materials & engineering sciences center atoms to continuum external second gate, fourier...
TRANSCRIPT
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
External Second Gate, Fourier Transform Ion Mobility Spectrometry:
“FT-IMS”
Next Generation Ion Mobility Spectrometer
Edward E. Tarver, Ph.D.
Analytical Material Sciences Department
Sandia National Laboratories-Livermore, California
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Real-time response: few seconds analysis time.
Sensitivity: low part-per-billion detection without pre-concentration.
Versatility: simultaneous/universal response.
Simplicity of electronics: no vacuum pumps/chromatographs.
Field portability: low power, size and weight.
Battery powered military and commercial units available.
Unattended monitoring: perimeter and network defense.
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Sample Inlet
Ion Drift Region
Drift Gas Exhaust Air Drift Gas Inlet
High VoltageRepeller
63NiIonization Region
EntranceGate
FocusingRings
ApertureGrid
Faraday Collector
Signal Out
Commercial/Military IMS Drift Tube
Drif
t Gas
Flo
w----
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Ion Gating in Signal Averaging IMS
open
closed
0.2 ms 20-25 ms
1. Gate is pulsed open to admit ions less than < 1% of the duty cycle.
2. Greater than 99% of the ions formed in the source are not detected.
3. Given the initial quantities, the sensitivity loss can be devastating.
Reference: United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. “Technology Against Terrorism: The Federal Effort”, (1991) Page 84.
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 5 10 15 20 25
Signal Averaging IMSReactant Ion and Calibrant Peaks
Inte
nsity
Drift Time (ms)
Signal intensity and spectral resolution generated by conventional (signal averaging) IMS.
The observed peak tailing is due to ion-molecule reactions occurring during time-of-flight and further compounded by the signal averaging process.
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Fourier Transform Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Increased Sensitivity, Lower Detection Limits: Sensitivity depends on the duty cycle.
FT-IMS operates with 50% ion gating efficiency compared to 1% with conventional IMS.
Fifty times more ions transmitted and detected than conventional IMS.
Improved Resolution, Fewer False Alarms: FT-IMS dual-gate design eliminates
broadening due to ion-molecule reactions and averaging process.
Conventional IMS sums all variations in ion velocity, broadening peaks and reducing
resolution. No need to average with FT-IMS.
Suited for Miniaturization: FT-IMS performance allows miniaturization of detectors.
Adaptable to Current IMS Systems: No hardware modifications to drift tube.
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Entrance gate pulse
Exit gate pulse
open
open
closed
closed
CYCLE REPEATED(IF DESIRED)
LOW FREQUENCY
HIGHFREQUENCY
1. Gates are open and closed for equal amounts of time no matter how frequently they are pulsed.
2. Ion collection during half of the analytical cycle time, i.e., 50% duty cycle.
3. Low frequency greater Signal/Noise, High frequency better Resolution.
Ion Gating in FT-IMS
8Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Fourier Transform of theIon Mobility Interferogram
0 1 2 3 4
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Frequency / kHz
Ion Mobility Interferogram Ion Mobility Spectrum
Fourier Transform
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
1b. 10 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum
Drift Time (ms)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
1a. Signal Averaged IMS Spectrum
Drift Time (ms)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
1b. 10 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum
Drift Time (ms)
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
Conventional IMS vs. FT-IMS
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
1c. 20 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum
Drift Time (ms)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
1d. 40 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum
Drift Time (ms)
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
FT-IMS Allows Tunable Resolution
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Fourier Transform IMSOpen
Closed
Open
Closed
Signal Averaging IMS
****** ***** ***** ***** ***** **** * ** * ** * ** ** ** *
*
************
*******
*
************
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
TNT Response as a Function of Scanning Time
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
PETN Response as a Function of Scanning Frequency
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
HNS Response at 10kHz and 20kHz Scanning Frequency
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
HMX Response: Frequency Range and Scan Time
20
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
RDX Response as a Function of Frequency Range Scanned
Resolution vs. Aspect Ratio as Indicator of Peak Quality
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
RESOLUTION (R): R = Drift Time (ms) / Peak Width at Half Height (ms)
•Resolution calculation ignores peak broadening below Half Height where peak tailing and overlap limits ability to separate adjacent peaks.
