mechanical behavior notes-2009d · mohr’s circle in 3-d • we can use a 3-d mohr’s circle to...

30
Module #6b Module #6b Yield/failure criteria READING LIST DIETER: Ch. 2, pp. 36-38; Ch. 3, pp. 77-85 Dowling: Ch. 7, pp. 254-302 Ch. 3 in Roesler Ch. 2 in McClintock and Argon Ch. 7 in Edelglass

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jul-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Module #6bModule #6b

Yield/failure criteria

READING LISTDIETER: Ch. 2, pp. 36-38; Ch. 3, pp. 77-85

Dowling: Ch. 7, pp. 254-302

Ch. 3 in RoeslerCh. 2 in McClintock and Argon

Ch. 7 in Edelglass

Page 2: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

MohrMohr’’s Circle in 3s Circle in 3--DD• We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of

stress and to determine principal stresses.

• Essentially three 2-D Mohr’scircles corresponding to the x-y, x-z, and y-z faces of the elemental cubic element.

x

y

z

xx

xy

xz

zz

zyzx

yy

yx

yz

13

2

123

Page 3: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Adapted from G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill (1986) p. 37

3 = 2 = 0

max

1

3 = 0

max = 2

1

2

1 3

max

1 = 2 = 03

2 = 3

max = 2= 3

1

2=3

max = 2= 3

1

1

3

2

1

σ3

2

1

σ3

2

1 = -22 = -23

1 = 22 = 23

1

3

2

UniaxialTension

3

1

2

UniaxialCompression

BiaxialTension

Triaxial Tension(unequal)

Uniaxial Tension plusBiaxial Compression

1 0 00 0 00 0 0

1

2

0 00 00 0 0

1

2

3

0 00 00 0

3

0 0 00 0 00 0

Page 4: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Influence of States of StressInfluence of States of Stress• Biaxial and triaxial tension:

– Effectively reduces the shear stresses resulting in a considerable decrease in ductility. (Plastic deformation is produced by shear stresses.)

• Uniaxial tension plus biaxial compression:

– Produces high shear stresses and contributes towards increased plastic deformation without fracture.

– This is like metal forming via extrusion which gives better ductility than uniaxial tension.

Page 5: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Multiaxial LoadingMultiaxial Loading

Most service conditions and forming operations (Ex., drawing) involve multiaxial loading.

Under multiaxial loading conditions, a material or structure may yield or fracture locally (or globally) depending upon the state of stress.

We can use the calculated principal stresses to define criteria for yielding or failure.

Page 6: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield/Failure Criteria (1)Yield/Failure Criteria (1)

Mathematical tools to decide whether the stress state in a material will cause plastic deformation or failure.

Consider an isotropic polycrystalline metal deformed in uniaxial tension. It will yield when:

This is a valid yield criterion for the stated problem.

applied YS

Page 7: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield/Failure Criteria (2)Yield/Failure Criteria (2)

Consider the same isotropic polycrystalline metal deformed in a multiaxial stress state.

We can’t simply determine the stress at yielding because stress will vary from point to point.

Instead we calculate an equivalent stress from the components of the stress tensor and compare it withthe critical stress for yielding/failure.

Page 8: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield/Failure Criteria (3)Yield/Failure Criteria (3)The equivalent stress, being a function of the stress tensor, can be expressed as:

At yielding/failure, this equivalent stress much reach the critical value (e.g., σYS, σf, τCRSS, etc.). Thus:

, , ,

(at failur

,

e)

,equivalent xx yy zz yz xz xy critical

equivalent ij critical

or

, , , , ,equivalent xx yy zz yz xz xy

Page 9: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield/Failure Criteria (4)Yield/Failure Criteria (4)Yield criteria are generally expressed as:

Thus, when f(σij) < 0, the material does not yield/fail.

When f(σij) ≥ 0, the material yields/fails.

