master space plan final - university of california,...

T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s

1 . 0 E xecut ive S ummary

2 . 0 B ackground2 . 1 Univers i ty of Cal i forn ia, R ivers ide2 . 2 Col lege of Humanit ies , Arts , and Social Sc iences2 . 3 Long Range Development P lan2 . 4 The Master Space P lan2 . 5 Process/Methodology

3 . 0 A ssessment of C urrent C ondit ions3 . 1 Overv iew3 . 2 Const ra ints of Ex i s t ing Faci l i t ies3 . 3 Qual i tat ive Summary of Space Needs

4 . 0 S pace P lanning A ssumpt ions4 . 1 Overv iew4 . 2 Enrol lment4 . 3 Faculty Dis t r ibut ion4 . 4 Inst ruct ional and Research ( I&R) Standard Space4 . 5 Non-Standard Teaching Laboratory Space4 . 6 Organized Research and Act iv i t ies (Centers)4 . 7 Academic Support , Publ ic Serv ice and Phys ical

Educat ion4 . 8 General Ass ignment Class rooms4 . 9 Summary of Quant i tat ive Needs

5 . 0 B est P ract ice R esearch5 . 1 Qual i tat ive Analys i s5 . 2 Quant i tat ive Analys i s

6 . 0 M aster S pace P lan6 . 1 Guiding Pr incip les6 . 2 Master Space P lan6 . 3 Dist r ibut ion of Space6 . 4 Capital Improvement P lan

7 . 0 A ppendix

C o l l e g e o f H u m a n i t i e s ,A r t s , A n d S o c i a l S c i e n c e s

AA cc kk nn oo ww ll ee dd gg ee mm ee nn tt ss

A cademic P lanning and B udgetGretchen Bolar , V ice Chancel lor - Academic P lanning and

BudgetLuis Carrazana, Senior Educat ional Faci l i t ies

P lanner/Pro ject ManagerT im Rals ton, Ass i s tant V ice Chancel lor - Academic P lanning

and BudgetPol ly Bre i tk reuz, Pr incipal AnalystNi ta Bul lock, Senior Phys ical P lannerJoanne Cate, Pr incipal Analyst

C ol lege of H umanit ies , A r t s , and S ocial S ciencesProfessor Gene AndersonProfessor John AsheMr. Dale Bai lyProfessor Barbara BennettAssociate Dean Phi l ip BrettProfessor John Br iggsProfessor Steve Br intProfessor J im BrownProfessor Chr i s BuckleyProfessor Curt BurgessMs. Chery l BurnettProfessor Susan CarterProfessor Chr i s Chase-DunnProfessor Tom Cogswel lProfessor T rudy CohenProfessor Steve Cul lenbergProfessor John DivolaMs. K ipp DoughertyProfessor Emory E l l iot tMs. Sandi Evelyn-VeereMr. L indy FenexMs. Dianne FewkesProfessor F red GableProfessor Chr i s t ine Gai leyProfessor John GanimProfessor Mary GauvainProfessor Jonathan GreenProfessor Bob HannemanDirector Dave Kel l s t randProfessor Kr i s K ing

c k n o w l e d g e m e n t sAUU nn ii vv ee rr ss ii tt yy

oo ffCC aa ll ii ff oo rr nn ii aa ,,

RR ii vv ee rr ss ii dd ee

Professor David KronenfeldProfessor B i l l MegenneyProfessor Kevin Morr i seyProfessor Car los MortonProfessor Sal ly NessDean Patr ic ia O'Br ienProfessor Dan OzerProfessor Rob ParkerProfessor Andy ReathProfessor Susan RoseAssociate Dean Sahron Sal ingerProfessor Tom ScanlonMs. Carol ShearerProfessor F red St r ick lerProfessor R ichard SutchProfessor Kar l TaubeProfessor Carole-Ann Ty lerProfessor Phi l Wi lkeMs. Judy Wood

Doug Graham, AIA, V ice Pres identRod Rose, V ice Pres identSal R inel la, PhD, V ice Pres identJames Hawkes, Senior Consul tantAnnie Yao, Consul tantSusan Ser jak, Graphics Special i s t

UU nn ii vv ee rr ss ii tt yyoo ff

CC aa ll ii ff oo rr nn ii aa ,,RR ii vv ee rr ss ii dd ee

SS TT RR AA TT UU SS ,, aaDD ii vv ii ss ii oo nn oo ff

TT hh ee JJ CC MMGG rr oo uu pp

E X E C U T I V ES U M M A R Y

C o n t e x t

The purpose of th i s Master Space P lan i s to recommendst rategies for provid ing the amount and type of space needed forthe Col lege of Humanit ies , Arts , and Social Sc iences (CHASS) thatwi l l support the Col lege's miss ion and goals for the next decade,through 2010-11. The P lan takes into account expected growth instudents , facul ty , and staf f ; changes or t rends in teaching andlearn ing methodo log ies ; and in s t i tu t iona l po l icy regard ingal locat ion of facul ty and capita l resources for faci l i t ies develop-ment.

T he Master Space P lan i s a l so intended to be cons i s tentwith the UC Rivers ide Long Range Development P lan (LRDP), acomprehens ive land use plan that i s used to guide development ofUnivers i ty faci l i t ies .

U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , R I V E R S I D EC O L L E G E O F H U M A N I T I E S , A R T S , A N D S O C I A L S C I E N C E S

M a s t e r S p a c e P l a n | F a l l 2 0 0 1 | P a g e 1

The Col lege of Humanit ies , Arts , and Social Sc iences i s thelargest col lege on the UC Rivers ide campus, enrol l ing almost 56%of a l l undergraduates and near ly 37% of graduate students . In FY1999-2000, Col lege enrol lment was approx imately 5,600 FTE s tu-dents , wi th about 245 FTE facul ty . By the year 2010-11, enrol lmentin CHASS i s pro jected to be about 9 ,800 FTE s tudents , an increaseof 75%; and an expected 83% increase in the number of facul ty , tomore than 449 FTE.

T he mix of d isc ip l ines and departments wi th in the Col lege i spart of i t s d i s t inct ive miss ion with in the Univers i ty of Cal i forn ia,R ive r s ide . By o rgan i z ing depar tment s , cente r s , and spec ia lprograms of the performing and v isual arts , the humanit ies , andthe social sc iences under the aegis of a s ingle Dean, the Col legeprovides unique opportuni t ies for s tudents and facul ty to interactacros s d i sc ip l ines in a dynamic teach ing and researchenv i ronment . In e f fect , CHASS i s the equ iva lent o f amoderately-s i zed stand-alone l iberal arts col lege, wi th the addedbenef i t o f s t rong l inks to the natura l and phys ica l sc iences ,Engineer ing, and UCR's profess ional schools of Management, andEducat ion.

1UCR Carri l lon Tower

Watkins House

Arts

Hinderaker Hall

Humanities & Social Sciences

Sproul Hall Watkins

Hall

Humanities& Olmsted

Highlander Hall

RivieraLibrary

Life Sciences & Spieth Hall

Carillon Tower

Commons

P.E

University Ave

Can

yon

Cre

st D

rive

North Campus Drive Abe

rdee

n D

rive

60

215

LEGENDExisting CHASS SpaceCHASS & other space

Master Space Plan:Exist ing Condit ions



Because CHASS provides the inte l lectual home for mostundergraduate students , the centra l i ty of i t s faci l i t ies , access ib i l i tyof i t s c lasses , facul ty , teaching ass i s tants , and support serv ices tostudents i s important . A l though CHASS cur rent ly occupies space in20 di f ferent bui ld ings, the vast major i ty of i t s space i s in just s ix ofthem, located re lat ively c lose together a long the Car i l lon Mal l , thecenter of most undergraduate academic act iv i ty .

A lthough the Humanit ies and Social Sc iences bui ld ing wasrecent ly completed, in 1996, most of the more than 243,600 ass ign-able square feet (asf) occupied by CHASS departments in 1999-2000 are in bui ld ings that are more than 30 years o ld, and in whichthere have been l i t t le or no major renovat ions. Thus, the age,condit ion of ex i s t ing space, and the capabi l i ty of these o lderbui ld ings to meet the demands of new pedagogies, researchmethods, and advanced informat ion technology i s as important toth is Col lege as the demands of growth.

Ex

ec

ut

iv

e

Su

mm

ar

y

I n March of 2001, Academic P lanning and Budget (APB)retained STRATUS of Los Angeles , Cal i forn ia to provide consul t ingserv ices associated with th i s Master Space P lan. A previous CHASSfaculty survey and Department Chai r interv iew performed by APBprovided basel ine informat ion, as d id the Col lege's AcademicPlan, white papers , and UCR’s V is ion 2010 St rategic P lan. Facultyal locat ion budgets and ex is t ing space ut i l i zat ion were studied.Department Chai rs , facul ty and staf f were engaged in severalworkshops to d i scuss the ex i s t ing and ideal env i ronments fo rteaching and learn ing, facul ty graduate students and programs,performance and studies , and appl ied technology. Best pract iceresearch was conducted of aspi rat ional inst i tut ions to ident i fy thedist inguish ing character i s t ics of exemplary models . Qual i tat iveand quant i tat ive data were synthes ized to create the MasterSpace P lan Summary and provide basel ine informat ion for severala l ternat ive scenar ios . The scenar ios were evaluated by the Deanand Vice Chancel lor of Academic P lanning and Budget. The pre-fer red scenar io was chosen, and i s represented in th i s MasterSpace P lan document.

P r o c e s s

M e t h o d o l o g y

- QQuuaalliittaattiivvee -

Space Surveys

InterviewFocus Groups0Workshops

- QQuuaannttiittaattiivvee -Space DriversEnrollmentFaculty

Best PracticeResearch

MASTER SPACE PLAN



F i n d i n g s &R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s

Meeting the space needs of the Col lege for the nextdecade wi l l requi re both new space to accommodate the expect-ed growth in numbers of s tudents and facul ty , and s igni f icantattent ion to the type and qual i ty of space necessary to support a21st century learn ing envi ronment. Us ing Univers i ty of Cal i forn iaspace al lowance guidel ines for CHASS disc ip l ines, the Col lege wi l lrequi re more than 410,000 asf by the 2010-11 academic year, anincrease of a lmost 167,000 asf , or a lmost 70% more space than i scur rent ly avai lable.

To address the important qual i ty of space i ssues, eachexis t ing, new, and reass igned faci l i ty wi l l need to be f lex ib leenough to enhance the development of interdisc ip l inary programsand act iv i t ies , provide more opportuni t ies for interact ion amongfaculty and students , and in general be ut i l i zed to thei r h ighestand best use.

T he Table and S i te p lans that fo l low address ProposedCHASS space Dis t r ibut ion for 2010-11; the proposed locat ions fornew and reass igned faci l i t ies at the Col lege core; and the h ighestand best use for each new, reass igned, and ex is t ing faci l i ty .

T he Capi ta l Improvement P lan proposes that two newbui ld ings, ( tentat ively labeled Col lege Bui ld ing I and I I ) , be con-st ructed at a s i ze of about 68,000 asf (56,000 asf CHASS) and47,000 asf , respect ively .

