methodological approach for the definition of agricultural...

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RIVER BASIN ACTION PLANS INTO

RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS

Technical Assistance for the conversion of

River Basin Action Plans into River Basin Management Plans

(EuropeAid/134561/D/SER/TR)

Methodological approach for the definition of

Agricultural Demand Units in the Konya Closed Basin

Activity 4.6.1 Making a draft version of the river basin management

plans

Output 26, ToR activity 2.2.8 Draft RBMPs for the pilot river basins

Date of delivery

TR2011/0327.21-05-01-001



Document title Methodological approach for the definition of

Agricultural Demand Units in the Konya Closed Basin

Filename AUX_001_4.06.01_GE_EN_V00_R00

Version 00

Review 00

Document date 2016-07-27

Related Technical Offer activity 4.6.1

Related Terms of Reference activity 2.2.8

Due date of deliverable:

Dissemination level

PU Public

RE Restricted to a group specified by the Beneficiary

CO Confidential, only for members of the Consortium and Beneficiary

Deliverable status version control

Version Review Date Comments

00 00 2016-07-27

01 00 2016-09-14

Approved

Version Review Date



PROJECT DETAILS

BENEFICIARY: Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, Directorate General for Water Management

Contact details Counterparts

Beştepe Mahallesi Alparslan Türkeş Caddesi No: 71

Yenimahalle – Ankara,

PK: 06510

Phone: +90 312 207 50 00

Abdurrahman ULUIRMAK Deputy Director General

E-mail: [email protected]

Phone: +90 312 207 63 65

Taner KİMENÇE

Head of Basin Management Department

E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +90 312 207 60 97

Burhan Fuat ÇANKAYA

Section Manager for Basin Planning E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +90 312 207 63 54

CONTRACTING AUTHORITY: Central Finance and Contracts Unit

Contact details Counterpart

Eskişehir Yolu 4.Km. 2180 Cadde (Halkbank

Kampüsü) No:63 C-Blok 06510 Söğütözü – Ankara –

Turkey

Phone: + 90 312 295 49 00

Fax : + 90 312 286 70 72

Pakize Berna ERGÜN

Contract Manager


MONITORING AUTHORITY: European Union Delegation in Turkey

Contact details Counterpart

Address: Uğur Mumcu Cad. No:88, Kat: 4,

Gaziosmanpaşa 06700 Ankara – Türkiye

Phone: +90 312 459 87 00 Fax: +90 312 446 67 37

Elif TORCU

Sector Manager


CONSORTIUM: TRAGSATEC, INITEC INFRASTRUCTURES, AMBISAT and SU-YAPI

Contact details of the Leader Company Counterparts

TRAGSATEC

Julián Camarillo 6B 3A, Madrid – Spain

Alfredo CORROCHANO

Team Leader

E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +90 312 258 63 77 Mobile: +90 537 873 78 46

Marta ROBLEDO JIMENEZ

Project Manager


Phone: +34 913226792

Contact details of the Project Office

Beştepe Mahallesi Alparslan Türkeş Caddesi No: 71

Yenimahalle – Ankara,

PK: 06510

Phone: +90 312 207 56 25

Paragon İş Merkezi, Kızılırmak Mah. Ufuk Üniversitesi

Caddesi 1445. Sokak ÇUKURAMBAR – ANKARA

18th Floor, Madrid Office

Phone: +90 312 258 63 77

Commencement project date 2014-12-29

Project duration 36 months

mailto:[email protected]









TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1

2 Sources of information ........................................................................................... 1

3 Analysis of topology ............................................................................................... 1

4 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 5

4.1 Surface Agricultural Demand Units in the current scenario (2012) ............................ 5

4.2 Groundwater Agricultural Demand Units in the current scenario (2012) .................... 8

4.3 Surface Agricultural Demand Units in future scenarios .......................................... 12

5 Summary ............................................................................................................ 14

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Summary of the methodology .......................................................................................................... 14

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Example of topology problem.............................................................................................................2









