mastercard impact of innovation study regional report ... · healthcare, education and public...

22
© 2016 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior written consent of Ipsos. September 2016 Regional Report Total Europe MASTERCARD IMPACT OF INNOVATION STUDY

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • © 2016 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior written consent of Ipsos.

    September 2016

    Regional Report – Total Europe

    MASTERCARD IMPACT OF INNOVATION STUDY

  • 2 2

    3 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

    4 METHODOLOGY

    6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    8 ATTITUDES TOWARDS DIGITALIZATION

    15 PAYMENT AND AUTHENTICATION METHODS

    26 SEGMENTS BASED ON LEVEL OF DIGITALIZATION

    32 IPSOS PROJECT TEAM

    CONTENT

  • 3

    Background & Objectives

    Mastercard commissioned LocalTime PR and Ipsos Hungary to conduct a regional

    study on digitalization of different areas of consumers’ life.

    The aim of the study is to measure the

    level of digitalization and to better understand related habits and attitudes in

    23 countries.

    Measuring segments based on the openness towards digitalization and cross-

    country comparisons are also included in the study objectives.

  • 4

    Methodology

    Target group: online urban population aged 20-50 years, bank users, owning a bank account. Participating countries are: Hungary, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Poland, Serbia, Bulgaria, Austria, Croatia, Israel, Romania, UK, Italy, Germany, France, Sweden, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, Egypt, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kenya Sample structure: N=1000 respondents per country, representative sample of 20-50 aged online urban population by gender, age and region Methodology: online self-completed interviews via Ipsos access panel Questionnaire: 20 minutes long self-completed online questionnaire

  • 5

    Sample structure of the online population of consumers by regions

    Distribution of the samples along demographic groups (in %)

    Europe

    Gender male 52

    female 48

    Age 20-29 23

    30-39 33

    40-50 43

    Education

    primary 1

    vocational 14

    secondary 21

    college / university 64

    I do not want to answer 1

    Working status

    I have my own company 8

    I work as an employee 70

    I am currently unemployed 5

    I am a student 5

    I am on maternity leave 2

    I am a pensioner 2

    I do not work / full-time mother / etc. 5

    I do not want to answer 3

    Social status

    A 30

    B 11

    C1 15

    C2 14

    D 6

    E1 1

    E2 19

    NA 4

    Significantly higher vs. total sample

    Significantly lower vs. total sample

  • 6 6

    Mastercard Impact of Innovation Study - Executive Summary

  • Attitudes toward digitalization

    Payment & authentication methods

    Segments based on level of digitalization

    European consumers have a positive attitude towards digitalization and innovation: on the regional level more than two thirds are rather satisfied with digitalization and more than 50% think that innovation has a favourable impact on society.

    An overwhelming majority think that digital services will spread further, and only around 1 out of 10 respondents think that they will remain the privilege of a smaller group.

    Public education, healthcare and public transport are the most important areas to innovate in all markets.

    Executive summary

    Mobile payment has the highest potential to become a widely accepted payment method: more than a half would choose it instead plastic cards in almost every country. UK, Germany, France and Austria are the most traditional in terms of payment devices.

    Regarding the authentication method safety of the bank account is the most important factor, but personal data protection is also a much relevant need, especially in Israel and Bulgaria. Biometric authentication is currently used by a minority, but generally consumers in Europe do not have serious safety concerns with it.

    Segmenting factors vary on a wide scale across countries, especially the penetration of online banking and mobile payment. Sweden, Russia and Ukraine are the most developed when looking at the banking aspect. The highest number of digital services is used by the Ukrainian, Turkish and Swedish consumers.

    Regarding total segment distribution, Sweden, Russia and Ukraine have the highest share of eager promoters. Share of resistants is below one fifth of the population in most of the countries.

