michael garcia - stanford university space race.doc · web viewaccording to chinese leaders, the...
TRANSCRIPT
Michael GarciaEthics of Dev. In a Global EnvironmentMay 30, 2005Professor Lusignan
The Space Race:
The U.S – Soviet/ Russian Relationship in Regards to Space
Exploration
Throughout history, technology has played a crucial role in
international relations. The space race between the United States and
the Soviet Union during the 1950’s and 60’s is indeed a major
landmark in the history of technological feats accomplished by man. To
historically understand of the significance of this race, it is important to
not only look at the events that transpired during these years but to
also examine what motivated each of these world powers to take part
of such a competition. Significantly, the events that took place during
this time have shaped current U.S. and Russian involvement in space
exploration and these current involvements also deserve our attention.
The Origins of the Space Race
What motivated the U.S. and the Soviet Union to spend countless
dollars and resources in an attempt to reach the moon? To answer this
question, we must first look at the true origins of the “space race.”
Interestingly, it was neither the Soviet Union nor the U.S., but rather
1
the German military that began and led the advancement of rocket
technology during World War II.
At the end of the war, all of the major allied
powers began to investigate and exploit the advances
in German missile technology. Nordhausen, a major
German rocketry center for the A-4 missile program,
became a prime target of the Soviets. However, when
they reached Nordhausen to obtain crucial rocketry information, they
found that the German engineers working on the A-4 program had
already willingly surrendered to the U.S. Army. Within days of the
surrender, parts for at least 100 A-4 missiles were shipped into the U.S.
zone from Nordhausen along with crucial rocket technology
documentation (russianspaceweb.com). In response to the Americans
swift takeover of Germany’s rocketry technology, Stalin was reported
saying:
This is absolutely intolerable. We defeated the Nazi armies; we
occupied Berlin and Peenermunde; but the Americans got the
rocket engineers. What could be more revolting and more
inexcusable? How and why was this allowed to happen? (Siddiqi 24)
Such a victory by the U.S. boosted its advancement in missile and
rocket technology. However, this loss by the Soviet Union did not seem
to hinder their progression in rocketry. By 1948, the Soviets were able
to reach a level of technological ability equivalent to the wartime
2
German accomplishments. During this time, the Soviets not only
focused on missiles, but also on researching artificial satellites and
launch vehicles. The progress that the Soviets made between the years
of 1949 and 1953 was quite remarkable. By 1953, the “Soviets had
almost completely left behind the German antecedents of the missile
program and moved into the realm of intercontinental ballistic missile
(ICBM) development, effectively laying the foundation for the birth of
the Soviet space program” (Siddiqi 69).
Meanwhile on the American side, in 1950, a U.S. Army team
stationed in Huntsville, Alabama began work on developing a series a
Redstone rockets. These rockets were tested at Cape Canaveral Air
Force base. During this time, work was also being done to complete
the Atlas, the first U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile (Koman).
However, despite all the American progress that was taking place, the
Soviets were not only pulling ahead in rocketry progress, they were
also broadening the “missile gap.”
By 1954, the Soviets successfully tested an H-bomb and were
mass producing a medium-range ballistic missile, the SS-3. Within the
next three years, the Soviet Union was able to fire an intercontinental
ballistic missile that had a range of over five thousand miles. The U.S.
officials were stunned by the rate at which the Soviets were able to
advance their rocket technology. However, the American public did
not fully realize the technological successes of the Soviets until the
3
launching of Sputnik (Koman). The launching of this artificial satellite
fueled a major fear of the United States that it was quickly falling
behind the Soviets in what would quickly become known as the “space
race” (historychannel.com).
Sputnik and the Dawn of the Space Age
On October 4, 1957, the launching of Sputnik changed the course
of history. For the first time, man had been able to overcome the
bounds of Earth and break free from this planets atmosphere and send
their handiwork into space. With this great soviet accomplishment
came heavy social, political, and military implications for the U.S. and
for the world.
“The Soviet satellite served as a distinct milestone; it moved the
Cold War into a new phase – one characterized by the very real
possibility of Soviet dominance in the new arena of space, and thus
by extension, on Earth. With only a ball of metal, the Soviets had
managed to achieve what they were unable to convey with decades
of rhetoric on the virtues of socialism: that the USSR was a power
with which to be reckoned” (Siddiqi 171).
sputnik indeed had its roots in military technology. The artificial space
satellite was launched with the same rocket engine as the
intercontinental ballistic missile SS-3, a demonstration of the power of
the Soviet military. For much of the American public, the Soviet’s
4
ability to launch satellites into orbit translated into the Soviet’s
capability to launch ballistic missiles that could carry nuclear bombs
from Europe to the United States. Senator Lyndon Johnson was quoted
saying; “Soon, they will be dropping bombs on us from space like kids
dropping rocks onto cars from freeway overpasses” (batnet.com).
