mathematical modelling of cancer invasion of tissue: the role of the urokinase plasminogen...
TRANSCRIPT
Mathematical Modelling of Cancer Invasion of Tissue:
The Role of the Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System
Mark Chaplain and Georgios Lolas
Division of MathematicsUniversity of Dundee
SCOTLAND
The Individual Cancer Cell“A Nonlinear Dynamical System”
Multi-Cellular Spheroid
•~ 10 6 cells• maximum diameter ~ 2mm• Necrotic core• Quiescent region • Thin proliferating rim
Malignant Epithelial Tumour
• Bladder Carcinoma• Typical features :
• Irregular structure• Highly invasive
• Potentially fatal
Metastasis:“A Multistep Process”
The Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System.
• uPA • uPAR • Plasmin• PAI-1• Vitronectin
The Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System.
• uPA released from the cells as a precursor (pro-uPA).
• uPAR is the cell surface receptor of uPA.
• Plasmin is a serine protease that can degrade most ECM proteins.
The Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System.
• PAI-1 is a uPA inhibitor. PAI-1 binds uPA/uPAR complex.
• uPA and PAI-1 are degraded and uPAR is recycled to the cell surface.
• Vitronectin is an ECM protein, involved in the adhesion of cells to the ECM. PAI-1 and uPAR compete for vitronectin binding.
The Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System.
The uPA system.
The uPA receptor (uPAR) is anchored to the surface of a variety of cells including tumor cells.uPA is secreted by normal and tumour cells and binds with highspecificity and affinity to uPAR. This binding activates uPA andfocuses proteolytic activity to the cell surface where plasminogenis converted to plasmin. Components of the ECM are degraded by plasmin, facilitating cellmigration and metastasis.Vitronectin interacts with uPAR leading to the activation of an intracellular signaling cascade.
The uPA system.
The uPA system.
““All models are an approximation, All models are an approximation, and ultimately a falsification, and ultimately a falsification, of reality’’of reality’’
Alan Turing
Mathematical Model at Cell-Receptor Level
• uPA binds to its receptor thus forming a stable complex, namely the uPA/uPAR complex.
• PAI-1 binds with high affinity to uPA.
1/1
/2
1
PAIuPAPAIuPA
uPARuPAuPARuPAk
k
ODE Mathematical Model
productionuPARPAIdecay
productionrecycling
presencePAItoduetiondownregula
prrrkpprprukdt
dp
rpa
parrkrprpruk
dt
dr
2
/1
2020002
11
1
41
0010001
)()(
)()(
Steady States
• (i) a steady state where plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is in excess over uPA receptor p = 1.12, r = 0.39.
• (ii) a steady state where there is an ‘equality’ of uPAR and PAI-1concentrations: p = 0.62, r =0.72.
• (iii) a steady state where we observe an ‘excess’ of uPAR over PAI-1: r = 4.0, p = 0.1.
Stability of the Steady States
• (i) p = 1.12, r = 0.39, a stable spiral.• (ii) p = 0.62, r =0.72, a saddle point.• (iii) r = 4.0, p = 0.1, a stable node.
Cell Migration in Tissue:Chemotaxis
No ECM
with ECM
ECM + tenascinEC &
Cell migratory response to local tissue environment cues
HAPTOTAXIS
PDE Model: The cancer cells equation
vcccx
v
x
pc
x
uc
xx
cD
xt
txccccc 131 1
,
• We assume that they move by linear or nonlinear diffusion (random motility/kinesis).This approach permits us to investigate cell-matrix interactions in isolation.
• We assume that they also move in a haptotactic (VN) and chemotactic (uPA, PAI-1) way. Haptotaxis (chemotaxis) is the directed migratory response of cells to gradients of fixed or bound non diffusible (diffusible) chemicals.
• Proliferation: Logistic growth + cell – matrix signalling.
Vitronectin
• The extracellular matrix is known to contain many macromolecules, including fibronectin, laminin and vitronectin, which can be degraded by the uPA system.
• We assume that the uPA/uPAR complex degrades the extracellular matrix upon contact.
• Proliferation: logistic growth + cell-ECM signalling
• Loss due to PAI-1 binding.
1/VN-PAI
22
signallingmatrix -cell
23
growth logistic
2
ndegradatio
)1(,
vpvcvvvuct
txv
The uPA equation.
• Active uPA is produced (or activated) either by the tumour cells or through the cell-matrix interactions.