  • 8

    Attitudes towards digitalization

  • 9

    Total Europe

    UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    Europe

    The majority of consumers are rather satisfied with digitalization regardless of the country, while they were a bit more cautious when rating the impacts of innovation on society

    1 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 0 4 5 4 5 6 5 4 4 6 3 4 3 7 5 6 2 6 1 1

    25 33 28 30 38

    21 21 34 34

    22 22 22 26 25 21

    15 23

    17 15

    47 48 52 50

    46

    44 44 42 45

    50 51 39 48 45 44

    44 43

    46 45

    23 12 15 13 9

    27 30 18 14 25

    23 35

    17 23 27 38 26 34 38

    3,9 3,7 3,8 3,7 3,6

    3,9 4,0 3,7 3,6 4,0 3,9 4,1 3,7 3,8 3,9

    4,2 3,8

    4,1 4,2

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Total UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    Q2A. Satisfaction with 'digitalization’

    1 – Not at all satisfied, I’m afraid we are heading in the wrong direction 2 3 4 5 – Completely satisfied, I think this is the way it should be Average (1-5)

    Base: all respondents

    Total Europe

    UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    Europe

    2 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 1 8 6 6 8 15

    4 14 9 13 9 9 8 13 11 10 3

    11 5 4

    31 31 35 42

    44

    21

    34 37 39 32 26 27 41

    32 32

    20

    33 22 21

    39 45 43 38

    33

    40

    32 34 37

    40 41 34

    32 36 38

    44

    35

    40 37

    20 17 13 10 5

    35 16 17 10 19 22 29

    12 18 17 33

    17 32 37

    3,7 3,7 3,6 3,5 3,2

    4,0

    3,4 3,5 3,4 3,7 3,7 3,8

    3,4 3,5 3,6 4,1

    3,5 3,9 4,1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Total UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    Q2B. Innovation has a positive effect on society

    1 – Does not have a positive impact at all 2 3 4 5 – Definitely has a positive impact Average (1-5)

  • 10

    84%

    76% 84%

    78%

    81%

    86%

    87%

    84%

    86% 83%

    89%

    91%

    83%

    85%

    91%

    87%

    82%

    89%

    92%

    Total

    UK

    IT

    DE

    FR

    SW

    HU

    SK

    CZ

    PL RS

    BG

    AT

    HR

    IL

    RO

    TR

    RU

    UA

    Digital services will be used on more and more areas of life, and by more and more people

    Digital services will be used on more and more areas of life, but it will remain the privilege of a smaller group of people

    The areas of using digital services will remain very close to the current state

    Fewer and fewer people will use digital services

    An overwhelming majority of European consumers agree that digital services will be used on more areas by more people

    Base: all respondents

    Q6. What should we expect from the future regarding digital services? Total Europe

  • 11 Base: all respondents

    Healthcare, education and public transport are the main areas where more innovation of digital services would be necessary

    Q5. Too few digital services on this area, more innovation needed

    Europe

    Total Europe

    UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    commerce

    networking, meeting people

    healthcare

    public education

    financial issues / services

    public transport

    automobile, driving a car

    other type of transport

    travelling

    hosting & catering

    work-related

    0-20% 21-40% 41-60% >60%

  • 12

    Payment & authentication methods

  • 13

    Europe

    Total Europe

    UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    65%

    24%

    14%

    25%

    8%

    3%

    6%

    8%

    20%

    45%

    14%

    10%

    14%

    8%

    5%

    5%

    2%

    41%

    68%

    34%

    16%

    25%

    11%

    5%

    6%

    4%

    15%

    55%

    18%

    14%

    24%

    6%

    4%

    5%

    6%

    28%

    27%

    7%

    6%

    9%

    3%

    4%

    2%

    2%

    61%

    47%

    18%

    10%

    14%

    6%

    5%

    6%

    9%

    31%

    54%

    16%

    13%

    20%

    8%

    6%

    6%

    4%

    28%

    57%

    22%

    16%

    24%

    8%

    6%

    7%

    4%

    24%

    69%

    29%

    16%

    24%

    4%

    9%

    9%

    10%

    14%

    72%

    34%

    19%

    27%

    9%

    8%

    9%

    12%

    15%

    49%

    18%

    12%

    20%

    7%

    9%

    6%

    6%

    31%

    70%

    32%

    17%

    28%

    9%

    7%

    6%

    6%

    15%

    58%

    32%

    15%

    18%

    11%

    13%

    10%

    8%

    22%

    72%

    48%

    21%

    29%

    11%

    14%

    14%

    15%

    10%

    Mobile payment has the highest potential across all countries, especially in Sweden, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine. UK, Germany, France and Austria are the most traditional in terms of payment devices.

