memorandum code: asa-2016-31 - california state university · memorandum code: asa-2016-31 date:...
TRANSCRIPT
Student Academic Support, Academic Affairs Eric G. Forbes
401 Golden Shore, 6th Floor Assistant Vice Chancellor Long Beach, CA 90802-4210 (562) 951-4744
www.calstate.edu [email protected]
CSU Campuses
Bakersfield • Channel Islands • Chico • Dominguez Hills • East Bay • Fresno • Fullerton • Humboldt • Long Beach • Los Angeles • Maritime Academy • Monterey Bay
Northridge • Pomona • Sacramento • San Bernardino • San Diego • San Francisco • San José • San Luis Obispo • San Marcos • Sonoma • Stanislaus
MEMORANDUM Code: ASA-2016-31
Date: December 9, 2016
To: CSU Presidents
From: Eric G. Forbes
Assistant Vice Chancellor
Subject: Impacted Campuses/Programs, 2018-2019
With the close of the Fall 2017 initial application filing period on November 30, 2016, it is again
necessary to determine if your campus and its programs will likely be impacted for 2018-2019.
Section 89030.5 of the California Education Code provides for a series of public hearings and
notifications in the event that a campus wishes to change its admission criteria by declaring
impaction or discontinuing impaction for specific programs or categories. Ordinarily, the minimum
time-period would be one year after approval by the Chancellor’s Office; however, the code permits
a period of 6 months if the request is based on the absence of resources. A copy of Section 89030.5
is attached for your review.
The California State University is likely to continue to face increased enrollment pressures over the
next several years. Many campuses will face considerable challenges as they seek to provide access
to new students at the same time they encourage continuing students to finish more courses in an
academic year. In order to meet enrollment targets, campuses should continue to utilize the
enrollment management policy and practices adopted by the CSU Board of Trustees at its March
2000 meeting and modified at its September 2002 meeting (Office of the Chancellor, AA, SAS,
“Admission Priorities,” 9-19-2002). Campuses should utilize this policy to avoid impaction where
possible. Please provide a narrative of your on-going efforts to manage enrollment and increase
capacity. See Appendix 1 for sample areas to address. For more robust enrollment and capacity
planning you may need to seek a model that will assist in this process. A method that may be
helpful is a Matriculation Decay Enrollment Model. For further information, see Appendix 2 and
attachments.
Please be reminded that the Board of Trustees has authorized the Chancellor to designate academic
areas (program impaction for discipline, division, major) and class levels (campus impaction for
freshmen, upper-division transfers, post-baccalaureate/graduate students) as “impacted” in cases
where there is compelling evidence that significantly more CSU-eligible applicants and currently
enrolled students seeking to change majors are likely to request access during the initial filing period
than can be accommodated. Campus requests for admission impaction must indicate and
demonstrate trends toward over-enrollment that will continue into the future. Once impaction is
Action is required from
Provosts/Vice Presidents
for Academic Affairs
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
ASA-2016-31
December 9, 2016
Page 2 of 12
declared, supplemental admission criteria authorized by the Chancellor may be used for academic
areas and class levels in the selection of candidates for admission to those areas.
Since the initial application filing period for Fall 2018 will begin on October 1, 2017, all new
impaction requests must be approved by April 1, 2017, which is 6 months prior to the receipt of
applications. Campuses are not permitted to request or discontinue impaction after the fact of
receiving applications for any given term. Moreover, given the complexity involved with the
notification procedures, program and campus impaction can only be considered for the college year
beginning with the fall term.
RETENTION OF CURRENT IMPACTION STATUSES
Data collection has been simplified for campuses wishing to continue impaction for first-time
freshmen, upper division transfers, or for academic programs already impacted. Please provide the
data requested for each area on the enclosed Attachment 1. The requested data is now based on
actual application and enrollment numbers.
For undergraduate programs with more than one concentration, campuses are encouraged to submit a
separate form reflecting the application and enrollment trends for each option. Specific adjustments
in the supplemental admission criteria regarding the eligibility index for first-time freshmen or cutoff
grade point averages are not required to be designated as these items along with the opportunity to
use wait lists can only be determined after the enrollment capacity is known and the applications
received are processed.
