW 82.50
16 00040570 V1600061 GANAHL LUMBER L669531 OH 12/12/2014 MW 391.70
16 00040571 V1600156 GBC/ACCO BRANDS USA LLC 2339159 OH 12/12/2014 MW 211.77
16 00040572 V1600200 KELLY PAPER 6872377 OH 12/12/2014 MW 2,762.48
16 00040573 V1600248 MUSIC IS ELEMENTARY 223054 OH 12/12/2014 MW 204.76
16 00040574 V1603084 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3078-109905 OH 12/12/2014 MW 41.04
16 00040575 V1602724 Occupational Health Centers of 60240222 OH 12/12/2014 MW 61.00
16 00040576 V1600946 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 60902653 OH 12/12/2014 MW 28.19
16 00040577 V1602687 RED TRUCK FIRE & SAFETY COMPAN 11-66509 OH 12/12/2014 MW 2,018.83
16 00040578 V1602647 RICOH 1051448762 OH 12/12/2014 MW 829.44
16 00040579 V1600328 SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION 65300927 OH 12/12/2014 MW 569.21
16 00040580 V1603242 SELL, MITRA REIMB 12/04/14 OH 12/12/2014 MW 403.80
16 00040581 V1603298 SPARKFUN ELECTRONICS 1624647 OH 12/12/2014 MW 1,575.80
16 00040582 V1600355 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3249765904 OH 12/12/2014 MW 483.26
16 00040583 V1603002 BERNAL, SUSAN AUG SEP OCT 2014 OH 12/12/2014 MW 65.52
16 00040584 V1603015 GOLD STAR FOODS 1018396 OH 12/12/2014 MW 131.11
16 00040585 V1603016 HENDRICKS, DIANA NOV 2014 OH 12/12/2014 MW 16.02
EXHIBIT A 7.F.2 - Page 3 of 6
14.10 EXHIBITS
CYPRESS SD 01/05/15 Check Register - One Line Page 3
MON, JAN 05, 2015, 8:48 AM --req: EMDAVI----leg: 16 ----loc: 16FISCAL--job: 14414032 #J061--prog: CK500 <1.43>--report id: CKREG1--
SORT: Check ID & No
SELECT Check Dates: 12/1/2014-12/31/2014
Check ID/# Payee ID Payee Name First Reference Subs Check Date Cancel Dt Replaced By Type Check Amount
=========== ============ ============================== ================ ==== ========== ========== =========== ==== ==============
16 00040586 V1603149 MARTIN, ANITA AUG SEP OCT 2014 OH 12/12/2014 MW 56.62
16 00040587 V1603025 PAPA JOHN'S PIZZA 7186 OH 12/12/2014 MW 4,889.58
16 00040588 V1603061 PICK UP STIX CATERING NOV 2014 OH 12/12/2014 MW 4,987.50
16 00040589 V1603037 THOMAS, BARBARA NOV 2014 OH 12/12/2014 MW 28.56
16 00040590 V1602211 COUNTY OF ORANGE HCA15107 OH 12/15/2014 MW 20,390.75
16 00040591 V1600206 AT & T MOBILITY 2217 DEC 2014 OH 12/16/2014 MW 409.12
16 00040592 V1602934 AUGMENTATIVE COMMUNICATION THE 110114 OH 12/16/2014 MW 580.00
16 00040593 V1600070 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF JUSTICE 069901 OH 12/16/2014 MW 147.00
16 00040594 V1600768 CDW-G RD55603 OH 12/16/2014 MW 748.88
16 00040595 V1600083 CERTIFIED TRANSPORTATION SERVI 01-121055 OH 12/16/2014 MW 2,152.80
16 00040596 V1603252 CLUB Z! 1415 OH 12/16/2014 MW 2,713.40
16 00040597 V1600346 GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY DEC 2014 OH 12/16/2014 MW 17,991.87
16 00040598 V1600585 HERITAGE MUSEUM 10714 ARNOLD OH 12/16/2014 MW 810.00
16 00040599 V1603230 HOSLER, GENEVIEVE JUL-DEC 2014 OH 12/16/2014 MW 33.16
16 00040600 V1600640 LOS ANGELES COUNTY OFFICE OF E REGISTER LOWE OH 12/16/2014 MW 400.00
16 00040601 V1600999 NSTA CONVENTIONS 2854672 OH 12/16/2014 MW 185.00
16 00040602 V1600266 ORANGE COUNTY DEPT. EDUCATION 94II1777 OH 12/16/2014 MW 70.00
16 00040603 V1600285 PARADIGM HEALTHCARE SERVICES C 28305 OH 12/16/2014 MW 108.51
16 00040604 V1602846 PARK HOUSE TIRE INC 1020140516 OH 12/16/2014 MW 1,148.04
16 00040605 V1600627 PSI 3942 OH 12/16/2014 MW 106.49
16 00040606 V1602673 RICOH AMERICAS 43820389 OH 12/16/2014 MW 3,970.06
16 00040607 V1601851 RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION 5033662465 OH 12/16/2014 MW 3,082.68
16 00040608 V1600331 RUTAN & TUCKER 706069 OH 12/16/2014 MW 748.00
16 00040609 V1600339 SEXAUER INC., J.A. 323569939 OH 12/16/2014 MW 489.77
16 00040610 V1600343 SOUTH COAST SUPPLY 4178 OH 12/16/2014 MW 340.20
16 00040611 V1600344 SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON CO. DEC 2014 OH 12/16/2014 MW 43,400.07
16 00040612 V1600345 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SENSORY SC 34 OH 12/16/2014 MW 1,256.00
16 00040613 V1600648 SUPER DUPER PUBLICATIONS 2025389A OH 12/16/2014 MW 101.40
16 00040614 V1603053 WICKETTS INTERNATIONAL PLUMBIN 107771 OH 12/16/2014 MW 1,174.50
16 00040615 V1603264 ASPIRAR-OXFORD TUTORING 2 OH 12/18/2014 MW 2,378.50
16 00040616 V1602930 HARBOTTLE LAW GROUP 0636 OH 12/18/2014 MW 670.50
16 00040617 V1602980 NIGRO & NIGRO PROFESSIONAL COR 4945 OH 12/18/2014 MW 12,870.00
16 00040618 V1600266 ORANGE COUNTY DEPT. EDUCATION 94II1604 OH 12/18/2014 MW 11,153.01
16 00040619 V1603035 SUBWAY 12/15/14 OH 12/18/2014 MW 605.00
16 00040620 V1602527 PLATT SECURITY INC 031958 OH 12/18/2014 MW 2,240.00
16 00040621 V1603008 CYPRESS SCHOOL DISTRICT CL VI NOV 2014 OH 12/18/2014 MW 2,961.81
16 00040622 V1603008 CYPRESS SCHOOL DISTRICT CL DE NOV 2014 OH 12/18/2014 MW 16,606.53
16 00040623 V1603174 THERESA VAUGHN-WORKSITE SPECIA JAN 2015 OH 12/18/2014 MW 1,666.67
16 00040624 V1603302 !#1 TOUCH-SCREEN TABLET COMPUT 1201411 OH 12/19/2014 MW 1,190.00
16 00040625 V1603258 A BETTER TOMORROW EDUCATION ABTE0934 OH 12/19/2014 MW 543.13
16 00040626 V1603247 AIREMASTERS SERVICE 14-13 OH 12/19/2014 MW 250.00
16 00040627 V1603241 BLUE LABEL POWER 5673 OH 12/19/2014 MW 344.41
EXHIBIT A 7.F.2 - Page 4 of 6
14.11 EXHIBITS
CYPRESS SD 01/05/15 Check Register - One Line Page 4
MON, JAN 05, 2015, 8:48 AM --req: EMDAVI----leg: 16 ----loc: 16FISCAL--job: 14414032 #J061--prog: CK500 <1.43>--report id: CKREG1--
SORT: Check ID & No
SELECT Check Dates: 12/1/2014-12/31/2014
Check ID/# Payee ID Payee Name First Reference Subs Check Date Cancel Dt Replaced By Type Check Amount
=========== ============ ============================== ================ ==== ========== ========== =========== ==== ==============
16 00040628 V1602280 BUS WEST BP113581 OH 12/19/2014 MW 55.32
16 00040629 V1600768 CDW-G RC24704 OH 12/19/2014 MW 645.60
16 00040630 V1600118 D & D REFRIGERATION INC. 35615 OH 12/19/2014 MW 275.00
16 00040631 V1600485 GST/E SYSTEMS JOI321576 OH 12/19/2014 MW 796.39
16 00040632 V1602912 IVS COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY 14-1891 OH 12/19/2014 MW 754.93
16 00040633 V1600023 LOS ALAMITOS AUTO PARTS 188180 OH 12/19/2014 MW 164.10
16 00040634 V1603084 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3078-111237 OH 12/19/2014 MW 52.92
16 00040635 V1600946 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 60904781 OH 12/19/2014 MW 23.87
16 00040636 V1600307 PSYCHOL.CORP/HARCOURT ASSESS./ 10036252 OH 12/19/2014 MW 316.47
16 00040637 V1602687 RED TRUCK FIRE & SAFETY COMPAN FS-01433 OH 12/19/2014 MW 2,529.68
16 00040638 V1600355 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3250789713 OH 12/19/2014 MW 1,090.12
16 00040639 V1600465 VAVRINEK-TRINE-DAY & CO. LLP 0110007-IN OH 12/19/2014 MW 1,328.03
16 00040640 V1603307 WARESDIRECT.COM STEEL CABINET OH 12/19/2014 MW 105.76
16 00040641 V1600397 WAXIE ENTERPRISES INC. 74988379 OH 12/19/2014 MW 2,319.71
16 00040642 V1603015 GOLD STAR FOODS 1172426 OH 12/19/2014 MW 3.40
16 00040643 V1602263 APPLE INC. 4313407673 OH 12/22/2014 MW 9,708.53
16 00040644 V1603058 CALIFORNIA SCHOOLS VEBA JAN 2015 OH 12/23/2014 MW 240,191.73
16 00040645 V1602975 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANC JAN 2015 OH 12/23/2014 MW 1,047.86
16 00040646 V1602453 A.M. ELECTRICAL SERVICES 8626 OH 12/26/2014 MW 1,950.00
16 00040647 V1600844 AMERICAN RENTALS 357746 OH 12/26/2014 MW 249.60
16 00040648 V1603256 BASIC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES TEA 4123 OH 12/26/2014 MW 1,100.00
16 00040649 V1603311 BRAIN HURRICANE BH3158 OH 12/26/2014 MW 406.25
16 00040650 V1601870 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 355517 OH 12/26/2014 MW 29.38
16 00040651 V1601898 CYPRESS LOCK AND SAFE 18143 OH 12/26/2014 MW 349.53
16 00040652 V1602997 DASH ADVERTISING, PENNY 10600 OH 12/26/2014 MW 113.04
16 00040653 V1603239 DATA IMPRESSIONS 02IC5044 OH 12/26/2014 MW 608.68
16 00040654 V1602624 EARTHQUAKE MANAGEMENT 22140 OH 12/26/2014 MW 664.38
16 00040655 V1601265 GAS COMPANY, THE DEC 2014A OH 12/26/2014 MW 219.13
16 00040656 V1600177 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1010277 OH 12/26/2014 MW 1,452.55
16 00040657 V1602912 IVS COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY 14-1913 OH 12/26/2014 MW 157.85
16 00040658 V1600023 LOS ALAMITOS AUTO PARTS 188820 OH 12/26/2014 MW 86.24
16 00040659 V1602826 NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST 11/24/14 OH 12/26/2014 MW 2,000.00
16 00040660 V1600133 OFFICE DEPOT 74254319001 OH 12/26/2014 MW 1,336.13
16 00040661 V1602846 PARK HOUSE TIRE INC 1020141167 OH 12/26/2014 MW 1,330.41
16 00040662 V1603304 PROFESSIONAL TUTORS OF AMERICA 51207 OH 12/26/2014 MW 748.00
16 00040663 V1600946 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 60906901 OH 12/26/2014 MW 49.91
16 00040664 V1602673 RICOH AMERICAS 19152721 OH 12/26/2014 MW 299.15
16 00040665 V1602362 SAFETY 1ST PEST CONTROL INC 49457 OH 12/26/2014 MW 1,575.00
16 00040666 V1600343 SOUTH COAST SUPPLY 181660 OH 12/26/2014 MW 453.01
16 00040667 V1600355 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3250789715 OH 12/26/2014 MW 355.92
16 00040668 V1602406 THINKING MAPS INC INV0040986 OH 12/26/2014 MW 1,282.18
16 00040669 V1602966 TOTAL COMPENSATION SYSTEMS INC 4352 OH 12/26/2014 MW 4,800.00
EXHIBIT A 7.F.2 - Page 5 of 6
14.12 EXHIBITS
CYPRESS SD 01/05/15 Check Register - One Line Page 5
MON, JAN 05, 2015, 8:48 AM --req: EMDAVI----leg: 16 ----loc: 16FISCAL--job: 14414032 #J061--prog: CK500 <1.43>--report id: CKREG1--
SORT: Check ID & No
SELECT Check Dates: 12/1/2014-12/31/2014
Check ID/# Payee ID Payee Name First Reference Subs Check Date Cancel Dt Replaced By Type Check Amount
=========== ============ ============================== ================ ==== ========== ========== =========== ==== ==============
16 00040670 V1603053 WICKETTS INTERNATIONAL PLUMBIN 107802 OH 12/26/2014 MW 174.00
16 00040671 V1603261 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC 1338238-IN OH 12/26/2014 MW 516.55
16 00040672 V1602527 PLATT SECURITY INC 032047 OH 12/29/2014 MW 2,320.00
16 00040673 V1602922 B OF A BUSINESS CARD DEC 2014 OH 12/30/2014 MW 1,080.93
16 00040674 V1602951 FRIENDS OF ARTS EDUCATION 3/11/15 ARNOLD OH 12/30/2014 MW 90.00
16 00040675 V1603119 RODRIGUEZ, GERRY MILEAGE NOV2014 OH 12/30/2014 MW 51.52
16 00040676 V1602922 B OF A BUSINESS CARD DEC 2014 OH 12/30/2014 MW 877.93
Check ID & No [16] Total: 593,999.47
*** GRAND TOTAL ***
Machine and Hand Written 593,999.47
==============
593,999.47
EXHIBIT A 7.F.2 - Page 6 of 6
14.13 EXHIBITS
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICT
AUDITREPORT
FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
14.14 EXHIBITS
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014TableofContents
FINANCIALSECTION Page
IndependentAuditors’Report..................................................................................................................................................................1Management’sDiscussionandAnalysis...............................................................................................................................................3BasicFinancialStatements:
Government‐wideFinancialStatements:StatementofNetPosition.........................................................................................................................................................12StatementofActivities...............................................................................................................................................................13
GovernmentalFundsFinancialStatements:BalanceSheet.................................................................................................................................................................................14ReconciliationoftheGovernmentalFundsBalanceSheettotheStatementofNetPosition.....................15StatementofRevenues,Expenditures,andChangesinFundBalances...............................................................16ReconciliationoftheGovernmentalFundsStatementofRevenues,Expenditures,andChangesinFundBalancestotheStatementofActivities...............................................17
ProprietaryFundFinancialStatements:StatementofNetPosition.........................................................................................................................................................18StatementofRevenues,Expenses,andChangesinNetPosition............................................................................19StatementofCashFlows...........................................................................................................................................................20
FiduciaryFundFinancialStatement:StatementofFiduciaryNetPosition..................................................................................................................................21
NotestoFinancialStatements...............................................................................................................................................................22
REQUIREDSUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATIONBudgetaryComparisonSchedule–GeneralFund.........................................................................................................................44ScheduleofFundingProgress...............................................................................................................................................................45NotestotheRequiredSupplementaryInformation....................................................................................................................46
SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATIONLocalEducationalAgencyOrganizationStructure.......................................................................................................................47ScheduleofAverageDailyAttendance..............................................................................................................................................48ScheduleofInstructionalTime.............................................................................................................................................................49ScheduleofFinancialTrendsandAnalysis......................................................................................................................................50ScheduleofExpendituresofFederalAwards.................................................................................................................................51ReconciliationofAnnualFinancialandBudgetReportwithAuditedFinancialStatements.....................................52NotetotheSupplementaryInformation...........................................................................................................................................53
14.15 EXHIBITS
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014TableofContents
OTHERINDEPENDENTAUDITORS’REPORTS Page
IndependentAuditors'ReportonInternalControloverFinancialReportingandonCompliance andOtherMattersBasedonanAuditofFinancialStatementsPerformedinAccordancewith GovernmentAuditingStandards.....................................................................................................................................................54IndependentAuditors’ReportonStateCompliance...................................................................................................................56IndependentAuditors'ReportonComplianceForEachMajorFederalProgramandon InternalControlOverCompliance................................................................................................................................................58
FINDINGSANDQUESTIONEDCOSTS
ScheduleofAuditFindingsandQuestionedCosts: SummaryofAuditors’Results......................................................................................................................................................60 CurrentYearAuditFindingsandQuestionedCosts...........................................................................................................61 SummaryScheduleofPriorAuditFindings...........................................................................................................................64
14.16 EXHIBITS
FinancialSection
14.17 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.18 EXHIBITS
1
INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’REPORTBoardofTrusteesCypressSchoolDistrictCypress,CaliforniaReportontheFinancialStatementsWehaveauditedtheaccompanyingfinancialstatementsofthegovernmentalactivities,eachmajorfund,andtheaggregateremainingfundinformationofCypressSchoolDistrict,asofandforthefiscalyearendedJune30, 2014, and the relatednotes to the financial statements,which collectively comprise theDistrict's basicfinancialstatementsaslistedinthetableofcontents.Management’sResponsibilityfortheFinancialStatementsManagement is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements inaccordancewithaccountingprinciplesgenerallyaccepted in theUnitedStatesofAmerica; this includes thedesign,implementation,andmaintenanceofinternalcontrolrelevanttothepreparationandfairpresentationoffinancialstatementsthatarefreefrommaterialmisstatement,whetherduetofraudorerror.Auditors'ResponsibilityOurresponsibilityistoexpressopinionsonthesefinancialstatementsbasedonouraudit.WeconductedourauditinaccordancewithauditingstandardsgenerallyacceptedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica,thestandardsapplicabletofinancialauditscontainedinGovernmentAuditingStandards,issuedbytheComptrollerGeneralof theUnited States, andStandardsandProcedures forAuditsofCaliforniaK‐12LocalEducationalAgencies2013‐14. Thosestandardsrequirethatweplanandperformtheaudittoobtainreasonableassuranceaboutwhetherthefinancialstatementsarefreefrommaterialmisstatement.Anauditinvolvesperformingprocedurestoobtainauditevidenceabouttheamountsanddisclosuresinthefinancialstatements.Theproceduresselecteddependontheauditor’sjudgment,includingtheassessmentoftherisksofmaterialmisstatementofthefinancialstatements,whetherduetofraudorerror.Inmakingthoserisk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fairpresentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in thecircumstances,butnot for thepurposeofexpressinganopinionontheeffectivenessoftheentity’s internalcontrol. Accordingly,we express no suchopinion.An audit also includes evaluating the appropriatenessofaccountingpoliciesusedandthereasonablenessofsignificantaccountingestimatesmadebymanagement,aswellasevaluatingtheoverallpresentationofthefinancialstatements.Webelievethattheauditevidencewehaveobtainedissufficientandappropriatetoprovideabasisforourauditopinions.OpinionsInouropinion,thefinancialstatementsreferredtoabovepresentfairly,inallmaterialrespects,therespectivefinancial position of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fundinformationofCypressSchoolDistrict,asof June30,2014,andtherespectivechanges in financialpositionand, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the fiscal year then ended in accordance with accountingprinciplesgenerallyacceptedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica.
14.19 EXHIBITS
2
EmphasisofMatterAsdiscussedinNote1.G.tothebasicfinancialstatements,theDistricthaschangeditsmethodforaccountingandreportingcertainitemspreviouslyreportedasassetsorliabilitiesduringfiscalyear2013‐2014duetotheadoptionofGovernmentalAccountingStandardsBoardStatementNo.65,"ItemsPreviouslyReportedasAssetsandLiabilities". Theadoptionof this standard required retrospectiveapplication resulting in a $1,276,405reductionofpreviouslyreportednetpositionatJuly1,2013.Ouropinionisnotmodifiedwithrespecttothismatter.OtherMattersRequiredSupplementaryInformationAccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’sdiscussionandanalysisonpages3through11,budgetarycomparisoninformationonpage44,andscheduleoffundingprogressonpage45bepresentedtosupplementthebasicfinancialstatements.Suchinformation,althoughnotapartofthebasicfinancialstatements,isrequiredbytheGovernmentalAccountingStandardsBoard,whoconsidersittobeanessentialpartoffinancialreportingforplacingthebasicfinancialstatementsinanappropriateoperational,economic,orhistoricalcontext.Wehaveappliedcertainlimitedprocedurestothe required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in theUnited States ofAmerica,which consistedof inquiries ofmanagement about themethodsof preparing theinformationand comparing the information for consistencywithmanagement’s responses toour inquiries,the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financialstatements.Wedonotexpressanopinionorprovideanyassuranceontheinformationbecausethelimitedproceduresdonotprovideuswithsufficientevidencetoexpressanopinionorprovideanyassurance.OtherInformationOur auditwas conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectivelycompriseCypressSchoolDistrict’sbasicfinancialstatements.Theothersupplementaryinformationlistedinthetableofcontents ispresentedforpurposesofadditionalanalysisandisnotarequiredpartofthebasicfinancialstatements.Theothersupplementaryinformationlistedinthetableofcontents,includingtheScheduleofExpendituresofFederal Awards, is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to theunderlyingaccountingandotherrecordsusedtopreparethebasicfinancialstatements.Suchinformationhasbeensubjected to theauditingproceduresapplied intheauditof thebasic financialstatementsandcertainadditional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlyingaccounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financialstatements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generallyacceptedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica.Inouropinion,theothersupplementaryinformationisfairlystated,inallmaterialrespects,inrelationtothebasicfinancialstatementsasawhole.OtherReportingRequiredbyGovernmentAuditingStandardsInaccordancewithGovernmentAuditingStandards,wehavealsoissuedourreportdatedDecember10,2014on our consideration of the District's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of itscompliancewithcertainprovisionsof laws,regulations,contracts,andgrantagreementsandothermatters.Thepurposeofthatreportistodescribethescopeofourtestingofinternalcontroloverfinancialreportingandcomplianceandtheresultsofthattesting,andnottoprovideanopiniononinternalcontroloverfinancialreporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance withGovernment Auditing Standards in considering the District's internal control over financial reporting andcompliance.
Murrieta,CaliforniaDecember10,2014
14.20 EXHIBITS
3
FigureA‐1.OrganizationofCypressSchoolDistrict’sAnnualFinancialReport
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014ThisdiscussionandanalysisofCypressSchoolDistrict’s financialperformanceprovidesanoverviewof theDistrict’s financial activities for the fiscal year ended June30,2014. Please read it in conjunctionwith theDistrict’sfinancialstatements,whichimmediatelyfollowthissection. FINANCIALHIGHLIGHTS TheDistrict’soverall financialstatusdeclinedfromlastyear,asthenetpositiondecreasedby20.2%to
$6.7million. Totalgovernmentalrevenueswere$34.9million,about$1.7millionlessthanexpenses. Thetotalcostofbasicprogramswas$36.6million. Becauseaportionofthesecostswerepaidforwith
charges, fees, and intergovernmental aid, the net cost that required taxpayer funding was only $29.7million.