The Soviets success could also easily be heard and seen by the
world by looking into the heavens. The
satellite was a small sphere, about two
feet across with long “whiskers pointing
out from one side, and although it was
only 184 pounds, it carried radio
transmitters to allow the world to hear its powerful and recognizable
“beeps.” Its rocket booster, which weighed nearly four tons, also
reached orbit and could easily be seen from Earth. The satellite was
also successful in obtaining valuable information about the densities of
the upper layers of the atmosphere and the propagation of radio
signals in the ionosphere. (windows.ucar.edu).
Interestingly, in 1957, there was actually no set out Soviet space
program governing body nor were there any long-range goals,
no financial planning, and no agenda. This lack of total Soviet space
program structure lasted for a few years. However, massive amounts
of propaganda produced by Soviet officials suggested otherwise to the
5
U.S.S.R public, “hailing the glorious benefits of a nationwide effort”
(Siddiqi 171).
Nevertheless, the launching of Sputnik called
for immediate action in the U.S. By January of
1958, the U.S. launched its own artificial satellite,
Explorer 1, after a failure of an initial launch in
December of 1957. Explorer 1 indeed had its
successes for the U.S. The U.S. satellite led to the
first scientific discovery of the space race. It
showed that the Earth was surrounded by heavy bands of radiation
that would be named Van Allen named after James A. Van Allen, the
director of the operation.
The launch of Sputnik also directly led to the proposal of
America’s own space program. The creation of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was proposed in the
National Aeronautics and Space Act, commonly called the “Space Act”
(hq.nasa.gov). The proposal stated:
The Congress declares that the general welfare and security of
the United States require that adequate provision be made for
aeronautical and space activities. The Congress further declares
that such activities shall be the responsibility of, and shall be
directed by, a civilian agency exercising control over aeronautical and
space activities sponsored by the United States, except that activities
6
peculiar to or primarily associated with the development of
weapons systems, military operations, or the defense of the United
States (including the research and development necessary to make
effective provision for the defense of the United States) shall be the
responsibility of, and shall be directed by, the Department of
Defense. (National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958).
The congress approved the Space Act and it was signed by President
Eisenhower on July 29th, 1958. As a result, NASA was officially
created on October 1st, 1958.
Sending Man into Space
“Our mission is to ensure that the Soviet rockets fly higher and
farther than has been accomplished anywhere else up until now. Our
mission is to ensure that a Soviet man be the first to fly in a rocket.
And our mission is to ensure that it is Soviet rockets and Soviet
spaceships that are the first to master the limitless space of the
cosmos” –Sergey Korolev, leader of USSR space program
After the successful launching of Sputnik, an ambitious idea
began to form in the minds of the Soviets; launching a satellite that
would carry a living individual. Sergey Korolev, a mechanical
engineer who was a major leader of the Soviet space program,
suggested that a dog be used. The plan was to have completed
preparations for the launch in time for the fortieth anniversary of the
7
Great October Socialist Revolution on November 7th. The official order
for the launch was issued on October 12, 1957, just eight days after
the launching of Sputnik. This operation required Soviet engineers to
modify the structure that was used for the fist satellite, which was
called the PS-1. The modified satellite that was to be used came to be
known as Simple Satellite No. 2 (PS-2).
The building of PS-2 officially began on October 10, 1957, even
before the official order for the
operation took place. The
Soviets found it extremely
important to have the launch in
time for the holiday as it would
have great political
significance. The PS-2 was a
small stubby cylindrical container for one dog. The container was
equipped with systems for monitoring the life of the dog, as well as
instruments for feeding the animal and supplying it with oxygen and
ridding the container of carbon dioxide.
A dog named Layka was chosen for the mission and on
November 3, 1957, the Soviets became the first to send a life into
space. Sadly, on November 7, Layka died of heat exhaustion due to
malfunctions in the spacecraft’s temperature control. The dog was
never planned to return to Earth, however, Layka was initially
8
supposed to be put to sleep by a lethal injection. Layka paved the way
for the future of the Soviet and U.S. space programs (Siddiqi 172-
175).