Impacted campuses are reminded that they should abide by the following restrictions and not admit
students from these catagories:
Lower division transfer applicants;
Applicants in pursuit of second bachelor’s degrees, unless in STEM disciplines or nursing;
Unclassified post-baccalaureate students;
Upper division transfer students, who are not fully eligible.
Academic areas and class levels designated as impacted for the 2017-2018 academic year are shown
online at www.calstate.edu/sas/impactioninfo.shtml. Please indicate which areas, if any, will
continue to be impacted at your campus during the 2018-2019 academic year by completing the
program data form for each academic area and class level, and a narrative detailing efforts to
increase capacity (see Appendix 1). Indicate deletions where appropriate. The deadline to submit a
renewal request is March 15, 2017. Requests to retain current impaction designations can be
submitted without engaging public hearings or notifications.
INTRODUCING OR MODIFYING CAMPUS IMPACTION
Campuses wishing to introduce or modify campus impaction by level for first-time freshmen or
upper division transfers or campuses wishing to modify the local admission area are subject to
proceedings under Section 89030.5. A local admission area must be designated. Local applicants
who meet standard criteria for CSU eligibility must be accorded high priority whereas those
applicants from institutions outside the local area will be subject to supplemental admission criteria.
A list of school districts that are within the local admission area must be included in the impaction
plan, and only the largest districts, e.g. LAUSD, may be subdivided for impaction purposes. Absent
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
ASA-2016-31
December 9, 2016
Page 3 of 12
strong evidence to the contrary, designated local admission areas should adjoin geographic areas that
are contiguous to the campus.
Coded memo AA-2010-20 distinguishes the local admission areas from the outreach service areas
for each campus. Refer to the most updated matrix on CSU local admission and service areas at
www.calstate.edu/sas/impactioninfo.shtml for more information. Unless the entire service area is
included in the local admission area, campuses should not extend the local admission area into
regions beyond the established service area.
INTRODUCING OR MODIFYING ACADEMIC PROGRAM OR MAJOR IMPACTION Campuses wishing to introduce or significantly modify impaction for an academic program, major,
or group of majors must present the evidence for program impaction on Attachment 2 and a detailed
description of the proposed supplemental admission criteria and change of major procedures. For
undergraduate programs with more than one concentration, campuses are encouraged to submit a
separate form reflecting the application and enrollment trends for each option.
Campus impaction at the class level or program impaction can only be designated if the campus can
demonstrate that it has exhausted existing enrollment capacity by implementing other enrollment
management strategies. Please provide a narrative detailing efforts to increase capacity (see
Appendix 1). Impaction will be approved for the entire academic year enabling campuses to set
supplemental admission criteria and utilize wait lists during each filing period. Once impacted,
campuses may not accept applications for the impacted category after the initial filing period closes.
Campuses wishing to discontinue impaction for an academic program, major, or group of majors
must present evidence of sufficient, long-term capacity. A detailed explanation should be included
with the request. For undergraduate programs with more than one concentration, campuses are
encouraged to submit a separate form reflecting the application and enrollment trends for each
option.
When a campus receives its preliminary approval to declare or discontinue impaction, it must then
fulfill the requirements of Section 89030.5 of the California Education Code before impaction can
actually be instituted. A final formal approval will be granted for the new or adjusted impaction
request by April 1, 2017, after the confirmation of the public hearing and notification process is
received. An outline of the expected activities and deadline dates are indicated on the next page.
Please submit all responses to Dr. April Grommo, Director, Enrollment Management Services,
Student Academic Services by the established deadlines. Questions concerning this memorandum
may be directed to Dr. Grommo by telephone at (562) 951-4726 or by email at
[email protected] or to me at (562) 951-4744 or [email protected].