Ex

ec

ut

iv

e

Su

mm

ar

y

ASF Existing: 1999-2000 Proposed Proposed Proposed 243,637 Total ASF Eliminated Reassigned New

2,448 Art Annex18,916 California Museum of Photography1,890 College Building South

21,130 Highlander Hall15,965 Humanities 50,228 Humanities & Social Sciences24,667 Life Sciences/Spieth Hall32,422 Olmsted Hall41,166 Physical Education/P.E. Utility2,817 Sproul Hall1,516 Theatre Workshop

23,498 Watkins Hall3,238 Watkins House

239,901 Existing (561) Arts Trailer

(1,075) Trailer 5(1,156) Trailer 6

(472) Trailer 10(472) Trailer 10A

(3,736) Existing to be Eliminated10,560 Highlander Hall27,000 Hinderaker Hall37,560 Reassigned to CHASS32,000 Rouse Building55,560 Arts Building56,000 College Building 147,000 College Building 2

158,560 New Space432,285 Total CHASS & CHASS Driven Space (New General Assignment Classrooms) Provided410,309 Total Required CHASS Space 2010 - 2011

1999/2000 - 2010/11

PPrrooppoosseedd CCHHAASSSS SSppaaccee DDiissttrriibbuuttiioonn:: 11999999 - 22001111

Ex

ec

ut

iv

e

Su

mm

ar

y



Watkins House

Arts

Hinderaker Hall


Sproul Hall Watkins

HallHumanities& Olmsted

Highlander Hall

RivieraLibrary


Carillon Tower

Commons

P.E

University Ave

Can

yon

Cre

st D

rive


rdee

n D

rive

60

215

COLLEGEBUILDING I

Performing Arts Center

COLLEGEBUILDING II

LEGEND

Existing CHASS Space

CHASS & other space

New CHASS space

Space Reassigned to CHASS

Master Space P lan:CHASS Space Al locat ion

Col lege Bui ld ing I i s envis ioned to be a Col lege and Univers i tyresource cons i s t ing of contemporary general ass ignment c lass rooms,non-s tandard c lass labs , and in terd i sc ip l inary academic centers .Prox imity of Col lege Bui ld ing I to the Commons would re inforce theidea of an academic gather ing place and Col lege hearth.

Col lege Bui ld ing I I i s envis ioned as pr incipal ly a Psychologybui ld ing, but a lso a faci l i ty that could br idge between the CHASSSocial Sc iences and CNAS B io logical Sc iences by provid ing neededhigh-qual i ty wet lab research, teaching and support space, includingvivar ium.

An addit ional 27,000 asf wi l l be provided for the Col lege inrenovated space in H inderaker Hal l , assuming the re lease of adminis -t rat ive space in H inderaker to other bui ld ings. In addit ion, the cam-pus wi l l requi re a major new Performing Arts complex, and the re loca-t ion and real ignment of a number of ex i s t ing departments or centersas they grow larger and new interdisc ip l inary l inkages evolve overt ime.

Ex

ec

ut

iv

e

Su

mm

ar

y



Master Space P lan:Highest and Best Use of

Faci l i t ies

Watkins House

Arts

Hinderaker Hall


Sproul Hall Watkins


Highlander Hall

RivieraLibrary

Life Sciences& Spieth Hall

Carillon Tower

Commons

P.E

University Ave Can

yon

Cre

st D

rive


rdee

n D

rive

60

215

LEGENDTeaching & Learning EnvironmentGraduate Students & Programs: Wet LabsGraduate Students & Programs: Dry LabsPerformance & Studio Environment

COLLEGE BUILDING II

COLLEGE BUILDING I

Faculty EnvironmentsPublic Service


2 B A C K G R O U N D

U n i v e r s i t y o fC a l i f o r n i a ,

R i v e r s i d e

Located on more than 1,100 acres, three mi les east ofdowntown R ive r s ide , in one o f the fas tes t g rowing a reas o fCal i forn ia, the Univers i ty of Cal i forn ia 's R ivers ide campus (UCR) i sone of the most important educat ional and cul tura l resources forthe In land Empire region. Th i s growth i s a l so character ized by aninc reas ing ly d ive r se and mu l t i -cu l tu ra l popu la t ion in thecommunit ies that are served by the campus.

F i r s t establ i shed as an exper imental orchard and researchfaci l i ty in 1907, the campus opened as a general campus of theUnivers i ty of Cal i forn ia in 1954. S ince then, enrol lment has grown tomore than 10,000 undergraduate and graduate students in the fa l lof 2000, and i s expected to increase to 25,000 by the year 2015.

T his number of s tudents , coupled with concomitant growthin facul ty , s taf f , and dai ly v i s i tors to the campus wi l l requi re majorchanges in teaching and research, development of serv ices andprograms for s tudents , and faci l i t ies to support them in a 21stcentury learn ing envi ronment.

2 . 1



UCR Campus Map

UCR Vicinity Map

World leadersh ip in se lected areas - UCR's decade-goal i s to se lect a number of academic a reas in wh ich i tcan achieve wor ld-c lass s tanding: areas in which UCR'sname i s synonymous with excel lence.

Culture of Inqui ry - a cul ture that ensures that everymember of the univers i ty community , as wel l as v i s i tors to thecampus, wi l l embrace and feel welcome to part ic ipate inthe inte l lectual l i fe of the univers i ty .

D ivers i ty and Excel lence - that the fus ion of teachingand research excel lence wi l l occur wi th in a mult icu l tura lenvi ronment; and

U CR' s mora l imperat i ve - the acceptance o fresources in t rust and the acceptance of the obl igat ionsthat accompany that t ru s t ; and i t s commi tment as aresearch univers i ty to engaging the fundamental i s sues thatface society as a whole.

U CR i s c las s i f ied , accord ing to Carneg ie Foundat iondes ignat ions as a Doctoral/Research Univers i ty-Extens ive, whichmeans that i t of fers a wide range of baccalaureate programs andgraduate programs through the doctorate degree. I t ' s most recentst rategic plan, V is ion 2010, completed in Apr i l , 2001, ident i f ied fourmajor organiz ing themes:



Ba

ck

gr

ou

nd

C o l l e g e o fH u m a n i t i e s ,

A r t s , a n dS o c i a l

S c i e n c e sAs the largest col lege at UCR, the Col lege of Humanit ies ,

Arts , and Social Sc iences (CHASS) i s the inte l lectual home for themajor i ty of a l l undergraduates enrol led at the R ivers ide campus,provid ing more than 70% of UCR's total s tudent credit hours . TheCol lege includes twenty academic departments , four researchcenters , and approx imately 245 facul ty FTE. I t ' s fa l l , 1999-2000enrol lment was 5,620 FTE s tudents .

I n addit ion to i t s broadly d iverse and mult i -d i sc ip l inaryprogram, the Col lege has achieved a nat ional and internat ionalreputat ion for excel lence. I t s facul ty have earned a s ix th-placerank ing among the nat ion ' s pub l ic re search in s t i tu t ions inHumanit ies , Arts , and Social Sc iences. In 2000, CHASS accountedfor hal f of the campus 's f i f ty Guggenheim Fel lows; and elevenmembers of the facul ty were named fe l lows of the Amer icanAssociat ion of the Advancement of Sc ience in just the last threeyears .

2 . 2

UCR 2010



Ba

ck

gr

ou

nd

Expected growth of the UCR campus over the next decadewi l l requ i re CHASS to re-eva luate i t s mi s s ion , goal s , and thes t ra teg ies necessa ry to ma in ta in and enhance h igh qua l i t yteaching and research. Among the i ssues to be addressed wi l l bethe s igni f icant impact of advanced technologies on the learn ingenvi ronment ; const ruct ion of new faci l i t ies and renovat ion ofex is t ing, outdated bui ld ings; recru i tment and retent ion of facul tyand graduate students ; provid ing an organizat ional and f inancialinf rast ructure that supports and enhances col laborat ive learn ingand research; and the enhancement of the Col lege's l inks to thegreater community through programs such as performing arts ,gal ler ies , museums, and other publ ic serv ice programs.

L o n g R a n g eD e v e l o p m e n t

P l a n

The CHASS Master Space P lan, which i s the focus of th i ss tudy , mus t be cons i s tent w i th the campus Long RangeDevelopment P lan (LRDP), a comprehens ive land use plan that i sused to guide development of future Univers i ty faci l i t ies . The 2001LRDP wi l l cons ider the academic goals of the campus through theyear 2015, inc luding enro l lment expectat ions , changes in thecharacter of the campus and i t s sur rounding communit ies , and theneeds for c i rculat ion, open space, park ing, and hous ing. Al l ofthese factors wi l l a l so p lace a h igh demand on the campusinf rast ructure, including ut i l i t ies , roads, energy requi rements , andother natural resources.

T h e M a s t e rS p a c e P l a n

I n the decade that fo l lows, campus enrol lment i s expectedto inc rease to approx imate ly 21 ,000 , w i th en ro l lment in theCol lege increas ing f rom i t s present 5 ,620 FTE s tudents to a lmost9,800 FTE s tudents . The number of facul ty requi red for CHASS i s pro-jected to increase near ly 84%, f rom 245.40 facul ty FTE in 1999-2000to 449.68 FTE in 2010-11. In addit ion, graduate headcount in theCol lege i s expected to increase about 38%, f rom 459 FTE to 633 FTEin the same t ime per iod. The need to understand the impact of th i sexpected growth on space and faci l i t ies i s the pr imary dr iver ofth i s p lan.

2 . 3

2 . 4

Ba

ck

gr

ou

nd

The purpose of the Master Space P lan i s to understand theut i l i za t ion o f ex i s t i ng fac i l i t ie s as s igned to the Co l lege o fHumanit ies , Arts , and Social Sc iences and to propose st rategies forprovid ing the amount and type of space needed to support theCol lege's miss ion and goals through f i scal 2010-11, cons i s tent wi ththe campus LRDP. The plan takes into account expected growth instudents , facul ty , and staf f ; ant ic ipated changes in cur r icu lum,research, suppor t se rv ices fo r facu l ty and s tudents ; and theint roduct ion of new educat ional del ivery methodologies .



P r o c e s s /M e t h o d o l o g y

2 . 5

M e t h o d o l o g y

- Qualitative -Space Surveys

InterviewFocus GroupsWorkshops

- Quantitative -Space Drivers

EnrollmentFaculty

Aspirational

Best PracticeResearch

MASTER SPACE PLAN- Define Priority Projects -

T he methodology for preparat ion of the CHASS MasterSpace plan involved f ive pr imary in i t iat ives:

(a) R ev iew and ana lys i s o f ex i s t ing space condi t ions andut i l i zat ion patterns , including inst ruct ional spaces. Th i s included areview of the phys ical inventory and a walk- through of the spaceass igned to CHASS in each bui ld ing, d iscuss ions with chai rs orother representat ives of departments and centers about thei r useof space; meet ings with adminis t rat ive s taf f of the Col lege andAcademic P lanning and Budget to understand the resu l ts of thei rown faci l i t ies assessment conducted dur ing the Winter of 1999-2000; and reconci l iat ion of th i s qual i tat ive informat ion with data inthe campus inventory system.