    Q11. Preferred device for payment

    41%

    16%

    13%

    10%

    9%

    5%

    4%

    4%

    43%

    31%

    15%

    6%

    21%

    6%

    3%

    2%

    3%

    49%

    72%

    28%

    19%

    35%

    19%

    5%

    8%

    6%

    15%

    57%

    16%

    21%

    29%

    9%

    7%

    7%

    6%

    24%

    mobile phone tablet smart watch ID card / passport

    implant fitness band jewellery household appliances

    none of these

    52%

    24%

    13%

    19%

    8%

    8%

    7%

    7%

    31%

    Base: all respondents

  • 14

    PIN code fingerprint scan code received via SMS during the transaction

    'selfie' pay other

    Europe

    Total Europe

    UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    The preferred authentication method varies a lot across countries, but fingerprint scan was chosen by at least a third in almost every country

    Base: all respondents

    Q12. Which authentication method would you prefer when paying with your bank card?

    46%

    40%

    8%

    5%

    1%

    23%

    39%

    30%

    7%

    1%

    40%

    35%

    19%

    3%

    3%

    8%

    37%

    48%

    4%

    2%

    41%

    41%

    9%

    4%

    4%

    31%

    40%

    25%

    2%

    1%

    31%

    36%

    29%

    4%

    1%

    32%

    35%

    29%

    3%

    1%

    37%

    34%

    25%

    4%

    1%

    30%

    48%

    17%

    4%

    1%

    33%

    30%

    30%

    5%

    1%

    43%

    31%

    23%

    2%

    1%

    36%

    50%

    8%

    5%

    1%

    31%

    33%

    29%

    6%

    1%

    29%

    30%

    33%

    7%

    1%

    15%

    39%

    38%

    7%

    1%

    29%

    25%

    43%

    2%

    1%

    21%

    38%

    33%

    7%

    0%

    28%

    35%

    31%

    5%

    1%

  • 15

    4 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 1 9

    6 6 8 15

    4 14

    9 13 9 9 8 13 11 10 3 11

    5 4

    27 31

    35 42

    44

    21

    34 37

    39 32 26 27

    41 32 32

    20

    33

    22 21

    38 45 43

    38 33

    40

    32 34 37

    40 41 34

    32 36 38

    44

    35

    40 37

    22 17 13 10 5

    35 16 17 10 19 22 29

    12 18 17 33

    17 32 37

    3,6 3,7 3,6 3,5 3,2

    4,0

    3,4 3,5 3,4 3,7 3,7

    3,8

    3,4 3,5 3,6

    4,1

    3,5

    3,9 4,1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    1 – Not at all secure way of payment 2 3 4 5 – Completely secure way of payment Average (1-5)

    Biometric authentication methods are used by a minority for the time being. On the whole few concerns arose regarding their safety, but in some countries consumers still have to be convinced. Swedish, Romanian, Russian and Ukrainian consumers have more trust in them.

    Base: all respondents

    Total Europe

    UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    Europe

    Q13. To what extent do you feel it is a secure way of making purchases authenticated with your fingerprint, facial features, or with another biometrical method?

