methods of teaching: early years (mot ey)
DESCRIPTION
Methods of Teaching: Early Years (MOT EY). Week 15 April 4. Introduction to the subject. Methods of Teaching: Early Years Intended learning outcomes – by the completion of this subjects students should be able to demonstrate they have: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Methods of Teaching: Early Years(MOT EY)
Week 15April 4
Introduction to the subject Methods of Teaching: Early Years
Intended learning outcomes – by the completion of this subjects students should be able to demonstrate they have: Developed a deep understanding of the early years of schooling
and the issues that teachers need to be mindful of when working with this age group
Become familiar with the VELS documents that apply to this stage of schooling
Gained confidence in planning teaching and learning materials; and
An awareness of resources and support that will assist in their teaching.
Assessment Essay: Laying the foundations of learning (60%) Early Years (literacy or numeracy based) unit/program of work
(40%)
The early years of schooling Prep to Year 4
Developmental stages (Piaget) VELS: Laying the foundations
Developing fundamental knowledge, skills and behaviours in literacy and numeracy
Developing social, physical and personal capabilities
Early Years Learning Framework Best Start Transition to school
Key theories that influence the early years Constructivism
Inquiry learning
Reggio Emilia
Constructivism“…effective learning occurs when individuals construct their own understandings”
(McInerney, D. & McInerney, V. (2010) Educational Psychology: Constructing Learning, 5th Edition. Pearson:Australia, p. 20).
Personal/cognitive/radical constructivism Intrapersonal dedvelopment of learning Knowledge is ‘built up’ through self-exploration and discovery
Social constructivism Construction of shared knowledge in social situations Through collaboration learners develop understandings through their
involvement and participation in activities Teachers provide prompts, scaffolding and guidance when needed
In the classroom Practical activities that challenge personal learning Setting up concrete materials for students to construct understandings with
i.e. Water play for volume concepts Active involvement of the learner Learning should be problem based with real-world engagement
Inquiry learning“Learning based around students’ questions; it incorporates a range of philosophical, curricular and pedagogical approaches to teaching”
(Churchill, R (2010) Teaching: Making a Difference. John Wiley & Sons Australia, p. 155).
Learning through exploration and problem solving Emphasis on:
process over content conceptual understanding student-initiated questioning dialogue as a means of deepening thinking
Inquiry through Induction (i.e. in science) Deduction (i.e. in Humanities) Negotiation (i.e. students choosing a topic they want)
Development of skills (in primary) predicting, hypothesising, generating questions, engaging in dialogue,
synthesising findings.
Inquiry Stage Purpose
1. Engagement and tuning in To identify and define the issue or topicTo generate interestTo determine students’ prior knowledge and attitudes
2. Determining directions and organising ourselves
To choose a focus for the inquiryTo identify guiding questions and formulate a hypothesis or propositionTo scope the inquiry and formulate a plan of actionTo determine sources for seeking required information
3. Finding out and sorting out To collect and synthesise informationTo compare and contrast informationDrawing conclusionsTo interpret the informationTo present and communicate the understandings and conclusions that have been drawn
4. Taking action and reflection To take action that makes some connection with the school, home and/or wider communityTo set goals for future learning based on self-assessment and reflection
Planning for Inquiry Learning Planning with an emphasis on the interrelationships between
knowledge, using creative thinking, critical thinking and problem solving as a foundation for exploring knowledge
Teachers need strong pedagogical content knowledge and cross-curricular knowledge
Shaping curriculum - big ideas, essential questions, concepts & throughlines Through problem based learning students investigate and research as a way
of developing mastery of the key understandings – end product may be project, case study, performance etc.
Big ideas Essential questions
Container concepts
Understandings and throughlines
Our nation Who are Australians?
NationalismPlaceSocial valuesInclusion & exclusionCulture & the ArtsMobilityGlobal citizenry
Australia is a diverse multicultural nation. People live in widely differing locations. Inclusion and exclusion are powerful forces. Is our school an inclusive school?
Inquiry learning In table groups
Look at the learning focus statement Select a ‘big idea’ (i.e. Energy in science level 3) Work out the essential question/s, container
concepts and key understandings that students need to have Extension: develop an inquiry learning activity based on
thisBig ideas
Essential questions
Container concepts
Understandings and throughlines
Reggio Emilia approach Prior-to-school and primary school approach to learning Based on principles of respect, responsibility and
community through exploration and discovery Inquiry based – student directed Teacher as co-learner and collaborator with the child
Facilitate learning through planning learning based on child’s interests
Asking questions to further understanding Actively engaging in activities alongside child ‘Inside the learning situation’ (Hewett, 2001) Teaching strategies – confusion, allowing mistakes to happen,
not having an end in sight (counter to many other strategies) Teacher collects data to be reviewed later
Photo’s, videos, notes, conversations
What philosophical framework/s do these theories come from?