Teaching and Learn ing - the type and qual i ty ofinst ruct ional spaces and resources, cur rent and projectededucat iona l de l i ve ry methods fo r underg raduate andgraduate courses , and support requi rements .

Faculty - cur rent needs for research and emergingresearch areas; facul ty interact ion with in the Col lege andacross the campus ; and the enhancement o f scho la r l yact iv i ty .

Graduate Students and Programs - nature and qual i tyo f re sou rces and suppor t fo r g raduate s tudent s ,col laborat ion with other s tudents and facul ty members ; andsupport for graduate student research.

P er fo rmance and S tud io - requ i rement s anddif ferences in teaching, s tudio, rehearsal and performancespace among the arts d isc ip l ines; community outreach andinvolvement through arts programs and events ; t rends inteaching and emerging interdisc ip l inary arts programs.

T echno logy and In f ras t ructu re - need fo rcomprehens ive technology planning, establ i shment of anintegrated technology in f ras t ructure ; spec ia l technologyrequi rements of indiv idual programs and centers wi th in theCol lege.

Ba

ck

gr

ou

nd

(b) Review and discuss ion of cur rent and projected teachingand research methodologies , including the impact of advancedinformat ion technology. These meet ings were organized into f iveenvi ronment-speci f ic focus groups to engage part ic ipants in d is -cuss ion of a var iety of factors and perspect ives about ex i s t ingcondit ions and future t rends that would dr ive the character andqua l i t y o f fac i l i t ie s requ i red by the Co l lege. At tended byapprox imately 80 facul ty and staf f , they addressed the fo l lowinggeneral topics :



Ba

ck

gr

ou

nd



(c) Benchmark research on t rends in s imi lar or compet i t iveprograms in other inst i tut ions - ident i f icat ion of "best pract ices" inpeer inst i tut ions with s imi lar programs, enrol lment, cur r icu lar andprogram emphas i s , i nc lud ing a quant i ta t i ve ana ly s i s o fcomparat ive space types, where compar isons are feas ib le.

(d) Development of a set of guid ing pr incip les - guidel ines fordevelopment of new faci l i t ies , renovat ion of ex i s t ing faci l i t ies , orreal ignment of spaces to ass i s t adminis t rators and/or archi tects inthe development of space al locat ion and des ign cr i ter ia.

(e) D eve lopment o f a p lann ing mode l on wh ich to basemin imum space requ i rement s - a budget ing too l fo r u se indeve lop ing space a l locat ion po l ic ie s and long te rm cap i ta lbudget requi rements .

A S S E S S M E N TO F C U R R E N TC O N D I T I O N S

O v e r v i e w

A n impor tant and d i s t ingu i sh ing characte r i s t ic o f th i sCol lege i s the organizat ional integrat ion of the humanit ies , arts ,and soc ia l sc iences , p rov id ing un ique oppor tun i t ie s fo rinterdisc ip l inary programs and innovat ions in cur r icu lum develop-ment and research. However, the requi rements for space andfaci l i t ies vary s igni f icant ly throughout the Col lege, to a largeextent based upon the special i zed needs of indiv idual d isc ip l inesor departments .

For example, the Performing Arts and Arts d iv i s ions requi reextens ive studio and performance spaces; Psychology requi res wetlaborator ies and prox imity to v ivar ium faci l i t ies ; and other SocialSciences and the Humanit ies departments requi re more attent ionto of f ice, conference, and scholar ly act iv i ty spaces to support thetypes of inst ruct ion and research common to thei r d i sc ip l ine. Atthe same t ime, a l l of them requi re s imi lar spaces for facul ty of f ices,teaching ass i s tants , c lass rooms, seminar rooms, conference rooms,and computer laborator ies .

I n ef fect , the s i ze and scope of CHASS i s qui te s imi lar tothat of a l iberal arts col lege without the sc iences, engineer ing,and profess ional schools . The chal lenge i s to provide as inte-grated an envi ronment as poss ib le, whi le s t i l l recogniz ing theunique nature of each of i t s separate disc ip l ines.



3 . 1

C o n s t r a i n t so f E x i s t i n g

F a c i l i t i e s

3 . 2

Current ly , CHASS occupies space in 20 di f ferent bui ld ings,inc lud ing 5 t ra i le r s . Together , these bu i ld ings compr i seapprox imately 243,600 ass ignable square feet (asf) . The vastmajor i ty of the space, i s ass igned to CHASS in only s ix of thesebui ld ings: Humanit ies and Social Sc iences, Humanit ies , Olmsted,L i fe Sciences, Watk ins Hal l , and Phys ical Educat ion.

Watkins House

Arts

Hinderaker Hall


Sproul Hall Watkins

Hall

Humanities& Olmsted

Highlander Hall

RivieraLibrary


Carillon Tower

Commons

P.E

University Ave

Can

yon

Cre

st D

rive


rdee

n D

rive

60

215

LEGENDExisting CHASS SpaceCHASS & other space

3

Core CHASS Faci l i t i es

L i fe Sciences and Spieth Hal l - cur rent ly house themajo r i t y o f the Un ive r s i t y ' s l i fe sc ience and b io log ica lsc iences c lass laborator ies , research laborator ies , and apr incipal campus v ivar ium. With modernizat ion, th i s faci l i tycan cont inue to support these types of act iv i t ies . However,there i s a growing need for sc ience research space to sup-por t Ce l l B io logy , Neurosc ience, V iva r ium, and otherCo l lege o f Natu ra l and Agr icu l tu ra l Sc iences (CNAS)research space needs. The long term highest and best useof L i fe Sciences and Spieth Hal l may be for CNAS.

The Arts bui ld ing - des igned with heavy emphas is onstudio and performance space, th i s faci l i ty i s not su i table foro f f ice-based d i sc ip l ines such as Human i t ie s o r Soc ia lSciences.

The Humanit ies and Social Sc iences bui ld ing i s inmany ways the converse of the Arts bui ld ing. Humanit iesand Social Sc iences i s a bui ld ing des igned pr imar i ly forfacul ty of f ices, re lated support spaces, and class rooms. I thas l imi ted ut i l i ty as a mult i -d i sc ip l inary faci l i ty that mightalso accommodate modern c lass laborator ies , some typesof research labs, or arts s tudios .

Watk ins Hal l i s des igned with a rest r ict ive s t ructuralsystem that supports medium-s ized class rooms and classlabs; however i t i s less su i table for facul ty of f ices. I t s loca-t ion adjacent to the R ivera L ibrary, may provide an oppor-tuni ty to eventual ly convert th i s faci l i ty to a modern inst ruc-t ional center . Because Watk ins i s a re lat ively smal l , o lderbui ld ing, and occupies a valuable s i te on the Car i l lon Mal l ,cons iderat ion might be given to i t s eventual replacementwith a more substant ia l bui ld ing, in part or in whole.

Sproul Hal l i s a l so centra l ly located adjacent to theCar i l lon Mal l . I t i s d iv ided into sequent ia l segments thatseem best su i ted for lecture hal l s , facul ty and adminis t rat iveoff ices, c lass rooms, and seminar rooms. Current ly , Sproulhouses most of the Graduate School of Educat ion; however,the space requi rements for both the School of Educat ionand CHASS are s imi lar .

As

se

ss

me

nt

o

f

Cu

rr

en

t

Co

nd

it

io

ns

The bas ic des ign of most of these bui ld ings l imi ts thei r useto the types of d isc ip l ines and programs that now occupy them.For example, Psychology's need for laboratory and v ivar ium spacemus t be met in bu i ld ings that can suppor t a laborato ryinf rast ructure. Current ly , only the Humanit ies/Olmsted bui ld ing i sdes igned with suf f ic ient ly f lex ib le space to meet most of i t s spaceneeds, yet a l low the department to remain as c lose as poss ib le toex is t ing laboratory faci l i t ies . In addit ion:



L i fe Sciences

Spieth Hal l

Arts Bu i ld ing

Humanit ies & SocialSciences

Watk ins Hal l

Humanit ies - Olmsted

As

se

ss

me

nt

o

f

Cu

rr

en

t

Co

nd

it

io

ns

CHASS also occupies space in temporary t ra i lers , the BarnTheater and in H ighlander Hal l . The CHASS t ra i lers occupy landthat i s dest ined for development to support addit ional campusgrowth; thus, they wi l l have to be replaced at some point in t ime.On the West Campus i s H ighlander Hal l , a former motel purchasedby the Un ive r s i t y . I t i s cu r rent l y as s igned p r imar i l y to theEconomics Department. The bui ld ing's locat ion and des ign, wi than exter ior balcony corr idor , does not eas i ly lend i t se l f to uses byacademic departments . However, H ighlander Hal l could becomea center for scholar ly act iv i ty or one or more research centers .



Q u a l i t a t i v eS u m m a r y o fS p a c e N e e d s

3 . 3

T he fo l lowing i s a qual i tat ive summary of cur rent andprojected faci l i t ies- re lated needs synthes ized f rom discuss ions inthe envi ronment-speci f ic focus groups with facul ty and staf f :

H ighlander Hal l

Barn Theater

Teaching and Learn ing

High-qual i ty c lass rooms and seminar roomsVary ing s i zes and conf igurat ionsF lex ib i l i ty to accommodate di f ferent pedagogies.

Sproul Hal l

High- level appl icat ion and support , especial ly in thelearn ing envi ronment (c lass rooms, seminar rooms, c lasslaborator ies , and studios) .

Shared h igh-tech spaces, equipment, and resources(e.g. ; GIS , v i sual model ing)

Cons is tent and ubiqui tous technology throughout a l lCol lege faci l i t ies .

In te ract ion so f tware that suppor t s se l f -pacedteaching.

Enabled dis tance learn ing appl icat ions.Special i zed thecnology labs.

As

se

ss

me

nt

o

f

Cu

rr

en

t

Co

nd

it

io

ns

A Performing Arts Center to serve the community as aregional cul tura l faci l i ty and to att ract and retain facul tyand students .

Addit ional growth space for a l l Arts programsInc reased capab i l i t y fo r d ig i ta l and mu l t imed ia

development labs, TV, and product ion studios .Addit ional h igh-qual i ty performance and rehearsal

space.

U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , R I V E R S I D EC O L L E G E O F H U M A N I T I E S , A R T S & S O C I A L S C I E N C E S


Space for research, socia l interact ion - a "p lace tocal l thei r own".

Research space in or adjacent to Psychology andAnthropology laborator ies .

Spec ia l i zed labs o r re search a reas to enhancecol laborat ion around research interests .

Co l laborat i ve spaces in Human i t ie s and Soc ia lSciences

Shared spaces for access to h igh-cost or un iquetechnology (e.g. ; v i r tual real i ty , d ig i ta l media labs, etc.)

Graduate Students and Programs

Perfomance and Studio

Technology and Inf rast ructure

Adequate off ices for fu l l - t ime, part - t ime, and v is i t ingfaculty

Support spaces for facul ty research groups, centers ,or departments ; conference rooms, l ibrary, data labs,lounge, and storage space.

Ident i f iable areas to encourage disc ip l ine-based aswel l as interdisc ip l inary interact ion among faculty andstudents .

Inv i t ing places for v i s i t ing scholars to l ive, interact,and work with facul ty(e.g. ; ret reat- l ike sett ing).

