memos to council 3-12-2010

Upload: dallasobserver

Post on 30-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    1/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    2/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    3/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    4/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    5/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    6/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    7/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    8/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    9/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    10/27

    A Report Cardis issued for

    each of theseven (7)districtsitwill identifythe districtand managers

    How muchis eachgrade

    worth?

    3%3%3%3%3%3%3%3%3%3%

    40%

    30%

    The OverallCommunity Grade is

    the monthly totalaverage of the ServiceDelivery Grade (30%),Community CodeConduct (40%) and theService RequestsCreated by Inspectors(30%)see below for

    The Overall Averagethe quarters gradesbe updated as each

    The District Highlights(Comments)box pro-vides an area foradditional explanation

    Grading Tableisused to determinethe Service DeliverGrade

    Service Delivery Gradeis based on thereduction of Service Requests (SRs)reported through 3-1-1

    The goal is to reduce the number of SR

    as compared to the same month

    Service Requests Created by Inspectorsindicates the percentage of casescreated proactively by inspectors

    The goal is to increase the percent ofproactive SRs by 10% as compared to

    Community Code Conduct reflectsan audit of services requests from edistrict

    The audit examines activities such customer contact, whether the caseclosed within the Service Level Agrment, and whether all activities wer

    properly completed

    The District Stats bodetails the total volumSRs as well as the mocommon SRs as compto the previous fiscal y

    Page 2

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    11/27

    Community

    Code AreaGrade

    (1) Central A-(2) Northeast B+

    (3) Southeast B+

    (4) Southwest B+

    (5) Northwest A

    (6) North Central A-

    (7) South Central B+

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010(For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    City-wide SR Volume

    Improvement Rating

    B+

    NORTHWESTAug 09 SR Volume: 2,817

    Most Common SR for Aug 09:

    High Weeds

    SOUTHWESTAug 09 SR Volume: 5,272

    Most Common SR for Aug 09:

    High Weeds

    NORTHEASTAug 09 SR Volume: 3,322

    Most Common SR for Aug 09:

    High Weeds

    NORTH CENTRALAug 09 SR Volume: 1,404

    Most Common SR for Aug 09:

    High Weeds

    SOUTHEAST

    Aug 09 SR Volume: 7,557Most Common SR for Aug 09:

    High Weeds

    SOUTH CENTRALAug 09 SR Volume: 4,915

    Most Common SR for Aug 09:

    High Weeds

    CENTRALAug 09 SR Volume: 2,209

    Most Common SR for Aug 09:

    High Weeds

    NORTHWESTFeb 10 SR Volume: 1,386

    Most Common SR for Feb 10:

    Signs

    SOUTHWESTFeb 10 SR Volume: 2,727

    Most Common SR for Feb 10:

    Loose Animals

    NORTHEASTFeb 10 SR Volume: 2,099

    Most Common SR for Feb 10:

    Loose Animals

    NORTH CENTRALFeb 10 SR Volume: 784

    Most Common SR for Feb 10:

    Litter

    SOUTHEAST

    Feb 10 SR Volume: 2,860Most Common SR for Feb 10:

    Loose Animals

    SOUTH CENTRALFeb 10 SR Volume: 2,431

    Most Common SR for Feb 10:

    Loose Animals

    CENTRALFeb 10 SR Volume: 1,396

    Most Common SR for Feb 10:

    Graffiti

    CCS-FRM-003 Effective Date 02/19/2010 Rev 3Page 3

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    12/27

    Manager: Jim McKissick

    Assistant Manager: Dianna Jones

    Jan '10 Feb '10 Mar '10Overall

    Average

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    Feb 10

    Actual

    %

    ChangeGrade

    Animals both Loose and Loose/Aggressive 148 68 -54% A+

    Litter 51 13 -75% A+

    Animal Confined 50 32 -36% A+

    Substandard Structure 41 17 -59% A+

    Signs 28 20 -29% A+

    Graffiti 31 23 -26% A+

    Bulky Trash 19 15 -21% A-

    Illegal Outside Storage 15 3 -80% A+

    Junk Motor Vehicle 10 8 -20% B+

    High Weeds 7 15 114% F

    Grade

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    FY 10

    Target

    Feb 10

    ActualGrade

    Percentage of service requests created by

    inspectors in the field 43% 53% 56% A+

    The Central Community Code District scored very well in the trend analysis section of the report card. Only High Weed service requests

    trended negatively. The previous months' coordinated efforts to address Loose Animals have been successful.

