materials for homogenous hadron calorimetry marcel demarteau fermilab internal review august 2,...
TRANSCRIPT
Materials for Homogenous Hadron
Calorimetry
Marcel DemarteauFermilab Internal Review August 2, 2010, Fermilab
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Introduction As demonstrated by the previous speakers, HH-calorimetry
portends to be extremely powerful
Next generation experiments demand the ultimate in precision and background rejection
Total absorption hadron calorimetry is well positioned to significantly enhance the physics reach of future experiments
But, significant R&D is needed to develop the right medium that meets the physics requirements
The timescale of new experiments seems well matched with carrying out a well focused R&D program on the development of these new materials
Slide 2
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
History Investing in new calorimetry techniques has been done in the
past KTeV: high-speed , high-resolution CsI EM calorimeter (1996)
3100 crystals, covering 2m x 2m 27 X0 deep (50cm)
Three crystal vendors: Horiba, Crismatec and Bicron
Only Horiba was able to grow 50cm long crystals. Crismatec and Bicron has 25 cm long crystals that were glued together
Tight mechanical tolerances were difficult to achieve simultaneouslywith the uniformity requirements
Uniformity often required polishing and too much polishing would take the crystal out of mechanical spec.
Slide 3
2½x2½x50 cm3
5x5x50cm3
Horiba $4.78/cc $4.10/cc
Crismatec
$3.76/cc $2.80/cc
Bicron $4.60/cc --
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
E760 / E835 Calorimeter Experiment to explore charmonium states through p-pbar
annihilation Calorimeter was composed of 1280
lead-glass Čerenkov counters read out with photomultiplier tubes Spatial resolution of 9 mm obtained Energy resolution of 3.0%/√E + 1.5%
Slide 4
Fermilab Pub 90/190-ENIM A 519 (2004) 558–609
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
E760 / E835 Calorimeter Crystals were manufactured by Schott Glass Technologies,
Inc. Duryea, Pennsylvania
Slide 5
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
History Some more recent examples are:
OPAL: leadglass calorimeter L3: BGO EM calorimeter CMS: PbWO4 calorimeter
Dedicated efforts to develop the crystals
Slide 6
L3
OPAL CMS
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Requirements Goal: obtain high energy resolution through total absorption Requirements: simultaneous detection of Cherenkov and
scintillation through wavelength and timing cut
Specifications: 1. Clean separation of scintillation/Cherenkov light
High transmittance down to UV (300nm) Scintillation at longer wavelength, ~500nm Relatively slow decay, ~100ns No short wave and fast decay scintillation
2. High density for short interaction length3. Good Cherenkov light yield, 10pe/GeV4. Modest scintillation light yield, 1000pe/GeV5. Stable properties 6. Low cost
Slide 7
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Material Search
Slide 8
Sci
ntill
ator
s
Inorganic
Organic
Single Crystals
Ceramics
Glasses
Plastics
Liquid Scintillators
Oxides
Halides
A disc
ipline
in its
elf
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Fluoride Scintillators
… and many more varieties due to doping, e.g. Eu (Europium), Sm (Samarium), Tb (Terbium), Er (Erbium) doped PbF2
Slide 9
Crystal PbF2 BaYb2F8 CdF2 CeF3 LaF3:Nd LaF3:Ce BaF2
Densityg/cm3
7,78 7,0 6,38 6,16 5,89 5,89 4,88
Cut-off, nm
245 230 320 280 125 (pure) 125 (pure) <200
LY, Ph/MeV ~100 >400 1600 70070
2200 14009700
Decay, ns
18 1,3-6 5/30 5300
3, 27;270
0,9630
Lum,nm
~370 173>350
300;350 200302
Woody,96
Visser,92 Moses,91 Visser,92
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Oxide Scintillators
Slide 10
Crystal PbWO CdWO ZnWO CaWO CaWO:Bi NBWO BGO GSO BSO
Density 8,2 7,9 7,87 6,06 6,06 7,59 7,13 7,13 6,8
Cut-off, nm
>350-400
300 280 >380 300 295
LY, Ph/MeV
100 18.000 21.500 6.000 8.400 100 8.200 12.000 1.200
Decay, ns
5, 10 -21 μs
-9μs
400 3, 25 300 30-60 112
Emission,nm
430 495 480 420 480 530 480 440 470
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Material Development The materials for total absorption calorimetry need to be
engineered to meet the specifications
This is clearly NOT our task
Slide 12
Modify the absorption edge
Optimize scintillation and Cherenkov
Improve optical properties
Address cost
…
Doping
bonding
Energy trans.