Attachments
c: Chancellor Timothy P. White
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
ASA-2016-31
December 9, 2016
Page 4 of 12
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
Dr. Loren J. Blanchard, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic and Student Affairs
Mr. Steve Relyea, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Nathan S. Evans, Chief of Staff for Academic and Student Affairs
Dr. April Grommo, Director of Enrollment Management Services
Vice Presidents for Student Affairs
Vice Provosts/Vice Presidents of Enrollment Management/Services
Directors of Admissions and Records
Directors of Outreach and Recruitment
Directors of Institutional Research
Enrollment Reporting Officers
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
ASA-2016-31
December 9, 2016
Page 5 of 12
NEW IMPACTION REQUESTS
BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 89030.5 OF THE CALIFORNIA EDUCATION CODE, IT IS IMPORTANT
TO FIRST APPLY FOR IMPACTION WITH THIS OFFICE BY COMPLETING THE ENCLOSED
FORMS AND RETURNING THEM WITH YOUR OFFICIAL REQUEST TO IMPACT. ONCE YOU
RECEIVE TENTATIVE APPROVAL FOR IMPACTION FROM THIS OFFICE, THEN YOU SHOULD
PROCEED AS OUTLINED BELOW. IN ORDER TO FULFILL EACH OF THE REQUIREMENTS, YOU
SHOULD SUBMIT YOUR NEW OR MODIFIED REQUEST NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 22, 2016.
IMPACTION PROPOSAL TIMELINE December 22, 2016 Deadline for campuses to submit preliminary requests for new or modified campus
impaction, for new or modified program impaction, or discontinuation of campus or
program impaction to the CSU Chancellor’s Office (CO). Requests must include
program data forms, a narrative on managing enrollment and increasing capacity and
a detailed description of the proposed supplemental criteria. Please send requests
directly to Dr. April Grommo at [email protected]. January 20, 2017 Campuses receive tentative approval or denial for new or modified impaction
requests from the Chancellor’s Office.
February 1, 2017 Each campus with impaction requests subject to Section 89030.5 announces its
proposed impaction plans on its individual websites and publishes the plans in three
newspapers within the campus service area (see coded memo AA-2010-20).
February 1-13, 2017 Each campus arranges a public meeting with stakeholders, including the governing
boards of school districts, governing boards of community college districts, and
community organizations that are located within the campus service area. Feb 15 – Mar 10, 2017 Hold three public hearings in various locations/times in the service area of the
affected campus. Post and retain comments or composites solicited at these hearings
on the campus website. March 15, 2017 Submit final request for 2018-2019 impaction including renewal/continuation of
impaction with any adjustments to the CO. Requests must include program data
forms, a summary of proposed supplemental criteria and a narrative on managing
enrollment and increasing capacity. New or modified impaction requests must also
include documentation demonstrating public hearing and communication process. April 1, 2017 Deadline for Chancellor’s Office to grant final approval for new or modified
impaction requests. May 24, 2017 Chancellor reports impaction decisions in writing to the Board of Trustees. June 2, 2017 Public comments and responses may be removed from campus websites.
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
ASA-2016-31
December 9, 2016
Page 6 of 12
DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
Academic area is defined as a discipline, division, major, or group of majors.
Application quota is the number of applications determined necessary to yield the enrollment capacity.
Applications received represent the number of applications received during the initial filing period and include applications from currently enrolled students seeking access to the academic area or class level, as well as new applications for admission to the campus that specify the academic area or class level.
Class level is defined as freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, lower division, upper division, postbaccalaureate, or graduate.
Continuing enrollment represents the number of students accepted into the academic area or class level in previous terms who continue in that area during the specified years.
Enrollment capacity is the number of students for whom facilities and staff are available to provide an opportunity for an adequate college education.
Enrollment total is the number of students enrolled in the academic area or class level during the specified year. It is the sum of continuing students in addition to new and returning student enrollments. Current year enrollment may be estimated.
Impacted Major/Campus at CSU is designated as impacted when the number of CSU eligible applications received in the initial filing period is greater than the number that can be accommodated by the major or campus.
Initial filing period is October 1 through November 30 for the fall term and the first month of the announced filing period for all other terms. All applicants to an academic area or class level during the initial filing period must receive equal consideration regardless of the filing date within the initial filing period.
New and returning students data include applicants for admission to the campus who designate the academic area or class level, and former students who are returning after an absence of one or more terms of regular sessions. There have been a number of questions raised about how to accurately reflect the number of applicants to impacted programs. Please take the following into consideration as you complete line (E) on the “Program Data” chart:
Applications received during the initial filing period must include those who are new applicants to the university as well as those continuing students who are expected to seek a change of major to the impacted academic area or class level. If you believe it more adequately reflects the situation at your campus, you may use two values in line E:
One for applicants new to the university, and One for currently enrolled students who seek to enter an impacted academic major.
