master’s thesis benchmarking the organizational benefits of it
TRANSCRIPT
Benchmarking the organizational benefits of IT
Diderik van Wingerden
Master’s Thesis Economics and ICT
May 22, 2008
What is “benchmarking”? Project context: M&I/Partners IT benchmarks Research objective Designing the benchmark instrument Empirical study: testing the instrument Conclusions and recommendations The next step..
Contents
What is “benchmarking”?
Take “snap-shots” Find “best practices” Identify, measure, compare, analyse and improve Some definitions:
“[..] a process that helps agencies to find high performance levels (benchmarks) in other organizations and learn enough about how they are achieving those levels so the practice or process producing the performance can be applied in one’s own agency.” (Keehley in Nelissen and De Goede 1999)
“The core of benchmarking: learning about your own organization through other organizations.” (Van Eekeren 2003)
Project context: M&I/Partners IT benchmarks
Yearly IT benchmarks for: Housing associations Municipalities Health care
Focus on IT costs: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Also includes simple measurement of: Application functionality IT process maturity
Project context: M&I/Partners IT benchmarks (2)
€ -
€ 20,00
€ 40,00
€ 60,00
€ 80,00
€ 100,00
€ 120,00
€ 140,00
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
Spraak
Apps
WAN
LAN
Werkplek
ICT-mgnt
Research objective
“Develop a practical instrument for an IT benefits benchmark which evaluates the organizational benefits of IT and compares these between organizations.”
Preconditions: Easy to use, limited effort Generally applicable across industries
Designing the benchmark instrument
Designing the benchmark instrument (2)
organization
processes
Information systems
IT infrastructure
generic industry specific
Information Economics
method
Method of Bedell
IT infrastructure method
business process categories
list of information systems
Empirical study: testing the instrument
Qualitative field research: Semi-structured interviews
Interviews with: 6 housing associations 2 municipalities 1 financial service provider 1 international real estate company 3 IT Economics experts
Field test: 3 housing associations
Empirical study: testing the instrument (2)
Housing Association A Housing Association B
EIA: effectiveness of IS
Empirical study: testing the instrument (3)
EIO: effectiveness of IS
IIO: potential of IT
0
Invest selectively
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10Invest aggressively Invest selectively
Stabilize Disinvest
Association A
Association D
Association C
Conclusions and recommendations
Instrument proven useful for housing associations Application of existing methods in new context Method of Bedell most useful, others less useful Business process and IS model proven in practice
Conclusions and recommendations (2)
Inconclusive on use for municipalities and financial service providers
Not useful for international real estate companies Business Unit level
Complex terminology Data gathering: interpretation and subjectivity Shortcoming in method of Bedell
Conclusions and recommendations (3)
Go for the method of Bedell Overcome shortcoming
Rules and guidelines for data gathering Simplify and improve definitions Integrate with IT costs results Develop and test for other industries Improve calculation and presentation format
The next step..
Apply the instrument in first-off benchmarking round 10 participants Improved version
Extra
Kwaliteit informatievoorziening(gewogen naar bedrijfsbelang)
Potentieel van ICT (gewogen naar bedrijfsbelang)
0
Invest selectively
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10Aggresief investeren Selectief investeren
Stabiliseren Desinvesteren€ 70 / VHE€ 80 / VHE€ 90 / VHE
€ 100 / VHE
€ 110 / VHE
€ 120 / VHE
€ 130 / VHE
Woningcorporatie A
Woningcorporatie B
Woningcorporatie C
Extra (2)
Extra (3)
ICT-kosten als percentage van de jaaromzet
Potentieel van ICT (gewogen naar bedrijfsbelang)
0 3,00 %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Woningcorporatie A
Woningcorporatie B
Woningcorporatie C
1,50 % 2,00 % 2,50 %1,00 %0,50 %
Extra (4)
Typology of IT benefits