Example:Uniaxial tension. Material deforms elastically up to the yield stress. When applied load reaches the critical load (i.e., the YS), plastic deformation occurs. The yield/failure criterion could be expressed as:

0ij equivalent ij criticalf

0ij applied YSf

Page 10: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield/Failure Criteria (5)Yield/Failure Criteria (5)For isotropic materials, we can express yield criteria in terms of principal stresses.

If we plot the function f(σ1,σ2,σ3) on orthogonal σ1, σ2, σ3 axes we obtain a yield surface.

We can use the yield surface to determine, for each possible state of stress, whether or not a material yields/fails.

1 2 3, , 0f

Page 11: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield/Failure Criteria (6)Yield/Failure Criteria (6)There are many different yield criteria.

We will limit ourselves to these three:

1. Rankine2. Tresca3. von Mises

Remember, there are more than these two.

Page 12: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield (Failure) Criteria (7)Yield (Failure) Criteria (7)Tresca (Maximum-Shear-Stress) Yield Criterion:

• Yielding occurs when the difference between the maximum and minimum normal stresses reaches a critical value, the yield strength

CRSS CRSS

CRSS CRSS

τ

σ

τ

σ

Yield strength Yield strength

Yield strength Yield strength

123 123

No Yielding! Yielding!

[for a tensile test]

max min 1 3 ys 1 3max 2 2

ysCRSS

OR

Page 13: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield (Failure) Criteria (8)Yield (Failure) Criteria (8)Rankine (Maximum-Principal-Stress) Criterion:

• Cleavage fracture occurs when the cleavage strength is reached before the yield strength.

1 2 3

1

, ,eq ys

f

BUT

(the cleavage strength)

CRSS CRSS

CRSS CRSS

τ

σ

τ

σ

Yield strength Yield strength

Yield strength Yield strength

123 123

Cleavage fracture! Yielding!

f

Cle

avag

e st

reng

th

Cle

avag

e st

reng

th

f

Page 14: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Yield (Failure) Criteria (9)Yield (Failure) Criteria (9)Von-Mises Yield Criterion (Distortion Energy Criterion):

• Yielding occurs when the second invariant of the stressdeviator, J2, exceeds a critical value or:

J2 = constant = k2.

• What is the stress deviator and how do I find k2?

• The stress deviator represents the part of the total stress state that causes shape change (i.e., deformation).

Page 15: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

TOTAL HYDROSTATIC[ISOTROPIC]

DEVIATOR

x

y

z

xx

xy

xz

zz

zyzx

yy

yx

yz

x

y

z

m

m

m

x

y

z

xx-m

xy

xz

zz-m

zyzx

yy-m

yx

yz

causes dilation

causes distortion

= +

Shape changeVolume change

No shape change!

Page 16: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Hydrostatic StressTotal Stress Stress Deviator

0 00 00 0

xx xy xz xxm

yx yy yz m

zx z

m xy xz

yx yy m yz

zx zyy zz m zz m

The Stress Deviator (1)The Stress Deviator (1)

1 3 12

3 3 3

m

xx yy zzm

IP

The hydrostatic stress, , does not cause plastic deformation

The stress deviatior causes plastic deformation

Page 17: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

The Stress Deviator (2)The Stress Deviator (2)

• Take the determinant of the stress deviator.

--

-

23

23

23

xx m xy xz

ij yx yy m yz

zx zy zz m

xx yy zzxy xz

yy zz xxyx yz

zz xx yyzx zy

Page 18: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

The Stress Deviator (3)The Stress Deviator (3)

• This yields a new cubic equation that has three new invariants:

• The invariants are the:(1) sum of main diagonal; (2) sum of principal minors; (3) determinant of deviator tensor.

