meap 2015-004
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
1/28
Memorandum
MAEP 004 s. 2015
DATE
25 November 2015
TO
All University and local student councils
FROM
Miguel Enrico A. Pangalangan, Student Regent
SUBJ ECT
Proposed amendments to the Codified Rules for Student Regent Selection(CRSRS)
Here is a summary of the proposed amendments to the CRSRS, as submitted to theOffice:
On qualifications
Inclusion of academic requirement as a qualification for StudentRegent nominees
On voting
during the Student Regent selection
On general provisions
3-year sunset (moratorium on amendments) provision
Included herewith are the (1) updated and official copy of the Codified Rules for StudentRegent Selection or CRSRS and (2) the official communications containing the proposedamendments to the CRSRS of UP Diliman College of Social Sciences and PhilosophyStudent Council received last 1 October 2015.
A separate Memorandum on the General Assembly of Student Councils that will considerthe foregoing proposed amendments will be issued. Thank you.
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
2/28
University of the Philippines System
CODIFIED RULES FOR STUDENT REGENT SELECTION
[1][2]
The Student Councils of the University of the Philippines System hereby1
promulgate the rules hereunder, governing the democratic selection process for2
the Member, Representing the Student Body in the Board of Regents, hereinafter3 referred to as the Student Regent (SR) as mandated under Republic Act4
Numbered Ninety-Five Hundred, otherwise known as the "University of the5
Philippines Charter of 2008".[3]6
ARTICLE I7
Definition of Terms8
SECTION 1.Any position of responsibility shall include officers and committee9
chairpersons in any student or community organization as well as members,10
officers and committee chairpersons in any University or College Student Council.11
SEC 2. The General Assembly shall mean the University and College Student12
Councils in the UP System.13
SEC 3.The Regional Units (RU) of the UP System are the following:14
UP Diliman Extension Program (UPDEP) in Pampanga15
UP Manila School of Health Sciences (SHS) in Baler, Aurora16
UP Manila SHS in Palo, Leyte17 UP Manila SHS in Koronadal, South Cotabato18
UP Visayas Tacloban College19
SEC 4.The Autonomous Units (AU) of the UP System are the following:20
University of the Philippines Baguio21
[1] FIRST ADOPTED by the University and College Student Councils of the University of the
Philippines System at the UP System Student Councils Meeting, 2 February 1997, School of Labor
and Industrial Relations (SOLAIR) Auditorium, UP Diliman. Subsequently amended at the GeneralAssembly of Student Councils (GASC) of the UP System on 26 and 27 January, 1998 at the
National Institute of Geological Sciences (NIGS) Auditorium UP Diliman and at the GASC on 29-
30 October, 1999 at the College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology (CEAT)
Auditorium, UP Los Baos, on 26-27 October, 2002 at the Commission on Audit (COA)
Auditorium in Palo, Leyte, on October 27-28, 2003 at the Cebu Coliseum Conference Room,
Cebu City, on October 25-26, 2004 at the Miag-ao Interactive Learning Center, UP Visayas,
Miagao, Iloilo; on October 24-25, 2007 at UP Mindanao, Davao City. LATEST VERSION from the
GASC on January 25-26, 2014 at UP Mindanao.
[2] APPROVED in UP System-wide referendum of students in January 2009, pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the UPCHARTER OF 2008.
[3] SUPERSEDES EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBERED TWO HUNDRED AND FOUR -A.
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
3/28
University of the Philippines Diliman22
University of the Philippines Cebu23
University of the Philippines Los Baos24
University of the Philippines Manila25
University of the Philippines Visayas26
University of the Philippines Mindanao27
SEC 5.The Office of the Student Regent (OSR) refers to the incumbent Student28
Regent, the secretariat and the OSR volunteers.29
SEC 6. A bona fide student of the university means an individual taking up30
academic units for bachelor's degree, master's degree, doctorate degree, non-31
degree, or certificate courses in the university, including those who are in32
residency status or on leave of absence (LOA).33
SEC 7.Majority refers to the least whole number greater than 50% of all the34councils system-wide.35
SEC 8.Majority vote refers to the least whole number greater than 50% of the36
total votes of all the councils present and voting.37
SEC 9.Protester refers to the party who files protest against a particular nominee,38
or against the result of any deliberation or process.39
SEC10.Protestee refers to the party being protested.40
ARTICLE II41
Statement of Principles and Policies42
SEC. 1.The Student Regent must be democratically selected among all students43
in the UP System through a peaceful and orderly process that ensures maximum44
student participation.45
SEC. 2.The selection process must be conducted in a manner consistent with46
the principle of broad and open participation of students in all levels regardless47of race, gender and sexual orientation, political ideology and affiliation, academic48
standing, social status, ethno-linguistic origin, age physical abilities and religious49
affiliation.50
SEC. 3.The selection of the Student Regent is exclusively a student affair. The51
administration and other sectors in the University are prohibited from interfering52
with the process by conducting interviews, administrative investigations or in any53
other manner inconsistent with this principle.54
SEC. 4. Consistent with the preceding section, the endorsement of the UP55
President to the President of the Republic of the Philippines of the nominee/s56
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
4/28
entertain nor endorse any name aside from those deliberated and selected by the58
students in the manner consistent with these rules.59
SEC. 5. Controversies and protests regarding the selection shall be resolved60
through the internal mechanisms provided hereunder.61
ARTICLE III62
Qualifications of the Nominees63
SEC 1.A nominee for the position of the Student Regent must meet the following64
qualifications:65
(a) S/he must be a student currently enrolled in the university at the time of66
his/her nomination;67
(b) S/he should have an accumulated residency of at least one year, which68
would include periods of residency and/or leave of absence;69(c) S/he must be a Filipino citizen and;70
(d) S/he must have a track record reflective of his/her commitment to serve71
the studentry.72
SEC. 2.No disqualification on the basis of good academic status or standing or73
performance shall be imposed on the nominees.74
SEC. 3.Grounds for disqualification shall be imposed on nominees found guilty,75
at any time within his/her stay in the university, including periods when the76 nominee is under leave of absence, prior to the proclamation of the Student77
Regent, of any act involving gross misconduct or misbehavior, violence inflicted78
towards another person or any property that is not his/hers, dishonesty, graft and79
corruption, or any criminal offense involving moral turpitude.80
SEC. 4.Questions against the qualification of a nominee shall be filed at the OSR,81
or any officer and/or member of any UP student council. Such questions shall be82
resolved before the deliberations when the system-wide process begins. The83
decision of the GA is final.84
ARTICLE IV85
Nomination, Acceptance and Withdrawal86
SEC. 1.Any student, group, or organization may nominate a student from any87
college of any of the Autonomous or Regional Units of the UP System who has88
the qualifications set forth above. Open nominations by any student or student89
group/organization/council shall be held in every college in the UP System under90
the supervision of the College Student Council (CSC) or, in the absence thereof,91
the University Student Council (USC).92
In cases wherein a CSC and USC nominate a candidate for SR93
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
5/28
