measuring the corporate volunteer movement...measuring the corporate volunteer movement: a...
TRANSCRIPT
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Measuring the Corporate Volunteer Movement
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
1
Measuring the Corporate Volunteer Movement: A Conversation
Farron Levy, President, True Impact (moderator)
Gwen Migita, VP, Sustainability & Corporate Citizenship, Caesars Entertainment Corporation
Rebecca Wang, Sr. Manager, Community Engagement, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Tauni Lanier, Executive Director, IMPACT 2030
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
2
Welcome and Introduction
Farron Levy
President
True Impact
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
1. What to measure
2. How to measure
3. How much to claim
Principles of Practical Measurement
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
What to Measure: Can Measure Should Measure
INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES
Resources invested(time, materials, cash)
Services delivered(and to whom)
Resulting improvement in targeted social condition
(e.g., literacy, hunger, homelessness)
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES
Resources invested(time, materials, cash)
Services delivered(and to whom)
Resulting improvement in targeted social condition
(e.g., literacy, hunger, homelessness)
What to Measure: Can Measure Should Measure
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES
Resources invested(time, materials, cash)
Services delivered(and to whom)
Resulting improvement in targeted social condition
(e.g., literacy, hunger, homelessness)
Manager Focus “Investor” Focus
What to Measure: Can Measure Should Measure
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
INPUTS OUTPUTS OUTCOMES
Resources invested(time, materials, cash)
Services delivered(and to whom)
Resulting improvement in targeted social condition
(e.g., literacy, hunger, homelessness)
1. Social Impact. How much are we solving thesocial problem we care about? (End Outcome)
– X inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
– X low-income children attain healthy weight
2. (Contextual) Cost Per Outcome. How efficiently are we creating that social value?
– Option A: $300 = 1 child gains reading proficiency
vs.
– Option B: $200 = 1 child gains reading proficiency
What to Measure: Can Measure Should Measure
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
How to Measure: Ideal Practical
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Reach Preparation Mobilization Social Impact
100 people trained
?? people learned skills
?? peoplechanged behavior
?? peopleachieved success
How to Measure: Best Available Data
Data Sources & Assumptions
Tracking
− Randomized controlled trial(scientific confirmation)
− Compare program participants with similar population not receiving services
− Systematic outcome tracking
Estimation
− Sampling, piloting
− Previous results
− External studies
Speculation
− Logical assumptions
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Reach Preparation Mobilization Social Impact
100 people trained
90 people learned skills
?? peoplechanged behavior
?? peopleachieved success
Data Sources & Assumptions
Tracking
− Randomized controlled trial(scientific confirmation)
− Compare program participants with similar population not receiving services
− Systematic outcome tracking
Estimation
− Sampling, piloting
− Previous results
− External studies
Speculation
− Logical assumptions
90%
How to Measure: Best Available Data
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Reach Preparation Mobilization Social Impact
100 people trained
90 people learned skills
68 peoplechanged behavior
51 peopleachieved success
Data Sources & Assumptions
Tracking
− Randomized controlled trial(scientific confirmation)
− Compare program participants with similar population not receiving services
− Systematic outcome tracking
Estimation
− Sampling, piloting
− Previous results
− External studies
Speculation
− Logical assumptions
90% 75% 75%
How to Measure: Best Available Data
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
How much to claim: Contribution vs. Attribution
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Project Impact
100 adults gainemployment
Share X 25%
Funder’sClaim
Resulted in 25 adults gaining employment
Social Value (Outcomes). How much are we solving the social problem we care about?
– X inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
– X low-income children attain healthy weight
Allocated. A share of the program’s impact equal to the portion funded (contribution) or resulting gain (attribution).
Grant/Traditional Volunteerism/In-Kind Donations$25,000 invested of $100,000 program = 25%
How much to claim: 3-Tier Claim Structure
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Project Impact
150 adults gainemployment
Share + 50% increase
Funder’sClaim
Resulted in 50 adults gaining employment
Allocated. A share of the program’s impact equal to the portion funded (contribution) or resulting gain (attribution).