Spec ia l i zed labs o r re search a reas to enhancecol laborat ion around research interests .

Faculty

S P A C E P L A N N I N GA S S U M P T I O N S

O v e r v i e w

The Master Space P lan space "model" for CHASS s tarts wi ththe use of ex i s t ing standards or guidel ines and dr ivers (enrol lmentand facu l ty ) fo r dete rm in ing cer ta in " s tandard" space typeal lowances , par t icu la r l y facu l ty o f f ices , c las s rooms and c lasslaborato r ie s , and research that i s d i sc ip l ine - spec i f ic . Thosestandards have been augmented us ing recent comparat ive datafrom s imi lar inst i tut ions to der ive the standard space needs. To th i sset of s tandard space needs, special i zed or "non-standard" spaceneeds o f the Co l lege have been added based on spec i f icpedagogies or research requi rements to create program-basedguidel ines.

I n th i s sect ion, ex i s t ing square footages are based onFY1999-00 data compi led by the Off ice of Academic P lanning andBudget.



4 . 1

E n r o l l m e n t4 . 2

T he Co l lege o f Human i t ie s , A r t s and Soc ia l Sc iencesprovides both the foundat ion for a general univers i ty educat ionacross the cur r icu lum and opportuni t ies for careers in a var iety off ie lds . With the campus s lated for s igni f icant growth in enrol lmentover the next ten years , the Col lege wi l l be the recip ient of a largeproport ion of that expected growth. In f i scal year 1999-00, theCol lege enrol led 55.5% of a l l undergraduate fu l l - t ime equivalentstudents (FTEs) and 36.8% of graduate FTEs .

4

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns



UUnnddee rrggrraadduuaattee FFTTEE ss

FFYY11999999-0000

((AAcc ttuuaall))

CHASS55.5%

Other44.5%

GGrraadduuaattee FFTTEE ss

FFYY11999999-0000

((AAcc ttuuaall))

CHASS36.8%

Other63.2%

Campuswide enrol lment i s expected to near ly double by2010-11, and the Col lege i s ant ic ipated to grow at a s imi lar rate:

Actual FY1999-00

FY2005-06

Percent Increase

FY2010-11

Percent Increase

Campus FTEs 10,662 15,800 48.2% 20,200 89.5% CHASS FTEs 5,620 7,766 38.2% 9,781 74.0%

F a c u l t yD i s t r i b i t i o n

4 . 3

T he oppor tun i ty fo r s ign i f icant g rowth over the nex tdecade must be pursued in ways that not only bui ld on the uniquecharacter and st rength of the Col lege, but a lso al low CHASS tot rans fo rm i t s p rogrammat ic landscape to accommodatedisc ip l inary advances, new research, and teaching opportuni t ies .No where wi l l th i s be more evident then in the combined growthant ic ipated for humanit ies , arts , and social sc iences facul ty . In thenext ten years , the tota l facu l ty increase fo r the Col lege i sexpected to top 80%.

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns



-100200300400500

1999-00 Actual

2005-06 2010-11FY

Fac ulty FTE s

Gro w th

The fo l lowing table represents the cur rent and projectedd i s t r ibu t ion o f facu l ty F TE to meet and accommodate theexpected needs:

ActualFY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11

Arts 34.62 52.08 64.20Humanities 63.21 87.36 107.72Social Sciences 116.86 160.95 198.22Interdisciplinary 0.00 10.00 20.00English Comp 30.71 46.88 59.54CCHHAASSSS TToottaall 245.40 357.27 449.68

I n s t r u c t i o n a la n d R e s e a r c h

( I & R )S t a n d a r d

S p a c e

4 . 4

The Col lege faces a var iety of chal lenges which, i f note f fect i ve ly addres sed, w i l l hamper the asp i ra t ions fo rpre-eminence in CHASS and for the campus. Two key chal lenges inpart icular are an ant ic ipated shortage of space for academic andresearch programs to meet the growth demands, and maintain ingthe pedagogical envi ronment whi le teaching an increas ing num-ber of s tudents .

I n order to provide an adequate and f lex ib le base toaccommodate academic and research needs, ass ignable squarefoot (asf) factors were developed on a per facul ty FTE bas i s andinclude al lowances for the fo l lowing space types:

Faculty of f icesResearch/ Scholar ly Act iv i ty spaceResearch Ass i s tant or Post-Doc spaceTeaching Ass i s tant spaceAdminis t rat ive spaceConference spaceSupport space

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns

Faculty ass ignable square feet factors by disc ip l ine are asfo l lows:



Discipline ASF/FTEArts 400-600Humanities 400Social Sciences 400-1,200Interdisciplinary 600English Comp 100-150

Discipline ActualFY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11

Arts 16,789 27,924 34,422Humanities 29,202 34,944 43,088Social Sciences 68,847 92,320 113,688Interdisciplinary 0 6,000 12,000English Comp 0 2,826 3,590CCHHAASSSS TToottaall 114,838 166,818 210,348

ActualFY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11

CHASS Total 4,573 6,102 7,609

By apply ing these factors to the facul ty d is t r ibut ion insect ion 4.3, the projected space needs (asf) are as fo l lows:

T he major i ty of inst ruct ion in th i s Col lege occurs in non-s tandard teach ing laborato r ie s and genera l as s ignmentclass rooms (both of which are addressed below), but there i s asmal l s tandard teaching laboratory component. The fo l lowingtable represents the projected space needs across the Col lege:

N o n - S t a n d a r dT e a c h i n g

L a b o r a t o r yS p a c e

4 . 5Given the programmatic requi rements of th i s Col lege,

more than 85% of the teaching laboratory space i s c lass i f ied asnon-standard. By def in i t ion, non-standard teaching laborator iesare not used on a regular ly scheduled bas is , but they do serves tudent s e i the r in g roups o r i nd iv idua l l y . I n o rder toaccommodate the unique needs of th i s Col lege, a factor of 8asf per s tudent FTE has been appl ied. I f th i s factor were appl iedto FY1999-00 s tudent FTE enrol lment, the Col lege would bespace def ic ient by 45%.

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns



-10,00020,00030,00040,00050,000

AASSFF

Actual FY1999-00 ProjectedFY1999-00

NNoo nn-SSttaannddaarrdd TTee aacc hhiinngg ss

LLaabb oo rraattoo rriiee ss

I n the fo l lowing table, the total Non-standard TeachingLaboratory space i s d is t r ibuted into four categor ies of space.Percentages of the total a l locat ion are based upon the ext rapola-t ion of s imi lar cur rent space, adjusted to improve dis t r ibut ion andrect i f ied to address def ic iencies .

Teaching Lab Space Type Percentage Distribution

Computer Open Lab 20% Multimedia Open Lab 5% Observation Open Lab 10% Performing Arts Open Lab 65%

B ased on the tota l Non-s tandard Teaching Lab spacerequi red and percentage dis t r ibut ion noted above, the fo l lowingtable represents the projected space needs across the Col lege:

Space TypeActual

FY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11Computer Open Lab 2,330 12,426 15,650Multimedia Open Lab 522 3,106 3,912Observation Open Lab 2,499 6,213 7,825Performing Arts Open Lab 25,641 40,383 50,861CCHHAASSSS TToottaall 30,992 62,128 78,248

O r g a n i z e dR e s e a r c h a n d

A c t i v i t i e s( C e n t e r s )

4 . 6

I n add i t ion to p rov id ing a suppor t i ve env i ronment fo rindiv idual and disc ip l inary-based research, the Col lege h is tor ical lyhas sought to promote interdisc ip l inary col laborat ion. New facultyh i re s in Co l lege-w ide "c lu s te r s " w i l l i nc rease the base o fresearchers work ing across d isc ip l inary and st ructural boundar ies .But for growth, these centers must re ly increas ingly on ext ramuralsources of support . Therefore, in order to accommodate potent ia lgrowth in the future, a " typical " center has been created based onan ex i s t ing success fu l Center to prov ide an adequate spaceal lowance.

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns

The typical center may be occupied by more than oneprogram, but a l lows for f lex ib le change as programs expand orcontract over t ime. I t wi l l cons i s t of 4 ,200 ASF, made up of thefol lowing space components :



Space Type Quantity

Faculty Offices 12Research Assistant Offices 4Visiting Scholar/Other Offices 4Scholarly Activities Areas 2Administrative Area 1Copy/Workroom 1Computer Lab 1

The fo l lowing table represents the projected space needsfor Centers across the Col lege:

ActualFY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11

CHASS Total 12,073 16,939 25,300

A c a d e m i cS u p p o r t ,

P u b l i c S e r v i c ea n d P h y s i c a l

E d u c a t i o n

4 . 7 W ith the expans ion o f the campus , a t tent ion toin f ras t ructu re needs i s a p r imary cons ide rat ion . As ju s t oneexample o f the cha l lenge, g rowth has imp l icat ions fo rundergraduate advis ing. UC R ivers ide i s a mandatory advis ingcampus - a l l undergraduate students are requi red to meet withthei r academic advisers each quarter . The types of programsincluded in th i s sect ion are:

Academic Adminis t rat ion ( i .e. ; Dean's Off ice)Cultural Centers ( i .e. ; Cal i forn ia Museum of Photography)Vivar iaPubl ic Serv ice ( i .e. ; Theatre Faci l i t ies Uni t )

Space needs for these programs are based on discuss ionsw i th admin i s t ra t ion , facu l ty and s ta f f ; the fo l low ing tab lerepresents the projected space needs across the Col lege:

ActualFY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11

CHASS Total 41,967 51,524 50,550

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns

The needs of the Phys ical Educat ion program were nottaken into cons iderat ion in the development of space project ions.However the ex is t ing square footage for FY1999-00 i s 38,254 asf ,and no addit ional growth i s pro jected at th i s t ime.



G e n e r a lA s s i g n m e n tC l a s s r o o m s

4 . 8

For th i s Col lege in part icular , the provis ion of adequategeneral ass ignment c lass rooms i s cr i t ical as many of the disc ip l inesexclus ively use th i s envi ronment for inst ruct ion. In FY1999-00, theCol lege ut i l i zed 51.7% of the ent i re campus c lass room inventory,and th is rate of ut i l i zat ion i s not expected to decl ine. Therefore,given the dramat ic increase in s tudent enrol lment, the spaceneeds for the campus and the Col lege's proport ional share havebeen incorporated.

I n general , the c lass room of the future wi l l need to beinteract ive and f lex ib le, and both requi rements af fect squarefootage per s tudent or s tat ion. Interact iv i ty can be achieved moste f fect i ve ly th rough seat ing a r rangement and by exp lo i t i ngtechno logy to enhance par t ic ipat ion in the c las s room, andf lex ib i l i ty through moveable chai rs and tables that a l low for easyre -a r rang ing f rom lectu re , to d i scus s ion , to sma l l g roupcol laborat ion and back again.