Secondperiodaveragedailyattendance(gradesK‐6)increasedby55,ormorethan1.5%.OVERVIEWOFTHEFINANCIALSTATEMENTSThis annual report consists of three parts – management discussion and analysis (this section), the basicfinancial statements, and required supplementary information. Thebasic financial statements include twokindsofstatementsthatpresentdifferentviewsoftheDistrict: The first two statements are district‐wide financial statements that provide both short‐termand long‐
terminformationabouttheDistrict’soverallfinancialstatus. The remaining statements are fund financial statements that focus on individual parts of the District,
reportingtheDistrict’soperationsinmoredetailthanthedistrict‐widestatements. Thegovernmental funds statements tell howbasic services like regularandspecial educationwere
financedintheshorttermaswellaswhatremainsforfuturespending. Short and long‐term financial information about the activities of the District that operate like
businesses(self‐insurancefunds)areprovidedintheproprietaryfundsstatements.Thefinancialstatementsalsoinclude notes that explainsome of the information inthe statements and providemore detailed data. FigureA‐1 shows how the variousparts of this annual reportare arranged and related tooneanother.
Management’sDiscussionandAnalysis
BasicFinancial
Information
RequiredSupplementaryInformation
FundFinancialStatements
District‐WideFinancialStatements
NotestoFinancialStatements
SUMMARY DETAIL
14.21 EXHIBITS
4
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014OVERVIEWOFTHEFINANCIALSTATEMENTS(continued)FigureA‐2summarizesthemajorfeaturesoftheDistrict’s financialstatements, includingtheportionoftheDistrict’sactivitiestheycoverandthetypesofinformationtheycontain.FigureA‐2.MajorFeaturesoftheDistrict‐WideandFundFinancialStatements
TypeofStatements
District‐Wide
GovernmentalFunds
ProprietaryFunds
FiduciaryFund
Scope EntireDistrict,exceptfiduciaryactivities
TheactivitiesoftheDistrictthatarenotproprietaryorfiduciary,suchasspecialeducationandbuildingmaintenance
ActivitiesoftheDistrictthatoperatelikeabusiness,suchasself‐insurancefunds
Instancesinwhichthedistrictadministersresourcesonbehalfofsomeoneelse,suchasscholarshipprogramsandstudentactivitiesmonies
Requiredfinancialstatements
StatementofNetPosition
StatementofActivities
BalanceSheet Statementof
Revenues,Expenditures&ChangesinFundBalances
StatementofNetPosition
StatementofRevenues,Expenses&ChangesinFundBalance
StatementofCashFlows
StatementofFiduciaryNetPosition
Accountingbasisandmeasurementfocus
Accrualaccountingandeconomicresourcesfocus
Modifiedaccrualaccountingandcurrentfinancialresourcesfocus
Accrualaccountingandeconomicresourcesfocus
Accrualaccountingandeconomicresourcesfocus
Typeofasset/liabilityinformation
Allassetsandliabilities,bothfinancialandcapital,short‐termandlong‐term
Onlyassetsexpectedtobeusedupandliabilitiesthatcomedueduringtheyearorsoonthereafter;nocapitalassetsincluded
Allassetsandliabilities,bothshort‐termandlong‐term;Thedistrict’sfundsdonotcurrentlycontainnonfinancialassets,thoughtheycan
Allassetsandliabilities,bothshort‐termandlong‐term;TheDistrict’sfundsdonotcurrentlycontainnonfinancialassets,thoughtheycan
Typeofinflow/outflowinformation
Allrevenuesandexpensesduringyear,regardlessofwhencashisreceivedorpaid
Revenuesforwhichcashisreceivedduringorsoonaftertheendoftheyear;expenditureswhengoodsorserviceshavebeenreceivedandpaymentisdueduringtheyearorsoonthereafter
Allrevenuesandexpensesduringtheyear,regardlessofwhencashisreceivedorpaid
Allrevenuesandexpensesduringtheyear,regardlessofwhencashisreceivedorpaid
Theremainderofthisoverviewsectionofmanagement’sdiscussionandanalysishighlightsthestructureandcontentsofeachofthestatements.
14.22 EXHIBITS
5
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014OVERVIEWOFTHEFINANCIALSTATEMENTS(continued)District‐WideStatementsThe district‐wide statements report information about the District as a whole using accounting methodssimilartothoseusedbyprivate‐sectorcompanies.ThestatementofnetpositionincludesalloftheDistrict’sassetsand liabilities. Allof thecurrentyear’srevenuesandexpensesareaccountedfor inthestatementofactivitiesregardlessofwhencashisreceivedorpaid.Thetwodistrict‐widestatementsreporttheDistrict’snetpositionandhowithaschanged.Netposition–thedifferencebetweentheDistrict’sassetsanddeferredoutflowsofresourcesandliabilitiesanddeferredinflowsofresources–isonewaytomeasuretheDistrict’sfinancialhealth,orposition. Overtime,increasesanddecreasesintheDistrict’snetpositionareanindicatorofwhetheritsfinancial
positionisimprovingordeteriorating,respectively. ToassesstheoverallhealthoftheDistrict,youneedtoconsideradditionalnonfinancial factorssuchas
changesintheDistrict’sdemographicsandtheconditionofschoolbuildingsandotherfacilities. In the district‐wide financial statements, the District’s activities are categorized as Governmental
Activities. MostoftheDistrict’sbasicservicesareincludedhere,suchasregularandspecialeducation,transportation,andadministration.Propertytaxesandstateaidfinancemostoftheseactivities.
FundFinancialStatementsThefundfinancialstatementsprovidemoredetailedinformationabouttheDistrict’smostsignificantfunds–nottheDistrictasawhole.FundsareaccountingdevicestheDistrictusestokeeptrackofspecificsourcesoffundingandspendingonparticularprograms: SomefundsarerequiredbyStatelawandbybondcovenants. TheDistrictestablishesotherfundstocontrolandmanagemoneyforparticularpurposes(likerepaying
itslong‐termdebt)ortoshowthatisproperlyusingcertainrevenues.TheDistricthasthreekindsoffunds: Governmental funds –Most of theDistrict’s basic services are included in governmental funds,which
generallyfocuson(1)howcashandotherfinancialassetsthatcanreadilybeconvertedtocashflowinand out and (2) the balances left at year‐end that are available for spending. Consequently, thegovernmental funds statementsprovideadetailed short‐termview thathelpsyoudeterminewhethertherearemoreorfewerfinancialresourcesthatcanbespentinthenearfuturetofinancetheDistrict’sprograms. Becausethisinformationdoesnotencompasstheadditionallong‐termfocusofthedistrict‐widestatements,weprovideadditionalinformationonaseparatereconciliationpagethatexplainstherelationship(ordifferences)betweenthem.
Proprietary funds–When theDistrict chargesotherDistrict funds for the services it provides, these
services are reported in proprietary funds. Proprietary funds are reported in the sameway that allactivitiesarereportedintheStatementofNetPositionandStatementofActivities.Infact,theDistrict’sinternal service fund is included within the governmental activities reported in the district‐widestatementsbutprovidesmoredetailandadditionalinformation,suchascashflows.TheDistrictusestheinternalservicefundtoreportactivitiesthatrelatetotheDistrict’sself‐insuredprogramfordentalandvisioninsuranceclaims.
14.23 EXHIBITS
6
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014OVERVIEWOFTHEFINANCIALSTATEMENTS(continued)FundFinancialStatements(continued) Fiduciaryfund–TheDistrictisthetrustee,orfiduciary,forassetsthatbelongtoothers.TheDistrictis
responsible for ensuring that the assets reported in these funds are used only for their intendedpurposesandbythosetowhomtheassetsbelong.AlloftheDistrict’sfiduciaryactivitiesarereportedina separate statement of fiduciary net position. We exclude these activities from the district‐widefinancialstatementsbecausetheDistrictcannotusetheseassetstofinanceitsoperations.
FINANCIALANALYSISOFTHEDISTRICTASAWHOLENetPosition.TheDistrict’scombinednetpositionwasloweronJune30,2014,thanitwastheyearbefore–decreasing20.2%to$6.7million(SeeTableA‐1).TableA‐1
VarianceIncrease
2014 2013* (Decrease)Currentassets 19,967,937$ 28,710,717$ (8,742,780)$Capitalassets 44,064,779 37,888,723 6,176,056Totalassets 64,032,716 66,599,440 (2,566,724)Currentliabilities 2,675,408 5,097,705 (2,422,297)Long‐termliabilities 54,691,907 53,152,940 1,538,967Totalliabilities 57,367,315 58,250,645 (883,330)NetpositionNetinvestmentincapitalassets (4,813,482) (5,614,467) 800,985Restricted 8,921,466 10,881,478 (1,960,012)Unrestricted 2,557,417 3,081,784 (524,367)Totalnetposition 6,665,401$ 8,348,795$ (1,683,394)$
*Asrestated
GovernmentalActivities
Changes innetposition,governmentalactivities. TheDistrict’s total revenuesdecreased3.3%to$34.9million (See TableA‐2). The decrease is due primarily to the receipt of one‐time funds from theOffice ofPublicSchoolConstructioninprioryears.The total cost of all programs and services increased 4.7% to $36.6 million. The District’s expenses arepredominantlyrelatedtoeducatingandcaringforstudents,67.6%.ThepurelyadministrativeactivitiesoftheDistrict accounted for just 6.3% of total costs. A significant contributor to the increase in costs wasdepreciationandothergeneraladministrationcosts.TableA‐2
VarianceIncrease
2014 2013 (Decrease)TotalRevenues 34,899,057$ 36,072,424$ (1,173,367)$TotalExpenses 36,582,451 34,952,697 1,629,754Increase(decrease)innetposition (1,683,394)$ 1,119,727$ (2,803,121)$
GovernmentalActivities
14.24 EXHIBITS
7
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014FINANCIALANALYSISOFTHEDISTRICT’SFUNDSThe financial performance of theDistrict as awhole is reflected in its governmental funds aswell. As theDistrictcompletedthisyear,itsgovernmentalfundsreportedacombinedfundbalanceof$17.4million,whichisbelowlastyear’sendingfundbalanceof$23.9million.Theprimarycauseofthedecreasedfundbalanceiscapitalprojectsexpenditures.GeneralFundBudgetaryHighlightsOverthecourseoftheyear,theDistrictrevisedtheannualoperatingbudgetseveraltimes.Themajorbudgetamendmentsfallintothesecategories:
Revenues–increasedby$2.4millionprimarilytoreflectfederalandstatebudgetactions. Salariesandbenefitscosts– increased$1.3millionduetoa3%salary increaseandaone‐time1%
bonus. Other non‐capital expenses – increased $0.5 million to re‐budget carryover funds and revise
operationalcostestimates.While the District’s final budget for the General Fund anticipated that expenditures would fall short ofrevenuesbyabout$0.9million,theactualresultsfortheyearshowthatrevenuesexceededexpendituresbyroughly$2.2million. Actualrevenueswere$0.1millionmorethananticipated,andexpenditureswere$1.1million less than budgeted. That amount consists primarily of restricted categorical program dollars thatwerenotspentasofJune30,2014thatwillbecarriedoverintothe2014‐15budget.CAPITALASSETANDDEBTADMINISTRATIONCapitalAssetsBy the endof 2013‐14 theDistrict had invested $8.2million innew capital assets, related to theDistrict’songoingmodernizationprogram. (MoredetailedinformationaboutcapitalassetscanbefoundinNote6tothefinancialstatements).Totaldepreciationexpensefortheyearexceeded$2.0million.TableA‐3:CapitalAssetsatYear‐End,NetofDepreciation
VarianceIncrease
2014 2013 (Decrease)Land 744,680$ 744,680$ ‐$Constructioninprogress 407,883 8,366,328 (7,958,445)Improvementofsites 2,335,525 2,517,304 (181,779)Buildings 39,726,152 25,510,059 14,216,093Equipment 850,539 750,352 100,187Total 44,064,779$ 37,888,723$ 6,176,056$
GovernmentalActivities
14.25 EXHIBITS
8
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014CAPITALASSETANDDEBTADMINISTRATION(continued)Long‐TermDebtAt year‐end theDistrict had approximately $54.7million of long‐termdebt as shown inTableA‐4. (Moredetailed information about the District’s long‐term liabilities is presented in Note 7 to the financialstatements).TableA‐4:OutstandingLong‐TermDebtatYear‐End
VarianceIncrease
2014 2013 (Decrease)Generalobligationbonds 46,622,599$ 45,376,443$ 1,246,156$Certificatesofparticipation 7,210,772 7,199,500 11,272Otherpostemploymentbenefits(OPEB) 580,494 345,360 235,134Capitalleasepayable 7,381 31,803 (24,422)Compensatedabsences 270,661 199,834 70,827Total 54,691,907$ 53,152,940$ 1,538,967$
GovernmentalActivities
FACTORSBEARINGONTHEDISTRICT’SFUTUREBudgetOverviewTheGovernorsignedthe2014‐15BudgetActonJune20,2014.InlateJune,theGovernorsigned17budget‐relatedbillsintolaw.The2014‐15budgetpackageassumestotalstatespendingof$152.3billion,anincreaseof8.6percentover revised totals for2013‐14.Thisconsistsof$108billion fromtheGeneralFundand theEducation Protection Account created by Proposition 30 (2012), and $44.3 billion from special funds. Thebudgetpackageassumesspendingfromfederalfundstobe$98billion,anincreaseof20.9percentover2013‐14 revised levels, mainly due to increases in the health area of the budget. Bond spending is expected todecline53percentin2014‐15.MajorFeaturesofthe2014‐15SpendingPlanSimilartothe2013‐14budget,the2014‐15spendingplanmakestargetedaugmentationsinafewareaswhilepayingdownseveralbilliondollarsinkeyliabilities.Inaddition,ifcertainrevenueandothertargetsaremet,additionalspending—mostlyforpayingdowndebt—wouldbe“triggered”underthebudgetplan.FullyFundsCalSTRSPensionProgramAs of the end of 2012‐13, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) had a $74 billionshortfall. Budget‐related legislation aims to erase the unfunded liability in 32 years by increasingcontributionsfromthestate,schoolandcommunitycollegedistricts,andteachers.Proposition98The budget plan includes large Proposition 98 funding increases for schools and community colleges. TheProposition98budgetcontinues implementationof theLocalControlFundingFormula,paysdownmostofthe remaining payment deferrals, and pays down several hundredmillion dollars of other Proposition 98obligations.
14.26 EXHIBITS
9
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014FACTORSBEARINGONTHEDISTRICT’SFUTURE(continued)SpendingChangesFundingforK‐14educationincreasessignificantlyunderthenewbudgetpackage.Inthesectionsthatfollow,wedescribehowtheStateisspendingthesefunds.DeferralPaymentsPaysDown$5.2BillioninOutstandingDeferralsThebudgetpackagepaysdown$5.2billioninoutstandingdeferrals($4.7billionforschoolsand$498millionforcommunitycolleges).Ofthetotalpaydown,$1.4billionisdesignatedas2012‐13spending,$3.1billionisdesignatedas2013‐14spending,and$662millionisdesignatedas2014‐15spending.Underthebudgetplan,$992million indeferrals ($897million for schools and$94million for community colleges)would remainoutstandingattheendof2014‐15.EliminatesRemainingDeferralsifMinimumGuaranteeExceedsEstimatesThe budget package pays down additional deferrals (potentially eliminating all outstanding deferrals) ifsubsequentestimatesofthe2013‐14and2014‐15minimumguaranteesarehigherthantheadministration’sMay2015estimates.Effectively,thebudgetplanearmarksthefirst$992millioninpotentialadditional2013‐14and2014‐15spendingfordeferralpaydowns.MandatesPaysDown$450MillioninOutstandingEducationMandateClaimsWe estimate the State currently has a backlog of more than $5 billion in unpaid claims for educationmandates.Thebudgetincludes$400milliontoreducethemandatebacklogforschools.(Ofthisamount,$287millionis2014‐15Proposition98fundingand$113millionisfromunspentprior‐yearfund.)Fundswillbedistributedtoschoolsandcommunitycollegesonaper‐studentbasis.AddsSeveralMandatestoSchoolandCommunityCollegeBlockGrantsTheCommissiononStateMandates recentlyapprovedsevennewreimbursableeducationmandates.Sixofthese mandates apply to schools, two apply to community colleges, and one applies to both schools andcommunity colleges. For schools, the budget adds to the block grant mandates related to (1) parentalinvolvementprocedures,(2)complianceactivitiesassociatedwiththeWilliamsv.Californiacase,(3)uniformcomplaintprocedures,(4)developerfees,(5)charterschooloversight,and(6)publiccontracts.EnergyGrantsStateProvidesSecond‐YearFundingforEnergyProjectsPassedbyvotersinNovember2012,Proposition39increasesstatecorporatetaxrevenuesandrequiresforafive‐yearperiod,starting in2013‐14, thataportionof theserevenuesbeusedto improveenergyefficiencyand expand the use of alternative energy in public buildings. The 2014‐15 budget provides $345millionProposition98GeneralFundforProposition39schoolandcommunitycollegeenergyprograms.Specifically,the budget provides $279 million for school grants, $38 million for community colleges grants, and $28millionfortherevolvingloanprogramforbothschoolsandcommunitycolleges.(EstimatesofProposition39revenuesare lower in2014‐15compared to2013‐14, resulting in lessprovided forschoolandcommunitycollegegrants.)Thebudgetalsoprovides$8millionnon‐Proposition98GeneralFundforProposition39job‐training programs administered by the California Conservation Corps ($5 million) and the CaliforniaWorkforceInvestmentBoard($3million).
14.27 EXHIBITS
10
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014FACTORSBEARINGONTHEDISTRICT’SFUTURE(continued)Chapter751ObligationMakesFinal$410MillionPaymentonOutstandingProposition98ObligationsFrom2004‐05and2005‐06The2014‐15budgetmakesafinal$410millionpaymenttoretirethestate’sobligationsetforthinChapter751, Statutes of 2006 (SB 1133, Torlakson). Chapter 751 required the state to provide additional annualschool and community college payments until a total of $2.8 billion had been provided. Of the amountprovidedinthebudgetpackage,$316millionisforcontinuedfundingoftheQEIAprogram($268millionforschoolsand$48millionforcommunitycolleges)and$94millionistopaydownaseparatestateobligationrelatedtoschoolfacilityrepairs.K‐12EducationThelargestK‐12augmentationisforthesecond‐yearphaseinoftherecentlyadoptedLocalControlFundingFormula(LCFF).Thebudgetalsoincludesseveralotherschool‐specificaugmentations—someofwhichrelatetoschooloperationsandsomeofwhichrelatetoschoolinfrastructure.Inadditiontothesebudgetactions,theLegislature adopted trailer legislation relating to school district reserves and independent study (IS)programs.OperationalFundingProvides$4.7BillionforLCFFImplementationThebudgetplanincludes$4.7billioninadditionalfundingfortheschooldistrictLCFF—resultinginper‐pupilLCFF funding that is12percenthigher than2013‐14 levels.Theadditional funding issufficient toclose29percentofthegapbetweendistricts’2013‐14fundinglevelsandtheirtargetfundingrates.Weestimatethe2014‐15fundinglevelisapproximately80percentofthefullimplementationcost.Thebudgetalsoincludes$26millionfortheLCFFforcountyofficesofeducation(COEs).ThisincreaseissufficienttobringallCOEsuptotheirLCFFfundingtargetsin2014‐15.OtherNotableK‐12ActionsThebudgetprovides$54milliontocontinueimplementationofnewstudentassessmentsand$33milliontoprovideacost‐of‐livingadjustment(COLA)forseveralK‐12programs(includingspecialeducationandchildnutritionprograms).InfrastructureAllocates$189MillionforEmergencyRepairProgram(ERP)Chapter899,Statutesof2004(SB6,Alpert),createdtheERPto fundcriticalrepairprojectsatcertain low‐performingschools.Chapter899requiresthestatetocontributeatotalof$800millionfortheprogram.Thestatehasprovided$338milliontodate.Thebudgetprovides$189millionfortheERPin2014‐15.Allocates$27MillioninOne‐TimeFundsforSchoolInternetInfrastructureThe budget includes $27 million in one‐time Proposition 98 funding for schools to purchase Internetconnectivity infrastructure upgrades required to administer new computer‐based tests. Grantees are to beselectedbasedontheresultsofastatewideassessmentofschools’InternetconnectivityinfrastructuretobecompletedbytheK‐12High‐SpeedNetwork(HSN)byMarch1,2015.
14.28 EXHIBITS
11
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTManagement’sDiscussionandAnalysis(Unaudited)FortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014FACTORSBEARINGONTHEDISTRICT’SFUTURE(continued)ShiftsRemainingBondAuthorityAmongCertainSchoolFacilityProgramsThe budget package shifts remaining bond authority from the Career Technical Education (CTE) andHighPerformance Incentive (HPI) school facility programs to the New Construction andModernization facilityprograms.LocalReservesRequiresSchoolDistrictstoDiscloseandJustifyReservesChapter 32, Statutes of 2014 (SB 858, Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review), creates new disclosurerequirements effective beginning in 2015‐16 for districts that have reserves exceeding state‐specifiedminimums. If a district’s budget reserve exceeds the state minimum, Chapter 32 requires the district toidentify the amount of reserves that exceed the minimum and explain why the higher reserve levels arenecessary.ThedistrictmustdisclosethisinformationinapublicmeetingandeachtimeitsubmitsabudgettoitsCOE.CapsLocalReservesSomeYearsUnderProposition2Proposition2ontheNovember2014ballotsetforthnewconstitutionalprovisionsrelatingtostatereserves,including provisions relating to a new state reserve for schools. With the voters approvingProposition2,certainprovisionsofChapter32gointoeffect.Theseprovisionscapschooldistricts’reservelevelstheyearafterthestatemakesadepositintothenewstatereserveforschools.Thecapsformostdistrictswillrangefrom3percentto10percentofadistrict’sannualexpenditures.All of these factorswere considered inpreparing theCypress SchoolDistrictbudget for the2014‐15 fiscalyear.CONTACTINGTHEDISTRICT’SFINANCIALMANAGEMENTThis financial report is designed toprovideour citizens, taxpayers, customers, and investors and creditorswith a general overview of the District’s finances and to demonstrate the District’s accountability for themoney it receives. If you have any questions about this report or need additional financial information,contacttheDistrict’sBusinessOfficeat(714)220‐6941.