• The production of active uPA by the tumour cells.• Decay of uPA due to PAI-1 binding.
upcvcuD
t
txuu 313131
2 )(,
• c (x,t) : tumour cell density.• v (x, t) : the extracellular matrix concentration.• u (x, t) : the uPA concentration
ucuD
t
txu
cvvvcuvt
txv
cvccx
vc
x
uc
xx
cD
xt
txc
u
ccc
31312
232
131
,
1,
1,
ucuD
t
txu
cvvvcuvt
txv
cvccx
vc
x
uc
xx
cD
xt
txc
u
ccc
31312
232
131
,
1,
1,
The PAI-1 equation.
• Active PAI-1 is produced (or activated) either by the tumour cells or as a result of uPA/uPAR interaction.
• Decay of PAI-1 due to uPA and VN binding.
vpupcucpD
t
txpp 42414141
2 )(,
• c (x,t) : tumour cell density.• v (x, t) : the extracellular matrix concentration.• u (x, t) : the uPA concentration.• p (x, t) : the PAI-1 concentration.
vpupcucpD
t
txp
upcvcuDt
txu
pvcvvvcuvt
txv
cvccx
v
x
pc
x
uc
xx
cD
xt
txc
p
u
cccc
424141412
3131312
22232
131
)(,
)(,
1,
1,
vpupcucpD
t
txp
upcvcuDt
txu
pvcvvvcuvt
txv
cvccx
v
x
pc
x
uc
xx
cD
xt
txc
p
u
cccc
424141412
3131312
22232
131
)(,
)(,
1,
1,
Turing Type Taxis Instability
• Initially homogeneous steady state evolved into a spatially heterogeneous stable steady state.
• Linearly stable spatially homogeneous steady state at c = 1, v = 0, u = 0.375,
p = 0.8.• The spatially homogeneous steady
state is still linearly stable in Diffusion presence.
Taxis Instability
Since the addition of diffusion did not affect the stability of the aforementioned steady state, our only hope for destabilizing the steady state is the introduction of the chemotaxis term.
Modelling Plasmin Formation.
• c (x,t) : tumour cell density.• v (x, t) : the extracellular matrix concentration.• u (x, t) : the uPA concentration.• p (x, t) : the PAI-1 concentration.• m (x, t): the plasmin concentration.
ucpvpumD
t
txm
vpupcmpDt
txp
cuupcuDt
txu
vpupvvvmuvmt
txv
cuccx
v
x
pc
x
uc
xx
cD
xt
txc
m
p
u
cccc
5352512
424141412
3331312
22212
131
,
)(,
,
1)(,
1,
ucpvpumD
t
txm
vpupcmpDt
txp
cuupcuDt
txu
vpupvvvmuvmt
txv
cuccx
v
x
pc
x
uc
xx
cD
xt
txc
m
p
u
cccc
5352512
424141412
3331312
22212
131
,
)(,
,
1)(,
1,
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Linear stability analysis
Non-trivial steady-state: (c*, v*, u*, p*, m*) (1, 0.07, 0.198, 1.05, 0.29)
linearly stable
Semi-trivial steady state: (0,1,0,0,0)
linearly unstable
We consider small perturbations about the non-trivial steady state:
0Wn0WW
xWxw
xw
xx
,
where)(),(
form theof
solutions seeking and)...,,(),( denoting
...),,(*,),(*
22
~~
~~
k
ect
vut
tvvvtuuu
kk
tk
Linear stability analysis
0)(...)( 2425 khkf
0Re
DISPERSION RELATION
Linear stability analysis
Linear stability analysis: Dispersion curveμ=0.2
Dynamic Tissue Invasion
Linear stability analysis: Dispersion curve: μ=10
Cancer cell density profile: μ=10
Linear stability analysis: Dispersion curve: μ=1
Linear stability analysis: Dispersion curve: μ=0.9
Linear stability analysis: Dispersion curve: μ=0.95
“Stationary” Pattern: μ=0.95
• Relatively simple models generate a wide range of tumour invasion and heterogeneity.
• In line with recent experimental results (Chun, 1997) – plasmin formation results in rich spatio-temporal dynamics and tumour heterogeneity.
• The impact of interactions between tumour cells and the ECM on possible metastasis.
• “taxis”, invasion and signalling are strongly correlated and rely on each other.
• “dynamic” pattern formation through excitation of multiple spatial modes
Conclusions and Future Work: