mfdr cap-scan - [email protected] ingwell kuil - world bank
DESCRIPTION
MfDR CAP-Scan www.MfDR.org/capscan - [email protected] Ingwell Kuil - World Bank Abdel Aziz Ould Dahi - Mauritania Civil Service College, Singapore 2009. Guiding Principles. South-South knowledge sharing Ongoing improvements to methodology Theoretical: How it works - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
![Page 2: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
MfDR CAP-Scan
www.MfDR.org/capscan - [email protected]
Ingwell Kuil - World Bank Abdel Aziz Ould Dahi - MauritaniaCivil Service College, Singapore 2009
![Page 3: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Guiding Principles
South-South knowledge sharingOngoing improvements to methodology
Theoretical: How it worksPractice: How to get it done Realistic: Continuous effort in country
![Page 4: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Managing for Development Results
Development of a results cultureShift from focusing on inputs to performanceEvidence-based decision makingClear goals, monitoring and evaluationAccountability to deliver results
![Page 5: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
A global urgency to focus on Results
Improve development outcomes and results on the ground Improve country systems to Manage for Development ResultsImplement Results Based approaches
MDGs, Paris Declaration, Accra Agenda for ActionKorea 2011 4th High Level Forum
![Page 6: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Development of CAP-Scan
Roundtable on MfDR in Hanoi (2007)OECD/DAC Joint Venture on MfDRWorking group of AsDB, AfDB, CIDA, EC, IADB, MSI, MCC, UNDP, USAID, World Bank, partner countriesMethodological sources:UNDP: Capacity Assessment Tool; CIDA: Capacity self-assessment tool; EC: Institutional Assessment and Capacity Development; WB: PEFA; Etc. Experiences in Mauritania, Niger, Senegal
![Page 7: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CAP-Scan instrument
Broad-based, high-level, short-term, low-cost self-assessment by governments to identify strengths and capacity needs, develop actions to address resource needs, and target donor support:
A framework on development performanceEvidence-based decision-making toolSimple and practical tool for strategic planning, risk management, and monitoring and evaluation of results
![Page 8: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Scope
Focus on the five MfDR pillars:
1 Leadership, 2 Evaluation & Monitoring, 3 Accountability & Partnerships, 4 Planning & Budgeting, 5 Statistics
![Page 9: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
MfDR PillarsComponents Awareness Exploration Transition Full Implementation
Commitment
Top management asserts importance of MfDR. But no concrete initiatives have
been initiated.
A small number of managers investigate
MfDR tools, and apply them sporadically. But,
initiative is not consistent, nor mandated.
Full commitment within government to MfDR. New
MfDR practices are systematically adopted. Most, but not all, staff,
support initiative and most, but not all units practice MfDR.
All units practice comprehensive and systematic MfDR systems. Staff report benefits outweigh costs of
MfDR. Organization is learning how to use, and continuously adapt MfDR.
MfDR informs policy
Although leaders claim that evidence should be
integrated into policy processes – reliable data are
not collected or used.
At least a few decisions are taken based on hard data.
However, these are the exceptions in an
environment where data are seldom available or used.
A thorough array of results-based data-grounded decision- and
policy-making support systems are installed in some units.
Leadership emphasizes the importance of such systems and
indicates that they should be harmonized and used universally.
Results-based management systems are utilized in virtually all relevant
areas. These systems are adequately funded, staff at all levels appreciate their utility, they use data to revise policy and procedures, and systems are in place to continuously improve
them.
National planning
National Development Plan exists. However, outcomes and targets – even for such areas as poverty reduction or health – are not clearly
articulated.
National Development Plan articulates outcomes, and maybe even some specific
targets. However, that discipline is not
consistently applied throughout the Plan.
National Development Plan clearly articulates outcomes, results, and measurable targets against which
programs can be measured. However, data are not
systematically collected and used by decision makers. “Ownership”
of the Plan and its data are not widespread.
Outcomes, results and targets area consistently and appropriately applied throughout the National Development Plan. Relevant data are collected and used to adapt implementation of the
plan. Decision-makers recognize the utility of the data and ensure it is
integrated into the decision-making process.