By the end of 1957, both the U.S. and the Soviet Union began
making preparations for human spaceflight. In 1958, NASA initiated
Project Mercury, the first man-in-space program, which consisted of
three main goals, “to orbit a manned spacecraft around Earth; to
investigate man's ability to function in space; to recover both man and
spacecraft safely” (nasa.gov). In April 1959, NASA selected the
American armed forces to choose its first astronauts. All of which had
backgrounds in aviation. It is likely that this, in fact, influenced the
Soviets to choose pilots as well as their cosmonauts.
Indeed, it became a frantic race between the U.S. and the Soviet
Union to see who could be the first to have human presence in space.
John F. Kennedy emphasized the importance of the Mercury Project
during an address at Rice University in 1962:
“We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to
be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used
for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear
science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it
will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the
United States occupies a position of preeminence can we help
decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new,
9
terrifying theater of war.”
It was not just a competition of technological ability, but of political
superiority between Soviet socialism and American capitalism. The
space race would prove to have huge impacts on the public of the two
governments.
Unfortunately for the U.S. the Soviet would again add to their
long list of firsts in the Space Race. On April 12, 1961, The Soviet
Union sent the first man, Yuri Gagarin, into space. Less than a month
later, the U.S. sent their own into space. On May 5, 1961, Alan
Shepard became the first American to enter space. Between 1961 and
1963, the U.S. made six successful manned flights to space.
It is interesting to note that the U.S. and the Soviet Union were
the only two countries to send man into space for nearly four decades.
China finally became the third nation to send one of their citizens into
space on October 15, 2003. Yang Liwei orbited the Earth and safely
returned a few days later as a Chinese
hero. The Chinese mission had
extremely close ties with its military
and as a result, the operation was
surrounded with secrecy. However,
the launch itself was solicited to the
Chinese public to boost national wide
pride and to increase popular sentiment behind the communist party
10
(CNN.com). According to Chinese leaders, the launch was also to raise
the profile of Chinese technology, which today is recognized as one of
the worlds most advanced.
A Sprint to the Moon
"I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal,
before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning
him safely to the Earth. No single space project...will be more
exciting, or more impressive to mankind, or more important...and
none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish” -John F. Kennedy,
May 25, 1961
In March 1965, NASA began making
major preparations for space travel to the
moon by creating Project Gemini. Project
Gemini utilized extremely sophisticated
space craft. During Gemini missions,
U.S. astronauts were able to conduct
space walks and were able to change their orbit; something that no
Soviet crew had ever accomplished. Project Gemini also consisted of
astronauts spending long periods of time in space. One mission lasted
14 days; the estimated time that a lunar trip would take. The Apollo
Project officially began in 1963, with many Americans and NASA
engineers wondering if Kennedy’s ambitious goal could ever be
11
accomplished. However, on July 20, 1969 America finally became a
‘first’ in the long space race with the Soviets. On that glorious day for
America, Neil Armstrong and Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin of Apollo 11
became the first humans to step foot on the moon. Americans
understood this to be a huge victory over the Soviet Union and over
socialism.
It is now understood that placing an American on the moon was
a key maneuver in John F. Kennedy’s Cold War strategy. Kennedy
gave NASA programs top priority and many times the Kennedy
administration implied that Eisenhower had not done nearly enough
during the rapid technological advancement of the Soviets before and
during the launching of Sputnik. During his administration, Kennedy
found it to be extremely important to prevent the Soviets from getting
to the moon first and from governing it with “a hostile flag of
conquest,” but rather wanted America to be the first so that it could
place on the moon a “banner of freedom and peace.” Kennedy’s
assignation gave the mission an aura of sacredness and President
Johnson pushed for its completion in the name of the past president
(Koman).
The Soviets never landed a man on the moon, although they
were successful in landing a series of rovers for which they used to
explore the lunar surface. During the moon race, the Soviet engineers
built the Soyuz spacecraft, which was very similar to the Apollo. The
12
Soyuz soon became a major interest to NASA. Interestingly, after
America’s major victory in the space race, U.S. – Soviet tensions
began to decrease, eventually to the point when the two countries
joined together for the Apollo-Soyuz test project in 1975.
U.S – Soviet/Russian Cooperation
The Apollo-Soyuz test project, which consisted of the American
Apollo spacecraft docking to the Soviet Soyuz spacecraft in orbit, was
the first international cooperation in regards to space exploration. It
would become a huge milestone in technological development as it
showed that political adversaries could work together to conduct a
complex space project. The mission also epitomized what President
Nixon labeled as “detente.” Each country did, however, have its own
intentions.