T herefore, in order to accommodate these needs, a rangeof space factors were appl ied based on cur rent pract ice. Thefol lowing table i l lust rates var ious c lass room types and s i zes , asf perstudent s tat ion or seat, the expected weekly number of hours ofs tat ion use (as prescr ibed by the UC System), and the resu l t ing asfper space factor by s tat ion s i ze:

Classrooms ASF/Station

A÷

WeeklyHours of

Station Use

B=

ClassroomSpace Factor

C

Seminar (1-15 stn)Small Discussion Classroom (16-25 stn)Large Discussion Classroom (26-50 stn)Lecture Hall (51-100 stn)Large Lecture Hall (101-200 stn)Theatre-Style Lecture Hall (201-300 stn)Theatre-Style Lecture Hall (300+ stn)

30303025221616

35353535353535

0.860.860.860.710.630.460.46

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns

When these c lass room space factors are appl ied by c lass-room type, the fo l lowing space needs (asf) for general ass ignmentclass rooms are generated. The proport ional needs (51.7% basedon current use) of the Col lege are also l i s ted:



Actual FY1999-00

FY2005-06

Percent Increase

FY2010-11

Percent Increase

Campus 64,242 117,711 83.2% 151,126 135.2% CHASS (@51.7%) 33,213 60,857 83.2% 78,132 135.2%

S u m m a r y o fQ u a n t i t a t i v e

N e e d s

4 . 9

The projected enrol lment growth and the h i r ing of newfaculty wi l l severely tax the Col lege's ex i s t ing ass ignment andconf igurat ion of space. In order to meet the needs of th i s ten-yearper iod, the Col lege's overal l space wi l l need to increase by morethan 65%.

-100,000200,000300,000400,000500,000

AASSFF

FY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11

C HASS To tal ASF Ne e d s

Sp

ac

e

Pl

an

ni

ng

A

ss

um

pt

io

ns



The fo l lowing table summar izes the total space needs ofthe Col lege:

ActualFY1999-00 FY2005-06 FY2010-11

I&R Standard Space 119,411 172,920 217,957Non-Standard Teaching Labs 30,992 62,128 78,248Organized Rsch/Act Centers 12,073 16,939 25,300Academic Support/Public Service 41,967 51,524 50,550Other Non-Standard Space 940 - -CCHHAASSSS SSuubb-TToottaall 205,383 303,511 372,055

Physical Education 38,254 38,254 38,254CCHHAASSSS SSuubb-TToottaall ((iinnccll.. PP..EE..)) 243,637 341,765 410,309

General Assignment Classrooms(@51.7%)

33,213 60,857 78,132

CCHHAASSSS TToottaall ((iinnccll.. CCllaassssrroooommss)) 276,850 402,622 488,441

Research Methods

Research was conducted by employing var ious methods and consul t ing numerous sources to ident i fynat ional ly recognized best pract ice faci l i ty modelscons i s tent wi th the st rategic goals of the Col lege of Humanit ies , Arts , and Social Sc iences, including:

B e s t P r a c t i c eR e s e a r c h

Q u a l i t a t i v eA n a l y s i s

M ost h igher educat ion in s t i tu t ions a re faced w i ths igni f icant external pressures such as technological , demographicand f inancial change, and to pos i t ion themselves for success inthe 21st Century. In order to successfu l ly compete, an organizat ionmust seek out , s tudy, and incorporate re levant best pract icesemployed by h ighly admired organizat ions.

T here i s broad recognit ion both at the Campus and with inthe Col lege of Humanit ies , Arts , and Social Sc iences that withoutappropr iate faci l i t ies the univers i ty wi l l not be able to att ract ,compete for , and retain the very best facul ty , s taf f and students .Therefore, as part of the Master Space planning process , speci f icenvi ronments were ident i f ied for s tudy, evaluat ion cr i ter ia werecreated, and research was conducted to document best pract icefaci l i ty models and s t rategies to support the Col lege's futuredi rect ion.



5 . 1

Discuss ions with facul ty , s taf f , and adminis t ratorsInterv iews with other inst i tut ional representat ives and profess ionals around the countryConsul tat ions with profess ional organizat ionsand associat ionsPart ic ipat ion in major regional and nat ional conferences and associat ionsVis i t s to prototypical faci l i t iesConduct ing extens ive l i terature and internet searches

5

Be

st

P

ra

ct

ic

e

Re

se

ar

ch



Evaluat ion Cr i ter ia

The fo l lowing summar izes the contents and featuresof best pract ice space models that correspond to the f ivespeci f ic envi ronments and needs ident i f ied for the CHASSMaste r Space P lan : Teach ing and Learn ing ; GraduateStudents and Programs; Performance and Studio; Faculty ;and Technology/ Inf rast ructure.

-Teaching and Learn ing Envi ronment-

The teaching and learn ing envi ronment should becharacter ized by h igh-qual i ty c lass rooms and seminar roomsof va ry ing s i zes and conf igu rat ions w i th f lex ib i l i t y toaccommodate d i f fe rent pedagog ies . An example o finnovat ive c lass room usage i s at Rensse laer Po lytechnicInst i tute , where Col laborat ive rooms al low for peer learn ing,team meet ings , i n s t ructo r /c l ien t consu l ta t ions , andpresentat ions . In add i t ion , the i r S tud io rooms a l low fo rinteract ion among students and teachers . These c lass roomsare common ly u sed by the var ious depar tment s inArch i tectu re , Humani t ies , Soc ia l Sc iences , Management ,Science, and Mathemat ics . At the Univers i ty of Pennsy lvania ,Mu l t i -Pu rpose Rooms (capac i ty o f 50 -275) w i th f lex ib lefurn i ture ar rangements or f ixed, t iered seat ing al l equippedwith AV technology are also used by vary ing d isc ip l ines.

A ddi t iona l needs to be addres sed a re theava i lab i l i t y o f re sou rces such as counse l ing , d i s tancelearn ing capabi l i t ies , and special i zed centers . For example,at the Univers i ty of Ar i zona's Integrated Learn ing Centerresources avai lable include a Media and Faculty SupportCenter ; F i r s t Year Center ; Univers i ty Learn ing Center ; and anInformat ion Commons. Serv ices of fered inc lude tutor ing,s tudy sk i l l s deve lopment , and academic adv i s ing andcounse l ing . W i th in the In fo rmat ion Commons a re a l sod i scuss ion , meet ing , b reak-out rooms , lectu re ha l l s andclass rooms.

-Graduate Students and Programs-

G raduates need space fo r soc ia l in te ract ion , o ressent ia l ly "a p lace to cal l thei r own." Cornel l Univers i ty ' s B igRed Barn , prov ides s tudents wi th just that . The Barn i s acenter for socia l act iv i t ies of fer ing a meet ing place fors tudents f rom al l f ie lds and schools , provid ing a sett ing fors tudent, facul ty , and staf f interact ion and a forum to shareideas, interests , and ta lents . Food serv ices, lounge space,and special act iv i t ies are al l avai lable.

Rensselaer Studio Class room

Rensselaer col laborat iveclass room

Univers i ty of Pennsy lvaniaSmart Lecture Hal l

Be

st

P

ra

ct

ic

e

Re

se

ar

ch

Research, col laborat ive, and dedicated space; andshared computer , d ig i ta l media labs, and other special i zedresources are just as important for graduate students as aresocial spaces. At Cornel l Univers i ty , Graduate Programs andSpec ia l i zed Research Cente r s scat te red acros s campusinclude dozens of dedicated lab and research space inareas as d iverse as a Center for Advanced Technology inB iotechnology to a Afr ican Studies and Research Center to aCente r fo r Re l ig ion , E th ic s , and Soc ia l Po l icy . A t theUn ive r s i t y o f Ca l i fo rn ia , Los Ange les , Depar tment o fPsychology , the Fernald Chi ld S tudy Center , a researchfaci l i ty on campus of fer s use of severa l c lass rooms, anoutdoor p layground, and assessment space with recordingcapabi l i t ies for data col lect ion and research. Laborator ieson campus for teaching and research are augmented bythose out s ide the Depar tment . Facu l ty and s tudent scol laborate in teaching and research with Medical Schooldepar tment s , B ra in Research In s t i tu te , Neuropsych ia t r icInst i tute, and Psychological and Counsel ing Serv ices. TheDepartment a lso houses the Psychology Cl in ic, a t ra in ingand research center for psychotherapy and diagnost ics wi thexper imental laborator ies and therapy rooms. Last ly , at theUn ive r s i t y o f Southern Ca l i fo rn ia : Schoo l o f Bus ines s :Exper ient ia l Learn ing Center , faci l i t ies cons i s ts of two largeclass room areas, a centra l v iewing and contro l cor r idor anda l ib ra ry . A l l rooms a re fu l l y equ ipped w i th remotevideotaping and playback equipment. Observat ion of theact iv i t ies t ranspi r ing in each of the f ive rooms i s madeposs ib le by a one-way glass that separates the studios f romthe contro l room.



-Performance and Studio Envi ronment-

P er fo rmance and s tud io space in the A r t s i ss ign i f icant ly af fected by rapid changes in technology -d ig i ta l and mult imedia development labs; TV and product ions tud ios ; g rowth space fo r a l l A r t s p rograms ; and new,h igh-qua l i t y pe r fo rmance and rehear sa l space a re a l lcharacter i s t ics o f the types o f fac i l i t ie s needed in th i sd isc ip l ine. Faci l i t ies at the Cal i forn ia State Univers i ty , LongBeach, Dance Center offers ample space with seven dancestudios of var ious s i zes , wi th one capable of doubl ing as avideo studio. The Martha B. Knoebel Dance Theater , seats250 and i s a l so located in the dance center . I t containslounges, s tudios , dress ing rooms, c lass rooms, scene shop,res tau rant , dance c l in ic , compute r lab , cos tume shop,recording studio, technology booth, and media center .

Cornel l Univers i ty“B ig Red Barn”

Cal i forn ia State Univers i tyLong Beach

Technology Booth


Costume Shop



Be

st

P

ra

ct

ic

e

Re

se

ar

ch

At the Univers i ty of Pennsy lvania , ar t gal ler ies areplent i fu l . I t s Arthur Ross Gal lery presents objects f rom pr ivateco l lect ions and h i s to r ic in s t i tu t ions , i nc lud ing Penn , toenhance the ambience on campus and to draw v is i tors toWest Phi ladelphia. I t s Logan Hal l Fox Art Gal lery serves as anexhib i t space for s tudents , facul ty , and staf f art i s t s . Thegal lery i s a l so used for break-out sess ions, informat ion fa i r s ,smal l recept ions, meet ings, poetry readings, and informalta lks/ lectures . The Emi ly Sachs Dance Gal lery provides spacefor smal l performances and rehearsals wi th a mi r rored wal l ,dance barres , and hardwood f loor wi th twelve acoust icmus ic pract ice rooms. The Computer Lab has s tat ions with amixer and sound reproduct ion equipment. Sprague Memor ia lHal l at Yale houses Morse Recita l Hal l , an auditor ium with aseat ing capacity of 700. The bui ld ing compr ises a mus icl ibrary wi th s tudy rooms, record ing s tudio, mus ic recordl ibrary, l i s tening room, and dig i ta l recording faci l i ty .