14.29 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 12
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTStatementofNetPositionJune30,2014
TotalGovernmentalActivities
ASSETSCurrentassets:
Cash 16,434,367$Investments 1,175,896Accountsreceivable 2,328,721Inventories 11,392Othercurrentassets 17,561
Totalcurrentassets 19,967,937Capitalassets:
Non‐depreciableassets 1,152,563Depreciableassets 61,804,374Lessaccumulateddepreciation (18,892,158)
Totalcapitalassets,netofdepreciation 44,064,779
Totalassets 64,032,716
LIABILITIESCurrentliabilities:
Accountspayable 2,611,352Unearnedrevenue 64,056
Totalcurrentliabilities 2,675,408Long‐termliabilities:
Portiondueorpayablewithinoneyear 440,253Portiondueorpayableafteroneyear 54,251,654
Totallong‐termliabilities 54,691,907
Totalliabilities 57,367,315
NETPOSITION
Netinvestmentincapitalassets (4,813,482)Restrictedfor:
Capitalprojects 6,282,691Debtservice 1,743,714Categoricalandnutritionprograms 895,061
Unrestricted 2,557,417
Totalnetposition 6,665,401$
14.30 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 13
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTStatementofActivitiesFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
Net(Expense)Operating Revenueand
Chargesfor Grantsand ChangesinExpenses Services Contributions NetPosition
GovernmentalActivitiesInstructionalServices:
Instruction 19,284,331$ 204,667$ 3,005,570$ (16,074,094)$Instruction‐RelatedServices:
Supervisionofinstruction 695,620 13,900 211,772 (469,948)Instructionallibrary,mediaandtechnology 641,524 ‐ 758,843 117,319Schoolsiteadministration 1,467,005 508 4,044 (1,462,453)
PupilSupportServices:Home‐to‐schooltransportation 537,929 337 18,582 (519,010)Foodservices 1,420,295 657,075 911,538 148,318Allotherpupilservices 671,207 17,862 175,794 (477,551)
GeneralAdministrationServices:Dataprocessingservices 502,507 ‐ ‐ (502,507)Othergeneraladministration 1,813,330 16,951 149,667 (1,646,712)
Plantservices 3,728,283 ‐ 130,001 (3,598,282)Enterpriseactivities 18,426 ‐ ‐ (18,426)Interestonlong‐termdebt 3,042,544 ‐ ‐ (3,042,544)Otheroutgo 725,555 47,374 565,027 (113,154)Depreciation(unallocated) 2,033,895 ‐ ‐ (2,033,895)
TotalGovernmentalActivities 36,582,451$ 958,674$ 5,930,838$ (29,692,939)
GeneralRevenues:
Propertytaxes 17,272,910Federalandstateaidnotrestrictedtospecificpurpose 9,392,712Interestandinvestmentearnings 69,721Miscellaneous 1,274,202
Totalgeneralrevenues 28,009,545
Changeinnetposition (1,683,394)
Netposition‐July1,2013,asoriginallystated 9,625,200
Adjustmentforrestatement(Note1.G.) (1,276,405)
Netposition‐July1,2013,asrestated 8,348,795
Netposition‐June30,2014 6,665,401$
Functions/Programs
ProgramRevenues
14.31 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 14
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTBalanceSheet–GovernmentalFundsJune30,2014
GeneralFund
BuildingFund
SpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjects
Non‐MajorGovernmental
Funds
TotalGovernmental
FundsASSETS
Cash 9,000,914$ 10,836$ 4,628,304$ 2,487,601$ 16,127,655$Investments ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,175,896 1,175,896Accountsreceivable 2,071,784 5 1,840 145,537 2,219,166Storesinventories ‐ ‐ ‐ 11,392 11,392Duefromotherfunds 5,369 611 840,225 2,181 848,386Othercurrentassets 17,561 ‐ ‐ ‐ 17,561
TotalAssets 11,095,628$ 11,452$ 5,470,369$ 3,822,607$ 20,400,056$
LIABILITIESANDFUNDBALANCES
LiabilitiesAccountspayable 1,511,543$ 9,860$ 459,963$ 102,666$ 2,084,032$Duetootherfunds 843,017 600 ‐ 4,769 848,386Unearnedrevenue 64,056 ‐ ‐ ‐ 64,056
TotalLiabilities 2,418,616 10,460 459,963 107,435 2,996,474
FundBalancesNonspendable 15,000 ‐ ‐ 11,392 26,392Restricted 646,664 992 5,010,406 3,703,780 9,361,842Assigned 672,637 ‐ ‐ ‐ 672,637Unassigned 7,342,711 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,342,711
TotalFundBalances 8,677,012 992 5,010,406 3,715,172 17,403,582
TotalLiabilitiesandFundBalances 11,095,628$ 11,452$ 5,470,369$ 3,822,607$ 20,400,056$
14.32 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 15
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTReconciliationoftheGovernmentalFundsBalanceSheettotheStatementofNetPositionJune30,2014Totalfundbalances‐governmentalfunds 17,403,582$
44,064,779
Ingovernmentalfunds,interestonlong‐termdebtisnotrecognizeduntiltheperiodinwhichitmaturesandispaid.Inthegovernment‐widestatementofactivities,itisrecognizedintheperiodthatitisincurred.Theadditionalliabilityforunmaturedinterestowingattheendoftheperiodwas: (526,593)
Ingovernmentalfunds,interestsubsidiesreceivedfromQualifiedSchoolConstructionBonds(QSCB)arerecognizedintheperiodthattheyarereceived.Inthegovernment‐widestatements,theyarerecognizedintheperiodthattheyareearned.Thefederalinterestsubsidiesincludedinreceivablesinthegovernment‐widestatementswere: 101,715
Ingovernmentalfunds,onlycurrentliabilitiesarereported.Inthestatementofnetposition,allliabilities,includinglong‐termliabilities,arereported.Long‐termliabilitiesrelatingtogovernmentalactivitiesconsistof:
Generalobligationbondspayable 46,622,599Certificatesofparticipationpayable 7,210,772Otherpostemploymentbenefitspayable 580,494Capitalleasespayable 7,381Compensatedabsencespayable 270,661 (54,691,907)
Internalservicefundsareusedtoconductcertainactivitiesforwhichcostsarechargedtootherfundsonafullcost‐recoverybasis.Becauseinternalservicefundsarepresumedtooperateforthebenefitofgovernmentalactivities,assetsandliabilitiesofinternalservicefundsarereportedwithgovernmentalactivitiesinthestatementofnetposition.Netpositionforinternalservicesfundsattheendoftheperiodis: 313,825
Totalnetposition‐governmentalactivities 6,665,401$
Amountsreportedforgovernmentalactivities inthestatementofnetpositionaredifferentbecausecapitalassetsusedforgovernmentalactivitiesarenotfinancialresourcesandthereforearenotreportedasassetsingovernmentalfunds.Thecostoftheassetsis$62,956,937,andtheaccumulateddepreciationis($18,892,158).
14.33 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 16
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTStatementofRevenues,Expenditures,andChangesinFundBalances–GovernmentalFundsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
GeneralFund
BuildingFund
SpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjects
Non‐MajorGovernmental
Funds
TotalGovernmental
FundsREVENUES
LCFFsources 23,541,085$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 23,541,085$Federalsources 1,291,729 ‐ ‐ 1,073,969 2,365,698Otherstatesources 4,058,087 ‐ ‐ 66,906 4,124,993Otherlocalsources 2,660,898 6,420 25,877 2,174,084 4,867,279
TotalRevenues 31,551,799 6,420 25,877 3,314,959 34,899,055EXPENDITURES
Current:InstructionalServices:
Instruction 19,129,249 ‐ ‐ ‐ 19,129,249Instruction‐RelatedServices:
Supervisionofinstruction 695,620 ‐ ‐ ‐ 695,620Instructionallibrary,mediaandtechnology 641,524 ‐ ‐ ‐ 641,524Schoolsiteadministration 1,443,643 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,443,643
PupilSupportServices:Home‐to‐schooltransportation 553,441 ‐ ‐ ‐ 553,441Foodservices ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,420,296 1,420,296Allotherpupilservices 677,590 ‐ ‐ ‐ 677,590
Enterpriseactivities 2,750 ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,750GeneralAdministrationServices:
Dataprocessingservices 502,507 ‐ ‐ ‐ 502,507Othergeneraladministration 1,885,657 ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,885,657
Plantservices 3,020,686 ‐ 342,298 983 3,363,967CapitalOutlay 700 6,026,527 2,483,591 84 8,510,902Intergovernmentaltransfers 807,209 ‐ ‐ ‐ 807,209DebtService:
Principal 24,422 ‐ ‐ 322,484 346,906Interest 1,221 ‐ ‐ 1,385,700 1,386,921Issuancecostsanddiscounts ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,250 2,250
TotalExpenditures 29,386,219 6,026,527 2,825,889 3,131,797 41,370,432
Excess(Deficiency)ofRevenuesOver(Under)Expenditures 2,165,580 (6,020,107) (2,800,012) 183,162 (6,471,377)
OTHERFINANCINGSOURCES(USES)Interfundtransfersin ‐ 1,869,360 840,225 230,072 2,939,657Interfundtransfersout (840,225) ‐ (500,000) (1,599,432) (2,939,657)
TotalOtherFinancingSourcesandUses (840,225) 1,869,360 340,225 (1,369,360) ‐
NetChangeinFundBalances 1,325,355 (4,150,747) (2,459,787) (1,186,198) (6,471,377)
7,351,657 4,151,739 7,470,193 4,901,370 23,874,959
FundBalances,June30,2014 8,677,012$ 992$ 5,010,406$ 3,715,172$ 17,403,582$
FundBalances,July1,2013
14.34 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 17
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTReconciliationoftheGovernmentalFundsStatementofRevenues,Expenditures, andChangesinFundBalancestotheStatementofActivitiesFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014Totalnetchangeinfundbalances‐governmentalfunds (6,471,377)$
Amountsreportedforgovernmentalactivities inthestatementofactivitiesaredifferentbecause:
Capitaloutlaysarereportedingovernmentalfundsasexpenditures.However,inthestatementofactivities,thecostofthoseassetsisallocatedovertheirestimatedusefullivesasdepreciationexpense.Thedifferencebetweencapitaloutlayexpendituresanddepreciationexpensefortheperiodis:
Expendituresforcapitaloutlay 8,209,951Depreciationexpense (2,033,895) 6,176,056
Ingovernmentalfunds,repaymentsoflong‐termdebtarereportedasexpenditures.Inthegovernment‐widestatements,repaymentsoflong‐termdebtarereportedasreductionofliabilities.Expendituresforrepaymentoftheprincipalportionoflong‐termdebtwere: 346,906
Ingovernmentalfunds,postemploymentbenefitscostsarerecognizedasexpendituresintheperiodtheyarepaid.Inthegovernment‐widestatements,postemploymentbenefitscostsarerecognizedintheperiodthattheyareincurred.TheincreaseinthenetOPEBliabilityattheendofperiodwas: (235,134)
Ingovernmentalfunds,ifdebtisissuedatapremium,thepremiumisrecognizedasanotherfinancingsourceintheperioditisincurred.Inthegovernment‐widestatements,thepremiumisamortizedasinterestoverthelifeofthedebt.Amortizationofpremiumfortheperiodis: 54,716
Ingovernmentalfunds,accretedinterestoncapitalappreciationbondsisnotrecordedasanexpenditurefromcurrentresources.Inthegovernment‐widestatementofactivities,however,thisisrecordedasinterestexpensefortheperiod. (1,634,628)
Ingovernmentalfunds,interestsubsidiesreceivedfromQualifiedSchoolConstructionBonds(QSCB)arerecognizedintheperiodthattheyarereceived.Inthegovernment‐widestatements,theyarerecognizedintheperiodthattheyareearned.Thefederalinterestsubsidiesincludedinreceivablesinthegovernment‐widestatementswere,lessamountsaccruedintheprioryearwere: (11,111)
Ingovernmentalfunds,interestonlong‐termdebtisrecognizedintheperiodthatitbecomesdue.Inthegovernment‐widestatementofactivities,itisrecognizedintheperiodthatitisincurred.Unmaturedinterestowingattheendoftheperiod,lessmaturedinterestpaidduringtheperiodbutowingfromthepriorperiod,was: 4,846
Inthestatementofactivities,compensatedabsencesaremeasuredbytheamountsearned duringtheyear.Inthegovernmentalfunds,however,expendituresfortheseitemsaremeasuredbytheamountoffinancialresourcesused(essentially,theamountsactuallypaid ). (70,827)
Theinternalservicefundisusedbymanagementtochargethecostofself‐insuranceactivities.Thenetrevenue(expense)oftheinternalservicefundisreportedwithgovernmentalactivities. 157,159
Changeinnetpositionofgovernmentalactivities (1,683,394)$
14.35 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 18
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTStatementofNetPosition–ProprietaryFundJune30,2014
GovernmentalActivities
InternalServiceFund
ASSETSCash 306,712$Accountsreceivable 7,840
TotalAssets 314,552
LIABILITIESEstimatedclaimliabilityforIBNR 727
Totalliabilities 727
NETPOSITIONRestricted 313,825$
14.36 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 19
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTStatementofRevenues,Expenses,andChangesinFundNetPosition–ProprietaryFundFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
GovernmentalActivities
InternalServiceFund
OPERATINGREVENUESSelf‐insurancepremiums 2,800,000$
Totaloperatingrevenues 2,800,000
OPERATINGEXPENSESEmployeebenefits 5,568Paymentsforservices 2,639,460
Totaloperatingexpenses 2,645,028
OperatingIncome(Loss) 154,972
NON‐OPERATINGREVENUESInterestincome 2,187
ChangeinNetPosition 157,159
NetPosition,July1,2013 156,666
NetPosition,June30,2014 313,825$
14.37 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 20
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTStatementofCashFlows–ProprietaryFundFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
GovernmentalActivities
InternalServiceFund
CASHFLOWSFROMOPERATINGACTIVITIESCashreceivedfromassessmentsmadetootherfunds 2,792,160$Cashpaymentsforpayroll,insuranceandoperatingcosts (3,176,249)
Netcashprovided(used)byoperatingactivities (384,089)
CASHFLOWSFROMINVESTINGACTIVITIESInterestoninvestments 2,187
Netincrease(decrease)incash (381,902)
Cash,July1,2013 688,614
Cash,June30,2014 306,712$
Operatingincome(loss) 154,972$Changesinoperatingassetsandliabilities:
Increaseinaccountsreceivable (7,840)Decreaseinestimatedclaimliability (531,221)
Netcashprovided(used)byoperatingactivities (384,089)$
(used)byoperatingactivities:Reconciliationofoperatingincome(loss)tonetcashprovided
14.38 EXHIBITS
Thenotestofinancialstatementsareanintegralpartofthisstatement. 21
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTStatementofFiduciaryNetPositionJune30,2014
AgencyFund
125PlanFund
ASSETSCash 32,170$
TotalAssets 32,170$
LIABILITIESDuetoemployeegroups 32,170$
TotalLiabilities 32,170$
14.39 EXHIBITS
22
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIESA. ReportingEntity
A reporting entity is comprised of the primary government, component units, and other organizationsthatareincludedtoensurethefinancialstatementsarenotmisleading.TheprimarygovernmentoftheDistrictconsistsofallfunds,departments,andagenciesthatarenotlegallyseparatefromtheDistrict.ForCypressSchoolDistrict,thisincludesgeneraloperations,foodservice,andstudentrelatedactivitiesoftheDistrict.ComponentunitsarelegallyseparateorganizationsforwhichtheDistrictisfinanciallyaccountable.TheDistrict'scomponentunitsaresointertwinedwiththeDistrictthattheyare,insubstance,thesameastheDistrict and, therefore, are blended and reported as if they were part of the District. The DistrictGoverningalsoservesasthegoverningboardforthePublicFinancingCorporation.AlthoughtheboardmembersofthePublicFinancingCorporationareappointedbytheDistrictBoard,thecorporationexistssolelytofinancetheacquisitionandconstructionofequipmentandfacilitiesfortheDistrict.
ComponentUnit
IncludedintheReportingEntityBecause:
SeparateFinancialStatements
Cypress School District PublicFinancing Corporationwas formedfor the sole purpose of providingfinancial assistance to theDistrictbyacquiring, constructing, financing,selling and leasing public facilities,land, personal property andequipment for theuseandbenefitofthe District. The District leasescertain school facilities from thecorporation under a lease‐purchaseagreementdatedMarch1,2013.
GoverningboardcomposesboardofFinancingCorporation
Notprepared.
B. BasisofPresentation,BasisofAccounting
1. BasisofPresentationGovernment‐WideFinancialStatementsThestatementofnetpositionandthestatementofactivitiesdisplayinformationabouttheprimarygovernment (the District). These statements include the financial activities of the overallgovernment, except for fiduciary activities. Eliminations havebeenmade tominimize the double‐counting of internal activities. Governmental activities generally are financed through taxes,intergovernmentalrevenues,andothernonexchangetransactions.ThestatementofactivitiespresentsacomparisonbetweendirectexpensesandprogramrevenuesforeachfunctionoftheDistrict'sgovernmentalactivities.Directexpensesarethosethatarespecificallyassociatedwithaprogramorfunctionand,therefore,areclearlyidentifiabletoaparticularfunction.Program revenues include (a) fees, fines, and charges paid by the recipients of goods or servicesoffered by the programs and (b) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting theoperational or capital requirements of a particular program. Revenues that are not classified asprogramrevenues,includingalltaxes,arepresentedasgeneralrevenues.
14.40 EXHIBITS
23
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES(continued)B. BasisofPresentation,BasisofAccounting(continued)
1. BasisofPresentation(continued)FundFinancialStatementsThefundfinancialstatementsprovide informationabouttheDistrict's funds, including its fiduciaryfunds and blended component units. Separate statements for each fund category ‐ governmental,proprietary, and fiduciary ‐ are presented. The emphasis of fund financial statements is onmajorgovernmental funds, each displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental andenterprisefundsareaggregatedandreportedasnonmajorfunds.Proprietaryfundoperatingrevenues,suchaschargesforservices,resultfromexchangetransactionsassociatedwith the principal activity of the fund. Exchange transactions are those inwhich eachpartyreceivesandgivesupessentiallyequalvalues. Nonoperatingrevenues,suchassubsidiesandinvestmentearnings,resultfromnonexchangetransactionsorancillaryactivities.
MajorGovernmentalFundsTheDistrictmaintainsthefollowingmajorgovernmentalfunds:
GeneralFund:ThisfundisthegeneraloperatingfundoftheDistrict.Itisusedtoaccountforallfinancialresourcesexceptthoserequiredtobeaccountedforinanotherfund.TheDistrictalsomaintainsaDeferredMaintenanceFund.Undertheflexibilityprovisionsofcurrentstatutethatallowcertainformerlyrestrictedrevenuestobeusedforanyeducationalpurpose,theDeferredMaintenance Fund does not currentlymeet the definition of special revenue funds as it is nolongerprimarilycomposedofrestrictedorcommittedrevenuesources.Becausethis funddoesnotmeetthedefinitionofspecialrevenuefundsunderGASB54,theactivityinthisfundisbeingreportedwithintheGeneralFund.BuildingFund: This fund isusedtoaccountfortheacquisitionofmajorgovernmentalcapitalfacilitiesandbuildingsfromthesaleofgeneralobligationbondsandbondanticipationnotes.SpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjects: ThisfundisusedtoaccountforfundssetasideforBoarddesignatedconstructionprojects.
Non‐MajorGovernmentalFundsTheDistrictmaintainsthefollowingnon‐majorgovernmentalfunds:
SpecialRevenueFund:
CafeteriaFund:ThisfundisusedtoaccountforrevenuesreceivedandexpendituresmadetooperatetheDistrict'sfoodserviceoperations.
14.41 EXHIBITS
24
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES(continued)
B. BasisofPresentation,BasisofAccounting(continued)
1. BasisofPresentation(continued)
Non‐MajorGovernmentalFunds(continued)
CapitalProjectsFunds:
CapitalFacilitiesFund:ThisfundisusedtoaccountforresourcesreceivedfromdeveloperimpactfeesassessedunderprovisionsoftheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct.County School Facilities Fund: This fund is used to account for state apportionmentsprovidedformodernizationofschoolfacilitiesunderSB50.CapitalProjectsFundforBlendedComponentUnits:Thisfundisusedtoaccountfortheactivityofthecertificatesofparticipation.
DebtServiceFunds:
BondInterestandRedemptionFund:Thisfundisusedtoaccountfortheaccumulationofresourcesfor,andtherepaymentof,Districtbonds,interest,andrelatedcosts.DebtServiceFund forBlendedComponentUnits: This fund is used to account for theaccumulationofresourcesfortherepaymentofcertificatesofparticipation.
ProprietaryFundsProprietary fund reporting focuses on the determination of operating income, changes in netposition,financialposition,andcashflows.Proprietaryfundsareclassifiedasenterpriseorinternalservice.TheDistricthasthefollowingproprietaryfund:
Dental and Vision Self‐Insurance Fund: This fund may be used to account for resourcescommitted to pay the costs of the District’s vision and dental benefits and claims for itsemployees.
FiduciaryFundsFiduciary fund reporting focuses onnet position and changes in net position. Fiduciary funds areusedtoreportassetsheldinatrusteeoragencycapacityforothersandthereforecannotbeusedtosupport the District’s own programs. The fiduciary fund category includes pension (and otheremployeebenefit)trustfunds,investmenttrustfunds,private‐purposetrustfunds,andagencyfunds.TheDistrictmaintainsthefollowingfiduciaryfunds:
Section125EmployeeBenefitPlan:TheDistrictmaintainsthisfundtoholdamountsthatarecollectedonbehalfofemployeesforbenefits.
14.42 EXHIBITS
25
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES(continued)
B. BasisofPresentation,BasisofAccounting(continued)
2. MeasurementFocus,BasisofAccounting
Government‐Wide,Proprietary,andFiduciaryFundFinancialStatementsThe government‐wide, proprietary, and fiduciary fund financial statements are reported using theeconomicresourcesmeasurementfocusandtheaccrualbasisofaccounting.Revenuesarerecordedwhenearnedandexpensesarerecordedat thetime liabilitiesare incurred,regardlessofwhentherelated cash flows take place. Nonexchange transactions, inwhich theDistrict gives (or receives)valuewithoutdirectlyreceiving(orgiving)equalvalue inexchange, includepropertytaxes,grants,entitlements,anddonations. Onanaccrualbasis,revenuefrompropertytaxes isrecognizedinthefiscalyearinwhichalleligibilityrequirementshavebeensatisfied.GovernmentalFundFinancialStatementsGovernmental fundsarereportedusingthecurrent financialresourcesmeasurement focusandthemodifiedaccrualbasisofaccounting.Underthismethod,revenuesarerecognizedwhenmeasurableandavailable.TheDistrictconsidersallrevenuesreportedinthegovernmentalfundstobeavailableif the revenues are collectedwithin 60 days after year‐end. Expenditures are recordedwhen therelatedfundliabilityis incurred,exceptforprincipalandinterestongenerallong‐termdebt,claimsandjudgments,andcompensatedabsences,whicharerecognizedasexpenditurestotheextenttheyhave matured. Capital asset acquisitions are reported as expenditures in governmental funds.Proceedsofgenerallong‐termdebtandfinancingfromcapitalleasesarereportedasotherfinancingsources.
C. BudgetaryDataThe budgetary process is prescribed by provisions of the California Education Code and requires thegoverningboardtoholdapublichearingandadoptanoperatingbudgetnolaterthanJuly1ofeachyear.TheDistrictgoverningboardsatisfiedtheserequirements.Theadoptedbudgetissubjecttoamendmentthroughouttheyeartogiveconsiderationtounanticipatedrevenueandexpendituresprimarilyresultingfromeventsunknownatthetimeofbudgetadoptionwiththelegalrestrictionthatexpenditurescannotexceedappropriationsbymajorobjectaccount.Theamountsreportedastheoriginalbudgetedamountsinthebudgetarystatementsreflecttheamountswhentheoriginalappropriationswereadopted.Theamountsreportedasthefinalbudgetedamountsinthebudgetarystatementsreflecttheamountsafterallbudgetamendmentshavebeenaccountedfor.Forbudgetpurposes,onbehalfpaymentshavenotbeen includedasrevenueandexpendituresasrequiredundergenerallyacceptedaccountingprinciples.
D. EncumbrancesEncumbranceaccounting isused inallbudgeted funds toreserveportionsofapplicableappropriationsforwhichcommitmentshavebeenmade.Encumbrancesarerecordedforpurchaseorders,contracts,andother commitmentswhen they arewritten. Encumbrances are liquidatedwhen the commitments arepaid.AllencumbrancesareliquidatedasofJune30.
14.43 EXHIBITS
26
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES(continued)E. Assets,DeferredOutflowsofResources,Liabilities,andNetPosition
1. CashandCashEquivalents
The District considers cash and cash equivalents to be cash on hand and demand deposits. Inaddition, because theTreasuryPool is sufficiently liquid to permitwithdrawal of cash at any timewithoutpriornoticeorpenalty,equityinthepoolisalsodeemedtobeacashequivalent.
2. InventoriesInventoriesarevaluedatcostusingthefirst‐in/first‐out(FIFO)method.Thecostsofgovernmentalfund‐typeinventoriesarerecordedasexpenditureswhenconsumedratherthanwhenpurchased.
3. CapitalAssetsPurchasedor constructed capital assets are reported at cost or estimatedhistorical cost. Donatedfixed assets are recorded at their estimated fair value at thedateofdonation. The costofnormalmaintenanceandrepairs thatdonotaddtothevalueof theassetormateriallyextendassets' livesarenotcapitalized.Capital assets are depreciated using the straight‐line method over the following estimated usefullives:
Description EstimatedLives
BuildingsandImprovements 25‐50yearsFurnitureandEquipment 15‐20yearsVehicles 8years
4. CompensatedAbsences
The liability for compensated absences reported in the government‐wide statements consists ofunpaid, accumulated vacation leave balances. The liability has been calculated using the vestingmethod,inwhichleaveamountsforbothemployeeswhocurrentlyareeligibletoreceiveterminationpayments and other employeeswho are expected to become eligible in the future to receive suchpaymentsuponterminationareincluded.