3 21 2 3 0J JJ

Page 19: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

The Stress Deviator (4)The Stress Deviator (4)

• Two of the new invariants, the invariants of the stress deviator, are of great importance:

1 1

2 2 2 2 2 22

2 2 21 2 2 3 1

2

3

( ) ( ) ( )

1 ( ) ( ) ( ) 6( - - )6

1 ( ) ( ) ( )6

m xx m yy m zz m

m xx yy yy zz zz xx xy yz xz

J I

IJ

Page 20: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

The Stress Deviator (5)The Stress Deviator (5)• In uniaxial tension, yielding occurs when σ1 = σYS

(yield stress) and σ2 = σ3 =0. Thus J2 becomes:

• It represents the condition required to cause yielding.

2 2 21 2 2 3 3 1

2 2

2

2

2

1 ( ) ( ) ( )61 ( ) ( )6

3

YS YS

YS

k

J

Page 21: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

The Stress Deviator (6)The Stress Deviator (6)

• Therefore, the von Mises criterion becomes:

• Yielding occurs when J2 equals or exceeds the tensile yield stress.

1/22 2 2 21 2 2 3 3 1

1 ( ) ( ) ( ) 32 YSk YS

Page 22: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

• Look at Figure 1.11 from Courtney’s text (next page). This figure shows the yield locus for plane stress.

• States of stress with principal stresses lying within the bounds of the yield locus do not produce yielding.

Quadrant I: yielding occurs when 1 or 2 = ys

max (1) - min (3=0) = ys

Quadrant II: 1 (min) < 0; 2 0; 3 = 0)2 - 1 = ysso neither 1 or 2 = ys and still get yielding

• The Tresca criterion is less complicated (in terms of math). It is often used in engineering design. It is also more conservative.

• However, the Tresca criterion does not take into account the intermediate principal stress and requires that you know the maximum and minimum principal stresses.

Page 23: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

FIGURE 1.11

(a) The Tresca yield condition for biaxial loading. Stress combinations lying within the curve do not result in plastic flow; those lying outside it do. In quadrants I and III, yielding occurs when the magnitude of the algebraically largest (in I) or smallest (in III) stress exceeds σys, the tensile yield strength. In quadrant II, (σ2>0, σ1<0, σ3=0), yielding is defined by σmax(=σ2)-σmin(=σ1) =σys, and this results in a 45° line defining yielding. The yield criterion is similar in quadrant IV (σ1>0, σ2<0, σ3 = 0), except that σ1 and σ2 are interchanged. (b) The von Mises yield condition for biaxial loading is shown by the solid line. Stress combinations lying within the ellipse do not lead to plastic flow; those lying outside do. The Tresca condition (dotted line) is compared to the von Mises one in the figure. The former is more conservative and the two are equivalent only for uniaxial (σ1,2>0 with σ2,1=σ3=0), and balanced biaxial (σ1=σ2, σ3=0), tension. (c) Comparison of experimental data for selected metals with the Tresca and von Mises criteria. The latter clearly fits the better data, though the difference between the criteria is not great.

[adapted from Courtney, p. 18]

EXPERIMENTAL DATA FOR BIAXIAL LOADING

Von Mises more accurately shows that for biaxial

loading the minor stressdoes affect yielding

No yielding

Yielding

III

III IV

1

2

y

y

1 2

3

, 00

Yielding

1

2

y

y

y

y

Tresca

von Mises2 2 2

1 2 1 3 2 3( ) ( ) ( )

2

y

minor tensile stress doesnot affect the stress required for yielding.

1 2BIAXIAL TENSION (σ ,σ > 0 )

Steel

Copper

Nickel

Tresca

von Misesy

y

y

1

2

No yielding

H*

Page 24: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

• Stress combinations lying within the curve do not result in plastic flow; those lying outside it do.

• In quadrants I and III, yielding occurs when the magnitude of the algebraically largest (in I) or smallest (in III) stress exceeds σys, the tensile yield strength.

• In quadrant II, (σ2>0, σ1<0, σ3=0), yielding is defined by σmax (=σ2)-σmin(=σ1) =σys, and this results in a 45°line defining yielding. The yield criterion is similar in quadrant IV (σ1>0, σ2<0, σ3 = 0), except that σ1 and σ2 are interchanged.

minor tensile stress doesnot affect the stress required for yielding.