Figure 10. Big irrigated areas managed by DSI..................................................................................................6

Figure 11. Small irrigated areas managed by DSI ..............................................................................................7

Figure 12. Irrigated areas managed by other institutions and private users ..................................................8

Figure 13. Irrigated areas managed by cooperatives (groundwater resources).............................................9

Figure 14. Irrigated areas managed by privates users (groundwater resources) ........................................ 10

Figure 15. Irrigated areas managed by cooperatives (groundwater and future surface resources) ......... 11

Figure 16. Irrigated areas managed by private users (groundwater and future surface resources) ......... 12

Figure 17. Future surface irrigated areas managed by DSI ........................................................................... 13

Figure 18. Irrigation areas identified in Konya Closed Basin ......................................................................... 15



Page 1 of 15

1 INTRODUCTION

This document contains the methodology to be applied to define the Agricultural Demand Units (ADUs) located in the Konya closed basin.

These demand units are defined as follow: “Demands that have the same use, share the source

of supply and whose returns are reintegrated basically in the same area will be grouped into larger territorial units, called demand units”.

The ADUs will be the unit used in the water budget. For each one, the guarantee of the water

supply and their deficit will be calculated.

2 SOURCES OF INFORMATION

The input data considered have been supplied by official sources of the Turkish government and

are as follow:

Master Plan of the Konya Closed Basin 2014 (Economic analysis of agriculture Section).

Master Plan of the Konya Closed Basin 2014 (Hydrogeology Section).

Shapefiles with irrigation areas managed by the DSI (surface and groundwater) in the

Konya closed basin, included in the named Master Plan (16_Diger_Bilgiler.mdb):

DSI_YUS_SULAMA_SAHALARI.shp

DSI_YAS_SULAMA_SAHALARI.shp

Shapefiles with irrigation surfaces managed by private users (surface and groundwater)

in Konya closed basin, included in the named Master Plan (16_Diger_Bilgiler.mdb):

HALK_SULAMALARI_YUS.shp

HALK_SULAMALARI_YAS.shp

Corine Land Cover 2006 project (geodatabase).

3 ANALYSIS OF TOPOLOGY

After analyzing the geographical information, some topological problems have been detected in

the previously shapefiles. These shapefiles includes the irrigation areas supplied with surface or

groundwater resources.

These problems have been gaps and overlaps between polygons of the same shapefile and they

have been repaired with ArcGIS software.

The figures included below show some of the problems identified.



Page 2 of 15

Figure 1. Example of topology problem





Page 3 of 15






Page 4 of 15






Page 5 of 15

4 METHODOLOGY

4.1 Surface Agricultural Demand Units in the current scenario (2012)

Several agents manage irrigated areas with surface water resources:

DSI,

other institutions and

private users.

According to the input data, these irrigation areas could be grouped in:

big and small irrigation areas managed by the DSI,

irrigated areas managed by other institutions,

irrigated areas managed by private users and

areas of overlap between those managed by the DSI and private users. These areas will

be included as part of the large irrigation areas managed by the DSI.

The difference between big and small-irrigated areas managed by DSI is stablished by the

Economic analysis section of the Master Plan.

In relation to the initial data, there are not available geographic information for the areas that

are managed by other institutions, but the Master Plan (Economic analysis section) provides the value of gross and net surface for these areas.

The rest of the irrigation areas have geographic information and values of gross and net irrigated

area in line with the economic analysis section of the Master Plan.

To define the surface ADUs, the following criteria will be applied:

1. SW-01: DSI (Big Areas). Big irrigated areas managed by DSI will be considered as an

independent ADU. These ADUs will include the common surface with irrigated areas

managed by private users or other institutions, as well as the overlapping surface with

areas irrigated with groundwater resources.

For these ADUs, gross and net area will be taken in line with the Master Plan (MP) in its

economic section. On the other hand, its geographic delineation will be established

according to the MP (hydrogeology section) GIS layers and their source of water

resources will be identify at level of water body.