5. PropertyTaxCalendar
TheCountyisresponsiblefortheassessment,collection,andapportionmentofpropertytaxesforalljurisdictionsincludingtheschoolsandspecialdistrictswithintheCounty.TheBoardofSupervisorsleviespropertytaxesasofSeptember1onpropertyvaluesassessedonJuly1.Securedpropertytaxpaymentsaredueintwoequalinstallments.ThefirstisgenerallydueNovember1andisdelinquentwithpenaltiesonDecember10,andthesecondisgenerallydueonFebruary1andisdelinquentwithpenaltiesonApril10.SecuredpropertytaxesbecomealienonthepropertyonJanuary1.
14.44 EXHIBITS
27
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES(continued)E. Assets,DeferredOutflowsofResources,Liabilities,andNetPosition(continued)
6. FundBalances
Thefundbalanceforgovernmentalfundsisreportedinclassificationsbasedontheextenttowhichthegovernment isboundtohonorconstraintsonthespecificpurposesforwhichamounts inthosefundscanbespent.Nonspendable: Fund balance is reported as nonspendable when the resources cannot be spentbecausetheyareeitherinanonspendableformorlegallyorcontractuallyrequiredtobemaintainedintact.Resourcesinnonspendableformincludeinventoriesandprepaidassets.Restricted: Fund balance is reported as restricted when the constraints placed on the use ofresourcesareeitherexternallyimposedbycreditors,grantors,contributors,orlawsorregulationsofothergovernments;orimposedbylawthroughconstitutionalprovisionorbyenablinglegislation.Committed:TheDistrict'shighestdecision‐makinglevelofauthorityrestswiththeDistrict'sBoard.Fund balance is reported as committed when the Board passes a resolution that places specifiedconstraints on how resources may be used. The Board can modify or rescind a commitment ofresourcesthroughpassageofanewresolution.Assigned:ResourcesthatareconstrainedbytheDistrict'sintenttousethemforaspecificpurpose,but are neither restricted nor committed, are reported as assigned fund balance. Intent may beexpressedbyeithertheBoard,committees(suchasbudgetorfinance),orofficialstowhichtheBoardhasdelegatedauthority.Unassigned: Unassigned fund balance represents fund balance that has not been restricted,committed,orassignedandmaybeutilizedbytheDistrictforanypurpose.Whenexpendituresareincurred,andbothrestrictedandunrestrictedresourcesareavailable,itistheDistrict'spolicytouserestrictedresourcesfirst,thenunrestrictedresourcesintheorderofcommitted,assigned,andthenunassigned,astheyareneeded.
7. DeferredOutflows/InflowsofResourcesIn addition to assets, the statement of net position will sometimes report a separate section fordeferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows ofresources,representsaconsumptionofnetpositionthatappliestoafutureperiodandsowillnotberecognizedasanoutflowofresources(expense/expenditure)untilthen.TheDistricthasnodeferredoutflowsofresources.
Inaddition to liabilities, the statementofnetpositionwill sometimes reporta separate section fordeferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows ofresources, represents an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period andwill not berecognizedasaninflowofresources(revenue)untilthattime.TheDistricthasnodeferredinflowsofresources.
14.45 EXHIBITS
28
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES(continued)E. Assets,DeferredOutflowsofResources,Liabilities,andNetPosition(continued)
8. NetPosition
Net position is classified into three components: net investment in capital assets; restricted; andunrestricted.Theseclassificationsaredefinedasfollows: Net investment in capitalassets ‐ This component of net position consists of capital assets,
including restricted capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by theoutstandingbalancesofanybonds,mortgages,notes,orotherborrowingsthatareattributabletothe acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets. If there are significant unspentrelateddebtproceedsatyear‐end,theportionofthedebtattributabletotheunspentproceedsarenotincludedinthecalculationofnetinvestmentincapitalassets.Rather,thatportionofthedebtisincludedinthesamenetpositioncomponentastheunspentproceeds.
Restricted ‐This componentofnetposition consistsof constraintsplacedonnetpositionusethroughexternal constraints imposedby creditors (suchas throughdebt covenants), grantors,contributors,orlawsorregulationsofothergovernmentsorconstraintsimposedbylawthroughconstitutionalprovisionsorenablinglegislation.
Unrestrictednetposition‐Thiscomponentofnetpositionconsistsofnetpositionthatdoesnotmeetthedefinitionof"netinvestmentincapitalassets"or"restricted".
Whenbothrestrictedandunrestrictedresourcesareavailableforuse,itistheDistrict'spolicytouserestrictedresourcesfirst,thenunrestrictedresourcesastheyareneeded.
F. UseofEstimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principlesrequiresmanagementtomakeestimatesandassumptionsthataffectthereportedamountsofassetsandliabilitiesanddisclosureofcontingentassetsandliabilitiesatthedateofthefinancialstatementsandthereportedamountsofrevenuesandexpendituresduringthereportedperiod. Actualresultscoulddifferfromthoseestimates.
G. NewGASBPronouncements
Duringthe2013‐14fiscalyear,thefollowingGASBPronouncementbecameeffective:StatementNo.65,ItemsPreviouslyReportedasAssetsandLiabilities(Issued03/12)This Statement establishes accounting and financial reporting standards that reclassify, as deferredoutflows of resources or deferred inflows of resources, certain items thatwerepreviously reported asassetsandliabilitiesandrecognizes,asoutflowsofresourcesorinflowsofresources,certainitemsthatwerepreviouslyreportedasassetsandliabilities.
14.46 EXHIBITS
29
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE1‐SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTINGPOLICIES(continued)G. NewGASBPronouncements(continued)
StatementNo.65(continued)Duetotheimplementationofthisstatement,thecalculationofdeferredamountonrefundingwasrevisedto eliminate the inclusionof costs that shouldbe recognizedas anexpense in theperiod incurredandeliminated debt issuance costs which should be recognized as an expense in the period incurred.Accounting changes adopted to conform to the provisions of this statement should be appliedretroactively.TheresultoftheimplementationofthisstandardwastodecreasethenetpositionatJuly1,2013by$1,276,405,whichistheamountofunamortizeddebtissuancecostsatJuly1,2013.Concepts Statement No. 4, Elements of Financial Statements, introduced and defined the elementsincluded in financial statements, including deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows ofresources.Inaddition,ConceptsStatement4providesthatreportingadeferredoutflowofresourcesoradeferredinflowofresourcesshouldbelimitedtothoseinstancesidentifiedbytheBoardinauthoritativepronouncementsthatareestablishedafterapplicabledueprocess.This Statement also provides other financial reporting guidance related to the impact of the financialstatementelementsdeferredoutflowsofresourcesanddeferredinflowsofresources,suchaschangesinthe determination of themajor fund calculations and limiting the use of the termdeferred in financialstatementpresentations.
NOTE2–CASHANDINVESTMENTSCashatJune30,2014isreportedatfairvalueandconsistedofthefollowing:
RatingGovernmental
FundsProprietary
Fund TotalFiduciaryFunds
PooledFunds:CashinCountyTreasury 16,100,917$ 278,670$ 16,379,587$ ‐$
TotalPooledFunds 16,100,917 278,670 16,379,587 ‐
Deposits:Cashonhandandinbanks ‐ ‐ ‐ 32,170Cashinrevolvingfund 15,000 ‐ 15,000 ‐Cashcollectionsawaitingdeposits 11,738 28,042 39,780 ‐
TotalDeposits 26,738 28,042 54,780 32,170
TotalCash 16,127,655$ 306,712$ 16,434,367$ 32,170$
Investments:FidelityGovernmentPortfolio AAAm 1,175,896$ 1,175,896$
GovernmentalActivities
14.47 EXHIBITS
30
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE2–CASHANDINVESTMENTS(continued)PooledFundsIn accordancewithEducationCodeSection41001, theDistrictmaintains substantiallyallof its cash in theCounty Treasury. The County pools and invests the cash. These pooled funds are carried at cost whichapproximatesfairvalue.Interestearnedisdepositedannuallytoparticipatingfunds.Anyinvestmentlossesareproportionatelysharedbyallfundsinthepool.Because theDistrict's deposits aremaintained in a recognizedpooled investment fundunder the careof athirdpartyandtheDistrict'sshareofthepooldoesnotconsistofspecific,identifiableinvestmentsecuritiesownedbytheDistrict,nodisclosureoftheindividualdepositsandinvestmentsorrelatedcustodialcreditriskclassificationsisrequired.Inaccordancewithapplicablestate laws, theCountyTreasurermay invest inderivativesecuritieswith theState of California. However, at June 30, 2014, the County Treasurer has represented that the PooledInvestmentFundcontainednoderivativesorotherinvestmentswithsimilarriskprofiles.CustodialCreditRisk–DepositsCustodialcreditriskistheriskthatintheeventofabankfailure,theDistrict’sdepositsmaynotbereturnedtoit.TheDistrictdoesnothaveapolicyforcustodialcreditriskfordeposits.Cashbalancesheldinbanksareinsuredupto$250,000bytheFederalDepositoryInsuranceCorporation(FDIC)andarecollateralizedbytherespective financial institutions. In addition, the California Government Code requires that a financialinstitutionsecuredepositsmadebyStateorlocalgovernmentalunitsbypledgingsecuritiesinanundividedcollateralpoolheldbyadepositoryregulatedunderStatelaw(unlesssowaivedbythegovernmentalunit).Themarketvalueofthepledgedsecuritiesinthecollateralpoolmustequalatleast110percentofthetotalamount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure publicdeposits by pledging first trust deedmortgage notes having a value of 150 percent of the secured publicdepositsandlettersofcredit issuedbytheFederalHomeLoanBankofSanFranciscohavingavalueof105percent of the secured deposits. As of June 30, 2014, none of the District’s bank balancewas exposed tocustodialcreditriskbecauseitwasinsuredbytheFDIC.Investments‐InterestRateRiskTheDistrict'sinvestmentpolicylimitsinvestmentmaturitiesasameansofmanagingitsexposuretofairvaluelossesarisingfromincreasinginterestrates.TheDistrict'sinvestmentpolicylimitsinvestmentpurchasestoinvestmentswithatermnottoexceedthreeyears.InvestmentspurchasedwithmaturitytermsgreaterthanthreeyearsrequireapprovalbytheBoardofTrustees.InvestmentspurchasedwithmaturitiesgreaterthanoneyearrequirewrittenapprovalbytheSuperintendentpriortocommitment.MaturitiesofinvestmentsheldatJune30,2014consistedofthefollowing:
FairValue
LessThanOneYear
OneYearThroughFiveYears
Investmentmaturities:FidelityGovernmentPortfolio 1,175,896$ 1,175,896$ ‐$
Maturity
14.48 EXHIBITS
31
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE2–CASHANDINVESTMENTS(continued)Investments‐CreditRiskTheDistrict's investmentpolicy limits investmentchoices toobligationsof local, stateandfederalagencies,commercialpaper,certificatesofdeposit, repurchaseagreements,corporatenotes,bankeracceptances,andother securities allowed by State Government Code Section 53600. At June 30, 2014, all investmentsrepresented governmental securitieswhichwere issued, registered and held by the District's agent in theDistrict'sname.Investments‐ConcentrationofCreditRiskTheDistrictdoesnotplacelimitsontheamountitmayinvestinanyoneissuer.AtJune30,2014,theDistricthadthefollowinginvestmentthatrepresentsmorethanfivepercentoftheDistrict'snetinvestments.
FidelityGovernmentPortfolio 100%
NOTE3–ACCOUNTSRECEIVABLEAccountsreceivableasofJune30,2014consistedofthefollowing:
Proprietary
GeneralFund
BuildingFund
SpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjects
Non‐MajorGovernmental
Funds TotalSelf‐Insurance
FundFederalGovernment:Categoricalaidprograms 801,219$ ‐$ ‐$ 133,209$ 934,428$ ‐$
StateGovernment:LCFFSources 202,402 ‐ ‐ ‐ 202,402 ‐Lottery 295,582 ‐ ‐ ‐ 295,582 ‐Categoricalaidprograms 648,036 ‐ ‐ 6,912 654,948 ‐
Local:Specialeducation 105,864 ‐ ‐ ‐ 105,864 ‐Interest 13 5 1,840 510 2,368 ‐Otherlocalrevenue 18,668 ‐ ‐ 4,906 23,574 7,840
Total 2,071,784$ 5$ 1,840$ 145,537$ 2,219,166$ 7,840$
GovernmentalFunds
14.49 EXHIBITS
32
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE4‐INTERFUNDACTIVITIES
A. BalancesDueTo/FromOtherFunds
Balancesdueto/fromotherfundsatJune30,2014consistedofthefollowing:
SpecialReserve Non‐MajorGeneral Building FundforCapital GovernmentalFund Fund OutlayProjects Funds Total
GeneralFund ‐$ 611$ 840,225$ 2,181$ 843,017$BuildingFund 600 ‐ ‐ ‐ 600Non‐MajorGovernmentalFunds 4,769 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,769
Total 5,369$ 611$ 840,225$ 2,181$ 848,386$
CafeteriaFundduetothetheGeneralFundforreimbursements 4,769$GeneralFundduetotheSpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjectsforredevelopmentfunds 840,225GeneralFundduetotheBuildingFundforcapitaloutlayprojectsfordeveloperfees 611GeneralFundduetotheCafeteriaFundforcateringcosts 2,181BuildingFundduetotheGeneralFundtoclearoutholdingaccounts 600
Total 848,386$
DueFromOtherFunds
B. TransfersTo/FromOtherFunds
Transfersto/fromotherfundsduringtheyearendedJune30,2014consistedofthefollowing:
SpecialReserve Non‐MajorBuilding FundforCapital GovernmentalFund OutlayProjects Funds Total
GeneralFund ‐$ 840,225$ ‐$ 840,225$SpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjects 500,000 ‐ ‐ 500,000Non‐MajorGovernmentalFunds 1,369,360 ‐ 230,072 1,599,432
Total 1,869,360$ 840,225$ 230,072$ 2,939,657$
840,225$500,000
1,369,360
230,072
Total 2,939,657$
TransfersFromOtherFunds
GeneralFundtransfertotheSpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjectsfordeveloperfeesandreimbursedcostsSpecialReserveFundforCapitalOutlayProjectstransfertotheBuildingFundtocoverexpendituresCapitalProjectsFundforBlendedComponentUnitstransfertotheBuildingFundforcapitalprojects
CapitalProjectsFundforBlendedComponentUnitstransfertoDebtServiceFundforBlendedComponentUnitsforissuanceofCOPS
14.50 EXHIBITS
33
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE5–FUNDBALANCESMinimumFundBalancePolicyDuring the 2010‐11 fiscal year, pursuant to GASB StatementNo. 54, theDistrict adopted aminimum fundbalancepolicyfortheGeneralFundinordertoprotecttheDistrictagainstrevenueshortfallsorunpredictedexpenditures. Thepolicy requires aReserve forEconomicUncertainties consistingofunassignedamountsequaltonolessthanthreepercentoftotalGeneralFundexpendituresandotherfinancinguses.When an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance isavailable,theDistrictconsidersrestrictedfundstohavebeenspentfirst.Whenanexpenditureisincurredforwhichcommitted,assigned,orunassignedfundbalancesareavailable,theDistrictconsidersamountstohavebeenspentfirstoutofcommittedfunds,thenassignedfunds,andfinallyunassignedfunds,asneededunlessthegoverningboardhasprovidedotherwiseinitscommitmentorassignmentactions.AtJune30,2014,fundbalancesoftheDistrict’sgovernmentalfundswereclassifiedasfollows:
SpecialReserve Non‐MajorGeneral Building FundforCapital GovernmentalFund Fund OutlayProjects Funds Total
Nonspendable:Revolvingcash 15,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 11,392$ 26,392$
TotalNonspendable 15,000 ‐ ‐ 11,392 26,392Restricted:
Categoricalprograms 646,664 ‐ ‐ ‐ 646,664Foodservices ‐ ‐ ‐ 248,398 248,398Capitalprojects ‐ 992 5,010,406 1,711,669 6,723,067Debtservice ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,743,713 1,743,713
TotalRestricted 646,664 992 5,010,406 3,703,780 9,361,842Assigned:
Deferredmaintenance 187,637 ‐ ‐ ‐ 187,637Assetmanagement 485,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ 485,000
TotalAssigned 672,637 ‐ ‐ ‐ 672,637Unassigned:
Reserveforeconomicuncertainties 906,792 ‐ ‐ ‐ 906,792Remainingunassignedbalances 6,435,919 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,435,919
TotalUnassigned 7,342,711 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,342,711
Total 8,677,012$ 992$ 5,010,406$ 3,715,172$ 17,403,582$
14.51 EXHIBITS
34
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE6–CAPITALASSETSANDDEPRECIATIONCapitalassetactivityfortheyearendedJune30,2014wasasfollows:
Balance, Balance,July1,2013 Additions Retirements June30,2014
Capitalassetsnotbeingdepreciated:Land 744,680$ ‐$ ‐$ 744,680$Constructioninprogress 8,366,328 4,338 7,962,783 407,883
Totalcapitalassetsnotbeingdepreciated 9,111,008 4,338 7,962,783 1,152,563Capitalassetsbeingdepreciated:
Improvementofsites 4,376,470 ‐ ‐ 4,376,470Buildings 38,873,462 15,934,004 ‐ 54,807,466Equipment 2,386,046 234,392 ‐ 2,620,438
Totalcapitalassetsbeingdepreciated 45,635,978 16,168,396 ‐ 61,804,374Accumulateddepreciationfor:
Improvementofsites (1,859,166) (181,779) ‐ (2,040,945)Buildings (13,363,403) (1,717,911) ‐ (15,081,314)Equipment (1,635,694) (134,205) ‐ (1,769,899)
Totalaccumulateddepreciation (16,858,263) (2,033,895) ‐ (18,892,158)Totalcapitalassetsbeingdepreciated,net 28,777,715 14,134,501 ‐ 42,912,216
Governmentalactivitycapitalassets,net 37,888,723$ 14,138,839$ 7,962,783$ 44,064,779$
NOTE7–GENERALLONG‐TERMDEBTChangesinlong‐termdebtfortheyearendedJune30,2014wereasfollows:
Balance, Balance, AmountsDueJuly1,2013 Additions Deductions June30,2014 WithinOneYear
Generalobligationbonds:Principalpayments 40,518,130$ ‐$ 322,484$ 40,195,646$ 375,718$Accretedinterest 2,880,106 1,637,144 2,516 4,514,734 4,282Unamortizedpremium 1,978,207 ‐ 65,988 1,912,219 65,989Sub‐totalbonds 45,376,443 1,637,144 390,988 46,622,599 445,989
Certificatesofparticipation:Principalpayments 7,365,000 ‐ ‐ 7,365,000 ‐Unamortizeddiscount (165,500) ‐ (11,272) (154,228) (11,272)
Sub‐totalCOPs 7,199,500 ‐ (11,272) 7,210,772 (11,272)Otherpostemploymentbenefits 345,360 235,134 ‐ 580,494 ‐Compensatedabsences 199,834 70,827 ‐ 270,661 ‐Capitalleases 31,803 ‐ 24,422 7,381 5,536
Total 53,152,940$ 1,943,105$ 404,138$ 54,691,907$ 440,253$
PaymentsforgeneralobligationbondsaremadebytheBondInterestandRedemptionFund.CertificatesofparticipationaremadebytheDebtServiceFundforBlendedComponentUnits.Capitalleasespaymentsaremade by the General Fund. Compensated absences will be paid for by the fund for which the employeeworked.
14.52 EXHIBITS
35
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE7–GENERALLONG‐TERMDEBT(continued)A. GeneralObligationBonds
On November 4, 2008, District voters approved Measure M, authorizing the District to issue and sellgeneralobligationbondsofupto$53.6million. Proceedsfromthesaleofbondsarebeingusedfortheconstruction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or replacement of school facilities, including the furnishingandequippingofschoolfacilities.Asummaryofoutstandingbondsisshownbelow:
Issue Maturity Interest Original Balance, Balance,
Series Date Date Rate Issue July1,2013 Additions Deductions June30,20142008A 5/5/2009 5/1/2034 2.0%‐5.0% 16,999,052$ 15,984,052$ ‐$ 130,000$ 15,854,052$2008B‐1 4/21/2011 8/1/2050 5.0%‐5.25% 20,139,078 20,139,078 ‐ 47,484 20,091,5942008B‐2 4/21/2011 8/1/2025 5.33%‐6.65% 4,535,000 4,395,000 ‐ 145,000 4,250,000
Total 41,673,130$ 40,518,130$ ‐$ 322,484$ 40,195,646$
AccretedInterest:2008A 551,555$ 173,630$ ‐$ 725,185$2008B‐1 2,328,551 1,463,514 2,516 3,789,549
Total 2,880,106$ 1,637,144$ 2,516$ 4,514,734$
TheamountsrequiredtoamortizeoutstandingbondsatJune30,2014areasfollows:
FiscalYear Principal Interest Total2014‐15 375,718$ 1,169,408$ 1,545,126$2015‐16 428,339 1,157,684 1,586,0232016‐17 513,150 1,145,178 1,658,3282017‐18 606,098 1,130,002 1,736,1002018‐19 1,028,178 1,183,163 2,211,3412019‐24 7,270,123 5,800,791 13,070,9142024‐29 13,239,441 3,401,465 16,640,9062029‐34 4,093,263 18,443,987 22,537,2502034‐39 2,171,152 28,032,998 30,204,1502039‐44 2,568,000 37,116,532 39,684,5322044‐49 3,560,416 48,146,468 51,706,8842049‐51 4,341,768 20,206,856 24,548,624
Total 40,195,646$ 166,934,532$ 207,130,178$
14.53 EXHIBITS
36
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE7–GENERALLONG‐TERMDEBT(continued)B. CertificatesofParticipation
OnMarch7,2013,theDistrictissuedcertificatesofparticipationintheamountof$7,365,000throughtheCypressSchoolDistrictPublicFinancingCorporationatinterestratesrangingbetween2.00%to3.625%.The certificateswere issued to provide the fundsnecessary for the acquisition, construction, delivery,andinstallationofcertainschoolfacilities,buildingsandequipment.The annual requirements to amortize certificates of participation outstanding at June 30, 2014 are asfollows:
FiscalYear Principal Interest Total
2014‐15 ‐$ 230,150$ 230,150$2015‐16 ‐ 230,150 230,1502016‐17 335,000 230,150 565,1502017‐18 455,000 223,450 678,4502018‐19 485,000 213,213 698,2132019‐24 2,945,000 839,944 3,784,9442024‐28 3,145,000 287,793 3,432,793
Total 7,365,000$ 2,254,850$ 9,619,850$
C. CapitalLeasesTheDistrictleasesequipmentandfacilitieshavingacapitalizedcostof$31,803underagreementsthatprovide for title to passuponexpirationof the leaseperiod. Futureminimum leasepayments are asfollows:
FiscalYear Principal Interest Total
2014‐15 5,536$ 277$ 5,813$2015‐16 1,845 92 1,937
Total 7,381$ 369$ 7,750$
14.54 EXHIBITS
37
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE8–JOINTVENTURESThe Cypress School District participates in joint ventures under joint powers agreements with the NorthOrange County Self‐Funded Workers’ Compensation Agency (NOCSFWCA) and the North Orange CountyLiabilityandPropertySelf‐InsuranceAuthority(NOCLPSIA). TherelationshipsbetweentheDistrictandtheJPAsaresuchthattheJPAsarenotacomponentunitoftheDistrictforfinancialreportingpurposes.The NOCLPSIA JPA provides property and liability insurance coverage for its members and NOCSFWCIAprovides its members workers compensation insurance coverage. The JPAs are governed by a boardconsistingofarepresentativefromeachmemberdistrict.ThegoverningboardcontrolstheoperationsofitsJPAs independent of any influence by themember districts beyond their representation on the governingboard.EachmemberdistrictpaysapremiumcommensuratewiththelevelofcoveragerequestedandsharessurplusesanddeficitsproportionatelytoitsparticipationintheJPAs.CondensedauditedfinancialinformationasofJune30,2014fortheJPAsisshownbelow:
NOCSFWCA NOCLPSIA
TotalAssets 2,185,176$ 4,366,468$TotalLiabilities 1,820,475 3,958,383
TotalNetAssets 364,701$ 408,085$
TotalRevenues 257,107$ 606,127$TotalExpenditures 214,123 878,109
NetIncome(Loss) 42,984$ (271,982)$
NOTE9–RISKMANAGEMENTPropertyandLiabilityTheDistrictisexposedtovariousrisksoflossrelatedtotorts;theftof,damageto,anddestructionofassets;errorsandomissions; injuriestoemployeesandnaturaldisasters. DuringfiscalyearendingJune30,2014,theDistrictparticipatedintheNOCLPSIApublicentityriskpoolforpropertyandliabilityinsurancecoverage.Settledclaimshavenotexceededthiscommercialcoverageinanyofthepastthreeyears.Therehasnotbeenasignificantreductionincoveragefromtheprioryear.Workers’CompensationFor fiscalyear2014, theDistrictparticipatedintheNOCSFWCAJPAforworkerscompensation,withexcesscoverageprovidedbytheSchoolsExcessLiabilityFund(SELF)publicentityriskpool.ClaimsLiabilityTheDistrictrecordsanestimatedliabilityfordentalandvisionclaimsagainsttheDistrict. Claimsliabilitiesarebasedonestimatesoftheultimatecostofreportedclaims(includingfutureclaimadjustmentexpenses)andanestimateforclaimsincurredbutnotreportedbasedonhistoricalexperience.