    The level of proactive work performed by Code Compliance Staff came in above target with 56% of Service Request received created by staff

    in the field rather than the public. The target was 53%.

    The Quality of Service performed by Code Compliance Staff scored the same in February as in comparison to January. Continued emphasis

    will be placed on staff to provide detailed notes indicating customer contact was made.

    The Audit of Central has shown the following:* 100% of sampled requests contained detailed notes* 54% of sampled requests had all activities properly completed* 41% of sampled requests had details to prove customer contact was made* 81% of sampled requests had all photos and documents attached* 100% of sampled requests were closed within their Service Level Agreement

    B-

    Service Requests Created by Inspectors (30% of overall)

    District Highlights (Comments)

    Service Delivery Grade (Each 3% of overall)

    Reduction of Top 10 frequent Cases (Acceptable reduction target is 10%)

    Community Code Conduct (40% of overall)

    Service Request Audit - 99 SRs @ 5% Margin of error

    A- A-

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010

    (For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    Community Code:(1) Central

    Feb '10 Central SR VolumeImprovement Rating A-2nd Qtr FY 09 - 10

    Grading Table% Change Grade-27.5% & Below A+

    -25.0% A

    -22.5% A-

    -20.0% B+

    -17.5% B

    -15.0% B-

    -12.5% C+

    -10.0% C-7.5% C-

    -5.0% D+

    -2.5% D

    0.0% D-

    +2.5 plus F

    Central Stats(Volume numbers include 311 andinspector created Service

    Requests)

    FY2009-2010Total Volume: 1,396

    Most Common SR: Graffiti

    FY2008-2009

    Total Volume: 1,667

    Most Common SR: Animals

    Loose/Aggressive

    CCS-FRM-003 Rev 3Effective Date 02/19/2010 Page 4

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    13/27

    Manager: Robert Curry

    Assistant Manager: Connie Reese (For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    Jan '10 Feb '10 Mar '10Overall

    Average

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    Feb 10

    Actual

    %

    ChangeGrade

    Signs 257 11 -96% A+Animal Loose Aggressive 153 107 -30% A+

    Litter 112 38 -66% A+

    Obstruction 84 26 -69% A+Parking Unapproved Surfaces 83 15 -82% A+

    Bulky Trash 70 35 -50% A+

    Animal Confined 64 122 91% FIllegal Land Use 53 8 -85% A+

    Illegal Outside Storage 49 6 -88% A+

    Substand Structure 44 34 -23% A

    Grade

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    FY 10

    Target

    Feb 10

    ActualGrade

    Percentage of service requests created by

    inspectors in the field 39% 49% 50% A+

    The North East Community Code District continues to improve in the trend analysis portion of the report card. Efforts to combat Loose

    Animals has proven to be effective, however Confined Animals continues to trend negatively. Collaborative efforts with Animal Services

    will continue to reduce Animal Confined cases through education and outreach.

    The level of proactive work performed by Code Compliance Staff came in slightly above target with 50% of Service Request received

    created by staff in the field rather than the public. The target was 49%.

    The Quality of Service performed by Code Compliance Staff scored well overall, but there is room for improvement in the areas of proving

    customer contact was initiated. Code Compliance Management will work closely with their staff to ensure that staff working these cases

    take the proper time to fully document when customer contact is made by request.