Where impaction occurs for an academic area at an advanced class level (e.g., sophomore or junior), it is not appropriate to reflect the number of applications received at lower class levels where you may admit the student to the university in a “pre-major” category. For example, if admission to your business or clinical nursing program requires successful completion of specified lower division prerequisite courses, you should not include first-time freshman applicants in the number of applications received during the initial filing period (line E); however, you should include sophomore, junior, and senior applicants applying for admission to that program.
Reporting period data usually reflect fall enrollments. Campuses may include other terms, in addition to the fall term, if the combined data better represents enrollment conditions.
Transfers First Time Freshmen Transfers
Continuing students
New students
0
Transfers
First Time Freshmen
First Time Freshmen
0B. Enrollment Total
D. Applications Quota (New & Returning). Maximum applications to reach capacity E. Actual applications received during initial 2017 filing period
F. Applications received as percent of quota (E/D)
FALL TERM - APPLICATIONS
A. Academic Area/Class Level: Capacity in terms of headcount
C. Enrollment as percent of capacity (Total/B/A)
CSU CONTINUING IMPACTION 2018-2019
Executive Order No. 563 requires campuses to supply historical data for each academic area and class level for which the impaction designation is requested. For requests to continue impaction, please complete the following form, one form for each relevant class level or impacted major (undergraduates only, no 2nd BA/BS). Definitions of the data required to complete the form are attached. Please type your responses.
CSU Campus:
Academic Program/Class Level:
Fall 2017
Attachment 1
Fall 2016FALL TERM - ENROLLMENTS
G. CSU eligible applicants denied for fall term in this academic area/class level
Enrollment Numbers In terms of headcount
Returning students
FALL TERM - APPLICANTS DENIED Fall 2016
Projected
2014 2015 2016 Fall 2017
*Fall 2017 enrollment may be estimated.
Please provide a summary of supplemental criteria used for admission for this class level or
program/major.
New students
C. Enrollment as percent of capacity
(Total/B/A)
D. Applications Quota (New & Returning)
Maximum applications to reach capacity
Actual
Attachment 2
E. Applications received during initial filing
period
F. Applications received as percent of
quota (E/D)
A. Academic Area/Class Level:
Capacity in terms of headcount
Enrollment Numbers
In terms of headcount
Continuing students
CSU IMPACTION 2018-2019
Executive Order No. 563 requires campuses to supply historical data for each academic area and
class level for which the impaction designation is requested. Definitions of the data required to
complete the form are attached. Please type your responses.
CSU Campus:
Academic Program/Class Level:
FALL TERM - APPLICATIONS AND ENROLLMENTS
Returning students
B. Enrollment Total*
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
ASA-2016-31
December 9, 2016
Page 9 of 12
APPENDIX 1
CAMPUS EFFORTS TO INCREASE CAPACITY
While enrollment pressures continue, concerns from the public and the legislature regarding
campus impaction also continue to be raised. To assist the Chancellor’s Office and campuses to
respond to these concerns, it would be helpful to understand the work being done at the
individual campuses to increase capacity. As part of your impaction request, please provide a
comprehensive narrative regarding your campus efforts to manage enrollments. The narrative
may include information on the following:
Course Demand/Bottleneck Analysis
Reduction in high-unit majors
Implementation of degree audits and planning tools
Course planning software
Course demand analysis and class schedule optimization
Distance Learning and Technology
Technology solutions such as hybrid courses, virtual labs, etc.