•Drift time dependent: broad, low intensity peaks with long drift times can give higher Resolution (R) than strong, sharp peaks with short drift times.
•Misleading indicator of instrumental resolving power.
ASPECT RATIO: AR = Peak Height (h) / Peak Width at Base (w)
•Unbiased indicator of peak quality, includes peak width below Half Height.
•Aspect Ratio is Independent of drift time and describes actual peak shape.
Resolution Number vs. Aspect Ratio (Drift Time/w1/2) (Peak Height/wb)
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Drift Time (ms)
R = 5/2 = 2.5 R = 20/2 = 10 R = 32/2 = 16 R = 40/2.5 = 16
AR = 3.25/.375 = 8.6 AR = 8.6 AR = 8.6 AR = 0.235
Resolution in IMS
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Selected Bench-top IMS Instruments
IMS 5000 UVIMS-MCC Itemiser AirSentry IonScan 400B
Draeger G.A.S. G.E./Ion Track SAES/Molecular Smiths DetectionSafety Co. Technol. AnalyticsGermany Germany U.S.A. Italy U.K.
Tritium 63Ni or UV 63Ni 63Ni 63Ni50 30-60 NA 25 44
Selected Handheld IMS Instruments
RAID-M IMS Mobile µIMS VaporTracer Quantum Sniffer LCD3.2
Bruker Draeger G.A.S. G.E./Ion Track Implant Sciences Smiths Detection
Daltonics Safety Co. Technol. CorporationGermany Germany Germany U.S.A. U.S.A. U.K.
63Ni Tritium 63Ni 63Ni Laser Corona30+ 50 30-60 NA 50 NA
Reference: Analytical Chemistry, Product Review. October 1, 2003. Pages 435-438A
Peak Resolution: R = td/w1/2 Aspect Ratio: AR = h/wb
PEAK IMS X2G-FT-IMS IMS X2G-FT-IMS
Ko =1.84 SA 10K 20K 40K SA 10K 20K 40K
TNT 40.97 30.27 36.59 10.74 156.8 101.6 PETN 41.23 28.74 39.56 13.68 209.8 18.88 HNS 41.94 28.74 34.31 5.98 188.4 130.2 HMX 41.35 28.57 40.98 3.02 185.6 36.56 RDX ------ 28.84 50.92 ------ 113.4 31.89
Averages: 41.37 29.03 37.72 8.35 170.8 63.82
Ko =1.54
TNT 45.59 30.41 30.75 42.47 9.12 156.8 134.0 56.87 PETN 38.20 37.42 41.40 ------ 5.68 47.14 75.90 ------ HNS 45.70 26.86 40.67 ------ 12.8 51.70 77.13 ------ HMX 42.04 31.76 41.49 65.99 7.52 147.4 56.84 29.81 RDX 46.33 ------ 34.11 75.27 9.32 ------ 17.86 ------
Averages: 43.57 31.61 37.68 61.24 8.88 100.8 72.34 ------
Peak Quality Determines
False Alarm Rate
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25
Signal Averaging IMS100ppb RDX in acetoneIn
ten
sity
Drift Time (ms)
RDX
acetone
reactant ionpeak
8.5 ms
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Comparison of FT-IMS and Signal Averaging IMSSample 100 ppb RDX
Signal Averaged IMS
Fourier Transform IMS
Inte
nsi
ty
Drift Time (ms)
RDX
Note the comparative resolution of the peak a 8.5 ms. FT-IMS is able to resolve both species Present whereas signal averaging cannot. The peak at 12 ms is residual acetone.
8.5 ms
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Handheld FT-IMS
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
FT-IMS: Rear View
Materials & EngineeringSciences CenterAtoms to Continuum
FT-IMS: 9-Volt Batteries in Parallel
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
FT-IMS: Interior View
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
FT-IMS: Vertical Battery Arrangement
Materials & EngineeringSciences Center
Atoms to Continuum
Acknowledgements
Sandia National Laboratories, Research Foundations &Laboratory Directed Research and Development Grants
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore CA Analytical Material Sciences Department
Dr. Jim Wang, Mr. Anh Phan, Dr. Kent Pfeiffer, Mr. John Warmouth
Professor Herbert Hill, Washington State University, Pullman WAProfessor David Harris, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont CA
United States Department of the Navy: Contract N4175603GO14803