Programming and Planning in the EY VELS are a guide Integration of literacy and numeracy across
the curriculum Integration of discipline learning Integration of VELS strands
VELS Early Years: Laying the foundationsStrands
Physical, Personal and Social Learning
Discipline-based Learning
Interdisciplinary Learning
VELS Early Years: Laying the foundationsStrand Domain
Physical, Personal and Social Learning
Discipline-based Learning
Interdisciplinary Learning
Health and Physical Education Personal Learning Interpersonal Development Civics and Citizenship_________________________________________
The Arts English The Humanities Economics Geography History Languages Other Than English Mathematics Science_______________________________________________
Communication Design, Creativity and Technology Information and Communications
Technology Thinking Processes
VELS Early Years: Laying the foundationsStrand | Domain | Dimension
Standards and Learning Focus statements Standards are written for each dimension
Define what students should know and be able to do
i.e. Standards are the outcomes for assessing and reporting student achievement
Set at a challenging competence level, not a minimum competence level
Learning focus statements Outline of the learning needed to progress through
the domain and achieve the standards Suggest appropriate learning experiences Can be drawn on to develop teaching and learning
activities
VELS Level 1 2 3
School Level Prep Yr 1 & 2 Yr 3 & 4
Physical, Personal and Social Learning
Health and Physical Education * *
Interpersonal Development
Personal Learning
Civics and Citizenship
Discipline Based Learning
The Arts * *
English
The Humanities
Mathematics
Science
Interdisciplinary Learning
Design, Creativity and Technology
Information and Communications Technology
Thinking Processes
VELS: Levels with formal standards for Assessment and Reporting
VELS: Laying the foundations Your turn:
8 Groups Look at the VELS standards for level 1, 2 & 3 Make a note of the intended learning outcomes for
each level
What connections do you see? What patterns do you see? What critiques do you have?
Designing an integrated Program Learning focus statements Level statements Level standards
Student’s interests, teacher’s interests
What key knowledge and skills are necessary to show a deep understanding?
What resources will you need? (including people & places)
What do you need to do to make sure you have a strong understanding?
How does it incorporate literacy and numeracy?
Early Years On line tutorial
Is online
Assessment Essay: Laying the foundations of learning (60%)
3000 word essay Detailed commentary about the early years of
schooling Consider a range of impacts on children’s development in the
EY of schooling Examination of knowledge, skills and behaviours that state &
federal curriculum documents identify as essential for the EY. Discussion of the Teaching and Learning approaches in the EY Appropriate reading & ability to analyse, synthesise and
evaluate relevant materials Clear and concise articulation Academic style of writing
Assessment Early Years unit/program of work (literacy or numeracy based)
(40%) focuses on a particular VELS level (1,2,3) 3-4 week period of time ALL learning domains Emphasis on literacy and numeracy Statement contextualising the unit Logical and clear development of learning Clear aims and intended learning outcomes – link to curriculum
documents Teaching approaches and strategies for student engagement, learning
differences and styles Include samples of teaching materials – activity sheets, resources,
web sites, ict tools Assessment instruments to gauge student achievement of intended
outcomes. Self-selected groups of 2-3 students (let me know next week) Build on your early years essay Approx 2000 words
Suggested reading Cobb, P. (1994) Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical
development. Educational Researcher, 23, 13–20. Baxter Magolda, M. (2004) Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological
reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39, 31–42. Duffy T.M. & Jonassen, D. (eds) (1992) Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Hendry, G. D. (1996) Constructivism and educational practice. Australian Journal of Education, 40, 19–
45. Phillips, D. C. (1995) The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational
Researcher, 24, 5–12. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998) Dewey, Vygotsky, and the social administration of the individual:
Constructivist pedagogy as systems of ideas in historical spaces. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 535–70.
Sigel, I. E. & Cocking, R. R. (1977) Cognitive Development from Childhood to Adolescence: A Constructivist Perspective. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Trent, S. C., Artiles, A. J. & Englert, C. S. (1998) From deficit thing to social constructivism: A review of theory, research, and practice in special education. Review of Research in Education, 23, 277–307.
Windschitl, M. (2002) Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Psychology, 72, 131–75.
DEECD website – p-10 resources: http://education.vic.gov.au/studentlearningresources/preptoyear10.htm
NSW DET – COGS (Cognitive outcome groups) : http://curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/timetoteach/cogs/unitsintro.htm
Wilson, J & Wing Jan, L 2003, Focus on inquiry: A practical approach to integrated curriculum planning, Curriculum Corporation.
Boomer, G 1992, ‘Negotiating the curriculum’, in G Boomer, N Lester, C Onore & J Cook (eds), Negotiating the curriculum: Educating for the 21st century, Falmer, London, pp. 4–14
Coalition of Essential Schools 1998–2002, www.essentialschools.org, viewed 15 September 2009.
Pigdon, K & Woolley, M (eds) 1992, The big picture: Integrating children's learning, Eleanor Curtain Publishing, Armadale, Victoria.
Hamston, J & Murdoch, K 1996, Integrating socially: Planning integrated units of work for social education, Eleanor Curtain, Armadale, Vic.
Murdoch, K & Hornsby, D 1997, Planning curriculum connections: Whole school planning for integrated schools, Eleanor Curtain Publishing, South Yarra, Victoria.
Cadwell, L. (1997) Bringing Reggio Emilia Home: An innovative approach to Early childhood Education. NY: NY Teachers college Press
Hewett, V. (2001). Examining the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal. Issue 29 pp 95-100