Expansion of distance learning and CSU Online (Course Match)
Flexible Scheduling
Improvements in space allocation of large and small classrooms based on actual
enrollments
Classroom transformation – development of larger learning spaces
Year-round operations, state and/or self-support
Off-site Centers
Advising Initiatives (including e-Advising) to support timely graduation
Early Start efforts to reduce remediation
Super Senior interventions
Early alert systems
Course transformation to improve success in high fail courses
Other advising enhancements as appropriate
Miscellaneous Best Practices
Reduction/elimination of exceptional admits
Other areas relevant to your campus
Provosts/Vice Presidents for Academic Affairs
ASA-2016-31
December 9, 2016
Page 10 of 12
APPENDIX 2
MATRICULATION DECAY ENROLLMENT MODEL
Enrollment planning requires campuses to reflect on past and anticipate future outcomes. One
way to do this is through use of an enrollment model. Attached are examples of a model that
relies on matriculation decay. The model sorts students into “entered as” groups (first-time
freshmen, new UG transfers, new master/doctoral, new PB credential, new PB other, and
transitory) and the uses prior like term retention and unit taking behavior as proxies for the
behavior of the next cohort at a similar point in time. Computations are made for Academic
Year enrollments in the decay model while state support summer enrollment FTES are loaded
into the model summary without computation within the decay model. Campus resident and
NRT targets are loaded on the summary page to form targets for comparison.
The decay model is vulnerable to large shifts in outcomes (large shift in retention, short time to
degree, increased or decrease units per student, unrealistic new student assumptions) and should
be viewed in the university’s context.
The excel sheet contains a working version of the model (if you change headcount inputs for new
students in spring 2017 or beyond the model will recalculate FTES). You can look at the data
sheet to better understand what is entered and how it moves through the model (yellow fields on
the data sheet reflect known data for fall 2015-fall 2016). The PDF includes a view of the
summary sheet.
If you are interested in learning more about the model please contact Ed Sullivan, Assistant Vice
Chancellor for Academic Research and Resources ([email protected]).
matriculation decay enrollment model.xlsx
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U
Headcount FTES
fall 2015spring 2016
fall 2016spring 2017
fall 2017spring 2018
fall 2018 spring 2019 fall 2015 spring 2016 fall 2016spring 2017
fall 2017spring 2018
fall 2018spring 2019
New FTF 4,276 127 3,642 120 3,750 120 3,700 120 3,684 114 3,232 108 3,328 108 3,283 108
New Transfers 3,661 1,116 2,928 1,500 3,750 800 3,700 1,150 2,982 888 2,458 1,194 3,148 637 3,106 915
Continuing UG 17,839 23,024 18,257 22,187 17,839 22,581 17,760 22,496 15,168 19,962 15,672 19,240 15,278 19,589 15,246 19,495
New Masters/EDD 975 175 929 175 925 175 925 175 787 113 773 113 769 113 769 113
Continuing Masters/EDD
2,107 2,617 1,877 2,360 1,711 2,230 1,648 2,187 1,492 1,921 1,313 1,731 1,204 1,650 1,166 1,626
New PB Cred 195 65 169 65 170 65 170 65 192 52 168 52 169 52 169 52
Continuing PB Cred 31 198 100 215 108 222 110 223 15 184 64 183 67 194 69 192
New PB Other 64 6 19 6 20 6 20 6 55 5 13 5 13 5 13 5
Continuing PB Other 59 72 36 35 16 22 14 20 44 55 25 27 11 16 10 15
Transitory 1,049 879 1,088 879 1,088 879 1,088 879 430 346 390 346 390 346 390 346
Total 30,256 28,279 29,045 27,542 29,377 27,100 29,135 27,321 24,850 23,639 24,108 23,000 24,378 22,710 24,222 22,867
res 23,100 22,006 22,397.0 21,410.8 22,648.2 21,141.0 22,503.7 21,287.4nrt 1,750.0 1,633.3 1,710.5 1,589.2 1,729.7 1,569.1 1,718.7 1,580.0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 nrt rat 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Target (resident +NRT) 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 1,734pct of
resident target
YRO 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 23,020 100.1%
