material requirements planning defined materials requirements planning (mrp) is the logic for...
TRANSCRIPT
Material Requirements PlanningDefined
• Materials requirements planning (MRP) is the logic for determining the number of parts, components, and materials needed to produce a product.
• MRP provides time scheduling information specifying when each of the materials, parts, and components should be ordered or produced.
• Dependent demand drives MRP.
Material Requirements Planning System
• Based on a master production schedule, a material requirements planning system:– Creates schedules identifying the
specific parts and materials required to produce end items.
– Determines exact unit numbers needed.
– Determines the dates when orders for those materials should be released, based on lead times.
Firm orders from knowncustomers
Forecastsof demand
from randomcustomers
Aggregateproduct
plan
Masterproductionschedule
(MPS)
Materialplanning(MRP)
Engineeringdesign
changes
Bill ofmaterial
file
Inventorytransactions
Inventoryrecord
file
Reports
3
Product Structure Thinking Challenge
The demand for product A is 50. How many of each component is needed to satisfy demand?
A
B(2) C(3)
D(2)
E(1)E(3) F(2)
D(2)G(1)
A
B(2) C(3)
D(2)
E(1)E(3) F(2)
D(2)G(1)
Product Structure Solution
A
B(2) C(3)
D(2)
E(1)E(3) F(2)
D(2)G(1)
A
B(2) C(3)
D(2)
E(1)E(3) F(2)
D(2)G(1)
50
50 x 3 = 15050 x 2 = 100
150 x 2 = 300
150 x 1 = 150
300 x 1 = 300
300 x 2 = 600
100 x 3 = 300
100 x 2 = 200
Note: D: 200 + 600 = 800 E: 300 + 150 = 450
MRP Scheduling Terminology
• Net requirements – the amount needed to meet gross requirements in a particular period.
• Planned order receipt - amount of the item that you are planning to receive in a particular period
• Planned order release - an order that you are planning to release in a particular period
MRP Example - One item’s complete record
Starting information 1 2 3 4 5
Gross Requirements 2 20 25 15
Scheduled Receipts 5 30
On-Hand 20 20
Net Requirements
Planned Order Receipts
Planned Order Releases
Lead time = 3; lot policy = lot-for-lot (LFL); on-hand = 20 units; safety stock = 0 units.
MRP Example - Period 1
1 2 3 4 5
Gross Requirements 2 20 25 15
Scheduled Receipts 5 30
On-Hand 20 20 23
Net Requirements
Planned Order Receipts
Planned Order Releases
Lead time = 3; lot policy = lot-for-lot (LFL); on-hand = 20 units; safety stock = 0 units.
MRP Example - Period 2
1 2 3 4 5
Gross Requirements 2 20 25 15
Scheduled Receipts 5 30
On-Hand 20 20 23 3
Net Requirements
Planned Order Receipts
Planned Order Releases
Lead time = 3; lot policy = lot-for-lot (LFL); on-hand = 20 units; safety stock = 0 units.
MRP Example - Period 3
1 2 3 4 5
Gross Requirements 2 20 25 15
Scheduled Receipts 5 30
On-Hand 20 20 23 3 33
Net Requirements
Planned Order Receipts
Planned Order Releases
Lead time = 3; lot policy = lot-for-lot (LFL); on-hand = 20 units; safety stock = 0 units.
MRP Example - Period 4
1 2 3 4 5
Gross Requirements 2 20 25 15
Scheduled Receipts 5 30
On-Hand 20 20 23 3 33 8
Net Requirements
Planned Order Receipts
Planned Order Releases
Lead time = 3; lot policy = lot-for-lot (LFL); on-hand = 20 units; safety stock = 0 units.
MRP Example - Period 5
1 2 3 4 5
Gross Requirements 2 20 25 15
Scheduled Receipts 5 30
On-Hand 20 20 23 3 33 8
Net Requirements 7
Planned Order Receipts 7
Planned Order Releases 7
Lead time = 3; lot policy = lot-for-lot (LFL); on-hand = 20 units; safety stock = 0 units.
Low Level Coding
• What about this?
A
B C
D C E
E
Level 0
Level 1
Level 3
Level 2
Won’t having the same part at different levels make it harder to do level by level
calculations?
Low Level Coding - “How to”• Place each item at same level - it simplifies the calculations
A
B C
D C E
E
Level 0
Level 1
Level 3
Level 2
A
B
CD C
EE
Before: After:
Another MRP ExampleAn end item (A) is assembled from 1 sub-component C, 2 part D’s, and 1 sub-component B
Each sub-component C is assembled from 1 part D and 1 part E
Each sub-component B is assembled from 1 part C and 2 part E’s
The master production schedule calls for 250 units of A in week 6, 140 in week 8, and 200 in week 9.
The following information is available from the inventory status file:
Part/Sub-component BeginningAvailable
ScheduledReceipts
Lead Time SafetyStock
Lot Size
A 5 0 1 week 0 L4LB 5 0 1 week 5 10'sC 0 0 2 weeks 0 L4LD 0 5 in week 1 1 week 0 150 min.E 5 5 in week 2 1 week 0 10's
Types of Time Fences• Frozen
– No schedule changes allowed within this window.
• Moderately Firm– Specific changes allowed within product groups
as long as parts are available.
• Flexible– Significant variation allowed as long as overall
capacity requirements remain at the same levels.