T he need for a Performing Arts Center as a regionalcul tura l center and to att ract and keep facul ty at theUnivers i ty of Cal i forn ia, R ivers ide i s essent ia l . The CarpenterPerforming Arts Center at Cal i forn ia State Univers i ty , LongBeach, i s a fu l l - serv ice presentat ion venue with a seat ingcapacity of 1 ,079 capable of accommodat ing al l types ofper fo rmances . A t the Un ive r s i t y o f Pennsy lvan ia , theAnnenberg Center i s a performing arts center wi th threetheaters and a var iety of profess ional programming thatincludes drama, dance, and mus ic performances. A lso oncampus i s the I rv ine Audi tor ium Main Hal l , a 1,260-seatperforming arts complex. The Main Hal l i s equipped with asound system, hear ing ass i s tance system, d ig i ta l satel l i tepro jector , s l ide pro jector , In ternet access and in tercomsystem. I t contains meet ing rooms, dress ing rooms, pract iceand rehearsal rooms, audiovisual equipment, p ianos, mus icstands, choral and stage r i sers , and a dance f loor .

-Faculty Envi ronment-

Part icular ly in the Humanit ies and Social Sc iences,facul ty requi re ret reat- l ike spaces, f ree f rom dis t ract ion withoppor tun i t ie s fo r co l laborat ion and s ta f f suppor t ; acommun i ty se t t ing w i th u se o f spec ia l i zed spacesinteract ively and col laborat ively . In addit ion, a p lace forv i s i t ing scholars to l ive, interact, and work with facul ty i sneeded. One such env i ronment i s demonst rated at theIns t i tu te fo r Advanced S tudy , an independent , p r i vatein s t i tu t ion ded icated to lea rn ing th rough fundamenta lresearch across a wide range of f ie lds wi th f ive schools . EachSchoo l has a sma l l pe rmanent Facu l ty w i th some 180fel lowships awarded annual ly .

Univers i ty of Pennsy lvaniaRehearsal Studio

Yale Univers i ty Recita l Hal l

Univers i ty ofPennsy lvania

Art Gal lery

Univers i ty of Pennsy lvania Performing Arts Center


Center for FacultyDevelopment

Be

st

P

ra

ct

ic

e

Re

se

ar

ch

T here i s no fo rma l cu r r icu lum, degree p rograms ,laborator ies , or other exper imental faci l i t ies . No contracted ordi rected research i s done, and i t receives no income f rom tu i t ionor fees . The In s t i tu te ' s fac i l i t ie s i nc lude severa l academicbui ld ings, two l ibrar ies , a d in ing hal l , an auditor ium, and hous ingfor Members .

R esearch space; techno logy and teach ing suppor t ;ident i ty wi th both departments (d isc ip l ine) and centers ( inter-d i sc ip l ina ry ) a re equa l l y impor tant . A t the Ca l i fo rn ia S ta teUnivers i ty , Long Beach, Center for Faculty Development, resourcesinclude a l ibrary with tapes/v ideos and dig i ta l informat ion. Eventssuch as educat iona l work shops , new facu l ty seminar s , andinst i tutes for grant wr i t ing are of fered.

Off ice, conference room, l ibrary, and lounge space areneeded as wel l . The Cal i fo rn ia S tate Un iver s i ty , Long Beach,Center for Faculty Development, has two rooms avai lable forfacul ty and staf f to reserve for events and meet ings. In addit ion,the Nat ional Humani t ies Center in Nor th Caro l ina, a pr ivate,nonprof i t inst i tut ion that ex i s ts to encourage excel lent scholarsh ipfor advanced study in the humanit ies , provides pr ivate studies ,seminar and conference rooms, and open spaces to faci l i tate theexchange of ideas and informat ion for thei r facul ty . A t radi t ionaland dig i ta l l ibrary i s a l so avai lable as are lounges and readingareas. Each year, up to 40 scholars , se lected by r igorous peerrev iew come to the Center for a year- long res idency.



Nat ional Humanit iesCenter

Be

st

P

ra

ct

ic

e

Re

se

ar

ch



-Technology/ Inf rast ructure-

A need for a cons i s tent ly h igh level of appl icat ionand support ; shar ing of h igh-tech spaces, equipment, andresources; provid ing ubiqui tous technology throughout; andenabl ing of d is tance learn ing appl icat ions and developingof special i zed technology labs i s ev ident. For example, atthe Univers i ty of Ar i zona: Comput ing Commons, faci l i t iesinc lude a Facu l ty Deve lopment Group; In fo rmat ionTechnology Inst ruct ion Support Group; Research Support ;Geograph ic In fo rmat ion Sy s tems , and S ta t i s t ic s Lab;V i sua l i za t ion Cente r ; and V ideo P roduct ion . C las s roomsinc lude team work rooms , compute r c las s rooms fo rfacu l ty/ s ta f f i n s t ruct iona l pu rposes , a v ideoconfe renceroom, several conference rooms, and auditor ium equippedwith projector , VHS VCR, data and voice connect ion. Also atthe Univers i ty of Michigan: Media Union, faci l i t ies include anAdvanced Visual i zat ion/Animat ion Lab; V i r tual Real i ty Laband Cave; V ideo, Aud io , and E lect ron ic Mus ic S tud ios ;Center for Paral le l Comput ing; t radi t ional and dig i ta l l ibrary;Technology Assessment Lab; V isual Resources Room; andLearning/ Inst ruct ional Technology Lab. Class rooms includefou r mu l t imed ia p ro ject rooms ; te leconfe rence/videoconference room; Conference Center ; and computert ra in ing rooms with a total of more than 500 workstat ions.Las t l y , a t the Un ive r s i t y o f Texas , Aus t in , techno log ica linclude v i sual i zat ion labs and edit s tudios .

Univers i ty of Texas, Aust inVisual i zat ion Labaratory

Univers i ty of MichiganMedia Union

Vi r tual Real i ty Lab

Univers i ty of MichiganMedia Union

Video Conference Room

Be

st

P

ra

ct

ic

e

Re

se

ar

ch

I ncluded in the space al lowance for each disc ip l ine are thefol lowing space dr ivers :

Faculty of f iceResearch Ass i s tant or Post-Doc spaceTeaching Ass i s tant spaceAdminis t rat ive spaceConference spaceSupport space.

F our comparab le in s t i tu t ions were ident i f ied andresearched:

Univers i ty of Cal i forn ia, DavisUnivers i ty of Cal i forn ia, I rv ineUnivers i ty of Cal i forn ia, Los AngelesUnivers i ty of Colorado, Boulder .



Among these Univers i t ies , the range of ASF per facul ty ineach category was compared:

DisciplinePlanning

Factor ASF/Faculty RangesArts 550 264 – 749Humanities 400 239 – 663Psychology 1,200 1,391 (only one response

was received)Social Sciences 550 280 – 609

Humanit ies inc luding Creat ive Wr i t ing, Comparat iveL i te ra tu re , Fo re ign Language, Eng l i sh , H i span ic S tud ies ,ssH is tory, Ph i losophy, Rel ig ious Studies ;

Arts inc luding Art H is tory, Art Studio, Dance, Mus ic,Theatre;

Psychology ; and

Socia l Sc iences inc luding Anthropology, Economics,E thn ic S tud ies , Po l i t ica l Sc iences , Soc io logy , Women ' sStudies .

Q u a n t i t a t i v eA n a l y s i s5 . 2

As was noted in Sect ion 4 of th i s report , t radi t ional spacestandards do not necessar i ly ref lect contemporary program-dr ivenrequi rements . Therefore, in order to ver i fy and/or augment thespace p lann ing as sumpt ions fo r s tandard in s t ruct iona l andresearch space, comparat ive data descr ib ing ass ignable squarefeet (ASF) per tenured or tenure-t rack facul ty was col lected forthe fo l lowing disc ip l ines:

M A S T E R S P A C EP L A N

G u i d i n gP r i n c i p l e s

The fo l lowing guid ing pr incip les are intended to providethe Col lege with a f ramework for future planning and decis ion-making re lated to the Master Space P lan and the creat ion of anovera l l academic env i ronment o f d i s t inc t ion . These Gu id ingPr incip les are based upon synthes ized data presented in ear l iersect ions o f th i s repor t , spec i f ica l l y Sect ions 2 -6 , and weresubsequent ly d i scus sed, re f ined and approved by the Dean,Department Chai rs , s taf f and Off ice of the Vice Chancel lor ofAcademic P lanning and Budget. They are:



6 . 1

61. Expand departmental and mult i -d i sc ip l inary space toaccommodate increases in enrol lment and facul ty by us ingnew, renovated, and reass igned space.

2 . I ncrease the s i ze, number, and improve access toplaces of publ ic serv ice e.g. museums, gal ler ies .

3 . Create a Col lege "heart " , a h ighly v i s ib le, access ib le,and enr iching place that symbol izes the dis t inct iveness ofthe Col lege.

4 . Enhance the development of interdisc ip l inary spaceand programs.

5 . Improve the qual i ty of the learn ing envi ronment andincrease the quant i ty of learn ing spaces part icu lar ly forsmal l , medium, and very large classes.

6 . Improve opportuni t ies for facul ty- facul ty and facul ty-s tudent interact ion.

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n

7. I ncrease the quant i ty , qual i ty , and access to specialspaces and equipment, e.g. computer labs, performancestudios , v i sual i zat ion and v i r tual real i ty laborator ies .

8 . I mprove in te rdepar tmenta l and in t radepar tmenta linteract ion and adjacencies .

9 . P rovide space for teaching ass i s tants .

10. Create "wiggle room" in each bui ld ing to faci l i tateincremental growth.

11. Create f lex ib le spaces and conf igurat ions, des ignedto ant ic ipate and adapt wel l to change.

12. Avoid moving departments unnecessar i ly in order toaccommodate program growth.

13. P lan each bui ld ing, ex i s t ing and new, for i t ' s h ighestand best use.



Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



M a s t e rS p a c e P l a n

6 . 2

Space Summary The Space Summary indicates the cur rent s i ze and locat ionof Col lege centers , departments , and support space, and therequi rements for space in the years 2005/6 and 20010/11. Beyond2010/11, space needs are less predictable and have therefore notbeen addres sed. Fu tu re space p ro ject ions , par t icu la r l y fo rinst i tut ional and research space, inst ruct ional , adminis t rat ion andsupport space are based upon quant i tat ive analys i s of spacedr ivers used by the Univers i ty of Cal i forn ia, and der ived programstandards.

Non-standard teaching laborator ies have been quant i f iedin a s imi lar manner, but delegated to the departments for the Artsand Psychology because of thei r un iqueness , and centra l i zed forthe Humanit ies and other Social Sc iences to faci l i tate shared use.Best pract ice research was used to complement the Univers i ty ofCal i forn ia planning methodology with recommendat ions for spacequal i ty , d i s t r ibut ion, and use. A Center " template" was developedbased on the s i ze and general space composi t ion of the Center forIdeas and Soc ie ty , wh ich i s genera l l y he ra lded as a CHASSexemplar . For those serv ices and spaces not d i rect ly dr iven by theappl icat ion of qual i tat ive or quant i tat ive data, such as Dean'sOff ice, Student Affa i r s , Art Gal lery, etc. , profess ional judgementwas used, conf i rmed by the Dean, to determine space needs.

As noted in the space plan summary, CHASS space needsfor 2005/6 exceed the overal l space avai lable in 2000/1 by morethan 85,000 asf , and by more than 165,000 asf in 2010/11. Thoughthe overal l space needs can be met by a var iety of East Campus,West Campus and off campus methodologies , the space needscan only be accommodated by reass igned ex is t ing UCR space orbui ld ing or acqui r ing new or new-to-Col lege space.

