measurement of elliptic flow of electrons from heavy flavor decays @ rhic shingo sakai (univ. of...
TRANSCRIPT
Measurement of elliptic flow of electrons from heavy flavor
decays @ RHIC
Shingo Sakai
(Univ. of Tsukuba / JSPS)
2
outline
Introduction Elliptic flow (v2) & Nuclear modification factor (RAA) Motivation
Result Method electron v2 from (Mim. & centrality) Charm v2 (compare model) v2 vs. RAA
Summary
3
Elliptic flow (v2)
x
y
p
x
p y
Initial spatial anisotropy
Momentum space anisotropy
of particle emission
2th harmonic of the Fourier expansion of the azimuthal distribution
Reflect initial spatial anisotropy transfer
=> A powerful probe of the initial state of the high energy heavy ion collision
hydrodynamical interruption => pressure gradient of
early stage of collision
dN/dφ N∝ 0(1+2v2cos(2(φ))
4
Elliptic flow vs. hydro model
Identified particle v2 => show mass dependence v2(π) > v2(K) > v2(p)
hydrodynamical model well represent the feature of v2
early time thermalization
τ ~ 0.6 fm/c perfect fluid (no viscosity)
The matter is like fluid
5
Nuclear modification factor ; RAA
Nuclear modification factor ; RAA
Yield AuAU
Yield pp*<NColl_AuAu>
RAA =
particle production @ high pT => hard process => scale by pp collision (RAA = 1.0)
significant suppression in AuAu
parton energy loss in the dense dense matter
6
Quark number scaling
Presented by M. Lamont (QM04)
Baryon
Meson
v2 is scaled with number of quarks quark level elliptic flow Consistent Quark coalescence model (N.Q.S)
N.Q.S well explain other measurement ; Rcp , particle ratio (p/π)
7
Motivation ; why charm quark ?
flow ? energy loss ?
Light quarks (u,d,s) flow & energy loss in the matter
Charm is much heavier than u,d,s quarks and believed to be produced in initial collisions via gluon fusion => propagates through medium created in the collisions
Charm interact medium ? => charm energy loss & charm flow ? => if so, indicate strongly coupling in the medium
8
Charm study @ PHENIX experiment
PHENIX study charm quark via electron,μ and J/ψ Central arm (|η| < 0.35)
semi-leptonic decay c -> D -> e cc -> J/ψ -> ee
Muon Arm (1.15 < |η| < 2.25) semi-leptonic decay c -> D ->μ cc -> J/ψ-> μμ
9
Charm quark study via electron
Electron sources photonic
- photon conversion
- Dalitz decay (π0,η,ω ---) non-photonic
- Ke3 decay
- primarily semi-leptonic decay
of mesons containing c & b
background subtraction method cocktail method converter method
B.G
10
Cocktail method
estimate background electron with simulation
sum up all background electrons
Input π0 (dominant source) use measured pT @ PHENIX other source assume mt scale of pi
clear enhancement of inclusive electron w.r.t photonic electron
11
Converter method
install “photon converter ”(brass ;X0 = 1.7 %) around beam pipe
increase photonic electron yield
Compare electron yield with & without converter
experimentally separate
Non-converter ; Nnc = Nγ+Nnon-γ Converter ; Nc = R *Nγ+Nnon-γ
12
Charm quarks energy loss
clear suppression @ high pT in more central collision
=> charm quarks energy loss
low pT is consistent with binary scaling in large uncertainty
Charm interact medium @ low pT ?
v2 measurement give us answer
13
Non-photonic electron v2 measurement
Non photonic electron v2 is given as;
dNe/d = dNpho.e /d + dNnon-pho.e /d
v2e = ( v2γ
e + RNP v2non-γe ) / (1 + RNP)
Photonic electron v2
=> Cocktail method (simulation)=> Converter method (experimentally determined)
Inclusive electron v2
=> Measure (Non-photonic e) / (photonic e)=> measure
14
Electron v2 measurement @ PHENIX
e-
Electron v2 is measured by R.P. method
R.P. --- determined with BBC Tracking (pT,φ) --- DC + PC electron ID --- RICH & EMCal
dN/d(-) = N (1 + 2v2obscos(2(-)))
eID @ RICH
B.G.
After subtract B.G.
Fig : Energy (EMcal) & momentum matching
of electrons identified by RICH.
Clear electron signals around E-p/p = 0
15
Inclusive & photonic electron v2
Inclusive e v2
Photonic e v2
50 % of electrons come from non-photonic @ high pT (>1.5 GeV/c) photonic electron v2 ; converter (pT<1.0) & cocktail (pT>1.0)
16
Non-photonic electron v2
clear non-zero non-photonic electron v2 measured ! main source of non-photonic electron ; D->e => D v2 is also non-zero
17
Non-photonic electron v2 (centrality dep.)
Hydro -> driving force of v2 is pressure gradient (ΔP)
ΔP is get large with impact parameter (centrality) => v2 get large with centrality
Non-photonic electron v2 seems like get large with impact parameter
18
expected D v2 from non-photonic e v2
expected D meson v2 from non-photonic electron v2 => would be smaller than pi v2
expected D v2 from non-γ v2
process(1) D v2 = a*f(pT) a ; free parameter f(pT) ; pi,K,p(2) D -> e v2
(3) Calculate χ2
(4) Find χ2 minimum for “a”
19
Charm quark flow ?
1 2 30 4
pT[GeV/c]
pT[GeV/c]
Compared with quark coalescence model prediction.with/without charm quark flow(Greco, Ko, Rapp: PLB 595 (2004) 202) - No Bottom contribution - c v2 small u v2 @ low pT - quark v2 flat @ high pT
Below 2.0 GeV/c ;consistent with charm quark flow model. => indicate charm quark flow !
20
Non-γ e v2 vs. RAA (1)
Origin of v2 @ high pT => energy loss pi0 yield strongly suppress @ high pT and strong elliptic flow observed
Non-γelectron strongly suppress @ high pT same as pi0 but v2 is smaller than pi0
21
Non-γ e v2 vs. RAA (2)
estimate D meson v2 assume charm & u have same v2
D meson v2 get N.Q.S
mass effect for N.Q.S v2M (pT) = v21 (R1 pT) + v22 (R2pT)
Ri = mi / mM
(mi ; effective mass of quark i) (Phys.Rev. C68 (2003) 044901 Zi-wei & Dence Molnar)
v2D(pT) ~ v2u (1/6*pT) + v2c (5/6*pT)
pi0 v2
u quark v2
22
Non-γ e v2 vs. RAA (3)
if charm & u has same v2, the maximum v2 = 0.1 => Non-photonic electron v2 is smaller than pi (pi0) v2 though RAA is consistent with pi0
23
Summary
Study charm v2 via electron v2 measurement Non-zero non-photonic electron v2, decay electron
v2 from charm, observed. Non-photonic electron v2 consistent with charm flow
model Charm quark study via electron indicate charm flow
& charm energy loss in the matter
=> indicate particles in the matter strongly coupling