Example of Time Fences
8 15 26
Weeks
FrozenModerately
Firm Flexible
Firm Customer Orders
Forecast and availablecapacity
Capacity
Work-Center Scheduling Objectives
• Meet due dates
• Minimize lead time
• Minimize setup time or cost
• Minimize work-in-process inventory
• Maximize machine utilization
Priority Rules for Job Sequencing
1. First-come, first-served (FCFS)
2. Shortest operating time (SOT)
3. Last-come, first served (LCFS)
4. Earliest due date first (EDD)
Many other possible rules...
Example of Job Sequencing: First-Come First-Served
Jobs (in order Processing Due Date Flow Timeof arrival) Time (days) (days hence) (days)
Answer: FCFS Schedule
Jobs (in order Processing Due Dateof arrival) Time (days) (days hence)
A 4 5B 7 10C 3 6D 1 4
Suppose you have the four jobs to the right arrive for processing on one machine.
What is the FCFS schedule?
Average Lateness = (0 +1 + 8 + 11)/4
= 5 days
Average Flow Time = (4+11+14+15)/4
= 11 days
Total Flow Time
Late
A 4 5 4 0B 7 10 11 1C 3 6 14 8D 1 4 15 11
PriorityRule
AverageFlow Time
AverageLateness
TotalFlow Time
FCFS 11 days 5 days 15SOT 7 days 2 days 15LCFS 7.75 days 2.75 days 15EDD 7.25 days 1.75 days 15
Summary:
Characteristics of Location Decisions
• Long-term decisions• Very difficult to reverse• Affect fixed & variable costs
– Transportation cost • As much as 25% of product price
– Other costs: Taxes, wages, rent etc.
• Objective: Maximize benefit of location to firm
• Cost focus– Revenue varies little
between locations
• Location is a major cost factor– Affects shipping &
production costs (e.g., labor)– Costs vary greatly between
locations
Manufacturing Location Strategies
© 1995 Corel Corp.
Service Location Strategies
• Revenue focus– Costs differences among
locations are relatively less important
• Location is a major revenue factor– Affects amount of
customer contact– Affects volume of
business © 1995 Corel Corp.
Location Methods:
Factor Rating Method
• Most widely used location technique• Useful for service & manufacturing
locations• Rates locations using factors
– Qualitative (intangible) factors• Example: Education quality, labor skills
– Quantitative (tangible) factors• Example: Short-run & long-run costs
Factor Rating Method Solution
Omaha Denver
Factor Weight ScoreWeighted Factor Score
Weighted Factor
Mfg. costs 0.7 8 5.6 6 4.2Cost of living 0.1 7 0.7 6 0.6Labor avail. 0.2 10 2 8 1.6
1 8.3 6.4
Omaha is bestOmaha is best
Location Methods:
Factor Rating Method +/-+ Easy to understand and compute
- How do you pick weights?
- How do you assign rankings?
Location Decision Sequence
1. Country1. Country 2. Region/Community2. Region/Community
3. Site3. Site© 1995 Corel Corp.
© 1995 Corel Corp.
© 1995 Corel Corp.
Plant Location Methodology: Centroid Method Formulas
C = d V
V x
ix i
i
Cx = X coordinate of the centroid
Cy = Y coordinate of the centroid
dix = X coordinate of the ith location
diy = Y coordinate of the ith location
Vi = volume of goods moved to or from ith location
C = d V
Vy
iy i
i
Plant Location Methodology: Example of Centroid Method
Question: What is the best location for a new Z-Mobile warehouse/temporary storage facility considering only distances and quantities sold per month?
• Centroid method example– Several automobile showrooms are located according to the
following grid which represents coordinate locations for each showroom.
S howroom No o f Z-Mo b ile s s o ld p e r mo nth
A 1250
D 1900
Q 2300X
Y
A(100,200)
D(250,580)
Q(790,900)
(0,0)
Thinking Challenge Solution
00 3030 6060 9090 120120 150150
3030
6060
9090
00
Seattle(50,60)494k units
Aberdeen (20,35)18k units
Spokane (160,50)171k units
Warehouse at (77, 57): Wenatchee Nat’l Forest!
XX
© 1995 Corel Corp.
Balancing Supply Chain Capability with Customer
Demands
Information
Supply Chain Capability
Customer Requirements
Increased CostsOvertimeExpeditingIncreased Inventory
Increased Demand:
Marketing programs
Promotions
Supply Chain Capability
Customer Requirements
Information
Market Demand,New
Products, Promotions
Suppliers, Manufacturers,
Distributors, Carriers
Formulas for Measuring Internal Supply-Chain
Performance
• Inventory Turnover = Cost of goods sold .
Average inventory value
Weeks)(52Sold Goods ofCost
ValueInventory Average Supply of Weeks
Supply Chain MeasuresCommon practice is to measure within a function:
Supplier Plant DistributionCenter
Customer
Price CostEfficiencyOutput
InventoryStock RotationSpace
CostQualitySpeedFlexibility
Measure Across Supply Chain Nodes
The correct method is to measure across a node:
Supplier Plant DistributionCenter
Customer
Cycle TimeOn-time DeliveryVendor ManagedInventory
Cycle TimeDelivery ReliabilityProduct Availability
Cycle TimeOrder CompletionPerformance
The Bullwhip Effect – Cont’d
What is Outsourcing?Defined
Outsourcing: moving a firm’s internal
activities and decision responsibility to
outside providers.
Reasons to Outsource
• Organizationally-driven - gain focus
• Improvement-driven - quality, skills, innovation
• Financially-driven - reduce asset investment
• Revenue-driven - gain market access, expand sales
• Cost-driven - supplier has lower cost structure