Page 6 of 15

Figure 10. Big irrigated areas managed by DSI

2. SW-02: DSI (Small Areas). The small irrigation areas managed by DSI will be considered

as an independent ADU, except in the case of units that share the origin of water

resources, in this case they will be grouped. For the delineation of ADUs, it will consider

that two irrigation areas share the origin of water resources if the diversions of surface

waters are located in the same water body.

These units will include the common surface with irrigated areas managed by private

users or other institutions, as well as the overlapping surface with areas irrigated with

groundwater resources.

For these ADUs, gross and net area will be taken in line with the Master Plan (MP) in its

economic section. On the other hand, its geographic delineation will be established

according to the MP (hydrogeology section) GIS layers and their source of water

resources will be identify at level of water body.



Page 7 of 15

Figure 11. Small-irrigated areas managed by DSI

3. SW-03: Other Institutions and Privates. An individual ADU will be established at

province level to group the irrigated areas managed by other institutions and private

users.



Page 8 of 15

Figure 12. Irrigated areas managed by other institutions and private users

4.2 Groundwater Agricultural Demand Units in the current scenario (2012)

Cooperatives and private users manage irrigated areas with groundwater resources.

According to the input data, these irrigation areas could be grouped in:

irrigation areas managed by cooperatives that are supplied only with groundwater

resources,

irrigation areas managed by private users that are supplied only with groundwater

resources,

irrigation areas of overlap between those managed by cooperatives and private users.

These areas will be included as part of the surfaces managed by cooperatives.

irrigation areas managed by cooperatives and private users supplied with groundwater

and surface resource (mainly in big areas managed by the DSI).

In relation to the initial data, all of these irrigation areas have geographic information.

To define the groundwater ADUs, the following criteria will be applied:

1. GW-01: Cooperatives without future surface contributions. For the irrigation areas in

each groundwater body, those ones managed by cooperatives and which will not be

subject to future surface resources will be considered as an individual ADU. These units



Page 9 of 15

will include the irrigated surfaces managed by private users that are overlapping with

areas managed by cooperatives and will not include the surfaces supplied with surface

resources in the current scenario (2012).

For these ADUs, its geographic delineation will be established according to the MP

(hydrogeology section) GIS layers and their source of water resources will be identify at

level of water body. On the other hand, its gross area will be considered equal than the

GIS area and its net area will be taken in line with the Master Plan (MP) in its

hydrogeology section.

Figure 13. Irrigated areas managed by cooperatives (groundwater resources)

2. GW-02: Privates without future surface contributions. For irrigation areas in each

groundwater body, those ones managed by private users and which will not be subject

to future surface resources will be considered as an individual ADU. These units will not

include the irrigated surfaces managed by private users overlapping with areas

managed by cooperatives and will not include the surfaces supplied with surface






Page 10 of 15


GIS area and its net area will be taken in line with the Master Plan (MP) in its hydrogeology section.

Figure 14. Irrigated areas managed by privates users (groundwater resources)

3. GW-03: Cooperatives with future surface contributions . For irrigation areas in each

groundwater body, those ones managed by cooperatives and which will be subject to

future surface resources will be considered as an individual ADU. These units will

include the irrigated surfaces managed by private users that are coincident with areas



Areas with future surface contributions are include in the GIS layers of MP (hydrogeology section) as areas managed by the DSI, but programmed to year 2024.


(hydrogeology section) GIS layers without overlaps and their source of water resources

will be identify at level of water body (surface or groundwater). On the other hand, its

gross area will be considered equal than the GIS area and its net area will be taken in line with the Master Plan (MP) in its hydrogeology section.



Page 11 of 15

Figure 15. Irrigated areas managed by cooperatives (groundwater and future surface resources)

4. GW-04: Privates with future surface contributions. For irrigation areas in each

groundwater body, those ones managed by private users and which will be subject to

future surface resources will be considered as an individual ADU. These units will not

include the irrigated surfaces managed by private users that are coincident with areas



Areas with future surface contributions are include in the GIS layers of MP (hydrogeology section) as areas managed by the DSI, but programmed to year 2024.