Committee (UC) which will be composed of students from different years95
or courses or different year level or department as the case may be.96
SEC. 2.Upon written notice of his/her nomination, a nominee must file and sign97
the certificate of acceptance (CA) of the nomination with the CSC or USC within98
two (2) weeks from the release of such notice or until the date set forth by the99 Search Committee.100
SEC. 3.Each CA must be accompanied with a vision statement, curriculum vitae101
or rsum and bio data. Any material misstatement of facts is a ground for102
disqualification at any stage of the selection process.103
SEC. 4.The nominee must furnish the Search Committee at each respective level104
with his/her rsum and vision paper for the Office of the Student Regent at least105
five (5) days before each respective deliberation except as otherwise provided106
under these rules.107
SEC. 5.The nominee of any student group / organization / council may not be108
withdrawn at any level of the search without the consent of the nominee who has109
validly accepted the nomination.110
SEC. 6.In cases when a student is nominated in more than one unit, s/he must111
undergo the search process in each of those units; otherwise, s/he must accept112
only one of the nominations. The search committee concerned must furnish the113
OSR a certification that such a nominee underwent the process as required.114
ARTICLE V115
Duties and Responsibilities116
SEC. 1.The Office of the Student Regent will serve as the overall coordinating117
body during the selection process. It shall have the following duties and118
responsibilities:119
(a) It shall inform all the student councils of all official communications120
pertinent to the process through memoranda, personal orientation and121other similar means.122
(b) Support information drive on the historical vision-mission of the Office and123
the historical role of the students in the struggle to reestablish the OSR and124
in the selection process;125
(c) Serve as the General Assembly Secretariat during the system-wide126
selection process for the SR. The Secretariat shall, among others, facilitate127
and moderate the deliberations, provide all the student councils of the128
minutes of the selection process and receive protests.129
(d)
Form the University Search Committee (USC) in the event that the USCs130 are unable to form the said committee in their respective unit.131
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
6/28
during the whole process of the selection. They shall have the following duties133
and responsibilities:134
(a) Inform all the students and student organizations regarding the SR selection135
process through organizational memoranda, personal orientation and other136
similar means;137 (b) Launch massive information drive on the historical vision-mission of the138
OSR and the historical role of the students in the struggle to re-establish139
the OSR and in the selection process;140
(c) The chairpersons of the USCs and CSCs shall serve as presiding officer of141
the UC, or CC, respectively;142
(d) The USC shall form the CC in the event that a CSC is unable to form the143
said committee in their respective college; and144
(e) Ensure maximum participation of all the students in the selection process145
by conducting symposia, fora or similar activities.146
SEC. 3.The KASAMA sa UP, by virtue of its historical role in the re-establishment147
of the Office of the Student Regent, shall provide the historical perspective of the148
Office and the Selection Process. They shall have the following duties and149
responsibilities:150
(a) Launch massive information drive on the historical vision-mission of the151
OSR, the historical role of KASAMA sa UP in the struggle to revive the OSR152
and the UP student body in the selection process;153
(b)
Inform all students and student organization regarding the SR selection154 process through organizational memoranda, personal orientation and other155
similar means; and156
(c) Ensure maximum participation of all the students to the selection process157
by conducting symposia, fora or similar activities.158
ARTICLE VI159
College-wide Process160
SEC. 1.The CSC shall act as the College Search Committee for the SR Selection,161
referred to as the College Committee (CC), which shall be composed of all the162members of the CSC.163
SEC. 2.The CC, and in the absence of a CSC, the USC, shall be responsible for164
gathering required documents from the nominees: his/her vision statement,165
Curriculum Vitae or rsum and bio data. The CC shall have the following powers166
and functions:167
(a) Has control and supervision on the conduct of the Search on its level;168
(b)
Must conduct information drives and publicity campaigns on the Search;169 (c) Must decide pre-deliberation or pre-election controversies, questions of170
eligibility and other matters arising from the interpretation of these rules of171
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
7/28
(d) Must conduct an open, public and college-wide deliberations with the173
nominees and, at the discretion of the CC, at least one non-binding straw174
poll among the constituents of the college;175
(e) May promulgate rules and regulation supplemental but not inconsistent with176
these rules for the smooth, orderly and peaceful conduct of the Search;177
and178 (f) Conduct their deliberation(s) on the nominees and vote for at most two (2)179
official nominee(s) for the college.180
SEC. 3.The official nominee(s) of each college shall be decided upon by each181
respective CC taking into consideration the result of the straw poll(s), if any, and182
college-wide deliberations(s).183
SEC. 4. The list of the nominees and the name(s) of the official college184
nominee(s) shall be submitted to the University Student Council (USC) for the185
Autonomous University-wide selection. In the absence of the USC and in the case186of colleges in the regional units, the list of nominees and the name/s of the official187
nominee/s shall be submitted directly to the OSR for the System-Wide selection188
without passing through their respective AU selection process. Each CSC shall189
attach an official endorsement for their official nominee/s.190
SEC. 5.All protests shall be made in writing stating the reasons therefor and filed191
with the CC, and furnishing a copy thereof to the other party, within five (5)192
working days upon receipt of notice of the result of the deliberations or elections,193
as the case may be. The protester shall only be allowed to file once either before194 the College level or the Autonomous Unit level.195
SEC. 6.Such protest shall be decided within five (5) working days after they are196
received. Failure to resolve the matter within the required period resolves the197
protest in favor of the protestee. The protest shall be resolved by a unanimous198
decision of the CC, if possible. When the CC decides unanimously, such decision199
is final and unappealable. In the case of non-unanimity, majority vote of those200
present and voting in the CC shall decide on the matter. In such case, the protest201
on the same ground may be evaluated as an appeal during the AU process. Such202
appeal must be received by the USC and CC concerned two (2) working days203before the AU process provided no AU process can be held within two days after204
College-Wide deliberations.205
ARTICLE VII206
Autonomous University-wide Process207
SEC. 1.The USC shall be responsible for gathering pertinent data, such as bio-208
data, rsum, Curriculum Vitae, and the like, regarding the nominees for the CC.209
It may summon the college nominees for interview and for other purposes. No210 other nominee shall be considered except those nominated by each college211
through the CC or the USC as the case may be212
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
8/28
SEC. 2.The USC and CSC shall act as the University Search Committee for the213
Student Regent, referred to as the University Committee (UC), which shall be214
composed of the members of the respective USCs and the Chairpersons of the215