The Master Space P lan, which cons i s ts of a Space Summaryand S i te P lan, are intended to provide the Col lege with a l iv ingmodel and guide with respect to capita l and space needs andalternat ives for resolut ion through 2010/11. On a department-bydepartment bas i s , i t i s not intended to provide ent i t lement tospace or resources, but rather to suggest a magnitude of spaceand concomitant i s sues that must be addressed in order to createan opt imum envi ronment for each disc ip l ine.

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



University of California, Riverside

CCOOLLLLEEGGEE OOFF HHUUMMAANNIITTIIEESS,, AARRTTSS && SSOOCCIIAALL SSCCIIEENNCCEESS

Master Space Plan

1999-2000 2005-2006 2010-2011

Division Department

Current Building Location

Net ASF Dept. ASF Div .

ASFDept./Div.

ASF Comments & Assumptions Dept./Div. ASF Comments & Assumptions

General 8,254 8,727 9,500 Dean's Office HUMANITIES &

SOCIAL SCIENCES6,575 8,254 6,500 Assumes space for Dean's

Office and support space only. Student Affairs, Theatre Workshop is

separated. Reference: CNAS Dean's Office: 4,400

ASF

7,000 Assumes more space for management and

support staff, support functions.

THEATRE WORKSHOP 1,516 Folded into Dance Department for space

planning purposes. Also used by Theatre.

WATKINS 163 Eliminated.Student Affairs HUMANITIES &

SOCIAL SCIENCES 2,227 Assume interim/long term

relocation to Sproul Hall (current Dance office

space).

2,500 Assumes more space to support student

enrollment increases.

Centers 42,284 56,234 64,550 Art Gallery WATKINS HOUSE 3,238 3,799 3,799 Assumes no growth, no

change in location. 4,000 Assumes growth is limited

to off site storage or as part of a new Alumni Center, Commons, or

other relocation.

T (TRAILER) ART GALLERY

561 Assumes Trailer is eliminated to vacate current site for future

development.

Center for Bibliographic

Studies

OLMSTED 2,362 2,362 2,362 Assumes no growth or growth will occur on other

campuses.

2,500 Assumes some growth for requested "dirty space". Long term plan assumes this program is relocated (perhaps to Highlander Hall) and the space is a

placeholder for Psychology expansion.

Center for Ideas & Society

HIGHLANDER 4,257 4,257 4,257 Assumes no growth for the immediate future.

4,200 Assumes no growth of this Center, but the

emergence and perhaps co-location of other

Centers. Assumes this is the maximum effective size for a collaborative Center. (See Typical Center Document)

Center for Social & Behavioral

Sciences Research

HIGHLANDER 618 2,010 2,676 Assumes no growth for the immediate future,

however, there may be consolidation.

4,200 Assumes this is the maximum effective size

for a collaborative Center. CSBSR may grow

to this size or relocate andoccupy 1/2 of a Typical

Center floorplate.

HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES

1,392

1999-2000 2005-2006 2010-2011 Division

Department Current Building

Location Net ASF Dept. ASF Div .

ASFDept./Div.

ASF Comments & Assumptions Dept./Div. ASF

Comments & Assumptions

Centers (cont)Presley Center

for Crime & Justice

COLLEGE BUILDING SOUTH

1,890 1,890 1,890 Assumes limited by available space in

College Building South.

4,200 Assumes this is the maximum effective size

for a collaborative Center. Presley Center

may grow to this size or relocate and occupy

1/2 of a Typical Center floorplate.

Theatre Facilty Unit

HUMANITIES 9,050 9,050 9,050 Assumes no change to existing Humanities-Olmsted allocation.

9,050 Assumes no change to existing Humanities-Olmsted allocation.

Future Performing Arts Center may have

different management structure.

Center "A" 4,200 Future Growth 4,200 No additional growthCenter "B" 4,200 Future Growth

UCR/California Museum of

Photography

CALIFORNIA MUSEUM OF

PHOTOGRAPHY (off campus)

18,916 18,916 28,000 Assumes acquisition of Rouse Building and space

allocated to CMP per 6/11/01 Feasibiility Study.

28,000 Assumes no change from Rouse Building

acquisition and program expansion.

Humanities 40,747 53,094 65,703 English HUMANITIES &

SOCIAL SCIENCES11,288 14,129 11,890 Excludes non-standard

teaching space which will be centralized for

CHASS.

14,646

OLMSTED 678 Temporary locationSPROUL 237 To reunify with balance of

English DepartmentEnglish 1ABC 2,804 Instructor's offices only 3,561 Instructor's offices onlyEnglish: Basic

Writing/English 4&5

HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES (Rms 1102 - 1103)

1,926 2,826 Assume existing space is 25% undersized, then

include allowance for faculty office space.

3,590 Increase general space proportionally to match

increase in FTE and include increase in

offices.History HUMANITIES &



CHASS.

13,702

Comparative Literature &

Foreign Languages

HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES

6,021 6,141 9,704 Excludes non-standard teaching space which will be centralized for

CHASS.

11,990

SPROUL 120 Philosophy HUMANITIES &



CHASS.

8,044

Religious Studies HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES


CHASS.

3,682

Hispanic Studies HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES


CHASS.

6,488

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



1999-2000 2005-2006 2010-2011 Division



ASFDept./Div.


Psychology 28,562 40,124 47,192 Psychology LIFE SCIENCES 22,719 28,562 38,176 Assumes:

- All Psychology space except for wet labs,

vivarium, and wet lab support space moves to

Olmsted.- Non standard Psychology Teaching Labs included in

Psychology space.

47,192 Assumes growth occurs in place (Olmsted) for dry

labs, offices, by relocating Center for Bibliographic Studies,

Honors, and MEXUS. Wet lab growth, vivarium, lab support reintegrated with

new building project.

HIGHLANDER 905 LIFE SCIENCES -

VIVARIA1,745 1,745

SPIETH - VIVARIA 203 203 OLMSTED 2,990

Social Sciences 78,895 90,262 102,171 Anthropology WATKINS 8,231 9,387 14,368 Excludes non-standard

teaching space which will be centralized for CHASS.

17,687

T (TRAILER) 6 1,156 Assumes Trailer eliminated to vacate current site for

future development.

Economics HIGHLANDER 12,881 12,881 9,862 Excludes non-standard teaching space which will be centralized for CHASS.

12,142

Ethnic Studies HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES

2,549 2,782 4,872 Excludes non-standard teaching space which will be centralized for CHASS.

6,000

SPROUL HALL 233 Physical

EducationPE 38,254 38,254 38,254 May be some opportunity

to share gym space with Performance Arts.

Otherwise, assumes no program change.

38,254 Assumes no change.

Political Science WATKINS 4,919 5,043 7,282 Excludes non-standard teaching space which will be centralized for CHASS.

8,966

OLMSTED 124 Seek to reunify department

Sociology WATKINS HALL 6,224 8,243 10,822 Excludes non-standard teaching space which will be centralized for CHASS.

13,322

T (TRAILER) 10 472 Eliminated, unified with Department, or provided in

other campus space.

Assumes Trailer eliminated to vacate current site for

future development.

T (TRAILER) 10A 472 Eliminated, unified with Department, or provided in

other campus space.


future development.

T (TRAILER) 5 1,075 Eliminated, unified with Department, or provided in

other campus space.


future development.

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



1999-2000 2005-2006 2010-2011 Division



ASFDept./Div.


Women's Studies WATKINS 751 751 3,248 Excludes non-standard teaching space which will be centralized for CHASS.

4,000

Archaeological Research Unit

WATKINS 1,554 1,554 1,554 Assumes no change for immediate future.

1,800 Assumes some growth for files, maps, etc.

Arts 44,895 71,792 89,631 Art OLMSTED 8,168 10,616 14,819 Relocated from Olmsted to

new Arts Building in Fall 2001.

18,518 Assumes non-standard teaching space is

included in department total because of

potential uniqueness of space.

ART ANNEX 2,448 Demolished Fall 2001.History of Art OLMSTED 3,583 3,583 5,915 Relocated from Art History

to new Arts Building in Fall 2001.




Creative Writing WATKINS 1,399 1,399 6,235 Better academic affinity with Arts versus Social

Sciences.

7,767

Dance HIGHLANDER 2,469 7,608 17,398 Relocated to new Arts Building in Fall 2001.

Assumes no immediate reassignment of Highlander

space.



potential uniqueness of space. Additional space may be located in a new

Performing Arts Center.

PE 2,912 Assumes no change to PE space.

SPROUL 2,227 Relocated to new Arts Building in Fall 2001.

Conversion to Student Affairs is proposed.

Music OLMSTED 11,714 11,714 15,940 Relocated to new Arts Building in Fall 2001.





Theatre HUMANITIES 6,915 9,975 11,485 Theatre space to be split between Arts Building,

Humanities and Olmsted.





OLMSTED 3,060

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



1999-2000 2005-2006 2010-2011 Division



ASFDept./Div.

ASF Comments & Assumptions Dept./Div. ASF

Comments & Assumptions

Interdisciplinary - 6,000 12,000 Film & Media 3,000 New program - location

to be determined. Has strong affiinities with Arts,

Engineering.




Performance & Visuality

3,000 New program - location to be determined. Has

strong affiinities with Arts, Engineering.




Total CHASS Departmental ASF 243,637 243,637 243,637 326,233 390,747 Total CHASS Shared Non-Standard Teaching Lab 15,532 19,562 Total CHASS ASF 243,637 243,637 341,765 410,309 UC Benchmark: 1,036 asf/CHASS faculty 254,234 370,132 465,868

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



T he Master S i te P lan depicts the locat ion of bu i ld ingscurrent ly a part of CHASS, UCR bui ld ings ident i f ied as candidatesfor reass ignment to CHASS, or new CHASS bui ld ings. As d iscussedin Chapter 3 .0 , not every bu i ld ing i s su i tab le fo r every use .There fo re each depar tment , p rogram, and center shou ld belocated in accordance w i th the Gu id ing P r inc ip les , SpaceSummary, and in accordance with the avai lable ASF and h ighestand best use of each bui ld ing. The Master S i te P lan drawing belowcolor-codes each CHASS bui ld ing to depict i t ' s h ighest and bestuse for the Teaching and Learn ing Envi ronment, Graduate Studentsand Programs, Wet Labs or Dry Labs, Performance and Studio, andFacu l ty Env i ronments . In some cases , bu i ld ings a re genera l l ysu i table for a var iety of purposes, and have been indicated assuch.