    Q14. Penetration of biometric authentication methods

    7% 6% 5% 4% 2% 10% 5% 4% 3% 7% 15% 8% 8% 8% 9% 6% 19% 4% 12%

  • 16 Base: all respondents

    Ratings of biometric authentication along different aspects were moderate in most of the cases, but it is definitely considered to be an innovative solution for payment

    Europe

    Total UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    These are safer than the traditional authentication methods

    It is trendy, cool to pay with these methods

    They ensure a fast payment process

    These authentication methods are easy to use

    They are new, innovative solutions for payment authentication

    3,5 3,4 3,6 3,2 3,2 3,3 3,7 3,6 3,5 3,6 3,7 3,5 3,1 3,5 3,3

    3,6 3,6 3,7 3,8

    3,2 3,2 3,1 2,9 2,9 3,0 3,4 3,5 3,5 3,2 3,3 2,9 3,0

    3,4 3,1 3,4 3,4 3,3 3,3

    3,6 3,4 3,6 3,6 3,4 3,6 3,9 3,6 3,5 3,7 3,8 3,5 3,6 3,9 3,4 3,8 3,7 3,6 3,6

    3,6 3,5 3,5 3,4 3,3 3,4 3,8 3,6 3,5 3,7 3,9 3,6 3,5 3,8 3,6 3,7 3,6 3,7 3,7

    3,8 3,7 3,8 3,5 3,4 3,7 4,0 3,9 3,9 3,8 3,8 3,7 3,5 3,8 3,8 3,8 3,8 4,0 3,9

    Q15. Below you can see some statements told by others about using biometric authentication when shopping. Please rate each of them on a 5 point scale according to what extent do you agree with them!

  • 17

    Security of the bank account is the No. 1 factor everywhere when choosing the authentication method. Personal data protection is especially important for Bulgaria and Israel.

    Base: all respondents

    Europe

    Total UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    the security of my bank account

    the security of my personal data

    speed of the process

    simplicity

    1,6 1,5 1,8 1,5 1,5 1,7 1,6 1,5 1,5 1,7 1,8 1,7 1,5 1,7 1,8 1,7 1,8 1,5 1,8

    2,1 2,0 2,1 2,1 2,0 2,1 2,0 2,0 2,1 2,2 2,0 1,9 2,1 2,0 1,9 2,1 2,0 2,1 2,1

    3,1 3,2 3,1 3,3 3,3 3,3 3,1 3,2 3,1 2,9 3,1 3,1 3,3 3,1 3,1 2,9 3,0 3,1 2,9

    3,2 3,2 3,1 3,1 3,2 2,9 3,3 3,2 3,2 3,2 3,2 3,2 3,1 3,2 3,2 3,3 3,2 3,3 3,3

    Q16. Factors when choosing the authentication method

  • 18

    Segments based on level of digitalization

  • 19

    Definition of segments

    service service service

    device

    banking

    banking

    banking

    device

    banking

    banking

    banking

    device

    banking

    banking

    banking

    resistant

    drifting follower

    enthusiastic follower

    eager promoter

    For defining segments based on levels of digitalization we have used the following aspects:

    banking

    low no online banking (via browser or app) and no mobile payment

    mid user of online banking (via browser or app) but no mobile payment

    high user of mobile payment

    device

    low

    0-3 pcs. of the following devices: smartphone, tablet, smart TV, smart watch, sports-related smart device, health-related smart device, streaming box / set-top box, wireless speaker / headphones, drone, e-book reader, MP3 player / portable media player, game console

    mid

    4-6 pcs. of the following devices: smartphone, tablet, smart TV, smart watch, sports-related smart device, health-related smart device, streaming box / set-top box, wireless speaker / headphones, drone, e-book reader, MP3 player / portable media player, game console

    high

    7+ pcs. of the following devices: smartphone, tablet, smart TV, smart watch, sports-related smart device, health-related smart device, streaming box / set-top box, wireless speaker / headphones, drone, e-book reader, MP3 player / portable media player, game console

    service

    low 0-3 services used with monthly frequency (selected in Q1 and codes 1-6 in Q2)

    mid 4-10 services used with monthly frequency (selected in Q1 and codes 1-6 in Q2)

    high more than 10 services used with monthly frequency (selected in Q1 and codes 1-6 in Q2)