Criteria For Each Progressive Stage
Leadership
Matrix
![Page 10: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1. Scope tasks
10.Implement improvement
3. Craft process
7. Identify emerging & advanced aspects of MfDR
2. Identify participants
4. Adapt tools
6. Analyze / present results
8. Prioritize improvement
5. Collect data
9. Plan improvement
Process
![Page 11: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Products
![Page 12: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Benefits for the client
Raise government consciousness of MfDR, in the local contextHelp government chart its own path to MfDRFacilitate cross-organizational cooperationPromote participation and consensusMap a prioritized plan for improvement with focused follow-upMeasure progress against the planLink with other toolsIntroduction to a broad intervention post CAP-Scan
![Page 13: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Niger
![Page 14: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Senegal
![Page 15: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Mauritania
![Page 16: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Lessons learnt
Quality Assurance TeamBenchmark with non-governmental actorsAction PlanningLink to implementationLink to other initiativesIncreasing cooperation with Regional CoPs on MfDREstablishment of Advisory Committee
![Page 17: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Inter-sectoral character of capacities adds complexity to the search for solutionsCapacity Building was identified as a long-term goalThe CAP-Scan is an opportunity to develop an improvement plan• Self-assessment by senior government officials• Cross-cutting groups• Setting capacity building priorities• Concrete action plan that integrates existing efforts
Rationale
![Page 18: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Team
![Page 19: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Sector Meetings • Self-
Assessment• Group
Discussion
Preparation for Working Sessions
• Consolidation and synthesis
Working Sessions
• Self-Assessment
• Priorities• Action Plan • Monitoring
Launch
June 30 - July 8 July 6 – 11 July 12 & 15
Process planning
![Page 20: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results per MfDR pillar
Leade
rship
Evalua
tion a
nd Mon
itorin
g
Accou
ntabil
ity an
d Part
nershi
ps
Plann
ing an
d Budg
eting
Statis
tics
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Mauritania
Mauritania
![Page 21: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Results per dimension
0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00
Survey capabilityData quality assessment
Data Disaggregatio
n
Statistics strategy
Inter-sectoral CoordinationInternal Coordination
Performance based budgetingBudget reflects national
priorities
Public access to results
Independent media
Legislative Oversight
Judicial IndependenceReporting harmonization
Data management capability
Government performance is oriented toward results
Data management capabilityMonitoring and Evaluation
Capacity
National Development Plan evaluation systems
Human Resource Management
Change Management
Linking the field and the capital
Donor coordination and alignment with national priorities
Accountability and Delegation
Involvement of Non governmental stakeholders
MfDR informs policy
Commitment
Statistiques
Processus budgétaire
Redevabilité et contrôle
Suivi et Evaluation
Leadership
![Page 22: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
4321
4
3
2
1
Score of self-assessmentPrio
rity
= co
mbi
naiso
n Im
porta
nce,
Feas
ibilit
y, U
rgen
ce
Budget reflects National priorities
Management of change
Public access to information
Data quality assessment
Commitment
MfDR informs policy
« Quick win » ?
Action requested
No urgent action needed
Efforts without
significant returns
Identification of priorities
![Page 23: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Action Plan
Dimension
Programmed actions Indicator/Monitor-ing
Referencesituation
Target situation Schedule
Financing Resp. Exec.
Prep-
aration
Exe-cution
Prior-ity
Comment/Connec-tion with existing
actionObtain-ed
Obtain-
able
Source
Leadership
Commitment CAP-Scan
3.0 1
1.1.1 Promulgate law organizing the monitoring and evaluation system of the CSLP
Law adopted
TO + 6 month
s
MEF
1.1.2 Extend the sector CDMST: MFPMA, MPEFP, MC
No. depts. CDMT
7 10 toTO + 1
yr
MEF/other
depart-ments
1.1.3 Study of capacity-strengthening needs of the coordination structure for governmental action (DG of Interministerial Coordination) to ensure performance of the coordination, facilitation and support roles at the interministerial level.
MEF for
submiss-ion to
PM
1.1.4 General introduction of a specialized body or unit responsible for strategic programming in the MPM and MC.
% direct/Dept
60% 100% by TO
+ 6 month
s
Ministry
submits to PM
Adjustment of organization charts
Clarity and articulation of vision CAP-Scan
3.0 1
1.2.1 Make the different programming tools consistent: analysis to harmonize terminology, structure and actions.
TO + 6 month
s
MEF/
DGCI
MEF/DGCIM
Human Resource Management CAP-Scan
1.25 2
1.8.1 Establishment of performance-evaluation tools for civil servants and government employees: pilot perimeter on the staff of the M&E units in the DEPs.