Grant/Traditional Volunteerism/In-Kind Donations$25,000 invested of $100,000 program = 25%
Skills Based Volunteerism / Pro BonoIncreased reach or efficacy of program by 50% (# of successful outcomes)
Social Value (Outcomes). How much are we solving the social problem we care about?
– X inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
– X low-income children attain healthy weight
How much to claim: 3-Tier Claim Structure
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Project Impact
100 adults gainemployment
Share X 50%
Funder’sClaim
Resulted in 50 adults gaining employment
Yes
No
Instrumental to ensuring program implementation(a “foundational” investor)?
Enabled 100 adults to gain employment
✓
Enabled. The total impact resulting from the program the funder enabled.
Allocated. A share of the program’s impact equal to the portion funded (contribution) or resulting gain (attribution).
Social Value (Outcomes). How much are we solving the social problem we care about?
– X inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
– X low-income children attain healthy weight
How much to claim: 3-Tier Claim Structure
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Project Impact
100 adults gainemployment
Share X 50%
Funder’sClaim
Resulted in 50 adults gaining employment
Yes
No
Instrumental to ensuring program implementation(a “foundational” investor)?
Enabled 100 adults to gain employment
Yes
No
Program inspired or enabled other similar programs?
Catalyzed 1,000 adults to gain employment
✓ ✓
Catalyzed. Impacts from other programs enabled by a funder-enabled program.
Enabled. The total impact resulting from the program the funder enabled.
Allocated. A share of the program’s impact equal to the portion funded (contribution) or resulting gain (attribution).
Social Value (Outcomes). How much are we solving the social problem we care about?
– X inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
– X low-income children attain healthy weight
How much to claim: 3-Tier Claim Structure
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Program Location CostGain Employment(# beneficiaries)
$ per Outcome
Intervention A Locale 1 $75,000 179 $419
Intervention A Locale 2 $75,000 344 $218
Intervention A Locale 3 $100,000 111 $901
Intervention B Locale 4 $20,000 11 $1,818
Intervention C Locale 5 $5,000 57 $88
Intervention C Locale 6 $5,000 55 $91
Grand Total $280,000 757 $370
Social Objective: Helping inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
Proving & Improving Value
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Program Location CostGain Employment(# beneficiaries)
$ per Outcome
Intervention A Locale 1 $75,000 179 $419
Intervention A Locale 2 $75,000 344 $218
Intervention A Locale 3 $100,000 111 $901
Intervention B Locale 4 $20,000 11 $1,818
Intervention C Locale 5 $5,000 57 $88
Intervention C Locale 6 $5,000 55 $91
Grand Total $280,000 757 $370
Social Objective: Helping inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
Proving Value
✓ We helped 757 people gain employment
Proving & Improving Value
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Program Location CostGain Employment(# beneficiaries)
$ per Outcome
Intervention A Locale 1 $75,000 179 $419
Intervention A Locale 2 $75,000 344 $218
Intervention A Locale 3 $100,000 111 $901
Intervention B Locale 4 $20,000 11 $1,818
Intervention C Locale 5 $5,000 57 $88
Intervention C Locale 6 $5,000 55 $91
Grand Total $280,000 757 $370
Social Objective: Helping inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
Improving Value
✓ Intervention A /Locale 2 is 2-4x as cost effective as the others.
What best practices can we learn?
Proving Value
✓ We helped 757 people gain employment
Proving & Improving Value
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
Program Location CostGain Employment(# beneficiaries)
$ per Outcome
Intervention A Locale 1 $75,000 179 $419
Intervention A Locale 2 $75,000 344 $218
Intervention A Locale 3 $100,000 111 $901
Intervention B Locale 4 $20,000 11 $1,818
Intervention C Locale 5 $5,000 57 $88
Intervention C Locale 6 $5,000 55 $91
Grand Total $280,000 757 $370
Social Objective: Helping inner-city adults gain living-wage employment
Improving Value
✓ Intervention A /Locale 2 is 2-4x as cost effective as the others.
What best practices can we learn?
✓ Intervention C is the most cost-effective strategy at $88-$91/person.
Worth additional investment?