    The Audit of Northeast has shown the following:

    * 100% of sampled requests contained detailed notes* 89% of sampled requests had all activities properly completed

    * 70% of sampled requests had details to prove customer contact was made* 74% of sampled requests had all photos and documents attached

    * 100% of sampled requests were closed within their Service Level Agreement

    B

    Service Requests Created by Inspectors (30% of overall)

    District Highlights (Comments)

    Service Delivery Grade (Each 3% of overall)

    Reduction of Top 10 frequent Cases (Acceptable reduction target is 10%)

    Community Code Conduct (40% of overall)

    Service Request Audit - 112 SRs @ 5% Margin of error

    B+ A-

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010

    Community Code:(2) Northeast

    Feb '10 Northeast SR VolumeImprovement Rating A-

    2nd Qtr FY 09 - 10

    Grading Table% Change Grade-27.5% & Below A+

    -25.0% A

    -22.5% A-

    -20.0% B+

    -17.5% B

    -15.0% B-

    -12.5% C+

    -10.0% C-7.5% C-

    -5.0% D+

    -2.5% D

    0.0% D-

    +2.5 plus F

    Northeast Stats(Volume numbers include 311 andinspector created Service

    Requests)

    FY2009-2010Total Volume: 2,099

    Most Common SR: Loose

    Animals

    FY2008-2009

    Total Volume: 1,624

    Most Common SR: Signs

    CCS-FRM-003 Rev 3Effective Date 02/19/2010 Page 5

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    14/27

    Manager: Phyllis Goode

    Assistant Manager: Michael Bryan

    Jan '10 Feb '10 Mar '10Overall

    Average

    Service Delivery IndicatorsJan 09

    Actual

    Feb 10

    Actual

    %

    ChangeGrade

    Litter 92 28 -70% A+Animal Loose/Aggressive 526 316 -40% A+

    Parking on Unapproved Surfaces 149 35 -77% A+

    Junk Motor Vehicle 73 7 -90% A+Substandard Structure 55 12 -78% A+

    Illegal Outside Storage 30 4 -87% A+

    High Weeds 18 7 -61% A+Animal Confined 171 141 -18% B+

    Signs 47 6 -87% A+

    Animal Sick/Injured 124 77 -38% A+

    Grade

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    FY 10

    Target

    Feb 10

    ActualGrade

    Percentage of service requests created by

    inspectors in the field 54% 64% 51% C+

    The South East Community Code District performed well again in the month of February. The increases on Animal Services related cases

    reflect the efforts taken in previous months to address negative trends.

    The level of proactive work performed by Code Compliance Staff came in below target with 51% of Service Requests received created

    by staff in the field rather than the public. The target was 64%. Staff will perform more sweeps to address Code concerns before

    they're reported by the public.

    The Quality of Service performed by Code Compliance Staff scored well overall, but there is room for improvement in the areas of proving

    customer contact was initiated. District Management will work closely with their staff to ensure that staff working these cases take the

    proper time to fully document when customer contact is made by request.

    The Audit of Southeast has shown the following:

    * 100% of sampled requests contained detailed notes* 51% of sampled requests had all activities properly completed

    * 45% of sampled requests had details to prove customer contact was made* 86% of sampled requests had all photos and documents attached

    * 100% of sampled requests were closed within their Service Level Agreement

    B-

    Service Requests Created by Inspectors (30% of overall)

    District Highlights (Comments)

    Service Delivery Grade (Each 3% of overall)

    Reduction of Top 10 frequent Cases (Acceptable reduction target is 10%)

    Community Code Conduct (40% of overall)

    Service Request Audit - 108 SRs @ 5% Margin of error

    B+ B

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010

    (For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    Community Code:(3) Southeast

    Feb '10 Southeast SR VolumeImprovement Rating B

    2nd Qtr FY 09 - 10

    Grading Table% Change Grade-27.5% & Below A+

    -25.0% A

    -22.5% A-

    -20.0% B+

    -17.5% B

    -15.0% B-

    -12.5% C+

    -10.0% C

    -7.5% C-

    -5.0% D+

    -2.5% D

    0.0% D-

    +2.5 plus F

    Southeast Stats(Volume numbers include 311 andinspector created Service

    Requests)