Site Plan

Master Space Plan:Highest and Best use

Master Space Plan:Space Allocation

Watkins House

Arts

Hinderaker Hall


Sproul Hall Watkins


Highlander Hall

RivieraLibrary


Carillon Tower

Commons

P.E

University Ave

Can

yon

Cre

st Dr

ive

North Campus Drive Aber

deen

Driv

e

60

215

COLLEGEBUILDING I


COLLEGEBUILDING II

LEGEND

Existing CHASS Space

CHASS & other space

New CHASS space

Space Reassigned to CHASS

Watkins House

Arts

Hinderaker Hall


Sproul Hall Watkins


Highlander Hall

RivieraLibrary

Life Sciences& Spieth Hall

Carillon Tower

Commons

P.E

University Ave Can

yon

Cre

st Dr

ive

North Campus Drive Aber

deen

Driv

e

60

215

LEGENDTeaching & Learning EnvironmentGraduate Students & Programs: Wet LabsGraduate Students & Programs: Dry LabsPerformance & Studio Environment

COLLEGE BUILDING II

COLLEGE BUILDING I

Faculty EnvironmentsPublic Service


Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n

S hou ld that re locat ion occur , H inderaker w i l l p rov ideapprox imately 27,000 asf of addit ional space for expans ion ofsome CHASS programs and/or centers .


M a s t e r S p a c e P l a n | F a l l 2 0 0 1 | P a g e 1 0

Col lege Bui ld ing I - i s conceived as a 68,000 asf , 115,000overal l gross square feet (ogsf) faci l i ty cons i s t ing of academicoff ices , ins t ruct ional and research laborator ies and supportspace. Whi le the actual locat ion i s yet to be determined, theplanned use of Col lege Bui ld ing 1 s t rongly suggests that i t bes i ted adjacent to the Commons and centra l to the CHASS core.Th is i s cons i s tant wi th the proposed Guiding Pr incip les whichident i fy the need for - "a h ighly v i s ib le, access ib le, and enr ich-ing place that symbol izes the dis t inct iveness of the Col lege."Col lege Bui ld ing I i s a l so speci f ical ly intended to respond to thefol lowing addit ional pr incip les :

Col lege Bui ld ing I I - proposed to be a 47,000 asf , 78,000ogs f fac i l i t y and the eventua l home o f a re - in tegratedDepartment of Psychology. Col lege Bui ld ing I I could also beconceived to create an academic br idge between the SocialSciences and L i fe Sciences, thus faci l i tat ing the integrat ion ofteaching and research across the two largest col leges, CHASSand Col lege of Natural and Agr icul tura l Sc iences. Th i s faci l i tyshould be capable of both wet lab and special i zed inst rumentresearch and have access to v ivar ium faci l i t ies as wel l .

Enhance the development of interdisc ip l inary space andprograms

Improve the qual i ty of the learn ing envi ronment andincrease the quant i ty of learn ing spaces part icu lar ly forsmal l , medium, and very large classes

Improve opportun i t ies for facul ty- facul ty and facul ty-s tudent interact ion

Increase the quant i ty , qual i ty , and access to specialspaces and equipment, e.g. computer labs, performancestudios , v i sual i zat ion and v i r tual real i ty laborator ies

Create f lex ib le spaces and conf igurat ions, des igned toant ic ipate and adapt wel l to change

Plan each bui ld ing, ex i s t ing and new, for i t ' s h ighest andbest use

Hinderaker Hal l - wi l l prov ide CHASS with s igni f icant lymore space, appropr iate for facul ty of f ices and “dry lab” grad-uate research programs. I t i s a l so located in the center of theCHASS core, which wi l l faci l i tate access by s tudents and facul -ty . H inderaker Ha l l w i l l a l so accommodate computer labs ,f lat- f loor c lass rooms and seminar rooms. Though Hinderaker Hal li s cu r rent l y occup ied by UCR campus Admin i s t ra t ion andStudent Bus iness Serv ices, there are discuss ions underway tocons ider re locat ing the Adminis t rat ion and Student Serv icesfunct ions e lsewhere.

I n addit ion to the cur rent CHASS bui ld ings, four addit ionalbui ld ings are indicated on the Master S i te P lan and are descr ibedbelow:

Proposed Col l ege Building I s i t e

Proposed Col lege Bui ld ing I Is i te

Hinderaker Hal l

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



Performing Arts Center - ident i f ied in the campus LRDP asa portal to and f rom the local and regional community , th i smajor campus and community arts complex wi l l prov ide neededArts academic space as wel l as a regional performance venue.S ince the major i ty of funding for the Performing Arts Center wi l ll i ke ly come f rom non-state sources, i t i s uncertain i f the faci l i tywi l l be real i zed with in the 10 year t ime f rame of th i s MasterSpace P lan. The Center i s conceived to be adjacent to a futurepark ing st ructure on Lot 24 and future Alumni Center , c lose tothe Ar t s bu i ld ing, and at the ceremonia l ent rance to thecampus.

D i s t r i b u t i o no f S p a c e

6 . 3

A space dis t r ibut ion model was created to provide theCol lege with a tool to cont inue to develop al ternat ive scenar ios asthe fu tu re un fo lds . The space d i s t r ibu t ion p rov ided in theAppendix i s one model for locat ing ex is t ing and new departments ,cente r s and p rogram b locks w i th in the bu i ld ings p rev ious l ydescr ibed. Al l new space i s accommodated and meets most of thecr i ter ia of the Guiding Pr incip les . However, the fu l l impl icat ions ofa phys ical ly mult i -d i sc ip l inary envi ronment have not been com-pletely addressed, and requi re fur ther cons iderat ion. Therefore,th i s vers ion of recommended space al locat ion should be cons id-ered as only one scenar io on which to base fur ther analys i s .

S evera l a l te rnat ives ex i s t to accommodate CHASStrans i t ional needs unt i l Col lege Bui ld ing I , Col lege Bui ld ing I I , andHinderaker Hal l are bui l t or become avai lable, br inging with themmore than 130,000 asf .

C a p i t a lI m p r o v e m e n t

P l a n

6 . 4

Addit ional Space in H ighlander Hal l

Univers i ty V i l lage i s expanding because of the growth ofre ta i l , commerc ia l , and hous ing deve lopment in the a reammediate ly wes t o f the ma in campus . Severa l UCRadminis t rat ive departments cur rent ly located in H ighlander Hal l ,such as the Vice Chancel lor for Univers i ty Advancement, havebeen ident i f ied as candidates for re locat ion to the Vi l lageacross Univers i ty Avenue f rom Highlander Hal l . In total , th i s rep-resents approx imately 27,000 ASF which could in part or in totalre locate and re lease space that could be made avai lable toCHASS.

H owever , as ind icated in the Cur rent Fac i l i t ie sAssessment and Guiding Pr incipals , H ighlander Hal l i s not wel lsu i ted to academic space, nor i s i t located c lose to theacademic core of the CHASS P rec inct . Su i tab le re locat ioncand idates fo r H igh lander Ha l l cou ld inc lude: Cente r fo rB ib l iographic Studies , cur rent ly in Olmsted Hal l ; Pres ley Centerfor Cr ime and Just ice, cur rent ly in Col lege Bui ld ing South; NewCenters which can be located somewhat removed f rom theAcademic Core.

U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , R I V E R S I D EC O L L E G E O F H U M A N I T I E S , A R T S & S O C I A L S C I E N C E S

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n


Potent ia l re-use of Sproul Hal l

S proul Hal l cur rent ly houses the Graduate School ofEducat ion , (GSOE) CNAS Mathemat ics Depar tment , Med iaServ ices and some CHASS space. The re locat ion of CNAS 'Mathemat ics Department to the Surge Bu i ld ing wi l l re leasealmost 10 ,000 ASF in Sprou l Ha l l . A needs analys i s fo r theGraduate School of Educat ion suggests that GSOE wi l l neednear ly a l l of Sproul Hal l space to meet i t s pro jected enrol lmentdemand in 2010/11. However, in the inter im, i t i s reasonable tocons ider that at least some of the vacated space can beass igned to CHASS.

Phys ical Educat ion Bui ld ing

The Phys ical Educat ion Bui ld ing gymnas ium space couldpotent ia l ly be shared on a scheduled bas is wi th PE/Athlet ics forperforming arts pract ice or rehearsal .

Sproul Hal l

Phys ical Educat ion Bui ld ing

Highlander Hal l

Ma

st

er

S

pa

ce

P

la

n



L i fe Sciences

Approximately 14,800 asf of L i fe Sciences space wi l lbecome avai lable with the re locat ion of much of Psychology toOlmsted Hal l . Th i s space would funct ion wel l for Anthropology, asocial sc ience program that may requi re the use of wet labspace. Benef ic ia l secondary ef fects include vacat ing a largepart of Watk ins Hal l to accommodate substant ia l pro jectedgrowth of the remain ing social sc iences programs, and prox imi-ty to CNAS l i fe sc iences for academic k insh ip. Al ternat ively , th i sspace could be reass igned to CNAS to support program growthin Cel l B io logy and Neuroscience.

Addit ional Real Estate Leases or Acquis i t ions

There may be other real estate opportuni t ies , such asacqu i s i t ion o f the Rouse Bu i ld ing fo r A r t s re search andexpans ion of the UCR/Cal i forn ia Museum of Photography; orother leas ing opportuni t ies of f campus that could not only meetspace needs fo r some CHASS p rograms , but p rov ide aCol lege-based resource for the R ivers ide community as wel l .

Watkins House

Arts

Hinderaker Hall


Sproul Hall Watkins

Hall

Humanities& Olmsted

Highlander Hall

RivieraLibrary


Carillon Tower

Commons

P.E

University Ave Ca

nyon

Cre

st D

North Campus Drive Ab

erd

een

60

215

LEGEND

Interdisciplinary Center SpaceClassroom and Faculty Office SpaceWet Lab SpaceHigh Bay Space

Master Space Plan:Transitional Space Opportunities

L i fe Sciences

Cal i forn ia Museum ofPhotography

A p p e n d i x


1 . C ol lege of Humanit ies , Arts & Social Sc iences,

T able A-O: Fal l 1999 Inventor ied Ass ignable Space(11/30/00)

2 . U nivers i ty of Cal i forn ia, R ivers ide

G eneral Campus Headcount and FTE Enro l lment,Work load FTE P ro ject ions D i s t r ibu ted by Un i t(11/27/00)


C o l lege o f Human i t ie s , A r t s & Soc ia l Sc iences ,Mas te r Space P lan - Space P ro ject ions , S TRATUS(7/10/01)


C o l lege o f Human i t ie s , A r t s & Soc ia l Sc iences ,Mas te r Space P lan - Space P ro ject ions , Non-Standard Teaching Laborator ies , STRATUS (7/10/01)


C o l lege o f Human i t ie s , A r t s & Soc ia l Sc iences ,Mas te r Space P lan - Typ ica l Cente r , S TRATUS(7/10/01)


C o l lege o f Human i t ie s , A r t s & Soc ia l Sc iences ,Maste r Space P lan - Space P ro ject ions , Genera lCampus Class rooms, STRATUS (7/10/01)


A p p e n d i x


7 . S ect ion 5.1: Best Pract ice Research, Qual i tat ive Analys i s ,STRATUS (13 Pages)

8 . S ect ion 5 .2 : Bes t P ract ice Research , Quant i ta t i veAnalys i s , STRATUS (8/29/01)

9 . M eet ing Minutes, Faculty Envi ronment, Performance andStudio Envi ronmnet, Teaching Envi ronment, Technology/Inf rast ructure (3/22-23/01)

1 0 . T rans i t ion P lan, provided by Academic P lanning and Budget.


master space plan final - university of california,...

Documents