    From the combination of the 3 aspects we defined 4 general segments:

  • 20

    Levels of digitalization on different areas are quite different across Europe, especially the penetration of online banking and mobile payment varies on a wide scale

    Base: all respondents

    Distribution of segment components Banking Devices Services

    Europe

    Total

    UK

    IT

    DE

    FR

    SW

    HU

    SK

    CZ

    PL

    RS

    BG

    AT

    HR

    IL

    RO

    TR

    RU

    UA

    23%

    22%

    40%

    26%

    37%

    3%

    26%

    20%

    12%

    14%

    38%

    29%

    12%

    31%

    21%

    51%

    8%

    21%

    11%

    52%

    65%

    50%

    68%

    58%

    57%

    58%

    69%

    75%

    60%

    44%

    53%

    79%

    47%

    64%

    45%

    61%

    32%

    34%

    24%

    13%

    10%

    6%

    5%

    40%

    17%

    11%

    13%

    26%

    19%

    18%

    9%

    22%

    15%

    4%

    31%

    47%

    54%

    28%

    20%

    23%

    35%

    48%

    21%

    29%

    26%

    25%

    26%

    32%

    21%

    26%

    31%

    22%

    19%

    29%

    25%

    24%

    39%

    40%

    44%

    37%

    35%

    40%

    43%

    48%

    45%

    40%

    44%

    41%

    38%

    44%

    38%

    40%

    36%

    37%

    42%

    33%

    40%

    33%

    28%

    17%

    39%

    29%

    26%

    30%

    34%

    24%

    38%

    36%

    25%

    40%

    41%

    35%

    38%

    35%

    12%

    18%

    14%

    15%

    26%

    4%

    10%

    11%

    15%

    17%

    4%

    8%

    9%

    7%

    5%

    7%

    8%

    5%

    2%

    61%

    67%

    61%

    68%

    64%

    51%

    72%

    77%

    72%

    68%

    77%

    60%

    72%

    69%

    57%

    68%

    49%

    56%

    49%

    28%

    16%

    25%

    17%

    9%

    45%

    18%

    12%

    13%

    15%

    19%

    33%

    19%

    24%

    38%

    25%

    43%

    39%

    49%

    low mid high

  • 21

    12 11 15 17

    27

    3 12 11 11 10

    17 10 9

    15 7

    13 6 9 4

    42 42 43

    48

    51

    36

    50 56 52 45

    45

    40 49

    45

    42 41

    42 34 34

    27 33 29

    24

    16

    33

    25 24

    25 28

    28

    28

    27 26

    27

    33

    28 28 34

    18 14 13 10 5

    28

    13 9 12 17 10

    21 15 13

    24 13

    25 28 28

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    resistant drifting follower enthusiastic follower eager promoter

    Same goes for total segment shares: they differ a lot within Europe, with Sweden, Russia and Ukraine being the most developed

    Base: all respondents

    Total Europe

    UK IT DE FR SW HU SK CZ PL RS BG AT HR IL RO TR RU UA

    Europe

    Segment shares

  • 22 22

    IPSOS PROJECT TEAM

    Andrea Ágoston Account Manager [email protected]

    +36 1 476 7622

    Péter Kunos Account Director [email protected]

    +36 30 356 54 89

    +36 1 476 7765

    Ipsos Zrt. - Budapest, Thaly Kálmán u. 39. H-1096

    www.ipsos.hu www.ipsos.com © 2016 Ipsos – All rights reserved. This proposal constitutes the sole and exclusive property of Ipsos. Ipsos retains all copyrights and other rights over, without limitation, Ipsos' trademarks, technologies, methodologies, analyses and know how included or arising out of this proposal. The addressee of this proposal undertakes to maintain it confidential and not to disclose all or part of its content to any third party without the prior written consent of Ipsos. The addressee undertakes to use this proposal solely for its own needs (and the needs of its affiliated companies as the case may be), only for the purpose of evaluating the proposal for services of Ipsos. No other use is permitted.