CSCs or any other duly elected college representative in case they are not216
constitutionally part of the CSC.217
SEC. 3.The UC shall have the following powers and functions:218
(a) Has control and supervision of the conduct of the Search in its level;219
(b) Must conduct information drives and publicity campaigns on the Search;220
(c) Must decide appeals from the CC decision concerning the college-wide221
process, decide pre-deliberation or pre-election controversies, questions222
of qualifications and other matters arising from the interpretation of these223
rules and on the conduct of the Search in its level;224
(d) Must conduct open, public and college-wide deliberations with the225
nominees and at the discretion of the UC, at least one non-binding straw226poll among the constituents of the college;227
(e) Shall conduct their own deliberation(s) on the nominees and vote for at228
most two (2) official nominee(s) of the AU;229
(f) Shall decide before the AU deliberations proper on the appeals from the230
decisions of the CCs. Such decision is final and unappealable; and231
(g) May promulgate rules and regulations supplemental but not inconsistent232
with these rules for the smooth, orderly and peaceful conduct of the233
Search.234
SEC. 4.The two (2) official nominees of each AU shall be decided upon by the235
UC taking into consideration the result of the straw polls, if any, and the AU-wide236
deliberation/s.237
SEC. 5.The list of the nominees and the name/s of the official AU nominee/s238
shall be submitted to the OSR for the System-Wide selection. Each USC shall239
attach an official endorsement for their official nominee/s.240
SEC. 6.All protest shall be made in writing stating the reasons therefor and filed241
with the UC, and furnishing a copy thereof to the protestee, within five (5) working242days upon receipt of notice of the result of the deliberation or elections, as the243
case may be.244
SEC. 7.Such protests shall be decided within five (5) working days after they are245
received. Failure to resolve the matter within the required period resolves the246
protest in favor of the protestee. The protest shall be resolved by a unanimous247
decision of the UC, if possible. When the UC decides unanimously, such decision248
is final and unappealable. In the case of non-unanimity, a majority vote of those249
present and voting in the UC shall decide on the matter. In such case, the protest250 on the same ground may be revived as an appeal during the System-wide251
process Such appeal must be received both by the OSR and the USC concerned252
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
9/28
prescribed period for appeal, the same can no longer be entertained at any level.254
SEC. 8.The nominees must submit their Vision Paper and GPOA to the Office of255
the Student Regent fourteen (14) calendar days before the System-wide selection256
provided no system-wide deliberations shall be held within fourteen (14) days257
after the AU/RU process.258
SEC. 9.The OSR and the USCs shall provide the Vision Paper and GPOA to all259
SCs at least ten (10) working days before the System-Wide process, including all260
protests pertaining to the nominees that were forwarded to the OSR.261
ARTICLE VIII262
System-wide Process263
SEC. 1.A majority of all student councils system-wide shall constitute the quorum264
of the GA, sanctioning the system-wide process of the Student Regent selection.265
SEC. 2.The General Assembly (GA) of all UP University and College Student266
Councils of all Autonomous and Regional Units shall deliberate on the AU and RU267
nominees, with the incumbent Student Regent as the Presiding Officer.268
SEC. 3.The first order of business for the said deliberation shall be the reading269
of the Codified Rules for Student Regent Selection by the incumbent Student270
Regent, subsequent vote of reaffirmation thereof by the majority of the GA, and271
the deliberation on the protests and appeals elevated to the system-wide level, if272 any.273
SEC. 3.1The college representatives who are not officially part of the CSC274
must be recognized to be part of the CSC and may vote in behalf of the275
CSC provided that they have written authorization.276
SEC. 4.All the protests and/or appeals shall be read by the presiding officer and277
immediately be resolved by the majority of the GASC after a deliberation thereon.278
The GA shall resolve protests and/or appeals from the decisions of the UC. Such279
decision shall be final and unappealable.280
SEC. 5.After the individual presentation of the nominees with their vision paper,281
GPOA and an open forum following such, the GA shall vote for the final three (3)282
nominees by raising of hands or secret balloting depending on the prerogative of283
the assembly. The presiding officer shall declare the final three nominees who284
received the highest number of votes from the AUs and RUs present and voting.285
SEC. 6.The three nominees shall then be subjected to further questioning by the286
GA.287
Consensus building shall take priority over division of the house in288
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
10/28
SEC. 8.In the event that no consensus is reached, the three nominees shall be290
subjected to further deliberation/s until a nominee garners two-thirds vote of all291
AUs and RUs present and voting. After which, s/he shall be subjected to a final292
deliberation to receive the mandate of the GASC.293
SEC. 9.The incumbent Student Regent shall declare the selected nominee of the294
GASC in the UP System for the Student Regent.295
SEC. 10.The votes during the System-wide selection shall be allotted as follows:296
UP Baguio - 2 votes297
UP Diliman - 2 votes298
UP Cebu - 2 votes299
UP Los Baos 2 votes300
UP Manila 2 votes301UP Visayas 2 votes302
UP Mindanao 2 votes303
UPDEP in Pampanga 1 vote304
UP Visayas Tacloban College 1 vote305
UPM SHS in Palo, Leyte 1 vote306
UPM SHS in Baler, Aurora 1 vote307
UPM SHS in Koronadal, South Cotabato - 1 vote308
SEC. 11.No individual student or group or student council is allowed to nominate309 any student directly to the Office of the UP President or the Office of the President310
of the Republic of the Philippines. All nominations must be submitted and311
deliberated in the process as herein provided.312
ARTICLE IX313
General Provisions314
SEC. 1.The Student Regent-select must resign from any position of responsibility315
in any student or community organization and/or student council and student316
publication.317
SEC. 2.The Student Regent-select must not be permanently disqualified from318
the University. However, the Student Regent-select is advised to file a leave of319
absence (LOA) to devote his/her time in the fulfillment of his/her duties and320
responsibilities.321
SEC. 3.The dates and periods pertinent to the selection process in the college,322
AU and system levels shall be fixed by the OSR with the consent of all the USCs323
and regional units.324
These rules shall be amended or repealed through the majority vote of all325
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
11/28
to the OSR not later than the first (1st) day of October.327
SEC. 5.These rules shall take effect immediately upon approval by at least a328
majority of all student councils present and voting.329
SEC. 6.Failure to attend or to send a representative with written authorization to330 the GASC for the presentation of proposed amendments during the system-wide331
selection forfeits the right to vote in the processes of amendment and selection,332
respectively. However, they shall still be bound by the results of the said process.333
SEC. 7.Upon vacancy of the position of the SR-select or the incumbent SR due334
to permanent disqualification from the university, incapacity to enroll or file an335
LOA the following semester, death, illness or any other cause which prevents336
him/her from discharging functions, the position shall be filled by the second337
selected nominee, or the third nominee if the latter cannot assume the position.338
Attested:
KRISTA IRIS V. MELGAREJO SGD.)