    FY2009-2010Total Volume: 2,860

    Most Common SR: Loose

    Animals

    FY2008-2009

    Total Volume: 4,906

    Most Common SR: Litter

    CCS-FRM-003 Rev 3Effective Date 02/19/2010 Page 6

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    15/27

    Manager: Paul Ramon

    Assistant Manager: Charles Trammel

    Jan '10 Feb '10 Mar '10Overall

    Average

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    Feb 10

    Actual

    %

    ChangeGrade

    Animals both Loose and Loose/Aggressive 520 289 -44% A+Litter 134 42 -69% A+

    Parking on Unapproved Surfaces 139 17 -88% A+

    Illegal Outside Storage 61 9 -85% A+Junk Motor Vehicle 74 12 -84% A+

    Signs 38 22 -42% A+

    Substandard Structure 53 25 -53% A+Illegal Garbage Placement 22 8 -64% A+

    Animal Confined 155 114 -26% A+

    Obstruction/Sidewalk/Alley 19 17 -11% C+

    Grade

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    FY 10

    Target

    Feb 10

    ActualGrade

    Percentage of service requests created by

    inspectors in the field 50% 60% 50% B

    The Southwest Community Code District scored well in the month February in all of the top 10 Service Request categories. Loose animal

    service requests were reduced through intensified sweeps. The Kiest Park area will continue to remain as a target area for animal sweeps

    and staff will continue to work towards maintaining these high scores by proactively addressing the issues before they become public

    concerns.

    The level of proactive work performed by the Code Compliance Staff came in below target with 50% of Service Request received

    created by staff in the field rather than the public. The target was 60%.

    The Quality of Service performed by Code Compliance Staff scored well overall, but there is room for improvement in the areas of proving

    customer contact. Code Compliance Management will work closely with their staff to ensure that staff working these cases

    take the proper time to fully document when customer contact is made by request.

    The Audit of Southwest has shown the following:

    * 100% of sampled requests contained detailed notes* 70% of sampled requests had all activities properly completed

    * 49% of sampled requests had details to prove customer contact was made* 60% of sampled requests had all photos and documents attached

    * 100% of sampled requests were closed within their Service Level Agreement

    B-

    Service Requests Created by Inspectors (30% of overall)

    District Highlights (Comments)

    Service Delivery Grade (Each 3% of overall)

    Reduction of Top 10 frequent Cases (Acceptable reduction target is 10%)

    Community Code Conduct (40% of overall)

    Service Request Audit - 69 SRs @ 5% Margin of error

    B+ B

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010

    (For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    Community Code:(4) Southwest

    Feb '10 Southwest SR VolumeImprovement Rating B

    2nd Qtr FY 09 - 10

    Grading Table% Change Grade-27.5% & Below A+

    -25.0% A

    -22.5% A-

    -20.0% B+

    -17.5% B

    -15.0% B-

    -12.5% C+

    -10.0% C

    -7.5% C-

    -5.0% D+

    -2.5% D

    0.0% D-

    +2.5 plus F

    Southwest Stats(Volume numbers include 311 andinspector created Service

    Requests)

    FY2009-2010Total Volume: 2,727

    Most Common SR: Loose

    Animals

    FY2008-2009

    Total Volume: 4,107

    Most Common SR: Loose

    Animals

    CCS-FRM-003 Rev 3Effective Date 02/19/2010 Page 7

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    16/27

    Manager: Kathy Hernandez

    Jan '10 Feb '10 Mar '10Overall

    Average

    Service Delivery IndicatorsJan 09

    Actual

    Feb 10

    Actual

    %

    ChangeGrade

    Signs 23 9 -61% A+Animals Loose Aggressive 150 90 -40% A+

    Litter 44 8 -82% A+

    Obstruction/Sidewalk/Alley 22 12 -45% A+Parking Unapproved Surface 34 5 -85% A+

    Bulky trash 55 20 -64% A+

    Animal Confined 64 72 13% FIllegal Land Use 19 8 -58% A+

    Illegal Outside Storage 15 3 -80% A+

    Substandard Structure 32 9 -72% A+

    Grade

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    FY 10

    Target

    Feb 10

    ActualGrade

    Percentage of service requests created by

    inspectors in the field 43% 53% 55% A+

    The Northwest Community Code District scored well across the board on their trend analysis. The only exception are Animal Confined

    service requests, which continue to trend negatively. Collaborative efforts with Animal Services will continue to reduce Animal

    Confined cases through education and outreach.