1 2BIAXIAL TENSION (σ ,σ > 0 )

No yielding

Yielding

III

III

1

2

ys

ys

1 2

3

, 00

Tresca

[adapted from Courtney, p. 18]

IV

Page 25: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

No yielding

Yielding

1

2

ys

ys von Mises

[adapted from Courtney, p. 18]

ys

ys

2 2 21 2 1 3 2 3( ) ( ) ( )

2

ys

• The von Mises yield condition for biaxial loading is shown by the solid line.

• Stress combinations lying within the ellipse do not lead to plastic flow; those lying outside do.

• The Tresca condition (dotted line) is compared to the von Mises one in this figure.

• The former (Tresca) is more conservative and the two are equivalent only for uniaxial (σ1,σ2 > 0 with σ2, σ1 = σ3=0), and balanced biaxial (σ1=σ2, σ3=0), tension.

Page 26: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Comparison• Comparison of experimental data for

selected metals with the Tresca, Rankine, and von Mises criteria.

• The latter (von Mises) clearly fits the data better for ductile metals.

• The Rankine criterion fits a brittle metal like gray cast iron quite well.

• However, the difference between the criteria is not great.

From, Mechanical Behavior of Materials: Engineering Methods for Deformation, Fracture, and Fatigue, Third Edition, p. 275, by

Norman E. Dowling. ISBN 0-13-186312-6.© 2007 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights

reserved.

1

2 von Mises

Tresca

Rankine

Page 27: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

• The yield strength for a new Ni-base superalloy is 1000 MPa. Determine whether yielding will have occurred on the basis of both the Tresca and Von Mises failure criteria assuming the following stress state.

Example ProblemExample Problem

0 0 5000 200 0 MPa

500 0 900

p. 1/4

Page 28: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

Example ProblemExample Problem

2 2 2

2 2 2

2 2

3 2

3 2

0 0 5000 200 0 MPa

500 0 900

( ) (

0 200 900

)

( 2 ) 0

- ( ) [(0 200) ( 200 900) (0 900) (0) (500) (

xx yy yy zz xx zz xy yz xz

xx yy zz xy yz xz xx yz yy xz zz x

xx yy zz

y

3 2

3

2

2

2

2 2

0) ][(0 200 900) 2(0 500 0) (0 0 ) ( 200 500 ) ( 900 0 )] 0

( ) [ 70,000] [ 50,000,000] 0

70,000 50,000,000

1100

1,100 0

1. First determine the principal stresses

p. 2/4

Page 29: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

-2000 -1000 0 1000-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

3 +1,1

002 -7

0,00

0+5

0,00

0,00

0 (1

06 MP

a)

(MPa)

3 = -11232 = -200

223.7

p. 3/4

Page 30: Mechanical Behavior Notes-2009d · Mohr’s Circle in 3-D • We can use a 3-D Mohr’s circle to visualize the state of stress and to determine principal stresses. • Essentially

• Principal stresses:

σ1 = 223.7; σ2 = -200.0; σ3 = -1123.0

• Von Mises:

For yielding to occur J2 ≥ k2 (=σo2/3) therefore k = 789.9.

σo = k (3)1/2 = 1368.1 MPa

Since 1168.1 MPa > 1000 MPa, yielding occurs.

• Tresca:

Since σo = 1346.7 MPa > 1000 MPa, yielding occurs.

2 2 21 2 2 3 3 1

2 2 2

21 ( ) ( ) ( )61 (223.7 ( 200)) (( 200) (1123)) (( 1123) 223.7)6623,908.6

J

1 3max

223.7 ( 1123.0) 673.4 2 673.4 1346.72 2 2

oo

OR

2. Substitute principal stresses into equations for Tresca and Von Mises failure criteria

p. 4/4