14.55 EXHIBITS
38
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE9–RISKMANAGEMENT(continued)UnpaidClaimsLiabilitiesTheDistrictestablishesaliabilityforbothreportedandunreportedevents,whichincludesestimatesofbothfuture payments of losses and related claim adjustment expenses. The following represent the changes inapproximateaggregateliabilitiesfortheDistrictfromJuly1,2012toJune30,2014:
Dental&VisionLiabilityBalance,July1,2012 37,538$
Claimsandchangesinestimates 2,585,973Claimspayments (2,591,563)
LiabilityBalance,June30,2013 31,948Claimsandchangesinestimates 2,608,239Claimspayments (2,639,460)
LiabilityBalance,June30,2014 727$
AssetsavailabletopayclaimsatJune30,2014 314,552$
NOTE10‐COMMITMENTSANDCONTINGENCIESA. StateandFederalAllowances,Awards,andGrants
TheDistricthasreceivedstateandfederalfundsforspecificpurposesthataresubjecttoreviewandauditbythegrantoragencies.Althoughsuchauditscouldgenerateexpendituredisallowancesundertermsofthegrants,itisbelievedthatanyrequiredreimbursementwillnotbematerial.
B. ConstructionCommitments
As of June 30, 2014, the District had commitments with respect to unfinished capital projects ofapproximately$0.3million.
NOTE11‐EMPLOYEERETIREMENTSYSTEMSQualified employees are covered under multiple‐employer defined benefit pension plans maintained byagencies of the State of California. Certificated employees aremembers of the State Teachers’ RetirementSystem(STRS),andclassifiedemployeesaremembersofthePublicEmployees’RetirementSystem(PERS).PlanDescriptionandProvisionsPublicEmployees’RetirementSystem(PERS)PlanDescriptionThe District contributes to the School Employer Pool under the California Public Employees’ RetirementSystem (CalPERS), a cost‐sharing multiple‐employer public employee retirement system defined benefitpensionplanadministeredbyCalPERS.Theplanprovidesretirementanddisabilitybenefits,annualcost‐of‐livingadjustments,anddeathbenefitstoplanmembersandbeneficiaries.Benefitprovisionsareestablishedbystatestatutes,as legislativelyamended,within thePublicEmployees’RetirementLaw. CalPERS issuesaseparate comprehensive annual financial report that includes financial statements and requiredsupplementaryinformation. CopiesofthecomprehensiveannualfinancialreportmaybeobtainedfromtheCalPERSExecutiveOffice,400QStreet,Sacramento,California95811.
14.56 EXHIBITS
39
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE11‐EMPLOYEERETIREMENTSYSTEMS(continued)PublicEmployees’RetirementSystem(PERS)(continued)
FundingPolicyActiveplanmembersarerequiredtocontribute7.0%oftheirsalaryandtheDistrictisrequiredtocontributean actuarially determined rate. The actuarialmethods and assumptionsused fordetermining the rate arethoseadoptedby theCalPERSBoardofAdministration. Therequiredemployercontributionfor fiscalyear2013‐14was11.442%.ThecontributionrequirementsoftheplanmembersareestablishedbyStatestatute.TheDistrict’scontributionstoCalPERSforthelastthreefiscalyearswereasfollows:
Contribution
PercentofRequiredContribution
2013‐14 $491,235 100%2012‐13 $453,462 100%2011‐12 $411,607 100%
StateTeachers’RetirementSystem(STRS)PlanDescriptionThe District contributes to the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS), a cost‐sharingmultiple‐employerpublicemployeeretirementsystemdefinedbenefitpensionplanadministeredbyCalSTRS.The plan provides retirement, disability and survivor benefits to beneficiaries. Benefit provisions areestablishedbystatestatutes,as legislativelyamended,withintheStateTeachers’RetirementLaw. CalSTRSissues a separate comprehensive annual financial report that includes financial statements and requiredsupplementary information. Copies of the comprehensive annual financial report may be obtained fromCalSTRS,100WaterfrontPlace,WestSacramento,California95605,oratwww.calstrs.com.FundingPolicyActiveplanmembers are required to contribute8.0%of their salary. The requiredemployer contributionrateforfiscalyear2013‐14was8.25%ofannualpayroll.ThecontributionrequirementsoftheplanmembersareestablishedbyState statute. TheDistrict’s contributions toSTRS for the last three fiscalyearswereasfollows:
Contribution
PercentofRequiredContribution
2013‐14 $1,237,757 100%2012‐13 $1,243,649 100%2011‐12 $1,231,163 100%
On‐BehalfPaymentsThe District was the recipient of on‐behalf payments made by the State of California to STRS for K‐12education.ThesepaymentsconsistofstateGeneralFundcontributionsofapproximately$0.6milliontoSTRS(4.267%ofsalariessubjecttoSTRSin2013‐14).
14.57 EXHIBITS
40
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE12–CYPRESSEDUCATIONFOUNDATIONTheDistrictleasesfacilitiestotheCypressEducationFoundationforuseasachildcarecenter. TheDistrictdoes not receive lease or rental revenue from the Foundation, but it does charge the Foundation for aprorated shareofutilities andmaintenance costs. Inaddition, theFoundationmakes regulargrants to theDistrictof$100,000every3months.TheFoundationgrantsarerestrictedastouseandmayonlybeusedforpurposesspecifiedintheFoundationdocuments.NOTE13–OTHERPOSTEMPLOYMENTBENEFITSCypressSchoolDistrictadministersasingle‐employerdefinedbenefitotherpostemploymentbenefit(OPEB)plan thatprovidesmedical,dental andvision insurancebenefits toeligible retireesand their spouses. TheDistrict implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement #45,Accounting and FinancialReportingbyEmployersforPostemploymentBenefitPlansOtherThanPensionPlans,in2008‐09.
PlanDescriptionsandContributionInformationMembershipintheplanconsistedofthefollowing:
Retireesandbeneficiariesreceivingbenefits* 30Activeplanmembers* 248Total 278
*AsofOctober1,2012actuarialvaluation
Followingisadescriptionofthecurrentretireebenefitplan:Non‐representedemployeesreceivebenefitsaccordingtotheappropriateclassification.
Certificated ClassifiedManagement Certificated Classified Management
Benefittypesprovided Medical,dental,&vision Medical,dental,&vision Medical,dental,&vision Medical,dental,&visionDurationofbenefits ToMedicareage ToMedicareage ToMedicareage ToMedicareageRequiredservices 10years 10years 10years 10yearsMinimumage 55 55 55 55Dependentcoverage No No No NoDistrictcontribution% 100% 100% 100% 100%Districtcap Sameasactive Sameasactive Sameasactive Sameasactive
TheDistrict’sfundingpolicyisbasedontheprojectedpay‐as‐you‐gofinancingrequirements,withadditionalamounts to prefundbenefits asdetermined annuallyby the governingboard. For fiscal year2013‐14, theDistrictcontributed$312,000.
14.58 EXHIBITS
41
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE13–OTHERPOSTEMPLOYMENTBENEFITS(continued)
AnnualOPEBCostandNetOPEBObligationTheDistrict’sannualOPEBcost iscalculatedbasedon theAnnualRequiredContribution(ARC),anamountactuariallydeterminedinaccordancewiththeparametersofGASBStatement45.TheARCrepresentsalevelof funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and amortize anyunfundedactuarialliabilities(orfundingexcess)overaperiodnottoexceedthirtyyears.ThefollowingtableshowsthecomponentsoftheDistrict’sannualOPEBcostfortheyear,theamountactuallycontributedtotheplan,andchangesintheDistrict’snetOPEBobligation:
Annualrequiredcontribution(ARC) 546,785$InterestonnetOPEBobligation 17,268AdjustmenttoARC (16,919)AnnualOPEBcost 547,134
Contributionsmade (312,000)IncreaseinnetOPEBliability 235,134
NetOPEBliability‐July1,2013 345,360NetOPEBliability‐June30,2014 580,494$
TheDistrict’sannualOPEBcost,thepercentageofannualOPEBcostcontributedtotheplan,andthenetOPEBobligationfor2013‐14andtheprecedingtwoyearsareasfollows:
Annual NetYearEnded OPEB Percentage OPEBJune30, Cost Contributed Obligation2012 305,983$ 100% 103,720$2013 546,890$ 56% 345,360$2014 547,134$ 57% 580,494$
FundedStatusandFundingProgress–OPEBPlansAsofOctober1,2012,themostrecentactuarialvaluationdate,theDistrictdidnothaveafundedplan.Theactuarial accrued liability (AAL) for benefits was $4.3million and the unfunded actuarial accrued liability(UAAL)was$4.3million.Actuarialvaluationsofanongoingplaninvolveestimatesofthevalueofreportedamountsandassumptionsabouttheprobabilityofoccurrenceofeventsfarintothefuture.Examplesincludeassumptionsaboutfutureemployment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Actuarially determined amounts are subject tocontinualrevisionasactualresultsarecomparedwithpastexpectationsandnewestimatesaremadeaboutthe future. The schedules of funding progress present multiyear trend information about whether theactuarial values of plan assets are increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accruedliabilitiesforbenefits.
14.59 EXHIBITS
42
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE13–OTHERPOSTEMPLOYMENTBENEFITS(continued)ActuarialMethodsandAssumptionsProjections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan asunderstoodbytheemployerandplanmembers)andincludethetypesofbenefitsprovidedatthetimeofeachvaluationand thehistoricalpatternofsharingofbenefitcostsbetweentheemployerandplanmembers tothatpoint.Theactuarialmethodsandassumptionsusedincludetechniquesthataredesignatedtoreducetheeffectsofshort‐termvolatilityinactuarialaccruedliabilitiesandtheactuarialvalueofassets,consistentwiththelong‐termperspectiveofthecalculations.Additionalinformationasofthelatestactuarialvaluationfollows:
ValuationDate Ocotber1,2012
ActuarialCostMethod Entryagenormal
AmortizationMethod Levelpercentageofpayrollmethod
RemainingAmortizationPeriod 30years
AssetValuation N/A
ActuarialAssumptions:Investmentrateofreturn 5.0%Inflation 3.0%Healthcarecosttrendrate 4.0%
NOTE14–FUTUREGASBPRONOUNCEMENTThe following statements issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) will becomeeffectiveinfutureyearsandareexpectedtohaveasignificantimpactontheDistrict'sfinancialreporting:StatementNo.68,AccountingandFinancialReportingforPensions—AnAmendmentofGASBStatementNo.27(Issued06/12)Theprimaryobjectiveof thisStatement is to improveaccountingand financial reportingbystateand localgovernmentsforpensions.Italsoimprovesinformationprovidedbystateandlocalgovernmentalemployersabout financial support for pensions that is provided by other entities. This Statement results from acomprehensive review of the effectiveness of existing standards of accounting and financial reporting forpensionswithregardtoprovidingdecision‐usefulinformation,supportingassessmentsofaccountabilityandinterperiodequity,andcreatingadditionaltransparency.This Statement replaces the requirements of Statement No. 27,Accounting forPensionsby StateandLocalGovernmentalEmployers,aswellastherequirementsofStatementNo.50,PensionDisclosures,astheyrelateto pensions that are provided through pension plans administered as trusts or equivalent arrangements(hereafterjointlyreferredtoastrusts)thatmeetcertaincriteria.This Statement establishes standards for measuring and recognizing liabilities, deferred outflows ofresources, anddeferred inflowsof resources, and expense/expenditures. Fordefinedbenefitpensions, thisStatementidentifiesthemethodsandassumptionsthatshouldbeusedtoprojectbenefitpayments,discountprojected benefit payments to their actuarial present value, and attribute that present value to periods ofemployeeservice.
14.60 EXHIBITS
43
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestoFinancialStatementsJune30,2014NOTE14–FUTUREGASBPRONOUNCEMENT(continued)StatementNo.68(continued)Cost‐SharingEmployersIn financial statements prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis ofaccounting,acost‐sharingemployerthatdoesnothaveaspecialfundingsituationisrequiredtorecognizealiabilityforitsproportionateshareofthenetpensionliability(ofallemployersforbenefitsprovidedthroughthepensionplan)—thecollectivenetpensionliability.Anemployer’sproportionisrequiredtobedeterminedonabasisthatisconsistentwiththemannerinwhichcontributionstothepensionplanaredetermined,andconsideration should be given to separate rates, if any, related to separate portions of the collective netpensionliability.Theuseoftheemployer’sprojectedlong‐termcontributioneffortascomparedtothetotalprojected long‐term contribution effort of all employers as the basis for determining an employer’sproportionisencouraged.Acost‐sharingemployerisrequiredtorecognizepensionexpenseandreportdeferredoutflowsofresourcesand deferred inflows of resources related to pensions for its proportionate shares of collective pensionexpenseandcollectivedeferredoutflowsofresourcesanddeferredinflowsofresourcesrelatedtopensions.
14.61 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.62 EXHIBITS
RequiredSupplementaryInformation
14.63 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.64 EXHIBITS
Seeaccompanyingnotestorequiredsupplementaryinformation. 44
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTBudgetaryComparisonSchedule–GeneralFundFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
VariancewithActual* FinalBudget‐
Original Final (BudgetaryBasis) Pos(Neg)Revenues
LCFFSources 19,145,380$ 23,398,546$ 23,541,085$ 142,539$FederalSources 1,298,641 1,282,248 1,291,729 9,481OtherStateSources 5,995,187 3,843,938 4,058,087 214,149OtherLocalSources 2,604,333 2,927,883 2,660,763 (267,120)
TotalRevenues 29,043,541 31,452,615 31,551,664 99,049
ExpendituresCurrent:
CertificatedSalaries 14,900,114 15,480,132 14,992,089 488,043ClassifiedSalaries 4,434,601 4,785,471 4,785,471 ‐EmployeeBenefits 4,810,547 5,165,112 5,165,112 ‐BooksandSupplies 941,915 1,534,103 1,013,075 521,028ServicesandOtherOperatingExpenditures 2,953,315 2,839,723 2,571,697 268,026
CapitalOutlay ‐ 52,265 51,535 730Intergovernmentaltransfers 625,000 650,495 807,209 (156,714)
TotalExpenditures 28,665,492 30,507,301 29,386,188 1,121,113
Excess(Deficiency)ofRevenuesOver(Under)Expenditures 378,049 945,314 2,165,476 1,220,162
OtherFinancingSourcesandUsesInterfundTransfersOut (1,192,601) (2,192,601) (840,225) 1,352,376
TotalOtherFinancingSourcesandUses (1,192,601) (2,192,601) (840,225) 1,352,376
NetChangesinFundBalances (814,552) (1,247,287) 1,325,251 2,572,538
FundBalances,July1,2013 7,314,124 7,314,124 7,314,124 ‐
FundBalances,June30,2014 6,499,572$ 6,066,837$ 8,639,375$ 2,572,538$
*
BudgetedAmounts
TheactualamountsreportedinthisschedulearefortheGeneralFundonly,anddonotagreewiththeamountsreportedontheStatementofRevenues,Expenditures,andChangesinFundBalancesbecausetheamountsonthatscheduleincludethefinancialactivityoftheDeferredMaintenanceFund,inaccordancewiththefundtypedefinitionspromulgatedbyGASBStatementNo.54.
14.65 EXHIBITS
Seeaccompanyingnotestorequiredsupplementaryinformation. 45
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofFundingProgressFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
Actuarial UAALasaActuarial Accrued Unfunded PercentageofValuation Valueof Liability AAL Funded Covered CoveredDate Assets (AAL) (UAAL) Ratio Payroll Payroll
5/1/2008 ‐$ 3,112,152$ 3,112,152$ 0% 23,009,308$ 13.5%10/1/2010 ‐$ 2,640,199$ 2,640,199$ 0% 19,250,859$ 13.7%10/1/2012 ‐$ 4,291,369$ 4,291,369$ 0% 19,571,952$ 21.9%
14.66 EXHIBITS
46
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotestotheRequiredSupplementaryInformationFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
NOTE1–PURPOSEOFSCHEDULESBudgetaryComparisonScheduleThis schedule is required by GASB Statement No. 34 as required supplementary information (RSI) for theGeneral Fund and for each major special revenue fund that has a legally adopted annual budget. Thebudgetarycomparisonschedulepresentsboth(a)theoriginaland(b)thefinalappropriatedbudgetsforthereportingperiodaswellas(c)actualinflows,outflows,andbalances,statedontheDistrict’sbudgetarybasis.A separate column to report the variance between the final budget and actual amounts is also presented,althoughnotrequired.ScheduleofFundingProgressThis schedule is required by GASB Statement No. 45 for all sole and agent employers that provide otherpostemploymentbenefits(OPEB).Theschedulepresents,forthemostrecentactuarialvaluationandthetwoprecedingvaluations, informationabout the fundingprogressof theplan, including, foreachvaluation, theactuarial valuation date, the actuarial value of assets, the actuarial accrued liability, the total unfundedactuarial liability (or funding excess), the actuarial valueof assets as apercentageof the actuarial accruedliability(fundedratio), theannualcoveredpayroll,andtheratioof thetotalunfundedactuarial liability(orfundingexcess)toannualcoveredpayroll.NOTE2–EXCESSOFEXPENDITURESOVERAPPROPRIATIONSAt June 30, 2014, the District incurred the following excess of expenditures over appropriations in theindividualmajorfundpresentedintheBudgetaryComparisonSchedulebymajorobjectcode:
GeneralFund
IntergovernmentalTransfers 156,714$
14.67 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.68 EXHIBITS
SupplementaryInformation
14.69 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.70 EXHIBITS
47
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTLocalEducationalAgencyOrganizationStructureJune30,2014TheCypressSchoolDistrictwasestablishedasaschooldistrictin1895.TheDistrictencompassesthecityofCypressaswellasportionsofBuenaParkandLaPalmainthenorthwesternportionofOrangeCounty.TherewerenochangestotheDistrict’sboundariesduringtheyear. TheDistrictoperatedsixelementaryschools(kindergartenthroughgrade6)duringtheyear.
GOVERNINGBOARDMember Office TermExpires
Mrs.ValeriPetersWagner President November,2014
Mrs.CandiceKern Vice‐President November,2016
Mr.BrianNakamura Clerk November,2016
Mr.StephenBlount Member November,2014
Mr.DavidGiese Member November,2014
DISTRICTADMINISTRATORS
BeverlyM.Hempstead,Superintendent
TimMcLellan,Ed.D.,
AssistantSuperintendentofBusinessServices
TracyMouren‐Laurens,AdministrativeDirector,HumanResources/Instruction
14.71 EXHIBITS
Seeaccompanyingnotetosupplementaryinformation. 48
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofAverageDailyAttendanceFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
TK/K‐3 Grades4‐6 TotalRegularADA:RegularADA 2,117.20 1,697.25 3,814.45ExtendedYearSpecialEducation 3.62 2.76 6.38SpecialEducation‐NonpublicSchools ‐ 2.42 2.42ExtendedYearSpecialEducation‐NonpublicSchools ‐ 0.29 0.29TotalADA 2,120.82 1,702.72 3,823.54
Other(includedinRegularADAamounts):
TransitionalKindergarten 49.05
TK/K‐3 Grades4‐6 TotalRegularADA:RegularADA 2,118.14 1,699.83 3,817.97ExtendedYearSpecialEducation 3.62 2.76 6.38SpecialEducation‐NonpublicSchools ‐ 2.46 2.46ExtendedYearSpecialEducation‐NonpublicSchools ‐ 0.29 0.29TotalADA 2,121.76 1,705.34 3,827.10
Other(includedinRegularADAamounts):
TransitionalKindergarten 48.95
SecondPeriodReport‐CertificateNo.(A6E15161)
AnnualReport‐CertificateNo.(244DFF0D)
14.72 EXHIBITS
Seeaccompanyingnotetosupplementaryinformation. 49
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofInstructionalTimeFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
2013‐14 NumberofDays NumberofDaysPreviously Actual Traditional YearRound
GradeLevel Required Reduced* Minutes Calendar Calendar Status
Kindergarten 36,000 35,000 45,840 180 180 CompliedGrade1 50,400 49,000 50,785 180 180 CompliedGrade2 50,400 49,000 50,785 180 180 CompliedGrade3 50,400 49,000 50,785 180 180 CompliedGrade4 54,000 52,500 55,010 180 180 CompliedGrade5 54,000 52,500 55,010 180 180 CompliedGrade6 54,000 52,500 55,010 180 180 Complied
*AmountsreducedaspermittedbyEducationCodeSection46201.2(a).
1986‐87Minutes
14.73 EXHIBITS
Seeaccompanyingnotetosupplementaryinformation. 50
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofFinancialTrendsandAnalysisFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
(Budget)GeneralFund 20153 20142 2013 2012
Revenuesandotherfinancingsources 32,652,365$ 31,551,664$ 29,547,531$ 29,903,640$
Expenditures 30,426,987 29,386,188 28,494,272 27,811,390Otherusesandtransfersout 1,192,601 840,225 979,207 1,187,961
Totaloutgo 31,619,588 30,226,413 29,473,479 28,999,351
Changeinfundbalance(deficit) 1,032,777 1,325,251 74,052 904,289
Endingfundbalance 9,672,152$ 8,639,375$ 7,314,124$ 7,240,072$
Availablereserves1 8,751,483$ 7,342,711$ 6,113,300$ 2,825,034$
Availablereservesasapercentageoftotaloutgo 28% 24.3% 20.7% 9.7%
Totallong‐termdebt 56,025,068$ 54,691,907$ 53,152,940$ 44,434,538$
AveragedailyattendanceatP‐2 3,824 3,824 3,769 3,829
TheGeneralFundbalancehasincreasedby$1,399,303overthepasttwoyears.Thefiscalyear2014‐15adoptedbudgetprojectsanincreaseof$1,032,777.Foradistrictofthissize,thestaterecommendsavailablereservesofatleast3%oftotalgeneralfundexpenditures,transfersout,andotheruses(totaloutgo).
TheDistricthasnotincurredanoperatingdeficitinthepastthreeyears,anddoesnotanticipateincurringanoperatingdeficitduringthe2014‐15fiscalyear.Long‐termdebthasincreasedby$10,257,369overthepasttwoyears.
Averagedailyattendancehasdecreasedby5overthepasttwoyears.NochangeinADAisanticipatedduringfiscalyear2014‐15.
1AvailablereservesconsistofallunassignedfundbalancesintheGeneralFund.
2TheactualamountsreportedinthisschedulearefortheGeneralFundonly,anddonotagreewiththeamountsreportedontheStatementofRevenues,Expenditures,andChangesinFundBalancesbecausetheamountsonthatscheduleincludethefinancialactivityoftheDeferredMaintenanceFund,inaccordancewiththefundtypedefinitionspromulgatedbyGASBStatementNo.54.