    The level of proactive work performed by Code Compliance Staff came in above target with 55% of Service Request received created

    by staff in the field rather than the public. The target was 53%.

    The Quality of Service performed by Code Compliance Staff scored very well overall. More efforts to have Officers indicate customer

    contact will be encouraged through the district management.

    The Audit of Northwest has shown the following:

    * 100% of sampled requests contained detailed notes* 73% of sampled requests had all activities properly completed

    * 68% of sampled requests had details to prove customer contact was made* 62% of sampled requests had all photos and documents attached

    * 100% of sampled requests were closed within their Service Level Agreement

    B-

    Service Requests Created by Inspectors (30% of overall)

    District Highlights (Comments)

    Service Delivery Grade (Each 3% of overall)

    Reduction of Top 10 frequent Cases (Acceptable reduction target is 10%)

    Community Code Conduct (40% of overall)

    Service Request Audit - 70 SRs @ 5% Margin of error

    A A

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010

    (For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    Community Code:(5) Northwest

    Feb '10 Northwest SR VolumeImprovement Rating A

    2nd Qtr FY 09 - 10

    Grading Table% Change Grade-27.5% & Below A+

    -25.0% A

    -22.5% A-

    -20.0% B+

    -17.5% B

    -15.0% B-

    -12.5% C+

    -10.0% C

    -7.5% C-

    -5.0% D+

    -2.5% D

    0.0% D-

    +2.5 plus F

    Northwest Stats(Volume numbers include 311 andinspector created Service

    Requests)

    FY2009-2010Total Volume: 1,386

    Most Common SR: Signs

    FY2008-2009

    Total Volume: 1,624

    Most Common SR: Signs

    CCS-FRM-003 Rev 3Effective Date 02/19/2010 Page 8

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    17/27

    Manager: Macklin Wright

    Jan '10 Feb '10 Mar '10Overall

    Average

    Service Delivery IndicatorsJan 09

    Actual

    Jan 10

    Actual

    %

    ChangeGrade

    Signs 73 17 -77% A+Litter 35 15 -57% A+

    Animal Confined 70 57 -19% B+

    Animal Loose Aggressive 57 26 -54% A+Bulky Trash 31 21 -32% A+

    Substandard Structure 28 15 -46% A+

    Junk Motor Vehicle 15 9 -40% A+Animal Sick/Injured 29 23 -21% A-

    Obstruction Alley/Sidewalk/Street 22 22 0% D-

    Animal Cruelty 19 18 -5% C-

    Grade

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    FY 10

    Target

    Feb 10

    ActualGrade

    Percentage of service requests created by

    inspectors in the field 40% 50% 40% C+

    The North Central Community Code District scored well in the trend analysis portion of the report card for the month of February.

    Obstruction and Animal Cruelty service requests trended negatively and will be emphasized in the next month.

    The level of proactive work performed by Code Compliance Staff came in well below target with 40% of the Service Request received

    being created by the staff in the field rather than the public. The target was 50%.

    The Quality of Service performed by Code Compliance Staff showed room for improvement in the areas of proving customer contact and

    attaching pertinent documents and photos. Code Management will work closely with their staff to ensure that staff working these cases will

    take the proper time to fully document when a customer contact is made by request. The name of the inspectors associated with these

    cases will be forwarded to their respective managers to ensure they correct issues identified by the audit.

    The Audit of North Central has shown the following:

    * 98% of sampled requests contained detailed notes* 75% of sampled requests had all activities properly completed

    * 60% of sampled requests had details to prove customer contact was made* 78% of sampled requests had all photos and documents attached

    * 100% of sampled requests were closed within their Service Level Agreement

    C+

    Service Requests Created by Inspectors (30% of overall)

    District Highlights (Comments)

    Service Delivery Grade (Each 3% of overall)

    Reduction of Top 10 frequent Cases (Acceptable reduction target is 10%)

    Community Code Conduct (40% of overall)

    Service Request Audit - 51 SRs @ 5% Margin of error

    A- B

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010

    (For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    Community Code:(6) North Central