The Apollo-Soyuz test project had its roots in 1970, just one year
after Apollo landed on the moon, when representatives for NASA and
the USSR Academy of Science met in Moscow to discuss a possible
joint piloted space mission. Two years later, President Nixon and
Soviet Council of Ministers Chairman Alexey N. Kosygin signed the
document that ordered the Apollo-Soyuz project to take place.
The Apollo project was soon to come to an end to make way for
NASA’s new Space Shuttle program and the U.S. saw that cooperation
with the Soviet engineers would provide a valuable amount of
13
previously unavailable information. For the Soviets, on the other hand,
such a mission was thought to be a great means to boost their public
relations. The Soviets were able to show that they were on the same
technological level as the U.S. which would be extremely helpful after
losing the race to the moon (Rumerman).
During the project, the U.S. remained extremely open about the
space program, unlike the Soviets who kept the details of the mission
secret from the USSR public. This was most likely because of the
Soviet space program’s close links to the military. The Soviets often
referred to the USSR Academy of Sciences when discussing the
Apollo-Soyuz test project to give the impression that it was run by the
Academy rather than the RKK Energia, the true company that built the
Soyuz spacecraft and worked for the Soviet Military (Rumerman).
Because of the difference is the countries’ spacecraft structure,
American and Soviet engineers had to work to modify each. They also
constructed the Docking Module,
the docking system which was
carried into orbit by the Apollo.
This module would later become
the foundation for the standard international docking system used
today.
On July 17, 1975, two days after Soyuz 19 was launched from
Baikonur and the Apollo was launched from the Kennedy Space
14
Center, the two spacecrafts came into contact and carried out a
successful docking. Cosmonaut Leonov reported to Earth, “Soyuz and
Apollo are shaking hands now,” a phrase that undoubtedly contained
political significance (Rumerman).
The Apollo-Soyuz test project set the stage for future
technological relations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. The
U.S. began the Space Shuttle program with the hopes of building a
reusable winged spacecraft that would be able to deliver resources to
orbiting laboratories and space stations. Although this program
began in 1972, instituted by President Nixon, the first space shuttle,
Columbia, didn’t launch until 1981. Within this time frame, the
Soviets worked to develop and upgrade the Soyuz and in 1986, they
used the Soyuz to begin building space station Mir.
A year after the fall of the Soviet Union, President George H.W.
Bush and Russian President Yeltsin announced new space exploration
plans; flying an astronaut the Mir space station. Two years later,
President Clinton expanded U.S. – Relations by inviting Russia into the
building of the International Space Station (ISS), along with Europe,
Canada, and Japan. The building of the ISS utilized Mir. Building the
ISS also required Russia to adhere to the Missile Technology Control
Regime (MTCR) which “sought to stop the proliferation of missile
technology.” The MTCR objected to a contract that Russia had with
India that consisted of Russia giving India advanced rocket engines,
15
technology, and information. The U.S. required Russia to reformat the
contract, and Russia claimed that do so would cost 400 million dollars.
The U.S. agreed to pay Russia 400 million dollars for their cooperation
in the ISS while Russia agreed to restructure the contract with India
to abide by the MTCR ( U.S. Government).
Currently, the progress of the ISS is in great jeopardy. The
2003 Columbia disaster in which 7 crewmembers were killed when the
space craft exploded caused the grounding of the U.S. Space Shuttle
program. With the grounding of the Shuttle, the U.S. has become
dependent on the Russian Soyuz and other Russian transport
capabilities. Unfortunately, after April of 2006, the U.S. will no longer
be able to pay for ISS programmed flights on the Soyuz because of the
Iran Non-Proliferation Act (INA) (The Economist). Enacted in 2000,
the INA was constructed to stop
“foreign transfers to Iran of weapons of mass destruction,
missile technology, and advanced convention weapons,
particularly from Russia. Section 6 of the INA bans U.S. payments
to Russia in connection with the ISS unless the U.S. President
determines that Russia is taking steps to prevent such
proliferation” (CRS Report).
At this time it appears unlikely that President Bush will determine that
Russia is complying with the INA; Iran’s nuclear program is a very
urgent concern at the present. At this point in time, the only way to
16
ensure future U.S. access to the ISS is for the U.S. to have a
spacecraft to reach the ISS. Since the Columbia disaster, NASA has
spent over a billion dollars upgrading the Space Shuttle. However,
when the Shuttle will fly again is still to be determined, if, in fact, it
will ever fly again (Preston).