3RevisedFinalBudgetSeptember,2014.
14.74 EXHIBITS
Seeaccompanyingnotetosupplementaryinformation. 51
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofExpendituresofFederalAwardsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
Federal Pass‐ThroughFederalGrantor/Pass‐Through CFDA EntityIdentifying Cluster FederalGrantor/ProgramorClusterTitle Number Number Expenditures Expenditures
FederalPrograms:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture:
PassedthroughCaliforniaDept.ofEducation(CDE):ChildNutritionCluster:
SchoolBreakfastProgram‐Basic 10.553 13525 20,506$SchoolBreakfastProgram‐EspeciallyNeedy 10.553 13526 56,337NationalSchoolLunchProgram 10.555 13523 688,216USDADonatedFoods 10.555 N/A 94,119
TotalChildNutritionCluster 859,178$PassedthroughOrangeCountyDepartmentofEducation:
NutritionNetwork 10.561 02151 10,267
TotalU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture 869,445
U.S.DepartmentofEducation:PassedthroughCaliforniaDept.ofEducation(CDE):
NoChildLeftBehind(NCLB):TitleI,PartA,BasicGrants 84.010 14329 218,158TitleII,PartA,ImprovingTeacherQualityLocalGrants 84.367 14341 123,301TitleIII,LimitedEnglishProficient(LEP)StudentProgram 84.365 14346 92,110
IndividualswithDisabilitiesEducationAct(IDEA):SpecialEducationCluster:
BasicLocalAssistanceEntitlement,PartB 84.027 13379 553,562PreschoolGrants,PartB,Section619 84.173 13430 45,172PreschoolLocalEntitlement,PartB,Section611 84.027A 13682 79,901MentalHealthAllocationPlan,PartB,Sec611 84.027 14468 43,625
TotalSpecialEducationCluster 722,260
TotalU.S.DepartmentofEducation 1,155,829
U.S.DepartmentofHealth&HumanServices:PassedthroughCaliforniaDept.ofEducation:
MedicaidCluster:Medi‐CalBillingOption 93.778 10013 95,633Medi‐CalAdministrativeActivities(MAA) 93.778 10060 13,633
TotalMedicaidCluster 109,266
TotalU.S.DepartmentofHealth&HumanServices 109,266
TotalExpendituresofFederalAwards 2,134,540$
14.75 EXHIBITS
Seeaccompanyingnotetosupplementaryinformation. 52
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTReconciliationofAnnualFinancialandBudgetReportwithAuditedFinancialStatementsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
TherewerenodifferencesbetweentheAnnualFinancialandBudgetReportandtheAuditedFinancialStatementsinanyfunds.
14.76 EXHIBITS
53
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTNotetotheSupplementaryInformationJune30,2014NOTE1–PURPOSEOFSCHEDULESScheduleofAverageDailyAttendance(ADA)Averagedailyattendance(ADA) isameasurementof thenumberofpupilsattendingclassesof theDistrict.The purpose of attendance accounting from a fiscal standpoint is to provide the basis on whichapportionmentsofStatefundsaremadetoschooldistricts.Thisscheduleprovidesinformationregardingtheattendanceofstudentsatvariousgradelevelsandindifferentprograms.ScheduleofInstructionalTimeTheDistrict has participated in the Incentives for Longer InstructionalDay and Longer Instructional Year.TheDistricthasnotmetitstargetfunding.ThisschedulepresentsinformationontheamountofinstructionaltimeofferedbytheDistrictandwhethertheDistrictcompliedwiththeprovisionsofEducationCodeSections46200through46206.Districts must maintain their instructional minutes at the 1986‐87 requirement, as reduced by EducationCodeSection46201.2(a).ScheduleofFinancialTrendsandAnalysisThisscheduledisclosestheDistrict’s financial trendsbydisplayingpastyears’dataalongwithcurrentyearbudgetinformation.ThesefinancialtrenddisclosuresareusedtoevaluatetheDistrict’sabilitytocontinueasagoingconcernforareasonableperiodoftime.ScheduleofExpendituresofFederalAwardsThe schedule of expenditures of Federal awards includes the Federal grant activity of the District and ispresented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented inaccordancewiththerequirementsoftheUnitedStatesofAmericaOfficeofManagementandBudgetCircularA‐133,AuditsofStates,LocalGovernments,andNon‐ProfitOrganizations.Therefore,someamountspresentedinthisschedulemaydifferfromamountspresentedin,orusedinthepreparationofthefinancialstatements.SubrecipientsOf the Federal expenditures presented in the schedule, the District provided no Federal awards tosubrecipients.ReconciliationofAnnualFinancialandBudgetReportwithAuditedFinancialStatementsThisscheduleprovidestheinformationnecessarytoreconcilethefundbalanceofall fundsreportedontheUnauditedActualfinancialreporttotheauditedfinancialstatements.
14.77 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.78 EXHIBITS
OtherIndependentAuditors'Reports
14.79 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.80 EXHIBITS
54
INDEPENDENTAUDITORS'REPORTONINTERNALCONTROLOVERFINANCIALREPORTINGANDONCOMPLIANCEANDOTHERMATTERSBASEDONANAUDITOFFINANCIALSTATEMENTSPERFORMEDINACCORDANCE
WITHGOVERNMENTAUDITINGSTANDARDSBoardofTrusteesCypressSchoolDistrictCypress,California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States ofAmericaandthestandardsapplicabletofinancialauditscontainedinGovernmentAuditingStandardsissuedbytheComptrollerGeneralof theUnitedStates, the financialstatementsof thegovernmentalactivities, theaggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fundinformationofCypressSchoolDistrictasofandfortheyearendedJune30,2014,andtherelatednotestothefinancial statements, which collectively comprise Cypress School District's basic financial statements, andhaveissuedourreportthereondatedDecember10,2014.InternalControlOverFinancialReportingIn planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered Cypress School District’sinternal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that areappropriateinthecircumstancesforthepurposeofexpressingouropinionsonthefinancialstatements,butnot for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Cypress School District’s internalcontrol. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Cypress School District’sinternalcontrol.Adeficiencyininternalcontrolexistswhenthedesignoroperationofacontroldoesnotallowmanagementoremployees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correctmisstatements on a timely basis. Amaterialweakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, ininternal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the District'sfinancialstatementswillnotbeprevented,ordetectedandcorrectedonatimelybasis.Asignificantdeficiencyis a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a materialweakness,yetimportantenoughtomeritattentionbythosechargedwithgovernance.Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of thissectionandwasnotdesignedtoidentifyalldeficienciesininternalcontrolthatmightbematerialweaknessesor significantdeficiencies. Given these limitations,duringourauditwedidnot identifyanydeficiencies ininternalcontrolthatweconsidertobematerialweaknesses. However,materialweaknessesmayexistthathavenotbeenidentified.
14.81 EXHIBITS
55
ComplianceandOtherMattersAspartofobtaining reasonableassuranceaboutwhetherCypressSchoolDistrict’s financial statementsarefree of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws,regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliancewithwhich could have a direct andmaterialeffecton thedeterminationof financial statementamounts. However,providinganopiniononcompliancewiththoseprovisionswasnotanobjectiveofouraudit,andaccordingly,wedonotexpresssuchanopinion.The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or othermatters that are required to bereportedunderGovernmentAuditingStandards.PurposeofthisReportThepurposeofthisreportissolelytodescribethescopeofourtestingofinternalcontrolandcomplianceandtheresultsofthattesting,andnottoprovideanopinionontheeffectivenessoftheDistrict'sinternalcontrolor on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with GovernmentAuditing Standards in considering the District's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, thiscommunicationisnotsuitableforanyotherpurpose.
Murrieta,CaliforniaDecember10,2014
14.82 EXHIBITS
56
INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’REPORTONSTATECOMPLIANCE
BoardofTrusteesCypressSchoolDistrictCypress,CaliforniaReportonComplianceforStateProgramsWehaveauditedCypressSchoolDistrict'scompliancewiththetypesofcompliancerequirementsdescribedintheStandardsandProcedures forAuditsofCaliforniaK‐12LocalEducationalAgencies2013‐14,publishedbytheEducationAuditAppealsPanel,fortheyearendedJune30,2014.CypressSchoolDistrict’sstateprogramsareidentifiedbelow.Management'sResponsibilityManagementisresponsibleforcompliancewiththerequirementsoflaws,regulations,contracts,andgrantsapplicabletoitsStateprograms.Auditors'ResponsibilityOurresponsibilityistoexpressanopiniononcomplianceforeachofCypressSchoolDistrict'sStateprogramsbasedonourauditof the typesof compliancerequirementsreferred tobelow. Weconductedourauditofcompliance in accordancewith auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; thestandards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by theComptroller General of theUnited States; andStandardsandProcedures forAuditsofCaliforniaK‐12LocalEducational Agencies 2013‐14. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtainreasonableassuranceaboutwhethernoncompliancewiththetypesofcompliancerequirementsreferredtobelow occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about Cypress School District’scompliancewith those requirementsandperformingsuchotherproceduresasweconsiderednecessary inthecircumstances.WebelievethatourauditprovidesareasonablebasisforouropiniononcomplianceforeachStateprogram.However,ourauditdoesnotprovidealegaldeterminationofCypressSchoolDistrict’scompliance.
Description
ProceduresinAuditGuide
ProceduresPerformed
AttendanceReporting 6 YesTeacherCertificationandMisassignments 3 YesKindergartenContinuance 3 YesIndependentStudy 23 NotapplicableContinuationEducation 10 NotapplicableInstructionalTimeforSchoolDistricts 10 YesInstructionalMaterialsGeneralRequirements 8 YesRatiosofAdministrativeEmployeestoTeachers 1 YesClassroomTeacherSalaries 1 YesEarlyRetirementIncentive 4 Notapplicable
14.83 EXHIBITS
57
Description
ProceduresinAuditGuide
ProceduresPerformed
GannLimitCalculation 1 YesSchoolAccountabilityReportCard 3 YesJuvenileCourtSchools 8 NotapplicableLocalControlFundingFormulaCertification 1 YesCaliforniaCleanEnergyJobsAct 3 No(seebelow)AfterSchoolEducationandSafetyProgram:
GeneralRequirements 4 YesAfterSchool 5 YesBeforeSchool 6 Notapplicable
EducationProtectionAccountFunds 1 YesCommonCoreImplementationFunds 3 YesUnduplicatedLocalControlFundingFormulaPupilCounts 3 YesCharterSchools:
ContemporaneousRecordsofAttendance 8 NotapplicableModeofInstruction 1 NotapplicableNonclassroom‐BasedInstruction/IndependentStudy 15 NotapplicableDeterminationofFundingforNonclassroom‐BasedInstruction 3 NotapplicableAnnualInstructionalMinutes–ClassroomBased 4 Notapplicable
CharterSchoolFacilityGrantProgram 1 NotapplicableWedidnotperformtesting forCaliforniaCleanEnergy JobsActbecause therewerenoexpendituresmadeduringtheyear.OpiniononCompliancewithStateProgramsIn our opinion, Cypress School District complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliancerequirementsreferredtoabovefortheyearendedJune30,2014.The purpose of this report on State compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of Statecompliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the StandardsandProcedures forAuditsofCaliforniaK‐12LocalEducationalAgencies2013‐14. Accordingly,thisreportisnotsuitableforanyotherpurpose.
Murrieta,CaliforniaDecember10,2014
14.84 EXHIBITS
58
INDEPENDENTAUDITORS'REPORTONCOMPLIANCEFOREACHMAJORFEDERALPROGRAMANDONINTERNALCONTROLOVERCOMPLIANCE
BoardofTrusteesCypressSchoolDistrictCypress,CaliforniaReportonComplianceforEachMajorFederalProgramWehaveauditedCypressSchoolDistrict'scompliancewiththetypesofcompliancerequirementsdescribedinthe OMB Circular A‐133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each ofCypressSchoolDistrict'smajorfederalprogramsfortheyearendedJune30,2014.CypressSchoolDistrict’smajor federal programs are identified in the summary of auditors’ results section of the accompanyingscheduleoffindingsandquestionedcosts.Management'sResponsibilityManagementisresponsibleforcompliancewiththerequirementsoflaws,regulations,contracts,andgrantsapplicabletoitsfederalprograms.Auditors'ResponsibilityOurresponsibilityistoexpressanopiniononcomplianceforeachofCypressSchoolDistrict'smajorfederalprogramsbasedonourauditofthetypesofcompliancerequirementsreferredtoabove.WeconductedourauditofcomplianceinaccordancewithauditingstandardsgenerallyacceptedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica;the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by theComptrollerGeneralof theUnitedStates;andOMBCircularA‐133,AuditsofStates,LocalGovernments,andNon‐ProfitOrganizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A‐133 require thatwe plan and perform theaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliancerequirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal programoccurred.Anaudit includesexamining,ona testbasis,evidenceaboutCypressSchoolDistrict’scompliancewith those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances.Webelievethatourauditprovidesareasonablebasisforouropiniononcomplianceforeachmajorfederalprogram.However,ourauditdoesnotprovidealegaldeterminationofCypressSchoolDistrict’scompliance.OpiniononEachMajorFederalProgramIn our opinion, Cypress School District complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliancerequirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federalprogramsfortheyearendedJune30,2014.
14.85 EXHIBITS
59
ReportonInternalControlOverComplianceManagement of Cypress School District is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internalcontrol over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning andperformingourauditofcompliance,weconsideredCypressSchoolDistrict’sinternalcontrolovercompliancewiththetypesofrequirementsthatcouldhaveadirectandmaterialeffectoneachmajorfederalprogramtodeterminetheauditingproceduresthatareappropriateinthecircumstancesforthepurposeofexpressinganopinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control overcomplianceinaccordancewithOMBCircularA‐133,butnotforthepurposeofexpressinganopinionontheeffectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on theeffectivenessoftheDistrict’sinternalcontrolovercompliance.A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control overcompliance does not allowmanagement or employees, in the normal course of performing their assignedfunctions,toprevent,ordetectandcorrect,noncompliancewithatypeofcompliancerequirementofafederalprogram on a timely basis. Amaterialweakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or acombination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonablepossibilitythat material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not beprevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control overcomplianceisadeficiency,oracombinationofdeficiencies,ininternalcontrolovercompliancewithatypeofcompliancerequirementofafederalprogramthatislessseverethanamaterialweaknessininternalcontrolovercompliance,yetimportantenoughtomeritattentionbythosechargedwithgovernance.Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the firstparagraphofthissectionandwasnotdesignedtoidentifyalldeficienciesininternalcontrolovercompliancethatmightbematerialweaknessesorsignificantdeficiencies.Wedidnotidentifyanydeficienciesininternalcontrolover compliance thatweconsider tobematerialweaknesses,asdefinedabove. However,materialweaknessesmayexistthathavenotbeenidentified.ThepurposeofthisreportoninternalcontrolovercomplianceissolelytodescribethescopeofourtestingofinternalcontrolovercomplianceandtheresultsofthattestingbasedontherequirementsofOMBCircularA‐133.Accordingly,thisreportisnotsuitableforanyotherpurpose.
Murrieta,CaliforniaDecember10,2014
14.86 EXHIBITS
FindingsandQuestionedCosts
14.87 EXHIBITS
(Thispageintentionallyleftblank)
14.88 EXHIBITS
60
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofAuditFindingsandQuestionedCostsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014SECTIONI‐SUMMARYOFAUDITORS'RESULTS
FinancialStatements
Typeofauditor'sreportissued: UnmodifiedInternalcontroloverfinancialreporting:
Materialweakness(es)identified? NoSignificantdeficiency(s)identifiednotconsideredtobematerialweaknesses? No
Noncompliancematerialtofinancialstatementsnoted? No
FederalAwards
Internalcontrolovermajorprograms:Materialweakness(es)identified? NoSignificantdeficiency(s)identifiednotconsideredtobematerialweaknesses? No
Typeofauditor'sreportissuedoncomplianceformajorprograms: Unmodified
Anyauditfindingsdisclosedthatarerequiredtobereported inaccordancewithCircularA‐133,Section.510(a) NoIdentificationofmajorprograms:
CFDANumbers NameofFederalProgramorCluster
10.553&10.555
DollarthresholdusedtodistinguishbetweenTypeAandTypeBprograms: 300,000$
Auditeequalifiedaslow‐riskauditee? Yes
StateAwards
Internalcontroloverstateprograms:Materialweakness(es)identified? NoSignificantdeficiency(s)identifiednotconsideredtobematerialweaknesses? No
Typeofauditor'sreportissuedoncomplianceforstateprograms: Unmodified
ChildNutritionCluster
14.89 EXHIBITS
61
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofAuditFindingsandQuestionedCostsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014SECTIONII‐FINANCIALSTATEMENTFINDINGSThis section identifies the significant deficiencies, material weaknesses, and instances of noncompliancerelatedtothefinancialstatementsthatarerequiredtobereportedinaccordancewithGovernmentAuditingStandards.Pursuant toAssemblyBill (AB)3627,allaudit findingsmustbe identifiedasoneormoreof thefollowingcategories:
FiveDigitCode AB3627FindingTypes10000 Attendance20000 InventoryofEquipment30000 InternalControl40000 StateCompliance41000 CalSTRS50000 FederalCompliance60000 Miscellaneous61000 ClassroomTeacherSalaries70000 InstructionalMaterials71000 TeacherMisassignments72000 SchoolAccountabilityReportCard
Therewerenofinancialstatementfindingsin2013‐14.
14.90 EXHIBITS
62
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofAuditFindingsandQuestionedCostsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014SECTIONIII‐FEDERALAWARDFINDINGSANDQUESTIONEDCOSTSThis section identifies the audit findings required to be reported by Circular A‐133, Section .510(a) (e.g.,significantdeficiencies,materialweaknesses,andinstancesofnoncompliance,includingquestionedcosts).Therewerenofederalawardfindingsorquestionedcostsin2013‐14.
14.91 EXHIBITS
63
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTScheduleofAuditFindingsandQuestionedCostsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014SECTIONIV‐STATEAWARDFINDINGSANDQUESTIONEDCOSTSThis section identifies the audit findings pertaining to noncompliance with state program rules andregulations.Therewerenostateawardfindingsorquestionedcostsin2013‐14.
14.92 EXHIBITS
64
CYPRESSSCHOOLDISTRICTSummaryScheduleofPriorAuditFindingsFortheFiscalYearEndedJune30,2014
Original
FindingNo.
Finding
Code
Recommendation
CurrentStatus Finding2013‐1:CafeteriaClaimForm
TheDistrictreportsthenumberofmealsservedineachcategorybypaid,free,orreducedpricetotheCalifornia Department of Education. In testingreimbursablemealsbysite,theactualmealsservedin December, 2012 were underreported and didnot agree with the amounts submitted forreimbursement.TheDistrictoriginallysubmittedareimbursement claim form for a total of 13,071lunchesand1,730breakfasts.Duringourreviewofthe supporting documentation, theDistrict shouldhave submitted a claim form for 30,774 lunchesand 3,597 breakfasts for a total difference of$34,693. The District has already filed a revisedclaimreimbursementformforDecember,2012.
60000 We recommend that the District establish controls toensure that the reimbursement claim forms are properlyprocessed and accurate to ensure that the Cafeteriarevenueisfairlypresented.
Implemented.
Finding2013‐2:SchoolAccountabilityReportCard
InconjunctionwithEdCode33126,theschoolistoprovide an accountability report card to includesafety,cleanliness,andadequacyofschoolfacilities,toincludeanyneededmaintenancetoensuregoodrepair.Theconditionreportedshouldbesupportedby the school's Facilities Inspection Tool (FIT),School Facilities Condition Evaluation as requiredby Ed Code 17002. In addition, according to EdCode 35256, the governing board must publicizethe School Accountability Report Card (SARC) foreachschoolbyFebruary1stofeachyear.TheSchoolFacilityRepairStatusontheSARCforA.E.ArnoldElementarySchooldidnotmatchtheFITform.
72000 We recommend an employee be in charge of verifyinginformation presented in the SARC to be accurate andupdatedannually. This informationisessentialtopresenttheimageoftheschoolfairlytothepublic.Inaddition,theSARCsshouldbepublishedonanannualbasisbyFebruary1st.
Implemented.
14.93 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 1 of 9
A. E. Arnold Elementary School
School Accountability Report Card
Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year
Published During 2014-15
Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.
• For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.
• View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. • For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. • For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the
district office.
About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year)
School Contact Information
School Name------- A. E. Arnold Elementary School
Street------- 9281 Denni Street
City, State, Zip------- Cypress CA, 90630
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6965
Principal------- Denine Kelly
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- ar.cypsd.k12.ca.us/
CDS Code 30-66480-6027767
District Contact Information
District Name------- Cypress School District
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6900
Superintendent-------
Beverly M. Hempstead
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- www.cypsd.k12.ca.us
School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)
The mission of A. E. Arnold School, in partnership with parents and our diverse community, is to empower students to reach their full potential as responsible, productive, contributing members of our global society by maintaining high expectations; by providing a powerful and innovative curriculum that emphasizes higher level thinking and creative problem-solving skills and challenges students and staff to strive for excellence; and by providing a safe, risk-free learning environment that encourages mutual respect and responsibility.
14.94 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 2 of 9
Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten------- 101
Grade 1------- 75
Grade 2------- 83
Grade 3------- 102
Grade 4------- 98
Grade 5------- 130
Grade 6------- 100
Total Enrollment------- 689
Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American------- 4.9
American Indian or Alaska Native------- 0.0
Asian------- 32.5
Filipino------- 5.2
Hispanic or Latino------- 28.2
Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander 0.6
White 24.8
Two or More Races 3.5
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 37.9
English Learners 27.0
Students with Disabilities 6.5
A. Conditions of Learning
State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):
• Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;
• Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair.
Teacher Credentials
Teachers School District
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15
With Full Credential 27 26
Without Full Credential 0
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0
14.95 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 3 of 9
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0
Total Teacher Misassignments * 0 0
Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
This School 100.00 0.00
All Schools in District 100.00 0.00
High-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00
Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) Year and month in which data were collected: November 2012
Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials/
Year of Adoption
From Most Recent
Adoption?
Percent of Students Lacking Own
Assigned Copy
Reading/Language Arts McGraw-Hill SRA Imagine It! (K-1st) - Adopted 2012
Houghton Mifflin Medallion (2nd-6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Mathematics Houghton Mifflin (K-5) - Adopted 2002
Holt (6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Science------- Macmillan/McGraw Hill (K-5) - Adopted 2008
Holt(6th) - Adopted 2008
Yes 0
History-Social Science Harcourt - Adopted 2008 Yes 0
School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year)
The information is about the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities, including the condition and cleanliness of the school grounds, buildings, and restrooms. Additional information about the condition of the school's facilities may be obtained by speaking with the school principal.
14.96 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 4 of 9
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year)
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 12/12/2014
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned Good Fair Poor
Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer
[X] [ ] [ ] Administration: Kitchen: Restrooms:
Interior: Interior Surfaces
[X] [ ] [ ] Restrooms:
Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation
[X] [ ] [ ]
Electrical: Electrical
[X] [ ] [ ] Restrooms:
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains
[X] [ ] [ ] Administration: Classrooms: Kitchen: Restrooms:
Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials
[X] [ ] [ ]
Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs
[X] [ ] [ ] Administration: Classrooms: Kitchen: MPR: Restrooms:
External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences
[X] [ ] [ ] Administration: Classrooms: Kitchen: MPR: Restrooms:
Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year)
Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor
[X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
B. Pupil Outcomes
State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):
• Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program);
• The Academic Performance Index; and • The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the
University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress / Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 81 78 82 80 76 77 60 59 60 Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
14.97 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 5 of 9
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
All Students in the LEA 77
All Student at the School 82
Male------- 74
Female------- 89
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 89
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino 71
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White------- 77
Two or More Races-------
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 73
English Learners------- 70
Students with Disabilities
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Note: CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
English-Language Arts 71 74 75 72 77 74 54 56 55
Mathematics------- 73 75 77 74 77 76 49 50 50
History-Social Science 48 49 49 Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks (Three-Year Comparison)
API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Statewide------- 8 8 9
Similar Schools------- 7 5 6 Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced.