    Feb '10 North Central SR VolumeImprovement Rating B

    2nd Qtr FY 09 - 10

    Grading Table% Change Grade-27.5% & Below A+

    -25.0% A

    -22.5% A-

    -20.0% B+

    -17.5% B

    -15.0% B-

    -12.5% C+

    -10.0% C-7.5% C-

    -5.0% D+

    -2.5% D

    0.0% D-

    +2.5 plus F

    North Central

    Stats(Volume numbers include 311 and

    inspector created Service

    Requests)

    FY2009-2010Total Volume: 784

    Most Common SR: Litter

    FY2008-2009

    Total Volume: 1,033

    Most Common SR: Signs

    CCS-FRM-003 Rev 3Effective Date 02/19/2010 Page 9

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    18/27

    Manager: Steve Williams

    Assistant Manager: Odie Hayes

    Jan '10 Feb '10 Mar '10Overall

    Average

    Service Delivery IndicatorsJan 09

    Actual

    Feb 10

    Actual

    %

    ChangeGrade

    Animals both Loose and Loose/Aggressive 486 322 -34% A+Litter 123 13 -89% A+

    Substandard Structure 54 13 -76% A+

    Junk Motor Vehicle 54 4 -93% A+Parking Unapproved Surface 71 15 -79% A+

    Animal Sick/Injured 118 88 -25% A+

    Animal Confined 116 104 -10% C+High Weeds 13 9 -31% A+

    Illegal Outside Storage 42 3 -93% A+

    Illegal Dumping 45 20 -56% A+

    Grade

    Service Delivery IndicatorsFeb 09

    Actual

    FY 10

    Target

    Feb 10

    ActualGrade

    Percentage of service requests created by

    inspectors in the field 39% 49% 50% A+

    The South Central Community Code District continued to trend positively in the month of February. Animal related service requests

    reflected positive improvements due to sweeps in targeted areas. The district will continue all efforts to maintain their scores by proactively

    addressing issues before they become public concerns.

    The level of proactive work performed by Code Compliance Staff came in on target with 50% of Service Request received created by staff

    in the field rather than the public. The target was 49%.

    The Quality of Service performed by Code Compliance Staff showed room for improvement in the areas of proving customer contact and

    attaching pertinent documents and photos. Code Compliance Management will work closely with their staff to ensure that staff working

    theses cases take the proper time to fully document when a customer contact is made by request.

    The Audit of South Central has shown the following:

    * 89% of sampled requests contained detailed notes* 66% of sampled requests had all activities properly completed

    * 47% of sampled requests had details to prove customer contact was made* 66% of sampled requests had all photos and documents attached

    * 100% of sampled requests were closed within their Service Level Agreement

    B-

    Service Requests Created by Inspectors (30% of overall)

    District Highlights (Comments)

    Service Delivery Grade (Each 3% of overall)

    Reduction of Top 10 frequent Cases (Acceptable reduction target is 10%)

    Community Code Conduct (40% of overall)

    Service Request Audit - 102 SRs @ 5% Margin of error

    B+ A-

    City of Dallas

    Code Accountability Report Card

    February 2010

    (For the period of 2/01/10 through 2/28/10)

    Community Code:(7) South Central

    Feb '10 South Central SR VolumeImprovement Rating A-

    2nd Qtr FY 09 - 10

    Grading Table% Change Grade-27.5% & Below A+

    -25.0% A

    -22.5% A-

    -20.0% B+

    -17.5% B

    -15.0% B-

    -12.5% C+

    -10.0% C

    -7.5% C-

    -5.0% D+

    -2.5% D

    0.0% D-

    +2.5 plus F

    South Central

    Stats(Volume numbers include 311 and

    inspector created Service

    Requests)

    FY2009-2010Total Volume: 2,431

    Most Common SR: Loose

    Animals

    FY2008-2009

    Total Volume: 2,688

    Most Common SR: Loose

    Animals

    CCS-FRM-003 Effective Date 02/19//2010 Rev 3Page 10

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    19/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    20/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    21/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    22/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    23/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    24/27