fluorescence
Heat treatment
Composition
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Collaboration HH-calorimetry needs the development of new materials
It appears that there are no fundamental limits to count Cherenkov and scintillation photons
There are many potential candidates, but systematic studies are absent
The expected time scale for application is enough to develop new sensor material
Affordable cost of detectors is a key problem for crystal technology and production
Systematic collaborative R&D is of critical importance !
Slide 13
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Workshops To date, two workshops on HH-calorimetry organized:
Shanghai, February 19, 2008 Exploratory discussions with companies and universities
Beijing, May 9, 2010 Satellite meeting at the CALOR 2010 workshop http://indico.ihep.ac.cn/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=1470 Twelve detailed presentations on the subject
Given the traction and interest of the community, an international organization committee to pursue the development of materials for HH-calorimetry has been formed before the 2nd workshop:
Marcel Demarteau, Steve Derenzo, Etiennette Auffray, Jun Fang, Alexander Gektin, Paul Lecoq, Michele Livan, William Moses, Adam Para, Yifang Wang, Marvin Weber, Tianchi Zhao, Ren-yuan Zhu
Slide 14
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Workshops A third workshop is being
planned as satellite meeting at the IEEE meeting in Knoxville, TN, October 31, 2010 Conveners of the 3rd HHCAL
workshop: Paul Lecoq (CERN) Stephen E. Derenzo (LBL) Marvin J. Weber (LBL)
Slide 15
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Consortium Formation of an HH-cal consortium
BGRI (Beijing Glass Research Institute) Caltech CERN Fermilab IHEP (Beijing) Institute for Scintillation Materials (Kharkov) LBL (HEP and Materials Science) NingBo University SICCAS (Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of
Science) University of Washington
All interested in collaborative R&D, each bringing specific expertise
Slide 16
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
LBNL For example, LBNL High-Throughput Facility for Scintillator
Material Discovery High-Throughput Screening of Crystalline Powder and Solid
Samples (Stephen Derenzo) LBNL Crystal Growth Facility (Edith Bourret-Courchesne)
Slide 17
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
LBNL High-Throughput measurements:
8 keV monochromatic X-ray beam diffractometry for synthesis
verification 50 keVp white X-ray beam
luminescence spectra scintillation luminosities
200-1000 nm optical excitation excitation and emission spectra quantum efficiencies
200-1000 nm reflectance band gaps (1.5 to 5 eV)
80 ps, 40 keVp pulsed X-rays decay times scintillation luminosities filters for wavelength selected decay times
All with computer-controlled sample changers, bar code readers, and automatic data upload to a real-time database
Slide 18
Furnace Array
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Fermilab’s Role Fermilab plays at least two critical roles:
Scientific driver for the development of new materials Applications in new projects, such as the ILC, CLIC or MuC Application in high precision experiments
‘Client’ or ‘End-user’ of the new materials Characterization of new materials in real beam conditions (test beam) Feasibility of technology in realistic setups (arrays) Development of technology for use in experiments
Development of Calibration Development of photo-readout Development of mechanical assembly …
Fermilab is in the eminent position to take scientific leadership for high-energy physics applications of this technology
Slide 19
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Summary The development of new materials for total absorption
hadron calorimetry is a necessity
Fermilab will not and cannot develop these materials
Industry and other research institutions are very interested in carrying out the R&D for this development, as witnessed by the growing interest in this effort
Fermilab is in the unique position to take scientific leadership, but requires us to demonstrate unambiguously that we are committed to developing the technology
Slide 20
HHCAL Review, Fermilab, August 2, 2010 -- M. Demarteau
Resources Needed Seed money for industry to start the development of new
materials is needed. It is expected that this will be of the order of $50-$100k per year Note that there is an agreement that costs will be shared
among the main stakeholders
As for the scientific leadership, that will be support indirectly through support for the simulation, photo-readout and beam test efforts
Slide 21