31stStudent Regent
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
12/28
1 October 2015
Hon. Mico A. Pangalangan
Student Regent
Board of Regents
Dear Student Regent Pangalangan ,
Greetings!
As provided for by Article IX Section 4 of the Codified Rules fo
Student Regent Selection (CRSRS), the College of Social Sciences and
Philosophy (CSSP) Student Council of the University of the Philippines
Diliman forwards the following proposed amendments attached herewith to
the Codified Rules for Student Regent Selection (CRSRS).
Please note that proposed amendments or modifications are those textin boldface. Repealed clauses affected by proposed amendments are in
italicised texts enclosed in brackets.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
In Service,
Aubrey Lagbas
Chairperson
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
13/28
CSSP STUDENT COUNCIL 2015-2016Proposed CRSRS Amendments
I. ON THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE SR NOMINEES: ACADEMIC REQUIREMENT
Article II: Statement of Principles and Policies
Section 2. The selection process must be conducted in a manner consistent with the principle of broad andopen participation of students in all levels regardless of race, gender, and sexual orientation, politicalideology and affiliation, [academic standing,] social status, ethno-linguistic origin, age, physical abilitiesand religious affiliation.
Article III. Qualifications of the Nominees
Section 1. A nominee for the position of the Student Regent must meet the following qualifications:
a) S/he must be a student currently enrolled in the university at the time of his/her nomination;
b) S/he should have an accumulated residency of at least one year which would include periods of residencyand/or leave of absence;
c) S/he must be a Filipino citizen [and];
d) S/he must have a track record reflective of his/her commitment to serve the studentry
E) S/HE MUST SATISFY THE MINIMUM ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS SET BY THEUNIVERSITY CODE SUCH THAT S/HE MUST NOT INCUR THE STATUS OF ACADEMICDELINQUENCY OF PROBATION OR GRAVER THE SEMESTER PRIOR TO HER/HISNOMINATION.
[Section 2. No disqualification on the basis of good academic status or standing or performance shall beimposed on the nominees.]
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
14/28
II. ON THE VOTING SCHEME OF THE SYSTEM-WIDE PROCESS: ONE COUNCIL, ONE
VOTE
Article VIII: System-wide Process
Section 5. After the individual presentation of the nominees with their vision paper, GPOA and an open forumfollowing such, the GA shall vote for the final three (3) nominees by raising of hands or secret ballotingdepending on the prerogative of the assembly. The presiding officer shall declare the final three nominees who
received the highest number of votes from the UNIVERSITY STUDENT COUNCILS AND COLLEGESTUDENT COUNCILS OF THE AUs and RUs present and voting.
Section 8. In the event that no consensus is reached, the three nominees shall be subjected to further deliberation/s until a nominee garners two-thirds vote of all UNIVERSITY STUDENT COUNCILSAND COLLEGESTUDENT COUNCILS OF THE AUs and RUs present and voting. After which,s/he shall be subjected to afinal deliberation to receive the mandate of the GASC.
SECTION 9. IN THE EVENT THAT NO NOMINEE GARNERS TWO-THIRDS OF THE VOTES CAST,THE TWO NOMINEES WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VOTES SHALL BE SUBJECTED TOFURTHER DELIBERATIONS. IF THERE SHOULD BE NO CONSENSUS AS TO WHO SHALL BE
SELECTED, VOTES SHALL BE CAST AND THE NOMINEE GARNERING THE HIGHER NUMBEROF VOTES SHALL BE PROCLAIMED AS THE NEXT STUDENT REGENT.
SECTION 10. THE INCUMBENT STUDENT REGENT SHALL DECLARE THE SELECTEDNOMINEE OF THE GASC IN THE UP SYSTEM FOR THE STUDENT REGENT.
SECTION 11. THE VOTES DURING THE SYSTEM-WIDE SELECTION SHALL BE ALLOTTED ASFOLLOWS:
[UP Baguio 2 votes
UP Diliman 2 votes
UP Los Baos 2 votes
UP Manila 2 votes
UP in the Visayas 2 votes
UP in Mindanao 2 votes
UP Cebu 2 votes
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
15/28
UPV Tacloban 1 vote
UP Extension Program in Pampanga 1 vote
UP School of Health Science in Palo, Leyte 1 voteUP School of Health Science in Baler, Aurora 1 vote]
EACH USC PRESENT FROM THE DIFFERENT UP AUTONOMOUS UNITS SPECIFICALLYBAGUIO, DILIMAN, LOS BANOS, MANILA, MINDANAO, AND VISAYAS SHALL BE ENTITLEDTO ONE (1) VOTE WHILE EACH CSC PRESENT FROM THE DIFFERENT UP AUTONOMOUSAND REGIONAL UNITS SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ONE (1) BASE VOTE, REGARDLESS OFSTUDENT POPULATION.
FURTHER, THE USC OF EACH UP AUTONOMOUS UNIT SHALL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITYOF CONSULTING THROUGH MECHANISMS IT DEEMS PRACTICABLE ITS CONSTITUENTCOLLEGE/S AND/OR DEGREE-GRANTING INSTITUTE/S WITHOUT EXISTING RESPECTIVESTUDENT COUNCIL/S, IF THERE BE ANY SUCH CONSTITUENT COLLEGE/S AND/OR DEGREE-GRANTING INSTITUTE/S, AND THEREBY CARRY ITS/THEIR ONE (1) BASE VOTE EACHDURING THE GASC FOR SR SELECTION.
SECTION 12. NO INDIVIDUAL STUDENT OR GROUP OR STUDENT COUNCIL IS ALLOWED TONOMINATE ANY STUDENT DIRECTLY TO THE OFFICE OF THE UP PRESIDENT OR THEOFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES. ALL NOMINATIONSMUST BE SUBMITTED AND DELIBERATED IN THE PROCESS HEREIN PROVIDED.
III. ON EFFECTIVITY
Article IX: General Provisions
Section 5. These rules, INCLUDING THE AMENDMENTS PASSED BY THE GASC, shall take effectimmediately upon approval by at least a majority of all student councils present and voting. ITS
EFFECTIVITY WILL COVER THREE (3) YEARS AND ONLY AFTER THEN WILL THESE RULES
BE OPEN FOR NEW AMENDMENTS.
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
16/28
University of the Philippines SystemCODIFIED RULES FOR STUDENT REGENT SELECTION
[1][2]
The Student Councils of the University of the Philippines System hereby promulgate the1rules hereunder, governing the democratic selection process for the Member,2Representing the Student Body in the Board of Regents, hereinafter referred to as the3
Student Regent (SR) as mandated under Republic Act Numbered Ninety-Five Hundred,4otherwise known as the "University of the Philippines Charter of 2008".[3]5
ARTICLE I6Definition of Terms7
SECTION 1. Any position of responsibility shall include officers and committee8chairpersons in any student or community organization as well as members, officers and9committee chairpersons in any University or College Student Council.10
SEC 2.The General Assembly shall mean the University and College Student Councils11 in the UP System.12
SEC 3.The Regional Units (RU) of the UP System are the following:13
UP Diliman Extension Program (UPDEP) in Pampanga14UP Manila School of Health Sciences (SHS) in Baler, Aurora15UP Manila SHS in Palo, Leyte16UP Manila SHS in Koronadal, South Cotabato17UP Visayas Tacloban College18
SEC 4.The Autonomous Units (AU) of the UP System are the following:19
University of the Philippines Baguio20University of the Philippines Diliman21University of the Philippines Cebu22University of the Philippines Los Baos23University of the Philippines Manila24
[1] FIRST ADOPTED by the University and College Student Councils of the University of the
Philippines System at the UP System Student Councils Meeting, 2 February 1997, School of Labor
and Industrial Relations (SOLAIR) Auditorium, UP Diliman. Subsequently amended at the GeneralAssembly of Student Councils (GASC) of the UP System on 26 and 27 January, 1998 at the
National Institute of Geological Sciences (NIGS) Auditorium UP Diliman and at the GASC on 29-
30 October, 1999 at the College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology (CEAT)
Auditorium, UP Los Baos, on 26-27 October, 2002 at the Commission on Audit (COA)
Auditorium in Palo, Leyte, on October 27-28, 2003 at the Cebu Coliseum Conference Room,
Cebu City, on October 25-26, 2004 at the Miag-ao Interactive Learning Center, UP Visayas,
Miagao, Iloilo; on October 24-25, 2007 at UP Mindanao, Davao City. LATEST VERSION from the
GASC on June 20-21, 2015 at UP Visayas Miagao Campus.
[2] APPROVED in UP System-wide referendum of students in January 2009, pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the UPCHARTER OF 2008.
[3] SUPERSEDES EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBERED TWO HUNDRED AND FOUR -A.
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
17/28
University of the Philippines Visayas25University of the Philippines Mindanao26
SEC 5.The Office of the Student Regent (OSR) refers to the incumbent Student Regent,27the secretariat and the OSR volunteers.28
SEC 6.A bona fidestudent of the university means an individual taking up academic29units for bachelor's degree, master's degree, doctorate degree, non-degree, or30certificate courses in the university, including those who are in residency status or on31leave of absence (LOA).32
SEC 7.Majority refers to the least whole number greater than 50% of all the councils33system-wide.34
SEC 8.Majority vote refers to the least whole number greater than 50% of the total votes35of all the councils present and voting.36
SEC 9.Protester refers to the party who files protest against a particular nominee, or37against the result of any deliberation or process.38
SEC10.Protestee refers to the party being protested.39
ARTICLE II40Statement of Principles and Policies41
SEC. 1.The Student Regent must be democratically selected among all students in the42UP System through a peaceful and orderly process that ensures maximum student43
participation.44
SEC. 2.The selection process must be conducted in a manner consistent with the45principle of broad and open participation of students in all levels regardless of race,46gender and sexual orientation, political ideology and affiliation, academic standing, social47status, ethno-linguistic origin, age physical abilities and religious affiliation.48
SEC. 3. The selection of the Student Regent is exclusively a student affair. The49administration and other sectors in the University are prohibited from interfering with the50process by conducting interviews, administrative investigations or in any other manner51
inconsistent with this principle.52
SEC. 4.Consistent with the preceding section, the endorsement of the UP President to53the President of the Republic of the Philippines of the nominee/s selected under these54rules is purely ministerial. The UP President can neither entertain nor endorse any name55aside from those deliberated and selected by the students in the manner consistent with56these rules.57
SEC. 5.Controversies and protests regarding the selection shall be resolved through58the internal mechanisms provided hereunder.59
ARTICLE III60Qualifications of the Nominees61
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
18/28
SEC 1.A nominee for the position of the Student Regent must meet the following62qualifications:63
(a) S/he must be a student currently enrolled in the university at the time of his/her64nomination;65
(b) S/he should have an accumulated residency of at least one year, which would66
include periods of residency and/or leave of absence;67(c) S/he must be a Filipino citizen and;68(d) S/he must have a track record reflective of his/her commitment to serve the69
studentry.70
SEC. 2. No disqualification on the basis of good academic status or standing or71performance shall be imposed on the nominees.72
SEC. 3.Grounds for disqualification shall be imposed on nominees found guilty, at any73time within his/her stay in the university, including periods when the nominee is under74
leave of absence, prior to the proclamation of the Student Regent, of any act involving75 gross misconduct or misbehavior, violence inflicted towards another person or any76property that is not his/hers, dishonesty, graft and corruption, or any criminal offense77involving moral turpitude.78
SEC. 4.Questions against the qualification of a nominee shall be filed at the OSR, or any79officer and/or member of any UP student council. Such questions shall be resolved80before the deliberations when the system-wide process begins. The decision of the GA81is final.82
ARTICLE IV83
Nomination, Acceptance and Withdrawal84
SEC. 1.Any student, group, or organization may nominate a student from any college85of any of the Autonomous or Regional Units of the UP System who has the qualifications86set forth above. Open nominations by any student or student group/organization/council87shall be held in every college in the UP System under the supervision of the College88Student Council (CSC) or, in the absence thereof, the University Student Council (USC).89
SEC. 1.1.In cases wherein a CSC and USC nominate a candidate for SR, the90said CSC and USC shall form a College Committee (CC) or University Committee91
(UC) which will be composed of students from different years or courses or92 different year level or department as the case may be.93
SEC. 2.Upon written notice of his/her nomination, a nominee must file and sign the94certificate of acceptance (CA) of the nomination with the CSC or USC within two (2)95weeks from the release of such notice or until the date set forth by the Search Committee.96