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    25/27

    Memorandum

    CITY OF DALLASMarch 12, 2010DATE

    Honorable Members of the Quality of Life Committee: Deputy Mayor Pro TemPauline Medrano (Chair), Vonciel Jones Hill (Vice Chair), Carolyn R. Davis, AngelaHunt, Sheffie Kadane, David A. Neumann, Steve Salazar

    TO

    Responses to the Quality of Life Committee Regarding the Earn It! Keep It! Save It!Free Tax Preparation Services Briefing

    SUBJECT

    On Monday, March 8, 2010, you were briefed on the Earn It! Keep It! Save It! FreeTax Preparation Services. The following is in response to the follow-up questionsraised at the Quality of Life Committee meeting.

    1. Question: How can we access a link to our council websites to direct citizens toyou?

    Response: The website http://unitedwaydallas.org/EKS/EKS.GetInvolved.html will provide information on how council members can help.

    2. Question: Can you provide information on locations and sites for the families?

    Response: The website

    http://unitedwaydallas.org/EKS/EKS.FindFreeTaxHelp.html provides informationabout schedules and locations for families.

    3. Question: Will you provide all the councilmembers with the e-file of the flyer?

    Response: A copy is attached in both English and Spanish.

    Please let me know if you have any additional questions.

    Forest E. TurnerAssistant City Manager

    cc: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Frank Librio, Public Information OfficeMary K. Suhm, City Manager Ryan S. Evans, First Assistant City ManagerThomas P. Perkins, Jr., City Attorney Jill A. Jordan, P.E., Assistant City ManagerCraig D. Kinton, City Auditor A.C. Gonzalez, Assistant City ManagerJudge C. Victor Lander, Administrative Judge Municipal CourtDeborah A. Watkins, City Secretary Jeanne Chipperfield, Chief Financial OfficerHelena Stevens-Thompson, Assistant to the City Manager

    Dallas, Together We Do It Better.

    http://unitedwaydallas.org/EKS/EKS.GetInvolved.htmlhttp://unitedwaydallas.org/EKS/EKS.FindFreeTaxHelp.htmlhttp://unitedwaydallas.org/EKS/EKS.FindFreeTaxHelp.htmlhttp://unitedwaydallas.org/EKS/EKS.GetInvolved.html
  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    26/27

    Free Income TaxPreParaTIon

    Yu dsv t kp ll yu y.

    Dt py t gt yu ts ppd.Instant Reund loans can cost you hundreds odollars in interest. Keep 100% o your reund byusing our ree tax services. IRS-certifed tax preparerswill help you get the reund you deserve.

    U.S. citizenship is not required. You may qualiy orree help i your 2009 income is less than $50,000.