AY 24,245 23,554 23,544 23,545
CY 25,445 24,754 24,744 24,745
Amount over Target (minus is under)
945 254 244 245
% over resident and NRT Target in CY (minus is under)
3.9% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1,733pct of
resident target
% over resident Target in CY (minus is under)
0.1% 0.0% 23,011 100.0%
CY 2016-17 Resident FTES
estimate
Sample of Hypothetical Semester Campus (composite example drawn from multiple campuses)Matriculation Decay Planning Model for 2016-17 based on Hypothetical FTES targets (resident and NRT)
(hypothetical Spring 2017, 2017-18 and 2018-19 new student estimates in bold)HC and FTES include Resident and NRT students
24,7542016-17 Resident CY FTES
Target 23,000
CY 2016-17 NRT est
20CY 2016-17 Resident estimate
minus 2016-17 Resident Target
Projected NRT overage ( 1,500 NRT FTES expectation)
234
CY 2016-17 total (Resident + NRT)
CY 2017-18NRT Estimate
CY 2017-18 Resident FTES
Estimate
2017-18 Resident CY FTES Target (hypothetical) 23,000
CY 2017-18 total (Resident + NRT)
24,744
CY 2017-18 Resident estimate minus Hypothetical 2017-18
Resident Target11
Projected NRT overage (assumes 1,500 NRT FTES expectation)
233
Copy of Matriculation Decay Enrollment Model
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC
Headcount FTES
fall 2015spring
2016fall 2016
spring
2017fall 2017
spring
2018fall 2018 spring 2019 fall 2015 spring 2016 fall 2016
spring
2017fall 2017
spring
2018fall 2018
spring
2019
New FTF 4,276 127 3,642 120 3,750 120 3,700 120 3,684 114 3,232 108 3,328 108 3,283 108
New Transfers 3,661 1,116 2,928 1,500 3,750 800 3,700 1,150 2,982 888 2,458 1,194 3,148 637 3,106 915
Continuing UG 17,839 23,024 18,257 22,187 17,839 22,581 17,760 22,496 15,168 19,962 15,672 19,240 15,278 19,589 15,246 19,495
New Masters/EDD 975 175 929 175 925 175 925 175 787 113 773 113 769 113 769 113
Continuing
Masters/EDD2,107 2,617 1,877 2,360 1,711 2,230 1,648 2,187 1,492 1,921 1,313 1,731 1,204 1,650 1,166 1,626
New PB Cred 195 65 169 65 170 65 170 65 192 52 168 52 169 52 169 52
Continuing PB Cred 31 198 100 215 108 222 110 223 15 184 64 183 67 194 69 192
New PB Other 64 6 19 6 20 6 20 6 55 5 13 5 13 5 13 5
Continuing PB Other 59 72 36 35 16 22 14 20 44 55 25 27 11 16 10 15
Transitory 1,049 879 1,088 879 1,088 879 1,088 879 430 346 390 346 390 346 390 346
Total 30,256 28,279 29,045 27,542 29,377 27,100 29,135 27,321 24,850 23,639 24,108 23,000 24,378 22,710 24,222 22,867
res 23,100 22,006 22,397.0 21,410.8 22,648.2 21,141.0 22,503.7 21,287.4
nrt 1,750.0 1,633.3 1,710.5 1,589.2 1,729.7 1,569.1 1,718.7 1,580.0
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 nrt rat 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Target (resident +NRT) 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 1,734
pct of
resident
target
YRO 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 23,020 100.1%
AY 24,245 23,554 23,544 23,545
CY 25,445 24,754 24,744 24,745
Amount over Target
(minus is under)945 254 244 245
% over resident and
NRT Target in CY (minus
is under)
3.9% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1,733
pct of
resident
target
% over resident Target
in CY (minus is under)0.1% 0.0% 23,011 100.0%
excel
CY 2016-17
Resident FTES
estimate
Sample of Hypothetical Semester Campus (composite example drawn from multiple campuses)
Matriculation Decay Planning Model for 2016-17 based on Hypothetical FTES targets (resident and NRT)
(hypothetical Spring 2017, 2017-18 and 2018-19 new student estimates in bold)
HC and FTES include Resident and NRT students
24,754
2016-17 Resident CY FTES
Target 23,000
CY 2016-17
NRT est
20
CY 2016-17 Resident estimate
minus 2016-17 Resident
Target
Projected NRT overage ( 1,500 NRT
FTES expectation)234
CY 2016-17 total
(Resident + NRT)
CY 2017-18
NRT Estimate
CY 2017-18
Resident FTES
Estimate
2017-18 Resident CY FTES
Target (hypothetical) 23,000CY 2017-18 total
(Resident + NRT)24,744
CY 2017-18 Resident estimate
minus Hypothetical 2017-18
Resident Target
11
Projected NRT overage (assumes
1,500 NRT FTES expectation)233