SEC. 3.Each CA must be accompanied with a vision statement, curriculum vitae or97rsum and bio data. Any material misstatement of facts is a ground for disqualification98at any stage of the selection process.99
SEC. 4.The nominee must furnish the Search Committee at each respective level with100his/her rsum and vision paper for the Office of the Student Regent at least five (5) days101b f h ti d lib ti t th i id d d th l102
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
19/28
SEC. 5.The nominee of any student group / organization / council may not be withdrawn103at any level of the search without the consent of the nominee who has validly accepted104the nomination.105
SEC. 6.In cases when a student is nominated in more than one unit, s/he must undergo106
the search process in each of those units; otherwise, s/he must accept only one of the107nominations. The search committee concerned must furnish the OSR a certification that108such a nominee underwent the process as required.109
ARTICLE V110Duties and Responsibilities111
SEC. 1.The Office of the Student Regent will serve as the overall coordinating body112during the selection process. It shall have the following duties and responsibilities:113
(a)
It shall inform all the student councils of all official communications pertinent to114 the process through memoranda, personal orientation and other similar means.115(b) Support information drive on the historical vision-mission of the Office and the116
historical role of the students in the struggle to reestablish the OSR and in the117selection process;118
(c) Serve as the General Assembly Secretariat during the system-wide selection119process for the SR. The Secretariat shall, among others, facilitate and moderate120the deliberations, provide all the student councils of the minutes of the selection121process and receive protests.122
(d) Form the University Search Committee (USC) in the event that the USCs are123unable to form the said committee in their respective unit.124
SEC. 2.The University and College Student Councils shall actively participate during the125whole process of the selection. They shall have the following duties and responsibilities:126
(a) Inform all the students and student organizations regarding the SR selection127process through organizational memoranda, personal orientation and other128similar means;129
(b) Launch massive information drive on the historical vision-mission of the OSR and130the historical role of the students in the struggle to re-establish the OSR and in131the selection process;132
(c)
The chairpersons of the USCs and CSCs shall serve as presiding officer of the133 UC, or CC, respectively;134(d) The USC shall form the CC in the event that a CSC is unable to form the said135
committee in their respective college; and136(e) Ensure maximum participation of all the students in the selection process by137
conducting symposia, fora or similar activities.138
SEC. 3.The KASAMA sa UP, by virtue of its historical role in the re-establishment of the139Office of the Student Regent, shall provide the historical perspective of the Office and the140Selection Process. They shall have the following duties and responsibilities:141
(a)
Launch massive information drive on the historical vision-mission of the OSR, the142historical role of KASAMA sa UP in the struggle to revive the OSR and the UP143t d t b d i th l ti144
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
20/28
(b) Inform all students and student organization regarding the SR selection process145through organizational memoranda, personal orientation and other similar means;146and147
(c) Ensure maximum participation of all the students to the selection process by148conducting symposia, fora or similar activities.149
ARTICLE VI150College-wide Process151
SEC. 1.The CSC shall act as the College Search Committee for the SR Selection,152referred to as the College Committee (CC), which shall be composed of all the members153of the CSC.154
SEC. 2.The CC, and in the absence of a CSC, the USC, shall be responsible for155gathering required documents from the nominees: his/her vision statement, Curriculum156Vitae or rsum and bio data. The CC shall have the following powers and functions:157
(a) Has control and supervision on the conduct of the Search on its level;158(b) Must conduct information drives and publicity campaigns on the Search;159(c) Must decide pre-deliberation or pre-election controversies, questions of eligibility160
and other matters arising from the interpretation of these rules of the conduct of161the Search on its level;162
(d) Must conduct an open, public and college-wide deliberations with the nominees163and, at the discretion of the CC, at least one non-binding straw poll among the164constituents of the college;165
(e) May promulgate rules and regulation supplemental but not inconsistent with these166rules for the smooth, orderly and peaceful conduct of the Search; and167
(f)
Conduct their deliberation(s) on the nominees and vote for at most two (2) official168nominee(s) for the college.169
SEC. 3.The official nominee(s) of each college shall be decided upon by each respective170CC taking into consideration the result of the straw poll(s), if any, and college-wide171deliberations(s).172
SEC. 4.The list of the nominees and the name(s) of the official college nominee(s) shall173be submitted to the University Student Council (USC) for the Autonomous University-174wide selection. In the absence of the USC and in the case of colleges in the regional175
units, the list of nominees and the name/s of the official nominee/s shall be submitted176 directly to the OSR for the System-Wide selection without passing through their177respective AU selection process. Each CSC shall attach an official endorsement for their178official nominee/s.179
SEC. 5.All protests shall be made in writing stating the reasons therefor and filed with180the CC, and furnishing a copy thereof to the other party, within five (5) working days upon181receipt of notice of the result of the deliberations or elections, as the case may be. The182protester shall only be allowed to file once either before the College level or the183Autonomous Unit level.184
SEC. 6.Such protest shall be decided within five (5) working days after they are received.185Failure to resolve the matter within the required period resolves the protest in favor of the186
t t Th t t h ll b l d b i d i i f th CC if ibl187
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
21/28
When the CC decides unanimously, such decision is final and unappealable. In the case188of non-unanimity, majority vote of those present and voting in the CC shall decide on the189matter. In such case, the protest on the same ground may be evaluated as an appeal190during the AU process. Such appeal must be received by the USC and CC concerned191two (2) working days before the AU process provided no AU process can be held within192two days after College-Wide deliberations.193
ARTICLE VII194Autonomous University-wide Process195
SEC. 1.The USC shall be responsible for gathering pertinent data, such as bio-data,196rsum, Curriculum Vitae, and the like, regarding the nominees for the CC. It may197summon the college nominees for interview and for other purposes. No other nominee198shall be considered except those nominated by each college through the CC, or the USC199as the case may be.200
SEC. 2.The USC and CSC shall act as the University Search Committee for the Student201 Regent, referred to as the University Committee (UC), which shall be composed of the202members of the respective USCs and the Chairpersons of the CSCs or any other duly203elected college representative in case they are not constitutionally part of the CSC.204
SEC. 3.The UC shall have the following powers and functions:205