    cll 211 t f hus d dts

    UitdWyDlls.g/ks

    nthwst1. cuity T ct (Fudti

    cuitis) - nth Dlls Shd miistis2857 Merrell Rd., 75229Mon-Fri 3-7, Sat 9-12

    2. csu cdit cuslig Svis

    Gt Dlls8737 King George Dr., 75235Mon 6-9

    3. cthli chitis - mill Sil cts2827 Lapsley, 75212Mon-Fri 9-4:30

    4. nighbly outh Wks (Dlls Wst chuh chist)3510 N. Hampton Rd., 75212Sat 9-4

    5. cuity T ct (Fudti

    cuitis) - ok Lw cuity outhct3707 Cedar Springs Rd., 75219

    Mon, Thu & Fri 11-7, Tue-Wed 11-5, Sat 9-2

    nthst6. cuity T ct (Fudti

    cuitis) - est Dlls cuity ct4210 Junius St., 75246Mon-Fri 11-7, Sat 9-2

    7. cthli chitis - Bdy ct

    4009 Elm St., 75226Mon-Fri 9-4:30, Sat 9-12

    8. Fgus rd Iititiv - Shilh T Bptistchuh d cuity ct2914 Oates Dr., 75228Tue 6-9, Sat 10-4

    9. 2-Pits Wd & Sd nw Hp Luthchuh2835 Peavy Rd., 75228Tue 6-9, Sat 10-4

    10. Fgus rd Iititiv - Wd & Sd/Fily

    Fiil ct7229 Ferguson Rd., Ste. 4101, 75228Tue 6-9, Sat 10-4

    Suthst11. Gils I. - Suth Dlls ct

    4411 Meadow, 75215

    Thu 7-9, Sat 10-4

    Suthwst12. Gils I. - ok cli ct

    350 N. Zang, 75212Thu 7-9, Sat 10-4

    13. nighbly outh Wks (muti Viwchuh chist)411 W. Illinois Ave., 75211Sat 9-3

    14. cd Bptist chuh6808 Pastor Bailey Dr., 75237Mon 6-8:30, Thu 4-8, Sat 10-4

    15. cuity T ct (Fudticuitis) - Suthwst Wk ct7330 S. Westmoreland, 75237Mon-Fri 9-5

    16. Fidship Wst Bptist chuh2020 W. Wheatland Rd., 75232

    Mon-Thu 11-5, Fri 10-7, Sat 9-4

    Sponsors

    EarnIt!KeepIt!$aveIt!United Way of Metropolitan Dallas

    United Wayof Metropolitan Dallas

  • 8/14/2019 Memos to Council 3-12-2010

    27/27

    PreParacInDe ImPUeSToS GraTIS

    Ustd quds td su di. n pgup qu lgui l pp sus ipusts.

    Los prstamos del reembolso inmediato puedencostarle cientos de dlares en inters. Mantenga el100% de su reembolso utilizando nuestros servicios deimpuestos gratuitos. Un ajustador certifcado por el IRSle ayudar a conseguir el reembolso que usted merece.

    Ciudadana no es requerida y usted podra califcar paraasistencia si sus ingresos del 2009 ueron menos de$50,000.

    Ll l 211 p f hs y hsUitdWyDlls.g/ks

    nst1. cuity T ct (Fudti

    cuitis) - nth Dlls Shd miistis2857 Merrell Rd., 75229lun-vie 3-7, sb 9-12

    2. csu cdit cuslig Svis

    Gt Dlls8737 King George Dr., 75235lun 6-9

    3. cthli chitis - mill Sil cts2827 Lapsley, 75212lun-vie 9-4:30

    4. nighbly outh Wks (Dlls Wst chuh chist)3510 N. Hampton Rd., 75212sb 9-4

    5. cuity T ct (Fudti

    cuitis) - ok Lw cuity outhct3707 Cedar Springs Rd., 75219

    lun, jue & vie 11-7, mar-mi 11-5, sb 9-2

    ndst6. cuity T ct (Fudti

    cuitis) - est Dlls cuity ct4210 Junius St., 75246lun-vie 11-7, sb 9-2

    7. cthli chitis - Bdy ct

    4009 Elm St., 75226lun-vie 9-4:30, sb 9-12

    8. Fgus rd Iititiv - Shilh T Bptistchuh d cuity ct2914 Oates Dr., 75228mar 6-9, sb 10-4

    9. 2-Pits Wd & Sd nw Hp Luthchuh2835 Peavy Rd., 75228mar 6-9, sb 10-4

    10. Fgus rd Iititiv - Wd & Sd/Fily

    Fiil ct7229 Ferguson Rd., Ste. 4101, 75228mar 6-9, sb 10-4

    Sust11. Gils I. - Suth Dlls ct

    4411 Meadow, 75215

    jue 7-9, sb 10-4

    Sust12. Gils I. - ok cli ct

    350 N. Zang, 75212jue 7-9, sb 10-4

    13. nighbly outh Wks (muti Viwchuh chist)411 W. Illinois Ave., 75211sb 9-3

    14. cd Bptist chuh6808 Pastor Bailey Dr., 75237lun 6-8:30, jue 4-8, sb 10-4

    15. cuity T ct (Fudticuitis) - Suthwst Wk ct7330 S. Westmoreland, 75237lun-vie 9-5

    16. Fidship Wst Bptist chuh2020 W. Wheatland Rd., 75232

    lun-jue 11-5, vie 10-7, sb 9-4

    Sponsors

    EarnIt!KeepIt!$aveIt!United Way of Metropolitan Dallas

    United Wayof Metropolitan Dallas