Proving Value
✓ We helped 757 people gain employment
Proving & Improving Value
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
1. What to measureInvestor metrics(outcome, contextual cost/outcome)
2. How to measure Use best available data
3. How much to claim3-Tier Structure(allocated, enabled, catalyzed)
Measurement Principles
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
o Funder’s claim (social impact)
o Profile Content
Social Impact Report
Investment
Impact Receipt®
Grants + Volunteerism +In-kind Donation
Universal Social Impact Reporting Tool
• Standardized, quantitative outcomes
• Allocates “claim”
• Compatible with any grants/volunteer management system
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
23
IMPACT 2030
Tauni Lanier
Executive Director
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
24
MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVES
Primary Objective:
1. Develop or identify a method/approach for measuring the Impact of
Human Capital Investment for Corporate Employee Volunteer
Programs (CEVPs) on the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
➢ Per the UN Secretary General’s 2015 statement, we need to show
how much volunteers are contributing to the UN’s measure of
progress on the SDGs, which is ideally through the SDG indicators.
➢ May also consider supplemental “Add-ons” …
--to show contributions to SDGs that do not align well with
particular indicators,
--to provide information on the volunteer project that the Company
Employer finds of great value and not too complicating
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
25
MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVES2. Develop or identify a method/approach for measuring the impact of
such CEV programs on the company itself (business case) and
the volunteers
3. Facilitate opportunities for collaboration among Impact 2030
companies (partners) and other organizations, across SDGs and
across specific regions
IBM STUDY: BIG DATA1. Initially identifying which organizations collect what data on their
employee volunteer programs. Will be exploring big data and perhaps
proxy/surrogate indicators for the SDG indicators
2. Follow-up with Partners
3. Exploring big data and perhaps proxy/surrogate indicators for the
SDG indicators
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
26
CALL TO ACTION
Measurement 2.0
Benefit for the Partners
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
27
Caesars Entertainment Corporation
Gwen Migita
VP, Sustainability & Corporate Citizenship
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
28
Caesars Entertainment Framework and Goals
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
29
5-Year Strategic Plan: Social & Environmental Responsibility Macro Metrics
Compliance & Regulatory (Responsible Gaming, Supplier
Diversity)
Employee & Property CR Teams
Engagement Citizenship Marketing
Community, NGO & Partner Engagement
Foundational Programs Continue:
PEOPLE PLANET PLAY Responsible Conduct: Guest perception that Caesars “does what’s right no matter what”
Food Champions SDG 12.3 (Food Waste Targets Under Review)
Health & Wellness: Employee wellness program participation
Great Place to Work: Employee Opinion Scores
Diversity & Inclusion: Manager level or higher minorities or women
Science Based Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets:94% GHG reduction 2011-2050, Scope 3 TBD supplier targets
Responsible Gaming: Employees who learn behaviors to potentially mitigate problem gaming from CET
Existing employee and guest 2020 targets continue: (1) 60% participation in CodeGreen or HERO (2) 67% A scores in each of the indicators from: responsible gaming, environmental impact, employee wellbeing and economic development among guests
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
30
Primary
Secondary
• Guest number/length visits of loyalty program members and key sub-populations, such as millennials and women.
• Social media response of the public.
• Net Promoter Score (NPS) of TR members and key sub-populations, such as millennials and women.
• Guest spend of loyalty program members and key sub-populations, such as millennials and women.
I would recommend!
Program Goals: Key Metrics for Regional CSR Campaigns
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
31
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Rebecca Wang
Sr. Manager, Community Engagement
HPE Corporate Affairs
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
32
FY16 Community engagement scorecard
Delivering best-in-class programs to engage employees in strengthening communities around the world
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
33
FY16 Community engagement scorecard
Delivering best-in-class programs to engage employees in strengthening communities around the world
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
34
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
35
Q & A
Co-Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
36
Next Steps
• Impact 2030 (www.impact2030.com)
• Principles of Practical Measurement slides &True Impact / POL measurement and benchmarking (www.trueimpact.com/pol2017)
• UN SDGs (sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs)
• Rate this session
− Visit the App Store or Google Play
− Search for “Points of Light Conference”
− Log in with the email address you used to register
− Password: “serviceunites”
− Click on “Sessions,” find this session
− Click “Session Rating”