3-Year Plan indicator: % of officials evaluated
100% on the perimeter
by TO + 1 yr
![Page 24: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Six priority areas were identifiedActions were developed in a full group discussion, including all key ministriesActions focused on new action areas and refining existing projectsThe Director General of the Development and Economic Cooperation of the MOF agreed to take the lead on follow-up actionsThe Action Plan was disseminated to donors in-country to support the actions
Action Plan and dissemination
![Page 25: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
MfDR CAP-Scan
Workshop Civil Service College, Singapore 2009
Ingwell Kuil & Abdel Aziz Ould Dahi
![Page 26: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Workshop process
1. Use the ‘matrix’ to discuss the stage of development regarding the MfDR system in your country
2. Describe the main arguments of your discussion in the ‘journal’ and quantify the results
3. Graph the quantitative results in the ‘profile’4. Prioritize the results you’ve identified in the
‘prioritization matrix’5. Use the prioritization matrix to make an ‘action
plan’
![Page 27: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
xxx
MfDR Self-Assessment Matrix MfDR Pillars CRITERIA FOR EACH PROGRESSIVE STAGE
Components Awareness Exploration Transition Full Implementation
LEADERSHIP
Commitment to Results Management
Deputy and assistant Deputy assert importance of MfDR. But no concrete initiatives have been initiated.
Some managers investigate MfDR tools, and apply some in ad hoc manner. But, initiative is not consistent, nor mandated.
Full commitment within organization to MfDR. New practices systematically adopted to MfDR. Most, but not all, staff, support initiative and most, but not all units practice MfDR.
All units practice comprehensive and systematic MfDR systems. Staff report benefits outway costs of MfDR. Organization is learning how to use, and continuously adapt MfDR.
Evidenced-based policy processes
National Development Plan
Public consultation in planning and policy making
Self-Assessment Development Calculation Sheet (IDCS)
Organization: Ghana Ministry of Planning: Aug-08
Jun-07 Aug-08Pillar
Components Score Score Comments
Leadership Commitment 2.00 3.00
Four of five units have instituted Results Frameworks and Program Monitoring Plans. Data are produced regularly for those units and some decisions are made on data. The remaining unit is expected to adopt systems next year.
Evidence 1.00 1.00 No ChangeNational Development Plan Results Mgt. 2.00 4.00
National Development Plan now has full sets of results measures and ministries are reporting on progress against those indicators. Twice annual meetings of cabinet to review progress against indicators.
1.67 2.67 PillarsLeadership
Results Commitment
Evidenced-Based Mgt.
Public Consultation
Evaluation and Monitoring
M & E Capacity
Client Satisfaction Survey
Accountability & Feedback
Financial Resources
External Resources
Network Resources
Service Delivery
Active Membership
Legend:
Baseline: as of 2007
Mid-Course: as of 2008
End of period: 2009
Ghana Ministry of Planning
Awareness Exploration Transition Full Implementation
Self Assessment Profile: 2007-2008
1. CAP-Scan matrix
2. CAP-Scan journal
3. CAP-Scan profile
![Page 28: MfDR CAP-Scan - capscan@mfdr.org Ingwell Kuil - World Bank](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062502/56816609550346895dd93ff2/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Capacity Improvement Result 1: {enter priority capacity result improvement desired}
Performance Indicator(s):
Activities Resources needed
Sources Completion date
Person
Responsible
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
4321
4
3
2
1
Matrix Progress Scoring
Quadrant indicatingareas needing most
urgent attention M&ECapacity
(3)Public
Consultation(3)
Results Related toBudget (1)
InformsPolicy (3)
PillarsLeadership
Results Commitment
Evidenced-Based Mgt.
Public Consultation
Evaluation and Monitoring
M & E Capacity
Client Satisfaction Survey
Accountability & Feedback
Financial Resources
External Resources
Network Resources
Service Delivery
Active Membership
Legend:
Baseline: as of 2007
Mid-Course: as of 2008
End of period: 2009
Ghana Ministry of Planning
Awareness Exploration Transition Full Implementation
Self Assessment Profile: 2007-2008
3. CAP-Scan profile
4. CAP-Scan prioritization
5. CAP-Scan action plan
Matrix Progress Scoring 2 3 4
MfD
R Pr
iorit
y Ra
nkin
g
3
4