Currently, the U.S. does indeed have ambitious goals for the
future of its space program. In 2004, Bush announced that he wanted
to see the U.S. return to the moon by 2015, which would act as a
stepping stone to Mars;
"In the past 30 years, no human being has set foot on another
world or ventured farther up into space than 386 miles…It is time
for America to take the next steps…the desire to explore and
understand is part of our character."
Such goals will require the U.S. to have access to a space station to
conduct proper necessary research.
Last month, NASA was handed over to the leadership of Michael
Griffin, the new Administrator of NASA. Griffin was nominated by
President Bush and confirmed by the United States Senate. As the
holder of over nine degrees, Griffin seems more than capable of
leading NASA. Like Bush, Griffin holds the same plans for returning
to the moon as an eventual means of reaching Mars. Whether or not
this project will include Russia depends much on the current relations
we have with Russia and with the INA. NASA has cooperated with
17
Russia very much on possible Mars exploration missions and recent
collaboration has centered on the Russian High Energy Neutron
Detector instrument.
Space exploration technology has progressed rapidly within the
last few decades. U.S. – Russian competition and cooperation has
impacted the world in ways that were thought impossible a century
ago. It will be extremely interesting to see how these countries
continue to change the course of space technology in the next few
decades.
18
Sources
Siddiqi, Asif A. Sputnik and the Soviet Space Challenge. Miami: University Press of Florida, 2003.
Siddiqi, Asif A. The Soviet Space Race with Apollo. Miami: University Press of Florida, 2003.
Siddiqi, Asif A. “The Apollo-Soyuz Test Project.” Centennialofflight.gov. 20 May, 2005.
http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/SPACEFLIGHT/ASTP/SP24.htm
U.S. Government, Committee on Space and Aeronautics and the House of Representatives. Hearing: U.S. – Russian Cooperation in Space. Serial No. 108-25. First Hearing, June 11, 2003.
Squassoni, Sharon and Marcia S. Smith. “CRS Report for Congress: The Iran Nonproliferation Act and the International Space Station: Issues and Options. March 2, 2005.
Pifer, Steven, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. “The U.S. and Russia: Space Cooperation and Export Controls.” Testimony Before the House Science Committee, Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics. June 11, 2003.
Larry Wheeler. “NASA May Partially Abandon Space Station.” Florida Today. May 20, 2005.
Preston Lerner. “NASA’s Fixer-Upper Flies Again.” Popular Science. May 2005: 63-64.
“No Plan B for Outer Space.” The Economist.com. 20 May. 2005 http://www.economist .com/sciences/dispalystory.cfm?
story_id=3738885.
Lane, Earl. “Bush: Moon Return by 2015.” Newsday.com. 17 May. 2005. http://www. newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-bush-space-
0114,0,4190003. story?coll =ny-nationalnews-headlines
Scott, David. Two Sides of The Moon. New York: Simon and Shuster,
2004.
19
Rumerman, Judy. “Space Shuttle.” Centennialofflight.gov. 10 May, 2005. http://www.centennialofflight .gov/essay/ SPACEFLIGHT/Shuttle/ SP25.htm.
“China's first manned spacecraft has successfully returned to the Earth with astronaut Yang Liwei in good health, according to Chinese news agency reports” CNN.com. 12 May. 2005. http://www.cnn.com /2003/TECH/space /10/15/china.launch/.
Koman, Rita G. “Man on the Moon: The U.S. Space Program as a Cold War Maneuver.” Oah.org. 15 May. 2005. http://www.oah.org/pubs
/magazine/coldwar/koman.html
Images
Image of Space Walk: http://www.space.com/news/spacehistory/greatest_space_events_1960s.html.
Image of Layka: www.bfi.org.uk/collections/etv/lists/space.html.
Image of A-4 missile: www.russianspaceweb.com/ kapyar_a4_erect_2.jpg
Image of Sputnik: www.2.fht-esslingen.de/ telehistory/sputnik.html
Image of Explorer: www.phy.mtu.edu/ rocket/explorer.gif
Image of Yang Liwei: http://www.cnn.com /2003/TECH/space /10/15/china.launch/.
Image of Apollo-Soyuz Test Project: www.pilotfriend.com/.../ space/images5/9.jpg
20
21