14.98 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 6 of 9
Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group (Three-Year Comparison)
Group Actual API Change
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
All Students at the School -15 9 8
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 1 1 0
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino -15 20 22
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White------- -25 11 3
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -16 22 22
English Learners 2 -6 12
Students with Disabilities Note: "N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.
State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):
• Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level
Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards
Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards
-------5------- 11.3 21.1 53.4 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
C. Engagement
State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):
• Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year)
The School Site Council (SSC) is an advisory group that meets regularly to receive information, discuss school programs, and provide input toward school-based decision-making. The SSC is composed of the principal, three classroom teachers, one other school staff member, and five parents of students. A subcommittee of the SSC is the English Language Advisory Committee (ELAC). All meetings are open to the public. The school actively seeks parent involvement for school programs in a variety of ways:
The PTA supports the school program by encouraging and organizing parent involvement, promoting the self-esteem of students, and enriching the school program by providing special programs, services, and activities.
A number of parents and community volunteers work in the classrooms assisting teachers and school staff in a variety of ways to effectively lower adult to student ratio.
Parents participate at the district level on various district committees, such as the district Budget Committee, District English Learner Advisory Committee, and PTA Council.
14.99 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 7 of 9
State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):
• Pupil suspension rates; • Pupil expulsion rates; and • Other local measures on the sense of safety.
Suspensions and Expulsions
Rate School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Suspensions------- 0.83 0.8 0.51 0.8
Expulsions------- 0 0 0 0 Note: The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year)
The school has developed a disaster plan for use in an emergency situation. Staff members are inserviced and assigned responsibilities for plan implementation. There are monthly disaster drills for school-wide safety. The school and District also work in conjunction with the community-based School Community Alert Team (SCAT). School inspection reports rated the cleanliness, orderliness and care of the school as satisfactory.
D. Other SARC Information
The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)
AYP Criteria School District
Made AYP Overall
Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts
Met Participation Rate: Mathematics
Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts
Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics
Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status In PI
First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012
Year in Program Improvement* Year 2
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 1
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 100.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process.
14.100 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 8 of 9
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
Grade Level
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes
1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
K ----------
16.2 5 0 0 11 7 25 1 1 2
1 ----------
31.3 0 3 0 19 2 2 19 1 3
2 ----------
27 1 4 0 21 2 3 21 2 2
3 ----------
30.2 0 5 0 26 1 3 20 2 3
4 ----------
32 0 3 0 26 1 4 25 1 3
5 ----------
30.7 0 3 0 21 2 3 26 1 4
6 ----------
27 1 4 0 23 2 3 25 1 2 1 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)
Title Number of FTE
Assigned to School Average Number of Students per
Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor------- -
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) - ---
Library Media Teacher (Librarian) - ---
Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) .49 ---
Psychologist------- 1.0 ---
Social Worker------- - ---
Nurse------- .16 ---
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.0 ---
Resource Specialist------- 1.0 ---
Other------- - --- Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Level
Expenditures Per Pupil Average Teacher Salary Total
Supplemental/ Restricted
Basic/ Unrestricted
School Site------- 725 2,080 5,404 71,950
District------- --- --- 5,367 $77,793
Percent Difference: School Site and District --- --- 0.7 -5.9
State------- --- --- $4,690 $67,289
Percent Difference: School Site and State --- --- -2.4 8.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data.
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
• Class Size Reduction (CSR) • Lottery • Special Education • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
• Economic Impact Aid • School & Library Improvement • School Readiness • School Improvement
14.101 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for A. E. Arnold Elementary School Page 9 of 9
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $42,951 $41,535
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $75,413 $64,101
Highest Teacher Salary $93,093 $82,044
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $118,332 $104,336
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $0 $107,911
Average Principal Salary (High) $0 $102,488
Superintendent Salary $187,244 $155,309
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 45 41
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 6 For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Professional Development
Staff development priority areas are based upon the State Standards, District needs, and School-level data. District-wide staff development focused on Common Core State Standards and Thinking Maps. Staff development days, minimum days, and staff meetings were used to provide training and support. In addition, Arnold teachers in grades K-3 participated in additional training/coaching in the area of Cognitively Guided Instruction. Teachers also collaborate with colleagues during weekly Professional Learning Community meetings. Where appropriate, staff members also attend conferences, workshops, and or county office training in specific areas related to their assignment. Classified employees are provided the opportunity to attend inservices relevant to their specific assignment. These are offered during their work day and/or on student-free days.
14.102 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 1 of 9
Clara J. King Elementary School
School Accountability Report Card
Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year
Published During 2014-15
Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.
• For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.
• View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. • For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. • For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the
district office.
About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year)
School Contact Information
School Name------- Clara J. King Elementary School
Street------- 8710 Moody Street
City, State, Zip------- Cypress CA, 90630
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6980
Principal------- Carol Erbe
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- ki.cypsd.k12.ca.us/
CDS Code 30-66480-6027791
District Contact Information
District Name------- Cypress School District
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6900
Superintendent-------
Beverly M. Hempstead
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- www.cypsd.k12.ca.us
14.103 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 2 of 9
School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)
The mission of Clara J. King School, in partnership with parents and our diverse community, is to empower students to reach their full potential as responsible, productive, and contributing members of our global society by maintaining high expectations; by providing a powerful and innovative curriculum that emphasizes thinking and creative problem-solving skills and challenges students and staff to strive for excellence; and by providing a safe, risk-free learning environment that encourages mutual respect, responsibility, and positive self-worth. Clara J. King School is a community of active thinkers and learners. We strive to create a culture where each student reaches his or her personal best in academics and citizenship. King kids ROCK: They are Responsible, Organized, Careful, and Kind. King Elementary School is a professional learning community. We continue to show Academic Excellence with an API well above the 800 state goal. We believe that this is due to our dedicated staff, partnerships with parents and community resources, and on-site afterschool programs that support our school goals. King School has several programs and opportunities for students to improve their academics such as Class Act, Club King after school program, supplemental fine arts acting, singing, and instrumental music programs, Cypress College P.E. partnership, Student Council, and other community and business partnerships, . Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten------- 75
Grade 1------- 75
Grade 2------- 85
Grade 3------- 81
Grade 4------- 71
Grade 5------- 91
Grade 6------- 87
Total Enrollment------- 565
Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American------- 4.8
American Indian or Alaska Native------- 0.0
Asian------- 28.0
Filipino------- 7.1
Hispanic or Latino------- 38.9
Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander 1.1
White 14.2
Two or More Races 6.0
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 61.1
English Learners 29.6
Students with Disabilities 5.7
14.104 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 3 of 9
A. Conditions of Learning
State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):
• Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;
• Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair.
Teacher Credentials
Teachers School District
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15
With Full Credential 24 22
Without Full Credential 0
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0
Total Teacher Misassignments * 0 0
Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
This School 100.00 0.00
All Schools in District 100.00 0.00
High-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00
Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) Year and month in which data were collected: November 2012
Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials/
Year of Adoption
From Most Recent
Adoption?
Percent of Students Lacking Own
Assigned Copy
Reading/Language Arts McGraw-Hill SRA Imagine It! (K-1st) - Adopted 2012
Houghton Mifflin Medallion (2nd-6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Mathematics Houghton Mifflin (K-5) - Adopted 2002
Holt (6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Science------- Macmillan/McGraw Hill (K-5) - Adopted 2008
Holt(6th) - Adopted 2008
Yes 0
History-Social Science Harcourt - Adopted 2008 Yes 0
14.105 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 4 of 9
School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year)
The information is about the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities, including the condition and cleanliness of the school grounds, buildings, and restrooms. Additional information about the condition of the school's facilities may be obtained by speaking with the school principal.
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year)
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 12/12/2014
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned Good Fair Poor
Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer
[X] [ ] [ ]
Interior: Interior Surfaces
[X] [ ] [ ]
Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation
[X] [ ] [ ]
Electrical: Electrical
[X] [ ] [ ]
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains
[X] [ ] [ ]
Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials
[X] [ ] [ ]
Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs
[X] [ ] [ ]
External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences
[X] [ ] [ ]
Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year)
Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor
[X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
B. Pupil Outcomes
State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):
• Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program);
• The Academic Performance Index; and • The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the
University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress / Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 65 75 67 80 76 77 60 59 60 Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
14.106 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 5 of 9
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
All Students in the LEA 77
All Student at the School 67
Male------- 64
Female------- 69
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 79
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino 48
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White------- 64
Two or More Races-------
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 58
English Learners------- 45
Students with Disabilities
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Note: CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
English-Language Arts 60 68 60 72 77 74 54 56 55
Mathematics------- 64 72 64 74 77 76 49 50 50
History-Social Science 48 49 49 Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks (Three-Year Comparison)
API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Statewide------- 7 8 7
Similar Schools------- 6 9 5 Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced.
14.107 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 6 of 9
Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group (Three-Year Comparison)
Group Actual API Change
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
All Students at the School 0 30 -17
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 1 19 2
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino -7 47 -35
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White-------
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 4 30 -31
English Learners -11 42 -24
Students with Disabilities Note: "N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.
State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):
• Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level
Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards
Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards
-------5------- 24.5 12.8 11.7 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
C. Engagement
State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):
• Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year)
The School Site Council (SSC) is an advisory group that meets regularly to receive information, discuss school programs, and provide input toward school-based decision-making. The SSC is composed of the principal, three classroom teachers, one other school staff member, and five parents of students. A subcommittee of the SSC is the English Language Advisory Committee (ELAC). All meetings are open to the public. The school actively seeks parent involvement for school programs in a variety of ways:
Parent representation for the District LCAP Committee and District ELAC.
The PTA supports the school program by encouraging and organizing parent involvement, promoting the self-esteem of students, and enriching the school program by providing special programs, services, and activities.
A number of parents and community volunteers work in the classrooms assisting teachers and school staff in a variety of ways to effectively lower adult to student ratio.
Many volunteers assist in the office, library, computer lab, and other areas of the school as needed.
Parents accompany classes on field trips and with classroom incentives and special activities.
14.108 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 7 of 9
State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):
• Pupil suspension rates; • Pupil expulsion rates; and • Other local measures on the sense of safety.
Suspensions and Expulsions
Rate School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Suspensions------- 0.90 2.8 0.51 0.8
Expulsions------- 0 0 0 0 Note: The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year)
The school has developed a disaster plan for use in an emergency situation. Staff members are inserviced and assigned responsibilities for plan implementation. There are monthly disaster drills for school-wide safety. The school and District also work in conjunction with the community-based School Community Alert Team (SCAT). School inspection reports rated the cleanliness, orderliness and care of the school as satisfactory.
D. Other SARC Information
The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)
AYP Criteria School District
Made AYP Overall
Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts
Met Participation Rate: Mathematics
Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts
Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics
Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status In PI In PI
First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012 2011-2012
Year in Program Improvement* Year 2 Year 2
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 1
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 100.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process.
14.109 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 8 of 9
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
Grade Level
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes
1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
K ----------
21.8 4 0 0 20 3 1 25 3
1 ----------
21 3 0 0 21 1 3 25 3
2 ----------
21.3 3 0 0 25 1 2 28 3
3 ----------
30.3 0 3 0 23 1 2 27 3
4 ----------
26.3 0 3 0 29 3 24 3
5 ----------
29 0 3 0 26 3 30 3
6 ----------
21.3 1 3 0 31 3 29 3 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)
Title Number of FTE
Assigned to School Average Number of Students per
Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor------- -
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) - ---
Library Media Teacher (Librarian) - ---
Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.49 ---
Psychologist------- 0.60 ---
Social Worker------- - ---
Nurse------- .16 ---
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist .80 ---
Resource Specialist------- 1.00 ---
Other------- --- Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Level
Expenditures Per Pupil Average Teacher Salary Total
Supplemental/ Restricted
Basic/ Unrestricted
School Site------- 556 2,080 5,404 76,047
District------- --- --- 5,367 $77,793
Percent Difference: School Site and District --- --- 0.7 -0.5
State------- --- --- $4,690 $67,289
Percent Difference: School Site and State --- --- -2.4 14.2 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data.
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
• Class Size Reduction (CSR) • Lottery • Special Education • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
• Economic Impact Aid • School & Library Improvement • School Readiness • School Improvement
14.110 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Clara J. King Elementary School Page 9 of 9
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $42,951 $41,535
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $75,413 $64,101
Highest Teacher Salary $93,093 $82,044
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $118,332 $104,336
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $0 $107,911
Average Principal Salary (High) $0 $102,488
Superintendent Salary $187,244 $155,309
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 45 41
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 6 For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Professional Development
Staff development priority areas are based upon curriculum focuses and District needs. Areas of emphasis are identified each year to align with newly adopted State Standards and State Frameworks. Curriculum revisions are an ongoing process with the major revision of every curriculum area corresponding to the year of the textbook adoption. The annual number of school days dedicated to staff development for the most recent three-years period is 2 days. King School plans one additional staff development day through the use of Title 1 funds. In addition to our District priority goals, our staff development focus for the school year included ST Math, Thinking Maps, and an introduction to Common Core State Standards. We also placed an emphasis on Program Improvement to adapt our school program to meet the identified needs of all student subgroups, including use of a Specialist Teacher to work with intervention groups. Our Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) staff team has continued to work with the rest of the staff to improve behaviors and school climate. Classified employees have been trained in Thinking Maps. They attend additional inservices relevant to their specific assignment.
14.111 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 1 of 9
Margaret Landell Elementary School
School Accountability Report Card
Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year
Published During 2014-15
Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.
• For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.
• View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. • For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. • For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the
district office.
About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year)
School Contact Information
School Name------- Margaret Landell Elementary School
Street------- 9739 Denni Street
City, State, Zip------- Cypress, CA 90630
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6960
Principal------- Rena Gibbs
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- la.cypsd.k12.ca.us/
CDS Code 30-66480-6027858
District Contact Information
District Name------- Cypress School District
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6900
Superintendent-------
Beverly M. Hempstead
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- www.cypsd.k12.ca.us
School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)
The mission of Margaret Landell School is to ensure Leadership, Achievement, Nurturing, Development of Excellence, and Love of Learning for all students. At Landell School, we recognize that America’s future hinges on the education we give our children. The youth of our school community have a right to knowledge, skills, discipline, values and virtues that will assist them to achieve a productive, fulfilled life.
14.112 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 2 of 9
Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten------- 127
Grade 1------- 95
Grade 2------- 95
Grade 3------- 96
Grade 4------- 122
Grade 5------- 94
Grade 6------- 96
Total Enrollment------- 725
Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American------- 2.3
American Indian or Alaska Native------- 0.0
Asian------- 51.9
Filipino------- 4.6
Hispanic or Latino------- 12.3
Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander 0.7
White 25.0
Two or More Races 3.3
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 13.0
English Learners 20.6
Students with Disabilities 5.4
A. Conditions of Learning
State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):
• Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;
• Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair.
Teacher Credentials
Teachers School District
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15
With Full Credential 26 24
Without Full Credential 0
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0
14.113 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 3 of 9
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0
Total Teacher Misassignments * 0 0
Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
This School 100.00 0.00
All Schools in District 100.00 0.00
High-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00
Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) Year and month in which data were collected: November 2012
Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials/
Year of Adoption
From Most Recent
Adoption?
Percent of Students Lacking Own
Assigned Copy
Reading/Language Arts McGraw-Hill SRA Imagine It! (K-1st) - Adopted 2012
Houghton Mifflin Medallion (2nd-6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Mathematics Houghton Mifflin (K-5) - Adopted 2002
Holt (6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Science------- Macmillan/McGraw Hill (K-5) - Adopted 2008
Holt(6th) - Adopted 2008
Yes 0
History-Social Science Harcourt - Adopted 2008 Yes 0
14.114 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 4 of 9
School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year)
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year)
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 12/12/2014
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned Good Fair Poor
Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer
[X] [ ] [ ] Administration: Classrooms: Kitchen: MPR: Restrooms:
Interior: Interior Surfaces
[ ] [X] [ ] Classrooms: Restrooms:
Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation
[X] [ ] [ ]
Electrical: Electrical
[X] [ ] [ ] Administration: Classrooms: Kitchen: MPR:
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains
[X] [ ] [ ]
Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials
[X] [ ] [ ]
Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs
[X] [ ] [ ]
External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences
[X] [ ] [ ]
Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year)
Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor
[ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
B. Pupil Outcomes
State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):
• Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program);
• The Academic Performance Index; and • The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the
University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress / Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 89 85 88 80 76 77 60 59 60 Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
14.115 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 5 of 9
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
All Students in the LEA 77
All Student at the School 88
Male------- 89
Female------- 88
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 92
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino 82
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White------- 82
Two or More Races-------
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 75
English Learners-------
Students with Disabilities
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Note: CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
English-Language Arts 85 88 85 72 77 74 54 56 55
Mathematics------- 86 83 88 74 77 76 49 50 50
History-Social Science 48 49 49 Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks (Three-Year Comparison)
API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Statewide------- 10 10 10
Similar Schools------- 3 5 8 Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced.
14.116 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 6 of 9
Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group (Three-Year Comparison)
Group Actual API Change
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
All Students at the School -7 0 8
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- -3 1 1
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White------- 7 -3 10
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
English Learners -5 -6 5
Students with Disabilities Note: "N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.
State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):
• Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level
Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards
Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards
-------5------- 19.1 35.1 20.2 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
C. Engagement
State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):
• Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year)
The School Site Council (SSC) at Landell is an advisory group that meets regularly to receive information, discuss school programs, and provide input toward school-based decision-making. The SSC is composed of the principal, three classroom teachers, one other school staff member, and five parents of students. A subcommittee of the SSC is the English Language Advisory Committee (ELAC). All meetings are open to the public. Landell actively seeks parent involvement for school programs in a variety of ways:
Parent representation is sought for the District Budget and Finance Committee and District ELAC.
The PTA supports the school program by encouraging and organizing parent involvement, promoting the self-esteem of students, and enriching the school program by providing special programs, services, and activities.
A number of parents and community volunteers work in the classrooms assisting teachers and school staff in a variety of ways to effectively lower adult to student ratio.
14.117 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 7 of 9
State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):
• Pupil suspension rates; • Pupil expulsion rates; and • Other local measures on the sense of safety.
Suspensions and Expulsions
Rate School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Suspensions------- 0.71 0 0 0.8
Expulsions------- 0.51 0 0 0 Note: The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year)
The school has developed a disaster plan for use in an emergency situation. Staff members are inserviced and assigned responsibilities for plan implementation. There are monthly disaster drills for school-wide safety. The school and District also work in conjunction with the community-based School Community Alert Team (SCAT). School inspection reports rated the cleanliness, orderliness and care of the school as satisfactory.
D. Other SARC Information
The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)
AYP Criteria School District
Made AYP Overall
Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts
Met Participation Rate: Mathematics
Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts
Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics
Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status In PI
First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012
Year in Program Improvement* Year 2
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 1
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 100.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process.
14.118 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 8 of 9
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
Grade Level
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes
1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
K ----------
22.8 1 3 0 29 4 32 3 1
1 ----------
28.7 0 3 0 31 3 32 3
2 ----------
26.6 0 5 0 31 3 32 3
3 ----------
31 0 3 0 29 4 32 3
4 ----------
31 0 3 0 32 3 31 4
5 ----------
28.3 0 4 0 30 3 31 3
6 ----------
29.5 0 4 0 28 4 32 3 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)
Title Number of FTE
Assigned to School Average Number of Students per
Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor------- - 0
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) - ---
Library Media Teacher (Librarian) - ---
Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.49 ---
Psychologist------- 1.00 ---
Social Worker------- - ---
Nurse------- .16 ---
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.90 ---
Resource Specialist------- 1.00 ---
Other------- --- Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Level
Expenditures Per Pupil Average Teacher Salary Total
Supplemental/ Restricted
Basic/ Unrestricted
School Site------- 718 2,080 5,404 75,755
District------- --- --- 5,367 $77,793
Percent Difference: School Site and District --- --- 0.7 -0.9
State------- --- --- $4,690 $67,289
Percent Difference: School Site and State --- --- -2.4 13.8 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data.
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
• Class Size Reduction (CSR) • Lottery • Special Education • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
• Economic Impact Aid • School & Library Improvement • School Readiness • School Improvement
14.119 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Margaret Landell Elementary School Page 9 of 9
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $42,951 $41,535
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $75,413 $64,101
Highest Teacher Salary $93,093 $82,044
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $118,332 $104,336
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $0 $107,911
Average Principal Salary (High) $0 $102,488
Superintendent Salary $187,244 $155,309
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 45 41
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 6 For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Professional Development
Professional development priority areas are based upon curriculum focuses and District needs. Areas of emphasis are identified each year to align with newly adopted State Standards and State Frameworks. Curriculum revisions are an ongoing process with the major revision of every curriculum area corresponding to the year of the textbook adoption. The annual number of school days dedicated to professional development for the most recent three-years period is 2 days. Classified employees are encouraged to attend inservices relevant to their specific assignment. Professional development is also provided to teachers and staff on select minimum days throughout the school year. Staff are supported as they work to implement their learning through in-class coaching, demonstration lessons, meetings with the principal, and opportunities to observe colleagues.
14.120 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 1 of 9
Steve Luther Elementary School
School Accountability Report Card
Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year
Published During 2014-15
Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.
• For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.
• View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. • For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. • For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the
district office.
About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year)
School Contact Information
School Name------- Steve Luther Elementary School
Street------- 4631 La Palma Street
City, State, Zip------- La Palma CA, 90623
Phone Number------- (310) 220-6918
Principal------- Jacki Teschke
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- lu.cypsd.k12.ca.us/
CDS Code 30-66480-6027874
District Contact Information
District Name------- Cypress School District
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6900
Superintendent-------
Beverly M. Hempstead
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- www.cypsd.k12.ca.us
School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)
Every staff member at Luther School is committed to his or her role of fostering an environment that serves the educational and emotional needs of all students while designing an instructional program that places every student on the path for college and career readiness as well as acquiring the skills necessary to become 21st century thinkers and learners.
14.121 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 2 of 9
Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten------- 86
Grade 1------- 66
Grade 2------- 84
Grade 3------- 68
Grade 4------- 67
Grade 5------- 62
Grade 6------- 70
Total Enrollment------- 503
Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American------- 2.0
American Indian or Alaska Native------- 0.4
Asian------- 26.4
Filipino------- 7.6
Hispanic or Latino------- 37.2
Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander 1.2
White 20.3
Two or More Races 5.0
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 39.8
English Learners 14.3
Students with Disabilities 9.7
A. Conditions of Learning
State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):
• Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;
• Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair.
Teacher Credentials
Teachers School District
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15
With Full Credential 20 20
Without Full Credential 0
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0
14.122 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 3 of 9
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0
Total Teacher Misassignments * 0 0
Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
This School 100.00 0.00
All Schools in District 100.00 0.00
High-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00
Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) Year and month in which data were collected: November 2012
Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials/
Year of Adoption
From Most Recent
Adoption?
Percent of Students Lacking Own
Assigned Copy
Reading/Language Arts McGraw-Hill SRA Imagine It! (K-1st) - Adopted 2012
Houghton Mifflin Medallion (2nd-6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Mathematics Houghton Mifflin (K-5) - Adopted 2002
Holt (6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Science------- Macmillan/McGraw Hill (K-5) - Adopted 2008
Holt(6th) - Adopted 2008
Yes 0
History-Social Science Harcourt - Adopted 2008 Yes 0
School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year)
The information is about the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities, including the condition and cleanliness of the school grounds, buildings, and restrooms. Additional information about the condition of the school's facilities may be obtained by speaking with the school principal.