(a) Has control and supervision of the conduct of the Search in its level;206(b) Must conduct information drives and publicity campaigns on the Search;207(c) Must decide appeals from the CC decision concerning the college-wide process,208
decide pre-deliberation or pre-election controversies, questions of qualifications209
and other matters arising from the interpretation of these rules and on the conduct210of the Search in its level;211
(d) Must conduct open, public and college-wide deliberations with the nominees and212at the discretion of the UC, at least one non-binding straw poll among the213constituents of the college;214
(e) Shall conduct their own deliberation(s) on the nominees and vote for at most two215(2) official nominee(s) of the AU;216
(f) Shall decide before the AU deliberations proper on the appeals from the decisions217of the CCs. Such decision is final and unappealable; and218
(g) May promulgate rules and regulations supplemental but not inconsistent with219
these rules for the smooth, orderly and peaceful conduct of the Search.220
SEC. 4.The two (2) official nominees of each AU shall be decided upon by the UC taking221into consideration the result of the straw polls, if any, and the AU-wide deliberation/s.222
SEC. 5.The list of the nominees and the name/s of the official AU nominee/s shall be223submitted to the OSR for the System-Wide selection. Each USC shall attach an official224endorsement for their official nominee/s.225
SEC. 6.All protest shall be made in writing stating the reasons therefor and filed with the226UC, and furnishing a copy thereof to the protestee, within five (5) working days upon227
receipt of notice of the result of the deliberation or elections, as the case may be.228
S h t t h ll b d id d ithi fi (5) ki d ft th229
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
22/28
received. Failure to resolve the matter within the required period resolves the protest in230favor of the protestee. The protest shall be resolved by a unanimous decision of the UC,231if possible. When the UC decides unanimously, such decision is final and unappealable.232In the case of non-unanimity, a majority vote of those present and voting in the UC shall233decide on the matter. In such case, the protest on the same ground may be revived as234an appeal during the System-wide process. Such appeal must be received both by the235
OSR and the USC concerned ten (10) working days before the System-Wide process.236After the lapse of the prescribed period for appeal, the same can no longer be entertained237at any level.238
SEC. 8.The nominees must submit their Vision Paper and GPOA to the Office of the239Student Regent fourteen (14) calendar days before the System-wide selection provided240no system-wide deliberations shall be held within fourteen (14) days after the AU/RU241process.242
SEC. 9.The OSR and the USCs shall provide the Vision Paper and GPOA to all SCs at243
least ten (10) working days before the System-Wide process, including all protests244 pertaining to the nominees that were forwarded to the OSR.245
ARTICLE VIII246System-wide Process247
SEC. 1.A majority of all student councils system-wide shall constitute the quorum of the248GA, sanctioning the system-wide process of the Student Regent selection.249
SEC. 2.The General Assembly (GA) of all UP University and College Student Councils250of all Autonomous and Regional Units shall deliberate on the AU and RU nominees, with251
the incumbent Student Regent as the Presiding Officer.252
SEC. 3.The first order of business for the said deliberation shall be the reading of the253Codified Rules for Student Regent Selection by the incumbent Student Regent,254subsequent vote of reaffirmation thereof by the majority of the GA, and the deliberation255on the protests and appeals elevated to the system-wide level, if any.256
SEC. 3.1The college representatives who are not officially part of the CSC must257be recognized to be part of the CSC and may vote in behalf of the CSC provided258that they have written authorization.259
SEC. 4. All the protests and/or appeals shall be read by the presiding officer and260immediately be resolved by the majority of the GASC after a deliberation thereon. The261GA shall resolve protests and/or appeals from the decisions of the UC. Such decision262shall be final and unappealable.263
SEC. 5.After the individual presentation of the nominees with their vision paper, GPOA264and an open forum following such, the GA shall vote for the final three (3) nominees by265raising of hands or secret balloting depending on the prerogative of the assembly. The266presiding officer shall declare the final three nominees who received the highest number267of votes from the AUs and RUs present and voting.268
SEC. 6.The three nominees shall then be subjected to further questioning by the GA.269
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
23/28
SEC. 7.Consensus building shall take priority over division of the house in selecting the270Student Regent.271
SEC. 8.In the event that no consensus is reached, the three nominees shall be subjected272to further deliberation/s until a nominee garners two-thirds vote of all AUs and RUs273present and voting. After which, s/he shall be subjected to a final deliberation to receive274
the mandate of the GASC.275
SEC. 9.The incumbent Student Regent shall declare the selected nominee of the GASC276in the UP System for the Student Regent.277
SEC. 10.The votes during the System-wide selection shall be allotted as follows:278
UP Baguio - 2 votes279UP Diliman - 2 votes280UP Cebu - 2 votes281
UP Los Baos 2 votes282 UP Manila 2 votes283UP Visayas 2 votes284UP Mindanao 2 votes285UPDEP in Pampanga 1 vote286UP Visayas Tacloban College 1 vote287UPM SHS in Palo, Leyte 1 vote288UPM SHS in Baler, Aurora 1 vote289UPM SHS in Koronadal, South Cotabato - 1 vote290
SEC. 11.No individual student or group or student council is allowed to nominate any291
student directly to the Office of the UP President or the Office of the President of the292Republic of the Philippines. All nominations must be submitted and deliberated in the293process as herein provided.294
ARTICLE IX295General Provisions296
SEC. 1.The Student Regent-select must resign from any position of responsibility in any297student or community organization and/or student council and student publication.298
SEC. 2. The Student Regent-select must not be permanently disqualified from the299 University. However, the Student Regent-select is advised to file a leave of absence (LOA)300to devote his/her time in the fulfillment of his/her duties and responsibilities.301
SEC. 3.The dates and periods pertinent to the selection process in the college, AU and302system levels shall be fixed by the OSR with the consent of all the USCs and regional303units.304
SEC. 4.These rules shall be amended or repealed through the majority vote of all the305student councils in the UP System. Proposals to amend should be submitted to the OSR306not later than the first (1st) day of October.307
SEC. 5.These rules shall take effect immediately upon approval by at least a majority of308ll t d t il t d ti309
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
24/28
SEC. 6.Failure to attend or to send a representative with written authorization to the310GASC for the presentation of proposed amendments during the system-wide selection311forfeits the right to vote in the processes of amendment and selection, respectively.312However, they shall still be bound by the results of the said process.313
SEC. 7.Upon vacancy of the position of the SR-select or the incumbent SR due to314permanent disqualification from the university, incapacity to enroll or file an LOA the315following semester, death, illness or any other cause which prevents him/her from316discharging functions, the position shall be filled by the second selected nominee, or the317third nominee if the latter cannot assume the position.318
Attested:NEILL J OHN G. MACUHA SGD.)