GIS area and its net area will be taken in line with the Master Plan (MP) in its hydrogeology section.



Page 12 of 15

Figure 16. Irrigated areas managed by private users (groundwater and future surface resources)

4.3 Surface Agricultural Demand Units in future scenarios

The initial information also allow to define a number of surface irrigation areas, whose

development will take place in the future (2024), because there are infrastructures not

completed in the base scenario (2012). These areas will be considered as big irrigation areas managed by the DSI.

According to the initial data, these areas have available geographic information and

values of gross and net irrigated areas included in the GIS layers of the MP (hydrogeology section).

For these ADUs, its delineation will be established according to the GIS layers of the MP

(hydrogeology section) and their source of water resources will be identify at level of

surface water body. The delineation of these ADUs will not include the overlaps with the

irrigated areas of the current scenario (2012) defined in the previous paragraphs.

On the other hand, the gross area of these units will be considered equal to the GIS

layers area and its net surfaces will be taken in line with the MP (hydrogeology section),

without the net area of the demands of the current scenario (2012) that overlaps.



Page 13 of 15

Figure 17. Future surface irrigated areas managed by DSI



Page 14 of 15

5 SUMMARY

Below it is shown a summary table with the proposed methodology.

Table 1. Summary of the methodology

Type of Demand Resources GIS Surface

(ha) Gross Surface (ha) Net Surface (ha) Spatial Scale

SW-01: DSI (Big Areas) SW Yes Master Plan surfaces (Economic Section)

Master Plan surfaces (Economic Section) Each Big Area

SW-02: DSI (Small Areas) SW Yes Master Plan surfaces (Economic Section)

Master Plan surfaces (Economic Section)

SWB (Economic

Master Plan)

SW-03: Other Institutions and Privates SW Not Master Plan surfaces (Economic Section)

Master Plan surfaces (Economic Section)

Province

GW-01: Cooperatives without future surface contributions

GW Yes GIS surfaces (without

overlapping with surface irrigated areas)

Master Plan surfaces (Hydrogeological

Section) GWB

GW-02: Privates without future surface contributions

GW Yes

GIS surfaces (without

overlapping with surface irrigated areas)

Master Plan surfaces

(Hydrogeological Section)

GWB

GW-03: Cooperatives with future

surface contributions GW Yes

GIS surfaces (intersection with

future surface irrigated areas)


Section)

GWB

GW-04: Privates with future surface contributions

GW Yes

GIS surfaces (intersection with

future surface irrigated

areas)


Section)

GWB

SW-04: Future DSI (Big Areas) SW

Yes (without

overlapping

with actual demands)

Master Plan GIS (without overlapping


Master Plan GIS (without overlapping


SWB

Below it is shown a summary table with the results grouped by typology of ADUs, using

the proposed methodology.

Table 2. Results of ADUs delineation

Type of Demand Number of

ADUs Gross Surface (ha) Net Surface (ha) Spatial Scale

SW-01: DSI (Big Areas) 19 216.823,00 132.741,00 Each Big Area

SW-02: DSI (Small Areas) 27 15.877,00 9.553,70

SWB

(Economic

Master Plan)

SW-03: Other Institutions and Privates 5 36.626,05 34.611,59 Province



Page 15 of 15

Type of Demand Number of

ADUs Gross Surface (ha) Net Surface (ha) Spatial Scale

GW-01: Cooperatives without future

surface contributions 15 160.343,87 156.571,83 GWB

GW-02: Privates without future surface

contributions 15 313.850,29 298.671,05 GWB

GW-03: Cooperatives with future

surface contributions 5 73.391,91 71.630,77 GWB

GW-04: Privates with future surface

contributions 6 95.970,28 93.696,29 GWB

SW-04: Future DSI (Big Areas) 49 84.457,61 56.302,32 SWB

TOTAL 141 997.340,02 853.778,55 SWB

Figure 18. Irrigation areas identified in Konya Closed Basin

methodological approach for the definition of agricultural...

Documents