14.123 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 4 of 9
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year)
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 12/12/2014
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned Good Fair Poor
Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer
[X] [ ] [ ]
Interior: Interior Surfaces
[X] [ ] [ ]
Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation
[X] [ ] [ ]
Electrical: Electrical
[X] [ ] [ ]
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains
[X] [ ] [ ]
Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials
[X] [ ] [ ]
Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs
[X] [ ] [ ]
External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences
[X] [ ] [ ]
Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year)
Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor
[X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
B. Pupil Outcomes
State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):
• Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program);
• The Academic Performance Index; and • The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the
University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress / Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 74 58 71 80 76 77 60 59 60 Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
14.124 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 5 of 9
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
All Students in the LEA 77
All Student at the School 71
Male------- 75
Female------- 65
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 87
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino 53
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White------- 87
Two or More Races-------
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 52
English Learners-------
Students with Disabilities
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Note: CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
English-Language Arts 63 68 64 72 77 74 54 56 55
Mathematics------- 63 67 65 74 77 76 49 50 50
History-Social Science 48 49 49 Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks (Three-Year Comparison)
API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Statewide------- 7 7 7
Similar Schools------- 1 2 2 Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced.
14.125 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 6 of 9
Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group (Three-Year Comparison)
Group Actual API Change
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
All Students at the School C 22 -11
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- C 20 -15
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino C 32 -12
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White------- C 14 27
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged C 46 -3
English Learners C 22 -25
Students with Disabilities Note: "N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.
State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):
• Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level
Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards
Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards
-------5------- 25.8 12.9 6.5 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
C. Engagement
State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):
• Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year)
The Steve Luther School Site Council (SSC) is an advisory group that meets regularly to receive information, discuss school programs, and provide input toward school-based decision-making. The SSC is composed of the principal, three classroom teachers, one other school staff member, and five parents of students. A subcommittee of the SSC is the English Language Advisory Committee (ELAC). All meetings are open to the public. Steve Luther Elementary School seeks parent and community involvement for school programs in a variety of ways:
Parent representation on the site English Language Advisory Committee.
The PTA supports the school program by encouraging and organizing parent involvement, promoting the self-esteem of students, and enhancing school programs by providing extracurricular enrichment opportunities and services.
A number of parent and community volunteers such as the Women's Outreach Organization,Volunteers in Policing, Project BARK, work schoolwide to enhance and enrich several areas of the educational experience for students.
14.126 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 7 of 9
State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):
• Pupil suspension rates; • Pupil expulsion rates; and • Other local measures on the sense of safety.
Suspensions and Expulsions
Rate School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Suspensions------- 0.56 0.2 0.51 0.8
Expulsions------- 0 0 0 0 Note: The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year)
The school has developed a disaster plan for use in an emergency situation. Staff members are inserviced and assigned responsibilities for plan implementation. There are monthly disaster drills for school-wide safety. The school and District also work in conjunction with the community-based School Community Alert Team (SCAT). School inspection reports rated the cleanliness, orderliness and care of the school as satisfactory.
D. Other SARC Information
The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)
AYP Criteria School District
Made AYP Overall
Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts
Met Participation Rate: Mathematics
Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts
Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics
Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status In PI
First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012
Year in Program Improvement* Year 2
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 1
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 100.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process.
14.127 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 8 of 9
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
Grade Level
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes
1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
K ----------
13.5 8 0 0 12 7 22 1 3
1 ----------
31.5 0 2 0 22 1 3 22 1 2
2 ----------
23.3 1 2 0 20 1 2 21 1 3
3 ----------
29.5 0 2 0 22 1 2 23 1 2
4 ----------
24 1 2 0 19 1 2 22 1 2
5 ----------
32 0 2 0 24 1 2 21 1 2
6 ----------
32 0 2 1 19 1 3 23 1 2 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)
Title Number of FTE
Assigned to School Average Number of Students per
Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor------- - -
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) - ---
Library Media Teacher (Librarian) - ---
Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.49 ---
Psychologist------- 0.80 ---
Social Worker------- - ---
Nurse------- .16 ---
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.00 ---
Resource Specialist------- 1.00 ---
Other------- --- Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Level
Expenditures Per Pupil Average Teacher Salary Total
Supplemental/ Restricted
Basic/ Unrestricted
School Site------- 532 2,080 5,404 77,945
District------- --- --- 5,367 $77,793
Percent Difference: School Site and District --- --- 0.7 1.9
State------- --- --- $4,690 $67,289
Percent Difference: School Site and State --- --- -2.4 17.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data.
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
• Class Size Reduction (CSR) • Lottery • Special Education • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
• Economic Impact Aid • School & Library Improvement • School Readiness • School Improvement
14.128 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Steve Luther Elementary School Page 9 of 9
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $42,951 $41,535
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $75,413 $64,101
Highest Teacher Salary $93,093 $82,044
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $118,332 $104,336
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $0 $107,911
Average Principal Salary (High) $0 $102,488
Superintendent Salary $187,244 $155,309
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 45 41
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 6 For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Professional Development
Staff development priorities correlate with data analysis which indicates student needs, namely in the areas of developing and refining effective instructional practices and methods of engaging all students in achieving their maximum potential. Professional development is delivered during pre-student days, several district wide minimum days throughout the school year, weekly staff meetings, Professional Learning Communities, and by the Instructional Learning Coaches. Teachers are supported through in-class coaching, Professional Learning Communities, staff meetings, teacher-principal meetings, and district wide ongoing support.
14.129 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 1 of 9
Juliet Morris Elementary School
School Accountability Report Card
Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year
Published During 2014-15
Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.
• For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.
• View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. • For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. • For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the
district office.
About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year)
School Contact Information
School Name------- Juliet Morris Elementary School
Street------- 9952 Graham Street
City, State, Zip------- Cypress CA, 90630
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6995
Principal------- Lori Hernandez
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- mo.cypsd.k12.ca.us/
CDS Code 30-66480-6027841
District Contact Information
District Name------- Cypress School District
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6900
Superintendent-------
Beverly M. Hempstead
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- www.cypsd.k12.ca.us
School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)
Juliet Morris School is committed to providing a nurturing environment in which ALL children may develop individual academic, emotional, social, and physical skills to their maximum potential.
14.130 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 2 of 9
Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten------- 99
Grade 1------- 96
Grade 2------- 121
Grade 3------- 96
Grade 4------- 104
Grade 5------- 114
Grade 6------- 127
Total Enrollment------- 757
Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American------- 2.4
American Indian or Alaska Native------- 0.0
Asian------- 32.6
Filipino------- 4.0
Hispanic or Latino------- 26.7
Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander 0.0
White 30.1
Two or More Races 4.1
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 28.8
English Learners 18.5
Students with Disabilities 5.8
A. Conditions of Learning
State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):
• Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;
• Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair.
Teacher Credentials
Teachers School District
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15
With Full Credential 25 25
Without Full Credential 0
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0
14.131 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 3 of 9
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0
Total Teacher Misassignments * 0 0
Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
This School 100.00 0.00
All Schools in District 100.00 0.00
High-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00
Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) Year and month in which data were collected: November 2012
Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials/
Year of Adoption
From Most Recent
Adoption?
Percent of Students Lacking Own
Assigned Copy
Reading/Language Arts McGraw-Hill SRA Imagine It! (K-1st) - Adopted 2012
Houghton Mifflin Medallion (2nd-6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Mathematics Houghton Mifflin (K-5) - Adopted 2002
Holt (6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Science------- Macmillan/McGraw Hill (K-5) - Adopted 2008
Holt(6th) - Adopted 2008
Yes 0
History-Social Science Harcourt - Adopted 2008 Yes 0
School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year)
The information is about the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities, including the condition and cleanliness of the school grounds, buildings, and restrooms. Additional information about the condition of the school's facilities may be obtained by speaking with the school principal.
14.132 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 4 of 9
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year)
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 12/12/2014
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned Good Fair Poor
Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer
[X] [ ] [ ]
Interior: Interior Surfaces
[X] [ ] [ ]
Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation
[X] [ ] [ ]
Electrical: Electrical
[X] [ ] [ ]
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains
[X] [ ] [ ]
Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials
[X] [ ] [ ]
Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs
[X] [ ] [ ]
External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences
[X] [ ] [ ]
Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year)
Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor
[X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
B. Pupil Outcomes
State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):
• Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program);
• The Academic Performance Index; and • The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the
University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress / Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 84 73 72 80 76 77 60 59 60 Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
14.133 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 5 of 9
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
All Students in the LEA 77
All Student at the School 72
Male------- 71
Female------- 74
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 91
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino 52
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White------- 74
Two or More Races-------
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 46
English Learners------- 38
Students with Disabilities
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Note: CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
English-Language Arts 76 81 77 72 77 74 54 56 55
Mathematics------- 75 79 77 74 77 76 49 50 50
History-Social Science 48 49 49 Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks (Three-Year Comparison)
API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Statewide------- 9 9 9
Similar Schools------- 2 6 4 Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced.
14.134 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 6 of 9
Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group (Three-Year Comparison)
Group Actual API Change
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
All Students at the School -31 22 -14
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- -7 5 2
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino -62 34 -6
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White------- -21 34 -31
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -67 33 -1
English Learners -47 25 3
Students with Disabilities Note: "N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.
State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):
• Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level
Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards
Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards
-------5------- 19.0 26.7 28.4 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
C. Engagement
State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):
• Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year)
The School Site Council (SSC) is an advisory group that meets regularly to receive information, discuss school programs, and provide input toward school-based decision-making. The SSC is composed of the principal, three classroom teachers, one other school staff member, and five parents of students. A subcommittee of the SSC is the English Language Advisory Committee (ELAC). All meetings are open to the public. The school actively seeks parent involvement for school programs in a variety of ways:
Parent representation is needed for the District Budget and Finance Committee, and District ELAC.
The PTA supports the school program by encouraging and organizing parent involvement, promoting the self-esteem of students, and enriching the school program by providing special programs, services, and activities. Our school also has a foundation, Friends of Morris, that raises money to supplement educational programs in may ways, such as technology.
A number of parents and community volunteers work in the classrooms assisting teachers.
14.135 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 7 of 9
State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):
• Pupil suspension rates; • Pupil expulsion rates; and • Other local measures on the sense of safety.
Suspensions and Expulsions
Rate School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Suspensions------- 0 0.3 0.51 0.8
Expulsions------- 0 0 0 0 Note: The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year)
The school has developed a disaster plan for use in an emergency situation. Staff members are inserviced and assigned responsibilities for plan implementation. There are monthly disaster drills for school-wide safety. The school and District also work in conjunction with the community-based School Community Alert Team (SCAT). School inspection reports rated the cleanliness, orderliness and care of the school as satisfactory.
D. Other SARC Information
The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)
AYP Criteria School District
Made AYP Overall
Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts
Met Participation Rate: Mathematics
Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts
Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics
Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status In PI
First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012
Year in Program Improvement* Year 2
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 1
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 100.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process.
14.136 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 8 of 9
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
Grade Level
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes
1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
K ----------
32.3 0 1 2 28 3 33 3
1 ----------
30.3 0 3 0 28 4 32 3
2 ----------
32 0 3 0 32 3 30 4
3 ----------
25.8 0 4 0 32 3 32 3
4 ----------
22 1 4 0 25 1 3 26 1 3
5 ----------
30 0 4 0 29 4 29 4
6 ----------
30 0 4 0 31 4 32 4 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)
Title Number of FTE
Assigned to School Average Number of Students per
Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor------- - -
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) - ---
Library Media Teacher (Librarian) - ---
Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.49 ---
Psychologist------- 0.40 ---
Social Worker------- - ---
Nurse------- .16 ---
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 1.00 ---
Resource Specialist------- 1.00 ---
Other------- --- Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Level
Expenditures Per Pupil Average Teacher Salary Total
Supplemental/ Restricted
Basic/ Unrestricted
School Site------- 737 2,080 5,404 76,409
District------- --- --- 5,367 $77,793
Percent Difference: School Site and District --- --- 0.7 -0.1
State------- --- --- $4,690 $67,289
Percent Difference: School Site and State --- --- -2.4 14.7 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data.
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
• Class Size Reduction (CSR) • Lottery • Special Education • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
• Economic Impact Aid • School & Library Improvement • School Readiness • School Improvement
14.137 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Juliet Morris Elementary School Page 9 of 9
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $42,951 $41,535
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $75,413 $64,101
Highest Teacher Salary $93,093 $82,044
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $118,332 $104,336
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $0 $107,911
Average Principal Salary (High) $0 $102,488
Superintendent Salary $187,244 $155,309
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 45 41
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 6 For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Professional Development
Staff development priority areas are based upon curriculum focuses and District needs. Areas of emphasis are identified each year to align with newly adopted State Standards and State Frameworks. Curriculum revisions are an ongoing process with the major revision of every curriculum area corresponding to the year of the textbook adoption. The annual number of school days dedicated to staff development for the most recent three-years period is 2 days. This professional development time has been dedicated to improving practices aligned with the Common Core State Standards. Classified employees attend inservices relevant to their specific assignment.
14.138 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 1 of 9
Frank Vessels Elementary School
School Accountability Report Card
Reported Using Data from the 2013-14 School Year
Published During 2014-15
Every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC), by February 1 of each year. The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC.
• For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.
• View this SARC online at the school and/or LEA Web sites. • For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. • For additional information about the school, parents and community members should contact the school principal or the
district office.
About This School Contact Information (Most Recent Year)
School Contact Information
School Name------- Frank Vessels Elementary School
Street------- 5900 Cathy Ave.
City, State, Zip------- Cypress CA, 90630
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6990
Principal------- Helen Lu
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- ve.cypsd.k12.ca.us/
CDS Code 30-66480-6027833
District Contact Information
District Name------- Cypress School District
Phone Number------- (714) 220-6900
Superintendent-------
Beverly M. Hempstead
E-mail Address------- [email protected]
Web Site------- www.cypsd.k12.ca.us
14.139 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 2 of 9
School Description and Mission Statement (Most Recent Year)
Frank Vessels Elementary School is committed to equipping students with the tools they need for academic, personal and social achievement. Frank Vessels Elementary School enables every student to reach their highest potential by establishing a curriculum that meets or exceeds government standards for education; providing extracurricular programs that develop children's mental, physical and social skills; and partnering with parents and the community to create an environment geared to the success of all students. WE BELIEVE...
Each student is an individual who is deserving of respect, fairness and understanding.
School experiences should provide opportunities for each child to do his or her best.
Learning is a life long experience.
The learner must be nurtured within a respectful, cooperative environment.
Learning will combine process and knowledge to support one's growth as a whole person.
Teaching must be varied and creative to meet the individual needs of students.
Parents and the staff of the school must recognize and encourage the important role that each has in the child's education. The school community recognizes and appreciates the valuable contribution of the community at large to education. At Frank Vessels School, we recognize that America’s future hinges on the education that we give our children. The youth of our community have a right to knowledge, skills, discipline, values, and the virtues that will assist them to achieve a productive, fulfilled life. The Vessels School staff is committed to providing children with opportunities to build character, self-esteem, and achievement of excellence! Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level Number of Students
Kindergarten------- 83
Grade 1------- 99
Grade 2------- 98
Grade 3------- 99
Grade 4------- 103
Grade 5------- 99
Grade 6------- 93
Total Enrollment------- 674
Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Total Enrollment
Black or African American------- 1.3
American Indian or Alaska Native------- 0.0
Asian------- 24.0
Filipino------- 3.9
Hispanic or Latino------- 31.5
Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander 0.6
White 33.7
Two or More Races 4.7
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 27.9
English Learners 15.7
Students with Disabilities 9.9
14.140 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 3 of 9
A. Conditions of Learning
State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1):
• Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;
• Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and • School facilities are maintained in good repair.
Teacher Credentials
Teachers School District
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15
With Full Credential 29 28
Without Full Credential 0
Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) 0
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions
Indicator 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners 0 0
Total Teacher Misassignments * 0 0
Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2013-14)
Location of Classes Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects
Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
This School 100.00 0.00
All Schools in District 100.00 0.00
High-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00
Low-Poverty Schools in District 100.00 0.00 Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2014-15) Year and month in which data were collected: November 2012
Core Curriculum Area Textbooks and Instructional Materials/
Year of Adoption
From Most Recent
Adoption?
Percent of Students Lacking Own
Assigned Copy
Reading/Language Arts McGraw-Hill SRA Imagine It! (K-1st) - Adopted 2012
Houghton Mifflin Medallion (2nd-6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Mathematics Houghton Mifflin (K-5) - Adopted 2002
Holt (6th) - Adopted 2012
Yes 0
Science------- Macmillan/McGraw Hill (K-5) - Adopted 2008
Holt(6th) - Adopted 2008
Yes 0
History-Social Science Harcourt - Adopted 2008 Yes 0
14.141 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 4 of 9
School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year)
The information is about the safety, cleanliness, and adequacy of school facilities, including the condition and cleanliness of the school grounds, buildings, and restrooms. Additional information about the condition of the school's facilities may be obtained by speaking with the school principal.
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year)
School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 12/12/2014
System Inspected Repair Status Repair Needed and
Action Taken or Planned Good Fair Poor
Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer
[X] [ ] [ ]
Interior: Interior Surfaces
[X] [ ] [ ]
Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation
[X] [ ] [ ]
Electrical: Electrical
[X] [ ] [ ]
Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains
[X] [ ] [ ]
Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials
[X] [ ] [ ]
Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs
[X] [ ] [ ]
External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences
[X] [ ] [ ]
Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year)
Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor
[X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
B. Pupil Outcomes
State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Pupil Achievement State Priority (Priority 4):
• Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and its successor the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program);
• The Academic Performance Index; and • The percentage of pupils who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the
University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress / Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students in Science (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 82 81 82 80 76 77 60 59 60 Note: Science assessments include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
14.142 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 5 of 9
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Results by Student Group in Science (School Year 2013-14)
Group Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced
All Students in the LEA 77
All Student at the School 82
Male------- 84
Female------- 78
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 100
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino 71
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
White------- 74
Two or More Races-------
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 69
English Learners-------
Students with Disabilities
Students Receiving Migrant Education Services Note: CAASPP includes science assessments (CSTs, CMA, and CAPA) in grades 5, 8, and 10. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Standardized Testing and Reporting Results for All Students (Three-Year Comparison)
Subject
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards)
School District State
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
English-Language Arts 74 79 75 72 77 74 54 56 55
Mathematics------- 80 81 78 74 77 76 49 50 50
History-Social Science 48 49 49 Note: STAR Program was last administered in 2012-13. Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Academic Performance Index Ranks (Three-Year Comparison)
API Rank 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Statewide------- 9 9 9
Similar Schools------- 7 8 7 Note: For 2014 and subsequent years, the statewide and similar schools ranks will no longer be produced.
14.143 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 6 of 9
Academic Performance Index Growth by Student Group (Three-Year Comparison)
Group Actual API Change
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
All Students at the School -7 7 -11
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian------- 23 8
Filipino-------
Hispanic or Latino -11 20 -29
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
White------- -9 -7 -14
Two or More Races
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged -13 8 -25
English Learners 10 18 2
Students with Disabilities Note: "N/D” means that no data were available to the CDE or LEA to report. “B” means the school did not have a valid API Base and there is no Growth or target information. “C” means the school had significant demographic changes and there is no Growth or target information.
State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Other Pupil Outcomes State Priority (Priority 8):
• Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of English, mathematics, and physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2013-14)
Grade Level
Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards
Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards
-------5------- 13.3 19.4 48.0 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy.
C. Engagement
State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3):
• Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (Most Recent Year)
The School Site Council (SSC) at Vessels is an advisory group that meets regularly to receive information, discuss school programs, and provide input toward school-based decision-making. The SSC is composed of the principal, three classroom teachers, one other school staff member, and five parents of students. A subcommittee of the SSC is the English Language Advisory Committee (ELAC). All meetings are open to the public. Vessels actively seeks parent involvement for school programs in a variety of ways:
Parent representation is needed for the District Budget and Finance Committee, and District ELAC.
The PTA supports the school program by encouraging and organizing parent involvement, promoting the self-esteem of students, and enriching the school program by providing special programs, services, and activities.
A number of parents and community volunteers work in the classrooms assisting teachers and school staff in a variety of ways to effectively lower adult to student ratio.
14.144 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 7 of 9
State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6):
• Pupil suspension rates; • Pupil expulsion rates; and • Other local measures on the sense of safety.
Suspensions and Expulsions
Rate School District State
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Suspensions------- 0.15 1.1 0.51 0.8
Expulsions------- 0 0 0 0 Note: The rate of suspensions and expulsions is calculated by dividing the total number of incidents by the total enrollment x 100. School Safety Plan (Most Recent Year)
The school has developed a disaster plan for use in an emergency situation. Staff members are inserviced and assigned responsibilities for plan implementation. There are monthly disaster drills for school-wide safety. The school and District also work in conjunction with the community-based School Community Alert Team (SCAT). School inspection reports rated the cleanliness, orderliness and care of the school as satisfactory.
D. Other SARC Information
The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Adequate Yearly Progress Overall and by Criteria (School Year 2013-14)
AYP Criteria School District
Made AYP Overall
Met Participation Rate: English-Language Arts
Met Participation Rate: Mathematics
Met Percent Proficient: English-Language Arts
Met Percent Proficient: Mathematics
Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2014-15)
Indicator School District
Program Improvement Status In PI
First Year of Program Improvement 2011-2012
Year in Program Improvement* Year 2
Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 1
Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement --- 100.0 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. * DW (determination waiver) indicates that the PI status of the school was carried over from the prior year in accordance with the flexibility granted through the federal waiver process.
14.145 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 8 of 9
Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary)
Grade Level
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes Avg. Class Size
Number of Classes
1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+ 1-20 21-32 33+
K ----------
14.7 6 0 0 12 7 21 1 3
1 ----------
29.3 0 4 0 25 1 3 20 2 3
2 ----------
25.3 1 3 0 17 2 3 25 1 3
3 ----------
26.7 1 5 0 20 2 3 20 2 3
4 ----------
28.3 0 3 0 25 1 3 21 2 3
5 ----------
27 1 2 1 23 1 3 25 1 3
6 ----------
31.3 0 3 0 24 1 3 23 1 3 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class).
Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2013-14)
Title Number of FTE
Assigned to School Average Number of Students per
Academic Counselor
Academic Counselor------- - -
Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) - ---
Library Media Teacher (Librarian) - ---
Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.49 ---
Psychologist------- 1.00 ---
Social Worker------- - ---
Nurse------- .16 ---
Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 2.00 ---
Resource Specialist------- 1.00 ---
Other------- --- Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data. One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Level
Expenditures Per Pupil Average Teacher Salary Total
Supplemental/ Restricted
Basic/ Unrestricted
School Site------- 664 2,080 5,404 66,073
District------- --- --- 5,367 $77,793
Percent Difference: School Site and District --- --- 0.7 -13.6
State------- --- --- $4,690 $67,289
Percent Difference: School Site and State --- --- -2.4 -0.8 Note: Cells with “---“ do not require data.
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2013-14)
• Class Size Reduction (CSR) • Lottery • Special Education • Gifted and Talented Education (GATE)
• Economic Impact Aid • School & Library Improvement • School Readiness • School Improvement
14.146 EXHIBITS
2013-14 School Accountability Report Card for Frank Vessels Elementary School Page 9 of 9
Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2012-13)
Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category
Beginning Teacher Salary $42,951 $41,535
Mid-Range Teacher Salary $75,413 $64,101
Highest Teacher Salary $93,093 $82,044
Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $118,332 $104,336
Average Principal Salary (Middle) $0 $107,911
Average Principal Salary (High) $0 $102,488
Superintendent Salary $187,244 $155,309
Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 45 41
Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5 6 For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Professional Development
Staff development priority areas are based upon curriculum focuses and District needs. Areas of emphasis are identified each year to align with newly adopted State Standards and State Frameworks. Curriculum revisions are an ongoing process with the major revision of every curriculum area corresponding to the year of the textbook adoption. The district and school site have provided the following staff development to teachers and support staff: Common Core, ELA/Math Shifts, Thinking Maps, Technology, Engagment Strategies, Instructional Strategies, SRI (Student Reading Index is used to chart student progress in reading comprehension and vocabulary development), Reading strategies, etc. Teachers use modified days to collaborate across grade levels to share instructional strategies and plan lessons based on what was learned from the staff development. Academic support is provided to students and teachers based on state, district and classroom assessment results. Internal walk-throughs are conducted to ensure implementation of our school focus and best practices. Grade level and cross-grade level articulation promotes collaboration and provides an opportunity for teachers to share successful instructional strategies and monitor student assessment results. Classified employees attended inservices relevant to their specific assignment.
14.147 EXHIBITS