32ndStudent Regent
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
25/28
1 October 2015
Hon. Mico A. Pangalangan
Student Regent
Board of Regents
Dear Student Regent Pangalangan ,
Greetings!
As provided for by Article IX Section 4 of the Codified Rules fo
Student Regent Selection (CRSRS), the College of Social Sciences and
Philosophy (CSSP) Student Council of the University of the Philippines
Diliman forwards the following proposed amendments attached herewith to
the Codified Rules for Student Regent Selection (CRSRS).
Please note that proposed amendments or modifications are those textin boldface. Repealed clauses affected by proposed amendments are in
italicised texts enclosed in brackets.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
In Service,
Aubrey Lagbas
Chairperson
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
26/28
CSSP STUDENT COUNCIL 2015-2016Proposed CRSRS Amendments
I. ON THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE SR NOMINEES: ACADEMIC REQUIREMENT
Article II: Statement of Principles and Policies
Section 2. The selection process must be conducted in a manner consistent with the principle of broad andopen participation of students in all levels regardless of race, gender, and sexual orientation, politicalideology and affiliation, [academic standing,] social status, ethno-linguistic origin, age, physical abilitiesand religious affiliation.
Article III. Qualifications of the Nominees
Section 1. A nominee for the position of the Student Regent must meet the following qualifications:
a) S/he must be a student currently enrolled in the university at the time of his/her nomination;
b) S/he should have an accumulated residency of at least one year which would include periods of residencyand/or leave of absence;
c) S/he must be a Filipino citizen [and];
d) S/he must have a track record reflective of his/her commitment to serve the studentry
E) S/HE MUST SATISFY THE MINIMUM ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS SET BY THEUNIVERSITY CODE SUCH THAT S/HE MUST NOT INCUR THE STATUS OF ACADEMICDELINQUENCY OF PROBATION OR GRAVER THE SEMESTER PRIOR TO HER/HISNOMINATION.
[Section 2. No disqualification on the basis of good academic status or standing or performance shall beimposed on the nominees.]
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
27/28
II. ON THE VOTING SCHEME OF THE SYSTEM-WIDE PROCESS: ONE COUNCIL, ONE
VOTE
Article VIII: System-wide Process
Section 5. After the individual presentation of the nominees with their vision paper, GPOA and an open forumfollowing such, the GA shall vote for the final three (3) nominees by raising of hands or secret ballotingdepending on the prerogative of the assembly. The presiding officer shall declare the final three nominees who
received the highest number of votes from the UNIVERSITY STUDENT COUNCILS AND COLLEGESTUDENT COUNCILS OF THE AUs and RUs present and voting.
Section 8. In the event that no consensus is reached, the three nominees shall be subjected to further deliberation/s until a nominee garners two-thirds vote of all UNIVERSITY STUDENT COUNCILSAND COLLEGESTUDENT COUNCILS OF THE AUs and RUs present and voting. After which,s/he shall be subjected to afinal deliberation to receive the mandate of the GASC.
SECTION 9. IN THE EVENT THAT NO NOMINEE GARNERS TWO-THIRDS OF THE VOTES CAST,THE TWO NOMINEES WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBER OF VOTES SHALL BE SUBJECTED TOFURTHER DELIBERATIONS. IF THERE SHOULD BE NO CONSENSUS AS TO WHO SHALL BE
SELECTED, VOTES SHALL BE CAST AND THE NOMINEE GARNERING THE HIGHER NUMBEROF VOTES SHALL BE PROCLAIMED AS THE NEXT STUDENT REGENT.
SECTION 10. THE INCUMBENT STUDENT REGENT SHALL DECLARE THE SELECTEDNOMINEE OF THE GASC IN THE UP SYSTEM FOR THE STUDENT REGENT.
SECTION 11. THE VOTES DURING THE SYSTEM-WIDE SELECTION SHALL BE ALLOTTED ASFOLLOWS:
[UP Baguio 2 votes
UP Diliman 2 votes
UP Los Baos 2 votes
UP Manila 2 votes
UP in the Visayas 2 votes
UP in Mindanao 2 votes
UP Cebu 2 votes
-
7/24/2019 MEAP 2015-004
28/28
UPV Tacloban 1 vote
UP Extension Program in Pampanga 1 vote
UP School of Health Science in Palo, Leyte 1 voteUP School of Health Science in Baler, Aurora 1 vote]
EACH USC PRESENT FROM THE DIFFERENT UP AUTONOMOUS UNITS SPECIFICALLYBAGUIO, DILIMAN, LOS BANOS, MANILA, MINDANAO, AND VISAYAS SHALL BE ENTITLEDTO ONE (1) VOTE WHILE EACH CSC PRESENT FROM THE DIFFERENT UP AUTONOMOUSAND REGIONAL UNITS SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ONE (1) BASE VOTE, REGARDLESS OFSTUDENT POPULATION.
FURTHER, THE USC OF EACH UP AUTONOMOUS UNIT SHALL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITYOF CONSULTING THROUGH MECHANISMS IT DEEMS PRACTICABLE ITS CONSTITUENTCOLLEGE/S AND/OR DEGREE-GRANTING INSTITUTE/S WITHOUT EXISTING RESPECTIVESTUDENT COUNCIL/S, IF THERE BE ANY SUCH CONSTITUENT COLLEGE/S AND/OR DEGREE-GRANTING INSTITUTE/S, AND THEREBY CARRY ITS/THEIR ONE (1) BASE VOTE EACHDURING THE GASC FOR SR SELECTION.
SECTION 12. NO INDIVIDUAL STUDENT OR GROUP OR STUDENT COUNCIL IS ALLOWED TONOMINATE ANY STUDENT DIRECTLY TO THE OFFICE OF THE UP PRESIDENT OR THEOFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES. ALL NOMINATIONSMUST BE SUBMITTED AND DELIBERATED IN THE PROCESS HEREIN PROVIDED.
III. ON EFFECTIVITY
Article IX: General Provisions
Section 5. These rules, INCLUDING THE AMENDMENTS PASSED BY THE GASC, shall take effectimmediately upon approval by at least a majority of all student councils present and voting. ITS
EFFECTIVITY WILL COVER THREE (3) YEARS AND ONLY AFTER THEN WILL THESE RULES
BE OPEN FOR NEW AMENDMENTS.